I recently started using Zend Framework as well. It's a little new, 1.0.1, but it's pretty robust and mature for a 1.0 release. It's really well thought out, development is happening quickly, and it's got power behind it (Zend...well...they know PHP). Also, the license is great, BSD (All contributers have to submit an CLA, etc.).
If they can't tell the difference, why should they approve the team spending twice as long on the cleanup as on the prototype?
Well, I can't speak for this specific case, but often if you tell them something along the lines of "it will look and feel the same, but it will last for years rather than months" they tend to be sufficiently motivated. Especially the upper management that thinks (correctly or incorrectly) that the business would instantly go bankrupt if they did not read these reports.
What about people that want to sell an item by a certain time? Theoretically, this could extend the bidding indefinitely. I understand that it would mean they are making more money, but sometimes you just want it to END.
I see this kind of comment all the time, but to me it makes perfect sense. I don't know about you, but most of my meetings, etc are scheduled via E-Mail. It's already there, already open, so convenient...why not?
Somebody needs to set up a site where we can donate money to the OpenBSD project through PayPal or some other convenient method. http://www.openbsd.org/donations.html
True, I don't "have anything to do with the publication of this site". However, I do publish sites, and hear similar things...not much bothers me more than "your site sucks" from someone who, for reasons unknown to me, feels they must continue to come back and visit my bad site just to tell me how bad it is.
Sure you can. Might want to point that out in your text though. If you read your comment you would assume that Taco is a PITA and his site sucks. If this is how you feel leave. If not, don't make it seem like that's how you feel.
It's also his site, and not the only one out there. If you dislike it so much why keep coming back? Have you no more intelligence than the dog that returns to it's own vomit?
If ScuttleMonkey does not know Beatles-Beatles, then why is he almost the only one who has ever posted his stories?
I have seen many, many, many submissions by Beatles-Beatles. I can't remember even one of them being posted by someone other than ScuttleMonkey. If it was simply a matter of Beatles-Beatles submitting a lot of stories, which you seem to infer, then they would be spread out among a number of editors, not all of which would be ScuttleMonkey.
"It was hard getting the list down to ten, but we did; here's the top ten - (1)Wikipedia, (2)Firefox, (3)Open Office, (4)Bittorrent, (5)MediaWiki, (6)Xvid, (7)pbb, (8)Outfoxed, (9)dyne:bolic, (10)GIMP, (11)Apache and (12)SourceForge."
Must be new math...6+6=10 now
Re:who would seriously sign up for this?
on
You've Got Indictments
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
I would assume it would become part of sentencing "300 hours community service, 1 year probation, and you must sign up for the new SMS indictment system" And even deals "We're willing to offer reduced sentence in exchange for names, and your voluntary involvement in the new SMS indictment program"
Also, having worked at a law firm before (albeit in the US), I can tell you that they will do ANYTHING to be in the courts' good graces. I can DEFINITELY see law firms making this mandatory for all employees (and making sure that the courts know they do this).
It gets better than that. A Mersenne Prime is a prime number that is one less than a power of 2 (like 3=4-1=2^2-1 and 7=81=2^31). Given this: M_n=2^n-1, you also know that for M_n to be a Mersenne Prime, n must be prime. So you don't even do calculations for the rest of the numbers.
Read the whole snippet for more info.
After reading the full text of the article from the parent's link, a couple things stick out to me. First, he provides 2 excel files, one which he admits causes the exception to occur, but he says does NOT do anything malicious. Do you really trust him?
Secondly, he seems to be unable to count. He says you can claim to be "THE ONLY ONE IN THE WORLD possessing the knowledge about the vulnerability." He says Microsoft (whom he told) doesn't count. Seems to me that still leaves him and the buyer. I was always taught that 1+1=2
The average user doesn't want "new and cool". They're happy with Internet Explorer. You can explain to them about security, and they don't listen. You can explain to them why their computer keeps being infested with spyware and trojans, and they don't listen. IE is what they know, it is the only internet they've ever known, and they'll stubbornly stick with it when someone tries to make them switch to some newfanged nerdy thing with a weird name. They don't understand computers like we do so they don't appreciate the dangers and benefits and possibilities of choice. We wouldn't become enthused about changing the injectedgyroroateraxel on our car now would we, because we don't know about cars. Neither do they know anything about computers, and the paradyme is the same.
