This is absolutely true. It is also an issue that very few people seem to recognize. It is a shame too because not only would recognizing it make the world a better place, it is inevitable, AND not planning for it is likely going to make things a lot worse before they get better.
Whether they realize it or not, it is a lot of what OWS is about.
Well, I'm not going to tell you that it didn't happen. Like I said though, you may want to try Insteon. It is a protocol that was based on X10. It took all of the problems that X10 had and tried to fix them. I used to use X10, and after switching to Insteon, I have had much better results.
Old or super low end CFL has problems with X10. for the last 8 or 9 years, the buld of CFLs sold work just fine with X10. LED lights have never had a problem with X10. Of course, you should start transitioning away from X10 anyway. Insteon is the upgraded version of X10, and it has a lot of advantages. One being that while X10 becomes less reliable the more devices you have, Insteon becomes more reliable. A huge number of the Insteon devices are backwards compatible with X10 also.
Good luck with that. I'm going to seek split custody. That will get rid of the child support payments, and you will need to turn over custody 50% of the time.
That is what people with faster metabolisms or who's bodies crave what is readily available say. If it is that simple, explain to me why I gain weight on a 2300 calorie a day diet of carbohydrates, but lose it on a 3500 calorie a day diet of fat. The "eat less, exercise more" myth has been debunked hudreds of thousands of times. It is what 90% of all fad diets are based on. The only reason that the "eat less, exercise more" scam works is that the small percentage of people that it makes a good sound byte, there are huge profits to be made by building scam diets around it, and the small segment of the population that it actually works for uses confirmation bias to tell themselves that they are somehow better people than those who's bodies need different things to be healthy.
No way. That device doesn't look any larger than a Commodore Plus/4. It was released in 1984, so it would have had prototypes in 1983. The TSR-80 model 100 had an LCD graphics display in 1983. There is no technical reason that the devices couldn't have been made. While the device is interesting from a retro computer prototype point of view, the device is pretty much in line with the kinds of ideas being tried at the time. It isn't some sign that Apple was decades ahead of the competition.
There are no products that start from scratch, so of course you would start with an already-developed product. I'm pretty sure that if you go to Apple with several million dollars, and tell them that you would like an iPad with twice as much storage, they would accommodate you. For several million dollars, they would probably even put in an SD slot if you asked real nice.
If by "AVERAGE", you mean "Completely made up", that will be difficult. If by "AVERAGE", you mean real people that are neither in the top earners, nor the bottom earners, then I have, and do frequently. They don't work three jobs. Some of them work 2 jobs. Most don't.
You are wrong and short sighted. Most people DO care about having control over the code execution path. They are just too stupid to know what they care about. Your statement makes about as much sense as saying that most people don't care if diesel fuel triples in cost. After all, they don't want to drive semi trucks. They just want to drive their Prius to the grocery store and by reasonably priced food.
Just because you don't use something directly doesn't mean that it doesn't have a significant impact on your life. Some people are not smart enough to understand this, but it doesn't change the fact that it is true.
There is no consumer product that isn't part of that "race to the bottom". If you were willing to spend several million dollars on a tablet, I'm sure you could get something dramatically better than any tablet currently on the market. There is always a cost/quality trade off.
Worst advice ever. Sure that adult will likely lose weight at 1500 calories, be he will also likely feel like crap, be too tired to do anything, and constantly be starving. Even worse, his body will likely try to compensate for this by trying to store every calorie it can as fat for just such occurrences. This means that as soon as he does have a calorie to spare, it will pack on as fat instead of giving him more energy to burn immediately, or just crapping it out.
If eating less was really all it took, we would have very few fat people.
You are aware that the 3D being used now is not the same as the 3D that was done in the 50s and 70s right? In the 50's, 3D technology just wasn't up to snuff. The 3D that was done in the 70's was using the same, not up to snuff technology. Entertainment technology that isn't good enough to pull off what it is attempting and failing, only to be reintroduced years later when the tech has improved is a common occurrence.
Still motion 3D has been popular for decades because the tech for still motion stereographic was dramatically simpler, and got good enough much sooner.
I don't know why. It is a great phone. The only complaint I have with the one I have is that it is short on storage, so you have to manager the number of apps installed more than newer phones. Given when it was produced, the amount of storage is reasonable.
The only problem with the Nexus One was that Google made a bad choice on what their goals were. The Nexus One raised the bar on what an Android phone should be. In that space it was a resounding success. Google should not have looked at large sales as their goal for success.
I actually hope that this is what Motorola turns into now that Google owns them. Google should make phones that truly show off what Android can do and price the phones just a little higher than what the competition can make a profit at. This way, Google forces any manufacturer that wants to play in the high end to make good as good of phones as they can. It also sets a maximum price that the other manufacturers can charge for these high end phones and still lets them make a profit. Google only needs to break even with Motorola to have it be a resounding success. This tactic will not only ensure that Android is seen in the best light, but by making sure that other phone manufacturers can make a profit and take 90% of the sales, they keep a thriving hardware ecosystem, and get to be the good guys.
