Slashdot Mirror


Mozilla Lightning 0.1 Released

Mini-Geek writes "MozillaZine is reporting that Lightning 0.1 is released. Lightning is a new Mozilla-made calendar extension for Mozilla Thunderbird that will eventually (once it becomes more mature and stable) be built into Thunderbird. From the article: 'The Lightning Project is a redesign of the Calendar component. Its goal is to tightly integrate calendar functionality (scheduling, tasks, etc.) into Mozilla Thunderbird.'"

198 comments

  1. Screenshots :) by B3ryllium · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm using it at home already. Screenshots at my blog.

    1. Re:Screenshots :) by eMartin · · Score: 1

      From your blog: "Note: Large images are in PNG format, older versions of IE may have difficulty displaying them"

      That's a bit smug, don't you think? After all, older versions of MOST browsers may have difficulty displaying PNG images, and the ones you posted don't use transparency, which is IE's main problem.

    2. Re:Screenshots :) by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      You have a fair point. I thought about the transparency issue as I was typing that in, even. I guess I could edit the story and correct it :)

    3. Re:Screenshots :) by shokk · · Score: 1

      I would have been much more interested in the tabbed mail view for Thunderbird.
      http://www.flickr.com/photos/69903184@N00/70869729 /

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    4. Re:Screenshots :) by goodenoughnickname · · Score: 1

      Man, you live a busy life. Did Megan's chiropratic appointment go well?

      (Or shall I say "chiropract" -- where's the word wrap?)

    5. Re:Screenshots :) by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Am I missing something, I can't add attendees to events. Isn't that the whole point of contact integration.. where else can you use contacts?

    6. Re:Screenshots :) by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      zomg! I can't run Quake 4 on Windows 0.1! Something is teh wrong!

      Wait for it. If you don't want to wait, help out. If you don't want to do either of those, this is not the extension you are looking for.

    7. Re:Screenshots :) by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Well duh.. I read on the lightning page that it has contact integration and I was just wondering if there was any place I could test this. Obviously its not working. Though I'm glad as hell they finally got a thunderbird version because a standalone calendar without email is just plain useless.

    8. Re:Screenshots :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't sound smug, it's the only browser the rest of the world knows.

  2. its the biggest difference between Outlook by Zantetsuken · · Score: 0, Redundant
    So I think its great that its being souped up, the only reason I would EVER use outlook over thunderbird is calendars, but that would be if I used em in the first place

    cool looks like 1st post

    1. Re:its the biggest difference between Outlook by fireboy1919 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Group sharing of contacts, resources, etc?

      Scheduling with multiple complex calendars? Meeting invitations and e-mail reminders seemlessly included (and able to be sent from one outlook client to another)?

      A lot of that is based on the fact that you're using outlook as an exchange client.
      I definitely believe that Exchange is a steaming pile. It crashes frequently and has severe problems when the data in it exceeds a certain size for no good reason. Occasionally it corrupts itself.

      It takes an expert in Exchange to administer despite the fact that the tasks that it is designed to handle are relatively simple concepts. (In contrast, SQL Server, which does something far more complicated to understand is actually easier to administer, IMHO, because it mostly works right).

      However, at a lot of places we're all stuck with it, and with Outlook, until we've got a complete scheduling and e-mail solution that has features that are close.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    2. Re:its the biggest difference between Outlook by croddy · · Score: 5, Funny

      The next step is that Thunderbird+Lightning will be integrated into Firefox -- and then we'll finally have the Mozilla-based internet suite we've all been waiting for!

    3. Re:its the biggest difference between Outlook by GundamFan · · Score: 1

      Hum... that would be a bit full circle...
      I always thought T-Bird and F-Fox where supposed to be stand alone products.

      The intigration between the two is actual pretty good as it is... in fact I would say that having one product that does it all may not always be a good thing I don't always want T-Bird to grab my mail just because I want to surf the web for instance.

      --
      I don't give a damn for a man that can only spell a word one way.
      Mark Twain
    4. Re:its the biggest difference between Outlook by ooze · · Score: 1

      That doesn't happen in Seamonkey too. If they figure out a good way that all Mozilla application share the same Gecko runtime, I'd even switch over. But apparantly they don't which means for each open Mozilla application you have an additional 20MB copy of the runtime in memory.

      --
      Just because I can imagine doing a hippopotamus, doesn't mean I'd like to do it.
    5. Re:its the biggest difference between Outlook by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      When I have to rank Microsoft's products, I usually put SQL Server on third, right behind the natural keyboards and optical mice.

    6. Re:its the biggest difference between Outlook by Marc2k · · Score: 1

      ...the joke was that Mozilla itself is a full Internet suite, and Firefox was their answer to users' complaints that it was heavily-bloated when they would primarily use it for one or two things.

      --
      --- What
    7. Re:its the biggest difference between Outlook by trixtah · · Score: 1

      Speak for yourself. We've been running Exchange 2003 for two years now, and the only downtime we've had for non-patching needs was when we had a hard disk failure on one of the boxes. 9 Exchange servers distributed over Australia.

      I get maybe 1-2 Exchange-related calls a week from 3500 users, most of which are stupid things like "I'm in cache mode and delayed send doesn't work!". I wish it *did* bloody work, but there's MS for you (apparently the *majority* of people don't use the functionality, thus no need for them to make it work in cache mode).

  3. Confused by SeanHayward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I thought lightning comes before thunder.

    --
    If I found in my own ranks that a certain number of guys wanted to cut my throat, I'd make sure that I cut their throat.
    1. Re:Confused by Sebilrazen · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...only on her birthday.

      --
      "There are no facts, only interpretations." --Friedrich Nietzsche.
    2. Re:Confused by theurge14 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but thunder only happens when it's raining.

    3. Re:Confused by Ecko7889 · · Score: 1

      I highly doubt that statement is true. Condensation has nothing to do with thunder or lightning.

      --
      $sig$
    4. Re:Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe so, but I want to see the sunshine after the rain

    5. Re:Confused by GWTPict · · Score: 1

      From Dreams by Fleetwood Mac from 1977's Rumours album. Damn, my age is showing again.

    6. Re:Confused by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      I know what you mean. That was the best-selling record of all time... at one point.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  4. Mail + Calendar?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why must calendar apps be merged with mail apps? Seriously?

    1. Re:Mail + Calendar?! by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Outlook reason is that you can notify others by email when you'll be booking a room or away for a meeting.

      I don't understand hy the integration is taking so long. Sunbird has been around for a year or more and it's slow as molassas in February. I try to use it but it's such a hog that it pains me to leave it running. It should be 500Kb big, and open in 2 seconds on a P4. This is 2006, we should be demanding applications that open in blazing speeds, not more features.

    2. Re:Mail + Calendar?! by Aspirator · · Score: 1

      I thought that a *nix philosophy was
      "do one thing and do it well"

      This merging of functions is the path to feature bloat.

    3. Re:Mail + Calendar?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason for this is simple, we dont have many devs, we have about 5 devs that are working on this, and a few that come and go. So code up or shut up.

    4. Re:Mail + Calendar?! by Threni · · Score: 1

      >I thought that a *nix philosophy was
      >"do one thing and do it well"

      Maybe.

      >This merging of functions is the path to feature bloat.

      It seems obvious to me that a calender and an email client make a pretty good match, because you use email to arrange stuff to do. If "feature bloat" is another way of saying "increasing the functionality of your programs" then yeah, I'm a big fan of it.

      Having said that, I don't use Thunderbird, because I only use Gmail now (through Firefox), so having it as a plug-in to Firefox would work for me (though to be honest I don't have much use for calender software, because I'm perfectly happy with the 2006 pocket diary I bought for 30p).

      Perhaps what is needed is a plug-in standard for any app - email client, browser, whatever, where you'd add a plug-in plug-in, and then you could add whatever you wanted to it (assuming the host app, ie Firefox, Thunderbird etc) could provide the functionality (email database, web access etc) you were after.

    5. Re:Mail + Calendar?! by kamochan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In a corporate environment, scheduling and email go hand in hand, which is why I'm glad to see the MozCal project finally take steps forward.

      I still agree with parent. Mac OSX has separate email and calendar (and address book) apps, which do their own things, but still integrate nicely together. Speedwise beat the Mozilla apps as well. Worthy of learning from, IMHO.

