US eggs don't last longer. The e-coli outside on the shells have absolutely nothing to do with the life period of eggs. If at all, e-coli or other bacteria that get into the egg are the problem. And inn this regard then american way of washing is counter productive as it encourages migration of microbes through the shell.
On the other hand, the white of the egg is alkaline, bacteria usually don't survive this. Only in rare cases they manage to reach the yolk. In the yolk they strife so quickly that an "rotten egg" is immediately recognized.
Eggs last easy half a year or longer, in stable conditions. However they dry out.
Since the EU doesn't want to regulate to that level ($$), Sorry, you are completely mistaken: we have the exact same regulation, with the exact opposite wording: it is forbidden to wash eggs because of the automated washing processes that would rub the bacteria into the shell. And using hot water and even detergents on the outside would reduce the shelf life of the eggs.
Sorry, I'm 100% certain that the copyright situation regarding data base schema in the USA is the same as in Europe. While it strictly speaking is under "copyright", everyone who payed for it is free to use it as he sees fit (because of interoperability exceptions) And everyone who invents by accident the exact same schema ist free to to use it as well. Because in the end the "copyright" does not prevent him in this special case to do so.
And the law situation is like this since over 50 years, it hard has changed recently, and then in the US only, that would be astonishing.
Then explain please, why did you write this: Every Linux package manager I've ever used uses root privileges to update app packages.? And why this: The need for reboots has nothing to do with permissions.? No one said reboots have anything to do with permissions. Reboots in windows are 99% of the time are unnecessary as well, but the stupid guy who programmed the installer added a "lets reboot after install for good measure".
Pfft...:D So why is no one using the Oxford comma then, when it is so important and so logical? How does it come that after 8 years english in school and talking and writing english since 30 years, this topic is only covered on/. ? Recently... as in "during the last 3 years" or so?
Again: a comma in front of "and" or "or" makes no real sense for most people on the planet, regardless of language. And your explantation makes not much sense either. If you wanted to express stuff like this you would simply adjust the sentence structure and not rely on an extra comma (which I would never hear when you follow your own advice and make an extra "pause")
The name alone "Oxford comma" implies that it is simply mental masturbation of a spelling/grammar elite:D
If you find some german language rules, complicated, point them out. Perhaps I can explain them as simple as you tried to explain the oxford comma:D
And sorry: if your country followed the EU so badly that you have now phone contracts without roaming then I would try to change that.
it either became more expensive Sorry, it can't be more expensive. You seem not to listen. A single month in a foreign EU country with normal phone and data behaviour would have cost you half a year of your contract, or more. A single day can be as expensive as a month at home.
Example: my old contract was EUR15 per month. Calling someone, regardless where in EU, costs EUR1.00 per minute. Receiving a call costs EUR1.00 for the first hour and then something like 20 cents per minute.
So if I get called during the week 2 times a day and accept the call, my phone bill already has DOUBLED.
Now I pay EUR20.00 per month, and have free calls in Germany, and unlimited data and no roaming charges in the EU.
Yes, bottom line it is more expensive. As I avoided using my phone like hell before the change of contract. But sometimes I could not avoid it and instead of paying my EUR 15 bill I came home with EUR 150...
And: I can switch back any time into my old 15 tarif anyway, and I guess you can do the same.
because, as I've said multiple times, the current law in the United States does not allow you to copy database schemas. Yes, you said that. And you are wrong.
No idea why that is so hard to google for you or to grasp from my explanaitions.
I have no idea why you keep arguing about this. Because I like to argue:D
fair use exemptions (such as interoperability) would come into play. Exactly, and that extents to the "schema".
Depending on what the economy can contribute, or not? If the don't want foreign workers in their country then there is no deal. If they have nothing to sell of interest, then there is no deal anyway.
VAT on agriculture goods in Germany was until recently 1.5%
So: not really worth collecting. Considering that a farmer or fisherman pays VAT on fuel and other goods, and that those payments are deducted from the VAT he has as revenue, it is bottom line still again a zero sum game. Unless the farmer has an relatively high harvest with very low consumption of energy etc. it is always a negative for the state.
One complication is that the bitcoin mining operations might find it easy to transfer excess coins to some low-tax jurisdiction and sell them there Tax laws usually don't work like that. Usually you are responsible for all your global income at the place you are living. So you could only avoid VAT or similar taxes with such a scheme, which most of the time makes no sense.
2. If you have an application that allocates memory in one DLL and frees it in another, then it is vital that the library that does the memory management be a DLL. Otherwise, each DLL has it's own statically linked memory mapping library, and they don't know about each other's allocations. Then don't link memory management code into those DLLs... problem solved, facepalm.
