Slashdot Mirror


Submitting "Nuking the Fridge" To Scientific Peer Review

An anonymous reader writes "George Lucas claims there was 'a 50/50 chance' Indiana Jones could survive the atomic blast in Legend of the Crystal Skull by hiding inside a refrigerator. Dr. David Shechner subjects this claim to rigorous peer review, and his findings are not good news for people looking to hide from nukes in appliances."

284 comments

  1. "Rigorous peer review" by MrEricSir · · Score: 4, Funny

    Glad I'm not one of Dr. David Shechner's peers, then. Although from the sound of things he must not have many left!

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:"Rigorous peer review" by Starteck81 · · Score: 2

      Glad I'm not one of Dr. David Shechner's peers, then. Although from the sound of things he must not have many left!

      At least not any smart ones!

      --
      "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed H
    2. Re:"Rigorous peer review" by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      In the September 2011 issue of Wired that rests happily on the top of my shitter, there is a description of a paper written by Economist Paul Krugman called The Theory of Interstellar Trade, which states that empires cannot work on a galactic scale due to the fact that round trips of several hundred years are likely, even at speeds close to the speed of light. Food spoils. Natural resources aren't worth the energy it takes to transport them. Colonies can't be governed.

      The paper ignores other sci-fi contructs like wormholes and hyperspace, which are considered Bantha poodoo.

    3. Re:"Rigorous peer review" by Imrik · · Score: 2

      His peers have interns/grad students.... err had anyway.

    4. Re:"Rigorous peer review" by jackbird · · Score: 4, Informative

      You forgot to include the actual paper, although your comment also appears to state that you haven't actually read it. It's chock-full of bad puns.

    5. Re:"Rigorous peer review" by aiht · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      ... The Theory of Interstellar Trade, ...

      Is the acronym intentional, I wonder...?
      And no, I do not mean TTOIT.

    6. Re:"Rigorous peer review" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The paper ignores other sci-fi contructs like wormholes and hyperspace, which are considered Bantha poodoo.

      By whom? Many of the top minds in astrophysics consider those areas of research to be entirely valid.

    7. Re:"Rigorous peer review" by silverspell · · Score: 5, Funny

      The paper ignores other sci-fi contructs like wormholes and hyperspace, which are considered Bantha poodoo.

      By whom? Many of the top minds in astrophysics consider those areas of research to be entirely valid.

      "We have top minds working on it now."

      "Who?"

      "Top. Minds."

    8. Re:"Rigorous peer review" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would find Mr. Jones, cooked to perfection, or preserved like a fossil..

    9. Re:"Rigorous peer review" by rust627 · · Score: 0

      Another one for Bill Engvall to add ftp his "Heres your sign" routine

      "Hey Jimmy boy, come over here
      We want you to hide in this fridge while we set off a small nuke over there
      and we will come back later when the place has cooled down enough to see if you (and /or the fridge) has survived......"

      "Well all right, you better hold my sign though, I don't want to see it get damaged"

      --
      da da da dum indeed.
    10. Re:"Rigorous peer review" by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

      <pedant>The quote was with "top men", not "top minds"</pedant>

    11. Re:"Rigorous peer review" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a fucking moron.

  2. What this really means by Manuka · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is that he denied the Mythbusters a chance to go nuclear.

    1. Re:What this really means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well in his defense, after the cannonball shoot, the SF bomb squad wasn't inclined to let them field test that idea on their demolitions grounds either :D

    2. Re:What this really means by Manuka · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm sure they can find some small pacific atoll that nobody wants anymore. Maybe do it in conjunction with Shark Week. Maybe you can jump sharks AND hide in fridges all at once.

    3. Re:What this really means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tonight on Mythbusters... Can you survive while swimming with a shark in a fridge full of water, during a nuclear blast?

    4. Re:What this really means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Jamie wants BIG boom.

    5. Re:What this really means by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          They could scale it down a bit. Say 10% scale. So only 8,800 pounds of TNT, and a 1/10 scale fridge with a 1/10 scale buster in it.. So, a mushroom cloud only 2.9 miles high, with a blast radius of .75 miles. That may be a bit much for their testing range. Lately, I'm pretty sure they'd have to beg for permission to light a firecracker.
       

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    6. Re:What this really means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you mean that they would jump the shark on an episode in order to see whether that would be the end of their show? Or at least the end of the good seasons? That would certainly be an interesting meta-myth to study, but I'm not sure they are prepared to risk ending their show...

    7. Re:What this really means by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Tonight on Mythbusters... Can you survive while swimming with a shark in a fridge full of water, during a nuclear blast?

      Depends...does the shark have laser beams attached to its head?

    8. Re:What this really means by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "Maybe you can jump sharks AND hide in fridges all at once."

      Oh, c'mon... everybody knows sharks come with lasers, LASERS! not nukes.

    9. Re:What this really means by Sulphur · · Score: 1

          They could scale it down a bit. Say 10% scale. So only 8,800 pounds of TNT, and a 1/10 scale fridge with a 1/10 scale buster in it.. So, a mushroom cloud only 2.9 miles high, with a blast radius of .75 miles. That may be a bit much for their testing range. Lately, I'm pretty sure they'd have to beg for permission to light a firecracker.

      What myth would they be busting with a lit firecracker?

    10. Re:What this really means by Zinho · · Score: 1

      It'll be testing that line from Armageddon where they say that a firecracker in the palm of your hand won't hurt you unless you make a fist around it. They'll mix it in with a bunch of other irrelevant-to-the-plot physics questions from assorted films. If we're really lucky they'll conclude at the end that using nukes to crack an asteroid is a good idea.

      --
      "Space Exploration is not endless circles in low earth orbit." -Buzz Aldrin
    11. Re:What this really means by The_Laughing_God · · Score: 1

      How is that 10%?

      Nukes are measured in kilo-or mega TONS, 1 ton = 1000kg, so 1 kt = 1,000,000 kg not 1000kg.

      Yes, I know the original article screwed up on this point. I wrote that off as a typo, but let's not extend the error here, where future junior-high geeks will find it via search engine and contaminate their intuitions

    12. Re:What this really means by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          That'd be a good one. And kids would learn a lesson. "See kids, you can lose a hand by playing with fireworks."

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  3. Trauma by Dan+East · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Forget the radiation and heat. The trauma from the g-forces of that flight and landing would have killed anyone easily.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Trauma by thereitis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And let's not forget we're talking about "surviving" afterward - that could mean living the rest of your life in an ICU. Indiana Jones not only survived but kicked some serious ass the same day.

    2. Re:Trauma by mrmeval · · Score: 2

      Indiana Jones is immortal

      Harrison Ford is just OLD

      Dammit, I was hoping to see a few dozen more movies by him.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    3. Re:Trauma by oodaloop · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think Indiana Jones was only immortal while he was in that temple. In the Young Indiana Jones serial in the '80s, he was depicted with...OMG I'm such a dork.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    4. Re:Trauma by snowgirl · · Score: 2

      I think Indiana Jones was only immortal while he was in that temple.

      Indeed, as the Grail Knight specifically says that the immortality the cup grants lasts only within the temple. And further if you examine the... OMG, I'm such a dork, too.

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    5. Re:Trauma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guys... The grail was from the third movie not the series... ONE DORK TO RULE THEM ALL!!!

    6. Re:Trauma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Indiana Jones was only immortal while he was in that temple.

      Indeed, as the Grail Knight specifically says that the immortality the cup grants lasts only within the temple. And further if you examine the... OMG, I'm such a dork, too.

      Well, wasn't the knight in the temple 'immortal' because he could and, for the sake of the plot, apparently did keep drinking from the Grail. His brothers, who also drank from the Grail, lived to extreme old age too; just not as long as the one who stayed behind to guard the Grail.

      And it's just a fictional story. Why does discussing the plot of a fairly popular movie make anyone a dork?

    7. Re:Trauma by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Yet another reason to be thankful that Chuck Norris was not from Soviet Russia.

      Because no fucking way way would a refrigerator fit inside an atomic bomb. It's just ludicrous, and the universe would collapse into an absurdularity.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    8. Re:Trauma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but the knights brother who made it out died of "extreme" old age when he passed the story on to some monks on his death bed.

    9. Re:Trauma by CheerfulMacFanboy · · Score: 1

      I think Indiana Jones was only immortal while he was in that temple. In the Young Indiana Jones serial in the '80s, he was depicted with...OMG I'm such a dork.

      Not dorky enough to remember its from the 90s.

      --
      Fandroids hate facts.
    10. Re:Trauma by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Indiana Jones is immortal

      Actually, after playing Uncharted 1 and 2 (which I and a zillion others have referred to as "that game where you're basically Indiana Jones"), Indy is a WIMP compared to Nathan Drake.

    11. Re:Trauma by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, they removed the Old Indy scenes from the DVD release. I didn't like them at the time, but I still would want DVD releases to be (at least optionally) unmodified.

      Even though the show obviously wasn't as good as the theatrical movies, it was an entertaining way to get a little bit of infotainment into people's heads.

    12. Re:Trauma by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      Well, wasn't the knight in the temple 'immortal' because he could and, for the sake of the plot, apparently did keep drinking from the Grail. His brothers, who also drank from the Grail, lived to extreme old age too; just not as long as the one who stayed behind to guard the Grail.

