Slashdot Mirror


Some Apple iMacs "Assembled In America"

whisper_jeff writes "A number of newly-purchased standard units are showing an "Assembled in America" notation. While the markings don't necessarily mean that Apple is in the midst of transferring its entire assembly operation from China to the U.S., it does indicate that at least a few of the new iMacs were substantially assembled domestically."

279 comments

  1. But... by b5bartender · · Score: 3, Interesting

    North America or Central America?

    1. Re:But... by Sez+Zero · · Score: 4, Informative

      TFA notes the language "Assembled in the USA" so that's pretty clear.

    2. Re:But... by aaronfaby · · Score: 4, Informative

      It actually says "Assembled in USA".

    3. Re:But... by b5bartender · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ah, excellent use of quotations in the summary.

    4. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wonder if they mean.. we take it out of bulk packaging and put it into consumer packaging ;-) (sarcasm)

    5. Re:But... by ogl_codemonkey · · Score: 2

      Of course! It's to complement the use of the possessive apostrophe.

    6. Re:But... by vlm · · Score: 4, Informative

      The article goes into detail about how customs officials are not amused by things like that. "more than screwdriver assembly" is required.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    7. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Over the past 30 years, wages in the U.S. have remained flat while productivity has doubled. So the average worker is producing twice as much for the same pay. Where do you think all of that extra free production capacity goes? It maybe is related to the concentration of wealth at the top. Whatever your take on Unions, they're labor cost are still inadequate compared to production. But whatever, keep sucking up to the rich and maybe they'll actually let you kiss their ring one day.

    8. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or South America? America is a large continent, not a single country... ;)

    9. Re:But... by the_B0fh · · Score: 2

      Not sure what's your point? Is it a good thing or a bad thing that Apple is moving some parts of the manufacture of their computers to USA?

      Oh, look, the ocean is wet and the sky is tall.

      And why the hell is it modded informative?

    10. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      North America or Central America?

      South America ...

    11. Re:But... by ranton · · Score: 4, Insightful

      they're labor cost are still inadequate compared to production

      Unless Union members are the ones responsible for the increased productivity (as opposed to the robotics engineers, business process analysts, etc.), how could you possibly think they are due any increased pay based on their increased production? Even if Union members are responsible for some of the increases in productivity, if they were being paid by the company while they were devising ways to improve productivity then they are still not entitled to increased pay (other than raises based on merit, but Unions are generally against that).

      If Unions were doing their own productivity research based on money obtained from Union dues, then I completely agree that Union members should share in the extra profit that comes from the increased productivity.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    12. Re:But... by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 0

      But whatever, keep sucking up to the rich and maybe they'll actually let you kiss their ring one day.

      Wouldn't it be faster to cut off the finger and keep the ring?

      I mean, if they're going to be sociopaths to us...

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    13. Re:But... by Trepidity · · Score: 1

      An interesting outcome of this line of thinking is that at some point all human needs could be met by robot production: but all the production will go to the roboticists and businessmen who rolled them out, and not to anybody else.

    14. Re:But... by arth1 · · Score: 1

      The article goes into detail about how customs officials are not amused by things like that. "more than screwdriver assembly" is required.

      Not a problem when we're talking about new Macs. Where's the glue gun?

    15. Re:But... by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

      Seeing as you've been on slashdot a while, I'd expect you to recognize "angry agreement points" when you see them.

      They just haven't gotten around to adding "+1 What He Said!" yet. ;)

    16. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, there is NO continent of America. There is a country called America (Specifically the United states of America)
      there is a continent of North America, and a different continent of South America.

    17. Re:But... by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Over the past 30 years, wages in the U.S. have remained flat while productivity has doubled. So the average worker is producing twice as much for the same pay. Where do you think all of that extra free production capacity goes?

      A problem is measuring productivity in monetary value. If prices go up and expenses down, it will look like a productivity increase.

    18. Re:But... by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      Just because something is twice as efficient doesn't mean they're working harder.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    19. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah I know, was trying for dry humor, hence the "sarcasm" :)

    20. Re:But... by magarity · · Score: 2

      So these ones will run, what? $8000 to offset Union Labor costs?

      You have to pay the longshoremen's union to take it off the container ships whether the parts are assembled in the USA or China. And it doesn't say which state has the assembly facility; there ARE non-union states, actually. Anyway, the biggest reason computer parts are manufactured overseas (China) is the absolutely horrible pollution.

      But by shipping the parts to the USA to be assembled by some robots, people can get a warm fuzzy feeling for having bought a domestic made product.

    21. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's a pretty distant extrapolation, but at that point, would compensation even matter much anymore? We'd be talking about methods of production so efficient, and presumably a similar degree of automation applied to the acquisition and refinement of materials, that things would resemble a kind of post-scarcity economy described in Star Trek episodes.

    22. Re:But... by Trepidity · · Score: 1

      The Star Trek episodes presuppose some kind of distribution of that wealth, though. It's quite possible to have a dystopian version of a post-scarcity economy, where the technology exists to produce anything, but only one social class has control of it, and other people are basically their serfs. (In fact I'm pretty sure there are some good dystopian sci-fi books about this.)

    23. Re:But... by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      That is basically the plot of Dune and the Asimov Foundation Series (spacers) in case you didn't notice...

    24. Re:But... by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

      It's not something I've thought a lot about, but I wonder how that might happen. I guess that's what fiction is good for.

      Star Trek obviously looked at it the other way, where the technology removed the issue of wealth distribution entirely. For a social class to maintain exclusive control of a technology with a low barrier to ownership would be pretty difficult, I'd think. For instance I'm trying to imagine our world, but where only a few, very wealthy people could maintain exclusive ownership and use of our (very common, primitive, and inexpensive) 3d printers.* Seems impossible.

      Obviously an assumption there is that the devices themselves are simple, inexpensive, and the materials they consume are abudant. Interesting to think about, though.

      * patent jokes aside

    25. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not because they were working twice as hard, perish that aberrant thought. It is because smart mechanical engineers, and not necessarily Americans, automated the production processes. So it takes half as much of the American "workers."

    26. Re:But... by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      But whatever, keep sucking up to the rich and maybe they'll actually let you kiss their ring one day.

      Wouldn't it be faster to cut off the finger and keep the ring?

      I mean, if they're going to be sociopaths to us...

      Just who is the sociopath here? You seem to be the one proposing cutting of others peoples extremities.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    27. Re:But... by fullback · · Score: 1

      If the quality is anything like the rest of the crap being made in the USA now, you better stay away from those models.

    28. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      no, there is NO continent of America. There is a country called America (Specifically the United states of America)
      there is a continent of North America, and a different continent of South America.

      That depends on your definition of Continent. In many (most?) definitions, the whole landmass is considered a single continent.

      But regardless of whether you call the landmass "continent" or not, it was called America for centuries before the country ill-named "United States of America" even existed. (I say ill-named because it is misleading, as are "Central African Republic and, to a lesser extent, South Africa).

      Don't believe me? Check your favorite English dictionary or encyclopedia!

    29. Re:But... by artor3 · · Score: 1

      The methods for increased productivity weren't invented by the current CEO or shareholders either. Why are they entitled to the extra profits?

    30. Re:But... by ranton · · Score: 1

      The methods for increased productivity weren't invented by the current CEO or shareholders either. Why are they entitled to the extra profits?

      For one thing, actually doing the inventing isn't even the most important task performed for most accomplishments. It is providing money. There are plenty of products I could create if I had enough money to pay a twenty man development team for three years. No matter how smart or skilled I am, the 10 million dollars would probably be far more responsible for the success of the team than my paltry 6000 hours of work (obviously there are rare exceptions, it is hard to quantify Isaac Newton's contributions for instance).

      The shareholders provide the money necessary for the operation of the company. Even though most shareholders aren't original shareholders, without the promise of selling shares for more money in the future, companies could not get nearly as much money from selling initial shares. And all shareholders are responsible for increasing the value of any shares the company still controls, which provides additional capital to the company.

      If I invest money in a company, I am doing that because I expect a return on my investment. Employees get a paycheck, but all I get is either dividends or the increased valuation of my stock. Employees agree to their compensation when they take their job. They can choose to only work for companies that provide profit sharing if they so choose. This of course assumes they are worth enough to convince a company to share profits, but then again if they are not then they obviously aren't worthy of a share. If they think companies are being stupid by not offering profit sharing, these employees could just start their own company. And if they don't have enough money for that, they have learned first hand why money is usually more important than talent or good ideas.

      CEOs are a different story. I completely agree that most highly paid CEOs in the US make too much money. But just because CEOs make too much money does not mean that employees should get more (something about two wrongs not making a right). If it is determined than any individual CEO does not deserve his/her pay it is the shareholders that deserve that money.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    31. Re:But... by Chrisje · · Score: 1

      When do you see anyone from any content refer to Chile, Brazil, Argentina or Suriname as "America" because it's in South America? I'm not trying to slag you off (unlike some others) but I am really curious about the answer.

      Thing is I have never come across *anyone* from this side of the pond or from South America that doesn't see "America" as being the USA. Moreover, people from South America don't say they're from South America, they mention weird stuff like Venezuela, Colombia or Guyana. ;)

    32. Re:But... by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 4, Informative

      Works of fiction dealing with this include ..

      * Neal Stephenson's "The Diamond Age" - not so bad, actually, the lower classes at least get free subsistence goods

      Cory Doctorow

      * Printcrime - short story, imprisonment for using your printer to print copyrighted goods
      * Makers

      Charles Stross

      * Singularity Sky - deals with a society that deliberately withholds molecular manufacturing technology from it's people, and what happens when it drops from the sky one day (literally)

      Mashall Brain

      * Manna - short story, two possible outcomes of robot labour (internment camps for the poor, and the Star Trek type utopia)

    33. Re:But... by Chrisje · · Score: 2

      This is why we should have a political system in place that would include minimum wages and inflation correction on those minimum wages. The fact of the matter is that the government of a country has a duty to define what it thinks is a decent minimum standard of living for its citizens, and the accompanying infrastructure needed to uphold that.

      In my view people should see their pay, at the very least if it's minimum wage, increase at the same rate as inflation across the board. This is the only way you can keep substantial portions of your citizenry from slipping into the crushing poverty you see. The US is a very uncivilised country from that perspective. There are a lot of very poor people. These poor people are, by and large, under educated. Furthermore, since the only affordable food is junk, these people are open to risk of obesity, diabetes and other health related issues. This is all the more an issue when you consider that universal health care is actually still a topic that seems to be controversial in the US. Nobody on this planet understands why it's a controversial topic, so you're very much alone in that.

      Now many people in the US and in Europe seem to believe in the trickle down model of wealth distribution. Any idiot can see this is really not the case. The reason everyone knows Buffett, Gates and Carnegie is because they were / are exceptions. Most people we classify as Rich (R) are only out after becoming Wealthy or More Rich (TM). Having said that, I do believe that if the bottom of society is well off enough to consume, this will spark increased demand, which is good for the layers above it.

      To cut a long story short, a worker's pay shouldn't increase only because he / she is more productive, a workers pay should increase because it's the civilised thing to do. Furthermore, the economy develops best from the bottom, not the top.

      The latter point I made is actually seen in economic growth indices for countries when you correlate that with the average income gap between poor and rich. Statistically speaking economic growth increases as that income gap decreases.

    34. Re:But... by alci63 · · Score: 1

      I suggest you read this enlightning entry in the Anarchist FAQ: http://www.infoshop.org/AnarchistFAQSectionC2#secc23 , called "Is owning capital a sufficient reason to justify profit". You may not share their views, but at least this is an argumented point.

    35. Re:But... by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

      I'll check a few of them out. Thanks for the heads-up.

    36. Re:But... by ranton · · Score: 1

      I was impressed with the parts of the article that deal with moral arguments about the ownership of capital, but all of its attempts to actually discredit the value of capital are just silly. For instance:

      it should be noted that neither the capitalist nor the landowner actually engages in anything that might be called a productive activity

      This statement ignores that at some point that capital (I don't understand why they separate the concepts of capital and land ownership) was purchased with the results of productive activity. Instead of buying food, or theatre tickets, or going on a vacation, the capitalist bought something that holds value. All value that this capital holds for its owner is still the result of productive activity.

