Slashdot Mirror


Google Forms Partnership With NASA

jangobongo writes "Google said on Wednesday that it plans to partner with NASA on space research projects. The new partnership will involve R&D on biotechnology, information technology and nanotechnology, as well as supercomputing. The news article notes some of the mutual benefits: "Google stands to gain from learning about NASA's supercomputers, which could come in handy as the Mountain View search engine compiles even bigger indexes of information and video. NASA leaders cited the benefits of getting access to Google's search expertise to pick out nuggets of information from the volumes of data streaming back from satellites and human space launches."" This story might seem familiar to you. Consider it a public service: if I didn't screw up occasionally, a lot of angry readers would have no other way to vent their rage in a safe environment.

237 comments

  1. Saw that coming by fembots · · Score: 5, Funny

    First they were collaborating on technology, so the next natural step is to form a partnership. All in all took less than 10 hours to decide.

    1. Re:Saw that coming by Zarquil · · Score: 2, Funny

      10 more hours and they'll have a marriage with a couple of really rowdy kids running around the place...

    2. Re:Saw that coming by iotashan · · Score: 1, Funny

      Look, ma... Duplicate comments for a duplicate post! :)

    3. Re:Saw that coming by fembots · · Score: 1

      Are you talking to me or CmdrTaco?

    4. Re:Saw that coming by SoCalChris · · Score: 1, Insightful

      From everything I've heard, the editors never even respond to dupe reports.

      And something tells me that he didn't have to spend more than a few seconds "hunting" for the dupe, considering it is still on the front page.

    5. Re:Saw that coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps tomorrow they will form a team.

    6. Re:Saw that coming by daniil · · Score: 1

      I was talking to you, even though in hindsight, I should have saved that harsh tone for TripMaster Monkey (hey, at least your post was topical).

      --
      Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    7. Re:Saw that coming by Yocto+Yotta · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Hey now, at least Taco acknowledged it and apologized in advance. Have you seen that before?

      --
      A B A C A B B
    8. Re:Saw that coming by p33p3r · · Score: 1

      Better to form a team than to become a contractor

  2. R E P O S T by popo · · Score: 5, Funny


    Fer crying out loud, its not only a repost, its *still* up on the /. front page!!!

    Get it together CmdrTaco!

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
    1. Re:R E P O S T by Megane · · Score: 5, Funny

      Zonk is so good that he's been posting dupes before the original article appears!

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    2. Re:R E P O S T by ectospasm · · Score: 1

      I can't find it, but I think I saw somewhere where CmdrTaco said that dupes served a purpose, such as giving people who haven't seen the story yet a chance to read about it. Of course, the fact that the original for this story is on the front page is still pretty sad...

      --


      We are the music makers. We are the dreamers of the dreams.
    3. Re:R E P O S T by Rahga · · Score: 4, Funny

      Physics can explain this...

      The article is moving is moving so fast that that while it appears to be in at the bottom of the page one second, then at the top of the page by the next second. However, the article has taken what would feel like days in our time to make the trip, and observes that we haven't moved at all.

    4. Re:R E P O S T by oGMo · · Score: 4, Funny

      But this one features the Google icon on top, so we're getting both sides of the story.

      --

      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    5. Re:R E P O S T by djh101010 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Fer crying out loud, its not only a repost, its *still* up on the /. front page!!!

      Once again, I saw this before it happened (subscribers see articles before they go "green") and reported it to the "If you see a serious problem with this article, report it to daddypants@slashdot.org". I sent the email, with a link and everything to Zonk's post of the same thing.

      Just like last time, nothing happened. No acknowledgement of the email (automated _or_ human), and the dupe went out.

      Hey editors, does anyone read the daddypants emails? Am I wasting my time? I mean, if you're not going to do anything about it anyway, remove the mailto: link.

      Annoyed,
      djh101010

    6. Re:R E P O S T by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    7. Re:R E P O S T by fantastic · · Score: 1

      Its getting like CNN, disregard all the other news , ie reject posts from the rest of us and repost the same old thing time and time again.

    8. Re:R E P O S T by djh101010 · · Score: 1

      I don't suppose that whatever rocket scientist who modded that post "redundant" would care to explain their thinking?

    9. Re:R E P O S T by twilight30 · · Score: 2

      You're still subscribing?

      Why in the name of crikey would you want to do that? Continuing to shoot money their way is essentially reinforcing their poor behaviour.

      If it were me, I'd be thinking seriously about cancelling it and firing them a strongly-worded letter explaining why.

      --
      ========================================
      Death will come, and will have your eyes
      -- Pavese
    10. Re:R E P O S T by Jim+Hall · · Score: 1

      Fer crying out loud, its not only a repost, its *still* up on the /. front page!!!

      You know, I think I'll submit this same story tomorrow, and see if they post it ... :-)

    11. Re:R E P O S T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Tell me sir, how does it feel to PAY for the privilege to see a post in advance, give a fair warning of DUPE-ness, and get modded redundant?
      I'll get modded down too, but it won't cost me any :-)

      But then again I'm going AC, to not spoilt the points the good people gave me.

    12. Re:R E P O S T by djh101010 · · Score: 1

      You're still subscribing? Why in the name of crikey would you want to do that? Continuing to shoot money their way is essentially reinforcing their poor behaviour.

      Well, I haven't used up my pages yet. As to if I'll send more money? (shrug) Dunno. I'm not really seeing any benefit to being a subscriber other than being able to see the dups before they're posted,y'know?

    13. Re:R E P O S T by RealAlaskan · · Score: 1
      It's a duplicate. If you want to discourage dup's, don't come look here and tell us it's a repost; don't click on it at all. If Slashdot gets no traffic from reposts, they'll soon stop wasting front page space on them.

      I sort of like reposts, since I usually don't come here often enough to see both the original and the repost. These dup's double the chance that I'll see a story on the front page. Having both on the front page at the same time is a little goofy, I have to admit. Still, if that doesn't hurt either their pride or their revenue stream, why should the slashdot crew care?

    14. Re:R E P O S T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well done, sir!

    15. Re:R E P O S T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My hero!

    16. Re:R E P O S T by extrasolar · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, maybe the daddypants account is just a joke or something. Here, try the following email address because I'm *sure* it works: rootdevslashnull@slashdot.org .

    17. Re:R E P O S T by gronofer · · Score: 1
      You may think it's just funny, but these duplicates are making it hard to read slashdot. Lets say you start at the front page and read the articles until you see one that looks familiar. So have you read all the new stuff and reached the stuff you were reading yesterday, or is it a dup?

      For safety, you could take a look at the next article too, but maybe there were just two dups in a row?

      How many articles do you need to check before you are sure you have reached yesterday's stuff?

    18. Re:R E P O S T by phyruxus · · Score: 1

      (Score:-1, Redundant)
      someday we'll hear from the department of redundancy department. someday.

      lol

      --
      "A witty saying proves nothing." ~Voltaire
      "d'Oh!" ~Homer
  3. /.ed already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Anonymous because I'm not a karma whore

    Google confirms Ames plan Search engine plans offices, partnership with space agency

    Verne Kopytoff and Dan Levy, Chronicle Staff Writer

    Thursday, September 29, 2005

    Google Inc. confirmed Wednesday that it will build up to 1 million square feet of offices at NASA Ames Research Center and collaborate with the space agency on research surrounding topics such as supercomputing that could benefit everything from moon launches to online searches.