      Ah, but the Grail couldn't be removed from the Temple, so in that case, the immortality only lasts as long as you're in the temple. Once you leave, you begin slowly dying again.

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    13. Re:Trauma by mrmeval · · Score: 2

      I actually meant immortal on our side of the 4th wall. If they ever kill him in a story there will be a lingering doubt that he will stay dead. If the IP holders were to in some way convince people they kill him off in a story the IP holders won't be able to wallow in the Indiana Jones Money Tub anymore. ;)

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  4. George Lucas. by Chas · · Score: 3, Funny

    The only thing George is an expert on is MOICHANDISING!

    But, if you're about to suffer the effects of a close range nuclear detonation, you could do worse... At least this way you'll feel proactive about avoid death as you die horribly.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:George Lucas. by bronney · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't run from a nuclelar detonation, you'll die tired.

    2. Re:George Lucas. by BeefMcHuge · · Score: 2

      Actually he was referring to Spaceballs. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvmZ9SPcTzU

    3. Re:George Lucas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoosh.

      -- Gene Simmons

    4. Re:George Lucas. by Apothem · · Score: 1

      Who knows, if he had actually been right, he probably would have started 'MOICHANDISING!' the type of fridge they they used in the movie to live through the explosion.

    5. Re:George Lucas. by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          It won't matter much. By the time you know it happened, you were just vaporized. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    6. Re:George Lucas. by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

      Still looking for Spaceballs the Flamethrower, haven't found one yet.

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    7. Re:George Lucas. by BeefMcHuge · · Score: 1

      I don't get it

    8. Re:George Lucas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you know there is going to be a nuke on the local Global Stability chart, get the beach gear out! It is going to be a hot day indeed.

  5. Its just a movie people by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    n/t

    1. Re:Its just a movie people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe to you!

    2. Re:Its just a movie people by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      And not a very good one at that.

      The kept postponing IJ4 to make sure they had the perfect script, then settled for this drek... They might as well have made a prequel.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    3. Re:Its just a movie people by cyclomedia · · Score: 1

      My understanding of it was that Speilberg wanted to make several more movies (and still does) but Lucas wouldn't make Indy 4 without aliens in. After a zillion years of patience Speilberg realized Lucas wasn't going to back down so gave in.

      --
      If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
    4. Re:Its just a movie people by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      And not a very good one at that.

      The kept postponing IJ4 to make sure they had the perfect script, then settled for this drek... They might as well have made a prequel.

      Yep, Indiana Jones in "The adventurers of the Grad Student dig!"

  6. Then let's test these next by davidbrit2 · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Ripping out a man's heart without killing him.
    2. Jumping from a plane using an air raft.
    3. Keeping an immortal knight in a subterranean cavern for thousands of years.

    Or, how about just shut up and watch the movie.

    1. Re:Then let's test these next by readandburn · · Score: 1

      Jumping from a plane using an air raft.

      I get your point, but Mythbusters did this one and it was plausible IIRC.

    2. Re:Then let's test these next by hawguy · · Score: 3, Informative

      1. Ripping out a man's heart without killing him.
      2. Jumping from a plane using an air raft.
      3. Keeping an immortal knight in a subterranean cavern for thousands of years.

      Or, how about just shut up and watch the movie.

      Mythbusters already busted that middle one. I'd like to see them test the ripping out a man's heart one, though I'm not sure PETA will appreciate them testing on live animals.

    3. Re:Then let's test these next by DreadPiratePizz · · Score: 1

      They mythbusters actually tested using a raft to jump out of a plane, and they concluded it was plausible.

    4. Re:Then let's test these next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here here!

    5. Re:Then let's test these next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's actually "hear, hear".

    6. Re:Then let's test these next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      They could do it in China... I'm sure they could come up with someone waiting to be executed whom they need to make a serious public spectacle out of (bonus points to the condemned if, when his heart is being pulled out of his chest, yells the Mandarin equivalent of "Freeeedommmmmm!!!gaaakkkgakkk")

    7. Re:Then let's test these next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Simple, use politicians and lawyers. I think to be certain we need to try it on at least 10 thousand.

    8. Re:Then let's test these next by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd like to see them test the ripping out a man's heart one,

      Not something you do successfully in your average weird cultist temple, but this is done in heart transplants all the time...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    9. Re:Then let's test these next by Fluffeh · · Score: 1

      Mythbusters already busted [mythbustersresults.com] that middle one. I'd like to see them test the ripping out a man's heart one, though I'm not sure PETA will appreciate them testing on live animals.

      Hey, for the sake of scientific accuracy, the myth is ripping a MANS heart out without killing him, not some animals heart. I am not sure that PETA has any standing with that one...

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    10. Re:Then let's test these next by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Disbelief can only be suspended so far. The first and third items on your list were attributed to supernatural events, and the second, while implausible, was nowhere near as insane as the nuked fridge stunt. Granted, suspension of disbelief is an entirely personal thing, but for me, the other three movies only pushed the boundaries of reality enough to be entertaining, whereas the fourth movie completely obliterated it.

      --
      To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    11. Re:Then let's test these next by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 1

      1. Ripping out a man's heart without killing him.
      2. Jumping from a plane using an air raft.
      3. Keeping an immortal knight in a subterranean cavern for thousands of years.

      Or, how about just shut up and watch the movie.

      Mythbusters already busted that middle one. I'd like to see them test the ripping out a man's heart one, though I'm not sure PETA will appreciate them testing on live animals.

      PETA would, however, be totally fine with that experiment being performed on a human.

      --
      To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    12. Re:Then let's test these next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ^This.

      I'm willing to suspend disbelief and pretend that magic is real... but there's no way that "physics as normal" allows the fridge stunt to work.

    13. Re:Then let's test these next by jd2112 · · Score: 1

      Mythbusters already busted [mythbustersresults.com] that middle one. I'd like to see them test the ripping out a man's heart one, though I'm not sure PETA will appreciate them testing on live animals.

      Hey, for the sake of scientific accuracy, the myth is ripping a MANS heart out without killing him, not some animals heart. I am not sure that PETA has any standing with that one...

      Perhaps, for the sale of saving the life of an animal, a PETA member will volunteer for this experiment.

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    14. Re:Then let's test these next by Alotau · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd like to see them test the ripping out a man's heart one, though I'm not sure PETA will appreciate them testing on live animals.

      Simple, use politicians and lawyers. I think to be certain we need to try it on at least 10 thousand.

      Your subjects are flawed... one needs a heart in the first place to have it ripped out.

    15. Re:Then let's test these next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      There, there.

    16. Re:Then let's test these next by bronney · · Score: 1

      kalima!!! kalima!!! kalima!!!

    17. Re:Then let's test these next by icebraining · · Score: 2

      Well, a man is a living animal...

    18. Re:Then let's test these next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you some kind of necrophile? I appreciate the nude PETA females much more when they're alive and shakin' it.

    19. Re:Then let's test these next by tnk1 · · Score: 5, Informative

      "JAT stewardess Vesna Vulovi survived a fall of 33,000 feet (10,000 m)[7] on January 26, 1972 when she was aboard JAT Flight 367. The plane was brought down by explosives over Srbská Kamenice in the former Czechoslovakia (now Czech Republic)." - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_fall

      Yes, not a rubber life raft, but it's not impossible to survive dropping out of the sky, just really freaking unlikely. Of course, that woman actually landed in part of the plane, broke her skull and was in a coma for 27 days. Probably not in a mood for serious ass kicking at that point, but she's no Indiana Jones either.

    20. Re:Then let's test these next by izomiac · · Score: 2

      Suspension of disbelief has limits. Movie writers seem to rely on mass ignorance to stretch these limits. Nobody would accept a car chase that suddenly goes airborne because everybody knows that cars can't fly under their own power. That said, some things can be accepted as a visually appealing metaphor, such as banging at the keyboard to hack a computer.

      Others, like being knocked out for half a day and actually waking up (and without brain damage no less), simply shows the writer knows nothing about the subject he's writing on. Once you realize the world doesn't follow the same laws as your own, and there is no predictable set of laws that it does follow, then most people lose interest. The semi-predictability is crucial. It's akin to the difference between a conversation and a random series of words. Or a protagonist which has 30 superpowers and solves every conflict by revealing a new one (deus ex machina).

    21. Re:Then let's test these next by Kozz · · Score: 5, Funny

      ... whereas the fourth movie completely obliterated it.

      Wait... there was a fourth movie?!

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    22. Re:Then let's test these next by davidbrit2 · · Score: 1

      Okay, then how about we just go with "nearly every damn thing Indy does with his whip defies the laws of physics"? Ropes/whips do not work that way

    23. Re:Then let's test these next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be a scientist: We won't know for certain till we reach in and pull out whatever we hold. I say we sample 20 thousand... just to be sure.

    24. Re:Then let's test these next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's actually "ahoy-hoy".

    25. Re:Then let's test these next by Fluffeh · · Score: 1

      A case of accuracy though - All men are living animals. Not all living aminals are men.

      C'mon, the folks here should be used to these sort of mistakes causing havok with solutions/research.

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    26. Re:Then let's test these next by alienzed · · Score: 1

      Actually, myth busters did the raft from plane thing, if I remember correctly it actually sorta worked...

