Yes, no sites have ever been built with it, and no one ever found it to be useful ever. OK. Your argument is very sound sir, and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.
Perhaps non of those are actual issues other than what you've imagined for yourself? I've had a long relationship with PHP. I cannot say I love it, but I can say I can use it. That said, I'm more inclined to say that I do not *see* it. Why? Because it's a medium, and I'm focused on the expression. Any language can be used for expressing anything, and it's a bloody waste of time to fiddle over idealistic details of how one does it differently than another.
First, Drupal is not, and never was designed around MVC. It is a PAC system. Second, if you've made any real attemt at understanding how the system works (a task not impossible by any stretch of the imagination, else you're simply incapable of reading code), you'd soon realize that the function to use is non-other than dsm. You're basically saying that you haven't taken the first step to understand Drupal development, else you'd quickly would have found the "Devel" module that exposes those render arrays for you to properly navigate them. And, are you seriously claiming that you were not able to find the proper tpl file to override? I cannot imagine a more braindead task when it comes to drupal output. There is virtually nothing inherent to that system that makes this difficult aside from a healthy dose of "I won't read the fucking manual".
Hope you realize UB is quite dated. While there are remenants of these aspects in Commerse (successor), really, what you're looking at is a separation of concerns. What a product is, vs how it will display are fundamentally separate concepts. When you approach this problem with the least assumptions, it makes sense to enable nodes for the actual display. The question is really about your assumptions about what these aspects of the system are, and how to work with them to create an actual UX.
I would love to know what modules do this at this point. You posted quite recently, and I deal with a lot of different modules. Care to provide a solid example? Otherwise I'd have to say your opinion is really dated.
I would agree with you if we were both looking at a static codebase from which no lesson can be learned but I cannot attest to that being the case. One thing I've noticed is that Drupal is not a static platform. The maintainers of modules that are used most often than not are quite open to suggestion if the issue hits the nail on the head. One should not underestimate the need to keep a good reputation.
"ships products"? how very specific. "more quickly"? I can write hello world in under 1 minute! "super well"? is that like superswell? "apps" what ones? "good money with least effort"? how quantitative.
Except for that annoying bit everyone seems to keep forgetting... having a voice in a supposedly democratic republic. How's that first amendment doing, by the way?
If the thinking is within the expected field, then sure. If the "thinking" is taking advantage of a real trade having nothing to do with the job, I wouldn't assume so.
I'm not in the US, so I'm not speaking about the laws there. And as I said in another reply, from what I gather there's an aliby angle. I do not know it's merrits, but my statement does make the assumption. That's the only real hole in the argument. Cheers.
The statement hinges on the suspicion that the other *knows* and is not ignorant. Now I won't claim that I know what he knows, but from what I've understood thus far the other twin was helping in establishing alibiys. Now if that's a crock of shit, then absolutely, we have nothing.
Let me spell it out for you. I don't give a shit. You've been dismissed as a troll. And as long as you do not provide an actual argument I won't be giving any further shits. Clear enough?
Actually, it's impossible to understand your intent here, since you didn't actually say *anything* at all. So to speed up the process of getting through your nonsensical babbles, I put words in your mouth that bare some resemblence to what's statistically likely to be your reality.
Slashdot Mirror
Yes, no sites have ever been built with it, and no one ever found it to be useful ever. OK. Your argument is very sound sir, and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.
Perhaps non of those are actual issues other than what you've imagined for yourself? I've had a long relationship with PHP. I cannot say I love it, but I can say I can use it. That said, I'm more inclined to say that I do not *see* it. Why? Because it's a medium, and I'm focused on the expression. Any language can be used for expressing anything, and it's a bloody waste of time to fiddle over idealistic details of how one does it differently than another.
First, Drupal is not, and never was designed around MVC. It is a PAC system. Second, if you've made any real attemt at understanding how the system works (a task not impossible by any stretch of the imagination, else you're simply incapable of reading code), you'd soon realize that the function to use is non-other than dsm. You're basically saying that you haven't taken the first step to understand Drupal development, else you'd quickly would have found the "Devel" module that exposes those render arrays for you to properly navigate them. And, are you seriously claiming that you were not able to find the proper tpl file to override? I cannot imagine a more braindead task when it comes to drupal output. There is virtually nothing inherent to that system that makes this difficult aside from a healthy dose of "I won't read the fucking manual".
"4 years ago." And you honestly think that your opinion can actually be constructive at this point?
Hope you realize UB is quite dated. While there are remenants of these aspects in Commerse (successor), really, what you're looking at is a separation of concerns. What a product is, vs how it will display are fundamentally separate concepts. When you approach this problem with the least assumptions, it makes sense to enable nodes for the actual display. The question is really about your assumptions about what these aspects of the system are, and how to work with them to create an actual UX.
I would love to know what modules do this at this point. You posted quite recently, and I deal with a lot of different modules. Care to provide a solid example? Otherwise I'd have to say your opinion is really dated.
I would agree with you if we were both looking at a static codebase from which no lesson can be learned but I cannot attest to that being the case. One thing I've noticed is that Drupal is not a static platform. The maintainers of modules that are used most often than not are quite open to suggestion if the issue hits the nail on the head. One should not underestimate the need to keep a good reputation.
The only time it's hard to read is when you lack context. It just means you heaven't read enough books to make the comment in the first place.
"ships products"? how very specific. "more quickly"? I can write hello world in under 1 minute! "super well"? is that like superswell? "apps" what ones? "good money with least effort"? how quantitative.
No, because it's not web-scale.
Except for that annoying bit everyone seems to keep forgetting... having a voice in a supposedly democratic republic. How's that first amendment doing, by the way?
In the same paragraph you describe the real children and call *them* grown up. Irony abound.
At MacDonalds!? Are you insane?
I'm sure you've made your point even stronger now by making it ad hominem. You get a sticker.
Do you feel better now? Have you satisfied your pathetic ego?
If the thinking is within the expected field, then sure. If the "thinking" is taking advantage of a real trade having nothing to do with the job, I wouldn't assume so.
Does anyone give a shit but you?
I addressed that. The aliby angle.
I'm not in the US, so I'm not speaking about the laws there. And as I said in another reply, from what I gather there's an aliby angle. I do not know it's merrits, but my statement does make the assumption. That's the only real hole in the argument. Cheers.
The statement hinges on the suspicion that the other *knows* and is not ignorant. Now I won't claim that I know what he knows, but from what I've understood thus far the other twin was helping in establishing alibiys. Now if that's a crock of shit, then absolutely, we have nothing.
Indeed.
Let me spell it out for you. I don't give a shit. You've been dismissed as a troll. And as long as you do not provide an actual argument I won't be giving any further shits. Clear enough?
Both did it, both stay silent == conspiracy.
That was pretty simple.
Wish that was true.
Actually, it's impossible to understand your intent here, since you didn't actually say *anything* at all. So to speed up the process of getting through your nonsensical babbles, I put words in your mouth that bare some resemblence to what's statistically likely to be your reality.