>Windows 9 must succeed--Microsoft's reputation is already suffering badly enough with every other release being a consumer failure, I doubt they want to see what happens if they produce two turkeys in a row.
And what are you going to do if you don't like Windows 9? Go get Windows from another software company? That's right. Let the butthurt in.
95? Shit. Crashed all the time. 98? Awesome. Transformative. Amazing. Me? Shit. Crashed all the time. XP? Amazing. Transformative. Vista? Shit. Crashed all the time. And there were internal memos leaked that exposed the fact it was intentionally difficult and frustrating to use. 7? Amazing. Transformative. 8? Shit. Didn't crash all the time, but fucking Metro. And now all the settings are in two different places, and every time you try to find one it switches to the fucking Metro interface.
The reason Microsoft does this: It allows them to sell 2 Windows licenses for every PC OEMs sell. OEM licenses require OEMs to sell PC's with only the latest version of Windows, so the OEM has to buy one license for Windows 8, then another license for Windows 7 so they can ship Windows 7 as demanded by the customer.
Yes, the "cloud" is the best thing that ever happened to software companies.
Adobe came up with the original concept of taking away software that you install on your own computer and making you run it on their servers instead.
This prevents people from finding a version of their product that serves their needs and never upgrading.
Now instead of trying to force you to upgrade by introducing critical bugs that interrupt your workflow (I've seen it done in person, not at Adobe but at other companies) they simply shut off access to your data if you stop paying them.
"That's a nice rendering. Be a shame if you were to... lose access to it. Oh by the way, your monthly tithe is due."
I'm sorry but super VGA is not acceptable in a five thousand dollar tablet.
Most Windows software made in the last ten years won't even work at that resolution.
I don't care if you can read it under molten lava, if the resolution is so low as to break the device's functionality there's no justification for purchasing it.
"If fewer people are dying from cancer pharmaceutical companies will make less money, so fewer people will invest. Lets let more people die from cancer so big pharma can continue to profit."
Before we worry about the problem of whether or not students can afford to eat we need to deal with the problem of poor children not being able to go to college.
I've been doing this for years.
My TV is a 30" Planar touchscreen monitor.
Plug it into the HDMI port on my laptop: Instant touch screen home theater system.
Plug it into my Galaxy S3: Instant giant Android tablet.
Plug it into my Roku: Instant Netflix box.
I predict that eventually televisions and monitors will merge into a single appliance because there's really no point in having a TV with its own internal logic components that will be outdated in a year.
Oh yes, Sony and other manufacturers are fighting the good fight. They LOVE to make people replace their televisions every year or to so they can watch TV in the newest format. But they will lose that battle.
I was mining bitcoins with two AMD Radeon 9790 cards and was barely turning a profit.
The problem is that the electricity cost to run the computer and the video cards is very expensive.
It tripled my electricity bill.
Then the difficulty was doubled, now I'm making negative profit.
There is very little chance that if I continued to mine, the bitcoins I have in my wallet would ever become worth enough to make the money back.
The same is true for everyone else: The more GPU's you add the more electricity costs and so you need so much hardware to break even that you'll never go into profit.
The only hope is that you're one of the lucky few first people to receive one of the ASIC units from the two companies that claim to be close to shipping.
Of course neither of those companies has actually shown a working unit even though they've taken thousands of orders (including two orders from me, one to each company).
I'm going to assume that they mean "assembled in the USA" in the same way that Levis means "made in the USA," which is to say they are fabricated in China, then a tiny sticker or a single screw or some such is applied in the US so that they can legally say the product was made in the US.
Usually if a company requires verification of your RMA it's because it gives them an excuse to not ship you the replacement product if they can't get in contact with you.
They figure that if it's enough work for you to get the replacement product eventually you'll give up.
I have seen companies do shady things like:
Intentionally deliver products to the wrong address so they'll be returned, sometimes multiple times.
Intentionally send a broken product as a replacement, multiple times.
Take a broken product out of your return box, put it into a new box and ship it right back to you without even testing it.
Intentionally damage a product and send it to you so you'll have to return it again.
Receive your return item and let it sit on a shelf for months hoping you'll give up on getting a replacement.
Machines can never make decisions about who should experience harm because this decision has been handled by humans using belief systems.
Person A can take an action which would benefit many people, but in doing so, person B would be unfairly harmed. Under what circumstances would it be morally just for Person A to violate Person B's rights in order to benefit the group?
For about the last ten years every time I've upgraded my CPU I've upgraded the motherboard as well because there's no point putting a new CPU into an old motherboard.
