Basically, the dogmatic point of departure is simple: the EU principle of non-refoulement is anchored in Article 19(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU, which contains a prohibition to remove, expel or extradite any person to a State where there is a serious risk that he or she would be subjected to the death penalty, torture or other inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. The Charter should govern the uniform interpretation of the principle of non-refoulement in Union law, both in the Treaties and in secondary legislation (like the Returns Directive and the Qualification Directive). As the prohibition of refoulement is absolute in the ECHR, it should universally be interpreted to be absolute regardless of the legal context of EU law in which it appears. Article 19(2) of the Charter corresponds to Article 3 ECHR, and so must be interpreted the same way (Article 52(3) of the Charter). See the ECtHR ruling in Chahal, and more case law in Kees Wouters, International Legal Standards for the Protection from Refoulement, Intersentia, 2009, p. 307 - 314. The Court of Justice has recognized the absolute nature of the rule in its judgment in Aranyosi (paras 85-87).
In a survey by the Frankfurter Allgemeiner Zeitung, however, most of the top 30 companies on the German stock exchange (DAX) said they were unable to employ any of the new arrivals. The companies said migrants lacked the necessary qualifications needed to fill any of their roles.
Although the companies surveyed employ four million workers, FAZ reported that between them, they had only hired 54 migrants.
Fifty of these are employed by the German post office, and the vast majority of top German companies hired none at all. Software giant SAP reported having two migrants working for them, and pharmaceutical manufacturer Merck also said they had hired two.
I.e. if Turkey or Libya open the floodgates then there's nothing the EU can do legally to stop large numbers of people being dependent on benefits in the EU indefinitely.
True, but the alarmist side always trot out 'weather is not climate' whenever the weather is cold because one day's cold weather doesn't say anything about long term climate changes. Which is true - saying 'The fact it's cold means global warming isn't happening' is a dumb argument. However it's also a dumb argument to say that because it's warm on a particular day global warming must be happening is a dumb argument, but not one the alarmist side ever object to. I.e. the media are being intellectually dishonest about when they use this argument.
In this case the 'weather is not climate' distinction applies. If you're a wannabe migrant it's plausible that you're more likely leave when it is summer rather than winter because you've got less chance of freezing to death. That's responding to weather - it's 20 degrees C warmer in summer than in winter and if you want to cross the Med and walk across multiple countries that makes a difference. You're not responding to the fact that it's 0.8 degrees C warmer now than it was 100 years ago, because that makes no difference.
That would require someone do a multivariate analysis. And they won't do that because it would show civil war, oppressive governments etc are more strongly correlated to refugee flows than climate.
Actually one big driver was getting rid of people like Gaddafi who stopped migrants coming to Europe. The EU had a deal with Gaddafi. Then France and the UK toppled him and Libya became essentially a failed state.
So how much is climate a cause? Not much. Weather probably does have some impact though - mainly because if you're going to cross the Med or walk across Europe you'd be better off doing when it's not freezing cold. But weather and climate are not the same thing.
If a majority of people here think that the Russians 'hacked the election' and also think that Snowden who defected to Russia with a bunch of US/UK secrets is 'a hero', then it's fair to say a lot of people here don't know what the hell they're talking about.
The art of abusing people. Of ambushing them with questions, following them with questions, hounding them with questions, driving them to their fucking graves with questions. It's sort of being like a photographer, except no ones' killed any royalty doing it... yet.
The problem with saying 'the spirit of Net Neutrality' is that in the US 'Net Neutrality' meant 'regulating ISPs under Title II as Common Carriers'. Since neither Amazon nor Google were not ISPs them blocking each other wouldn't violate the FCC's rules.
Laws don't have a 'spirit', all that matters is the details of the law. And in fact if people are trying to convince you to support a law because its 'spirit' they're probably trying to draw your attention away from some of those details.
Net Neutrality meant 'regulating ISPs under Title II'. It doesn't have anything to do with Google and Amazon blocking each others products on their platforms.
