Slashdot Mirror


Indian Gov't Wants Worldwide Ban On Rape Documentary, Including Online

An anonymous reader writes India's far-right Hindu Nationalist government headed by Narendra Modi has banned telecasting and viewing online of a BBC documentary on the 2012 Delhi rape which shocked the nation. The documentary consists interviews of the rapist Mukesh Singh, his lawyers and the victim's parents seems to expose the male dominant nature of Indian society. Indian government is now attempting to ban the documentary worldwide. Critics of the Indian government's action has accused it of not addressing issues women face and instead trying to hide the dirty secrets of its culture from the world. Some Indian websites have also reported that the views expressed by the rapist are echoed by policemen, lawyers and politicians of the nation. So far the government's attempt to ban the video online is with mixed success.

356 comments

  1. Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by jcr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Someone has to teach Modi what "Streisand Effect" means.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Also, "worldwide ban". Good luck with that. Indian government, the attempt at a ban says much more about you than the documentary itself does.

      The fact that this incident sparked mass protests, on the other hand, shows that many people in India are good and decent, and of course abhor things like this. I wish them the best of luck in taking control of their government someday. It's something we're still struggling with ourselves on a regular basis.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    2. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Someone has to teach Modi what "Streisand Effect" means.

      The salient point is: if they're dark skinned there's going to be trouble.

      I didn't know Steisand was black...

    3. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He's technically correct. Anywhere where there are dark skinned people, there's going to be trouble. That's because anywhere where there are people, there's going to be trouble.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re: Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nobody should want to rape anyone.

    5. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Luckyo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Most of the people in India agree with him, including women. That is the main problem with Indian society in relation to rape. It's not just "policemen, politicians and lawyers" but average people as well. Views like "women are responsible for what (rape) happens to them if they dress in a certain way and go out in the evening alone" are commonplace.
      Those opposed are mainly educated people in the cities, and even among them, there's no real consensus. Remember, this is a huge country with a large portion of rural dwellers, caste system that persists in spite of being banned by government and very conservative views on many issues.
      It's also a country where most people will rather buy a slightly more expensive phone than replace their outhouse with a running water toilet.

      Streisand effect is working in his favour on this one, even though his intentions are obviously impossible to achieve, simply because it shows his constituents that he shares their world view.

    6. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by narcc · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Views like "women are responsible for what (rape) happens to them if they dress in a certain way and go out in the evening alone" are commonplace.

      It's pretty common here in the States as well...

    7. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, it's not. In fact it's so far in the opposite direction that our top scholars and professors of law are publicly referring to our policies as "madness".

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    8. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by jcr · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, I'm watching it, and 20 minutes in I want to not only strangle all the perps, but both of their lawyers. Jesus Christ, what a greasy, evil, stupid and vicious pair of shysters.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    9. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So, rather than admit there's a problem, just sweep it under the rug. Not gonna happen.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    10. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are our policies? What is the opposite direction?

    11. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      He only gets elected by local citizens though, so outrage from foreigners doesn't matter much, and may even help his election chances in his strongly nationalistic party.

    12. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You didn't define "our". If the US people are calling US policies madness, then it must be common place enough, or there wouldn't be a noticeable outcry against it. Note, TFS indicates some in India think it is madness there as well.

    13. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by bingoUV · · Score: 3, Interesting

      caste system that persists in spite of being banned by government and very conservative views on many issues.

      Caste "system" is not banned and it never was. Even the British loved it as it was a nice way to divide people. Complexity of Indian caste system lends itself to creative uses.

      It's also a country where most people will rather buy a slightly more expensive phone than replace their outhouse with a running water toilet.

      "Most people" in India don't have an outhouse, most of those who have , don't have any running water to their outhouses.

      Those with running water to their outhouses don't have any need to practice economy. So you are wrong in every way.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    14. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Nethead · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, I got about 20 minutes in before I was about to put my fist through the monitor. The main perp said that only 20% of women are decent? I though we had rednecks in the US. Nothing like these total pieces of shit.

      Now I see why women avoid IT jobs with all the H1-B dudes roaming the halls.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    15. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      Well yeah, that is the function of censorship. The content doesn't matter.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    16. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Views like "women are responsible for what (rape) happens to them if they dress in a certain way and go out in the evening alone" are commonplace.

      It's pretty common here in the States as well...

      No, it's not. What is common in the US is the point of view that if you do stupid, reckless things then bad people will take advantage of you. In India, the view is that if a Woman doesn't follow traditional social protocol, then good Upstanding citizens will rape her as punishment.

    17. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by HiThereImBob · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      It's also a country where most people will rather buy a slightly more expensive phone than replace their outhouse with a running water toilet.

      Then why all the rape? Someone teach these people about Tinder!

    18. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 4, Funny

      Obligatory HHGTTG:

      "To summarize the summary of the summary: people are a problem."

    19. Re: Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nobody should rape anyone. "should want" doesn't work, or else the idiots who try to "cure" homosexuality would have a point. It's sort of like the difference between "nobody should steal" and "nobody should want to take stuff without paying for it."

    20. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      You mean the "campus rape crisis" that doesn't actually exist on the campuses where women are actually less likely to be raped than women in the general population? The entire thing is based on poor statistics, something for which the users of those statistics are at least as responsible for as the originators.

      Any rape is too much rape, but by creating fairy stories about the prevalence, causes and definition of rape you won't do anything useful to reduce that figure. In fact you'll probably make it worse.

      Posting ac because, unfortunately, it's just too dangerous to say things like this in connection with one's IRL identity these days.

    21. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      dunno about that.

      many people want to APPEAR good and decent there.

      TOO FUCKING BAD LYNCH MOBS AND DENYING TRIAL is pretty fucking far from being decent. yet statistics and probabilities say that some people in the lynch mob were rapists too.

      so yeah, they got a lot of work ahead of them in being viewed as fair and civilized society.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    22. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by msobkow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Which is precisely why the world should see this video. Because those "ideals" are far too prevalent in Indian society, and the nation should not be allowed to gloss over just how backwards so many of their people are beneath a veneer of respectability. It wasn't until this case that rape was even really taken seriously by the government itself, and then only because of mass protests.

      It's not that all the people support the viewpoint by any means.

      But it's important to show the world just how entrenched that viewpoint is in Indian society so that the rest of the world can apply pressure for things to change.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    23. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 4, Interesting

      US culture is currently going through a Rape Scare that is very much like the Red Scare of the 50s. Witch hunters are everywhere, and what do you know, they find witches all the time. Just like in the 50s, it's just hysteria that feeds itself. Crime is down to historic lows right now.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    24. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, this is only true because the places where there are dark skinned people are the places where white racists and/or imperialists go to commit their hate crimes.

    25. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Etymology is not always indicative of current meaning. OP may have been unaware, but your intellectual dishonesty says a lot more about you than the OP.

    26. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One day some country may experiment with democracy again... hahahahah sorry, couldn't even type that with a straight face.

    27. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Shimbo · · Score: 1

      Etymology is not always indicative of current meaning. OP may have been unaware

      In any case, it's a highly dubious etymology anyway. Funnily enough, I discovered the word first in the works of that notorious anti-semite, Isaac Asimov.

    28. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the horror of the common Indian. They should probably be wiped off the planet with their pakistan buddies.

    29. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Crime is down to historic lows right now.

      Rape is consistently underreported.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    30. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      How does blue light protect women? I know they implemented blue light in bathrooms on my campus for the reason that it's quite hard to find a vein in blue light so junkies couldn't use the areas lit that way.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    31. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Did you know that over 90% of those in prison for violent crimes are men? Men are evil! But wait - 99% of men have never had and will never have a conviction for a violent crime, so saying men are evil is flat out bigotry as bad as any Klanner roaming the backwoods with a length of rope and a shotgun.

      When you project the crimes of a miniscule minority onto much larger groups, you're a bigot.

      A similar principle applies here. Let's take for example this article which claims a woman is raped in India every 20 minutes. While it goes without saying that any rape is too much rape, this makes it sound like India is the world's rape capital. Once every 20 minutes, my god!

      Except the population of India is 1.25 billion, so counting the number of 20 minutes in the year we get around 26297. Divide 1.25 billion into that and look, we get 0.00002, or two per hundred thousand, which is considerably lower than most western countries. A very different picture emerges. Yes, scumbags and psychos exist in India the same as everywhere else. No that's not an indictment of Indian society, and what they're trying to do is protect their national reputation in the same way they're prioritising a space programme over indoor plumbing.

      What happens when hysterias like the feminists and other carrion creatures manufacture for fun and billions in profit take hold is people suffer and die, torn to death by mobs without trial or due process. Trying to spin this call for a ban into the government protecting rapists is just more of the same - the government is acting in a confused and not terribly intelligent manner, but it doesn't want the country painted in a bad light.

      And that's before we start talking about dowry law abuses, domestic violence law abuses, and maintenance law abuses, of which there are a great many. A quarter of all male suicides in India are directly attributed to family problems.

      So, we have well provisioned westerners sitting behind their screens, tut tutting at the dastardly H1-B dudes roaming the halls scaring off all teh wimminz, suckling at the teat of hyped up outrage, squinting myopically through their little electronic rectangles at a world they've never experienced and have little understanding of, proudly touting the merits of skepticism in their signatures while massive human suffering goes unnoticed.

      Still, that outrage feels good though eh?

    32. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know much about the IT guys, maybe that's the case, maybe not, but I recall a conversation held with a guy from India who came from a pretty well off family there, working here not as an IT guy but making a fair chunk of money. Back then I was a bit more naive and brought up some topic that was a bit controversial (I guess! It wasn't for me), and he's answer was "that was in the past, things have changed now", when referring to India.
      Since then, and it has been almost 15 years, I am a bit convinced that they are a strange culture, who would rather put a lot of effort in denial rather than on fixing the problems. Which is fine, it's their choice. But to treat everyone else as stupid and try to fool them pretending that all is fine, well, it's an insult to ones intelligence.

    33. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by markass530 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Posting ac because, unfortunately, it's just too dangerous to say things like this in connection with one's IRL identity these days.

      no it's not , I would have posted everything you did and I'm using my real identity, go find whoever has your balls and ask for them back

    34. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Luckyo · · Score: 4, Informative

      1. Discrimination against lower castes is illegal in India under Article 15 of its constitution. It is however still prevalent. Not sure how your example of British rule which ended many decades ago has any more relevance to current situation than, for example, the fact that during the same period rape within marriage was completely legal everywhere Europe.

      2. The obvious elephant in the room that you chose to ignore to get to claim that "I'm wrong in every way" on this one is that it's a well known and documented fact that there have been several programmes that allowed almost any Indian person to get a running water toilet for minimal price. It was widely rejected by people who preferred to put money in things like buying slightly more expensive smartphones instead. This was noted all the way up to the prime minister of India.

      I'm not sure why you're so hell bent on making the "you're wrong in every way" claim as to ignore things like Indian constitution, well documented charity programmes and even PM statements.

    35. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      I don't think you quite understand how relative numbers such as "down to historic lows" work. Especially since you happened to accidentally agree with his statement in yours.

    36. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by mrchaotica · · Score: 2

      The blue light protects women by being attached to a phone that calls the campus police. The point of the light is so that no matter where on campus you are, at least one is always in view so that if you need the police you know which way to run.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    37. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Hizonner · · Score: 2

      The word "shyster" is not and never has been an anti-semitic slur, nor does it arise from any anti-semitic slur.

      It does not mean "Jew" or even any particular kind of Jew. It has never been selectively applied to Jews.

      http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-shy1.htm.

    38. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It takes a lot of balls to say you "would have" done something, especially under your "real" identity of markass530. Kudos to you!

    39. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Immerman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > a strange culture, who would rather put a lot of effort in denial rather than on fixing the problems
      What's strange about that? Sounds like pretty much every culture I've ever heard of. Try to get "brogrammers" to admit they have a misogyny problem. Try to get _rabid_ feminists to admit they have a misandry problem. Try to get religious fundamentalists to admit they have a rational plausibility problem. Try to get economists to admit they have a "no actual clue about anything" problem.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    40. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The campus rape cause is one that that's typically been taken up by middle and upper class folks, a number of whom have been raped on campus. This is because this is primarily the demographic that ends up at university in the first place - the lower class are far less likely to end up at university.

      The issue is that for that demographic, campus is far and away the most likely place these people will be raped, more so than the middle class neighbours they grew up in, and more so than the middle class neighbours they'll likely live in when they graduate and enter the working population with a graduate salary.

      From their perspective therefore it is a big problem, it is the place where most rapes happen to people from their background, but the reason it doesn't look such a relative problem compared to overall rape statistics is because most rapes occur in lower class neighbourhoods, and with relatively disturbing regularity.

      So you're right that rapes off campus are far more likely, but not for the people who typically attend university - if a university goer gets raped in their lifetime it's far and away more likely to occur whilst they're at university. The problem is that where the general statistics show higher levels of rape outside of university it's a result of a broader problem - the higher levels of crime that occur in lower class neighbourhoods in general.

      Of course, these aren't the only two walks of life where there's a distinct rape problem- the military has a rape problem, and prisons have a rape problem.

