Then-Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe testified in the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence in December that the Obama Administration Justice Department would not have sought a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant to put surveillance on volunteer Trump campaign advisor Carter Page without a dossier that had been funded by the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, according to a memorandum released by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.
The application for the FISA warrant did not inform the FISA court that approved the warrant that the DNC and Clinton campaign had been involved in financing the dossier that provided information used in the application.
If someone who has gone through the training to "serve and protect" wilted in the face of danger, do you think people who have been trained to teach kids are going have better reactions?
And they'll succeed, too, because a little more than half of the population are too ignorant, clueless and gullible to see what's going on.
And never let it be said that on Slashdot people aren't contributing to the problem. Here is an example:
Here you have it folks, a perfect example of fascism at work. Corporations slowly but surely establishing their power over governement and the people. Legislators, media, weapons, etc. All the tools necessary to enforce totalitarism.
Police carry guns. Is your thinking that they are all cowards? (Even if a few actually are?)
Soldiers carry guns. Is your thinking that they are all cowards?
Are young girls that don't get assaulted, raped, or murdered because they used a gun "cowards"? Or do you think they should be assaulted, raped, or murdered?
Maybe the problem isn't that any of them are cowards, but that you believe and wrote something foolish. What will people think if you do that often enough? Perhaps that you are a..... ?
Three Democratic congressmen attended a private dinner hosted by Iranian President Hassan Rouhani in 2013, a new report reveals.
Reps. Keith Ellison of Minnesota, Andre Carson of Indiana and Gregory Meeks of New York attended the private dinner, along with Louis Farrakhan, a notorious anti-Semite who leads the black supremacist group Nation of Islam.
Iran is the number one state sponsor of terrorism, according to the United States government, which has listed the Islamic Republic as a state sponsor of terror since 1984. Rouhani was in New York for a United Nations meeting and held the dinner party just hours after speaking to the UN General Assembly. . . .
Ellison, Meeks and Carson’s attendance at the 2013 dinner is just the latest tie between Democratic members of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) and Farrakhan. . . .
The CBC held a secret meeting with Farrakhan in 2005, where then-Illinois Sen. Barack Obama took a smiling picture with the hate group leader. The existence of both the meeting and Obama’s photo with Farrakhan remained secret until last month. A Final Call photographer said he suppressed the photo for 13 years at the CBC’s request, in order to protect Obama’s political career.
I want a parliamentary system with proportional representation, and end to the Senate . . .
Then you will be continued to be (bitterly?) disappointed by the legislative arrangements of the United States of America.
Our entire system of government was designed by wealthy landowners to give themselves a disproportionate amount of political power at the expense of the working class.
There is no mention in the Constitution of "votes per acre," and any state requirements to own property to vote are long gone.
So you mean to tell me that you didn't go so far as drilling down into the methodology section by country? If you had you would have found the (i) link to this document in Sweden's row noted as "New Income Definition Since 2012":
TRR: current transfers received, including transfers from social security (including accident and disability benefits, old-age cash benefits, unemployment benefits, maternity allowances, child and/or family allowances, all income-tested and means-tested benefits that are part of social assistance, including quasi-cash transfers given for a specific purpose such as food stamps); transfers from employment related social insurance; as well as cash transfers from both non-profit institutions and other households.
TRP: current transfers paid, including direct taxes on income and wealth, social security contributions paid by households, contributions to employment-related social insurance, current transfers paid to both other households and non-profit institutions. Taxes on realised capital gains should be excluded from wealth taxes when possible. [Values for transfers paid should be reported in the OECD questionnaire with a negative sign].
And of course there are formula showing the addition of TRR components and subtraction of TRP components.
North Korea has made repeated public statements that for them an attack on the United States was inevitable. That is a matter of "when", not "if". They have repeated stated that their ICBMs and nuclear weapons only target the United States. They have repeated stated that they are at war with the US, and that the truce is off. The war is back on, but there hasn't been any shooting by the UN forces lead by the US, only by North Korean forces, including the recent border incursion by North Korea. I'm curious, . . . who were you thinking?
The point of both was to obtain money. $400,000 is a pretty good haul for limited work. What do you think the average take was for wannacry? I doubt it was $400,000. I doubt laundering it will be a big challenge for North Korea, North Korea is a criminal enterprise in itself. It is possible they won't have to do much if they plug it back into criminal activity on the dark web.