In fact both Google and Amazon wanted ISPs - though of course not themselves - regulated under Title II.
Tacitus in his historical and ethnographic work 'Germania' discussed customs of the Ancient Aryan Peoples.
Retirement came from fighting the Romans to west or savage slavic tribes to the east. And by retirement I mean 'death'. He doesn't mention any prior discussion.
# Performance. # # Given aes(enc|dec) instructions' latency asymptotic performance for # non-parallelizable modes such as CBC encrypt is 3.75 cycles per byte # processed with 128-bit key. And given their throughput asymptotic # performance for parallelizable modes is 1.25 cycles per byte. Being # asymptotic limit it's not something you commonly achieve in reality, # but how close does one get? Below are results collected for # different modes and block sized. Pairs of numbers are for en-/ # decryption. # # 16-byte 64-byte 256-byte 1-KB 8-KB # ECB 4.25/4.25 1.38/1.38 1.28/1.28 1.26/1.26 1.26/1.26 # CTR 5.42/5.42 1.92/1.92 1.44/1.44 1.28/1.28 1.26/1.26 # CBC 4.38/4.43 4.15/1.43 4.07/1.32 4.07/1.29 4.06/1.28 # CCM 5.66/9.42 4.42/5.41 4.16/4.40 4.09/4.15 4.06/4.07 # OFB 5.42/5.42 4.64/4.64 4.44/4.44 4.39/4.39 4.38/4.38 # CFB 5.73/5.85 5.56/5.62 5.48/5.56 5.47/5.55 5.47/5.55
Compared to the normal, non AES-NI x86-64 implementation which looks pretty good to me it's about 10x better
# Version 2.1. # # aes-*-cbc benchmarks are improved by >70% [compared to gcc 3.3.2 on # Opteron 240 CPU] plus all the bells-n-whistles from 32-bit version # [you'll notice a lot of resemblance], such as compressed S-boxes # in little-endian byte order, prefetch of these tables in CBC mode, # as well as avoiding L1 cache aliasing between stack frame and key # schedule and already mentioned tables, compressed Td4... # # Performance in number of cycles per processed byte for 128-bit key: # # ECB encrypt ECB decrypt CBC large chunk # AMD64 33 43 13.0 # EM64T 38 56 18.6(*) # Core 2 30 42 14.5(*) # Atom 65 86 32.1(*) # # (*) with hyper-threading off
It makes sense to hardware accelerate something like AES, after all people have being doing it in FPGAs for ages.
This is what happens when Millennials try to invent things. Back in the old days they'd be forced to post to comp.security for a few years before they were allowed to write an RFC and they'd be properly monstered by the bitter old men that post there, probably from some sort of facility for mentally ill alcoholics. This would teach the youngsters humility.
You could just as easily have a Contacting Us page. Make sure your email address doesn't appear in an un-obfuscated form in it so it can't be harvested. E.g. for javascript build it up from a few fragments, for noscript change the @ and . characters into an image.
security.txt is dumb because it includes your email address and phone number in form that is very easy for a script to grab.
Google doesn't have one, but then Google doesn't employ anyone the public can contact anyway
You could use the Tleilaxu Eyes model where the eyes are free but they're monetized in various ways which are a trade secret and probably not entirely in the users' best interests.
Sounds like an improvement on those LUDDITES AND FOOLS at the University Ethics Board telling me I can't do simple experiment to make velociraptors. They kicked me out of my laboratory and now I have to do my experiments in primitive conditions down in the sewer.
Slashdot Mirror
EU is just as capable as Turkey at controlling their border so if Turkey tried EU would just close the border to Turkey and then Turkey is fucked.
EU countries all signed up to the ECHR which says
1) They can't just shoot migrants arriving
2) They're not allowed to return them because that would violate the principle of 'non-refoulement'
https://eulawanalysis.blogspot...
