Slashdot Mirror


Next G8 President Wants To "Regulate the Internet"

antispam_ben writes "The President of Italy, which will have the Presidency of the G8 starting January 1, says he wants to use the future position of Italy to 'Regulate the Internet.' Italy's President Berlusconi appears to be a cantankerous character, prompting riots when Italy last had the G8 presidency in 2001. This will no doubt be a serious effort, but knowing the fundamental design of the Internet involves routing around damage, the efforts could be more amusing than threatening." Update — 12/5 at 00:04 by SS: Reader fondacio noted that Silvio Berlusconi is Italy's Prime Minister, not its President. He is Italy's G8 representative, and Italy will hold the presidency in 2009.

279 comments

  1. Media mogul wants to restrict bad press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Typical from the people in power nowadays

  2. It'll never happen. by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 5, Funny

    Never happen. The mafia will just disappear him. ;)

    --
    Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
    1. Re:It'll never happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think that you foreigners don't really have a clear picture of what the mafia is and does in Italy.

    2. Re:It'll never happen. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I think that you foreigners don't really have a clear picture of what the mafia is and does in Italy.

      So ... enlighten us.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    3. Re:It'll never happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a bad idea when it was posted the other day too :p

    4. Re:It'll never happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      First, there's not only one mafia. The mafia you know is the sicilian mafia, whose focus is mainly on drugs and "pizzo" (a fee asked as an insurance that nothing happens to your possessions). In other regions in the south, there are 'ndrangheta (in Calabria), Camorra (in Campania, the region where Naples is) and Sacra Corona Unita (in Puglia, the "heel of the boot"). Then, you have the kidnappers in Sardinia.

      Ndrangheta makes money mainly from kidnapping, "pizzo" and control, plus the usual stuff. Sacra Corona Unita is not very frequently in the news. Camorra is behind everything can be pumped money from in Campania: from drugs to pizzo to garbage collection and disposal, as you heard in the news recently, even to undertakers (yep, you read correctly). All these mafias are deeply rooted in the local behavior, with the population either supporting directly or indirectly. Moreover, they have strong connections with politics, either with the local Communes or regional administrations or even at the State level. It is not unheard of that some illuminated major has been found burned alive chained to his car just because he fired an employee, so in this picture, even if you want to change things, you really cannot.

      Therefore, the mafia does what carries them money. They don't do strong public events if they can prevent it, because that would likely involve an outburst of police. Making Berlusconi disappear would be a very strong act, something that mafia is unlikely to do unless strongly menaced (something that happened with two judges, Falcone and Borsellino). Please note that politicians have been killed in Italy (eg. Aldo Moro) by extremist left-wing terrorists (the so called Brigate Rosse) which do not have anything to do with mafia.

      In the north of italy (eg. from florence up north) mafia does exists, but because of the many southerns that moved in, and brought some activity. The people from the North of italy are very different, and they dont' like the southeners at all. Some actually consider them Italian-speaking africans.

    5. Re:It'll never happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually Berlusconi IS with the mafia.
      There's quite a lot of books and articles about how he's associated with mafia and how his father was in the past.

      It's just that information is not free anymore...
      But you just have to look for something in order to find it.

      Uh, and for the records, also the minister of the Senate (Renato Schifani) is connected with mafia and he was declared guilty by a court.

      Sincerly,
      an Italian

      P.S. One of his ministers (Berlusconi's) told to the press that he wants an "unique IP address for every citizen"... LOL!

    6. Re:It'll never happen. by travbrad · · Score: 0, Troll

      They pet cute furry bunny rabbits, make rainbow paintings, and have bingo night to raise money for starving children in Africa...DUH!

    7. Re:It'll never happen. by Dramacrat · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'd recommend "Gomorrah", written by a Camorra... 'expatriate', so to speak, in hiding in Sweden (or England?); the Camorra bosses stated he'd be dead by Christmas. It's been translated to English. The Camorra is easily the strongest, the most modern, as they evolved to a focus on sheer business and not the older trappings of the other 'clans' or organizations. All that aside: the AC above me is correct, as far as my observations since I've been here.

      --
      There are over 36 million lines of COBOL code in the world, and they are all raping children.
    8. Re:It'll never happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Berlusconi is the mafia.

    9. Re:It'll never happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might be interested to know that a very large percentage of the population in Sicily voted for him. This could have never happened with such large margins without the mafia support as they control a lot of votes in a variety of ways.
      So, the mafia is very very unlikely to harm him in any way.

    10. Re:It'll never happen. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Thank you. That actually was enlightening.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    11. Re:It'll never happen. by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      People think the Mafia is just one big criminal organization... but there's so much *more* to it than that.

    12. Re:It'll never happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not at all.
      Italy is a strange country. Basically every city is a different country, with different traditions, people behavior, food, dialect (which is unintelligible from italian). You can travel 30 km and find a completely different kind of Italy. The traditional image you have of Italians is mainly the one of the south, made popular by the emigration and movies. The productive North is seldomly known, and the administrative Center, with Rome, is in the news for political reasons.

      So, when you speak about Italy and italians, you should keep in mind that it is a very strong generalization. Despite this, what can I say? I'm italian, I moved abroad since years, I won't go back, ever. I think Italy is a very nice country with all its arts and good food, but there are too many idiots and bigots.

    13. Re:It'll never happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it had to happen at least once on /.

    14. Re:It'll never happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting: You didn't mention L'internet Gangstas and Mafia from myspace, etc ;)

    15. Re:It'll never happen. by Dramacrat · · Score: 1

      While we're all here, have a free link: http://gcaw.net/2007/12/12/naples-confidential/

      --
      There are over 36 million lines of COBOL code in the world, and they are all raping children.
    16. Re:It'll never happen. by kyashan · · Score: 1

      mafia won't do anything ..for the same reasons why sharks don't eat lawyers ;)

      BTW he's not the president, nor many Italian's prime minister. He's a media mogul dinosaur (owns 3 major TV channels and bribes the channels he doesn't own directly). Many of us are waiting for the net to squash him down.

      He fears the Internet.

      --
      "La presi e te la pagai (480.000 Lire)"
    17. Re:It'll never happen. by merraksh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In the north of Italy, mafia does exist because there are criminals and entrepreneurs up there too. Entrepreneurs with little care for legality and criminals with a passion for power are not only from the South. You may wish to use fewer urban legends and a few more facts next time. The mafias are firms with hierarchies, business targets, and competitors. They lobby the Parliament and consider the law in a more elastic way than others. They exist where the law is not enforced or is changed in order to favor them. It is true, some idiots consider southerners Italian-speaking africans, and I know a few, but the people from the North of Italy are not that different, let alone better. [A guy from Bergamo, a stronghold of southerner-bashers]

    18. Re:It'll never happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All these mafias are deeply rooted in the local behavior, with the population either supporting directly or indirectly

      Why is this so? Living conditions in Italy are not as hard as in Russia and the culture is quite marketable to foreigners. Is the influence of WWII still the key?

      It is not unheard of that some illuminated major has been found burned alive chained to his car just because he fired an employee, so in this picture, even if you want to change things, you really cannot

      No wonder the Italian economy is somewhat slow. Perhaps an Italian version of the FBI and federal courts would do the trick.

    19. Re:It'll never happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha life must be nice wherever you live, without lazy people and those looking to make a fast buck without putting in an honest days labour.

    20. Re:It'll never happen. by fbjon · · Score: 1, Funny

      but there are too many idiots and bigots.

      And here you are, posting on slashdot...

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    21. Re:It'll never happen. by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

      I just had to comment on this one,,,,, Mafia.,,,, LOL

    22. Re:It'll never happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One can only hope... :p

    23. Re:It'll never happen. by bsDaemon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Italy is a strange country. Basically every city is a different country, with different traditions, people behavior, food, dialect (which is unintelligible from italian). You can travel 30 km and find a completely different kind of Italy.

      One of my professors in Ireland was always fond of saying that an Italian's loyalty is to his bell tower -- meaning, local as possible. I've never heard an Italian admit to it before though.

    24. Re:It'll never happen. by nerk_i_one · · Score: 0

      there are no more kidnappers in Sardinia, too risky business. our preferred and shiny new dirt way for making money is the bank-armored-van armed assault ! :))

    25. Re:It'll never happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please make a distinction between mafia and white collars crime. north italy is crushed under the foot of corruption, concussion, and have the highest level of insider trading ever seen, with laws passed only for profiting national companies under the control of the controllers. take Mediaset, Italian tv broadcaster, formerly property of the prime minister: a law has currently sabotaged sky, rising his vat from 10 to 20%, while another law reduced the income of the public tv contender, leaving Medaiset (which is illegally transmitting over the frequencies of other companies) the only relevant player in information in itali

      oh, did I say that the berluscony family owns almost a monopoly also on printed media, and school books? abr/>
      This is the situation here. Please invade us.

    26. Re:It'll never happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, it is true. And this is due to our history.
      Suppose that for more than one thousand years your country was the size of a big city of today, and you were frequently attacked by nearby cities. Also suppose that your lord is quite ok, and interested in culture and ideals and stuff. Here you have the North.

      Suppose now that you are invaded for a thousand years by different people. Greeks, danes, spaniards, arabs, and each of them does his shit and leaves you in the dirt, until a band of 1000 people from the north kick the spaniards out. Here you have the south.

    27. Re:It'll never happen. by Monsieur_F · · Score: 2, Funny

      P.S. One of his ministers (Berlusconi's) told to the press that he wants an "unique IP address for every citizen"... LOL!

      ok, I'll take 127.0.01

      --
      McCartney fans pay bus tickets. [...] Lennon fans too, with discretion.
    28. Re:It'll never happen. by Monsieur_F · · Score: 1

      (oops, forgot to preview)

      --
      McCartney fans pay bus tickets. [...] Lennon fans too, with discretion.
    29. Re:It'll never happen. by mirkob · · Score: 2, Interesting

      a little ting to add,

      berlusconi already ceded to mafia's pizzo and menaces (if not been entirely his pawn) 35+ year ago, before it entered in politic,

      the only proved (in tribunal) thing is that he accepted as stablemaster on his residence a mafia assassin...

      see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vittorio_Mangano for details.

      that mean that berlusconi will never take huge paces versus the mafia (if not some to please them!)

      it's a huge embarrasment that this kind of "man" reign over italy and expecially over the minds of the tons of weak willed and utterly uninformed italians

      only hope he does not create more disaster to you all in his role of the G8.

      for more info on berlusconi criminal career see

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silvio_Berlusconi#The_.22judicial_persecution.22

    30. Re:It'll never happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's hillarious. Berlusconi is the mafia. He owns all major television stations and use them intensively to spread his propaganda, and during his last term (yes, he was reelected and no one outside Italy understands how) he enacted laws protecting him against lawsuits being run against him. Horrible, horrible politician by European standards, but Italy has given up on democracy, and that is what is keeping Berlusconi in power.

    31. Re:It'll never happen. by rmav · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The people from the North of italy are very different, and they dont' like the southeners at all. Some actually consider them Italian-speaking africans.

      You got almost everything right, but this broad generalization does not give the rest justice. I come from the north of Italy, even though I now emigrated to Germany. It is not that I do not like the southerners - I do not like the culture many of them have, and I do not identify myselfs with their values: A form of catholicism bordering with paganism, no sense of state, more respect for the mafia than the laws of the state, a sense of family so strong that you cannot "escape" it without being rejected by the whole local community, with obligations that go beyond the laws, ad so on...
      An example: in Agrigento, 97% of the families do NOT pay the tax on tv sets, used by the state to fund the state TV, in my home town, Rovigo, however, 97% of the families DO pay this tax - and we are called "fessi", i.e. "dolts", or "nitwits", because of this and many similar examples.

