Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Dealing With University Firewalls?

An anonymous reader writes "My university only provides access to the web, via a restrictive content filter and proxy service. There is no access to the wider internet. I was wondering if this is common, and if anyone has any suggestions on how to go about protesting the issue. I've spoken to the lecturers and they have the same frustrations I do. I've also spoken to the head of the IT department who spouted lines about 'protecting the network.' This is very frustrating, I've seen a number of students making use of 3G/4G dongles to get access to the net and this just seems crazy. The restrictions applied to the web are draconian, with sites such as hackaday, hypberbole and a half, somethingawful, etc being blocked." What would you do to get better access?

582 comments

  1. It's their bandwidth ... by Dark$ide · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ... so you get controlled.

    Get over it.

    --

    Sigs. We don't need no steenking sigs.

    1. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by mattventura · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If the university's IT department isn't providing the services that students and faculty need, then the issue should probably be raised above the IT department. The purpose of an IT department is to provide a service to the organization, not to make the organization bend over to the IT dept.

    2. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I have been in the position of having to block internet to a college in a previous job. There were constant battles between the marketing and academic departments about blocking and unblocking social media sites. In the end the marketing department won and they were unblocked. The tutors didn't like it because they relied so much on computers for their lessons rather than using good old fashioned methods like lecturing and demonstrating.

    3. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Miseph · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Unless the author has a full ride scholarship including room and board... I'd say there is at least a partially legitimate claim to some rights here.

      Anyway, yeah, campus networks can be like that. It's bull. It's also, in my experience, rarely something the IT people are terribly fond of; most of them are at least passingly familiar with how the internet works, and ultimately it requires far more work to maintain a ridiculously locked-down network than one with minimal restrictions. Usually, that comes from higher up in the organization, from some old administrator or trustee or something... IT takes order in academia just like they do in business.

      The best bet for getting a change on this is actually o complain to higher administration, and perhaps as well to school and/or local publications. Putting things in writing usually works well. Bring up issues of censorship and academic freedom, and be sure to mention how this new-fangled internet thing is a really important part of the future. Keep in mind that the details of what is or is not filtered is, largely, irrelevant... it's easy to lose a non-techie audience by getting into the weeds. The point here is to engage them on the emotional level: these decisions are not made because there are clear-cut rational arguments for them, they are made because somebody doesn't like ______ which they believe to be on the internet. Again, getting too logical or specific will just make eyes glaze over, so keep it rhetorical and abstract.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    4. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      Which doesn't mean that their actions are immune from criticism.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    5. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by buglista · · Score: 2
      This. I used to work for a uni and we made every effort to look after people, even those using "unsupported" OSs like Linux. (half of the 3rd line support guys had Linux desktops, so it was only "unsupported" officially - in practice everything worked fine.) We blocked the bare minimum of content - ie. some English student is probably writing an essay on pr0n for all I know. If you're going to get a worm, you can get it over 3G anyway - guess what the default route is going to be when you disconnect?

      And there, I was the security guy. But then I'm not a ****.

    6. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hackaday, hypberbole and a half, somethingawful

      Yep, they sure do need those sites for work. Don't know how they get a single thing done with access to Something Awful blocked.

    7. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except that the students pay for it with tuition..

    8. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by ettusyphax · · Score: 2

      This would be true... if they owned the bandwidth. If it's a state college, they don't. If private, I would still argue that benefactors of the university have a right to do with the bandwidth as they please. Fundamentally, the administration should have every right (speaking morally, not necessarily legally here) to restrict the bandwidth however they feel... if it were a corporation where the employees work for the employer. In a university setting, the administration is supposed to work for the students. Of course that's not how it works in the real world. I would then argue that if they want to continue pointless censoring of benign content as the author claims, they should remove any reference to "university" or "college" from their name. That way everyone will know up front that this is just a degree mill, not a place of learning.

      I can't help but think that you are likely in IT and say "get over it" as a reaction to perceived or real threats to your network by meddling students. Either that, or you're just an asshole with no scruples. By your same logic, Comcast should have the right to censor whatever they see fit because it's "their bandwidth." Some people actually argue this claim unironically - thankfully, that's not the world we live in yet. But if more idiots like you refuse to see reason and want to horde everything for themselves, give no thought to civil rights of others, and laugh at people who don't know as much about computers as you do, well... I can't say I'm optimistic about the future. You're certainly not doing any favors for the already-negative public image of our industry.

    9. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by pla · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seriously? So if I walk into your house and you dont provide services I "need" I can freely break rules to get them? Oh wait this is Slashdot: No rules for me and lots of them for others.

      If I pay to live in your house...
      and you have me locked in to that arrangement for four (or more) years...
      and you agree to provide internet access, and you forbid me from having Verizon drop a DSL line right to my bedroom...
      in favor of charging some insane "Internet access" line item to my bill for 4x as much...

      Then yes, I damned well expect you to provide me with real internet access, and you can fully expect me to actively work around whatever attempts you may make to enforce your morality on my net feed.

      This doesn't involve either the FP's parents or his employer - He pays a boatload of money every year for housing AND internet access, and his uni has decided they can selectively skip out on the second half of that deal simply because they have a captive audience. If they tried to pull this crap on any userbase that actually had the money to fight it, you can bet this would end up in the courts.

    10. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your analogy is a bit off. More like your rented from an apartment who claimed to have "the internet". Once you were in contract with them, you come to find out the internet access with heavily filtered and broken.

      False advertisement.

      They're acting as an ISP. I wonder if net neutrality laws apply.

    11. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      That's the way we work around here. I'm pretty sure my university doesn't block anything.

      Except: I have a friend who works in a research lab, the computers there do have nanny filters on them - but I think that is due to the PI of the lab, and not the university, I worked in an associated department that shares a "local" IT group, and we never had such filters.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    12. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by ByOhTek · · Score: 1, Informative

      What post did you read? The GP said that the issue needs to be brought up to the appropriate group to get the rules changed, not to break the rules. I'd advise you get some more ADHD medication, and a bit less caffeine...

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    13. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      Usually if a university has restricted access, they will mention it. Also, since you aren't specifically paying for the internet, I expect Net Neutrality rules won't apply.

      And you forgot the biggest screw up of the GPs analogy.

      GGP: They don't have what you want, appeal to a higher authority
      GP: Why are you suggesting they break the rules?

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    14. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      An opinion, by nature, cannot be "correct". It can either agree or disagree with the opinions of others.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    15. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah universities normally get confused who the customer is and indeed the whole concept of the relationship.

    16. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by kontos · · Score: 1

      There are no net neutrality laws.

      --
      SM MBL-VIR looking 4 SIG 4 LTR. must be DDF, no 420, SD ok.
    17. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The purpose of an IT department is to provide a service to the organization

      Not quite, the purpose of an IT department is to do as told by those who hired them. That is the organization they are there to support.

      When head administration tells IT to block websites, they block websites.

      If your desires do not match those of the head administration, then that sucks, but that doesn't change the fact IT is there to enforce the policies of those that OWN that network, not the students.

      Trust me, if the head people did not want the network exactly how it currently is, the entire IT department would be fired and replaced damn fast. That hasn't happened, because they are doing as they are told.

      Don't blame the IT department for the policies from above that they must enforce.
      Blame the people that made the policy.

    18. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The way I see it, your mommy and daddy can pay for cell service if it's that important. Otherwise, the IT dept. at the university is providing a service as a means for students to get an education. If you don't need anything beyond web access to get that education, they are keeping costs down for the university. They don't need to be paying for your Frostwire downloads.

    19. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? I thought it was to bitch about how uselesa the people are that ensure their job security.

      That's just a job perk.

    20. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one "needs" Somethingawful or Hyperbole and a Half.

    21. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by multimediavt · · Score: 2

      1. There's one thing universities hate more than budget cuts and that's bad publicity. Make a noise and get this issue in the local press and higher if you can do it. 2. For your best results to Item 1 stage a protest to get your point across and get the media there. Social networking and flyers posted around campus will be very helpful with getting other wronged folks out in force. Give folks at least a few days notice and let them know time and place. You may or may not want to inform the administration, depends on their assemblage policies and attitudes toward non-violent protest. You need to also come up with a viable solution (or at least some evidence to contradict their draconian stance), so research some other universities with open networks, Virginia Tech is one. Make sure your student government and whatever governing body of the university are aware of the issue as well. Letter's to those bodies may be sufficient to get the ball rolling. I have worked both as a student and as an administrative faculty member to change backwards policies. It's difficult and takes time, but I have used the techniques above for success. The most important thing to remember is you are dealing with academic minded folks, so the more information and evidence you can bring forward to support change, and the more eyes you can get watching are critical for success in changing policy. Good luck! You certainly have a large community of support behind you..

    22. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's your money. Take it to another university. Their restrictions probably say a lot about their commitment to the free flow of ideas and information. Where do you go, Bob Jones?

    23. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by FictionPimp · · Score: 0, Troll

      We sign contracts now for 4 years to go to college?

      So here's some advice.

      1) Do your research before you go to college.
      2) If you don't like your current school, you can *gasp* change schools.

    24. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by paiute · · Score: 3, Funny

      The purpose of an IT department is to provide a service to the organization, not to make the organization bend over to the IT dept.

      Thousands of corporate ITers just spit coffee onto their monitors.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    25. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I don't want to block websites. It's an extra thing for me to keep up and maintain, I'm called constantly each time some stick in the mud finds a site they find objectionable that the service we use hasn't filtered yet or doesn't think is objectionable. I even personally recommended that we not filter the internet.

      But I'm getting paid to do what I'm told to do, not to do what I think is the best thing for the company.

    26. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by wisty · · Score: 1

      We sign contracts now for 4 years to go to college?

      So here's some advice.

      1) Do your research before you go to college.
      2) If you don't like your current school, you can *gasp* change schools.

      I'm guessing your a lot older than most freshmen.

    27. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The lab is probably protected because they don't want their data being leaked before they patent it.

      Most parts of a university don't need nanny filters. If I were running a University IT system I'd have the dorms, classrooms, labs, and university staff on 4 independent sets of IP space (NAT if required.) This way laptops taken to classrooms and labs get the filtered to "do your work, and don't slack off" and requires going through a SOCKS proxy which in turn each teacher or lab head can set their own policy if the students are wasting time. Given someone could probably P2P bridge, but when I was at a college 15 years ago, most of the computers in the Win98 lab were infected with viruses and unusable (with pirate software downloaders on them,) where as the NT lab was completely locked down and useable except for only having MSIE3 as a web browser. Dorms would run unrestricted but throttled during certain times of day so that any infections or P2P apps don't render the internet access unusable. Staff would have an additional filter layer which would track what is being accessed and emailed so that any bad behavior on the part of staff is tracked.

    28. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by kenh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and you have me locked in to that arrangement for four (or more) years...

      Locked in? The only lock in I know of is that most/nearly all universities require you are enrolled for the two years prior to getting your BA/BS

      and you agree to provide internet access, and you forbid me from having Verizon drop a DSL line right to my bedroom...

      You don't have to live on campus, it's an option, not a requirement.

      in favor of charging some insane "Internet access" line item to my bill for 4x as much...

      As much as what, the $40/month DSL bill you are lusting after?

      How long before you decide to rail against the cafeteria for not offering you the foods you want, prepared how you want, and for a subsidized price too?

      --
      Ken
    29. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by dj245 · · Score: 2

      We sign contracts now for 4 years to go to college?

      It is not a real contract but it is effectively one. Most colleges are dicks when it comes to transferring credits. They often won't accept credit from other colleges, and when they do, they often count the credit as "humanities elective" or "free elective" or some other BS. The result is that when you change schools, you are usually throwing away all the work you did before. The "escape clause" is pretty unfavorable to the student, as it were.

      I tried to transfer once as a junior (2 years completed) to a comparable school 50 miles away in the same state. The schools even have some joint initiatives and research. They would have effectively made me a freshman again had I gone through with it.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    30. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What "rights" are you referring to? You don't have a right to internet access. It's a service the university is providing. If you're not happy with the service, get a 3G/4G dongle and get your own.

      I agree with the post about bringing it up with the student union, but it's unlikely to get changed by that. The idea that there are rights somehow violated here, or that there is a case for a suit (mentioned by another poster) is ridiculous. The university provides whatever filtered content they would like to; you don't have to use it at all.

    31. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Fezzick · · Score: 1

      You don't have to live on campus, it's an option, not a requirement.

      A LOT of universities require freshman and sophomores to live on campus. In those cases, it is indeed a requirement.

    32. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What he is not paying for is the right to ignore rules ... he should have the ability to lobby for change, but not unilateral control of a group network, no.

    33. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      If I pay to live in your house...
      and you have me locked in to that arrangement for four (or more) years...

      I might as well have just stopped reading your post there, they might lock you in to studying with them for 4 years but you are allowed to move off campus you know. University Halls always have loads of restrictive policies, in my day you could not even have any sort of internet or phone service in your room, and this was before mobile phones so we all spent lots of time queuing at the payphones in the cold.

      The solution to this is simply to move off campus into private accommodation and practice being a real grown up. By the time I finished uni everyone one of my mates had done this as part of the whole growing up experience. I moved out after my first year as I hated the overly sheltered environment of student halls

      This doesn't involve either the FP's parents or his employer - He pays a boatload of money every year for housing AND internet access, and his uni has decided they can selectively skip out on the second half of that deal simply because they have a captive audience.

      Is it actually a boat load of money compared to the average rent in that area? In my day uni halls were dirt cheap compared to living off campus. This was especially true when you factored in the bills for water, power, telephone, gas (for heating, not driving your car), etc that you had to all pay separately when you lived outside halls. If the university are subsidising the shit out of his internet access then they have a right to restrict it as much as they like providing they are up front about it.

      Then yes, I damned well expect you to provide me with real internet access, and you can fully expect me to actively work around whatever attempts you may make to enforce your morality on my net feed.

      This is the most retarded part of your entire post. The correct work around for this is to move the hell out of the universities sheltered halls of residence, get a 3G card or a VPN account if that is allowed through the firewall. Your approach may very well get you expelled, that will dump you in the gutter with no qualifications. No other university or employer is going to touch you if they find out you were expelled from a previous university for hacking into their network, even if you can explain that it was just to use SSH or something not on port 80.

      This is also against the law in most western countries, you may even get a criminal record and will screw your life over utterly. Only last month there was a case here in the UK about an ethical hacker who has been convicted of breaking into facebook. He might have through he was doing them a favour but they did not share his sentiment.

      We all do stupid crap when were are young, but thankfully most of use avoid getting dragged through the law courts for it. Bypassing the access controls on your university network though will certainly be very frowned upon if you are caught. Banking on not being caught is also a very big gamble, somewhere in your university is probably someone with a brain, even if most undergraduates have no direct contact with them. If they get a sniff of someone bypassing their security they may even contract in outside help to get to the bottom of who is doing it.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    34. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since the university will be held liable in our modern day for anything it's students do, they have every right to provide whatever form of limited and controlled access they feel will provide them adequate protection from the MPAA/RIAA or whatever other lawsuits or law enforcement might decide to come after them. The same crowd here who feels entitled to "damned well expect" to be provided full unfettered net access will undoubtedly be the ones who expect to be protected by the same university from having their identities revealed when they use that net connection to break the law.
          If you don't like it, nobody is stopping you from using an aircard through your favorite ISP if it really cramps your style that much. Or just use a proxy. This is melodramatic nonsense.

    35. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The students and faculty 'would' be requesting services they don't need. IE. 'Everything'

      Who is the judge of what 'they' need? i dunno. But for sure, it can't be them.

    36. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by MogNuts · · Score: 1

      Since the OP didn't mention specifics, I'm betting that he is a student living in the dorms that wants access to other than port 80. The best advice I learned very quickly and often, is:

      Move off campus. Even if it's to apartments that are only a block away.

      In this case, the parent poster is right. University access have some pretty draconian BS. Examples:

      - One school I lived in wouldn't allow member of the opposite sex in AT ALL unless signed in by another member of the same sex. If I wanted my gf to come in, even at 11 am, I had to find a girl to sign her in. Retarded. And no guests AT ALL, period, after midnight. When you go out at night and then you want to have friends over, forget it.

      - Phones. All universities do this. Now it's not a problem anymore because people have cell's, but when I went, cell's were just starting to be commonplace. So you had to pay like 25 cents a call and like 20 per month for the privelege. Unless it was an on-campus call.

      - You pay the same amount for a dorm as you do rent, sometimes more, and they kick you out during breaks and over the summer. So you pay more for the privelage of that.

      And of course the restricted internet problem like you have. Seriously, move off campus into your own apartment. Student loans still will pay for it--just because you dorm is included in tuition doesn't mean that you get a free ride--you gotta pay either way. I think a lot of new students don't realize that.

      Move out, get your own place (using loans for food and rent if need be) and get your own unfettered internet, nicer, superior, and cheaper apartment, the ability to not have a roommate (probably the worst thing ever in college is always ending up with shit roommates), being able to actually use a stove and cook your own food or eat what you want instead of dorm food, etc. It's the hands down best thing you can ever do.

    37. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait wait, if you paid me to live in my house with or without a lease of some sort, you think I CAN'T prevent you from having some new line run through my wall?

      If you want to pay me to use my Internet connection then put up with whatever controls I put in place or get 3G.

      Personally, I think maybe unis should wire dorms like we do barracks, and apartments, where each unit gets service independently. Youd get a discount probably, we did in the barracks.

    38. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. In addition, my old school charged $60 a semester to be able to use internet, which had all sorts of restrictions on it. That comes out to ~$15 a month, the exact same rate as AT&T's introductory, NON CENSORED, dsl service. So yeah, you basically end up paying the same price for a far shittier service.

    39. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make an excellent point. The loss of credits for a transfer is ridiculous, especially when both schools are in the same state. My administration/regime would mandate that all state supported colleges and universities standardize the curricula and allow full credits for transfers.

    40. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by hipp5 · · Score: 1

      How long before you decide to rail against the cafeteria for not offering you the foods you want

      Why shouldn't you rail against the cafeteria for not offering foods you want? Sure, it might be unreasonable to complain that your cafeteria doesn't offer caviar and smoked salmon, but if all they offer is ham sandwiches isn't it reasonable to ask them to expand their offerings?

      Universities provide a service in exhange for money. It's not unreasonable for ask for adjustments to that service, especially when the service that is being provided is so far below what others in the "industry" are providing (as is the case here).

    41. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      since you aren't specifically paying for the internet

      At my school you sure as hell did pay specifically for internet, separate bill and all that, later bundled with phone service (to increase the price since no one wanted phone service).

    42. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by shmeeps · · Score: 1

      This. Around where I live, 2/3 of the local colleges require you to live on campus for at least a year. In addition to that, they are the highest priced living areas available to the students in terms of cost/benefit ratio, ie, they have the least amount of space, more disrepair, less utilities, etc.

    43. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by xenobyte · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There were constant battles between the marketing and academic departments about blocking and unblocking social media sites. In the end the marketing department won and they were unblocked. The tutors didn't like it because they relied so much on computers for their lessons rather than using good old fashioned methods like lecturing and demonstrating.

      Why was that a problem? - That people might use (gasp!) their computers for more that just the lessons?

      Sounds like narrow-minded tutors with a feeble grasp on reality.

      Besides, why should the tutors care? - If people waste the lessons updating Facebook instead of getting smart, they'll simply fail and thus have wasted their tuition. I hope Facebook was worth it, but the tutors shouldn't care less if the students are that stupid.

      --
      "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
    44. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by pikine · · Score: 1

      The university can easily spin around bad press by saying they're creating an ivory tower for the students to learn effectively; after all they're a learning institution. And what good it is if you destroy the university's reputation while you're still in it? Doesn't the worth of your degree depend on it?

      But with the help of student union or professor support, I think it's realistic to ask the IT department to put on each blocked page a "request for approval" button, which the IT department must honor if the website does not violate acceptable use policy. Even if the acceptable use policy contains clause such as "under the discretion of ____" and if the IT department is constantly ignoring the request, then you can make a case to the Dean or some higher up that the IT department is not doing their job, and you need legitimate access to a site. If they Dean doesn't respond, then you could make a case to the Board of Trustees, and eventually to the press, that the university is in fact not creating an ivory tower for learning, but a prison of knowledge starvation.

      In the best case scenario, hopefully they will eventually give up on the request for approval button and just plainly open access to everything.

      --
      I once had a signature.
    45. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Blue23 · · Score: 1

      Big question is why they have the restrictions. Often it's because they are afraid of lawsuits and liability. Or even parents kicking up a fuss. "I came to visit my poor innocent Johnny, and his roommate was showing some unimaginable* filth!"

      If legal is pushing it to avoid things like "the university is promoting hate crimes/pr0n/racism/drug use/alternate lifestyles/etc.", that's a very different route to try to change it than "Dean XYZ wants to try to keep the internet 'educational only'", again different than "IT manager has limited bandwidth and is trying to restrict data hogs", still different than "some guy wants to put his stamp of morality on everything".

      Understanding the reason behind the restrictions is the first step in understanding how to change it.

      --
      * You might be able to imagine it, because you've heard of Rule #34.

      --
      LITTLE GIRL: But which cookie will you eat FIRST? C. MONSTER: Me think you have misconception of cookie-eating process.
    46. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by pla · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you don't need anything beyond web access to get that education, they are keeping costs down for the university.

      Which completely ignores the reality of college as the entirety of students' lives for four years. When you live on campus, the "university life" equals your life. You eat cafeteria food (and thank Zeus for the rare occasions when you get to experience "real" food), you attend uni sporting events (even if you don't like sports - Just something to do), you listen to local garage bands, and, you absolutely depend on what utilities and services the university provides for your living arrangements. Including internet access.


      they are keeping costs down for the university.

      BS. Telling someone they can't look at porn at 10pm on a Saturday evening amounts to nothing but blatant moralizing; telling someone they can't visit music download sites treats everyone as an a priori criminal.

      Or, more functionally, if internet access costs the university so much to provide, why don't they allow students to arrange for their own DSL or cable (and lets not insult each other by trying to pass off $100/mo 2GB/mo 3g as "broadband", a point the FP directly brought up)? Oh, right - Because unis make a fortune charging students an arm and a leg for subpar basic services. Back in my day, basic phone service counted as the big "gotcha" - Cell phones have largely killed that revenue stream, but back when you could get $14.99/mo local-only land lines, the universities charged around $60/mo.

      as a means for students to get an education.

      Can we all drop the "only there for an education" attitude? No one - And I feel comfortable phrasing that as an unqualified absolute - dedicates themselves to their studies 24/7. Aside from missing out on half (arguably, the more important half) of the "university life", ie the social part, few people need to dedicate that much time to their studies (and those that do won't last long before burning - or flunking - out).

    47. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, really? I guess it doesn't cost thousands of dollars per semester to attend college. How dare the freeloaders expect they get reasonable service when they totally aren't going into longterm debt in order to get a proper education! These tools should learn to let the corporat-errr, I mean, university do as it pleases! After all, the little guy adds nothing to the bottom line! Hail to our corporate overlords!

    48. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "How long before you decide to rail against the cafeteria for not offering you the foods you want, prepared how you want, and for a subsidized price too?"

      Why would anyone do that?

      All the universities around here, and some I get to out-state in the course (no pun intended...) of my job, provide vegetarian, kosher, (usually) vegan, and other choices to their diners. And yeah, the food's pretty cheap - although I'll confess I haven't looked directly into the financial structuring of those cafeterias.

    49. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by bucky0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Besides, why should the tutors care? - If people waste the lessons updating Facebook instead of getting smart, they'll simply fail and thus have wasted their tuition. I hope Facebook was worth it, but the tutors shouldn't care less if the students are that stupid.

      Because most teachers go into teaching to get students to learn? Because a lot of institutions tie student performance into their evaluations? Because students that aren't paying attention are more likely to distract their neighbors? etc etc...

      --

      -Bucky
    50. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously? So if I walk into your house and you dont provide services I "need" I can freely break rules to get them? Oh wait this is Slashdot: No rules for me and lots of them for others. If I pay to live in your house... and you have me locked in to that arrangement for four (or more) years...

      Wait, you can't drop out of college anymore?

      Then yes, I damned well expect you to provide me with real internet access, and you can fully expect me to actively work around whatever attempts you may make to enforce your morality on my net feed.

      Lots of people have unreasonable expectations.

    51. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      Weird. That's the first I've heard of any university doing that. Here (and most others I've heard of) it is bundled with the dorm cost (like phone service). It is probably so they can, at any point, enact such a restriction policy, but we've had such access/bundles here for 14 years at least, and they've not done any access restriction yet.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    52. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by bucky0 · · Score: 1

      Then why are you bitching about it on Slashdot? Chances are, none of us are the administration you're railing against. It *is* their network and their rules. If you don't like the food, the internet, the dorms then your options are to complain to them or leave. If it's not providing the things you want to have, then you've probably made a bad choice when you were applying to schools. (assuming they didn't mislead you on what they were providing)

        My university didn't allow cable TV in the dorms (they didn't even have the hookups), and I didn't run around trying to find a few miles of coax to string a cable to my room. They also have an amazing cafeteria, and I love eating food, so it made a lot of sense to go there :)

      --

      -Bucky
    53. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by bucky0 · · Score: 1

      I might as well have just stopped reading your post there, they might lock you in to studying with them for 4 years but you are allowed to move off campus you know.

      Many universities don't allow you to move out of the dorms (the cynic in me says it's for the $$, but who knows). I went to a tiny school in a really rural location and even if we wanted to move out, there were more students in the town than actual people in the town (1400 students, 800 residents), so it would've never worked to have people spread around.

      --

      -Bucky
    54. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have to live on campus, it's an option, not a requirement.

      You obviously haven't been to college in a while. At my old school, they started requiring freshmen to live on campus when I was a junior or senior.

    55. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I keep seeing this "tutors/teachers/professors shouldn't care if their students fail for being stupid" thing.

      Given a choice between doing something useful (transferring knowledge; coding/testing a project that will be used by millions) and doing something not useful (talking to dead space while some students use Facebook and other students have difficulty focusing because of all the blinking screens around them; coding/testing a project that is has already been cancelled and will never see the light of day), which do you think would be the preferred option?

      With very rare exceptions, teachers/professors/tutors *WANT* their students to learn, and even apart from that, it's a lot more fun to teach a student who is engaged, to speak to a lecture hall full of people who are actually present, to feel like your work in preparing the materials has actually had a purpose.

      And, of course, their tenure/pay/job/departmental funding may be on the line if students fail to learn, even if the reason is, at root, students using social media or playing games (thinking they can multitask and still learn as much - ha!) instead of having these distractions not available in the room.

    56. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by mindcandy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I am security@ a large public .edu .. and I can say that their approach is quite *uncommon* among my peers in the industry.

      Education is typically a very open environment, and IT will happily provide (within reason) anything that doesn't interfere with something else.

      For example, we have several "hacking labs" on campus, where students are free to do basically whatever they want, regardless of how malicious. Granted, those networks are firewalled off from the rest of campus (and the Internet). We also have PlanetLab, TOR (which I run myself), and a few other projects.

      As for Internet access, we don't have "wide open" like your home DSL (email, for example, must go through our servers for obvious reasons) .. and we block common things like tcp/6666 and tcp/445 outbound .. but other than that, we reguarly field calls from folks that just got $shiny_new_game for their $toy and want to know if we can figure out why voice chat (or whatever) doesn't work.

      Last year we actually had students bring their PS3/Xbox units into a conference room in the IT department, hooked up to our projectors, and had then all plug into a switch where we were running a sniffer .. we had the network engineers, security team, etc. all assembled and basically told the students "go for it" and made several ongoing tweaks to things to ensure they got the best experience (gaming is a latency-sensitive application, we just needed to figure out how to prioritize it with QoS and the packeteer).

      In short .. tl/dr .. sounds like your Uni has a sucky policy. Take it up with the provost .. you are paying to be there, and Internet access is part of your campus experience. If it's not up to par, they need to make changes.

    57. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by dave420 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Hmm. How about just not living on campus? I didn't. I shared a house with a bunch of folks, and we were free to get all the unfiltered internets we could carry, and lived like normal people.

      The uni IT guys have to maintain a network, and so if unrestricted access is given to all, there really is a great risk that their network will become host to all kinds of messed-up crap which stops students from actually studying. So yeah, your 10pm wank might be shelved, but your 9am lecture is actually feasible. Installing a student's own DSL line is fraught with issues regarding telephony infrastructure, and I doubt the university wants loads of telco workers traipsing around messing with wires at all hours because said 10pm wank is not working.

      If there is a problem, talk to the student union. Just don't assume the university is doing the wrong thing - they probably have concerns you've not even thought of.

    58. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by jonwil · · Score: 1

      I dont understand why a college would require that.
      If someone is paying a fortune to attend college and wants to live in an off-campus apartment, why should the college care?

      In some cases the college cares about the student attending classes because e.g. the parents are paying the tuition and care that they are getting their moneys worth but I see no reason why students cant still make it to class even if they are living in off-campus housing.

    59. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And lose 50-60 hours of courses, because most upper division stuff doesn't transfer?

      No thanks.

      Lower division stuff (calc 1, English, etc.) most likely will move between colleges. However, almost nothing past the sophomore level will likely be accepted, unless it is in the same college system (UCLA to UCSB), etc. Even then, there are likely courses who won't be credited, and some colleges demand a "B" or an "A" to transfer, so a gentleman's C won't cut it.

      If this were as simple as "if you don't like it, go elsewhere", that is one thing. However, colleges are a de facto monopoly, and in some, their IT departments are people who have zero clue about anything except calling tech support when a server goes pointed end up. To boot, there are few places nastier than the politics in an uni's IT division. You have the rabid net nannys, the rabid donors who want everything their way because they bought a building, and so on.

      I hate to say this, but the OP pretty much has three options:

      Option #1: Bite the bullet and get a 3G/4G card.

      Option #2: Get the lower division classes out of the way, and get to a school that doesn't treat their students like retarded children or convicted criminals.

      Option #3: This is the option that is mentioned, but NOT recommended. Route your own access. Usually IT departments in unis enough that you can do this. However, if someone snitches on you, the same "sysadmin" who can't figure out an inode versus a registry hive will be bringing the local police and will be trying to arrest/ban/expel any students that he suspects are "hacking" [1].

      Were it me, it would suck to lose the beer money, but I'd take the lumps and go with option #1, perhaps finding a friend off-campus that can be bribed so his/her wireless network can be used for larger file transfers.

      [1]: I have "hacking" in quotes. At one university I visited, I've seen students be arrested because one of them showed the admin that perl could be accessed from the server via URLs.

    60. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      Except in the rare case where rules would be put in after 3-4 years of you being in school (in which case, your almost done, so suck it up), maybe the smart thing is to switch schools before you have advanced classes under your belt.

      If you sit on a problem for 2 years, it's a little late to start bitching.

    61. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      psst. You are paying for an education. Not free Internet. There are many places with Internet access around, go there.

      Unless it says explicitly that students get unlimited free Internet, you are out of line. If you read your contract you would see that. Most universities call them policies. Things like acceptable use policy. They might even go so far as to say these (list of things) are not allowed.

      Remember failure to follow the rules can get you booted from university. With all credits revoked. Welcome to reality. There are consequences for your actions.

    62. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by mcgrew · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing your a lot older than most freshmen.

      I'm guessing you're a lot younger than most freshmen.

    63. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by pla · · Score: 1

      The correct work around for this is to move the hell out of the universities sheltered halls of residence

      As quite a few others have already pointed out, many unis require you to live on-campus. "Move the hell out" simply doesn't exist as an option, short of dropping out. But hey, the university of Phoenix looks just as good on a resume as Harvard, right?


      Your approach may very well get you expelled [snip] No other university or employer is going to touch you [snip] you may even get a criminal record and will screw your life over utterly.