      So whilst you're right, that there is more rape outside of campus than on campus, I'd warn against using that very generalised overall rape statistic of on campus vs. off campus as a justification to ignore the problem of rape on campus. The fact is that rape occurs in these different walks of life for different reasons. Changing the culture of the military so that staff can report rapes without fear of killing their career will do nothing to lower levels of rape in poor areas where social cohesion and respect for the law has been completely lost, just as dealing with rape in prisons will do nothing to stop the preppy jock who after a few beers and a life of entitlement believes he can just take whatever woman he wants knowing they're away from home and their family support network and more vulnerable.

      These are all distinct problems, and simply pretending rape has one single cause, and one single solution such that single trait campus like university rape can be ignored is counter-productive. All rape must be stopped, but there's no one single solution to do so - rape on campus isn't a fairy story for the demographic whom it's most likely to effect, it's a real problem, just like rape in the military, rape in prison and so forth also are.

      The only thing that shouldn't be surprising is that the rape on campus problem has come to the fore because it's a problem that affects the demographic of society with the most money and the greatest ability to be heard - poor people, soldiers, and prisoners don't much get listened to when they have problems. Is it unfair that those folk can raise the issue more easily? yes absolutely. But it doesn't mean there isn't still a problem to be solved there.

    41. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by dasunt · · Score: 2

      It's also a country where most people will rather buy a slightly more expensive phone than replace their outhouse with a running water toilet.

      Is this a problem? I'm not sure about outhouses in India, but I've used them in the US. A flush toilet isn't that much of an improvement from a personal use perspective - the main advantage is that it can be inside the house. So the trade off is "having to walk outside" versus "having to walk to a room inside".

      Contrast that with a fancy phone which provides communications and internet as well as apps. That trade off is involves having internet access and making it easy for friends, family, and employment contacts to reach you.

      I'd make the decision for the phone myself.

    42. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by xski · · Score: 1
      Let me guess, you're up in arms due to the word 'shyster'. Try select, right click, Search for ...

      Note the relevant bit: Various false etymologies have suggested an anti-Semitic origin, but there is no proof for that.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S...

      Etymology

      The etymology of the word is not generally agreed upon. The Merriam-Webster Dictionary says it is based on the German Scheißer (literally "shitter" but also used to refer to deceivers),[1] but the Oxford English Dictionary describes it as "of obscure origin", possibly deriving from a historical sense of "shy" meaning disreputable.[2] Various false etymologies have suggested an anti-Semitic origin, but there is no proof for that.[3] One source claims that the term originated in Philadelphia in 1843 from a disreputable attorney named "Schuster."[4]

    43. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by J41M · · Score: 1

      Views like "women are responsible for what (rape) happens to them if they dress in a certain way and go out in the evening alone" are commonplace.

      It's pretty common here in the States as well...

      No, it's not. What is common in the US is the point of view that if you do stupid, reckless things then bad people will take advantage of you.

      The fact the you just blamed the victim by saying it's their fault shows that it is common in the States. Most rapes are about control, so the messed up people who are rapists think that have to put women (and men) in their place. It's not the victim's actions but how people react to them that is the problem-worldwide.

    44. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Well, yes, I guess that you are right. Wasn't Hitler a black guy? And, Stalin? Idi Amin? Pol Pot? Oh yeah - Genghis Khan - he had to be blacker than the blackest black man as well!

      And, if they could just run all the black people out of Ukraine, well, their problems would be solved!

      Pull your head out of whichever orifice you keep it in - you're suffering from a lack of oxygen.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    45. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      ROFLMAO - she isn't going to give them back. She had them bronzed, and hung them from the rear view mirror. They sparkle in the sunlight as she cruises for more girlie boys to emasculate. Nope - no give backs!!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    46. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by RuffMasterD · · Score: 2

      Your rant is based on a figure derived from an annual report of the National Crime Records Bureau of India. That figure is for reported rapes. Yes, India does appear to have a relatively low rate of reported rapes. But that doesn't mean that the actual rape rate is low for so many reasons. Reported rapes are a subset of all rapes. The more unreported rapes there are, the smaller that subset.

      If there is a stigma associated with rape, for example if a young woman can't find a husband if everyone in her village knows she was raped, then there is a strong incentive not to report a rape. If a woman knows the perpetrator will blame her, and the police are likely to believe the perpetrator is right, then she may simply not bother to report the rape. Most rapes are committed by a relative or close friend of the family, so there may be family pressures not to report the rape. Rape within marriage is not even considered rape in India, so there is simply nothing to report because a judge can't do anything. I am sure there are many more reasons why a rape would not be reported.

      So, officially a woman is raped in India every 20 minutes. In reality? Probably a lot more. The fact that so many women feel they can't even report a rape deserves everyones outrage. Maybe if India was a little less concerned with how the rest of the world sees it, and a little more concerned with actually solving its problems, then the rest of the world wouldn't make such an issue of it.

      --
      Human Rights, Article 12: Freedom from Interference with Privacy, Family, Home and Correspondence
    47. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Asimov, an anti-semite? Why don't you explain that?

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    48. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by LifesABeach · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh India, whose culture peaked 3,600 years ago. We know you want to be all grown up; it's a process.

    49. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      There is nothing complex about being un-read.

    50. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Funny you should mention "elephant." I cannot help but wonder how many female Martin Luther Kings india will need?

    51. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      What's funny is the lengths India tries to hide the painfully obvious.

    52. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      I've been all over this planet, and one thing is certain, temples to Thomas Crapper are in more places than any other faith.

    53. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by bobstreo · · Score: 1

      I think Idi Amin was.

    54. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact the you just blamed the victim

      Where?

      by saying it's their fault

      Where?

    55. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A similar principle applies here. Let's take for example this article which claims a woman is raped in India every 20 minutes. While it goes without saying that any rape is too much rape, this makes it sound like India is the world's rape capital. Once every 20 minutes, my god!

      Except the population of India is 1.25 billion, so counting the number of 20 minutes in the year we get around 26297. Divide 1.25 billion into that and look, we get 0.00002, or two per hundred thousand,

      So you believe India is a nation of all women raping each other?

    56. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that you think he just blamed the victim shows that it will be a long time before people can even understand what each other is saying. So we need to stop thinking about what we can do (because we can't do anything sensibly) and go back to "what can I do, since we don't even yet have the capacity to communicate with one another?"

    57. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, its "problems exist", or simply "existence"

    58. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would agree with much of your post, and yet multiply it by ten and it's still less than the US. However you slice it, hysterical media hyperbole claiming an epidemic of rape isn't helping anyone. In the case of the man mentioned, it was actively harmful - he was pulled out of a jail cell and torn apart by an angry mob without ever seeing the inside of a courtroom.

      The one thing India doesn't need is the greasy hand of the feminist pulling strings - after all, who has more to gain from rape than them? The more rape they can come up with the more they can demand power, legislation and money from governments. Feminists love rape, they couldn't exist without it.

      If it hasn't happened already I expect a survey in the near future telling us that one in four Indian women have been raped (where rape includes harsh language and being looked at crosswise, buried in the fine print in the middle of the windiest section of the technical report).

      Sober analysis and intelligent research are the only efforts that will make a difference here.

      One correction to your post incidentally, women (not men) do have recourse to civil remedies in the case of marital rape, including but not limited to financial compensation for emotional abuse, under the auspices of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005. Some of the penalties are quite extreme, and they don't require the same burden of evidence as a criminal case would.

      Indian men have complained for years that the act has been mercilessly abused by malicious partners, but who cares what men have to say, right?

    59. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Totally agree with the AC part. I don't know what to say when friends bring this shit up. I could easily link them to the truth, but it's SUCH a hysteria that I would be "that guy".

    60. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      I'm glad someone is awake. Idi Amin helps to prove that being black doesn't make you either good or bad - nor does being white make you good or bad. I was going to mention that other black guy's name, the one with all the child soldiers, but I couldn't remember his name - and still can't. He's been in the news within the past couple years, with all the world outraged over his child soldiers among other things. He has a name that sounds kinda silly to an American, innocent and childish sounding - but I just can't remember what it is!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    61. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by ggrocca · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think OP refers to policies against sexual violence that have been enacted of late in many USA universities, based on things like "if you wake up and don't remember the night before than it was rape". Several young males have been thrown out of school and tainted for life without any kind of due process - just badly handled internal procedures carried out inside their academic institution.

      There's also the other face of the coin that rapes, especially when undergrads are involved, seems to be a real problem that universities and local police forces seem to be very ill-equipped to address. It's just that handling it exercising draconian justice without presumption of innocence, as far as the school is concerned, while doing nothing outside school in normal courts at the same time, does not seem to offer real justice to either victims or accused.

      Especially considering that rape cases are very, very difficult cases. They are terrible tragedies for the sufferer of the crime, which is horrible for them when it happens on one hand, and real nightmares for people who is falsely accused of being a perpetrator. More often than not, they end up in being "my-word-against-yours" cases, where the police and the courts end up making accusations and judgments based on the "character" of the people involved. Quite a mess.

      There has been an ongoing debate about this for at least a year in all major media (the NYT had several pieces, both investigative and opinion), and journalistic scandals with sources and false reporting were conveniently thrown in the mix as well (was it Rolling Stone? I'm too lazy to check). Google away to your pleasure!

    62. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Shimbo · · Score: 1

      It was sarcasm.

    63. Re: Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but those aren't cultures but groups, it's different. What you say is true, some groups act on denial just as much, bug they're not a wholly functioning country wide culture. I notice you denouncing these groups and so would many, and in the other hand a government legislating denial. Huge difference.

    64. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Oh - I guess the sarcasm font was filtered out by one of my Firefox addons.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    65. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Joseph Kony, leader of the Lord's Resistance Army

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J...

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    66. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They view in the states is that we never use the word "responsible" with any seriousness or sincerity. Responsibility is a forbidden topic. I'm pretty sure most of American agrees on at least that one topic.

      Beyond that (getting much more subjective) my view is that there are assholes out there, and there is also bad luck. So everything involves risk. If you go out at night, you are taking a risk, and you should probably think about that risk and ways that you can assess it and alter it.

      But let's be clear: the words "you should" in the above sentence have jack shit to do with responsibility. It's not about responsibility, it's about strategy. And strategy is also why you punish rapists: it's believed to be a successful method for altering risks.

    67. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Baloroth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The fact the you just blamed the victim by saying it's their fault shows that it is common in the States. Most rapes are about control, so the messed up people who are rapists think that have to put women (and men) in their place. It's not the victim's actions but how people react to them that is the problem-worldwide.

      No, he didn't "blame the victim by saying it's their fault", and the fact you claimed he did means you are part of the problem. Look at it this way: if I drive a Porsche into a bad neighborhood, leave it unlocked with the keys inside, and it gets stolen, are you going to say I didn't mess up? No, of course I messed up, because failing to lock the doors on your car is stupid. That doesn't mean I'd bear the responsibility for the car being stolen, but it does mean what I did was stupid, and I would partially bear responsibility for a chain of action that lead to the car being stolen, and I could maybe have prevented the car being stolen. Since I cannot control the actions of other people, only my own, what I can do to prevent my car from being stolen is to take the proper precautions: lock the doors, don't park in bad neighborhoods, install a tracking system, etc.

      For women (or men: rape works in both directions, though it's generally a vastly worse problem for women, especially attractive ones), that means not wearing revealing clothing while drunk at 3AM in a bad alley, watching their drinks closely, only hanging out with groups of people they trust and know well, etc. None of that means they're the ones responsible for the rape if they do get raped: but it does mean they can lower the probability of rape happening by being smart, and since the goal is to stop rapes from happening, we should encourage them to be smart, and discourage them from being stupid.

      In other words: we can't blame the women for being raped, but we certainly can blame them for being stupid. Yes, everyone should be able to be as stupid as they want with no fear of other people doing bad things to them, but so long as we live in the real world, that will never happen (though we can still strive towards it, of course), so we should tell people to stop being stupid, because that means bad things are less likely to happen to them.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    68. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by jcr · · Score: 2

      "Shyster" is a Yiddish word for an unscrupulous person, usually a lawyer. I'm a Jew myself, you guilt-peddling twat. Now fuck off.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    69. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was Jewish by birth although he was atheist by convistion.

    70. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by jcr · · Score: 1

      What is your problem, kid? Are you so bent out of shape over four characters that you're going to bitch about it every chance you get?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    71. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by jcr · · Score: 2

      narcissistic

      What could be more narcissistic than obsessing over my refusal to comply with your demands?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    72. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by jcr · · Score: 2

      The US has its own rape culture.

      Not even close. If anything, the USA has a witch-hunting culture that manifests in debacles like the Duke Lynch Mob.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    73. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by jcr · · Score: 1

      Get some professional help, kid. You don't have to be this way.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    74. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by jcr · · Score: 1

      I watched it because a government wants to censor it. Got a problem with that?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    75. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's that other black guy too, Mobutu Sese Seko who was put into power in the Congo by Belgium and the United States. After being helped in the assassination of the democratically elected Patrice Lumumba. The United States and Belgium had a hand in that too. Belgium royally fucked the Congo.

    76. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I think he is in the process of learning that right now.

    77. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFLMAO - she isn't going to give them back. She had them bronzed, and hung them from the rear view mirror. They sparkle in the sunlight as she cruises for more girlie boys to emasculate. Nope - no give backs!!