In my experience, that's just not true. Those who don't know much about computers tend to trust those that do. I make a suggestion, and they usually want to follow it. I'm an "IT Manager" at a small office (10 people). I didn't make it mandatory to switch to Firefox, but I told them it was better (from a security point of view as far as virii and spyware, etc). Everyone opted to get it and use it. It only took a day or two, and I heard from three of them, that they had downloaded and installed it at home too. Three more asked me if I could show them how to install it, so they could do it at home, so I typed up some short instructions. Three more said their kids already had it installed at home. I, of course, have it at home.
My point is: People aren't scared of it. They just need someone that they trust to recommend it to them. If you recommend it, and people are scared to use it, they might not trust your computer prowess. Tell them to go ask someone they DO trust.
I'd say that's a definite yes, yes, yes. From their FAQ's:
How do I add tracking code to my website?
Enter the code below into all of your web pages, between the <head> and </head> tags, and after any <meta> tags in that section. If you use a common include or template, you can enter it there.
You'll need to update the "xxxx-x" in the sample above with your own Google Analytics account number. You can find this number in the email sent to you when you signed up, or you can access your personalized tracking code in its entirety by clicking Check Status in the Analytics Settings page of your Analytics account.
Notice that the file you link to is called urchin.js?
I don't see any difference between what Google are doing here and what they do to index web sites.
The roam the web - they take local copies of every web page - they index those pages - then they display a 'snippet' of the page in response to a search query.
Same deal with the books. Scan them into a private archive, index the archive - display the title and a sentence or two of content to provide context. I see no problem with that.
The difference is, when people put something on the web, there is a sort of understanding that it is public information (of course, there are exceptions in password protected areas/pages, etc...but for the most part, it's public). The people that wrote these books were not under that same understanding when their book was published.
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for Google archiving books. It'll be a huge plus for students, not to mention to me personally. However, I DO see where the writers are coming from. IMO though...they need to get over it, or opt out. Am I mistaken, or can they send in a list of their books that they DON'T want scanned? How hard is it for a writer to submit a list of his/her books if he/she doesn't want them indexed?
They have a history of marketing "repackaged" old stuff with the new. They made the top load NES when they did SNES. They did the Newer gameboy style at the same time as the gameboy color. Etc, Etc. It seems to work for them.
Slashdot Mirror
To me, the current yellow box that's labeled "Sponsored Links" is enough.
I recently started using Zend Framework as well. It's a little new, 1.0.1, but it's pretty robust and mature for a 1.0 release. It's really well thought out, development is happening quickly, and it's got power behind it (Zend...well...they know PHP). Also, the license is great, BSD (All contributers have to submit an CLA, etc.).
What about people that want to sell an item by a certain time? Theoretically, this could extend the bidding indefinitely. I understand that it would mean they are making more money, but sometimes you just want it to END.
I see this kind of comment all the time, but to me it makes perfect sense. I don't know about you, but most of my meetings, etc are scheduled via E-Mail. It's already there, already open, so convenient...why not?
Somebody needs to set up a site where we can donate money to the OpenBSD project through PayPal or some other convenient method.
http://www.openbsd.org/donations.html
Person 1: How many ADHD kids does it take to screw in a light bulb?
Person 2: I don't know, how many?
Person 1: Wanna go ride bikes?
I'm Crazy Eddie...I put Babies on Spikes!
I thought this could ONLY happen in America.
Well, I have a Windows box on Verizon Wireless service (their cellular internet). Here is my traceroute:
tracert www.google.com
Tracing route to www.l.google.com [64.233.179.99]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 9.sub-66-174-217.myvzw.com [66.174.217.9]
2 Request timed out.
3 98.sub-66-174-30.myvzw.com [66.174.30.98]
4 161.sub-66-174-30.myvzw.com [66.174.30.161]
5 97.sub-66-174-101.myvzw.com [66.174.101.97]
6 65.sub-66-174-102.myvzw.com [66.174.102.65]
7 ge-6-1-133.hsa1.Sacramento1.Level3.net [64.158.148.1]
8 so-3-0-0.mpls1.Sacramento1.Level3.net [4.68.113.57]
9 as-3-0.bbr2.Washington1.Level3.net [4.68.128.206]
10 ae-12-53.car2.Washington1.Level3.net [4.68.121.83]
11 unknown.Level3.net [166.90.148.174]
12 72.14.238.232
13 72.14.238.97
14 66.249.95.124
15 72.14.238.155
16 72.14.238.182
17 64.233.179.99
Trace complete.
