Since landmines are a "automated" kill device and there are already laws against it, maybe the same laws can be applied. After all there must be a human (...) selecting for not killing unintended ("?") targets.
I mean, if by some wonder rootkit detection became too good (like some av products that can list virus/variants not in some sort of db) some goverments/agencies/bofh can be serious mad about it, after all those sort of detection can prevent "wiretapping" a computer. (In a short range when you know were the computer are there are always other ways...)
is opaque from the outside and transparent from the inside
if those are transparent it will give a perfect hidding for cameras. Since many places already have laws because of cellphone cameras (because they are covert by nature) I think that those places will rule somehow against those kind of fabric.
As for when this paridigm shift will occur, it won't be able to until broadband access is as cheap, plentiful, and above all, dependable as electricity or running water. Givin the fact that many areas of the world are still having issues with those, I'd wager we have a while to wait before the Web-as-platform paradigm really takes off.
that is true. But is also true that in that places nobody pays for software licences
Dcc could help here... If a load of spam is in transit in a single server it can be tracked easely. Actualy it is a good thing
http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/dcc/
Slashdot Mirror
A hole gives a lot of reflection :)
A comment suggesting the possibility torture as method of data extraction is Insightful
Since landmines are a "automated" kill device and there are already laws against it, maybe the same laws can be applied. After all there must be a human (...) selecting for not killing unintended ("?") targets.
They are on the way...
The contest made history this week, when Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen's SpaceShipOne craft sped 100km above Earth'
I mean, if by some wonder rootkit detection became too good (like some av products that can list virus/variants not in some sort of db) some goverments/agencies/bofh can be serious mad about it, after all those sort of detection can prevent "wiretapping" a computer. (In a short range when you know were the computer are there are always other ways...)
is opaque from the outside and transparent from the inside
if those are transparent it will give a perfect hidding for cameras. Since many places already have laws because of cellphone cameras (because they are covert by nature) I think that those places will rule somehow against those kind of fabric.
Does the US system make money?
Aren't the largest suppliers of gps products American companies? They pay taxes...
As for when this paridigm shift will occur, it won't be able to until broadband access is as cheap, plentiful, and above all, dependable as electricity or running water. Givin the fact that many areas of the world are still having issues with those, I'd wager we have a while to wait before the Web-as-platform paradigm really takes off.
that is true. But is also true that in that places nobody pays for software licences
They don't need to monitor the mail accounts, they only need to monitor the add clicks...
ads in gmail have their own marquers (../pageclick?client=ca-gmail).
Since pinhole cameras do not have lenses how does this system is supposed to work?
Many surveillance cameras this days are pinhole.
Like this
http://www.failuremag.com/science_content.html interesting...
Dcc could help here... If a load of spam is in transit in a single server it can be tracked easely. Actualy it is a good thing http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/dcc/