    The partnership is intended to blend the expertise and huge resources of one of the leading Internet companies with an army of scientists focused on the stratosphere and beyond.

    "Google and NASA share a common desire to bring the universe of information to people around the world," said Eric Schmidt, the company's chief executive officer, in a statement. "Imagine having a wide selection of images from the Apollo space mission at your fingertips whenever you want it."

    The partnership, announced late Wednesday at a press conference at the NASA facility, will bring a marquee tenant to the Ames Research Center, located at Moffett Field, a former military airfield near Mountain View that has been struggling to find a new purpose since the military pulled out in the 1990s.

    For Google, the new partnership comes at a time when the Internet search engine is expanding by leaps and bounds, hiring on average 10 people per day. Experts say the company, which now employs more than 4,000 people, has ambitions beyond Internet search and could pose a serious threat to Microsoft Corp. for supremacy in desktop consumer computing.

    This collaboration with NASA could also portend a new intellectual center for Silicon Valley, one that has been sorely missed since the heyday of Palo Alto's Xerox PARC, a seminal research facility that helped foster much of today's technology.

    The details of the real estate part of the deal were vague but was expected to cost Google in excess of $200,000. Schmidt said that the planning is still in the early stages and that the building on vacant land would take place over the course of many years.

    In addition to supercomputing, the research and development between Google and NASA will involve biotechnology, information technology, nanotechnology and development of excessively large vibrating butt plugs for TripMaster MonkeyCunt's anal stimulation.

    Google stands to gain from learning about NASA's supercomputers, which could come in handy as the Mountain View search engine compiles even bigger indexes of information and video. NASA leaders cited the benefits of getting access to Google's search expertise to pick out nuggets of information from the volumes of data streaming back from satellites and human space launches.

    "NASA is nothing but drowned in information when we come back from our missions," said Scott Pace, associate administrator for NASA.

    Google's headquarters will remain nearby in Mountain View.

    Some academics have expressed hope that the collaboration will foster innovation across the Bay Area. The partners said that while some of the research will be public, some may be kept private, in keeping with Google's reputation for secrecy.

    Part of the mission behind the collaboration is to bring more private enterprise into the space field.

    NASA officials were enthusiastic about the Google alliance, announced at a press event late Wednesday afternoon at the NASA Ames Center.

    "Our planned partnership presents an enormous range of potential benefits to the space program," said NASA Ames Center Director Scott Hubbard. At 1400 square feet, the new campus would be larger than filmmaker George Lucas' garage and nearly as big as the executive washrooms in the Bank of America Center in San Francisco's Financial District.

    The agreement would allow the company to design and develop a campus for whatever needs it envisions.

    Google has been hoping to expand for at least a ye

  4. Fuckety! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suck it bitches!!!!

  5. So it wasn't a joke after all by scenestar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sign me up for G.C.H.E.E.S.E.

    http://www.google.com/jobs/lunar_job.html

    --
    perpetually dwelling in the -1 pits
    1. Re:So it wasn't a joke after all by filesiteguy · · Score: 1

      Heh, you beat me to the punch (line). That's the first thought that I had after reading this. Google...NASA...lunar jobs.

  6. Didn't even make it off the first page... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before it was duped.

  7. Wow. by bhsx · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I thought they already did that.
    Hmm... shows what I know.

    --
    put the what in the where?
  8. Searching Space by rsmith-mac · · Score: 4, Funny

    Am I the only one that finds a certain sense of subtle irony in a search engine company searching space itself? Now if only I could use Google to find my car keys...

    1. Re:Searching Space by bhsx · · Score: 4, Funny
      --
      put the what in the where?
    2. Re:Searching Space by blackmonday · · Score: 4, Funny

      I searched Google for your car keys, they're in between the cushions on your couch.

    3. Re:Searching Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you find something after searching space, was it really space to begin with?

    4. Re:Searching Space by NitsujTPU · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ya I'm a girl - do you have a problem with it, bub?

      No, I don't.

    5. Re:Searching Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet another comment to file under "misuse of the word irony".

    6. Re:Searching Space by abirdman · · Score: 1

      I get that, but what worried me was the idea they might try and replace a rocket engine with a search engine. Maybe the new staff at the top of NASA needs to talk to someone in the know, about how those infernal contraptions really work! Sheesh.

      --
      Everything I've ever learned the hard way was based on a statistically invalid sample.
    7. Re:Searching Space by arodland · · Score: 1

      Ya I'm a girl

      A transgendered, bilingual girl, at that!

    8. Re:Searching Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google doesn't know, but Ask.com looks like they've got some ideas...

      http://web.ask.com/web?q=where+are+my+car+keys%3F& qsrc=0&o=0

    9. Re:Searching Space by RM6f9 · · Score: 1

      "Space, the final frontier - These are the voyages of the Starship Google-borg, its continuing mission: To absorb strange new worlds; to search out new life, and new assimilations, to boldly go where no one has gone before."

      --
      Take the 90-Day Challenge! http://rwmurker.bodybyvi.com/
    10. Re:Searching Space by morganjharvey · · Score: 1

      I think this is where I insert the comment about life immitating bbspot or somesuch?
      I can't remember where I saw the link for this originally, but here it is.

      cheers, morgan

    11. Re:Searching Space by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      Listen to you with your one-upmanship.

  9. We all know the real reason behind this. by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think Google is just hoping to get discounted fares for trips to their lunar base.

  10. Google with NASA... huh? by PickyH3D · · Score: 1
    I really cannot imagine that Google needs assistance with super computing? The distributed computing they perform alone shows their own expertise in the area. I also would assume that distributed computing serves their purposes better than a single super computer (or even a few).

    Really, what I am saying is, why is Google doing this, or more over, being allowed to do this? Seems to me to be a bunch of PR. When I first read it, I thought, "that's cool, good of them," but now I seem to find myself questioning what Google has to gain. It's not like they can make the data streaming from the satellites and other inputs available to the public.

    1. Re:Google with NASA... huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot.

    2. Re:Google with NASA... huh? by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      Even if Google is the best at supercomputing, they would benefit from the old adage that "two heads are better than one". NASA has been at this for longer, and maybe they can together come up with something better than Google has now.

      Is there any chance that Google will be paid for their work? Maybe that's happening in a less public manner (still legal and open, but not advertised)? I mean, who reads budget documents?

      Or maybe Google is really trying to do something good? I mean, their motto is "Don't be Evil", right? Not that I accept what people say at face value, but it is worth considering.

    3. Re:Google with NASA... huh? by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1
      Cue Collossus: "You will learn to love me"

      --The Forbin Project

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    4. Re:Google with NASA... huh? by PickyH3D · · Score: 1

      I love the logic there. Also, thanks for posting anonymously, puss. I was looking for a reason to be encouraged by the news. Your reply exemplifies that of a Google fanboy/anti-MS zealot. Thanks for playing.

  11. Re:Duped in under 9 hours. by Otter · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...and it's not like there's a high threshold here for Google stories. Haven't they changed their cafeteria prices or repainted their parking spaces or something since this morning?

  12. All your base belong to Google? by fizz · · Score: 1

    Ive been saying this for the better part of two years now. Google will own the world! Its not MS you have to worry about. Maybe people should actually start putting in for their jobs on the lunar base as it might become a reality instead of a practicle joke :)

  13. Re:LOL... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must be new here...

  14. NOOGLE by eebra82 · · Score: 0

    "Google and NASA share a common desire to bring the universe of information to people around the world," said Eric Schmidt, the company's chief executive officer, in a statement. "Imagine having a wide selection of images from the Apollo space mission at your fingertips whenever you want it."