      But many notherners that did not fall to the rhetoric of the Lega Nord (The Northern League, our own "Parti Quebecois") can discern. People from Puglia are hard workers and have similar values to the north (they speak a VERY weird and interesting dialect, though, that can drive linguists crazy :-) and even in Sicily, the people of the town of Ragusa are proud to have a clean, efficient public administration and very little Mafia influence.

      I do not consider them italian-speaking africans, even though sometimes I ask myself why the State did not agree with the Sicilian separatist movement that was active 1943-1948, then briefly again in the sities!

      You know, sometimes it is easy to fall to rhetoric. Recently, in Germany, some calabrian people, connected with the Ndrangheta, have been brutally massacred. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Luca_feud

      I just happen to live 20 km from the german town of Duisburg, and for a few weeks the Germans looked at us italians with suspicions, like we all traveled with our "lupara" (a kind of rifle originally conceived to kill wolves threatening sheep) and ready to kill. I was deeply ashamed of my people and almost (almost) muttered "maledetti terroni" between my teeth ("maledetto" means "damned" and "terrone" literally means "peasant", but refers now in a derogatory way to southerners - like they call us notherners "polentoni", i.e. "polenta eaters").

      But there is a deep difference between disliking them as a whole or finding some aspects of their culture at odds with the own concepts and ideals of a civilised, organised state. It is the difference between racism and identification with a set of values with no pretense at all of superiority.

      Roberto

    32. Re:It'll never happen. by rmav · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think Italy is a very nice country with all its arts and good food, but there are too many idiots and bigots.

      And how is that different from any other country? Let take as an example the country where I live. Germany. Not much different. Idiots and bigots are an overwhelming majority in every country...
      Roberto

    33. Re:It'll never happen. by RichiH · · Score: 1

      Your opinion seems to be a popular one. Lots of Italians I know will never ever move back to Italy.

    34. Re:It'll never happen. by giuda · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just one small thing. I am from Sardinia, and the kidnapping is dead from almost 10 years. There's no mafia in Sardinia like in southern Italy :)

    35. Re:It'll never happen. by aliosha · · Score: 0

      Strange, since it is a direct translation of an Italian expression, "campanilismo" (belt-tower-ism)...

    36. Re:It'll never happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the north of italy (eg. from florence up north) mafia does exists, but because of the many southerns that moved in, and brought some activity. The people from the North of italy are very different, and they dont' like the southeners at all. Some actually consider them Italian-speaking africans.

      And the guy i'm replying to is what we call a racist.

      Seriously, no mafia in the north and the small one that's there is because of southern immigrants? are you one of the lega, the ones that goes for celtic tradition and the pope (even if those two things are not compatible) ?
      and how do you explain the "mafia del brenta" or the fact that half of our politics have deep connection with people involved with mafia?

      btw: berlusconi is the prime minister however he has the same powers as us president, in our nation the president is much more similar to the queen in uk, much more a rapresentative figure rather than one who can act and change laws.

    37. Re:It'll never happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never happen. The mafia will just disappear him. ;)

      Don't know much about Italy I see... Berlusconi is the mafia. (no smilies)

    38. Re:It'll never happen. by moxley · · Score: 1

      Now THAT'S the passion we expect from you Italians!

    39. Re:It'll never happen. by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Popular among those who moved out and that you know. :)

      What about the others?

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    40. Re:It'll never happen. by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      I don't speak Italian (I did take Latin and I have been to Italy for 2 weeks one time), and had no real reason to come across that phrase before. Michael just liked to talk about Italians, there was no real reason.

      I think he was trying to draw parallels between county and town loyalty in Ireland, especially with regards to GAA sports, where they are not professional -- its done for pride and glory and all that jazz.

    41. Re:It'll never happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Italian-speaking africans??!!!!
      You are a racist ignorant. And mafia (meant as connections between some politicians and criminal activities) does exist in the north of Italy as well, but not because it was imported by Southerners. Actually, this kind of mafia does exist in many Westerner democratic countries, not just in Italy.

    42. Re:It'll never happen. by merraksh · · Score: 1

      Good point. But mafia is indeed involved in white collar crime, as its politicians control some contract works for building apartment blocks and major infrastructures. I would not classify that as corruption/concussion, which is a "softer" illegal way to favor an individual. The sat-TV VAT being increased to 20% is only the latest trick played by the people around Berlusconi. He succeeded in creating a consensus machine that turns voters away from his legal problems and hides the appalling lack of competition in most of the Italian industry. His methods are very much from the corruption/concussion "soft" illegal tool box, with one of its closest collaborators, Cesare Previti, being found guilty for corrupting two justices, however another of his closest allies, Marcello Dell'Utri, co-founder of B.'s party, was found guilty of collaborating with the Sicilian mafia. One of the reasons why he is still in power (making the Italians the laughing stock of Europe) is that his consensus machine convinced a lot of people that the Italian justice and media are biased against him, and while distracting people with Fox-like journalism he undermined the judicial system, making legality an option for Italians. This, in turn, spurred the ease of having things done the illegal way and suggested that that is not only not too bad, but also cool. Another reason is the lack of a strong opposition, or even worse, the opposition caring for the interests of the companies lobbying them. Let me not mention the Vatican.

    43. Re:It'll never happen. by RichiH · · Score: 1

      Guess if I know them over the intarwebs or locally. Obviously, the local ones do not count.

    44. Re:It'll never happen. by Kirth · · Score: 1

      Given Berlusconi is tied in with them, I'd guess not...
      http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/2638609.stm

      --
      "The more prohibitions there are, The poorer the people will be" -- Lao Tse
    45. Re:It'll never happen. by oliderid · · Score: 1

      Actually Berlusconi IS with the mafia.

      Well I really don't know if he has such a link, but the thing I know for sure is that he is a shame for Italy and now for the whole Western Europe.

    46. Re:It'll never happen. by theaveng · · Score: 1

      >>>The traditional image you have of Italians is mainly the one of the south, made popular by the emigration and movies. The productive North is seldom known, and the administrative Center, with Rome, is in the news for political reasons.
      >>>

      This paragraph could just as easily described the United States (the south, the productive north, and the administrative center around Washington). Most countries don't have one culture, but multiple intermingling cultures.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    47. Re:It'll never happen. by theaveng · · Score: 1

      Well the Italians (Romans) had been kicking ass for 1000 years prior, so I guess the neighbors finally got fed-up and decided to strike back (and also reclaim some of the wealth the Romans had looted). Turn-about is fair play.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    48. Re:It'll never happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well I don't know where you are an which "italians" you have met.
      But we have even a word for that: campanilismo
      campanile is the bell tower.

      Basically piedmont conquered the rest of italy around 1860.

      The north and some parts of the centre had strong political movements towards a united Italy (although at the time a hard political fight was going on about who should. A strong political current advocated for the Pope .... think Iran ...)

      The south which was the biggest italian state at the time and the less developed, basically stuck at a medival political system, ....
      well the south was basically conquered against its people will.
      A long "police operation" was launched to stop the brigantaggio and bring order.
      Basically a small civil war went on for nearly two decades. Italians have been force fed an heroic image of a national struggle for reunification for generations but the differences are still there. It took the draft in WWI for italians to start mixing, basically nobody spoke italian at home until the 1950s.

      Exporting democracy has always been a pretty mess...
      Some sociologists say that the mafias stemmed into simple criminal activity in the second half of the 20th century after they had lost the cultural origin as a cultural resistance movement.

    49. Re:It'll never happen. by elefantstn · · Score: 1

      And how is that different from any other country?

      German food sucks.

      --
      If it ain't broke, you need more software.
    50. Re:It'll never happen. by ahabswhale · · Score: 1

      Are you sure America didn't fuck it up somehow? I mean, I'm gonna start thinking this isn't /. unless the US isn't somehow responsible for all the fucked up shit on the planet.

      --
      Are agnostics skeptical of unicorns too?
    51. Re:It'll never happen. by theaveng · · Score: 1

      Most of Italy's problems predate 1900, and prior to 1916 the U.S. minded its own fucking business* so no you can't blame the U.S. in this case.

      *
      * I wish the U.S. would learn to do that now. I'm tired of involving myself in foreign wars. We have two natural barriers - the Atlantic and the Pacific - they will provide plenty of protection from Chinese or European invasion.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    52. Re:It'll never happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that happens when you live in a wellfare state..
      Then again, I made an conscience effort to prevent showing any cultural bias in order to get some further understanding. I guess it takes generations to form a "working" EU.

    53. Re:It'll never happen. by rmav · · Score: 1

      And how is that different from any other country?

      German food sucks.

      BWAHAHAH! Yes :) This is a nice comment!

      But, in fact, not even this is true - they DO have very nice traditional dishes. Sadly, 99% of the Germans have forgotten them :( It is not hopeless to find these recipes, and even some good restaurants that prepare them. Mind you, I said it is not hopeless, not that it is easy.

      Roberto

    54. Re:It'll never happen. by marnues · · Score: 1

      I think you need to read up on your pre-WWI US History. The Spanish-American war didn't happen because we were minding our own business. We got ourselves mixed up with the Texans...something many of us rue to this day. Let's see, there were a couple invasions of Canada and that War of 1812. 54 or fight also comes to mind (though we got out of that without 54 or fight). We took Hawaii pretty much by force. The Monroe doctrine was definitely not minding our own business. Forcing the Natives onto reservations so that white farmers could take their land was about the greatest extent of not minding our own business. Really WWI was a natural progression as the Western hemisphere was finally conquered by whitey and almost completely decolonized.

    55. Re:It'll never happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe, but then "americans" should be worried about the native americans getting fed up and kicking their fat butt back to their original countries. Turn about is fair play.

  3. No authority by Forthan+Red · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Since the "President of the G8" doesn't have the authority to do SQUAT, who cares?

    1. Re:No authority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Since the "President of the G8" doesn't have the authority to do SQUAT, who cares?

      Since the president is the guy who decides on the G8 meetings toilet breaks, I think you will live to regret those words! With an unlimited supply of water and "one john to rule them all", Berlusconi will show the leaders of the world what happends when you cross him.

    2. Re:No authority by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he doesn't have direct control, but slow steering of the ship via blackmail ( WTO ) has to start somewhere.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    3. Re:No authority by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      He is a buffoon.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    4. Re:No authority by vvaduva · · Score: 1

      He could clog the tubes though...

    5. Re:No authority by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      The G8 runs most of the Black Helicopters actually, it's not the UN, ZOG and the Lizards like the mainstream media types like David Eicke and Alex Jones tell you.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    6. Re:No authority by Forthan+Red · · Score: 1

      The Internet isn't a series of tubes. It's a line of trucks - delivering under-the-table construction materials to Ted Steven's house.

    7. Re:No authority by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      And regulate the internet in which manner?

      If we can get rid of all that spam that clutters and pains all of us then we can at least win something.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    8. Re:No authority by eggnoglatte · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, he does set the agenda for the meeting, so if he is serious, he could dedicate a fairly large chunk of the meeting time to this topic.

      Now, theoretically the rest of them could just tell him off on this topic. But lets face it: they all need to justify being at a meeting that took a huge effort to organize with thousands of cops protecting them, tens of thousands of people demonstrating etc. In other words, they need a result. ANY result. Internet regulation is an easy topic in that respect, since the wish for some amount of control over the internet is widespread among politicians of many countries. So the meeting dynamics could very easily be stacked against common sense and individual right.

      But what else is new?