      Your comment is both misogynist and misandric* at the same time. Impressive. I guess you're just a misanthrope?

      *The adjective form of misandry. I had to look it up.

    78. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The anti-semitic slur wasn't "shyster" -- it was "Lawyer".

      *ducks and runs*

    79. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Luckyo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The main advantage is hygiene. That is less diseases spread by parasites in the faeces and no need to empty out the outhouse getting people into direct contact with faeces.

      It takes having lived a really comfortable life to not understand this basic issue with hygiene.

    80. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking the same thing. I never expected to hear a lawyer say these things. It makes me sick.

    81. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

      He's technically correct. Anywhere where there are dark skinned people, there's going to be trouble. That's because anywhere where there are people, there's going to be trouble.

      But... if you're white, the problem is people with different skin colour. [mumbles] something about the accumulation of power leading to paranoia and justified guilt - the less competition you have the more you fear it [mumble] the pure and simple truth....

    82. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Nethead · · Score: 2

      I was going to reply but the AC in post #49205121 said all that needs said about your rant. But please allow one point: " A quarter of all male suicides in India are directly attributed to family problems." So? I'm surprised it's that low. Besides just plain mental health issues I'm guessing that family and business problems are the cause of most suicides, anywhere.

      As far as "..a world they've never experienced and have little understanding of.." I've walked those halls for over two decades as employee and contractor. I've seen it with mine own eyes, and listed to the stories of coworkers.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    83. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      I was directly responding to someone bringing up the US, I thought it was pretty obvious in a threaded discussion that I was responding to the point about American views.

      Also something doesn't need to be commonplace for ideologues and zealots to stir up a frenzy and even distort public policy over it. Just look at the HUAC's witch hunts trying to find communist spies and sympathizers.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    84. Re: Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Cultures are not defined by national boundaries.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    85. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Discrimination is banned, in certain ways, not caste "system". In fact, government itself discriminates by reserving jobs, promotions, college admissions, so you will understand if someone find idiotic your statement of caste" system " being "banned ". And besides discrimination, there are a million other aspects to the caste "system ".

      There have been such programs many times, but " most people " are so far from honestly taking advantage of the programs that it is funny someone calls outhouses a common feature in Indian society. The programs get taken advantage of, if at all, by collecting the money and NOT building the outhouse.

      Your statement implies "most people"
      1. already have an outhouse,
      2. have running water supply,
      3. neglect to fix its leaks and
      4. instead focus on getting a better smartphone.

      The first two points are extremely incorrect.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    86. Re: Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and it's been doing it for a long time. Just look back to king Leopold. He was no Mao but I think it's fair to compare him to pol pot

    87. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Yep - Kony. That's the guy. He's an absolute pig, but the color of his skin has nothing to do with his piggishness.

      Not only are there black pigs, and white pigs - there are even black and white pigs!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    88. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Nethead · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Feminists love rape, they couldn't exist without it."

      You are a sad, sick little man.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    89. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same sentiments exactly. The problem is not the video. The problem is the idiots like Nethead watching it and God forbid, coming up with their generalizations.

    90. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 0

      You're the one who used a random psycho to paint all the little brown people who tuk yer jerrrrb as misogynistic rapists-in-waiting, chucklehead.

      If speaking truth to power offends you, find a site better suited to your intellectual capabilities, like say jezebel.

    91. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anecdotal racism is still racism.

    92. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are what you eat, or so the proverb says.

    93. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Runaway1956 · · Score: 0

      I can't help wondering what kind of "life" you have. Have you ever been outside? Have you ever been alone? Have you ever seen a mountain, or the ocean?

      Here's a video for you to enjoy.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    94. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by hucker75 · · Score: 1

      They're not less grown up than us, they're DIFFERENT to us. Why does everyone have to be the same?

    95. Re: Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, what was the point of that diarrhea of consciousness?

    96. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Views like "women are responsible for what (rape) happens to them if they dress in a certain way and go out in the evening alone" are commonplace.

      It's pretty common here in the States as well...

      No, it's not. What is common in the US is the point of view that if you do stupid, reckless things then bad people will take advantage of you.

      The fact the you just blamed the victim by saying it's their fault shows that it is common in the States. Most rapes are about control, so the messed up people who are rapists think that have to put women (and men) in their place. It's not the victim's actions but how people react to them that is the problem-worldwide.

      He didn't say that. He said that it's the point of view that it's their fault, that'c common

    97. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I am from India and trust me, it is only a small minority (of educated not-poor people) who are protesting. The rest (majority) of India is either poor people, village people, uneducated people or conservative people or some combination of these. And it is these same people who voted Modi into power in the first place. While the last category that is the conservative people support the ban, the first three categories, that is the poor, village or uneducated people got major life problems do deal with and couldn't care less whether some documentary is banned or not.

    98. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Now I see why women avoid IT jobs with all the H1-B dudes roaming the halls.

      This comment says more about you than about them 'H1-B dudes'. By your logic, should I also equate you with the rednecks in the US? Just how is an H1-B employee the same a rapist? Just because both are Indian?

    99. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > it's important to show the world just how entrenched that viewpoint is in Indian society so that the rest of the world can apply pressure for things to change.

      Oh, so the views of some insane rapist must be automatically entrenched in the whole of Indian society, huh. By the same logic, the views of Charles Manson must be entrenched in the whole of USA?

      What is really entrenched here is the the racism in your mind.

    100. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's actually more of a relevant argument in the case of India with these horrific gang rapes. It's still not a good response, but remember that most women who are raped in the US are not going out wearing slutty clothing. Most are raped by someone they know. Often, someone they know well. Rape is not something that is some stranger in the night attacking a girl who wanders around by herself drunk, not usually anyway. Rape is often committed by someone trusted, someone with whom the woman feels safe. And when a woman becomes aware of vulnerability ...

      You don't understand that it's hard to be told that we can't walk places men can because it's not safe. That we have to live a restricted life because we're vulnerable. That we can't go out and get drunk with trusted friends because some "friend" of the opposite sex might think, hey, what a good opportunity.

      I trust my husband - but nearly every other man I've been with pushed me to continue with sex even when it became uncomfortable or painful. It's not rape, but it's coercion and selfishness. There are so many men in the world who see women's bodies as something to be used for their own pleasure. My body is my own to be used for my pleasure and for that of the person I love. When I was single and sleeping around, pleasure for the men I slept with was a byproduct.I choose what to do with my body.

      And fuck the world for telling me that my body is to be used, that I can't walk safely the way men can. Don't tell me it's about strength. The weakest of men feels safer walking down the street at night than many strong women (I won't say the strongest of women, because the strongest could probably feel pretty safe).

      Sorry for wanting to live my life.

    101. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      If he is a Berkeley professor I understand completely.

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    102. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      Any junkie worth his salt(see what i did there?) can find a vein under one of those blue lights.

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    103. Re: Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      You can do better :)

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    104. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      You need to watch Charlotte's Web and get some perspective.

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    105. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      While I agree with your overall point, I'd say that gang rape is different from the typical rape. And that is why the college stuff makes the news as well. Rape by one person shows that this one person is terrible. But gang rape - how it can even start, that's what baffles me. There is even before an understanding of women as objects to be used for sexual pleasure, not as people. This is a shared concept - if it were not, how could a gang rape be initiated? Imagine being one of them ... you would have to really trust that your friends also hated women in order to initiate a gang rape. Rape is terrible and tragic in any circumstance. But rape can be conducted by one sick person. Gang rape requires the initiator to trust that his friends will follow. Gang rape is society. Gang rape means it's not an aberration, it's accepted. And that is where you see misogynistic culture - whether it's fratboys or India - it is not normal. It is abnormal. But certain sectors of society and certain parts of the world accept it.

      I know there are plenty of great people in India fighting against misogyny. That's not my fight, but I watch and applaud.

    106. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing about the "campus rape crisis" is that the rapes that happen on campus are similar to the rapes that get so much attention in India. Gang rape is atrocious. Gang rape means that these men are secure in thinking their peers will support them in brutalizing a woman. It implies a societal issue. Yes, most rape is conducted by someone a woman knows well. The shock with gang rape is that there's this consensus. It's the same with brutality against the homeless. It's shocking to think that young people could assume consensus, but they do. And that is the problem. It's not that these girls are drunk. It's that several guys agree to do this and not one stands up and says no. That's why gang rape is so upsetting. Rape happens. Knowing that your buddies will accept you initiating and participate? That should not happen. That is what implies that it's socially acceptable and that is why recent campus rapes have been so concerning - because they were gang rapes. Although, actually more high schools from what I recall of the most recent events ... the point is, social acceptance of rape is scary and gang rape implies social acceptance.

    107. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by LifesABeach · · Score: 0

      India's need to beat the drum for Cultural Rape is not Different, it's Enlightened?

    108. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is an incredibly racist comment.

    109. Re: Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but I've other obligations on my time in addition to dispensing occasional pithy bits of wisdom to ACs on Slashdot.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    110. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by NewYork · · Score: 1

      https://kickass.to/storyville-2015-s22e10-india-s-daughter-720p-pxg-t10312634.html

    111. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by NewYork · · Score: 1

      http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/corporate-dossier/argumentative-too-emotional-are-indians-tough-to-work-with/articleshow/45638709.cms

    112. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by NewYork · · Score: 1

      Unlike in US, rape is a "hate crime" in India;
      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...
      http://www.washingtonpost.com/...

    113. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Rakarra · · Score: 2

      Let's take for example this article [shaktivahini.org] which claims a woman is raped in India every 20 minutes

      That poor woman...

    114. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Hey buddy, you're starting to sound as dumb as apk. Don't go down that road, 'k?

    115. Re: Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then read Animal Farm, I guess.

    116. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by t_ban · · Score: 1

      dunno about that. many people want to APPEAR good and decent there. TOO FUCKING BAD LYNCH MOBS AND DENYING TRIAL is pretty fucking far from being decent. yet statistics and probabilities say that some people in the lynch mob were rapists too. so yeah, they got a lot of work ahead of them in being viewed as fair and civilized society.

      Yeah, why don't the fuckers just follow your shining personal example?

      --
      First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win. -Gandhi
    117. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by hucker75 · · Score: 1

      It's just different. Muslims think we're wrong to uncover our faces.

    118. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is what you typed dangerous to say? Your last sentence is basically the same as "I'm not racist but...", its a fucking cop out because you are too much of a pussy to say it when attached to your name. You are no different than gamersgaters.

    119. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      And in other news, Amish are starting line up for an apple watch.

    120. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Why do females getting on a bus in india need armed guards?

    121. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by hucker75 · · Score: 1

      Do you actually have a point?

    122. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but as a society, we are getting better about that. Estimates of rape are almost always too high (probably) because they tend to count "having sex while intoxicated" as a woman being raped (they don't count it as a man being raped, and they don't bother to ask how intoxicated you were or whether the victim actually feels she/he was raped).

      None of that was intended to belittle the experience for any rape survivor - I'm quite sure it's a terrible experience, and we should do everything we can to prevent rape, but we should also be accurate in our assessments of how common it is.

    123. Re:Well, I guess I've got to watch it now. by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      What makes you, or the man, think that -he- is safe there?

      If you want to be (reasonably) safe, don't go in unsafe places. And, learn safe and accurate Gun Handling. 8-)
      Most people walk around in a dream world where no bad thing can happen. Most of the time they get away with it, but it's not real.

      On the other hand, real criminals are (usually) few and rare. Most people are polite and helpful, except maybe in the big cities. If your friends are rude and rough with you, maybe they -are- criminals. Don't stay around people you don't like, it's not worth the trouble. There are plenty of others...

  2. Bittorrent by AndyCanfield · · Score: 2

    So what's the bittorrent name for the file? I've got to grab it just in case the Hindu fanatics win.

    1. Re:Bittorrent by Ultra64 · · Score: 4, Informative

      magnet:?xt=urn:btih:0EC1B682EFE55269F319620CAFEA9031320EA4E5&dn=bbc+documentary+delhi+rape+case+hd+720p&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.demonii.com%3A1337%2Fannounce

    2. Re:Bittorrent by jcr · · Score: 2

      The title of the program is "India's Daughter". No idea what the name of the torrent is.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    3. Re:Bittorrent by roc97007 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      So what's the bittorrent name for the file? I've got to grab it just in case the Hindu fanatics win.

      This is the internet. The fastest way to make anything ubiquitous that can be electronically transferred, is to attempt to ban it.

      I would expect bittorrent links pretty much everywhere by right about.... now.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    4. Re:Bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      magnet:?xt=urn:btih:0EC1B682EFE55269F319620CAFEA9031320EA4E5&dn=bbc+documentary+delhi+rape+case+hd+720p&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.demonii.com%3A1337%2Fannounce

      Stalled at 39%, try a better one.

