What is the fundamental difference between physical art and digital art such that the digital art shouldn't be covered by the first sale doctrine? As far as I can tell, the only difference is the presence of a lobby...
The blog standard is far superior, where usually the incorrect section is stricken through (but left readable) with a statement right below saying what they got wrong. The key is that the correction is attached to the original media, far stronger a correction.
For a newspaper to make a correction, they have to do something that will be seen, and evidence is left behind of what was there before. When you change something online, you can just change it and deny that it was ever anything else.
I'm pretty sure he doesn't mean "rigorous" in the math sense of the word (or even the dictionary definition now that I look at it). Most likely it is just used as a synonym for "a lot of work."
That said, it sounds to me more like a course that teaches you what calculus can do, not a course in how to do calculus. It is of different value, but not necessarily less, especially for people taking calculus for different purposes.
As a HS math teacher in training, I've been thinking about this after reading this guy's idea. Long story short, lots of little tests, one given for every idea or concept. Unlimited re-tests are allowed, as it's a lot easier to do now that tests are short 5-10 minute things, so you are grading based on what the student knows at the end of the class.
So if you need to register under your real name, I would assume that means nicknames are no good? So everyone signed up as "Tom" whose real name is "Thomas" just committed a felony? Wonderful.
Businesses rise and fall through competitive selection. Businesses evolve. Market niches for survival. Don't you mean they are intelligently guided by Adam Smith's invisible hand?
Unfortunately, all of our evidence that any food is safe is macroscopic. I haven't really kept up on to date with this, but I don't remember seeing any evidence that GM food was dangerous, it was simply the lack of evidence that it was safe.
I was under the impression that you needed a specific e-mail to be allowed access to a certain network. So you would need a name@schoolname.edu to get access to the school's network, and a name@companyname.com to get access to the company's network. Though on the other hand, I could just be imagining all of that.
If you can't see my profile, then you don't go to my campus and I don't care!
Heh, exactly. I'm not sure how they're "protecting their image" if only people that go to Kent State or are friends of the athletes can look at their profiles... That said, I don't know how many athletes Kent State is going to have in a couple years if none of them are allowed to use facebook. They are not really know for their academics, so they'd have more popularity-jock types, and not having facebook wouldn't sit well with many of them.
Sure.... I'm sure there will be situations with this. They probably won't involve mainstream press, but there will be someone. Remember, reporters don't just come from the US.
Who else will be there, really, except reporters and the athletes?
Well, I would like to go to the Olympics sometime. I don't know if I would go to them in China or not, but if some people I know are competing, it's certainly possible.
Exactly. A search that learns about you would be very bad. For example, if the search engine sees that you visit/. frequently, it will just assume that anything you type in is a typo, and what you meant to type was 'porn'. On second thought, that might not be so bad after all...
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I remember reading somewhere that it was found that the NSA's values were better against certain attacks unknown to the 'public' at the time of DES' creation. Of course, this doesn't mean that you can now trust the NSA completely, only that they dealt truthfully about this in the past.
Slashdot Mirror
That was my thinking as well. I was all for a ban, knowing it would not last, but would create another strategic reserve so to speak.
What is the fundamental difference between physical art and digital art such that the digital art shouldn't be covered by the first sale doctrine? As far as I can tell, the only difference is the presence of a lobby...
Historically that doesn't go well.
Yeah, but historically those 1% didn't have fighting robots to defend their wealth...
The blog standard is far superior, where usually the incorrect section is stricken through (but left readable) with a statement right below saying what they got wrong. The key is that the correction is attached to the original media, far stronger a correction.
For a newspaper to make a correction, they have to do something that will be seen, and evidence is left behind of what was there before. When you change something online, you can just change it and deny that it was ever anything else.
Just move to Turkey. Only 5 inches there.
Of course, you're probably in America, which will make you feel even worse.
I'm pretty sure he doesn't mean "rigorous" in the math sense of the word (or even the dictionary definition now that I look at it). Most likely it is just used as a synonym for "a lot of work."
That said, it sounds to me more like a course that teaches you what calculus can do, not a course in how to do calculus. It is of different value, but not necessarily less, especially for people taking calculus for different purposes.
As a HS math teacher in training, I've been thinking about this after reading this guy's idea. Long story short, lots of little tests, one given for every idea or concept. Unlimited re-tests are allowed, as it's a lot easier to do now that tests are short 5-10 minute things, so you are grading based on what the student knows at the end of the class.
Don't you mean regular expressions? http://xkcd.com/208/
You mean like this? http://www.chainsawsuit.com/20081125.shtml
So if you need to register under your real name, I would assume that means nicknames are no good? So everyone signed up as "Tom" whose real name is "Thomas" just committed a felony? Wonderful.
Replacing? You must be new here.
Well, considering that .99 is actually cheaper than 1.00...
I was under the impression that only growing it was illegal, as it could be used to hide growing of marijuana.
Unfortunately, all of our evidence that any food is safe is macroscopic. I haven't really kept up on to date with this, but I don't remember seeing any evidence that GM food was dangerous, it was simply the lack of evidence that it was safe.
Yeah, but it'll only have one button...
I was under the impression that you needed a specific e-mail to be allowed access to a certain network. So you would need a name@schoolname.edu to get access to the school's network, and a name@companyname.com to get access to the company's network. Though on the other hand, I could just be imagining all of that.
In this country too, seeing as many college athletes are older than 21.
Well, I would like to go to the Olympics sometime. I don't know if I would go to them in China or not, but if some people I know are competing, it's certainly possible.
Exactly. A search that learns about you would be very bad. For example, if the search engine sees that you visit /. frequently, it will just assume that anything you type in is a typo, and what you meant to type was 'porn'. On second thought, that might not be so bad after all...
Actually, here in Wisconsin the government forces farmer to take much lower prices on their milk than farmers in California.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I remember reading somewhere that it was found that the NSA's values were better against certain attacks unknown to the 'public' at the time of DES' creation. Of course, this doesn't mean that you can now trust the NSA completely, only that they dealt truthfully about this in the past.