    What NASA need to do if they want more people watch their stuff is to get cameras that don't hold the same level of quality as the ones where UFO:s are caught on tape.

    It will be very interesting to see what Google can do here. And check this quote:

    "Experts say the company, which now employs more than 4,000 people, has ambitions beyond Internet search and could pose a serious threat to Microsoft Corp. for supremacy in desktop consumer computing."

    That reminds me of the stories that were published a few years back about MS sats that were launched all over (and above) our planet. I wonder when we'll be seeing the next Google sat? :)

  15. New opportunity for a partnership! by macklin01 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Perhaps slashdot can form a partnership with google to mine the vast data streaming from slashdot and detect dupes? :-) -- Paul

    --
    OpenSource.MathCancer.org: open source comp bio
    1. Re:New opportunity for a partnership! by op12 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The data has been mined, and a month of posts has be reduced to 6 posts:

      1. Google becoming evil!
      2. Google vs. Microsoft!
      3. IE vs. Firefox!
      4. *AA coming after $P2P
      5. Linux/Open source: is it spreading/becoming mainstream?
      6. Slashvertisments


      ...I keed.......kind of...

    2. Re:New opportunity for a partnership! by stupidfoo · · Score: 1

      You forgot one:
      7. Vaporware

      And I'd alter 1 to read "Google becoming evil/is awesome!"

    3. Re:New opportunity for a partnership! by bd1e0d0 · · Score: 1

      This would be wonderful. Slashdot.Google.com! I wonder what it would be like ...

  16. Innerspace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google is pursuing outerspace now, when will they get around to "innerspace"?

    "I see you're thinking about porn. Why not click on www.Playboy.com Google Ads (tm)."

  17. Moffett by 110010001000 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    One million square feet! is certainly a lots of real estate space (no pun intended) that in the South Bay Area has to be worth a not insignificant chunk of change. Granted, Moffett field sits on an amazing amount of land and although I have not been back to the base for years, I imagine it is still some pretty choice real estate that just so happens to be right up the road from Google.

    It also might be of interest to note that Moffett is right next door to a former NIMA (NRO) facility and given Google's interest in mapping the surface of the Earth and other remote sensing activities, might be pretty convenient.

  18. NASA twenty years from now by totallygeek · · Score: 4, Funny
    The head of NASA will be saying, "Looking back, working with Google was a mistake."

  19. Next within 2 hours on news! by TarrySingh · · Score: 2, Funny

    Google's partnership with NASA confirmed! :-)

    --
    Scott McNealy to Michael: "Suck my Sun!" Michael Dell to Scott : "Lick my Dell!"
  20. *Disney* partners with NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haven't you ever been to EPCOT?

    http://www.123disney.com/epattractions/ep8.html

    "Dining at the Land"
    " For informal snacks and meals, Sunshine Season Food Fair offers an array of foods from barbecue to angel food cake topped with strawberries. ...Following that, you ride through greenhouses where Disney Company, with NASA and the USDA (U.S. Dept. of Agriculture), is conducting some very successful and unique experiments."

  21. Re:Another Dupe... by vandon · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I'm sure the editors read /.
    It's just that after working with so many computer components, the lead solder from the circuit boards is causing alzheimer's.

  22. Well... by Bob+Vila's+Hammer · · Score: 1

    Its as if some terrific universal force has finally put 2 and 2 exclusive forces together. In that vein, I sure wish Nerf would get together with Louisville Slugger and produce a crotchbat that can handle my needs. As far as I'm concerned, the formula nerf + crotch hasn't yet equaled lots of fun.

    --


    --"The perfect example of the man of action is the suicide." - William Carlos Williams
  23. Re:/.ed *still* by adavies42 · · Score: 1

    ITYM "still /.ed".

    --
    Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
    -kfg
  24. Repeat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    One can't get a "Ask Slashdot" posting, but they can repeat a story while the original is still on the main page...

    Why do I like this site?

  25. MS-Spacestation? by zappepcs · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Now that google is working with NASA (Twice) does this mean that Ms will build the MS Spacestation in order to beat google?

    1. Re:MS-Spacestation? by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      Of course then we would have to build the Linux Space Station "Tvorlds" to prove the MS SpaceStation "Ballmer" with it's proprietary technologies is bad and evil. Penguins in Space!

      Of course, Having THREE Space Stations (1.5 working, the OpenSource one and 25% of the other two) is a step forward from where the ISS is now.

    2. Re:MS-Spacestation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leaked info from Microsoft:

      The MS Death Star will be shaped like the windows logo and consist of over 10 million windows desktops (made by Dell) for each of the stormtroopers. "When this battle station is fully operational it will be the ultimate source of power in the universe!" exclaimed Lord Ballmer! However, Gates was quick to remind him, "Do not be so proud of this technological terror you have constructed. The ability to destroy a planet is insignificant compared to the power of good source." Ballmer quickly remarked "Do not try to scare us with your old coder's ways Lord Gates, your sad devotion to that ancient religion has not helped you conjure up Longhorn 1.0, or given you clarivoyance enough to find Google's hidden HQ!" Just then many popups flooded Ballmers' Mozilla Firefoz session and he turned to Gates for help. "I find your lack of faith disturbing." , Gates was reported to have said as he clicked 'block popups from this site' for Ballmer.

    3. Re:MS-Spacestation? by jebilbrey · · Score: 1

      I bet the UK mars probe (Beagle) was secretly sponsored by Microsoft. That explains why it crashed to the ground at a couple hundred miles per hour! It BSODed mid landing!!!

  26. Could we get a finer detailed.. by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 5, Funny

    .. play-by-play of the growing relationship with Google and Nasa? Because 2 stories in 1 day is certainly not enough for me.

    --


    "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
  27. Should Be Open Bid by geomon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The government should only form alliances with industry where there are no other obvious partners. While Google may have a lead on search technology, opening up the partnership process to include Microsoft and Yahoo! would benefit the government more than sole sourcing.

    Competition for government partnerships is always better than just selecting the current industry lead. The US government did that with office suites and is now paying a hefty price for that decision.

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
    1. Re:Should Be Open Bid by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      It seems like it would perhaps be a bad idea to let three cutthroat competitors into a parternship with an "outsider" ---on the one hand you get 3 different kinds of input, but how do you deal with the competitors squabbling?

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    2. Re:Should Be Open Bid by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      That really hasn't been the government trend in this administration. Besides, didn't I read somewhere that Google is paying for this privledge?

      I agree in principal that open bid is needed, but MS, Yahoo, and Google are fairly different. I mean, it is possible to define a set of requirements for which Google is the only real choice out there.

    3. Re:Should Be Open Bid by Brendor · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I wrote this reply to the previous article but thought it might be relevant here as well. Google's "robustly academic" corporate culture of as well of their product offerings are well suited to NASA in particular.

      "Considering how much data NASA has to process, I think Google's tools fit right in . . ."

      I remember a TV news piece about NASA not having the capability to process the data in it s collection due to the bandwidth of the tape backup system at the time and the shelf life and quantity of the tapes. This is the sort of data set that Google seems to look for in any market they can conceive of.