If your link worked, it would probably help (also, it's unconstitutional not unconstituitional):
Google: DOJ COPA law is unconstitutional
True, I don't "have anything to do with the publication of this site". However, I do publish sites, and hear similar things...not much bothers me more than "your site sucks" from someone who, for reasons unknown to me, feels they must continue to come back and visit my bad site just to tell me how bad it is.
:|
Hypersensitivty by association I suppose
Sure you can. Might want to point that out in your text though. If you read your comment you would assume that Taco is a PITA and his site sucks. If this is how you feel leave. If not, don't make it seem like that's how you feel.
It's also his site, and not the only one out there. If you dislike it so much why keep coming back? Have you no more intelligence than the dog that returns to it's own vomit?
http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/12/
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/29/1
http://politics.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/09
"It was hard getting the list down to ten, but we did; here's the top ten - (1)Wikipedia, (2)Firefox, (3)Open Office, (4)Bittorrent, (5)MediaWiki, (6)Xvid, (7)pbb, (8)Outfoxed, (9)dyne:bolic, (10)GIMP, (11)Apache and (12)SourceForge." Must be new math...6+6=10 now
I would assume it would become part of sentencing "300 hours community service, 1 year probation, and you must sign up for the new SMS indictment system" And even deals "We're willing to offer reduced sentence in exchange for names, and your voluntary involvement in the new SMS indictment program"
Also, having worked at a law firm before (albeit in the US), I can tell you that they will do ANYTHING to be in the courts' good graces. I can DEFINITELY see law firms making this mandatory for all employees (and making sure that the courts know they do this).
It gets better than that. A Mersenne Prime is a prime number that is one less than a power of 2 (like 3=4-1=2^2-1 and 7=81=2^31). Given this: M_n=2^n-1, you also know that for M_n to be a Mersenne Prime, n must be prime. So you don't even do calculations for the rest of the numbers. Read the whole snippet for more info.
After reading the full text of the article from the parent's link, a couple things stick out to me. First, he provides 2 excel files, one which he admits causes the exception to occur, but he says does NOT do anything malicious. Do you really trust him?
Secondly, he seems to be unable to count. He says you can claim to be "THE ONLY ONE IN THE WORLD possessing the knowledge about the vulnerability." He says Microsoft (whom he told) doesn't count. Seems to me that still leaves him and the buyer. I was always taught that 1+1=2
Just food for thought.
Article: http://www.djspyhunter.com.nyud.net:8090/teapot/20 05/12/rsstroom-reader-toilet-paper-printer.htmlp loaded_images/rsstroom_reader_restroom-761230.jpg
Picture: http://www.djspyhunter.com.nyud.net:8090/teapot/u
My point is: People aren't scared of it. They just need someone that they trust to recommend it to them. If you recommend it, and people are scared to use it, they might not trust your computer prowess. Tell them to go ask someone they DO trust.
I don't see any difference between what Google are doing here and what they do to index web sites.
The roam the web - they take local copies of every web page - they index those pages - then they display a 'snippet' of the page in response to a search query.
Same deal with the books. Scan them into a private archive, index the archive - display the title and a sentence or two of content to provide context. I see no problem with that.
The difference is, when people put something on the web, there is a sort of understanding that it is public information (of course, there are exceptions in password protected areas/pages, etc...but for the most part, it's public). The people that wrote these books were not under that same understanding when their book was published. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for Google archiving books. It'll be a huge plus for students, not to mention to me personally. However, I DO see where the writers are coming from. IMO though...they need to get over it, or opt out. Am I mistaken, or can they send in a list of their books that they DON'T want scanned? How hard is it for a writer to submit a list of his/her books if he/she doesn't want them indexed?
Created on..............: 2005-Jun-08.
/.ers constantly stalking google, I'm surprised no one noticed this until recently.
With all the
gmail.com is to mail.google.com as http://googlebase.com/ will be to base.google.com?
They have a history of marketing "repackaged" old stuff with the new. They made the top load NES when they did SNES. They did the Newer gameboy style at the same time as the gameboy color. Etc, Etc. It seems to work for them.