The scenario itself is possible, but having an effect beyond Peak Everything(which is still quite bad, mind you) would be quite hard, as it would be equivalent to competing with thousands of biological versions of 'goo' that millions if not billions of years more experience.
so how long till we have a swarm of replicators based on this technology:)
Well, first this technology would have to produce Reese so we won't have to worry too much...
In reality, though, Replicator-like situations are infeasible on planets which already have lifeforms(like humans or Asgard). That isn't to say, though, that nanotechnology wouldn't be a very deadly weapon, for example nanobots designed to destroy one's nervous system.
Your quote reminded me of this quote:
First they ignore you
then they laugh at you(this is worthless nonsense)
then they fight you(this is an interesting, but perverse, point of view; this is true, but quite unimportant)
then you win(I always said so)
-Gandhi
Well, considering that they have never been anti-Christian and on many occasions have defended the right of Christians, I'd have to say you're full of shit. Stop listening to Limbaugh, not only is he the most full of shit, the ACLU has defended him in court before, so by your rules he's eivl.
That's the problem with human nature. It's not consistent. Then again, no human is consistent either. Show me a consistent person and I'll show you a person with no opinions on anything whatsoever.
Male bees(the drones) come from unfertilized eggs. Female bees(the workers and queen, the latter only emerging after the existing queen leaves) come from fertilized eggs.
Why did you use 'who' for 'for' and 'whom' for 'from'? You know you're supposed to use whom on all prepositions, not just the ones you like. (Because you said offtopic rant, I get to comment on your spelling and grammar)
Is "heteregounes" French?(Heterogenous) And how many of the letters at the end are silent?
Is occupanotial "not occupational"?
I think there are ways for people to be stupid without being on crack, or any other drug for that matter. A nice concussion will work just as well. So will FOX News.
Re:Very offtopic: What's with this slashdot banner
on
Dealing with Phishing
·
· Score: 1
Same. Actually, it went into the range of the 'large' ad and the large ad came out. I don't have Adblocker but I'm seriously considering it now.
Slashdot Mirror
Oh, we all know the Mac's 'creativity tools' are just because there are absolutely no games available for the platform :P
CORRECTION: The ants actually have 'paedometers'.
The scenario itself is possible, but having an effect beyond Peak Everything(which is still quite bad, mind you) would be quite hard, as it would be equivalent to competing with thousands of biological versions of 'goo' that millions if not billions of years more experience.
Actually, some corn chips are white, and I believe that chips with guacamole in them are green, correct me if I'm wrong
In reality, though, Replicator-like situations are infeasible on planets which already have lifeforms(like humans or Asgard). That isn't to say, though, that nanotechnology wouldn't be a very deadly weapon, for example nanobots designed to destroy one's nervous system.
No, the solution is to not give the malware the path to even be able to do this by using a capability-type system.
Oh, I'm sure you could just make them see the actual hardware for the video card, just not for anything else
Your quote reminded me of this quote:
First they ignore you
then they laugh at you(this is worthless nonsense)
then they fight you(this is an interesting, but perverse, point of view; this is true, but quite unimportant)
then you win(I always said so)
-Gandhi
Great, you just magnified what should have been an update of 1 or 2 packages to 50+ packages.
Yes, but there are still a significant number on Linux, even with M$ astroturfers coming in full-force.
Only problem is that there are only five actual record labels(i.e. only five that aren't subsidiaries of some other label) in the RIAA.
My Latin teacher from Maine(who knows Stephen King personally, but that's a different story altogether) has used 'wicked' in such a way.
I think that's an oxymoron.
Well, considering that they have never been anti-Christian and on many occasions have defended the right of Christians, I'd have to say you're full of shit. Stop listening to Limbaugh, not only is he the most full of shit, the ACLU has defended him in court before, so by your rules he's eivl.
Why are the spaces randomly placed like that?
Go reread the Fourteenth Amendment. This is why you failed civics class.
Yeah, that's why they supported the free speech rights of people like Rush Limbaugh. Go look it up, it happened.
I'd rather live in Sweden or Canada, hands down. Now where would you rather live, Sweden or Somalia?
That's the problem with human nature. It's not consistent. Then again, no human is consistent either. Show me a consistent person and I'll show you a person with no opinions on anything whatsoever.
Male bees(the drones) come from unfertilized eggs. Female bees(the workers and queen, the latter only emerging after the existing queen leaves) come from fertilized eggs.
Why did you use 'who' for 'for' and 'whom' for 'from'? You know you're supposed to use whom on all prepositions, not just the ones you like. (Because you said offtopic rant, I get to comment on your spelling and grammar)
Is "heteregounes" French?(Heterogenous) And how many of the letters at the end are silent?
Is occupanotial "not occupational"?
I think there are ways for people to be stupid without being on crack, or any other drug for that matter. A nice concussion will work just as well. So will FOX News.
Same. Actually, it went into the range of the 'large' ad and the large ad came out. I don't have Adblocker but I'm seriously considering it now.