      Since this data is work of the federal government it should be Public domain as well. The Public would benefit form having such information available. Anything from videos of all previous shuttle missions (NASA TV presented by Google Video) to Galactic Maps, Transcripts and scientific data from unmanned and manned missions going back to the 1950s. (Does NASA (or any other govt. agency) currently offer the data they've collected for the public in usable formats such as excel spreadsheets or other comparable formats that are not primarily publications formats such as PDF or HTML?)

    4. Re:Should Be Open Bid by CSfreakazoid · · Score: 1

      Why should anybody else be involved? Yahoo, the second best ranked search engine is "powered by GOOGLE" any company that convince someone to pay them and give them a monopoly deservse the eclusive partnership.

  28. Will this one get pulled? by mrpotato · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Another dupe was pulled earlier this week. Let's pull this one too. Nothing to see here.

    --

    cheers
  29. Wow, it really IS Rocket Science! by argent · · Score: 1

    Wow, search engine technology really is Rocket Science!

    At least it's not Brain Surgery.

    1. Re:Wow, it really IS Rocket Science! by EnderWiggin99 · · Score: 1

      Apparently not to the Slashcode authors, who can't even be bothered to do a background check on new story submissions. How hard is it to automate a dupe-checker to verify that the title keywords and the submission links are not found in the submissions database before the story goes live?

      Apparently very very difficult. Google must be worth its market cap.

  30. Re:Pete and Repeat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dupe, with an ass full of man juice.

  31. hehe, i'm a bad person. by Frac · · Score: 1, Troll

    So, it's a dupe.

    As a subscriber, you'll see a note under unposted articles that says:

    "See any serious problems with this story? Email our on-duty editor."

    You know what... I know this was a dupe, and I didn't tell their on-duty editor!!!!

    I'm feeling mischievous today.

    1. Re:hehe, i'm a bad person. by lukedukekiwi · · Score: 1

      its only taco, no damage done

    2. Re:hehe, i'm a bad person. by Amouth · · Score: 1

      you know i saw the orignal this moringing.. and just as i was going to leave work i check and hot damn it is right here on the top.. i had to check the clock to make sure i didn't jsut dream that i spent the day working and praying i didn't have to be here for another 8 hours..

      good thing it was a dupe.. becuse i don't think i could have taken the other option

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  32. Re:Pete and Repeat by spoonyfork · · Score: 4, Funny

    Pete and Repeat are on a boat, Pete jumps off, who's left . . . ?

    Repeat.

    Pete and Repeat are on a boat. Pete jumps off. Who's left?

    --
    Speak truth to power.
  33. MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  34. Simply Shocked by eunos94 · · Score: 1

    I say, who would have thought? I know I couldn't have any prior knowledge of this. Not even if it had still be on the front page of Slashdot.

  35. That’s a misprint by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

    It’s supposed to read “Google Forms Partnership with NSA.”

    --

    Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
  36. search engine by ecumenical_40oz · · Score: 5, Funny

    find: moon landing AND mars landing NOT 15 year wait NOT 10 Billion dollar price tag

    1. Re:search engine by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Empty set (0.0003 sec)

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
  37. LOL by bhsx · · Score: 0, Troll

    Maybe I should've put this under my -1 redundant post.
    Maybe we'll all get one.
    Maybe I'll get -1:Troll
    Maybe the bad mods have won
    Is that OK? Rhyming one with won? Reminds me of the Pin Pals episode.
    (throwing in an obscure Simpsons episode should win-over the mods)
    I'm fiending for some attention. Please. Please look at me!

    --
    put the what in the where?
  38. Re:Pete and Repeat by QuijiboIsAWord · · Score: 0

    Pete and Repeat are on a boat, Pete jumps off, who's left...?

    Repeat.

    --
    -Hmm...I got a G+ invite, better remember to remove the request from my sig...-
  39. It's a job; not a hobby by Sun+Tzu · · Score: 1, Funny

    Evidently, Taco doesn't read /.

  40. Implications in the Geospatial domain by Lord+Satri · · Score: 1

    As indicated on the brand-new slash-css website http://slashgisrs.org/ , this new "team" will probably have an impact on GIS.

    "Google's engineers will be able to pick NASA's brains for ideas on supercomputing design, which could help the company in its efforts to create products such as 3-D maps. "We already have Google Earth. We'd like to have Google Mars and Google Moon," quipped Peter Norvig, director of search quality at Google."
    Taken from http://appdomains.slashgisrs.org/article.pl?sid=05 /09/29/173248

  41. They are going to port Google Earth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...to other planets. Been too single platform, up to now.

  42. Repostings by gomaze · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Do you think this would stop if the Editors started reading the website they are posting to? I really think that this happens to often. I mean if it happened at like 4 in the morning, I can understand. Hell, I would be half asleep aswell. Well here is to hoping that things will continued to be improved.

  43. Google is so played by dmeiz · · Score: 0

    So tired of hearing about Google. I want a new company to worship...

  44. -1 Flamebait by insignificant1 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    'nuff said.

  45. A Better Partnership by eander315 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wish they would partner with Slashdot so the editors can search the site before posting DUPES.

  46. CmdrTaco says.... by dotpavan · · Score: 1
    ..Consider it a public service: if I didn't screw up occasionally, a lot of angry readers would have no other way to vent their rage in a safe environment.

    what are you talking? if we were to direct our anger on you, then what is the-punch-bag-of-slashdot-dept CowboyNeal for?

  47. Article has it backwards. by team99parody · · Score: 3, Insightful
    From TFA: "Google stands to gain from learning about NASA's supercomputers, which could come in handy as the Mountain View search engine compiles even bigger indexes of information and video."

    More realistically, NASA's supercomputer guys stand to gain from learning how to build even bigger supercompuers than their for cheaper.

    It seems all too often that the press seems to misrepresent the old stoggy has-beens as "teaching" teh upstarts (like the other story on slashdot that claimed "HP Propelling Linux Into Truly 'Big' Time", when IBM & Google have pretty much proven that Linux is leading HP if anything propelling HP into the big time).

    I think the partnership's great, though -- I'd love to see what kinds of computing efforts could be pulled off with NASA's resources (billions are small to them (" as the average launch expenditures during its operations up to 2005 accumulates to $1.3 billion " from wikipedia); while it still makes news when Google raises 4-billion) and Google's knowledge.

    1. Re:Article has it backwards. by cnkeller · · Score: 1
      More realistically, NASA's supercomputer guys stand to gain from learning how to build even bigger supercompuers than their for cheaper.

      Disclaimer: I work at NAS, but in no way speak for them.

      The kinds of computing work and research (and problems) that we deal with here are traditionally of the shared memory kind. It's a lot more challenging problem space than linking up a few thousand 1U boxes over gigE and calling it a supercomputer (hello va tech); even if the linpack runs are fairly impressive for that type of system. This isn't to say that both sides won't benefit from the partnership, but as far as I can tell, Google doesn't do supercomputing.

      --

      there are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots

    2. Re:Article has it backwards. by Lightman_73 · · Score: 1

      Please, someone with mod points, mod the parent up insightful.

      For the grandparent : repeat after me : "a bunch of loosely connected c.o.t.s. boxes used for running a bunch of (sequential) jobs is not a supercomputer". Supercomputers (with or without virtual shared memory, NUMA or not) are a completely different thing. They may be, in some cases, similar on a hardware level, but they're two worlds apart from a software standpoint.