    5. Re:Bittorrent by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      It would be nice if someone would actually stay on and, y'know, seed this thing.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    6. Re:Bittorrent by gmack · · Score: 1
    7. Re:Bittorrent by Drakster · · Score: 1

      Same file, different torrent. If you've already downloaded the previous one, just rename it to resume where it was left off.

      magnet:?xt=urn:btih:a39dbfc5b2981e4cac5d09d3632d6bbe9a5c1b2b&dn=BBC%20Storyville%20India%27s%20Daughter.mp4&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.demonii.com%3A1337%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.publicbt.com%3A80%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.openbittorrent.com%3A80%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.istole.it%3A80%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.ccc.de%3A80%2Fannounce

    8. Re:Bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a lovely self-portrait! You must be proud.

    9. Re:Bittorrent by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Nope, the filesizes are slightly different. Was going to try to jump-start the original torrent using the file you pointed to, but that obviously won't work. Thanks a lot for the link, though—lots of seeders and very zippy (I got the whole thing in 57 seconds flat). Cheers.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    10. Re:Bittorrent by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

      Download and install qBittorrent. I have two and a half shit-tons of search engines incorporated into the client. Hit the search tab, type whatever is piquing my interest, and I get results. The search also informs me which torrents are healthy, which are unhealthy, and most of the time I can figure out which torrents are bogus.

      Or - ya know - maybe you could use Google to locate a torrent.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  3. Only cowards censor by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hey India: "Sticking your head in the sand ignoring the issue doesn't make it go away!"

    Deal with it.

    1. Re:Only cowards censor by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hey India: "Sticking your head in the sand ignoring the issue doesn't make it go away!"

      I suspect you could say that to all governments, on lots of issues.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Only cowards censor by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Hey India: "Sticking your head in the sand ignoring the issue doesn't make it go away!"

      India doesn't want the issue to go away, because that would mean changing, and no one wants to. India wants people to go back to pretending everything's okay. That's why "shocking" documentaries are dangeours, and get banned.

      It's why freedom of speech is so important: rising issues to public consciousness is the only way to resolve them peacefully. The only alternative is letting them shimmer until they reach the point of explosion and tear the country apart as they do. Time will tell whether the rising countries like India and China will learn that in time. Russia doesn't seem to have, from two collapses, and is consequently heading for third and possibly final.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  4. How this works. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Unless the video is hosted on servers in India, they cannot ban it being viewed in other countries, at least not without the cooperation of every government in the world. Unless someone is lying in the documentary, I see this as the government of India trying to hide the truth about the culture of the country. Obviously the Indian government has never heard of the Streisand effect.

  5. I refer to higher powers on this. by retech · · Score: 1
    1. Re:I refer to higher powers on this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ONCE AND FOR ALL

  6. Tech Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    How can a country that hosts so many of the world's call centers still have no idea how the internet works?

    1. Re:Tech Support by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Informative

      How can a country that hosts so many of the world's call centers still have no idea how the internet works?

      Well, if their understanding of Microsoft Windows support is any guide ...

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Tech Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I guess you've never worked in an IT group with a large group of workers imported from India.

      They don't even know how to load paper in a printer.

    3. Re:Tech Support by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Politicians vs. technology is in the same crappy state in India as it is everywhere. How can the US be the inventor of the internet and still have politicians who in general know nothing about this series of tubes?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  7. Because clearly: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You wouldn't want another lynch mob breaking into the holding facility where the "alleged" rapist is and have them subjected to "untold terrors". "Now, now Mr. X, don't scream while we remove your genitals and everything will be just fine in the morning."

  8. Barbara Striesand by Georules · · Score: 1

    effect

  9. Who would have guessed male dominance? by Bob_Who · · Score: 2, Insightful

    After all, traditional marriages are arranged by the parents, per dowry arrangements and negotiations. Parents of the bribe, I mean bride, must pay life's savings to marry off daughters. You must avoid getting stuck with feeding her and her illegitimate children for your entire life. If you can manage to marry her off, then even if her husband dies first, the custom dictates that she must throw herself on her dead husband's burning corpse as part of the ritual funeral ceremony, If he can't feed you you're better off burned alive then left over to the throngs of dudes. Many female babies seem to suffer greater mortality for some reason that defies standard statistical deviation....

    1. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by rubycodez · · Score: 5, Informative

      uh, your information is dated, they don't do the fling-yourself-on-the-pyre thing any more. It was outlawed in 19th century in India, and in 1920 in Nepal.

      "Be it so. This burning of widows is your custom; prepare the funeral pile. But my nation has also a custom. When men burn women alive we hang them, and confiscate all their property. My carpenters shall therefore erect gibbets on which to hang all concerned when the widow is consumed. Let us all act according to national customs." -- Commander in Chief in India, to Hindu priests complaining that they couldn't do the Sati thing any more.

    2. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by phorm · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. The CIC sounds like a guy I could get along with.

    3. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by jcr · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    4. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      And yet the feminist movement is so powerful in india it can literally keep the government from outlawing raping men.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    5. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by Ultra64 · · Score: 0

      Were you born retarded, or did you gain your retardation later in life?

    6. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by s.petry · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This is where you should begin to wonder who is controlling these movements. I saw the signs women were holding during their rallies in India. Signs were in English and matching the exact rhetoric we see on signs in the US Feminist movement. "End gender based sexual assault". So men that are raped are not allowed in _their_ arguments, and neither are women raped by other women. The former is a staggeringly high statistic if you include incarceration, and the latter seems to match male on female rape by percentages.

      No, it's not just prison where men get raped but county jail for events like exercising your first amendment rights.. er.. illegally protesting.

      The unfortunate fact is that men are victims of sexual assault by women as well as other men. In the US we have a double standard, where a female sexually assaulting a male is always a victim somehow. The male victims are pressured into not talking, and often refused the ability to pursue charges. How many of the female teachers found to be sexually assaulting minor students have been charged and registered as sex offenders? Yeah, go ahead and check that number.

      Finally, no! My comments are not intended or implied to justify the case TFA discusses. ALL sexual assault is wrong. What my comments are intended to do is show the double standards, which has the known consequence of intensifying aggressive acts like sexual assaults.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    7. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Yes, everyone is a slave, to their parents. Well, at least the male parent. When the head of household (the one with 100% of the power) is male, how is the man oppressed?

    8. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by sonicmerlin · · Score: 0

      Dude, only westerners, especially Americans, can have the gall to simplemindedly dismiss thousands of years of culture as "inferior" and "oppressive". Why don't you actually try talking to the people in that culture to find out what they think?

    9. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly you have never been married to a woman with the ability to speak.

    10. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by rossz · · Score: 1, Troll

      When women who are raped are treated like trash. When there is, for all intents and purposes, slavery (despite being outlawed). When an accident of birth forever brands you as undesirable and lowly. Then fuck yes, I will dismiss your culture as backwards and inferior. You had that thousand years to become decent. You chose not to.

      In a fraction of that time we got rid of slavery. Women have equal rights. Rapists and child molesters are tossed in prison and outcast by the majority of people. A person born low can rise up to become head of a corporation.

      So go fuck yourself.

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    11. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by rossz · · Score: 2

      You are perfect example of the stupidity that keeps male rape victims from seeking justice.

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    12. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There has never ever been any man ever sexually assaulted by a woman? Not once ever. Not a single unsolicited sexual action. No kick to the groin. No male child abused by a female adult. Not one ever.

      Your psychological projection of hate and impugning intelligence is deafening.

    13. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even I, the high and esteemed Anonymous Coward, must concede that the brain meats must be stretched to acknowledge the possibility; such is the extent of my societal indoctrination.

      But then I remember that people are assholes, and some women are assholes too, and everything else just kind of falls into place from there. That and the fact that there are few problems in bed that a few restraints won't fix. Remember kids, use them responsibly!

    14. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not subhuman but they are world class dicks.

      Traveling in India with my blonde girlfriend was a f**king nightmare as the assholes would just try to grab her and cop a feel as she was walking past on the street. In the end I had to walk in front and a friend would walk just behind her like f**king body guards just to keep the pricks off. God help her if she was on her own.

    15. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a complete moron. Men are sexually assaulted and raped frequently, they can't report it. They will be shamed, laughed at, and their charges never filed. There even exists a rubbish crime "made to penetrate". What a joke. Unwanted sexual activity by anyone, to anyone is rape. RAPE. Eventually, this will be accepted and we will have gender equality in this area.

    16. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by Megol · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes men are sexually assaulted by men and women. Yes men are raped by men and women. So what?

      What this article is about is a culture that accepts rape and even murder for someone that dresses wrong and does the wrong thing. IFF they are women.

      Your attempts of misdirection is simply pathetic.

    17. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Many female babies seem to suffer greater mortality for some reason that defies standard statistical deviation...."

      Sounds like this problem is solving itself. Y chromosome arbitrage makes the market more efficient. Clearly there was a market inefficiency and the invisible hand is in the process of rectifying the situation.

    18. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I don't live in India, so everyone I talk to that was born into it thinks that culture is fucked up, which is why they left.

      Why, where are you? You seem to imply that you've experienced "inferior" and "oppressive" culture, and western culture. Or are you a hypocrite criticizing others for what you yourself do?

      I don't recall anyone saying "inferior". If you read what I said, I just said the man isn't oppressed. You disagreed.

      If that's not your meaning (that you think men are oppressed in India), then you are an argumentative asshole.

    19. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      uh, your information is dated, they don't do the fling-yourself-on-the-pyre thing any more. It was outlawed in 19th century in India,

      So that makes you think it doesn't happen?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    20. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I saw the signs women were holding during their rallies in India. Signs were in English

      Please, try not to be a colossal idiot. Before complaining, ask yourself what you're complaining about. Why would the signs be in English? Because their own government doesn't give a fuck about their rights, and they're appealing to an international audience to try to get some traction.

      Just think for just two seconds instead of letting your knee jerk. Nobody fucking cares how put upon you think you are by this anti-rape movement. It's not about you.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    21. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Many female babies seem to suffer greater mortality for some reason that defies standard statistical deviation...."

      *SNIP*and the invisible hand is in the process of rectifying the situation.

      You joke, but that's exactly what will happen.

      In a country like China, nothing - absolutely nothing - will lift the status of women like supply shortage.

      With 20% more male than female babies born, women's market value will rise. If they don't have western level equality in twenty years I'll be shocked.

    22. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      From back when the Brits had balls and the Empire deserved that name.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    23. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You know, I can't help but think you might be right. Something that has been part of our culture for thousands of years, dating back to times before the onset of recorded history, that can't be bad.

      So keeping slaves must be fine. We used to sell people who can't pay their taxes into slavery. On a side note, are you current on your mortgage payments? My house needs a new coat of paint and, well, you know, it's cheaper to just own the guy painting it than hiring someone...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    24. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " It was outlawed in 19th century in India..." by the British.

      Just needed to finish that sentence for you.

    25. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by readin · · Score: 1

      I've never understood how "patriarchal society" and "tolerance of rape" go together. I a culture where women are just used for one night stands and abadoned, I could see male police not paying much attention to rape.

      But in a society where a daughter's virginity is highly important to her ability to get married, in a society where marrying a virgin is considered very important, in a society where traditional marriage is valued and infidelity a rightly punishable offense, how can rape be ignored? Surely the father brother and husband (including potential future husbands) of the raped woman have a huge interest in protecting her and should be allowed to do unspeakable things to the perpetrator.

      I just don't get how that's not the case.

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    26. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Women have equal rights.

      Why? All women are pigs.

    27. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    28. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With 20% more male than female babies born, women's market value will rise. If they don't have western level equality in twenty years I'll be shocked.

      Except that just like western women, they do not have children and therefore have no market value.

      Because feminism!

    29. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that was when they really put the boot into darkie. Even the word loot stems form those heady days of plundering India. Killing millions while emptying the country. What glorious days.

      Idiot.

    30. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by sonicmerlin · · Score: 1

      Slavery? What? Are you referring to "servants", who are paid for their work just as a US house maid or butler would be?

      What do you mean by women are "treated like trash"? Women are raped in every country, and every culture, by *criminals*, not normal people. Women actually feel less safe than men in almost every country, with the gap often greatest in developed countries: http://www.gallup.com/poll/155...

      I don't know why you think rapists and child molesters aren't punished. If a woman doesn't report a crime then yes the rapist will go unpunished, but that's true in every country. No one likes child molesters, anywhere at all.

      You have an emotional reaction to this event and you can't even think clearly.

    31. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by sonicmerlin · · Score: 1

      You're almost certainly talking to people who were born in America. The ones who left India usually do it for economic opportunity. The "brain drain" that occurs b/c people want more financial security. In Western countries every first generation Indian family pushes their children to be doctors, and to marry doctors, so they can be rich. I think that's screwed up.

      I haven't implied anything about experiencing "inferior" or "oppressive" cultures. I'm saying your assumption that women have been "oppressed" for thousands of years is insane. If women were all so unhappy society wouldn't be able to exist. Eastern cultures value interdependence and harmony. If 50% of your population is literally suffering then the system doesn't fracking work.

      You're glibly assuming your own culture is superior without even trying to talk to or understand the people, both men and women, that have lived in a constantly evolving multi thousand year culture. Just hand waving away such a rich history without truly understanding it is the height of arrogance.

    32. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by sonicmerlin · · Score: 1

      What slaves? You mean servants? Who are paid for their work? Who go home and eat with their families? Whose wages have increased along with India's economic growth?

      Do you even know anything about India?

    33. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s.petry is clearly living in his own reality.