      It also ignores that activity is not the only factor in producing something. The decision to use that land productively (to grow crops for instance) instead of just building a lavish garden or other luxury, is just as important. This is also ignored in the article's argument.

      Almost the entire argument is built upon the concept that no contribution has value until actual physical labor is used. Business decisions such as how to best use a piece of land, what types of machinery to buy, or hiring someone to make these decisions for you are not given any value at all. I was so surprised to see how weak their actual argument was after reading their very well written introduction.

      But what is this "contribution" of capital and land? Without any labourers there would be no output.

      Without the land there would be no output either. This is probably the most ridiculous statement in the entire article.

      In addition, in physical terms, the marginal product of, say, capital is simply the amount by which production would decline is one piece of capital were taken out of production.

      This is not completely accurate. The value of the capital is also determined by the difference between the productive output of different options. The fertility of the land contributes to its value just as much as its acreage. The same holds true for laborers. The quality of the labor provided, compared to the quality of labor that could be obtained from different workers, is primarily what sets the value of that labor.

      Suppose our ten workers had cultivated the five acres as a worker collective. In this, they would receive the entire product, all one hundred bushels, instead of sixty. Is this unfair? To whom should the other forty bushels go? To the land, for its 'contribution'? Should the collective perhaps burn forty bushels as an offering to the Land-God?

      Okay, maybe this is actually the most ridiculous part of the article. If the workers own the land as a collective, then the other 40 bushels (the value assigned to the landowner in an earlier example) are split amongst them because they are the land owners.

      This article should really just stick to moral arguments, because from a purely economical standpoint its arguments are just silly. But then again, if you are just trying to persuade people who already have anarchists leanings, you probably don't have to spend much time making your arguments stand up to much scrutiny.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    37. Re:But... by alci63 · · Score: 1

      This statement ignores that at some point that capital (I don't understand why they separate the concepts of capital and land ownership) was purchased with the results of productive activity. Instead of buying food, or theatre tickets, or going on a vacation, the capitalist bought something that holds value.

      Or they the land was taken by force by an ancestor and inhereted. This argument stand as long as capital is the fruit of one's work. This might be the case, but no so aften I think...

    38. Re:But... by kryliss · · Score: 1

      I've never needed anything more than one or two different screw drivers to assemble any of my PCs............

      --
      --- If the bible proves the existence of God, then Superman comics prove the existence of Superman.
    39. Re:But... by ranton · · Score: 2

      Or they the land was taken by force by an ancestor and inhereted. This argument stand as long as capital is the fruit of one's work. This might be the case, but no so aften I think...

      It doesn't take work to take land by force? Warfare has done a pretty good job of ensuring that land is in the hands of more productive societies, since wars are generally won by the society that can fund a better army.

      But like I said in my post, if they keep their argument purely based on morality then it is at least intriguing. I still disagree, but if you are a pacifist and believe that property taken and kept by force is not deserved, I do believe that is a valid point to be made.

      And what does inheritence have to do about anything? So now you are saying I can spend money on myself, but not to make life better for my descendents? Is the fruit of my labor worth less because I inherited a high level of intelligence from my mother?

      Is upward mobility through generations not to be allowed? Shame on all those immigrants that toiled in thankless jobs to provide a better life for their children.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    40. Re:But... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      This is why we should have a political system in place that would include minimum wages and inflation correction on those minimum wages.

      I heard an interesting statistic on the news this morning: 2/3rds of those earning less than $10 per hour work for corporations.

      But as to "inflation," that's not a very good metric. Expensive things these workers can't afford go down in price and the things they require go up in price, and inflation stays the same but their cost of living has increased.

      Now many people in the US and in Europe seem to believe in the trickle down model of wealth distribution. Any idiot can see this is really not the case.

      Indeed, corporate profits are at a record high. Any idiot that believes trickle down fairy dust should ask himself why wages aren't also at a record high? It's because "trickle down" isn't a myth, it's a DAMNED LIE. As is the lie (believed by the stupid) that if you tax the rich they won't invest. Taxes have nothing to do with investment. If a factory owner is selling more than he can produce, he's going to buy new machinery and hire people, PERIOD. No matter how high or low his taxes are. Likewise, if he's producing more than he can sell he's going to lay workers off and perhaps sell some machinery. No matter how high or low his taxes are.

      To cut a long story short, a worker's pay shouldn't increase only because he / she is more productive, a workers pay should increase because it's the civilised thing to do.

      The trouble with that is the people running these giant companies who exploit the poor are sociopaths. They aren't civilized in the least.

    41. Re:But... by fredprado · · Score: 1

      Providing work is every bit as important as providing money. Without work there is no result, period. Still you seem to think that the people who provided money deserve increasing compensations while the people providing work do not.

    42. Re:But... by ranton · · Score: 1

      In my view people should see their pay, at the very least if it's minimum wage, increase at the same rate as inflation across the board. This is the only way you can keep substantial portions of your citizenry from slipping into the crushing poverty you see.

      I disagree with this both because I don't think it is the only way, and I don't think it is sufficient.

      Minimum wage does not take into account household composition, so a wage that provides a good life for a single person is different than for a dual income family, a single father, etc. Are we to make minimum wage high enough that a single earner can support a family of 6? Minimum wage would have to be very very high (probably close to $20/hour) to have it do away with poverty. And that doesn't even start to deal with the crippling effect that such a high minimum wage would have on an economy.

      Also, anything that separates wages from worker productivity is dangerous. Whether it is minimum wage laws, union strong arming, or any other tactic that feels good but ultimately results in someone being paid more than they are worth by their employer. This is a primary reason that jobs have been pushed overseas (obviously not the only reason, so don't use that statement for a strawman argument).

      If a society wants to provide income for its citizens that is above their economic value because of their value as a human being, I am all for that. But it should be given out by the government or other institutions whose duty it is to look after people, not a company whose goal is to make money. Many of the 12 million unemployed in this country could get jobs if there was no minimum wage. Much of the money the government now spends on unemployment insurance could then be spent on welfare payments to these employees that are making so little. Similar amounts of money would be spent by the government, but in this case actual work is being done in this country instead of being shipped overseas.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    43. Re:But... by ranton · · Score: 2

      Providing work is every bit as important as providing money. Without work there is no result, period.

      I never said that labor is not valuable, but any blanket statemen saying that labor is more imporant, just as important, or less important than money is just silly. A year of my labor is far more valuable than a 1990 Ford truck. But it is far less valuable than a 4000 square foot home (in my neighborhood at least), or a 400 acre farm.

      While it is true that without work there is no result, the exact same thing can be said for capital. My programming ability is useless without a computer. My ability to cook is useless without food. If I don't have the ability to claim land to even forage for food, or don't own or rent land with access to water, then I will die very quickly.

      Still you seem to think that the people who provided money deserve increasing compensations while the people providing work do not.

      I clearly said that I think laborers deserve their wages. I just believe those wages should be determined based on their actual value to their employer. Society can decide to provide them extra income based on their value as a human being separately.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    44. Re:But... by fredprado · · Score: 1

      That was not a blanket statement at all, it was just a logical consequence of a very verifiable fact. If you consider the workforce and the capital as a whole both are equally important because they are equally necessary to generate any result. Sure a single worker is not as critical, but then again a single share isn't either.

      If both things are equally important and there are many laws to enforce the rights of shareholders regarding the share of the profits, why shouldn't there be similar laws to enforce the right of workers? Like, for example forcing the companies to give shares to workers.

    45. Re:But... by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Yes, and those damn Australians too! Curse you and your continent named country that's almost, but not exactly, the same as the continent!

    46. Re:But... by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      I believe they have done this with past iMacs as well. There is obviously some part in the US where it makes sense to make them in the US. Apple basically screwing together all the parts except one part made in the US probably counts as assembled in the US.

    47. Re:But... by ranton · · Score: 1

      If both things are equally important and there are many laws to enforce the rights of shareholders regarding the share of the profits

      I don't know of any laws that enforce the rights of shareholders regarding the share of profits. Companies can decide if they are going to pay out dividends.

      Laborers are paid with wages. Shareholders are paid with profits (in the form of dividends or possibly in increased share price). Shareholders are not given a paycheck every other week regardless of the company's success, and laborers are generally not given a portion of profits.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    48. Re:But... by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      Even if you want to assume at some point a continent was called America centuries ago, we no longer call russia the USSR nor do we divide Germany into west and east Germany. There is no continent America and people (mainly Canadians) getting uppity about it only make themselves look ignorant. They should complain that there is no Britain. It's the United Kingdom of Britain and Northern Ireland or, if you refer to the collection of islands, then it's Great Britain. Yet we can get by without someone pooping their pants and talking about Britain.

      Refering to the North and South of America as one entity is generally called "The Americas" and not America and if you look in the dictionary you'll see it says America is also a name for the United States therefore it's perfectly valid to reference the US as America or its citizens as Americans. Some dictionaries also put the US as its first definition so in their mind it's the most common meaning. Some don't and all that means is most people don't give a shit.

    49. Re:But... by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Somebody still has to: design, develop, engineer, produce, manufacture, maintain, repair, ship/receive, install, order, track expenses, train all the people who handle robots, etc. etc. etc. Given that it won't be one giant Flip-the-switch-and-everything-is-now-robots, this probably means MORE jobs for everyone (some in the old non-robot industries and many new ones in the new robot industries).

      Guy who used to hammer 1000000000 rivets a day needs to learn a new skill...perhaps lubricating the elbow of 1000000000 robots a day, or something equally menial that has equivalent low-skill requirements? Or better yet, maybe hammer guy doesn't have to work 60 hours a week in a factory, can read stuff and get more educated, and then can start managing robot orders or something.

    50. Re:But... by fredprado · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of laws in place to protect shareholders and assure that their rights are upheld. Surely not the right to dividends but the right to share the benefits of a company's growth by having their shares raising in value with nothing but an initial investment. Workers on the other hand, do not share the same benefits. They exchange their work for the same fixed wages no mater how well the company goes. You may argue that means they have a lower risk, but that again is false if a company goes badly chances are the employees will be cut. So in a way he is taking even greater risks than the investor.

      As it is, with the system working as you pointed, laborers are always at the losing side. Labor demand decreases because of automation, outsourcing and newer technologies, unemployment increases, wages diminish, capital concentrates in fewer and fewer hands and the structure is doomed to collapse sooner or later. One way to try to avoid it would be by forcing employees to pay part of the wages with shares, as I suggest.

    51. Re:But... by jonadab · · Score: 1

      More likely they've figured out how to substantially automate assembly so that there's very little labor involved per unit. (Labor is expensive in the first world. That's why so many labor-intensive products are made elsewhere and shipped in. On the other hand, power is relatively cheap in the first world, so if almost all of the work is being done by machines instead of people, locating manufacturing plants in the first world can make sense. You still need people to run the machines, of course, but the more automated your plant becomes the less labor you need per unit of product.)

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    52. Re:But... by ranton · · Score: 1

      They exchange their work for the same fixed wages no mater how well the company goes. You may argue that means they have a lower risk, but that again is false if a company goes badly chances are the employees will be cut. So in a way he is taking even greater risks than the investor.

      An employee takes far less risk than an investor. If a shareholder loses his investment, that money is gone. If an employee loses his job, his capability to perform labor is not gone.

      Even though the employee takes less risk by simply taking a job, he is still probably in a riskier situation than any investor who can afford to lose their investment. But that risk is a result of their financial situation, not their role as an employee. The fact that they can lose their job is not much of a risk, it is their lack of savings or possibly even a lack of skillsets if they are fearful of getting a new job.

      One way to try to avoid it would be by forcing employees to pay part of the wages with shares, as I suggest.

      How is that any different than just giving them wages? Every employee has the opportunity to use their pay to buy shares in the company they work for. If you are referring to giving them stock on top of their current wages, that is no difference than just giving them a raise (a raise where you force them to spend it a certain way).

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    53. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      {["blah blah blah"]}

    54. Re:But... by fredprado · · Score: 1
      But the financial situation is exactly the point here. Regardless of the motives the risks are in average much higher for employees than for investors, even though ideally it should be the opposite. Lack of savings and lack of desired skillsets are terms that can be applied to more and more people as time passes.