  48. instant karma by cobbaut · · Score: 5, Funny
    --
    European Linux user, living in Antwerp
    1. Re:instant karma by benjamin264 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or repost your comments and see if they get modded the same...

      In any event, I really hope that all of this does generate some positive interest in NASA.

    2. Re:instant karma by dummyname12 · · Score: 1

      OK!:

      One small step for man
      (Score:5, Funny)
      by LiquidCoooled (634315) Alter Relationship on Thursday September 29, @09:08PM (#13674792)
      A giant leap for google kind towards the Copernicus Center [google.com]

      Old News.
      (Score:5, Funny)
      by HugePedlar (900427) Alter Relationship on Thursday September 29, @09:08PM (#13674794)
      (http://www.hugepedlar.com/)
      http://moon.google.com/ [google.com] and http://www.google.com/jobs/lunar_job.html [google.com]

      Reasoning
      (Score:5, Funny)
      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 29, @09:15PM (#13674830)
              Nasa recently unveiled plans to make another moon landing by 2020
      And why not, they've looked for Osama every other place that he isn't.

      I can see it all now...
      (Score:5, Funny)
      by Linker3000 (626634) Alter Relationship on Thursday September 29, @09:32PM (#13674915)
      "Mission Control, this is Mars Pathfinder 1, we are experiencing minor power fluctuations on bus C and require some diagnostic advice, over..."
      "Pathfinder 1, roger that, wait one..."
      "Pathfinder, this is Mission Control, please surf to history.nasa.gov/ap13rb/ch4pt.2.pdf. If you need a copy of Acrobat Reader please advise and I will supply the URL, over..."

      Re:I can see it all now...
      (Score:5, Funny)
      by LiquidCoooled (634315) Alter Relationship on Thursday September 29, @09:39PM (#13674938)
      Thats still sounds a like a hell of a lot better future than if they chose Microsoft for the on board diagnosis:
      "Mission Control, this is Mars Pathfinder 1, we are experiencing minor power fluctuations on bus C and require some diagnostic advice, over..."
      Clippy: It looks like your all going to die. Would you like to.....
      *silent scream*

      SETI to GETI
      (Score:5, Funny)
      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 29, @09:42PM (#13674950)
      The Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence will be replaced by Google for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence.

      Re:Moffett
      (Score:5, Informative)
      by josephtd (817237) Alter Relationship on Thursday September 29, @09:27PM (#13674888)
      Yea, well there is now a surplus of of office space around the Moffett Field area. My office is over on Shoreline and there are For Lease signs everywhere.

      Re:Google never should have went public
      (Score:5, Informative)
      by bheer (633842) Alter Relationship on Thursday September 29, @09:44PM (#13674964)
      Google's stock offering has been very carefully structured to give Larry and Sergei a lot more control[1] than the ordinary shareholding public (and besides, Google is still relatively closely held - the main shareholders of Google are its investors and they trust the founders+Eric Schmidt implicitly). In fact, the non-founding shareholders (mostly Kleiner Perkins and Sequoia) likely know that Google's 'goofiness' makes for good press and share price, and as long as the party continues they're unlikely to rock the boat.
      [1] WaPo: After IPO, Google Founders Plan to Remain in Control [washingtonpost.com]

  49. The Perfect /. Story by Viper+Daimao · · Score: 1

    Google and NASA in the same /. story! Will they be using linux or some other open source software? If so, then we may have the Perfect /. Story!!

    Hey, if the editors can dupe, why cant I?

    --
    "In the game of life, someone always has to lose. To me, if life were fair, that someone would always be Oklahoma." -DKR
    1. Re:The Perfect /. Story by vandon · · Score: 1

      NASA has big archives of space data, and they're only going to get bigger - the next generation of earth observing satellites are expected to generate 4 petabytes/year. That's 4 * 10**15, folks - think 8,000 500 GB drives. Per year. For at least the next ten years. One year is on the order of the size of Google's web cache.

      Current archives are merely huge, and off-the-shelf databases are having trouble indexing it all - I've heard of a database holding just metadata (date/time, geographic extent, data type, resolution, format, etc.) for millions of observations where queries were taking tens of seconds, and this was with top-of-the-line commercial database software with all the spatial search bells and whistles.

      If anybody can come up with a better way to store and index this stuff, it's Google.

    2. Re:The Perfect /. Story by mikeabbotthome · · Score: 1

      That makes sense. How to best handle vast databases on a budget. I suspect that some of what google might be researching involves extracting information from images and possibly that could be involved as well.

  50. Why not? by CPNABEND · · Score: 1

    While I do not believe the common folks would care, there are a lot of geeks that would love to google for Mars info, etc. It is information paid for with taxpayer $$, and has no national security implications... Unless the Martians are massing the space ships for an attack. :^)

    --
    My wife doesn't listen to me either...
  51. Sure am glad I mailed the on-duty editor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank God I took the time out of my day and bothered to email the fucking editor on duty.

  52. In other news... by Mini-Geek · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Google forms dupe with Slashdot
    There are some unconfirmed rumors that Slashdot is aware of the dupe:
    "This story might seem familiar to you. Consider it a public service: if I didn't screw up occasionally, a lot of angry readers would have no other way to vent their rage in a safe environment."

    --
    do {print "Mini-Geek Rules!\n";}
    until ($TheEndOfTheWorld);
    1. Re:In other news... by WilliamSChips · · Score: 4, Funny

      In other news, the "THIS IS A DUPE" whiners form a partnership with the /. editors--because the latter repeats itself less.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    2. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently Google is busy forming partnerships lately. It seems they've teamed up with the makers of Spam as well...

  53. Instant karma! by hanoverjames · · Score: 0, Redundant

    1. harvest the top comments from original 2. repost as own 3. ??? 4. Profit!!

  54. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot forms a partnership with a goldfish - because it has a longer memory.

  55. Re:Pete and Repeat by Karma_fucker_sucker · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Repeat.

    Pete and Repeat are on a boat, Pete jumps off, who's left . . . ?
    Repeat.
    Pete and Repeat are on a boat.
    Pete jumps off.
    Who's left?

    --
    Evil people don't think they're evil. - George Lucas, Making of Ep III
  56. Re:Pete and Repeat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Do you not have f*cking sense of humor? Of course it's redundant, that's the point. The whole f*ing article is redundant."
    The world would be a better place if only more people would use a fucking asterisk.
  57. Re:Pete and Repeat by Karma_fucker_sucker · · Score: 3, Funny

    How fucking dare you say "asterisk"!

    --
    Evil people don't think they're evil. - George Lucas, Making of Ep III
  58. google earth + world wind? by slizz · · Score: 0

    i wonder if this partnership will affect google earth's relationship with world wind. maybe they will collaborate? share satellite imagery? hopefully both products will stay out, they perform some different functions, this seems to be the only place where there is currently competition between google and nasa, and i wonder if this has anything to do with the partnership.

