I never saw an option to load/save java script code inside of a browser. There for I doubt a guy who wants to learn programming, will see/notice such an option either. Which browser are you using and how do you edit/load/save javascript code?
And how do you develop a JS script in a web browser and safe it to a remarkable useful file? Can you givve an example in a browser like Chrome, e.g. ?? I'm honestly not aware of any way to 'develop' software inside of a web browser besides emulators hosted on the internet where the browser is only an interface to.
Uh, you are bad in reading? I did not say you are wrong. I said it makes no sense. That is all.
Why would: "Something about A, B and C" have a different meaning than"Something about A, B, and C" ?? In most languages the seccond example would be a typing error.
The distingtion between the two is a mere brain masturbatiion. No one is puting imaginary braces around your two examples and interpreting them as: "Something about A, (B and C)" -- A and B are 'kind of' C, or Something about (A, B, and C)" - note, the additional comma, which would be an additional break before the 'and'. Why would an additional break be a natural indication that the three things are grouped together?
Sorry, my point simply was: this makes no sense. And my other point was: likely the majourity of the engllish world agrees, as in my limited access to english discussions about this topic, it only occcured here on/. about 3 or 4 times in recent years. I nevver heard about it before, during my 40 years of reading english:)
Pretty difficult to have an interesting discussion if every one takes it as an attack on his knowledge or intellect.
Yes and no, as you are supposed to wash your hands after dealing with eggs. And more inportant: cross contamination is only relevant for raw food, or fresh food. E.g. you deal with eggs and then make a salad. e-coli could ccome into the salad. However they likely find nothing to strive on, so even if the slalad is outside on a BBQ for a few hours, it does not matter. Depending on dressing, it does not matter anyway as baccteria would noot strife in acid (balsamico etc.) The main problem still are the eggs and stuff made from the eggs, like home made mayonaise or mouse au chocolate etc. As we Europeans learned long ago: cleaning the eggs has nearly no effect on the speed how e-coli will be unhealthy on a humid warm afternoon in dishes that contain raw eggs.
And strangely: the US have an absurd hig amount of cases of food poisoning caused by eggs, close to 100k cases per year.
Why do you think Aspatam is safe? It is known since decades that it increases cancer risks and is about to be forbidden as a food additive in the EU.
Actually I don't ccare about your links.
As I pointed out: you can not prove absence of a risk. You only can prove risks. If you don't know that you don't qualify for discussions about this.
So good luck with your pro GMO and anti organicc food agenda:)
Hint: organic food can not contain any ill causing stuff, otherwise it would not be called organic (or it would be illegal), GMO food sometimes does contain ill causing stuff, albeit in low concentrations, like that corn with poison in the outer skin. So calling one safe and the other same safe is idiotic... but up to you:)
Hope you don't die from eating the wrong food, medicals, etc. Would be a shock to learn on the death bed that benzyl alcohol can kill you, or?
You did not cite any EU evidence. I explained to you that your understanding of the EU directive is wrong. Believe it or not, up to you.
You misunderstand eliberatly the point about payment: if I pay for a database, I'm close to free to do what evver I want, regardless of agreement. Copyright law allows me to interact with the data, the schema etc. and copy/transfer what evver I need to keep my systems running, without any chance for you to claim copyright infringement.
Simple case: you deliver me a database and software to access it and a raw set of data in it in an Oracle installation. I copy that into a Postgres database and change the connection ulrs and credentials to connect the software to 'my new database'... that is completely legal, because: neither the bootstrap data nor the schema is protected from being copied or redistributed. And you can try to force agreements on my as long as you want. In the EU they would be void.
Anyway, as you are obviously not distributing schemas but concernned about your schemas being distributed... up to you:) Good luck.
Did not look like you wanted to claim ovverlapping genetic causes. And if you were, why did you not point them out? There hardly can be overlapping genetic causes in cancer cases where the affected area is mostly controlled by the sexual hormones of the victim. It is much more likely that breast and prostata cancer is more easy/often detected and/or caused by the same ' ulnerability' to _any_ canccer and not just the two affected areas. Anyway... I only wanted to make fun about your ill formulated post... no idea about actual cancer in families. The guys who died of any cancer in my family where all smokers. And all the others get stone old. Well, mostly.
