Basically every programmer I have ever met. Why would I have a question if I have a drawn mock up of a screen I should program? And why would there be questions because I do it once for iOS and then for Android?
In the ajava world and iOS badically every GUI code generator generates the exact same code a programmer would write. Last time I checked.Net though, the WinForms generator was a mess.
The article btw. is not about ordinary GUI editing/code generation but about generating code from a scetch, aka a pocture.
I go to the hotels booking site and it tells me: $100 per night I go to expedia.com and it tells me: $70 per night I go to booking.com and it tells me: $63 per night
All tell me on the web site: only 3 rooms left, 4 clients are currently looking to book a room.
Then I go to trivago.com and they list me that expedia.com and booking.com actually also had a price for $55... on my android device. (Ofc. they list me also other boooking sites that are even cheaper. And then you remember: "Ah! As a Mac or iPad user, you don't get the cheapest price but get trapped in that 'dynamic pricing' bullshit" (Or however it is called)
So why does the hotel charge on its own web site twice as much as any booking site demands and on top of that pays the booking site 30% fee?
The point was: you can not calculate the amount of developers world wide by looking at git hub accounts, or bit bucket (there I have an account, and the username is not angelosphere)
20 million professional developers globally[??] seems a reasonable estimate. Reasonable estimate? As git hub clients/customers. Perhaps. As anything else, no. According to Stackoverflow Germany has 700,000 software developers from about 80,000,000 inhabitants and 40,000,000 work force. I would imagine that scales to far more than 20M developers world wide.
I'm a professional developer and have no git hub account. Why would I? I don't host my professional code on a server out in the internet. I'm not even legally allowed to do so. All companies I work for have their own git or svn servers. The few hobby projects I work on I host on my git and on my back ups... there is no point in having a git hub account.
Well, Your post has some truthes but also some falsehoods. Then again you talk about methodologies and then call other people 'Agile weenies' and even claim they dont like git. Sorry: that does not make sense.
Your assertion suggests there is no difference between spending and not spending. No I did not say that. I said money below my mattresse is out of circulation. Money in a fond more or less too, as it is used to hold the shares. On the other hands, when shares are bought money changes its owner. What the owner is doing with the money is another thing. Money in a bank account, which is not invested otherwise, is not circulating, so it is lost for business, too. However that money enables the bank to issue loans, so there is still 'some circulation'.
I'm not familiar with the US monetary/banking system. So I can not comment on that.
Like a fleet of on the water ships are? Which are even slower...
The point we made about your posts was that you have absurd ideas how an airship works and what its vulnerabilities are.
It is most certainly not vulnerable to an A10 gattling gun...
I suggest to read up how a gattlin gun works, what kind of ammunition it uses, why that ammunition is deadly for a simple tank, and why that amunition makes nearly no damage to an Airship, unless you hit a beam inside of its frame.
To break the ship appart you need to hit by luck lots of those frames... and to kill it by putting enough holes into its gas ballons an A10 does not carry enough ammunition.
WW1 has enough stories about brittish air craft carrying Airships attacking german Zeppelines. There are even movies about it. Bottom line the difference, if we talk about Airships, between the machine guns of a biplane and a gattling gun of an A10 is not that high.
If you are nitpicking, then he was right about lettuce 'somewhat'.
Anyway, his main claim was: we don't need to care about bees as most important plants (neither spinache nor lettuce is important in context of callories and proteins) are not depending on bees.
90% of our food plants do depend on 'bees'. (But actually not on 'enslaved' honey bees;D, wild humble bees do more pollination than honey bees in germany. However the last few years those are on a decline, too)
Most of the planes you mention can not even fly high enough to tough an Airship, most noteable the Apache. I suggest to google what an Airship actually is and how they are build up from the inside, then come again.
The other planes are completely meaningless, as they carry the same weaponary anway.
And a gattling gun of the A10 (or the machine gubs of the Fxx) nearly does not harm an Airship at all, unless it hits a beam, it only hits thin air, what is so hard to grasp in that?
Dude, an A-10 gun run on an airship would practically turn it into confetti. It's extreme overkill and it would do more than just cause "leaks".
Unless it hits a huge amount of vital parts of the frame: no. An Airship consists mostly out of air. Figuratively speaking. As long as you don't hit the main beams it flights just fine. And even if you break it into two parts the teo parts likely would gracefully slow down to earth. You seem not to have a clue what an Airship is versus a Blimb....
If you really are talking about war fare, then I suggest to imagine a Airship that has weapons to fire back, or like in WWI is actually an air craft carrier. Then your single A10 has to fight 3 or 4 drones or manned aircrafts while you poke tiny holes into the helium baloons with you gatling cannon... gooooood luck!
An air to air missile has an astonishing small amount of explosives, most of the time a modern fighter survives the hit and is only in about half the time disabled to need an emegency landing and explosions are even rarer. That is a little bit diferent for SAMs. Except for the Phienix missiles I doubt an ordinary missile, lets say Sidewinder class, will do more than make a hole in the hull and kill a few helium baloons behind it.