  59. I read a funny joke press release this morning by Work+Account · · Score: 2, Funny
    GOOGLE/NASA TEAM UP
    SILICON VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, USA
    AP NEWS WIRE
    One of the first fruits of the Google/NASA pairing will be the gShuttle. The existing space shuttle will be modified to store 10x the amount the previous shuttle could (though no details yet from NASA as to why they need that much space and if they'd actually use it). The new shuttle would also bring up paid advertisments based on various criteria, the formula for which Google has not made public. Another gShuttle innovation would be a radically simplier control and navigation system. The pilots will not simply type in their commands to the shuttle (e.g. "rearThrusters:fire burntime:10"). One particularly interesting feature is the "I feel lucky" button on the navigation console, no specifics as to the exact function of this button was put forth by the Google spokesdrone.
    --

    If you "get" pointers add me as a friend (116)!
  60. First Google Earth.. by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...next, Google Space!

    1. Re:First Google Earth.. by UnapprovedThought · · Score: 1

      Ya, there's so many possibilities, I can barely contain the excitement:

      • Now we can search the Moon for... traces of the Apollo module, and ... uh?
      • We can search inside Mars for the Beagle crash site, and ... uh?
      • We can search the asteroid belt for... rocks? Irony?
      • We can search Jupiter to see where the Big Red Storm is today?
      • We can search Saturn for... ring composition?
      • We can search inside Neptune for... car keys?
      • We can search inside Ur...

      OK, maybe those of us who haven't lost our moral fibre should stick to searching the inner planets, and leave those "other" types of searches to those in the law-making bodies of the executive branch who are inherently unable to enjoy those types of things and will therefore exercise the appropriate levels of restraint when reviewing the data they have collected *cough* *cough*....

  61. Typo in the headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It should be NSA not NASA. ;)
    They finally found use for their user behavior loging.

  62. Re:Pete and Repeat by dotpavan · · Score: 0, Redundant

    nobody, coz I just shot Repeat. Problem solved.

  63. Re:Pete and Repeat by Karma_fucker_sucker · · Score: 0, Redundant
    nobody, coz I just shot Repeat. Problem solved

    With a repeater?

    --
    Evil people don't think they're evil. - George Lucas, Making of Ep III
  64. We ALREADY HAVE google Moon!! by JeffHeatonDotCom · · Score: 1

    We already have google moon. Check it out:

    http://moon.google.com

  65. GO GOOGLE! by NIN1385 · · Score: 1

    There is no end to this, it is great. Glad to see stuff like this happening, this is the only company I have no problem with if they decide to monopolize the industry. Milton Bradley would be so proud they're following in the footsteps of his board game!

    --

    If carrots got you drunk, rabbits would be fucked up. - Comedian Mitch Hedberg R.I.P. 03/30/68-2/24/05
    1. Re:GO GOOGLE! by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1
      Except Milton Bradley had nothing to do with Monopoly. Parker Brothers were the guys that originally distributed it.

      But they didn't invent it, and neither did Darrow, the man credited with inventing it.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    2. Re:GO GOOGLE! by Kinky+Bass+Junk · · Score: 1

      "this is the only company I have no problem with if they decide to monopolize the industry."

      And that's the exact problem with this. Google is lulling people into believing that their monopoly is an "OK" monopoly; no monopoly is a good monopoly. They're teaming up with the government! You can't get much more monopolistic than that. If Microsoft teamed up with the Government, what would you say?

      --
      Anonymous Coward
    3. Re:GO GOOGLE! by NIN1385 · · Score: 1

      Bah, it's going to happen eventually anyway...whether it's google or something worse, I'd rather have it be google.

      --

      If carrots got you drunk, rabbits would be fucked up. - Comedian Mitch Hedberg R.I.P. 03/30/68-2/24/05
  66. Eletric Shock Therapy by Ranger · · Score: 0, Redundant

    We should attach electrodes to the genitals of all slashdot editors. And they are all automically shocked when one of them posts a dupe. Also they will then receive an email saying which one of them did it. The offender gets twice the voltage and twice the duration.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
    1. Re:Eletric Shock Therapy by Ranger · · Score: 1

      You mean they actually enjoy it?

      --
      "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
    2. Re:Eletric Shock Therapy by KylePflug · · Score: 1

      Redundant? What, they already have electrodes?

  67. Re:Pete and Repeat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did

  68. NASA + Slash + NSA + Google + IBM ... still dupes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The really hard problems of the universe are clearly still way beyond us.

  69. Re:What would the world's smartest people do? by vertinox · · Score: 1

    but now I seem to find myself questioning what Google has to gain.

    Think about it. If you put some of the world's brightest minds in the same building and they all have a discussion among themselves, what would they conclude they would all like to do?

    GET OFF THIS GOD FORSAKEN PLANET!

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  70. Coming Soon - NASOOGLE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Useless, overweight organisations - combine! Forming NASOOGLE! No wonder Google has managed to make their stock price defy gravity recently. :) I'm sure we'll soon see the other fruits of their work:

    * The Space Shuttle "USS Beta", it sorta works but nobody can be held responsible because it's clearly still being tested. And you want a ride, you have to be invited by someone else who's already an astronaut.

    * "Unintrusive" advertising on all Hubble images. Sure, you get a slightly less useful image (and hey, it's text, so it can't be bad.. right?) - but for some reason you can now never delete any data. Images of Uranus now all have links to toilet humor websites, due to advertisers for whom the joke never seem to get old.

    * Thousands of junker PCs at mission control are running in a cluster - half of them have failed, but who knows which ones? The NASOOGLE Surveyor robots are sent on a 3 year mission to the server room to seek out dead machines. Bonus mission: second robot accidentally enters nerd founder's psyche, discovers their virginity, buried under pile of money and stock certificates. Core sample of founder's brain is unsucessful due to excessive ego field, boosted by recent purchase of a private Boeing 767.

    * Google Maps now randomly delivers distances in Imperial or Metric, without telling you which. It'll crash (into another planet) when asked to be specific.

    * Meanwhile, NASOOGLE tests a new type of spacecraft drive, powered by pure irony emminating from Slashdot posters asserting Google's "do no evil" policy. Point out that the only product Google sells is advertising (since when have advertising companies ever worked in the interest of you, their targets?), view lunatic Google zealots defending Google for being bastion of good, hook web browser up to irony detector, and voila! Sustained spaceflight is achieved, travelling at twice the speed of light.

    I could go on, but I'm bored now. Google and NASA both seem to be waning organisations who haven't really done anything original, worthwhile or exciting in a while. They kind of deserve each other at this point.

  71. America Writers' Guild Lawsuit in 5... 4... by doublem · · Score: 1

    In related news, the American Writers' Guild has filed a lawsuit to block Google from partnering with NASA.

    A Guild Spokes-Weasel said, "We can't let them do NAYTHING until they resolve their issues with us. If they want to do anything, they have to pay us a licensing fee."

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
  72. two projects in one day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought I hear about a deal with NASA already.
    They must be doing two projects with NASA.

  73. Aanother revenue generating source by managedcode · · Score: 1

    This is a confluence of intellectual monsters. No doubt, MIT students line up for Google recruting events. Damm it they got another revenue source and trust me this will be something big say atleast few 100 million dollars.
    By the way are you using managed code to build your apps ? Trust MCPP.

  74. "Brain! Brain! What is BRAIN?!!!" by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    Google, Google, Google!