      But English is the second most spoken language in the country. For the upper-classes, it is often a first language. All university courses are taught in English. Nearly all billboards are in English. English pervades the social sphere, it is utterly commonplace for tv shows, movies and songs to switch between hindi and english from one sentence to another, even mixing words together in the same sentence. Hindi faces cultural resistance, being seen as a northern language. English has colonial overtones, but Britain is gone which makes English more palatable than Hindi in some areas.

      The fact that the signs are in english is unremarkable, especially given that education is highly correlated with progressive political views. That s.petry thinks it is meaningful only proves his ignorance of the topic.

    34. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is because 'rape culture' is a feminist lie. If anything, more rape happen because of feminism values are being imported in India.

    35. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by xski · · Score: 1
      Dude, I seriously hope you're joking.

      "That's the way we've always done it" is a really bad reason to do, well, anything. In fact, its worse than bad, its no reason at all.

    36. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You're almost certainly talking to people who were born in America.

      That's rather odd. Considering I'm not in America. And I was only counting those who I knew the country of birth of.

      When you make up huge backstories based on your ignorance, there's no point in me saying anything. You infer all sorts of things nobody ever said.

      I haven't implied anything about experiencing "inferior" or "oppressive" cultures.

      Really?

      Dude, only westerners, especially Americans, can have the gall to simplemindedly dismiss thousands of years of culture as "inferior" and "oppressive". Why don't you actually try talking to the people in that culture to find out what they think?

      Because that appears to be *exactly* what you are saying.

      You're glibly assuming your own culture is superior without even trying to talk to or understand the people, both men and women, that have lived in a constantly evolving multi thousand year culture. Just hand waving away such a rich history without truly understanding it is the height of arrogance.

      What culture is "mine"? You are so sure that I think it's superior and I have no understanding, but you have guessed wrongly multiple times what my culture is.

      The only arrogant jackasss here is you.

      Oh, and you forgot to answer the questions about you. Where are you, and where were you born? Or is your experience irrelevant to insulting others experiences?

    37. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by dskoll · · Score: 1

      India was lucky it was the British who colonized them. Ex-British colonies have tended to fare far, far better than ex-French, ex-Belgian, ex-German, ex-Spanish, etc. colonies.

    38. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by dskoll · · Score: 1

      more rape happen because of feminism values are being imported in India.

      And there, ladies and gentlemen, is the problem. Raving fools who gibber absolute nonsense like the above are the ones who devalue women and make sexual violence against them acceptable.

    39. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by dskoll · · Score: 1

      I've spoken to lots of Indian women who absolutely detest the misogyny rampant in India. They've experienced it first-hand and should know what it's like.

      I'm not saying there's no misogyny here in Canada or in the US... of course there is. But in terms of absolute public safety and equality of opportunity, women here are far better off than in India.

    40. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by dskoll · · Score: 1

      f women were all so unhappy society wouldn't be able to exist. Eastern cultures value interdependence and harmony. If 50% of your population is literally suffering then the system doesn't fracking work.

      You are wrong. I suggest you read "Cruel and Usual Punishment" by Nonie Darwish. That explains the hellish combination of brutality, fear and indoctrination in parts of the Islamic world that perpetuates the oppression of women and causes untold misery to families.

      Yes, the system "doesn't fracking work." Unfortunately, when the system is controlled by powerful people who are willing to use extreme violence to force people to do what they want, non-fracking-working systems can persist for centuries.

    41. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If anything, more rape happen because of feminism values are being imported in India.

      Yup. If women would just accept their place in society, men wouldn't have to teach them a lesson by raping them.

    42. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sexual violence made against women is acceptable to the same level of acceptable sexual violence made against men. You see, I was sold equity and I expect no less then equity. As long as all these ideologies only care about women's privileges I wont care about any of that non-sense. If sexual violence has to be eradicated it has to be from everyone disregard for sex.

    43. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Who is talking about India? You talk about how something that has been part of a culture for thousands of years can't be wrong. Slavery HAS been part of "Western" culture for thousands of years, so I guess abolishing it was an atrocity.

      We have to remember our cultural heritage! What was good 2000 years ago can't be bad today!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    44. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by dskoll · · Score: 1

      I call bullshit. Yes, sexual violence against anyone is wrong. I'm not disagreeing. But feminism is about equality for women; it's not about oppressing men.

      Feminists do tend to preoccupy themselves with women's issues because that's their mandate. Traditionally, men have been in positions of power and traditionally women have been less powerful.

      Finally, I call BS on your implication that sexual violence against men is anywhere near as widespread as sexual violence against women. I also call BS on your implication that "feminist culture" is "responsible" for "more rape".

    45. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If anything, more rape happen because of feminism values are being imported in India.

      Yup. If women would just accept their place in society, men wouldn't have to teach them a lesson by raping them.

      Such are the teaching of feminism; "If men were to accept there place the world would be a better place for feminists".

      Eventually you will grow out of these politically correct ideologies. One day you will see that women are as violent and as capable of rape then any men. And when you do, the hatred of men for political gain wouldn't even bother you because you will have become hope-free. Our civilisation is going nowhere and the earth is dying anyway.

    46. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      "So what"? The argument that a culture is utterly dominated and tilted against women and ONLY women yet somehow still manages to end over backwards for feminist protesters to the point of keeping raping men legal is ludicrous.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    47. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by sonicmerlin · · Score: 1

      Oh my god. Islamic nations are not the same as Japanese is not the same as Korean is not the same as India. In fact India has had a long and tumultuous history of dealing with Islamic invaders who slaughtered their leaders and people.

      You haven't even spoken to any of these people. You sit at home in front of your computer, isolated from the rest of the world's cultures, with not a clue as to how these societies actually work. It's so easy for Americans or Europeans to dismiss other societies as inferior, oppressive, ruled by violence. These words are so obscene and heavy, filled with the worst kind of accusations. You've put yourself on this absurd pedestal of superiority.

      You honestly think billions of people, hundreds of millions of families, are carrying on lives where half the population is living in utter fear and misery? That they feel scared, helpless, controlled, etc.? Do you have a clue what you're trying to say? How could these extremely communal societies that emphasize harmony function like that for thousands of years? How does that jive with studies like this that show women feel less safe in developed countries: http://www.gallup.com/poll/155...

      How can you make proclamations without at least interacting with these cultures?

    48. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by sonicmerlin · · Score: 1

      I'm not the one claiming a multi thousand year culture is inferior and oppressive. You think pointing out that Americans have the arrogance to dismiss other societies as cesspools without knowing a god awful thing about those people, is somehow painting them as "inferior"?

      What culture is yours, then, Marc? Because I'm American, born and raised here, but I've spent a lot of time travelling to different countries and living with people there. I've met a lot of different people from different societies with completely different value systems, some that I didn't agree with- but I learned to open my eyes and realize I couldn't be an arrogant douchebag and dismiss their way of life as "oppressive" and "violent" without trying to understand who they were and why they were.

    49. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      I saw the signs women were holding during their rallies in India. Signs were in English...

      That's in no way remarkable. In fact, it's to be expected, given that

      Hindi in the Devanagari script is the official language of the Union. English is an additional co-official language for Government work.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    50. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You are still asserting I said lots of things I didn't say.

    51. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Dude, only westerners, especially Americans, can have the gall to simplemindedly dismiss thousands of years of culture as "inferior" and "oppressive".

      Wrong. If there's one thing all cultures can agree on, it's that foreigners are barbarians.

      Also, thousands of years of culture tends to result being thousands of years out of date.

      Why don't you actually try talking to the people in that culture to find out what they think?

      Udwin did, and recorded the response. Apparently it can be summed up as "rape is awesome, and so is censorship". Which is both monstrous and oppressive.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    52. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      That's right, the government at the time

    53. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by William+Baric · · Score: 1

      And you are the perfect example of asshole who try to make believe men are victims of sexual assault by women in order to blame women for something.

    54. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by KamikazeSquid · · Score: 1

      Do you have an actual citation for that?

    55. Re:Who would have guessed male dominance? by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1
      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
  10. Government Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's cute how governments forget this, but the commonly accepted definition of government is something like "group of people that control the monopoly on violence within a given region". Demanding a worldwide ban on anything is tantamount to claiming you are allowed to inflict violence with impunity anywhere in the world. When the US does it, it's almost disgustingly true lately, but for the most part it's just delusional. I just wish people would remember, without force there is no law. That is why there is no "international law", no one entity has a monopoly on violence world wide.

    1. Re:Government Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      coughCIAcoughcough

  11. Yeah, That's Not Going To Work, India by Greyfox · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hopefully you have a "Plan B." One would think, ideally, one of your plans would be to not rape people. I mean, just throwing that out there. After, I dunno, the third or forth news story I was all like "Wow, they're really raping a lot of people in India all of a sudden. Did one of our fraternities start outsourcing or something?" And you guys do know that raping people is bad, right? I mean, based on your reaction to this movie, it does seem like you're aware of that. So maybe try not raping people for a while, see how that goes for you.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Yeah, That's Not Going To Work, India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefully you have a "Plan B." One would think, ideally, one of your plans would be to not rape people. I mean, just throwing that out there. After, I dunno, the third or forth news story I was all like "Wow, they're really raping a lot of people in India all of a sudden. Did one of our fraternities start outsourcing or something?" And you guys do know that raping people is bad, right? I mean, based on your reaction to this movie, it does seem like you're aware of that. So maybe try not raping people for a while, see how that goes for you.

      The irony here is that India is not raping a whole lot more people all of a sudden. Rape is an endemic problem in every society. Rape is about domination and subjugation. Which is a very male thing. Not a national, regional, religional thing. A male thing. Especially an alpha male thing. The "big swinging dick", if you will.

      The irony here is that India, a country that has viciously perpetrated a male dominated society, now finds itself being forced to "introspect". Imagine that. Golly gee! This is what every city and country needs to do, right? Except, now, besides Indian being a land of snake charmers, elephants, and call centers, and all the stereotypes thereof, it is now also the caricature of rape.

      This is not to deny the real issue. But the over-simplified generalization that everyone is going to draw is all the stuff you are going to read and hear about.

      Lovely, that.

    2. Re:Yeah, That's Not Going To Work, India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a problem, but it's also clearly worse in some regions. One of those regions is india.

  12. Full documentary on Youtube: here is the link by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    BBC Full Documentary- 'India's Daughter' on Nirbhaya Delhi Gang Rap | Jyoti singh | HD | Banned

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxkMzBqjgw8

    1. Re:Full documentary on Youtube: here is the link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...with 12 yellow rectangles signifying 12 ad breaks... no, I'll find it elsewhere.

    2. Re:Full documentary on Youtube: here is the link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      download an mp4 with no commercials:
      youtube-dl -f 18 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxkMzBqjgw8

  13. Derivative work by tepples · · Score: 2

    Perhaps "the cooperation of every government in the world" shall take the form of the Berne Convention. If the video contains anything copyrighted by the Indian government or by a corporation friendly to the Indian government, then anyone hosting the video is liable for copyright infringement. Not all countries recognize fair use to the same extent.

    1. Re:Derivative work by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      If the video contains anything copyrighted by the Indian government or by a corporation friendly to the Indian government, then anyone hosting the video is liable for copyright infringement. Not all countries recognize fair use to the same extent.

      I always wanted to copyright my name, do something outrageous, and then sue all the media that runs a story on it.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Derivative work by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      This. Because it's been shown to work so very well as to cause any and all torrents of copyrighted material to disappear instantly and without a trace, along with any copies of said material already housed on various storage media wherever they might be found, scattered all around the planet. *nods sagely*

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    3. Re:Derivative work by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but news have some backdoor in Berne. I think there was even a verdict lately (but don't remember what country it was) that said that you can't take down news with claims of copyright.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Derivative work by tepples · · Score: 2

      Even if copyright enforcement doesn't completely stop the spread of a work among the technological elite, it still chills awareness among the general public. For a lot of people, if it's not on Netflix and it's been repeatedly taken down from YouTube, it doesn't exist. Major news media are unlikely to report on it positively, as their parent companies also own movie studios and don't want to appear to condone copyright infringement.

    5. Re:Derivative work by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      You reckon that Bollywood is going to send lawyers to Outback Fucking Nowhere to try to win a case against each and every one of us? Ehhh - I'll take my chances.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    6. Re:Derivative work by tepples · · Score: 1

      If Bollywood isn't owned by Hollywood yet, that'd surprise me.

  14. It's on youtube by walterbyrd · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is the link.

    BBC Full Documentary- 'India's Daughter' on Nirbhaya Delhi Gang Rap | Jyoti singh | HD | Banned

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxkMzBqjgw8

    1. Re:It's on youtube by amiga3D · · Score: 2

      torrent link to a 720p file

      http://kickass.to/storyville-2...

    2. Re:It's on youtube by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love you guys. :)

    3. Re:It's on youtube by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I'm seeding this torrent and I have noticed that over half the peers connected to me are indicated as being from India.

    4. Re:It's on youtube by PJ6 · · Score: 1

      Here is the link.

      BBC Full Documentary- 'India's Daughter' on Nirbhaya Delhi Gang Rap | Jyoti singh | HD | Banned

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxkMzBqjgw8

      I got through 10 seconds, then page the refreshed and it was blocked from my region (US) on copyright grounds.

      Really, what's the point of that?

