Funny thing, though, if you'd followed that advice in the last couple years and were running Debian or one of its derivatives, you'd be wide open for pretty much anyone to log in, thanks to that OpenSSL fiasco.
Yes, technology can be pretty scary and unsettling, but there are plenty of simple phones for those who think technology isn't really for them. Such as http://www.dorophones.com/.
Others mentioned the Earth being molten, but even as it is now, the Earth is plastic enough that if you removed a big enough chunk, the rest of the planet would flow and deform until it was spherical again.
With the x86 instruction set, I can load a data file and execute a jump to a data segment without the code having passed through any sort of system loader.
But not with the subset of x86 that NaCl allows, you can't.
It's well known known and documented that some fraction of people have adverse reactions of pretty much any vaccine. That is a direct side-effect of what a vaccine is.
If you think they aren't, show me an example of using monads to represent side-effect programming effectively while allowing parallelization of the task.
Monads can encapsulate away the side-effects, but unless you show me a solid example of it I sincerely doubt that they can both be properly efficient and retain the multiprocessing advantages.
Either way, everything said so far has been entirely baseless assumptions. Amdahl's law is logically strict and based on direct mathematical deductions. This "Gustafson's law" is based on nothing but wishful thinking.
Slashdot Mirror
And you didn't consider that this might possibly be a joke?
Funny thing, though, if you'd followed that advice in the last couple years and were running Debian or one of its derivatives, you'd be wide open for pretty much anyone to log in, thanks to that OpenSSL fiasco.
I hate to state the obvious
Then why do you do it?
hey,hybrid american.
i don't your future and killing soon!
The wind isn't limited to just the funnel. You're going to have quite a time trying to fly an UAV near a tornado.
Yes, technology can be pretty scary and unsettling, but there are plenty of simple phones for those who think technology isn't really for them. Such as http://www.dorophones.com/.
Most posts in this thread are dead wrong, except for this one. Cave Story is what you want.
Are you kidding? Ghosts with whips are some of the scariest ones!
A very good book about how democracy is horrible and corporeal punishment is awesome, indeed.
It's not really "light-hearted parody", it's satire. And it's hilarious and highly entertaining satire.
And part of the fun is watching the fans of the book complain about it, and the people who take it at face value complain for almost opposite reasons.
If you spend 40 hours a week in a high stress job, maybe you shouldn't play a game that is another job.
2.4mm sure goes further than the upper layer of skin, though, so that's hardly a good comparison.
He predicted that people will overplay their discoveries and promise far more than they can deliver?
This thing is not going to be reading any dreams any time soon.
Others mentioned the Earth being molten, but even as it is now, the Earth is plastic enough that if you removed a big enough chunk, the rest of the planet would flow and deform until it was spherical again.
which leads me to wonder if your firm is capable of making a great game
LostWinds was a pretty good game.
With the x86 instruction set, I can load a data file and execute a jump to a data segment without the code having passed through any sort of system loader.
But not with the subset of x86 that NaCl allows, you can't.
Which are both forbidden by the x86 subset used by NaCl.
It's well known known and documented that some fraction of people have adverse reactions of pretty much any vaccine. That is a direct side-effect of what a vaccine is.
That's not what this article is about.
The you probably have either not used it much at all, or else you have used it far too much.
Shelling cities sure is a great way to defend against terrorists.
If you think they aren't, show me an example of using monads to represent side-effect programming effectively while allowing parallelization of the task.
Monads can encapsulate away the side-effects, but unless you show me a solid example of it I sincerely doubt that they can both be properly efficient and retain the multiprocessing advantages.
Either way, everything said so far has been entirely baseless assumptions. Amdahl's law is logically strict and based on direct mathematical deductions. This "Gustafson's law" is based on nothing but wishful thinking.
The more you're doing, the more it's going to be interconnected and not possible to do at the same time.
Sounds reasonable too.
Ruby is nowhere near a functional language. It's imperative as anything else.