    You're gonna feel pretty dumb when Google ships you off to toil in the soylent green mines!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  75. Its time has come...my gift to the /. community... by Linker3000 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Slashdot EeziPost (TM) MK I

    #NB: For obvious reasons, the first option is ENABLED by default - remember to turn off if you are NOT responding to a dupe

    [X] Another: [X] Dupe [ ] Slashvertisment [X] WTF [X] $editor is a dork

    [ ] Frist psot [ ] link to GNAA [ ] Link to goatse [ ] $random_drivel

    [ ] I Haven't RTFA, but... $random_opinionated_comment

    [ ] Slashdotted already!. I bet their server runs on $topic_item too

    [ ] Soul_sucking registration required

    [ ] Mod Parent [ ] up [ ] Down

    [ ] Fsck: [ ] SCO [ ] Micro$oft [ ] DMCA [ ] DRM [ ] MPAA [ ] RIAA [ ] Google [ ] Bush [ ] You all

    [ ] I for one welcome our new $topic_item overlords

    [ ] Imagine a beowulf cluster of those

    [ ] In Soviet Russia, $topic_item owns you!

    [X] Meh!

    [ ] Netcraft confirms $topic_item is: [ ] dead [ ] dying

    [ ] But have the inventors thought of what will happen if $random_amateur_insight

    [ ] Once again the USA is clamping down on my [ ] Amendment rights.

    [ ] You insensitive clod

    [ ] But people who download music from P2P networks are more likely to buy the album

    [ ] Cue DVD Jon-type crack in 3..2..1

    [ ] Torrent, anyone?

    [ ] Here's a link to a patch: $random_linux_distro_url

    [ ] Profit!!

    [ ] Still no cure for cancer

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
  76. Re:Slashdot should partner with Google by toupsie · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Wow the Slashdot editors didn't like that post...

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  77. Why don't they just BUY NASA and be done with it? by wsanders · · Score: 1

    Tired of getting screwed by Congress? Tired of being forced to implement 30 year old obsolete and dangerous technology for political reasons? Tired of some pork barrel law that forces your Operation center to locate in hurricane-prone areas?

    Privatize!

    Coming soon: Google buys the education system! No more aguing about whether cavemen rode dinosaurs like horses!

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  78. Naaaaaasa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Naaaaaasa?

  79. Re:Pete and Repeat by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    "Who's left?"

    No, Who's not on the boat, he's on first.


    sheesh!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  80. Tell this to Peter Norvig! by Lord+Satri · · Score: 1

    I know this. I guess Peter Norvig, director of search quality at Google, was meaning improving Google Moon. He wanted to fit Google Moon and Google Mars in the same sentence, with a confusing result!

  81. Re:Pete and Repeat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Pete. Pete has left the boat.

    "Bureaucrat Conrad, you are technically correct -- the best kind of correct!"

  82. Re:Pete and Repeat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Pete and Repeat are on a boat. Pete jumps off. Who's left?

    Unfortunately, CmdrTaco.

  83. That's wicked - wish I had mod points!!! by StuffJustHappens · · Score: 1

    See Subject - LOL

    --
    --What's this sig thing all about then? Should I have one?
    1. Re:That's wicked - wish I had mod points!!! by jx100 · · Score: 4, Funny

      ..don't you mean...

        Slashdot EeziPost (TM) MK I

      #NB: For obvious reasons, the first option is ENABLED by default - remember to turn off if you are NOT responding to a dupe

      [ ] Another: [ ] Dupe [ ] Slashvertisment [ ] WTF [ ] $editor is a dork

      [ ] Frist psot [ ] link to GNAA [ ] Link to goatse [ ] $random_drivel

      [ ] I Haven't RTFA, but... $random_opinionated_comment

      [ ] Slashdotted already!. I bet their server runs on $topic_item too

      [ ] Soul_sucking registration required

      [X] Mod Parent [X] up [ ] Down

      [ ] Fsck: [ ] SCO [ ] Micro$oft [ ] DMCA [ ] DRM [ ] MPAA [ ] RIAA [ ] Google [ ] Bush [ ] You all

      [ ] I for one welcome our new $topic_item overlords

      [ ] Imagine a beowulf cluster of those

      [ ] In Soviet Russia, $topic_item owns you!

      [ ] Meh!

      [ ] Netcraft confirms $topic_item is: [ ] dead [ ] dying

      [ ] But have the inventors thought of what will happen if $random_amateur_insight

      [ ] Once again the USA is clamping down on my [ ] Amendment rights.

      [X] You insensitive clod

      [ ] But people who download music from P2P networks are more likely to buy the album

      [ ] Cue DVD Jon-type crack in 3..2..1

      [ ] Torrent, anyone?

      [ ] Here's a link to a patch: $random_linux_distro_url

      [ ] Profit!!

      [ ] Still no cure for cancer

      ?

  84. Problems by uberdave · · Score: 1

    Google moon doesn't have any of the Ranger sites, nor any of the Russian sites. I'm not sure, but I don't think the far side of the moon is even shown.

  85. Re:Its time has come...my gift to the /. community by SoCalChris · · Score: 3, Funny

    [ ] Still no cure for cancer

    I think your Slashdot EeziPost (TM) MK I is having a conflict with the Fark SquirrelNut Commentator 3000 (TM)

  86. Google twenty years from now by chill · · Score: 1

    More like the head of Google will be saying, "Looking back, working with NASA was a mistake."

    I guess the response to the April 1st ad to work at Google's Moon location was just to overwhelming to ignore.

      -Charles

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  87. Is it possible to mod down dupe complainers? by yog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I guess it's handy to know that a story is redundant, but when most of the ensuing discussion is focussed on that point, it gets kind of boring, not to mention that the postings are themselves dupes of each other. I wish that the user options provided a way to hide such postings so that those of us interested in the story can discuss it. Although, I do tend to browse at -1 since some decent comments do get modded down by ignorant moderators.

    I think it's really cool that NASA is partnering with Google; there seems to be some real synergy there. Someone at Google or at NASA is thinking creatively. NASA has data, and Google has data-processing technologies. Makes sense.

    I disagree with the guy who thinks Google should share the partnership with Yahoo and Microsoft. Think of the complexities that would be involved in such a 4-way collaboration, with the three competitors jockeying for a dominant role while publicly acting like friendly partners, while secretly trying to steal each other's technologies, and so forth. No, Google is the premier search engine in the world; no one else comes close, and it seems unlikely that MS/Yahoo will become household search terms any time soon. "Let's just MSN that recipe when we get home!" "Did you yahoo this or did you write yourself?" No I don't think so somehow.

    It would be interesting to see if NASA opens up its space probe data streams to Google searches in the future. Perhaps this will spawn a whole new cottage industry of weekend warriors who try to interpret the gigabytes of information streaming back from Mars probes and the like.

    --
    it's = "it is"; its = possessive. E.g., it's flapping its wings.
    1. Re:Is it possible to mod down dupe complainers? by Thing+1 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Is it possible to mod down dupe complainers?

      It should be fairly simple to add a regex text field with a modifier of your choice.

      Like for Friends, Foes, Fans, and Freaks, you can choose different modifiers; this would open it up so you could, say, mod to -5 any post with "dupe" in it.

      Several of those could be added: subject, comment, signature, and even name. Actually, do it the way Google does attachments, and have the type be a drop-down as well. Then you could have as many as you like, and the default view doesn't take a lot of screen real estate.

      Me, I'd +5 any mention of Discworld or Douglas Adams. ;-)

      Giving me the idea that, like your relationships, it might be nice to have the regexs be public. (It should be optional though.)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  88. Dupes - That's What We Do! by wsanders · · Score: 1

    Taco is just f***ing with us - read the intro. It can't be one of /.'s core competencies yet, they haven't registered the domain:

    Get it while it's hot:

    Whois Server Version 1.3 ...
    No match for domain "SLASHDUP.COM".

