Big Media has never won. They were late to the game and cannot reverse history. They literally cannot win. Facts and history are not on their side, and this is no different.
Conventional taxis don't have to go out of business - that's a strawman/misnomer. Why don't they provide their own apps to provide service to riders? Oh, right. Uber is doing what taxi services refuse to in a lot of instances. Uber isn't the problem here, but old outdated legislation is.
Taxi services don't operate 24/7 with 100% coverage, that is and never can be the case anywhere. Meanwhile, uber is opening up to other competition and enabling better coverage than the taxi services themselves provide.
Be reasonable. They can also submit anything that doesn't fit their scope of propaganda directly to the government and remove any hint of anonymity to thus gain more favor with the government, as well.
It is actually proven that having real time traffic data to make traffic decisions is to the benefit of everyone driving. On the flip side, I don't really like how that equation works out for your personal privacy.
Considering they used their money to make this into the system, I see absolutely no reason to simply say "it's okay, they're using the rules they created".
To anyone who has a shred of fear of flying, the game of "screwing with the pilots for laughs" is not fucking funny.
Except that this has ZERO to do with what's going on. The fact that they broke the law to basically steal his laptop, this has nothing to do with screwing with the pilots.
Pearson does a lot of things; I'd find them fairly neutral in the process - what they do will work with basically anything.
That's not to say what they do is good? I find Pearson to be shit when it comes to education tools - they are filled with bloatware, drm, and things that don't provide any benefit to thing using them, but I wouldn't really blame them for anything here.
I would blame the superintendent and apple for sticking their nose into more sales under the guise of supporting education.
While they didn't willingly/intentionally give their information to the NSA, the fact that they were compromised by the NSA means that they should still be considered compromised going forward, so you are correct.
TLDR: don't do business with the NSA. This also means we really, really, really need to get rid of FIPS as well.
GMO foods kill? More like your DNA is modified by what you eat, so eating foods with modified DNA may have undesirable effects (see: obesity, diabetes).
I don't think I've heard anyone actually state that GMO foods kill them directly, though?
Without any example, you are basically lying with your post. It's just as easy to obfuscate information by providing no example and asking people to prove a negative.
It sounds like "Spray and pray". In fact, people who don't use google do not exactly jump to searching on Bing, mostly because bing is terrible at being a search engine. Are there alternatives? Yes. Is this a way to bring light to them? Not even remotely.
Yahoo is bing, so using yahoo is using bing and is just as much garbage as bing.
Maybe the part about "I deleted all the unimportant emails. Trust me" part?
I can't wait to hear what happens when forensics gets to their machines and hopefully finds tons and tons of illegal activity.
No person should ever be allowed to do this, especially someone who doesn't understand the impact of doing this from a technology perspective and only from a political one.
You're misunderstanding. If you create a form of encryption to which you do not hold the keys, all of the compelling in the world isn't going to do anything. Which is what most modern OS's including ios do.
Yeah, ok. Show me where/how you can guarantee that any more than anyone else who already has your data? Apple in this case *already has your data* without HealthKit. Apple is identical to google and facebook and every tech company that collects user data in this regards.
Sirius isn't free, you pretty much have to buy the hardware too.
Also, 90% of their stations are outright garbage and far less personalized than Pandora.
At the same time, Pandora is ridiculous because it's treated more like a radio stream and less acknowledging basic functionality like "I want to play a song again" or "I want to restart the same song". Spotify is equally garbage in this regards as you are limited on the number of streams and the selection is limited. Google music is the next closest thing at $8/mo, but in reality it's no better as well.
Until you have a streaming service that doesn't have to resort to covers to play certain songs just because the big bad publishers think their music is so magically valuable (it isn't), we're going to be stuck with garbage solutions like this.
What isn't mentioned about every music streaming solution? None of them pay the artist *anything*, because this assumes artists actually get their tenth of a cent per stream. It's unlikely, because that's probably split 20/80 with their publisher, assuming they even get the money and that a publisher isn't somehow taking all the money from the artist who doesn't even work for them.
Uh, your mistake would not be smart TV's. Your mistake is buying a smart TV's that have some sort of voice/audio control. There's no reason to trust any mfr with audio information.
Roku TV's for example, do not do this - they don't have or need a microphone, really.
Slashdot Mirror
Big Media has never won. They were late to the game and cannot reverse history. They literally cannot win. Facts and history are not on their side, and this is no different.
This is hilariously dishonest.
Conventional taxis don't have to go out of business - that's a strawman/misnomer. Why don't they provide their own apps to provide service to riders? Oh, right. Uber is doing what taxi services refuse to in a lot of instances. Uber isn't the problem here, but old outdated legislation is.