Is that why it is the 6th largest economy in the world? I'll hang with the morons thank you very much.
In answer to your question, no, it isn't. California's economy is in spite of the current government, not because of it. That won't last forever. Practically the entire current California government and the infected 9th Circuit of the US Court of Appeals seems to be doing what they can to either destroy or damage prospects for the future.
I am never more in fear of my life than when I see a police officer, and that should not be the case.
You do understand that may be completely on you, don't you? Have you sought counseling? Are you engaged in criminal enterprises?
As said, a few bad apples spoils the barrel, and the barrel is not in a healthy state. The whole barrel needs to go.
Yes, that is the claim of some activists. It doesn't always work out the way it is expected to ... or is the outcome exactly what is expected but unstated?
The nationwide median income for the US is in red. To the left of the red column are other OECD countries, and to the right of the red bar are individual US states. These national-level comparisons take into account taxes, and include social benefits (e.g., "welfare" and state-subsidized health care) as income. Purchasing power is adjusted to take differences in the cost of living in different countries into account.
*Throw Stuff On The Wall To See What Sticks. And you got a +5? Impressive
NATO countries agreed to spend 2% of GDP on defense. That isn't outlandish, but few of them meet that, or even come close.
The true folly is putting yourself at risk of living under the rule of a foreign enemy that conquers you. Perhaps you should speak to some of the people still alive in Europe that remember how that worked out before you cheer the folly that refusing to provide for an adequate defense enables.
Ah, but I forget . . . Europe is headed for ruin anyway since it chooses not to control it borders, native Europeans are failing to reproduce in meaningful numbers, and the EU and many national governments are inviting in the foreign replacements for the European population which has little or no love for Europeans or their values. It turns out that you will live under foreign domination of those hostile to your values after all . . . just give it 30 years or so unless things change drastically, and soon.
It seems to me you have a few things wrong there. There will still be survivors of an attack by a 150kt nuclear warhead, it just becomes more difficult or less likely as you get closer to the explosion. But ultimately you are going to reach an area where the force of the explosion attenuates to the point it is no longer a major threat (a cube root function) The same goes for larger warheads. Next, it is reasonable to doubt that North Korea has enough warheads to cause nuclear winter. Finally, there seems to be reason to doubt that North Korea will be allowed to progress much further in developing its combined nuclear warheads and long range missiles. I doubt that President Trump will stand for it, and he has already launched missiles at another country that was transgressing.
But Trump asking for fewer people from a black country and more people from one of the whitest countries is almost explicitly indicating a preferred race.
Of course Leftists think that. As a practical matter race is very likely to be a key lens for them, and a distorting one at that.
Meanwhile others might look at the issue and consider the fact that Norway's population is highly educated, has a generally similar culture, society, government, values, is a peaceful society with an advanced economy. Many speak English. They are NATO allies. As such Norwegians might be likely to both fit in well to American society and make significant contributions. Why, it's almost a shame that they're "white", eh? Well, at least many of them are probably both atheists and socialists, so no harm in letting them into the US, eh?
By the way.... the obtuse AC you were answering was complaining about comments by Progressive American PopeRatzo.... making what is obviously a joke . . . unless you're sufficiently "woke" . . . I guess.
These countries are NOT America. They may have their own issues (and certainly do), however they are a very very different place. Unfortunately they are being slowly infected by 'American Exceptionalism' and all the BS that seems to drag along with it, however they are less far along that diseased path.
You've got it backwards. The Scandinavian countries have been infected by "socialist exceptionalism" but may be throwing it off to return to Scandinavian exceptionalism.
As Sanandaji explains clearly in his meticulously sourced book, though, what most Big Government advocates see as desirable outcomes in Scandinavia — relative prosperity, high levels of income equality, long lifespans, good health, low levels of poverty, and more — all predate the welfare state. On life expectancy, for example, four out of the top five OECD nations were in Scandinavia in 1960, with Norway at the very top. On income, meanwhile, most of the shift toward “equality” happened between 1870 and 1950 — long before the welfare state took over. Ironically, the emergence of Big Government even put some of that at risk, along with the long-established cultural norms such as the Protestant work ethic, honesty, social trust, entrepreneurship, innovation, and more that made those advances possible to begin with.