  15. Will watch by moondo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    An issue that I never cared about suddenly became interesting. Thanks Indian government for stimulating my interest.
    And thank you to the people who posted links here.

    1. Re:Will watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am quite sure that the Indian government at large is tossing and turning in its sleep that moondo is suddenly interested in the topic.

      Get over yourself, you tosspot.

    2. Re:Will watch by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Am quite sure that the Indian government at large is tossing and turning in its sleep that moondo and the many, many users with Indian IP addresses I see getting this torrent that I'm seeding are suddenly interested in the topic.

      TFTFY.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  16. Sometimes it takes embarrasement to effect change by JoeyRox · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The rapist's comments in the documentary are pretty shocking - he blames the victim for the rape, for being out at 9PM rather than at home doing house chores. I suspect this perspective isn't unique to this one man and thus the government considers it an embarrassing reflection on the nation as a whole. Maybe that's a good thing.

  17. Pot vs Kettle by dbIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It was illegal to do that in India a few year before it was illegal for you guys to keep slaves - you should have thought about that before you played the "backwards savages" card.
    The current situation is based on current problems that can exist in places other than India (or toga parties in the USA).

  18. another ban in the works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fifty shades of grey might also be banned. it is currently being 'viewed' by a larger committee, which is going to decide whether this film should be banned.

  19. The new catholic church. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is the Indian government becoming the new catholic church? Louis CK demonstrated how the purpose of raping little boys was so the priests could shit out purity bricks so they could make more bibles. In India they rape women so they can make chakra blocks. No crown chakras here though, it's all down in the root and sacral chakras you fiends.

    Karma will get to them.

    1. Re:The new catholic church. by MobSwatter · · Score: 1

      Any religion that "forgives" creates a "system" for people to abuse and teaches acceptance that they are screwed up people. Mason's had the idea of making better people, but the people in this country chose the easy path and is why we have the problems we have now. If you don't like what you see in India, just know that they are already here and will eventually have influence. Interesting thing to see in the US is if you talk to a person that moved here from another country, they still refer to it as their country. Where does that put the US?

    2. Re:The new catholic church. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's my fucking world you fascist nationalist. It's mine and everyone else's too. Not your fucking company and not your fucking government. lol.

      At the end of time, all evil is the result of man, not men, but humans. We all have a golden view of the self, evolution has made us like that, you always think you are right, that your perspective is best. Everyone is wrong as long as bad things are happening.

      We like to think we're so intelligent. We aren't. We can't even share things properly (loving each other and giving up the vices of greed, lust and pride), prevent ourselves from murdering.

      Now I've got a terrible case of foot and mouth disease to go cure.

  20. Re:Sometimes it takes embarrasement to effect chan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The comments he makes will make any sane male want to beat this scumbag to a bloody pulp no longer resembling a human being. The fact that he can say this with a straight face and that others, many others, probably agree with him is just horrid. I can't think of many more shit-holes worse than India, only the Caliphate would be categorically worse, but I'm sure there are some that come close. This kind of attitude defiles all the values I was brought up to uphold. It is beyond sickening. On one hand it is not my place to tell them how to run their shit-hole, but on another if they try to port this kind of bullshit to a land where I live, there will be hell to pay. Fuck this shit, it has no place in my world.

  21. Not Gonna Happen In Modi's Life or Any Other's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The act of Rape is central to the Culture of India.

    Outlaw Rape is to Outlaw India.

    In India Rape cures Menopause.

    In Indie Rape cures HIV infections.

    In India Rape bestows Power through cum to the Victum.

    Modi is for Rape and Rape is for Rape.

    Just cannot separate them .

    Ha ha

    1. Re:Not Gonna Happen In Modi's Life or Any Other's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Religion is the essence of culture and culture is the dress of religion." Ergo, RAPE is the essence of Desi and Desi is the dress of RAPE.

      Rape is a sacrament for some sort of deity there. After all, stone penises and stone vaginas abound there, eh?

      It almost makes one desire for an asteroid just large enough to strike just the right spot of the Indian Ocean. Wash that subcontinent of its depravity. Wash up and out the Indo-Gangetic Plain. The sharks will turn away in disgust.

  22. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  23. Re:Sometimes it takes embarrasement to effect chan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the comment got your panties in a bunch? the crime was worse than the comments.

    Had the criminal said "the right things", hopefully you wouldn't be forgiving them.

  24. Ah...BBC..! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am from India and have been regularly following BBC for the last 20 years or so. What I know about them is that they won't miss a chance to report any negative news about India no matter how irrelevant or unimportant those might be. News about ridiculous Hindu rituals, road mishaps, building collapses in India frequently make to their world news page with obligatory annotations like majority of Indian population is illiterate, India has a very poor track record of road safety, most Indians don't have access to basic amenities and on. I am not saying those are untrue but this basically exposes that they haven't got over their colonial hangover yet; they just cannot accept an independent India; they want to present India as a country of snake-charmers to the world.
    The Delhi incident just gave them an opportunity to reinforce their stereotypes associated with India. In this documentary, they obviously want to present India as a male dominated society where rape is viewed as somewhat justifiable to an extent.

    1. Re:Ah...BBC..! by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      To play along with your narrative then let me just say that trying to ban this documentary plays right into the hands of the people trying to put India into a negative light. The proper response would be to say that those guys were tried and convicted and that the government is attempting to fix attitudes and put an end to this type of behavior. Banning the documentary sends the message that instead of fixing the problem it's getting swept under the rug. Honestly from what I've read a lot of progress has been made and I do applaud this but trying to ban this documentary is not only futile but harmful as well.

    2. Re:Ah...BBC..! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      News about ridiculous Hindu rituals, road mishaps, building collapses in India frequently make to their world news page with obligatory annotations like majority of Indian population is illiterate, India has a very poor track record of road safety, most Indians don't have access to basic amenities and on. I am not saying those are untrue....

      All these horrible things are true, but the BBC shouldn't say them? Why, exactly?

    3. Re:Ah...BBC..! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please die in a fire

    4. Re:Ah...BBC..! by red+crab · · Score: 1

      Same AC who posted the above, the BBC does have a right to report those; I am talking of its focus on those topics and the tone in which these events are reported. Try reading BBC's reporting on India, you couldn’t miss the irony and sarcasm, and that is only specific to India.

    5. Re:Ah...BBC..! by red+crab · · Score: 1

      And what is the point in letting this pervert voice his opinion on TV; one who had showed no remorse during the trial too. Delhi rape was a very unfortunate incident, it has made a deep imprint in collective conscience of Indian society. Bringing it up again in this manner is painful; to be very precise. If the documentary's purpose was only to show if anything has improved after this incident, it was fine. Fine that they interviewed the policemen, the lawyers and victim's family, but why should this remorseless sadomasochist put his views on TV? There is a limit up to where Press freedom should be allowed and sadly its only the Government who can stop the Press. I would generally detest the former's interference in latter's affairs but sadly sometimes its the latter that is deviant as in this case; and it does need to be reined upon (For the record, i am the OP AC).

    6. Re:Ah...BBC..! by ultranova · · Score: 1

      building collapses in India frequently make to their world news page

      ...And you see this primarily as an image problem?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    7. Re:Ah...BBC..! by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I see your point about giving bad people a venue to air their views. As horrid as hearing that was I feel it's important for everyone to understand why things like this happen. It's this viewpoint that women are possessions (however precious) that must be changed. It's the idea that because a woman doesn't conform to some idea or standard that she is nothing and can be used, killed and tossed to the side of the road that is dangerous. A lot of times people who may think that way, when they see someone like this mouthing the same viewpoint they hold they will see how it looks and hear how it sounds. Many times it will make them think on these ideas and realize how wrong it is. Without the dialogue you can't really get results and ultimately without an open forum for expression of ideas you can't really have freedom. Ultimately I believe you can count on people watching this to be revolted just as you and I were. I looked at the peer list on the torrent for this film and I notice that over half the peers I see there are from India. I hope that this film helps to open eyes. Ultimately before a wound can heal it has to be cleaned and that process is usually very painful. So sad to see such a bright and wonderful woman snuffed out of existence. Having a daughter of my own and 4 grand daughters I hope that this kind of evil will one day be eradicated.

    8. Re:Ah...BBC..! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't imagine that we in our country would watch foreign documentaries about our biggest criminals on television. As if India is not big enough to gather stuff to fill its media in own country.

  25. Re:Sometimes it takes embarrasement to effect chan by grep+-v+'.*'+* · · Score: 4, Informative

    The rapist's comments in the documentary are pretty shocking... I suspect this perspective isn't unique to this one man and thus the government considers it an embarrassing reflection on the nation as a whole.

    I just finished watching it (after DLing in case it disappears.) I find hints of "honor" and what I've heard about the Middle East and about Islam appearing as well.

    a) woman should always be accompanied by members of their family when outside (in public), and
    b) need to cover themselves so that strangers won't lose control of their facilities (presumably by their penis.)

    Are men so sexually animistic that they can't control themselves after seeing a boob? In this case it seems like the guys were out for an opportunistic "good time" and wanted to teach her a lesson for resisting.

    Maybe the idea is that teenagers might be lacking in self-control and so you need to help them along. Completely blaming women and hiding them away does not solve the problem though. But maybe that is the exact procedure to keep the male leaders (family, town, precinct, area, state) in control.

    Perp:
    "A decent girl won't roam around at 9 o'clock at night."
    "A girl is far more responsible for a rape than a boy."
    So: It's not my fault, she made me do it to her.

    Lawyers:
    "A woman means I immediately put the sex in his eyes."
    "A female is just like a flower .. [that] always needs protection."
    "In our society, we never allow our girls to come out from the house after 6:30 or 7:30 or 8:30 in the evening with any unknown person" "If very important, she should go outside BUT she should go with a [parental guardian]"
    "The women are more precious than ... a diamond. It is up to you how you want to keep that diamond in your hand."
    "If my daughter/sister engaged in pre-marital activities, and disgraced herself and allowed herself to lose face and character by doing such things, I would most certainly take this [person] to my farmhouse, and in front of my entire family I would put petrol on her and set her alight."
    So: if you let your women out at night unaccompanied, they get what you deserve. And it almost sounds like they're living with wild animals roaming the streets. Well, maybe they (and we) are. Self-control, anyone?

    Seems like there's also a hook to "terrorism" and "conforming to society will protect you" here, but I just can't place my finger on it quite yet. "Be somewhat afraid of the general population because they might not be civilized like you are" comes to mind.

    --
    If the universe is someone's simulation -- does that mean the stars are just stuck pixels?
  26. mixed success??? by fustakrakich · · Score: 0

    Why the fuck is it getting any success? When the hell are we going to have the guts to tell all the censors to go fuck themselves?

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re: mixed success??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flamebait? So, the moderators are pro-censorship? Should I be surprised?

  27. Rape in India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear India, quit acting like a Muslim country & air your dirty laundry. Rape is a crime and nothing will change if you pretend it isn't happening.

  28. Re:Just to keep things in perspective: by HiThereImBob · · Score: 2

    and want safe streets for themselves and their women

    Surely you see the irony to referring to women as possessions while ranting about the plight of women.

  29. Re:Sometimes it takes embarrasement to effect chan by penguinoid · · Score: 1

    When the comment basically amounts to "I'm not sorry and I'd do it again and encourage others to do likewise"...

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  30. India is murder on women by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm of Indian descent. I used to live there, and frequently visit. I speak one of the main languages. I'm well aware of their culture.

    India is missing 50,000,000 girls. No typo, that's FIFTY MILLION. If you don't believe misogyny is a fundamental part of the national fabric, why don't you tell me WTF happened to these girls?

    Here's another way to look at things:

    Chance of being killed in Syrian Civil War: 1 in 300
    Chance of dying before five years of age if you're a girl in India: 1 in 20

    No opinions, those are numbers. If you doubt them, research the latest Indian census, World Bank data on child mortality, wartime data from the Human Rights Data Analysis Group, among many many others.

    Is the picture becoming clearer?

    1. Re:India is murder on women by tshawkins · · Score: 1, Informative

      We should also remember this was not just a rape, it was a horrific gang rape and assult. Aside from the trauma of the rape itself, this poor woman was beaten with an iron bar and then raped with that bar to the point where parts of her intestines where pulled outside of her body. This would have been a horiffic event in any country , not just india. Also dont forget this completly innocent woman died of these nighmare injuries she sustained.

      That is why so many people feel sickend by this act.

    2. Re:India is murder on women by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So whats the chance of dying as boy before 5? 1/25?

    3. Re:India is murder on women by nedlohs · · Score: 2

      The under-five mortality rate in India is 53 per 1000. In other worlds 1 in 20. Which of course means you've added "if you're a girl" for no reason other than to try and imply something that is isn't true.

      Yes the child mortality rate in India is high, but it is not gender specific as you are trying to imply. Which is the antithesis of "no opinions, those are numbers".

    4. Re:India is murder on women by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Yes the child mortality rate in India is high, but it is not gender specific as you are trying to imply.

      Yes it is. According to the 2011 census, For every 1000 boys 6 and under, there are only 919 girls. If you don't think that is proof of gender specific child mortality, where do you think those 81 other girls are?