      How is that any different than just giving them wages? Every employee has the opportunity to use their pay to buy shares in the company they work for. If you are referring to giving them stock on top of their current wages, that is no difference than just giving them a raise (a raise where you force them to spend it a certain way).

      Not all companies have open capital and shares available to the public. Most don't.

      You are right about those that have it. It is basically nothing different from simply giving people money as it happens now, as long as they can't just create more shares and dilute value and other shady things that are unfortunately allowed in the stock market under certain conditions.

      For the majority of companies that don't have public available shares, this mechanism would make all the difference in the world, though.

    55. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Even if you want to assume at some point a continent was called America centuries ago, []

      Yes, centuries ago. Go figure. A map from 1507 where the label "America" is well entrenched in the South American part of the generally unexplored territory (hint: third row, first column, near the top), and there was a reason for that (hint: first row, third column, right at the top: the guy who charted the South American coast but never visited North America). Even in much more modern maps that do include most of the territories the label America is placed next to South America (but probably only for layout reasons).

      Furthermore, even nowadays both the official sources as well as hundreds of millions of people still call the whole landmass "America".

      (At this point I was going to quote several dictionaries and encyclopedias, but I realized that at the end you acknowledge that pretty much all of them include the landmass as a definition of "America" and most of them actually have it as the first definition.)

      There is no continent America []

      There are many definitions of "continent". Wikipedia does a fantastic job presenting the five most popular ones. It so happens that you grew up in a place where the version taught is (I suppose) the one with seven continents. But in most other countries the definition used is one of the other four. Note that in three of the five definitions "America" is a single continent.

      and people (mainly Canadians) getting uppity about it only make themselves look ignorant.

      Mainly Canadians and Latin Americans, with a total population of around 600 million, thus making around 2/3 of the population of America. Oh, sorry, of "The Americas". (And that is ignoring the tens of millions of Latin Americans and Canadians living in the USA). Sorry, dude, you are grossly outnumbered.

      Refering to the North and South of America as one entity is generally called "The Americas" and not America

      That's because people like you need a revisionist workaround after the fact that their country has an ill-conceived name.

      and if you look in the dictionary you'll see it says America is also a name for the United States therefore it's perfectly valid to reference the US as America or its citizens as Americans. Some dictionaries also put the US as its first definition so in their mind it's the most common meaning.

      I love how it becomes evident that only until this point did you look up the word "America" in the dictionaries and encyclopedias. You suddenly realized that your previous argument ("America is NOT the landmass") is fundamentally flawed and tried to change it to a new one ("America is ALSO the country").

      Some don't and all that means is most people don't give a shit.

      As I said, MOST people actually do give a shit. It just happens to be people that you don't talk to (at least not about this kind of topics).

    56. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure what's your point? Is it a good thing or a bad thing that Apple is moving some parts of the manufacture of their computers to USA?

      Oh, look, the ocean is wet and the sky is tall.

      And why the hell is it modded informative?

      And you're modded "3"? It's obviously a good thing for whoever ends up actually employed at an Apple assembly plant here in the USA, but it's bad for the public overall because you (maybe?) and others will heap praise on Apple for doing this even though they are going to help keep wages down in their sector of the economy (like every other good U.S. company).

      That's the point, Deep Thinker.

  2. hmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and after some research it comes out it's somewhere in South America.

    1. Re:hmm.. by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      I wasn't aware that USA stood for United South America

    2. Re:hmm.. by flimflammer · · Score: 1

      Well now you know.

    3. Re:hmm.. by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      And knowing is half the battle.

  3. Assembled in USA, not America - Big difference! by mr_zorg · · Score: 5, Informative

    The summary and title are misleading. If you read the article, the pictures clearly shows "Assembled in USA". My first thought when I saw "Assembled in America" was that Foxconn has facilities in Brazil now - so perhaps it was really "Assembled in South America". But, no, it really is in the USA. Very cool, Apple.

    1. Re:Assembled in USA, not America - Big difference! by holden+caufield · · Score: 1

      Let's hope it means "in the United States of America" and not some town in a faraway land named "usa" that they've chose to capitalize the letters.

      --
      I'll create an amusing sig when I have something meaningful to post.
    2. Re:Assembled in USA, not America - Big difference! by jandrese · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've occasionally thought that some town in China could make make a killing by renaming itself USA.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    3. Re:Assembled in USA, not America - Big difference! by msauve · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The article is misleading, too. It states "the 21.5-inch iMacs are some of the first known examples of an Apple computer being assembled in the U.S., according to Fortune."

      However, Apple ][, ][+, Macintoshes up to at least the SE and Mac II, were all made in the USA.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    4. Re:Assembled in USA, not America - Big difference! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The summary and title are misleading. If you read the article, the pictures clearly shows "Assembled in USA". My first thought when I saw "Assembled in America" was that Foxconn has facilities in Brazil now - so perhaps it was really "Assembled in South America". But, no, it really is in the USA. Very cool, Apple.

      Not to mention Foxconn *does* have facilities in Brazil, so it would have been fairly easy to have them assembled there.

    5. Re:Assembled in USA, not America - Big difference! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until a few years ago, most clothing "Made in the USA" was actually made in Saipan, which is technically A,erican, but had no minimum wage, child labor protections, safety standards, etc.

    6. Re:Assembled in USA, not America - Big difference! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may well be an urban legend, but I remember back in the 50s being told that there was a town named USA, Japan for just this reason.

    7. Re:Assembled in USA, not America - Big difference! by larry+bagina · · Score: 2

      iMacs were manufactured at Apple's Elk Grove, California facility from 1992-2003.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    8. Re:Assembled in USA, not America - Big difference! by msauve · · Score: 2

      That's amazing, since the iMac wasn't even introduced until 1998!

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    9. Re:Assembled in USA, not America - Big difference! by mrmeval · · Score: 5, Informative

      http://www.snopes.com/business/genius/usa.asp

      The Usa Shrine was built there in the 8th century so the time traveler who managed to name or rename it for such a nefarious plot had to have arrived somewhat earlier.

      It's a very pretty place.

      http://www.city.usa.oita.jp/

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    10. Re:Assembled in USA, not America - Big difference! by Demolition · · Score: 4, Informative

      Just to expand on this a bit more...

      From 1976-1981, Apple manufactured all Apple computers in the U.S. They had plants in Fremont, CA, Elk Grove, CA, and Carrollton, TX.

      In 1981, they opened plants in Cork, Ireland, and Singapore to serve the European and Asian markets, respectively.

      In 1984, a second plant was built in Fremont exclusively for Mac production. The Cork factory also switched over to making Macs.

      In 1985, John Sculley took over from Steve Jobs and one of his first actions as CEO was to shut down the three original plants, leaving only the three in Fremont, Cork, and Singapore.

      In 1991, Apple opened another new U.S. plant in Fountain, CO.

      In 1992, the second Fremont plant was downsized and most of its operations were moved to Sacramento. That same year, a new plant was built in India, and the Elk Grove plant was doubled in size to accommodate a motherboard/logicboard factory. I recall that the last batch of Macs rolled out of Fremont in 1998 or 1999 before the plant itself was shuttered.

      1992 is the watershed year. From then until 1994, Apple began downsizing its U.S. manufacturing and, in turn, expanding its operations in Ireland.

      Today, all of the Apple-owned plants are gone, except for Elk Grove and Cork. Apple now relies on external vendors in several locations: Texas, Czech Republic, Singapore, South Korea, China, and Brazil.

      I'm guessing that the new U.S.-assembled Macs are made in Elk Grove and by the contractor in Texas.

    11. Re:Assembled in USA, not America - Big difference! by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      They were much too far ahead of their time, so they were stored for a while until the world caught up to Apple.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    12. Re:Assembled in USA, not America - Big difference! by stephanruby · · Score: 2

      Besides built-to-order machines, the 21.5-inch iMacs are some of the first known examples of an Apple computer being assembled in the U.S., according to Fortune.

      Also, Fortune is wrong.

      The "Apple I" is actually the first known example of an Apple computer being assembled in the US.

      I remember, Apple hired US housewives to assemble their first computers.

    13. Re:Assembled in USA, not America - Big difference! by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      Shows you what Fortune knows.

    14. Re:Assembled in USA, not America - Big difference! by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      It was a nefarious plot. According to treaty, products are labeled with the COUNTRY of manufacture, not the city. Nice try, though.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    15. Re:Assembled in USA, not America - Big difference! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The summary and title are misleading. If you read the article, the pictures clearly shows "Assembled in USA". My first thought when I saw "Assembled in America" was that Foxconn has facilities in Brazil now - so perhaps it was really "Assembled in South America". But, no, it really is in the USA. Very cool, Apple.

      ...or possibly assembled in that hellhole, Saipan. Anything "made" in Saipan is allowed to claim it is made in the USA.

    16. Re:Assembled in USA, not America - Big difference! by Shag · · Score: 1

      Sounds accurate. I had a build-to-order PowerMac G5 in '03 that was from Elk Grove, and I've seen people post online much more recently that their BTO Mac Pro's came from Elk Grove or Texas as well (and, I think, XServes). Offshoring production to Foxconn makes perfect sense if you're going to crank out tens of thousands of identical units, but if somebody's paying you to customize something, you lose that efficiency of scale.

      This may, incidentally, explain why build-to-order options on Macs seem so expensive - we're seeing the cost of having American workers do the customization.

      --
      Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    17. Re:Assembled in USA, not America - Big difference! by Chrisje · · Score: 1

      The tone of your message implies there is something inherently wrong about Brazil. It's an emerging economy with some of the most stunning women on the planet, good music and excellent food. They also have a nice bit of forest around. I'd sooner move to Brazil than to the US, I'm afraid.

    18. Re:Assembled in USA, not America - Big difference! by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

      My Apple IIgs was made in Singapore and sold here in the USA along with the rest I have seen. Don't know if any of that model were actually built here. My beige G3 along with the early PCI PowerMacs were all assembled in the USA though. For a while Apple used to source the high end models domestically, with the cheap models coming from overseas.

    19. Re:Assembled in USA, not America - Big difference! by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      You aren't allowed to say "assembled in the US" and assemble it in Brazil. Secondly refering to both continents is usually done in the plural, The Americas.

  4. There goes the quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Bah... There goes the quality...Now you wont have slave workers that have every incentive to make sure that the quality is excellent otherwise they will die a slow apple death....

    1. Re:There goes the quality by lennier1 · · Score: 1

      Either that or the quality at their Asian manufacturers has sunk so low, they might as well move production back to the US.

  5. Misdirection by asmkm22 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I couldn't care less about where it was assembled. The parts are still made in China, which is where the quality is real labor comes from. I'll be impressed if they open up actual factories here in the US, and stop using Ireland to funnel cheaper tax rates.

    1. Re:Misdirection by thestudio_bob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I couldn't care less about where it was assembled. The parts are still made in China, which is where the quality is real labor comes from. I'll be impressed if they open up actual factories here in the US, and stop using Ireland to funnel cheaper tax rates.

      I'm sure this is directed to all large multi-national companies and not just Apple, right? Or is the old adage, "Haters going to hate." in full effect here?

      --
      The real Sig captains the Northwestern. This one captains /.
    2. Re:Misdirection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually a lot of the parts are made in Japan or Korea, then shipped to China for assembly.

      Shipping it to the USA for assembly is a pretty big deal. It's a big step in the right direction.

    3. Re:Misdirection by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      What do you mean large multinationals? It's pretty difficult to buy diverse electronic parts manufactured outside Asia no matter who you are.

    4. Re:Misdirection by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      A big step across a big ocean.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    5. Re:Misdirection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Assembled in the USA" can be misleading. The Freightliner trucks have "some assembly in the USA." They are fully made abroad, and ship to North Carolina with 4 wheels, ready for the "final assembly," during which time they screw on the 4 wheels.

    6. Re:Misdirection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What we really need in the US is to just ditch the income tax system, and do like the rest of the sane world... and use a VAT.

      Sell a product here, that value-added tax will be paid, regardless if the company is based here, based in China, or trying to hide in some income tax haven.

    7. Re:Misdirection by painandgreed · · Score: 2

      I couldn't care less about where it was assembled. The parts are still made in China, which is where the quality is real labor comes from. I'll be impressed if they open up actual factories here in the US, and stop using Ireland to funnel cheaper tax rates.