    9. Re:No authority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mistake him with the Italian goalkeeper!

    10. Re:No authority by sumdumass · · Score: 4, Funny

      It isn't as much the black helicopters as much as it is the paint. I had a red and white helicopter once and as soon as I painted it black (white is a bitch to get bug splat from), it started doing weird things like flying over mutilated farm animals and following random people around the city and along the country side.

      This behavior was very annoying because I originally got it to impress the chicks and that all ended when they would ask what the hell was i doing and my only reply was, it isn't me, I haven't had control since we took off. I ended up getting rid of it when I started receiving outrageous fuel bill when it decided to take off on it's own and do this shit.

      Those other people might want you to think some organization is controlling them but I'm telling you, it is the paint. Those other people are wrong on a lot of things, Aliens don't just abduct dumb people either, the get the smart ones too. The smart ones just don't talk about it.

    11. Re:No authority by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      That's racist. Black helicopters may commit more crime, but that is because of complex socioeconomic factors.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    12. Re:No authority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually can agree with everything in your post except the last part. Its a common misconception so I understand. Yes, we do abduct humans equally. However, we keep the smart ones and send the dumb ones back. Think of it as your fishing quotas. We are only allowed to keep 2 dumb ones for every 10 smart ones we catc... er abduct.

      PS. The paint was invented by the smart ones we abducted. Pretty cool huh?

  4. Enforcement not regulation is the answer by Bryansix · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Internet does not need to be regulated. Instead what needs to happen is for all of the major countries of the world (including Russia and China) to start cooperating and prosecuting computer fraud where people misrepresent themselves to steal information and use it for personal gain. These laws already exist in most countries and the goal should be to extend them into the far corners of the globe along with a willing police force or the ability for Interpol to operate where needed.

    1. Re:Enforcement not regulation is the answer by JCSoRocks · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly. This is a classic instance of creating more ridiculous laws, rules and regulations rather than simply enforcing what's already in place. I've seen the same approach used to try to "clean up" the Internet to get rid of child porn. Special filters and laws don't need to be created to ban child pornography from the Internet. There are already laws against it... just enforce them and leave the rest of us alone. To catch a predator is a great example - that show uses existing laws to nail those guys.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    2. Re:Enforcement not regulation is the answer by Narpak · · Score: 1

      Instead what needs to happen is for all of the major countries of the world (including Russia and China) to start cooperating and prosecuting computer fraud where people misrepresent themselves to steal information and use it for personal gain.

      Part of that particular problem is that some of those that misrepresent themselves to steal information works for various governments targeting other governments. So from side of the issue they might want to deal with the problem, but from another they want to use the situation to their advantage.

    3. Re:Enforcement not regulation is the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it does tapdance around entrapment laws.

    4. Re:Enforcement not regulation is the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not familiar with your laws, but is it okay to broadcast the guy on TV without his consent?
      Just because he's an asshole doesn't imply that he has no rights to privacy or does it?

    5. Re:Enforcement not regulation is the answer by Walpurgiss · · Score: 1

      They probably pay the ones that let them broadcast the show. But.. If that's the case, I don't know why anyone caught by the show would ever consent.

      No amount that the station could offer them would be enough, and it could possibly violate some kind of son of sam type laws.

      I'm not sure, but I'd think they would have to be agreeable somehow, otherwise get blurred/omitted.

    6. Re:Enforcement not regulation is the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I knew that girl was 18. She told me her last boyfriend was Asian, and that crap doesn't start 'til college." - Dennis Duffy on 30 Rock, trying to explain his appearance as a predator on Dateline.

    7. Re:Enforcement not regulation is the answer by alemaco · · Score: 1

      creating more ridiculous laws, rules and regulations rather than simply enforcing what's already in place

      This is exactly what's been happening all the time in Italy. Politicians make laws and they have to show everybody they work so they can be re-elected.

      --
      No sig is good enough for me.
    8. Re:Enforcement not regulation is the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, thats EXACTLY what the internet needs. A world wide police force with global access and the right to opperate with impunity in any country.

      RIIIIGHT.

      The RIAA tried that and this community screamed blue bloody murder. Now because the flag is "fraud" we're going to back it? I don't think so.

      Is internet fraud the /. version of think of the children?

    9. Re:Enforcement not regulation is the answer by SuchiRu · · Score: 1

      Ehrm.... No. Japan has only laws for producing child porn. Everything else is fair game, and that is from one of the most powerful economic countries in the world. http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/national/20081130TDY02303.htm

    10. Re:Enforcement not regulation is the answer by Pandare · · Score: 3, Informative

      In California, where several episodes of To Catch a Predator were filmed, there is potentially a civil claim to be made if it is the case that the film crew divulged private facts about the predator. Additionally, there is also a potential harm in that the show may present the predator in a false light, i.e. they are implying that the predator's intent is different than his actual intent.

      The other two torts regarding privacy aren't applicable, since the guy agreed to enter the house of someone else where the crew presumably got the permission of the owners to film. So, it seems that they do not specifically need permission from the people being filmed to air their faces if they're confident that the guy actually did it. Since they work with the cops, it's safe to assume they only show the guilty ones, so those found innocent aren't being misrepresented. This is completely ignoring the entrapment claim that could be made in the criminal courts, since the question asked was do they need express permission.

      Relevant laws and cites include an RCFP advisory, and both Cal. Civ. Code  990, 3344 and Cal. Civ. Code  1708.8

      And IANAL, nor do I claim any special knowledge of the law, but I'm taking my LSAT on Saturday, for whatever that matters.

    11. Re:Enforcement not regulation is the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... but it's okay when I am the one doing the stealing! If someone else does it, then it's bad!

    12. Re:Enforcement not regulation is the answer by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Japan has only laws for producing child porn.

      It's compulsory!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    13. Re:Enforcement not regulation is the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine if common sense prevailed and we already had enough laws -- what's in that for government? What's in that for the power elite who make their fortunes in the business of government?

    14. Re:Enforcement not regulation is the answer by theaveng · · Score: 1

      >>>In Japan, a law prohibiting child prostitution and child porn was put into effect in 1999.
      >>>However, the law stipulates no punitive measures for simple possession of child porn.

      That's how it should be. It's not the photo that is the crime, but the sexual act with a minor - which is not necessarily a child. A young adult can also me a minor, so the proper phrase should be "minor prostitution" or "underage prostitution".

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    15. Re:Enforcement not regulation is the answer by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      Since they work with the cops, it's safe to assume they only show the guilty ones, so those found innocent aren't being misrepresented.

      There are cases from episodes that aired in 2006 that still haven't finished at trial yet. An episode from last year still hasn't had trials begin yet.

      I will commend Hansen because he has distinguished between pedophilia (a disease in the DSM, the psychiatry Bible) and sexual predation (a crime).

  5. Stop him! by Mathiasdm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What he is doing is useless, as Tor (for anonymous browsing), I2P (for anonymous fast downloading) and Freenet (for anonymous data storage) make such filters obsolete even before they are implemented.

    --
    Join the anonymous, help develop the network: http://www.i2p2.de
    1. Re:Stop him! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Until they pass laws that makes such measures illegal. They want to know what every citizen is doing at all times, makes it easier to stop people who oppose the government.

      The economy is screwed, the governments pissed it all away on wars nobody can win in an attempt to get even richer but know that but the only way they'll keep people in line is to make them too afraid to do anything.

    2. Re:Stop him! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They will never do it.

      Why?

      Because they also use such things to check up on opponents.

      People have right to privacy on the internet, as far as i know...

    3. Re:Stop him! by nicklott · · Score: 1

      Or they would do if they were actually usable... Perhaps they work when you're connected to Internet2 or GEANT but out here in the real world of 4k/256 ADSL they suck ass.

    4. Re:Stop him! by Mathiasdm · · Score: 1

      I2P downloading at 30-40 kBps is perfectly possible. It might not be very fast compared to non-anonymous networking, but still, that's quite okay. When downloading large files, people just leave their downloads on for a while anyway. Visiting I2P websites (known as eepsites) is also quite fast.
      The same goes for visiting websites through Tor: the latency is high, but doable (depending on how much latency you're willing to tolerate :p).

      I can't comment on Freenet, as I haven't really used it yet.

      And no, I'm not on some super-connection, just cable.

      --
      Join the anonymous, help develop the network: http://www.i2p2.de
    5. Re:Stop him! by Mathiasdm · · Score: 1

      Well, they could of course take away the right to privacy (some laws already do). That's exactly what this article is about.

      However, Freenet now has a darknet part, so I guess it would be kinda hard to detect (don't know the details, can someone else comment on that?).

      --
      Join the anonymous, help develop the network: http://www.i2p2.de
    6. Re:Stop him! by PinkyDead · · Score: 1

      Maybe not...

      By restricting all those people doing legitimate business, maybe those of us hiding behind Tor etc will get better bandwidth and be able to commit our crimes in peace and at speed.

      --
      Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
    7. Re:Stop him! by liquidsin · · Score: 1

      when anonymity is outlawed, only outlaws will have anonymity...or something

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    8. Re:Stop him! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no such thing as anonymity. I did a paper on traffic analysis attacks on the Tor network.

    9. Re:Stop him! by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      The economy is screwed, the governments pissed it all away on wars nobody can win in an attempt to get even richer but know that but the only way they'll keep people in line is to make them too afraid to do anything.

      Lol.. DO you really believe that? Do you really think the government controls the economy or that not paying for wars (all the war finance is barrowed money, none from your pockets yet) is the cause of the collapse?

      Hey, I got some swap land, err I mean prime beach front property for sale if you interested. I also have some ocean front property in Arizona I will let go cheap. You know, with all these wars that we aren't paying for yet, I really need the cash.

  6. The internet to Prez Berlusconi: by Roland+Piquepaille · · Score: 5, Funny

    fuck.it

    1. Re:The internet to Prez Berlusconi: by Vu1turEMaN · · Score: 1

      The best part is that this is a real page...

      What does it say on it..."Courtesy Page"?

    2. Re:The internet to Prez Berlusconi: by Seedy2 · · Score: 1

      A real honest LOL moment. :)

      --
      Nothing to say here... move along
  7. All is not lost! by iSzabo · · Score: 1

    At least everyone will waste a lot of money.

  8. Why? by yetijoe · · Score: 1

    What is the end game... how is government going to make it better. I can see (and support) investment in expansion. But they compare this to the financial crisis and the G8 regulating those markets. In my opinion the internet is not broken like the financial markets!

  9. Opportunity by Sanat · · Score: 1

    This could be viewed as an opportunity for the countries to work together but usually these things become opportunities to grab power as the AC above said... so rather than assist mankind it stalls out true progress.

    There is a lot wrong with how the Internet is being used for scams, viruses, rootkits, etc. With a few countries working together then maybe more would be interested in joining in the cooperation.

    --
    And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make
  10. Not the president by fondacio · · Score: 5, Informative

    Berlusconi is not the president of Italy. He's the prime minister. The president is Giorgio Napolitano.

    1. Re:Not the president by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously. It would seem that Berlusconi may be a global politician who understands little about the internet, we here on the internet know very little about global politics.

    2. Re:Not the president by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      Berlusconi is not the president of Italy. He's the prime minister. The president is Giorgio Napolitano.

      Reminds me of a story CNN ran some years ago about the Spanish 'Presidential election.' I'll bet King Juan Carlos was a bit horrified when he heard about that!

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    3. Re:Not the president by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Spain we have monarchy, but they dont use they power. Everything is run by the government, ruled by the "president of the nation". So no mistake there.

      anonymous spanish coward

    4. Re:Not the president by Phil06 · · Score: 0

      He didn't prompt the riots. Anarchists prompted the riots.