5. Only the really old languages like C++ and QuickBasic supports static linking. I'm pretty sure Visual Basic, C# and.NET all require DLLs Depends probably which VisualBasic version you are talking about. Modern VB is running on.NET. Everything on.NET is byte code. Similar to Java Byte Code. So be definition it is a DLL. if you want to access native code, that would be in a dll, obviously, as you have to load it somehow dynamically... however everything that DLL needs, could be static linked into hat DLL.
If you need root privileges to run a package manager, then the installed packages are only root writeable. If they would be owned by an ordinary user you would not need root privileges.
Reboots are completely unnecessary, if the system is done right. Unless you want to load a new kernel, or rare cases a new device driver, there is no reason at all.
Of course Macs and Linux use DLLs to: dynamic linked libraries do not need to end in *.dll... e.g. on linux and macs and basically any unix system they end in *.so
This is not 'insightfull' but just plain ignorant how most restaurants work.
Making food 'X' costs $5. Sell in the restaurant for $5, no profit. Sell another coke, beer for $3, reult is $2 profit.
Sell for take away, with no beer or other drink: zero profit.
Sure, it would make sense if low cost food deliveries would be forced to make the food prices 'transparent', but that is not how the restaurant business is run at the moment in developing countries like the USA.
Every bussiness where you create value 'from nothing', like fishing and farming, has VAT rates for the sold products that are actully not worth colecting as the oversight about it costs more than the VAT returns. So you want to say: if you mine gold in Icelands and sell the gold you have to add VAT on the sale, and give it to the tax bureaus? If that is the case, bitcoin should be handled similarily (and the law actually most likely covers that already, so no law change required, or not?) If it is not the case it should have no extra tax but handle it via income/corporate tax.
Why would power prices go up if icelands decide to store and provide power for the EU?
Interesting that a ccountry that has less than twice the population of the mediocre town I live, can not gang up and gets its shit together like Icelands displayed during the last soccer world championships:)
Slashdot Mirror
US eggs don't last longer.
The e-coli outside on the shells have absolutely nothing to do with the life period of eggs.
If at all, e-coli or other bacteria that get into the egg are the problem. And inn this regard then american way of washing is counter productive as it encourages migration of microbes through the shell.
On the other hand, the white of the egg is alkaline, bacteria usually don't survive this. Only in rare cases they manage to reach the yolk. In the yolk they strife so quickly that an "rotten egg" is immediately recognized.
Eggs last easy half a year or longer, in stable conditions. However they dry out.
Since the EU doesn't want to regulate to that level ($$),
Sorry, you are completely mistaken: we have the exact same regulation, with the exact opposite wording: it is forbidden to wash eggs because of the automated washing processes that would rub the bacteria into the shell. And using hot water and even detergents on the outside would reduce the shelf life of the eggs.
Then give some evidence.
Sorry, I'm 100% certain that the copyright situation regarding data base schema in the USA is the same as in Europe. While it strictly speaking is under "copyright", everyone who payed for it is free to use it as he sees fit (because of interoperability exceptions) And everyone who invents by accident the exact same schema ist free to to use it as well. Because in the end the "copyright" does not prevent him in this special case to do so.
And the law situation is like this since over 50 years, it hard has changed recently, and then in the US only, that would be astonishing.
Then explain please, why did you write this:
Every Linux package manager I've ever used uses root privileges to update app packages. ?
And why this:
The need for reboots has nothing to do with permissions. ?
No one said reboots have anything to do with permissions. Reboots in windows are 99% of the time are unnecessary as well, but the stupid guy who programmed the installer added a "lets reboot after install for good measure".
Pfft ... :D /. ? Recently ... as in "during the last 3 years" or so?
So why is no one using the Oxford comma then, when it is so important and so logical?
How does it come that after 8 years english in school and talking and writing english since 30 years, this topic is only covered on
Again: a comma in front of "and" or "or" makes no real sense for most people on the planet, regardless of language. And your explantation makes not much sense either. If you wanted to express stuff like this you would simply adjust the sentence structure and not rely on an extra comma (which I would never hear when you follow your own advice and make an extra "pause")
The name alone "Oxford comma" implies that it is simply mental masturbation of a spelling/grammar elite :D
If you find some german language rules, complicated, point them out. Perhaps I can explain them as simple as you tried to explain the oxford comma :D
Many people don't need roaming.
And sorry: if your country followed the EU so badly that you have now phone contracts without roaming then I would try to change that.
it either became more expensive
Sorry, it can't be more expensive. You seem not to listen. A single month in a foreign EU country with normal phone and data behaviour would have cost you half a year of your contract, or more. A single day can be as expensive as a month at home.
Example: my old contract was EUR15 per month. Calling someone, regardless where in EU, costs EUR1.00 per minute. Receiving a call costs EUR1.00 for the first hour and then something like 20 cents per minute.
So if I get called during the week 2 times a day and accept the call, my phone bill already has DOUBLED.
