Neither would Blues, or pretty much any major iconic genre. Depending on how this case is construed it's basically going to kill homages and the like. FUN paying tribute to 99 luftballoons with a line in the lyrics? Better get that contractually approved.
"anti-feminist"... I hear that word thrown around a lot but the thing is it doesn't mean anything. Is Ayaan Hirsi Ali an anti-feminist? What about Amanda Marcotte? Karen Decrow? Cathy Brennan? Chanty Binx? Malala? Christina Hoff-Sommers? What counts as "feminist" is so broad that the term "anti-feminist" has lost as meaning. If people who commit hate crimes or lead literal hate groups or even just openly advocate hate and bigotry can be considered feminists just like the people who consider that first group "idiotic women" who are "obsessed with trivial bullshit" are considered feminists then the term "anti-feminist" is useless.
The ONLY meaningful information that word conveys is that the person using it is so utterly intellectually and morally bankrupt as to literally resort to screaming "communist!" to try and completely discredit someone purely on the grounds that said person disagrees with them.
And by the way that "rag" was saying the same thing dozens of our nation's most preeminent legal scholars are also publicly saying. That feminist policies are "madness" lacking even the most basic and fundamental concepts of due process and the presumption of innocence.
If you want to talk about little credibility and a transparent agenda lets talk about your side quoting outright fraudulent statistics deliberately designed to vastly inflate the number of female victims in order to create the false appearance of an epidemic that doesn't exist. Let's talk about the deliberate and calculated erasure of male domestic violence and rape victims in order to prop up a false narrative.
"So what"? The argument that a culture is utterly dominated and tilted against women and ONLY women yet somehow still manages to end over backwards for feminist protesters to the point of keeping raping men legal is ludicrous.
I was directly responding to someone bringing up the US, I thought it was pretty obvious in a threaded discussion that I was responding to the point about American views.
Also something doesn't need to be commonplace for ideologues and zealots to stir up a frenzy and even distort public policy over it. Just look at the HUAC's witch hunts trying to find communist spies and sympathizers.
No, it's not. In fact it's so far in the opposite direction that our top scholars and professors of law are publicly referring to our policies as "madness".
I can buy an RPG and rockets right now. It'll cost an obscene amount of money, $200 to the ATF, and 6 months to over a year of investigation and paperwork processing but it's perfectly legal for me to do.
Also this isn't some random ad-hom, that was a literal quote from a major political player. People are literally so ignorant that they think "the shoulder thing that goes up" is a deadly part of an "assault weapon" and trying to write absurd legislation that regulates purely cosmetic features or go for a gun grab instead of actually doing something sensible.
And the question is who decides what those situations are? The same people who think "the shoulder thing that goes up" is what makes a deadly AKR-47 assault RPG?
Here's a clue in return: Making things up to attack people with is called a straw man. The definition of "SJW" hasn't changed at all, you're just pulling that excuse out of your ass to try and deflect from the fact that doxing and subsequent public auto-de-fes are such routine conduct that it's becoming a topic of discussion even for mainstream newsmedia.
SJW has always and still refers to those that use social justice as an excuse to be increasingly unhinged and violent toxic bigots.
Well I was referring to a particular agendy that happens to be held by the people who have turned doxing and the ensuing public two minutes hate into their daily bread.
2005 was well before the rise of modern outright-falsehood pushing online "journalism" which deliberately weaponized wikipedia by abusing the Woozle Effect.
Slashdot Mirror
I have an abusive relationship with R. I want to love it, but it keeps hurting me.
Haven't you been paying attention? The presumption of innocence is "victim blaming" now. Neither the left nor the right care about it.
Don't you know? Feminism is about equality, you horrible misogynist pissbaby neckbeard dudebro fuckboy shitlord. Women are just more equal than men.
Neither would Blues, or pretty much any major iconic genre. Depending on how this case is construed it's basically going to kill homages and the like. FUN paying tribute to 99 luftballoons with a line in the lyrics? Better get that contractually approved.
http://www.hindustantimes.com/...