Indeed, before the emergence of welfare-state policies beginning in the 1960s and 1970s, Sweden was among the most prosperous and fast-growing economies on the planet. Between 1870 and 1936, when Sweden was characterized by relatively free markets, the nation enjoyed the highest rate of growth in the industrialized world. Innovation and entrepreneurship flourished, making Sweden one of the richest countries on Earth. Then came the radical Social Democratic period characterized by an ever-larger and more expensive government. Between 1975 and the mid-1990s — marked by the radical, if short-lived, experiment in “Third Way” socialism — Sweden dropped from being the fourth richest nation in the world down to the 13th richest.
Fortunately for Swedes, as the giant welfare state's harmful effects became increasingly obvious, the Swedish political class began to reverse course. From lowering taxes and government spending to deregulating and privatizing broad swaths of the economy, policymakers realized that the nation's continued success depended on freer markets — not total government. Still, the damage was severe. As Sanandaji explains, citing his earlier research on the subject, the rate of business formation during the “third-way era” was “dreadful.” In 2004, none of the 100 largest firms ranked by employment were founded within Sweden after 1970. “Furthermore, between 1950 and 2000, although the Swedish population grew from 7 million to almost 9 million, net job creation in the private sector was close to zero,” he observed.
Today, Denmark, despite higher taxes, has more economic freedom than the United States. Sweden and Finland are both catching up, too. And interestingly, despite Sanders' recent pronouncements on ABC News about Scandinavia having “more income and wealth equality,” Sweden still has a great deal more “wealth inequality” today than the United States, according to a study cited in the monograph.
Many European nations are endangering their future with the policy choices they are currently making. In 30 years it is possible that Europe will be almost unrecognizable, including the country you live in. Demographic decline, immigration, the EU is under great strain already and the heavy hand of Eurocrats may push other countries to leave the UE. Russia is resurgent, Eastern Europe is terrified, and Western Europe is intent on suicide it seems.
You really want to do some preparation since your situation improves considerably with it. Neither a standard wood frame house nor car is going to be much protection if you are in them, and remember the radiation would come from above as well. You want to be in the shelter for 14 days if possible to allow the radiation levels to drop. If possible you want to get at least a meter of soil between you and the radiation - in all directions, including above you. The radiation will be the worst at the beginning and then fall off over time.
If nothing else, you could dig a trench and park the car over it. Ideally the engine would be over you, and you could put sandbags on the floor.
Slashdot Mirror
Obama DOJ Wouldn’t Have Sought FISA Warrant on Trump Advisor Without Clinton-Campaign-Funded Dossier
Then-Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe testified in the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence in December that the Obama Administration Justice Department would not have sought a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant to put surveillance on volunteer Trump campaign advisor Carter Page without a dossier that had been funded by the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, according to a memorandum released by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.
The application for the FISA warrant did not inform the FISA court that approved the warrant that the DNC and Clinton campaign had been involved in financing the dossier that provided information used in the application.
You missed my point.
If someone who has gone through the training to "serve and protect" wilted in the face of danger, do you think people who have been trained to teach kids are going have better reactions?
Maybe there is another way to go.
Kendra St. Clair: Oklahoma Girl, 12, Shoots Intruder During Home Burglary
Girl, 11, scares off home intruder with shotgun
Armed With Her Dad’s Gun, This 17-Year-Old Girl Fended Off A Wanted Man Who Broke Into Her Home
I recognize you and some teachers don't feel up to it, but apparently there are people who manage.
There are other organizations that will track shooting scores without supporting school massacres.
So they are like the NRA then.
Why all of the drama on your part?
"All it takes for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing". And these days, I see a hell of a lot of good men doing a hell of a lot of nothing.
Oh, many "good people" are doing far worse than nothing, they are working towards the wrong ends.
Nation That Calls Trump ‘Hitler’ Demands He Take All Guns Away
And they'll succeed, too, because a little more than half of the population are too ignorant, clueless and gullible to see what's going on.
And never let it be said that on Slashdot people aren't contributing to the problem. Here is an example:
Here you have it folks, a perfect example of fascism at work. Corporations slowly but surely establishing their power over governement and the people. Legislators, media, weapons, etc. All the tools necessary to enforce totalitarism.
That is rubbish.