    6. Re:Mail + Calendar?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >It seems obvious to me that a calender and an email client make a pretty good match, because you use email to arrange stuff to do.

      Email is not to "arrange stuff to do", it's to communicate.

      You don't see any calendar functions in MSN messenger, do you?

    7. Re:Mail + Calendar?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      So code up or shut up

      Wow. Thanks for convincing me Sunbird is a waste of time. Wow.

    8. Re:Mail + Calendar?! by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      Err...Right. Mail + spamfilter = bad. Mail + encryption = bad. Whatever you say.

      There's a difference between needed features and bloat.

    9. Re:Mail + Calendar?! by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 2, Funny

      >> and it's slow as molassas in February

      Try it in May or June. Its usually faster around that time of the year.

    10. Re:Mail + Calendar?! by Valdoran · · Score: 1
      You don't see any calendar functions in MSN messenger, do you?
      Oh, please, don't give 'em any ideas. :|
    11. Re:Mail + Calendar?! by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 1

      As in communicating that I am holding a meeting next tuesday, and would like you and 20 others to attend, and you communicataing back that you will or won't be there, and possibly me having to reschedule that meeting to a different time, and you agreeing or disagreeing to be there, all without having to open up a calendar program and retype all the details?

      No, I guess I don't see how email and calendaring might be related.

    12. Re:Mail + Calendar?! by Threni · · Score: 1

      > Email is not to "arrange stuff to do", it's to communicate.

      I use email to arrange stuff to do.

      > You don't see any calendar functions in MSN messenger, do you?

      No, but MSN messenger isn't an email program.

    13. Re:Mail + Calendar?! by danheretic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The very simple answer to that is because users want it. It doesn't matter if it's a smart idea, or efficient, or flies in the face of the project's original philosophies. At some point you have to decide if you are creating software for your benefit or for the users'. The users want/demand an integrated email/calendar app. If Mozilla doesn't supply it, someone else will. (And does.) If Mozilla does supply it, it will likely be better than other similar products. Either way, the users who want an integrated email/calendar app will use one -- whether or not Mozilla makes one. You are not going to change their (collective) minds about it. Personally, I would rather see Thunerbird become a bit more bloated (or have an offshoot) and still be able to convert Joe User away from Outscum.

    14. Re:Mail + Calendar?! by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 1

      "we have about 5 devs that are working on this, and a few that come and go. So code up or shut up."

      Assuming you're on the Sunbird team [or lightning] and were wondering why no one but 4 others are helping you, your attitude might play a loarge roll. Not everyone can code well enough to help in that regard, so if you don't take constructive criticism, try taking your own advice and code up AND shut up, and let Mozilla's PR team handle the public.

    15. Re:Mail + Calendar?! by rosciol · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While I agree with a lot of the separation of function items that people brought to light, I think that the reason, besides the fact that Microsoft did it first, is because a calendar application that's not interfaced in a convenient manner to a communications mechanism is not nearly so useful as one that is. Outlook Calendar wouldn't be used at all if it weren't true that I could send out a meeting invite to a hundred people, whose calendars I just checked, and receive responses. Unless you're going to integrate an e-mail backbone to a calendaring application, which puts you in the same problem in reverse, having tight integration of a calendaring application with its natural mate, a communications application for coordination, is actually a pretty reasonable approach. Offline calendars are always going to suffer from this problem, because every person you want to coordinate with will need specialized software and will need to be using your calendaring application (yes, I understand that is the case for basically every calendar+mail out there). To me, the easiest way to get away from the whole mess is to move to online calendar systems. Hyperlinks are already fully integrated into standard e-mail functionality, so online calendar systems have an existing usable integration mechanism, no proprietary anything required. And online calendars make sense for a whole slew of other reasons as well. When's Google's calendaring application going to be done anyway?

    16. Re:Mail + Calendar?! by I_M_Noman · · Score: 1
      In a corporate environment, scheduling and email go hand in hand
      They never used to until Outlook. We used to use OnTime at one place I worked, which was a dedicated calendaring app that was not tied to e-mail. It required its own server, which everyone read from, and calendar updates were instantaneous. When I got to my current firm and saw that they were using a calendaring app that relied on e-mail to send notifications, I was confused.

      Bottom line, calendaring and e-mail need not go "hand in hand".

    17. Re:Mail + Calendar?! by kamochan · · Score: 1

      When I got to my current firm and saw that they were using a calendaring app that relied on e-mail to send notifications, I was confused.

      Bottom line, calendaring and e-mail need not go "hand in hand".

      You are absolutely right. It just results in manual mucking about when you need to schedule across organizations, which a) might not be using the same scheduling app, and/or b) might not have access to the other's app... It wasn't too long ago when this was actually the norm. What a PITA.

      I'm of course a consultant, who by definition constantly works with multiple organizations, so the topic hits sort of close to home. For a single shop solution, a dedicated calendaring app might be quite sufficient even these days.

    18. Re:Mail + Calendar?! by AaronCampbell · · Score: 1

      I see this kind of comment all the time, but to me it makes perfect sense. I don't know about you, but most of my meetings, etc are scheduled via E-Mail. It's already there, already open, so convenient...why not?

    19. Re:Mail + Calendar?! by Q2Serpent · · Score: 1

      Don't confuse the UNIX philosophy with zero features.

      Mail + spamfilter = good, if the spam filter is a separate (library | application | plugin). This means that I can use the spamfilter of my choice (or even write one) with the mail program as long as it interfaces correctly.

      What is bad is a mail program with an embedded spam filter that you can't rip out and change. This sort of lock-in sucks. Better ways of doing things come along all the time, and if I have to change my mail and spam filter setup because I want to use a new encryption plugin, what's the use?

    20. Re:Mail + Calendar?! by mjtg · · Score: 1
      Why must calendar apps be merged with mail apps? Seriously?

      In big organisations, lots of people (especially those higher up the food chain) live, work and breath by their electronic calendars. Communication between calendars, via vCalendar/iCalendar or whatever, can theoretically be done using any number of transport protocols, but the only one that is universally implemented is by SMTP.

      Hence, if you want to set meetings with someone through your electronic calendar, you need one that is integrated with a mail application.

      And, since the people who want this functionality are generally senior people in large organisations, there is a big demand for it, and the dollars to pay for it. And where there is demand and $$$, there is usually good supply.

      That's why.

      I work in an organisation of about 1000 people, where nearly everyone uses Lotus Notes. About 10 of us run Linux desktops. The other Linux users use Thunderbird, but I spend half my working life going to meetings, so I use Evolution - sadly, I couldn't survive with just Thunderbird. I've been waiting for Mozilla's calendar integration to mature so that I can at least consider switching to Thunderbird.

    21. Re:Mail + Calendar?! by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      You don't see any calendar functions in MSN messenger, do you?

      Actually, if you're running the whole shebang - AD, Exchange, Outlook and an internal MSN server - when you do things that are scheduled in your calendar (eg: go to a meeting, go to lunch) your IM presence is automatically updated to reflect that. It's quite nice.

  5. Pocket PC Compatability by alphax45 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Too bad my pocket PC will only properly sync with Outlook. Althoug to be honest Outlook 2003 is not that bad. I would still like to try an open source based e-mail client, but until it will sync with my PDA correctly I can't make the switch.

    --
    K Man
    1. Re:Pocket PC Compatability by hhghghghh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Too bad my pocket PC will only properly sync with Outlook. Althoug to be honest Outlook 2003 is not that bad. I would still like to try an open source based e-mail client, but until it will sync with my PDA correctly I can't make the switch. Blame either the makers of PockerPC or the makers of Outlook for that. You'd almost think they're conspiring to prevent people from being able to switch..

    2. Re:Pocket PC Compatability by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      That's my upcoming dilemma. I use a different app for my pocket pc for calendars (Informant). Thing is, although they don't have a desktop version, they use the outlook database, so all my contacts and calendar is in Outlook. My email is Tbird. I'm not too sorry that email isn't mobile for me - I carry too much shit around in my email (pop server, never delete the local versions). I'm getting a real admin asst soon, and we'll need to share calendars and contacts. Which, economically, means MS SBS. I'm not looking forward to it, to be honest. Add that to my (hopefully) impending switch from cell and pda to cell/pda combination, and outlook is getting less and less seperable from me. Not a comfortable felling, I assure you.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    3. Re:Pocket PC Compatability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? If you're not already dependent on exchange, why start? There are plenty of webbased calendaring solutions that can manage schedules, contacts, and so on. Try a few of them out and see if they won't do what you need (especially for only two people).