I don't understand what part of this constitutes stuff that matters.
Lots of people have mobile offices in their cars. You can even buy caddies and laptop mounts that strap right to the seat in your car, or bolt to the floor.
Before tablets and smartphones became popular I used to have a laptop stand in my car so I could use Microsoft Maps for directions, and I knew of several other people who had similar setups.
These days this kind of thing is pretty commonplace.
I don't know what's up with news stories on Slashdot these days.
It's fan service for the furries.
Many furries will refuse to participate or use a product that doesn't acknowledge their subculture. This can lead to a significant loss of profit potential.
Brands are starting to recognize that furries comprise a significant and growing profitable market so they're starting to add anthropomorphic options to their services and products.
For further example Second Life has entire sims owned and operated by furries and Everquest 2 added anthropomorphic felines.
Wow, this is sensationalist titling on par with Digg or Reddit.
Title: New Earth 2.0 found 2 miles outside Earth's atmosphere!
Body: No not really. What we meant to say is that a planet approximately the size of the earth with no possibility of hosting human life was found far beyond the Sloan Great Wall.
Same thing, different story.
Getting into a pissing match with your child is only going to make them escalate every challenge you present until the value of the resources you're taking away exceeds the value of winning the argument.
In the end regulation of the resources you're taking away from your child will create enough work that you won't bother and your child will win the argument by default. Then you'll lose subsequent arguments because you have no power with them.
The same applies to corporations. If you set a marker for escalation of the argument the corporation will continue to do bad things only up to the level at which they have learned they will be punished to a degree that their profit margin is impacted enough to cause a shareholder uprising, which means they will continue to do wrong in metered fashion.
Likewise my experience with OCZ products is that either they work or they don't. One out of 3 OCZ products has to be returned for exchange. So I spend a little more to not have to do the returns.
Slashdot Mirror
Confirmation bias.
They did ship it, except it was called Surface Pro.
And it didn't have two screens, it had one double density screen.
I'm still confused about why they cannibalized their giant table-screen name for a new product, though.
>Windows 9 must succeed--Microsoft's reputation is already suffering badly enough with every other release being a consumer failure, I doubt they want to see what happens if they produce two turkeys in a row.
And what are you going to do if you don't like Windows 9? Go get Windows from another software company? That's right. Let the butthurt in.
9 should be good.
Remember, every other version of Windows is good.
95? Shit. Crashed all the time. 98? Awesome. Transformative. Amazing. Me? Shit. Crashed all the time. XP? Amazing. Transformative. Vista? Shit. Crashed all the time. And there were internal memos leaked that exposed the fact it was intentionally difficult and frustrating to use. 7? Amazing. Transformative. 8? Shit. Didn't crash all the time, but fucking Metro. And now all the settings are in two different places, and every time you try to find one it switches to the fucking Metro interface.
The reason Microsoft does this: It allows them to sell 2 Windows licenses for every PC OEMs sell. OEM licenses require OEMs to sell PC's with only the latest version of Windows, so the OEM has to buy one license for Windows 8, then another license for Windows 7 so they can ship Windows 7 as demanded by the customer.
Yes, the "cloud" is the best thing that ever happened to software companies. Adobe came up with the original concept of taking away software that you install on your own computer and making you run it on their servers instead. This prevents people from finding a version of their product that serves their needs and never upgrading. Now instead of trying to force you to upgrade by introducing critical bugs that interrupt your workflow (I've seen it done in person, not at Adobe but at other companies) they simply shut off access to your data if you stop paying them. "That's a nice rendering. Be a shame if you were to... lose access to it. Oh by the way, your monthly tithe is due."
I'm sorry but super VGA is not acceptable in a five thousand dollar tablet. Most Windows software made in the last ten years won't even work at that resolution. I don't care if you can read it under molten lava, if the resolution is so low as to break the device's functionality there's no justification for purchasing it.
"If fewer people are dying from cancer pharmaceutical companies will make less money, so fewer people will invest. Lets let more people die from cancer so big pharma can continue to profit."
Before we worry about the problem of whether or not students can afford to eat we need to deal with the problem of poor children not being able to go to college.
I've been doing this for years. My TV is a 30" Planar touchscreen monitor. Plug it into the HDMI port on my laptop: Instant touch screen home theater system. Plug it into my Galaxy S3: Instant giant Android tablet. Plug it into my Roku: Instant Netflix box. I predict that eventually televisions and monitors will merge into a single appliance because there's really no point in having a TV with its own internal logic components that will be outdated in a year. Oh yes, Sony and other manufacturers are fighting the good fight. They LOVE to make people replace their televisions every year or to so they can watch TV in the newest format. But they will lose that battle.