Why don't you continue reading the thread here? There are plenty of americans who point out your mistake, and from them I learn, so it is super easy as a foreigner to follow a forum and learn frm the posts. Obviously more easy than for a nativve:)
No, you don't. The display layer, displayes. For what exactly would it need 'sanity' checks, and what exactly would be a sanity check in case of a unicode display? Hu? Yes, this UTF-8 code is a valid UTF-8 code: please display it! Yes, this UTF-16 code is a valid UTF-16 code, please display it. Yes, this UTF-32 code is a valid UTF-32 code, please display it. That would be a pointless excercise as all UTF-8/16/32 ccodes are valid codes, there is nothing to 'sanity' check!
IRA, is North Ireland, part of UK, not Ireland. Your points about communist regimes after the break up of the USSR are wrong. No idea how you come to such thoughts.
The transitional phase from the collapse of the USSR wasn't smooth despite what they try to push in western history classes. Of course it was not smooth... but there were no civil wars, and especially no 'communist attempts of supression' besides the break up of Yugoslavia, where it is difficult to decide if it was a civil war or a war amoung countries. Or the war in Tchetchenia... and now Ukraine. The break up of the USSR is not tought in 'western history classe'. What ever you mean with that. It just happened recently, it is not 'history' yet. Depending on country you will hardly find anything in a history class that is younger than WWII.
I only agree that learning to program is harder in our days because languages are more complex and tools as well. E.g. persistance annotations etc.
One the other hand: 1) is wrong. Worst case you have to download an IDE, there is nothngi to install. Linux and Macs come with IDEs/programming languages pre installed, e.g. Python. 2) is wrong. Modern IDEs give you information, what exactly would they hide? Folding away doc comments? 3) what has that to do with programming? And we all know where the information os going to: FB and NSA. Where it comes from is irrelevant, most of it is either fake or tits... who cares?
Learning to program is not easier. It is harder. Because languages are more complex. And to a certain exptend required tools are more complex. You never really needed to know something about computers in the old days. You started it and laned in a REPL for Basic. You had usually a mini assembler build in. Thats it, what exactly do you need to know to program on such a thing?
The stuff you learned about computers you basically acquired by accident while you programmed on them. What is a POKE/PEEK and why do they have an effect, oh memory, oh IO-ports...
Oh, how do you savce a graphic to disk, how to load it, oh there is a special memory area holding the graphics? Etc....
Actually I think that people who use the word 'coding' have no clue about computers and software anyway...
Only ine who is not confident in his craftmanship is concerned about jobs getting off shored. There are plenty of development that can't be easy offshored, e.g. stuff that relies on local laws as e.g. energy production and trade in the EU. And on top of that there are plenty of countries where it is fun to work, if my job would be 'off shored' I would 'follow' the job and work in a similar job off shore, nothing is easier than that in our times.
While the answer might look complex, it is actually super simple: MIT style licenses make you as a software developer/copy right holder more free... it is hard to find a case where GPL makes you more free.
And I think people who use illegal drugs, live in the wrong country or state. They should move to a state where the drugs are legal or can be prescribed to adicts.
The rest of your post only shows what an uneducated moron you are.
What makes this curious, at least in my mind, is that breast cancer and prostate cancer risk are actually somewhat correlated with each other familially. You are mistaken. Breast cancer affects mainly women and prostate cancer mainly men...
The overwhelming evidence for the majority of additives and preservatives is that they are safe in the levels found in processed foods. Uh? You don't know the difference between your opinion and evidence?
Ha ha, coming with logic (flat earthers and that) and then writing something like this: when there are dozens of studies showing it does not. You can not show/prove the "absence" of something. How many hundred years do you want to conduct a test that you can be confident a certain substance does not have a certain effect? How many people/animals/test subjects do you want ton involve?
Yes, we make many tests, at some point "we give up" and conclude it is save. However if you would look at how many substances are forbidden in the EU but allowed in the US, that should make you wonder what actually is safe and what not.
The same logic was used against smokers while cigarette companies were hiding the dangers involved. but you do know that this was an american thing... in the rest of the world everyone knew that smoking gives you a high cancer risk, particular lung cancer and circulation problems, particular smoker's legs etc.
Slashdot Mirror
I never saw an option to load/save java script code inside of a browser.
There for I doubt a guy who wants to learn programming, will see/notice such an option either.
Which browser are you using and how do you edit/load/save javascript code?
And how do you develop a JS script in a web browser and safe it to a remarkable useful file?
Can you givve an example in a browser like Chrome, e.g. ??
I'm honestly not aware of any way to 'develop' software inside of a web browser besides emulators hosted on the internet where the browser is only an interface to.
