so what the fuck are they doing between the call and the arrival "within 4 hours"? Are there that many crimes happening that are worse than a break-in with owner in home that it takes that long?
Not sure how I missed that. So just more reason their issues with money are self inflicted. If they can't make that work, it isn't facebook or the contracting company's fault, it's theirs.
Wow...documents that have been out for over a year are going to now become an issue that will lead to this chain of scandalous events? Sorry, if they were going to be an issue for now President Trump they would have been an issue before he got elected. That's not to say that people like you won't continue to claim there is something when there's nothing...but there really is nothing.
Take a quick look around that apartment (it's not a garage, maybe it once was, but it's one room apartment now) and note a few things. They have some pretty damn nice looking furniture. They have a projector. They have what appears to be a flat screen TV to the left. They have one of those "bladeless" fans that at least looks like a dyson. They have better shit than I did when I moved. They make $78K a year, which isn't rich, but I found numerous apartments for rent in Menlo Park for less that $2000 a month that are bigger than that "garage". Based on 78000 a year, without consideration for the 3 deductions they have, their after tax income in california would be $58000. That leaves 2800 a month after rent if they're paying that much. Not a ton, but I lived on less than that with my family in california. I didn't own a big TV or a projector. We ate mac n cheese a lot. And I found a way to save up enough to move to a better job and place for us all.
Sounds more likely to me that they have managed their income poorly.
If you create a better Amazon, Jeff Bezos 90 billion will make its way to you. There may be finite money, but it never stays in one place forever. The only thing that lets it stagnate is the same type of thinking that assholes like you who think because the fat kid HAS 10 pieces of cake that regardless of how he got them, he should be forced to give 9 of them away. What if he had 10 birthday parties to go to that day and got a piece of cake at each one? And what if he's taking them home to his 9 siblings who weren't invited? Would you force him to give up the 9 pieces then? You're butthurt that you didn't make Amazon and also you're clearly a moron.
Yep, I choose to be where I am. I have had the desire to do something entrepreneurial like that, but wasn't willing to take the risk. That wasn't Jeff Bezos fault. Nor was it Bill Gates fault. In fact, Bill Gates is one reason I even considered many of those ventures in the first place.
Life is hard. Sometimes you have to do hard things to make it work. They choose not to. I moved halfway across the country to get a better job for my family. It wasn't easy. I left behind family that I haven't seen since. No one is entitled to a better job. You have to fucking work for it and sometimes make sacrifices to get there. If you aren't willing to make the same sacrifices, well then you probably aren't going to get the same benefit. Stop waiting for other people (unions, facebook, whoever) to hand you things. Go find it and work for it yourself because in the end, the only person you can trust to be working for you is YOU.
Opportunity is God here. Take it or leave it, that's up to you. Some people try and fail, some people try and succeed, that is opportunity. You could make the next Amazon if you weren't too busy worrying about stopping other people from trying because of your butthurt.
Well, that's slightly different. Carrier isn't moving jobs to Mexico, and at the time of the deal it said that some jobs would be replaced with automation. Now, for it to be 600 of the 800 it was planning to move is a pretty big deal. But that does mean that 200 jobs were actually saved. While that means less than 20% of the jobs saved from moving them to Mexico are going to still exist, they got to keep there job for over 6 months extra while knowing that they were likely going to need a new job anyway. It's too bad the people who are lashing out against this didn't pay attention to the fact that the automation of some jobs was coming as an alternative. Oh well, if you only believe in reading headlines you're bound to be disappointed when the details hit you personally.
With FoxConn either they build the plant or they don't. And yes, Trump will likely move on, but that means local govt, media and citizens need to keep vigilant watch and spam Paul Ryan's office with calls and emails if it seems like Foxconn is not following through.
While foxconn has had numerous plans to build plants, including in the US, Wisconsin has been selected as part of a new effort. That started with Apple directing Foxconn to investigate the possibility of opening plants in the US as a result of Donald Trump's election win and the associated expectations around changes in import costs. Foxconn the responded by doing so, had seven candidate states identified last month, and now has selected Wisconsin. However, it should be noted that they haven't had a great track record with following through. I hope Trump holds their feet to the fire to make sure they do. But given that track record all manner of watchdog (media, government, citizens) should want to hold Foxconn to their promise.
That is how it works for older vehicles and those that don't have on-board sensors that meet whatever the applicable state guidelines are. However, for new vehicles the on-board sensor is trusted implicitly. But, even if they state tested new vehicles as part of the certification of the model year, that could easily be defeated by providing a special version of the vehicle built to pass actual emissions inspection.