Now I pay EUR20.00 per month, and have free calls in Germany, and unlimited data and no roaming charges in the EU.
Yes, bottom line it is more expensive. As I avoided using my phone like hell before the change of contract. But sometimes I could not avoid it and instead of paying my EUR 15 bill I came home with EUR 150 ...
And: I can switch back any time into my old 15 tarif anyway, and I guess you can do the same.
because, as I've said multiple times, the current law in the United States does not allow you to copy database schemas.
Yes, you said that. And you are wrong.
No idea why that is so hard to google for you or to grasp from my explanaitions.
I have no idea why you keep arguing about this. :D
Because I like to argue
fair use exemptions (such as interoperability) would come into play.
Exactly, and that extents to the "schema".
Depending on what the economy can contribute, or not?
If the don't want foreign workers in their country then there is no deal.
If they have nothing to sell of interest, then there is no deal anyway.
If you produce more power than the island needs, why would that affect the price on the island, sorry, I don't get it.
VAT on agriculture goods in Germany was until recently 1.5%
So: not really worth collecting. Considering that a farmer or fisherman pays VAT on fuel and other goods, and that those payments are deducted from the VAT he has as revenue, it is bottom line still again a zero sum game. Unless the farmer has an relatively high harvest with very low consumption of energy etc. it is always a negative for the state.
One complication is that the bitcoin mining operations might find it easy to transfer excess coins to some low-tax jurisdiction and sell them there
Tax laws usually don't work like that. Usually you are responsible for all your global income at the place you are living. So you could only avoid VAT or similar taxes with such a scheme, which most of the time makes no sense.
Wow ...
you are quite disconnected from reality.
What has a islamic terror 'state' to do with a communist democratic country in Europe?
And why/how would mankind exhaust such veins? There will most likely never be many 'full steel' buildings ... same for other metals.
Interesting technology!
Most of your points are true for an IPO, too.
2. If you have an application that allocates memory in one DLL and frees it in another, then it is vital that the library that does the memory management be a DLL. Otherwise, each DLL has it's own statically linked memory mapping library, and they don't know about each other's allocations. ... problem solved, facepalm.
Then don't link memory management code into those DLLs
5. Only the really old languages like C++ and QuickBasic supports static linking. I'm pretty sure Visual Basic, C# and .NET all require DLLs .NET. Everything on .NET is byte code. Similar to Java Byte Code. So be definition it is a DLL. if you want to access native code, that would be in a dll, obviously, as you have to load it somehow dynamically ... however everything that DLL needs, could be static linked into hat DLL.
Depends probably which VisualBasic version you are talking about. Modern VB is running on
If you need root privileges to run a package manager, then the installed packages are only root writeable.
If they would be owned by an ordinary user you would not need root privileges.
Reboots are completely unnecessary, if the system is done right. Unless you want to load a new kernel, or rare cases a new device driver, there is no reason at all.
Of course Macs and Linux use DLLs to: dynamic linked libraries do not need to end in *.dll ... e.g. on linux and macs and basically any unix system they end in *.so
Lady Ada is unfortunately already dead, in case you missed the news ;)
http://www.immediatec.net/
Bullcrap!
Nearly no restaurant offers take out!!
Oh ... you are talking about the place YOU live? ... I was talking about the place I live.
Well
The peercentages mke no sense in my place, you are either this one or the other ...
This is not 'insightfull' but just plain ignorant how most restaurants work.
Making food 'X' costs $5.
Sell in the restaurant for $5, no profit.
Sell another coke, beer for $3, reult is $2 profit.
Sell for take away, with no beer or other drink: zero profit.
Sure, it would make sense if low cost food deliveries would be forced to make the food prices 'transparent', but that is not how the restaurant business is run at the moment in developing countries like the USA.
And a 'fresh' Lasagne would only taste half as good as a freshly reheated one with extra cheese on top.
They need that as 'required by the install program'. ...
They don't really need that computing power
The lack of conductivity of wires is grately overrated.
Right now, I'm as well of the opinion that the UK might not leace after all.
But: that will require interesting shifts in many things.
If the UK really exits, it is unlikely they rejoin in the near future. They basically don't fullfill any requirement for joining.
Every bussiness where you create value 'from nothing', like fishing and farming, has VAT rates for the sold products that are actully not worth colecting as the oversight about it costs more than the VAT returns.
So you want to say: if you mine gold in Icelands and sell the gold you have to add VAT on the sale, and give it to the tax bureaus? If that is the case, bitcoin should be handled similarily (and the law actually most likely covers that already, so no law change required, or not?)
If it is not the case it should have no extra tax but handle it via income/corporate tax.
Why would power prices go up if icelands decide to store and provide power for the EU?
Interesting that a ccountry that has less than twice the population of the mediocre town I live, can not gang up and gets its shit together like Icelands displayed during the last soccer world championships :)