You could have made it more essy by providing a link people could click on :) :)
Muhuhuha!
But that would be to easy
And how exactly do you develop a piecemof software inside of a web browser, save it to disk and reload it the next day to continue working on it?
Uh, you are bad in reading?
I did not say you are wrong.
I said it makes no sense. That is all.
Why would:
"Something about A, B and C" have a different meaning than"Something about A, B, and C" ??
In most languages the seccond example would be a typing error.
The distingtion between the two is a mere brain masturbatiion. No one is puting imaginary braces around your two examples and interpreting them as: "Something about A, (B and C)" -- A and B are 'kind of' C, or Something about (A, B, and C)" - note, the additional comma, which would be an additional break before the 'and'. Why would an additional break be a natural indication that the three things are grouped together?
Sorry, my point simply was: this makes no sense. And my other point was: likely the majourity of the engllish world agrees, as in my limited access to english discussions about this topic, it only occcured here on /. about 3 or 4 times in recent years. I nevver heard about it before, during my 40 years of reading english :)
Pretty difficult to have an interesting discussion if every one takes it as an attack on his knowledge or intellect.
Yes and no,
as you are supposed to wash your hands after dealing with eggs.
And more inportant: cross contamination is only relevant for raw food, or fresh food. E.g. you deal with eggs and then make a salad. e-coli could ccome into the salad. However they likely find nothing to strive on, so even if the slalad is outside on a BBQ for a few hours, it does not matter. Depending on dressing, it does not matter anyway as baccteria would noot strife in acid (balsamico etc.)
The main problem still are the eggs and stuff made from the eggs, like home made mayonaise or mouse au chocolate etc.
As we Europeans learned long ago: cleaning the eggs has nearly no effect on the speed how e-coli will be unhealthy on a humid warm afternoon in dishes that contain raw eggs.
And strangely: the US have an absurd hig amount of cases of food poisoning caused by eggs, close to 100k cases per year.
Why do you think Aspatam is safe?
It is known since decades that it increases cancer risks and is about to be forbidden as a food additive in the EU.
Actually I don't ccare about your links.
As I pointed out: you can not prove absence of a risk. You only can prove risks.
If you don't know that you don't qualify for discussions about this.
So good luck with your pro GMO and anti organicc food agenda :)
Hint: organic food can not contain any ill causing stuff, otherwise it would not be called organic (or it would be illegal), GMO food sometimes does contain ill causing stuff, albeit in low concentrations, like that corn with poison in the outer skin. So calling one safe and the other same safe is idiotic ... but up to you :)
Hope you don't die from eating the wrong food, medicals, etc. Would be a shock to learn on the death bed that benzyl alcohol can kill you, or?
You did not cite any EU evidence.
I explained to you that your understanding of the EU directive is wrong.
Believe it or not, up to you.
You misunderstand eliberatly the point about payment: if I pay for a database, I'm close to free to do what evver I want, regardless of agreement. Copyright law allows me to interact with the data, the schema etc. and copy/transfer what evver I need to keep my systems running, without any chance for you to claim copyright infringement.
Simple case: you deliver me a database and software to access it and a raw set of data in it in an Oracle installation. ... that is completely legal, because: neither the bootstrap data nor the schema is protected from being copied or redistributed. And you can try to force agreements on my as long as you want. In the EU they would be void.
I copy that into a Postgres database and change the connection ulrs and credentials to connect the software to 'my new database'
Anyway, as you are obviously not distributing schemas but concernned about your schemas being distributed ... up to you :) Good luck.
Did not look like you wanted to claim ovverlapping genetic causes. ... I only wanted to make fun about your ill formulated post ... no idea about actual cancer in families. The guys who died of any cancer in my family where all smokers. And all the others get stone old. Well, mostly.
And if you were, why did you not point them out?
There hardly can be overlapping genetic causes in cancer cases where the affected area is mostly controlled by the sexual hormones of the victim.
It is much more likely that breast and prostata cancer is more easy/often detected and/or caused by the same ' ulnerability' to _any_ canccer and not just the two affected areas.
Anyway
Why don't you continue reading the thread here? :)
There are plenty of americans who point out your mistake, and from them I learn, so it is super easy as a foreigner to follow a forum and learn frm the posts.
Obviously more easy than for a nativve
No, you don't.
The display layer, displayes.
For what exactly would it need 'sanity' checks, and what exactly would be a sanity check in case of a unicode display?