    4. Re:Pocket PC Compatability by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      You lost me at "webbased". I'm not on the 'net for a good portion of the time I need to work in my calendar and contact app. I also need the calendar to sync with my pda, as that's all I have in the field sometimes. Since I'm not in a big city, WiFi doesn't exist, and I can't even get mobile internet in about 1/2 of my area (analog only cell coverage, where coverage even exists).

      Nope, I'm tied to a local solution, with periodic updates over a shared internal network. If I could find a way out, I would, but part of the problem is that I don't have much time for research (too busy with "work"). I can't even express how happy I'd be to ditch MS Outlook. Heck, it doesn't even do what I need it too, and it's phenomenally annoying at times, but it's running and it keeps my appointments and contacts, and it doesn't involve spending time to re-work.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    5. Re:Pocket PC Compatability by Orkie · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't exactly describe them as conspiring since they are both Microsoft...

    6. Re:Pocket PC Compatability by M-G · · Score: 1

      That noise you heard was the joke going right over your head...

    7. Re:Pocket PC Compatability by Klaruz · · Score: 4, Informative

      Have you heard of FinchSync?

      http://www.finchsync.com/

      FinchSync is a tool for synchronizing contacts, appointments and tasks from Mozilla email and calendar products with a Pocket PC.

    8. Re:Pocket PC Compatability by adolfojp · · Score: 1

      I like to use EssentialPIM on the desktop. The non free version includes PocketPC connectivity. There is even a "portable" version for thumb drives.

      http://www.essentialpim.com/

      No, I don't work for the company, I just like their app ;-)

      Needless to say, I would love to see the lightning project finished and connecting with PocketPC.

    9. Re:Pocket PC Compatability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I hadn't. Glad to know now.

      Thanks!

    10. Re:Pocket PC Compatability by BiDi · · Score: 1

      Why blame anyone for not doing the stuff to help the non-idiot computer users? It's not where the money is. Remember... it's called software development - and when there is money involved there are idiots involved. Smart people don't pay for 1s and 0s.

      For intelligent users all there is needed is some kind of "outcrap emulator" that will simulate running outlook spyware & spam sucing software on your computer and you're all set - the sync software will think of you as an idiot outlook (l)user and will not complain. It will simply sync with an emulator, the emulator will take care of the rest and make exportable data files or even integrate with superior products out there.

    11. Re:Pocket PC Compatability by jrockway · · Score: 1

      > You lost me at "webbased". I'm not on the 'net for a good portion of the time I need to work in my calendar and contact app. I also need the calendar to sync with my pda, as that's all I have in the field sometimes. Since I'm not in a big city, WiFi doesn't exist, and I can't even get mobile internet in about 1/2 of my area (analog only cell coverage, where coverage even exists).

      The other 99.9% of the world sits in front of their desktop computer all day, then goes home. You might need something special, but most people don't.

      I personally use emacs calendar, which is conveniently integrated with an e-mail client and text editor. What other calendaring program has emacs-style keybindings?

      --
      My other car is first.
  6. other calendaring solutions by slackaddict · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This question is aimed at those who use this type of software heavily: how does the Mozilla option compare to some web-based solutions like, say, the calendaring option for the SquirrelMail project?

    --
    ConsultingFair.com
    1. Re:other calendaring solutions by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

      SquirellMail requires, um, a web server?

      Seriously, I view remote apps as dangerous and uncontrollable. I don't have an IT staff, or a local webserver. I'm on my laptop most of the time, and (around me) there are precious few places I can get on the 'net when I'm out of the office, and most of them wan't me to pay several dollars for an hour or two of time (no, I don't live in/near a big city). Online apps don't work for me, and certainly not for a mission critical app like my calendar.

      Unfortuntaly, unless (or until) lightining will synch with my pda, I can't really use it.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    2. Re:other calendaring solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realise that you can install a web server on your laptop and use SquirrelMail locally, don't you?

    3. Re:other calendaring solutions by DavidpFitz · · Score: 1
      Seriously, I view remote apps as dangerous and uncontrollable. I don't have an IT staff, or a local webserver. I'm on my laptop most of the time, and (around me) there are precious few places I can get on the 'net when I'm out of the office
      Luckily for me, .Mac gives me the best of both worlds. I can get to my calendar through the .Mac web site and I can also get at it offline using iCal from my laptop.

      Surely there's something similar for other operating systems?
    4. Re:other calendaring solutions by jacksonj04 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sadly not. .Mac is one of the main reasons I'm thinking of moving to Macs entirely, new desktop and laptop. If they released a PDA, I would switch without a second thought.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    5. Re:other calendaring solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but you're comparing server-side tools to client-side tools. .....Apples != Oranges.......

      What they are trying to achieve here is a IMO, a categorical replacement of some of the functionality in Outlook.

      When Thunderbird eventually comes to fruition, and it will with advances like this, ALL my users will be switched over. At that point the only thing left will be FULL FEATURED PDA sync'ing to Thunderbird (see full functionality equivalent sync to Outlook).

      If you want to talk about Webmail comparisons, features, and functionality please do so. Otherwise please stay on topic!!!!!

    6. Re:other calendaring solutions by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The biggest problem with this solution is that it's all client side. Outlook is a combination of client side and server side functionality. For example, if I accept a meeting request, put it on my calendar, and then go home. I can access my calendar from anywhere and see what my schedule is without having to connect to my desktop machine.

      Now, sure, there are various workarounds. You could use a VPN and store all your calendar information on an smb share or nfs drive, but that's pretty slow, not to mention that it requires a great deal of configuration to set up.

      Outlook/Exchange work very well for what they do, even if they suck in many other ways. The end user experience is largely "it just works" for every condition they might want.

    7. Re:other calendaring solutions by rayde · · Score: 3, Funny

      you sir, are in luck ;)

    8. Re:other calendaring solutions by Kool+Moe · · Score: 1

      Outlook is a client/server combination assuming you're willing to shell out the cash, and headaches, of Exchange.
      I imagine a Thunderbird calendar would at least support the iCAL format so you could publish it to your own WebDAV server and access it from anywhere, just as you could with Outlook/Exchange, but without the huge cost overhead.
      KM

      --
      Kinda like Moe, but just a little more Kool
    9. Re:other calendaring solutions by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      I've looked at Newtons quite intently, and I don't think they offer the same level of integration with modern systems. A new one would probably end up compatable with the iPod Dock Connector, have a hard disk, and sychronise with your .Mac account over WiFi - the sync is the most important feature to me.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    10. Re:other calendaring solutions by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      But then everyone else (okay, my admin asst - nobody else cares) could only access my calendar when I was on the local net, and that doesn't help. And I have to run a webserver and squirrelmail, just to get my calendar. Seems kind bassackwards...and I've already got that with Outlook (the bassackwardness, that is).

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  7. Finally! by Tezkah · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Anyone remember this from like a year ago? I've switched from Windows to Linux, and I use Evolution just for its calendar feature (I've been using Gmail for my email with Firefox for at least a year now). It's great how it integrates with GNOME's calendar and shows appointments and the like.

    Lightning? Hopefully it is useful to get people to switch away from Outlook, but its the lack of Exchange support that matters to most people, Hopefully that gets added soon!

    good work mozilla lightning team!

    1. Re:Finally! by archen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think you're kind of missing the big picture here, and that is cross platform capability. I use Kontact myself so I could care less about this but lets consider a company that is tired of MS Windows. Or better yet is stuck on legacy desktops that the newest version of MS Office won't support - that will be many of us soon. Well we could say, everyone stop - now we use Linux! Yay! But that shit doesn't happen because you're goiong to end up with a migration period, and that COULD be years!

      By having something that lets people talk on OSX, Windows, BSD, Linux or whatever you, give a corperation an agnostic solution that lets them transition at their own pace. Personally I'm not convinced with the whole stuffing email/callandaring together, but some swear by it... which is why we have this in the first place.

    2. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without Exchange support this is a non-starter in most corporate environments.

      Don't get me wrong -- I hate Outlook and Exchange. I absolutely have to interoperate with the corporate Exchange server and I want a decent alternative to Outlook (on Windows by the way).