For a while here in Missouri they had the Gateway Clean Air program for car emissions testing. You didn't even have to go to some specific company/building to get tested they could actually set up on the side of a road, often an on-ramp to a major interstate, a camera at license plates and a set of sensors for recording actual emissions and viola, if you were up for renewal on registration you'd get a certificate of passing (or failing) in the mail not too long after. Whether this is an accurate or cost effective method of testing I have no idea. I also don't know how effective any particular testing procedure can be, but someone seemed to think it was worthwhile to do it this way.
Dear lord almighty...how do you go through international customs and not know why it's two separate steps? Or was this a veiled attempt at one world government? Nope pretty sure you're just another one of the complete idiots on this post.
Read what each airport on the list had to do to be granted the exemption from the law. Doesn't make them perfect but it makes them better than they were. It was temporary because they were found to be lacking in that area, they all corrected the issue, and they were thus returned to normal status. Why is this so hard for you and the other morons on this post to understand?
Since you failed 3rd grade reading, yes it did. The goal was to force those listed airports to change their security procedures. They have now all changed and therefore all are exempted from the ban, effectively ending the ban. That was the entire point. Was it because the guardian idiots included the travel ban as part of the story (completely unrelated) that you couldn't wrap your pea brain around that?
Exactly, no one thought this was controversial. It also has nothing to do with the separate travel ban. This is just more fake news as much as that term feels like a joke, this is clearly entirely made up to sound like a story. Reality is the required actions were taken by all airports on the list, so the associated result was the ban on laptops on flights from those airports was lifted. It's really depressing how stupid people are...
So you're openly admitting to being a moron? The ban was only temporary if the airports listed actually made the changes to security that caused the ban in the first place. You're just too fucking stupid to understand that, and I appreciate you publicly announcing that fact.
Well, perhaps I'm a douche for posting a comment mocking the summary rather than providing meaningful discussion. But I don't think me being a douche lead to people modding my comment interesting.
Actually, it's in the summary twice which is the entire reason I posted what I did. I thought it was odd and funny that they reused the exact same sentence.
Slashdot Mirror
For everything after "tighter." Though even the third sentence probably would have been okay, that last sentence did AC in.
so what the fuck are they doing between the call and the arrival "within 4 hours"? Are there that many crimes happening that are worse than a break-in with owner in home that it takes that long?
Not sure how I missed that. So just more reason their issues with money are self inflicted. If they can't make that work, it isn't facebook or the contracting company's fault, it's theirs.
This is false. Where the fuck did you get the idea that a US citizen can't talk to a Russian citizen? You are so fucking dumb...
Wow...documents that have been out for over a year are going to now become an issue that will lead to this chain of scandalous events? Sorry, if they were going to be an issue for now President Trump they would have been an issue before he got elected. That's not to say that people like you won't continue to claim there is something when there's nothing...but there really is nothing.
Take a quick look around that apartment (it's not a garage, maybe it once was, but it's one room apartment now) and note a few things. They have some pretty damn nice looking furniture. They have a projector. They have what appears to be a flat screen TV to the left. They have one of those "bladeless" fans that at least looks like a dyson. They have better shit than I did when I moved. They make $78K a year, which isn't rich, but I found numerous apartments for rent in Menlo Park for less that $2000 a month that are bigger than that "garage". Based on 78000 a year, without consideration for the 3 deductions they have, their after tax income in california would be $58000. That leaves 2800 a month after rent if they're paying that much. Not a ton, but I lived on less than that with my family in california. I didn't own a big TV or a projector. We ate mac n cheese a lot. And I found a way to save up enough to move to a better job and place for us all.
Sounds more likely to me that they have managed their income poorly.
If you create a better Amazon, Jeff Bezos 90 billion will make its way to you. There may be finite money, but it never stays in one place forever. The only thing that lets it stagnate is the same type of thinking that assholes like you who think because the fat kid HAS 10 pieces of cake that regardless of how he got them, he should be forced to give 9 of them away. What if he had 10 birthday parties to go to that day and got a piece of cake at each one? And what if he's taking them home to his 9 siblings who weren't invited? Would you force him to give up the 9 pieces then? You're butthurt that you didn't make Amazon and also you're clearly a moron.
Yep, I choose to be where I am. I have had the desire to do something entrepreneurial like that, but wasn't willing to take the risk. That wasn't Jeff Bezos fault. Nor was it Bill Gates fault. In fact, Bill Gates is one reason I even considered many of those ventures in the first place.