      --
      "...and yet, I blame society" Duke - Repo Man
    5. Re:Not the president by thirty-seven · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, the government in Spain is run by the "Presidente del Gobierno", literally President of the Government not President of the Nation. This is using the non-US definition of "government", meaning "executive branch". This basically means "chairman of the cabinet", which is what "prime minister" or "first minister" also means. Indeed, the Spanish "Presidente del Gobierno" is usually called the "Prime Minister" in English.

      --

      Atheism is a religion to the same extent that not collecting stamps is a hobby.

    6. Re:Not the president by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Berlusconi is not the president of Italy. He's the prime minister. The president is Giorgio Napolitano.

      Not that it makes much difference. See also: Russia, Putin, that other guy who's in charge now, really he's not a puppet at all, what's his name again?

      Since Berlsuconi already controls a large chunk of private and public media, it's only natural he's hostile and afraid when something can threaten his monopoly.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    7. Re:Not the president by Malc · · Score: 1

      It was very poorly written and exaggerated antispam_ben's ignorance. "Italy's President Berlusconi appears to be a cantankerous character" - sounds like he hasn't even heard of the Italian PM. How can that be possible? He's been around for years constantly in the news for his dodgy dealings and making high-level diplomatic gaffes.

    8. Re:Not the president by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      But isn't a PM usually head of the legislature, not the executive branch?

    9. Re:Not the president by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      Prime Minister is the head of the Cabinet, which is the 'executive branch' if you want to call it that. Not sure about whether or not he/she's the head of Parliament though. Anyone...?

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    10. Re:Not the president by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I wikipediaed "prime minister." It says the PM the head of the executive branch. I'm primarily confused because I thought the PM was chosen from all members of parliament by parliament and not by popular vote (this is the way in the UK, no? not sure about Italy).

      Since parliament is the legislature, and the PM is chosen by parliament, does this mean the head of the executive branch is not elected by the people? That seems odd to me, but then again, I've spent the 25 years of my life in a system in which the only head-of-branch who is not democratically elected is the Chief Justice of the SCOTUS. And parliamentary citizens might find that odd if their judges are popularly elected.

    11. Re:Not the president by thirty-seven · · Score: 1

      In most parliamentary systems (and my knowledge is mostly about Canadian and other Westminster-style systems), the prime minister is chosen from parliament. In many such systems the prime minister is not technically chosen by parliament, but is chosen by the head of state, and the prime minister must retain the confidence (approval) of parliament to remain in power. Nevertheless, whether the prime minister is chosen by parliament or not, the requirement that the PM retains the approval of parliament means that the PM is generally who parliament would have chosen.

      In a purely parliamentary system (i.e. most of Western Europe except for France, all Commonwealth Realms), the head of state may be a directly-elected president, an indirectly-elected president, an appointed president, or a monarch, but they have a largely* ceremonial role and are definitely not the active head of the executive.

      It wouldn't make sense to directly elect the prime minister, because the essence of a parliamentary system is that the government (i.e. executive) must have the confidence of parliament.

      In most parliamentary systems, certainly in Canada, the judiciary is independent, but there is not a separation of powers between the legislative and executive branches. The link between the legislative bodies and the executive is what makes it a parliamentary system.

      * - For an example of why I said that the head of state is "largely ceremonial" instead of "completely ceremonial", see this story about "Crisis in Ottawa", where the representative of Canada's head of state was not merely ceremonial.

      --

      Atheism is a religion to the same extent that not collecting stamps is a hobby.

    12. Re:Not the president by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      That is extremely interesting. We only touch on this in law school in the US (unless you take elective courses regarding foreign legal systems).

      We learn in Constitutional Law that one reason we have a trifurcated system because it was the "natural" progression and reaction to the trend in England at the time.

      In my understanding, the basic trend was that supreme power was vested in the monarch. The Crown controlled Parliament and the judiciary was subservient to the it as well, being appointed and controlled by the monarch.

      Basically, the Parliament of the UK was once merely councils of advisors to the Crown*. Then the Magna Carta came into being, forcing the Crown to cede some regulatory powers (over taxation) ultimately to tenants-in-chief (high nobles who had advised the monarch, among other things), which eventually became the Parliament.

      So, with the Magna Carta, the legislative body began breaking out and forming its own distinctive "branch" of government. Then came the English Bill of Rights and other things. Eventually, it became almost automatic for the monarch to approve of acts of Parliament, weakening the doctrine of Royal Assent (Royal Assent could be withheld to block legislation. In theory, the Queen could block legislation to this very day (if my understanding of the UK is correct--which it very well may not be), but in practice she wouldn't because it undoubtedly would soil the reputation of the Royal institution (by getting involved in politics).

      In a similar manner (but later in time), the judiciary became a distinct branch. The modern Common Law judiciary began about 1000 years ago in England (and Wales?). In the 12th century distinct courts were created (King's Bench, Courts of Assize, etc.) by the monarch. By the 1500s, the judiciary was drifting away from the monarch while still remaining quasi-executive in nature because it was not completely independent of the Crown.

      Technically speaking, it was not until 2006 that the judiciary of the UK became fully independent with the Constitutional Reform Act of 2005. But in practice, the judiciary has been fully independent since the 1700s. In 1701, the Act of Settlement established the right of judges to hold office in times of good behavior (we see echoes of this in the United States Constitution).

      It is in this milieu that the United States Constitution was written and ratified. And because it's extremely difficult to modify the US Constitution, the system has remained the way it was designed. However, I'm not sure how we would modify the courts even if we could. I think most people are relatively pleased that the courts are not subservient to the Congress or President. However, I bet a few anti-abortionists would prefer if federal judges were controlled by the President or were popularly elected.

      But this entire post was off-topic. I just find the development of English courts and the seeds of US government fascinating.

      * Interestingly but almost irrelevantly, before William the Conqueror came over, the Anglo-Saxon equivalent of advisors to the Crown were the Witenagemot, which sounds an awful lot like the high court in Harry Potter, the Wizengamot. I can't help but think that JK Rowling did this on purpose. It's possible she knows some Old English, because Witenagemot is Old English for "meeting of wise men." Perhaps "Wizengamot" would be quasi-Old English for "meeting of wizards."

      Any UKers out there want to correct misstatements I made about UK institutions, feel free!

    13. Re:Not the president by thirty-seven · · Score: 1
      The Parliament of Canada has some excellent resources to explain the basics of the parliamentary system there. They provide good information about how the general British-style parliamentary system works within a specific, real context.

      The Library of Parliament hosts the following, online:

      I especially recommend "How Canadians Govern Themselves", first written by a Senator and now updated and published by the Library of Parliament. It is written for a general audience (not the law school crowd), but I do not think that it over-simplifies things. Because most Canadians' expectations of how government should function is shaped by US sources, the publication includes a section that compares US and Canadian governance, which I think would be a useful section for any interested American readers, too.

      --

      Atheism is a religion to the same extent that not collecting stamps is a hobby.

  11. It's About Time by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

    The efficiency of a multinational organization and
    the effectiveness of the Italian president will finally
    make my internet experience safe and unoffensive.
    This truly is a golden age.

  12. Not specific enough! by jaxtherat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What the fuck does "regulate the inernet" actually mean? It could mean anything!

    1. announce plans to regulate internet
    2. ???
    3. profit

    --
    http://www.zombieapocalypse.tv/
    1. Re:Not specific enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That's exactly what it means. Berlusconi is a crooked Media Proprietor. "Regulating the Internet" is code for "eliminate competition for my business interests". The Internet is a major thorn in the side of those, such as Berlusconi, who own media companies which rely on obsolete business models. So yes, the starting point really is is "regulate the internet" and the intended result really is profit.

    2. Re:Not specific enough! by syousef · · Score: 1

      What the fuck does "regulate the inernet" actually mean? It could mean anything!

      It means: All your base (and pr0nz) are belong to us!

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    3. Re:Not specific enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find your use of word "fuck" rather offensive. You should be aware that use of profanities makes other people less likely to take your argument seriously.

    4. Re:Not specific enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck does "regulate the inernet" actually mean? It could mean anything!

      He was misquoted. The word he actually used was regulatte. He actually meant that he was going to grab a coffee and then surf for porn.

    5. Re:Not specific enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think of the worst thing that comes to your mind

    6. Re:Not specific enough! by cashman73 · · Score: 1

      If it means laying the smack-down on ICANN, and getting rid of stupid, wasted-space domains like .biz, .aero, and .museum, I'm all for it! But if it means censoring content and monitoring usage, then they can DIAF!

    7. Re:Not specific enough! by gedrin · · Score: 1

      It means

      1. We recognize that the genius and effort of many people have created something useful, profitable, and powerful.
      2. We recognize that we cannot replace it with something of our own creation.
      3. We desire control over use, profits and power, either for their own sake or because we fear the individual's use of such.
      4. Therefore we will use the power of laws, and the use of force implied for thier enforcement, to sieze the control we desire over what others have created.

      --
      Moderation : -1 Conservative Viewpoint
    8. Re:Not specific enough! by jaxtherat · · Score: 1

      You do realise you're on the internet, right?

      --
      http://www.zombieapocalypse.tv/
  13. Censorship - not Regulation by earlymon · · Score: 4, Informative

    Whack him as crazy all you want, but the truth is that he's crazy and despotic. From TFA:

    Berlusconi owns swathes of the Italian mass media.

    The left-wing newspaper L'Unita wrote: "You can not say that it is not a disturbing proclamation, given that the only countries in the world where there are filters or restrictions against internet are countries ruled by dictatorial regimes: those between China, Iran, Cuba, Saudi Arabia."

    And -

    Any G8 move next year to "regulate the internet" led by Berlusconi is likely to attract criticism. He has often been accused of using his power to try to silence dissent. He lost a long-running libel battle against The Economist earlier this year after it said he was not "fit to run Italy" and was this week suing American critic Andrew Stille for defamation.

    More on this guy - http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/02/world/europe/02italy.html?_r=1&ref=europe

    --
    Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
    1. Re:Censorship - not Regulation by Vihai · · Score: 3, Informative

      "You can not say that it is not a disturbing proclamation, given that the only countries in the world where there are filters or restrictions against internet are countries ruled by dictatorial regimes: those between China, Iran, Cuba, Saudi Arabia.

      And Italy. Yes, Italy has a state list of sites to be filtered.

      With the excuse of protection from child pornography they started state filter and they are now expanding them to block other inconvenient sites.

      First online gambling sites not agreeing to pay italian administration their share.

      Then sites selling cigarettes.

      Then The Pirate Bay.

      It is just a matter of time until they will block sites criticizing the government itself.

    2. Re:Censorship - not Regulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Italy. Yes, Italy has a state list of sites to be filtered.

      And, of course, Australia soon to be added to that list of countries...

    3. Re:Censorship - not Regulation by earlymon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is just a matter of time until they will block sites criticizing the government itself.

      You've nailed it in one.

      --
      Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
    4. Re:Censorship - not Regulation by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      the only countries in the world where there are filters or restrictions against internet are countries ruled by dictatorial regimes: those between China, Iran, Cuba, Saudi Arabia.

      And Australia.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    5. Re:Censorship - not Regulation by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      No North Korea?

    6. Re:Censorship - not Regulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "First online gambling sites not agreeing to pay italian administration their share."
      Sure, why not?

      "Then sites selling cigarettes."
      High Five!

      "Then The Pirate Bay."
      Nooooooo! They lost it...

      I guess the problem is: When you start walking down that road, you won't know when to stop.

  14. Beppe Grillo take on it by ilithiiri · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here for his post http://www.beppegrillo.it/eng/2008/12/open_letter_to_rupert_murdoch.html

    Beppe Grillo is an Italian *comedian* turned blogger turned person fed up with the current state of italian affairs. He tried (so far in vain) to promote laws signed by the populace, which would not allow politicians to be in the Parliament if they have been convicted by courts.

