The real problem often ends up being that one company makes an idea which gets to be really popular, and people wouldn't be able to live without it, then it gets to be considered a basic idea and everyone says that it is unpatentable.
It seemed to me that the video store was started because of the new ipod, not the other way around...
Mainly because, without the video store and with no line-in recording, the video functionality would be virtually useless (especially if it respects DRM).
At the school that I go to, many people have iPods. It's not too uncommon to hear of someone being mugged for their ipods. If this happened often when an ipod would be mostly kept in a bag or pocket and the only indication would have been the headphones, imagine how the problem would escalate if people were carrying ipods around visibly watching videos on them.
Sounded to me as though it is the media itself that degrades rather than the player deleting it.
If they can afford to make it for so cheap, then it must be cheaper to make than a DVD (unless it's a licensing thing), and then if it didn't degrade by itself then they would probably just use the same technology for permanent discs.
Also, microsoft denied having anything to do with this idea...
Well, you have to consider also that, Internet Explorer having somewhere in the range of 90% market share as opposed to under 7% market share for Mozilla, about 13 times as many vulnerabilities would logically be found... (and only about 5 times as many are)
You do know that, if he existed, he was jewish, right? he never would have said anything about sins etc. Some random arab, probably insane or on some wierd drug, made up the bible thousands of years ago, so you base your life around these two things?
Jesus probably never even existed.
And, although you didn't directly say that, it is inferred because you have said that that is a sin, and that sinners should burn in hell forever:P
it's your choice, sure.
It's just that if you make the wrong choice, then the bible says off to hell you go for eternity.
Like in the gun example. You can choose not to meet their demands, but they're probably going to kill you...
yes, there actually is...
according to christianity, if you don't do what god wants you to do (fulfill the demands of the guy with the gun), then god will send you to hell for all eternity or something... (the guy will shoot you)
If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.
i.e. homosexuals must be killed according to Leviticus, and...
Matt 5:17-18
17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
That's supposedly a quote from "jesus", talking about the laws from before his time, and saying that he will fulfill them (this is presuming him to be a fictional character, but holds true either way)
Re:Not particularly difficult....
on
The Know-It-All
·
· Score: 1
But, I presume, he tried to remember all of the details from it. I doubt that these people whom you know could, after reading at that rate for 33,000 pages could tell you all of the things that happened in what they read.
So not only will he hit the pilot square in the eye from the ground, but he will aim it at the glass so that it splits into two beams and also hits the co-pilot? Wow.
Slashdot Mirror
Today was a great day in the history of coca-cola production.
The real problem often ends up being that one company makes an idea which gets to be really popular, and people wouldn't be able to live without it, then it gets to be considered a basic idea and everyone says that it is unpatentable.
e.g. the type of GUI developed at PARC
e.g. the archos jukebox, first released on August 29, 2002. Steve Jobs originally claimed that they wouldn't make PVP's, because there wasn't enough demand for them. (http://portables.about.com/cs/portablevideo/a/app lepvp.htm)
It seemed to me that the video store was started because of the new ipod, not the other way around... Mainly because, without the video store and with no line-in recording, the video functionality would be virtually useless (especially if it respects DRM).
At the school that I go to, many people have iPods. It's not too uncommon to hear of someone being mugged for their ipods. If this happened often when an ipod would be mostly kept in a bag or pocket and the only indication would have been the headphones, imagine how the problem would escalate if people were carrying ipods around visibly watching videos on them.
It's nice and cool in my new Hummer v2.
Sounded to me as though it is the media itself that degrades rather than the player deleting it.
If they can afford to make it for so cheap, then it must be cheaper to make than a DVD (unless it's a licensing thing), and then if it didn't degrade by itself then they would probably just use the same technology for permanent discs.
Also, microsoft denied having anything to do with this idea...
go figure.
I could be mistaken, but I believe that ludere is third conjugation (ludo ludere lusi lusum), so "ludent" would be future.
I know, very significant.
The presumption is that any large project is going to have bugs/security flaws in it, and the question is how quickly they get found and exploited.
Not how many it has, how many are going to be found and exploited.
Well, you have to consider also that, Internet Explorer having somewhere in the range of 90% market share as opposed to under 7% market share for Mozilla, about 13 times as many vulnerabilities would logically be found... (and only about 5 times as many are)
You do know that, if he existed, he was jewish, right? he never would have said anything about sins etc. Some random arab, probably insane or on some wierd drug, made up the bible thousands of years ago, so you base your life around these two things?
:P
Jesus probably never even existed.
And, although you didn't directly say that, it is inferred because you have said that that is a sin, and that sinners should burn in hell forever
See you there
so instead you are saying that if someone is homosexual, then they deserve to spend eternity burning in hell?
so you agree with your friend jesus that you must go around and kill them all or else you will be sent to hell...?
it's your choice, sure. It's just that if you make the wrong choice, then the bible says off to hell you go for eternity. Like in the gun example. You can choose not to meet their demands, but they're probably going to kill you...
And the old law says that homosexuality is a sin...
anyway, unnecessarily killing other animals...? Ring a bell?
yes, there actually is... according to christianity, if you don't do what god wants you to do (fulfill the demands of the guy with the gun), then god will send you to hell for all eternity or something... (the guy will shoot you)
I realize that it is considered to be old law.
But, as shown in the second quote, 'jesus' plans on fulfilling the old laws
you don't sacrifice animals, but you consider eating animals to be a decent idea?
Well, your statement is false...
Leviticus 20:13---
If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.
i.e. homosexuals must be killed according to Leviticus, and...
Matt 5:17-18
17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
That's supposedly a quote from "jesus", talking about the laws from before his time, and saying that he will fulfill them (this is presuming him to be a fictional character, but holds true either way)
But, I presume, he tried to remember all of the details from it. I doubt that these people whom you know could, after reading at that rate for 33,000 pages could tell you all of the things that happened in what they read.
So not only will he hit the pilot square in the eye from the ground, but he will aim it at the glass so that it splits into two beams and also hits the co-pilot? Wow.
Do you really believe that they shut down two entire publications because one person decided to unsubscribe?
It's their magazine, with their opinions...
try saving to your computer first then opening in your client (as opposed to opening it from a temporary folder)
it's also quite likely that, while screwing around in their BIOS, they'll mess something else up.
Microsoft has not even announced an Xbox 2 for any time soon, let alone next year...