    3. Re:Finally! by lixee · · Score: 1

      Evolution's wonderfully integrated with GNOME. The only trouble for me is that it doesn't allow calendar web publishing,

      --
      Res publica non dominetur
  8. Info on Google Calendar by xmas2003 · · Score: 1

    Slashdot discussed Google Calendar over a year ago - wonder what is the holdup for them ...

    --
    Hulk SMASH Celiac Disease
    1. Re:Info on Google Calendar by MagicM · · Score: 2, Informative

      CL2 was discussed here more recently than that.

    2. Re:Info on Google Calendar by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Discused on Slashdot this March 10th. Apparently it's in closed beta. (A beta beta?)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:Info on Google Calendar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you look closely at that thread on the google calendar, the second comment asks "...Google would soon be offering VOIP. Remember that? We're still waiting..."

      Well there you have it. We've got that VOIP through Google Talk and everything else should fall into place soon enough!

  9. Sunbird? by Moby+Cock · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What ever happened to Mozilla Sunbird? That was a calendar project too.

    1. Re:Sunbird? by fosterNutrition · · Score: 5, Informative

      Lightning and Sunbird share the same codebase, and therefore have the exact same functionality and bugs, but Sunbird is standalone, whereas Lightning requires Thunderbird or the like.

      I used Sunbird for a little while a while back, and while it is a step in the right direction, it really needs a lot of work. Of course, this new release may have fixed all the bugs that irked me, and it is of course only version 0.1 - and with that in mind, Sunbird/Lightning really is a factor to consider, but not quite ready for widespread use. When it is though, it will be good.

    2. Re:Sunbird? by Lord+Satri · · Score: 1

      Go to http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/

      You'll find out they haven't forgot Sunbird. It seems Lightning is 'Sunbird within Thunderbird'. Correct me if I misunderstood :-)

    3. Re:Sunbird? by MikeyTheK · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, I believe you're both wrong. Sunbird can run standalone, within Firefox, within Thunderbird, or within the Mozz desktop suite. The only reason I know this is because I was trying to make it work with a certain Yahoo Day Planner widget (the 0.2 version of Sunbird does work, the 0.3 version does not). I am asking the same question - why do we care about Lightning?

      --
      Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies.
      Never forget: 2 + 2 = 5 for extremely large values of 2.
    4. Re:Sunbird? by MSG · · Score: 5, Informative

      Lightning and Sunbird share the same codebase, and therefore have the exact same functionality and bugs

      That's not quite it. Sunbird and Mozilla Calendar share the same codebase, and therefore have the same functionality and bugs. The difference between them is *only* packaging. Sunbird is packaged as a standalone app, while Mozilla Calendar is an extension for Firefox or Thunderbird.

      Lightning, however, is a Thunderbird extention that puts the calendar UI directly in the Thunderbird window. The calendar provided by Sunbird/Mozilla Calendar uses a separate window. The group of products probably shares a codebase for handling calendar and related data, but the UI code is different between Lightning and the others. It's going to have its own share of bugs and features.

    5. Re:Sunbird? by GbrDead · · Score: 1

      while (while) while();

    6. Re:Sunbird? by MSG · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sunbird is the name given to the standalone distribution of the old calendar application. The XPI extension for Thunderbird or Firefox was named Mozilla Calendar. Aside from packaging, they were basically the same application. So, as a minor correction, "Sunbird" does not run within the other Mozilla products, the Mozilla Calendar does.

      Lightning is a completely different UI, designed to integrate better with Thunderbird than the Calendar application does. It'll provide some of the same things that Outlook does, which would have been moderately difficult, and possibly confusing in the old Calendar application.

    7. Re:Sunbird? by MikeyTheK · · Score: 1

      Whoops. I clearly misread the Sunbird and Calendar pages http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/. Apologies, all. In the second section, I quote:

      Calendar vs. Sunbird

      Calendar is the calendar extension for Mozilla products such as Mozilla Firefox,Mozilla Thunderbird, Seamonkey and the Mozilla Application Suite.

      Sunbird is the standalone form of the calendar extension, which means that it doesn't need one of the above mentioned applications to run. Sunbird and Calendar use the same base code so their functionality is virtually the same and they share the same bugs and bug fixes. Some features currently depend on the underlying product:


      and, further down the same page:
      Tuesday, March 14th, 2006:
      The Calendar team is proud to announce the first official release of the new Lightning extension: Lightning 0.1 for Windows, Linux and Mac OS X. This is a major milestone on the road to an integrated calendar for users of the award-winning mail-client Mozilla Thunderbird. Thanks go to all developers, testers and other supporters of the project.

      --
      Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies.
      Never forget: 2 + 2 = 5 for extremely large values of 2.
  10. What about by Kelz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Corporate functionality? I'll be quite a few IT people would love to see a viable open source E-mail/corporate calender program (though MSO is so entrenched in many systems it would be damn near impossible to uproot it now...). This could be a big plus for newer businesses.

    1. Re:What about by rayde · · Score: 1

      then the question becomes, will it be able to interact with MS Exchange or Exchange equivalents? That has got to be a consideration in some cases.

    2. Re:What about by rizzo420 · · Score: 1

      i'd like to see it interact with calendar sharing in exchange... i hate outlook, so this would be awesome if it did...

      --
      please me, have no regrets.
  11. Will it sync with Outlook Calender? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It will be really good, if it can sync with existing Outlook calender invite.
    Ex - You get a calender invite from outlook - your mozilla calender gets updated.
    Similarly when you send a calender invite, it should be able to sync with others outlook calender in the same way. (i.e. calender invite from lighting setting up schedule in outlook calenders)

    Since I am among the very people who use thunderbird in the office, and it is very *very* difficult since everybody else sends meeting requests in .ics formats.

    1. Re:Will it sync with Outlook Calender? by wed128 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed. The only reason i'm using Outlook Webaccess on my slackware box at home as opposed to Thunderbird is those god damned calender requests i keep getting from co-workers.

    2. Re:Will it sync with Outlook Calender? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I have a few clients with this same issue. They'd switch away from the Outlook headaches to Thunderbird in a second, but the problem of being sent Outlook invites/appointments nixes it.

      To me, this is pressing development need #1.

    3. Re:Will it sync with Outlook Calender? by galaga79 · · Score: 1

      I just installed the extension then and when you get sent an Outlook invitation it displays a message with the topic, start and end times, and whether you want to accept or decline the meeting.

      However it doesn't seem to work when I accept the meeting.

  12. Suitable Exchange compatible linux apps?? by lightyear4 · · Score: 1

    While I'm not a fan of Microsoft Exchange, there's no denying that it works. With that said, I require its use at work, yet I spend most of my days using my linux machine. And that Exchange web interface is just godawful.

    So I am wondering: What exchange compatible applications are Slashdotters using in linux?

    1. Re:Suitable Exchange compatible linux apps?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just kill Exchange! ;) We've been using Zimbra at work since their early beta releases. No more reboots... They's now got iSync support so it's trivial to work offline. They've also got a web based live demo.

    2. Re:Suitable Exchange compatible linux apps?? by richlv · · Score: 1

      mmm. getting it to integrate with stable lightning...
      btw, how hard was it to install zimbra ?
      i remember that installing openxchange was pretty awful experience.
      i'm somewhat concerned by the fact that some pretty important parts (mostly backup/restore of individual mailboxes) is not currently avilable under opensource licence (though i understand they have to motivate purchases somehow :) ). are you using opensource edition ?

      --
      Rich
  13. Why should mail and calendar be integrated? by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    At work we use GroupWise, and I find the integration most annoying. There is no connection between when I want to check my calendar, and when I want to send or read mail. Not to mention that I hate the GroupWise mail client, and use another when possible. I also hate the GroupWise calendar client, but I don't know if there are alternatives (I obviously need access to the information entered by our secretary, and she need to se the meetings I have entered).

    I understand that the calendars for the people in the workgroup need to be synchronized, but is email really the best protocol for that? And if so, does it need to be integrated in the same client?

    1. Re:Why should mail and calendar be integrated? by illiterate_light · · Score: 1

      I prefer an integrated mail/calendar app for one reason -- I'm always checking my mail, but I don't always check the calendar, and if the calendar is visible automatically when I'm checking/sending mail, then I don't forget to do the shit I tried to use the calendar to remind me. Otherwise, the calendar might sit dormant for a day because I don't think to check it, and then I miss an appointment that I'd forgotten about.

