Let's get rid of hunting, cars, pesticides and buildings first then, since all of those result in more bird deaths than wind power: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
And roasting birds? Seriously?
Come to think of it, roasted bird sounds good. Solar panels on every street corner, anyone?
Yes, I2P has a number of clients specifically made for it. Also, since the traffic stays inside the network, there's not the same issue as with Tor (that bittorrent basically ruins the outproxies).
That upside is also a downside, since it means you can't torrent traffic from regular sites, you have to stick to internal I2P torrents.
For one, the weight a CMS adds is compensated by all of the code that is already present, all of the plugins that can be added without any trouble, the possibility for non-coders to easily modify website content...
Especially for large websites, this can dramatically improve how fast you can update and improve your site.
Also, if you don't want to use a CMS, a framework like Django or Ruby on Rails is the way to go. These allow you to program everything yourself, but already have a lot of functionality built-in, to avoid reinventing the wheel.
Unlike with Tor, each user is a router (especially true for high-bandwidth users). Obviously people are not a router to the regular net (as that could get people in trouble), but all users route data through the I2P network itself.
In other words, if you want high-bandwidth bittorrenting, it helps a lot to contribute bandwidth yourself (makes you well-integrated). This keeps leechers to a slightly lower level.
Secondly, as torrents consume a lot of bandwidth, they also provide cover traffic for other people who might not more anonymity.
The fail is in fact on nobodies end. The reason https is 'not supported' is simply because nobody has set up an outproxy for it. If somebody does set up one, you will be able to use https.
Wait. We're supposed to dare to click on that link?
Damn you, April 1st!
Hm, perhaps that can be an achievement: dared to click a link resemblin goatse.
Comcast is a cable company, right? So isn't this just because their VoIP can be put in a separate Docsis channel (and prioritised accordingly), while 'regular' VoIP is sent as normal data?
I2P downloading at 30-40 kBps is perfectly possible. It might not be very fast compared to non-anonymous networking, but still, that's quite okay. When downloading large files, people just leave their downloads on for a while anyway.
Visiting I2P websites (known as eepsites) is also quite fast.
The same goes for visiting websites through Tor: the latency is high, but doable (depending on how much latency you're willing to tolerate:p).
I can't comment on Freenet, as I haven't really used it yet.
And no, I'm not on some super-connection, just cable.
What he is doing is useless, as Tor (for anonymous browsing), I2P (for anonymous fast downloading) and Freenet (for anonymous data storage) make such filters obsolete even before they are implemented.
Slashdot Mirror
Let's get rid of hunting, cars, pesticides and buildings first then, since all of those result in more bird deaths than wind power: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... And roasting birds? Seriously? Come to think of it, roasted bird sounds good. Solar panels on every street corner, anyone?
By Ben Vigoda, Co-Founder and CEO: http://phm.cba.mit.edu/theses/03.07.vigoda.pdf
Have a look at PlayOnLinux. It's free and works well enough.
Yes, I2P has a number of clients specifically made for it. Also, since the traffic stays inside the network, there's not the same issue as with Tor (that bittorrent basically ruins the outproxies). That upside is also a downside, since it means you can't torrent traffic from regular sites, you have to stick to internal I2P torrents.
Wait, what? The LGPL is less free because it's called that way? The LGPL gives me, as a developer, MORE freedom. It's all a matter of perspective.
For one, the weight a CMS adds is compensated by all of the code that is already present, all of the plugins that can be added without any trouble, the possibility for non-coders to easily modify website content ...
Especially for large websites, this can dramatically improve how fast you can update and improve your site.
Also, if you don't want to use a CMS, a framework like Django or Ruby on Rails is the way to go. These allow you to program everything yourself, but already have a lot of functionality built-in, to avoid reinventing the wheel.
Ignore the above. It was due to a bad copypaste, apparently (linefeed missing).
Yes, it affects Vista (just tested it here). The example exploit contains a bug though. You need to add an import line 'from socket import socket'.
Here you go :-)
And yes, you are absolutely right. I couldn't entirely understand the article either.
It would still be an Iran-only network, unless there are unfiltered gateways, but it would at least allow internal communication.
Indeed, with rapidshare, you can still easily be 'sold out' when the French government requests IPs from the rapidshare hosts.
By the way, we're already noticing the effect on I2P. The new router count is getting a huge boost today.
Unlike with Tor, each user is a router (especially true for high-bandwidth users). Obviously people are not a router to the regular net (as that could get people in trouble), but all users route data through the I2P network itself.
In other words, if you want high-bandwidth bittorrenting, it helps a lot to contribute bandwidth yourself (makes you well-integrated). This keeps leechers to a slightly lower level.
Secondly, as torrents consume a lot of bandwidth, they also provide cover traffic for other people who might not more anonymity.
Yes, it would make a useful addition (lots of things would :P). We just need someone to set it up and it'll be there.
The fail is in fact on nobodies end. The reason https is 'not supported' is simply because nobody has set up an outproxy for it. If somebody does set up one, you will be able to use https.
It's the Anonymous network dance!
You can share if you want to
You can slow down to a crawl
But at least you will be safe
Sixty-five kay in a cave
But detection chance is small!
http://torproject.org/
http://www.i2p2.de/
http://gnunet.org/
http://freenetproject.org/
CLI: Command-Line Interface That includes CLUI's ;-)
This one is obviously real. Bow to the superiority of CLI browsers!
Oh, time to go. Ctrl+A D
Wait. We're supposed to dare to click on that link? Damn you, April 1st!
Hm, perhaps that can be an achievement: dared to click a link resemblin goatse.
Comcast is a cable company, right? So isn't this just because their VoIP can be put in a separate Docsis channel (and prioritised accordingly), while 'regular' VoIP is sent as normal data?
Well, they could of course take away the right to privacy (some laws already do). That's exactly what this article is about.
However, Freenet now has a darknet part, so I guess it would be kinda hard to detect (don't know the details, can someone else comment on that?).
I2P downloading at 30-40 kBps is perfectly possible. It might not be very fast compared to non-anonymous networking, but still, that's quite okay. When downloading large files, people just leave their downloads on for a while anyway. Visiting I2P websites (known as eepsites) is also quite fast. :p).
The same goes for visiting websites through Tor: the latency is high, but doable (depending on how much latency you're willing to tolerate
I can't comment on Freenet, as I haven't really used it yet.
And no, I'm not on some super-connection, just cable.
What he is doing is useless, as Tor (for anonymous browsing), I2P (for anonymous fast downloading) and Freenet (for anonymous data storage) make such filters obsolete even before they are implemented.
Funny thing being: it's posted by Anti-Globalism.
Too bad that, all too often, many people are not interested in who gets elected, and a lot of politicians do things they did NOT announce.
Australians, time to hop on I2P or Tor!
I do have Javascript installed, and am running Adobe Flash (Linux version). Doesn't work :(