      I bet you the parts were actually made in Korea, Japan, and Taiwan. If the iMac is anything like the iPad, China has little high tech industry to contribute to it, just cheap human labor. Those three countries make most of the parts and get more money than China out of the purchase price. China gets all the crap because its the last stop before sale and has its name on the product.

    8. Re:Misdirection by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 2

      Apple do assemble in Ireland too. My iMac G5 with iSight says "Assembled in Ireland", as do many BTO products.

    9. Re:Misdirection by isdnip · · Score: 2

      The rest of the world has income taxes too, mostly much higher than in the US, especially on higher incomes.

      VAT is additional. Of course most countries have public funding of health care, higher education, and other services that are mostly private in the US.

    10. Re:Misdirection by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Liar! Freightliners have more than 4 wheels!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    11. Re:Misdirection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, their CPUs and chipsets are manufactured from raw silicon ingot, at plants in USA or Israel. RAM, NAND, and LCD display probably manufactured in Korea. The GPU is probably manufactured in USA, Germany, or Taiwan.

      This is where the bulk of the cost, and "value added" production in an iMac comes from. PCB, connectors, power supply components, case, keyboard, etc. are probably largely made in China.

    12. Re:Misdirection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know most of the rest of the first world countries use both Income tax and VAT right?

    13. Re:Misdirection by rhook · · Score: 1

      It appears that you believe that VAT is paid by the manufacturer, you are mistaken. VAT has no effect on tax havens.

    14. Re:Misdirection by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      and likely, using faulty chinese capacitors (electrolytics) that are known to last only a short time (a year or so, not decades like they used to last).

      you have to go out of your way to source japanese electrolytics. those last for the decades I referred to; but they do cost more.

      I'm constantly repairing switches, motherboards, anything that has cheap bulk filter caps on the DC rails. the bulges are the usual telltale sign (badcaps.net is a good place to learn about this).

      and so, even if its built in the US, the parts are what matter much more than the assembly effort.

      and the parts are usually designed to wear out in a very short period of time.

      wake me when they do an about-face on chinese exploding capacitors. then, I'll know they are really doing something real about quality.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    15. Re:Misdirection by dominator · · Score: 1

      The Intel CPU is made in the USA. The Hard Drives in Japan, Korea, or Taiwan. The RAM in Japan or Korea. The "Gorilla Glass" for tablets and phones is made by Corning in the USA. Many times with electronics, China's role is to assemble parts that were sourced globally.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_PC_hardware_manufacturers

    16. Re:Misdirection by Alioth · · Score: 1

      I've been doing some electronic design and assembly recently, and you'd be (probably) absolutely wrong. Not a single semiconductor part I used came from China. The only Chinese part was a connector (Tyco Mag45 ethernet magjack). The chips came from Korea, the UK, Taiwan and Japan.

    17. Re:Misdirection by asmkm22 · · Score: 1

      In this case, just Apple. I don't particularly care if a company ships jobs overseas; that's normal, as sad as it is. What I care about is a company shipping jobs over seas and then trying to make it sound like they are some all american company.

  6. I suspect.... by mark-t · · Score: 0

    ... that this is to appease people's guilt. They won't know for sure where their imac was manufactured, so they might assume they one that they bought was manufactured domestically in order to feel better about buying one/

    1. Re:I suspect.... by the_B0fh · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My god. You really think that? What is wrong with you people?! A company does something that is in the right direction, and it's because they feel guilty?

      And if they don't, it's because they are assholes.

      Talk about a catch-22.

      What about your other electronic equipment? Where are they designed and manufactured and assembled? Why do they get a fucking free pass?

    2. Re:I suspect.... by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      Please stop assuming every other company gets a free pass. This article is about Apple, which would explain why most of the comments are singling out Apple. Should everyone in this thread attach a list of electronics manufacturers to their comments to make you happy?

      Also if you reread the comment you replied to, he was referring to the consumers guilt, not Apple's.

    3. Re:I suspect.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      This wasn't about Apple's guilty feelings, it was about consumers. Note, that the article only said *SOME* are manufactured domestically. This knowledge leaves the consumer with the possible hope that their particular unit was not the product of labour that would be illegal in the USA, and can thus could feel potentially less guilty about buying one.

    4. Re:I suspect.... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Which makes no sense given that every unit is stamped with where it was assembled.

    5. Re:I suspect.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      It doesn't have to make sense... I was talking about feelings here, and rather feeble rationalization.

    6. Re:I suspect.... by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      On certain things, yes, every other company does get a free pass. Look at the Foxconn story. To this day, Apple is associated with Foxconn, and every now and then, someone will bring up Apple's labor abuses in China. Nevermind the fact that Microsoft, Google (Motorola), Sony, Nintendo, Samsung, and a slew of other companies have work done by Foxconn in China too. It would at least make me a little happier if journalists would do better to fairly explain who Foxconn are and point out their role in the whole industry. Granted, consumers should do their own research, but after a while the joke gets old, and it becomes tiring hearing about how horrible Apple because of Foxconn from some idiot typing on a Samsung.

  7. Good! by drussell · · Score: 1

    North America has generally seemed to have forgotten how to actually build things. I'm located in Canada, and on those few items my tiny company makes, I'm proud to put the stamp and seal of where it's made on my products...

    1. Re:Good! by ourlovecanlastforeve · · Score: 0

      Canada is in North America.

    2. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't be so defensive. GP's entire post can just as easily be read "we have generally seemed to have forgotten" as "you have generally seem to have forgotten". Also pretty sure drussell knows where Canada is.

    3. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The world's top manufacturing country is the United States, as has been the case since before WWII. In 2007, the United States' manufacturing output was $1.831 trillion US Dollars (USD).
      Your stupid conception of the world is shared by many people, so I won't blame you for repeating BS.
      I will however laugh at you for being Canadian.

    4. Re:Good! by sixsixtysix · · Score: 1

      measuring it by dollars seems to be shady at best. it should be by volume, as you can make less stuff here for more money.

      --
      ...
    5. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10x salary costs lead to 10x output. That doesn't actually mean there was 10x more produced.

    6. Re:Good! by Chrontius · · Score: 1

      I'd have moderated if this wasn't anonymous; instead, I shall clarify:

      American manufacturing is incredibly productive. Why? Automation. We can crank out expensive, precision goods with tight tolerances and great yields. Problem is, robotic assembly lines don't lead to huge employee headcounts. I'm not sure what happens when automation makes people so productive that the design team hands their blueprints off to a fully automated factory, but I suspect that the result is something that could be described as "structural unemployment" or "cascading economic collapse".

    7. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually us output usually a revenue generated number. Output in the US over a decade is up, with less worker participation overall.

    8. Re:Good! by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      I don't get why people look at this kind of future with such gloom and doom. When robots do everything for us, we get closer to a Star Trek economy where we constantly improve ourselves because we can.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    9. Re:Good! by Rockoon · · Score: 2

      ..by volume? Sounds like you want to punish miniaturization.

      The only reasonable way to measure it is dollars, and the U.S. is manufacturing more than ever. We just dont use nearly as much manual labor now.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    10. Re:Good! by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      "service-oriented society"

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    11. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't get why people look at this kind of future with such gloom and doom. When robots do everything for us, we get closer to a Star Trek economy where we constantly improve ourselves because we can.

      I like it! But, wouldn't that be a lot like socialism?

    12. Re:Good! by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      I point you to Honey Boo Boo.

    13. Re:Good! by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      It's because people can't seem to understand what needs to change in society. When robots do everything for us, we don't need to do any work. No work means no wages. This wouldn't be a problem if the robots just provided everything for us freely, but the masses shrilly scream about socialism at anything remotely like that.

      A future where minimal human effort is needed to survive doesn't really mesh well with Capitalism. That's a major change that many people can't comprehend.

    14. Re:Good! by Chrontius · · Score: 1

      And, he got it in one. And it's not really all that niche an idea; even TED has presented talks on the subject. And it's not just the US any more; Foxconn is getting in on the action and replacing workers with a million robots. (Incidentally, this may cause the American lead in precision manufacturing to narrow, or vanish entirely)

      But what happens when everyone who is manufacturing anything automates the entire process? Our agricultural system is already hugely centralized and automated. White collar "knowledge work" is on the chopping block next. Why? IBM wants it to happen, and has the ability to make it happen.

      We're also making more and more people; nobody really wants to stop screwing. So we've got more people and less work - how do we allocate enough purchasing power so they can pay for food, medicine, and housing? Two ideas spring to mind: A command economy, which is a terrible idea, and make-work, which is merely bad. Bad because it could either be terrible, or if we get really ambitious, we could make work space exploration, asteroid mining, building orbital elevators and ending our dependence on fossil fuels. So, not necessarily terrible. Except some significant portion of that work is going to be automated.

      I don't know the answer, but at least I can direct your attention to the problem.

    15. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would work if sociopaths weren't in control and we had unlimited resources for the robots to make things with. Once robots replace workers, the workers won't get to lounge on a marble bench being fed grapes from pretty robots while being fanned by muscular robots. Wars will be fought against the former workers where the goal is genocide (of a class, not a nation or race). "But why would soldiers take up arms against the citizens?" you ask. They won't. The crowd control weapons you see today will be fully automated, and will use facial recognition to make sure they don't attack the elite. "But why would they do this?" Because it would increase the resources available per person. After the plagues ravaged Europe, the increase in wealth per person allowed for contemplative thought and thus the renaissance. The same will happen in America, just in a controlled fashion. And the worst part is only the sociopaths will be left, and they turn their robot armies on each other too. Star Trek is silly hippy nonsense.

    16. Re:Good! by sixsixtysix · · Score: 1

      i hope you realize i meant by amount of stuff made, not size. ;) or maybe i am misunderstanding you. i have been drinking.
      does the u.s. really manufacture more actual products?
      by this i mean, a sweatshop will make way more articles of clothing per dollars spent than even a minimum wage paying factory, so we spend more (higher $) but do we actually make more?

      --
      ...
    17. Re:Good! by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      Hhigher standards of living mean lower population, with the strongest correlation being the level of education of females. We've already got sub-replacement birth rates in most of the western world. That does cause some complications itself, but the biggest problem in that regard is that there's too few people capable of working to sustain a large elderly population's retirement. Greater automation is perhaps one of the easiest solutions for this concern.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    18. Re:Good! by drussell · · Score: 1

      Yes, thank you... I was meaning "we" when I said North America; my point being it's not just the USA that seemingly doesn't manufacture as much, and yes I'm fully aware that "we" still manufacture many, many things, but it at least seems to me that we've outsourced many types of production to the point that we almost don't remember how to make them... Consumer products, etc. especially... How many "regular" consumer items that you buy lately have a made in Canada/USA/Mexico label on them? My T-shirt was made in Bangladesh, my shoes in Vietnam, my Dodge truck which was assembled in Detroit has a Nippon-Denso alternator and starter, not the USA/Canada made Mopar parts like my trusty old maxivan, etc. etc. etc. ad infinitum... My 20 year old 4800W garage space heater was made in Canada, and it still works perfectly after thousands and thousands and thousands of hours of use... The company still exists, making large ventilation fans and such, but doesn't make things like $50 heaters you buy at Home Depot / whatever anymore... I've repaired a friend's "made in China" similar model thrice already and it's only 2 years old.... Regardless of how much we "still manufacture" it SEEMS to ME that some things have really been lost. YMMV

    19. Re:Good! by drussell · · Score: 1

      Your stupid conception of the world is shared by many people, so I won't blame you for repeating BS.
      I will however laugh at you for being Canadian.

      Ditto.

      We all know the USA is far and away the best country in the world, by all metrics in all categories.

      --
      In the only episode of that "Are you smarter than a fifth grader?" show that I ever watched, the contestant honestly didn't know what country was located to the north of the United States. (To be fair, all the 5th graders did... :-) )

    20. Re:Good! by Chrontius · · Score: 1

      I don't disagree with your thesis; I wonder how well we can manage the transition.

      My question is somewhat different - how do we allocate resources when we can automate manufacturing, most white-collar work, farming, and what else am I forgetting? How do we make sure people don't starve when the first billion layoffs happen? It's likely that automation is a tragedy-of-the-commons issue; everyone has an incentive to abuse the commons (cut jobs and replace workers with robots) because the people who don't lose first, and lose hardest.

