I donno. Often I find myself micronmanaging things like code formatting, and I'm not even the manager, just the lead developer. When it comes time to find the cracks at the seams I'm the only one available to see them, and it gets pretty wild if there's no consistency. It's a bit of a two way street. So I end up literally telling my colegue to do things a certain way to save ourselves from rediscovery.
I'm not sure I can be on the same page with you on this. For one, every single human being suffers from cognitive dissonance in one way or another, so that's not being debated. Secondly, scientific debate, and mindless banter are two very different things, therefore I'm glad that they vent elewhere. Science, real science does not require loyalty. I've yet to encounter real scientists so entrenched in their beliefs that they never change, that trait seems to be predominantly with the religious. No one says findings are facts, they call them findings for a reason. No one calls theories facts, they are models of processes that withstood the test of time, and more importantly, have been used successfuly to make predictions. Debate is only as healthy as the mind of the debater. You can't debate with reality, and nonsensical ideas are rightfully shot down, because we all have a finte time here, and scientists would rather spend it doing science than educating the uneducatable.
When I say "no one calls" I am talking about people who know what those words actually mean, not the ignoramus.
Lets forget the *actual* research done in this area that consistenly points out hat letting stress out in a virtual setting pretty much removes all desire to do so in real life, but hey, go on, be afraid. Be very afraid.
Strictly speaking, nirvana does not belong to that list, as it's the absolute extinguishment of oneself. It's not a "round two," since that would be reincarnation.
You have an incredibly narrow view, which suggests a complete lack of experience. You seem to know nothing of the real dynamics of dominance and sumission. You are peddling some pretty idiotic assertions. For one, pidgeonholing a diverse animal such as a human being into a single category like this is disingenious to your argument. Furthermore, you seem to be completely lacking any knowledge in regards to research on the topic. Frankly, you're still putting your foot in your mouth with every single word. Please, continue to entertain us with your "knowledge" of women.
Wow... what a fail on your part. Firstly, I'm male. Secondly, a happily married one. Congradulations on not only being a douche, but also for demostrating how specacularly stupid you are. Before you swallow your foot completely, I'm, personally, quite familiar with the dominance vs submission dynamic in a relationship and can only say you have no clue as to what you're talking about nor what it actually is.
It's not the ethnicity, it's your culture. Even if HALF the shit I've seen is true, then I'm sorry to break this to you.... the 21st century has arrived, you've missed the boat, and you NEED to catch up. Pride, in this case, is detrimental to survival.
In both cases, you should have known better. It is as much the fault of the victim as it is of the perpetrator. Natural selection is the scientific term.
For a real brain teaser, I recommend comparing and contrasting the type system adopted from Simula (C++, Java, PHP, etc) with OOP type concepts from languages stemming from Smalltalk like Ruby, where classes are themselves runtime objects, to the type system of Haskell.
Slashdot Mirror
I donno. Often I find myself micronmanaging things like code formatting, and I'm not even the manager, just the lead developer. When it comes time to find the cracks at the seams I'm the only one available to see them, and it gets pretty wild if there's no consistency. It's a bit of a two way street. So I end up literally telling my colegue to do things a certain way to save ourselves from rediscovery.
clown.. jeez... it's getting late!
My ex-cloun is still kicking... wonder how long itll be befour the labour board moves in though...
So fucking sad
The special ointment for your butthurt is found at the edge of a cliff.
I'm not sure I can be on the same page with you on this. For one, every single human being suffers from cognitive dissonance in one way or another, so that's not being debated. Secondly, scientific debate, and mindless banter are two very different things, therefore I'm glad that they vent elewhere. Science, real science does not require loyalty. I've yet to encounter real scientists so entrenched in their beliefs that they never change, that trait seems to be predominantly with the religious. No one says findings are facts, they call them findings for a reason. No one calls theories facts, they are models of processes that withstood the test of time, and more importantly, have been used successfuly to make predictions. Debate is only as healthy as the mind of the debater. You can't debate with reality, and nonsensical ideas are rightfully shot down, because we all have a finte time here, and scientists would rather spend it doing science than educating the uneducatable.
When I say "no one calls" I am talking about people who know what those words actually mean, not the ignoramus.
So what's your opinion on children venting their frustrations?
As hard as that may be to accept as a parent, but your kid will be the one deciding when he's "old enough", just like you did. And rightly so.
Lets forget the *actual* research done in this area that consistenly points out hat letting stress out in a virtual setting pretty much removes all desire to do so in real life, but hey, go on, be afraid. Be very afraid.
And yet he'd make a good one. What's your point?
Strictly speaking, nirvana does not belong to that list, as it's the absolute extinguishment of oneself. It's not a "round two," since that would be reincarnation.
Ironically, you're debating that point... Why are things so black and white here?
It's neither, it's simple physics and ignoring them is the problem.
*submission
You have an incredibly narrow view, which suggests a complete lack of experience. You seem to know nothing of the real dynamics of dominance and sumission. You are peddling some pretty idiotic assertions. For one, pidgeonholing a diverse animal such as a human being into a single category like this is disingenious to your argument. Furthermore, you seem to be completely lacking any knowledge in regards to research on the topic. Frankly, you're still putting your foot in your mouth with every single word. Please, continue to entertain us with your "knowledge" of women.
Wow... what a fail on your part. Firstly, I'm male. Secondly, a happily married one. Congradulations on not only being a douche, but also for demostrating how specacularly stupid you are. Before you swallow your foot completely, I'm, personally, quite familiar with the dominance vs submission dynamic in a relationship and can only say you have no clue as to what you're talking about nor what it actually is.
It's not the ethnicity, it's your culture. Even if HALF the shit I've seen is true, then I'm sorry to break this to you.... the 21st century has arrived, you've missed the boat, and you NEED to catch up. Pride, in this case, is detrimental to survival.
He just described all women as submissive or having something wrong with them if not. I don't think there's much to argue with here.
Women enjoy being submissive? I guess they don't talk to you, and I have an idea as to why that might be.
In both cases, you should have known better. It is as much the fault of the victim as it is of the perpetrator. Natural selection is the scientific term.
They're not in it to create an awesome drug. They're into it because it's a quick buck off of desparate people. These aren't the same leagues at all.
For a real brain teaser, I recommend comparing and contrasting the type system adopted from Simula (C++, Java, PHP, etc) with OOP type concepts from languages stemming from Smalltalk like Ruby, where classes are themselves runtime objects, to the type system of Haskell.
"Design" would be the problem word overall, methinks.
Bible thumbpers don't really have good reading comprehension though. That's why they thump methinks.
"rarely"? wtf? What kind of child caring have you had experience with here?