Hu? Yes, this UTF-8 code is a valid UTF-8 code: please display it! Yes, this UTF-16 code is a valid UTF-16 code, please display it. Yes, this UTF-32 code is a valid UTF-32 code, please display it.
That would be a pointless excercise as all UTF-8/16/32 ccodes are valid codes, there is nothing to 'sanity' check!
Why don't you read the article you linked? While 'fuzzing' would be possible, no one likely evver thought about it.
Who in his sane mind would think that a random UTF code can crash a software, even the whole computer?
So it brings us back to square one: why and how would you test something you never thought about?
IRA, is North Ireland, part of UK, not Ireland.
Your points about communist regimes after the break up of the USSR are wrong.
No idea how you come to such thoughts.
The transitional phase from the collapse of the USSR wasn't smooth despite what they try to push in western history classes. Of course it was not smooth ... but there were no civil wars, and especially no 'communist attempts of supression' besides the break up of Yugoslavia, where it is difficult to decide if it was a civil war or a war amoung countries. Or the war in Tchetchenia ... and now Ukraine.
The break up of the USSR is not tought in 'western history classe'. What ever you mean with that. It just happened recently, it is not 'history' yet.
Depending on country you will hardly find anything in a history class that is younger than WWII.
The 'picture' in the article is not a picture but a movie. ...
If you click it, you see the X-ray scan
I only agree that learning to program is harder in our days because languages are more complex and tools as well. E.g. persistance annotations etc.
One the other hand: ... who cares?
1) is wrong. Worst case you have to download an IDE, there is nothngi to install. Linux and Macs come with IDEs/programming languages pre installed, e.g. Python.
2) is wrong. Modern IDEs give you information, what exactly would they hide? Folding away doc comments?
3) what has that to do with programming? And we all know where the information os going to: FB and NSA. Where it comes from is irrelevant, most of it is either fake or tits
Learning to program is not easier.
It is harder. Because languages are more complex. And to a certain exptend required tools are more complex.
You never really needed to know something about computers in the old days.
You started it and laned in a REPL for Basic. You had usually a mini assembler build in.
Thats it, what exactly do you need to know to program on such a thing?
The stuff you learned about computers you basically acquired by accident while you programmed on them. What is a POKE/PEEK and why do they have an effect, oh memory, oh IO-ports ...
Oh, how do you savce a graphic to disk, how to load it, oh there is a special memory area holding the graphics? Etc. ...
Actually I think that people who use the word 'coding' have no clue about computers and software anyway ...
Only ine who is not confident in his craftmanship is concerned about jobs getting off shored.
There are plenty of development that can't be easy offshored, e.g. stuff that relies on local laws as e.g. energy production and trade in the EU.
And on top of that there are plenty of countries where it is fun to work, if my job would be 'off shored' I would 'follow' the job and work in a similar job off shore, nothing is easier than that in our times.
Do you have some examples for your theories about Ireland and former USSR states?
While the answer might look complex, it is actually super simple: MIT style licenses make you as a software developer/copy right holder more free ... it is hard to find a case where GPL makes you more free.
Perhaps you should read the constitution.
There is no point in your constitution allowing arbitrary citizens to bear arms.
Strange, that foreigners know that and US citizens don't.
Don't you think so?
Here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
How exactly do you quality control random stuff no one is thinking about?
And I think people who use illegal drugs, live in the wrong country or state.
They should move to a state where the drugs are legal or can be prescribed to adicts.
The rest of your post only shows what an uneducated moron you are.
What makes this curious, at least in my mind, is that breast cancer and prostate cancer risk are actually somewhat correlated with each other familially. ...
You are mistaken. Breast cancer affects mainly women and prostate cancer mainly men
The overwhelming evidence for the majority of additives and preservatives is that they are safe in the levels found in processed foods.
Uh? You don't know the difference between your opinion and evidence?
Ha ha, coming with logic (flat earthers and that) and then writing something like this: when there are dozens of studies showing it does not. You can not show/prove the "absence" of something. How many hundred years do you want to conduct a test that you can be confident a certain substance does not have a certain effect? How many people/animals/test subjects do you want ton involve?
Yes, we make many tests, at some point "we give up" and conclude it is save. However if you would look at how many substances are forbidden in the EU but allowed in the US, that should make you wonder what actually is safe and what not.
The same logic was used against smokers while cigarette companies were hiding the dangers involved. ... in the rest of the world everyone knew that smoking gives you a high cancer risk, particular lung cancer and circulation problems, particular smoker's legs etc.
but you do know that this was an american thing