    On any other country (well, most of them) this would be implied, wouldn't it?

    No chance!

    Read on to http://www.beppegrillo.it/eng/condannati_parlamento.php for the state of the art of the Italian parliament.

    25 politicians in the Italian and European parliament convicted by courts.

    Did they steal candy? No chance.

    We're talking about judge corruption, extortion, that sort of stuff.

    On topic: Berlusconi seems he'd like now to create a UNIQUE ID for every net citizen so that they'd be univocally identified on the Internet.

    Sigh.

    --
    If anyone can hear me, slap some sense into me But you turn your head, and I end up talking to myself
    1. Re:Beppe Grillo take on it by Shin-LaC · · Score: 1

      Linking to a barely related (and barely coherent) blog post before going on a wholly off-topic rant does not quite make a comment on-topic. I'm not sure what makes Beppe Grillo's opinion relevant: his (former?) career as a comedian? His stint as a demagogue? His multiple manslaughter conviction? Italian public opinion has moved past the anti-political phase that characters like Grillo briefly embodied. The current government is doing a pretty decent job (which looks like a stellar job when compared to its predecessor's), and its approval ratings remain high - which is all the more remarkable when you consider the current situation of worldwide economic crisis. Things are changing.

      That said, if Berlusconi messes with the Internet I'm ready to turn into a single-issue voter and support anyone who would set things right. I doubt he's actually going to manage to do that, though.

    2. Re:Beppe Grillo take on it by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      Beppe Grillo [...] tried (so far in vain) to promote laws signed by the populace, which would not allow politicians to be in the Parliament if they have been convicted by courts.

      On any other country (well, most of them) this would be implied, wouldn't it?

      Oddly enough, not in the United States. Senator Ted Stevens of Alaska (he of "the Internet is a series of tubes" fame) was convicted of multiple felonies yet was not barred from office. This had the Republicans in a bit of a pickle until he was defeated in his re-election bid

      BTW, I'm an Italian-American and my relatives in Italy all refer to Berlusconi as "The Dwarf." I don't know if that's commonplace elsewhere in Italy.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    3. Re:Beppe Grillo take on it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't he give himself diplomatic immunity recently? He seems like quite an arse.

    4. Re:Beppe Grillo take on it by GbrDead · · Score: 1

      Lucky Italians. Here, in Bulgaria, there are no convictions of corrupt politicians. And this by far does not mean that there aren't any.

    5. Re:Beppe Grillo take on it by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      On topic: Berlusconi seems he'd like now to create a UNIQUE ID for every net citizen so that they'd be univocally identified on the Internet.

      And the populace is all singing and screaming "No" with a single voice?

    6. Re:Beppe Grillo take on it by rmav · · Score: 1

      I'm an Italian-American and my relatives in Italy all refer to Berlusconi as "The Dwarf." I don't know if that's commonplace elsewhere in Italy.

      Yes, he is often called "il nano" (the dwarf) or "il nano pelato" (the bald dwarf) or even "il psiconano" (the psychic dwarf). I find it very childish, even though I do not like "il silvio nazionale" (the national silvio - yes, YABN (yet another Berlusconi nickname)).

      But, then, his opponent Prodi is often called "il mortadella" (the bologna-salami one).

      Roberto

    7. Re:Beppe Grillo take on it by donatzsky · · Score: 1

      Indeed he did -- for life. And it's for all prime ministers; not just him.

    8. Re:Beppe Grillo take on it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I believe that in a true democracy, convicted felons who have paid their debt to society should be allowed to both vote and take office.

      The problem in Italy is that Belasconi keeps changes the law so that he cannot be prosecuted.

      Many succesful and talented people have serious criminal convictions in their past. That is why some countries allow most typs of criminal records to expire after 10 years or so, at least for the purposes of employment checks and so on.

      If we do not believe people can reform and sucessfully re-enter society (which is certainly not supported by the ststistics, contrary to what the tabloids say), then we should just execute everybody.

      A citizen who has erred should be able to regain his or her rights upon paying their debt to society. I mean all their rights.

  15. Fascist by retech · · Score: 1

    The G8 internet, now with more fascism. Bringing a preWW2 mentality to homes globally.

  16. Good by homer_s · · Score: 5, Funny

    I assume that since many people here support govt. regulation of industry and commerce, they should be all for this idea. I mean, if a complex system like the economy cannot function well without govt. regulation, a complex system like the internet cannot either.

    1. Re:Good by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Regulation of commerce != censorship of media.

      The former is a matter of preventing industrial sharks from taking over and squeezing every last penny from consumers while offering sub-par service, the latter involves imposing someone else's subjective moral values on the general populace. Not the same thing at all.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    2. Re:Good by grunaura · · Score: 1
      Granted this is unfeasible by the very nature of the Internet...

      To really understand the intention of Berlusconi you must understand that Italy is a modified socialist government itself. This man has his fingers in every sector of Italian business. I invite you to read "The Dark Heart of Italy, by Tobias Jones which outlines how deep this problem goes." Berlusconi owns the RAI, the government controlled television. He also has his fingers in AGIP which is the one gas (petrol automobile fuel) vendor that is also controlled by the government. Other gas stations may not sell gas at a rate under that which is set by AGIP. The bottom line is that this man is very powerful, very rich and not going anywhere soon.

      A recent figure came out in BBC stating that the mafia run businesses in Italy are operating at the 120 billion range which is enormous in contrast to Fiat's 50 Billion a year market share. My guess as an Italian speaking American is that this man really wants some form of revenue in the form of taxes out of the deal because piracy belongs to the mafia in Italy and TPB et. al. is cutting into its share. In fact Italy's government controlled telecoms "Telecom Italia," has been known to block TPB but I am unsure they are currently doing this or blocking torrent traffic.

      Then again, this is coming out in the register and notably not the most reliable source of information IMHO.

      PS: To my amusement and Italy's shame, he stated that we elected a "very tan" president.

    3. Re:Good by MobyDisk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Absolutely! No more allowing people just to connect to the Internet with any address they choose! Instead, I propose some sort of standard Internet Protocol address. And a central organization to assign everyone those addresses. Then, we can have some sort of header on every packet that will describe the source and destination address.

      Perhaps we could have a central organization who would assign names to those addresses. And they could standardize the naming schemes, and the protocols the naming servers use!

      nahh... that's just too much regulation :)

    4. Re:Good by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Sarcasm, right? I hope so, because -- absent any evidence of deliberate fraud, which is illegal in its own right -- the former is also "imposing someone else's subjective moral values on the general populace."

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    5. Re:Good by Toandeaf · · Score: 1

      The government is not the only organization that can exert control on you and limit your freedom. By controlling the market some are capable of eliminating choice on services which in turn have a drastic impact on people's lives. If you cause enough financial harm to others you take away their ability to compete freely with you. Though it is more subtle, it does have a direct impact on personal freedom. To say that regulation is equivalent to censorship is a horrendous misrepresentation.

    6. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is MobyDisk:s comment marked as insightful.
      I thought it was funny.

    7. Re:Good by lgw · · Score: 1

      The government has a very legitmate interest in standardizing weights and measures. Heck, it's one of the few powers actually given to the US federal government by our constitution! It's not much of a reach to tie that into net neutrality (I'm not sure I'm convinced, but the arument seems reasonable as a starting point). If you build a pipe which is used as infrasturcture, it's not subjective moral imposition to require that it use standard fittings so that it might be connected to other infrastructure pipes.

      Prevention of monopoly in a free market is a more difficult question - but when the government *creates* a monopoly by outlawing competition with the favored company (as is the case with most cable connections these days), regulation isn't a hard question at all. Of course, I'd prefer to see governments just *stop* the ridiculous practice of creating monopolies in the first place.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    8. Re:Good by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sarcasm, right? I hope so, because -- absent any evidence of deliberate fraud, which is illegal in its own right -- the former is also "imposing someone else's subjective moral values on the general populace."

      No, because economic regulation has nothing to do with "moral values" (which are, of course, inherently subjective). Rather, it's a purely utilitarian activity - maximizing the benefit for the society as a whole.

    9. Re:Good by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      "imposing someone else's subjective moral values on the general populace."

      Regulating markets will in some cases (when done right of course) increase societal wealth. Most notably when you're dealing with monopolies; but also in some other situation.

      I recall seeing an economic game (as in game theory) regarding the construction of and packet-routing on interconnected networks. If you let players behave individually rationally, the public gets less benefit than if the regulatory iron fist of government steps in.

      I think "we should make humanity richer" is a subjective moral value. I also think very little of those who oppose that goal, or want to pursue its negation. And I'm all in favor of having it imposed on me if I get to reap the benefits of it being imposed on others.

      This is of course all under the highly debatable assumption that overall, the government does well.

      I think governments can do well; I live in Denmark where I get my ass taxed off in return for free health service, free education, free welfare money while I'm taking the education, free libraries, free cellular telephony*, and the happiest people on the planet.

      * For low monthly usage; it's not even provided by the government but the (frigging) market. Yes, the market is regulated, but the government hasn't set the price to zero.

    10. Re:Good by Arthur+B. · · Score: 1

      You're imposing your subjective moral value about "price fairness" on "industrial sharks".

      --
      \u262D = \u5350
    11. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real issue is that Internet isn't just an industry or a trading plateform. Most people tend to think "free speech" rather than "monetizing web 2.0".

      They should rather say "regulating" international commerce and finance if they do mean to regulate the economy. . Then nobody would really complain about it IMHO.

      The problem with Berlusconi is that most of his assets are TV medias. And they are under heavy threats. This guy is only a genius when his self interest are concerned.

    12. Re:Good by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      To get technical, applying utilitarian activity is applying utilitarianism, a philosophy which uses the morality of "maximising the public good" as its metric (approximately).

    13. Re:Good by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      The same can be said of censorship. In some cases -- when "done right", of course -- censorship will increase "societal wealth" according to someone's metric. Just as with regulating markets, though, whether or not "societal wealth" has actually increased depends entirely on the observer's subjective moral values.

      In a purely voluntary context it can be said that each participant's wealth, and thus total wealth, is expected to increase objectively, but that cannot be said in any other context, and the actions under discussion are decidedly involuntary.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    14. Re:Good by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      maximizing the benefit for the society as a whole

      What does that even mean? Value is subjective -- that is one point on which all modern economists agree. As such, it is entirely meaningless to even compare the "magnitude" of values between different individuals, much less attempt to sum them up into some kind of collective utility function. Any system which would assign relative worth to different individuals' preferences is an application of subjective moral values. No "purely utilitarian activity" can exist outside of some subjective moral context.

      If everyone were to agree that your regulations were an improvement then you could say that they objectively increase "societal wealth", ex ante, but in that case the regulations would be unnecessary. In all other cases, the decision that the benefits to those who desire the regulations somehow outweigh the costs imposed on the rest is necessarily a subjective one.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    15. Re:Good by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      I recall seeing an economic game (as in game theory) regarding the construction of and packet-routing on interconnected networks. If you let players behave individually rationally, the public gets less benefit than if the regulatory iron fist of government steps in.

      I've seen the same analysis, but I wouldn't take it too seriously. In all such cases the "players" are not representative of how humans actually make decisions; the decision-making isn't recursive enough. Humans would take the results of this study into account and self-optimize their decisions accordingly, rather than automatically going for the so-called "rational" route (which is only "rational" when one ignores the known consequences).

      Game theory is useful in its proper context, but when the "players" are human beings, the game itself is not a fixed element, so the predictions don't necessarily hold.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    16. Re:Good by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      You know, comparing our sigs, I think we'll have to agree to disagree :)

    17. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said govt.