      --
      Never say never. Ah!! I did it again!
    27. Re:Then let's test these next by similar_name · · Score: 3, Informative

      Using a life raft to survive a fall from an airplane: mythbusted

    28. Re:Then let's test these next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that a couple of scenes prior to the atom bomb thing, Indy and one of his antagonists got in a head on collision while driving jeeps. Indy jumped out and he was fine, the antagonist stayed in his jeep. However, in the very next scene, the anagonist jumped into a new jeep and drove away with someone else after Indy. Now, I have never been in a nuclear blast but I have seen pictures, odds are there wouldn't have even been a refrigerator left, much less an archaeologist who survived in it. I have also been in minor car accidents, and have seen the aftermath of head on collisions. Even at 25 mph, a head on collision is not something that you just jump up and say "I'm fine", especially when you're not wearing your seat belt. I've never jumped out of a plane, taken someone's heart out, or been to Jordan, so strictly speaking I can't comment on the plausibility of the way these things have been portrayed in the Indiana movies. But when you're at the point when you are openly defying my knowledge of how the world works within my realm of experience, it's just dumb.

    29. Re:Then let's test these next by hawguy · · Score: 1

      It's actually "ahoy-hoy".

      I'm pretty sure it's Ahoy there matey!

    30. Re:Then let's test these next by Xocet_00 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, there wasn't.

    31. Re:Then let's test these next by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just go with "Yarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr..."

      --
      If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
    32. Re:Then let's test these next by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Ripping out a man's heart without killing him.

      You do recall that the guy died moments later, don't you? There's nobody in the film running around, minus their heart. Besides, this was some supernatural cult thing. You could easily rationalize it as some form of slight of hand or mass hypnosis to impress the audience of followers. No comment about the rocks that burn on command...

      Jumping from a plane using an air raft.

      There's an outside possibility you'd survive. If you were sure you're going to die, I'm sure you'd try it... But I generally agree with you on this one. It was ridiculous, but not as bad as nuking the fridge, and it wasn't in a horrendous stinker of a film, so it can be forgiven.

      Keeping an immortal knight in a subterranean cavern for thousands of years.

      Well, if he's immortal, it goes without saying that he'd be fine... What's the problem? Are you suggest that, a dozen or so centuries on, he might just get up and wander off? Touche. That must be what all the traps were for...

      Or, how about just shut up and watch the movie ?

      Hell no! What a steaming pile that thing was. Makes T-3, the Star Wars prequals, and Die Hard 4 seem good by comparison, which isn't easy. It's the root-canal of films by washed-up old hacks.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    33. Re:Then let's test these next by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Or, how about just shut up and watch the movie.

      It was possible with the first three because they were entertaining. The fourth one wasn't, so the nitpickery is much more entertaining.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    34. Re:Then let's test these next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, how about just shut up and watch the movie.

      I'm currently watching "Jeremiah" on hulu. 10 minutes ago I had to pause an episode because something didn't seem right. After a little math I figured that those 6 helicopters closing in on NORAD must have been doing better than 2,000 mph. No way!

    35. Re:Then let's test these next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's actually a really good comparison point you bring up. Yes whips and ropes in no way act like they do in the hands of Indiana Jones. However they really do serve to enhance the mythos of the movie universe. They keep the action flowing by breaking a relatively minor reality barrier to accomplish visually stimulating scene action.

      The hiding inside a fridge and getting kicked around like a box turtle on an inner city playground only to come out a little woozy, shake your head and stumble off in pursuit of the next scene breaks far too much. The likely result should have been much like the box turtle's....little chance of survival and if its still alive its not survival anyone would want.

      captcha: pogrom

    36. Re:Then let's test these next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whenever someone cites Mythbusters as proof of something, I have to wonder if they're kidding or if they just don't care about science. Don't get me wrong, the show is entertaining, it's just usually awful from the point of proving or disproving what they intended as their subject.

    37. Re:Then let's test these next by TheInternetGuy · · Score: 1

      Actually nowadays it's +1 or ^^^This

      --
      If my comment didn't sound as good in your head as it did in mine, then I guess we all know who's to blame
    38. Re:Then let's test these next by grahamd0 · · Score: 2

      Even at 25 mph, a head on collision is not something that you just jump up and say "I'm fine", especially when you're not wearing your seat belt.

      As a corroborating anecdote, I was once knocked unconscious riding in the back seat of car when it hit a telephone pole traveling ~30 mph, while wearing a seat belt.

      I have never been involved in a head-on collision at any speed, nor would I like to be.

    39. Re:Then let's test these next by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Dude, they don't eat meat. You're wasting your time.

    40. Re:Then let's test these next by grahamd0 · · Score: 1

      Or, how about just shut up and watch the movie ?

      Hell no! What a steaming pile that thing was. Makes ... the Star Wars prequals ... seem good by comparison, which isn't easy.

      Let's not get all crazy here.

    41. Re:Then let's test these next by Zibodiz · · Score: 2

      In order for it to be a plausible experiment, doesn't the subject need to have a heart to begin with?

    42. Re:Then let's test these next by nprz · · Score: 1

      It is the converse accident.
      I usually make sense of it with thinking of sets and subsets, but I've met quite a few college folks that couldn't get it and I wonder how they passed Philosophy 101 (i.e. Logic).

    43. Re:Then let's test these next by Evtim · · Score: 4, Informative

      The second in the world-record list of "people falling from the sky" is more bizzare. I read it in the "book of general ignorance". The name was Alkemade and he served on a British bomber during WW2 (the name is Dutch though). He fell 6km if I remember correctly by himself (not sitting on the plain chair or something), landed hitting trees and finally snow, had a cigarette and walked away...

    44. Re:Then let's test these next by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      Just like how there was only one Highlander movie.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    45. Re:Then let's test these next by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      Quite a lot of what he does with the whip can be done in reality, so long as your whip has a steel cable or similar for a core and fall. (I've not seen this "fourth" movie that supposedly exists, I think it's a myth)

      --
      Not a sentence!
    46. Re:Then let's test these next by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 1

      If you're willing to suspend disbelief on the basic premise of the movie (professor who kicks ass and finds magical artifacts, survives all sorts of danger and gets the girl... most of the time) the rest of it is just fun.

      Sure fridges don't do that in the real world, but the Ark of the Covenant can't melt Nazis, the Holy Grail can't cure gunshot wounds, and an Indian mystic can't keep you alive while holding your heart. There was a prototype Nazi aircraft that made hamburger meat out of a big guy... a plane that the Nazis didn't have in 1938 (and I don't think it ever got out of the prototype stage in 1944...) the sub base in the middle of nowhere was pretty neat... very GI Joe-esque. :)

      It's a fun ride... It's not accurate and not a source of National Geographic style insight...

      You'd understand the fridge, if only you spoke Hovitos.

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    47. Re:Then let's test these next by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      In my biology lab, we routinely ripped out hearts and kept them alive.

      Oh wait, you meant the *man*.

      Well, yeah, that could be an issue.

      At least the immortal knight had a good explanation.

    48. Re:Then let's test these next by Dogbertius · · Score: 4, Funny

      http://xkcd.com/566/

      It was enjoyable at best, but I was still happy to see another movie in the series. Kind of like the joke in Big Bang Theory on an episode about seeing all 6 Star Wars movies in a movie marathon.

      "So, 1-3, then 4-6, or 4-6, 1-3, classic style?"

      "Isn't it obvious? 4-6 first. I prefer to be disappointed in the order in which George intended us to be."

    49. Re:Then let's test these next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure what kind of movies you normally watch, but this kind of stunt is business as usual in Hollywood movies. Doesn't really matter it they contain magic or not. Or Aliens.

    50. Re:Then let's test these next by snowgirl · · Score: 2
      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    51. Re:Then let's test these next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hearts they have, it's souls, they're missing.

    52. Re:Then let's test these next by HertzaHaeon · · Score: 1

      So why aren't people complaining loudly about the mine cart ride in Temple of Doom?

      This isn't about physics or suspension of belief, really. It's about how nothing can live up to the old movies, because they're heavily steeped in nostalgia.

    53. Re:Then let's test these next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a Dan Brown novel. Maybe add "breathing water" to that.

    54. Re:Then let's test these next by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      No, just an old adventure game about Atlantis.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    55. Re:Then let's test these next by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      If you're willing to suspend disbelief on the basic premise of the movie (professor who kicks ass and finds magical artifacts, survives all sorts of danger and gets the girl... most of the time) the rest of it is just fun.

      Suspension of disbelief is a tricky thing, and I find that I (and I am certainly not unique in this regard) seem to be very picky and will happily accept some things while rejecting others.

      Anything to do with characters is bad: if a carachter acts in an inexplicable way all of a sudden, that tends to break the suspension.

      Magic, ark of the covenant, aliens, gods, comic-book stykle superheroes and supertech etc I can all accept. However, they have to be used in a way that we feel is consistent with the real world while we are watching the film.

      I am entirely happy to accept the Nazi-melting ark, and the holy grail with tricky caveats. The thing is that the characters are human and can only do things within their ability, or make use of some supernatural thing. The trouble with nuking the fridge scene is that the character is no longer bound by a set of self consistent rules. It's similar to (but less bad) to if the protagonist suddenly got the ability to fly to get out of a tricky situation.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    56. Re:Then let's test these next by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 1

      You must not have seen that festering pile of shit if you think that the only reason that it compares unfavorably to the rest of the movies is because of the nostalgia factor. I mean, the fourth movie had Shia LaBeouf in it. And they had him swinging through the forest with magical monkeys on vines. Your argument is invalid.