    2. Re:Why should mail and calendar be integrated? by 77Punker · · Score: 1

      It doesn't have anything to do with any e-mail protocol. It makes ical calendars. Currently, it's for keeping up with your own calendar and it just happens to be in an email client. Actually, it's just an extension. If you don't like it, don't get it.

    3. Re:Why should mail and calendar be integrated? by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      OTOH, why invent a new protocol for sending meeting invitations? Why not use email?

      But if you're set against the idea, one of the good things about Mozilla calendar is that it can be used standalone (Sunbird) or integrated (Lightning).

    4. Re:Why should mail and calendar be integrated? by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 1

      > OTOH, why invent a new protocol for sending meeting invitations? Why not use email?

      I don't want to send a mail to all my collegues that I'm at the dentist next monday. Most of them couldn't care less. However, I want them to be able to see that I will not be available, if they try to arrange something that day.

    5. Re:Why should mail and calendar be integrated? by CheeseTroll · · Score: 1

      Why would you send an email to your colleagues, instead of just creating a personal appointment on your GW calendar?

      --
      A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
    6. Re:Why should mail and calendar be integrated? by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Publish your free/busy times on a (WebDAV|FTP|NFS) share and let people subscribe to them. Free/busy times are part of the iCalendar standard and can be published from and read by Outlook; other programs could support them but not all have jumped on board.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    7. Re:Why should mail and calendar be integrated? by wiml · · Score: 1

      Hear, hear. A program should do one thing and do it well. I want my calendaring and my address book and my email client to coöperate, but I don't want them to be the same program. A program doing half-a-dozen unrelated things rarely does any of them well.

    8. Re:Why should mail and calendar be integrated? by misleb · · Score: 1

      What annoys me about Groupwise is that it totally lacks group calendaring! You'd think that an integrated system like that would do groups. You can proxy into another's calendar, but there is no way to invite a whole department (and check conflicts) to a meeting. WTF? Is this not the primary function of an institutional calendar? Or do most people really just schedule personal events?

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    9. Re:Why should mail and calendar be integrated? by Kool+Moe · · Score: 1

      Absolutely agree. I do a lot of email. It's nice at work to be able to click an email and add it to my calendar in a couple steps. I want to be able to do that at home too, where I don't run Outlook/Exchange.
      KM

      --
      Kinda like Moe, but just a little more Kool
    10. Re:Why should mail and calendar be integrated? by KmArT · · Score: 1

      Because probably the single biggest monopoly in the world produces software that has them "integrated". Most people can't see outside that paradigm. I personally would rather have two excellent stand alone apps that don't force me to use a proprietary protocol to interface with a proprietary backend system, rather than one bloated app (which runs on one operating system)...

    11. Re:Why should mail and calendar be integrated? by rsax · · Score: 1

      I don't think that's true. I'm using it right now and I can do a free/busy check among multiple invited people and if you look at the button in the top right corner of the client, the one with two people as the icon, it shows a multi-user calendar display. Basically each selected user's calendar side by side so you can get a quick look at what's going on in one shot.

    12. Re:Why should mail and calendar be integrated? by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 1

      The sad thing is that I wouldn't know if that is true. The interface is so byzantine that I have no clue about the capabilities of the product.

      Anyone know of a good, free calendar client that can hook up to whatever GroupWise use for a server?

      Their mail server has a pop3 interface, so I can use any client.

  14. Syncing with Thunderbird/Sunbird by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well, Finchsync is a program that allows you to sync your contacts with Thunderbird, and apparently your appointments with Sunbird (though that was broken last time I tried it).

  15. I just hope by norton_I · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I just hope they don't make thunderbird suck in the process. All I really want is a program that does mail that doesn't suck, and thunderbird is currently the closest I can find.

    1. Re:I just hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is an open source project if you don't want it to suck why don't you get off your fat ass and

      MAKE it not suck.

      instead of complaining to the internet

      you fucking hypocrite

    2. Re:I just hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's optional. Don't worry.

      Also, check out mutt.

    3. Re:I just hope by Iaughter · · Score: 1
      Not that anyone cares ...

      I totally agree with parent. I've been switching between mac mail and thunderbird for the past year and a half, trying to figure out which one sucks the least. Get disgusted with one and switch to the other for a few weeks.

      However, recently, I've been passing all my mail to my gmail account, which is set up to write the from address for my real email addresses, thereby avoiding the tackiness that is having a free, web-based email address as my primary account.

      Nowadways, I only use a fat email client, thunderbird, for S/MIME.

      Admittedly, I'm concerned about allowing a giant corporation to host all of my mail and not giving me the ability to encrypt any of it...

    4. Re:I just hope by TheDarkener · · Score: 1

      Also, check out mutt.

      If there was a reality show called Slashdot, they'd use you to say something like that right before they go to a commercial, to be witty.

      You clod.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  16. Beware of Known Dataloss Bugs by Alien54 · · Score: 1
    from the release notes

    Please be aware, that the use of nightly developer builds has some risks associated with it. Don't use them with production data.

    * There are KNOWN DATALOSS BUGS in the calendaring code.
    o Don't trust these builds with important calendaring or mail data
    o Always make backups (one possible strategy for Calendaring data backups is described at Calendar:WebDAV testing harness)

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  17. Make thunderbird more mature and stable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First they need to take care of Thunderbird...

    1. Re:Make thunderbird more mature and stable by Cunk · · Score: 1

      I agree. Thunderbird in its current form is an Outlook Express alternative. I couldn't care less about calendering as I never use it in Outlook anyway.

      --

      I am the inventor of the hilarious refrigerator alarm.
  18. Because MS did... by gentimjs · · Score: 1

    Seriously. Because MS merged thier calendar stuff with thier email stuff and now people expect them to be joined at the hip. Sad but simple.

  19. Integration by gatzke · · Score: 0

    Maybe later, they could develop a web page editor, IM chat client, then link it to a web browser.

    And we could call it Mozilla. Instead, we have five different projects with different names and weak integration. Crazy.

    1. Re:Integration by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I hear they plan to tie them all together into one project that does everything called "e-max".

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Integration by GotenXiao · · Score: 1

      You do realise they all share the same codebases, don't you? And integration isn't something that is neccesarily a good thing. *cough*IE*cough*

      --
      Goten Xiao
    3. Re:Integration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since I know how to use a text editor and don't use IM -- fuck off and take your bloat with you.

    4. Re:Integration by gatzke · · Score: 1

      Then why did they cut firefox out of mozilla?

      Browsing and email are the killer app for the internet.

      Calendaring solutions / meeting scheduling plus newsgroups are the killer app for business.

      Why not have a single application?

      Bloat oh no! We can't expect people to download a 15 MB executable! I like having a email notification in my browser. I like having links and copy past handled effectively.

  20. Telepathy by ricepudd · · Score: 0

    The number one feature I need for a calendar program is some form of telepathic link. I never have my on me when I need to make an appointment. If the Lightning developers include this feature then I'll be a convert for sure!

    1. Re:Telepathy by ricepudd · · Score: 0

      Erm, not only do I forget to carry my organiser around, I forget to include it in my slashdot comments too.

  21. Cant wait for palm sync condiuit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I can get this to sync with my treo or Clie I'd be a very happy camper.

  22. Agreed by thrill12 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I personally do not need a calendar, and I would stall any thunderbird upgrade if it ever contains one.
     
    Sleek, fast and trustworthy are a few keywords I put on the current thunderbird, and which is why I use it.
    If they have to do it, make it optional as a plugin or extension, as with every other major non-mail related feature.

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
    1. Re:Agreed by B3ryllium · · Score: 4, Informative

      Lighting is and always will be a Thunderbird plugin. It is not a separate product. It is a plugin for calendaring that integrates into the Thunderbird GUI. If you don't need it, don't install the extension. Simple as that.

  23. Calendar Necessary to Uproot Outlook by geoffrobinson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've seen it mentioned in this thread already, but I want to add my own emphasis.

    At least for corporations, people are tied to the clock/calendar. You can't disrupt the old tool until you can work with the old tool. Or, at the very least, be able to send meeting requests and import old calendar information into your new tool.