Basically, the dogmatic point of departure is simple: the EU principle of non-refoulement is anchored in Article 19(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU, which contains a prohibition to remove, expel or extradite any person to a State where there is a serious risk that he or she would be subjected to the death penalty, torture or other inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. The Charter should govern the uniform interpretation of the principle of non-refoulement in Union law, both in the Treaties and in secondary legislation (like the Returns Directive and the Qualification Directive). As the prohibition of refoulement is absolute in the ECHR, it should universally be interpreted to be absolute regardless of the legal context of EU law in which it appears. Article 19(2) of the Charter corresponds to Article 3 ECHR, and so must be interpreted the same way (Article 52(3) of the Charter). See the ECtHR ruling in Chahal, and more case law in Kees Wouters, International Legal Standards for the Protection from Refoulement, Intersentia, 2009, p. 307 - 314. The Court of Justice has recognized the absolute nature of the rule in its judgment in Aranyosi (paras 85-87).
https://www.hrw.org/news/2014/...
https://www.yahoo.com/news/eu-...
3) Inside the EU the migrants can claim asylum and even if they are refused they're unlikely to be deported
https://www.express.co.uk/news...
4) The numbers of asylum seekers who are likely to find work is minimal. Of the million plus migrants who arrived in 2016 only 54 found a job
http://www.breitbart.com/londo...
In a survey by the Frankfurter Allgemeiner Zeitung, however, most of the top 30 companies on the German stock exchange (DAX) said they were unable to employ any of the new arrivals. The companies said migrants lacked the necessary qualifications needed to fill any of their roles.
Although the companies surveyed employ four million workers, FAZ reported that between them, they had only hired 54 migrants.
Fifty of these are employed by the German post office, and the vast majority of top German companies hired none at all. Software giant SAP reported having two migrants working for them, and pharmaceutical manufacturer Merck also said they had hired two.
I.e. if Turkey or Libya open the floodgates then there's nothing the EU can do legally to stop large numbers of people being dependent on benefits in the EU indefinitely.
Because if you believe in a welfare state, you need more and more people to pay pensions.
Which tells you a welfare state is a Ponzi scheme.
Good times, man. Good times
http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/events/p-p-p-powerbook
True, but the alarmist side always trot out 'weather is not climate' whenever the weather is cold because one day's cold weather doesn't say anything about long term climate changes. Which is true - saying 'The fact it's cold means global warming isn't happening' is a dumb argument. However it's also a dumb argument to say that because it's warm on a particular day global warming must be happening is a dumb argument, but not one the alarmist side ever object to. I.e. the media are being intellectually dishonest about when they use this argument.
In this case the 'weather is not climate' distinction applies. If you're a wannabe migrant it's plausible that you're more likely leave when it is summer rather than winter because you've got less chance of freezing to death. That's responding to weather - it's 20 degrees C warmer in summer than in winter and if you want to cross the Med and walk across multiple countries that makes a difference. You're not responding to the fact that it's 0.8 degrees C warmer now than it was 100 years ago, because that makes no difference.
I.e. you're responding to weather not climate.
That would require someone do a multivariate analysis. And they won't do that because it would show civil war, oppressive governments etc are more strongly correlated to refugee flows than climate.
Actually one big driver was getting rid of people like Gaddafi who stopped migrants coming to Europe. The EU had a deal with Gaddafi. Then France and the UK toppled him and Libya became essentially a failed state.
https://www.theguardian.com/co...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Turkey also uses refugee flows as a foreign policy tool - they turn on the tap when they want more money from Europe.
https://www.euractiv.com/secti...
So how much is climate a cause? Not much. Weather probably does have some impact though - mainly because if you're going to cross the Med or walk across Europe you'd be better off doing when it's not freezing cold. But weather and climate are not the same thing.
If a majority of people here think that the Russians 'hacked the election' and also think that Snowden who defected to Russia with a bunch of US/UK secrets is 'a hero', then it's fair to say a lot of people here don't know what the hell they're talking about.
Stop Blackaddering.
Hero of the Soviet Union!