Of course there is. They just need to include a small chip in the device that contains the original boot loader, and a special key combination can restore the boot loader to factory spec. There would then be no practical way to brick the phone.
For something closer to home, you could go to CVS and get the craig. It's regular price is $99, but it is frequently on sale for $75-$80. Here is a review and info on rooting:
It might be the best tablet at that price point, but $80 Android tablets are becoming pretty common if you look in places like drug stores. I'm not saying I want one of the $80 tablets, but they certainly exist.
The Versa has a $11,000 sticker price. Even if they only had one latte a day, AND they paid sticker price, they would only need to have started saving in 2006, as the dealership would happily give them a 6 year loan so that they could pay for the rest of the car with future latte money.
Of course, unless the car is a hot item (which the Versa is not) the latte drinker has no need to pay sticker price. Get a 2011 at the end of the month, and they could likely get the car at $9000. At that point, they wouldn't need to have started saving until 2008. Now, if you go into a coffee shop, you will notice that these places are not empty once the standard work day starts. In fact, they have customers coming in all day as well as on the weekends. This is because not everyone limits themselves to a single latte in a day and they don't necessarily limit themselves to lattes on weekdays. 10 lattes in a week is certainly not unheard of, even amongst the less wealthy part of the population. In those cases, they don't even need to save beyond putting a small down payment on the car, as they are spending more on lattes than the cost of a car.
I am the opposite. I used to think that if the media was cheap enough, and didn't have a ticking time bomb like DRM in it, I would purchase more games. I signed up for GOG in March, and over the last year I have bought more games from them than I have bought for my PC than I had in the previous 10 years. I'm having to makes an vague estimate now, but I am likely nearing as many PC game purchases since march as ALL PC game purchases I have ever made.
I now that if I could go into a store and buy PS1 games new at $1 a pop (even if they were just in paper sleeves) I would buy tons of them. PS2 or Xbox, I wouldn't think twice about spending $2 for just about any game. In either case, I might go so far as to buy complete sets of the entire libraries.
It hasn't been for me. While most applications that are not compatible with my device will say so before downloading, that is not always the case. Maybe I am particularly unlucky when it comes to Apple devices, maybe others assume that they are 'holding it wrong' when stuff doesn't work, or maybe it is somewhere in between.
Slashdot Mirror
This is absolutely true. It is also an issue that very few people seem to recognize. It is a shame too because not only would recognizing it make the world a better place, it is inevitable, AND not planning for it is likely going to make things a lot worse before they get better.
Whether they realize it or not, it is a lot of what OWS is about.
Well, I'm not going to tell you that it didn't happen. Like I said though, you may want to try Insteon. It is a protocol that was based on X10. It took all of the problems that X10 had and tried to fix them. I used to use X10, and after switching to Insteon, I have had much better results.
Yes, what you saw was what happened to the company when their patent ran out.
Old or super low end CFL has problems with X10. for the last 8 or 9 years, the buld of CFLs sold work just fine with X10. LED lights have never had a problem with X10. Of course, you should start transitioning away from X10 anyway. Insteon is the upgraded version of X10, and it has a lot of advantages. One being that while X10 becomes less reliable the more devices you have, Insteon becomes more reliable. A huge number of the Insteon devices are backwards compatible with X10 also.
A little bit longer than it will take for someone to die because they don't have the feature.
Well, if you could keep your eyelids closed instead of spreading them for any guy on the internet, we wouldn't be in this position would we?
Good luck with that. I'm going to seek split custody. That will get rid of the child support payments, and you will need to turn over custody 50% of the time.
That is what people with faster metabolisms or who's bodies crave what is readily available say. If it is that simple, explain to me why I gain weight on a 2300 calorie a day diet of carbohydrates, but lose it on a 3500 calorie a day diet of fat. The "eat less, exercise more" myth has been debunked hudreds of thousands of times. It is what 90% of all fad diets are based on. The only reason that the "eat less, exercise more" scam works is that the small percentage of people that it makes a good sound byte, there are huge profits to be made by building scam diets around it, and the small segment of the population that it actually works for uses confirmation bias to tell themselves that they are somehow better people than those who's bodies need different things to be healthy.
I don't know. All of the companies sueing people over copyright violations are molesting my inner child. That means they are 'child molesters', right?
No way. That device doesn't look any larger than a Commodore Plus/4. It was released in 1984, so it would have had prototypes in 1983. The TSR-80 model 100 had an LCD graphics display in 1983. There is no technical reason that the devices couldn't have been made. While the device is interesting from a retro computer prototype point of view, the device is pretty much in line with the kinds of ideas being tried at the time. It isn't some sign that Apple was decades ahead of the competition.
There are no products that start from scratch, so of course you would start with an already-developed product. I'm pretty sure that if you go to Apple with several million dollars, and tell them that you would like an iPad with twice as much storage, they would accommodate you. For several million dollars, they would probably even put in an SD slot if you asked real nice.
If by "AVERAGE", you mean "Completely made up", that will be difficult. If by "AVERAGE", you mean real people that are neither in the top earners, nor the bottom earners, then I have, and do frequently. They don't work three jobs. Some of them work 2 jobs. Most don't.