"anti-feminist"... I hear that word thrown around a lot but the thing is it doesn't mean anything. Is Ayaan Hirsi Ali an anti-feminist? What about Amanda Marcotte? Karen Decrow? Cathy Brennan? Chanty Binx? Malala? Christina Hoff-Sommers? What counts as "feminist" is so broad that the term "anti-feminist" has lost as meaning. If people who commit hate crimes or lead literal hate groups or even just openly advocate hate and bigotry can be considered feminists just like the people who consider that first group "idiotic women" who are "obsessed with trivial bullshit" are considered feminists then the term "anti-feminist" is useless.
The ONLY meaningful information that word conveys is that the person using it is so utterly intellectually and morally bankrupt as to literally resort to screaming "communist!" to try and completely discredit someone purely on the grounds that said person disagrees with them.
And by the way that "rag" was saying the same thing dozens of our nation's most preeminent legal scholars are also publicly saying. That feminist policies are "madness" lacking even the most basic and fundamental concepts of due process and the presumption of innocence.
If you want to talk about little credibility and a transparent agenda lets talk about your side quoting outright fraudulent statistics deliberately designed to vastly inflate the number of female victims in order to create the false appearance of an epidemic that doesn't exist. Let's talk about the deliberate and calculated erasure of male domestic violence and rape victims in order to prop up a false narrative.
Bernie Madoff got rich too.
I'll take "contributing factors to Apple's single digit market share for $500 Alex."
Speaking of lynch mobs...
"So what"? The argument that a culture is utterly dominated and tilted against women and ONLY women yet somehow still manages to end over backwards for feminist protesters to the point of keeping raping men legal is ludicrous.
I was directly responding to someone bringing up the US, I thought it was pretty obvious in a threaded discussion that I was responding to the point about American views.
Also something doesn't need to be commonplace for ideologues and zealots to stir up a frenzy and even distort public policy over it. Just look at the HUAC's witch hunts trying to find communist spies and sympathizers.
And yet the feminist movement is so powerful in india it can literally keep the government from outlawing raping men.
No, it's not. In fact it's so far in the opposite direction that our top scholars and professors of law are publicly referring to our policies as "madness".
I can buy an RPG and rockets right now. It'll cost an obscene amount of money, $200 to the ATF, and 6 months to over a year of investigation and paperwork processing but it's perfectly legal for me to do.
Also this isn't some random ad-hom, that was a literal quote from a major political player. People are literally so ignorant that they think "the shoulder thing that goes up" is a deadly part of an "assault weapon" and trying to write absurd legislation that regulates purely cosmetic features or go for a gun grab instead of actually doing something sensible.
They should've called it the Molon Lathe
And the question is who decides what those situations are? The same people who think "the shoulder thing that goes up" is what makes a deadly AKR-47 assault RPG?
Should we not call it McCarthyism either because somewhere communists still exist? Tell you what lets stop using metaphors entirely.
Here's a clue in return: Making things up to attack people with is called a straw man. The definition of "SJW" hasn't changed at all, you're just pulling that excuse out of your ass to try and deflect from the fact that doxing and subsequent public auto-de-fes are such routine conduct that it's becoming a topic of discussion even for mainstream newsmedia.
SJW has always and still refers to those that use social justice as an excuse to be increasingly unhinged and violent toxic bigots.
Well I was referring to a particular agendy that happens to be held by the people who have turned doxing and the ensuing public two minutes hate into their daily bread.
Except that's pretty much what SJWs do. Target anyone, especially women and minorities, that disagrees with them.
Oh yeah totally, just like the US government obeys the constitution... and international treaties on war crimes and torture...
Finnish conjugation can fuck right off but you really only need three or four words to survive in Finland: Perkele, Sauna, Viina, Ruoka.
is that sooner or later we're all witches.
2005 was well before the rise of modern outright-falsehood pushing online "journalism" which deliberately weaponized wikipedia by abusing the Woozle Effect.
Can't beat a primary source.