      Wow... So, Drama major, right?

      Running an SSH tunnel to a proxy won't get you expelled, arrested, and branded an untouchable by the corporate world. If anyone cares, you'll get told off by NetOps; In the worst case and as a repeat-offender, they might disconnect your dorm room's network access.


      Not every stupid rule in this world comes down from On High, punishable by an eternity of having your liver eaten by a giant eagle every day. Most rules amount to little more than CYA (with the present restrictions solidly in that category), and if you can get around them, good for you; the school can still claim they officially don't allow it, wink wink nudge nudge.

    64. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Also, because it's hard to fail students, both in terms of the bureaucracy involved, and because they'll come to you and cry, no matter that it is their fault, and that's no fun at all.

      And because if you (as a professor or TA) fail a bunch of students it reflects poorly on YOU and not the students (which is as often right as it is wrong, and anyways unavoidable).

      And because if your UNIVERSITY fails too many students it will get a bad reputation and no one will want to attend anymore (that last bit is what the President of the university will think, anyway).

    65. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by skids · · Score: 1

      The thing most people don't realize about firewalls, is that they are the ultimate bureaucratic busy-work creator. Administrators can have endless meetings and such about exactly what rules to turn on/off. Any person lucky enough to be designated "the firewall guy" could pretty much, if they were particularly slothful and talented at workplace bullshitting, claim that running the firewall is a full-time job, get everything else moved off his plate, and spend his time leisurely sending emails back and forth about what the policy should be for specific hosts or services. Every policy change that effects the entire campus has to be approved in triplicate and then scheduled for an off-hours maintenance window. There's plenty of kicking back and reading Faceb... ehem... keeping up to date on current threats.

      As to the OP, your university is crazy. It's reasonable to block chatty/vulnerable M$ networking ports, and arguably (not in MHO) reasonable to block inbound connections, to people you provide ISP for. It's also reasonable and in fact advisable to throttle P2P protocols that irresponsibly chew through connect-based resources, and to give people trying to do their homework priority over that P2P which you do allow. Almost 100% of the malware development effort these days is targeting the browser, because the malware authors want to get at your PC when it's sitting behind a NAT with no port forwarding turned on. Firewalls offer zero protection against this, and deep-packet IPS systems can only protect the unencrypted content (but are extremely useful for subscribing to dynamic blacklist systems, which is also a reasonable blocking strategy).

      On the bright side, at least it's pretty much a guarantee that anything using TLS over HTTPS ports won't be filtered.

    66. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by prograsm · · Score: 1

      I'm in a similar position at another university and was going to post a similar response to yours.... But you've one-upped us by hosting console sniffing labs. This is a superb idea, rather than wait and see if something isn't working and then respond. It even sounds like a lot of fun, thanks!

    67. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by AF_Cheddar_Head · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Two reasons actually,

      1) Freshman are 18 yo and the university feels to some extent that the younger students are better off in a more controlled environment. Not saying I agree but the uni feels they are and a lot of parents probably agree.

      2) The university has a lot of expensive real estate in those dorm rooms and needs to make sure that they are full and paying for themselves.

      You can decide for yourself which is more important to the university and the accountants.

    68. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing that the teachers should teach their students to get them ready for the work place is proper time management. This should be a great opportunity to teach, not a wasted opportunity.

    69. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by anyGould · · Score: 1

      This. I used to work for a uni and we made every effort to look after people, even those using "unsupported" OSs like Linux. (half of the 3rd line support guys had Linux desktops, so it was only "unsupported" officially - in practice everything worked fine.)

      Seriously - universities don't support Linux?

      Hell, when I went to school (back in the dark ages of the mid-90s), you could walk over to the IT folks, and they'd loan you the Linux install discs! And that was before the current "plug USB stick into computer, reboot and get Ubuntu" ease of use.

      But anyway - if the university is being douches about their firewalls, get your own USB stick/mifi widget, and start making loud noises about how you're having to spend money because IT can't keep a network secure *and* usable at the same time.

    70. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by anyGould · · Score: 1

      Hmm. How about just not living on campus? I didn't. I shared a house with a bunch of folks, and we were free to get all the unfiltered internets we could carry, and lived like normal people.

      Some universities require on-campus living. Rice did back in the 90s, for instance - you weren't permitted to live off-campus for at least your first year.

      University of Alberta (where I went) didn't have that rule, but the on-campus "apartments" (using the term laughingly) did have ethernet hooked up directly to the campus network - in that day it beat the living hell out of 56K modem.

    71. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by anyGould · · Score: 1

      Agreed

      Another fun trick is that they will accept credits from other universities, but only if they deem the content of the course to be "equivalent" to one of their courses. (Meaning you have to find a course in New Uni's catalogue that matches the course you took at Old Uni, otherwise they don't recognize it.)

      Remembering that New Uni wants you to take as many courses as possible from *them*, any variation allows them to refuse you transfer credit.

    72. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You dont pay for network access when you go to school though. You pay for your education; network access is just an added benefit.

      Because network access is an added benefit, and not a requirement, the school can place an AUP on it, saying whatever they want. When you go there/ use Campus internet, you agree to the AUP, whether you read it or not. Its just like an EULA. Nobody reads those damn things, you just click "I Agree" and move on. But that EULA binds you to what you can and cannot do with that company's software. You do something illegal/outside of the bounds of that EULA, Microsoft or whoever it is could haul your ass to court for a violation of license agreement/contract.

      Your campus/college does not have to provide internet access; they could say "its too much money", "too much of a hassle", etc. They provide it to you for convenience. To make you happy. Nobody makes you use the campus internet.

      If you really dont like it, and you live in a college town, I can give you a 99.8 % guarantee that there is some little coffee shop around that has wifi. That is, unless youre in Utah like me, and the nearest one is a Starbucks about 2 to 3 miles down the road..

    73. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by DougBTX · · Score: 1

      By "correct", he probably means something like, "has a strong factual basis".

    74. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      I might as well have just stopped reading your post there, they might lock you in to studying with them for 4 years but you are allowed to move off campus you know.

      Many universities don't allow you to move out of the dorms (the cynic in me says it's for the $$, but who knows). I went to a tiny school in a really rural location and even if we wanted to move out, there were more students in the town than actual people in the town (1400 students, 800 residents), so it would've never worked to have people spread around.

      That must be a wierd thing specific to the US. Here in the UK I cannot think of a single university that forced you to live in halls. In fact, that would probably not even be legal here.

      How would that work with students who were local and chose to carry on living with their parents? Did they have to pay for a room they would not use or do they only open admissions to people who come from outside a certain geographical area?

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    75. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by ciascu · · Score: 1

      Ultimately, if students are unwilling to participate by learning, there isn't, and shouldn't be, anything that tutors can do to force them. If a tutor can't convince a student, who has chosen to sign up, why they should be interested enough to pass the course, there is an underlying problem with the attitude of either the tutor, or far more likely, the student. Overuse of the internet is a symptom, not a cause. While there is a valid point in terms of disruption, many lectures will be filled with students note-taking on laptops. Unless someone's just found a new Youtube gem and everybody else is crowding around, same difference. If so, see above. Bandwidth, fine, but do you expect students outside the lecture not to use social media? Can the cost of access incorporated in the student fees really be justified solely by the unblocked websites? Corralling them into the exam room, blocking internet access, etc. only masks the problem and raises the question - what do their marks signify? Capacity to work when coerced? Not much use for an employer, not much use as a life skill.

    76. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by KhabaLox · · Score: 1

      Oh, right - Because unis make a fortune charging students an arm and a leg for subpar basic services.

      But, isn't it more expensive for the university to maintain filters on their firewall? If the university's (and IT department's) primary goal was to make money, they wouldn't spend extra manpower managing the network this way. If they are doing this, then they must see a reason for it other than profit (whether that reason is right or wrong). It sounds to me like they are just doing some ham-fisted QoS management.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    77. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      Running an SSH tunnel to a proxy won't get you expelled, arrested, and branded an untouchable by the corporate world. If anyone cares, you'll get told off by NetOps; In the worst case and as a repeat-offender, they might disconnect your dorm room's network access.

      Did you read my post? I did say the correct approach was to try something like this when I talked about VPN. I was thinking that the person I replied to would take more drastic action to bypass his universities restriction.

      As quite a few others have already pointed out, many unis require you to live on-campus.

      To be honest, I still have a hard time believing this. Here in the UK not a single university in the country operates such a restriction, most have less accommodation than they need so force some (most, in many cases) students to live off campus.

      I just did a quick search and found that Harvard does seem to let you live off campus apart from in your first year, judging by the link here: http://www.admissions.college.harvard.edu/about/faq.html#11

      As I said, I spent a year in university halls then got the hell out as quick as I could, but I am surprised the force you to live on campus even in your freshman year.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    78. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by KhabaLox · · Score: 1

      I can confirm this. I was at Rice from 1993 to 2000 (TFW!). During that time you were required to live on campus for your freshmen year. A significant portion of people got booted off campus their sophomore year, but you were all but guaranteed housing for years 3 and 4, if you wanted to pay for it. Since then they have expanded housing, so there may be space for all students for all 4 years. Certainly back in the 1990s most people desired to live on campus, though we didn't have filtered internet. Of course, back then we were just downloading binaries off of USENET, not sharing video torrents.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    79. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Can't the students just get their own ISP for use at home? Blocking somethingawful sounds fine to me, is there actually any academic content there? If not then the students access it on their own dime instead of piggybacking on university access. If the students are in dorms and have no other access, well then that's all part of being a student and they undoubtedly have more internet access at school than more people have at their day-to-day job after school.

      Granted if this were a major university it would be a lot more open because the researchers would need broader access during working hours and faculty have a lot of clout than at a teaching college.

    80. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Jumperalex · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean, "unless the author is paying for their tuition, room and board themselves ..." a scholarship means someone else is paying and thus gets a say in the matter. But if the student is paying the bill the student gets a say in the service.

      Or am I missing something in your implication. It has been a while since I was at school and when I did I actually did have a "full ride" in the form of a full government funded education ... and it was in 1990 when there was nothing to filter ;-)

      --
      If you can't be good, be good at it!
    81. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I think part of that rule is the "let's build character" rule. You're expected to live in sub-standard housing, put up with idiots that you can't move away from, parties at 3am (a bad thing if you actually want an education), put up with awful dorm food, etc. Like summer camp but with more wildlife and dirt. And parents who are footing the bill like this.

      So ya, if it's not good enough and the parents who are paying are offended and outraged, then the parents can either pay for the 3G service, pay for a different university, or pay for the supply of porn on actual paper instead of on the net. If the student is not paying the bills then the student has little say in the matter.

    82. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I also work at a very large public .edu, and our border filtering consists of blocking stuff that's not supposed to be on the open Internet (e.g., common Windows networking ports) and that's about it. A peer at an institution in the next state over told me that her .edu actively searches for and blocks pornography, but that struck me as a potential First Amendment issue. Anyway, in spite of at least one very public case of child pornography on our network from a few years back, we still leave things about as open as reasonably possible.

      Dorms are the exception. However, students who live in the dorm sign a written agreement that they will not host services on their computer accessible to outside our university. This is partially enforced by a firewall and traffic analysis. Still, with gigabit directly to the border, the dorms don't have it all that bad.

    83. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give me a break. The telco's don't "mess around" with wires at all hours. They install/repair/etc during normal business hours. The wires should already be present given most universities have telephone lines going into each dorm room. Or they did a couple years ago.

      There isn't any good reason that a school network shouldn't be operated the same way a telco operates. Each room should have a dedicated connection. You get up to 5Mbps if you pay $x more. If you want up to 10Mbps you pay $x. If don't want to pay maybe you get nothing at all or you get only a basic 1.5Mbps connection.

      If the university is still having trouble maintaining the network they haven't invested in the network sufficiently. I recall my university was utterly under investing in the network. They did everything they could to avoid it and would say things like "the government is paying for it" just because a large portion of the students were subsidized and it was a 'public' state university. The students still PAID good money and there is no reason they could not have charged more for a faster Internet offering.

      They had two t1 lines for a student population of about 5k students. This was in 2003. In comparison my off-campus apartment had a fiber to the home connection just a few blocks from campus. We got 3x the speed of the connections for the entire non-academic side of campus. So, 3Mbps for an entire network in 2003 compared to 10Mbps if you moved three blocks away and were actually closer to the academic side of campus... which would you choose? And before you say that t1 was faster up. It wasn't. We got 2Mbps up. My shared apartment with own room, with utilities, with eletric, with full on cable, cost less than living "on campus".

      Given the amount of money they invested in managment technologies from Cisco and others I can't believe it wasn't cheaper to just BUY more bandwidth.

    84. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      But the bad publicity has to come off looking bad. A bunch of frat boys complaining that they can't get free access to porn or look at dead bodies on somethingawful won't generate bad publicity. They'd have to show that they were denied access to important educational resources, legitimate news sites, etc.

    85. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The student is not the customer. The parents pay the tuition and have a lot more say, the profs who bring in grants have more say, the alumni trust foundation members have more say, etc.

    86. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

      Partly it’s about the experience. I attended 2 colleges.

      The first, basically required everybody to live on campus and to turn in their car’s license plates.

      In the second, almost everybody (and I included those who lived on campus) departed for home on Thursday evening and came back Sunday night.

      The first was a better learning experience. Trapping a lot of young energetic students in one place created a lot of interesting experiences. Even “mindless” activities had a fair amount of intellectual side conversation. A real hot house environment. It’s one thing a lot of people miss when they talk about the new online learning opportunities. Some of the benefit comes from the enivomrent.

      The second place was much more sterile. I think I got as good of an education in the second place, but I was more mature and really had to focus to find challenges.

    87. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by treeves · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing you are the same age as a freshman.

      Not really, but now we've covered every possibility.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    88. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by sylvandb · · Score: 1

      How long before you decide to rail against the cafeteria for not offering you the foods you want, prepared how you want, and for a subsidized price too?

      As soon as they act with similar stupidity as locking out the internet. Say for example, telling me I have to be there for lunch promptly at 1:50pm, and the only thing they'll be serving at that time is peanut butter. Only peanut butter.

      Oh, and some schools living on campus IS a requirement.

    89. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by sylvandb · · Score: 1

      An opinion, by nature, cannot be "correct". It can either agree or disagree with the opinions of others.

      That opinion presumes no impartial standard of truth. Counter example: an opinion about a provable fact. It doesn't matter how much I announce my opinion that gravity does not exist or that the world is planar. Those opinions are incorrect. Whereas if it is my opinion (and it is) that gravity does exist and that the world is an oblate spheroid then my opinions agree with the facts and are thus correct.

      Unless of course your opinion is that facts are simply widely shared opinions. In that case there is no "correct" and you are, of course, entitled to your opinion.

    90. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by dweller_below · · Score: 1

      I am also security @ public .edu. Our approach to security and network monitoring is similar to the parent's. At one point, I made a YouTube video on USU's approach to security monitoring: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQc5FU_jqCk Basically, we feel that you can't have good thinkers, or great researchers if you tighten the screws too tight. Miles

    91. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Australia (where this university is) the age of majority is 18, the minimum university entry age is 17, but due to where birthdays fall normally in the year, plus break years people often take to travel etc. Almost all students are over 18, self funding their studies through paid employment etc. When I last saw the stats 80% of University students in Australia were not financially supported by their parents but instead paying directly.

      So the student is the customer, also our privacy laws don't allow parents to access any records/have any say in their children's education at this age.

      Alumni donators might have a lot of sway however.

      PS. I'm not the poster, but a lecturer who works at this university. The situation is.. fucked. A large portion of academic staff are working from home as the "Internet" access here is not useful for research. Yes, I am looking for a new job.

    92. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by grim4593 · · Score: 1

      If it was that much of an issue the university should connect their dorms to a separated dedicated internet line rather than the vital feed of their university network.

    93. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Alamais · · Score: 1

      People live on campus, take breaks, etc. A proper university network allows for legal recreational use as long as it does not interfere with 'work' uses (which can be a problem these days even sans torrenting, if a bunch of students are trying to stream Netflix/youtube/whatever videos at once).

    94. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rather painfully, at my college in the US, I live about 10 miles away (in the same town) and was required to live (or, at least, pay to live) in the dormitories my entire freshman year, and pay for a meal plan at the cafeteria - the only exceptions are appealed for, or below a certain income level. It's completely ridiculous, and the majority of off-campus housing is equitable or less in cost than the dormitories yearly, to say nothing of the meal plan requirement. I've spoken to students from several other colleges, and it's a rather typical thing in the US, for what I've heard.

    95. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by bucky0 · · Score: 1

      I don't think we're that far apart. Certainly the idea that a university should ban everything is stupid. I was just saying that people who dedicate their lives to teaching appreciate students that pay attention and succeed. Saying: "why should the teachers care if the students or pass" disregards why those people enter education compared to other careers

      --

      -Bucky
    96. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by ciascu · · Score: 1

      That's a fair comment. I recently had difficulties working remotely (necessarily) within a student network, primarily as the university erred on the side of caution maybe moreso than most. While I got the logic, it probably left me a little biased in this regard :) I've also come across a number of situations where students end up being tied into university, rather than self, directed learning.

      Absolutely, it is important, and I don't think the grandparent made the point that students must take responsibility for their learning in the most constructive way. It would be a pretty awful profession to be in if you didn't care about students, and surely education is most effective when it is a co-operative act. So, apologies, I think we agree.

    97. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      and we block common things like tcp/6666

      Students/staff needing to connect to their favorite IRC server that runs on port 6666, to join an online conference/chat might not feel that this is so open.

      It's important to remember: certain applications have well-known port numbers, However; the port number is not required to be used for a specific application; it's perfectly legitimate to utilize port 445 for purposes that have nothing to do with file sharing; it's perfectly valid to utilize port 25 for purposes that have nothing to do with SMTP.

      In fact, it's valid to connect out with these used as the ephemeral source port for the connection.

      Sometimes it makes sense to block these numbers on the destination traffic for incoming traffic; as a matter of policy, you can say that servers on your network listening on port 25 must always be SMTP servers.

      But you don't get to dictate to other remote networks, what certain port numbers are used for.

      And blocking any such port number is broken internet connectivity.

    98. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      I couldn't care less if my students are using facebook or youtube. As long as they don't disturb or distract the rest, they're free to fail as badly as they want. Or they may not fail if they already know the stuff in class. Doesn't really affect me. I'm there for the students that *do* care.

    99. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by dave420 · · Score: 1

      So dorms shouldn't have access to the university network. Genius.

    100. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by grim4593 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. With systems like Blackboard, electronic libraries, and online classes students shouldn't have to be on the university intranet to get their work done.

    101. Re:It's their bandwidth ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is also possible that the IT department "over-implemented" some stuffed shirts decree just to get them shot down. Its politics all the way down

  2. ssh is permitted? by tanveer1979 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In that case buy a ssh shell minimal hosting account for 2-3$/month.
    Create a tunnel.
    And browse.

    If paid public VPN services are allowed, you can also subscribe to such services. Of course, your browsing will be slower.

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
    1. Re:ssh is permitted? by hobarrera · · Score: 2

      I do this exactly. I have static IP at home, and a personal server elsewhere, so "ssh -D", and "tsocks" are an EXCELENT combo.

    2. Re:ssh is permitted? by toutankh · · Score: 2

      I would expect that SSH is forbidden and that everything has to go through the university's web proxy.
      That is the situation I was facing a few years ago when I lived on a college campus. The solution I found was called desproxy and apparently it still exists. Worked wonders with me.

    3. Re:ssh is permitted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The solution then is to use port 443 to run SSH. I have a free trial of Amazon EC2 I use for that kind of thing. The speeds are good, you can even watch YouTube with relatively little buffering. If anyone is interested I have it set up:

      Browser
      v
      SSH Socks Proxy
      v
      corkscrew (software to send ssh through an http proxy, you can also use PUTTY on windows for this)
      v
      CNTLM (you may not need this but I do because the proxy I go through uses NTLM authentication)
      v
      SSH server running on port 443.

    4. Re:ssh is permitted? by Kagetsuki · · Score: 0

      I'll second corkscrew. Someone please mod this AC up.

    5. Re:ssh is permitted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A colleague once told me about an application that tunnels over DNS.
      It should also work in wireless networks in hotels that redirect all traffic to their own website until you pay.

    6. Re:ssh is permitted? by BlueScreenO'Life · · Score: 1
      Desproxy didn't work for me. The Microsoft proxy they had at my college didn't dance with it.

      As for getting around the firewall, what I've done in the past when I needed that was to tether to my phone (through wifi if possible, for discretion).

    7. Re:ssh is permitted? by mverwijs · · Score: 5, Informative

      sslh for the win!

      Just 'apt-get install sslh', have it run on port 443. It will forward HTTPS traffic to your apache server running on whatever port you run it on, while forwarding ssh traffic to sshd.

      It's just.... beautiful.

    8. Re:ssh is permitted? by icebraining · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, I've used iodine successfully in the past. You need to get your own domain, though.

      You know the nice part? It uses their DNS servers to tunnel your data ;)

    9. Re:ssh is permitted? by Nexus+Unplugged · · Score: 1

      My high school actually blocked port 443. No logging into your email, no SSL at all. They even dropped SSH packets going over port 80. It was terrible. Thank god my university doesn't censor a thing.

    10. Re:ssh is permitted? by swarsron · · Score: 1

      Put Foxyproxy on top of that list. It's an extension for firefox to enably easy proxy setting switching and has an option to route all dns request through a chosen proxy.

    11. Re:ssh is permitted? by Matador · · Score: 0

      Exactly. FoxyProxy to a localhost (SOCKS 5) ssh tunnel.
      Then do about:config on FF and set DNS to use proxy, so even your DNS requests are secure.
      As others wrote, have sshd listen on 80/443 on some remote box, could be a home linux server w/ DynDNS, EC2 instance (4c/hr), or a VPS for $2-3/month.

    12. Re:ssh is permitted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In that case buy a ssh shell minimal hosting account for 2-3$/month.
      Create a tunnel.
      And browse.

      If paid public VPN services are allowed, you can also subscribe to such services. Of course, your browsing will be slower.

      If the submitter would post a link to the actual access policy terms & conditions, then we could make good suggestions. While your post is the first thing that comes to mind, it's probably specifically prohibited. And there's a pretty good chance that the firewall and proxy will prevent use of any VPN tunnels, and if so trying to set one up might throw an alarm and get the student in trouble.

      So without further information, the only reasonable answer to the submitter is "Find a different way to get online".

    13. Re:ssh is permitted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try with OpenVPN first. I have a german server (I live in Denmark) with 100/100 MBit, and the internet is fairly snappy from school.

    14. Re:ssh is permitted? by scubamage · · Score: 1

      Agreed. If speed isn't an issue, I used to have a dial up account that I used in my dorm room specifically because gaming servers were verboten on the campus internet, and dialup is cheap these days.

    15. Re:ssh is permitted? by Entropius · · Score: 3, Informative

      How can they forbid ssh and still call themselves a university?

      SSH'ing offsite is a basic prerequisite for all sorts of research in the physical sciences. It's an operation so basic that folks in physics don't even admit the possibility that someone would want to block it.

      At my old university the public (no logon required) wifi was heavily port-filtered. They blocked port 110, for instance -- no POP mail. But they left open SSH, knowing that people relied on it to get work done.

    16. Re:ssh is permitted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If all else fails there is also the possibility to run SSH over a DNS tunnel. It is a bit crazy but it works.

      http://www.splitbrain.org/blog/2008-11/02-dns_tunneling_made_simple

    17. Re:ssh is permitted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Browser
      v
      SSH Socks Proxy
      v
      Automated MITM attack (Yes, you *do* get an invalid cert. That's your warning that you're being spied on. What will you do about it when all encrypted traffic is blocked unless it is MITMed?)
      v
      BLOCKED. Also, possibly in some trouble for attempting to evade firewalls.

      This is how my workplace is configured...

    18. Re:ssh is permitted? by overlordofmu · · Score: 1

      You can also do that with "about:config" on firefox. No plug-in required.

      network.proxy.socks_remote_dns - set it to TRUE

    19. Re:ssh is permitted? by tokul · · Score: 1

      ssh is permitted?

      No. If competent people design their firewall rules and limit access from internal to external, they don't trust user on internal network. Only whitelisted services will be allowed and even whitelisted ones will have to pass content filtering/logging proxy.

      If liberal academics don't like paranoid networks, they are free to implement own network with wifi and 4G routers. Or complain about network control abuse by support staff to dean.

    20. Re:ssh is permitted? by forkfail · · Score: 1

      So - secure communications is part of the liberal conspiracy?

      What are you smoking?

      --
      Check your premises.
    21. Re:ssh is permitted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have the same setup, except instead of a static IP I use the free service from DynDNS (http://www.dyn.com) to manage my dynamic IP.

    22. Re:ssh is permitted? by SecurityTheatre · · Score: 1

      You do realize that the most common configuration for "web-proxy-only" Internet is to use WCCP to redirect all port 80 and port 443 traffic to the proxy server and/or block them all and require all web traffic to go through your magic proxy via Browser-configured proxy server.

      Using port 443 is neat and all, but won't work in most locked-down environments I've seen.

    23. Re:ssh is permitted? by Cyner · · Score: 1

      Sure, circumventing the college's acceptable use policy would never get him in any trouble; couldn't possibly get him kicked out even. This is definitely an insightful, helpful, and responsible response to the problem posed. It is not appropriate to address the problem through proper channels; or remind the IT Department that they exist to serve, support, and enable the educational purposes of the college.

      --
      FreeBSD.org - The power to serve
    24. Re:ssh is permitted? by BitterOak · · Score: 1

      How can they forbid ssh and still call themselves a university?

      SSH'ing offsite is a basic prerequisite for all sorts of research in the physical sciences. It's an operation so basic that folks in physics don't even admit the possibility that someone would want to block it.

      At my old university the public (no logon required) wifi was heavily port-filtered. They blocked port 110, for instance -- no POP mail. But they left open SSH, knowing that people relied on it to get work done.

      What many universities do is they allow ssh, but they use a firewall with a built-in ssh decryptor. Essentially the firewall acts as a man in the middle. The plaintext never leaves the firewall, but it is used in applying firewall rules which can include a prohibition on tunneling port 80 and the like. So, whenever you ssh off campus, the key fingerprint is that of the firewall, not the off campus server. You can check for MITM attacks occurring off campus by accessing a web interface to the firewall which will show you the remote key fingerprint for the host you are connecting to. It's quite clever actually.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    25. Re:ssh is permitted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any netflow probe, will quickly show dns data between your lan ip, and their dns as being extremely high.... id be tapping on your shoulder quickly :)

    26. Re:ssh is permitted? by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Only if you bothered to look. I seriously doubt most network admins will.

      In fact, considering that most paid wifi networks I've seen - including ones owned by major ISPs - use captive portals and block all connections but still let this pass, I seriously doubt most network admins are even competent enough to know it can be done in the first place.

    27. Re:ssh is permitted? by tokul · · Score: 1

      So - secure communications is part of the liberal conspiracy?

      No. Networks must be secure, but if you give too much control to security guys, they start abusing their position. In this case user talked about excessive restrictions on academic network. If network support applied same 'whitelisted ports only and only through proxy' policy as used on business networks, they abused their position. Academic network provides service to students. It is owned by community and not by network admins. Network users are complaining. This means that network security is too tight.

    28. Re:ssh is permitted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "ssh -ND 9998 username@website"

      Set the browser to use a SOCKS prozy on localhost:9998

    29. Re:ssh is permitted? by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      SSL on port 80 isn't standard practice, but is in spec for http. Do they MITM everything?

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    30. Re:ssh is permitted? by SecurityTheatre · · Score: 1

      Well, this is a very old comment, but WCCP works by forcing all traffic on 80 and 443 to transit a transparent proxy device. Some businesses do MITM everything, others may pass HTTPS traffic, but only to approved sites. It is quite seldom that you would bother to implement web filtering and then simply leave web ports wide open for anyone to bypass easily, although I'm sure it's done out of sheer administrative malaise sometimes. :-)

  3. Tributes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Become friends with a member of the IT department. Alcohol can go a long way in beginning an IT related friendship.

    1. Re:Tributes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This. Or, if your university has a Networking section/sub-section, start there.

      I work in IT at a university and although we do have some restrictions on websites (pornography and cheating websites), we also have an appeals process that is open to anyone. I find it silly that they would block off a huge host of seemingly random websites for "safety" reasons, except maybe on university-owned computers open to the public (even then, we just put DeepFreeze on ours).

      Another solution would be to get someone with some clout on your side. If your university is like most others, anytime someone important gets huffy over a subject people immediately fold to avoid confrontation. I'm talking about staff though, not academic departments (no one cares about those).

    2. Re:Tributes by westlake · · Score: 1

      Become friends with a member of the IT department. Alcohol can go a long way in beginning an IT related friendship.

      Get your friend in IT fired and you won't have any friends in IT.

    3. Re:Tributes by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      I find it silly that they would block off a huge host of seemingly random websites for "safety" reasons...

      I don't. Whenever you see such a policy, it means that someone who doesn't know WTF they are talking about established the policy.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    4. Re:Tributes by bigbangnet · · Score: 1

      Not unless the IT department is closely monitored by their supervisors and those same people are really paranoid which i think they are at this time of age. Well I am where I work and I make sure no one fucks with my firewall and network...a good use of a network monitor really helps. I use fear and I'm immune to beer so forget alcohol. Unless you shove it down my throat by 4 nude girls I could let some things go.

    5. Re:Tributes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or scantily clad, nubile, college-girls...

    6. Re:Tributes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went to a private university and they heavily restricted the internet to could access:

      1) Symantic anti-virus(which you have no access to and runs whenever it wants to/is told to) installed on all computers before being allowed to access the internet

      2) logging in to their network through their portal(for tracking)

      3) making you run a program before all of this that scans for all known P2P file sharing programs, and will not allow connection to the internet until said software was removed completely

      And after all of this if you circumvent their security you loose internet for one semester for your first offense, a year for your second, and no more internet for you for their third strike.

      It was fast internet, but let me tell you I moved off campus as soon as I could and got the "real" internet back =D
       

  4. Grow Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    The University probably has policies about Internet Access that the IT Manager is obliged to enforce. Go about it the correct way and see if you can get the policies changed instead of acting like its your right to have access to everything you want, just because YOU want it

    1. Re:Grow Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, is the poster not paying for a service? Is it just being provided for free? I think you may be the one needing to grow up.

    2. Re:Grow Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No,
      Grow up and go about this like an adult. I won this fight at Ohio State. Compile a hosrt (3-5 reason list) of why this is a bad thing. Make for damn sure that it represents minorities. For me, actually being handicapped, breaking XDMCP was a major problem; it meant that I had to walk half way across campus to do my job. (VMS should not be taunted, just respected). So, I got a list of good reasons, a dozen pizzas 200 flyers and about 300 people to come talk to the vice provost about our frustrations with the new firewall. Net result. Firewall restrictions got much more sane, UberBitch dorm network manager got an attitude adjustment, and the OSU network people started talking to their customers a little more. Greanted, it looked like an insurrection, but people who show up to bitch about a firewall aren't generally drunk. It worked remarkably adequately, except for the actual implementation of the SOCKS proxy.

    3. Re:Grow Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The University probably has policies about Internet Access that the IT Manager is obliged to enforce. Go about it the correct way and see if you can get the policies changed instead of acting like its your right to have access to everything you want, just because YOU'RE PAYING for it

      FTFY.

    4. Re:Grow Up by FictionPimp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's all fun and games to think that way. Until other people who are paying for that access bitch. Before we filtered content, we would get almost daily complaints from students about people watching porn in the library, or at a kiosk, or the guy who sat in our public area running a business (not a student, but he did pay for a gym membership so he is a paying customer....).