Both Google and Facebook were involved in this project which was non Net Neutral.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Basics
Monstering is actually valid British English, and means roughly the opposite of mentoring
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Monstering
The art of abusing people. Of ambushing them with questions, following them with questions, hounding them with questions, driving them to their fucking graves with questions. It's sort of being like a photographer, except no ones' killed any royalty doing it ... yet.
See also
Monster, Monster, Monster!
The problem with saying 'the spirit of Net Neutrality' is that in the US 'Net Neutrality' meant 'regulating ISPs under Title II as Common Carriers'. Since neither Amazon nor Google were not ISPs them blocking each other wouldn't violate the FCC's rules.
Laws don't have a 'spirit', all that matters is the details of the law. And in fact if people are trying to convince you to support a law because its 'spirit' they're probably trying to draw your attention away from some of those details.
Net Neutrality meant 'regulating ISPs under Title II'. It doesn't have anything to do with Google and Amazon blocking each others products on their platforms.
In fact both Google and Amazon wanted ISPs - though of course not themselves - regulated under Title II.
They're all named after Nazi shit
Yosemite - "Yo, Semite!"
El Capitan - Spanish for "SS-Hauptsturmführer"
I could go on.
Google Fit on an Android smartphone is free and probably does enough for 99% of people.
Tacitus in his historical and ethnographic work 'Germania' discussed customs of the Ancient Aryan Peoples.
Retirement came from fighting the Romans to west or savage slavic tribes to the east. And by retirement I mean 'death'. He doesn't mention any prior discussion.
I hope this has proved helpful.
And how many micro ops or real world CPU cycles does that translate to?
It's pretty good
https://github.com/openssl/ope...
Compared to the normal, non AES-NI x86-64 implementation which looks pretty good to me it's about 10x better
https://github.com/openssl/ope...
It makes sense to hardware accelerate something like AES, after all people have being doing it in FPGAs for ages.
http://ece-research.unm.edu/ji...
On ARM and x86 people have built crypto coprocessors
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
This is what happens when Millennials try to invent things. Back in the old days they'd be forced to post to comp.security for a few years before they were allowed to write an RFC and they'd be properly monstered by the bitter old men that post there, probably from some sort of facility for mentally ill alcoholics. This would teach the youngsters humility.
Security.txt is basically howtospamme.txt
https://www.bleepingcomputer.c...
You could just as easily have a Contacting Us page. Make sure your email address doesn't appear in an un-obfuscated form in it so it can't be harvested. E.g. for javascript build it up from a few fragments, for noscript change the @ and . characters into an image.
security.txt is dumb because it includes your email address and phone number in form that is very easy for a script to grab.
Google doesn't have one, but then Google doesn't employ anyone the public can contact anyway
https://www.google.com/securit...
Neither does slashdot, but then slashdot doesn't employ anything than can pass a Turing Test.
https://slashdot.org/security....
Also I heard that in Romania a lamb was born with two heads. Truly an ill omen. We are living in the end times!
Well you can still serve web pages from your 486, just not with AES-NI.
Actually openssl seems like it has pretty performant AES encoding even on MMX and just regular x86. It's unlikely to be bottleneck.
https://github.com/openssl/ope...
You could use the Tleilaxu Eyes model where the eyes are free but they're monetized in various ways which are a trade secret and probably not entirely in the users' best interests.
A bit like Google do with Android.
Shush, I'm trying to get iPhone users to try to post accented characters so we can laugh at them when it comes out all fubar.
Or a Rambo like greeter who can improvise booby traps to hold off the zombie hordes.
How can you be sure that the SHA-256 value against which you are verifying the disk image hasn't itself been tampered with on its way to your device?
True. And doing HTTPS encryption isn't all that taxing on a modern CPU. E.g. newish CPUs can do AES with one instruction
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Sounds like an improvement on those LUDDITES AND FOOLS at the University Ethics Board telling me I can't do simple experiment to make velociraptors. They kicked me out of my laboratory and now I have to do my experiments in primitive conditions down in the sewer.