    It is the small things like the Calendar and PowerPoint and file formats which let expensive software cling to a corporation like a bad fungus.

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
    1. Re:Calendar Necessary to Uproot Outlook by rsax · · Score: 1

      And shared address book and a server component required to uproot Outlook and Exchange.

  24. Solaris 8 by g2devi · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know if there are any contrib builds for Solaris 8 as there are for Thunderbird and Firefox?

    Alternately, does anyone know if there are any Java based alternatives to Lightning? The default CDE calendar that's installed at work is ancient.

  25. How to integrate... by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1

    ...this functionality into the larger desktop OS, with interoperability with major software suites, now that is the trick! See, this software would enable people on all platforms to collaborate, and that will be a killer app that would put Outlook, a crappy program, out of the picture.

  26. Schedule templates? by Chairboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd like to see schedule templates for helping me organize my busy life. I suggest the following pre-made ones for typical Firefox users:

    The Leveller
    7:45AM-8:50AM - Worlds of Warcraft
    8:50AM-8:53AM - Ninja fast shower, gotta get to work!
    8:53AM-9:05AM - Drive to work, clock in late
    9:05AM-11:30AM - Read and post to WoW forums from work computer
    11:30AM-12:30PM - Lunch! Just enough time to get home and mob, try to get Enchanted Axe of Althar or something.
    12:30PM-5:30PM - Do enough work to keep that ass boss off your back, sell some WoW gold on eBay.
    5:30PM-6:00PM - Drive home, resolve to buy some groceries and make a real dinner
    6:00PM-6:10PM - Realize that Jack in the Box is faster, just get something there.
    6:10PM-1:00AM - Worlds of Warcraft
    1:00AM-7:45AM - Fitful sleep, plagued by dreams where nobody can read your chat messages in game.

    The GPLion
    9:30AM - Wake up, play some TuxRacer.
    9:32AM - Check for updates to KDE, hit slashdot.
    9:50AM - Finish writing screed defending Stalman while untarring a new nightly build in the background.
    9:55AM - Start a new kernel compiling, then head off to CS class.
    10:00AM - Listen to stupid Microsoft-loving professor tell me about stuff I'll never need. What do I care about 'big-endian' crap, this is COMPUTER SCIENCE, not freakin' Gulliver's Travels.
    11:15AM - Get out of class, eat the macaroni & cheese I brought in tupperware.
    12:00PM-2:45PM - Various classes about stuff I'll never use. Why do I need an english class? I _SPEAK_ english!
    3:00PM - 4:00PM - Spent telling the TA who runs the computer lab why their PSP is inferior to my Samsung phone that runs linux, demo java TuxRacer.
    4:00PM-6:00PM - Kernel has finished compiling at home, spend time trying to get computer working again.
    6:15PM - Post comment to blog about how easy it was to get the new kernel going, and how you don't understand the problems other people are having.
    7:00PM-10:00PM - Xena marathon! Watch on my MythTV setup. With this transparent weather overlay over the screen, I can totally tell what the weather is like outside, even if the audio is out of sync, it's STILL better than a goddamned tivo.
    10:00PM-11:00PM - Porn.

    The Hipster
    7:00AM - Wake up with gentle alarm clock
    7:15AM - Bagel and LOX down at the coffee house.
    8:00AM - Bicycle to work while listening to all my podcasts on my Apple iPod(tm)
    9:00AM - Start work, be sure to check all my RSS feeds.
    12:00PM - Lunch. Did someone say sushi?
    1:00PM - Back to work, adjust my square DKNY glasses and buckle down for at least an hour of email, then back to websites.
    2:00PM - Boba/Bubble tea break!
    5:00PM - Outta work, begin bicycling home.
    6:30PM - Get home.
    7:00PM - Dinner time, zagats sez to try that place on 14th.
    9:00PM - Start watching all my Tivo'd shows, all PBS of course. I don't keep the idiot box for anything but PBS. Oh, and maybe Lost, and the Simpsons, but don't tell.

    1. Re:Schedule templates? by anzev · · Score: 2, Funny

      And yet, in your busy schedule you managed to find a way to post this much bs to Slashdot. Brilliant! Who's your time manager and can I rent her/him?

    2. Re:Schedule templates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>>7:15AM - Bagel and LOX down at the coffee house.

      Liquid Oxygen? I suppose that will wake you up pretty quickly...

    3. Re:Schedule templates? by sootman · · Score: 1

      You forgot one:
      Hipster
      8:20 AM - get hit by a car due to biking while listening to an iPod

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    4. Re:Schedule templates? by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Lox is smoked salmon fillet that has been cured and then often cold-smoked. The cold smoking does not cook the fish, resulting in its characteristic smooth texture, similar to the raw product.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    5. Re:Schedule templates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps GP is making fun of the SUPERFLUOUS CAPITALIZATION which implied that LOX is an ACRONYM?

    6. Re:Schedule templates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly you have never ORDERED at a NEW YORK DELI. The capitalization is for EMPHASIS and ensures that your ORDER is properly FILLED. (It also makes you seem like an ASS when ordering.)

  27. Closer to an end-to-end solution. by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 1

    Even though us geeks tend to see little value in having a calendar bolted to an email program, there are lots of people out there who just can't seem to live without it. So this is a good first step.

    But don't go looking for the one big server app that's going to be the "Exchange Killer" that goes with it. That's not how the open source world is answering that challenge. Exchange will not be a Goliath felled by David, it will be more like a Gulliver restrained by multiple Lilliputians. This is because programs like Lightning aren't being written to work with a single server -- they're using Webcal (iCalendar publish/subscribe over HTTP, made popular by Apple of course) and can talk to groupware servers like Citadel and OpenGroupware today. Further on down the line, connectors will become available for the emerging standard GroupDAV protocol. For more complex server-side logic, eventually CalDAV will come out of draft as well.

    It's going to be a great world. Finally, after all these years of delay, group calendaring and scheduling will be as open, interoperable, and non-dominated-by-one-player as email is today.

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
  28. Can I be the first to say by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

    F'n finally? I get the outlook itch when I want some calendering done, and anweb browser extension or stand alone app just isnt cutting it. I need it intergrated into my email client when I'm actually, you know, emailing people about dates and events.

  29. So - the next will be to integrate Firefox? by silverdr · · Score: 0

    Mozilla was pretty stagnant before somebody disbundled all the components and let them grow alone. Now is this news a sign of someone willing to combine the stuff back into a single app?

    --
    Now, mod me down freely. My karma can't get any worse...
  30. What's needed is better interprocess communication by Animats · · Score: 2, Interesting
    One huge problem in the Linux world is that there's no standard approach to inter-application communication. The Windows world has had a single solution for fifteen years. (One can argue that COM isn't very good, but it's always there.) OpenOffice uses their own implementation of CORBA. Firefox and Mozilla have some private intercommunication scheme. Most other programs don't talk well at all.

    This is an old, old problem with UNIX. In the beginning, there were pipes, which are unidirectional. There were signals, which were badly botched in early UNIX, resulting in several redesigns, all different, with the end result that nobody could trust signals. Then came sockets, which were bidirectional but oriented towards talking to services on remote machines, not interprocess peer to peer communication locally. There's still no standard, always-there way for one program in the UNIX world to call another and get an answer back. There are about five CORBA implementations, there's OpenRPC, there's Java RMI, and there are a few other schemes not used much. But mostly, there's not much talking back and forth, other than at the file and pipe level or to a remote server.

    I often wonder how UNIX history might have been different if a facility for this had been there from the early days. In UNIX, one program can invoke another, passing a set of command line arguments and environment variables. But all that comes back is a return code. How different it might have been if you got back output arguments. Then programs could have called other programs as subroutines.

    Or if UNIX/Linux had had good interprocess communication from the early days.

  31. Sunbird? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what is this thing now? What about Sunbird? I don't get it. Is this just a case of duplicate effort or did Sunbird become Lightning or ...?

  32. Digg.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good to know Slashdot is becoming the late reporting cousin of Digg.com

    1. Re:Digg.com by amrust · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Good to know this 'Digg.com' still apparently needs to troll Slashdot with their domain name, in order to generate any semblance of interest or traffic.

      --
      VOTE!
    2. Re:Digg.com by michaelhood · · Score: 1

      www.digg.com

      Estimated 5,873,100 visitor sessions in the last 30 days.

