The biggest exploitation here is people not bothering to research dodgy information they've been fed and acting on bad pretenses.
*Thinks about drug war constitutional violations and 70 years of federal and state courts willfully ignoring the actual meaning of Miller while the public failed to think about it*
Sooo, been here long have you? At least with businesses there's the excuse of relative obscurity. This is something out there in the OPEN and people still willfully ignore it, mainly because thinking logically about what the.gov does and why would be too fucking hard.
In the second case, the person could not have gotten any feedback other than the girl's posts on the net. The woman on the other hand, was able to gauge things just right through her daughter's interactions with the suicidal one.
No, primarily because it IS snail mail. It is unlikely that the girl would have reacted in the same way to a series of missives drawn out over weeks at a time.
Given that there should be an additional number of people who then do go out and pay for it, as well as other of your works, yes. Especially as those people would not have been exposed to you normally in the first place.
FACT: You have, or posited to have, a gas powered car.
FACT: You could have bought a diesel, but didn't consider the benefit of gas mileage to outweigh the cost.
My post responded directly to these facts, albeit in a quite nasty tone. Nasty tone however, does not an Ad Hominem attack make.
Except of course that he kept working through most of those vacations since to be perfectly honest the amount of stuff that the president needs to be at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave to do is rather small. As long as he's got the football with him, almost everything else can be done elsewhere.
Except their fire is perfectly on target. As long as Hamas/Fatah/Hezbollah use civilian areas for their operations, there are effectively from a war crimes standpoint on return fire no civilians.
Created DAMMIT, created. He wasn't some putz who knocked a couple of ideas together and simply invented something, no, he was the very Hand of God without which the internet could never have been invented.
Given that the tax breaks and protections tend to carry with them the assumption of children sometime in the relationship, there's a rather good argument for keeping it Male/Female only. Really a better solution would be to remove marriage from the equation entirely and just award the breaks and protections to those that have/adopt children, but that would be entirely too sensible and so will never happen.
Yes, which is why although gun ownership has pretty much skyrocketed in terms of number of guns in the past 16 years, the violence rates have gone down one hell of a lot.
AC ignoring the fact that polar bears aren't going extinct at all, nor the fact that scientists don't know whether changes to their will end up killing them or not(existence in non-climate controlled zoos tends to suggest otherwise but is no guarantee) as well as ignoring that the ban on DDT as a mosquito repellent(not the ban on using it to protect crops) has killed the most children in poor countries each year - Fucking hilarious.
Of course, that ignores both the existence of oil futures and the fact that if we had started drilling in '95 when this first came up we would be getting physical results by 2013.
You mean the land which might or might not contain oil but they have no clue how much or how hard it will be to access, or what type of crude? Yes, yes I have. OTOH, they pretty much have everything about ANWR pinned down except for the exact amount.
Slashdot Mirror
The biggest exploitation here is people not bothering to research dodgy information they've been fed and acting on bad pretenses.
*Thinks about drug war constitutional violations and 70 years of federal and state courts willfully ignoring the actual meaning of Miller while the public failed to think about it* Sooo, been here long have you? At least with businesses there's the excuse of relative obscurity. This is something out there in the OPEN and people still willfully ignore it, mainly because thinking logically about what the .gov does and why would be too fucking hard.
He's talking about the Apple Workers in the article. Specifically the ones living in the US. I'm pretty sure he was dead on about their conditions.
In the second case, the person could not have gotten any feedback other than the girl's posts on the net. The woman on the other hand, was able to gauge things just right through her daughter's interactions with the suicidal one.
No, primarily because it IS snail mail. It is unlikely that the girl would have reacted in the same way to a series of missives drawn out over weeks at a time.
Given that there should be an additional number of people who then do go out and pay for it, as well as other of your works, yes. Especially as those people would not have been exposed to you normally in the first place.
That's the uploader being responsible, and the act of downloading(picking up the paper) was not illegal.
Speculators are not Venture Capitalists. Don't confuse the two.
FACT: You have, or posited to have, a gas powered car. FACT: You could have bought a diesel, but didn't consider the benefit of gas mileage to outweigh the cost. My post responded directly to these facts, albeit in a quite nasty tone. Nasty tone however, does not an Ad Hominem attack make.
Except of course that he kept working through most of those vacations since to be perfectly honest the amount of stuff that the president needs to be at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave to do is rather small. As long as he's got the football with him, almost everything else can be done elsewhere.
*cough* shale *cough*
I don't think I'm watching the same presidential candidacy as you are.
Explain why the price of oil dropped quite a bit the same day the Bush rescinded the executive ban on drilling then?
Incumbent senators and reps.
Except their fire is perfectly on target. As long as Hamas/Fatah/Hezbollah use civilian areas for their operations, there are effectively from a war crimes standpoint on return fire no civilians.
Created DAMMIT, created. He wasn't some putz who knocked a couple of ideas together and simply invented something, no, he was the very Hand of God without which the internet could never have been invented.
Given that the tax breaks and protections tend to carry with them the assumption of children sometime in the relationship, there's a rather good argument for keeping it Male/Female only. Really a better solution would be to remove marriage from the equation entirely and just award the breaks and protections to those that have/adopt children, but that would be entirely too sensible and so will never happen.
No, they are taught to shoot to kill because the quickest, most reliable way to disable someone with a firearm is to kill them.
Yes, which is why although gun ownership has pretty much skyrocketed in terms of number of guns in the past 16 years, the violence rates have gone down one hell of a lot.
AC ignoring the fact that polar bears aren't going extinct at all, nor the fact that scientists don't know whether changes to their will end up killing them or not(existence in non-climate controlled zoos tends to suggest otherwise but is no guarantee) as well as ignoring that the ban on DDT as a mosquito repellent(not the ban on using it to protect crops) has killed the most children in poor countries each year - Fucking hilarious.
Of course, that ignores both the existence of oil futures and the fact that if we had started drilling in '95 when this first came up we would be getting physical results by 2013.
You mean the land which might or might not contain oil but they have no clue how much or how hard it will be to access, or what type of crude? Yes, yes I have. OTOH, they pretty much have everything about ANWR pinned down except for the exact amount.
Because on average they are, just like on average guys have greater upper body strength. Get over it.
You mean like the fact that he's probably not a liberal at all, but a progressive social liberal?
Of course, given that this is a 9th circuit case, it has the highest probability possible of being overturned.
Well, while they may have stated in their dissents that it was an individual right, the dissents themselves then attempted to erase that fact.