Police carry guns. Is your thinking that they are all cowards? (Even if a few actually are?)
Soldiers carry guns. Is your thinking that they are all cowards?
Are young girls that don't get assaulted, raped, or murdered because they used a gun "cowards"? Or do you think they should be assaulted, raped, or murdered?
Girl, 11, scares off home intruder with shotgun
Kendra St. Clair: Oklahoma Girl, 12, Shoots Intruder During Home Burglary
Armed With Her Dad’s Gun, This 17-Year-Old Girl Fended Off A Wanted Man Who Broke Into Her Home
Maybe the problem isn't that any of them are cowards, but that you believe and wrote something foolish. What will people think if you do that often enough? Perhaps that you are a ..... ?
Keep in mind that Ellison(no 2) is on record supporting a black ethnostate within the US(that by progressive values makes him a nazi by the way
Some company he keeps too.
Three Democrats Attended Private Dinner With Iran’s President And Louis Farrakhan
Three Democratic congressmen attended a private dinner hosted by Iranian President Hassan Rouhani in 2013, a new report reveals.
Reps. Keith Ellison of Minnesota, Andre Carson of Indiana and Gregory Meeks of New York attended the private dinner, along with Louis Farrakhan, a notorious anti-Semite who leads the black supremacist group Nation of Islam.
Iran is the number one state sponsor of terrorism, according to the United States government, which has listed the Islamic Republic as a state sponsor of terror since 1984. Rouhani was in New York for a United Nations meeting and held the dinner party just hours after speaking to the UN General Assembly. . . .
Ellison, Meeks and Carson’s attendance at the 2013 dinner is just the latest tie between Democratic members of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) and Farrakhan. . . .
The CBC held a secret meeting with Farrakhan in 2005, where then-Illinois Sen. Barack Obama took a smiling picture with the hate group leader. The existence of both the meeting and Obama’s photo with Farrakhan remained secret until last month. A Final Call photographer said he suppressed the photo for 13 years at the CBC’s request, in order to protect Obama’s political career.
Media Bury Obama-Farrakhan Photo
I want a parliamentary system with proportional representation, and end to the Senate . . .
Then you will be continued to be (bitterly?) disappointed by the legislative arrangements of the United States of America.
Our entire system of government was designed by wealthy landowners to give themselves a disproportionate amount of political power at the expense of the working class.
There is no mention in the Constitution of "votes per acre," and any state requirements to own property to vote are long gone.
So you mean to tell me that you didn't go so far as drilling down into the methodology section by country? If you had you would have found the (i) link to this document in Sweden's row noted as "New Income Definition Since 2012":
TERMS OF REFERENCE OECD PROJECT ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLD INCOMES 2017/18 COLLECTION
TRR: current transfers received, including transfers from social security (including accident and disability benefits, old-age cash benefits, unemployment benefits, maternity allowances, child and/or family allowances, all income-tested and means-tested benefits that are part of social assistance, including quasi-cash transfers given for a specific purpose such as food stamps); transfers from employment related social insurance; as well as cash transfers from both non-profit institutions and other households.
TRP: current transfers paid, including direct taxes on income and wealth, social security contributions paid by households, contributions to employment-related social insurance, current transfers paid to both other households and non-profit institutions. Taxes on realised capital gains should be excluded from wealth taxes when possible. [Values for transfers paid should be reported in the OECD questionnaire with a negative sign].
And of course there are formula showing the addition of TRR components and subtraction of TRP components.
TD:DR?
Right .. . . .
By the way, this is in the submission queue now courtesy of another person on Slashdot:
Why is liberal California the poverty capital of America?
North Korea has made repeated public statements that for them an attack on the United States was inevitable. That is a matter of "when", not "if". They have repeated stated that their ICBMs and nuclear weapons only target the United States. They have repeated stated that they are at war with the US, and that the truce is off. The war is back on, but there hasn't been any shooting by the UN forces lead by the US, only by North Korean forces, including the recent border incursion by North Korea. I'm curious, . . . who were you thinking?
The point of both was to obtain money. $400,000 is a pretty good haul for limited work. What do you think the average take was for wannacry? I doubt it was $400,000. I doubt laundering it will be a big challenge for North Korea, North Korea is a criminal enterprise in itself. It is possible they won't have to do much if they plug it back into criminal activity on the dark web.