      --
      To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    57. Re:Then let's test these next by Rising+Ape · · Score: 1

      That comic is annoying. Feynman was very hot on rigour - just read his comments on psychologists' experiments in one of his books, for example.

      There's no point doing an experiment if you aren't going to do it well enough to reliably draw a conclusion.

    58. Re:Then let's test these next by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see them test the ripping out a man's heart one, though I'm not sure PETA will appreciate them testing on live animals.

      Been there, done that: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/7787039/Cage-fighter-ripped-out-heart-of-training-partner.html

      You only need one freaked out cage fighter plus random victim.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    59. Re:Then let's test these next by St.Creed · · Score: 2

      He had a sprained ankle and got arrested, so no walking away. Still, falling 18000 feet and having no more than a sprained ankle so impressed the Germans that they gave him a certificate attesting to the fact and he was something of a celebrity in the POW camp.

      See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicholas_Alkemade

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    60. Re:Then let's test these next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in...fucking...credible!

    61. Re:Then let's test these next by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

      Call it a cucumber :D

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    62. Re:Then let's test these next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the voodoo doll either.....

    63. Re:Then let's test these next by Dog-Cow · · Score: 0

      Why was the car wearing a seat belt?

    64. Re:Then let's test these next by TheLink · · Score: 2

      A few more here:
      http://www.greenharbor.com/fffolder/unlucky.html
      e.g.

      Tang Lee Ping Kuala Lumpur: In February of 2001 Tang Lee Ping of Malaysia fell 1,500 meters after her main and back-up parachutes failed to open. She woke up three hours later in a nearby hospital. Her injuries were minor (only bruises). She attributed her survival to God and a soft landing area.

      Bruises only! I think 1500 metres is enough distance to get to "normal" terminal velocity.
      And: http://www.greenharbor.com/fffolder/leeds.html

      I walked away without so much as a scratch. Following this incident I must have made over a hundred free falls and static line jumps without incident.

      --
    65. Re:Then let's test these next by TheLink · · Score: 1

      From the link it wasn't busted very well. Since
      1) The previous failures were due to Buster falling off.
      2) When Buster was under the raft, using it as a parachute, Buster was damaged but might have survived.

      the chest sensors showed that he might have lived (50g shock watch was broken, but 75 and 100 were not), however, even though Buster might have lived, the notion that someone could have lept out and rigged the parachute-like harness is very unlikely.

      And if someone has the elite skills and luck to stay on the raft (not being a dead weight like buster), and thus landing on it, he would not be as badly damaged as Buster.

      Also raft size is important.

      --
    66. Re:Then let's test these next by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Hey I cranked down my expectations and pushed up my "suspension of disbelief" at the start. When the ball bearings started flying around, I pushed up my suspension of disbelief even more. So fridge scene was nothing.

      But when "Tarzan Boy" (junior) started swinging from tree to tree in the chase scene, I went "WHAT THE FUCK!". There have been so many entertaining chase scenes in Hollywood movies, some in the Indiana Jones movies themselves. So why did they have to resort to "Tarzan Boy"?

      Ignoring physics for entertainment is one thing, but that was just terrible.

      --
    67. Re:Then let's test these next by TheLink · · Score: 1

      The sequels to The Matrix weren't that bad if you don't take everything at face value and assume the writers actually weren't that stupid.

      See my posts:
      http://entertainment.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1963928&cid=34980542
      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1225567&cid=27899067

      Note: at the 6th try, the 6th Neo succeeds at both saving Trinity AND Zion. That was a significant advance over the previous iterations.

      I suspect Neo is both human and machine. The Architect says Neo is human and the humans said jokingly that Neo is a machine (a hint from the writers?). And I say he's probably both and hence that's why he is different/special.

      In contrast, there is unlikely to be any further depth to the story when "Tarzan Boy" (Indy Jr) swings from tree to tree in that travesty of an Indiana Jones movie.

      --
    68. Re:Then let's test these next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Looks like you won't ever need to wear a helmet.

    69. Re:Then let's test these next by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 2

      Feynman also demonstrated that the Challenger disaster might have been caused by faulty O-rings by dipping one into his ice-water, using a C-Clamp to test it.

      That, and it's "Zombie-Feynman" in the comic. Let's zombify you, and see if you don't lose some rigor. (mortis that is)

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    70. Re:Then let's test these next by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Same reason I'm more willing to buy into Babylon 5 than that famous bus jumping movie, Speed.

      One is science fiction that's got internal consistencies (not to mention good secondary characters), and the other is a supposedly real scenario that's entirely impossible.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    71. Re:Then let's test these next by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      That would be "Zìyóu!!!" ... at least, that's what Google says. I don't speak it :P

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    72. Re:Then let's test these next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im still waiting for the Matrix 2 and 3

    73. Re:Then let's test these next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suspension of disbelief has limits. Movie writers seem to rely on mass ignorance to stretch these limits. Nobody would accept a car chase that suddenly goes airborne because everybody knows that cars can't fly under their own power.

      James Bond, The Man With The Golden Gun.
      http://youtu.be/TsOAyt3iyns 4:40

    74. Re:Then let's test these next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to see an attempt to fly a tank.

    75. Re:Then let's test these next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why was the car wearing a seat belt?

      More importantly, why was a telephone pole travelling at 30mph?

    76. Re:Then let's test these next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a really suspicious wikipedia article. It doesn't state the *cause* of death. Did he actually die? Maybe he's still falling somewhere... (playing portal too much?).

    77. Re:Then let's test these next by BlueParrot · · Score: 1

      I have never been involved in a head-on collision at any speed, nor would I like to be.

      Depending on how solid the telephone pole was, your accident was actually worse than a head on collision with a comparably sized vehicle. A head on collision of two vehicles with comparable size and speed is roughly equivalent to driving into a solid wall ( to see why, consider that the point of impact doesn't move ). The energy in the impact is twice as large because you have two cars, but you also have twice as much crumble-zone to cushion the impact.

      Now the problem with telephone poles and the like is that the impact is focused on a tiny part of the vehicle. The crumble zones will be designed to absorb the energy of the impact by deforming, but when only a small part of them is struck by the impact they are a lot less effective. In the same way the recoil of a rifle is generally harmless, but when a tiny bullet strikes the target's body with the same force, the impact is focused on a small area, allowing the bullet to tear through your tissue.

      Of course if you assume you are in a small car, and the other vehicle is something much larger ( such as a trailer with tonnes upon tonnes of cargo ) then the impact will effectively be like driving at twice your speed into a solid wall. If you're travelling at 30mph , such an impact would be the equivalent to driving into a wall at 60mph , which has a very slim chance of survival.

    78. Re:Then let's test these next by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You left out the thing that belongs to them - twice!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    79. Re:Then let's test these next by airdweller · · Score: 1

      "the sub base in the middle of nowhere was pretty neat..."
      The Germans had a bunch of secret sub bases (e.g. in Finland, Svalbard, the Cola Peninsula, Franz Josef Land and Novaya Zemlya) before and during the WW2 so the movie's secret base in the Mediterranean wasn't that far off.

    80. Re:Then let's test these next by Tyndmyr · · Score: 1

      I once struck a stationary object at about 70 mph without seatbelt or airbags and walked away. Now, it should be noted that the energy in a head-on collision is notably different, but I dare say that, with a bit of luck, the same result could be achieved. That said, it was pretty bad for the van I was in. I agree it's a bit unlikely, but I don't have nearly the same problem with a protagonist surviving a jeep crash as I do with him riding a nuclear blast on a fridge.

      --
      Support more choices in goverment-Vote 3rd party.
    81. Re:Then let's test these next by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I had a bible-thumping girlfriend a while back that was extremely displeased every time I said "God damn it!" She'd say "don't damn god." She obviously couldn't tell the difference between a shit dog and dog shit. Just because a horse is a four legged animal doesn't make a dog into a horse.

    82. Re:Then let's test these next by grahamd0 · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, I believe that. I've been in several car crashes over the years. That one was both the slowest and the only one I wasn't able to immediately walk away from.

      Probably the worst was colliding with a rock wall in a Geo Metro nearly head on at about 45 mph. The car bounced back into the road, rolled a couple of times, and was completely totaled. But both me and driver were able to walk away.

      Only injury was to the driver, which was cuts on his hand from punching through the windshield in anger over having just totaled his mom's new car.

      I've never been able to understand people who don't wear their seat belt.

    83. Re:Then let's test these next by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      My dad experienced something like this personally. He was a paratrooper in the Army, and on one jump his buddy's chute didn't open, and neither did the emergency chute. 2000 feet down without a parachute. My dad, severely allergic to poison ivy, landed in a patch of the stuff and went to the same hospital. His buddy without the chute landed in a muddy plowed field and was just bruised badly, and spent less time in the hospital than my dad did.

      I'm sure even stranger things have happened.