F15s, F14s and especially A10s are prime examples for fighters that routiniously survive AAMs and SAMs, and can still hopple home on one leg.
In relation to an Airbuss where you need two missiles to kill the two engines, or need big luck that one of them lets a tank explode, an airship would need dozens of the same missile to poke enough holes into its baloons.
Then again, an Airship would fly to high to be reached ba an A10 anyway...
Of course you farm them before they flower. However that is a tricky thing as they litteraly flower over night. In german we use a bastardized version of the word 'shot' for that process. The lettuces I checked a few days ago all where insect pollinated. Self polinating and wind polinating as in corns/grasses is btw. not the same thing. Bottom line he claimed that a huge deal of our food plants would not require insects, when actually about 90% do. Anyway, I checked again, Lettuce has certain type of flower https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/..., those are primarily pollinated by insects and only by wind if they are planted close enough together. So says the german article. I linked the english version, as I could not translate the flower form easily.
The EU forbade usage of Neonicotinoids for many usages during times where bees are most active. It got sued for that by Bayer Dr plus all. In a few weeks the usage will most likely be completely forbidden. Or reduced to inside greenhouses and very rare emergency cases.
Just because you buy spinach or lettuce seeds in a farmer's store it does not mean the plant does not need pollination by insects/bees to form those seeds. Tomatoes and Asparagus are pollinated by bees/insects. So half your list is wrong. Bottom line 90% of the world's food plants are polinated by insects/bees.
I don't know what is normal and what not. Point is: if a queen dies, the hive does not necessarily die. Cold winters are no problem for European bees. I was of the impression in USA they mainly had European bees. A friend of mine is a bee keeper for a living, none of his hives ever died, but he uses some fancy tricks like having about 1 wasp nest per 10 hives and in total about 2 hornet nests. His observation is, having both kinds of predators around, makes the bees less lazy, more agile and more vigilant.
Slashdot Mirror
Do you yerk off when you write insulting posts like this?
No worries, if it givrs you relive, I have no objections.
The first link looks like a mistake, it has nothing to do with HTML/CSS.
Then again the question: why do you post nonsense like this?
What real life problem would you implement on top of a (simulated) turing machine?
Can YOU (not one, *you*) implement the Leipnitz Formula to calculate PI with the Turing machine simulator of your first link?
Throwing around 'turing complete' on /. is completely meaningless.
Basically every programmer I have ever met.
Why would I have a question if I have a drawn mock up of a screen I should program?
And why would there be questions because I do it once for iOS and then for Android?
In the ajava world and iOS badically every GUI code generator generates the exact same code a programmer would write. .Net though, the WinForms generator was a mess.
Last time I checked
The article btw. is not about ordinary GUI editing/code generation but about generating code from a scetch, aka a pocture.
I go to the hotels booking site and it tells me: $100 per night
I go to expedia.com and it tells me: $70 per night
I go to booking.com and it tells me: $63 per night
All tell me on the web site: only 3 rooms left, 4 clients are currently looking to book a room.
Then I go to trivago.com and they list me that expedia.com and booking.com actually also had a price for $55 ... on my android device. (Ofc. they list me also other boooking sites that are even cheaper.
And then you remember: "Ah! As a Mac or iPad user, you don't get the cheapest price but get trapped in that 'dynamic pricing' bullshit" (Or however it is called)
So why does the hotel charge on its own web site twice as much as any booking site demands and on top of that pays the booking site 30% fee?
But he was also the guy that openly admitted he was waiting over night in the queue in front of an "Apple Shop" to buy one of the first iPads.
I installed an Ubuntu in a VM some weeks ago.
Had to google how to open a "terminal".
The UI is close to unusable, looks fancy though.
And if you were not a moron you would not insult people.
That was not the point :D
The point was: you can not calculate the amount of developers world wide by looking at git hub accounts, or bit bucket (there I have an account, and the username is not angelosphere)
20 million professional developers globally[??] seems a reasonable estimate.
Reasonable estimate? As git hub clients/customers. Perhaps. As anything else, no.
According to Stackoverflow Germany has 700,000 software developers from about 80,000,000 inhabitants and 40,000,000 work force.
I would imagine that scales to far more than 20M developers world wide.
I'm a professional developer and have no git hub account. ... there is no point in having a git hub account.
Why would I?
I don't host my professional code on a server out in the internet.
I'm not even legally allowed to do so. All companies I work for have their own git or svn servers.
The few hobby projects I work on I host on my git and on my back ups
Well,
Your post has some truthes but also some falsehoods.
Then again you talk about methodologies and then call other people 'Agile weenies' and even claim they dont like git.
Sorry: that does not make sense.
Your assertion suggests there is no difference between spending and not spending.
No I did not say that.
I said money below my mattresse is out of circulation.
Money in a fond more or less too, as it is used to hold the shares.
On the other hands, when shares are bought money changes its owner. What the owner is doing with the money is another thing.
Money in a bank account, which is not invested otherwise, is not circulating, so it is lost for business, too.
