I can say that both technically and politically St. Cloud went about it the right way. The government did not sell it as an access for everyone network. They sold it as a business sector network that would encourage businesses to look at St. Cloud as a home base. For those of you not familiar with Central Florida there are a lot of outlying cities around Orlando like St. Cloud, each of these cities are trying to become the next small business sector in much the way that Winter Park did. St. Cloud positioned its network as a system to reduce the costs of opening a business in the Central Florida area and by doing so planed on the increased revenue from new businesses to offset the cost of the network. In turn this gave access to the citizens without them having to bear the brunt of the cost. The strategy was a political risk but it seems to have paid off. The network had its problems in the beginning but I currently use it daily without outages. So much so that last year I moved my phone off of a traditional line and onto SunRocket (that's another story). My call quality was excellent and I paid $200 a year for phone and nothing for internet access which used to be $70 a month for both. I believe we are now at a 77% adoption rate which I believe speaks to the opinion of the system. In all though I believe that it is all in how you position the implementation and how you sell it to the people. St. Cloud had a good strategy which paid off. It was a gamble for them but it worked out in the end.
No he basically said that it is rehashing old concepts like cvs, but that svn fixes some problems. what he calls "good enough" then he goes on to plug git as revolutionary. I am sorry but, the only thing new and revolutionary I have seen coming out of that space is Accurev.
Actually, Though the comment was party in jest, though I do believe that it is a prevailing issue. I believe there are far too many developers in the industry that are not competent in their ability to write quality software. This is evident in many developers adhering to patterns for the sake of using pattern when the patterns do not fit their needed problem set. Web programming is saturated with this kind of mentality; this is evident in new frameworks coming out weekly that rehash the same old problems and poorly I might add. Your comment about development being an artisan type endeavor might be more true than anyone wants to admit. The business side of the industry is scared of the idea that software may not be able to be manufactured. Crafting conjures the realization that each peace is unique and unlike an assembly line, carries unpredictability and risk as it cannot be quantified until it is completed. This takes away businesses ability to look like they are in control and masters of the software domain and makes people who otherwise feel as thought they are all controlling realize that in fact they have no control nor can they even begin to comprehend what needs to be done to control software development. Yet everyone goes on quietly knowing this and not saying anything because no one wants to look like a jackass. So the business goes on acting as though they are in control while not treating the process as a creative one because no one wants to admit that software cannot be manufactured. The sooner companies realize this, the better off the industry as a whole will be. Developers will be looked at as skilled contributors and not an cog that are replicable by the next guy with the same skills on the resume, Timelines will be more realistic and business personnel will realize that in fact they have no freaking clue how to manage a development environment and that they had better get someone who does know.
Can you verify that the ip address was not being spoofed at the time and did you verify the machine in question for exploits such as Sony's root kit that would make the machine more vulnerable to hackers who may be interested in using the machine as a zombie file server to distribute pirated content.
You have the right attitude but the wrong solution.
And if you drive over some schoolkids while fondling with your car-radio, you are still guilty of murder.
Stricter guidelines and requirements to get a license would be a good solution to this problem.
if you are a surgeon and kills a patient through malpractice, you are also in deep trouble.
Not everyone is cut out for higher education. Maybe we are letting the wrong people into med school. We allow morons to do more and more every day under the name equality. It a fluffy idea that we are not all different and that everyone can be a brain surgeon because we are all the same. I don't buy the bullshit and I say instead of making stupidity illegal let's stop being idiots ourselves and stop empowering stupid people.
Agreed, I have found no framework on the market that compares to Echo2 in terms of extensibility and flexibility. It truly is a comprehensive web UI toolkit, managing both the server side and client side and hiding the ugliness of the wiring of the two together.
I will see your ICallbackEventHandler and raise you a ActionListener It existed long before Atlas. I do both.NET and Java web work, I like ASP.NET and I have found Echo2 to be the closest to ASP.NET as far as productivity, and speed of development. While the implementations are different the basic idea (component / sub-component page hierarchy) are the same.
To be fair I think the progression to AJAX was an evolution of which the last breaking point was web service and the ability to easily (I use that term lightly) transmit simple objects across the wire. When MS built their web outlook they where passing raw XML back and forth across the wire, with all the nastiness that comes along with it. With the push towards web services, and the XmlHttpRequest laying in obscurity it was only natural that it someone would (re)figure out the coupling of these technologies to become AJAX for more info on who contributed what look here
Assuming you can fix the cold start problems of diesel
This problem has been fixed for years. With advances in fuel atomization, glow plugs et. al. Not to mention technologies like the Cummins heating mesh which fires up in freazing wheather while the gas boys are still turning over their starter.