  8. Assembled in USA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    1. Design product in California
    2. Outsource assembly to China
    3. Import product
    4. Assemble the BOX in America, stamp "assembled in the USA" on it
    5. Put the chinese product in the US-MADE BOX !
    6. ...
    7. PROFIT !

    1. Re:Assembled in USA... by ourlovecanlastforeve · · Score: 1

      Designed by Apple in California. Fabricated by people who only do it because there's no better place to work.

    2. Re:Assembled in USA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I do my job because it's the best place I could find to work...I have never thought of that as a bad thing.

    3. Re:Assembled in USA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure if you're trying to denigrate Foxcon.

      Or give them a selling point. "No better place to work". Because that's mostly true.

    4. Re:Assembled in USA... by ALeader71 · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, that's probably what "Made in the USA" means.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of War. - Plato
    5. Re:Assembled in USA... by maztuhblastah · · Score: 1

      Considering that the "Assembled in USA" text is on the machine itself, no, it's not.

      Also, the FTC takes a very harsh attitude towards the approach outlined in the GP's post. IIRC they actually discuss that very thing on their site.

      But hey, let's not let that stop the anti-USA snark!

    6. Re:Assembled in USA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think step 6 is to put the word "Apple" on the box.

  9. Bargaining chip by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    It's like when some government agency claims they're switching to Linux - suddenly the software and dollars come flowing out of Microsoft to them. This is nothing more than a trial balloon and a red flag to the Chinese hoodlums running the shows over there - clean up your act and/or give us cheaper rates, or we'll move.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  10. We apply the Apple logo in the US by ourlovecanlastforeve · · Score: 0

    I'm going to assume that they mean "assembled in the USA" in the same way that Levis means "made in the USA," which is to say they are fabricated in China, then a tiny sticker or a single screw or some such is applied in the US so that they can legally say the product was made in the US.

    1. Re:We apply the Apple logo in the US by tlhIngan · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm going to assume that they mean "assembled in the USA" in the same way that Levis means "made in the USA," which is to say they are fabricated in China, then a tiny sticker or a single screw or some such is applied in the US so that they can legally say the product was made in the US.

      There are very strict rules (the FTC enforces them) about the terms "Made in the USA" and "Assembled in the USA".

      The former means that all or virtually all of a product is made in the US. Obviously, the iMac doesn't quality for this (the FTC proposed defining it as 75% of manufacturing costs were spent in the USA AND the product was "last transformed" in the USA).

      "Assembled in the USA" means that it's made up of foreign parts, but the last substantial transformation (or assembly) of the product is done in the US. Interestingly, "screwdriver" assembly of foreign parts does not count. This could easily mean that the iMac was more than importing the parts into the US and put-together there - perhaps the case assembly was produced from US manufacturing processes (including say, the friction-stir-welding), then the rest of the parts (which are China and foreign made out of supply-chain necessity)

      Do not confuse the two terms "Made in USA" and "Assembed in USA" as they are significantly different in meanting. The FTC enforces the terminology and has found companies liable for violating "Made in USA" rules. Heck, I think some companies dubiously put "Made in USA from domestic and foreign parts"....

    2. Re:We apply the Apple logo in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at previous iMacs and how much it cost to build them. A short internet search turns up that they cost $25 to assemble in china. Most of the users reporting "Assembled in USA" has built to order iMacs, ones with modified sdd/hdd/ram/etc upgrades. Looks like they are just doing that and the final gluing of the display in USA. No screwdrivers needed!

    3. Re:We apply the Apple logo in the US by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      Don't get all high and mighty with your user ID of NULL mister Anonymous Coward.

    4. Re:We apply the Apple logo in the US by mister_playboy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just FYI, AC's user ID is 666.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    5. Re:We apply the Apple logo in the US by sixsixtysix · · Score: 2

      i didn't write that...oh you said uid

      --
      ...
  11. Don't hold your breath for Made in USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a good reason why most of electronics are made in asia today. The reason is components. The components are made in asia and shipping costs, export/import duties combined with labour expenses in US or Eu for that matter rises costs so much that it's not feasible to haul parts and build devices elsewhere.
    Exceptions like Intel CPU manufacturing apply to some specialized products.

    1. Re:Don't hold your breath for Made in USA by shmlco · · Score: 2

      "The reason is components. The components are made in asia and shipping costs, export/import duties combined with labour expenses in US or Eu for that matter rises costs so much that it's not feasible to haul parts and build devices elsewhere."

      Can't believe I'm responding to this but... wrong. Otherwise why Foxconn plants in Mexico and Brazil? Why does Corning make glass here and ship it to China?

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    2. Re:Don't hold your breath for Made in USA by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 1

      They choose Mexico and Brazil because their import duty for foreign assembled products is so high. Look at products such a s cars. Foreign assembled and manufactured cars are luxury even though people in Brazil should be able to afford BMWs, Audis, or American/European Fords. They can't so they manufacture their own cars which do not share any likeness from platform, chassis or styling. A ford Focus is not the same as Euro/American versions.

      As for Corning glass. Why is fish caught in the UK waters shipped to eastern Europe to be processed and then shipped back to the UK. The labour to process this fish is far cheaper even after the air miles than it would be to do it in the UK.

  12. What are you typing on? by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I couldn't care less about where it was assembled. The parts are still made in China

    If you cared about both things then you had better not be typing on a computer less than twenty years old.

    Otherwise why are you harping on Apple for slowly shifting some assembly AND manufacture (remember they make chips in Texas) to the U.S. and giving every other company a free pass?

    It's obvious it's going to take some time to move much of the whole process back to the U.S., if it can be done at all. At least Apple is trying.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:What are you typing on? by scot4875 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The reason that Apple gets singled out is because they go to such lengths to make sure you see the "Designed by Apple in California" every time you open one of their products, to trigger the "rah rah USA company!" emotional response. If they didn't go to such lengths to intentionally manipulate people, and also if they didn't position themselves as a premium brand when, in fact, their shit is made out of the same components and made in the same facilities as everybody else's shit, they might have a justifiable argument against being singled out.

      This is potentially a step in the right direction, at least. Nowhere near enough to take them out of the "do not recommend, do not buy" category though.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    2. Re:What are you typing on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, all that negative publication is because of those small words.

      Riiiiight.

    3. Re:What are you typing on? by Rockoon · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you cared about both things then you had better not be typing on a computer less than twenty years old.

      Gee, I don't know.. every computer I have owned for my entire adult life has been assembled in America, with American labor, and extremely reasonable work hours...

      ....on my kitchen table.

      I *still* don't give a fuck where your computer was assembled.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    4. Re:What are you typing on? by the_B0fh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because they actually design their stuff in California, unlike every other brand?

      Seriously, that chip on your shoulder? Doesn't it get heavy?

    5. Re:What are you typing on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being a malcontent gets fatiguing, no?

    6. Re:What are you typing on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they didn't go to such lengths to intentionally manipulate people

      THAT is what you call embossing "Designed by Apple in California" on packaging and products?
      My iPhone 4S says "Designed by Apple in California Assembled in China"

      I guess I'm missing the manipulation part, or the length part...

    7. Re:What are you typing on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He must live in an empty home if he applies his superior attitude of 'Nowhere near enough to take them out of the "do not recommend, do not buy" category though.' towards every other item built in Asia?

    8. Re:What are you typing on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ummm, you do know that the parts that you used to create 'every computer I have owned for my entire adult life' weren't really manufactured in the USA, right?

    9. Re:What are you typing on? by rhook · · Score: 1

      Are you implying that a uni-body enclosure does not magically make a product "premium"? I'm shocked, shocked I say!

    10. Re:What are you typing on? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      The reason that Apple gets singled out is because they go to such lengths to make sure you see the "Designed by Apple in California" every time you open one of their products, to trigger the "rah rah USA company!" emotional response.

      Are you saying:
      1) That Apple computers aren't designed on California? or
      2) That you're so fucking illiterate when you read that, you at first think is means something else, and then get angry because of your own stupidity?

    11. Re:What are you typing on? by maztuhblastah · · Score: 2

      Why bother labeling it at all? Apple's not the only one to design machines in the US. But they are, AFAIK, the only ones to label them accordingly.

    12. Re:What are you typing on? by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      I guess the 100% designed and made in China brands are supposed to be honest and not manipulative, since they plainly state on its packaging (and price tag, don't forget the price tag) that they are a cheapo non-brand made by slave labor.

      That's something he would use. After all, no pretense of being a premium brand and product.

      I mean, seriously, he really means it. What he's basically saying: everything is shit anyway, why pretend to be better? And perhaps also, why the price tag?

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    13. Re:What are you typing on? by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      Actually, I don't think that was the goal of "Designed by Apple in California". I believe it's been more to stir up emotions about California and California culture. It's a point of pride thing. Made in the USA isn't something I'd associate as mattering to people who buy Apple products. I'm not suggesting Macintosh owners don't love America - I own many Apple products, including many Macs, but for me "Made in USA" is usually at best an empty phrase and at worst a grave concern about quality. This comes from me being a guitarist. All of my Les Paul guitars are made in the USA, particularly Kalamazoo, though I've had a Nashville here and there, maybe a Memphis too. I have had a lot of guitars that had a made in the USA label on them, or some variant. This isn't the official stamped "Made in USA" logo with a flag though that wound up on Wal-Mart type products. In fact, many of these guitars were made in Japan and Korea during the 1980s, then sent to the US to be either assembled or "finished". In fact, some guitar makers would have "Los Angeles, CA" or "Fort Worth" on the neck plates for guitars that were brought over from Korea and Japan.

    14. Re:What are you typing on? by Shag · · Score: 1

      Apple's not the only one to design machines in the US.

      Yeah, I heard the new Samsung Chromebook was designed in California too, by Jony Ive.

      --
      Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    15. Re:What are you typing on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they actually design their stuff in California, unlike every other brand?

      Linksys products are designed in Irvine, California. Time to rescind that comment, Apple Boy.

    16. Re:What are you typing on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't use the same components as everybody else. They use some of the same components go into other first-rate notebooks. How many notebooks have bodies machined from a single piece of aluminum?

        Just because your budget plastic Walmart crapola consumer laptop has an intel processor does make it the equal of a MacBook Pro or a Lenovo T-series ThinkPad.

      Apple and other decent enterprise notebooks don't cut corners on the components or quality control to meet a lower-middle class consumer price point.

    17. Re:What are you typing on? by Chrisje · · Score: 1

      Now I have to chip in here because I work for HP and HP have famously designed some of their stuff in California. Hell, they designed Silicon Valley, while we're at it. Didn't Steve Jobs learn a thing or two at HP and Xerox, back in the day? HP still designs some stuff in California, but then a lot of it in Houston as well, funnily enough. And all over the planet. That's not the point though.

      California didn't become one of the largest economies in the world because Jobs launched the iPod, you know. It was pretty much already there.

      This is a good illustration of what Obama meant when he said "You didn't build that yourself". The infrastructure, technology, educational system, time and circumstances have to be available for people to come up with the things they come up with.

      This is why a dirt-poor coffee farmer in Guatemala without electricity didn't come up with the iPod.

      Apart from that, I buy Apple products because the interface is spiffy, they mostly just work, they are silent across the board and they look good. Alternatives that are equally silent and good looking have only become available recently, and then still at a price point that is not far off. You might say I don't care where my electronics are designed or assembled, I care about look, feel and functionality.

      Now I'm pretty sure this goes for most Apple consumers. Quite frankly, I had an iAudio X5L MP3 player back in the day for some of the reasons you mention. However, the interface was so sucky that when it broke, I played with an iPod Classic for about five seconds and realised why this was a superior product in every way. It's got nothing to do with fanboys, it's just good design.

      If however another company becomes better, I have no qualms in ditching them.

    18. Re:What are you typing on? by Alex+Zepeda · · Score: 1

      The reason that Apple gets singled out is because they go to such lengths to make sure you see the "Designed by Apple in California" every time you open one of their products, to trigger the "rah rah USA company!" emotional response. If they didn't go to such lengths to intentionally manipulate people, and also if they didn't position themselves as a premium brand when, in fact, their shit is made out of the same components and made in the same facilities as everybody else's shit, they might have a justifiable argument against being singled out.