      We would never have enough information to find and catch these people, so we would have to run around with our little "acceptable use policy" trying to find them and get them to sign it. Then hope that if they did it again, we would get enough notice to find them again and get them to sign it... again(you know the administration isn't going to expel a student over it...).

      Then one day a big shot had his kid with him and she saw a student watching some really bad porn. Now we have content filters. (At least that's the story I'm told when I was told to implement the filters). The best part was that big shot thought we always had the filters. They were really mad that IT didn't take it on ourselves to filter content.

    5. Re:Grow Up by 4pins · · Score: 1

      When I went to college the residency halls had separate Internet access that they were not allowed to filter. This left the university free to protect the libraries and the labs while letting people do whatever they liked in the privacy of their own rooms. It worked surprisingly well!

      An option to present to the administration.

      --
      I will not mourn that which I never had to lose. - Unknown
    6. Re:Grow Up by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      We don't filter the dorms at this time, just all wireless on campus, labs, and kiosks.

  5. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Buy VPS for about $5 (you can catch some specials $15/year for 128mb RAM / 10gb disk / 500gb bandwidth)
    2. Have SSH listen on 25/tcp, 80/tcp, 443/tcp and others
    3. ?????????
    4. YOU CAN NOW LOOK AT SOMETHINGAWFUL WHILE AT SCHOOL!!!!

    1. Re:LOL by allo · · Score: 1

      > port 25/tcp
      first thing i would filter as a network admin building a restrictive firewall. just think about all the spambots on student's pcs

  6. get over it by bloodhawk · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If you want unrestricted web access then pay for your own connection. Don't bitch about IT people doing their job properly, their primary goal is not to be an ISP for you to surf the web. Most corporates and government agencies all apply these so called "draconian" restrictions on thier staff and it isn't because they are all bastards. Basically your average user can be trusted about half the distance you can kick them, they all think they know what they are doing until something goes wrong then it is IT's fault for not protecting them.

    1. Re:get over it by ryanov · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You imagine he's going to school for free, do you? I work in university IT and understand the pros and cons and plusses and minuses, and while we don't do this, we do some of our own foolish things. However, I don't think for a second that the students aren't already paying for this connection.

    2. Re:get over it by kikito · · Score: 0

      No, it's because they are all bastards.

    3. Re:get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I am also in university IT. The students are NOT paying for a free unlimited Internet connection. They are paying for their degree, and can expect Internet access relevant to their degree, nothing more. Since a large amount of University funding comes from tax payers, why should they/we foot the bill for students to waste terabytes of data on Youtube and torrents?

    4. Re:get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      that's the thing

      an it-department of an university is expected to manage the network -including- connections to the outside world.

      Simply closing the network - while fullfilling the goal of protection - is not what they are expected to do as work!

      I could also put my car in a garage and throw the keys away - voÃlÃ, nil chance of accidents with my car.

    5. Re:get over it by ryanov · · Score: 1

      No, but I'd hardly call his university's situation the same thing as what you're talking about. Maybe what he's really out to do is what you're saying, but I could see that content filtering annoying me (as the filtering at my university commonly does if I try to look for anything related to security which is supposed to be part of my job function) and that's not what I'm up to.

    6. Re:get over it by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      This is BS.
      I live in a country with free public universities, yet I pay more than the average salary to go to a private one, and one of the thing they have to offer is "internet access in every building via WI-FI". An HTTP proxy is not real internet access.
      Additionally, I find that there are lectures on free speach and free internet given by the university all the time, yet I can't even open some specific programming sites, or use external e-mail.

      When you complain about e-mail being blocked, they respone that they give you a webmail interface for a university-only email account.

      That's not what people pay for, at all.

    7. Re:get over it by smash · · Score: 1, Informative

      NO, school isn't free. However, the money pays for tuition and course materials, not free internet porn.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    8. Re:get over it by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because youtube and torrents are part of using the internet.

      What part of education do you not understand?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    9. Re:get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you would find they would be paying a great deal more for unrestricted access. With that goes a raft of extra support problems, bandwidth consuption etc etc. I work in a large It department, we provide internet access for work purposes, we trialled less restrictive access for a 3 months as one of the directors thought our draconian ways were unfair and had no basis, we then watched as our IT costs, support calls and ISP connection costs all went through the roof. We are now back to using the standard filtering with internet blacklists, it isn't perfect, but then it is hard to get the perfect balance.

    10. Re:Get over it by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Maybe the slashbots have been unfairly filtered from being able to do their work before, (I have, on multiple occasions.) Or maybe in this case they'ce seen the damage this sort of resrtiction can cause in the context of education and they do not approve.

      I, personaly have issues with the groupthink, Ive even been m

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    11. Re:get over it by Peter+Bortas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "draconian" restrictions are there because someone in IT/management is lazy or has twisted viewes about what moral powers they should have over students. In other words because they are bastards.

      /ex-University sysadm

    12. Re:Get over it by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Sorry, accidently hit submit instead of preview... ...moddez down for saying it even exists. However, you cannot blame this as a groupthink invention. The maintenance of these restrictions is a waste of resources. If a student pay tuituion and fails, it is not the fault of the IT dept for failing to bl

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    13. Re:get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you should go elsewhere, and tell them why. If enough people do so, they will rethink their policy.
      Of course you might also be able to sue them for false advertising. However IANAL and don't know whether this is indeed possible.

    14. Re:get over it by e70838 · · Score: 2

      Censorship has never worked whatever the energy wasted in it. There is a lot of pedagogical material on youtube.

      You are wasting your time and the time of the students for a motivation that smells a bit like Nazism.

      The single excuse I give you is that it teaches student how to bypass censorship.

    15. Re:Get over it by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Oh, for f's sake. Im sorry, this is my fault for missing the preview button. No hard feelings for making fun of my incompetence.

      In short, let the student fail if he wants to waste time. Policiing the internet is not the job of a University iT dept and the groupthink agreeing with that doesn't make it wrong.

      Personnaly I'd rather my tuition and/or tax money not have a bloody thing to do with censoring the internet. Afterall, there are no guarantees anybody will graduate. This is not an issue of fairness.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    16. Re:get over it by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Most corporates and government agencies all apply these so called "draconian" restrictions on thier staff and it isn't because they are all bastards.

      This isn't a corporation, it is a facility for education. There are no profits to protect, here, nor is it their job to protect the students from their own habits. It's a waste of time and resources for IT to even be worrying about this.

      The word 'draconian' didn't come about just because people's eyebrows are furrowed.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    17. Re:get over it by sulimma · · Score: 2

      Yes. But there also is research on porn.

      It is a long time that I have been to university, but I have similar trouble with customers. Our Engineers waste a lot of time trying to get software we developed for a customer to the customers engineers because any of the following occur frequently:

      * dropbox is blocked
      * .exe and .dll are not allowed in e-mail
      * our hoster is in a class A net blacklisted by customers spam-filter
      * we chose a file name that matches some regular expression deemed dangerous by their IT staff
      * sftp is blocked
      and so on, and so on

      This is fine, if there is a clear procedure handling these exceptions. (e.g. if a researcher writing a paper on porn site can walk up to the IT appartment and get a list of sites opened for his computer within in minutes.) But ultimately these restrictions serve no real purpose and just waste a lot of money in the form of time lost by both IT, administrative and research staff.

      Also, I wonder if research really works, if researches have to convince a censoring body that there request to access a site is legitimate before they can proceed with their research. (Yes sir, gamesexpert.com is not a sex site!)

    18. Re:get over it by ToadProphet · · Score: 2

      And how much does it cost to setup and maintain those filters vs. give unlimited access?

      --
      It's on America's tortured brow, That Mickey Mouse has grown up a cow
    19. Re:Get over it by AgNO3 · · Score: 1

      Small college might not have anymore connection then an oc3. They probably need to limit based on the least common denominator just to make sure they have enough bandwidth for basic internet. (scale connection as college size goes up.) its not like all colleges have multiple fiber connections to the backbone.

      --
      OMG Ponies!!! with Glitter!!!! I miss Pink :-(
    20. Re:get over it by icebraining · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because, funnily enough, important education content like Stanford's machine learning lectures are available exactly via Youtube and torrents: http://see.stanford.edu/see/lecturelist.aspx?coll=348ca38a-3a6d-4052-937d-cb017338d7b1

    21. Re:get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When I went to school I used ssh and ftp quite frequently to transfer files to and from home and to compile software assignments on my home server.
      I could have jumped through hoops and spend late evenings at school but I didn't have to because the schools IT department was actually competent.
      Same thing at work. I whenever I like to I can access my workplaces VPN to transfer CAD projects and sources and also access the internal web-pages.
      When I re-installed my home computer I decided to not set up the VPN again, I live within walking distance form the office and I have found that I prefer to be at the office slightly more and have a strict separation between home-time and work-time. Co-worker with family feels a bit differently since the family appreciates when he is home even if he spends the time home working.

      Do you see how a competent IT-department have managed to make several peoples life more convenient? I'm not saying that you should just open up your network to anything, keeping the network free from bad stuff is important but allowing outgoing ssh/ftp/sftp and other basic connections is not likely to harm anyone and will make life a lot easier for the students with some basic computer knowledge.
      File hosting sites like rapidshare adn such is a grey area I guess, they could be useful for students that don't know how to set up a home server but they are also open for abuse and they don't really solve anything that a good e-mail service can't take care of.

      So, other IT-departments can set up way more useable networks without any real problems, why can't yours? Have you chosen the wrong technology, are you understaffed or are you just incompetent and need more training?

    22. Re:Get over it by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      They don't have enough resources to support their students, so blocking somethingawful is the solution?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    23. Re:get over it by sir-gold · · Score: 1

      students are not staff, and universities are not corporations or government offices Too many schools nowadays are forgetting that the students are the customers. If the school charges a "technology" fee separate from tuition, then the school is operating a separate "technology" service. Why are the students not allowed to have full access to a service that they are forced to pay upwards of $75/semester for?

    24. Re:Get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please tell me what the sites he listed have to do with his education? Is it just in his dorm or the labs? Did he even say? So yeah it is a solution. Since when is youtube a valid academic source of information? Whats his major? Do you know to even smartly comment on what is actually blocked and not blocked or how its being blocked? Is it a state school that's highly tax subsidized? Where his tutition pays still only a fraction of the cost of the education regardless of scholarships? I have been on site at places where just all the people streaming pandora has put enough load on the network to cause problems when added to the normal course of work network use.

    25. Re:get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why is that bullshit a "law"?

      it seems only so assholes like you can derail a conversation by bringing it up

      admittedly e70838 (gp) isn't terribly insightful with his Nazi implication

    26. Re:Get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      go suck a dick. honestly, just do it.

      also, CAPTCHA = "obscene"

    27. Re:get over it by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Would you advocate or approve of similar restrictions on the university library?

      What's the difference?

    28. Re:Get over it by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

      > In short, let the student fail if he wants to waste time. Policiing
      > the internet is not the job of a University iT dept and the
      > groupthink agreeing with that doesn't make it wrong.

      Do you have any clue how much it costs to provide high bandwidth 24x7? And the university probably has its business systems on the same internet connection at the same speed. A dedicated business connection with a decent SLA (Service Level Agreement) costs a helluva lot more than a residential "best effort" ADSL or cable connection. When a residential 25 or 50 megabit connection crawls along at 1 megabit under high load, too bad. On a business connection with an SLA, the ISP refunds a big chunk of money to the customer. To guarantee this, the ISP provides a *DEDICATED* (read f***ing expensive) dedicated line.

      Actually, even residential cable/ADSL is expensive in North America. Try renting a suite off-campus and getting an unlimited internet connection. Now double or triple that price, and you'll have an idea what it would cost the university to provide it to you as reliable access. Now imagine every student's tuition going up by that amount. Consider this a lesson in real life.

      The IT department isn't "policing the internet". They're following orders from the university management, which is trying to stay within budget.

      --

      I'm not repeating myself
      I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
    29. Re:get over it by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      Getting porn through firewalls is the easy part. Where I work we have a restrictive policy (http/https only with authenticated filtering proxy). And if I wanted porn, I could get it anytime. Not all sites are filtered and if they are, I just need a simple web proxy (like phproxy or glype).
      Actually useful stuff like SSH, webmails, Dropbox, git/svn/cvs/hg, ntp, etc... are much more difficult to work around.

    30. Re:get over it by Haeleth · · Score: 1

      ultimately these restrictions serve no real purpose and just waste a lot of money in the form of time lost by both IT, administrative and research staff.

      I'd be interested to see what evidence you have to support this claim. Dealing with e.g. the malware infestations and DMCA threats inevitably caused by people taking advantage of a network not blocking sketchy websites would probably also waste a lot of money and time.

      Are you really claiming that there are more researchers legitimately investigating porn websites than there are horny frat boys who just want to jerk off in their dorm rooms and then steal a movie for later? More software companies who have not figured out a better way to deliver their product than emailing it to random employees than random employees who would install every "screensaver" emailed to them by a criminal? Really? Because that sure sounds pretty implausible to me.

    31. Re:get over it by sulimma · · Score: 1

      > Are you really claiming that there are more researchers legitimately investigating porn websites than there are horny frat boys who just want to jerk off in their dorm rooms
      No. But I am claiming, that 1000 frat boys jerking of in their dorm do less harm, than one legitimiate research who can't do his work. If it were just porns, things would be easy. The point is, that in all sorts of areas administration tries to seperate useful from useless sites, but the people doing that have no way of knowing what will be required by their staff. (It might be porn for researcher X, a shopping site for researcher Y, slashdot for another one. I could imagine that access to warez websites has been important to the research of Lawrence Lessig.)
      So instead they should concentrate on detectign and filtering malware and not filter based on content.

      > More software companies who have not figured out a better way to deliver their product than emailing it to random employees than random employees who would install every "screensaver" emailed to them by a criminal? Really? Because that sure sounds pretty implausible to me.

      This is a misrepresentation of the case I made. The E-Mails we trying to send are to engineers specifically designated to develop driver installers in cooperation with us. Yet, there was no official approved way of getting .exe files to them, they had to use trial and error to figure out a way to get past their system.
      The random employee your are talking about should not have permission to install software in his system. But maybe they should have permission to receive .exe files to forward them to another employee with the correct permissions?

    32. Re:get over it by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 2

      And how much does it cost to setup and maintain those filters vs. give unlimited access?

      If you begin factoring in:

      • Virus / Malware
      • Bandwidth lost to students watching silly videos/going to social media / cost to upgrade infrastructure to support increased bandwidth.
      • Extra shared equipment (PCs) required due to increased usage of the existing equipment.
      • Lost productivity (I assume that the blocking affects also to the university workers).

      Then you find that "unlimited access" is everything but free.

      What the university needs is a process / form so the student can argue why he needs to access the page for his work (for example, in the same "blocked content page") so he has a way to get through if there are legitimate reasons (not everybody has the same needs, and also the filtering has just plain errors). Apart from that, it is all up IT department decission.

      --
      Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
    33. Re:get over it by Onetus · · Score: 0

      Because youtube and torrents are part of using the internet.

      What part of education do you not understand?

      Probably the part where you attribute education as equivalent to allowing you to watch youtube and obtain torrents, rather than equating it with learning how to think and solve problems. Maybe things have radically changed since i got a degree, but when you get into the Real World with your degree - you're expected to be able to use those skills and solve something you are unfamliar with - i.e. It's not on YouTube and there's never been a torrent for it.

      You want to use these extra-curricula resources for your own study - buy a 4G dongle and pay for it. People doing other subject matters buy their extra-curricular resources - just ask Law students about book costs.

    34. Re:get over it by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

      If you want unrestricted web access then pay for your own connection. Don't bitch about IT people doing their job properly, their primary goal is not to be an ISP for you to surf the web. Most corporates and government agencies all apply these so called "draconian" restrictions on thier staff and it isn't because they are all bastards. Basically your average user can be trusted about half the distance you can kick them, they all think they know what they are doing until something goes wrong then it is IT's fault for not protecting them.

      If the student is paying to go to the university then the student is paying for the connection. Especially since the university may charge a technology fee to help offset costs for the IT services to students like my university does instead of hiding it in the general tuition like others may do.

      --
      ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
    35. Re:get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're kind of missing the point here, grandpa. The point is that the poster ALREADY PAYS FOR HIS OWN CONNECTION because of fees at this university, and that as a PAYING CUSTOMER is receiving substandard service. A question was raised as to what to do about this and all you libertarians can do is knee-jerk bitch about paying for your own stuff and all. Now, getting an aircard and mobile broadband certainly IS a potential solution to this. Of course, then one would be paying twice for the same thing because the first one is hideously broken.

      It's different when you're not paying for it, of course. At work I do exactly this--my own mobile broadband that isn't subject to monitoring and filtering. Of course, they're paying me to be there, not the other way around.

      As to users being not trustable about half the distance you can kick them, I'd tend to disagree. There are some I couldn't kick very far at all and yet I still don't trust them. With great power comes great responsibility and all that, and with unfettered access comes unquestioning idiots. It's trouble. It's also life.

    36. Re:Get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want to private browse, get a private connection.

      It's not 100% clear, but from the sounds of it (i.e. the fact that others are resorting to 3G connections), he lives in some kind of university accommodation and has no choice of ISP.

    37. Re:get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what are they to do in their downtime? Huh? I bet you spend most of your time browsing the internet like everyone else while you tell the students "so sad, too bad."

      You jackass.

    38. Re:get over it by tehcyder · · Score: 0

      Because, funnily enough, important education content like Stanford's machine learning lectures are available exactly via Youtube and torrents: http://see.stanford.edu/see/lecturelist.aspx?coll=348ca38a-3a6d-4052-937d-cb017338d7b1

      If you're at Stanford you've presumably paid for and have access to that already. If you're not at Stanford, shouldn't your own university be providing the equivalent material?

      The idea of paying to attend a unniversity and then relying on another university's online learning materials seems bizarre.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    39. Re:get over it by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Yes. But there also is research on porn.

      There is also research on child pornography and the creation of malware. That doesn't mean that the university needs to give universal access to those areas.

      If you're doing actual research on porn, you would be able to get an exemption.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    40. Re:get over it by Xiaran · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why does it seem bizarre? I actually find you attitude strange. I left uni a long time ago but if I had access to alternate lectures of the same material from other universities I would have been all over that shit.

    41. Re:get over it by funnyguy · · Score: 2

      Ass|u|me

      You assume that this is a public university, and by and large, I think that's irrelevant. Students are paying for an education, not a degree. I'll open a corner market selling degrees if you'll come in and buy one. To say what you wrote is to say, students are "paying for their degree, not access to a comprehensive library. They will only see books directly relevant to their degree, nothing more." So, I'm sure you, in your infinite wisdom, can effectively make a comprehensive, always up-to-date list of approved books, periodicals, etc?

      This sounds like a possibly religious-based school. Those of that only schools I've run into who have filtered internet. Some public schools might limit outbound services, but I haven't seen much content filtering. Most school networks I've used have had separate dorm/student and university/faculty/staff networks. With computer labs being on the university network.

    42. Re:get over it by multimediavt · · Score: 2

      I am also in university IT. The students are NOT paying for a free unlimited Internet connection. They are paying for their degree, and can expect Internet access relevant to their degree, nothing more. Since a large amount of University funding comes from tax payers, why should they/we foot the bill for students to waste terabytes of data on Youtube and torrents?

      Umm, not sure what state or country you are in but most universities I know get no more than about 33% of their money from the state (most of that is used for salaries). The rest comes from tuition ( more than 50%) and donations/gifts to the university. So, OP not only could be paying for his/her connection, they are most likely supporting the entire university connection to the Internet. The university has a right to protect its systems and data, but not the right to restrict what people do with their own on their own time. There are very easy ways to cordon off dorm and other student networks (campus wireless) from the rest of campus while allowing general access to university systems and the Internet. Draconian access policies do not make better students nor more secure systems. In fact the exact opposite is almost assured in this case as students will be working from inside your network to breach whatever they can for the access they want. You will have more problems to deal with not less. I know, I have seen it happen. Unless the IT department is running on the bad metric of more tickets is good, you're creating more problems than you solve.

    43. Re:get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A number of libraries are blocked by the content filtering system.

    44. Re:get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What University's IT departments do you guys touting the "4g dongle" work for? So we can make sure and avoid your schools?

    45. Re:get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. They are paying for the connection, even if indirectly.

      I'd look at the school's policies. Not necessarily the rules of the school. See if there is something about freedom of speech in that respect. If someone is paying for a service and if the school is somehow violating their own rules, wouldn't that be breach of contract? I'm not a lawyer, so I don't know if legal challenges would work.

      Complain to the school's president. Encourage other students who feel the same to complain to the school's president. But try to present a clear and concise argument instead of 'whining'.

    46. Re:get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Totally agree. It's their job to secure the network and ensure uptime. If you can't live without somethingawful.com, view it on your phone.

    47. Re:get over it by Dhalka226 · · Score: 1

      Well, you're right of course, which is why the university will also try to ding you for some sort of "technology access fee" on top of the absolute gouging you'll get for tuition, course materials and anything else you get from the university.

      Naturally they have a right to secure their network, but if the sites the submitter listed are getting blocked it's because somebody's incompetent, lazy, or taking it upon themselves to exercise some kind of moral authority over their adult students' activities that extends well beyond such mandate.

    48. Re:get over it by kenh · · Score: 1

      You are wasting your time and the time of the students for a motivation that smells a bit like Nazism.

      Really? The school blocks hackaday and it is equated to the systematic extermination of millions of human beings?

      There is a lot of pedagogical material on youtube.

      Which is likely why the school in question doesn't block youtube - at least the OP didn't include youtube in his list of sites included in the "draconian" censored websites listed...

      --
      Ken
    49. Re:get over it by DesertJazz · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the poster, but personally I remember paying $500/semester for a technology fee. I definitely was paying for an internet connection at my university (along with the software library, etc.). If this had gone on there we would have literally revolted I believe... I did not go to a state university though, and somehow I doubt the OP is either. It strikes me as something a conservative private college would do.

    50. Re:get over it by kenh · · Score: 1

      I understand the school cafeteria employs draconian food filtering denying students access to pizza, steak and beer. Hey, these kids are paying top-dollar for their "food access plan" the university has no right to limit th emend to a few select foods at a given meal...

      --
      Ken
    51. Re:get over it by kenh · · Score: 1

      Does the library subscribe to every known publication, have every known book, newspaper and periodical? No, but I don't imagine the students are complaining about their inability to access such material.

      --
      Ken
    52. Re:get over it by kenh · · Score: 1

      Porn wasn't on the list of blocked sites in the original article, so I don't think that is the issue here...

      --
      Ken
    53. Re:get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I understand the costs of internet access, I currently work in the IT department for a large company (I am studying and working full time as a mature age student -- I have worked in IT for the past decade). If the issue were only that youtube were blocked (it isn't by the way) I would not be complaining. I think I should have included more information in the submission as this wasn't meant to be about comics on the internet, or ways to bypass content filtering (which of course exist), but rather to ask if this situation is common and ways to protest the issue. I think the attitude on slashdot has changed somewhat, I haven't used this site in the past five years as such I didn't think I'd need to provide a defense for the use of internet access within a learning environment, but thats ok. I'll provide some more information here for you.

      There are a number of problems with a lack of internet access (I put it this way, because the web is not the internet). One example of such is the games programming course that is offered within the university. Xbox360 devkits were purchased as well as Source Engine licenses to that these could be used for teaching in the class room. These need to authenticate directly to Microsoft and Valve respectively, the IT department has refused to allow these services through the firewall, as such the introductory components of this course are now taught with sub par free 3d engines. The staff are not being listened to either. The purchased hardware sits unused in the lab now.

      I am enrolled in a double major, computer science and computer security. A number of the readings for security units are blocked by the content filtering system due to discussions of terrorism or hacking. The lecturer for this unit provides a 4G to wifi bridge in the tutorials (as his complaints to the IT department are ignored) for these classes so that we can access the readings, however research on campus outside of those tutorials is not possible. This is directly impacting the ability of students to complete coursework and conduct research.

      Staff members have commented about issues with research systems not having access to the internet (work arounds are NOT provided for academic staff). I know that a number of staff members in the computer science building share the cost of a 4G internet connection so that they can connect to resources belonging to other universities and research insitutions (they can't SSH out to access government research clusters etc).

      This is a real problem and isn't just about cartoons on the internet. Yes I have applied for a transfer to another university, but for this semester I will have to remain here.

    54. Re:Get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bloody hell, get a life. As other people have said, but missed the point, the University's IT Dept. is there to provide a service. That service does not include catering to your stupid browsing whims. From the sounds of it, they're using a category based filter on web content. So Something Awful will probably be classed as "Adult". Your complaint in a nutshell is that you can't access your stupid cartoons. Man up and do some work. You want to private browse, get a private connection. If the Uni was actively preventing you from studying, you might have a point. Unfortunately the slash-bots on here seem to agree with you so I'm sure you'll at least get some feel-good factor from the hive mind.

      Wow, your boss must love it when you let him fuck you up the ass. Could you possibly grovel a bit more, sheeple?

    55. Re:get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am also in university IT. The students are NOT paying for a free unlimited Internet connection.

      Nobody said anything about a free unlimited connection, stop putting words in people's mouths.

      They are paying for their degree, and can expect Internet access relevant to their degree, nothing more.

      Good for you, but you're obviously not in the Budget and Accounting office. There are specific line item charges for any equipment/access which is specific only to a Major course of study. All students have to pay a "lab fee" or "equipment and facilities" fee which is for the general use of the intranet and internet access along with the student computer labs. Some colleges break it out in even more detail.

      why should they/we foot the bill for students to waste terabytes of data on Youtube and torrents?

      So what you're saying is that Youtube contains no material which might possibly relate to any Major course of study. To which I'll respond by saying No, you're completely dead wrong. If your school offers a Major in any social science then there aren't many videos which do not hold some relevance. You have made the judgement that since you personally find no academic worth in the site, then therefore it's Gospel Truth.

      Since a large amount of University funding comes from tax payers,

      Including your salary. The taxpayers should start by questioning why you think you're entitled to passing judgement on the academic worth of the internet, and how you're more qualified than the Professors in that decision. As an IT person, it's your job to protect the network and enforce the policies which the administration sets out in regards to what is "worthy" of being available and what is not.

    56. Re:Get over it by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      That door swings both ways. If you don't know the scope of what's being taught, how can you say Youtube isn't valuable? It's obviously valuable enough that cash-strapped stufdents are findinf their own solutions.

      As for the network bogging down over Pandora... seema like a better use of IT's time thab Something Awful, hmm...?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    57. Re:get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Probably the part where you attribute education as equivalent to allowing you to watch youtube and obtain torrents, rather than equating it with learning how to think and solve problems.

      For this week's homework assignment, you need to deliver a 5,000 word essay on the effects of social media on the Arab Spring.

      And I'm sorry, but some fucking moron in the IT department has youtube, twitter, and facebook blocked because he doesn't consider them "educationally relevant" or worthy of study in a College environment, so despite having paid the required Internet & Computer Lab access fees you'll have to go off campus to do your research.

    58. Re:get over it by Sylak · · Score: 2

      And yet, you would be surprised at the number of professors who use YouTube videos in class because they're better than the VHS tapes and film strips they used to use, or just better quality of the same videos...

    59. Re:get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow,,,,if you cant live without youtube and torrents,,,your life sucks

    60. Re:get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you begin factoring in:

      Virus / Malware

      Sheesh. Ban vulnerable equpiment instead then. There are several OSes largely invulnerable to viruses, and for which there is very little malware anyway. Someone wants a windows computer on the net - demand that they use a good firewall product. (Or switch to mac/linux/bsd/...)

      Bandwidth lost to students watching silly videos/going to social media

      Bandwith throttling is so much better than a block. They won't bother with choppy "funny cats" but will still be able to download an educational video and watch it later.

      Extra shared equipment (PCs) required due to increased usage

      Many bring their own PCs these days anyway. For shared PCs, have the rule that real works go before play. So a student in need of a computer can tell the game players and facebookers to get lost.

      Lost productivity

      Instead of a block, just log access unwanted sites, and by who. Warn them that they will have to explain why they access facebook or porn sites or whatever during work hours. Those with a legitimate reason will be able to.

      There are universities that keep a mostly open network. It works.

    61. Re:get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "draconian" restrictions are there because someone in IT/management is lazy or has twisted viewes about what moral powers they should have over students. In other words because they are bastards.

      /ex-University sysadm

      Unless the OP is at a University like BYU where its the board of directors (or leaders of the mormon church) who want specific sites blocked on their network.

    62. Re:get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a government school. Course related readings are also blocked. Lecturer s have complained, nothing gets done.
      I'm getting depressed now :(

    63. Re:get over it by jodido · · Score: 0

      More likely it's a policy handed down from well above IT--few if any IT departments can get away with enforcing such unpopular policies if they set them up on their own. If it came from IT and not from senior administration the policy would fall apart the first time the provost's office got a complaint about it. Everyone please stop badmouthing the IT people. I was one such once. We didn't make policy and I'd bet these guys don't either.

    64. Re:Get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they don't have enough resources to give their students unlimited access to somethingawful and other crap, so blocking the crap to save scarce resources for what they're actually supposed to be doing is the solution.

    65. Re:Get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So basically, because the IT staff is too incompetent to properly manage bandwidth via QoS, just block a whole bunch of websites. Which then does not even solve the bandwidth problems since people can just work around them using vpns and proxies. GREAT SOLUTION.

    66. Re:Get over it by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      Since when is youtube a valid academic source of information?

      Since Stanford and other places decided to put up their free lectures on it. It's now a very legitimate and very good source of educational information. You can also download them via bittorrent. Not to mention all the other useful how to videos. Amazingly people don't want to pay to host things and are perfectly fine letting google do it for them.

      That is btw why blocking is a very very bad idea. Because idiots like you run it and are as up to date on what actually matters as dinosaurs would be about Victorian fashion.

    67. Re:get over it by tibit · · Score: 1

      I don't know what you watch on YouTube, but it must be all the wrong things.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    68. Re:get over it by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      I remember the good old days when most of my research lab computers were constantly being DDOS attacked from all the student lab computers that had become bots because someone kept installing software from the internet. Before I left that university, they started automatic re-imaging the drives at 2am as an attempt to keep the malware in check. I believe it did a lot to solve the problem.

      My point being that IT/management may have valid reasons other than being "lazy" or being "bastards".

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    69. Re:get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are better (and probably cheaper) ways to deal with these though.
      My uni will block you from the network if they think you have a virus and rate-limits everything that is not intranet or I2 to 300 kbs. This is most likely significantly cheaper than the equipment needed to block websites and domains for content purposes and solves pretty much all the problems you point out.

    70. Re:get over it by tibit · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but I usually watch YouTube stuff at work and then it's 100% related to my work. Usually it's some engineering/science educational stuff that I need to learn new things. Same goes for torrents -- I usually use them for stuff like LibreOffice and browser updates, Linux and various free VM images, etc. You seem to think that it's OK to inconvenience the ones who use it for their education just because there are a bunch of goofballs out there.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    71. Re:get over it by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      This isn't a corporation, it is a facility for education. There are no profits to protect, here, nor is it their job to protect the students from their own habits. It's a waste of time and resources for IT to even be worrying about this.

      You're mistaken. Education is one of the functions of an University not the only one. Government research is usually being performed at these same institutions. You may want to check out the university directory sometime and pay attention to the number of doctorates and associates that are associated with research and do not teach.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    72. Re:get over it by ktappe · · Score: 1

      All the internet tools and services you enjoy CAME FROM UNIVERSITIES. Cutting off Interent = cutting off education, the very reason for the university TO EXIST IN THE FIRST PLACE.