Assuming you can fix the cold start problems of diesel
This problem has been fixed for years. With advances in fuel atomization, glow plugs et. al. Not to mention technologies like the Cummins heating mesh which fires up in freazing wheather while the gas boys are still turning over their starter.
Unlike hydrogen, we already have the infrastructure in place to handle, store and distribute biodiesel, and millions of vehicles that can already run off it, and the capacity to economically produce millions more of them.
May people overlook this very important fact when discussing grandiose ideas about alternative fuels and you hit the nail on the head. biodiesel unlike other alternative energies, can be integrated into the current delivery and distribution mechanisms. So much so, that a tanker of bio diesel can add to an existing tank of dino-diesel with no ill effect. People will just be getting mixed diesel until the dino is used up. A station can literally switch over tomorrow as if it where just a refill of regular diesel.
No given the basis of the article if you cure cancer someone else gets laid. The mice are getting laid not the scientist. So the correct assumption is that if you cure cancer the steroid shooting jock still gets laid he just does not die of cancer in the end. Way to balance the scales guys.
Re:Ajax web framework support
on
Head Rush Ajax
·
· Score: 1
No I know I was just making a joke of it at my expense.
Re:Ajax web framework support
on
Head Rush Ajax
·
· Score: 1
It's pretty apparent, that I am not too good at this buzzword thing. My original post was accused of being buzzword riddled when I though it was to the point and then my retort was accused of being amateur at best.
Re:Ajax web framework support
on
Head Rush Ajax
·
· Score: 1
I will say it again, as I have said it a thousand times before. I use Echo2, I like Echo2, when an article about Ajax comes up I am going to take the opportunity to say why I like Echo2. It is no different that the RoR guys highlighting their framework. I do not work for NextApp but I do like their product and I think it would be beneficial to others as well. It's called grassroots development, you find something you like and then you tell others about it. If these guys can take their time to build a framework for free then the least I can do is tell someone else about it. If you don't like it then foe me and don't read my posts it is as simple as that.
Re:Ajax web framework support
on
Head Rush Ajax
·
· Score: 4, Informative
Actully my description depicts exactly what the framework does it allows communication between the client and server to make a web application more dynamic. Now if I had said "creating synergy between the client and server, with bleeding edge technology, that creates a new development paradigm" I could see your complaint.
Slashdot Mirror
It's not like Scientology is above framing somone for a crime:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Freakout
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Snow_White
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Game_(Scientology)
I can say that both technically and politically St. Cloud went about it the right way. The government did not sell it as an access for everyone network. They sold it as a business sector network that would encourage businesses to look at St. Cloud as a home base. For those of you not familiar with Central Florida there are a lot of outlying cities around Orlando like St. Cloud, each of these cities are trying to become the next small business sector in much the way that Winter Park did. St. Cloud positioned its network as a system to reduce the costs of opening a business in the Central Florida area and by doing so planed on the increased revenue from new businesses to offset the cost of the network. In turn this gave access to the citizens without them having to bear the brunt of the cost. The strategy was a political risk but it seems to have paid off. The network had its problems in the beginning but I currently use it daily without outages. So much so that last year I moved my phone off of a traditional line and onto SunRocket (that's another story). My call quality was excellent and I paid $200 a year for phone and nothing for internet access which used to be $70 a month for both. I believe we are now at a 77% adoption rate which I believe speaks to the opinion of the system. In all though I believe that it is all in how you position the implementation and how you sell it to the people. St. Cloud had a good strategy which paid off. It was a gamble for them but it worked out in the end.
No he basically said that it is rehashing old concepts like cvs, but that svn fixes some problems. what he calls "good enough" then he goes on to plug git as revolutionary. I am sorry but, the only thing new and revolutionary I have seen coming out of that space is Accurev.
No I think the moderation was in reference to the mouse.
tell me about it.
Actually,
Though the comment was party in jest, though I do believe that it is a prevailing issue. I believe there are far too many developers in the industry that are not competent in their ability to write quality software. This is evident in many developers adhering to patterns for the sake of using pattern when the patterns do not fit their needed problem set. Web programming is saturated with this kind of mentality; this is evident in new frameworks coming out weekly that rehash the same old problems and poorly I might add. Your comment about development being an artisan type endeavor might be more true than anyone wants to admit. The business side of the industry is scared of the idea that software may not be able to be manufactured. Crafting conjures the realization that each peace is unique and unlike an assembly line, carries unpredictability and risk as it cannot be quantified until it is completed. This takes away businesses ability to look like they are in control and masters of the software domain and makes people who otherwise feel as thought they are all controlling realize that in fact they have no control nor can they even begin to comprehend what needs to be done to control software development. Yet everyone goes on quietly knowing this and not saying anything because no one wants to look like a jackass. So the business goes on acting as though they are in control while not treating the process as a creative one because no one wants to admit that software cannot be manufactured. The sooner companies realize this, the better off the industry as a whole will be. Developers will be looked at as skilled contributors and not an cog that are replicable by the next guy with the same skills on the resume, Timelines will be more realistic and business personnel will realize that in fact they have no freaking clue how to manage a development environment and that they had better get someone who does know.