    84. Re:Then let's test these next by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      Jumping out of a plane with a raft has been tested, as a matter of fact:
      http://kwc.org/mythbusters/2005/08/episode_37_escape_slide_parach.html

    85. Re:Then let's test these next by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      To expand on what serviscope_minor wrote, the difference is that in real life, the Ark doesn't exist. However, in the context of the movie, it's a magical artifact. So in that context, it's perfectly reasonable for it to melt nazis. Similarly with the holy grail and the mystic. They're all magic, which we can agree doesn't exist, but makes for entertaining plot devices.

      However, nukes and fridges do exist in real life. They aren't magic. They weren't presented as magical in the movie. The fridge was still able to do something that would be entirely magical. It was just dumb.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    86. Re:Then let's test these next by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying I agree with them, but humans are capable of consent, animals aren't. So it is not an ethical dissonance.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    87. Re:Then let's test these next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whenever some doesn't consider context I have to wonder if they're kidding or if they really lack the ability to understand context. The post you're responding to wasn't citing Mythbusters as proof of anything. It was merely providing a citation for the post it was responding to without comment on the validity of the actual statement. Here's an example.

      Bob says the earth is flat.
      John says that Bob says the earth is round.
      Jane corrects John that Bob in fact says the earth is flat.

      Jane is not saying Bob is correct, she is merely correcting John on what Bob said.

    88. Re:Then let's test these next by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 1

      Planes exist in real life, so do rafts. Why isn't there an outcry over the 2nd movie's "escape the plane crash with the raft"?

      All I'm saying is the fridge wasn't THAT big of a deal, and if anyone can suspend disbelief about the raft, and other things that exist in the real world, they can suspend disbelief about the nuked fridge. :) It just put the nuclear age in the context of the Indiana Jones movies. :)

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    89. Re:Then let's test these next by Anonymus · · Score: 1

      If the other vehicle is roughly the same weight and size as your vehicle, a 30mph head-on collision would be roughly equivalent to hitting that telephone pole, not worse as you might think.

    90. Re:Then let's test these next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be silly - clearly it was the telephone pole that was wearing a seat belt.

  7. This sounds like something made for TV.. by rykin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Peer review? This is a job for the Mythbusters!
    Let's see, we have a fridge, now we just need a nuclear testing facility!

    1. Re:This sounds like something made for TV.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Failure is always an option!" - Adam Savage

  8. Shoulda put the webserver in the fridge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shoulda put the webserver in that fridge instead - maybe then it could survive a slashdotting...

    1. Re:Shoulda put the webserver in the fridge by Jmanamj · · Score: 1

      In actuality you need to put the server in a fridge AND detonate a nuke nearby to counteract some of the slashdotting effects.

  9. Indie survived... by Guppy06 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... but the franchise didn't.

    Does that make him "Schrodinger's Archaeologist?"

    1. Re:Indie survived... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if jumping the shark made Fonzie "Shroedinger's Marine Biologist".

    2. Re:Indie survived... by mykepredko · · Score: 2

      Uhhmmm... Apparently Lucas is working on the screenplay to #5.

      Indiana's death has been somewhat exaggerated...

      myke

    3. Re:Indie survived... by grahamd0 · · Score: 1

      Apparently Lucas is working on the screenplay to #5.

      George Lucas is worse than a common mugger.

      At least the mugger has the decency to take your money once and leave you alone.

  10. jamie want big boom by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Don't do this at home.

    1. Re:jamie want big boom by billcopc · · Score: 2

      Ever!

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    2. Re:jamie want big boom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We're experts"

  11. Overpressure effects? by bejiitas_wrath · · Score: 1

    How high would the overpressure be under the nuclear blast? There would be a lot of pressure pushing on the fridge to blow it that far. And why was it lead lined? What would be the purpose of that in a commercial refrigerator.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effects_of_nuclear_explosions_on_human_health#Blast_effects_-_the_initial_stage

    http://www.intuitor.com/moviephysics/IndianaJones3.htm

    These links provide some food for thought.

    --
    liberare massarum ex ignorantia, clausa descendit molestie.
    1. Re:Overpressure effects? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      How high would the overpressure be under the nuclear blast?

      These links provide some food for thought.

      So does the article - in fact it provides the actual numbers.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:Overpressure effects? by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      you'd think that lead in a fridge would be a bad idea because it might contaminate the food

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  12. Refrigerator is just a disguise by rush,overlord,rush! · · Score: 5, Funny

    Actually it's the TARDIS, and Indiana Jones is just another alias of Dr. Who. Of course he will survive.

    1. Re:Refrigerator is just a disguise by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 2

      This is by far the most plausible explanation I've seen presented.

    2. Re:Refrigerator is just a disguise by rewarp · · Score: 1

      Doctor Who reference to chameleon circuits! If only I had mod points.

      --
      In adding a sig, for no other reason, than for aesthetics.
    3. Re:Refrigerator is just a disguise by ab0mb88 · · Score: 1

      That explains why they think he can regenerate as Shia LaBeouf in the next movie.

  13. Wrong subject by billcopc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I, for one, wish they had peer reviewed THE SCREENPLAY.

    What a shit movie that was.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
    1. Re:Wrong subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      At least Lucas's movies have gotten to the point where if you're over 12 you know ahead of time that it's almost certainly going to suck (and you might go anyway), rather than have it be a surprise. He's saved me hours of time by not tempting me at all in the last 13 years.

    2. Re:Wrong subject by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'd put Temple of Doom as a worse movie. It was cringe worthy from start to finish. Whereas the last one I'd put at third word, since it was cringeworthy near the end. The refrigerator scene was implausable but still humorous and a fun way to start off the movie.

    3. Re:Wrong subject by martin-boundary · · Score: 1
      When you talk about the end, do you mean the Alien bit? I don't see that having aliens in a movie is any worse than having a weapon of god, or a cult of evil magic, or yet another goblet with magical powers from god. All the movies have extranatural central elements.

      What made the first movie so great was that there was a Quest with a satisfying ending. It also started with a mini-quest to set the scene. The other movies replaced some of the elements while keeping some others. The last one didn't really have a quest, it was more like a rescue mission, and it didn't have a mini-quest to begin with. Also the puzzles were quite weak, and without them it's just an action movie. But the Alien bit at the end I would classify as a pure Indiana Jones story element.

    4. Re:Wrong subject by Greystripe · · Score: 2

      All the movies except the last had a supernatural feel to them. Making it aliens and not something unexplainable prevents the imagination from attempting to fill in the explanation which leaves the viewer no sense of wonder. It would be like if someone made a Star Wars movie in which they explained what the Force was made from...

    5. Re:Wrong subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think in general people are more willing to cut some slack for "God did it" explanation than "it was all aliens" (except for Battlestar Galactica, boy did those two final seasons suck).

      The irony that year was that there was an X-Files movie without aliens, and Indiana Jones movie with aliens. They should have had them switched.

    6. Re:Wrong subject by mitzoe · · Score: 1

      WHOOSH in 3... 2... 1...

    7. Re:Wrong subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be like if someone made a Star Wars movie in which they explained what the Force was made from...

      Oh, I see what you did there.

  14. Place your bets by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

    George Lucas must be dumber than I thought if he really thought there was a 50/50 chance of survival. What kind of odds does he give for being in a fridge while it gets hit by a 18 wheeler going 70 mph? Gotta be a 80%+ chance of survival compared to the nuclear blast.

    1. Re:Place your bets by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      No he's not dumb. He realizes that if he says 50-50, then millions of people will believe him and tell everyone they know about this "fact" they have discovered. He's actually quite smart. Completely incorrect - but when did that ever get in the way of making a buck?

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:Place your bets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No he isn't smart. Just greedy and manipulative. Which is quite easy to pick up on and why millions of people actively avoid anything with his name on it.

    3. Re:Place your bets by Jeremi · · Score: 2

      Completely incorrect - but when did that ever get in the way of making a buck?

      I submit that there is a distance from ground zero at which chances of in-fridge survival are in fact 50/50. Computing the distance is left as an exercise for the fanboy.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    4. Re:Place your bets by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Assuming that the survival rate function is continuous, then the intermediate value theorem would prove you right. I also stipulate that there must be a spot where the survival rate is exactly 66.667%

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    5. Re:Place your bets by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      George Lucas must be dumber than I thought if he really thought there was a 50/50 chance of survival.

      Maybe he was speaking on the assumption that there was a 50-50 chance of being in reality vs. a fantasy world.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    6. Re:Place your bets by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      Assuming that the survival rate function is continuous, then the intermediate value theorem would prove you right.

      You also have to assume that the 50% point lies somewhere in the range of f(0)..f(infinity), though intuition strongly suggests that it does.

      An interesting question is, what is the range of distances where a fridge makes a difference in your chances of survival?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    7. Re:Place your bets by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Presumably there would also be a number of locations where different types of house-hold appliace would provide 50% survival. It would be interesting to compare 50% survival in a washing machine to say 50% survival by standing behind a vacuum cleaner and 50% survival by beating the air with a broom.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    8. Re:Place your bets by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      On second thoughts our test subjects would be in serious trouble if in fact survival is not continuous but obeys its own quantum probability...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    9. Re:Place your bets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it's a 50/50 chance of survival. Either Indy lives or he doesn't. Were you the one sleeping in the back of the Statistics 101 class?

  15. And you know what else has been nuked? by Chas · · Score: 1

    The webserver!

    Fall! Fall before the power of the Slash and the Dot!

    HMBOOWAHAHAHAHA!