      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    73. Re:get over it by ktappe · · Score: 1

      NO, school isn't free. However, the money pays for tuition and course materials, not free internet porn.

      Because of course the Internet is nothing but porn. :: roll eyes ::

      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    74. Re:get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There may not be profits to protect but there is resources to protect. Letting the wrong access to a network can deminish these resources. Not everyone does this kind of security to protect anyone from themselves. Get off your high horse and see that even a minor incident with the security on the network is a much more damning incident when it comes to time and resources.
       
      Draconian is a word that some people use when they just aren't getting their way regardless of the logic.

    75. Re:get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My college bill has a "technology charge" for Internet, cable, and phone.. So yes, I am paying for Internet porn.

    76. Re:get over it by scubamage · · Score: 1

      So you're saying that a professor who finds an excellent lecture on youtube, or a teacher who posts his lectures on youtube, shouldn't be able to share them with his students. Sure, that makes sense to me. Likewise, the CS prof who tells his students to download an ISO of debian (you know, something that you can get as a torrent) shouldn't be able to do so. Just because you choose to focus on negative uses, there are positive ones. Even 6 years ago I had a number of teachers who relied very heavily on content freely posted to youtube to help serve as reference material (especially my Japanese film class, middle eastern politics, and assorted CS classes).

    77. Re:get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong a small small portion of finding comes from the taxes the majority comes from donations and student loans.

    78. Re:get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My university (A large university based in Montreal, Quebec) started to charge us 60$ per semester for "Web access". Oh, and the fee is mandatory !

      But in contrast with the OP story, my university does not filter/block content. You can even run torrents with more than decent speeds while behind the firewall.

    79. Re:get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are paying for room and board. At an extreme markup, no less.

      With that markup comes amenities: heating, electricity, water, and internet. If your slovenly IT department is too lazy and incompetent to effectively manage the network without cordoning off most of the internet, then perhaps you are simply unfit for your position.

    80. Re:get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fairness; the systematic extermination of millions of human beings wasn't the only thing the Nazis did. It's simply the most memorable.

    81. Re:get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are paying to get an education, and at most universities bandwidth is cheap. It's all the security monitoring and proxy servers that cost so much money, not to mention the staff to police it. We're paying $10,000 a month for a 10Gigabit internet connection, chump change in the scheme of things. We have no restrictions and other than some DMCA complaints, we don't have any issues either.

    82. Re:get over it by acohen1 · · Score: 1

      $75 ?! I think I payed about $800 a semester.

    83. Re:get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flawed analogy is flawed.

      Schools give access to all the available cooked food they have in the cafeteria. If you wanted a website that, say, catered to the fetish of horses having sex with toasters, but such a site is not available on the internet, then it's not censorship that's the problem, it's supply and demand.

    84. Re:get over it by mikkelm · · Score: 1

      Both of your examples are completely irrelevant. The issue at hand is about blocking what is available, not about making available what is not.

    85. Re:get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I now work in Tokyo as a programmer doing virtualized networks thanks to torrenting on university network. So the GP is just plain wrong, restricting students to save a few bucks is _NOT_ the way to go.

      Seriously, few things motivate a student more to be productive than multi-gigabit lines (back in the early 2000's) and horrendously slow java/python clients. Somehow I managed to make the fastest client around despite it being my first real OSS project. Thank you University of Oslo, and blessed be the free flow of information.

    86. Re:Get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm then get your own access or move out of the dorm. Im sorry your mommy didn't follow you to school to do your laundry and wipe your noise as well. Did some government agency make you chose the college you went to? Are you forced to stay at this school? or does your mommy make you stay at this school cause its close to home and she can come visit you there? Or maybe just chose a different school?

    87. Re:get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simon didnt just make up BOFH for no reason...

      It was in many ways what he wanted to do.

      Probably most of that stuff is just CYA. Or they got sued and have to do it. OR even more stupid signed some agreement to do it.

    88. Re:Get over it by Cederic · · Score: 1

      please tell me what the sites he listed have to do with his education?

      You have a horribly narrow view of 'education'.

      I have been on site at places where just all the people streaming pandora has put enough load on the network to cause problems when added to the normal course of work network use.

      So use traffic shaping. Do not censor the internet.

    89. Re:Get over it by mikkelm · · Score: 1

      Every part of your equation depends on scale and location. If the campus is in a major metropolitan area in the U.S., they can typically get an Ethernet handoff and a full table (or a default route, if they'd like,) for $1/Mbps/month. The installation costs *may* be higher than ancient telco stuff, but if the capital is available, any additional cost will be made up for in savings in less than a year.

    90. Re:get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the University Library I'd expect to have access to what the library had, not every book ever published by anyone, anywhere.

    91. Re:get over it by anyGould · · Score: 1

      * .exe and .dll are not allowed in e-mail

      We're all smart IT types here. Can we agree that filtering email based on file extension is possibly the most useless strategy ever?

      When my company firewall bounces an internal email because it has information.mdb attached (which is the file they asked me to build for them), but it doesn't bounce the renamed information.totallynotanmdb, it does not make the users feel safer in any way.

    92. Re:get over it by icebraining · · Score: 1

      I find Ng's explanations clearer. It's not necessarily my teacher's fault - some people might prefer his lectures.

      Bizarre is having all this free educational content that can actually help the students at no real extra cost for the university and not take advantage of it due to dumb restrictions.

    93. Re:get over it by ciascu · · Score: 1

      When I fly with, say, Air New Zealand, I am paying to arrive at my destination. My flight, depending on the direction, departure point and destination may well have significant subsidies both governmental and, de facto, from other flyers. However, if I had Ryanair service for 40 hours I'd be a little upset, and quite possibly in need of medical help on landing. While the whole point of the air journey is to arrive, I'm flying with AirNZ because (IMO) they provide a much better experience over that trip than the alternatives, for similar money. Multiply up to three years.

      So, yes, the taxpayer does subsidize the average public university to a significant degree. The university makes many expenditures on the life-style of admin, faculty, postgrads and students, whether that is the odd kitchenette, subsized cafeteria prices, subsized health care, etc. There is no guarantee that these actually contribute to the productivity of the individual, but they do contribute to morale and quality of life.

      I'm not going to say that Facebook access at University is fundamental to happiness, that'd be bizarre, but the suggestion that students aren't paying enough to have a say in their environment is a little odd.

    94. Re:get over it by ryanov · · Score: 1

      One saving grace for us is that we are a med school. We get less of the undergrad stuff that causes network headaches and our dorms are on cable.

    95. Re:Get over it by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      IT doesn't know what the students are actually doing. It's a stupid solution, which has already been proven.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    96. Re:get over it by izomiac · · Score: 1

      I trust you take a consistent approach on non-degree-relevant telephone calls, television channels, and postal service in the dorms?

    97. Re:get over it by kenh · · Score: 1

      Well yes, they built the Autobahn.

      I would hate to bury all the good work the Nazi's did by only mentioning their systematic genocide of millions and millions of people.

      --
      Ken
    98. Re:get over it by ajlisows · · Score: 1

      I can't imagine my story is too unique. When I got to college I started messing around with pirating software/finding porn. Music trading wasn't too popular yet (drive space issues, for one) but I dabbled. It led me to start learning about things like iRC, FTP, and eventually Linux. Unfettered access to the internet essentially guided me to my current career trajectory. If I had walked into firewalled dead ends everywhere I may have quit trying. A college education is more than what happens in the classroom.

    99. Re:get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all university's are publicly funded.

      Publicly funded functions should protect freedom of information, freedom of speech etc etc. In my opinion taking government money and then using it to fund censorship is crap. Complete crap.

      Matter of fact it might be cheaper to have a wide open pipe without all the security infrastructure and dumbass university IT types to admin it.

    100. Re:get over it by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      My story isn't much different. Truth be told, the textbook stuff I was taught in high school, with the exception of Math, hasn't turned out to be all that practical in my work life. The stuff I did in my computer classes, even the 'goofing off', had paid off in major ways. In general I am just not a fan of limiting a student's access to the world.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    101. Re:get over it by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      "draconian" restrictions are there because someone in IT/management is lazy or has twisted viewes about what moral powers they should have over students. In other words because they are bastards.

      Hey, don't count out incompetence now. Some MCSE with an outside vendor to put in a firewall to block everything can run a web content filter.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    102. Re:get over it by xelah · · Score: 1

      Students are typically also paying rent to their University, which is acting as a landlord. Restricting the private use of a service provided as part of a private residence because that use isn't part of some other service you're also providing is not an acceptable practice. Though, of course, limiting it in the library, lecture halls, etc., may be a different matter.

    103. Re:get over it by sir-gold · · Score: 1

      $800 per semester just for the technology fee? is that in US dollars and if so, does that price include a free laptop? At the college I'm currently going to, $800 would cover a full 3rd of my full-time tuition.

    104. Re:get over it by acohen1 · · Score: 1

      I believe thats what portion of the on-campus housing fee went to internet access. Its how they billed it per ethernet port to an off-campus house I managed that had college provided fiber. The laptops we were required to buy cost $2400 but at least they lasted for 4 years.

  7. You have web? So you have DNS. by Pegasus · · Score: 1

    Which means you can setup a dns proxy for IP traffic and use it. It's not fast but is very handy to have ready when you're for example on a wifi that wants you to pay for using it via some kind of web page.

    1. Re:You have web? So you have DNS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not necessarily. Where I work there is web access only, through a HTTP proxy. Computers only have access to internal dns servers which do not have access to the internet. Only the web proxy dns servers have that, and are inaccessible from client computers.

    2. Re:You have web? So you have DNS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he is being forced to use a proxy it is almost certain that the local machine will only have access to internal DNS.
      Only the proxy server needs to have access to full "external" DNS.

    3. Re:You have web? So you have DNS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if the DNS servers don't have internet access how the hell do they forward queries they are not authoritative for. Pegasus' idea is not great because the speed you get would be terrible but I am fairly sure it would work.

    4. Re:You have web? So you have DNS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only addresses that internal computers need to resolve are for internal servers. The web proxy takes care of the dns resolution for websites.

    5. Re:You have web? So you have DNS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because their DNS servers are allowed traffic at their border firewall

    6. Re:You have web? So you have DNS. by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      It's trivially easy to set up a router/firewall to redirect all traffic on port 53 that doesn't originate from a specific IP address back to that IP address. It's something that large networks have been doing for a while... run your own caching DNS server, and direct all DNS traffic to that server, and on a sufficiently large network it does reduce traffic by a noticeable amount. It's also just good practice, because it reduces unnecessary traffic.

    7. Re:You have web? So you have DNS. by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      And for anybody who's wondering: the name of the program is iodine (as in Ip over Dns, or as in atomic number 53).

    8. Re:You have web? So you have DNS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have rarely seen an implementation using resolution by the proxy (and I think it is only possible with a SOCKS proxy). Most of the time there is an internal DNS server to do the resolution that has external access.

    9. Re:You have web? So you have DNS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hence DNS tunneling would work since the servers would forward the query.

  8. Not an issue here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My university doesn't restrict internet access - they, however, ask you to not do anything illegal and log your activities. They give me 1GBit internet connection by cable or 450 MBit/s over WLAN (which I don't know how it is possible) so I can download stuff as quick as my slow laptop harddisk can save it.

    However, if they'd restrict access, I'd probably use TOR or some proxies to get full access or I'd set up a VPN connection to my server and access the internet in that way.

    1. Re:Not an issue here by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Yep the correct answer is TOR/I2P/VPN. Good work AC, too bad it got pushed down so far.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    2. Re:Not an issue here by toddestan · · Score: 1

      That probably got pushed down because from the sounds of it, the connection is so heavily restricted that those options aren't going to work.

    3. Re:Not an issue here by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Even China only recently figured out how to detect and block Tor (and they're working on a steganographic encryption algorithm to evade the block) and I doubt VPNs and SSH are blocked, that would be ridiculous.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  9. Google by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 0

    Took about 30 sec to find this on Google
    http://www.revsys.com/writings/quicktips/ssh-tunnel.html
    Really though, this is something college students deal with worldwide, and MANY solutions exist
    Why is this on /.?

    1. Re:Google by Daengbo · · Score: 3

      Because Slashdot is a joke now. It used to be a place where IT people hung out.

    2. Re:Google by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1

      What if it's simply reflecting the types that are passed off as IT people now?

      --
      Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
    3. Re:Google by philip.paradis · · Score: 1

      That's about the time a large portion of /. became a joke. While I still enjoy many discussions here, there is a definite difference in the /. of today and the /. of ten years ago. As a rule, any industry (including IT) has always had its share of pretenders, but they certainly seem to be much more numerous in IT these days. I blame it on the ever increasing trend of people going to college to get a piece of paper that allegedly qualifies them to do technical work, regardless of their actual ability to do the work.

      Signed,

      A /. user of about 12 years who recently created a new user account.

      --
      Write failed: Broken pipe
    4. Re:Google by icebraining · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've read the comments from stories from 2002. I don't see how are they much better. Are you sure you haven't forgot to take off the rose-colored glasses?

    5. Re:Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because I didn't ask how to bypass anything, but how to instigate change. Lecturers have the same issues, many readings required for coursework are blocked etc.
      Of course I could bypass the firewall/filters and I do. But I shouldn't have to. For more info on the issues please take a look at http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2693917&cid=39171463

  10. Is it important enough .. by dmomo · · Score: 1

    To choose a school based on it? Not going to a University with these restrictions is one way to vote with your dollar.
    If you don't plan on leaving, warn incoming students about these policies. Perhaps encourage them to ask about internet restrictions in their interviews. If it's a deciding factor in student enrollment numbers, they'd think hard about it.

    Further, you can petition and urge students to speak out against it. Taking action is an option.

    1. Re:Is it important enough .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Vote with your feet.
      My old university in Stockholm, Sweden didn't have any firewalling on the wifi-network. We even had a security labb where you could fool around, but that lab had a firwall protecting the Internet from stupid students.

  11. Practicality by Spad · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If they're dumb enough to lock down internet access to the point that it becomes unusable for work purposes whilst still allowing their network to be trivially bridged by 3G dongles then you're already fighting a losing battle. Chances are that the people writing the policy don't have the slighest clue what they're doing but have read some stuff about how the internet is bad and so should be blocked; be glad they don't do things like blocking all Javascript from running, which I've seen in some companies, thus breaking just about every site they don't already block (though arguably that's as much the fault of the websites in question as the security policy).

    Depending on their application security policies, if you've got a PC somewhere (friends, home, hosted box) with access to the internet proper, run an SSHd listening on a port you can get outbound on from the university network (if there even are any) and proxy all your traffic through that with a copy of Putty and something like Portable Firefox run off a USB key.

    Otherwise, you could try organising students and lecturers against the stupid IT policy, but I wouldn't hold out too much hope of getting anywhere.

    1. Re:Practicality by Kjella · · Score: 2

      If they're dumb enough to lock down internet access to the point that it becomes unusable for work purposes whilst still allowing their network to be trivially bridged by 3G dongles then you're already fighting a losing battle.

      Uh, who said anything about bridged? My impression was that they'd use 3G/4G dongles on their laptops instead of plugging into the university network at all, I don't see how you could block that short of jamming the signal. And presumably they don't care, if it doesn't happen over their network it's not their problem.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:Practicality by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      And presumably they don't care, if it doesn't happen over their network it's not their problem.

      Until those computers come back on their network with infections from the wild, defeating the entire point of their draconian restrictions. Of course, 3G dongles weren't needed for that, just a starbucks in walking distance of campus.

    3. Re:Practicality by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 1

      The same computers could be infected when the students go back home, get an USB from a friend....

      Conclusion: don't let computers you don't control in your network; at the very minimum keep them in an unstrusted VLAN.

      --
      Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
    4. Re:Practicality by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      If they're dumb enough to lock down internet access to the point that it becomes unusable for work purposes

      Because you use SomethingAwful on a daily basis to do your job?

    5. Re:Practicality by kenh · · Score: 1

      Until those computers come back on their network with infections from the wild, defeating the entire point of their draconian restrictions.

      You know, I bet they protect their university equipment from unfettered access from machines on the public network.

      The university campus isn't wired like the apartment you and your friend share with a router, switch and all machines on the same subnet...

      --
      Ken
  12. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most likely nobody cares that a handful of students want to get to somethingawful. Most likely they're using basic checkboxes in the content filter to block off large groups of site by generic category.

    Get the kids to come up with 500 legitimate sites that would be useful for schoolwork, but they can't get to. Petition someone important at the school. When presented with a list of 500 sites they have to unblock, IT won't whitelist, they'll start unchecking categories.

    Also, make the case for VPN services. You should be able to make a convincing argument. That'll give you a way to get at everything that remains blocked.

    1. Re:Well... by Cederic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or, possibly, treat the students like students. You know, intelligent inquisitive drunks that want to explore new things, test boundaries, flirt with the law and read somethingawful.com

      I really struggle to see why any university student network should be censored. Sure, firewall and lock down the staff network, where student data is held. Provide strong security on shared servers. But locking down all 'net access to filtered HTTP? That's a surefire way to damage innovation and discourage learning.

      I went to a university that had no firewalls - you could telnet to the main servers from external servers, and we used that capability to build and maintain internet services. Many people at my uni went on to build companies in the dotcom boom, take on programming jobs, otherwise put their acquired skills and knowledge to use. I would heavily discourage anybody from attending a university that didn't want the same for its students.

  13. port 443 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have this at work. get your sshd to listen on 443. if they manage to block that, start a petition. DPI is evil.

    1. Re:port 443 by Spad · · Score: 1

      It's quite possible that they only allow outbound 80/443 from their proxy server and block *all* outbound ports from client machines.

    2. Re:port 443 by dkf · · Score: 1

      I have this at work. get your sshd to listen on 443. if they manage to block that, start a petition. DPI is evil.

      You underestimate how tricky things could be. They might just block 443 anyway, which wouldn't be DPI but would be vastly annoying. Yes, it breaks sites thoroughly. Some might be white-listed (though the whitelist is likely to be out of date).

      Just for comparison: I've had meetings in places where the only external internet at all was via a crusty old proxy that couldn't even cope with the CONNECT verb and which would only allow you to reach port 80 in the first place. Not that it was worth trying to route around at all in the end; the bandwidth was awful and the latency in the multi-second range. Horrible horrible network. (There was another place that was nearly as bad until I had a word with their network guy and he told me the password for their external wifi; he was worried that it had no firewall in place to protect me, but I told him that I'd run my own security and handle the consequences. I was the only person who had good networking in the whole building. :-))

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    3. Re:port 443 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is in fact the case.

    4. Re:port 443 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use Tor, it happily works on just port 80 or 443.

    5. Re:port 443 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need DPI to selectively block connections on HTTPS (tcp/443) you twit. Browsers initiate SSL connections in the clear by asking proxy servers to CONNECT somehost:443 HTTP/1.1. If somehost is on the black list then the proxy denies the CONNECT request.

  14. VPN? by SalsaDoom · · Score: 4, Informative

    Why not just setup a VPN real fast with someones DD-WRT router. I did this at a job that had a really obnoxious content filtering thing that actually prevented me from doing my job. I just vpn'd to home, but you probably have at least one friend in town that has something good enough for you to work with. Even a shitty VPN will do, since your not trying to protect anything so much as evade things.

    --
    "Computers will never truly be free until the last windows user is strangled with the entrails of the last mac user."
    1. Re:VPN? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could pay for a VPN service (like Private Internet Access VPN Service for instance). They are also handy if you want content restricted to certain countries--like if you want to watch stuff on hulu.com and you live in Europe, just use a VPN service in the US and you can watch it just fine...

    2. Re:VPN? by omz13 · · Score: 1

      Because it is easy for VPN traffic to be blocked, especially as people tend to use this to get past content filters, etc.

    3. Re:VPN? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this thing you call "friend"?

    4. Re:VPN? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this thing you call "friend"?

      It's someone stalking you on facebook. :-)

    5. Re:VPN? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming that the university uses a firewall and a web proxy, this would not be possible. Only port 80 traffic is open, and even then it's behind a proxy so you're not going to get anything past that.

    6. Re:VPN? by izomiac · · Score: 1

      IMHO, it'd be easier to pay $5/month for a private VPN service (over port 443) and forgo paying for internet service twice. But I wholeheartedly agree with this approach. Based on how the network is setup, it could well be trivial for someone to sniff your internet traffic.

      An added benefit is that nobody is likely to hassle you unless there's a subpoena, so you won't have to explain why you visited "some Chinese gaming site" to a local authoritarian (it's a wonder why I'm not even more paranoid having had such noisy network administrators).

  15. Get over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Bloody hell, get a life. As other people have said, but missed the point, the University's IT Dept. is there to provide a service. That service does not include catering to your stupid browsing whims. From the sounds of it, they're using a category based filter on web content. So Something Awful will probably be classed as "Adult". Your complaint in a nutshell is that you can't access your stupid cartoons. Man up and do some work. You want to private browse, get a private connection. If the Uni was actively preventing you from studying, you might have a point. Unfortunately the slash-bots on here seem to agree with you so I'm sure you'll at least get some feel-good factor from the hive mind.

  16. OpenVPN on port 443 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Setup an OpenVPN server on port 443 from a server at your house. They cannot feasibly block port 443 for everyone, but they could block your residential IP. If you have a dynamic IP for your residential connection, this is a non-issue. Also use a dynamic DNS service so you don't have to keep changing your OpenVPN client's IP setting.

  17. Get into the net as a volunteer by kikito · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In all Universities there is an "Inner Circle" formed by network admins, who are impervious to proxy filtering.

    The incantation to enter that select group is:

    "Hey, I'd like to help with the university network maintenance. Can I do it as a practice? I'll do it for free."

    This psalm recited to the right university demon will get you access to the University's network system. With luck, in 1 or 2 months you will have the relevant network keys/info. Probably you will have the rights to whitelist the pages you want.

    Then move out of there.

    1. Re:Get into the net as a volunteer by ryanov · · Score: 1

      My university appears to filter everyone, even the IT department.

    2. Re:Get into the net as a volunteer by omz13 · · Score: 1

      That's because the worst offenders are the uni IT people.

    3. Re:Get into the net as a volunteer by dkf · · Score: 1

      My university appears to filter everyone, even the IT department.

      That's because only the desktop machines of the "Inner Circle" will be whitelisted, and that certainly won't be the whole of IT. There will be explicit exceptions in the firewall rules for specific source IP addresses. (One of the exceptions will have to be for the proxy itself, though that could be DMZed. That would be genuinely competent, but unexpected.)

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    4. Re:Get into the net as a volunteer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What world do you live in where competent IT staff will give you an admin account so you can help out "for free as practice?" If I were involved in any sort of Uni IT management I would let whiny "eager to learn" volunteers within 100 meters of the network equipment. Cripes, want to learn server management? Sign up for the course. Stay the heck away from my production server.

    5. Re:Get into the net as a volunteer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then you don't know anyone deep enough in the IT department. look for the guy with the t-shirt: BOW BEFORE ME FOR I AM ROOT!

    6. Re:Get into the net as a volunteer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.c++/msg/c6c71c0f5de4bd01?dmode=source&output=gplain

      From: lay...@hotmail.com (Tango)
      Subject: Electronic Warfare, Before the First Strike
      Date: 1998/05/14
      Message-ID:
      X-Deja-AN: 353820027
      Followup-To: comp.ai.philosophy,comp.security.misc,comp.software-eng,comp.windows.misc
      Organization: Netcom
      X-NETCOM-Date: Thu May 14 9:46:39 AM PDT 1998
      Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++

          Electronic Warfare Before the First Strike,
                          Constitutional Issues,
          and Total Domination by Rings of Electronic
                      Gangs in the Information Age.

      Please note that at this point the information
      will be released globally via various means of
      communications. There will be no illegal activities
      of any kind, no endangerment of any systems of
      communications, or any illegal activities whatsoever
      from this end of the wire, at least.

    7. Re:Get into the net as a volunteer by ryanov · · Score: 1

      Our dress code prohibits that sort of shit, and /I/ am root. I'm still filtered. If I ask for an exemption, I'm told "look at another site that isn't blocked -- we don't want to be putting in a bunch of exemptions."

    8. Re:Get into the net as a volunteer by ryanov · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that there are no explicit exceptions and if someone wants to see something that is blocked, they go and use the computer that's on DSL.

    9. Re:Get into the net as a volunteer by kikito · · Score: 1

      Who do you ask for an exemption?

    10. Re:Get into the net as a volunteer by ryanov · · Score: 1

      There's a form you fill out that goes to some sort of management committee or something. I think their standard is 30 days.

    11. Re:Get into the net as a volunteer by kikito · · Score: 1

      Well, then those guys are root. Not you.

    12. Re:Get into the net as a volunteer by kikito · · Score: 1

      What world do you live in where Universities have competent IT staff?

    13. Re:Get into the net as a volunteer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not the relevant problem here

      As a consultant I have seen a lot of educational and corporate networks. Some had a very tight ass internet usage policy, some moderate ones and some very lax ones.

      In 100% of the cases of really strict web policies, IT was exempt from it, whereas where policies were the same for most IT and users, then tend to be far more open.

      BTW, if you can lobby some change, here is what you should ask : that IT staff has exactly the same internet access as everyone else. This is the fastest way toward curbing fascist policies.

    14. Re:Get into the net as a volunteer by ryanov · · Score: 1

      The problem I run afoul of is being blocked from technical documentation on exploits or open-source software used to test for exploits, as it's "malicious." I asked for access figuring that it's part of my job function. I got told 1) we should be buying something for that anyway, not looking on the web 2) you can just view that at home (yeah, OK, let me go home right now then) 3) it wasn't worth the trouble for them to allow access, particularly since I'd already asked for an exception to see something else not all that long ago. Apparently the rest of the IT staff doesn't have much need/interest in that kind of stuff, as the majority of technical documentation they read they've paid out the ass for.

      Other marginally annoying stuff is blocked also (stuff like Fark, I think) because it's "Tasteless/Offensive" but is not all that important. Haven't pushed my luck otherwise.

    15. Re:Get into the net as a volunteer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was working in a university in Asia and made friends with the admin (the ONLY admin) who was working on understanding RedHat and wanted to get RH certified for admin. I helped him with understanding some simple things that had him confused and then had him help me set up Likewise to hook my fedora office box to the windows AD server. We ran into problems with the "green Dam Youth Escort" that is required on all university servers in China, he just smiled created a new virt server for me that didn't get filtered at all. Sweet,
      He and I let that school at about the same time and closed that server to protect him and me. There are some great admins in the world, you just gotta be helpful.

  18. 3G/4G? by 6Yankee · · Score: 3, Informative

    Back when I was at university, I bought a cable for my phone and got myself some sweet, sweet 9k6 access over GSM. It was faster and more reliable than the connection in the uni's computer labs ever was, not to mention no BS filtering. Paying by the minute made me focus on getting the job done and hanging up, too...

    As far as filtering goes, the conventional way around that was to log in as someone else. After all, their username was their matriculation number and the default password was their date of birth... If you couldn't read a classmate's ID and social-engineer his birthday out of him, no matter - the uni helpfully had an easily-accessible printout of the entire student body's personal information (in fact, you had to sign to get your grant, so they left it on the public side of the window), and those last few pages were awfully loose...

  19. Not sure who's confused... by ryanov · · Score: 1

    ....everyone else, or me. However, to me "restrictive access to the web only" and "no access to the wider internet" means to me that he's not going to be running an SSH or VPN proxy to anywhere (except the VPN access that runs over the web ports, and I guess SSH on an alternate port if it's a simple port filter).

  20. OpenVPN by terminal.dk · · Score: 1

    OpenVPN on an openVZ virtual server. A 128k server to $2-3/months should be fine.
    And OpenVPN is VPN over HTTP/HTTPS.

    But organize a protest. It should be easy to get huge support for it. Start it up on facebook.

    1. Re:OpenVPN by jimicus · · Score: 2

      No it isn't, OpenVPN is a protocol in its own right, the security comes from SSL. Usually it runs on UDP/1194, though you could run it on TCP/443.

      It wouldn't be over HTTPS, but even so it may well be able to get through the firewall this way - assuming the firewall isn't doing some clever DPI work to fingerprint traffic type. (Possible, but IME rare).

      I think you may have got the HTTP/S idea from the full version of OpenVPN that also installs a web-based GUI. But when users log in, the first thing they're prompted to do is download a pre-configured client.

  21. 4G dongle by symbolset · · Score: 1

    Seriously, you're not going to win this one. Get your own Internet. And by all means invest in the offshore VPN service too, so you can find out what the real Internet is like behind the Great Firewall of America because that's where we're going now too.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  22. Which University? by JambisJubilee · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'd say the university isn't fulfilling its role, and you should definitely rally to change things. The purpose of the university network (besides supporting research communications) is to allow you to learn.

    During my undergrad the university I attended provided full firewall-free internet with a *public* IP from their block for everyone who plugged in (and no-questions asked CNAMEs). The wireless was of course NAT'd but I had no problems.

    This all worked because of the genius way they solved problems was genius. If IT detected any funny business, a tech would physically show up at your lab/office and ask you what was going on and make you fix the problem right then and there.

    1. Re:Which University? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've heard about the university of Bristol having such restrictive filtering, but that was several years ago. I don't know if it has changed since then.

      There should be a public list of universities describing these limitations, so students can prepare their stay there.

    2. Re:Which University? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, this was basically how the university I attended worked as well. Including tracking people trying to be smart running bit-torrent on music/movies in hidden wifi locations around labs. Usually a "what do you think you are doing?" with a from a network admin got the point across that they knew what you were doing and were watching. No noticeable filtering.

    3. Re:Which University? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod the parent up. I am a network engineer at a major university, and I don't know a single large university that runs proxy servers or throttles their bandwidth anymore. IT there needs to get with the program and stop trying to control students and professors in the name of security.

    4. Re:Which University? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same experience here.

      We could even provide any equipment we wanted to the school, pay telco fees, and get whatever speed connection we wanted/could afford telco fees for at home for $4 /mo, and they would throw in a /28 network for our home use. Or, just use the modem pool for free-- still getting the /28 for home use.

      Any dns names you wanted were as simple as emailing hostmaster, and waiting a few hours to a day at the most.

      This was before ISPs existed (and when windohs didn't have a TCP/IP stack, so far fewer idiots on the net-- ah happy days). Get off my lawn!

    5. Re:Which University? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, too, work at a major uni here in the US. Our policies are similar to this. Any destructive or abusive funnybusiness is dealt with directly. Other than that, pulblic IPs are the norm, with full unthrottled access, other than some inbound port filtering at the border. I'd say there are actually fewer problems now than in the more draconian past.

  23. Cultural/Media Studies? by Bazman · · Score: 1

    Make friends with someone in your Cultural/Media Studies faculty. Preferably someone doing research into social media, emerging cultural phenomena, self-organising cliques, something like that. Then get them to repeatedly hassle IT to give them access to blocked sites, claiming its for their research. I reckon after the fifth time IT will give up and just open up the whole network (their router access control lists will get unmanageable for their competence level).

  24. VPN outwards by ThunderBird89 · · Score: 1

    My former university used a VPN-service, where every student had to set up a VPN on their computers, and connect to the VPN-server before being able to browse the web. One of the guys even admitted that they're raping the VPN standard in every way possible by using it to connect outwards, rather than inwards, but still they stuck with it.
    The downside was that until the VPN service connected, there was absolutely no traffic to the wider web, which includes Google DNS. So every time I wanted to connect, I had to reset my DNS settings to use theirs (I was too lazy to edit the address into my hosts file every time I remembered). That, and the fact they kept a detailed log about all your activities while on their network.

    --
    Hyperbole: I use it liberally!
  25. Just use 3G by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately in that kind of situation you can only work around by using other methods such as 3G/4G or a Webserver based Proxy Script (such as Glype). VPN's, Browser Proxies etc are off the cards due to the network setup.