  17. hooray, win will ensue! by blhack · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It has been said before, and I will repeat it here.

    The internet treats censorship like damage and simply routes around it.

    This "war on free information" (isn't the the en vogue thing to call a power struggle?) like every other idealogical war, cannot be won, and is counterproductive.
    With every "blow" to us (us being those that desire freedom of information) we simply grow smarter, stronger, and more sophisticated in our measures to ensure the integrity of our freedoms.
    Our numbers are so so so so so much greater than theirs. Every time one of us is jailed, or sued, or defamed 10 pop up as replacements. Every attempt to silence our voices results in us retreating further and further into obscurity and anonymity.

    I welcome an information war between those of us who want freedom of communication and those that don't. We, who have greater resources, intellect, and numbers, will prevail.

    --
    NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    1. Re:hooray, win will ensue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I welcome an information war between those of us who want freedom of communication and those that don't. We, who have greater resources, intellect, and numbers, will prevail.

      Except if we're complacent in the face of truly massive damage to the internet because we think we'll somehow automagically prevail. Sorry, but the internet's capacity to route around damage is limited, as any network admin can tell you. If you don't keep fighting every day to defend internet liberty, one day it'll be gone. Attackers only need to win once, defenders need to win always.

      Frankly, I for one think we need to go on the attack - destroy corrupt politicians proactively. Hack their systems and leak damaging information. They'll label us criminals. But - guess what - they already do that regardless of what we actually do. They don't care about the truth, they want control.

    2. Re:hooray, win will ensue! by Miseph · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Every attempt to silence our voices results in us retreating further and further into obscurity and anonymity."

      Yeah, sounds like we're really winning the war on censorship and defending our rights to free speech... Here's a hint, if you have to say something in increasingly anonymous and more obscure ways, you're losing.

      No government can ever prevent anything completely, only to degrees. The more they crack down, the more things will be done in secrecy, and the less people will actually do them at all. This is why the wars on drugs and terror have been such abysmal failures, they failed to curb the behaviors at all (perhaps even encouraging them!) and have had hardly any effect on the degree of publicity people who do them are willing to expose themselves to; by comparison, the war on child pornography has gotten people using increasingly obscure means of communication and distribution, kiddie porn still exists and probably always will, but I remember a time not so long ago when one could actually come across http sites openly hosting child porn for all to see.

      This post is not intended to support or endorse any particular view on the issues it mentions, simply to state a point on government suppression in general.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    3. Re:hooray, win will ensue! by bendodge · · Score: 1

      I think you welcome it as long as it's outside the US. This sort of garbage going on in the US could be very damaging indeed, as a huge chunk of internet backbone and servers is located in the US. The US gov also has the resources to track p2p people down and throw them in jail. Just imagine a law banning p2p outright. Thankfully, the US has a Bill of Rights which still has pretty strong backing by an armed public, despite years of erosion and brainwashing.

      'Internet information wars' are only fun when you have a stronghold to base your operations in. If the US loses its core freedoms, it won't be fun. At all. The moral of this story is to "Hang on to your Constitution" (Reagan).

      --
      The government can't save you.
    4. Re:hooray, win will ensue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be nice if you were right, but unfortunately Internet censorship is a very real threat. While a few tech-savvy people can route around, the vast majority does not know or care how to do it. People generally eat swallow what they get. There are numerous ways to censor the Internet, from using smart package inspection and bandwidth throttling to manipulating the page ranks in Google in a way that nobody will ever notice. The few ways around this (like TOR, gnunet, etc.) can easily be shut down or filtered, or, in the case of search engine manipulation, are ineffective.

    5. Re:hooray, win will ensue! by yossarianuk · · Score: 1

      I like your positive thinking, however I imagine the governments round the world will pump tonnes of money into efforts at restricting our internet freedoms. The fact that it is unethical, undemocratic and a complete waste of money will not put off governments, this think of the the billions of $$$ spent on the USA's war on drugs and the damage it has done to the entire planet.

  18. The Internet is already regulated by chrb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since Berlusconi didn't expand on what he meant, the Register article is slightly alarmist. Maybe he wants to regulate download speeds, or legislate net neutrality? The bald statement of wanting to "regulate the internet" is worthless. If he did want to restrict freedom of speech, and an E.U. directive were put forward, it would still need to be passed into national law by the E.U. member states, and even if that occurred it could still be challenged at the European Court under the Human Rights legislation.

    But realistically, the Internet is already regulated. Try putting a copy of Photoshop or pornography involving a 15 year old girl on your web page and see how long it lasts. The question is not whether the Internet is regulated, but the level of regulation. In China, criticising the government is prohibited. In the Middle East, pornography is prohibited. In the United States, reproducing commercial sensitive data is prohibited via copyright and patent laws, in Germany Nazi memorabilia is prohibited. Every society has its limits.

    1. Re:The Internet is already regulated by Adrian+Lopez · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In China, criticising the government is prohibited. In the Middle East, pornography is prohibited. In the United States, reproducing commercial sensitive data is prohibited via copyright and patent laws, in Germany Nazi memorabilia is prohibited. Every society has its limits.

      Which is precisely why G8 is the wrong group to tackle Internet regulation. Every society has its limits, but no society has exactly the same limits as the others. G8 is too far removed from the public interest to do any good here, and the interests of those who would regulate the Internet too different to lead to anything but an unreasonable "middle ground".

      --
      "In prison you just have to shut your eyes and take it. Here you have to shut your eyes and give it."
    2. Re:The Internet is already regulated by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      Try putting a copy of Photoshop or pornography involving a 15 year old girl on your web page and see how long it lasts.

      Do we get to chose the country it's hosted from?

    3. Re:The Internet is already regulated by drspliff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As the G8 president he can use his position to set agendas and to push his position on other members, hopefully they won't take it any further.

      The G8 is just yet another platform of power on the international level, it doesn't matter that it's too far removed from the public - that's likely of no matter; getting other high-ranking officials to take it on-board may lead to setting their own policies in a similar vain.

    4. Re:The Internet is already regulated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Note: I'm italian)

      Berlusconi is a 70 years old man and is only a facade for a bunch of highly skilled people that work for him.
      That said, phrases like these has always revelead
      to be tragedies. An example: the university reform, where they simply went for the stragith way of cutting everything from everywhere and started
      assuming no-one was fighting against the bill.

      As a matter of fact, the italian newspaper La repubblica (quite known here) reports of
      Roberto Maroni - minister for internal affairs / member the infamous northern league party who wanted to track down fingerprints for non-community incomers - that "speaking about the recent incrimination of two maybe-terrorists, it is necessary to enforce traking of digital communication. We are working on how to have any user have its own unique IP address at every time, so as to be able to track them better and avoid data deletion".

      Again, don't fall in the trap of thinking Maroni even knows what an IP address is. He doesn't.
      Neither Berlusconi does. Leading an internet regulation may range from enforcing politics like Maroni's one to "fight terrorism" (i'm sorry guys, USA is going to stop about this mantra, Italy won't) to "how to enforce content digital rights". But due to the recent timing, the first kind of attack is going to be.

  19. Streissand effect by blhack · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Look at what happend to 4chan and "anonymous" over the last year of so. Somebody posted a video of Tom Cruise acting like...well...like himself. Scientology's attempts to take this video down caused a bunch of idiots to start posting videos on youtube and..well...acting like idiots. Scientology's further attempts to silence them have caused what started as a joke to turn into a national-news-making group of resourceful, hate-filled individuals bent on "dispelling your organization from the internet and systematically dismantling it blah blah blah"

    I predict: Cisco makes a shitload of money selling filters
    a shitload of jobs are created to maintain all the censoring equipment
    a shitload of our money is spent to prevent us from communicating with one another
    a shitload of computer illiterates get angry when whatever side effects of this "regulation" start occuring
    a small number of geeks create a tool to allow a slightly larger number of geeks to continue doing what geeks have done since their beginning...that is: whatever they want.

    --
    NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    1. Re:Streissand effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think i love you.

    2. Re:Streissand effect by WillDraven · · Score: 1

      It seems to me, that our jobs as geeks should then be to provide easy to use tools to the computer illiterate masses, so that they might continue communicating unobstructed with one another.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    3. Re:Streissand effect by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 3, Funny

      Somebody posted a video of Tom Cruise acting like...well...like himself.

      You mention this and don't post a link?

    4. Re:Streissand effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here you go. Here is a list of videos where he has done that.

      http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000129/

    5. Re:Streissand effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0

  20. This is Italy we're talking about... by BearRanger · · Score: 1

    Is there any guarantee that Berlusconi will still be Prime Minister in January? Historically they've changed governments more frequently than Cowboy Neal changes his pants... ;-)

    1. Re:This is Italy we're talking about... by azaris · · Score: 1

      Is there any guarantee that Berlusconi will still be Prime Minister in January?

      Hilarious. There's more chance of Vladimir Putin being deposed than Berlusconi. He's prime minister for the fourth time already, and he's not going anywhere.

    2. Re:This is Italy we're talking about... by BearRanger · · Score: 1

      An example that proves my point. He's been prime minister 4 times... that's at least 8 governments right there as he's been in and out of power. Unless he's 100 years old that's a lot of change you can't necessarily believe in...

    3. Re:This is Italy we're talking about... by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 1, Funny

      Is there any guarantee that Berlusconi will still be Prime Minister in January? Historically they've changed governments more frequently than Cowboy Neal changes his pants... ;-)

      How often does one need to change assless chaps?

    4. Re:This is Italy we're talking about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, just to note, chaps are normally "assless" - they're extra shields for the legs, basically. Wearing chaps and nothing underneath would be odd, sure, but I'm just saying the "assless" qualifier is not really applicable to chaps - if they had an ass ("seat"), they'd be peculiar toughened trousers, not chaps.

      Try "chaps and no pants" or "nothing but chaps, a hat, and a big smile".

    5. Re:This is Italy we're talking about... by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Okay, just to note, chaps are normally "assless" - they're extra shields for the legs, basically. Wearing chaps and nothing underneath would be odd, sure, but I'm just saying the "assless" qualifier is not really applicable to chaps - if they had an ass ("seat"), they'd be peculiar toughened trousers, not chaps.

      Try "chaps and no pants" or "nothing but chaps, a hat, and a big smile".

      Gee, pedantic much? An assless chap Nazi... only on Slashdot!

  21. Its inevitable by nurb432 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not today, not tomorrow, but someday you can expect content regulation to take place.

    As we lose control little by little of our hardware, software, documents ( DRM ), its just a matter of time.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Its inevitable by Mojo66 · · Score: 1

      I agree. The internet, being anonymous and anarchic per se, is a nightmare to every authoritarian political system. Berlusconi's proposal only shows that western democracy is not far away anymore from countries like China and Russia, thanks to the aftermath of 9/11.

    2. Re:Its inevitable by syousef · · Score: 1

      Not today, not tomorrow, but someday you can expect content regulation to take place.

      Um, last I checked content was regulated. If you arrange to commit a crime via the internet, it's illegal.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    3. Re:Its inevitable by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Not all content is regulated, yet. Remember not all content is 'forsale'.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  22. this could be the final straw that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    will make me take up arms. Food prices have gone up, there's no hope of retirement, the tap water is poison, they are spraying the sky with aluminum oxide, pulsing us with HAARP and now they want to regulate the internet!

    I will start to take out these people by force if necessary once the internet becomes what it is not right now.

    1. Re:this could be the final straw that... by earlymon · · Score: 1

      I, for one, am delighted to live in a world where people will take up arms for the internet after living (and putting up) with poisoned air and water.