      --

      www.slashdot.org

      Estimated 7,797,900 visitor sessions in the last 30 days.

      (Source: metricsmarket.com)

      ---

      Looks to me like they're doing a-okay. Stop feeding trolls, you're no better with your weak attacks.

    3. Re:Digg.com by amrust · · Score: 1

      OK. I'll stop feeding him, if you stop defending him. We'll call it a "win-win".

      --
      VOTE!
    4. Re:Digg.com by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1
      Looks to me like they're doing a-okay.
      However they're doing, there's no reason for these annoying trolls to repeat that stupid "I saw that on Digg 3 years ago" crap. I'm pretty sure that anyone on Slashdot who cares about Digg is already there.
      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  33. great but how do i get out of GroupWise??? by catfoo · · Score: 1

    great but how do i get out of GroupWise??? i have to use Groupwise at work, which i kind of like. but i would love to be able to use sunbird/lightning (with whatever) as the merge point for my family calendar needs and my work needs.

    --
    no sig today, come back tomorrow
  34. Sunbird by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1
    What, so this is sunbird, but as a Thunderbird extension? It looks the same.

    What do I gain (or lose) using the extension instead of the Sunbird client?

    --
    "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
    --- Jerry Garcia
    1. Re:Sunbird by quiddity · · Score: 1

      sunbird is a 5mb (compressed) standalone app, that duplicates 90% of the core code of thunderbird/firefox. So lightning'll be way faster, and you wont have to fire up sunbird seperately.

      --
      .
      . hmmm
  35. They do have their work cut out for them by helix_r · · Score: 1


    The old way of calendaring is to have calendar on your PC/laptop that you then "sync" with your PDA. Nice, but it is possible to do much better.

    Any real calendar app must store your data on the web, allow you to share events with selected other's calendars, and provide multiple easy ways of hooking up (adding events, seeing, and being notified) by the calendar.

    So far, 30boxes and some others have come close to that.

    I can share share my calendar with my wife so that we can add stuff to each other's calendars as needed. There are bookmarklets that allow me to easily add an event without actually navigating to the calendar, I get an rss feed for my public events, tagging capabilities, and sms notification of events if I want. It's pretty much near ideal.

    So if mozilla wants to be a player in this department, they had better be ready to provide a lot a features and hit the ground running to compete with other calendar providers and, soon, Google Calendar.

    1. Re:They do have their work cut out for them by edmicman · · Score: 1

      Where is the free and opensource 30boxes that I can install on my own host and manage myself? I've tried Webcalendar, but it still seems very rough and early in it's product life. What else is out there, that's good?

    2. Re:They do have their work cut out for them by helix_r · · Score: 1


      I don't know, but why manage something as utilitarian as a calendaring system when you can have someone else do it for you and 200 million of your closest friends in a permanent, accessible, secure and scalable way?

  36. I Feel SO Safe by soloport · · Score: 1

    "To protect your computer, Firefox prevented this site (www.mozilla.org) from installing software on your computer."

    When trying to download Lightning... [Sigh]

    1. Re:I Feel SO Safe by soloport · · Score: 1

      Just pointing out the irony, here. Did I read the directions? Not the first time through. Who does? ;-)

    2. Re:I Feel SO Safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like how windows' firewall sometimes tries to block explorer.exe

    3. Re:I Feel SO Safe by pilkul · · Score: 1

      I think they're afraid of attacks like DNS poisoning. It's a good idea to ask for confirmation even when getting software from a site that should be legit.

  37. NOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Seriously. Because MS merged thier calendar stuff with thier email stuff and now people expect them to be joined at the hip. Sad but simple.

    Not so sad and not so simple. Email and calendar functions have been integrated into "groupware" type apps since the mainframe days. It provided a single place to go to since those functions are typically related in most businesses. It may not make sense for ones personal use, but it makes complete sense from a business standpoint. I don't need to have six different apps open all the time for various functions.

  38. Re:Because MS did...(So true) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When MS came out with Mail & Cal in the same app around 96' I when WTF, too.
    until then they were 2 separate apps.
    I'm sure the're kicking themselve that they didn't patent it.

  39. Don't Build It In by ThatDamnMurphyGuy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > Thunderbird that will eventually (once it becomes more mature and stable) be built into Thunderbird.

    God I hope not. The whole point of splitting out Thunderbird and Firefox from the Uber Mozilla Suite was to keep each part simple, non bloated, and good at what they do on their own. Thunderbird is an email client, not a scheduling client. If people want to download an extension for scheduling, fine. But don't lather up Thunderbird with something that it probably doesn't need for most poeple.

    Along the same lines, Firefox doesn't need to be a scheduling client either.

  40. Calendar vs. Sunbird by frank249 · · Score: 1

    It may be confusing but there are some differences between calendar and Sunbird. As explained here,
    Calendar is the calendar extension for Mozilla products such as Mozilla Firefox,Mozilla Thunderbird, Seamonkey and the Mozilla Application Suite.

    Sunbird is the standalone form of the calendar extension, which means that it doesn't need one of the above mentioned applications to run. Sunbird and Calendar use the same base code so their functionality is virtually the same and they share the same bugs and bug fixes. Some features currently depend on the underlying product:

    Open URL works only on Mozilla Firefox., Seamonkey and the Mozilla Application Suite.
    Email alarm works only in Mozilla Thunderbird, Seamonkey and the Mozilla Application Suite.


    --

    Today's vices may be tomorrow's virtues.

  41. Re:Pocket PC Outlook Compatability - who needs it? by Trull · · Score: 1

    I find that syncing iCal.app to my Sony K750i works much better than my previous Nokia Communicator ever did. I then publish the Calendar on a private webDAV share so my other machines' grab it and show in Kontact. Who uses Outlook other than out of desperation? between dotProject, Intellisys http://www.webintellisys.com/ and iCal even my boss can see what I've been up to.

    T

    --
    -- NSY - SY OOT - Doric signs on local shop doors.
  42. working backwards? by Tylerious · · Score: 0, Redundant

    So they decide Mozilla is too bloated with all the features, etc. So they split it up, creating a pure browser and a pure email client. And now they're just adding these features back into the purer versions? What's next? Adding page rendering to Thunderbird and an IRC client to boot?

  43. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  44. Too little by thsths · · Score: 2, Insightful

    too late. I mean really, the calender in Mozilla sucked since it came out with Netscape Communicator 3.0 or so. There are other programs that fill the niche (Kalendar, evolution), but they are not perfect.

    Having a good calendar application in Mozilla would certainly be nice. But at this glacial speed of development, I don't see it going mainstream any time soon.

  45. MS was hardly the first... by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 2, Informative

    Both IBM (PROFS) and UNISYS (OfisLink) had mainframe e-mail systems which combined both mail and meeting/calendar functionality a number of years before MS did it.

    It's a functional expectation of old-school corporate e-mail, not an MS "innovation"...

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
  46. rephrase by gentimjs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    rephrase, "MS Made-it-popular/got-people-used-to-it at levels-other-than-big-business"

  47. Re:What's needed is better interprocess communicat by BlueScreenOfTOM · · Score: 1

    It's funny, in my Operating Systems class they praise UNIX's multiple IPC methods, and we were assigned a project where we had to do a whole bunch (sockets, command line args, shared memory, and pipes). We don't learn anything about Windows coding, but they always presented it to us as though Windows IPC methods were inferior. It's interesting to hear it from someone who appears to have done both.

  48. Not quite there by trix7117 · · Score: 1

    I've been using the Mozilla Calendar extension for Thunderbird for a couple of months, and while I like the tighter integration between Lightening and Thunderbird, it doesn't work as well for me as the old Calendar extension. A few of my issues:

    -- Tasks appear on every day between the start and due date. I don't need to see the same task every day. If my taxes are due on the April 15th, I just want to see that I need to get them done before then. (Actually, this is the main reason I removed Lightening and went back to the Calendar extension. I just couldn't see my actual events with the same Tasks repeated on every day of the month).