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  16. Survival not so good for TFA website: by whoever57 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ( ! ) Fatal error: Out of memory (allocated 15728640) (tried to allocate 19456 bytes) in /var/www/overthinkingit.com/wp-includes/class-http.php on line 1358

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    1. Re:Survival not so good for TFA website: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only 16 GB of RAM? I've got more than that in my toaster.

    2. Re:Survival not so good for TFA website: by TennCasey · · Score: 1

      Yeah, seems like it nuked the fridge.

    3. Re:Survival not so good for TFA website: by Greystripe · · Score: 1

      So are you putting the bread under your laptop or on top of your tower? And does running it hot enough to toast bread really qualify it as a toaster?

  17. Google Cache by Chas · · Score: 3, Informative
    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  18. Back to basics by RandomAvatar · · Score: 4, Funny

    I guess it is back to hiding under a desk if we ever see a nuke coming.

  19. Successful test by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    Out next experiment, called "nuking the server", was carried out successfully. Oh I love a good slashdotting in the evenings. Now, anyone care to calculate the temperatures on the server at this time?

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  20. George Lucas Statistics by Jayfield · · Score: 1

    Of course it's 50/50, either: A. You live, or B. You die You can't fault his reasoning. Unless you took a math class ever.

    1. Re:George Lucas Statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought you were about to make a point about Bayesian statistics.

      50/50 is a reasonable prior when you have no knowledge.

      So if his model is "I know nothing at all" then 50/50 is a reasonable answer >.>

  21. spoiler alert?!? by phaserbanks · · Score: 2

    Thanks for the spoiler, Slashdot.

    Am I the only one who hasn't watched this supposed piece of crap movie?

    1. Re:spoiler alert?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoiler?

      The nuking the fridge was in the middle of the movie. Would you really expect Indiana to be killed in the middle of the movie? Especially by Spielberg - the God of Hollywood schmaltz?!

    2. Re:spoiler alert?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you haven't seen it by now, I suspect it's not even on your bucket list. Consider this the cliffs notes version.

    3. Re:spoiler alert?!? by geminidomino · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Spoiler alert? Really? The movie is 4 years old.

      While we're at it:
      They were the same guy.
      He was a ghost the whole time.
      The girl was a man
      Vader is Luke's father, and Leia is his sister.
      Rosebud is a sled.

    4. Re:spoiler alert?!? by retchdog · · Score: 2

      i thought rosebud was a brand of frozen peas.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    5. Re:spoiler alert?!? by webheaded · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that this is near the beginning of the movie so it doesn't really count as a "spoiler" very much.

      --
      "Those who would sacrifice essential liberties for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - BenF
    6. Re:spoiler alert?!? by Bieeanda · · Score: 2

      Filled with green peaness and country goodness, yeah.

    7. Re:spoiler alert?!? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Actually it was only about 15 minutes in.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    8. Re:spoiler alert?!? by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Necessary but funny: in regards to spoilification...

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    9. Re:spoiler alert?!? by hob42 · · Score: 1

      Whew. I watched Citizen Kane last weekend, just in time to avoid your inconsiderate spoiler.

  22. No Problem by NicknamesAreStupid · · Score: 5, Funny

    It would be almost certain that Ford would survive a movie nuke in a prop refrigerator. Union rules specify that prop 1940s refrigerators weigh enough to require an entire crew to move. It was probably made of depleted uranium. As for the nuke, it was no more than 450 teraflops due to FX budget constraints. It takes at least an petaflop to kill an A-list movie star, and that is contractually stipulated.

    1. Re:No Problem by webheaded · · Score: 1

      This makes my heard hurt. All of it. Please stop. :(

      --
      "Those who would sacrifice essential liberties for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - BenF
  23. Major Flaw with His Logic by BBF_BBF · · Score: 1
    Dr. Shechner did not take into account the stereotypical rules for campy action movies in his analysis. That's a major flaw that invalidates his whole analysis. George Lucas on the other hand, is well acquainted with the rules and all his action movies follow them to a T.

    Since Indy is the star of the action movie, he cannot die, unless it's a plot device where later in the movie he gets reanimated.

    So even if Indy only had his signature Fedora and Leather Jacket and no fridge, he would have survived the blast with just a few scratches. QED

    1. Re:Major Flaw with His Logic by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      So even if Indy only had his signature Fedora and Leather Jacket and no fridge, he would have survived the blast with just a few scratches.

      Though it probably would have blown his hat off, and raised puffs of dust from his jacket.

      A good plot twist would have been to have snakes in the fridge.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Major Flaw with His Logic by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1
      Dr. Shechner did take those rules into account, but he pointed out (correctly) that while most people habitually suspend disbelief in campy action scenes, it is self-evident that in this case, people could not suspend their disbelief. Crashing a plane is a "peril", and while jumping out in a rubber life-raft is ridiculous, it's escaping peril. Ditto for escaping a rolling ball of rock in a mine cart.

      But a nuclear bomb is not a peril, it's not a joke, it is sheer, guaranteed, total obliteration. It is a fiery certain death, and modern consciousness doesn't accept that you can bodge your way out of it. Popular culture has often allowed you to cheat certain death, even to the point of literally playing dice with the devil (or in Bill and Ted's case, Battleships and Twister). But not The Bomb. The Bomb is final.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  24. Not peer review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One guy writing a "funny" article in which he is the third guy on a website to criticize some ideas and writes it sort-of in the style of a scientific peer review is not actually sending an idea around for scientific peer review. Headline and summary failure.

    1. Re:Not peer review by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

      One guy writing a "funny" article in which he is the third guy on a website to criticize some ideas and writes it sort-of in the style of a scientific peer review is not actually sending an idea around for scientific peer review. Headline and summary failure.

      You're new here, aren't you.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  25. In Soviet Russia by Roachie · · Score: 0

    Fridge nuke YOU!

    --
    This sig is not paradoxical or ironic.
  26. Fallout: New Vegas Peer Reviewed This Storyline by amanicdroid · · Score: 2

    Scientists aren't the only peer-reviewing group. Bethesda looked at the evidence presented and showed their judgement here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-iPC-IyZCY

    1. Re:Fallout: New Vegas Peer Reviewed This Storyline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was Obsidian, not Bethesda.

    2. Re:Fallout: New Vegas Peer Reviewed This Storyline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was both:
      Fallout: New Vegas is an action role-playing open world video game developed by Obsidian Entertainment, and published by Bethesda Softworks. (Wikipedia, Fallout New Vegas)

  27. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In other news, still no cures for cancer

  28. Chuck Norris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wouldn't need a refrigerator.

    1. Re:Chuck Norris by azalin · · Score: 1

      Chuck Norris would just stare down explosion until it folded back into the bomb in order to hide.

  29. Uh, why do we care about this again? by geekmux · · Score: 1

    So a director of fiction makes an absolutely absurd claim that can damn near be debunked with common sense, and someone with a doctorate degree (which I now question) feels the need to not only study this, but submit it for peer review?

    Is the good doctor high on his own supply, or is this because it's George Lucas and therefore sensationalist attention-grabbing?

    Uh, not to mention we're submitting a scenario for peer review that has likely NEVER happened and likely never will. I suppose the icing on the cake would be that this is a Government funded study...

    1. Re:Uh, why do we care about this again? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Try thinking of it as a really, really, really big "Whoooosh!".

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  30. A child died, playing hide and seek by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1, Funny

    ... he got suffocated inside a fridge

    And this is not a fake news

    It happened, about 4 decades ago

    I think George Lucas ought to be careful of movie scenario he puts on his movies.

    Children watching the movie might just do what the hero does - hide inside a fridge, - and suffocate, just like that poor child who died 4 decades ago

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:A child died, playing hide and seek by v1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      that's not unique. There were enough cases of that exact thing happening that they made a federal law requiring that any non-functioning fridge with a latching door must have the door REMOVED. Deep freezes included.

      Not only are they mostly airtight, they're also fairly soundproof. Makes them an effective deathtrap.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    2. Re:A child died, playing hide and seek by superdave80 · · Score: 1

      I'd be a bit more concerned about the nuke going off nearby...

    3. Re:A child died, playing hide and seek by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 3, Informative

      Most home refrigerators do not have latches anymore.

    4. Re:A child died, playing hide and seek by Stewie241 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Right. And that was directly the result of a child watching an Indiana Jones movie. The idea of hiding in a fridge while playing hide and seek would never cross a child's mind had they not watched the movie.

    5. Re:A child died, playing hide and seek by Bogtha · · Score: 2

      The first drafts for Back to the Future had a fridge for a time machine, but it was changed to a car because they were worried about kids climbing into fridges.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    6. Re:A child died, playing hide and seek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Thank goodness... DeLorians are MUCH cooler... if ya' know what I mean!

    7. Re:A child died, playing hide and seek by u38cg · · Score: 2

      It happened often enough in the UK that safety videos were made about it. No links as I am at work, but it's easy enough to find on Youtube.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    8. Re:A child died, playing hide and seek by pla · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And this is not a fake news
      It happened, about 4 decades ago


      And do you know what has changed in the past four decades?

      Residential refrigerators don't latch. Haven't for 20-30 years, at least. They use a passive magnetic seal that even a kid could push open. Even standalone (residential) freezer units don't self-latch - They require a removable key-like knob to engage the lock, manually, from the outside (and even then, always have a safety release inside).


