It isn't weird once you recognize that our schools are not about education. They are a business. The school lunch programs are designed to give schools another claim to poverty. A claim that we MUST give them more money.
True. When it is one wolf deciding what to have for dinner, and 4 sheep, you don't know what is for dinner tonight, but you do know what is dinner for the the week.
That was my first thought. Even if no one is using those passwords, by using key loggers to snoop passwords, you invalidate all of your permission logging, so you don't actually know who accessed what.
Having met a lot of people that talk like you and believe it, I actually don't know if you are a troll or a racist. Am I getting a woosh and missing it?
Are you actually claiming that a little town in Idaho that has 100 skilled jobs will generate 110 new skilled jobs in a reasonable time frame if 100 new skilled immigrant workers move into the town? You should immediately apply at the DOL. You could obviously turn our nation's current unemployment problems around within the month.
Are you saying that you don't think it is racist for white people to say that they would rather vote for a white person because they are white? Or is it racist if a white person does it, but not if a black person does it?
One step more than that, no units at all can be "resold as received". If a unit is returned and resold, NewEgg needs to reformat the drive anyway. Selling "refurbished" computers with previous users data (and viruses) is negligence.
That being black made young black voters like him more is no worse than any of the other reasons, and arguably better than the refusal to vote for someone becuase of he is black.
He didn't run his campaign on it? Or that wasn't what his campaign was running on. He didn't personally need to stand up and declare that you should vote on him because of his race. There were plenty of other people doing that on his behalf. If you didn't see non-stop calls to vote for him because of his race, you were not paying attention.
Voting for either of the two major parties is "throwing your vote away". Why would either a D or R care to represent your interests if your going to vote for their no matter what?
It isn't racism. You want it to be, but that is you. If anything, it is nationalism. Nationalism and racism are two totally different things. There is a heavy correlation between the two, but they are not a causal relationship.
It is a little like having your brother dating. When he tells you that he just proposed to the love of his life, and the woman smiles and says that she wants to spend the rest of her life with him, have children and build a strong successful family, you wish him the best.
When the woman tells you that she is with him because in a few years she can divorce him and take half of everything he has and move back in with her high school sweetheart. That half of what he has is more than she and her real love could earn on their own. You wave him off. You point out how bad of an idea it is. If the woman happens to be a different race than you, it doesn't make you a racist.
The study found that when job pressures increase, the more mobile of society who are being pressured move to greener pastures while those who are less mobile and not being pressured don't move? Amazing! It almost sounds like people don't want to be out of work.
The fact that your other programmers had to get raises so that an H-1B worker could be hired shows your employer was paying far below the average in the area. It doesn't speak to the ethical nature of your former employer, or their willingness to pay reasonable wages to local workers.
It means that you have made a commitment to other people. That they are relying on you to finish your part of a job you committed to so that they can do their part. There are plenty of projects that make a point to tell users that they should have no expectations. There are other projects that take a much more professional approach, even if the work is being done for free.
Of course it can. You just hire senior software engineers and give them the title of junior software engineer. You then opt not to hire senior software engineers at a hire rate and you have just lowered the average wage paid to tech workers. I would think that as someone who was the co-founder of a startup, and the holder of an H-1B visa because your better than your American counterparts, you could have figured out that on your own.
Slashdot Mirror
It isn't weird once you recognize that our schools are not about education. They are a business. The school lunch programs are designed to give schools another claim to poverty. A claim that we MUST give them more money.
Very nicely put.
True. When it is one wolf deciding what to have for dinner, and 4 sheep, you don't know what is for dinner tonight, but you do know what is dinner for the the week.
No, invalidating all of your access log records by passing around the employee's password is certainly NOT going to protect you from lawsuit.
That was my first thought. Even if no one is using those passwords, by using key loggers to snoop passwords, you invalidate all of your permission logging, so you don't actually know who accessed what.
Exactly. Apple CHOSE to block the app. They were not legally compelled to do so.
Huh. That was always called racist/sexist when a white man was doing it.
So, you are serious then?
True. Both platforms are WAY past the point of critical mass, and the killer apps for phones are available on both platforms.
Having met a lot of people that talk like you and believe it, I actually don't know if you are a troll or a racist. Am I getting a woosh and missing it?
Are you actually claiming that a little town in Idaho that has 100 skilled jobs will generate 110 new skilled jobs in a reasonable time frame if 100 new skilled immigrant workers move into the town? You should immediately apply at the DOL. You could obviously turn our nation's current unemployment problems around within the month.
Are you saying that you don't think it is racist for white people to say that they would rather vote for a white person because they are white? Or is it racist if a white person does it, but not if a black person does it?
Then H-1B Visas are not needed.
One step more than that, no units at all can be "resold as received". If a unit is returned and resold, NewEgg needs to reformat the drive anyway. Selling "refurbished" computers with previous users data (and viruses) is negligence.
50% would be an indication of rampant racism among black voters. Even 25% would mean that there was a huge divergence in normal voting patterns.
That being black made young black voters like him more is no worse than any of the other reasons, and arguably better than the refusal to vote for someone becuase of he is black.
Only if your a racist.
He didn't run his campaign on it? Or that wasn't what his campaign was running on. He didn't personally need to stand up and declare that you should vote on him because of his race. There were plenty of other people doing that on his behalf. If you didn't see non-stop calls to vote for him because of his race, you were not paying attention.
It is both sides. It just isn't both sides of a right/left coin.
Voting for either of the two major parties is "throwing your vote away". Why would either a D or R care to represent your interests if your going to vote for their no matter what?
It isn't racism. You want it to be, but that is you. If anything, it is nationalism. Nationalism and racism are two totally different things. There is a heavy correlation between the two, but they are not a causal relationship.
It is a little like having your brother dating. When he tells you that he just proposed to the love of his life, and the woman smiles and says that she wants to spend the rest of her life with him, have children and build a strong successful family, you wish him the best.
When the woman tells you that she is with him because in a few years she can divorce him and take half of everything he has and move back in with her high school sweetheart. That half of what he has is more than she and her real love could earn on their own. You wave him off. You point out how bad of an idea it is. If the woman happens to be a different race than you, it doesn't make you a racist.
"Don't be evil".
"Do no evil" is pretty much impossible for even your average Joe, much less a company that must follow regulations that just might require it.
The study found that when job pressures increase, the more mobile of society who are being pressured move to greener pastures while those who are less mobile and not being pressured don't move? Amazing! It almost sounds like people don't want to be out of work.
The fact that your other programmers had to get raises so that an H-1B worker could be hired shows your employer was paying far below the average in the area. It doesn't speak to the ethical nature of your former employer, or their willingness to pay reasonable wages to local workers.
It means that you have made a commitment to other people. That they are relying on you to finish your part of a job you committed to so that they can do their part. There are plenty of projects that make a point to tell users that they should have no expectations. There are other projects that take a much more professional approach, even if the work is being done for free.
Of course it can. You just hire senior software engineers and give them the title of junior software engineer. You then opt not to hire senior software engineers at a hire rate and you have just lowered the average wage paid to tech workers. I would think that as someone who was the co-founder of a startup, and the holder of an H-1B visa because your better than your American counterparts, you could have figured out that on your own.