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  89. Re:Its time has come...my gift to the /. community by Linker3000 · · Score: 2, Funny

    In other new: Drew claims code infringement and hires same lawyer as SCO, grabs another beer. His dog wants compensation.

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
  90. Re:Pete and Repeat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nobody, coz I just shot Repeat. Problem solved.

    Problem solved.

  91. Google and Nasa.... by outz · · Score: 0

    This brings a whole new meaning to Google Earth.

    I mean we all know their main business is adverts ;)

    --
    What was your username again? -BOFH
  92. NASA and Google by p33p3r · · Score: 1

    A place with a scary database (search engine) mating with a place with scary (Cray YMP) computers. How scary can that be.Hmmmmmmmmm

  93. Well... by deathy_epl+ccs · · Score: 1

    I for one praise our beloved Google overlords.

  94. Different Story by kwiqsilver · · Score: 1

    The earlier story had a Nasa logo, this one has a Google logo. That makes them completely different stories.

  95. SETI by mattsucks · · Score: 1

    Google outta partner with SETI.

    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=space+aliens+ from+alpha+centauri&btnG=Google+Search

    Seems a lot simpler than the way we search now.

  96. Re:Its time has come...my gift to the /. community by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1
    You forgot:

    [ ] Degrading(sometimes funny, sometimes just plain stupid--parent is the former) comment about the /. community

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  97. Beta by outz · · Score: 0

    Will this mean all future NASA projects will be in a near-permanent Beta release? Oh wait, nothing new there...

    --
    What was your username again? -BOFH
  98. Google Forms Partnership With Slashdot by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

    This will enable Slashdot editors to google articles on Slashdot, so they can guarantee a steady flow of dupes.

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  99. Re:Its time has come...my gift to the /. community by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 4, Informative

    Don't forget

    [ ] Coral Cache: XXX.nyud.net:8090

  100. Google + Nasa = GOVGLE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my own opinion...

    But for those of you who think google !=gov, PUUUUUUUUHLEASE.

  101. In a manner of speaking... by psycho · · Score: 1

    >if I didn't screw up occasionally,

    For large values of "occasionally"?

  102. Re:What would the world's smartest people do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oddly enough, put enough of my friends high on pot in the same room and they'll conclude the same thing. :)

  103. Slashdot The Movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "When does this occur in the movie"
    "What you are seeing is Now, What is happening now, most likely happened Earlier, but since we never read our own site, we post it again."
    "so what happen to then?"
    "that will be tomorrow!"

  104. Re:Its time has come...my gift to the /. community by speculatrix · · Score: 1

    [ ] still no flying car

  105. FUCKING DUPE!!!! by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1, Funny
    if I didn't screw up occasionally, a lot of angry readers would have no other way to vent their rage in a safe environment.

    fucking fucking dupe!!!! stupid slashdot!!! stupid invalid htmlcode!!!!!!! dupe stories crap editors!!!!!! fucking dupe fucking dupe!!!!!!!12!111M fucking fucking dupe!!!! stupid slashdot!!! stupid invalid htmlcode!!!!!!! dupe stories crap editors!!!!!! fucking dupe fucking dupe!!!!!!!12!111M fucking fucking dupe!!!! stupid slashdot!!! stupid invalid htmlcode!!!!!!! dupe stories crap editors!!!!!! fucking dupe fucking dupe!!!!!!!12!111M

    Hey, you're right! I feel much better, now. I just wish the lameness filter would let me post in all-caps... I could really let loose then.

  106. Google Maps soon to cover the entire solar system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wanna find the shortest route from your house to Titan? Or where to order pizza on Pluto?
    Now you'll be able to :-).

  107. Re:Pete and Repeat by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
    No, not with a repeater. With his Peter.

    --
    Evan

    --
    "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  108. Copernicus by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 1

    Naturally, this is right in line with Google's Copernicus initiative. I'm sure it will also help their mapping of the moon. A big win for Google!

    --
    www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
  109. Google's going to the mooon! by IshmaelSquared · · Score: 0

    Yes, that's right, now you can search GoogleSpace all day long in search for God. I bet some Russian astrologer will sue NASA again because aligning Google and Nasa is madness!

  110. The logical Google Extensions are... by DrDebug · · Score: 1
    1. Re:The logical Google Extensions are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey man, thanks

    2. Re:The logical Google Extensions are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  111. Re:Typical... by tourvil · · Score: 1
    Maybe Taco should make me an editor.

    Well you got modded redundant, you're obviously qualified!

  112. News to me... by Evro · · Score: 1

    Maybe CmdrTaco, like me, has Zonk's stories blocked. This story's new to me!

    --
    rooooar
  113. Hmm....GString anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone?

  114. if I didn't screw up occasionally... by d_54321 · · Score: 1

    if I didn't screw up occasionally, a lot of angry readers would have no other way to vent their rage in a safe environment.
    Replace "readers" with "citizens" and this sounds like an awesome way to start out the next State of the Union speech...

  115. SUPERDUPE! by timothykaine · · Score: 1

    For christ sakes, its still on the front page. Perhaps the only words our mods can read are "cut" and "paste".

  116. Why is Slashdot broken? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All these uber-geeks, and yet the Slashdot site code still has no way to detect and at least *warn* someone before a post is repeated. My faith in nerd-kind has forever failed.

  117. Steve Ballmer to kill NASA by NotBorg · · Score: 1

    Microsoft's CEO Steve Ballmer has reportedly launched a chair in to orbit and vowed to "fucking kill NASA." In a press conference, Ballmer announced Microsoft's new space program claiming it was the next logical step, closing the gap between itself and rival companies such as Google and Yahoo! Launch.

    Although one chair doesnt seem like much of a threat, Microsoft plans to launch one million chairs and provide an innovative software solutions to track space seats through MSN's search portal.

    --
    I want this account deleted.
  118. World Wind was developed at Ames Research Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google might wish to improve their "Google Earth" project with elements of Nasa's World Wind (and visa versa).

  119. Re:Pete and Repeat by Dirtside · · Score: 1

    "I have but one asterisk for my country." - Nathan Hale (sic)

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  120. Re:instant karma -not working. by Neoncow · · Score: 1

    Haha, you lose. :P

  121. It's only a metaphor. by bernfast · · Score: 1
    Google partnering with NASA is only a metaphor for searching the universe for information. It's not meant literally as you can easily recognize from the fact that it doesn't make the slightest bit of sense.

    And this is very odd, because without that fairly simple and obvious piece of knowledge, nothing that ever happened on the Earth could possibly make the slightest bit of sense.

  122. Does this mean we can get to Mars now? by Wontsomebodypleaseth · · Score: 0

    Does this mean we can get a spaceship up now without it blowing up or confusing cm and inches... Or is this like another Google whim like Groups or talk... Decide Now!!!

    --
    If You can read this sig you are on the internet
  123. Another Slashdot Google Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ho hum. Anyone would think Google paid advertising money to Slashdot for the amount of Google stories around here lately!

  124. Re:Searching Space (Screenie) by tincho_uy · · Score: 1

    Actually, this came up in a fark PS contest some time ago... Now that'd be neat!

  125. Skynet? by Seltsam · · Score: 1

    What? No obvious Skynet reference?