      Children watching the movie might just do what the hero does - hide inside a fridge, - and suffocate, just like that poor child who died 4 decades ago

      So really, you just want to advocate for Time Machine safety, rather than ranting against how many cases of the plague we could avoid by simply getting rid of the rats?

    9. Re:A child died, playing hide and seek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      omg... they shouldn't have changed it

    10. Re:A child died, playing hide and seek by Kincaidia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sorry, bullshit on that. Growing up, we hid in cupboards, under the kitchen sink, in the fridge, everywhere when playing hide and seek. My dad actually went through several plate glass windows in one game. You're severely underestimating the imagination of children, or you had a crappy childhood.

    11. Re:A child died, playing hide and seek by x_IamSpartacus_x · · Score: 1

      Don't be too hard on this guy mods. He probably can't hear the WOOSH inside the fridge he's hiding in.

    12. Re:A child died, playing hide and seek by Stewie241 · · Score: 1

      Are you replying to me? Or to the OP? I guess I omitted the sarcasm tag, but I thought it was fairly obvious.

    13. Re:A child died, playing hide and seek by Kincaidia · · Score: 1

      I apologize. I blame the lack of coffee.

    14. Re:A child died, playing hide and seek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing too, it would have been pretty hard to get a refrigerator up to 85 mph.

      (As if it wasn't hard enough to get a Delorean up to 85 mph.)

    15. Re:A child died, playing hide and seek by webheaded · · Score: 1

      Wooooooosh. It is getting to be a sad state of affairs when one cannot tell sarcasm based on the fact that what the person has said is obviously completely ridiculous.

      --
      "Those who would sacrifice essential liberties for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - BenF
    16. Re:A child died, playing hide and seek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never mind a child opening a modern refrigerator. My cat can do that.

    17. Re:A child died, playing hide and seek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Residential refrigerators don't latch. Haven't for 20-30 years, at least.

      While that's technically correct – the '20-30 years at least' part – it's really more like 50+ years that refrigerators haven't been made with latches.

      I know this because I'm over 50 and I remember the refrigerators that my parents had when I was a kid.

      Now get off my lawn.

    18. Re:A child died, playing hide and seek by mhajicek · · Score: 3, Funny

      More importantly, most home refrigerators do not have nukes anymore.

    19. Re:A child died, playing hide and seek by bickle · · Score: 1

      I think George Lucas ought to be careful of movie scenario he puts on his movies. Children watching the movie might just do what the hero does - hide inside a fridge, - and suffocate, just like that poor child who died 4 decades ago

      Indeed. I hear there have been a rash of small children jumping out of crashing planes and trying to sail gracefully to the ground using only an inflatable raft. Most don't make it, and of those that do, none have successful in riding the raft safely down the side of a mountain and over waterfalls.

      It's a shame, really.

    20. Re:A child died, playing hide and seek by X0563511 · · Score: 1, Troll

      So you're implying that there are no refrigerators in the USA older than 50 years? Was there a Great Refrigerator Purge that I never heard of?

      You're not omnipotent. Stop thinking you are.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    21. Re:A child died, playing hide and seek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife's Grandparents just replaced their latching-door refrigerator with a new one a couple of months ago. Reason for replacement: the latch broke. I believe they still use it in the basement by tying the door shut.

    22. Re:A child died, playing hide and seek by ae1294 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not only are they mostly airtight, they're also fairly soundproof. Makes them an effective deathtrap.

      I've added that to my list of ways to dispose of my enemies.. Your Secret Overlord thanks you. You will receive a box of chocolates at your work station soon. They most certainly do not contain Thallium and most certainly nothing radioactive... and completely 100% do not contain a combination of the two.

      Yours in Russia,
      P.

    23. Re:A child died, playing hide and seek by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      Home models anyway.

    24. Re:A child died, playing hide and seek by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      88 yo.... 85 just gets you a ticket.

    25. Re:A child died, playing hide and seek by krakelohm · · Score: 1

      I remember watching a very riveting Punky Brewster on this subject.

      Part 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lgbZPTdbLys
      Part 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOjXSY1Ej_g

      --
      You are all a bunch of idots.
    26. Re:A child died, playing hide and seek by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      WHOOOSH! (that was the sound of a nuclear powered refrigerator flying over someone's head)

    27. Re:A child died, playing hide and seek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Happens all the time in your local country dump site.. I'd advise against opening any fridges you find there.

  31. Yeah, I'm Going There... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surviving a nuclear bomb in a fridge? All I see is 'duck and cover' homage there. Same with the rest of the movie. It's a big 50's homage, same as the original 3 were 30's homages.

    That said, I still wanna know how one tub of water the size we were shown in Temple of Doom can possibly flow through all those mine passages and have the kind of water pressure they put on film.

    Having watched all four side-by-side? Temple of Doom was the least like an IJ story to me. Raiders and Crusade were the best, followed by Skull and Temple.

  32. Tried to post at the site... but... by cc_pirate · · Score: 1

    It appears to be slashdotted :)

    While I certainly agree with the HIGH probability of Dr. Jones dying in his flying refrigerator, it is worth noting that in the Hiroshima bombing, there is a documented case of a bank worker surviving the blast from less than 330m from the hypocenter. Now granted, she was inside, at the back of a concrete bank building, but she DID survive, and was not fatally injured. Assuming the bomb was at the low edge of the kilotonnage listed (i.e. similar to the Hiroshima bomb), and assuming that the distance was as far as it appears in that one shot (i.e. much greater than 330m), I think Dr. Jones would have quite a reasonable chance of surviving provided the blast wave was NOT enough to propel his refrigerator through the air (and frankly, from the movie shown distance it seems unlikely). If instead George Lucas had chosen to have the fridge knocked over in a pile of burning rubble, I think Dr. Jones's chance of survival, while not excellent, would be within the real of reasonable probability.

    --

    "There are laws that enslave men, and laws that set them free. " - Sean Connery as King Arthur

  33. Lots of work to do by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

    Crap, looks like I'm going to hvae to stop cutting corners and go back to digging my underground bomb shelter. Oh well.

    --
    This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  34. Database Error by cadeon · · Score: 1

    Hiding in the fridge won't protect you from Slashdot, either.

  35. User Error by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Disbelief can only be suspended so far.

    That is a failure of you, not the movie.

    I am perfectly happy to suspend disbelief as much as the movie would like me to; I'm in it for the enjoyment of the spectacle, not to gripe.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  36. homage to the original back to the future script by retchdog · · Score: 5, Interesting

    in the original back to the future script, marty mcfly was sent "back to the future" in a refrigerator in one of the model houses at a nuclear test site. doc brown modded the fridge somehow so that the radiation would trigger the time circuits.

    the original script was very surreal, and a blatant social commentary on the failure/decay of the space age. for example, iirc, the time machine was powered by diet cola and marty is stranded because aspartame isn't invented until 1965.

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  37. Meta-Review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This review is... almost as bad as the movie scenario it attempts to debunk. I don't disagree with the math given the assumptions, but... the assumptions are stupid.

    First, the review is not clear about what it is trying to debunk--that Indy could have survived what would have been the real effects of a nuclear blast from the approximate distance shown (at least 2-3km), or that he could have survived given what was shown happening to the fridge. I'd say the former is far more interesting. Next, there's the list of stupid assumptions/analysis decisions. (1) The fridge's resulting velocity was inferred from its overtaking the car, (the shown result, not the actual effect from such a blast) (2) that the air blast would accelerate the fridge from zero to the speed of the wavefront by the time its leading edge got to the far end of the fridge (that is some THICK air...), (3) using THAT force to calculate how close he must have been to the epicenter.

    If the author really is a professional scientist, and this reflects the kind of analysis he normally does... Sigh...

  38. Rigourous Scientific Review not rigourous by maroberts · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, the rigorous scientific review ignores what I call the 'Chuck Norris Theory of Relativity', which states that for certain heroes there is an area relative to the location of the hero where the laws of the universe bend to their will instead of being the fixed laws that Einstein and others trotted out.

    In essence, every hero has a personal form of "gravity well" where normal theories concerning the mechanics of the universe do not strictly apply or are muted in effect. This theory is named after Chuck Norris, because he is the extreme example where the entire universe is affected by his will. Of course, except for Chuck Norris, this effect is not absolute; heroes can be harmed and even die in extreme cases, and it is even possible that the strength of the hero field fades with the number of books/movies/ tv episodes that he/she appears in.

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  39. Nuking the fridge= cool idea, badly executed by Harvey+Manfrenjenson · · Score: 2

    Let me start by arguing that "realism" does in fact matter and that it is a key problem with this scene. Yes, a movie can ask you to suspend disbelief and watch improbable things-- but the degree of improbability needs to be established early on and it needs to be consistent. You can't suddenly up the ante and insert a sequence which belongs in a Road Runner cartoon.

    The scene could have been fixed, or at least improved. Instead of showing the fridge hurtling a hundred yards through the air (which of course would have reduced Indy to a pulp), they could have thrown it twenty feet and shown the walls of the house buckling (but not vaporizing) from the overpressure. And maybe had the mannequins catch fire, just to further establish the lethality of the blast. And they should have gotten rid of the cute little fucking CGI gopher.

  40. Does no NO ONE REMEBER?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Indiana Jones drank from the holy freaking grail! He's immortal!