      In 2011, the population was nearly 1.2B. The birthrate was nearly 21/1000. That's over 2 million girls "missing" in 2011 alone and that's with infant mortality and birth rate that's been declining for well over a decade. The AC's estimate of 50 million missing girls seems entirely plausible.

    5. Re:India is murder on women by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      It's clearly not gender specific unless the poster lied about the girl's rate and gave a lower number than it actually is - which would seem a rather stupid thing to do when trying to claim it is high.

      The under five mortality rate is just a statistic, maybe it's missing a bunch of people - in which case you argue that you don't present the figure and pretend it's gender specific.

      Abortions would be one obvious answer for those missing girls. That's clearly not a mortality since there was never a person in the first place. But that's completely irrelevant since I didn't take issue with that claim. I took issue with presenting a non-gender specific statistics and taking on a gender to mislead the reader into thinking the statistic is gender specific.

    6. Re:India is murder on women by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Abortions would be one obvious answer for those missing girls.

      Sex selective abortions have been illegal since 2002. I'm sure that hasn't stopped them, but that doesn't make them OK.

      > But that's completely irrelevant since I didn't take issue with that claim.

      Ok, I get it. Aspergers-indeuced nitpick rather than anything meaningful. You can learn to recognize that in yourself if you work at it.

    7. Re:India is murder on women by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter if they are OK or not they are not deaths and do not register in the under five mortality rates - you know the statistic that was used as evidence for something it clearly doesn't show.

      I don't need to recognize that at all or work on it. I was very specific about what I was referring to. But sure resort to the personal attacks when the arguments fail I guess.

    8. Re:India is murder on women by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called "sex-selection abortion". Indians select the sex to get boys. They got boys, but who will the boys marry? The sex-selection abortion approach has created a rape culture. Women in India are not valued, before birth, after birth, or period. The entire society is degenerate.

      And this is where a lot of H-1Bs come from. Disgusting. We need to end the H-1B and end the practice of importing rapists into the US.

  31. Re:Just to keep things in perspective: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... outside of West, corruption is the /norm/.

    It's maybe not normal, but corruption is frequent inside the West. It's just the CEO knows a friend of a friend of a politician, instead of dealing directly with the politician. So it's impossible to see the secret kickbacks amongst the honest deals.

  32. Disproportional view of a country by LostMonk · · Score: 2

    To be fair, this kind of publicity creates hugely disproportional view of a country.
    I see this all the time on local news sites in Israel. Since 2012, rape case from India get a front page mention -- and absolutely no other kind of news from India! For the past 2 years the average reader, who has no business in India and knows nothing about it, is learning a single fact about a place that holds ~16% of all people -- women are getting raped there.
    Will this documentary help in the long run? who can tell (not me).

    1. Re:Disproportional view of a country by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I see this all the time on local news sites in Israel.

      Yeah, you should see what the news says about Israel.

      see this all the time on local news sites in Israel. Since 2012, rape case from India get a front page mention -- and absolutely no other kind of news from India!

      So, is there any other kind of news from India? Is there anything worth mentioning in comparison to the ongoing rape? Answer, no. It all pales by comparison. Nothing else happening in India is vaguely as interesting as how rapey they are, just like nothing more interesting than the ongoing Third Reich-esque treatment of Palestinians is ongoing.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  33. Re:Sometimes it takes embarrasement to effect chan by ChilyWily · · Score: 1

    Embarrassing perhaps... in my humble opinion, this is PR pure and simple. The real question is why focus on PR instead of actually fixing the cultural issues that make rape okay in India? Rape is rape - embarrassment or not.

  34. Re:Just to keep things in perspective: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And their parents! Oh... did I just refer to parents as possessions???

    NO I didn't. You are a retard.

  35. Re:Sometimes it takes embarrasement to effect chan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are men so sexually animistic that they can't control themselves after seeing a boob?

    They need more porn in India, and the other similar areas. Self control is easier with adjusted value of gratification and lots of examples of mutually enjoyable, consented event which in turn adjust the social norms of the viewer (as in "don't be dick about satisfying your partner") and the bring out the benefits of the "long game". After all, tantra is marketed as a Indian product.
      Also nationwide, easily accessible television would play its part in harmonizing culture like it did in the US and here in Europe some time ago. This has not occurred in these areas of question yet.

  36. "raising questions ..." by nmpg · · Score: 1

    ".. about the effectiveness of a ban in the Information Age." What questions? You can't do it. Period. No need to torrent, Google got you covered, here it is.

  37. India going down the drain? by einar.petersen · · Score: 1

    I say. It seems India is taking a step down the road to nothing less than media dictatorship of the entire world in what will be a futile and embarrasing attempt at hampering free speech. Could someone please step up and tell these Indian politicians grow up and own up to the problems that clearly seem to exist rather than trying to sweep em under the rug

    --
    MS, ALS, Aphasia ? http://globability.org - Me http://einarpetersen.com
  38. I know about two by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    I was in Pune when a report of a rape of an Australian girl in New Dehli came through. Basically they dragged her into a bus and a mob raped her on the bus while they drove around the city, they threw her out at a hospital but she died from her injuries.

    A week later another one happened to an American girl, a photographer who was with a guide. They beat up the guide and tied him up while 5 raped her over two days in a run down factory in Mumbai. What was pretty fucked up is that somehow the police made out that it was her fault...somehow. The police are corrupt and they have automatic weapons.

    A quizzed some of my Indian colleagues and they hated the rapists and were ashamed that such a thing happened, who wouldn't? So when I walked around the city and found myself in some of the rougher parts of town I got a real idea of why. So many people, everywhere is a mass of annonimity. When I realised where I was and that I was looking a a phone to navigate I realised that I was a real target for being robbed. I put the phone away, held my head high and thought 'c'mon sisterfuckers'. I'm 200lbs and have been training a variety of martial arts for 20years plus - but I knew that some of these guys were prepared to have a go - even if they could tell some of them would be hospitalised. Being street smart in your own country is nothing compared to being street smart on Indian streets but it helps. The little people sleep in the rain and it's no place for a western woman who is a gora.

    I did eventually get robbed, during Ganesha by two kids who hit me with a whip on the leg, dived for my pockets and grabbed the cash I had there - even waved it in my face - I let them go saying 'ok ok - you got me - now fuck off'. Everyone is trying to make a buck and it's not that Indian men are all rapists but I think the poor have to be master opportunists to survive and some of them are rapists.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    1. Re:I know about two by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Everyone is trying to make a buck and it's not that Indian men are all rapists but I think the poor have to be master opportunists to survive and some of them are rapists.

      When the government insists that women are at fault for their own rapes, then there is provably an actual culture of rape. Period, the end. When these things can happen in public and no one gets in trouble, there is a culture of rape.

      The fact that a small minority of Indians are protesting against it doesn't change the fact that they live in a culture which protects and even encourages rape.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:I know about two by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      When the government insists that women are at fault for their own rapes, then there is provably an actual culture of rape. Period, the end.

      Oh, there is no doubt about that however it's not the only problem that exists there. For a moment imagine driving on the roads of a country where the people can learn to drive but they can't read the road rules. Our perception of India is based on our perception of our own countries where as it should be based on barely controlled chaos that for some strange reason, works.

      You do anything you would do in any western country but it's three times bigger than America's populace and still a democracy. Wonderful and dangerous at the same time. I wouldn't say uncivilised but it is wild.

      Islam has the same issues with womens rights and rape, how can we fix it? The men of those cultures have to fix it the same way western cultures had to deal with domestic violence and rape in the 1970s. I'll also point out that the case of the Australian girl is different from the one mentioned in this story.

      When these things can happen in public and no one gets in trouble, there is a culture of rape.

      The fact that a small minority of Indians are protesting against it doesn't change the fact that they live in a culture which protects and even encourages rape.

      You're right, I agree and I think a lot of *educated* Indian men would agree - but they are in the minority. But what do you want the culture to do - get a lynch mob and tear the rapists apart? It already happens to people in vehicle accidents and you will find dealing with the police there a rather unpleasant experience. Of which I can tell you, from experience, is something you would rather avoid as it is very corrupt, more opportunists only this time with automatic weapons.

      Very bad business.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    3. Re:I know about two by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      But what do you want the culture to do - get a lynch mob and tear the rapists apart?

      Nope. Violence is the problem, not the solution.

      There isn't one solution. But every decision you make shapes the world, and the beginning is to be conscious of that.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:I know about two by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Nope. Violence is the problem, not the solution.

      Exactly!

      There isn't one solution. But every decision you make shapes the world, and the beginning is to be conscious of that.

      Which is why the best thing we can do to help is probably just watch the doc and be aware of the situation so we can apply pressure to the Indian government to address the issues.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  39. Re:Sometimes it takes embarrasement to effect chan by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Are men so sexually animistic that they can't control themselves after seeing a boob?

    Men from cultures which have not expected them to control themselves haven't learn to control themselves, on average. Which is why we need to bring pressure to bear upon them.

    Of course, we still have rape in the west. We have the very same sentiments here, just less of them. Let's worry about our own conduct, too and not pat ourselves on the back too much for not being like them.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  40. Re:Just to keep things in perspective: by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    It's maybe not normal, but corruption is frequent inside the West. It's just the CEO knows a friend of a friend of a politician, instead of dealing directly with the politician. So it's impossible to see the secret kickbacks amongst the honest deals.

    A lot of it is right out in the open, like campaign contributions. Then people just ignore it.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  41. Re:Just to keep things in perspective: by jbssm · · Score: 1

    While the Government of India may be trying to ban it and the some conservative rednecks of the country hold crazy views, it seems that the majority doesn't..
    It is the same Indians that are mass-protesting in response to rapes, to corruption, and want safe streets for themselves and their women: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]

    I believe your are mixing the majority with the vocal minority, like we do so many times about so many issues.

  42. um.. when did anyone on this thread ever say by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    that the US _wasn't_ a bunch of backwards savages. See, this is a common mistake people make. Assuming because someone takes the moral high ground that they're not willing to admit their faults. As an American let me step in here to say we're just as awful, possibly worse. The stuff we did (and continue to do) to the Middle East and South America (I hear we're back to trying to destabilize Venezuela) makes this crap look like small potatoes. And don't forget our last Vice President brought back torture as a legitimate tool for information gathering.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:um.. when did anyone on this thread ever say by dbIII · · Score: 1

      that the US _wasn't_ a bunch of backwards savages

      Neither was India despite some evil acts going on. Getting the point that it's not worth going back a couple of hundred years to explain why a bus driver today is an evil bastard?

    2. Re:um.. when did anyone on this thread ever say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You completely missed his position (likely due to his burying the key question in the title). He's saying the US and India are *both* a bunch of backwards savages. "Neither was India" doesn't address his position.

    3. Re:um.. when did anyone on this thread ever say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Torture is a legitimate tool for gathering information! It's the liberals that have their head in the sand, look at what those backwards College kids did at UCLA!!

      Link: http://www.ijreview.com/2015/03/260739-ucla-student-council-rejects-nomination/

  43. Re:Just to keep things in perspective: by nedlohs · · Score: 2

    To be a parent you must be a "parent of someone" it is a term that requires another party. To be a woman you are not a "woman of someone" there is no other party necessary. And hence the usage of "their" is completely different, and if you didn't know that you wouldn't be able to type through the drooling over the keyboard and hence you're being deceptive on purpose. Or maybe someone made an idiotic drool proof keyboard...

  44. Re:Just to keep things in perspective: by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1
    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  45. Re:Sometimes it takes embarrasement to effect chan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I just finished watching it (after DLing in case it disappears.) I find hints of "honor" and what I've heard about the Middle East and about Islam appearing as well."
    You seem to be surprised by that, I hate to break it to you, but it has been like that (to various degrees) in most parts in the world, for a very long time. The societal changes in the west is pretty much a first in the world, and extremely recent (women didn't have right to vote when my mother was born, In France), and not complete yet.

  46. Re:Just to keep things in perspective: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The level of corruption in the west has nothing to do with what it is in most part of the world. When is the last time you had to bribe someone ?

  47. In slightly related news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China takes pollution film offline
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/worl...

  48. That's trademark by tepples · · Score: 1

    I always wanted to copyright my name, do something outrageous, and then sue all the media that runs a story on it.

    I'm no lawyer, but I fail to see how that sort of case wouldn't be dismissed in summary judgment early on. The exclusive right in one's name is a trademark, not a copyright. It's an easy mistake to make, seeing as how the term "intellectual property" has caused people to confuse copyright and trademark. At least in my country, trademarks have a defense called "nominative fair use", which allows others to use a name freely in a work in ways that do not suggest endorsement of the work by the trademark's owner.

    1. Re:That's trademark by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      I think he was speaking figuratively. You took the parent post way too seriously.

  49. Anthropology by GerryHattrick · · Score: 1

    Any anthropologists around? IANaA, but my theory is that in cultures where testosterone-driven men (like us?) are not allowed to socialise nicely with girls of their own standard, and are shamed into avoiding masturbation or same-sex fun, there will be outbursts of plain primitive sexual aggression. India is hardly worst, if you consider what happens routinely in some Islamic countries.

  50. Re:Sometimes it takes embarrasement to effect chan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope he remembers his own advice to just lie back and don't resist if the other prisoners get ahold of him, let's see how well it works out. I heard stories about what they did to the ringleader before he committed suicide.

    http://www.cnn.com/2013/03/10/world/asia/india-rape-suspect-suicide/

  51. Typical misogynistic response by dskoll · · Score: 1

    Disgusting. Make out that the problem is the movie instead of Indian society's appalling misogyny and hatred of women.