I propose they use Manuel. It is from Barcelona.
And if they are smart, all of their servers should be Fawlty resistant.
And to change horses in mid-stream I can say I didn't get where I am today without having servers that were Fawlty resistant.
Certainly not . . .
Is that why it is the 6th largest economy in the world? I'll hang with the morons thank you very much.
In answer to your question, no, it isn't. California's economy is in spite of the current government, not because of it. That won't last forever. Practically the entire current California government and the infected 9th Circuit of the US Court of Appeals seems to be doing what they can to either destroy or damage prospects for the future.
Oh, I don't know about that. $400,000 isn't exactly chump change. Besides . . .
U.S. blames North Korea for 'WannaCry' cyber attack
Hmmm
Canada’s navy has ‘capability’ to help enforce North Korea sanctions: Vance
Any bets this is who is behind it?
Kim Digs for Cybercrime Coin Sanctions Can’t Snatch
And is that leading to this?
South Korea plans to ban cryptocurrency trading, rattles market
I am never more in fear of my life than when I see a police officer, and that should not be the case.
You do understand that may be completely on you, don't you? Have you sought counseling? Are you engaged in criminal enterprises?
As said, a few bad apples spoils the barrel, and the barrel is not in a healthy state. The whole barrel needs to go.
Yes, that is the claim of some activists. It doesn't always work out the way it is expected to . .. or is the outcome exactly what is expected but unstated?
Baltimore Police Backed Away From a Community That Protested Against Them, and Guess What Happened?
You seem to have misunderstood it. (One of the hazards of TL;DR + TSOTWTSWS*)
If Sweden and Germany Became US States, They Would be Among the Poorest States
The nationwide median income for the US is in red. To the left of the red column are other OECD countries, and to the right of the red bar are individual US states. These national-level comparisons take into account taxes, and include social benefits (e.g., "welfare" and state-subsidized health care) as income . Purchasing power is adjusted to take differences in the cost of living in different countries into account.
*Throw Stuff On The Wall To See What Sticks. And you got a +5? Impressive
NATO countries agreed to spend 2% of GDP on defense. That isn't outlandish, but few of them meet that, or even come close.
The true folly is putting yourself at risk of living under the rule of a foreign enemy that conquers you. Perhaps you should speak to some of the people still alive in Europe that remember how that worked out before you cheer the folly that refusing to provide for an adequate defense enables.
Military spending by NATO members - Does America contribute more than its fair share?
Ah, but I forget . . . Europe is headed for ruin anyway since it chooses not to control it borders, native Europeans are failing to reproduce in meaningful numbers, and the EU and many national governments are inviting in the foreign replacements for the European population which has little or no love for Europeans or their values. It turns out that you will live under foreign domination of those hostile to your values after all . . . just give it 30 years or so unless things change drastically, and soon.
It seems to me you have a few things wrong there. There will still be survivors of an attack by a 150kt nuclear warhead, it just becomes more difficult or less likely as you get closer to the explosion. But ultimately you are going to reach an area where the force of the explosion attenuates to the point it is no longer a major threat (a cube root function) The same goes for larger warheads. Next, it is reasonable to doubt that North Korea has enough warheads to cause nuclear winter. Finally, there seems to be reason to doubt that North Korea will be allowed to progress much further in developing its combined nuclear warheads and long range missiles. I doubt that President Trump will stand for it, and he has already launched missiles at another country that was transgressing.
But Trump asking for fewer people from a black country and more people from one of the whitest countries is almost explicitly indicating a preferred race.
Of course Leftists think that. As a practical matter race is very likely to be a key lens for them, and a distorting one at that.
Meanwhile others might look at the issue and consider the fact that Norway's population is highly educated, has a generally similar culture, society, government, values, is a peaceful society with an advanced economy. Many speak English. They are NATO allies. As such Norwegians might be likely to both fit in well to American society and make significant contributions. Why, it's almost a shame that they're "white", eh? Well, at least many of them are probably both atheists and socialists, so no harm in letting them into the US, eh?
By the way .... the obtuse AC you were answering was complaining about comments by Progressive American PopeRatzo .... making what is obviously a joke . . . unless you're sufficiently "woke" . . . I guess.
These countries are NOT America. They may have their own issues (and certainly do), however they are a very very different place.