    Universities provide you with internet access for material directly related to your course, Ethernet / fiber connections are not cheap and it is within their interests to keep costs down and so access to plausibly off-topic material is frequently limited in both workplace and educational institutions.

    Discussing the issues with campus management is an option, however not an advised one. The IT Department will be seen as "experts in the field" where as you "are just a student". Their word is the gospel truth to management. If your university is a reputable one with a dedicated IT department, volunteering to "help" is unlikely to yield the access required to bypass proxy restrictions, so that's off the cards too.

    I myself am a University student and I use a 3G connection for much the reasons you are complaining about. It doesn't cost me much at all to do so.

    1. Re:Just use 3G by ledow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unfortunately, 90% of the headache of running a network is the userbase. Even in a small secondary school it can be difficult to keep people from abusing the connection (hell, I know I abused my uni's connection when I was there, not to mention their storage, FTP, CPU time, etc.) without policies like this.

      They are providing you the service for things related to your work. Those sites you mention are not related to your work. Even if they were, the abuse of people using for things NOT related to their work is a burden that the IT department will be able to statistically measure. Otherwise they wouldn't bother with the hassle from students, staff, and technical problems associated with limiting your access.

      It's not a question of "experts vs students", it's a question of different priorities. Even if you escalated it to the Dean themselves with the aid of staff, you would all end up sitting in a room with the IT guys who would explain exactly how much traffic that system cuts out, how many lost hours, how fewer abuse complaints they receive, how many more PC's they'd need to cope with the extra demand because of people hogging the computers for personal use, etc. and all for something that - if a site is genuinely vital to your work - they would gladly adjust to make sure it didn't interfere with your studies.

      And then either you or the Dean would end up basically agreeing that what's in place isn't actually that draconian after all, and standard practice for most places for SEVERAL, very good, measurable, verifiable reasons. And every year you'd have the students/staff make the same argument and every year since the 90's it's been less of an issue because - as you point out - if you want unfiltered Internet for personal use, you can get it for next to nothing. And hell, in any university town I've ever been in, every cafe has free Internet to draw students in.

      You have paid the uni, indirectly, to support your studies. If they are not supporting your studies, you can complain. But you can't complain that they aren't other personal Internet services to all X thousand students on their campus without paying the difference it would cost.

      In my experience, working in schools rather than universities, I wouldn't be surprised if traffic (and therefore costs) quadrupled the second they relax their policy, even if they DON'T announce that they've done so. And those sorts of places usually run HUGE dedicated lines that are the backbone of the Internet - X thousand students accessing junk sites is NOT more important than the chemistry lab pushing a few Gigabytes around the world to their research partner. I assure you.

      You have a workaround in the form of your own Internet connection, use it. If you want the uni to provide it, they will charge you MORE for the same thing because they are NOT an end-user ISP.

    2. Re:Just use 3G by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can students -- who are paying their way through school -- then opt out of paying for the worthless university network, or is this more of a "you get to pay, and we get to dictate" situation?

    3. Re:Just use 3G by ledow · · Score: 1

      No more than they can opt of out paying for a lecturer they don't get on with, or a worksheet they didn't want, or a projector they didn't want to use in the lecture hall, or a piece of grass on the university grounds, or the rubbish collectors hired by the uni or any one of a million and one costs.

      You bought into the uni, they had clear policies on what was and was not provided. Your problem. Sure, a uni that had an "open" policy might be more popular, but probably more expensive - but that's the choice you made when you signed up to that university.

    4. Re:Just use 3G by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And those sorts of places usually run HUGE dedicated lines that are the backbone of the Internet - X thousand students accessing junk sites is NOT more important than the chemistry lab pushing a few Gigabytes around the world to their research partner. I assure you.

      Communications between universities around the world are routed through a separate, much faster network. The "X thousand students accessing junk sites" would not be noticed by any researcher transferring data.

    5. Re:Just use 3G by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Do what they did at the place I went to (at least in the computer labs) and give students a quota.

      So data transfer to things on the local network (such as the sites containing lecture recordings/notes) is unmetered as is traffic to those sites the university deems important for legit academic work but if you want to access other sites, you have to pay for it after you use up your monthly allotment.

      Need more quota? Log into the top-up page and buy more.

      To prevent people tying up machines in the labs that might be needed for important work, you can have different restrictions on what can be accessed by students in the labs vs what can be accessed by students with a personal PC in the dorm room or connected to the campus WiFi.

      Of course the quota idea doesn't help for things that are blocked for reasons other than bandwidth such as things that are blocked because they contain things that could get the university in trouble or things that are blocked because they contain things that go against the teachings or belief systems of the university (religious universities are probably likely to do this in the name of blocking "heretical" content)

    6. Re:Just use 3G by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      X thousand students accessing junk sites is NOT more important than the chemistry lab pushing a few Gigabytes around the world to their research partner. I assure you.

      That's great. That's why there is such thing as packet/connection classifiers. Heck, most proxies, like squid, have these built-in! Instead of blocking sites outright, how about limiting their bandwidth so they never cause any issues with "few GB of research stuff"??

      This blocking shit only inconveniences and even censors people that don't know what they are doing. For the rest of us, any network policy short of an air-gap, is just an annoyance.

    7. Re:Just use 3G by White+Flame · · Score: 1

      You have paid the uni, indirectly, to support your studies. If they are not supporting your studies, you can complain. But you can't complain that they aren't other personal Internet services to all X thousand students on their campus without paying the difference it would cost.

      As another poster brought up, you are not just there for education. You are a customer to their entire "student lifestyle experience", and this is typically supported by the uni's marketing materials. This is especially applicable to on-campus students, but all students are expected to have non-educational down time spent on-campus, too, with their tuition paying for access to the non-educational recreational and other entertainment facilities available. Universities spend millions of dollars on non-educational modifications (landscaping, common areas, fitness centers, etc) all the time; providing full internet access is not an illegitimate request.

    8. Re:Just use 3G by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, hackaday and similar sites are less important than pushing Chem lab data, but that is not grounds for blocking. It is just as easy to prioritize important traffic, and let the casual traffic slow to a crawl. Completely blocking it IS draconian, and hackaday in particular is an educational site. I have learned a lot from exploring the projects posted there.

  26. Didn't you know this going in? by slimjim8094 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a /. reader, I can only assume you're rather technical. Isn't this something you discovered before going there?

    Frankly, I wouldn't go to a school that did this. And I didn't. Thankfully, my first choice doesn't do anything like this. Traffic is unmonitored, but for legal reasons you have to register your MAC address to your university credentials to get out of the VLAN. This happens automatically with authentication to the wireless network, or manually through a captive portal for Ethernet.

    As required by law of all ISPs, they will use this to forward DMCA notices, which happens pretty frequently. I can't exactly fault them for that. They'll also notice if you're really hammering the network with worm traffic or something, in which case they'll kick you off until you get the system cleaned up, which I can't fault them for either.

    But other than that, they're pretty much out-of-the-way. They definitely view themselves as more of an ISP than anything academically-relevant, which is good. The university structure also places them at the same level as the individual schools (liberal arts, engineering, business, etc), and each school has its own school-specific IT that runs their own email and webhosting and so on, all of which helps keep them pretty much service-oriented. They pretty much provide internet access and server space to any university department that wants it (and pays for it, in one of those interdepartmental money-shuffling schemes), and otherwise back off from content management. Individual schools are free to filter whatever they want, but only in the school-managed network. In practice, none do. Even if they did, the dorms are separated out from that.

    Not to mention the university is almost as liberal as they come in terms of information freedom.

    But in any case, the university is your home for the time you're there. I wouldn't live somewhere that did this, and I wouldn't go to a school that did this. Not even because of the inconvenience - think about what that suggests about how they view academic and intellectual freedom.

    --
    I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    1. Re:Didn't you know this going in? by Jicehix · · Score: 1

      They definitely view themselves as more of an ISP than anything academically-relevant, which is good.

      It seems to me that in France, universities are in fact actually treated as ISPs and subject to the same legal requirements (logs retention, etc.).

      --
      Jicehix
    2. Re:Didn't you know this going in? by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      I may have been unclear... they're all legally ISPs, but at my school they see themselves as a provider of services to customers rather than anything more than incidentally associated with a university.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
  27. Two solutions: by subreality · · Score: 1

    1, technical. VPN. There are plenty of cheap providers out there who exist to fix this problem, or just find a friend who's willing to let you bounce off their home network.

    2, administrative. Go over the head of the technical guy who's blocking the net. You will need to do your homework first: have a good business case for why the current policies are a) inhibiting your (and many others') legitimate needs and b) aren't reasonable, necessary or effective measures to achieve security. If you have a hundred signatures on a petition you'll probably get some attention.

  28. If you're going to live under my roof... by micker · · Score: 0

    Get your own internet. If you're going to use what the school is giving you then you have to deal with their network restrictions. With what your parents are paying for you to attend college you shouldn't put their money at risk circumventing network security at the school. Buy your own internet access if you want to fark around.

    --
    Words are only yours until someone else uses them...
  29. Guessing the university... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're not an ECU student, are you?

  30. Get your own network by krelvin · · Score: 1

    Depending on where you are located, you can use 3G or 4G data on a phone or a dedicated hotspot. Unless you plan on going hog wild on it.. Then you control your access... Hard to imagine that you didn't know this going in though.... you did ask before you signed up right?

  31. picidae by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try a picidae server. http://pici.picidae.net/ It replies you with a clickable image of the website you browse. You can run a server at home or use one from the project.

  32. Re:My ass by geraud · · Score: 1

    Do not advertise the VPN provider who sold his customer to law enforcement last year. Bustmyass.com it is.

  33. Get on with some work by maroberts · · Score: 1

    If you were complaining about web sites related to your studies, you'd have some justification. The University network is there for studies and work, not for pissing around on.

    [At this point maybe I should confess that I spent all my mainframe time allocation at Uni playing the original MUD... :-P ]

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

    1. Re:Get on with some work by u38cg · · Score: 1

      That was a fair argument in 1995, but in 2012 internet access is not a sort of special priviledge toy, and it's reasonable to assume that it is many students' only connection.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    2. Re:Get on with some work by Cederic · · Score: 1

      [At this point maybe I should confess that I spent all my mainframe time allocation at Uni playing the original MUD... :-P ]

      Hmm. A couple of years behind you, but I spent six months online time in just one mud alone (of the dozens I played) during my three years at university.

      As a result I left university able to do OO programming with an understanding of Unix systems, basic TCP/IP and protocols, web development (such as it was in '94) and self-directed learning.

      None of which was explicitly taught on my course, but which did get factored into my honours degree grade by a tutor that understood that my coursework had suffered because I was having too much fun learning more interesting stuff elsewhere.

      I still respect his massive contribution to my career.

    3. Re:Get on with some work by Chrontius · · Score: 1

      This is 2012. Access to the Internet is ensconced by the U.N. as a basic human right.

  34. I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Universities do not exist to restrict information. Anybody who thinks they do, is not doing their job.

    I agree that it is likely and administrator, rather than the IT department, who is responsible, but don't count on it. That's just worthless guesswork. You can find out.

    Whoever is responsible, don't listen to all these wimps who just tell you to cave and pay for ANOTHER internet source when you're already paying for this one. Get hold of EFF, EPIC, the ACLU, and anybody else you can, and tell them your academic freedom is being repressed. Because it is true. But get some help. There are organizations out there who can not only help you find who is responsible, but put pressure on them to change the status quo.

    Don't cave and just buy an expensive cell phone data connection (especially with prices going up). Fight the BS. Because that's what it is: BS.

    1. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 3, Funny

      But it's their connection! Therefore, they are exempt from all criticism and he should do nothing if he disagrees with their policies.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    2. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by dkf · · Score: 1

      But it's their connection! Therefore, they are exempt from all criticism and he should do nothing if he disagrees with their policies.

      It's the university's connection, not the particular administrator of the IT department of the university's connection. That said, if it's an order that's come down from On High (it could be) then it's going to be hard to change since admins don't usually like to directly challenge nonsense from formal superiors.

      Another thing to check is whether the restriction is the same for all connections. We (speaking as someone who works in university IT) have a whitelisted wired network with very few restrictions (SMTP being the main one, for obvious reasons) and multiple wireless networks, all of which require authentication of some form in order to let you onto the majority of the internet. (Some of the wireless nets direct via a webpage form, others use a cryptographic identity as that's much more convenient for logging in with mobile devices.) Our main requirement overall is that only authorized users use the network (we've no problem with temporary auth for visitors) as that ensures that people are aware that they've got to obey the AUP (summary: don't break the law, don't be a total dick). As long as they're known, we don't care what they do (and for sure couldn't log it! We're really short of storage space.)

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    3. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Whoever is responsible, don't listen to all these wimps who just tell you to cave and pay for ANOTHER internet source when you're already paying for this one. Get hold of EFF, EPIC, the ACLU, and anybody else you can, and tell them your academic freedom is being repressed. Because it is true. But get some help. There are organizations out there who can not only help you find who is responsible, but put pressure on them to change the status quo.

      Yea, that’s a great choice - pick a fight over an issue that isn't really the point - no one is restricting your academic freedom. you are free to voice your opinio, research what you want - just not on their network. I'd imagine the EFF / ACLU / etc. laughing about your argument - I don't get unfettered internet via uni so way - my academic freedom is being restricted.

      I've been in that situation - and guess what - when you make a reasoned argument for why you need to do something they find a way to do it. Wanting to browse whatever whenever is not a reasonable request - and IT has to be sure that bandwidth is available for people really doing academic work - not to ensure we all get our /. fill

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    4. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wanting to browse whatever whenever is not a reasonable request

      Says the pathetic idiot.

      Could your brain be any more defective? And what the fuck is with all your "-" punctuation? Maybe if you had gone to as school with uncensored internet access you wouldn't have these mental defects. Do any good schools censor their internet? Did you go to college in North Korea or something?

    5. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "Yea, thatâ(TM)s a great choice - pick a fight over an issue that isn't really the point - no one is restricting your academic freedom."

      Complete BS as far as I am concerned. If you are paying or an Internet connection (and yes, if you're in college you're paying for it), and it is censored, then your academic freedom IS being restricted.

      "I'd imagine the EFF / ACLU / etc. laughing about your argument "

      Considering that they have already helped stop internet censorship at other universities in the United States, via the courts, I rather doubt they are laughing.

    6. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "Wanting to browse whatever whenever is not a reasonable request - and IT has to be sure that bandwidth is available for people really doing academic work - not to ensure we all get our /. fill"

      Nonsense. If you are a university student, and you are PAYING for access, then you deserve to get access. Which means yes, I would want exactly that... an unfettered Internet connection, just like anybody off-campus could get.

      Apparently, you are the sort of person who thinks University libraries should also be censored? How about U.S. mail going into and out of campus grounds? Should that be censored, too? The newspapers maybe?

    7. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      "Wanting to browse whatever whenever is not a reasonable request - and IT has to be sure that bandwidth is available for people really doing academic work - not to ensure we all get our /. fill"

      Nonsense. If you are a university student, and you are PAYING for access, then you deserve to get access. Which means yes, I would want exactly that... an unfettered Internet connection, just like anybody off-campus could get. Apparently, you are the sort of person who thinks University libraries should also be censored? How about U.S. mail going into and out of campus grounds? Should that be censored, too? The newspapers maybe?

      Nice straw men and ad-hominem as a bonus. To bad they have nothing to do with the topic it hand. Do you consider restricting access to certain volumes censorship? Should I have unfettered access to a rare book that is the only known copy? Or that if I can't print a million copies of a flyer on the computer lab printers the university is censoring me? Or, should I be free to demand the university add in any books I may want in the library simply because they are available? You seem to think the university owes you unfettered access to everything, no matter the costs, or be guilty of censorship.

      As for the ACLU, they have sued non-university systems over filtering that blocked certain material, I can not recall or find a case where they sued a university because a student was not allowed unfettered access. As a side note, given the SCOTUS has allowed schools to control distribution of materials they may find that unfettered access is not a 1st amendment issue.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    8. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "Nice straw men and ad-hominem as a bonus."

      Interesting you should say that, since I was directly addressing the issue of restricted access, which was what OP was about. But if you want real straw-man, we have this:

      "Do you consider restricting access to certain volumes censorship? Should I have unfettered access to a rare book that is the only known copy?"

      I did ask about censorship of books, but that's not a straw-man argument. Books and internet are both sources of valuable academic information. So there *IS* a direct comparison to be had.

      But nobody (except you) said ANYTHING about "rare books". In fact if it's on the internet, I don't think the term "rare" even applies. So who's making the straw-man argument here? Hint: I don't think it was me.

      "As for the ACLU, they have sued non-university systems over filtering that blocked certain material, I can not recall or find a case where they sued a university because a student was not allowed unfettered access."

      Out of context. I said ACLU has helped students with censored nets. Elsewhere, I stated that I would want unfettered access. But I did not put the two together and say ACLU would sue over unfettered access.

      "As a side note, given the SCOTUS has allowed schools to control distribution of materials they may find that unfettered access is not a 1st amendment issue."

      I did not claim that "academic freedom" was a 1st Amendment issue. It certainly can be in some instances, but I don't think I claimed that this was one of them.

    9. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      "Nice straw men and ad-hominem as a bonus."

      Interesting you should say that, since I was directly addressing the issue of restricted access, which was what OP was about. But if you want real straw-man, we have this:

      "Do you consider restricting access to certain volumes censorship? Should I have unfettered access to a rare book that is the only known copy?"

      I did ask about censorship of books, but that's not a straw-man argument. Books and internet are both sources of valuable academic information. So there *IS* a direct comparison to be had. But nobody (except you) said ANYTHING about "rare books". In fact if it's on the internet, I don't think the term "rare" even applies. So who's making the straw-man argument here? Hint: I don't think it was me.

      So you are in favor of censorship, as you would define it, as long as it's not you that is being "censored.;" or back to the point - can an institution reasonably restrict access to protect a resource for use by others as well?

      "As for the ACLU, they have sued non-university systems over filtering that blocked certain material, I can not recall or find a case where they sued a university because a student was not allowed unfettered access."

      Out of context. I said ACLU has helped students with censored nets. Elsewhere, I stated that I would want unfettered access. But I did not put the two together and say ACLU would sue over unfettered access.

      So you agree that unfettered access in not a civil liberty issue and simply something you would want. Fine, but we don't always get what we want. As a side note, the logical flow of your argument in response to my statements suggest you think the ACLU should act in such cases.

      "As a side note, given the SCOTUS has allowed schools to control distribution of materials they may find that unfettered access is not a 1st amendment issue."

      I did not claim that "academic freedom" was a 1st Amendment issue. It certainly can be in some instances, but I don't think I claimed that this was one of them.

      You claimed it was censorship that restricted academic freedom - so if it's not a 1st amendment issue what possibly could it be? there is no unfettered right to access anything written into the Constitution, so it becomes simply a contractual agreement between you and the university; which can include any terms the university wants and you can either agree or not use the service.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    10. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "So you are in favor of censorship, as you would define it, as long as it's not you that is being "censored.;" or back to the point - can an institution reasonably restrict access to protect a resource for use by others as well?"

      What? Where the hell did you get that, out of what I wrote? It sure as hell isn't anything I stated.

      Further, you aren't getting "back to the point" at all... you're getting back to the straw-man argument you were trying to make, which had nothing to do with my point, at all. Which I already explained. Duh. Are you actually reading what I wrote?

      "So you agree that unfettered access in not a civil liberty issue and simply something you would want."

      No, I don't necessarily agree with that at all. I was simply explaining that it is not anything I had stated earlier. Again... you are reading things into my words that don't actually exist.

      "As a side note, the logical flow of your argument in response to my statements suggest you think the ACLU should act in such cases."

      Yes, I did suggest that. But for reasons different from those you have tried to put in my mouth.

      "You claimed it was censorship that restricted academic freedom - so if it's not a 1st amendment issue what possibly could it be?"

      This illustrates the fuzziness of your logic throughout this exchange. I neither stated that the 1st Amendment was involved in THIS case, or that academic freedom equated to a 1st Amendment issue, again in this case. YOU are the only one who suggested as much.

    11. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      "So you are in favor of censorship, as you would define it, as long as it's not you that is being "censored.;" or back to the point - can an institution reasonably restrict access to protect a resource for use by others as well?"

      What? Where the hell did you get that, out of what I wrote? It sure as hell isn't anything I stated. Further, you aren't getting "back to the point" at all... you're getting back to the straw-man argument you were trying to make, which had nothing to do with my point, at all. Which I already explained. Duh. Are you actually reading what I wrote?

      Your point seems to be you want unfettered internet access and think it is due you simply because you pay tuition.

      Every time I reply to you, you say "I didn't say that;" despite having done so earlier.

      For example - you said the OP should contact the ACLU - when I respond that they would not buy the argument you make - you pint out they have taken cases involving students - I point out those are 1st Amendment issues and you say "I never said it was a 1st amendment issue despite your examples.

      In short, it seems you have no argument at all for why unfettered access should be given other than "I want it."

      This illustrates the fuzziness of your logic throughout this exchange. I neither stated that the 1st Amendment was involved in THIS case, or that academic freedom equated to a 1st Amendment issue, again in this case. YOU are the only one who suggested as much.

      As I pointed out above, you brought in the aCLU, 1st amendment issues and then backtracked. In addition to backing down whenever I called you on your argument, you consistently fail to address the salient point:

      Does a university have the right to control the use of limited resources to the broader university community can use them as needed? You never have answered that, despite my providing a number of examples which you dismiss as straw men since you seem to have no other response.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    12. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "Your point seems to be you want unfettered internet access and think it is due you simply because you pay tuition."

      Not just tuition; you also pay room and board, and fees for things such as internet. If it were ONLY tuition, I think it would be more up to the school. But regardless of just exactly how it is being paid for, it *IS* being paid for. Universities do not supply services for free. They are paid by fees or by taxes, one of the two.

      "Every time I reply to you, you say "I didn't say that;" despite having done so earlier."

      I say that when you twist my meaning. For example:

      ""So you are in favor of censorship, as you would define it, as long as it's not you that is being "censored.;""

      The fact is that I did NOT write that, or anything like it. You may have interpreted my words that way, but it isn't what I actually wrote and it sure is hell does not even remotely resemble anything I meant.

      "As I pointed out above, you brought in the aCLU, 1st amendment issues and then backtracked"

      No, that is not correct. YOU brought up the 1st Amendment. It wasn't me. YOU have kept insisting that the only justification the ACLU has to intervene is the 1st Amendment, but but that just isn't so, as I tried to tell you earlier. I neither stated or implied that the 1st Amendment was involved. You did.

      "In addition to backing down whenever I called you on your argument..."

      I have done no such thing. I haven't backed down from ANY of the statements I actually made; I only denied that I wrote the things that YOU were claiming I stated... but which I actually did not. Those are two very different things. I repeat: I was not making the arguments you have kept insisting I was making. I simply said that the student should contact the ACLU. I did not state or even imply that the 1st Amendment was involved. If I did, no doubt you will have no trouble quoting the words you claim I wrote which actually said that? I'd like to see them. As that link proves, the ACLU gets involved in academic freedom issues that do NOT involve the 1st Amendment. Just like I actually DID state.

      "you consistently fail to address the salient point: ... Does a university have the right to control the use of limited resources to the broader university community can use them as needed? You never have answered that, despite my providing a number of examples which you dismiss as straw men since you seem to have no other response."

      I never answered because it was a straw-man argument that, I repeat: has nothing whatever to do with the statement I originally made. I don't owe you answers to questions that aren't even relevant to the point I made.

      But since you seem to insist that I answer the question, relative or not, answer me this first: why do you keep insisting that they are "limited resources", without any evidence or citations to back that up? It is actually nothing more than an unfounded assumption. The universities with which I am familiar have internet resources that can hardly be called "limited", in comparison to regular cable service in the area. Also, they definitely charge for the privilege, as part of the cost of room and board... NOT as part of the tuition.

    13. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      That sentence should have been "relevant or not". But I wan't to add this as well: blocking sites or otherwise censoring internet content is generally MORE expensive than not doing it. So a "limited resources" argument does not necessarily apply. Possibly, if you are saying that they don't want too many people downloading files and the like. But there are perfectly legitimate reasons to do that, too.

      Major ISP don't tell you just how drastically the price of supplying internet bandwidth has come DOWN, for the simple reason that they want to keep raising prices, not lower them. But the era of limited bandwidth, as a practical matter, is close to being over.

    14. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      I never answered because it was a straw-man argument that, I repeat: has nothing whatever to do with the statement I originally made. I don't owe you answers to questions that aren't even relevant to the point I made.

      Since you insist on backtracking and then evading answering my point any further discussion relevant to what you said is, well, pointless.

      But since you seem to insist that I answer the question, relative or not, answer me this first: why do you keep insisting that they are "limited resources", without any evidence or citations to back that up? It is actually nothing more than an unfounded assumption. The universities with which I am familiar have internet resources that can hardly be called "limited", in comparison to regular cable service in the area. Also, they definitely charge for the privilege, as part of the cost of room and board... NOT as part of the tuition.

      Comparing their capacity to cable is relevant - do you really think any university network can withstand unlimited, unfettered use without degradation? As it degrades, people who are using it for real work suffer so others can torrent / watch videos / act. - activities that generally have nothing to do with academic uses.

      If it's provided as a result of a room and board deal then it really has nothing to do with the academic mission of the university - that is governed by contract law and if you don't like their deal go elsewhere - it's as simple as that. So your whole "academic freedom" argument is moot.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    15. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "Since you insist on backtracking and then evading answering my point any further discussion relevant to what you said is, well, pointless."

      I agree that it is pointless, but for different reasons. It is pointless because you refuse to even acknowledge what my original argument was. Then you try to yank the discussion in a different direction, and insist that I stated (or at least implied) things that I actually did not, THEN, when I try to steer the conversation BACK to what I was originally talking about in the first place, you call that "backtracking" and denial.

      Sheesh. I have been very patient with you but my patience is about gone.

      "Comparing their capacity to cable is relevant - do you really think any university network can withstand unlimited, unfettered use without degradation?"

      Many universities do exactly that, so why should I expect otherwise? Of course I mean "unlimited and unfettered" only in comparison to other local ISPs... we have to be reasonable here. Nobody expects infinite bandwidth. So yes... I do expect that universities can supply bandwidth to their students in a manner comparable to other local ISPs. In fact, many of them do so via contracts with the local ISPs themselves.

      If it's provided as a result of a room and board deal then it really has nothing to do with the academic mission of the university - that is governed by contract law and if you don't like their deal go elsewhere - it's as simple as that. So your whole "academic freedom" argument is moot.

      That's only if you live off-campus, in which case none of this makes any difference anyway, because if you live off-campus, you aren't going to be getting your internet from the university!

    16. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Many universities do exactly that, so why should I expect otherwise? Of course I mean "unlimited and unfettered" only in comparison to other local ISPs... we have to be reasonable here. Nobody expects infinite bandwidth. So yes... I do expect that universities can supply bandwidth to their students in a manner comparable to other local ISPs. In fact, many of them do so via contracts with the local ISPs themselves.

      This is what I mean about backtracking when called on a point you make - you started out by saying it violates academic freedom to not give unfettered access and called for the ACLU to step in ... I say it's not reasonable to expect unlimited, unfettered access, we go back and forth and now you say:

      Nobody expects infinite bandwidth. So yes... I do expect that universities can supply bandwidth to their students in a manner comparable to other local ISPs.

      Which was my original point - Universities have the right to limit access to make best use of a resource for all a point you now seem to agree with; the only questions is what is a reasonable way to control the usage.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    17. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "This is what I mean about backtracking when called on a point you make - you started out by saying it violates academic freedom to not give unfettered access and called for the ACLU to step in ... I say it's not reasonable to expect unlimited, unfettered access, we go back and forth ..."

      How is that "backtracking"? I am adhering to my original statement. How does that constitute "backtracking"?

      Yes, I did state "Nobody expects infinite bandwidth." That was merely to make sure we were keeping reasonable limits on this conversation. It is not in any way "backing down" or "backtracking" from what I originally stated. It was merely acknowledgment that we are talking about reasonable things, not outrageous hypotheticals.

      So when you say "I say it's not reasonable to expect unlimited, unfettered access", I was merely clarifying that we were talking about reasonably unlimited, and reasonably unfettered... exactly as one can get from some other ISP. At no time was I suggesting infinite bandwidth or infinite access. That would not be reasonable. If you are trying to claim that's what I meant, then we aren't even having the same argument.

      And at no time, throughout this whole exchange, did I see ANYTHING that would cause me to believe that you actually meant "I do expect that universities can supply bandwidth to their students in a manner comparable to other local ISPs."

      This entire conversation has been about a University blocking access to certain sites and materials. I do not call that "supplying bandwidth in a manner comparable to other ISPs". On the contrary; it is behavior for which "other ISPs" have either lost customers or gotten into trouble.

    18. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      "This is what I mean about backtracking when called on a point you make - you started out by saying it violates academic freedom to not give unfettered access and called for the ACLU to step in ... I say it's not reasonable to expect unlimited, unfettered access, we go back and forth ..."

      How is that "backtracking"? I am adhering to my original statement. How does that constitute "backtracking"?

      Let's see. I said:

      "Wanting to browse whatever whenever is not a reasonable request - and IT has to be sure that bandwidth is available for people really doing academic work - not to ensure we all get our /. fill"

      To which you replied:

      Nonsense. If you are a university student, and you are PAYING for access, then you deserve to get access. Which means yes, I would want exactly that... an unfettered Internet connection, just like anybody off-campus could get.

      and proceeded to make a number of straw man arguments and launch ad-homenum attacks all the while saying "that's not what I said or meant" until you say: Yes, I did state "Nobody expects infinite bandwidth."

      which was my original point which you have now conveniently stated is yours as well. So it looks like we are in agreement with my original stance and the only real issue is what is reasonable.

      So, yes, you have backtracked all the way to saying my original stance was yours as well.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    19. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "Nobody expects infinite bandwidth... which was my original point..."

      Bollocks. Until I made that clarification, I had never mentioned "unlimited bandwidth". In fact, I explicitly stated in the very beginning that is NOT what I was talking about, and it's right there, in your quote of my words:

      "... just like anybody off-campus could get..."

      ... and you proceeded to argue with me about that. If you were arguing about something else, like truly unlimited bandwidth, as opposed to a reasonable comparison with other ISPs, why did you not say so, in so many words? Because that has nothing at all to do with anything I was talking about, and you could not have been arguing with ME at all. I had assumed -- actually I had stated, just as you quoted there -- that I was only interested in a discussion within reasonable bounds, which I explicitly said was a comparison with "off-campus" ISPs. Since you did not plainly state otherwise, I had no choice but to assume your arguments were in the same context. If they were not (as you now say), and you were talking about completely unlimited bandwidth, and completely unfettered access, you were doing nothing but wasting both your time and mine, because that isn't even remotely what I was talking about. So why were you arguing with me in the first place?

      If you were actually arguing about something other than what I originally stated, I would have to ask why, because my statement there is perfectly clear. That is why I have repeatedly stated that you keep arguing about things I did not even say.

      And also, therefore, either you could not have meant what you now say, because you were arguing with THAT SENTENCE which you quoted, or you failed to understand that sentence. Either way, my statements have been consistent from the beginning: "just as anybody off-campus could get" compares on-campus internet to what is supplied by external ISPs, exactly as I repeated later on.

      With your quote, YOU have demonstrated that I have done nothing but remain consistent, and you have not. Either that, or you have been been arguing with thin air, and not me, because I made it clear in the very beginning that I was NOT talking about anything that was genuinely "unlimited"... I was only comparing to other ISPs.

      And I am done with this, because it is clearly a waste of time.