  41. JFC by malelder · · Score: 2

    He had as much chance of surviving a nuke in a fridge as he did flying off a cliff in a heavily laden life raft into a river far below...its FUN you dummies, anyone remember laughter?

    --


    Yuma, AZ...You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious.
    1. Re:JFC by webheaded · · Score: 1

      I really don't understand people in this way. Just watch the movie and quit nitpicking stupid shit like this. I mean, I'll admit...some of the things people do with computers in movies make me want to scream but it doesn't ruin the movie. Just watch it...you are supposed to be having fun. Quit over analyzing every stupid thing.

      --
      "Those who would sacrifice essential liberties for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - BenF
  42. Nuke? Pah! by Grindalf · · Score: 0

    It depends on personal toughness body building acumen, I would cite Arnie in “Predator” just after he says “What the hell ees that?”

    --
    The purpose of existence is to make money.
  43. Re:homage to the original back to the future scrip by dargaud · · Score: 1

    Sounds witty. Is it available somewhere to read ?

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  44. It's Kingdom of the Crystal Skull... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kingdom, not Legend

  45. You forgot... by itsdapead · · Score: 2

    Clinging to the outside of a submarine while it travels halfway around the world...

    The fridge stunt was completely in keeping with the tongue-in-cheek tone of the Indy films - the film sucked because it was the much-delayed fourth film in a trilogy. When has that ever worked?

    --
    In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    1. Re:You forgot... by airdweller · · Score: 1

      "Clinging to the outside of a submarine while it travels halfway around the world... "
      Actually, I consider that plausible. First, it traveled from the South-Eastern Mediterranean to - probably - Crete, during summer. Second, subs in those times submerged only in battle. I guess any man could pull it off if his other option was to drown.

  46. Re:homage to the original back to the future scrip by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1, Interesting

    That explains the " I'm sure that in 1985 plutonium is available in every corner drugstore, but in 1955 it's a little hard to come by. " line.

    That never made any sense to me : surely Doc Brown, as crazy as he was, knew that plutonium was too dangerous to ever be sold to ordinary consumers in a residential area. But diet soda WAS sold then, if he said " I'm sure that in 1985 aspartame/diet soda is available in every corner drugstore " it would have made perfect sense.

    Ironically, the line is funnier with plutonium.

  47. Re:homage to the original back to the future scrip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the 50s, people thought the atomic age was upon us, and thus soon everything was going to be "atomic". For a cultural example, just go back and re-read the original Asimov "Foundation" novel, written during that era. There are lots of references to "atomic" technology, including bizarre and improbable stuff that was pretty silly in its loose description considering Asimov's normal level of rigor, such as glowing personal force fields that were somehow "atomic"-ly generated, without really getting into any specifics as to how (not even to the normal speculative sci-fi level of explanation). Not even ol' Isaac was immune to the hype of the day which elevated the word "atomic" to basically mean "magic". Given that environment, it's not implausible at all for the Doc Brown of 1955 to think that plutonium would be a household item of the future.

  48. Re:homage to the original back to the future scrip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh man, that original script sounds so much better. Much better than, "oops I slipped. TIME TRAVELLL MY BOYYY!"

    Even better would have been if he was indirectly the person who gave the guy who invented aspartame the formula to make it. (not sure how or why Marty would be carrying the chemical formula, but eh, we could always have some note scribbled on the floor stuck to his shoe or something)
    And because it was some scrap, after all that hard work he'd think it was one of his old scribbles that wasn't done, does it, SCIENCE MY BOY.

  49. Slashdotted by eternaldoctorwho · · Score: 1

    Looks like TFA got nuked as well...

  50. Nuke this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't know about the fridge, but I sure wish someone had nuked "Legend of the Crystal Skull" before production...

  51. Re:homage to the original back to the future scrip by webheaded · · Score: 1

    That's because the line was a joke. It is not some silly irony...they intended for it to be a joke. The joke is exactly that...it would be silly for him to even think that in the first place.

    --
    "Those who would sacrifice essential liberties for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - BenF
  52. damn Spielberg , get some original ideas by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    It was ludicroius when Michael Mann did it twenty four years ago.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  53. Dunno by ledow · · Score: 2

    Dunno, but I heard of one poor sod that was caught within the Hiroshima bombings and, after being exposed, evacuated to Nagasaki just in time for...
    And that was a genuine, documented case from what I remember.

    Maybe people should watch "When The Wind Blows" more often and less Terminator. Nuke != instantaneous death. Really. It's a whole lot worse than that. In comparison to what happens to you after, it's probably better to go out in an instant flash of hot, burning death.

    1. Re:Dunno by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I vaguely remember reading about him a few years back. Maybe it was his obituary.

      That'd still be a good innings, all considered.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  54. Original back to the future script by Translation+Error · · Score: 1
    I found the original screenplay here, for anyone who's interested, but the magic ingredient is Coke, not diet cola.

    PROF. BROWN What happened?!?
    MARTY Well, I'm not sure exactly---I accidentally spilled some Coke in here---just a drop!

    --
    When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
  55. Something like this has been tested for survival by rcamans · · Score: 1

    In the early days of US nuclear bomb testing, no one knew what effect the bomb would actually have. So they built up a test around the bomb test tower. They parked Sherman? tanks at 1000 yards from the tower, manned them with volunteers, and asked the volunteers to seal their own tanks.
    They had a trench at 2000 yards? 8 to 12 feet deep, covered with canvas tarps, and had volunteers at the bottom of the trench.
    They built a TOWN 2 miles out and completely furnished it, inside and out, and had a company (Dukane Corp) instrument it completely so they could measure the effects inside the buildings.
    When the time for the test came, they asked photographers to stand 7 miles out and take photos and movies of the test. The Dukane engineer in charge of the instrumenting was one of the photographers.
    They told the photographers to face away from the bomb blast, wear dark glasses they gave them, close their eyes, and not open them until told.

    The bomb blast went off. The heat wave rolled out and set fire to the canvas tarps, so the soldiers in the bottom of the trenches had burning tarps falling on them (Oops). They said later that they hung on to the ground for dear life as it tossed around 10 feet in every direction. The soldiers in the tanks lived and were interviewed ass well.
    When the heat pulse hit the town, it set the paint on fire, but passed so quickly that the fires went out. they had not had time to reach self-sustaining.
    When it hit the photographers, it singed the hair on the backs of their heads.
    The photographers then thought it was ok for them to open their eyes. But the bomb light output was still increasing, and they said it went out 14 miles, bounced off the mountain they were facing, and blinded them. One of the guys in the tanks said they forgot to close the big gun breach, and the light poured in like a liquid and filled up the tank, blinding them.

    The Dukane engineer was the only photographer who had listened when they were told to us e# 5 or 6 sun filters on their cameras, so he got pictures and movies.
    Because he had listened, (and because Dukane was in the audio business?), he was asked to interview the volunteer soldiers.
    When he checked out the town instrumentation, he found that when the high pressure pulse in the air hit the wooden houses, it went through the walls like they were not there, and pushed everything into the center of the rooms. Then the vacuum pulse following the high pressure pulse hit the houses sucked everything back to the outside walls where stuff then fell down.

    You can see the Dukane engineer's photos, movies, and listen to his interviews at the Smithsonian Museum. I worked for him, years later. He was white-haired. He was the calmest, quietest, solidest person I have ever met by far. How are you going to disturb a guy who was standing on ground zero?

    So, yes, actually if Indiana Jones was in that town, like the movie had him, and he had jumped into a fridge, he would have survived just fine, even maybe without significant radiation damage.

    --
    wake up and hold your nose
  56. I am the spirit of dark and lonely water by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

    I remember those. Something along the lines of "...but to a small child it's a submarine, a castle, or a gipsy caravan".

    Unless it was nothing like that, in which case I clearly don't remember.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  57. Re:homage to the original back to the future scrip by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    iirc, the time machine was powered by diet cola and marty is stranded because aspartame isn't invented until 1965.

    So he'd have had to sit around for a few parsecs.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  58. Re:homage to the original back to the future scrip by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

    Google is your friend. Give him all your data to look after.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  59. Poor analysis by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    Poor Indy doesn't have much of a chance, but TFA is much too pessimistic. There could have been a big berm between the fridge and the nuke, absorbing and deflecting the initial impulse and direct radiation. He could have been accelerated very rapidly instead of instantaneously. He could have been launched with the fridge at an angle, so that aerodynamic forces kept it aloft only a few feet above the earth (no devastating landing crash). Rapid application of heat does not melt an object all at once, the surface boils off like the "ablative shield" of the Mercury capsules. Being sealed in a fridge doesn't asphyxiate you immediately, it probably takes about 20 minutes if you're at ease and very inactive and aren't oxygen deleted when you get inside. And so forth, and so on.

    It does not make a convincing argument if you don't allow for possibilities that defeat your viewpoint. Not all sharks wear lasers.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  60. Old news by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

    We figured out that G.L. was an idiot years ago.
    Sure, the lead lining very well might protect you from radiation. But there is nothing in a lead lined fridge that protects you from velocity.
    Assuming that the fridge stayed intact (and your body was not spread over a 20 mile radius) you would probably just be a pile of chunky pink goo when it landed. Best case scenario, the majority of your bones and organs would be destroyed.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.