      This just in - the internet hasn't been what it's been since AOL opened its spigot and Kevlar is on sale for the holidays - film at 11.

      --
      Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
  23. Update from the future!! by Sean0michael · · Score: 0

    Update - 12/5 at 00:04 by SS

    Wow, that's amazing! It's only just after 4:15pm on Dec. 4th local time. Time travel really is possible!

    --
    Funtime Candy Wow! - my plan for eventually conquering Japan.
    1. Re:Update from the future!! by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      UTC

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  24. mod parent up by Phantom+of+the+Opera · · Score: 1

    I say mod parent up. That's an excellent question.

    I do support govt regulation of industry and commerce.

    I support government regulation of the mechanical aspects of the internet, specifically net neutrality. I support internet privacy laws.

    I do not support government regulation of the content of the internet.

    I don't think that car manufacturers should be prohibited from making polka dotted ugly ass cars if they want to.

    1. Re:mod parent up by Arthur+B. · · Score: 1

      Everything is content on the Internet. Net Neutrality is a regulation of content, a particular one, but a regulation of content nonetheless.

      --
      \u262D = \u5350
    2. Re:mod parent up by Phantom+of+the+Opera · · Score: 1

      I suppose if you do some mental gymnastics, you can think of it as a regulation of content.

      It is a regulation of content the same way that laws saying that mail carriers may not read one's mail are a regulation of content.

      That makes Net Neutrality somewhat of a privacy issue; your packets are your business and those who are not the recipients should not open them up to examine them.

    3. Re:mod parent up by Arthur+B. · · Score: 1

      Reading the envelope doesn't mean opening the letter.

      --
      \u262D = \u5350
    4. Re:mod parent up by Phantom+of+the+Opera · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I follow your point

  25. Can't be that hard by mahohmei · · Score: 3, Funny

    C'mon, censoring the Internet can't be that hard. Just get a Websense filtering appliance and stick it in the Internet's MDF.

  26. Dumbocracy by Adrian+Lopez · · Score: 2, Funny

    The more mainstream the Internet becomes, the more it yields to dumb. Some people blame AOL. I blame humanity.

    Dumb has large numbers behind it.

    --
    "In prison you just have to shut your eyes and take it. Here you have to shut your eyes and give it."
  27. This man is a genius. by BumpyCarrot · · Score: 5, Funny

    Truly, Prime Minister Berlusconi is a great man, a marvel, the pinnacle of international leadership, and an example to us all.

    When Obama was elected as President, he was the first to compliment him on his suntan.

    --
    Do you see what I did there?
    1. Re:This man is a genius. by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      That would be Nicholas Sarkozy, the *French* premier, not Berlusconi
      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/23/unrepentant-berlusconi-st_n_145821.html?show_comment_id=18253942
      However, Silvio's quite capable of putting his foot in it, as well: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/3041288.stm
      My favourite?
      "On his equal opportunities minister and former model Mara Carfagna: "I'd go anywhere with you, even to a desert island. If I weren't already married, I would marry you straight away."
      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/3398962/Silvio-Berlusconis-top-10-gaffes.html

    2. Re:This man is a genius. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Berlusconi is a smart criminal. Don't be fooled by its idiotic appearances and gaffes, they're often staged moves played in front of cameras to reinforce the public opinion that he's an innocuous goof.

  28. Berlusconi v The Internet by John+Hasler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I expect that Berlusconi's definition of "regulate the Internet" is "make it stop competing with my television stations". Italians are to get their porn exclusively from him.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:Berlusconi v The Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I expect that Berlusconi's definition of "regulate the Internet" is "make it stop competing with my television stations". Italians are to get their porn exclusively from him.

      This is a key thing most people don't know....Berlusconi owns some absurdly high percentage of mass-media in Italy. TV, newspapers, etc....this guy has one giant propaganda machine.

    2. Re:Berlusconi v The Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds painful.

  29. Hey, paisano! by sizzzzlerz · · Score: 1

    I gotcher regulation right here! Fuhgedaboutit.

  30. Dodgy boiler running Italy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It is as if Jeffrey Archer or Robert Maxwell got to be prime minister of Britain.

    He got rich by a combination bending the rules and having scantily dressed young women present the weather on his TV channels. Now he is in power he just stops all investigations into his activities.

    He will just regulate the Internet so that no one can criticize him using it.

    1. Re:Dodgy boiler running Italy. by Curmudgeonlyoldbloke · · Score: 1

      It is as if Jeffrey Archer or Robert Maxwell got to be prime minister of Britain.

      Jeffrey Archer probably says that he did.

  31. Let the Internet Be by zach_the_lizard · · Score: 2, Informative

    The internet is the freest and most unregulated source of information there is. Certainly governments would want to regulate this, as many facts that make them uncomfortable can be spread. The mainstream media cannot be counted on to report everything; look at their cheer leading for the Iraq invasion. Latvia even made it a crime to criticize their central bank policies, and bloggers can end up in trouble. The internet needs less regulation, not more. All we'll end up with with regulation is having to pay or bribe (directly or indirectly) some stupid government official to get business done.

    --
    SSC
  32. Berlusconi is a pompous windbag... by Phizzle · · Score: 1

    ... and aside from his loud but empty rhetoric will have no impact on the Internet in Italy, much less in the EC or G8.

    --
    I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
  33. Own it by tsa · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I guess he wants to own the internet, just like he owns most of the mass media in Italy. Good luck with that!

    --

    -- Cheers!

    1. Re:Own it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no shit, man.

      he owns 20 ( twenty ) newspapers and 3 television (since it's prime minister, let's count even the state tv => 4 telesions)

  34. Come on ... by daveime · · Score: 1

    Silvio owns EVERYTHING !!!

  35. It's happening in all media controlled countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The old media moguls like Berlusconi and Murdoch are obviously pissed off at the internet. Advertisers now split their revenue between old and new media and there is now a voice outside of what the old media tells us.

    Here in Australia, the home of Rupert Murdoch, we have a government trying to destroy the internet at every opportunity. I see in Italy they have a similar thing happening.

    I guess i can take comfort in the fact it won't work.

  36. Don't worry ... by pentaknot · · Score: 1

    Don't worry, there are at least a couple of reasons while it will never happen. 1) The guy is a complete moron, I'm sure he thinks the internet is "a series of tubes" (in italian: una serie di tubi) 2) Generally speaking, when it comes to politics, Italy is not the fastest country in putting bills through their legislative pace. It may take a decade or more before they even come up with an actual concrete proposal.

  37. In a free world... by noddyxoi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    the internet regulates dictators.

    1. Re:In a free world... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, welcome our new Rick Astley overlord...

  38. As the President Anonymous of the Internet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I promise the "President of the G8" that we will fight any oppression and any restriction of our freedoms online, anywhere and anyhow.

    Just remember who controls the bytes...

  39. It routes around damage? by Ironchew · · Score: 1

    The internet routes around damage?
    Great, let me know when my incoming line routes around the only ISP in the area.

    1. Re:It routes around damage? by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      Do you have a router with a free port? Run a wire to your closest technically-minded neighbor. Repeat until you can ping Slashdot.

    2. Re:It routes around damage? by Jorophose · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Who needs wires?

      Slashdotters, let's get to work on mesh networking. Everyone set up a "piece" of the mesh, and we just keep rolling until we get entire provinces/states covered. Wires work great when you can go over 300ft without it starting to die.

      And with wireless the truly anon are free to stalk as they like. :)

  40. The Internet is Berlusconi's worst enemy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the Internet is Berlusconi's worst enemy. His control of printed media and private as well as public televisions prompted the Financial Times to talk of a situation similar to North Korea.

    However, he has no control of what happens on the 'Net and he makes no money out of it.

    For both financial and political reasons Internet is bad for him.

    Unsurprisingly, the government hasn't done anything to increase the use of Internet in Italy and it now lags almost at the bottom of Europe.

  41. No one regulates him.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not even the police!!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KkDp-6t-keA

  42. be careful of what you ask for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you might get it.

    "regulate the internet" stories are always tagged with "goodluckwiththat"... but, you know, it could end up very regulated, with the right political will.
    Is the Internet in China as unregulated as you wish? What is going on in Australia?

  43. Two Words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck Him.

  44. Well, if one thing... by XDirtypunkX · · Score: 1

    Berlusconi is proof that Italian fascism wasn't defeated in world war 2, it's proponents just got smarter about it. Wear a suit instead of dressing up in uniform and you can get away with anything.

    1. Re:Well, if one thing... by doublegauss · · Score: 1

      Berlusconi is proof that Italian fascism wasn't defeated in world war 2, it's proponents just got smarter about it. Wear a suit instead of dressing up in uniform and you can get away with anything.

      I'm not sure whether this was meant to be inflammatory or not, but there is more than a grain of truth to it. However, to say that Berlusconi is a later reincarnation of Mussolini would be wrong and misleading. It's more accurate to say that the weaknesses of Italian collective mind which made fascism possible are practically the same that made "Berlusconism" possible.

      I'm not making this up out of thin air. A fundamental book on what I'm talking about was written as early as 1958: "The Moral Basis of a Backward Society", by Edward C. Banfield.

      Disclaimer: yes, I'm a boring Italian academic.

  45. Fallback plan by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

    If he were somehow able to pull this off (a laughable scenario, judging by the comments), alternatives would pop up pretty quickly (a non-Internet WAN?)

  46. Berlusconi is a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was actually on the Mafia's payroll back in the day.....Someone should tie a block to Berlusconi and toss him in the Adriatic Sea :)

  47. quote about damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Did the person who originated that quote about routing around damage, anticipate countries the size of China literally making continent-wide firewalls and controlling communications with penalties of summary execution?

    1. Re:quote about damage by w0mprat · · Score: 1

      Did the person who originated that quote about routing around damage, anticipate countries the size of China literally making continent-wide firewalls and controlling communications with penalties of summary execution?

      Traffic routes around China just fine thanks.

      --
      After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
    2. Re:quote about damage by Xest · · Score: 1

      Yes because despite all that, Chinese dissidents are still successfully getting the information they want in and out of China via the internet.

      I understand that not every Chinese person can but the quote isn't necessarily referring to the individual but the populace as a whole and if even one or two dissidents can get their message out where it's spread further or can get information in where they can spread it further then their task is complete and the quote is valid. This is the case and hence the quote is indeed therefore valid.

  48. The Internet will be on prozac by w0mprat · · Score: 1

    FTFFFFA: "fundamental design of the Internet involves routing around damage, the efforts could be more amusing than threatening."

    Yes yes, those who actually understand what the intrawebs are, know that the internet works, exists and persists because it fundamentally routes around damage and congestion.

    Ah but you can regulate vastly distributed decentralised self organising networks. No really. There is no question the result is quite damaging.

    That is, if you consider an analogy of giving a neural network LSD or Heroin and call that your definition of regulation.

    --
    After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
  49. Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tcp/IP on his agenda!

    Herding cats (without a window on a sunny day) is easier that trying to "regulate" the internet.

    Given his statement, he's probably going to try to push an enema through the tubes OF the internet!

    Someone get him together with Senator Ted Stevens and let the two of them go bowling.

    On line.

    It'll be fun watching them trying to out-roll each other when neither of them knows a packet-switch from a hickory switch!

    Just another proof of Darrow's First Law - "Common sense AIN'T! If it WAS, there'd be more OF it around!"

  50. "Italian-speaking africans"??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he people from the North of italy are very different, and they dont' like the southeners at all. Some actually consider them Italian-speaking africans.

    What the fuck is that supposed to mean? That the northern italians are racist motherfuckers?