      This is potentially a step in the right direction, at least. Nowhere near enough to take them out of the "do not recommend, do not buy" category though.

      --Jeremy

      You're kidding, right?

      HP Touchpad:

      "Designed in USA. Made in China."

      So why aren't you singling out HP?

      --
      The revolution will be mocked
    19. Re:What are you typing on? by burning-toast · · Score: 1

      That is exactly why (s)he said (s)he doesn't care where yours is ASSEMBLED, it's largely irrelevant.

    20. Re:What are you typing on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple are far from the only people to do that. For example, most Husqvarna Viking sewing machines now say "designed in Sweden" to disguise the fact that they're made in Asia. Some Olympus cameras say "designed in Japan, made in Malaysia". It's much more common than just one company, but apparently it's OK to single out just that one.

    21. Re:What are you typing on? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      I want good shit. Japan preferably, but if LG got into computer manufacture I would buy their shit. Half the components are Samsung which is pretty good. Sony I wouldn't trust to suck my balls any good, much less produce good electronics.

    22. Re:What are you typing on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit, they get singled out because they're the most profitable.

  13. Nothing new for CTO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This has been the case for Configure-to-order (CTO) Macs for a long time.

    Basically, bulk shipping across the Pacific is cheap; point-to-point shipping across the Pacific is expensive.

    Stock-model PCs can be shipped on the proverbial slow boat en masse to a US distribution center, essentially in a convoy, and then unloaded and shipped UPS/Fedex to your door when you order them. You only have to wait for delivery from the dist center, since appropriately configured models are arriving every day.

    When you CTO a Mac, a unit has to be specifically configured to your spec before it can be shipped to you. If this were done in China, it would have to be air-freighted directly to your address from China, which is horrendously expensive. (Shipping the unit by boat would take forever.)

    I have seen this done even when the "configuration" is to include the full-format wired keyboard instead of the wireless compact keyboard. Apple's fulfillment process basically breaks down to not-custom-at-all (= China) or any-customization-no-mater-how-minor (= US) For US customers, at least. I think they also had a similar operation in Cork Ireland at one time.)

    So instead, when you CTO, the manufacturer bulk-ships enclosures, motherboards, LCD panels, and such to a US fulfillment center, then snaps the right pieces together to complete your order. It is quite literally assembly of the system. (About as much work as building your own PC from components from Newegg, I would say.)

    I would guess that most PC vendors do much the same thing, but since typical PC towers are much more easily configurable than an Apple iMac, they probably have to do even less work stateside.

    1. Re:Nothing new for CTO by Desler · · Score: 1

      Except this is being seen even on the non-BTO models.

    2. Re:Nothing new for CTO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not always the case. I bought a CTO Macbook Air within the past year, and it was sent via FedEx directly to my house from China.

    3. Re:Nothing new for CTO by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I've personally ordered four Macs, all build to order, over the last ten years. They've all been FedExed from Shanghai (to Alaska, flying over my head to Tennessee, then back to me). Ditto iPods, including some that were engraved.

      It's also very unlikely that the kind of BTO options Apple provides would qualify for an "Assembled in the USA" marking. Adding memory, changing the hard drive, etc. are not sufficient.

    4. Re:Nothing new for CTO by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      So instead, when you CTO, the manufacturer bulk-ships enclosures, motherboards, LCD panels, and such to a US fulfillment center, then snaps the right pieces together to complete your order. It is quite literally assembly of the system. (About as much work as building your own PC from components from Newegg, I would say.)

      I would guess that most PC vendors do much the same thing, but since typical PC towers are much more easily configurable than an Apple iMac, they probably have to do even less work stateside.

      The FTC has stated such "screwdriver" assembly of a computer from foreign parts does NOT qualify for "Assembled in USA" labelling. So no PC merely put together from foreign parts qualifies. There has to be some "substantial transformation" that takes place. So merely dumping the parts into a box doesn't qualify.

      What would qualify and likely happened is Apple made some of the cases in the US. In this case, assembly transformed a block of aluminum into a case (machining) and firction-stir-welded it together, then the parts were put inside. In this case, there was a transformation of a part from solid metal into a case (irrelevant where the metal came from as it was transformed).

      http://business.ftc.gov/documents/bus03-complying-made-usa-standard

    5. Re:Nothing new for CTO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My experience has been similar. 3 custom macs, all shipped directly from Shanghai.

    6. Re:Nothing new for CTO by noobermin · · Score: 1

      While the markings don't necessarily mean that Apple is in the midst of transferring its entire assembly operation from China to the U.S., it does indicate that at least a few of the new iMacs were substantially assembled domestically. Besides built-to-order machines, the 21.5-inch iMacs are some of the first known examples of an Apple computer being assembled in the U.S., according to Fortune.

      From the linked article:

      What's odd about Gong's iMac is that it was a stock, off-the-shelf, entry-level model, and not in any way made-to-order.

    7. Re:Nothing new for CTO by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 1

      Air freight is expensive, unless you pre-allocate so much capacity that the operators give you amazing rates.
      Apple are famous for one holiday season pre-purchasing so much additional air freight that PC manufacturers were left stranded because there were no more spots left on the planes.

      Apple (historically) have used Singapore and then China as their manufacturing base and CTO machines are configured to your spec - quite literally, your order goes into a queue and the next machine off the assembly line is configured to your spec, and air-freighted to you. This is why a CTO will generally take two weeks, unless it's a common "custom" configuration that Apple have in stock.

      The assembly is certainly not done like other vendors do, which is to pick parts from a bin and assemble your unit in the USA (or whatever country you're ordering from) they are configured in the same factory that builds the standard machines.

      It's amazing the rates you can get for freight when you buy lots of capacity.
      I can order a 20kg server from my wholesaler in Sydney which is nearly 900km away. If my order is more than about $300, the freight is free. Otherwise it's $15. If I have to RMA this same 20kg server, it's going to cost me the best part of $100 to get it back up to Sydney.

    8. Re:Nothing new for CTO by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      but since typical PC towers are much more easily configurable than an Apple iMac, they probably have to do even less work stateside.

      I think that's understating matters somewhat. Just to get the "case" open requires a heat gun, numerous guitar picks, and the patience of Jove to not damage anything. Replacing the RAM consists of a total disassembly of the entire system, removing every last piece, and there are several design decisions that the only explanation for is to make it more difficult for even the most experience disassembler to gain access to. With a PC case, the most you usually need is a phillips-head screwdriver, standard size. Even at that, many cases are designed with thumb screws so no tools are required at all to access and replace any component in the system. Opening the iMac requires a heat gun, guitar picks, two different kinds of Torx wrenches (a special order item), and anyone who services apple products will highly recommend a complete 25 bit set for screws, as well as an extender as the bolts are sometimes set into place with adhesive -- though you can get by with only 4 different bits to service the latest iMac. The odds of even an experienced system builder damaging the adhesive bonding the LCD/glass component to the case is high; It will likely require replacement. And no, Apple doesn't sell those separately. Even God would be turned away. Did I mention the bonded LCD and glass? Yeah... if you scratch the glass on the front, you have to replace both, even if the LCD is still perfectly functional.

      The only reason they're "Made in the USA" (*cough* assembled, I mean) is because shipping a build-to-order system from overseas is prohibitively expensive. Also, because repairing them is so damned difficult, they put the assembly and repair depot on the same site. Make no mistake though; It's not due to patriotic pride that the sticker is there.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    9. Re:Nothing new for CTO by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Probably because the product is so new, basically before it was released there were not CTOs(meaning spare capacity at the factory), and with supplies of certain parts remaining tight at least until the new year the only way to get even the stock configs to customers in a timely fashion is to either do the final assembly close to the customer or air mail it which as the GP pointed out is very expensive. My guess is that by Feb or March of next year you will see more and more stock iMacs assembled in China

    10. Re:Nothing new for CTO by behrat · · Score: 1

      They've all been FedExed from Shanghai (to Alaska, flying over my head to Tennessee, then back to me).

      Don't forget the world's round! That flight from China to Alaska was nowhere near Tennessee: http://www.happyzebra.com/distance-calculator/Shanghai-to-Anchorage.php

    11. Re:Nothing new for CTO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe Apple wants to keep the US based manufacturing line busy, and using all available spare time putting together standard units in US.

    12. Re:Nothing new for CTO by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      ... requires a heat gun, numerous guitar picks, and the patience of Jove to not damage anything.

      Sounds like a comic super hero: Have no fear, IT Guitarman is here!

    13. Re:Nothing new for CTO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've all been FedExed from Shanghai (to Alaska, flying over my head to Tennessee, then back to me).

      Don't forget the world's round! That flight from China to Alaska was nowhere near Tennessee: http://www.happyzebra.com/distance-calculator/Shanghai-to-Anchorage.php

      cool story, but FedEx's hub is in Tennessee. So I think what he was saying was that the trip was from China to Alaska, then from Alaska to Tennessee, then from Tennessee to his house.

    14. Re:Nothing new for CTO by msauve · · Score: 1

      Whoosh. FedEx (used to) send everything to Memphis, TN, sort it, then send it out to it's final destination. That's what he was referring to. It went from China, across Alaska via the great circle route to TN, then back to AK.

      I'm pretty sure they use more hubs now, but the OP should know where it went, since he could see the tracking info.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    15. Re:Nothing new for CTO by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Shanghai => AK => Memphis, TN => ceoyoyo

      ceoyoyo is somewhere between AK and TN.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    16. Re:Nothing new for CTO by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      I believe he meant the flight from AK to TN went over his head.

    17. Re:Nothing new for CTO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Torx wrenches are not special order items. They are not common household tools, but you can find them in any hardware store.

    18. Re:Nothing new for CTO by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      They are not common household tools, but

      I rest my case, your honor.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    19. Re:Nothing new for CTO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anchorage, AK is another one of FedEx's major bases - especially for China. Our esteemed late Pork Producer^HSenator, Ted (the Tube) Stevens gave them an offer they couldn't refuse.

      So they named the airport after him.

    20. Re:Nothing new for CTO by Above · · Score: 1

      FedEx's main US hub is in Memphis, TN.

      FedEx's large freighter aircraft, with a full load of cargo, can't make it from Shanghai to Memphis without refueling.

      I've seen many packages shipped that route, they show a stopover in Anchorage while the plane is refueled on the tracking. I think they may also technically clear customs in Alaska where the shipments are for all pre-cleared merchandise (e.g. where Apple charters the whole plane at launch). They can't bulk-clear the packages you and I ship.

      From Memphis, they enter the regular FedEx domestic shipment network to the lower 48, which should mean one more flight to a nearby city, and then off in a truck.

    21. Re:Nothing new for CTO by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Uh, yeah, that's great. Irrelevant, but online great circle calculators are cool. I'm kind of curious what kind of projection you're familiar with that DOES have trips from Shanghai to Alaska going over Tennessee though.

    22. Re:Nothing new for CTO by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Replacing the RAM consists of a total disassembly of the entire system, removing every last piece, and there are several design decisions that the only explanation for is to make it more difficult for even the most experience disassembler to gain access to.

      The new 21.5 inch memory is not user accessible, but the 27 inch memory is. This and examining the teardowns means that the only rational conclusion is that the reason is because of lack of space due to thinness, not bloody mindedness.

      The only reason they're "Made in the USA" (*cough* assembled, I mean) is because shipping a build-to-order system from overseas is prohibitively expensive.

      If you RTFA (o even TFS) you'd know that his is about standard units, not BTO.

      Make no mistake though; It's not due to patriotic pride that the sticker is there.

      Sticker? There's no fucking stickers on Macs. It's etched on the case like the rest of the usual small print.

    23. Re:Nothing new for CTO by BasilBrush · · Score: 0

      Your case was that TORX drivers they are special order items. You were wrong. You lose your case.

    24. Re:Nothing new for CTO by behrat · · Score: 1

      As the other commenters have pointed out, I miss-read your post and underestimated your knowledge. Sorry about that... and the reason I like Slashdot is for the knowledgable comments.

      But anyways, if you asked a grade school kid (and likely some of my facebook friends) to show the path from China to Alaska, they might draw a line heading West over the Atlantic since the most common world maps split the Pacific ocean. So that's what I thought you quickly miscalculated.

    25. Re:Nothing new for CTO by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I actually have qualifications for ordinary and celestial navigation aboard non-commercial vessels. But your point is well taken. Every house, particularly those with children, should have a globe. Mine are next to each other on the book shelf, about ten feet away at the moment.

    26. Re:Nothing new for CTO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      echo chamber in here

      chamber in here

      what?

    27. Re:Nothing new for CTO by rjstanford · · Score: 4, Funny

      Every house, particularly those with children, should have a globe. Mine are next to each other on the book shelf, about ten feet away at the moment.

      Its great that they're reading the globe, but should you really keep your children on the book shelf like that?

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    28. Re:Nothing new for CTO by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      When I was a kid I would have loved to live on a bookshelf. Then they made Toy Story and it looked as awesome as I remembered from imagining it as a kid.

  14. RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm going to assume that they mean "assembled in the USA" in the same way that Levis means "made in the USA," which is to say they are fabricated in China, then a tiny sticker or a single screw or some such is applied in the US so that they can legally say the product was made in the US.

    RTFA, which quotes the FTC regs on what is allowed to be labeled "USA."

    And no, nobody else does that either. Go look; your clothes say "made in Bangladesh" or wherever. The whole "put in one screw" thing is an urban legend from the '60s or something.

  15. corporations sit on billions by Vince6791 · · Score: 1

    if apple hired 4k(or more) people in manufacturing paying them $14($28 payroll tax) it would cost them about $215 million a year without health insurance, and probably best in Texas where living cost's are low compared to California and NYC. Why are corporations looking down on manufacturing like it's something beneath them. Apple is now worth about $500billion(not sure how much in cash or in stocks). A lot of these corporations are just sitting on billions for no apparent reason.

    1. Re:corporations sit on billions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are corporations looking down on manufacturing like it's something beneath them. Apple is now worth about $500billion [...]

      Because that $500 billion could be $1 trillion if they could cut enough costs!

    2. Re:corporations sit on billions by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      Steve Jobs said it best: it's not about wages, it's not about OSHA, it's not even about the government.

      Americans won't live 20 to a dorm room where they can be woken up at 3AM to make phones in a facility paid for by the government.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  16. Re:GO WHERE THE CHEAPEST LABOR IS LOCATED !! by AK+Marc · · Score: 0

    Labor costs aren't the issue. Infrastructure is key, or they'd all be made in Africa. And US manufacturing costs are high because of OSHA and EPA. If you are allowed to dump industrial waste into the nearest stream and dead workers are tomorrow's lunch, then you get to make stuff cheaper.

  17. US robots now cheaper than Chinese workers! by presidenteloco · · Score: 5, Funny

    I knew this time would come.

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    1. Re:US robots now cheaper than Chinese workers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US workers now cheaper than US robots. Never thought this say would come...

  18. out side of the usa health insurance is not part o by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    out side of the usa health insurance is not part of the job so that hurts US jobs.

    But having manufacturing in the usa makes it easier for the design team to work with the manufacturing team when issues come up and it can also make so some who has done the manufacturing can help the design team with ideas based on doing the job from there side.

  19. Welcome to USA, China by wiedzmin · · Score: 2, Funny

    That is a million dollar idea - rename one of the manufacturing towns in China to "USA"... god, the amount of cheap stuff you could sell to patriotic 'Mercins with that sticker.

    --
    Bow before me, for I am root.
    1. Re:Welcome to USA, China by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      Well of course the US requires the product to be stamped with the nation, not the town/city. Although there's already an urban legend about something similar done in Japan.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    2. Re:Welcome to USA, China by Gothmolly · · Score: 0

      Patriotic Merkins buy all their crap at Walmart already - they don't care about China, they care about saving 17 cents on a 5 gallon jar of pickles.

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    3. Re:Welcome to USA, China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Years ago, the Japanese did this. There is a city called "Usa" and the labels used to say "Made in Usa" and were truthful. They fooled a lot of people. I'm not sure if the US trade negotiators ever solved this problem of if it resolved itself when Japan started off-shoring its own low-tech manufacturing to China and others.

    4. Re:Welcome to USA, China by wiedzmin · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Well the "Made in America" versus "Made in USA" makes me wonder...

      --
      Bow before me, for I am root.
    5. Re:Welcome to USA, China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From another reply, that story about usa, Japan is an urban legend and shouldn't be repeated as fact. http://www.snopes.com/business/genius/usa.asp

  20. Nationalism is irrational. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Businesses should not choose locations on the basis of nationalist prejudice, but on the basis of the relative virtues of each potential location. Such virtues include the various aspects of economic freedom, which creates an evolutionary incentive for tyrannical governments to reform. The aggregate qualifications and work ethic of the potential employees in a particular location also makes a large difference, as do a number of other factors that are not directly related to governance. And of course the availability of cheap labor sways many decisions, but that is a good thing - it makes sure the poorest people in the world who are the most capable of working their way up get the opportunity to do so.

    Why should some American person who has squandered his opportunities to raise his career potential be paid more for a job that can be done by a Chinese person who is struggling to escape rural poverty? Why should USA be rewarded for declining in economic freedom at a time when China is making gradual reforms? After Obama's reelection, USA no longer deserves to be the most prosperous nation in the world...

    --libman

    1. Re:Nationalism is irrational. by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Businesses should not choose locations on the basis of nationalist prejudice, but on the basis of the relative virtues of each potential location.

      Bullshit. It should always be decided by efficiency metrics. Period. Less efficiency is always less optimal.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    2. Re:Nationalism is irrational. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Businesses should not choose locations on the basis of nationalist prejudice, but on the basis of the relative virtues of each potential location.

      Bullshit. It should always be decided by efficiency metrics. Period. Less efficiency is always less optimal.

      Um, that's exactly the same thing I've said.

      --libman

  21. good by M0j0_j0j0 · · Score: 1

    Just keep printing dollars like crazy, and soon you should have all the production back.

  22. Re:GO WHERE THE CHEAPEST LABOR IS LOCATED !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Stupid government regulations.

    What if I WANT to eat yesterday's coworker for lunch???

    GOP! GOP! GOP!

  23. Japan, not China... 1960's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    There is a town in Japan named "Usa" and back in the 1960's, transistor radios were made there and had a "MADE IN USA" label on them. They did not rename the town to USA, "Usa" was always been its name.
    The fact that items made there were imported into the USA bearing the label is true. My parents ran a radio & television shop in the mid-late 1960's and I saw these little Japanese transistor radios with the "MADE IN USA" labels first-hand, and even owned one myself as a child.

    1. Re:Japan, not China... 1960's by rhook · · Score: 4, Informative

      The fact that items made there were imported into the USA bearing the label is true.

      FALSE.

      http://www.snopes.com/business/genius/usa.asp

    2. Re:Japan, not China... 1960's by Dare+nMc · · Score: 3, Informative

      You should probably read the Snopes reference link from your wikipedia article, which makes it very clear that USA, Japan never exported anything as "Made in USA." That transistor radio may have been imported through Saipan thus getting the made in USA label, but it didn't get that label from USA, Japan. That was never done.

    3. Re:Japan, not China... 1960's by WhirledOne · · Score: 1

      As others have mentioned, the "Usa, Japan" story is an urban legend. That doesn't mean that you've entirely misremembered your own "little transistor radio," however. Many of the early small transistor radios were in fact made in the USA. It wasn't until the early 1960's that the American radio manufacturers pretty much gave up that market, and contented themselves with selling re-badged Japanese-made transistor radios. [Some high-end Zenith and (perhaps) GE transistor radios were made in the USA for a while longer, though]

    4. Re:Japan, not China... 1960's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      FALSE.

      As usual with Snopes, the article is a composition of conjecture and assumption that proves nothing.

      I'll put my faith with the OP - he had one of the radios.

    5. Re:Japan, not China... 1960's by The+Pirou · · Score: 2

      Jack Donaghy: Your magic jeans are from BDL? Oh Lemon, it's not hand-made in USA, it's pronounced Hand-made in Usa. The Hand people are a Vietnamese slave tribe and Usa is their island prison. They made your jeans. You know how they get the stitching so small?
      [puts hands to mouth and whispers]
      Jack Donaghy: orphans.

    6. Re:Japan, not China... 1960's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5/10

      Too obvious.

  24. First? by senatorpjt · · Score: 2

    "Besides built-to-order machines, the 21.5-inch iMacs are some of the first known examples of an Apple computer being assembled in the U.S., according to Fortune."

    I would think that in the past, they were all assembled in the US, at least the Apple II was made in the US. I'm not sure when they started making everything in China, but all of the manufacturing moved there pretty recently. The Apple II was made at the time that stuff was still manufactured here.

  25. CMs for protoproduction. by AndyKron · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sometimes companies start a new product in the states at a contract manufacturer so they can stay close, and work out the production lines. After that the information goes overseas. I used to work for a CM where we'd get this type of job all the time.

  26. If it doesn't come with a warm apple pie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then it's not really American and I don't fucking want it!

  27. by Americans, or by robots in America? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a worthwhile distinction. There will as little hand-ling as possible in the process, and these days quite a lot is possible. We've got a lot of posts here about "labour" by people who've seemed to have skipped over this detail. We'd better drag it into the light.

    [oh come on... captcha is "employ"]

  28. Funny 30 Rock episode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  29. "AMERICA...Fuck Yeah!" by Lashat · · Score: 0

    yup.

    --
    For every benefit you receive a tax is levied. - Ralph Waldo Emerson
  30. But it said America (at least according to the sum by aliquis · · Score: 1

    But it said America (at least according to the summary.)

    So where did the domestically part come from in the first place?

    What says it's made in the U.S.A.?

    There's plenty of countries and likely cheaper workforce in America. Some may be cheaper than that in China.

    (I read Caterpillar hired people very cheaply in the US though.)

  31. Maybe they mean "Litigated in the USA" . . . ? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    Design, components and construction are not important in products any more. It's all about patents and patent litigation.

    So maybe the USA is not the cheapest and best quality for production. But the patent lawyers, courts and juries in the USA are second to none!

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:Maybe they mean "Litigated in the USA" . . . ? by Swampash · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because Apple hasn't made much money lately selling products.

  32. Re:America..? by jo_ham · · Score: 0

    Why did they wrote America? Was it North America or South America? Maybe Mexico..?

    They didn't. They wrote "Assembled in USA". The summary just badly misquotes what is written on them - not unusual for slashdot of course.

  33. Yeah...assembled. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big deal, they were partially put together here. Whoopie.

    The electronics were made overseas, mostly assembled and shipped across and then finished being put together in the USA. Big deal. It doesnt really mean anything at all and to be honest, if it was made in the USA it would be a pile of shit. Its just a marketing scheme to get "AMERIKANS!!!! YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!" to get behind the product just because it has the american name on it somewhere.

    Id rather buy products made and assembled in china/japan because lets face it, american products either made or assembled are complete garbage. Of course by that I mean name brand products, because buying non name brand products from china/japan just means that youre buying products that equivliant to anything american made products and by that I mean cheap shit that doesnt work well and lasts about 4 days. Its just like american cars Ive ever owned are garbage, but my past 2 toyotas have lasted a very long time without a single problem ad run terrific. So yeah, I dont want anything an american has touched.

    1. Re:Yeah...assembled. by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      And, the reason for this, is because that same production knowledge was actually taught to overseas production facilites for a quick buck. PS: That toyota, more than likely, was made in the US. Assuming that's where you live.
      Oh, wait, I see by your last sentence that you don't live in America, you just live up your ass.

  34. Re:But it said America (at least according to the by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Given that Caterpillar will screw with their workers at the drop of the hat, no wonder they're low.

    In addition, some of those low wages were a result of unionbusting firms that brought in desperate labor.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  35. RTW is defective: no employer unions are affected. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    there ARE non-union states, actually

    Which use that status to have work in forms (such as the employer's union of contract/temp/agency labor) that would not pass muster in worker-friendly - that is, non-RTW - states.

    I wonder how much of a fan of RTW those states would be if they had to give employer unions(temporary, contract, agency labor) the same provisions of "not forced to accept as a condition of employment".

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  36. City of USA by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    TFA notes the language "Assembled in the USA" so that's pretty clear.

    Back in the 1950s Japan was plowsharing the remainder of it's WW II manufacturing plants into manufacturing cheap stamped-metal toys and gadgets, largely for export. "Made in Japan" was synonymous with cheap and shoddy. (This was when they were bootstrapping themselves out of the rubble, before they adopted Demming principles and became noted for high-quality, instead, starting with optics and cameras.)

    I hear that, during that time, a small manufacturing city in Japan renamed itself Usa (UH-suh). Then some of their manufacturers stamped "MADE IN USA" on their products, to try to fool the consumers. (Of course that got stopped pretty quickly. But it was a cute hack. B-) )

    "Assembled in" doesn't say squat about the components in the assembly. But at least it does tell you where the final assembly process is employing workers.

    It will be interesting to see whether the high unemployment rates and the collapsing dollar will be adequate to make bringing manufacturing back to the US economically desirable, or if the regulatory costs and barriers will keep the "exported jobs" exported.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:City of USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There have been claims that products made in this town and exported to the US in the 1960s carried the label "MADE IN USA, JAPAN", for it to have an appearance that the product is "Made in USA". It is, however, a myth that Japan renamed the town "Usa" following World War II so that goods exported from Japan could be labeled as such.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usa,_%C5%8Cita

      You are full of shit, fuck you.

    2. Re:City of USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "No wonder this piece is broken, it says 'Made in Japan'"
      "Are you kidding, Doc? Most of the best stuff is made in Japan"

      Not many people thought seriously about the irony in those lines. Oh, if only we'd seen it coming.

    3. Re:City of USA by Chrisje · · Score: 0

      Why that big a reaction? It is an urban myth, and he believed that urban myth. The whole key point about an urban myth is that quite a few people know and believe it.

      His overall point isn't bad though, so I don't understand why you had to tell him to go fuck himself.

      You come across as a cantankerous asshole, so maybe it's good you're an AC.

    4. Re:City of USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear that, during that time, a small manufacturing city in Japan renamed itself Usa (UH-suh). Then some of their manufacturers stamped "MADE IN USA" on their products, to try to fool the consumers.

      I hear that the sum of human knowledge has been placed on some kind of world-wide network of information retrieval machines, so that anyone can immediately determine which ideas are factual and which are just bogus.

      I'm guessing you're just being cute with your post, but on the off chance that you're serious, you should check out www.google.com. It's pretty awesome.

      Here's a demo of how you could have used it to educate yourself.

    5. Re:City of USA by stewbacca · · Score: 0

      He's an AC - Asshole, Cantankerous.

    6. Re:City of USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why that big a reaction? It is an urban myth, and he believed that urban myth. The whole key point about an urban myth is that quite a few people know and believe it.

      His overall point isn't bad though, so I don't understand why you had to tell him to go fuck himself.

      It is not a urban myth, It is a racist myth. Back in the days, it was fashionable to hate the Japanese. Depicting them as a shandy races that will go as far as rename a town just to shove junk into the honest, hard working, middle class American was common practice. Spreading myth without checking the fact is wrong, but spreading racist myth, knowingly or not, deserve at last a 'big reaction'.

      You come across as a cantankerous asshole, so maybe it's good you're an AC.

      This is why I post as AC. To shield myself from judgemental pricks that don't lookup their 'facts' before insulting others over the Internet.

  37. Outsourced by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    Isn't this just China out-sourcing to USA to cut costs?

  38. pretty definitive language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This suggests that there is at least some substantial assembly being performed in the U.S.

    Kudos to "AppleInsider" for these hard, authenticated, unequivocal insights.

    Personally I rather have iMacs assembled by some Chinaman than a bunch of Mexicans.

  39. USA ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So where is this Phantom production facility and why has Apple kept it secret? I hope it's true but something doesn't seem right.

  40. There's a domestic example of this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A couple of years ago my kids showed up on my doorstep. They were over the oppressive environment at my ex's place, and hungry for some freedom.

    They reigned supreme for a little while, but eventually me and my husband tired of being their servants, and started imposing rules. At the same time, my ex reevaluated the whole parent-child relationship into a parent-adult child one.

    Sure enough, they missed their friends and went back to the ex.

    I suspect it's exactly the same with Apple. China offered the moon to get their business, and American employees wanted to be paid a decent wage, so they moved to China. Now Chinese employees are agitating for better conditions, and Americans are desperate, so it's time to go home.

  41. Maybe Apple has set up manufacturing in Saipan? by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 2

    Apparently, stuff imported from The Northern Mariana Islands qualifies for a "Made in USA" label even though there are reports that the stuff actually comes from China. There's even a catchy name for this game: The Saipan Scam

  42. America? Don't you mean Freedom Land? :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    America? Don't you mean Freedom Land? :)

  43. Good job.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gluing those screens on guys!

  44. Re:But it said America (at least according to the by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    But it said America (at least according to the summary.)

    Trusting the summary to get it's 3 word quote right? You must be new here.

    Actually the iMacs have "Assembled in USA".

    Really, you didn't even need to RTFA, the first photo shows it.

  45. Re:But it said America (at least according to the by aliquis · · Score: 1

    I saw why poverty the last episode this evening/early night on Swedish television.

    That's the one about the U.S. and how the 400 richest got more than half the wealth...

    Yay. Way to go voting on the people they rule the most (but they will rule all so whatever, money talks.)

    Smart to vote for tax cuts like you are among the winning group.

    Save some on the poorest 10% or whatever who more or less got nothing, in reality compared to the big picture cost nothing and make no difference while allowing the rich to get richer.

    It's not like those 400 people could do well with 90% of their wealth? .. Much easier than to get more than 10% from everyone else considering they've got so little and will notice for things used in real life.

    People are so damn fooled by the money printing to. If they compared the value of their dollars at the pump, gold or even to our SEK they would notice their salaries had droped a lot. If they also take a look at the price of gold, stocks or similar they would also notice that people who got money and not only in their wallet are doing quite well. Thank you for the bailout.

    Yeah.. Need to save the banks because? ... If not wealth saved in them would get lost? And who's got the wealth? Relatively?

    (I don't really know how it should be solved. A reset of debt will be unfair (but of course hit the rich the most, but they will likely know about it in advance and protect themselves anyway..) High taxes or straight out robbery (from the government or people) and the money and people move. I like the talk about promises of the benefit of globalisation but how it's mostly let money move freely and not people. As in the people who have the most money and companies can take advantage of it to get more and have people under-cut themselves (already suggested in the U.S. to. Look at the state taxes. Compare that to a world where taxes increase globaly instead up to a western level) but the poor workers aren't allowed to move and take a job in a country with better salaries.)

    These last 5+ years has been crazy. I guess it became much worse during the Bush era. The poor and middle class was royalty fucked. Enjoy. It's not like you're likely to get it all back :/

  46. Re:But it said America (at least according to the by aliquis · · Score: 1

    royally.. of course :D

  47. Lead article the The Atlantic this month by davecb · · Score: 4, Informative
    You know, the magazine where Vannevar Bush published As We May Think, the seminal article about the web? In 1945?

    This month the lead is Comeback: Why the future of industry is in America

    We saw this some years ago when NASDAQ started insourcing, after realizing they'd overshot when doing outsourcing. Now it's visible in companies like Emerson and Apple.

    --dave

    --
    davecb@spamcop.net
  48. Re:But it said America (at least according to the by aliquis · · Score: 1

    Really, you didn't even need to RTFA, the first photo shows it.

    Of course I didn't. If I had done so I wouldn't point out how it was written in the summary (and more or less question whatever that was true or not.)

    Regardless I don't care much whatever iMacs are built in China, the U.S.A. or some other country in North or South America.

    If they are built in the U.S. it just show how much China has progressed and the U.S. reverted.

  49. Re:RTW is defective: no employer unions are affect by magarity · · Score: 2

    WTF... Did you just call unions "worker-friendly"? Unions are only friendly to unionized workers. They exist to keep non members from working. Union strikes are effective only because people who would be happy to work are kept out by laws preventing them from being hired. Laws requiring union membership are the equivalent of Jim Crow laws.

  50. Re:RTW is defective: no employer unions are affect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found this post very difficult to understand. Can you (or someone) maybe rephrase it, or expand on what you're saying?

  51. But that just means--- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have gathered the iMacs together in a US warehouse before shipping to customers.

  52. Prison Planet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    United States of America:
            5% world population
            25% of world prison population
            1 in 100 US adults in prison
            1 in 30 of 20-34yo men
    Racial:
            1 in 9 of 20-34yo black males
            more 17yo black in prison than college
    Prison Labour : Reinventing Slavery
            100% US Military helmets, ammunition belts, ID tags
            93% of US paints
            36% of home appliances
            21% of office furniture
    Economics:
            25c per hour allows US to compete with factories in China

    The upside? They get to work on Macs all day...

  53. Re:But it said America (at least according to the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a hint: don't base your ideas on what you see on TV.
    Even Swedish TV.

  54. Re:RTW is defective: no employer unions are affect by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    WTF... Did you just call unions "worker-friendly"? Unions are only friendly to unionized workers. They exist to keep non members from working.

    You either don't understand the first thing about unions, or are deliberately misrepresenting them. Unions don't exist to keep anybody from working, they exist to let workers bargain collectively. That means when someone joins your shop, if they don't join the union the union is diluted and marginalized, something employers love.

    Want to know how to keep a union out of your workplace? It's easy -- don't fuck your workers over. As the CEO of a then-non union airline once said in the early eighties, "any company that gets a union deserves one."

    Unions have no downside to the worker whatever, and many benefits. Unions have no upside to a company, and many detriments. It's no longer me against a big rich corporation with thousands of members, it's now me and the thousands (or hundreds depending on company size) of my fellow workers against the big rich corporation.

    Anyone who owns a business and likes unions is incredibly stupid. Anyone who works for a business and doesn't like unions* is equally stupid.

    * Yes, there are a few bad unions. Bad unions are in bed with management and have constructed rules that make it hard to get rid of union leadership. There are not many surving unions like that.

  55. Re:RTW is defective: no employer unions are affect by magarity · · Score: 1

    You either don't understand the first thing about unions, or are deliberately misrepresenting them. Unions don't exist to keep anybody from working, they exist to let workers bargain collectively.

    Sorry, this is an acceptance of unions' stated purpose while ignoring their practical purpose. For practical purposes unions exist to keep non-members from working. There is an excellent analysis of this behavior in the chapter titled "Of Wages and Profit in the Different Employments of Labour and Stock" in Smith's Wealth of Nations. Back then unions were called "guilds" but it's the same thing.

  56. No, you don't understand. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "Assembled in America" label carries with it the requirement that it not be a simple screwdriver operation. It has to be significantly transformed. Read the fucking link before commenting.

  57. Overrated mod? really? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

    Not sure how that got modded "overrated" when it's a direct, salient reply correcting the misquote in the summary with the actual words printed on the device itself.

    I'd be absolutely delighted to understand what makes that "overrated" when it's already at the base score.

  58. Re:But it said America (at least according to the by aliquis · · Score: 1

    Use Slashdot instead?

    I better base them on something..

    http://www.whypoverty.net/
    http://www.whypoverty.net/en/videos/

    It likely reached the U.S. to.

  59. Re:RTW is defective: no employer unions are affect by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    A guild was not a labor union. I find it telling that you had to go centuries back to a pre-industrial revolution book to make your nonexistant point.

  60. They protect employers against employees by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Staffing agencies, contingent work, and other forms of temporary labor function in the same way that a labor union does - they organize workers while providing protection and leverage - for the benefit of an employer against employees.

    These forms of less-than-permanent work are not covered by the "no closed shop" provision. If these forms of labor were covered, no person would be forced to accept unionization by any third party (whether it protects the employer or the worker).

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  61. Soon more by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

    Apple CEO Tim Cook revealed that one of the existing Mac lines will be manufactured exclusively in the United States next year, making the comments during an exclusive interview with Brian Williams airing tonight at 10pm/9c on NBC’s “Rock Center.” http://rockcenter.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/12/06/15708290-apple-ceo-tim-cook-announces-plans-to-manufacture-mac-computers-in-usa

    --
    Of course news about a fake are Fake News.