    -- It doesn't seem to handle remote calendars as well. I am currently running a Web DAV server to synch my calendars between my Mac at home and Thunderbird at work, so all of my calendars are remote. Lightening had issues with several events that have never been a problem in either iCal or the Calendar extension. This caused those calendars to mount read-only until I went and changed it. However, this happened every time I launched Thunderbird and it came across the same problem. A quick look at the error message implies that it has to do with either start or due dates on some tasks, but I haven't had a problem with any other calendar programs reading them, so I wouldn't expect Lightening to either.

    -- Finally, just a bunch of small visual things. There's no multi-week view, no indication of all day events other than the lack of a start time, events with short names don't span the whole cell (which causes it to look really crappy if you have multiple events with different lenght titles on the same day), etc.

    It looks like a good start, and I hope that these few bugs get taken care of because I would love to have the calendar integrated into Thunderbird instead of having to launch it separately, but for me it doesn't work as well as the Mozilla Calendar extension that I was already using.

  49. seems unnecessary by spacemanspiff18 · · Score: 1

    Why not implement this as some sort of extension, similar to extensions in firefox? That way, people who want an integrated calendar/email app can have one, and those (like me) who just want an application that does email only can still use Thunderbird? How many people really use all the calendar stuff, anyway?

    1. Re:seems unnecessary by petenz · · Score: 1

      ..."Lightning is a new Mozilla-made calendar extension"... That is the way it is.

  50. #1 priority: Exchange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, to make it a killer app get it communicate with Exchange!! If they (we?) don't, it will never really take off, especially in the business world. Let's hope they start on that from the beginning, and that we don't get a final version with Exchange compatibility still on the wrong side of the timeline. And, of course, PocketPC/Palm/Nokia/etc. synchronization would be nice, too.

    Other than that, great going!

  51. Re:What's needed is better interprocess communicat by Animats · · Score: 1
    Technically, the problem is that what you usually need is a subroutine call, but what the OS usuallly gives you is an I/O operation. Constructing a subroutine call from an I/O operation requires another layer of software. The UNIX/Linux world has many implementations of such a layer. They usually require some privileged server to handle the intercommunication, such as a CORBA server, an OpenRPC server, a Java RMI server, or a SOAP server. You can't be sure that any one of those will be present, and you can't just go and install one during an application install, for fear of conflicts with one already present. (Plus there's a security issue with allowing an application to install a privileged server.)

    That's the real problem. In the Windows world, you're certain to have COM and its friends available to every application. It's not perfect, but it's universal. The UNIX/Linux world has no comparably pervasive intercommunication mechanism. And most of the ones it does have assume a client/server system; they're not a good way for your calendar to talk to your e-mail program, which is more peer to peer.

  52. try Remind/Wyrd by Fourier · · Score: 1

    If performance and memory usage are among your biggest concerns, maybe Wyrd would be a better fit. It's built on top of Remind, a Unix console calendar with powerful scripting capabilities.

    Disclaimer: Yes, I wrote Wyrd, and am therefore thoroughly convinced of it's awesomeness. But in all seriousness, it's extremely fast and runs in under 2MB. Textmode applications have their advantages.

  53. Existing IPC mechanisms are fine by Phatmanotoo · · Score: 1

    I beg to differ. Unix offers many IPC methods, and RPC (in whatever incarnation) is widely acknowledged as the least desirable of them, in the Unix tradition. BSD sockets are probably the most useful and flexible. Sure, using sockets forces you to come up with some text-based protocol to "marshall/unmarshall" the data you pass among your software components. But this is good, since it forces you to use a loosely coupled architecture.

  54. Why you should merge Calendar and Email -- by SnuffySmith · · Score: 1
    It's the contacts, baby.

    For people who have a lot of meetings and phone calls, there's a real need to have addresses and phone numbers in one place and be able to access this info from a lot of different applications -- email, calendar, billing applications and so forth. Appending a calendar to an email program, or cramming the two things together, is one (not really so very good) way to accomplish part of this integration.

    Better Mozilla, or someone (Google? They seem smart.) addressed the problem from a new, and smarter, angle. Small business people I've talked to would pay serious money to have an accessible, extensible group, web accessible contact management application.

    1. Re:Why you should merge Calendar and Email -- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you saying an "affordable" web-based groupware like OpenGroupWare (www.opengroupware.org) or eGroupWare (www.egroupware.org -- syncs with Outlook, Blackberry, Windows Smartphones, etc...). Both of them are free, opensource (therefore easily extensible). eGroupware is fairly easy to install and use (I have been using eGroupWare for a while now and I would not want to go back to Exchange or Notes if someone were to give them away).

  55. Re:page rendering in Thunderbird. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Err, Thunderbird supports html email (and not via lynx --dump), so it already includes the page rendering component.

  56. Trust in Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It never ceases to amaze me.....

    I just enter all of my personal information into TellGoogleAll.com and Google lets me see it in a wonderful interface from anywhere! Does ANYONE else see a disturbing trend here?

    I see all the rants and raving about privacy issues and not trusting "the man" to maintain your privacy! I guess if I put a colorful logo on a webpage and tell people my company will always work against evil, the public will stampede my site to tell me everything!

    Let the March of the Lemmings commence.

  57. +5 arrogant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, now you are DEMANDING cool OPEN SOURCE applications, eh?

    Must be an american.

    1. Re:+5 arrogant! by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 1

      You're wrong on all accounts. I'm Canadian, and am not demanding the software, I'm providing feedback to the Slashgeek community about what I think makes the best applications in this day and any age. People have always wanted blazing fast apps. We'd still play C-64 games if it didn't take a minute to load some of them. A great app doesn't mean it can do everything under the sun. Opening in under 2 seconds is a cooler feature than a grammar checker for something like a spreadsheet or database.

  58. don't abandon your existing calendar... yet by jimmy+jimmy+james · · Score: 1

    Just a quick warning: there are still a lot of outstanding bugs in the codebase, don't trust 0.1 software with any important data.

    I've been bitten twice by Sunbird (hard) and have resigned to waiting till a non-beta release. I can't wait to see this project reach completion, but unless you can deal with randomly losing chunks of your important schedule, or the joy of missing meetings because they've magically changed times in your calendar, might be worth giving it a bit more time.

  59. Mail + Calendar+Browser+Chat+Editor by gatzke · · Score: 1

    Why not put them all together and have one kick butt application?

    Wait, we did have that in mozilla before the "core team" cut them all apart to simplify everything.

    Now they start coming back together.

    Whou would have thought that people might want to have a browser, calendar, and email client integrated? Brilliant!

    Seamonkey? What kind of name is that? Mozilla was bad enough, at least you could stick with the same stupid name.

  60. stdin/stdout by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1
    In UNIX, one program can invoke another, passing a set of command line arguments and environment variables. But all that comes back is a return code. How different it might have been if you got back output arguments. Then programs could have called other programs as subroutines.
    You can do just that. You call a program, write all input data for it to its stdin, and get the processed result from its stdout. You even get a separate channel for OOB error reporting.
  61. Firefox calendar extension; Sunbird issues by HorsePunchKid · · Score: 1

    For what it's worth (probably not much!), there is already an extension to integrate the calendar into Firefox. It's based on the 0.2 codebase, but that's not necessarily a bad thing at the moment. I've been running Sunbird 0.2 for months now with only a few minor problems. The various releases and nightlies I've tried of the new codebase have all either had bad crashing problems or data loss issues. I'm really looking forward to these getting resolved; there are some great new features in the Sunbird 0.3 releases!

    --
    Steven N. Severinghaus
  62. Takes Two to Conspire... by GozerBrothers · · Score: 1

    Blame either the makers of PockerPC or the makers of Outlook for that. You'd almost think they're conspiring to prevent people from being able to switch.

    But, you can't conspire with yourself! See, e.g., COPPERWELD CORP. v. INDEPENDENCE TUBE CORP., 467 U.S. 752 (1984) ("We hold that Copperweld and its wholly owned subsidiary Regal are incapable of conspiring with each other for purposes of 1 of the Sherman Act.") http://www.justia.us/us/467/752/case.html

  63. Sync my phone ^^ by kulvik · · Score: 1

    Lightning looks real promising. Let's just hope they don't do the same mistake as 90% of other calendar / todolist / addressbook projects do. We need to be able to synchronize our mobile phones, pda's and other equipment with it!!! Why do I still use Outlook? Because it's fast and stable? Hell no! I use it because it syncs my phone :/

    In my opinion, syncing should almost be priority 1 in these applications.

    *looking forward to deleting MS Outlook*