    How about fixing your society first so that women are respected as human beings?

  52. Disturbing survey from Asia. by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    Nearly 25% of men in 6 countries admit raping a woman. 41% in Papua New Guinea.

    http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2013/09/daily-chart-7?fsrc=scn%2Ftw%2Fte%2Fbl%2Fed%2Ftoomuchofabadthing

  53. Watch "It's a Girl" documentary by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    http://www.itsagirlmovie.com/

    1. Re:Watch "It's a Girl" documentary by nedlohs · · Score: 3

      Why?

      How is that going to change that the under-five mortality rate is India is 1 in 20. And thus if it is 1 in 20 for girls then it must also be 1 in 20 for boys and thus there is no gender component or bias in under-five mortality which is clearly what the post was trying to imply. And no I don't count abortions as murders or put them in mortality rates - but I'm a godless moron headed for hell anyway :)

      That it sucks to be a girl in most of the world (by population) is irrelevant to the original claim. Which as far as I can tell was "girl children die at exactly the same rate as boy children in India" - since that's what the cited statistic says.

      If girl's do in fact die under age 5 more than boys, then surely there's a better statistic to cite rather than expecting to people to buy and watch a movie.

      I also love the "hance of being killed in Syrian Civil War" comparison when numbers for under five mortality in Syria are easily available where the poster for the Indian number from for an actual useful comparison - and yes I realize you are probably not the anonymous coward who was trying to lie about the numbers they knew didn't support their implication.

  54. You missed the point by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    India is not being criticized for having criminals - all nations have criminals.

    India's politicians are being criticized for trying to censor this movie.

  55. Women in India are often EXTREMELY hostile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It should be said that women in India are often EXTREMELY hostile and manipulative toward men.

    1. Re: Women in India are often EXTREMELY hostile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder why that is.

    2. Re:Women in India are often EXTREMELY hostile. by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      It should be said that women in India are often EXTREMELY hostile and manipulative toward men.

      I see. So, "the beatings will continue until morale improves", huh? Good luck with that!

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    3. Re:Women in India are often EXTREMELY hostile. by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

      It should be said that women in India are often EXTREMELY hostile and manipulative toward men.

      The justification of arseholes and one-bookians with dicks the whole world over. The real reason you hate women is fear and ignorance. Fear that you won't get laid (which is true while you hold those opinions for those reasons) and ignorance as to why you won't get laid (because you refuse to learn anything).

      Cue the tire cliches about how "women" only want men who are arseholes (then how come you don't get laid every hour?); they only want "providers" and push the evolutionary psychology line (and ignore a women's right to not become pregnant, which negates that theory); the pathetic truths are that you marginalized yourself with your confirmation bias, and, the caliphate/baptists are recruiting large numbers.

    4. Re:Women in India are often EXTREMELY hostile. by hucker75 · · Score: 0

      The whole feminist movement is a joke. They want to be treated equal, but only when it suits them.

    5. Re:Women in India are often EXTREMELY hostile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for this.

      I get a lot of news in my email inbox. And I don't always look at which site it's from before I click. Whenever it has to do with women and it's from Slashdot, I find that the comments make me cringe and want to hide away in a small room far away from the world. I'm really considering cutting Slashdot out of my life because of the misogyny, so each comment that fights against it means something.

    6. Re:Women in India are often EXTREMELY hostile. by hucker75 · · Score: 1

      To whoever moderated my comment, why assume someone with the opposite opinion to you is a troll? How childish.

    7. Re:Women in India are often EXTREMELY hostile. by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

      To whoever moderated my comment, why assume someone with the opposite opinion to you is a troll? How childish.

      Agreed. It should have been moderated flamebait. What Slashdot needs is an "extremely stupid" to cover the contextually bullshit posts like yours.

      There is a feminist movement? (i.e. a common agenda?)

      The Feminist movement" (this one bookian fantasy you have) is "all about" equality?

      The answer to all those questions - just as the answer to the question "are all men equal?" or "is equality possible?" - is no. Simple answers are for simpletons and serve only to justify the agenda of shockjocks and other scumbags.

      Any time I read "they" I can be fairly certain someone is selling a confirmation bias. Jokes are funny, group think is not - and it's always bullshit whether gender, racial, or cultural. Bullshit when "representatives" tell it. i.e. "we [insert bullshit group think] believe", and bullshit when their "opposition" tell it i.e. "the whole [insert bullshit group think] is....". Don't suffer from confirmation bias? Test it then by inserting Baptist, Republican, Greenie, Marxist, Greek, Men, Skaters, etc as the group think - then try finding any three of the them, interviewed seperately, who agree on any ten points (not that you won't find more than 10 points they don't agree on)

      The whole anti-feminist movement is bullshit they only want women to act [insert fantasy here] when it suits them

      Apropos of little - the synonym for simple is stupid, and evolution isn't horizontal

    8. Re:Women in India are often EXTREMELY hostile. by Larryish · · Score: 1

      Free and open discourse means hearing from those you don't agree with.

      Suck it up buttercup.

    9. Re:Women in India are often EXTREMELY hostile. by hucker75 · · Score: 1

      Stop standing up for the weaker stupider sex.

    10. Re:Women in India are often EXTREMELY hostile. by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

      Stop standing up for the weaker stupider sex.

      First you try and associate what I've written as being pro-"feminist", then you infere I'm a chauvanist - reality is clearly not a friend of yours. Sadly part of the price of evolution is knowing there are people like you every five metres on average. Stop being a dickhead - if you move that tiny sac to one side you might be able to see the world as it really is. No matter, if your "viewpoint" has any genetic basis it's destined to die out very soon. In the meantime keep humming that Cake song - they wrote it with you in mind.

      Don't take that the wrong way Chav.

    11. Re:Women in India are often EXTREMELY hostile. by hucker75 · · Score: 1

      No, me chauvanist, you feminist. Read properly dimwit.

  56. I've seen the piece by dixonpete · · Score: 1

    Seemed just like a normal, high quality BBC documentary about a society in transition.

    I have to say though it doesn't paint that society in a particularly good light. I sure wouldn't take a daughter with me for a visit to that country..

  57. Re:Sometimes it takes embarrasement to effect chan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > I find hints of "honor" and what I've heard about the Middle East and about Islam appearing as well.

    It isn't about the middle-east or islam. Bride-burning is a primarily hindu thing, for example. The concept of "honor" is pervasive in practically all under-developed societies. Honor killings are rampant in south america where they are called "crimes of passion." I personally know a woman from the Philippines who was raped as a teenager (by an altar boy giving her a ride back to her home from church) who was forced to marry him and have his children. 15 years later, after innumberable beatings he leaves her for dead in the street with her skull cracked open. The same priest who married her finally grants her an annulment. And she was not from a poor family, she attended one of the most prestigious universities in the country - Ateneo de Manila and had a white-collar office-job working in the customs department. This is what happens in all cultures that value women as property more than they value them as people.

  58. Re:Sometimes it takes embarrasement to effect chan by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

    The real question is why focus on PR instead of actually fixing the cultural issues that make rape okay in India?

    You focus on PR when you're a democratic politician (note the lower case 'd', I'm not talking a political party here) and you know perfectly well that the real problem will take three generations to fix. Talking about three generation long solutions doesn't get you reelected.

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  59. Urgent pls help by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    I am having one doubt about what is Sriesand Effect. Please do the needful and revert.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Urgent pls help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sensors indicate the presence of a Desi in the vicinity. UV scanning indicates high levels of tumeric on the fingers. Gas analysis indicates high levels urea and hormone markers of bovine origin.

      Hold it! HOLD IT!, just check the GPS. It's Edison, New Jersey, you idiot!

  60. Yellow Journalism!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it right on the media to interview some perverted rapist and present his views as views of the whole country?

  61. Tourism will suffer as a result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This whole mess will give the Research & Analysis Wing something to do. Obtain the identities of all those who watch the documentary and add them to the blacklist of those to be denied visas of any sort. Ontario MPP Jagmeet Singh has been denied entry into India due to his stances on human rights abuses. Once they find that nearly anyone who has seen the film are viable tourist candidates, they will have screwed their own tourism industry.

    Truth alone triumphs. Many people will be angry as a result.

    This message was brought to you be Karl Martell. EDUCATE YOURSELF.

  62. Proving Katherine Mayo right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem with the move is that it proves the racists right. When truth proves racists right, expect maximum outrage. Read Mother India by Katherine Mayo. She was a racist, but she was correct in her assumptions. That is the REAL piss-off!

  63. Re:Just to keep things in perspective: by quenda · · Score: 1

    It is the same Indians that are mass-protesting in response to rapes,

    And the same Indians who form lynch mobs, breaking the accused out of prison and dragging them down the street to their death?

    http://www.smh.com.au/world/wo...

    Although, that only seems to happen to racial minorities in Northern India.

  64. Viiewing Videos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'd think the Indian government, any sane governing body, would require that all citizens be required to watch this video ten times. What the hell is wrong with these people...? This isn't something to hide. Or hide from. It's a learning moment and it's about time they learned.

  65. Streisand was a woman by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

    Perhaps someone should to point out to the Indian Gov't that Barbara Streisand was a woman. ;)

  66. Re:Just to keep things in perspective: by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

    "Grammar Lesson" by Larry Niven. http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/t...

    Possessive pronouns have multiple meanings, depending on the context. People have to be bright enough to figure it out, so they don't make stupid mistakes. When it's even possible to figure out. "English is hard."

    Frederick Douglass did not own his former master.

    I was going to follow that statement with an example that illustrates the point, but I had already done it without realizing it.

    "English is hard."

    --
    There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
  67. Our 1st Amendment Trumps Your Ban by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure any attempt on your part to ban this or similar films will only make more people want to see them.

  68. India's Caste Culture is a Rape Culture by NewYork · · Score: 1

    India's Caste Culture is a Rape Culture
    http://www.thedailybeast.com/w...
    If I were Prime Minister of India, I'd give Licensed Pistols to all Dalits/Adivasis in India;
    http://wh.gov/ijtyM

  69. Psychopaths do not fear prosecution/punishment by NewYork · · Score: 1

    Psychopaths do not fear prosecution/punishment;
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/re...
    Caste system created millions of psychopaths in India;
    http://www.hrw.org/legacy/engl...
    What else do you expect when Upper caste Brahmin Jyoti singh PANDEY abused/exploited Lower caste Mukesh singh YADAV for over 2000 years?
    https://petitions.whitehouse.g...

  70. But at the same day by NewYork · · Score: 1

    "But at the same day, the news of gang-rape of a 10-year old Lower Caste Untouchable Dalit girl and who was burnt subsequently was tucked away in the inside pages devoting only five to ten lines" --Kabir, former Chief Justice of India
    http://m.timesofindia.com/indi...

    The family of the Delhi gang-rape Brahmin victim was given huge compensation by governments and various bodies.
    But what happened to the dalit girl? Did her family get anything?

  71. Upper Caste convict photos are not published by NewYork · · Score: 1

    In MUMBAI Upper Caste girl gang rape case, Muslim convict photos are published in media;
    In DELHI Upper Caste girl gang rape case, Lower Caste convict photos are published in media;
    But in DABRA Lower Caste Untouchable Dalit girl gang rape case, Upper Caste convict photos are NOT published in media;
    http://tehelka.com/violation-i...

  72. No justice to Lower caste Dalit girl victims by NewYork · · Score: 1

    When a Lower caste Untouchable Dalit girl was gang-raped by 12 Upper Caste men in DABRA, her father killed himself because Police refused to take his complaint;
    But when a Upper caste Brahmin girl was gang-raped by 6 Lower caste men in DELHI, Indian Prime Minister intervened, amended the Law and set up a Special Court to prosecute/punish the culprits;
    http://india.blogs.nytimes.com...

  73. So much hue and cry because by NewYork · · Score: 1

    So much hue and cry because Victim is Upper caste Brahmin girl and Culprit is Lower caste Yadav;
    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06...
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wik...
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wik...

  74. Those who fail to learn from history by NewYork · · Score: 1

    "Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it." --Santayana
    Take your Caste share of land and go build your own nation as per "Communal Award"?
    India's Caste Culture is a Rape Culture;
    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06...
    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07...

  75. India is a Civilisation of rapists by NewYork · · Score: 1
  76. I gave the point, try reading by s.petry · · Score: 1

    Subject says it all. Ignoring my point makes you one of the fools that perpetuate and amplify the problem.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  77. If you meet anybody from India ask him by NewYork · · Score: 1

    If you meet anybody from India ask him "What Is Your Caste?";
    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06...

  78. Re:Sometimes it takes embarrasement to effect chan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perp:
    "A decent girl won't roam around at 9 o'clock at night."
    "A girl is far more responsible for a rape than a boy."
    So: It's not my fault, she made me do it to her.

    Perhaps attitudes started to change if the Indian gays started to act similarly:
    Perp:
    "A decent man won't roam around at 9 o'clock at night."
    "A man is far more responsible for a rape than a man."
    So: It's not my fault, he made me do it to him.