You are wrong and short sighted. Most people DO care about having control over the code execution path. They are just too stupid to know what they care about. Your statement makes about as much sense as saying that most people don't care if diesel fuel triples in cost. After all, they don't want to drive semi trucks. They just want to drive their Prius to the grocery store and by reasonably priced food.
Just because you don't use something directly doesn't mean that it doesn't have a significant impact on your life. Some people are not smart enough to understand this, but it doesn't change the fact that it is true.
Which is why there has never been any malware on a printer.
There is no consumer product that isn't part of that "race to the bottom". If you were willing to spend several million dollars on a tablet, I'm sure you could get something dramatically better than any tablet currently on the market. There is always a cost/quality trade off.
Worst advice ever. Sure that adult will likely lose weight at 1500 calories, be he will also likely feel like crap, be too tired to do anything, and constantly be starving. Even worse, his body will likely try to compensate for this by trying to store every calorie it can as fat for just such occurrences. This means that as soon as he does have a calorie to spare, it will pack on as fat instead of giving him more energy to burn immediately, or just crapping it out.
If eating less was really all it took, we would have very few fat people.
Including drinking water. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/01/14/national/main2358958.shtml
You are aware that the 3D being used now is not the same as the 3D that was done in the 50s and 70s right? In the 50's, 3D technology just wasn't up to snuff. The 3D that was done in the 70's was using the same, not up to snuff technology. Entertainment technology that isn't good enough to pull off what it is attempting and failing, only to be reintroduced years later when the tech has improved is a common occurrence.
Still motion 3D has been popular for decades because the tech for still motion stereographic was dramatically simpler, and got good enough much sooner.
I don't know why. It is a great phone. The only complaint I have with the one I have is that it is short on storage, so you have to manager the number of apps installed more than newer phones. Given when it was produced, the amount of storage is reasonable.
The only problem with the Nexus One was that Google made a bad choice on what their goals were. The Nexus One raised the bar on what an Android phone should be. In that space it was a resounding success. Google should not have looked at large sales as their goal for success.
I actually hope that this is what Motorola turns into now that Google owns them. Google should make phones that truly show off what Android can do and price the phones just a little higher than what the competition can make a profit at. This way, Google forces any manufacturer that wants to play in the high end to make good as good of phones as they can. It also sets a maximum price that the other manufacturers can charge for these high end phones and still lets them make a profit. Google only needs to break even with Motorola to have it be a resounding success. This tactic will not only ensure that Android is seen in the best light, but by making sure that other phone manufacturers can make a profit and take 90% of the sales, they keep a thriving hardware ecosystem, and get to be the good guys.
Of course there is. They just need to include a small chip in the device that contains the original boot loader, and a special key combination can restore the boot loader to factory spec. There would then be no practical way to brick the phone.
http://www.dealextreme.com/c/tablets-1409?page=1&pagesize=20&pagesort=price
For something closer to home, you could go to CVS and get the craig. It's regular price is $99, but it is frequently on sale for $75-$80. Here is a review and info on rooting:
http://reviewhorizon.com/2011/05/how-to-root-install-custom-roms-and-add-android-market-for-cvs-craig-cmp-738a-75-android-tablet/
It might be the best tablet at that price point, but $80 Android tablets are becoming pretty common if you look in places like drug stores. I'm not saying I want one of the $80 tablets, but they certainly exist.
The Versa has a $11,000 sticker price. Even if they only had one latte a day, AND they paid sticker price, they would only need to have started saving in 2006, as the dealership would happily give them a 6 year loan so that they could pay for the rest of the car with future latte money.
Of course, unless the car is a hot item (which the Versa is not) the latte drinker has no need to pay sticker price. Get a 2011 at the end of the month, and they could likely get the car at $9000. At that point, they wouldn't need to have started saving until 2008. Now, if you go into a coffee shop, you will notice that these places are not empty once the standard work day starts. In fact, they have customers coming in all day as well as on the weekends. This is because not everyone limits themselves to a single latte in a day and they don't necessarily limit themselves to lattes on weekdays. 10 lattes in a week is certainly not unheard of, even amongst the less wealthy part of the population. In those cases, they don't even need to save beyond putting a small down payment on the car, as they are spending more on lattes than the cost of a car.
I am the opposite. I used to think that if the media was cheap enough, and didn't have a ticking time bomb like DRM in it, I would purchase more games. I signed up for GOG in March, and over the last year I have bought more games from them than I have bought for my PC than I had in the previous 10 years. I'm having to makes an vague estimate now, but I am likely nearing as many PC game purchases since march as ALL PC game purchases I have ever made.
I now that if I could go into a store and buy PS1 games new at $1 a pop (even if they were just in paper sleeves) I would buy tons of them. PS2 or Xbox, I wouldn't think twice about spending $2 for just about any game. In either case, I might go so far as to buy complete sets of the entire libraries.
It hasn't been for me. While most applications that are not compatible with my device will say so before downloading, that is not always the case. Maybe I am particularly unlucky when it comes to Apple devices, maybe others assume that they are 'holding it wrong' when stuff doesn't work, or maybe it is somewhere in between.