Further,
Can you verify that the ip address was not being spoofed at the time and did you verify the machine in question for exploits such as Sony's root kit that would make the machine more vulnerable to hackers who may be interested in using the machine as a zombie file server to distribute pirated content.
No doubt I'm just white so I'm set.
You have the right attitude but the wrong solution.
And if you drive over some schoolkids while fondling with your car-radio, you are still guilty of murder.
Stricter guidelines and requirements to get a license would be a good solution to this problem.
if you are a surgeon and kills a patient through malpractice, you are also in deep trouble.
Not everyone is cut out for higher education. Maybe we are letting the wrong people into med school. We allow morons to do more and more every day under the name equality. It a fluffy idea that we are not all different and that everyone can be a brain surgeon because we are all the same. I don't buy the bullshit and I say instead of making stupidity illegal let's stop being idiots ourselves and stop empowering stupid people.
The answer is a=f (0)
Agreed, I have found no framework on the market that compares to Echo2 in terms of extensibility and flexibility. It truly is a comprehensive web UI toolkit, managing both the server side and client side and hiding the ugliness of the wiring of the two together.
No we are dry humping Nintendo. Get with the program, Sony, MS out Nintendo in. Next week we switch again.
I will see your ICallbackEventHandler and raise you a ActionListener It existed long before Atlas. I do both
To be fair I think the progression to AJAX was an evolution of which the last breaking point was web service and the ability to easily (I use that term lightly) transmit simple objects across the wire. When MS built their web outlook they where passing raw XML back and forth across the wire, with all the nastiness that comes along with it. With the push towards web services, and the XmlHttpRequest laying in obscurity it was only natural that it someone would (re)figure out the coupling of these technologies to become AJAX for more info on who contributed what look here
Let me try that again
Assuming you can fix the cold start problems of diesel
This problem has been fixed for years. With advances in fuel atomization, glow plugs et. al. Not to mention technologies like the Cummins heating mesh which fires up in freazing wheather while the gas boys are still turning over their starter.
Assuming you can fix the cold start problems of diesel This problem has been fixed for years. With advances in fuel atomization, glow plugs et. al. Not to mention technologies like the Cummins heating mesh which fires up in freazing wheather while the gas boys are still turning over their starter.
And they say that we have been giving the Middle East shit.
Doesn't look like such a good deal after all.
From the Fryer to the Fuel Tank I would like to make a title suggestion for the next book in the series.
From the Sewer to the Cylinder.
Well it sure beats that walking SHIT.
Unlike hydrogen, we already have the infrastructure in place to handle, store and distribute biodiesel, and millions of vehicles that can already run off it, and the capacity to economically produce millions more of them.
May people overlook this very important fact when discussing grandiose ideas about alternative fuels and you hit the nail on the head. biodiesel unlike other alternative energies, can be integrated into the current delivery and distribution mechanisms. So much so, that a tanker of bio diesel can add to an existing tank of dino-diesel with no ill effect. People will just be getting mixed diesel until the dino is used up. A station can literally switch over tomorrow as if it where just a refill of regular diesel.
If you cure cancer, you get laid.
No given the basis of the article if you cure cancer someone else gets laid. The mice are getting laid not the scientist. So the correct assumption is that if you cure cancer the steroid shooting jock still gets laid he just does not die of cancer in the end. Way to balance the scales guys.
No I know I was just making a joke of it at my expense.
It's pretty apparent, that I am not too good at this buzzword thing. My original post was accused of being buzzword riddled when I though it was to the point and then my retort was accused of being amateur at best.
I will say it again, as I have said it a thousand times before. I use Echo2, I like Echo2, when an article about Ajax comes up I am going to take the opportunity to say why I like Echo2. It is no different that the RoR guys highlighting their framework. I do not work for NextApp but I do like their product and I think it would be beneficial to others as well. It's called grassroots development, you find something you like and then you tell others about it. If these guys can take their time to build a framework for free then the least I can do is tell someone else about it. If you don't like it then foe me and don't read my posts it is as simple as that.
Actully my description depicts exactly what the framework does it allows communication between the client and server to make a web application more dynamic. Now if I had said "creating synergy between the client and server, with bleeding edge technology, that creates a new development paradigm" I could see your complaint.