    20. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      And by the way: to be honest, I don't think you really understand what either "straw-man" arguments or "ad hominem" attacks are.

    21. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      "Nobody expects infinite bandwidth... which was my original point..."

      Bollocks. Until I made that clarification, I had never mentioned "unlimited bandwidth". In fact, I explicitly stated in the very beginning that is NOT what I was talking about, and it's right there, in your quote of my words:

      There you go again, first calling my statement that ""Wanting to browse whatever whenever is not a reasonable request - and IT has to be sure that bandwidth is available for people really doing academic work - not to ensure we all get our /. fill", and I quote: "Nosiness", make an ad-hominem attack and now you say you didn't mean completely unfettered; and yet wonder why I say you are backtracking?

      It seems you agree with my original position but seem incapable of saying so. That's fine. Cheers.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    22. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "... and yet wonder why I say you are backtracking?"

      Because I wasn't backtracking. That's why.

      I am serious. I am done here. You are either trolling me or a complete dumbass. I don't really care which; I have no more time for this BS.

    23. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      "... and yet wonder why I say you are backtracking?"

      Because I wasn't backtracking. That's why. I am serious. I am done here. You are either trolling me or a complete dumbass. I don't really care which; I have no more time for this BS.

      No worries, I've concluded the same thing about you; you can pick which one you are doing or are.

      Cheers...

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    24. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Apologies, I know I stated that I would not reply anymore, but I simply could not resist this one last time.

      You have simply proven my point. *I* could not be trolling YOU, because it is you who keep insisting on arguing with me and asserting that I stated things I actually haven't.

      So THAT argument, at least, you definitively lose.

    25. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Apologies, I know I stated that I would not reply anymore, but I simply could not resist this one last time. You have simply proven my point. *I* could not be trolling YOU, because it is you who keep insisting on arguing with me and asserting that I stated things I actually haven't. So THAT argument, at least, you definitively lose.

      No need to apologize. It's interesting that you insist on winning even though, after much back and forth, you simply restate my original position an then claim it was yours. If you must win, fine, I'm glad you just finally agreed with my reasonable position.

      Of course, I could be snarking and say since I reached the same conclusion as you did with respect to you that you had to me and said you were either trolling or a dumbass as well, and now you say you aren't trolling that only leaves one conclusion.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    26. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      You are completely full of shit. I tried to drop the conversation, rather than "insist on winning", because we weren't arguing about the same things, which I have already proved. Too bad you aren't intelligent enough to have realized that even now. But you just wouldn't leave it alone.

      Oh, you're snarking all right. And as far as I am concerned, you can come to pretty much whatever conclusion you want. I don't think either your arguments or "conclusions" will convince any other Slashdot readers any more than they have convinced me.

    27. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      I don't think either your arguments or "conclusions" will convince any other Slashdot readers any more than they have convinced me.

      There you again again, backtracking after you agreed with me and now somehow deciding what you said wasn't what you mean. You really should think through your comments before you post because you do seem to be a bit more literate than the average /. poster; but you do seem a bit unable to do so and let your fingers do the walking before the brain has fully engaged. No worries

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    28. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "There you again again, backtracking after you agreed with me and now somehow deciding what you said wasn't what you mean."

      I repeat: you are completely full of shit. YOU were not agreeing with ME at all, as I clearly demonstrated. It is a mystery to me why you did not follow that logic; perhaps you just have no education in formal logic. The fact that you do not seem to understand what a "straw-man" argument actually is, or an "ad-hominem attack". I can only conclude that you are ignorant of other basic concepts of logic as well.

      Again, I say: too bad that you don't seem to understand that. But I think readers of this thread will see it plainly. Most readers do not seem to exhibit the comprehension issues you have paraded here for all to see.

    29. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      That was supposed to have been: "The fact that you do not seem to understand what a 'straw-man' argument actually is, or an 'ad-hominem attack', is strong evidence of this."

    30. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      YOU were not agreeing with ME at all,

      Let's review the bidding:

      I said:

      "Wanting to browse whatever whenever is not a reasonable request - and IT has to be sure that bandwidth is available for people really doing academic work - not to ensure we all get our /. fill"

      to which you replied:

      Nonsense. If you are a university student, and you are PAYING for access, then you deserve to get access. Which means yes, I would want exactly that... an unfettered Internet connection, just like anybody off-campus could get.

      and then followed a circuitous path, including side trips down ad-homenum and straw man lane, to get back to restating my original point by saying that when you said unfettered internet access you didn't mean completely unfettered - which was of course my exact original point.

      Ignoring the odd grammatical construction of "completely unfettered" (something unfettered is well, unfettered, or it is not unfettered, sort of like there's no small minority) it's pretty clear you are backtracking.

      So yes, I'm not agreeing with you - you're agreeing with me.

      But that's OK. As I said before, if you want to win, fine. I really don't care; although it seems important to you.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    31. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      I am not going to review anything. I have made my points, you did not understand them; that is that. I am done here. I have no reason to continue repeating myself. I'll let other readers judge what is what.

    32. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      I have made my points,

      Correct. Which ultimately was exactly the same as my original point although for some reason you can't seem to grasp that. Oh well.

      I am done here.

      Ok, but you keep backtracking and coming back. Oh well, Cheers...

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    33. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1
      But you keep putting bait out there, which has been almost too tempting to resist. Which is precisely why I suggested you may be trolling. That's how trolling got its name.

      "Correct. Which ultimately was exactly the same as my original point although for some reason you can't seem to grasp that. Oh well."

      No, you are the one failing to grasp. Look dude, I'll put it as simply as I can: if we were actually making the same point, why were you arguing with me in the first place? Was it just a mistake on your part, or were you baiting me, or did you truly not understand? Because it almost has to be one of those three.

      That's called a "slam-dunk". That's not the only issue with this exchange but it is sufficient to show that you are either ignorant or a troll. Note that I didn't say "stupid". I'm not accusing you of that.

      I have already shown that we could NOT have been making the same point. So I'm not going to go over that again. But add in the fact that you were arguing with me over that point, and we get a pretty solid conclusion, but it isn't the one you have been stating. Because even if we HAD been stating the same things, then you would have had no legitimate reason to be arguing with me. So either way, you are on the wrong side of the argument.

    34. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      No, you are the one failing to grasp. Look dude, I'll put it as simply as I can: if we were actually making the same point, why were you arguing with me in the first place? Was it just a mistake on your part, or were you baiting me, or did you truly not understand? Because it almost has to be one of those three.

      Actually, no. Let me make this real simple:

      At the start, I said it was not reasonable to expect to be able to browse whatever, whenever, that a uni's IT staff had to be able to make sure bandwidth is available for real academic needs.

      You replied:

      Nonsense. If you are a university student, and you are PAYING for access, then you deserve to get access. Which means yes, I would want exactly that... an unfettered Internet connection, just like anybody off-campus could get.

      (as a side note you said i was someone who wanted to censor the library (ad-homenum) and then made up some straw man about the US mail.)

      After a long and circuitous discussion you then said that unfettered doesn't mean completely unfettered - i.e. it is reasonable to manage access or use of the resource - which off course is what I originally said.

      I'm not sure what isn't clear in my original position nor that you eventually reached the same conclusion.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    35. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "I'm not sure what isn't clear in my original position nor that you eventually reached the same conclusion."

      Absolute horseshit. I will explain this for the third and last time, since you still don't seem to get it: I "reached that conclusion" in the very beginning, in this sentence:

      "Which means yes, I would want exactly that... an unfettered Internet connection, just like anybody off-campus could get." [emphasis added]

      "Just like anybody off-campus could get" clearly implies not literally unlimited, and not absolutely "unfettered", because the average off-campus ISP does not provide infinite bandwidth, or 100.000% of the internet's content.

    36. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      "Just like anybody off-campus could get" clearly implies not literally unlimited, and not absolutely "unfettered", because the average off-campus ISP does not provide infinite bandwidth, or 100.000% of the internet's content.

      There you go, backtracking again. First you say unfettered, and your "...just like anybody off-campus could get." implied that was available; after I say it's not unreasonable to control bandwidth use you say, "Of course, I never meant totally unfettered, nor, as you no add, not literally unlimited." Which, as I have pointed out, was my original point.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    37. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!

      Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!

      Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!

      You were quoting (and I was re-quoting) my original comment on the matter, which made my point! And you call even referring to THAT, "backtracking"!

      Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!

      Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!

      Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!

      It's almost TOO ridiculous to be funny!

    38. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      You were quoting (and I was re-quoting) my original comment on the matter, which made my point! And you call even referring to THAT, "backtracking"!

      Of course I used it - rather than paraphrase your statements, I juxtaposed it with your later ones that clearly back away from your original position, to illustrate how you eventually came to agreeing with me; even though you insist you aren't and that my original position was yours.

      It's almost TOO ridiculous to be funny!

      I wouldn't call your logic ridiculous, I'd use flawed; but you are free to characterize your argument any way you want. It's good you can laugh at yourself; far too fewe people can do that.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    39. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "Of course I used it - rather than paraphrase your statements, I juxtaposed it with your later ones that clearly back away from your original position, to illustrate how you eventually came to agreeing with me; even though you insist you aren't and that my original position was yours."

      Absolute proof you are trolling. Because that is the exact opposite of what you actually did. You quoted that sentence, then claimed I had reached the same conclusion in my later statements. But what you did not realize (and which I then pointed out), was that the conclusion you accused me of arriving at later was implicit in that original statement all along.

      There is no "backtracking" involved... I showed that the conclusion was the same as the one I discussed later, not any change of mind or story on my part. YOU, on the other hand, have kept claiming I said one thing, then you have claimed I was saying something else, then you claim I said the first (contradictory) thing again. When (as I clearly showed), nothing of the sort was going on.

      No more replies. You are a completely full of shit troll. Too bad Slashdot does not have a "flag this poster as troll" button. From my point of view you are a scum-of-the-earth lowlife with obvious emotional problems.

    40. Re:I Would Also Like To Know Who It Is by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      You quoted that sentence, then claimed I had reached the same conclusion in my later statements. But what you did not realize (and which I then pointed out), was that the conclusion you accused me of arriving at later was implicit in that original statement all along.

      Because that is what you did - you implied you get unfettered access off campus; and then later claim differently. of course, rather than discuss that, you launch, as usual, another ad hominem attack rather than take the time to think things through.Oh well...

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  35. A Brief on Drilling corporate firewall by jsse · · Score: 2

    The following serve as an overview. You would like to do your further research.

    (1) SSH client (inside) ---SSH Tunnel--> SSH server (outside, with webproxy)

    This may be the simplest setup, and the client could be linux or putty on Windows; and the server could be linux or CYGWIN on Windows

    (2) OpenVPN client (inside) ---OpenVPN handshake--> OpenVPN server (outside, with internet routing)

    You need to setup an OpenVPN server outside. For example, I reflash a CISCO router with OpenWRT at home so that I can connect from anywhere with OpenVPN client and use home's internet. This method could drill through most firewall/proxy, because it can be configured on any port, and any protocol (TCP or UDP).

    Above methods requires setting up Internet connection outside. You might want to circumvene University's security policies directly, say by malform URL request. However, I do not recommend you to do so, as it would be considered a direct attack on their firewall.

    1. Re:A Brief on Drilling corporate firewall by Krneki · · Score: 1

      Yap. But SSH is much harder to spot or block, all you need is 1 open port and doesn't matter which one. And if you have a proper router at home, you can use it as ssh server.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  36. don't like it, buy your own 3G card/modem by smash · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Oh wait... you expect unlimited access to the network for free? Hahaha...

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    1. Re:don't like it, buy your own 3G card/modem by geogob · · Score: 1

      Unlimited access to internet is much cheaper than university administrative fees for such things as, you know, internet connection.Your concept of "free" is quite distorted.

    2. Re:don't like it, buy your own 3G card/modem by dkf · · Score: 1

      Unlimited access to internet is much cheaper than university administrative fees for such things as, you know, internet connection.Your concept of "free" is quite distorted.

      The fees won't just be paying for the connection. There's a whole bunch of services too, including not just email but also things like having people around to help when things go wrong. That really costs and the value is invisible until you really need it.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  37. We have the same problem at our uni by mufflon · · Score: 1

    Check out proxy over dns. The dns is usually not as heavily filtered as the rest. It's not as fast (and you would need a computer you can connect to from outside, but it won't be subject to the same limitations).

  38. Protection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate to say it but as someone who implements networks with the very restrictions you mentioned. It is often because that is in the best interest of the school or business not to mention protecting your equipment from viruses and malware.

  39. QaD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember when i was in boarding school we used to use aol demo's to tunnel the schools firewall

  40. As a University network administrator ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to know at least what country this University is in. Where I am, it's all about the student experience and making and keeping the students happy is the #1 priority. Note, that our IT department is big and these views are only shared by some of the sections, most notably the one I run, but of course we provide the Internet access, including the firewalls and proxy and filter as well as the wireless networks.

    We spend considerable effort to protect the Internet from us, rather than the other way around. Heck, we currently give our students on the wireless networks real fully routable IPv4 addresses, with IPv6 coming soon.

  41. Security should be an Enabler by Yousef · · Score: 0

    Among the key aspects of security that many none security techies (control-freaks and politicians) miss is the fact that Security is supposed to be an enabler. It isn't supposed to get in the way of business.
    Aside from legal and compliance matters, security should never get in the way of day-to-day operations.
    The business of a University of LEARNING. Internet is a vital and essential part of learning - draconian restrictions will never help security.

    The "IT Guy" obviously hasn't segmented his network; nor has he done a threat assessment, risk assessment or analyzed the business requirements of Internet in a University!
    When your "security" policy/procedures force users to work around, bypass, hack; then that security policy has FAILED.

    At my old university, (1998), we got our useless IT Administrator sacked when the students and staff got together and made the case to the University Administrators (it was a fun meeting :-)). Unfortunately, University Administrators think they are running a prison, not an educational institute; however, they can't fight against the teachers and students! ;-)
    FIGHT DA POWA!

    --
    -- "To ask a question is to show ignorance; Not to ask a question means you'll remain ignorant."
    1. Re:Security should be an Enabler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a fuckwit who doesn't know what they are talking about

  42. ssh-tunnel to home ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... running on 443, because at least in my university, other ports were blocked (though I only needed the tunnel for some gaming stuff, exactly because of the port restrictions)

  43. Honestly I think you might have this all wrong.... by awjr · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you can go to your course lecturers and justify why you need access to Hackaday to complete your course, I am sure your lecturers have a process to unblock the sites.

    In the meantime there are 1000s of other students trying to use campus PCs without needing to find them screwed over by the previous user. What you *might* be able to persuade the University to do is to provide an unrestricted wi-fi point on campus for personal use.

  44. students are technically paying customers by OrangeTide · · Score: 2

    University isn't normally free.

    Also they Uni is wasting additional money on licenses for software and products to block everything, when it would be cheaper for them to provide a wide open internet to paying students.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:students are technically paying customers by smash · · Score: 1

      Tuition fees are not for internet service provision.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    2. Re:students are technically paying customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At my college we had a base tuition that covered all the services the college provided, which included computer lab and internet. Plus you had to pay for credit-hours and any additional lab fees. And we paid for parking, but that was more to discourage people who could take public transport or walk there from using the limited parking.

  45. Use their obligations as a landlord by m50d · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you're staying in university accommodation, and they're in a monopoly position as your internet provider, then they have an obligation (moral and possibly legal) to provide an equivalent service to what you'd get from a commercial ISP in private housing.

    --
    I am trolling
    1. Re:Use their obligations as a landlord by Jumperalex · · Score: 1

      Mod this up. I would but I have posted already on another conversation. All the people saying " you pay for the uni to provide tools for your education" are right when it comes to tuition and school computers. When it comes to the students computer, in their dorm, and they are unable to source a competetive option, then the uni should provide an unrestricted connection just like a student can get when off-campus.

      If you CAN get a non-school network connection well then ... frankly ... I'd rather do that since it might even be superior in speed / reliability / reduced monitoring.

      --
      If you can't be good, be good at it!
  46. Re:My ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If all the OP wants to use it for is stuff that is currently legal, no harm in taking the easy way out

  47. Anonymous Proxy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Search for a non blocked anonymous proxy? Granted you shouldn't trust sending your personal information through the proxy, you would be able to look at these sites you mentioned

  48. Network lockdown by university is frustrating by Xolve · · Score: 1

    This happens. And Its sad that university which should be a home for free flow of ideas just block the very channel for it. Even more frustrating is when access to IRC is blocked! I used tor but many IRC servers do not like that and they will now allow you on their network. IMHO blocking traffic where it prevents blocking of network is the one legitimate (e.g. torrent which just sucks up the whole bandwidth). I think when IT guys say that they want to prevent malware it shows they are too lazy to do their job of keeping the networks and computers safe.

  49. US issue? by tiedemann · · Score: 1

    I'm working at a university in Sweden. This kind of behaviour would be totally unacceptable here (afaik).
    Sure, the wired net with static IP's has a MAC filter but anyone is welcome to use the guest wlan which works ok as long as you don't need to access file shares behind our firewalls.

    1. Re:US issue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that the place where boys will soon be forced to sit down to pee?

  50. Speaking from the other perspective.. by GoLGY · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a member of an IT systems admin team for a faculty we've often got specific mandates which services we must restrict, and to what end. What you may also be up against, other than 'unprivileged' access - is politics. Students do Naughty Stuff (tm) - that's just a fact that keeps on proving itself true time and time again. Even if you can speak for you, your friends, or your entire course - I can bet dollars to donuts that there's someone out there trying to do something shifty. Case in point: I was seriously asked to relax the restrictions on banning Steam so a student could "download 10 or 15 gig so i didn't have to do it over dial-up". On-campus living - sure, i can see where restrictions like that may diminish any sort of sanity saving software platform ( Valve fan \o/ ), but I'm not going to open up a faculty network just so you can play games. It's an education facility, not your personal high speed connection to the 'net. If you were a postgraduate student researching something that required access - then by all means get your supervisor to approve your request and I'll be more than happy to make it happen.

    That being said - outline a clear case of why you need certain things re-classified and you may have a better case to work with. I am not suggesting that this tactic will work - as there's probably more to the story ( see - plug and play filter lists/software/appliances which remove the need to dedicate an entire FTE to putting classifications on traffic going out ) than you really know, but it will certainly stop you from seeming like a whinging student and more like an intellectual who is using sound reasoning. Hell - if you are able to find clear, repeated examples of wrongful clasification of websites, you may be able to enact a reconsideration of what's being used to deny you access or relax the level in which things are blocked.

    Of course, they might not care. Who knows?

    --
    --- perl -e 'printf("%s\n", pack "H*", "7369670a676f6c677940676f6c67792e6e65740a2f736967")'
    1. Re:Speaking from the other perspective.. by Supermike68 · · Score: 1

      As an educational institution they do have a right to control the content on their networks, but they are also have a responsibility to student success. Therefore they are almost obligated to provide students with a way to de-stress. I ran into this when I was in university a few years ago. There were students playing World of Warcraft in an area designated for studying. I had no problem with them playing but this caused them to create a number of distractions. When I asked the IT department why access to Blizzard servers was allowed they responded with 'As an educational institution we are responsible for student success, as a result we need to provide students with a way to de-stress. This was one of those ways'. I ended up buying $20 noise cancelling headphones and the problem was solved.

    2. Re:Speaking from the other perspective.. by PvtVoid · · Score: 1

      Let me be the first to say: Fuck you. I don't have to meet your criteria for intellectual seriousness to get access to the fucking internet, any more than I need to convince a librarian I am Serious(TM) enough to read a book that somebody doesn't like.

    3. Re:Speaking from the other perspective.. by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      Well, I'll add a little. I do agree with the GoLGY; however, the university/college must also adhere to its values and pick an appropriate solution.

      For instance, my college instituted the N2H2 Bess Filter designed for K-12 after some students used the network for porn; well, they used the system in the public labs in the dormatories. However, that is not an appropriate solution for a collegiant institution; and it was implemented campus wide - on all computers; it was also very difficult to get things approved as not being needed to filter. (E.g. I needed access to RightStuf as I had a license to be able to use their media for our media related club; but they wouldn't approve the site; despite it not meeting their policy requirements for being blocked.)

      Of course, the real kicker was that it was the policy of the college to teach kids reponsibility. Their use of the filter did not meet adhere to that policy. The main reason for the policy? Politics and alumni relations (e.g. money) as the incident that led to it was rather high profile to at least some alumni groups.

      Perhaps the better solution would simply to have required students to login to a proxy; and then hold them accountable for the sites retrieved through the proxy; and by default, everyone has to login. (Or perhaps, allow the login to by-pass the filter.)

      All that said, the content industry (e.g. RIAA and MPAA) has made it hard for colleges to run their networks as well. So you can put some of the blame there too.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    4. Re:Speaking from the other perspective.. by GoLGY · · Score: 1

      That's an immense over-reaction, and illustrates the "I pay, give me what i want" attitude which does not score points and makes any sort of discourse adversarial from the get-go. Well done! Gold star for you!

      The long and the short of the reality here is - if you, as a student, are asking me to take on your non-academia impacting website filter problem by appealing to my boss to get a change approved ( which then ties *my* name to it, and my boss' too for approving it ) and implemented ( which, may involve out of hours work depending on if such things require it ) then yes, you need to show a little fucking intelligence when it comes to asking me to do it. If you come at me with that attitude then I am going to dismiss your problem and then forget who you are, not because I'm a jerk but because I'm more worried about service delivery for the 12 odd thousand other faculty students that want to Get Stuff Done (tm) and not just those who complain about not getting their internet lulz. If the only reason you've got is "because I said so", then that's just not good enough.

      If you come to me saying "The website slashdot.org has been unfairly blocked under the reason pornography, could you check it out?" then I will at least have some sort evidence to back up any sort of claim that the solution that we as IT have in place, may not be appropriately doing its job. If your request is additional to a bunch more that claim there's classification errors going on - I have a strong case to review what's going on and perhaps knock down the paranoia level if there's such a device or bit of software that controls it, or at least try and effect change.

      --
      --- perl -e 'printf("%s\n", pack "H*", "7369670a676f6c677940676f6c67792e6e65740a2f736967")'
    5. Re:Speaking from the other perspective.. by GoLGY · · Score: 1

      All that said, the content industry (e.g. RIAA and MPAA) has made it hard for colleges to run their networks as well. So you can put some of the blame there too.

      Incredibly hard. To say that they've forced universities ( at least here in Australia ) to perform witch-hunts regularly is probably putting it lightly. But here, of course, laws are different - and education facilities are not covered by safe harbor.

      --
      --- perl -e 'printf("%s\n", pack "H*", "7369670a676f6c677940676f6c67792e6e65740a2f736967")'
    6. Re:Speaking from the other perspective.. by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      All that said, the content industry (e.g. RIAA and MPAA) has made it hard for colleges to run their networks as well. So you can put some of the blame there too.

      Incredibly hard. To say that they've forced universities ( at least here in Australia ) to perform witch-hunts regularly is probably putting it lightly. But here, of course, laws are different - and education facilities are not covered by safe harbor.

      Not sure whether or not they are covered by the Safe-Harbor clauses in the US, but the RIAA/MPAA have forced a few collegiant institutions to do filtering on their network for them, which is just wrong. I don't know how many have agreed without it getting made public (or at least have it come out in the press); but I would expect that there is at least pressure there to do so. It's a sad situation.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
  51. University IT usually gets run by morons by Weezul · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Rutgers University bans ssh public keys. Ergo, all the students employ expect scripts that contain their passwords. These expect scripts aren't from students writing em' themselves, but just copied from friends. In particular, there are students who barley know what ls and rm do, but certainly won't know to change their password if their laptop gets stolen. And students commonly hack one another's accounts by copying said script.

    --
    The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
    1. Re:University IT usually gets run by morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no it doesn't.
      University IT gets *managed* by morons, eventually the ones at the sharp end get pissed off with this and leave..
      I'm assuming the OP is behind an anal firewall as the Uni in question is covering their arses apropos p2p, music & film downloads etc. etc.
      It's the old baby and bathwater scenario, and is being driven by suits somewhere.

      Yrs,

      - Ex Uni IT

    2. Re:University IT usually gets run by morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Students always know about barley. After all, their favorite drink is made using it.

    3. Re:University IT usually gets run by morons by pongo000 · · Score: 1

      Rutgers University bans ssh public keys.

      How far Rutgers has fallen...anyone remember the old telnet days, prior to IRC? (Talking late 80's here...) quartz.rutgers.edu was one of the mainstays of the telnet scene. Guess times change...

    4. Re:University IT usually gets run by morons by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Wait, how do you ban a public key? Search everyone's backpacks for rogue thumbdrives that may contain keys?

    5. Re:University IT usually gets run by morons by lunchlady55 · · Score: 1

      Wait, how do you ban a public key? Search everyone's backpacks for rogue thumbdrives that may contain keys?

      In the server's /etc/ssh/sshd_config:

      Change
      PubkeyAuthentication yes
      to
      PubkeyAuthentication no

      (and maybe the RSAAuthentication too, I'm too lazy to really look it up)

      restart ssh

      TA-DA! The Aristocrats!

  52. Student computer club? by introcept · · Score: 1

    See if there's an on campus computer club, that will almost certainly lead you to people, servers and networks that will help with outside access.

    A few things I've seen used on campus:
    -SSH proxy tunneling
    -VPNs
    -IPV6 related workarounds
    -'partner' universities and organisation that can be accessed/tunelled through without going through the firewall
    -wifi router/repeater with long distance wifi link (eg with a 'cantenna') to an off-campus house/building
    -friends that work for campus IT, local ISPs and the university's ISP

  53. Specifically for torrents, an easy solution by DanTheManMS · · Score: 1

    If you're talking about torrents, then I have one word: BitcoinTorrentz. Cheaper than a VPN, you get your torrented files over a standard port 80 HTTP connection (though it is NOT encrypted, if that makes a difference), and hey this is Slashdot so LOL ANONYMOUS MONEY for whatever that's worth.

    For all other normal web traffic, yes your school is being very Draconian if they're blocking the likes of Hackaday. I mean hell, that's pretty much "Great Firewall Of China" levels of censorship there. I frankly don't know what you can do as a single person to try and change that, but know that most colleges in the US don't filter Internet traffic at all, so your IT admin is almost certainly on a power trip if he's implementing these sorts of policies.

    1. Re:Specifically for torrents, an easy solution by DanTheManMS · · Score: 1

      Pre-emptive defense: replace "at all" with "nearly as much" in that second paragraph.

  54. The internet should NOT be censored by pl0sql · · Score: 0

    Restricting internet access to students like this is ridiculous. If the "University Network" needs to be protected, segment it off from the part of the network students can get to the internet from.

    Who is the IT department to determine what is "beneficial" or "useful" to someone's University education? The internet was borne of research and inquisitiveness, blocking the internet goes against this idea completely.

    OK, so people might watch YouTube etc but if this helps students feel they are free to go and explore the internet and helps to foster a culture of learning, who cares?

    Someone’s "messing around" is another person’s productivity, I wonder if the IT department would have deemed the inception of Facebook for example, a good use the University network?

  55. Teamviewer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Teamviewer uses port 80 http which is never blocked, has a portable .exe.

  56. It's not all about censorship.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a lot of people seem to be missing here is that for any university IT dept, one of the main things they have to do is protect and manage their bandwidth. The question for most institutions is not a philosophical policy decision about "should we give full internet access", it's a technical question of "how much access can we give before our bandwidth gets saturated, to the detriment of our core business as a education institute."

    IME, most students these days are above-average users of youtube, iplayer, online gaming, streaming music, skype, torrents and other high bandwidth internet usage. No university in the world could reasonably afford the mahoosive pipe needed to allow all their students full access to everything. Even more 'legitimate' things that you wouldn't think of can cause huge problems - the last time a new version of Ubuntu was released, our University's bandwidth was completely saturated for 7 hours.

    It sounds like the OP's university is going about it in a slightly ham-fisted way though. Rate-capping of connections would be a better way to go. As many others have suggested, opening a dialogue is the way forward. But remember, like it or not, you are the supplicant here. Show some sympathy and understanding of the problems faced by the people you speak to and you stand a far higher chance of success. Wade in a like a toddler who can't have his sweeties and you'll be dismissed out of hand.

  57. Have you tried it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try being a network admin for something that is typically understaffed, underfunded, etc etc. I do it for a community college and most days it is fine but there are plenty of days when it isn't. You seem to forget that there is likely school business running on the network (different VLAN) and through the firewall too. We pretty much allow anything outbound but bandwidth shape to keep the higher priority stuff moving along. You know, things like class registrations, www. email, etc.

    Before resorting to some bypassing scheme, why don't you find out how to request certain sites be opened up? Unless of course you are just bitching because you can't check Facebook, download ISOs, torrent, or whatever else you determined falls under your academic freedom. Have you been to the school library? They don't have every book ever published there. You should complain about that too.

  58. Are you studying Computer Science or Programming? by OzTech · · Score: 4, Funny

    If so ...

    This is the basic test to see if you are worth letting back for the second semester.
    As you have posted this question on /. I suggest your consider a different career path.

    As you obviously want other technical people to get you out of trouble and solve all of your problems for you, I suggest you look at Sales and or Marketing.
    Something tells me you have a natural aptitude for either of these.

  59. ssh server on 443 + corkscrew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a ssh server running on port 443 and corkscrew kept me sane though my uni years when all traffic to the outside world had to go through their proxy. Once you can ssh somewhere you can set up tunnels and do anything you want

  60. Students Union. by chrb · · Score: 4, Informative

    Most (all?) universities have a union to represent the needs of the students. Get them to raise the issue and it's likely to be a lot more effective than one man's personal protest.

    1. Re:Students Union. by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Informative

      And never forget you are ultimately paying for a service and if they are hindering your ability to learn by crippling the network they are providing a poor service and need to be called on it. It took me awhile to get that to sink in with my oldest but now when a teacher isn't doing their job (one gave them a test on material he never covered because he went on vacation during the period he was suppose to cover it and didn't bother to tell the TA) or something is hampering their ability to get the most out of the class he will get as many of his classmates as he can together and they go to the dean. not only has several things been changed but he was put on the Dean's list for his leadership ability.

      Its like that old saying "There are sheep and there are wolves" and too many simply are afraid to 'rock the boat' or complain even when something is causing them grief. i bet if he organizes his fellow students he CAN get these rules changed, they are paying for the network after all.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  61. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  62. The OP isn't asking your opinion about IT policies by klifford · · Score: 1

    He's asking what options are available for getting around a problem he has. When someone's IT policy is threatened here, dozens of people instantly rush to its defense. The topic wasn't started to debate whether it was a good or bad policy; whether the IT department here was doing their job well; whether they were just crazy with power. Nor was it a pity plea; they don't want your derision.

    They wanted a solution to their problem. That's why they're asking /. how to deal with the situation. If someone asks you for help fixing their car, you don't launch into a rant about the engineer's design and material choices and how they know better. Hopefully, you go about helping them fix the problem.

    There's no point in having Ask Slashdot if the replies are all posts telling the asker they're meddling, they're stupid, they're lazy, they don't understand. You aren't obligated to respond to the questions. If you don't have a solution, don't say anything and avoid being an unhelpful dick.

  63. Depends on what university by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Informative

    If it is a private university, then yes, they can do whatever they like, no matter how stupid it is. If they are a public university, then no it isn't "their bandwidth" it is "the public's bandwidth" and they have certain responsibilities.

    So that's the first question to answer: Public or private? If it is private, well then suck it up. Private schools can, and often are, stupid with some of their rules. My recommendation is don't go to them, go to a public university.

    If it is public then the thing to find out is where this is coming from. If it is from on high, the board of regents, there may be little you can do, though you can investigate state law, maybe talk to FIRE. However if it is coming from an overzealous IT department, then maybe it is time for them to get smacked around and learn that they are there to provide a service, not to act like despots.