Life is hard. Sometimes you have to do hard things to make it work. They choose not to. I moved halfway across the country to get a better job for my family. It wasn't easy. I left behind family that I haven't seen since. No one is entitled to a better job. You have to fucking work for it and sometimes make sacrifices to get there. If you aren't willing to make the same sacrifices, well then you probably aren't going to get the same benefit. Stop waiting for other people (unions, facebook, whoever) to hand you things. Go find it and work for it yourself because in the end, the only person you can trust to be working for you is YOU.
Opportunity is God here. Take it or leave it, that's up to you. Some people try and fail, some people try and succeed, that is opportunity. You could make the next Amazon if you weren't too busy worrying about stopping other people from trying because of your butthurt.
Because that would be stupid as fuck. Much like you.
Well, that's slightly different. Carrier isn't moving jobs to Mexico, and at the time of the deal it said that some jobs would be replaced with automation. Now, for it to be 600 of the 800 it was planning to move is a pretty big deal. But that does mean that 200 jobs were actually saved. While that means less than 20% of the jobs saved from moving them to Mexico are going to still exist, they got to keep there job for over 6 months extra while knowing that they were likely going to need a new job anyway. It's too bad the people who are lashing out against this didn't pay attention to the fact that the automation of some jobs was coming as an alternative. Oh well, if you only believe in reading headlines you're bound to be disappointed when the details hit you personally.
With FoxConn either they build the plant or they don't. And yes, Trump will likely move on, but that means local govt, media and citizens need to keep vigilant watch and spam Paul Ryan's office with calls and emails if it seems like Foxconn is not following through.
While foxconn has had numerous plans to build plants, including in the US, Wisconsin has been selected as part of a new effort. That started with Apple directing Foxconn to investigate the possibility of opening plants in the US as a result of Donald Trump's election win and the associated expectations around changes in import costs. Foxconn the responded by doing so, had seven candidate states identified last month, and now has selected Wisconsin. However, it should be noted that they haven't had a great track record with following through. I hope Trump holds their feet to the fire to make sure they do. But given that track record all manner of watchdog (media, government, citizens) should want to hold Foxconn to their promise.
That is how it works for older vehicles and those that don't have on-board sensors that meet whatever the applicable state guidelines are. However, for new vehicles the on-board sensor is trusted implicitly. But, even if they state tested new vehicles as part of the certification of the model year, that could easily be defeated by providing a special version of the vehicle built to pass actual emissions inspection.
For a while here in Missouri they had the Gateway Clean Air program for car emissions testing. You didn't even have to go to some specific company/building to get tested they could actually set up on the side of a road, often an on-ramp to a major interstate, a camera at license plates and a set of sensors for recording actual emissions and viola, if you were up for renewal on registration you'd get a certificate of passing (or failing) in the mail not too long after. Whether this is an accurate or cost effective method of testing I have no idea. I also don't know how effective any particular testing procedure can be, but someone seemed to think it was worthwhile to do it this way.
Dear lord almighty...how do you go through international customs and not know why it's two separate steps? Or was this a veiled attempt at one world government? Nope pretty sure you're just another one of the complete idiots on this post.
Read what each airport on the list had to do to be granted the exemption from the law. Doesn't make them perfect but it makes them better than they were. It was temporary because they were found to be lacking in that area, they all corrected the issue, and they were thus returned to normal status. Why is this so hard for you and the other morons on this post to understand?
Since you failed 3rd grade reading, yes it did. The goal was to force those listed airports to change their security procedures. They have now all changed and therefore all are exempted from the ban, effectively ending the ban. That was the entire point. Was it because the guardian idiots included the travel ban as part of the story (completely unrelated) that you couldn't wrap your pea brain around that?
Exactly, no one thought this was controversial. It also has nothing to do with the separate travel ban. This is just more fake news as much as that term feels like a joke, this is clearly entirely made up to sound like a story. Reality is the required actions were taken by all airports on the list, so the associated result was the ban on laptops on flights from those airports was lifted. It's really depressing how stupid people are...
So you're openly admitting to being a moron? The ban was only temporary if the airports listed actually made the changes to security that caused the ban in the first place. You're just too fucking stupid to understand that, and I appreciate you publicly announcing that fact.
Can you please live stream this happening?
Well, perhaps I'm a douche for posting a comment mocking the summary rather than providing meaningful discussion. But I don't think me being a douche lead to people modding my comment interesting.
Actually, it's in the summary twice which is the entire reason I posted what I did. I thought it was odd and funny that they reused the exact same sentence.
Finally someone who gets it. Thank you.
How am I modded interesting for making fun of the summary for using the same sentence to start and finish? Lol I give up...