Unfortunately they are being slowly infected by 'American Exceptionalism' and all the BS that seems to drag along with it, however they are less far along that diseased path.
You've got it backwards. The Scandinavian countries have been infected by "socialist exceptionalism" but may be throwing it off to return to Scandinavian exceptionalism.
Debunking the Myth of Socialist “Success” in Scandinavia
As Sanandaji explains clearly in his meticulously sourced book, though, what most Big Government advocates see as desirable outcomes in Scandinavia — relative prosperity, high levels of income equality, long lifespans, good health, low levels of poverty, and more — all predate the welfare state. On life expectancy, for example, four out of the top five OECD nations were in Scandinavia in 1960, with Norway at the very top. On income, meanwhile, most of the shift toward “equality” happened between 1870 and 1950 — long before the welfare state took over. Ironically, the emergence of Big Government even put some of that at risk, along with the long-established cultural norms such as the Protestant work ethic, honesty, social trust, entrepreneurship, innovation, and more that made those advances possible to begin with.
Indeed, before the emergence of welfare-state policies beginning in the 1960s and 1970s, Sweden was among the most prosperous and fast-growing economies on the planet. Between 1870 and 1936, when Sweden was characterized by relatively free markets, the nation enjoyed the highest rate of growth in the industrialized world. Innovation and entrepreneurship flourished, making Sweden one of the richest countries on Earth. Then came the radical Social Democratic period characterized by an ever-larger and more expensive government. Between 1975 and the mid-1990s — marked by the radical, if short-lived, experiment in “Third Way” socialism — Sweden dropped from being the fourth richest nation in the world down to the 13th richest.
Fortunately for Swedes, as the giant welfare state's harmful effects became increasingly obvious, the Swedish political class began to reverse course. From lowering taxes and government spending to deregulating and privatizing broad swaths of the economy, policymakers realized that the nation's continued success depended on freer markets — not total government. Still, the damage was severe. As Sanandaji explains, citing his earlier research on the subject, the rate of business formation during the “third-way era” was “dreadful.” In 2004, none of the 100 largest firms ranked by employment were founded within Sweden after 1970. “Furthermore, between 1950 and 2000, although the Swedish population grew from 7 million to almost 9 million, net job creation in the private sector was close to zero,” he observed.
Today, Denmark, despite higher taxes, has more economic freedom than the United States. Sweden and Finland are both catching up, too. And interestingly, despite Sanders' recent pronouncements on ABC News about Scandinavia having “more income and wealth equality,” Sweden still has a great deal more “wealth inequality” today than the United States, according to a study cited in the monograph.
Most European countries are not living up to their defense obligations, relying upon the US to backstop them. That isn't a trivial matter.
Here is an interesting read: If Sweden and Germany Became US States, They Would be Among the Poorest States
Many European nations are endangering their future with the policy choices they are currently making. In 30 years it is possible that Europe will be almost unrecognizable, including the country you live in. Demographic decline, immigration, the EU is under great strain already and the heavy hand of Eurocrats may push other countries to leave the UE. Russia is resurgent, Eastern Europe is terrified, and Western Europe is intent on suicide it seems.
Be sure to turn off the light before you go.
You really want to do some preparation since your situation improves considerably with it. Neither a standard wood frame house nor car is going to be much protection if you are in them, and remember the radiation would come from above as well. You want to be in the shelter for 14 days if possible to allow the radiation levels to drop. If possible you want to get at least a meter of soil between you and the radiation - in all directions, including above you. The radiation will be the worst at the beginning and then fall off over time.
If nothing else, you could dig a trench and park the car over it. Ideally the engine would be over you, and you could put sandbags on the floor.
Maybe you want to peruse the following.
General background is here:
Fallout Protection - What to Know and Do about Nuclear Attack
FEMA TR-87 Standards for Fallout Shelters
Plans for Expedient Fallout Shelters
Below Ground Corrugated Steel Culvert Shelter Model
There are, of course, companies that sell shelters.
You might even be able to use something like this for a starter, just put about 3+ feed of earth around / above it.
SafRoom 8 ft. x 8 ft. x 7 ft. Steel Tornado Shelter
8 ft. x 7 ft. 14 Person Underground Tornado Storm Shed
I see your list omitted the Sharknado. . . . are you trying to be funny or something? ;D