    In that case maybe talk to the faculty senate. The faculty and administration can ultimately tell the IT department to sit down and shut up, they perhaps just need to be made aware of that fact. Get information from other universities, see how they do it. You'll have no trouble finding places that provide essentially unrestricted Internet access (the university I work at does). Present the faculty with ammunition that it can and should be done a different way and they may choose to affect a change.

    As something of an example of the second scenario in the private sector, my dad worked as a VP for a company;s American branch for many years. They decided to bring him over to the British branch for a bit to clean shit up. So he is over there, meets the guy who is the director in everything but title of that place (that was forthcoming). Guy says "Hi, welcome, I've got to go to this meeting, here's my office make yourself comfortable, I'll be back in an hour." My dad decides he'll check his e-mail and such things on the guys computer. No luck, can't get on the Internet.

    He has someone call IT for him. IT comes down and says "Oh ya he doesn't have Internet access, he doesn't need it." Umm what? The guy in charge doesn't have Internet access? And who the fuck decided he didn't need it? There was no company policy to this effect. Dad snarls at them, 5 minutes later computer has Internet access. The IT department there was very tyrannical. They made rules all of their own and it just never really occurred anyone to yank on their chain.

    Remember, and I say this as someone who works in IT: IT is a service industry. You are there to help people get their jobs done. That means not putting up artificial blocks to shit. That doesn't mean no blocks at all, you have to do things for security, compliance, and so on. However it does mean not being asshats and doing things like offering nothing but extremely locked down web access.

    Also any time you say no to something, you need to have an alternative. So you say "No, you can't have an FTP server. The passwords are clear text and that is insecure. However we will happily help you setup an SFTP (SSH) server instead which is fully secure."

    At any rate step one is to find out from where this policy comes, then you can see if anything can be done about it.

    1. Re:Depends on what university by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see this kind of post on slashdot all the time......... Unfortunately it is completely wrong.

      It doesn't matter where the funding comes from the University can decide its own policies. That means they can block all internet access if the choose.

      Just because some of the university funding comes from state/federal funds it does not mean the internet must be unrestricted. Unless I am mistaken the right to free internet has not been added to the constitution.

    2. Re:Depends on what university by kiwimate · · Score: 1

      IT is a service industry. You are there to help people get their jobs done

      Agreed. What is the first job of IT in a university? To ensure the network stays up, is reliable, and is stable so that students can do their work. It takes just one jackass who has an overinflated opinion of his own abilities and too much access to screw up hundreds or thousands of machines and prevent the students from doing their work.

      The flipside is that if a story were to appear on Slashdot about a large university whose network went down for several hours or days because of something accidental or malicious done by a student, people would be falling over themselves to gripe about the incompetence of the network admins.

      And most of the people commenting on this story have likely never administered a network as big and diverse as the network installed in a typical university.

    3. Re:Depends on what university by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Of course you have to know who it is IT works for. They inevitably do not work for the students. They work for the administration, and the administration works for who pays the bills. The bills are paid for by the state, rich alumni, the NSF, profs who bring in grants, and the actual people who pay the tuition (usually not the individual students but their parents). IT at either a university or a teaching college are not there to provide an ISP service.

      Now granted the college may be behind the times and may dwindle if faculty and students go elsewhere, but it is actually their network and they have the right to control it. And as it reads it's not just a case of denying internet access, but filtering out content that they feel is inappropriate to their educational mission. It's just a firewall, same as you get in many corporate environments in the post-university real world. It does not sound like the students can't get their work done because educational resources are blocked, but that their extra-curricular play time is disrupted.

      If there is a legitimate need to access these sites, then the solution has always been there: talk to the faculty and IT.

    4. Re:Depends on what university by somebody1 · · Score: 1

      The flipside is that if a story were to appear on Slashdot about a large university whose network went down for several hours or days because of something accidental or malicious done by a student, people would be falling over themselves to gripe about the incompetence of the network admins.

      That's because they *would* be incompetent in this case. If a student brought the network down by simply using the connection then something is wrong with the network. My university does not censor anything and there have been no major outages that I know of. They don't block outgoing traffic and on the wireless you even get a public IP address with both incoming and outgoing traffic allowed and yet the network manages to stay up somehow. Of course the network is set up competently, i.e. students' connections are isolated as much as possible, so even if a student's machine is compromised (which happens a lot I imagine) it is no worse for the others than any of the millions of compromised machines on the Internet. Also, there are some (negotiable) caps to prevent bandwidth wasting.

      And even if the network is not properly set up, how is censoring open-source communities' websites such as hackaday going to help it anyway?

  64. We have a common saying in Australia for this... by Joshua.Niland · · Score: 2

    HARDEN THE FUCK UP!

  65. suck it up junior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a poor little kid who has always known the internet is having a cry. that's alight, Slashdot will comfort your tears, we have nothing better to do since we realised the quality and relevance on this site was lost long ago. Don't despair that the world is not bending to your every whim. I've got a packet trace to run and have to figure out is this issue is SAN, DB, driver, app server, VM, programmer error, firewall, router or other. I'll be back to make you some hot coco & wipe your arse in an hour when I've finished doing my adult job.

  66. Academic Freedom by mattsday · · Score: 1
    Universities should be havens for academic freedom and research, not a narrow corridor where IT can arbitrarily set policy.

    Fortunately most universities I know (at least in the UK) respect this. They might hate having to deal with student residences (the wild west), but they prefer to generally treat students as adults and respect that the internet is far too useful as a tool to have some guy lock it down in the misguided name of security.

    --
    Now there's one hoopy frood who really knows where his towel is!
    1. Re:Academic Freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly! I think at any half-way decent university the students and faculty would unite to create an epic shitstorm if access to the internet were restricted like this.

  67. Re:The OP isn't asking your opinion about IT polic by ledow · · Score: 1

    Asking a stupid question will get you stupid answers.

    "How can I bypass my University's IT policy against their wishes" isn't a question that requires an answer. It's like asking "How do I deploy an open telnetd running as root on the Internet?" or "How do I bypass the fact that my ISP allow me to put my unauthenticated Windows fileshares online?"

    When you're doing something stupid, don't expect people to help directly. You think that telling someone they're doing it wrong isn't helping. It is. It helps them learn that they shouldn't NEED the answer to their question.

    If someone phones up a garage and asks how they can wire the metal door-handles directly to the battery, or how they can illuminate the petrol tank with an uncovered candle, you'd expect them to be similarly unhelpful. Because it's a stupid thing to do, and if you want to do that, you're on your own. Our "help" is to tell you not to try.

  68. I have a better answer. by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    Get friends to start buying old linksys routers and create your own rouge wireless internet campus wide. Get people to donate to pay for hardware and a few cable modems at the perimiter so your mesh network can have multiple internet gateways to balance the load.

    Old routers and openWRT will do this, then start putting them up.

    you are in college, it's time to be subversive and community building. a non uni owned student run wireless internet setup is the best way to do this.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:I have a better answer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get friends to start buying old linksys routers and create your own rouge wireless internet campus wide. Get people to donate to pay for hardware and a few cable modems at the perimiter so your mesh network can have multiple internet gateways to balance the load.

      Old routers and openWRT will do this, then start putting them up.

      you are in college, it's time to be subversive and community building. a non uni owned student run wireless internet setup is the best way to do this.

      Yes and research mesh networking.

      University campuses are full of clever folk and under funded resources.
      Required reading... only three copies in the library ... you better get to it
      early and read it quickly. This is no different. Quotas and limits for CPU and
      memory were invented because in a competitive world the shared commons gets
      trampled on. To bypass lots of filters and stuff a 3G/4G card for the laptop may be the
      way to go but watch the plan and bandwidth. Make sure you have coverage....

      The density of campuses and their demand for the likes of Netflix and other
      bandwidth consuming services is hard to provision.

      Universities DO have in in loco parentis obligations that drive some what looks like
      politics as parent back home make demands on the school.

      In some cases a bus ride to a Starbucks or other open WiFi service cross town can help
      and is less expensive than 3G/4G.

      How about Cable TV. Does the Cable TV service have internet?

  69. HTTP Tunneling by eggstasy · · Score: 1

    Unless they have a default-deny that only authorizes certain websites, you can set up an HTTP tunnel.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_tunnel
    There's software available for it, you don't need to be a fancy hacker to use this.

    In extreme cases, you might be able to work around default-deny HTTP filters by using DNS tunneling. It's horribly, horribly slow, but it works on some of those hotel connections where you would normally be able to access only one webpage, where you have to pay a fee to get X hours of connectivity.
    Here's an illustrated tutorial: http://analogbit.com/tcp-over-dns_howto

    Have fun!

  70. Re:My ass by dan2550 · · Score: 1

    It's the principal of the matter. If your service is based on the premise of anonymity you shouldn't fold to the cops unless required by law. Even then you shouldn't record any data of substance that can be used to prosecute customers.

  71. Evading it might get you expelled by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    You might want to check your University's Network AUP and make sure you won't get expelled for wanton evasion of their security policies.

    Best bet is probably to get your own cellular modem, or move off campus where you can get your own DSL/Cable/Fiber. It's their network, and you should abide by their rules even if you don't like them.

  72. Occupy by biodata · · Score: 2

    When I was at University the way to get things changed was to get a group of people who were interested enough, and then go and occupy something inconvenient to the administration to get the message heard.

    --
    Korma: Good
  73. What you are asking for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is somewhere between bad idea and illegal. If there is a policy you should start to investigate why somebody made a very strict policy. My guess is that they just don't want to be a part of a police investigation and don't want to see the university's name on the front page of all newspapers.

    You want a solution... buy a 3G USB stick.
    You want to be expelled then feel free to try to hack the system...

    If you do want to change the policy then you need to:
    a) understand the reason for it being there
    b) have a really good explanation for why a) is not the right way of protecting whatever they are protecting
    c) find the people responsible for the policy

  74. Multiple IPs and Ports by garnkelflax · · Score: 1

    I run into this with clients occasionally. I don't do onsite development work unless I am able to bring my own dev laptop and screens and other equipment including a hardware firewall between their network and my machine. And I don't use their email servers. I've been fortunate that it hasn't been rejected so far. Some clients only allow http/https access going out. I set up my dedicated server with multiple IP addresses for ports 80 and 443 that reroutes for pop/smtp, terminal services, etc... I ask the client first and show them my routing setup. Usually their policies are in place for non IT people and they just don't have different network policies for various departments.

  75. Re:The OP isn't asking your opinion about IT polic by rta · · Score: 1

    Well... i'd say the solution is not a technology one (though many of those are available and many have been mentioned).

    The best solution would be to transfer to a real school, because if they have as restrictive of a policy as OP suggests they're probably a crappy school anyway.

    An easier one would be to just use a phone or get DSL or cable or something to get to the blocked sites.

  76. What would I do to get better access? by msobkow · · Score: 1

    Pay for it.

    Those students with the 3G and 4G dongles that you're laughing at have the right idea.

    Internet access is not a "right", bub. It's a service you PAY for.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  77. From an IT Admin by perotbot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've been the internet cop is several organizations during my employment history and have seen administrators (not IT people) declare everything from "ALL shall be free!" to "Don't let them do anything more than their job" as a standard to use for filtering. Most likely what is happening is that someone, not in IT, has the list of "categories" from the filter service provider, be it Dan's Guardian or a big company like Websense, and have picked the usual suspects of Adult, Security, Malware, and Offensive, along with Hate Speech, Violence, and IT related" and flipped the filter on. The University Administration will ask you one question and one question only, "What part of your EDUCATION" is being effected by this? AND remember these people have fairly well tuned BS detectors. This isn't your parents' basement, they have the right to do what they will to reduce costs (your tuition) by protecting their network and reducing bandwidth use. If you don't like the on campus connection then move off campus and PAY for your own net connection where you can surf to your heart's content and waste your parents' money on reading hackaday instead of getting the Business Degree your parents are paying for by working overtime. And if you want REALLY draconian, they know eveery website you attempt to go to, whether it's blocked or not, and with the newest tech, they are doing a man in the middle on all SSL traffic so they know what you are doing there as well.

    --
    ~corporate tool, but employed~
    1. Re:From an IT Admin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for a state university's IT department. We have 400+ people working in computing services, and not a single one of them cares were you (student, faculty or staff) goes on the internet or what files you transfer in and out (as long as they are legal files--we do have to deal with DMCA notices too). Our network from the inside going outbound is, as far as I know, 99% uncensored. We do restrict certain things like port 25 for smtp and force it through the university's mail relays, but that's to prevent past issues of clueless mail admins running open smtp servers and unknowingly providing spammers with a gateway. Inbound, we filter all TCP ports, but it's easy to get exceptions for 80 and 443 for web servers (just has to have a security scan run to make sure you aren't running any vulnerable software; they use nessus for that). Other ports can be opened as necessary for inbound ssh, ftp, etc (although FTP has to be over SSL, or anonymous download only, no upload).

      Any attempts to restrict outbound service would immediately cause a battle cry of "YOU'RE VIOLATING MY ACADEMIC FREEDOMS!!!" from the faculty here. Considering that tenured faculty generally don't care who they piss off, and consider themselves sacrosanct, they would gladly force the issue with university administration.

    2. Re:From an IT Admin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to save this comment for the next time i casually bypass some network's firewall that is "protecting" me by blocking outgoing ssh connections, so I can savour the warm fuzzy feeling.

  78. Sounds a Bit Draconian To Me... by Volvogga · · Score: 1

    I'm assuming you live in on campus housing with the internet connection being provided by the university and pretty much mandatory. I think the old 'vote with your wallet' applies here... don't pay the huge fees for living on campus and find an apartment near by (check the bus routes if you don't have a car, and see if the buses give student discounts). Then you can have whatever internet connection you want. Do it soon, as this time of year, in my experience, is when spots start filling up. Doesn't mean you will have to move immediately, as many landlords near college campuses know students have to complete one housing assignment first, then move. They are usually just happy to have a guarantee of a rent check coming in. If you don't want to stay over the summer, then you may have to work out a deal where you pay half-rent during the summer to reserve the spot or something. Check your options. Find some roommates. See what they are willing to do.

    In the meantime, do as others have suggested and see if SSH tunneling and such is blocked. If it is, see about getting it unblocked. You could use the excuse of having to log into a server you own for non-school related projects. Employers like to see personal projects during interviews, and not stuff you were forced to do for class, so blocking that is hurting your chances for future employment. Doesn't matter if you are or are not as that point stands quite well.

    --
    Vol~
  79. VPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try using ProxPN or hotspotshield.
    I think it's somewhat common, and mostly just to reduce internet usage (and probably liabilities for illegal use).

  80. tor or vpn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't you just use tor?

  81. Facts are probably missing by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

    I'd question "anonymous reader's" facts. It's difficult to believe such a restrictive setup would ever exist as a general, university-wide policy. It's much more likely that the "anonymous poster" failed to set up an IT required _proxy_ service, which is a quite common practice. It's also possible that the firewall is for a smaller, restricted part of the network, such as those handling confidential data. Well managed proxies in these environments can help manage network abuse, help prevent or control malware, and restrict potentially network expensive access to porn, P2P services, or to track use of university funded resources, and help manage unregistered clients plugged into the university's networks, especially those using poorly secured wi-fi access points.

    I've also regularly seen people refuse to use the proxies who see them as limitations of their rights, and especially as interfering with their use of "their" computers, whether the university or company paid for them or not. This can usually be resolved with a short discussion with the person, explaining why the proxies have proven necessary. It cannot be resolved by giving Slashdot advice about how to work around the firewalls or proxies, because that creates a whole new set of potential problems.

  82. some restrictions make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    like, blocking stuff that the biggest part of worm-infested laptops brought in by freshmen would try to do. that is, mitigating harm that could be done by careless users. now censoring specific content is BS but there's no patent solution inbetween the two.

  83. I'm not recommending this... by tiniebras · · Score: 1

    When I was at Uni over a decade ago now, the firewall rankled with me (I'm a grown up...let me choose! ;) so being somewhat childish I attached a hardware keylogger and reported a computer fault (I think i cleared the isntalled printers and said the "PC won't print"). Anyhoo, next time I cam back to the lab I had me an admin login. This didn't allow me to access the net through my user, but interstingly the admin account seemed to have pretty much unfettered access to the web. I was too scared to use it, but had I needed soemthing in an emergency...it was there ;)

  84. Don't try to take matters into your own hands... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1- Get a VPS
    2- Run SSHD on some nice ports like 80 and 443
    3- Corkscrew or even PuTTY alone if it's a dumb old and not well configured squid proxy
    4- ...
    5- Profit?

  85. Internet access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This seems to be especially problematic in Australian universities. University IT typically argues that they cannot supply that level of internet access because of the cost of their service. I think that the backend cost needs to be reviewed, because most local ISPs charge a fraction of the cost of what the university charges per MB.

    I also think that metered internet access via VPN seems to be a better solution. My PhD supervisor is kind enough to foot the bill for my VPN access which means that I don't have to *** around with tunelling.

    1. Re:Internet access by aaron552 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how prevalent this is, but I'm Australian and my University's internet access is really not bad, most of the time. Things that I've run into that don't seem to work:

      • File hosting websites (Rapidshare, mediafire, etc.)
      • SSH (even on port 443)
      • Incoming connections (all PCs on the network have public IP addresses)
      • Skype is extremely unreliable (probably due to the above)
      • Bittorrent

      Apart from these, most things seems to work fine (inlcuding VPNs, so the list is largely irrelevant). ITS only seem to take notice if you transfer multiple gigabytes (>~2GB) within a day without a good reason, and send a warning before taking any further action.

      --
      I had a sig once. It was lost in the great storm of '09.
  86. Typical Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You get the usual self-important IT heads here defending their own little network. It's a freaking geeks circle-jerk. The purpose of the IT department is not to run a nice little network, it's to provide service to the users. You don't get to decide what that service is, you just provide it. The number of little napoleons of network admin around here are amazing - "It's my bandwidth, not yours!" "That's not for your degree". Sorry IT gimps, you don't get to decide what's legitimate for me to look up on my university network. You're the plumbers and janitors of the network, you don't get to decide what goes down the lines, you just get to make them work. So stop imposing your own rules on everyone else and just make the system work.

  87. Re:The OP isn't asking your opinion about IT polic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The post got edited somewhat prior to publication. I never asked how to to bypass but how to protest. Lecturers have the same issues. We have game programming courses which are being cut down to not include console platforms as the devkits cant phone home to microsoft. IT wont act even on this. Its not about comics on the net.

  88. Haven't actually read the thread... by f3rret · · Score: 1

    ...But couldn't you technically get through the firewalls and proxies via a VPN tunnel?

    And if the university blocks the standard VPN ports, use non-standard port.

    --
    Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
  89. College! by ff1324 · · Score: 0

    Turn off the computer and go outside. Go to a bar. Go to a concert. Go skiing. Go to the beach. Go to a party. Repeat as needed.

    THIS is what college is for.

  90. Probably-redundant answer by Kalzus · · Score: 1

    Move off campus.

    --
    "The Devil does not know a lot because He's the Devil, He knows a lot because he's old." -- unknown
  91. Re:Are you studying Computer Science or Programmin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a good point. The problem of getting around firewalls is pretty easily solved by Googling. If you can't do basic problem solving, you are definitely in the wrong field.

    Also internet access is a privilege. Even "way back when" I went to university some 15 years ago, you could still obtain your own cable or DSL. Do so. Torrent to your hearts content.

  92. The answer is quite simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just go to any public library, and you too could be watching all the hard core man on man pron you like while kids walk around right behind you.

    It's the American way don't cha know - ZERO consideration for anyone else. Get used to it.

  93. Ask the network admin very nicely to open a few... by nhat11 · · Score: 1

    ports and a reason why. Other than that there's no real way of doing it except a few ways.

  94. Re:Honestly I think you might have this all wrong. by buglista · · Score: 1

    The world is full of graduates who passed their courses. I want to see something else if I'm hiring, like working on open source projects, writing original papers, etc. This is the sort of attitude I expect from school up to the age of 18, not a university. (And yes, I used to decide filtering policy at a university, though not a US one. Is it better to block Internet banking sites and lose an hour of someone's time to get into town and back, or take the hit and have them only unavailable for 10 minutes?)

  95. BYU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brigham young university has some kind of internet filter. I don't have any experience with how strict it is, though.

  96. Faculty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get the faculty mad about it. If yours is like most universities, faculty are the only ones with the pull to demand big change like this.

  97. While you are at it by Monoman · · Score: 1

    Go complain that the school library doesn't let you access everything that has ever been printed (books, mags, etc) ... in every country, in every language. After all it is your money and your academic freedom.

    Let us know how that works out for you.

    --
    Keep the Classic Slashdot.
  98. Re:Honestly I think you might have this all wrong. by dcollins · · Score: 1

    "If you can go to your course lecturers and justify why you need access to Hackaday to complete your course, I am sure your lecturers have a process to unblock the sites."

    I'll bet that you're wrong. In my experience, college IT departments are run separately from teaching staff, and usually from the stance of "we'll tell you how things work" rather than vice-versa. Moreover, this policy is so wildly nonstandard that it smacks of a tyrannical banana-republic college IT department.

    Remember: Schools have an administrator side and a teaching side; the two sides are usually in direct conflict; and for the last 20+ years the teachers have always been losing.

    --
    We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
  99. A comment from the Submitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The submission I made was edited somewhat from submission through to being posted to the front page. Originally it was stated that all internet access was through the proxy server, with a firewall blocking everything else. So access to anything other than the web on campus is just not possible.

    Yes there are ways to tunnel through it, I know that and I did not ask about how to do so. I was asking for suggestions on protesting the issue, who to take it up with, how to go through things the proper way to bring about change.

    There are a number of problems with a lack of internet access (I put it this way, because the web is not the internet). One example of such is the games programming course that is offered within the university. Xbox360 devkits were purchased as well as Source Engine liceses to that these could be used for teaching in the class room. These need to authenticate directly to Microsoft and Valve respectively, the IT department has refused to allow these services through the firewall, as such the introductory components of this course are now taught with sub par free 3d engines. The staff are not being listened to either. The purchased hardware sits unused in the lab now.

    I am enrolled in a double major, computer science and computer security. A number of the readings for security units are blocked by the content filtering system due to discussions of terrorism or hacking. The lecturer for this unit provides a 4G to wifi bridge in the tutorials (as his complaints to the IT department are ignored) for these classes so that we can access the readings, however research on campus outside of those tutorials is not possible. This is directly impacting the ability of students to complete coursework and conduct research.

    Staff members have commented about issues with research systems not having access to the internet (work arounds are NOT provided for academic staff). I know that a number of staff members in the computer science building share the cost of a 4G internet connection so that they can connect to resources belonging to other universities and research insitutions (they can't SSH out to access government research clusters etc).

    This is a real problem and isn't just about cartoons on the internet. Yes I have applied for a transfer to another university, but for this semester I will have to remain here.

    1. Re:A comment from the Submitter by Monoman · · Score: 1

      The academic side of the university should put in a request for their own network, internet connection, and whatever else is needed. This should be done in a professional manner, covering all the necessary costs and justifications. If done properly it should bring the issue to the attention of those that can do something about it.

      If the the request gets shut down and the access on the current network remains blocked then you are free to exercise your own options. Mine would be to switch schools.

      --
      Keep the Classic Slashdot.
    2. Re:A comment from the Submitter by Sylak · · Score: 1

      The fact that this seems to be an issue with professors as well as students (and one can assume you live on campus) means that something should be done about this, including but not limited to, resolutions from student and faculty government (assumg you do have an open and somewhat transparent student government) and petitions of appeal to trustees or even to other members of school administration. There is honestly no reason why so many of these services should be limited and blocked at the University level, especially when the blocked content borders on censorship.
      As for slashdotters, don't be surprised that they're not answering your question, because it's a common theme to either ridicule the asked from question misunderstanding, or tell them they're asking for something wrong. Anybody telling you to "suck it up because it's free" probably hasn't lived on-campus for a long time, (and did before the internet was standard) and doesn't see the social and general importance of unrestricted internet (except to malware, and occasionally pornography) on college Campuses, especially those who claim that YouTube never has educational value.

  100. Universities are not for-profit corporations by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 2

    Universities exist to educate students, and I would say that the idea of a university censoring anything, including what websites its students can access, is antithetical to that -- and it should be unthinkable. If malware is a concern, just disconnect infected systems from the network and refuse to assign them IP addresses until the issue is resolved.

    --
    Palm trees and 8
  101. TOS/AUP by deathlyslow · · Score: 1

    The restrictions applied to the web are draconian, with sites such as hackaday, hypberbole and a half, somethingawful, etc being blocked."

    Did you read and understand the TOS/AUP before you signed on the dotted line, proverbially or literally? If you NEED access to sites with such questionable material that they are blocked, why not request access and specify why you need it? That's what's going to happen in the real world after you get a real job. Everything or at least most everything will need to go through multiple layers of bureaucracy to get access to products, tools, or sites. At each level there is always some sort of needs/benefits test done. As I see it the majority of students, the ones fresh out of High School at least, expect everything to be given to them with no limits or stipulations. It doesn't work that way in the corporate working world, so why should it be that way in the corporately ran education world either. I think higher ed should not be just book knowledge, but also to prepare the students for it's going to be like fro the rest of their working lives.

    --
    Don't blame me for redundant posts. I can't type very fast. Hence the user ID.
  102. Good luck is all I can say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was in a similar situation. For nearly 3 years I fought against the outdated and shit tastic IT department at my school (whose members i will point out didnt thought that I-Tunes was illegal like edonkey and napster....). There is nothing you can really do when you have an IT squad that thinks their gods and you are their children. The best thing i can recommend is that you need to get someone over them on board or nothing will change.

  103. Not Common by dcollins · · Score: 1

    "I was wondering if this is common..."

    In my experience, this is not at all common in universities. (It's the first time I've heard of anything so draconian; contrast this with the corporatists who are accustomed to it being the case in private businesses). Consider calling it an issue of "academic freedom" -- usually that's supposed to be a third-rail issue wherever I've taught.

    --
    We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    1. Re:Not Common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the response, so many replies have been outright hostile. I never asked how to bypass anything (I know that it can be done, it isn't the point to get around things but try to change them).

    2. Re:Not Common by dcollins · · Score: 1

      Well said, good luck to you!

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
  104. Push for academic freedom by labradort · · Score: 1

    I work in IT at a Canadian University. In our case, there is no requirement to go through a proxy server. It isn't necessary, although it is a strong solution to prevent running of web sites and bots on student, staff and faculty desktops.

    In University, faculty have clout. Talk to them. Get an informed opinion together and make a dialogue happen between faculty and IT services. This will likely help, and if it doesn't right away, faculty can push their issue with the senior administration to get things changed, whether that is change of policy or change of the person serving as IT Director/CIO.

    Of course the other option, if you are discovering this in your first year, is to switch to a campus with better IT management.

    The relationship between the student and the University is much like customer/client combined with hotel guest if they live on campus. The student should be treated like a customer, and pleased whenever possible. However they cannot expect to go beyond being a guest. A guest does not have the privileges of ownership. This is what rock stars have gotten confused when they trash their rooms. Just because you pay for something doesn't make you king of it. A guest remains at the pleasure of the host. If you break the rules of the host, you are not welcome to remain. Thus most IT departments have rules that if repeatedly broken, lead to loss of network access.

  105. OpenVPN by DNAGuy · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenVPN

    Looks like normal SSL traffic to your IT department. Looks like the free and open internet to you. There are plenty of providers out there who will hook you up with a connection for $5-10/month, if you don't feel like setting up your own.

    --

    BRENT ROCKWOOD, EST'd 1975

  106. rlly; just rlly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tor, I2P, proxies...

  107. I love my uni by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see the point of restricting anything outside of file sharing, my uni has unrestricted access ecxept file sharing which has to do with bogging down the upload as well as most uses being fairly illegal. It is possible to run torrents and such, but you have to get it cleared by IT using their automated system and you can only do it 50 times a semester, this system cut down federal agent visits on campus from 50+ to less than 5 a year, though feds can't track our internal network very easily or legally so there is that and it has community restrictions where people bogging down the connection during the day get kicked or banned. IT on campus has no problem with keeping the network safe, if you get a virus your computer gets blacklisted until you take it to IT and verify you removed the virus, if you fileshare you are given an automated warning to appeal it if you were doing something legitimate, such as when my phone was flagged for filesharing, it had to do with iCloud syncing, it has since been fixed. I am friends with people in IT and they maybe deal with 100 or so warnings in a week, if you fight it they will either call your bluff or forgive the offence, they see less than 20 viruses a week with maybe one or two being severe enough to require the "official" IT policy of re-installation of the OS, this is with around 7,500 students and well over 10,000 computers. As far as cheating sites, many professors promote them, as our exams are theory based or pencil and paper ONLY so they are made simple enough that if you learned doing homework it's easy, if you cheated on homework you are screwed. Then again this is a university with the majority being engineers so most of us are smart enough have our computers locked down and can solve virus issues easily, maybe other schools need self control in the students more so than IT restricting them, ours is often appreciated with most issues with the network being related to wi-fi during peak times which can't be solved unless IT gets more money with the state possibly cutting 12.5% of school funding this year.

  108. You're doomed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're right, accessing the Internet is totally like a projector.

    A uni with the kind of mentality that the submitter is talking about and that you exhibit have no place in modern society. It's anathema, totally opposite of the whole idea of a university and the university experience.

  109. Apparently things have changed by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

    In two ways:

    1) JFGI is the go to strategy for most things IT related. It is one of the first things I teach our students. Have a problem you don't know the solution to? See if someone else already solved it. Don't waste time reinventing the wheel, the solution may be out there. Even if not, someone may have done something related that will set you down the right path.

    2) Youtube is where we are now posting instructional videos. When there's something that students need to see over and over that doesn't change, like an introduction to lab equipment, I shoot video of it, edit it, and upload it to Youtube. Students can then watch it at the leisure, at home or on campus, rewatch it when needed, and other universities can make use of it, should they find the content useful. It is a valuable tool for reducing the time faculty spends on things as well as enhancing the education students receive.

    The Internet isn't just for LOLcats anymore. It is used for real work and education.

    Also, when you are talking the dorms, I feel (and we've been told here this is legally the case) that the university has an obligation to provide unfiltered access. It is your home, you do what you like. If they are unwilling or unable to do that, they ten need to open it up to competition: Let the phone and cable companies sell DSL and Cable Modem service. You can't go and declare yourself a monopoly and then also offer restricted service.

  110. Don't go through IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The best way to get something done like a policy change is to go through the marketing and retention office. If people start to put down one of the reasons why they are leaving as draconian internet policies, they will tell that to the president of the university and president will then tell the head of IT to fix the problem that they created.

  111. Really? by labradort · · Score: 1

    In all Universities there is an "Inner Circle" formed by network admins, who are impervious to proxy filtering.

    The incantation to enter that select group is:

    "Hey, I'd like to help with the university network maintenance. Can I do it as a practice? I'll do it for free."

    This psalm recited to the right university demon will get you access to the University's network system. With luck, in 1 or 2 months you will have the relevant network keys/info. Probably you will have the rights to whitelist the pages you want.

    Then move out of there.

    This is a position of power and trust. It isn't given to volunteers. That would be like volunteering to look after the SWAT teams guns, or volunteering to clean the bank vaults. You must have watched a lot of Commando Cody or something as a kid.

    1. Re:Really? by kikito · · Score: 1

      That's why you need the magic words: "I'll do it for free". Otherwise the enchantment doesn't work.

    2. Re:Really? by labradort · · Score: 1

      That's why you need the magic words: "I'll do it for free". Otherwise the enchantment doesn't work.