However that money enables the bank to issue loans, so there is still 'some circulation'.
I'm not familiar with the US monetary/banking system. So I can not comment on that.
Like a fleet of on the water ships are? Which are even slower ...
The point we made about your posts was that you have absurd ideas how an airship works and what its vulnerabilities are.
It is most certainly not vulnerable to an A10 gattling gun ...
I suggest to read up how a gattlin gun works, what kind of ammunition it uses, why that ammunition is deadly for a simple tank, and why that amunition makes nearly no damage to an Airship, unless you hit a beam inside of its frame.
To break the ship appart you need to hit by luck lots of those frames ... and to kill it by putting enough holes into its gas ballons an A10 does not carry enough ammunition.
WW1 has enough stories about brittish air craft carrying Airships attacking german Zeppelines. There are even movies about it. Bottom line the difference, if we talk about Airships, between the machine guns of a biplane and a gattling gun of an A10 is not that high.
If you are nitpicking, then he was right about lettuce 'somewhat'.
Anyway, his main claim was: we don't need to care about bees as most important plants (neither spinache nor lettuce is important in context of callories and proteins) are not depending on bees.
90% of our food plants do depend on 'bees'. (But actually not on 'enslaved' honey bees ;D, wild humble bees do more pollination than honey bees in germany. However the last few years those are on a decline, too)
Your decission who is more right or more wrong :)
Most of the planes you mention can not even fly high enough to tough an Airship, most noteable the Apache.
I suggest to google what an Airship actually is and how they are build up from the inside, then come again.
The other planes are completely meaningless, as they carry the same weaponary anway.
And a gattling gun of the A10 (or the machine gubs of the Fxx) nearly does not harm an Airship at all, unless it hits a beam, it only hits thin air, what is so hard to grasp in that?
Dude, an A-10 gun run on an airship would practically turn it into confetti. It's extreme overkill and it would do more than just cause "leaks".
....
Unless it hits a huge amount of vital parts of the frame: no.
An Airship consists mostly out of air. Figuratively speaking. As long as you don't hit the main beams it flights just fine. And even if you break it into two parts the teo parts likely would gracefully slow down to earth.
You seem not to have a clue what an Airship is versus a Blimb
If you really are talking about war fare, then I suggest to imagine a Airship that has weapons to fire back, or like in WWI is actually an air craft carrier. ... gooooood luck!
Then your single A10 has to fight 3 or 4 drones or manned aircrafts while you poke tiny holes into the helium baloons with you gatling cannon
An air to air missile has an astonishing small amount of explosives, most of the time a modern fighter survives the hit and is only in about half the time disabled to need an emegency landing and explosions are even rarer. That is a little bit diferent for SAMs. Except for the Phienix missiles I doubt an ordinary missile, lets say Sidewinder class, will do more than make a hole in the hull and kill a few helium baloons behind it.
F15s, F14s and especially A10s are prime examples for fighters that routiniously survive AAMs and SAMs, and can still hopple home on one leg.
In relation to an Airbuss where you need two missiles to kill the two engines, or need big luck that one of them lets a tank explode, an airship would need dozens of the same missile to poke enough holes into its baloons.
Then again, an Airship would fly to high to be reached ba an A10 anyway ...
Of course you farm them before they flower.
However that is a tricky thing as they litteraly flower over night. In german we use a bastardized version of the word 'shot' for that process.
The lettuces I checked a few days ago all where insect pollinated.
Self polinating and wind polinating as in corns/grasses is btw. not the same thing.
Bottom line he claimed that a huge deal of our food plants would not require insects, when actually about 90% do.
Anyway, I checked again, Lettuce has certain type of flower https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/..., those are primarily pollinated by insects and only by wind if they are planted close enough together. So says the german article.
I linked the english version, as I could not translate the flower form easily.
And/or sour milk. Later vinegar.
Actually airships are not fragile at all but super resilient.
However against a modern missile they probably stand no big chance either.
They don't exploit it either. People living outside of the system, beging in the streets, have nothing to do with the system.
The EU forbade usage of Neonicotinoids for many usages during times where bees are most active. It got sued for that by Bayer Dr plus all.
In a few weeks the usage will most likely be completely forbidden. Or reduced to inside greenhouses and very rare emergency cases.
Just because you buy spinach or lettuce seeds in a farmer's store it does not mean the plant does not need pollination by insects/bees to form those seeds.
Tomatoes and Asparagus are pollinated by bees/insects.
So half your list is wrong. Bottom line 90% of the world's food plants are polinated by insects/bees.
I don't know what is normal and what not.
Point is: if a queen dies, the hive does not necessarily die.
Cold winters are no problem for European bees. I was of the impression in USA they mainly had European bees.
A friend of mine is a bee keeper for a living, none of his hives ever died, but he uses some fancy tricks like having about 1 wasp nest per 10 hives and in total about 2 hornet nests.
His observation is, having both kinds of predators around, makes the bees less lazy, more agile and more vigilant.
More importantly, what do we lose ...
You really want to tell me you are that dumb?