Taxi services don't operate 24/7 with 100% coverage, that is and never can be the case anywhere. Meanwhile, uber is opening up to other competition and enabling better coverage than the taxi services themselves provide.
awww, a big government baby won't be able to keep playing fast and loose with breaking the law and using toys they can't handle responsibly!
qq!
Agreed.
I'd happily give up ESPN off sling to get something actually worthwhile. I haven't gone to ESPN even once on sling.
Be reasonable. They can also submit anything that doesn't fit their scope of propaganda directly to the government and remove any hint of anonymity to thus gain more favor with the government, as well.
Hmm. Maybe it's the "you don't have a way to opt out of receiving mail" part of things?
This is the actual truth. You are 100% correct.
It is actually proven that having real time traffic data to make traffic decisions is to the benefit of everyone driving. On the flip side, I don't really like how that equation works out for your personal privacy.
This is so laughably false I'm amazed you even tried to push such a logic. Please stop asking people to prove a negative.
Geoengineering is something you are referencing with no knowledge; an increase in seismic risk is exactly that.
Considering they used their money to make this into the system, I see absolutely no reason to simply say "it's okay, they're using the rules they created".
That's 100% wrong and dishonest.
Remember, we have made a strong stance against asset forfeiture going forward. The assets however, have not - and are thus still considered guilty.
Except that this has ZERO to do with what's going on. The fact that they broke the law to basically steal his laptop, this has nothing to do with screwing with the pilots.
Pearson does a lot of things; I'd find them fairly neutral in the process - what they do will work with basically anything.
That's not to say what they do is good? I find Pearson to be shit when it comes to education tools - they are filled with bloatware, drm, and things that don't provide any benefit to thing using them, but I wouldn't really blame them for anything here.
I would blame the superintendent and apple for sticking their nose into more sales under the guise of supporting education.
I doubt it would happen for a variety of reasons, but I'd love to see Google find a way to work with Tesla on this.
While they didn't willingly/intentionally give their information to the NSA, the fact that they were compromised by the NSA means that they should still be considered compromised going forward, so you are correct.
TLDR: don't do business with the NSA. This also means we really, really, really need to get rid of FIPS as well.
GMO foods kill? More like your DNA is modified by what you eat, so eating foods with modified DNA may have undesirable effects (see: obesity, diabetes).
I don't think I've heard anyone actually state that GMO foods kill them directly, though?
Without any example, you are basically lying with your post. It's just as easy to obfuscate information by providing no example and asking people to prove a negative.
Except that it's a known key with a known loophole?
You may as well try to tell me WPA-2 encryption is meaningful. It's not.
Maybe because they're trying?
You can't just magic your way into a SCOTUS review.
No, it doesn't sound like a good strategy.
It sounds like "Spray and pray". In fact, people who don't use google do not exactly jump to searching on Bing, mostly because bing is terrible at being a search engine. Are there alternatives? Yes. Is this a way to bring light to them? Not even remotely.
Yahoo is bing, so using yahoo is using bing and is just as much garbage as bing.
The fact that the FAA is attempting to define commercial activity with a drone is exactly the problem.
Maybe the part about "I deleted all the unimportant emails. Trust me" part?
I can't wait to hear what happens when forensics gets to their machines and hopefully finds tons and tons of illegal activity.
No person should ever be allowed to do this, especially someone who doesn't understand the impact of doing this from a technology perspective and only from a political one.
You're misunderstanding. If you create a form of encryption to which you do not hold the keys, all of the compelling in the world isn't going to do anything. Which is what most modern OS's including ios do.
"Apple doesn't mine it"
Yeah, ok. Show me where/how you can guarantee that any more than anyone else who already has your data? Apple in this case *already has your data* without HealthKit. Apple is identical to google and facebook and every tech company that collects user data in this regards.
Sirius isn't free, you pretty much have to buy the hardware too.
Also, 90% of their stations are outright garbage and far less personalized than Pandora.
At the same time, Pandora is ridiculous because it's treated more like a radio stream and less acknowledging basic functionality like "I want to play a song again" or "I want to restart the same song". Spotify is equally garbage in this regards as you are limited on the number of streams and the selection is limited. Google music is the next closest thing at $8/mo, but in reality it's no better as well.
Until you have a streaming service that doesn't have to resort to covers to play certain songs just because the big bad publishers think their music is so magically valuable (it isn't), we're going to be stuck with garbage solutions like this.
What isn't mentioned about every music streaming solution? None of them pay the artist *anything*, because this assumes artists actually get their tenth of a cent per stream. It's unlikely, because that's probably split 20/80 with their publisher, assuming they even get the money and that a publisher isn't somehow taking all the money from the artist who doesn't even work for them.
Uh, your mistake would not be smart TV's. Your mistake is buying a smart TV's that have some sort of voice/audio control. There's no reason to trust any mfr with audio information.
Roku TV's for example, do not do this - they don't have or need a microphone, really.