      I wouldn't give over this power even if they paid to do it. Free means nothing when you are talking about power and control being lost. People are not as naive as they are in movies. You might be able to volunteer at a radio station or something, but not network and systems administration.

    3. Re:Really? by kikito · · Score: 1

      Of course a good systems manager would not accept help from a student. He's little incentive; he'll get paid the same no matter what. And now he has to manage the machines AND teach something to a student.

      That is why I also said "to the right University demon".

      The trick is not talking to them, but to find someone managing money, not very tech-savy, and willing to make merits. One for who "radio" and "wifi" are very similar. You have to make them take you to the network guy and tell him "this student will be helping you from now on". Then they can go to their bosses and say "I got a new network guy FOR FREE! Ain't I awesome".

  112. That would be what I'd most recommend by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    However people are often loathe to switch universities.

    Parent is right though, lots of universities don't do this. We have no web filter, at all, where I work. Not only are they expensive, but they are ineffective. It would surely block shit that was legitimately needed for research, and fail to block things it should. Better to just do without.

    You can find universities, plenty of them, that will not fuck with your net access. Now they'll all have AUPs and the like. You get caught doing illegal shit you can get in trouble, and if you try and suck up more than your fair share of bandwidth you'll get snarled at (or they'll be rate limits to just keep it form happening). However they won't restrict where you can go, or what protocols you can use.

    Look at state schools, and particularly research schools (where I work, both are true). State schools, being a public entity, have a duty to provide the public access, including students. Research universities understand that arbitrarily banning shit interferes with research and thus is stupid.

  113. My Experience at College by Daisako · · Score: 1

    At my college we started with no controlled Internet for the most part. During my third year in college they implemented a filter that did similar to what the poster's college is doing. Our solution was to spread the word. Our college was primarily funded by donors and one of our strategies was to contact the donors and past alumni to get them to cancel their funds until the issue is resolved. That took care of the problem awfully quickly. The strategy is go for their wallets. We also had that crappy CleanAccess program by Cisco and bandwidth limiting; those two didn't get fixed until the guy in charge was fired.

  114. Re:The OP isn't asking your opinion about IT polic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plenty of people did directly help. Pointing him to setting up SSH tunneling or VPN services, to either be bought or setup himself to route around the horrible network he's on. Or fight the policy above the IT department. I'd add look into transferring to a different institution or off-campus living.

    So no "your" help is to tell him not to try.

  115. Get parents involved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that you've determined IT management isn't interested, it's time to escalate.

    Have PARENTS -- yes, the ones paying the tuition/room/board bills -- contact the administration. There are few things more effective for moving administrators, than concerned contact from a parent who expresses concern that their money is not providing the kind of educational experience they hoped it would. (Things that are even more effective: contact/concerns from accreditation boards, from the institution's Board of Directors, from Big Donors, from the state legislature if the school is public, and from Alumni who fall into any of these categories).

    Who should your parents call? If the filtering is hampering study, research, or other academic matters, call the Academic Dean or even Provost. If it's a complaint with the "campus life" atmosphere, call the Dean of Students/Student Life/whatever-it's-called-on-your-campus. Or just go right to the top and call the President's office. Or even better, send a letter to all three, wait 3 or 4 days, and call the Prez.

    In addition to other concerns, have parents point out that students and instructors are being forced to access the Internet via alternate means at their own expense, that some such means are undetectable and unblockable (3G/4G), and thus the campus network is MORE porous and undefended as a result. Mention competing schools in the area that have better policies.

    Change may not occur immediately but the conversation should begin. Involve student government -- can they make it enough of an issue to appear in a local new story? Lobby the faculty union if you're lucky enough to have one.

    Make popcorn.

  116. PPTP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do they block VPN connections out of your university?

  117. Re:The OP isn't asking your opinion about IT polic by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

    > He's asking what options are available for getting around a problem he has.

    There have been a couple of legitimate suggestions, if you've been reading...
    1) Get their own internet
    2) Present a reasonable sane argument to the university administration which probably gives the IT department their marching orders.

    > The topic wasn't started to debate whether it was a good or bad policy; whether
    > the IT department here was doing their job well; whether they were just crazy
    > with power. Nor was it a pity plea; they don't want your derision.

    If you're going with option #2 above, then you damn well have to take the real world into consideration
    * know what real-world problems IT is facing
    * be capable of marshalling facts on your side
    That was why all the explanations of what's happening.

    --

    I'm not repeating myself
    I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
  118. Re:Honestly I think you might have this all wrong. by awjr · · Score: 1

    I do find that the idea that giving unlimited internet access to a bunch of hormonally challenged students to be a one-way ticket to malware hell. It would be remiss of the IT department not to operate a white listing approach to their internet with a process in place for having a site added to the list.

  119. change universities and post the name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would anyone go to a university that doesn't provide internet access?

    Someone here saying "it's their network," are you joking? School isn't cheap. Are they going to refuse you classes and textbooks too?

    I can't conceive of a modern university not providing internet access. Internet access does not just mean HTTP. Tell us the school, I can't imagine anyone knowing this in advance would go there.

    I seriously think you'd be better off dropping out and getting a job then spending another day in a university that doesn't offer internet access. That's just a waste of time.

  120. SSH Tunnel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello, I had the same problem at my university. But I got around it by having an SSH server at home set to listen on port 443 (SSL). I then tunneled in using putty via flash drive (renaming "putty.exe" to "iexplore.exe" if it computer restricts foreign executables) and used remote desktop to explore the interwebs. I also tunneled EVE Online through this tunnel as well, playing games at school... shame on me.

  121. web access != internet access by Spazmania · · Score: 1

    This is the 21st century. Internet access, not web access, is as much a life requirement as a telephone.

    Errors in a university's behavior tend to be reflected in the reputation of its degree. An error as outrageous as what you describe is very unlikely to be the only one. Flawed decisions will have been made in every other aspect of university administration. The breadth of those errors is likely to impact the value of any piece of paper you leave there with. If you don't want to waste your time, find a better university and transfer

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
  122. Watch those URL names... [Re:get over it] by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

    * we chose a file name that matches some regular expression deemed dangerous by their IT staff ... (Yes sir, gamesexpert.com is not a sex site!)

    Yep! I remember when the firewall used to block the old JPL Mars exploration website, marsexploration.jpl.nasa.gov. Notice those three letters in the middle of the word "marsexploration." --JPL eventually renamed the site.

    And don't even try to access the old physics preprint site, xxxlanl, any site beginning with those letters just has to be pr0n. (that one got renamed, too)

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  123. transferring is so bad states have law forcing by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    transferring is so bad states have law forcing them to take community colleges credits.

    But over all that is a sing that the collage system needs change / reworking.

    I say brake it up in to smaller chunks / badges

    http://news.slashdot.org/story/12/01/08/221257/do-online-educational-badges-threaten-conventional-education-models

    http://chronicle.com/article/Badges-Earned-Online-Pose/130241/

    1. Re:transferring is so bad states have law forcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might want to look into remedial English at your local community college.

      colleges =/= colleges'
      sing =/= sign
      collage =/= college
      brake =/= break
      badges =/= batches
      over all =/= overall

      That's not even touching the punctuation, capitalization and structural errors.

    2. Re:transferring is so bad states have law forcing by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      badges =/= batches

      While the others are indeed wrong, if you'd read the linked article (or even the link text), you'd know that badges was correct, since it was linking to the article "Do Online Educational Badges Threaten Conventional Education Models?"

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    3. Re:transferring is so bad states have law forcing by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      transferring rules are so bad that states have law forcing them to take community college credits.

      But over all that is a sign that the college system needs change / reworking.

      I say break it up in to smaller chunks / badges that better fit the pace that newer tech comes out, non-matriculated students and part time students.

      http://news.slashdot.org/story/12/01/08/221257/do-online-educational-badges-threaten-conventional-education-models [slashdot.org]

      http://chronicle.com/article/Badges-Earned-Online-Pose/130241/ [chronicle.com]

    4. Re:transferring is so bad states have law forcing by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      Transferring is so bad that states have laws forcing them to take community college credits.
      But over all, that is a sign that the college system needs change / reworking.
      I say break it up into smaller chunk / badges.

      Right, then we can have a system of unrelated "certifications" in different aspects of various degrees and we could make it even harder to figure out what parts are equivalent! No, I think the answer is to standardize curriculums between different schools and require that they each accepts credit for the standardized courses.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  124. Want better access? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

    Pay for your own access.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  125. Re:The OP isn't asking your opinion about IT polic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He didn't ask how to hack his way around the firewall, he asked how he could most effectively protest the issue and if this was common.

    I *hope* it is not common, or the US is doomed.

  126. This is slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't call it a fucking "firewall" in your title and then a content filtering proxy in the body. You sound like an idiot.

    I shouldn't need to explain why your web proxy isn't a firewall.

  127. Re:The OP isn't asking your opinion about IT polic by Sylak · · Score: 1

    was wondering if this is common, and if anyone has any suggestions on how to go about protesting the issue. I've spoken to the lecturers and they have the same frustrations I do.

    No, I'm PRETTY sure he's asking about ways of protesting and getting this fixed, not about circumventing blocks in place...

  128. Find a better university. by goodmanj · · Score: 1

    Find a better university.

    The core idea of academia is the free flow of information. A university that cannot solve problems without discarding its principles has nothing useful to teach you.

    Make sure you tell 'em why you're leaving.

  129. Re:It's their band... no, tail wagging the dog by neurocutie · · Score: 1
    correct, IT subserves the university, student, faculty and staff, not the reverse. We have exactly the same nonsense at our univ., with the added observation that while all other depts are in budgetary and hiring freeze, the IT dept manages to grow and grow to be the largest most expensive single entity on campus, with the power to control everyones professional life.

    It is definitely the tail wagging the dog here, but if I go directly to the CIO, with the support of the dean and president, thinsg do get done, and graciously so... so the dog still can be the wagger if it so chooses to.

  130. WTF is wrong with you people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the major media labels suing businesses and universities, with their continuing push in Washington to purchase a SOPA/PIPA from the US senate and house, with ACTA getting turned on in many nations, providing internet access of any kind is a risk that carries a high price tag... You can hardly blame them for taking the cheap way out and just blocking access to non-web traffic and from sites that may expose themselves to further lawsuit risks... And to the OP that started this thread, get used to it baby. You're going to graduate from this college and move into the business world where they, too, block internet access to even more stuff than what the university is blocking.

  131. Port 80 is your friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tunnel via port 80.

  132. OpenVPN by ulzeraj · · Score: 1

    Seriously. OpenVPN can even breach HTTP proxies. You can also make the server to listen on any port that they allow direct communication. It operates on both TCP and UDP.

  133. Re:Honestly I think you might have this all wrong. by dcollins · · Score: 1

    It would be pretty much the death of higher education in America if what you say was implemented.

    --
    We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
  134. Tethering is the way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In college I used to tether as well. Back then you were lucky to get 33600bps on the dial up.

    give www.hidemyass.com a try, they have a awesome service for this type of thing.

  135. Tor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tor. Use it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tor_(anonymity_network)

  136. slashdot: comments from the man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i'm not young, but i find it disturbing to find that as the /. user
    community ages, so many of us have become "the man".

    i hope to avoid this trend by remaining immature and continuing
    to find universities filtering content to be assinine, short-sited,
    a waste of time and lazy.

  137. Ports by progwml6 · · Score: 1

    Most IT people are to lazy to filter port 443(https) You might be able to use a proxy there. Some also don't block ports. You can use putty to generate a ssh proxy. If all else fails, put a ssh server on port 80 or 443 and use the putty method. I do this all the time, in schools, and public buildings.

  138. Re:Are you studying Computer Science or Programmin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you re-read the post I never asked how to bypass these things. I agree it isn't difficiult.

    I can draw an analogy, if you don't agree with a law, should you try to change it or just break it?

    If you'd like more information take a look here: http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2693917&cid=39171653 this isn't about torrenting or comics on the internet, legitimate course materials are also blocked.

  139. Education vs Entertainment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Youtube and torrents OVERWHELMINGLY consist of purely entertainment content, not college educational content.
    Seems like you need a little more education on how to do basic math and how to recognize things at face value.

    1. Re:Education vs Entertainment by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Seems like you need a little more education on how to do basic math and how to recognize things at face value.

      You mean I should be like you and make statistics up to suit my own agenda?

      Here's a fun fact: I played games instead of doing homework in high school. To this day I use the observations I made playing those games to do my work.

      You're confusing the terms 'education' and 'course work'.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  140. When writing about alternative education models... by number6x · · Score: 1

    transferring is so bad states have law forcing them to take community colleges credits.

    If States thought it was bad to transfer, they would pass laws to discourage transfering college credits. If they are passing laws that require college credits to transfer, they must believe it is a good thing to transfer. The lawmakers seem to want to encourage it. Or did you mean 'BAD' as 'GOOD' like: 'That is one BAD A** M***** F***** transfering all those college credits from their community college'?

    But over all that is a sing that the collage system needs change / reworking.

    Does this statement have to do with art school? I'm not sure what singing and collages have to do with the topic.

    I say brake it up in to smaller chunks / badges

    Just call quizes 'chunks'. Then call tests 'badges'. Finally call semesters or quarters or trimesters 'patches' and you have implemented the new educational model. Baden Powell would be proud.

  141. VPN/Personal Proxy Server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have the same issue at my university. The IT staff seem almost draconian in what they decide to block. To get around it I either SSH into my own personal proxy outside the university or use Hotspot Shield which creates a VPN and gets you around the firewall.

  142. University Filtering is a MUST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work for K-12 and attended a public university. At university, PERSONAL devices connected to the network were pretty much unfiltered. UNIVERSITY computers available for student use were filtered. Filtering university computers keeps students from denying other students valuable resources, simply because they want to watch some guy getting kicked in the junk over and over on Youtube or spending hours on Facebook. Most of the easily accessible and large computer labs are like parking lots on Black Friday during peak hours, this is without the ability to get to facebook, youtube, twitter, ebay etc.

  143. Use 3/4G, Really. by RoutingGeek · · Score: 1

    You might think you are invisible, but in all reality, they're probably logging your every move. Trust me, much more than you can imagine can be logged/captured. I manage web filtersingfor a large corporate environment. In the bigger shops, it's not the IT guy that makes the decision on this stuff. It's the legal counsil, HR, and CSO (cheif security officer). Even though I have all the knowledge to bypass it, I surf with caution while on the job. Changes are logged, multiple systems log traffic, so anything questionable will used against you if a legitimate reason is found. By the way, setting up an SSH listener on 443 might not work. The really good filters have caught up on this practice and will still stop it if properly configured (for example, Palo Alto boxes!).

  144. Don't Violate the Agreement by farnsaw · · Score: 1

    Be aware you that are most probably bound by a usage agreement you signed when you entered university. If you violate this agreement, the University in question may a) suspend/expel you b) refuse to graduate you c) other retribution. Your choices are a) get another provider (3G/4G dongle) b) convince the university to change it's policy c) Live with it d) Leave the university (and presumably attend another with less draconian policies) e) start up your own company / provider to allow yourself and your fellow students access to unfiltered internet.

    Note that his applies to work networks as well as more and more companies are locking things down tightly.

    --
    "Computer Scientists can count to 1024 on their fingers" (non-mutant, non-mutilatated, human computer scientists)
  145. Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Set up a remote desktop to home computer through the https port, then use internet on home computer. Its not the fastest, but it works.

  146. Unfounded Entitlement by Deorus · · Score: 0

    It's not your university's job to provide you with access to the Internet. Be glad to have at least some access. If you want more, do what others are doing and use your phone / dongle.

  147. Doubt it by TheCarp · · Score: 1

    I can't speak for the whole community of universities, nor have I worked at one in a few years. That said, I think there are cultural issues here. WHen I worked at a University, we even debated whether someone would have a legitimate reason to receive email viruses.

    At the place I worked, there was NO firewall. Well..there was, but, it was opt in, only specific critical hosts were behind it. Users were not, the main service machines were not.

    It was seen as a matter of intellectual freedom and not wanting to restrict anything that might be legitimate research. However, as I started with...its cultural. We had people in IT who were long time academics and who were used to this and even championed it.

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  148. Open by lymond01 · · Score: 1

    Someone needs to take your IT Director by the ear and explain to him the differences between a corporation and a university.

    1) University folks generally get paid less than their corporate counterparts
    2) Basic research occurs on all levels, not just in the lab. Innovation in the network, software development, etc. happens and is expected to happen with the staff as well as faculty. It's a learning environment. It's a try-this environment.
    3) A university's most basic tenet is access to information and that goes both ways. By inhibiting what is likely the largest fountain of information and means of transferring that information, it's a little insane. Tell your IT guy to work on better security techniques: locking your kid in the closet may keep him safe but it's not a good idea.

  149. Univeristy or "Univeristy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm curious about this "University". The University I attended was a state University(in the United States) that would never have restricted internet access, because that would prevent professors from doing research. I suspect that you're at a trade school masquerading as a "University" in which case this sort of thing is very common. If that's that case you should just work from home. If you must work from there ssh to a virtual server as mentioned by others is best.

  150. More to it than that... by zooblethorpe · · Score: 3

    Besides, why should the tutors care? - If people waste the lessons updating Facebook instead of getting smart, they'll simply fail and thus have wasted their tuition. I hope Facebook was worth it, but the tutors shouldn't care less if the students are that stupid.

    Because most teachers go into teaching to get students to learn? Because a lot of institutions tie student performance into their evaluations? Because students that aren't paying attention are more likely to distract their neighbors? etc etc...

    Because teachers with no classroom management skills can't handle potential distractions? Because intro classes are too big for anyone to manage? Because a lot of institutions incorrectly apply industrial metrics to human dynamics?

    There are other concerns about unfettered Internet access in the classroom that go beyond the ideals you mention. My wife has had unfettered internet access in her classrooms for seven years now, in three different schools, and has had very few problems and none recurring. Granted, she's at the middle-school / high-school level instead of university, but plenty of her students have had laptops and smartphones in class. The keys are 1) having small enough class sizes that you can manage them effectively, and 2) having the classroom management skills to get in front of any potential issues and making sure the kids are paying attention to you instead of Lady Gaga. She's found that classes upwards of about 28 students really start to spiral downwards.

    As such, the many intro uni courses with 100+ students can't possibly work, unless the students themselves are invested in their own learning. That said, cutting off internet access is no guarantee that otherwise distracted students will suddenly find themselves raptly attending the teacher's words.

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
    1. Re:More to it than that... by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      As such, the many intro uni courses with 100+ students can't possibly work, unless the students themselves are invested in their own learning. That said, cutting off internet access is no guarantee that otherwise distracted students will suddenly find themselves raptly attending the teacher's words.

      I agree:
      "This is boring... Well, damn, all the sites I want to distract myself with are blocked. Guess I'll just watch a video, fire up World of Goo, or maybe one of the thousands of other games I have available in my general purpose computer."

      If the student is determined to be distracted, then who cares? As long as it's not disrupting anyone else, who gives a damn? K-12, I can understand, but for Colleges? Seriously? If I pay for a meal at a restaurant and play games on my phone until the food's cold then leave without eating a bite: It's wasteful, and I'm still hungry, but who really cares? That's My Fault. It's Foolish to assume that the actions of others somehow reflect how good a professor is. The problem is in the recruitment office, not the lecture hall.

      "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make them drink."

      "If you outlaw the Internet, then only outlaws will have the Internet."

      People consider censorship harmful and route around it with technology.

      You can not control the actions of others, you can only control your reaction to their actions. I think the Uni staff need re-education in the basic fundamental facts of existence. What the hell is so hard to understand?

  151. Change dorms, get WIFI from off-campus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can, move to a dormatory at the edge of the campus. See if there are some SSIDs that you can pick up from your room. If you do, then you've got a good starting point for the next step. Which is going up and down the houses on adjacent streets with flyers giving some contact info and offering to pay $20 a month for guest access to their wifi. (Maybe you can go lower or higher - if lucky somebody might be giving away wifi for free, but that $20 price sounds about fair for starters.)

    It might work, or it might not. This would be much cheaper than using a cellular service, and less hassle than trying to tunnel through the schools network which may be against IT policy or who knows what. Only downside is you got to make sure whoever is letting you on their wireless network is trustworthy enough, such that you don't get ripped-off or become the subject of MITM hacks. Likewise, you also have to be fair about how you use the network bandwith if it tends to be limited in some regards.

    One last option to consider is that college towns usually have restaurants, cafes, or bookstores right outside of the campus which are popular because they have wifi access which isn't restrictive. If you scout around, you'll know of these places because you'll see the laptop crowd hanging out there.

  152. Re:Honestly I think you might have this all wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ever take uP?

  153. Go get your own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I lived off campus (near campus, but off). I had my own el-cheapo dialup internet. I couldn't afford much in the way of internet, and didn't have a lot of time surfing the web as I was usually too busy studying!. Although a few times per semester my housemates and I would go out and drink (we didn't have a lot of beer money either). Since I had my own net connection, I didn't care how draconian the university was. Mind you, I didn't use their computers either, I generally used my own since 1) The lab computers were either all occupied, 2) The lab computers were 'taken over' by some prof. wanting to run some kind of big processing job and the lab machines are a cheap and readily available cluster. 3) The lab computers in general were slower than molasses in January. Sparc 1+ machines were craploads slower than my 66 MHz '486 (with 16 MB of ram!!!). Ok, its a few years ago, but still....get your own net connection. Budget for it.

  154. universities are often the worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    having been to meetings in corporate offices, government offices, and universities, I have to say that getting ordinary internet access is the hardest in universities, generally; which is strange, as access to information and communication is fundamental to their mission.

  155. We're on your side. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a sysadmin at a large Canadian University, and for the most part we try not to have any draconian policies on our network. I always thought that was what separated us from real corporate networks; Corporations need white lists and stuff because really there's very little excuse for their staff to access Facebook or other sites that aren't strictly work, but Universities are supposed to foster innovation and freedom to pursue knowledge. We CAN'T limit your internet access if we want to do that, it's completely counter to university culture. There's always a legitimate reason for accessing all sorts of different sites, heck we can't often even blog spam/phishing sites because there may be some faculty studying them and they'd raise a giant stink if we block them. So our network is generally very open.

    However, we are responsible for making sure that everyone on the network has the same access, and that means throttling services that are a drain on bandwidth i.e. streaming video, bittorrent. Of course it's mostly students who use those services the most, so they often see IT as unfairly targeting them when we're really just trying to make sure that everyone gets a fair chunk of the network.

    There's also just a general lack of security overall within university networks. If you run a server and it gets compromised, suddenly there's a system that's on our network that could cause trouble. So anyone running something even slightly questionable, if we notice it we have to shut it down.

    Then there's the fact that the big bad guys out there are monitoring us. We get copyright claims and cease and desists type stuff fairly regularly, I wish I saved a couple of those emails to show. The big wigs don't want to have to deal with "making a stand" against stuff like that, so we have no choice but to disconnect people who have been caught uploading movies and other copyrighted material. Again, it's something that students are doing mostly, so it appears we're targeting them when we're honestly not. As much as I'd like to give those guys sending the notices the finger, it's not my decision.

    What I'd suggest is make friends with your IT guys. Give them a legitimate reason why you want to do something, aside form just "well I should be able to because I'm paying my tuition". Often times they'd probably help you and suggest ways around some of these blocks and white lists. So long as you don't affect other users, or get the university in trouble, they're probably on your side.

  156. subscribe to internet service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DSL or Cable.

    If you are in dorms and neither is an option, 4G is.

  157. Restrictive Firewalls by wolfguru · · Score: 1

    The university network is there for a specific purpose - to provide the university with access to the sites and communications necessary to the function of the university, and to maintain the integrity and reliability of those connections. If you want to access things outside what the university defines as necessary to this function, you are welcome to do so, apparently, through the use of external connections. If you want free access to any pron site that strikes your fancy, you're asking for something that doesn't apply to the university's needs, and if it is not available to you through their network, it is a simple decision. buy it yourself, or whine much harder. As for the people telling you that the IT staff needs to be educated as to how to serve the student's needs, they need a lesson in exactly how much work is involved in cleaning up after the students that go blindly into the web trusting that they won't face any consequences, and the costs of providing an infrastructure that can support the campus without assuming the responsibility for every student's irresponsibility. If you have email, access to your university coursework, resources and search tools in a secure and dependable environment, the IT staff is doing their job admirably. If you want unrestricted access to anything on the net, regardless of its provenance, to download any movie or streaming video, pron or game site, tell mommy and daddy that you need the money to buy a 4G data device and pay for the bandwith/content you want.

  158. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  159. Make it a PR Nightmare by sohmc · · Score: 1

    A lot of post have dealt with the technical aspects of overcoming the firewall. While this may help in the short term, it doesn't help your friends or future students. If you're willing, you may want to consider taking this up with provost/president/ombudsman/et al.

    The easiest place to start is a local editorial. Your campus newspaper, local newspaper, local TV news. Tying your campus as against net neutrality should get enough people to pay attention.

    Next, consider famous alumni. There was a policy that was in the process of becoming a rule at the university when I was a student. When I graduated, I told them that I wouldn't pay alumni dues until this policy was scrapped. Of course, one alumni not paying dues is not really an issue. But when I started posting on the alumni message boards about the issue and more alumni got involved (some far more famous than me), the school quickly reversed the policy. Money, unfortunately, speaks louder than words.

    Another avenue is to speak at school board meetings. These meetings are often public but not well advertised. You may have to do some hunting to get this information.

    Finally, form a campus group. Get students involved. Raise awareness, have a fun run, etc.

    You want to make the cost to maintain the firewall unacceptably high. This might be a hard hurdle since they are probably weighing the cost to maintain the firewall and the cost of a free-for-all internet connection.

    --
    We don't live in Shouldland.
  160. They don't need the internet for distractions.. by Vegan+Cyclist · · Score: 2

    If they have a laptop, there are games, etc.. The internet is likely no more or less a distraction in this case.

  161. University is preparing you for life at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The University is preparing you for life at work. Do you really believe that in a work environment their won't be a highly restrictive proxy?

    Get over it. It is their network to run as they like, not yours.
    If you want control over the network - you need to buy it.

    At work if you try to get around network controls, you'd be fired. Your actions could have dire results to the company and cost millions should you cause something bad to happen.

  162. you are a champion of freedom! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you for doing this, you are so fucking awesome!

  163. Alternatives on Windows... by xded · · Score: 1

    Also you can use HTTPTunnel on any PHP enabled server (with almost no other requirements) and connect to it with the multiplatform Perl client to open a local SOCKS server (there are other projects named like this one, but this is the only one that really works). The client supports HTTP proxies and the request are normal HTTP GETs/PUTs (not CONNECTs). The project is not being updated since 2010, but it just works (even tho the SSL part has problems, but you can just configure the PHP folder on an HTTPS web server and use stunnel in front of the client).

    Then under Windows many programs do not support the SOCKS protocol to connect to the client (I'm looking at you, Remote Desktop), but you can just run ProxyCap to transparently redirect single programs (or all of them) through any proxy. There are free (as in beer, mostly) alternatives to ProxyCap, but they are either not updated (i.e., they don't work on 64-bit systems) or they are likely to deeply mess up the windows network driver configuration when you remove them (or both).

  164. A Few Ideas by nagalman · · Score: 1

    1. Change.org 2. Put pressure on the administration to change the censor policy: Get your fellow students and the faculty to sign a petition, then present the petition to the university of the president. Use social media to get the word out. Try to get an article in the local or national press. 3. Transfer to another university that does not block basic access to information, and write a letter to the president explaining why you are transferring and how you are going to encourage all of your fellow students to do the same.

  165. Re:So what? by Sylak · · Score: 1

    But it's the assumption he lives on campus, and therefore, does not have the ability to distinguish between the two (especially since it specified "university" not "community college" or "local college")

  166. Open Source Solution by bwall · · Score: 1

    You could always use something like fireBwall to write a module that avoids using the proxy. I use it often if a hotel WiFi uses ARP Poisoning to force you to register on their network. fireBwall lets you write modules that control your network flow. I know this is a shameless plug, but it really could help. http://firebwall.com/

  167. Re:The OP isn't asking your opinion about IT polic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the devkits cant phone home to microsoft

    And nothing of value was lost.

  168. Use an ssh tunnel to your own PC at home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Assuming you have some kind of internet at home, put up a cheap server out of old hardware, set up opensshd and then tunnel through to that with Firefox + Foxyproxy. You can even tunnel your DNS queries from Firefox that way.

    If you're on Windows, you might have to run a portable Firefox if they've locked down the desktop of course.

    ssh -l [username_at_home] \
    -o TCPKeepAlive=yes \
    -X -g -D localhost:8888 \

    Then, in Firefox after installing Foxyproxy change the following in about:config:

    ## network.proxy.socks_remote_dns: true
    ## network.proxy.socks: 'localhost'
    ## network.proxy.socks_port: 8888
    ## network.proxy.socks_version: 5
    ## network.proxy.type 1

    I might be missing some other stuff (specifically to routing DNS through the proxy) but that's the basic setup.

  169. From a Net Admin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find it's rather easy to setup a reactive filter. Make the rules known like no bittorrent during certain times + Heavy handed QoS makes life much easier. As a network admin my goal is to keep the network working. I'll let you do pretty much anything on it till it becomes saturated, then it's show time. I'm talking laying down the law, wraith of god style. You break the rules during peak load, enjoy dial up until the pipe frees up. Best part of this it all happens automatically. Universities that don't have some type of automated system in place and are filtering based on content beyond malicious sites need new management.

    I do admit to filtering differently based on time and location though. If your in one of the lecture halls Facebook just doesn't exist (even through your SSH tunnel ;P). If I feel really nasty (ie, get woken up at 1am) I'll let you connect to Facebook, but wont let it talk to you. It's very effective at stopping all sorts of things this way, it's also very good at crashing browsers and proxy programs.

  170. Common in the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is common in UK Universities, JANET ( Joint Academic Network) started charging based on transatlantic traffic - as a result almost all University's instroduced Squid proxy's for the dorms/hall of residence. This charging mechanism has changed now many of these proxy's remain in place for security/performance reasons.

    There are a number of ways to circumvent this:
    - Change your IP address to one outside the blocked range
    - Login to a Unix account and use SSH
    - Use a VPN server (open VPN can be tunneled over HTTPS if you run your service on TCP port 443)

  171. proxy by sylvandb · · Score: 1

    Proxy your traffic. If there is any connection thru the firewall to a system you control, you can proxy thru it. The tighter the firewall the more annoying and performance impact it will be, but it will work.

    Do they blacklist or whitelist? Blacklist means you have a good chance. With a whitelist, aka they lock it down so you can only connect to a few specific internet sites, you may be SOL.

    Some places firewall to protect from legal liability, "we have a firewall and we block that site/content but the offender bypassed our firewall." If you bypass the firewall, you take the blame and responsiblity squarely on yourself.

    Some places firewall to protect from problems caused by the clueless, so if you bypass the firewall, do try not to cause problems for other network users.

    Some places firewall because they themselves are clueless and/or frightened. Not much help for that, I'm afraid.

    Remember the correct pattern of thought... Think of the firewall as your ultimate university exam. Pass it. Quietly. This means you first need to learn about the subject -- networking, protocols, tunneling and firewalls in general, and your university firewall specifically. It will be very educational, and isn't that why you are in school?

    Enjoy learning.

  172. its simple.. by echonyne · · Score: 0

    You can use "Tor". Google it up and you'll know what it is (btw its an Open Source Project so its free :P). Been using it for like..2 years maybe :| Should work great (if you have good speeds available through your Univ. Network) Cheers, echo9

  173. you can still get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    porn on your phone

  174. what to do! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Download firefox setup an put it on ur pendrive and bring it to collage then install it! Go to settings, advanced network an click proxy! Follow me on twitter: OxideParadox