I miss old Slashdot.
I was mining bitcoins with two AMD Radeon 9790 cards and was barely turning a profit. The problem is that the electricity cost to run the computer and the video cards is very expensive. It tripled my electricity bill. Then the difficulty was doubled, now I'm making negative profit. There is very little chance that if I continued to mine, the bitcoins I have in my wallet would ever become worth enough to make the money back. The same is true for everyone else: The more GPU's you add the more electricity costs and so you need so much hardware to break even that you'll never go into profit. The only hope is that you're one of the lucky few first people to receive one of the ASIC units from the two companies that claim to be close to shipping. Of course neither of those companies has actually shown a working unit even though they've taken thousands of orders (including two orders from me, one to each company).
Most of the money made during the gold rush was made by merchants selling mining and panning equipment.
Designed by Apple in California. Fabricated by people who only do it because there's no better place to work.
Canada is in North America.
I'm going to assume that they mean "assembled in the USA" in the same way that Levis means "made in the USA," which is to say they are fabricated in China, then a tiny sticker or a single screw or some such is applied in the US so that they can legally say the product was made in the US.
Customer service monkey here.
I have seen some s##t.
Usually if a company requires verification of your RMA it's because it gives them an excuse to not ship you the replacement product if they can't get in contact with you.
They figure that if it's enough work for you to get the replacement product eventually you'll give up.
I have seen companies do shady things like:
Intentionally deliver products to the wrong address so they'll be returned, sometimes multiple times.
Intentionally send a broken product as a replacement, multiple times.
Take a broken product out of your return box, put it into a new box and ship it right back to you without even testing it.
Intentionally damage a product and send it to you so you'll have to return it again.
Receive your return item and let it sit on a shelf for months hoping you'll give up on getting a replacement.
Machines can never make decisions about who should experience harm because this decision has been handled by humans using belief systems.
Person A can take an action which would benefit many people, but in doing so, person B would be unfairly harmed. Under what circumstances would it be morally just for Person A to violate Person B's rights in order to benefit the group?
Source: Wikipedia
For about the last ten years every time I've upgraded my CPU I've upgraded the motherboard as well because there's no point putting a new CPU into an old motherboard.
I don't understand what part of this constitutes stuff that matters.
Lots of people have mobile offices in their cars. You can even buy caddies and laptop mounts that strap right to the seat in your car, or bolt to the floor.
Before tablets and smartphones became popular I used to have a laptop stand in my car so I could use Microsoft Maps for directions, and I knew of several other people who had similar setups.
These days this kind of thing is pretty commonplace.
I don't know what's up with news stories on Slashdot these days.
I've always seen the learning curve in editing Wiki articles as an idiot filter.
Learning how to format Wiki text proves you have the capability to learn and that your processes are malleable.
I speculate that if editing Wikipedia becomes any easier the quality of content will decrease while the administrative overhead will increase.
There's so much wrong here that I don't know where to begin.
So I won't.
It's fan service for the furries.
Many furries will refuse to participate or use a product that doesn't acknowledge their subculture. This can lead to a significant loss of profit potential.
Brands are starting to recognize that furries comprise a significant and growing profitable market so they're starting to add anthropomorphic options to their services and products.
For further example Second Life has entire sims owned and operated by furries and Everquest 2 added anthropomorphic felines.
Wow, this is sensationalist titling on par with Digg or Reddit. Title: New Earth 2.0 found 2 miles outside Earth's atmosphere! Body: No not really. What we meant to say is that a planet approximately the size of the earth with no possibility of hosting human life was found far beyond the Sloan Great Wall. Same thing, different story.
This is bad parenting and you should feel bad.
Getting into a pissing match with your child is only going to make them escalate every challenge you present until the value of the resources you're taking away exceeds the value of winning the argument.
In the end regulation of the resources you're taking away from your child will create enough work that you won't bother and your child will win the argument by default. Then you'll lose subsequent arguments because you have no power with them.
The same applies to corporations. If you set a marker for escalation of the argument the corporation will continue to do bad things only up to the level at which they have learned they will be punished to a degree that their profit margin is impacted enough to cause a shareholder uprising, which means they will continue to do wrong in metered fashion.
Likewise my experience with OCZ products is that either they work or they don't. One out of 3 OCZ products has to be returned for exchange. So I spend a little more to not have to do the returns.