    1. Re:"Italian-speaking africans"??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, just that the bahaviour of the southerners is more akin to african countries (you know, like the bazaar) than germanic ones (flowers at the windows).

    2. Re:"Italian-speaking africans"??? by badpazzword · · Score: 1

      That's outdated. As a matter of fact, the latent hostility/diffidence/uneasyness has now fully shifted towards gypsies and (dark-skinned) immigrants.

      Racism? No. Xenophobia? More like so.

      --
      When ideas fail, words become very handy.
  51. Memetic Manipulation & Differentiation by broward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    China, Australia and now Italy are moving towards Internet censorship. In 2006, at Defcon 14, I predicted that the Internet would move towards greater memetic differentiation to prevent widescale manipulation, that is, the ability to influence audiences would be dialed down to smaller and more local groups.

    http://www.realmeme.com/Main/about/Defcon14.ppt

    I wasn't sure of how it would happen, the mechanism which would start up but I know think "national security" is it.
    Here's an experiment I conducted last month along with a brief commentary.

    http://www.realmeme.com/roller/page/realmeme?entry=gaming_calculatedrisk2

    After execution, I was surprised at how many foreign government hits I got, many of them associated with national security. I wouldn't underestimate what's happening. There are serious economic and cultural forces at work and self-preservation is involved.

    1. Re:Memetic Manipulation & Differentiation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Interesting, I read both the slide show and the article, you should write an article of this on Slashdot.

      I'm from a developing country (Mexico) where there's a telecom monopoly ruled by Carlos Slim, one of the richest men in the world.

      Mexico is a great example of this since US lobbying and local private interests are quietly passing bills to censor critical media.

      This, added to a tech illiterate population turns into a perfect storm.

  52. If Italy regulates the Internet... by fortapocalypse · · Score: 1

    it will become much more fashionable

  53. Blame The Register by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 1

    Of all things, I actually RTFA and it's The Register's fault:

    Italian president and media baron Silvio Berlusconi said today that he would use his country's imminent presidency of the G8 group to push for an international agreement to "regulate the internet".

    Sadly, all too many people in the U.S. are lucky if they can find Italy on a map let alone know who is currently Prime Minister, etc.

    Cheers,
    Dave

    --
    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
    Ben
    1. Re:Blame The Register by travbrad · · Score: 1

      If only we could see it from Alaska..

  54. It means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...give me money and I'll do whatever you want.

  55. hmm-a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He a-musta be-a bit-a f-ed in-a da head-a!

  56. Re:Cold Pizza will never happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't care.
    Just so long as they deliver a piping hot pizza within 19 minutes.

    And if I have to pick it up, let's hope there ain't a "turf war" at my local pizzeria. I do not possess a flak-jacket (yet)

  57. Stolen post (this post is not stolen (yes, it is.) by Kagura · · Score: 3, Informative

    Berlusconi is not the president of Italy. He's the prime minister. The president is Giorgio Napolitano.

  58. Even in the US by aepervius · · Score: 1

    Even the US convicted parliamentary can be elected. The logic is probably that if you bar anybody convicted being elected, then politically you can have a great might by just either threatening to convict people, or even eliminate your political foe by convicting them of something minor. Now I tend to agree that corruption crime should ANYWAY make them unelectable, but once you start flagging SOME crime as making you unelectable, where do you set the limit ?

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:Even in the US by lgw · · Score: 1

      If you believe in democracy in the first place, then the voters are perfectly capable of deciding whether or not a politician should be elected despite a crimial record. How many crimes were Nelson Mandela and Lech Walesa convicted of?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    2. Re:Even in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For this even to have a chance of working, you need to be able to chose a candidate to elect.

      As things stand now in Italy, you can just put crosses on party symbols, each having a number of convicted or questionable people in their lists.

      Since you have to put a cross somewhere, otherwise the wrong lizard gets elected, this still gives a parvence of democracy to our regime.
       

  59. Ha! by Lost+Penguin · · Score: 1

    If they plug the tubes, Linux (and FreeSWan) will be the plunger.
    It may be a good thing for them to try.
    We need more DNS based opportunistic end to end encryption.

    --
    I am the unwilling control for my Origin.
  60. shame on us by garakkio · · Score: 1

    We Italian people feel really ashamed for having a such prime minister. It's the worst person I ever seen :-(

    1. Re:shame on us by lbbros · · Score: 1

      That was elected by a strong majority. Come on, a little respect for democracy. I'm not saying that regulating the Internet is good, just that people here make Berlusconi as if it was a dictator, while it was democratically elected by the Italian people. And if people say "why him, and not someone else?" I say:go and look at the state of the affairs of the rest of the parties. Part of them was swept out at the last election and doesn't even have seats in Parliament.

      --
      A CC-licensed illustrated horror novel
    2. Re:shame on us by garakkio · · Score: 1

      Sadly, we (in Italy) have a really strange form of democracy, in which someone can be elected as prime minister while owning the majority of media, having been convicted for many crimes, and many other bad things (too long to explain, take a look to wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berlusconi)

    3. Re:shame on us by amam12 · · Score: 1

      I'm really surprised that Italy's democracy allows for that. I checked out the link, too.

  61. Hey - GREAT Mod! by earlymon · · Score: 1

    Agreeing 100% with someone mod'd Informative is evidently the new definition of Troll.

    Pardon me while I throw myself on the floor laughing.

    --
    Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
    1. Re:Hey - GREAT Mod! by travbrad · · Score: 1

      Welcome to slashdot, where we have moderation trolls :)

    2. Re:Hey - GREAT Mod! by earlymon · · Score: 1

      Well - some days it just seems irresistible. :)

      --
      Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
  62. Ass calls female supporters "menopause section" by uassholes · · Score: 1
    He just lost a libel suit against The Economist for printing some articles describing how much of a shithead he is.

    The Economist wins Berlusconi lawsuit

    Sep 5th 2008 From Economist.com

    In July 2001 Silvio Berlusconi, then prime minister of Italy, launched a lawsuit in Italy alleging that The Economist had defamed him in its article "An Italian Story", which appeared in our April 26th 2001 issue. The magazine cover bore the title: "Why Silvio Berlusconi is unfit to lead Italy". We are pleased to announce that the Court in Milan has issued a judgment rejecting all Mr Berlusconi's claims and requiring him to make a payment for costs to The Economist. The full judgment, in Italian, is available here. The Economist will not be making any further comment. Mr Berlusconi is once again prime minister of Italy.

  63. So yopu know who Berlusconi is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don Silvio is fairly known in Europe, but just in case, I would like you to read his wikipedia article, especially the very long part on Controversies.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silvio_Berlusconi#Controversies

    This is the man who recently taxed pr0n, tried to kick out cypsys from his country, passed laws to ensure he can't be sued for anything related to his companys. More or less I would say he's the European version of Hugo Chavez, so, no credibility.

  64. Aren't you scared? by miomao70 · · Score: 1

    If you are not scared... you don't know Berlusconi and who is behind him.

  65. Don't feed the troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After an interminable string of international gaffes, from likening a German European MP to a Kapo to the recent praise of president-elect Obama for being "suntanned", I'm surprised anybody still takes Berlusconi's words seriously.

    Why don't we apply Internet rules to international politics (rather than the other way around) and simply ban Berlusconi as a troll?

    http://www.notspeakinginmyname.com

  66. A monkey who cant control mafia in his own country by unity100 · · Score: 1

    is going to control internet. yea.

    thats what berlusconi is. a total monkey, who grabbed the power with the help of his wealth, and press, and thinks that such stupid stunts can be pulled in civilized world.

    you may ask whether i do not consider italy a civilized country.

    well, in a civilized country monkeys or clowns do not grab power, and attempt insolence to the extent of trying to control entire WORLD's free speech.

  67. Italy has the Internets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm from Washington, DC. But I lived in Italy, speak Italian, etc. And Italy is BACKWARDS when it comes to the Inernet. It takes over a month to get Internet activated in your home. A substantial portion of the population does not have Internet at home.

    Internet cafes and wifi hotspots are extremely difficult to find, and you almost always end up going to a crappy phone/computer workstation location, and using a public computer that has keystroke loggers installed.

    And they want to regulate the Internet? If it were up to the Italians (luddites, in general), there would be no Internet.

  68. mod parent informative by unity100 · · Score: 1

    we need it

  69. Be worried by Whibla · · Score: 1

    I am.

    This is arguably one of the most corrupt politicians active in Europe today we are talking about. Yet, through control of Italy's media, self proposed legislation making him immune to prosecution, a populist and eternally varying agenda, and a cabinet stacked with convicted fraudsters (convicted whilst working for his media organisations, I should add), he has proved to be quite a 'successful' politician.

    All politicians are adept at playing people against each other, buying favours with promises, all the while keeping an eye out for number one, but if anyone can instigate (self-serving) legislation in the name of "regulating the internet", this man has that media / money motive, and, just perhaps, the means by which to do it.

  70. a comment from Italy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And my comment here from Italy
    is ^^^///_Censurato/Censured_

  71. he has several pending charges... by jaromil · · Score: 1

    ... and to get away with them changed the judges and the constitution... there is a popular italian blog being translated in english, one of the most popular blogs in the world actually. http://www.beppegrillo.it/

    he is a comician, his tones are satira, humor is one of the last things left to italians to stand such a corrupted government.

  72. Regular? by cwAllenPoole · · Score: 1

    I find that the best way to achieve regularity is with a high-fiber diet.

    --
    http://www.allen-poole.com/
  73. Please help us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As in topic, please came in Italy and help us from Berlusconi, mafia, camorra, 'ndrangheta and any other idiots
    We need your help

  74. While we're at it.... by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

    Lets regulate the wind too while we're at it - for all the good it will do.

    If they are successful 'regulating' the internet, it will no longer be an internet.

    The levels of stupidity are astounding.

    --

    Lodragan Draoidh
    The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
  75. Fascitalia! by toriver · · Score: 1

    Italians, eh?

    There was also an Italian EU "bigman" who wanted to filter internet searches in EU and block terms like "genocide" and "bomb".

    The former would have prevented EU citizens from finding the EU Commision's own documents about WW2, Srebrenica and Rwanda...

  76. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess he wants to own the internet, just like he owns most of the mass media in Italy. Good luck with that!

    Italian are not fascist, a part of them, but the other are not, Italy is divided in more politicians
    parts: as Pierferdinado Casini the left arm of Toto Cuffaro = President of region Sicily: corrupted; problems with mafia and friend of Silvio Berlusconi

    The left with Walter Veltroni unable to undestood what is the web, and the real problems of Italian People, they said in television: "Italy is recession", all must be "sober", then they take something 18.000 euro for month, they got cellular phone gratis paid with the taxes of Italian; prostitutes; drug; travels; hotels; refund for election campaign; then they got Parliamentary immunity, any finished in JAIL, 900 of them should stay in jail, and this mean that
    could not to stay corrupted people, or with ongoing processes or belonging to Mafia cosh

    like movements outside the parliament areas of extreme there are the Skin Heads and the various movements and leftist anarchists, there are Sjin Heads of Left and Skin Head of Right.

  77. Could please some talibans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come here in Italy and liberate us from this criminal?
    I mean, and I'm damn serious, please someone shoot this bastard.

  78. I don't believe in democraty by aepervius · · Score: 1

    I don't believe in democracy I rather think it is the least worst system we had up to now. The reason I don't see democracy as a solve-all is that you are by definition (sorry for the elitism) asking people to vote which do not have any clue and let themselves take in by any populist agenda, or by ideology disjointed from facts.

    But I still agree with you that conviction should NEITHER be an obstacle to be electable, NOR should convicted people get their right to vote removed.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  79. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is why Berlusconi hates Internet... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkVWRBjwIxA