Slashdot Mirror


Google Launches Web Traffic Analysis Service

segphault writes to pass along that Ars Technica has an interesting article about the recently released Google Analytics. Analytics is Google's new traffic analysis service that helps you to know everything from "how your visitors found you [to] how they interact with your site." Analytics is also built to integrate with AdWords if you are already utilizing that service.

247 comments

  1. Site down already? by xero9 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Seems it got /.ed before it even went live

    1. Re:Site down already? by isotropique · · Score: 1

      It looks like only the US English server is on maintenance. If you know another language than English, which is mandatory nowadays, you can explore Google Analytics and give it a try.

    2. Re:Site down already? by OldeTimeGeek · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Knowing a language other than English is mandatory? When was that?

      Guess I missed the email...

    3. Re:Site down already? by _eb0la_reston_ · · Score: 1

      Their servers just choked (before being slashdotted).
      (See http://flickr.com/photos/igonzalez/63231271/ -- That's the Message you get after logon on. )

      --
      mootion.com - Never underestimate VCs stock options (was: Web 2.0)
    4. Re:Site down already? by QMO · · Score: 1, Funny

      You didn't miss it. It was in both Esperanto and Yapese.
      I had to get someone to translate it for me.

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    5. Re:Site down already? by Big+Diluth · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Didn't you get the memo?

      We're using the new bilingual coversheets now for our site's TPS reports.

    6. Re:Site down already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UK English should be understandable enough, and its working, albeit

    7. Re:Site down already? by richy008 · · Score: 1

      UK English?!

      Excuse me... ENGLISH!

      UK English IS by definition, ENGLISH... Guess that's why you posted as an Anonymous Coward!

    8. Re:Site down already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey don't knock the messenger - its listed as "UK English" on googles drop down list.

  2. How visitors found this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slashdot! See, you don't need to be Google to do this.

    1. Re:How visitors found this by igny · · Score: 1

      I thought the porn sites would be their toughest critics.

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
  3. interesting acronym... by 0110011001110101 · · Score: 4, Funny

    GAS.... as in more hot-air from the friendly neighborhood Googledot.

    --
    Don't anthropomorphize computers: they hate that.
    1. Re:interesting acronym... by r!d3r · · Score: 1

      GAS? Is that the best you could come up with? Google launches something that 'might' stop me from spending a few grand each year on Analytics Software - sweet. What this might mean. Small Analytics sellers to fail? What will happen to the larger guys? Who will make the leap next, Micorsoft, Yahoo? This is a huge change in the landscape. .....let's shift right over to potty humor where have all the bright minds gone?

    2. Re:interesting acronym... by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      Crap, looks like we'll have to rename the GNU Assembler (gas).

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    3. Re:interesting acronym... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      *gasp* someone on slashdot is making a potty joke and decided not to follow it up witha commentary on how the real issue will effect real people?

      That's it! I'm suggesting we take the FUNNY modifier, and any other irrelevent ones, out of /. so we can focus only on the Insightful/Informative/InGENIUS comments. no one else should post dammit!

      Whats this you say? I can surf slashdot by threshhold? Thus negating all assinine comments as well as visually skipping over those rated NON-serious??

      Time to change your threshold level to +5 buddy, or you can just get over yourself and the self-inflated importance you have placed upon your meaningless life...

  4. Urchin by pubjames · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Did they do this based on their acquisition of Urchin? Are Urchin staff now working on this instead? Does this mean the death of Urchin software?

    1. Re:Urchin by drpimp · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yes. I believe the actually aquired them as far as I know back at least in early June. I was at a convention and saw both http://www.google.com/urchin/ and now http://www.urchin.com/ goes to Google's site as well. Of course we all now after the antics with Gmail name, Google is now going to stick with the names for product as follows.

      Google ******

      Where ****** is the product.

      --
      -- Brought to you by Carl's JR
    2. Re:Urchin by LkDotCom · · Score: 1

      The Javascritp file to be included is urchin.js
      So I think the answer is YES about the acquisition....

      --
      Grammar Zealots: please spare a non-english writer (lastknight dot com)
    3. Re:Urchin by BenDalton · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I would assume this is directly based on Urchin. Especially since the javascript used on sites that are to be monitored is "urchin.js".

    4. Re:Urchin by AaronCampbell · · Score: 1
      I'd say that's a definite yes, yes, yes. From their FAQ's:
      How do I add tracking code to my website?

      Enter the code below into all of your web pages, between the <head> and </head> tags, and after any <meta> tags in that section. If you use a common include or template, you can enter it there.

      <script src="http://www.google-analytics.com/urchin.js" type="text/javascript">
      </script>
      <script type="text/javascript">
      _uacct="UA-xxxx-x";
      urchinTracker();
      </script>

      You'll need to update the "xxxx-x" in the sample above with your own Google Analytics account number. You can find this number in the email sent to you when you signed up, or you can access your personalized tracking code in its entirety by clicking Check Status in the Analytics Settings page of your Analytics account.
      Notice that the file you link to is called urchin.js?
    5. Re:Urchin by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      The code that Google tells you to insert into your page includes a function call to urchin tracker:

      urchinTracker();

    6. Re:Urchin by gb506 · · Score: 1
      I bought the Urchin 5 software back in the Spring about a week before the deal w/ Google was announced. As part of the deal I was supposed to get a free license upgrade to version 6 of the software when it was released (at that time v6 was only a service model, ala Google Analytics, not software). Well, the v6 software was supposed to have arrived in the Summer, then it was pushed to the Fall. At this point I have no more expectation that v6 Urchin software will EVER be released, so the main reason I bought the software (v6 features) is probably now negated.

      I can see how Google would want to incorporate a good conversion tracking mechanism for AdWords customers, but I have a real big issue with giving all of my analytics info to Goggle for them to sift through. All of the Urchin v6 features seem to be in Google Analytics, but the reason I didn't want to use the Urchin 6 service model to begin with is that my analytics is a proprietary trade secret that I don't want others to see. And while I have not read the terms closely, my bet is that Google will use the analytics data in some way to benefit Google. If they did not intend to benefit from the info, it would not be FREE , now, would it?

    7. Re:Urchin by zardo · · Score: 1
      I was thinking along the same lines. This may just be the best purchase they ever made, I heard Urchin sold for 30 million, which is nothing compared to what they will make with this product.

      Looks like google is the one with all the great ideas, Bill needs to start drinkin coffee.

    8. Re:Urchin by rtv · · Score: 1

      Looks like it is indeed based on Urchin's work. Here's part of the script you have to insert in your page markup:

      <script src="http://www.google-analytics.com/urchin.js" type="text/javascript">
    9. Re:Urchin by John+Hurliman · · Score: 1
    10. Re:Urchin by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I'm hoping Google will get rid of Urchin's ongoing bugs (as experienced by way of Earthlink's site stats doodad), such as the one where it will occasionally show you someone else's stats (and refuse to show you your own stats), or decide that this week, all your stats for this year total up to "zero". I've reported these bugs several times, without result.

      Also, I most severely hope that Google will change the reporting function so it doesn't require javascript in the browser used to view the stats. Someone at Urchin once told me that they planned to do this, but it never happened.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  5. for the slashdotted crew by 0110011001110101 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Google has officially launched Analytics, a robust new web analysis system that provides site owners with traffic metrics and massive amounts of useful marketing data. Based on technology originally developed by a Californian company called Urchin that Google acquired in March, Analytics integrates with Google's popular AdWords system, and will vastly improve the quality and quantity of data provided to existing AdWords users. Those of you that don't use AdWords can still use Analytics by adding a simple javascript snippet to your web site.

    Analytics features an elegant user interface that leverages modern web technologies like Flash and DHTML. Although it seems a little rough around the edges (the Flash components don't display correctly in Firefox on my Linux system) the service is moderately impressive. It can export data in several formats, including XML and CSV. With Analytics, you can determine where your visitors are coming from, which links on your site are getting the most hits, how long the visitors spend on various pages of your site, and more:

    Learn how visitors interact with your website and identify the navigational bottlenecks that keep them from completing your conversion goals. Find out how profitable your keywords are across search engines and campaigns. Pinpoint where your best customers come from and which markets are most profitable to you. Google Analytics gives you this and more through easy-to-understand visually enhanced reports.

    It is still relatively difficult to get a good feel for the usefulness of the system at this point, but with over 80 pre-built reports, support for interactive report construction, and tracking for countless attributes, the amount of data it provides is downright prodigious. In addition to providing critical marketing data, it also tracks browser features so that web developers can make informed design decisions. Analytics will tell you the screen resolution and connection speed of your visitors, as well as whether or not their browsers support Flash and Java. Flash-rendered graphs are provided with each data collection so that you can get a quick visual overview.

    Although it may not be especially useful compared to some of the critical features, the geographical map overlay is probably one of the coolest features. Analytics will generate a Flash-based map of the world that shows you which regions your traffic comes from. You can click individual regions to get additional statistics, and you can use Flash's built-in zoom feature to get a closer look at specific locations.

    The site overlay mechanism is one of the other particularly interesting features. It will superimpose click statistics on top of your actual page so that you can (hypothetically) see what people are clicking just by browsing your site. During my experiments with Analytics, I had some trouble getting the site overlay feature to work correctly. Clicking the individual links in the site overlay caused the Analytics start page to load in the iframe rather than the actual content.

    Analytics fits perfectly into Google's advertising platform and business model. Despite the bugs (which may be specific to Linux or Firefox) Google's newest service looks powerful and comprehensive. The value of the features and the benefits of AdWords integration will probably be more than enough to convince site owners to use AdWords rather than a competing service.

    --
    Don't anthropomorphize computers: they hate that.
    1. Re:for the slashdotted crew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      it also tracks browser features so that web developers can make informed design decisions. Analytics will tell you the screen resolution and connection speed of your visitors, as well as whether or not their browsers support Flash and Java.

      Damnit no. How many times does this need to be explained?

      You know my screen resolution? Great. I a) surf non-maximised, b) surf with a sidebar open, c) use two monitors, or d) all of the above.

      You know my connection speed? Great. I'm now using my favourite P2P application, so my web browsing only gets a fraction of my available bandwidth.

      You know that my browser supports Flash and Java? Great. I have them installed for the stupid little games people email me on Fridays. I don't want Flash or Java as parts of web pages, just as content delivery mechanisms.

      This isn't even taking into account that it's impossible to measure these things to a known degree of accuracy. Sorry, the web isn't built to allow these kinds of things. You can make educated guesses, sure, but you have no way of knowing how close those educated guesses come to the truth, which makes them, for all intents and purposes, useless.

      None of these things allow web developers to make informed decisions. One of the fundamental principles of web design is that your designs have to be flexible enough to take into account all kinds of different constraints. Not surprisingly, wannabes don't want to go to that kind of effort, so they prefer to stick their heads in the sand and pretend like these numbers mean something. "95% of people have a 1024x768 screen, so I don't have to bother with making my design work for lower resolutions" and other such inanity. Grow the fuck up.

    2. Re:for the slashdotted crew by heho · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The flash based map is great, however with the launch of Google Local out of Beta and Google Maps, one would have to wonder why Google isn't using their own API's to show the data instea of using a flash based program.

    3. Re:for the slashdotted crew by dallask · · Score: 2, Insightful

      just give them time and we can zoom in on the house of the script kiddie who generated 32,000 hits to your admin pannel with a brute force password attack script...

      I cant fu3king wait!!!

      --
      The Code Ninja is swift with his tool, precise in his delivery, and deadly accurate in his execution.
    4. Re:for the slashdotted crew by abirdman · · Score: 1
      If you'd posted NON-anonymously, I'd have tossed you an "insightful" point. You're absolutely correct on all counts. What Google is giving their users is whatever they can collect (and crunch). It's not perfect, and in many cases it's misleading (giving screen resolution is not very useful! I never surf with my browser maximized, and I'm behind a NAT, so no matter which computer or browser I use, the information will be folded into one IP address). The point is they're collecting whatever is available.

      On the other hand, what a great idea for using all that huge computing machine they've put together. I'll venture out on a limb here and conjecture that a little (potentially over-simplified, and possibly misleading) data is better than none at all. The interestng stuff, like which link on a page are people clicking, are probably priceless, and not something that's easy to find using existing tools. One of these days I predict we'll all look up and realize that the Godzilla-Google computer beast is proxying everything we do on the web. If I had the slightest interest in web traffic, you can bet I'd be pasting their code into my website, instead of typing this reply.

      --
      Everything I've ever learned the hard way was based on a statistically invalid sample.
  6. Urchin by mysqlrocks · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When I heard that they had purchased Urchin back in March I was wondering how long it would be before they came out with a service like this. I'm sure this will be a lot better than a lot of those free "stat counter" services out there.

  7. Mod me down. by pubjames · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yes, yes, I'm an idiot. I should have RFA...

    1. Re:Mod me down. by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 5, Funny

      You think you're an idiot? I was hoping this would help my morning commute!

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  8. shameless MS plug? by 0110011001110101 · · Score: 2, Funny
    FTFA - Despite the bugs (which may be specific to Linux or Firefox) Google's newest service looks powerful and comprehensive.

    What's this all about? How did M$ infect my daily dosage of Slasdot/Google news?

    --
    Don't anthropomorphize computers: they hate that.
    1. Re:shameless MS plug? by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The concept behind that line seems to be a disclaimer. He doesn't want to get sued for saying that there are bugs, which there aren't, but isn't sure where the errors come from. So he is saying "Hey, there are bugs, but they could be Google, or Linux, or Firefox, or some combination of them", which seems fundamentally sound from a CYA perspective. It isn't a straight M$ plug either. The bugs could be caused by google, and there are more alternatives to Linux and Firefox than Windows + IE. The author simply didn't have the time or resources to check it on all 10-15 browser/OS combinations, and is noting what he used.

  9. Big Brother-esque (again) by Oscaro · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ok, so the service works by adding a snippet of code into your web-pages. Then google registers when someone arrives on that page, where he came from, and lots of other data. So google watches everything, it knows what kind of people visits your site and thus knows a lot both about the site and about the visitors.

    I know google has always been concerned about "legitimate" use of their data, but this is somehow frightening...

    1. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by oever · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not only that. It's worse. The snippet of code is javascript.

      This means that the added code has the ability to change the look of the page completely. If at any time Google decided that all web pages should have the word Microsoft replaced by Google, they could do this by adding an onload function to the javascript code that is added to all web pages using this service.

      --
      DNA is the ultimate spaghetti code.
    2. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
      If at any time Google decided that all web pages should have the word Microsoft replaced by Google
      So you can read: *Google* is a monopoly that uses evil techniques to dominate die market.
    3. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's extra-ugly in this case, since you're practically begging for an XSS security hole. Yeah, I know, it's Google we're talking about here, the ones with the motto "Do no evil". Right, that makes me trust them completely (rolls eyes).

      Executing someone else's JavaScript on your website means begging for trouble. JavaScript can install handlers to watch everything the visitor is doing, can read, create and modify cookies, can nose through that window's or tab's visited page history. Let's not talk about truly evil stuff such as inspecting content on the pages, overlaying links and buttons or injecting content.

      I'm sorry, no matter how much of a white in shining armor Google is, not sane webmaster should willfully inject foreign JavaScript on his website.

      PS: and before anybody replies that you can download the urchin script and see what it does, let me ask if you're willing to monitor it constantly.

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    4. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how is this different from DoubleClick?

    5. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by batknight23 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Frightening indeed. One large entity--whether it be a corporation or a government--collecting massive ammounts of data scares me to no end...

      Further thought to chew: Once Google has eaten all the worlds content, secrets, and privacy... Government(s) will (are?) have a field day getting court orders to tap that index in new and ever more creative ways.

    6. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by decipher_saint · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Isn't that the point of this service; detailed information gathering?

      This is no different from many other counter services already provided on the web (well, it has more robust reporting considering it's free).

      I do loathe the fact that it's a remote JS file, that has to change.

      --
      crazy dynamite monkey
    7. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Asketh the AC:

      So how is this different from DoubleClick?

      Well, obviously DoubleClick are evil. Google do no evil, so this time it's completely different, and it's OK to run someone else's JavaScript on your web site.

      </sarcasm>

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    8. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by diegocgteleline.es · · Score: 1

      perhaps someone who can read Javashit scripting code can decipher it for us

    9. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by Pieroxy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, when I do service my car, the garage has a full access to everything in the car. They could put a tracker and I wouldn't notice it in a century.

      It is a question of trust. If you decide to use their service, you will need them to have access to your pages (through JavaScript). If you don't trust them, just don't subscribe.

      My DSL Provider has a lot of information about myself as well, and I trust them with it. If my trust vanished, I'd switch (well, in France you have actually a lot of choice).

      My bank ... well, I think you get the point.

    10. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by digidave · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes, the potential to do evil is there, but all the best web traffic analysis programs operate in a similar way. For one thing, if you're selling advertising on your web site very few advertisers will take your web logs seriously since they're not at all independent and can be faked easily. For another, web logs for a popular web site are difficult to manage. Before switching from Apache's logs to Red Sheriff (works with Javascript like Google Analytics) I had to deal with about 1GB/day of logs. So what happens when I want to build a year over year chart? Hmmm... 730 GB of logs is a bit hard to work with, especially in 2001 with no 500 GB hard drives, so I had to do monthly reports for each year then paste the results into a spreadsheet to build charts. That took me many times longer than if I could have just generated a report from all the logs.

      Big brother and all, this is still the best way for a lot of people to manage their web traffic logging. Before selecting a company to work with, read their privacy policy.

      --
      The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    11. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      quote: Executing someone else's JavaScript on your website means begging for trouble. JavaScript can install handlers to watch everything the visitor is doing, can read, create and modify cookies, can nose through that window's or tab's visited page history. Let's not talk about truly evil stuff such as inspecting content on the pages, overlaying links and buttons or injecting content.

      You sure about that? I thought that javascript from another host isn't trusted and because of such won't be able to modify objects on the including page. Things like cookie modification is only allowed within the domain so unless google can spoof domains they'll only modify google.com cookies.

      Your concerns are valid but it's not possible to do something truly malicious.

    12. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, the question is what their definition of 'evil' is.

    13. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure you could check out the urchin javascript to make sure its ok, then set up a cron job to periodically check it for you and let you know if its changing...

      but then what if they are changing it for everyone *except* you?

    14. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by op12 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It is a question of trust.

      Not only a question of trust. It's also a matter of Google's reputation. Much like in the recent backlash at Sony, people are not going to sit idly when a company does something stupid. Google has much more to lose by pulling a stunt like that than the gain it would provide. Plus, you could always just rip the snippet out of your page if it does something undesirable.

    15. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by wranlon · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can load a javascript file from another domain, and send data to other domains via the ages-old image request piggyback. The javascriptfile in this case is loaded in the same domain and scope of the page itself. Most browsers have extra rules and conditions pertaining to cookies created by third-party resources like this. If anyone wanted to use the service but were concerned about the origins of the script, they could download it and host it on their own server while still sending the data back to Google. I think the previous poster was alluding to Web spyware, or behavior monitors.

    16. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by karmatic · · Score: 3, Informative

      You sure about that? I thought that javascript from another host isn't trusted and because of such won't be able to modify objects on the including page. Things like cookie modification is only allowed within the domain so unless google can spoof domains they'll only modify google.com cookies.

      Nope. Javascript loaded using runs in the security context of the main browser (as opposed to an iframe). document.cookie, document.write, the referer, etc. are all available.

      In fact, Google AdSense already does this. They write in an iframe that passes the number of plugins you have, the mime types you support, your resolution (screen, and window), if you have java installed, and the referer for every person who comes to the site. They use document.write() to write this IFRAME. There isn't really a lot they can't do through this.

    17. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by alta · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Here's an idea... If you don't like to take your chances with such a shady company like google, then don't sign up.

      But believe you me, I'm going to sign up the MOMENT the site isn't slashdotted.

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    18. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 1

      Bingo! Well said. I'll wait until tonight to sign up. I get super low trafic (10 hits a week, max) but as a small business usually each hit can become a phone call for consulting. Can't wait to see in a nice easy way the people who visit, where they click, etc. Fun stuff!

    19. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by lo0ol · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No "sane webmaster should willfully inject foreign JavaScript on his website"? I'm guessing you've never ran ads on your website before. That's the norm. Nearly every ad network has their code in JavaScript. Heck, chances are if someone is using Google Analytics they're ALREADY using Google AdSense on their site- who's to say that Google hasn't done the same with AdSense? People haven't said anything about the evils of AdSense yet really.

      My point is that it is about trust, as a previous poster said. A heck of a lot of companies do business in the exact same way. If you don't trust Google with your site, then don't use it (and get a license of Urchin for yourself- that is extremely solid software; I'd say the best in the business).

    20. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by NanoServ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      By your argument, it would seem unwise to install and use Firefox. It's a foreign piece of code (even though you can monitor its source code if you want, but who has the time for that?). It has the power to snoop through personal files on your computer and report the information back to mozilla.org. Since it has a huge user base and now an automatic and seamless update system, some malicious behavior could get installed into the program and we'd all be screwed without even knowing it.

      But the thing is, that doesn't happen. If Google attempted this, the behavior would quickly be discovered (because, although *you* aren't reviewing the .js file constantly, *people* are reviewing the .js file constantly) and Google would get some seriously bad PR. There's no incentive for them to risk their image like that.

    21. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Much like in the recent backlash at Sony, people are not going to sit idly when a company does something stupid.

      You've gotten confused again. You see, the people on slashdot are not representative of the population in general. Therefore, while the Sony matters (and other issues) are red-hot on this site, they are not well known outside of slashdot and similar sites. Yes, there were a few mainstream news articles on the Sony issue, but by and large it went by unnoticed.

    22. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      As well I have seen MANY web counter sites and whatnot who could potentially do much the same things. I definatly trust google over freecounters.com don't you? Did anyone even think about freecounters ability to screw us over? No?

    23. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by BenBenBen · · Score: 1

      It's no different (and in many ways less invasive) from what Hitwise do. Yahoo's Search Optimiser also works on snippets on each page, and is very useful thank you very much. "You have zero privacy. Get over it". I love this quote...

      --
      The Slashdot Paradox: "100% Overrated"
    24. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by Omestes · · Score: 1

      We're talking about willfully inserting a bit of code into a webpage.

      Hopefully the person doing this is tech savvy, and knows what they are doing. We're not really talking about the lay-public anymore, we are talking about people verging on geeks.

      Sony DRM can effect everyone, most of whom have no idea what DRM is, what a root kit is, or how it can compromise security, it also is done on the sly. With Google's new gizmo, you must copy the code, into your existant code, by hand (meaning you have knowledge). This pre-supposes SOME knowledge of the operations of code, and probably even some knowledge of what the script could do. Also, if you a resposible webmaster, you are monitoring activities on your site, meaning you would know if Google did something overtly malicious.

      Sony and Google are on different sides. Google, in part, relies on tech savvy people, we build their search into our tools (browsers, etc), we insert their code into our pages. If we were to stop doing this Google might take a hit. For Sony, they probably have come to hate us tech people for bringing this in the open. John Q. User could have never EVER discovered the root kit.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    25. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't you just download the code once and cache it in your website so they can't change it to do something you don't like to your site without your knowledge? (assuming the initial version is harmless.)

    26. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, no matter how much of a white in shining armor Google is, not sane webmaster should willfully inject foreign JavaScript on his website.

      As is everything in security, foreign javascript is about trust. If you trust them enough to spend money on Adwords, it seems illogical not to trust their javascript. Besides, Google would be nowhere without their 'white [knight] in shining armor' reputation - IMHO they would have little to gain and much to lose with unethical and/or insecure JS.

      I'm not saying we should just trust the big company (it didn't exactly work with Sony), but a webmaster who says 'I trust No javascript' is as impractical as a sysadmin who says 'I trust NO kernel modules'.

    27. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by MemeRot · · Score: 1

      Yeah, easy.

      It tracks you.

    28. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by zhez · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry, no matter how much of a white [knight] in shining armor Google is, no sane webmaster should willfully inject foreign JavaScript on his website.


      ... Unless forced to by his/her client/boss/CEO/Marketing Team.

      Many of the other most popular site-tracking systems also require this. Who do you trust more.. Google or statcounter.com or dynamicsitestats.com or somethingelsetotrackyou.com?
      --
      --- Zhez
    29. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by kenkanada · · Score: 1

      this past saturday canada's national radio station, CBC, did a piece on the sony thing during the very popular weekly program "The House". when my not-too-computer-literate mother asks me if i heard about sony installing spyware on peoples computers i take that as a pretty good sign it has made mainstream news. as for google analytics, i totally agree with the comments on trust.

    30. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by Politburo · · Score: 1

      The plural of anecdote is not data.

    31. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by Deviate_X · · Score: 1

      The fact the site has crashed already should have been enough to quell your enthusiam - and make you think twice.

    32. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by op12 · · Score: 1

      Therefore, while the Sony matters (and other issues) are red-hot on this site, they are not well known outside of slashdot and similar sites.

      To the contrary, I believe that the 368 stories listed on Google News, including ones in the Wahington Post, USA Today, NY Times, Boston Globe, BBC News, CNN, and many more could be counted as more than a few mainstream articles. The fact of the matter is while it may have been techies that uncovered it, the public was made aware of it and more importantly, it is forcing Sony to take some kind of action.

      Even the Bush administration spoke out against it: http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/11/192 7225&from=rss

    33. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by advid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Just like AdSense, then?

      The way I look at this is:
      1. I already have Google ads on my website.
      2. So Google already knows everything about my visitors.
      3. Thus, subscribing to this program just means that I can see that information as well.


      If you want to worry about privacy and "big brother", complain about AdSense. This is a simple extension, at most.
      --
      - "I'll probably get modded down for this."
    34. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by shut_up_man · · Score: 1

      This is true... I'm wondering if this could be done instead by the good ole transparent tracker gifs. Something like

      <img width=1 height=1 border=0 alt="" src="http://adtracker.google.com/trackscript.asp?t racker_id=4276528976247">

      (The possibility that the tracker might be written in ASP is purely for humour value)

    35. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by stevey · · Score: 1

      Ignoring the issue Google injecting content into the pages via the Javascript .. The fact that it relies upon the visitors having JavaScript installed makes this an unworkable solution for me.

      Sure many, many (most?) visitor have it on. But if you're wanting complete records the only way to do it is with your own server logs.

    36. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by Politburo · · Score: 1

      A Google News hit count is not the public consciousness. I stand by my assertion that the Sony matter is not well known outside of slashdot and similar circles.

    37. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by Jobe_br · · Score: 1

      No offense, but for Google's market, that doesn't matter. Check out other analytics systems such as WebSideStory's HBX (formerly Hitbox). It also depends on Javascript. And according to analytics that are routinely published, the number of folks not having Javascript enabled is dwindling to the point of obscurity.

      What folks really care about is the proliferation of anti-spyware software that deletes persistent cookies that allow analytics packages to track individual visitors as they return to the site (an important measurement for determining the stickiness of a site). Unfortunately, running Windows means, practically, that you need to be running this kind of software.

      Cheers

    38. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by Charles+Dodgeson · · Score: 1
      PS: and before anybody replies that you can download the urchin script and see what it does, let me ask if you're willing to monitor it constantly.

      Unless the server depends on information gathered by the client retreiving the script, it should be simple enough to make a copy of the JS, take a good careful look at it, and install it in a place under your control. Call your copy of the JS from your pages, and you only need to monitor Google's scripts for updates.

      I'm not saying that I'm happy about this whole approach, but I think that this one problem can be worked around.

      I quick glance at the script makes it look like it makes heavy use of a cookie. But I'm not sure how it is used. I certainly wouldn't want to give my visitors a cookie that I don't understand.

      --
      Prime numbers are exactly what Alan Greenspan says they are -S. Minsky
    39. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by m85476585 · · Score: 1

      I don't know if this will work, but what if you just save urchin.js on your own site?

    40. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by child_of_mercy · · Score: 1
      Well my girlfriend this morning got an email (below)from her college informing her that Sony/BMG CD's were banned from campus computers.

      I think that's taking it beyond just a slashdot thing.

      Anyway if you already use adsense on your page this isn't adding anything more intrusive.

      From: Matthew Sullivan
      Date: Nov 14, 2005 5:31 PM
      Subject: Using Music CDs on Campus.
      To:

      This is a message to all staff and students,

      It has been brought to our attention that there is significant risk to the security and the operation of UC computers in using Sony BMG produced CDs. For this reason, Sony BMG produced CDs in University of Canberra computers is prohibited. The reasons behind this are explained in more detail below. If you are not sure as to whether a CD is produced by Sony BMG please check the record label against the list below.

      This restriction does not apply to Sony BMG CDs used in personal CD players or music systems on campus.

      Portable computers, such as laptops, whether University or privately owned are prohibited from being connected to the campus network at all, if Sony BMG CDs are played in them.

      Known record labels owned by Sony BMG: Arista Records BMG Classics BMG Heritage BMG International Companies Columbia Records Epic Records J Records Jive Records LaFace Records Legacy Recordings Provident Music Group RCA Records RCA Victor Group RED Distribution Relatively Entertainment RLG â.. Nashville RME (Recording Media & Energy) SONY BMG Masterworks Sony/ATV Music Publishing Sony Classical Sony Music International Sony Music Independent Labels Sony Music Nashville Sony Urban Music Sony Wonder So So, Def Records Verity Records

      As part of good house keeping it is strongly advised that caution is exercised when any compact disc, email or web page prompts you with a End User License Agreement, a pop up window, or 'Security Warning' when you did not specifically request the new window or a software installation.

      The reasons, in detail, for the decision to prohibit the use of Sony BMG CDs in any computer on campus are;

      A Sony BMG CD inserted into a PC running Windows will attempt to install the Sony proprietary CD player software. As part of this installation the end user will have to agree to an End User License Agreement (EULA) which has no information regarding the uninstallation of the software, nor does it mention that proceeding will install stealth software (known as a rootkit) which deliberately hides running programs and the files it has installed in the same way that viruses, Trojans and hackers do.

      This software will cause some versions of Windows to become immediately unbootable and require a complete reinstall of the machine to recover.

      The software also has no known manufacturer created uninstall program, and should other tools (such as anti hacking tools, virus scanners etc) be used to remove the software it will render the CD drive of the machine completely inoperable.

      Further analysis of the "rootkit" indicates it is extremely badly written and allows the easy exploitation of the "rootkit" by persons less skilled and therefore allows potential virus writers to hide themselves from the operating system with no technical knowledge of "rootkits". During the last 24 hours a number of anti virus vendors have announced they have examples of new viruses that are using the Sony BMG "rootkit" to hide themselves.

      For the reasons above, CDs produced by Sony BMG are not to be inserted into any University of Campus computer for any reason. Further if you have inserted a Sony BMG music CD into a campus machine running the Microsoft Windows operating system you should contact the Service Desk for assistance in removal of the rootkit software. Macintosh users are not affected by this particular software, however there are reports of Macintosh aware software being installed so extreme caution should be exercised. Further announcements may be made later with regard to Macintosh computers.

      --
      'There is a Light that never goes out.'
    41. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by child_of_mercy · · Score: 1

      no javascript = no googleads.

      readers who don't see ads are little better than bots.

      --
      'There is a Light that never goes out.'
    42. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by shmlco · · Score: 1

      Sure, if you need to know that exactly 10,231,189 people visited your site today (and not 10,231,174). But knowing that, on average, 14% came from AOL and 22% came in off your Google ads (and which ads) and 15% off natural search (and what keywords) is another type of information altogether.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    43. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by abirdman · · Score: 1

      Gotta love the code comments! Searching for "Evil" turns up nothing. It's gotta be OK, right? Thx.

      --
      Everything I've ever learned the hard way was based on a statistically invalid sample.
    44. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by zobier · · Score: 1

      Webalizer does incremental batches and keeps running totals.

      --
      Me lost me cookie at the disco.
    45. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by agapits · · Score: 1

      if you are paranoid that Google will do that, you can just pull out the javascript code anytime.

      it's a free service. if you don't like/trust it, then don't put it in your site. no one is forcing you to put it in your site anyway.

    46. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're talking about willfully inserting a bit of code into a webpage.

      The post about Sony as talking about willfully inserting a program on your computer that could potentially monitor all your activites and cause general mayhem with driver upgrades etc. Somehow, changing a bit of text in a web-page doesn't quite compare.

    47. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But freecounter doesn't have access to:
      • your email (GMail)
      • web searches (google)
      • what news you read (google news)
      • what you want to shop(Froogle)
      • what ads you click (adwords)
      • what pages you visit (adsense, gas)
      • what you talk about (GTalk) etc.

      So you would rather have all of your information at one provider, instead of spreading it out so that no service has the complete image?
    48. Re:Big Brother-esque (again) by MarkNijhof · · Score: 1

      You could also download it save it and point to that file instead if the one from google, I guess that will still work unless they actualy also register when that js file is pulled from their server.

      -Mark

  10. Oddest Terms of Service by mir · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From the Terms of Service: The Google Services are made available for your personal, non-commercial use only.. Doesn't this reduce slightly the usefulness, or at least the potential audience, of the service?

    I am sure that's a mistake, but that prevents me from using the service for anything useful right now. Or even from testing it.

    --
    Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that you think before you break 'em. (Terry Pratchett)
    1. Re:Oddest Terms of Service by ccozan · · Score: 1

      I think they mean, you cannot offer this service in a commercial way (i.e., selling the stats), but each webmaster ( or the company behind that) can use this data only for their own needs ( personal ).

    2. Re:Oddest Terms of Service by Slashdoc+Beta · · Score: 1

      That is pretty strange; I wonder what they mean. For example, would running AdSense on your blog be considered commercial?

    3. Re:Oddest Terms of Service by mir · · Score: 1

      This is covered by the sentence in the introduction: As used in this agreement, "Google Services" does not include the Adwords or Adsense programs. But note that Analytics is not (yet?) excluded.

      --
      Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that you think before you break 'em. (Terry Pratchett)
    4. Re:Oddest Terms of Service by himself · · Score: 1

      I think that means that if you're going to use this for profit -- say, by a company -- they want you to send them money for the old, pre-Google-style Urchin product with its associated support plans (which, I should point out, are pretty good). You know, that old "money is exchanged for goods or services" angle that makes an economy an economy. :7)

      We have had Urchin for a while, and its charts-n-graphs are quite popular with web artistes, management types, and the departmental end users whose web pages are posted on our main site. It's good stuff.

  11. c'mon by Douglas+Simmons · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Registrars especially have pushed gimmicky "features" on domain buyers that people could otherwise get with a phonecall to their ISP or typing apt-get install webalizer. As far as tracking the way people "interact" on your site, without a google ad on every page or some script I don't see how they can track user behavior on the site (IE which paths through the site are most popular) beyond timing the first and last load of a page with an ad on it. OTOH most of these potential customers or users of this feature don't have my skills. It just raises the whole issue of whether or not google's still a strong buy at 393/share.

    1. Re:c'mon by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1
      without a google ad on every page or some script I don't see how they can track user behavior on the site

      You just answered the question: some script on every page. What's so hard about that? Maybe you just don't have the skills of Google's potential customers for this feature.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  12. Is this the future of google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This looks like google is relying less and less on their PageRank algorithm and more and more on data that they spy from users.

    It seems to me that the page rank is too easilly manipulated so they are resorting to the alexia toolbar method.

    Already they are pusing their toolbar hard (even for firefox where is has limited appeal). This says even more to me that they are using the stats from the toolbar and now these stats to monitor user browsing behavior, which it will use to better their search results.

    1. Re:Is this the future of google? by GweeDo · · Score: 1

      This makes perfect sense to me. Why base the "value" of a page off something you hope is right rather than off the actualy browsing trends of people.

    2. Re:Is this the future of google? by Rekolitus · · Score: 1

      Perhaps Google will buy StumbleUpon next.

    3. Re:Is this the future of google? by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      This makes perfect sense to me. Why base the "value" of a page off something you hope is right rather than off the actualy browsing trends of people.

      Because you're not tracking the browsing trends of people - you're tracking the browsing trends of a very small number of self-selected people who install the toolbar. In the case of Alexa, the installed base is absolutely _miniscule_, and it tends to be a very specific cross-section (these people weren't a randomly selected cross-section).

      For those reasons Alexa rankings are hugely gameable, and ridiculously useless, outside of the top 1000 or so.

    4. Re:Is this the future of google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      pusing their toolbar hard
      Pus?! That's gross!
  13. Use this to improve search by G4from128k · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If Google can tell how people react to a site, then it could use the data to affect pagerank. Sites that people bail from would lose pagerank and sites that people stay in and explore would gain page rank. Of course, Google would need some scheme for filtering out scam data where an SEO tries to make their site look interesting or make a competitor site look uninteresting by faking the behavior of visitors.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  14. spamming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since this service tracks "how users got to your site", I wonder if it includes filters to combat referer spaming. Most web statistics packages (such as webalizer and awstats) are still easy targets.

  15. Re:Digg.com by 0110011001110101 · · Score: 1

    Anybody have the definitive list of tech/geek/info websites out there? I am occasionally hearing about interesting sits through this fashion (complaining that they beat /. to the punch) and I always enjoy the site after browsing it.. but I'd like the end all, be all list please...

    --
    Don't anthropomorphize computers: they hate that.
  16. Re:developers developers developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    must have key to join channel! GG

  17. Welcome to 1993! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Those of you that don't use AdWords can still use Analytics by adding a simple javascript snippet to your web site.
    Gee, that's just what I need, another one of those broken odometers on my pages.

  18. Privacy? by maelstrom · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    So now Google can read my e-mail, track my searches, track my social network, and track which websites I go to with one cookie? All of these were opt-in until this one. Interesting...

    --
    The more you know, the less you understand.
    1. Re:Privacy? by KitesWorld · · Score: 2, Funny

      Umm, what's stopping you from blocking the cookie? :)

      Slow down cowboy! - Shaddup, slashhash. :/

  19. Google starting to slip? by 0110011001110101 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Is Google starting to slip? I hit the "Sign up >>" button within Google Analytics, recieved a Javascript error "Syntax Error" and have been waiting on a response page for 3 minutes now....

    This just isn't the quality I'd expect from their team of PhD and mental masters...

    Google if you're listening.. I have pages of code that throw syntax errors... scoop me up quick! I'm everything you're looking for and more!

    --
    Don't anthropomorphize computers: they hate that.
  20. Re:warning to Slashdot by Kosmatos · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Don't be ridiculous... Being the first site to post a story is not what Slashdot is about. Its about the comments posted on the story by the users. Great stuff like the "In Soviet Russia" jokes, the "5. Profit!" responses, the Open Source fanatics with their twisted mentality, the Microsoft-haters with their ridiculous love for Linux, the Apple-bashers who don't know what they are talking about.... :)

    --
    I'm your huckleberry
  21. Giving the others a run for their money. by ---s3V3n--- · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well this should be interesting. For years I used NedStat Basic (now WebStats4U, what a lame name). Anyhow, this last September they changed their name and quietly changed their TOS. The TOS changs were mentioned in small type at the bottom of an email announcing the 'exciting' changes. The biggest change is they now had the right to put pop-ups and other crap-tastic forms of advertising on your site.

    NedStat always seemed to be one of the better free analytic sites out there, with them starting to pup pop-ups on sites, I'd imagine a lot of people will happily switch away from them. And since one of the choices is Google, I'd imagine a lot will switch to Google.

    1. Re:Giving the others a run for their money. by musicmaster · · Score: 1

      Tellertest gives a good overview of alternative counters. Statcounter looks interesting, but I have to much pageviews for them. Now I am trying CountStat as a replacement for Nedstat.

      I surely will try Google when it is working.

      I found Google Analytics' information rather strange. It is all talk that seems directed at big budget companies about how they can help them to make money. And then when you register they are talking about non-commercial.

  22. *adds google-analytics.com to his hostperm.1* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Is it just me, or is Google getting just slightly too ubiquitous? It really scares me across just how large a part of my online activities they can track me, and "do no evil" stands very little chance when faced with the Homeland Security goons. Lcukily there's SeaMonkey/Firefox/Mozilla: *adds the following line to his hostperm.1 file* host script 2 google-analytics.com (note that the spaces between those strings have to be tabs)

    1. Re:*adds google-analytics.com to his hostperm.1* by Cruithne · · Score: 4, Funny

      *adds the following line to his hostperm.1 file*

      I know this is horribly wrong, but apparently i'm dyslexic... i read "hostperm" as "hotsperm".

    2. Re:*adds google-analytics.com to his hostperm.1* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you're just a 14-year old moron trolling for karma. Forget it.

    3. Re:*adds google-analytics.com to his hostperm.1* by Cruithne · · Score: 1

      I resent that remark! I am a 21 year old moron trolling for karma.

  23. No different than Google ads. by brunes69 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you have a Google ad on your page you are already giving them all this information.

  24. Schnikeys we slashdotted google by 0110011001110101 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This is from google after I timed out trying to sign-up:

    Currently Undergoing Maintenance

    Google Analytics reporting is currently undergoing maintenance and will be available shortly. Your site traffic is being logged and you will be able to see the data after system maintenance has concluded.

    --
    Don't anthropomorphize computers: they hate that.
    1. Re:Schnikeys we slashdotted google by mmkkbb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, it's been like that for an hour. I'm thinking I'll just stick with SiteMeter.

      --
      -mkb
  25. Doubt it's a mistake by pubjames · · Score: 1

    I'm sure they are going to start charging for this service in the future if you are a company.

    1. Re:Doubt it's a mistake by yerfatma · · Score: 1

      Are you sure? Isn't this a good way to drive people to buy AdWords? It seems more likely this is a concerted effort that came out of the realization people who actively track their web statistics in a meaningful way are people who spend more money on ads. Which is the chicken and which is the egg is a question left to Google in this case.

  26. slashdotted... by alexandreracine · · Score: 0

    How to say politely that your website is slashdotted?

    "Currently Undergoing Maintenance

    Google Analytics reporting is currently undergoing maintenance and will be available shortly. Your site traffic is being logged and you will be able to see the data after system maintenance has concluded."

    --
    No sig for now.
    1. Re:slashdotted... by diegocgteleline.es · · Score: 1

      This software was bought from another company so I'm not suprised at all that it doesn't scales how all the rest of google services (which unlike this service should be based in the "power" of the google cluster) do

  27. AdWords attractiveness rising... by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Funny

    Right after Microsoft leaked that memo where they're going to try enter the online ad market due to problems with their business strategies, Google pulls a rabbit out their hat to raise their AdWords attractiveness to new heights... Establishing their foothold further, before MS have even got their steam up. I can already hear things crashing in Ballmer's office. :-p

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  28. Try it again, it should work by digitaldc · · Score: 0

    It worked for me

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  29. Flash based? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 0, Troll
    Analytics will generate a Flash-based map of the world that shows you which regions your traffic comes from.

    What about those of us who don't use Flash? Why use Flash? Wouldn't it be just as easy to generate a table showing the same information?

    Flash-rendered graphs are provided with each data collection so that you can get a quick visual overview.

    See my previous question above.

    Seems like Flash is the new blink tag.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:Flash based? by TaylorTAP · · Score: 1

      Umm last time I checked more people had flash installed then Internet Explorer. With a 98% userbase I imagine if you don't have flash you need to step into this century and do an update.

    2. Re:Flash based? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flash content is much more offensive than the blink tag but since this broken by design system appears not to log hits from people who have javascript disabled, the point is moot.

    3. Re:Flash based? by Cpyder · · Score: 1
      Analytics will generate a Flash-based map of the world that shows you which regions your traffic comes from.

      What about those of us who don't use Flash? Why use Flash? Wouldn't it be just as easy to generate a table showing the same information?

      Think of the target audience for this product: managers and marketing people. They drool over shiny graphs, and have certainly got flash installed.

      I suppose they will provide hard numbers for the geeks and the financial people too, though I'm not sure about that (at the moment the site seems a bit slashdotted, so I can't check it out).

    4. Re:Flash based? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ahh,, you mean like every 64bit user out there?

      At least in your century flashw as available, but in 2005 (when 64bits became mainstream, yes that century) macromedia/adobe failed to suply a 64 bit plugin, thus forcing users to browse in 32 bits browsers.

  30. Graceful Slashdotting by wordisms · · Score: 4, Funny

    Google Analytics

    Currently Undergoing Maintenance

    Google Analytics reporting is currently undergoing maintenance and will be available shortly. Your site traffic is being logged and you will be able to see the data after system maintenance has concluded.

    1. Re:Graceful Slashdotting by iLogiK · · Score: 2, Funny

      never thought i'd see the day...google being slashdotted...
      i think that's one of the signs of the Apocalypse
      get ready everybody...the end of the world is near

    2. Re:Graceful Slashdotting by jamminm · · Score: 1

      It was down earlier, before it was posted on slashdot. I got google's email notice of the new service at 2:30 this morning and checked it out earlier.

  31. it seems to be in the really, really beta stage. by Marie+Antoinette · · Score: 0

    I tried to sign up for it, only to have the site crash on me halfway through.

  32. Death knell for Web Side Story by Slashdoc+Beta · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is the end of Web Side Story and similar analytics tools as we know it. Obviously webmasters will flock to Google's free (and probably superior) tools. Google simply takes the $400m market and redistributes the money back to publishers. Amazing.

    1. Re:Death knell for Web Side Story by ostiguy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      WSSI (Web side story) is currently down $2 to 15.99.

      ostiguy

    2. Re:Death knell for Web Side Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      I've never heard of Web Side Story, but I use awstats and will continue to (I avoided the problems that led to many awstats installs being hacked). I don't want google to have any detailed data about my sites or visitors. I don't and won't use adwords. They know enough already.

    3. Re:Death knell for Web Side Story by MemeRot · · Score: 1

      Except for the fact that this is currently only for non-commercial use, and limited to 1 mil views a month.

      But yes, when they roll out their commercial version, they will take a lot of business from web side story and others,

    4. Re:Death knell for Web Side Story by md27 · · Score: 1

      Disclaimer: Not attacking here, just interested in your comment.
      Where'd you see that it wasn't for commercial use? It certainly wasn't anywhere obvious as a clicked through this morning?

    5. Re:Death knell for Web Side Story by MemeRot · · Score: 1

      Read the Ars Technica comments. Some people went to sign up and were posting the weird terms of service, like 'not for use to increase traffic or sales on your website' - for a product designed to work with AdWords.

    6. Re:Death knell for Web Side Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And - Web Side Story (read HitBox) requires the ugliest/unwieldiest of code in your pages. Google's snippet is quite nice compared. I am not impressed with the reports from HitBox (or their crazy-ass admin website) or their monthly fees, I have already added the Google snippet to my pages (on top of the HitBox dreck), and will compare the results. It's been more than 12 hours though, and still no reports... I am predicting I'll be able to recommend the ditching of ShitBox.

    7. Re:Death knell for Web Side Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And still no reports for me as of noon on Wednesday - 36 hours...on about 8 different sites.

  33. Microsoft by pubjames · · Score: 5, Funny


    Coming to you from a couple of years in the future...

    Today Bill Gates released a statement "Yes, Google is currently number one in traffic analysis, but at Microsoft we think their service is really basic and we've got some amazing web analytics software in development that will blow Google's out of the water. It's coming out soon... Yes, I know I said we were going to crush Google in search a while ago and we didn't but we're definately going to crush them in Traffic Analysis. Really. Please believe me. Hey, don't walk away I'm still talking! Why doesn't anyone fear me any more..?"

  34. Google Watch would love it... by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

    I'm sure GoogleWatch loves this latest development: they now have to fear Google's stastics-gathering scripts on every page, in addition to the regular regimen of Google ads. I suppose a simple AdBlock filter with wildcards would work on the scripts readily enough, though.

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    1. Re:Google Watch would love it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I suppose a simple AdBlock filter with wildcards would work on the scripts readily enough, though.
      It's easier than that even, just add the following line to your hostperms.1 file (which can be found in your SeaMonkey/Firefox/Mozilla profile directory), and all script from this domain will be blocked from loading
      host script 2 google-analytics.com
      (Note that the spaces between those strings really should be tabs.) - I use this method extensively to get rid of all those stupid "intellitxt" inline ads.
  35. Conflict of interest??? by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 1

    Doesn't it strike anyone else that Google might have a conflict of interest in giving you unbiased analytics? Having a company who's claim to fame is directing visitors to sites on the internet (for a fee) might be inclined to bias analytic reports such that "your results were so much better after you paid for our ad ranking service." Paranoia?

  36. And The Best Part Of It Is... by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's a Totally Free Service!!

    (You just have to pay Google if you DON'T want them to track every little thing about you.)

    1. Re:And The Best Part Of It Is... by Omniscientist · · Score: 1
      Actually, it may not completely and totally free. While signing up and reading the license (yes, some people do) it said this:

      2. FEES AND SERVICES . Subject to Section 15 herein, the Service is provided without charge to You for up to 5 million pageviews per month per account...

      The license doesn't go on to say if you will be charged a fee after exceeding the limit or if they just plain won't do any more analyzing for you.

  37. From the TOS by carguy84 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Personal Use Only The Google Services are made available for your personal, non-commercial use only. You may not use the Google Services to sell a product or service, or to increase traffic to your Web site for commercial reasons, such as advertising sales. You may not take the results from a Google search and reformat and display them, or mirror the Google home page or results pages on your Web site. You may not "meta-search" Google. If you want to make commercial use of the Google Services, you must enter into an agreement with Google to do so in advance. Please contact us for more information.

  38. Interesting tidbit in the TOS ... by xmas2003 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Section 6 of the Terms of Service has some interesting wording that may cause some sites to think twice about deploying this.

    You hereby grant to Google and its wholly owned subsidiaries a limited license to use Your trade names, trademarks, service marks, logos, domain names and other distinctive brand features ("Brand Features") in presentations, marketing materials, customer lists, and financial reports. Further, Unless You notify Google otherwise in writing, Google and its wholly owned subsidiaries retain the right to identify You as a valued customer and optionally issue a press release that, at a minimum, discloses You have licensed the Product and that the Product is Your preferred web analytics package.

    --
    Hulk SMASH Celiac Disease
    1. Re:Interesting tidbit in the TOS ... by md27 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      All this says is they can say you use their service. I don't think you really need to worry since they won't proclaim you as a customer unless you're massive, like Microsoft or Yahoo or something they're not gonna care enough to talk about you.

    2. Re:Interesting tidbit in the TOS ... by digidave · · Score: 1

      You'll find nearly any product that requires a license agreement will grant the vendor the right to use your name. Ever installed MS Windows? Microsoft can mention that you're a customer.

      --
      The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    3. Re:Interesting tidbit in the TOS ... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      This is mainly so that if they proclaim "Reziac is a customer!" I can't sue them for mentioning my name and, in conjunction with that, displaying my trademark.

      I do think it's a bit presumptive, and begging for PR trouble, to thereby ASSUME that this product is my "preferred web analytics package". For all they know, I might run several, and if *asked* my preference, it might be another one. Not good PR when the vendor makes one claim and the customer makes another. Hopefully they'll actually ASK customers before making silly proclamations about who prefers what.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  39. Rather this than rely on DMOZ etc. by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Disclaimer: I'm as sceptical as the next guy about having any big organisation collecting massive amounts of data about some area of the Internet, and Google are clearly the biggest potential abusers of that information.

    However, right now the text that appears for a web site I help to run if you find it in Google isn't written by either Google or us, it's written by some anonymous editor at DMOZ. Those editors are notorious for not giving a damn what the webmasters of sites they link to (or don't link to, or link to but misleadingly) think; indeed, we have been blocking all referrals from DMOZ with a 403 since they rejected an update request that by their editor's own admission was in both their readers' interests and ours.

    Moreover, whether or not you're listed on DMOZ seems to have an absurd effect on your site's PageRank. It would be a welcome change for Google to construct their index independently, using only their own analysis of relevant factors directly related to the site in question, rather than relying on outside sources with dubious ethics.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  40. What about google-behaviourpersonality analysis by ACORN_USER · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    I remember a company named Search Space, a couple of years ago. I was talking to someone who worked there and they were firing all sorts of random data into neural nets and all sorts of hybrid emergent learning engines. The goal - well it was to detect and learn patterns of user behaviour, categorising these into good/bad actions. You wonder though, with so much info out there on your search habits, perhaps we'd be able to do the same thing as hand-writing analysis. Let a guy google for ten minutes and then assess his nature.

    User:Bill Gates
    Assessment:You are a power hungry, closed minded, egotistical b@stard. You ability to view the world without glasses which highlight you as the centre of all things is impaired. You goal is to dominate the world with substandard products. If it weren't for the legality of such things, you'd bomb the houses of every open source developer on the planet. You are also keen on donkies and young monkies dressed in bondage ware.

  41. Last Week's technology.. by Feint · · Score: 1

    And for all of you that have spent time and money re-writing your web site to use shiny new AJAX technology.. No more pages.. Only one hit it the google log.

    I sure hope Google has a way toto get this to work that isn't too hard to integrate..

  42. Man I wish I'd bought stock!!!!! by frankcow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is honestly going to rock the world of web analytics. I've been dealing with some of the major vendors lately, this move will herald some serious changes in how they do business. I'm still struggling to understand the implications!!!

  43. Re:warning to Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HEHE!

  44. I noticed by kurtis25 · · Score: 1

    I noticed this the other day. Blogger was running a little sluggish over my internet connection. One of the messages at the bottom was something about analytics-google.com. I checked it out but it gave me a Google splashed timed out message. I figured they were up to something like this when I noticed that. I figured they had already started to track movement on Blogger just because they can. I only hoped they would allow me to track it too. Just wait until they tie it into the search history.

  45. No encryption here? by Michael+Iatrou · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Gmail will force you to use https but if you want to sign in to Google Analytics, you provide the same credentials with no encryption.

    1. Re:No encryption here? by slug359 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Incorrect, the URL of the sign in box is: https://www.google.com/accounts/ServiceLoginBox?se rvice=analytics&nui= ...

    2. Re:No encryption here? by Michael+Iatrou · · Score: 1

      You are right, my mistake -- I only tried https, I didn't check the iframe in HTML to confirm the URL. Still, from usability point of view, there should be a note about the secure authentication: some people *do* care about security and unfortunately many web service providers are not as concern as Google about it.

  46. Yeah, I know: Pedantic by Xarius · · Score: 1

    "Analytics is also built to integrate with AdWords if you are already utilizing that service."

    Doesn't 'utilizing' mean using a tool for something other than it's intended purpose, i.e. "I utilised a screwdriver to prop the window open"?

    Shouldn't the word be using?

    --
    C17H21NO4
    1. Re:Yeah, I know: Pedantic by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, the difference between 'utilize' and 'use' is that when you 'utilize' something, you attempt to gain profit from the action. Not necessarily so, when you 'use' something.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:Yeah, I know: Pedantic by gammoth · · Score: 1
      I found this usage comment on dictionary.com interesting:
      Usage Note: A number of critics have remarked that utilize is an unnecessary substitute for use. It is true that many occurrences of utilize could be replaced by use with no loss to anything but pretentiousness, for example, in sentences such as They utilized questionable methods in their analysis or We hope that many commuters will continue to utilize mass transit after the bridge has reopened. But utilize can mean "to find a profitable or practical use for." Thus the sentence The teachers were unable to use the new computers might mean only that the teachers were unable to operate the computers, whereas The teachers were unable to utilize the new computers suggests that the teachers could not find ways to employ the computers in instruction.
  47. In other news... by Tidal+Flame · · Score: 0, Redundant

    In other news, Google has announced that they are planning to have a service for each word in the English dictionary by mid 2007. Google Myxomatosis is on its way!

    1. Re:In other news... by Pneuma+ROCKS · · Score: 1
      Google Myxomatosis is on its way!

      What's really funny is the obvious relationship between Google and rabbits.

      --
      Favorite quote: &quot;
  48. Beware, NSFW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Visiting the signup pages displays "Google Anal" in your Firefox browser tab.

  49. Have anyone read EULA for this tool? by foksoft · · Score: 1

    Just seeing first few lines of their javascrip seems that it is aimed at something different than to allow webmasters see what is happening on their websites. See:
    var _uctm=1; // set campaign tracking module (1=on|0=off)
    _uOsr[0]="google"; _uOkw[0]="q";
    _uOsr[1]="yahoo"; _uOkw[1]="p";
    _uOsr[2]="msn"; _uOkw[2]="q";
    _uOsr[3]="aol"; _uOkw[3]="query";
    ...
    These are just variables and I didn't walk through code but it warns me.
    Have anyone read EULA for this tool?

    1. Re:Have anyone read EULA for this tool? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That code is just parsing the referrer URL to look for search terms in the querystring.

      Nothing different than any other analytics service like Blogbeat or MeasureMap is doing.

    2. Re:Have anyone read EULA for this tool? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's for search term tracking...isn't it obvious?

    3. Re:Have anyone read EULA for this tool? by Fryed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My first guess upon looking at that snippet of code is that it is used to determine what search string brought users to that page. One of the things a web browser usually sends to a web server when requesting a page is the page that referred it. My guess is, the code you are looking at is part of a section of code that will figure out what search string brought the user to this page, if the referrer is a major search engine (ie, google, yahoo, msn, aol).

      The second string (q,p,q,query), is probably the variable in the referrer url that contains the search string that was used to send users to this page.

      Nothing evil, just some javascript magic so you can figure out how users are finding your webpage, which I imagine is quite useful information to a webmaster.

    4. Re:Have anyone read EULA for this tool? by in10se · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is nothing odd about this. These are the parameters the major search engines use to determine the keywords you searched for. Example:

      • google.com/search?q=my%20keywords
      • yahoo.com/search?p=my%20keywords
      • msn.com/results.aspx?q=my%20keywords
      • aol.com/aolcom/search?query=my%20keywords

      This is a standard item that web analytic software looks for so that it can tell you what keywords, and what search engines people used to find your site.

      --
      Popisms.com - Connecting pop culture
    5. Re:Have anyone read EULA for this tool? by matthew.thompson · · Score: 3, Informative

      This just looks like it's a method to track how people got to your page.

      Google and MSN use q=search+terms+here in the referer, aol query=me+too, yahoo p=small+green+vegetable

      This is no more than Google/Urchin (UCTM Urchin Capaign Tracking Module - We're Urchin software users at work) looking into the referer in the same way that your log analyser would.

      Of course it means that they now have the ability to see what other people are searching for on other search engines and track people's search engine usage.

      --
      Matt Thompson - Actuality - Insert product here.
    6. Re:Have anyone read EULA for this tool? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Urchin *itself* doesn't require javascript, nor any specific code on your pages; Earthlink uses it to generate stats on users' "personal webspace", but in that case it presumably has access to the webserver's logs.

      But how to run stats on a remote host? Obviously, it has to have some way for the remote host to speak to the counter, without needing to rely on webserver-specific features; hence the javascript, to make the browser do that job. (Of course, this won't tell you anything about visitors who have js disabled, like myself.)

      But it did occur to me that this also gives Google a whopping load of data that can be used toward developing a better pagerank system, that would favour real sites, and denigrate link farms and other useless crap. If this serves to elevate my sites in Google results, it's worthwhile.

      And if there's any page you don't want thusly indexed -- just don't add the js snippet, and they'll be invisible to Urchin.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  50. Re:What about google-behaviourpersonality analysis by manno · · Score: 1

    Wow, their's a lot of venom in there isn't there? Which one of your puppies did Mr. Gates run over yesterday? Yeah I don't like his company's Cooperate practices, but I'd say most of your assessment would require at least having the chance to meet with the guy face to face. All you know of him is from press releases, and the lovingly formed opinions of him posted here on slashdot. Like I said I'm not a huge fan of MS, but Billy G. and the company are two separate entities. I'm a different person at the office, why do you think he isn't?

    -manno

  51. yep by slashmojo · · Score: 1
    boardtracker.com

    You can search all the geek/tech/whatever boards & forums there, limit by category if you choose, and get alerts by email(free) and jabber(pay)..

  52. Google has been slashdotted by Ofenza · · Score: 1

    Mirror?

    1. Re:Google has been slashdotted by shihka · · Score: 1

      I have signed up for the service, taken some pictures and posted the screen shots on my blog. If you don't want to see the picture, I edited the article slightly and posted the words below: Google just rolled out a free web traffic analysis service named Google Analytics. You can catch the story at Slashdot. I have just signed up for an account. First full report is compiled after 12 hours, but in the main time, I can see a lot of buttons to play with. You can choose to view vital numbers from "Executive", "Marketer", or "Webmaster" point of view. There are so many functions I don't know where to start. Let me show you an overview picture. There is a pretty screen with 4 pictures to the top right. It shows you the webpage overview and covers "Visits and Pageviews", "Geo Map Overlay", "Visits bv New and Returning", and "Visit by Source". "Geo Map Overlay" is interesting, it shows the general location of where people is viewing your site. It uses javascript, so if your visitor has it off, you won't can see the location. Also, the display is in flash for some reason, so make sure you have macromedia flash. If you use Firefox, the popular plug-in AdBlock will block flash, you need to disable it. Firefox viewer can find flash plugins. I just use Internet Explorer for now, it works just fine. The service is the most powerful and flexible I have seen yet, even from paid service. I have been using StatCounter for months, but that free service only provides stat for your previous 100 visitors. Google 'limit' your free account to 5 million views a month, which is plenty for the average joes. If you go over 5 million, your website can most likely make you enough money to afford a pay service anyhow. Even better, if you have an AdWord Account and tie Google Analytics onto it, you have "unlimited" capacity! I will keep both webstat for now. StatCounter updates in real time while Google Analytics updates webstat once an hour. By keeping both I can choose to tap the information whenever I want. Also, I have StatCounter setup as "Public", so visitors can see webstat in real time. The information visitors see from StatCounter is the same as what I see as a webmaster. Google Analytics seems powerful, but it doesn't let me share the information real tiem like Stat Counter does. However, you can choose to export your stat from google into txt, xml, excel, or print it out on the spot. Google never cease to amaze me, they come out with free products better than many paid services. As I write on this free Blogger Platform, logged by free Google Analytics, and being searched by Google Engine, I can't help but praise - Vive Google! Google !

    2. Re:Google has been slashdotted by Ofenza · · Score: 1

      After a while I was able to create an account and browse it, but thank you for the detailed description!

  53. Why not integrate with Adsense? by the_womble · · Score: 1

    OK so i is integrated with Ad Words.

    Would it not make a lot of sense to integrate it with Ad Sense - whose users already have Google javascripts on their pages?

    1. Re:Why not integrate with Adsense? by Pichu0102 · · Score: 1

      Actually, it wouldn't make much sense to integrate it with Adsense. Seeing as adsense relies on the content of the page it's on, it wouldn't matter how the page looks to adsense. Adwords integration would help Adwords advertisers see what keywords keep people on their site longer, making a bit more sense than adsense integration.

    2. Re:Why not integrate with Adsense? by the_womble · · Score: 1

      I do not mean integration at the same level as ad words - i.e. of the stats. What I had in mind was:

      1) Allow adsense publishers to use their adsense login for analytics.

      2) Have a single javascript for both analystics and adsense

      3) If 1) above, then allow access to the stats from the adsense interface

      Of these three things, using the same login would the the most useful.

  54. um... DOH! by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2, Funny

    So don't use Google you paranoid muppet! There's a whole Internet of alternatives out there.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:um... DOH! by maelstrom · · Score: 1

      If you were paying attention, I said all of these services were opt in except for this one. If a website chooses to use this service, I get tracked by Google without my consent. Yes, *I* know how to block this, I assure you I can surf completely anonymously, that's not my issue. My issue is the millions of people who have no idea how to do this and de facto have no choice in this matter.

      --
      The more you know, the less you understand.
  55. So nu? by neodiogenes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yahoo's had this service ever since they bought out Overture -- and yes, it's also free if you're a big enough advertiser to make it worthwhile. And yes, it adds a javascript snippet to the advertisers' websites. You've probably visited hundreds of these sites already without knowing they were collecting third-party data. Sheesh. Add "Google" to any news story and all the world goes nuts. Personally, I'd wait until Google work out all the bugs before relying on it. It's still GIGO even when it's Google.

  56. Design of site by smallguy78 · · Score: 1

    Anyone notice the shift in the design of this site? From the google slightly-childish look, to big bold buzzwords displayed in a sans-serif font:

    http://www.google.com/analytics/conversionuniversi ty.html

    'Learn. Explore. Profit'

    They're obviously targeting morons who find that kind of sentence alluring (and need monotone sans-serif font design sexy) - worried they can just sell anal-ytics on the back of the google brand.

    --
    Nothing costs nothing
    1. Re:Design of site by ScottyH · · Score: 1

      And why are those buzzwords an image...graaahhhh. It drives me nuts!

    2. Re:Design of site by Kayamon · · Score: 1

      > 2. Explore

      Aha, it all becomes clear at last!

      --
      Kayamon
    3. Re:Design of site by ScottyH · · Score: 1

      Oh, and don't forget, "the web empowers you".

    4. Re:Design of site by MemeRot · · Score: 1

      Here's what I noticed when looking at the site after your comment. After seeing ROI like 4 times already I knew it was a bad sign. But this blew me away:

      "We've tripled our spend on search-based advertising, and as a result, increased our ROI by 188 percent."
      Jeff Saville
      Marketing Manager

      From http://www.google.com/analytics/case_study_deckers .html/. No, an increase on ROI is NOT achieved by tripling the money spent. Spending the money smarter, sure - but that's completely unrelated to amount of increased spending.

      The next few lines there also demonstrate a complete lack of understanding of what 'return on investment' means. If you increase spending on ads by 300%, and get less than a 300% increase in sales, you've decreased your return on investment.

      Next paragraph:
      "While the company's monthly spending on search-based advertising has increased by several thousand dollars, sales have increased by over 160 percent, and impressions are up by more than 360,000 per month. Deckers has also experienced a monthly increase in clicks of more than 2,000 and a boost in conversions of 3.5 percent. "Overall, return on investment increased by nearly 190 percent per month," says Saville."

      Uh hello meaningless numbers. Increased spending on ads - several thousand dollars (gee, very specific.... thought Google Analytics was supposed to tell you exactly what you're spending and what you're getting for it). So let's say they increased spending on ads by $3,000. Now, they get an increase of sales of 160%. Hmm. What did their sales used to be? No numbers? OK, so based on these two numbers, their ROI is somewhere between -10,000% and 200%. GREAT case study. You sooooo convinced me. I also fail to see how an increase of conversions of 3.5% could bring a greater ROI than 3.5%. Increasing ad spending will probably increase sales, for a while at least. That's an increase in sales, not an increase in the return you get on ad money.

      One of the other case studies was actually well written, but this was just ridiculous.

    5. Re:Design of site by kosmosik · · Score: 1

      > Anyone notice the shift in the design of this site?
      > From the google slightly-childish look, to big bold
      > buzzwords displayed in a sans-serif font

      WTF is wrong with this font? Design like design... It is for sure targeted at marketing staff and so on. Not because marketing staff are morons but because marketing staff does marketing. And IT staff does IT. And marketing staff does not do IT not because they are morons but because it is perhaps something else than IT? Something more social?

      I'am sysadmin (mind you) but I cannot stand types like you yelling that something else (that you apparently have no clue about) is for morons. Actually proper marketing (even thought it is bullshit misinformation usualy (for common sense)) is quite hard like anything else that requires proffesional skill.

      > 'Learn. Explore. Profit'

      > They're obviously targeting morons who find that kind of
      > sentence alluring (and need monotone sans-serif font
      > design sexy) - worried they can just sell anal-ytics on
      > the back of the google brand.

      Actually you was the first to notice this sentence. :) Of course this is evident marketing slogan... So what? Can't you filter that in your head? Belive me - most marketoids know what kind of slogan is that.

  57. No access to base domain by SeanDuggan · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I know it's not cool or "133t" to admit such things, but my homepage is a subdirectory of a larger domain. Oddly enough, they let me register users.adelphia.net with the service, but they won't let me register users.adelphia.net/~user.name/, where my site actually is. Since their code isn't on the base page, they don't register the code I have on subdirectories.

    Huh... and I'm mildly curious as to whether anyone else can register the URL of users.adelphia.net.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
    1. Re:No access to base domain by TropicalCoder · · Score: 0

      I'm in a similar situation. Just tried tried it - added the filter "Include only traffic to a subdirectory" and directed monitoring to my main page, then checked "Tracking status". I get the following message...

      The Google Analytics tracking code has not been detected on your website's home page. For Analytics to function, you or your web administrator must add the code to each page of your website. :(

    2. Re:No access to base domain by Reziac · · Score: 1

      And my domain is actually a godaddy redirect to a non-root page on my Earthlink webspace. There's nothing in the FAQ that covers this situation. I did make a support request via google's form, we'll see if they have a useful answer or not :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  58. Re:What about google-behaviourpersonality analysis by ACORN_USER · · Score: 1
    You don't really get to be one of the wealthiest men in the world by being a 'different person' outside of the office. You simply have to look at his early writing to see this.

    As much as I despise him, I have to rate him as being someone for whom "it's more than just a job". Yes, I 'REALLY' do rate him for that. I hate 9-5'ers in IT. It's a domain for the passionate and I have no time for those who punch-clock. Unfortunately, all that work of his is built on a slushy foundation of dog poop.

    Should I surprise you further? I actually rate MS higher than I rate the great overlord himself. MS Research, being a prime example of computational Mecca. I know MS guys, and I think that with a good shuffle up from all sides, a little revolution, some sound engineering and architectural practices and power-back-to-the-technologically-informed, you could have a pretty hot company, producing good software - and all without 'my' condemnation. It'll never happen. They have the talent pool; the only problem is that they are not utilising it.

    That said, I still fart in the general direction of all things Windoze. You can't really be that high up the food chain and not expect to have cheap shots made at your expense. He does good philanthropic work (although it's expected for people in that income bracket), but his general attitude is just plain bad for the future of development, IT and the world in general.

  59. Those with "Site Under Maintenance" - try using IE by 455 · · Score: 1

    Those with "Site Under Maintenance" - try using IE (if available)... worked for me.

  60. Netcraft is dead by berbo · · Score: 1

    Google confirms it.

  61. Google is Freakin Smart by rhyder · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am amazed time and again as Google finds segments in the market and exploits them. Now they are after web analysis, and not only do they provide a service, but they gain insight into how their competitors send traffic to your site. This is even better than just hosting, as you will get many people and companies that pay for hosting elsewhere, but will use GA to analyze traffic/logs.

    Google is web-omnipresent

    1. Re:Google is Freakin Smart by blank89 · · Score: 1

      I've lost count of how many new services they've come out with this month. I guess they must have been doing something with so many developers working for them, but they must have had so many releases in such quick succession planned out for a long time.

  62. Anyone else concerned about Google? by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Google is everywhere it seems, collecting data. Does this concern anyone else besides me? I use gmail and I notice that Google search now recognizes me. I can log out, but then I'm out of gmail as well. I've been doing more searching on A9 as a result. Of course, searching A9 means Amazon knows what I'm looking for, but at least I get a discount.

    But really, is Google getting to be too pervasive? It seems their future plans are really ambitious. Sure, the company's motto may be "do no evil" but that's not necessarily the motto of every employee there. Maybe I'm just paranoid...

    1. Re:Anyone else concerned about Google? by egotistical · · Score: 1

      I think they are plotting to take over the world, one book, video, and article at the time.

    2. Re:Anyone else concerned about Google? by ScottyH · · Score: 1

      How many times do people have to say this?

      WE GET IT ALREADY. Google is all-seeing, all-knowing. FEAR GOOGLE! Run! Run now!

    3. Re:Anyone else concerned about Google? by vonoech · · Score: 1

      How does this posting rate a 5 as "Insightful". In my opinion there is no insight here. The writer is asking a question (the same question several times actually). There is a reference to linked accounts; accounts which I and I think everyone else would assume would be linked. There was no mention of the kind of data that Google supposedly has.

      This post wasn't insightful.

      --
      "I'll be better when I'm older"
    4. Re:Anyone else concerned about Google? by iammaxus · · Score: 1

      A9 uses Google results http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A9.com. I haven't read the TOS, but its conceivable that they Google still tracks your searches and result choices via A9.

    5. Re:Anyone else concerned about Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is, this creates a Conflict Of Interest (at least perceived). Google does your AdSense, so you need a good analytics solution to make sure AdSense is working for you, how well, and to detect click fraud. Now, Google runs the analytics solution that does that stuff for you ... so if you do suffer from click fraud, or AdSense isn't right for you ... (dramatic line-breaks for the kicker)

      Do you trust Google to always be honest, and to let you know about it?

  63. Re:What about google-behaviourpersonality analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You are also keen on donkies and young monkies dressed in bondage ware.

    When I read that it was modded +2 Interesting. What sort of sick mind would do that? ONLY +2?!
  64. Analytics by certel · · Score: 1

    Wow, this seems like an interesting service. Knowing how Google is, they probably thought of everything. Look forward to using it!

  65. Not a big deal by SPYvSPY · · Score: 1

    This isn't that big of a deal. I don't like the inclusion of "marketing materials", but otherwise this is pretty much limited to the types of use most software developers reserve from their end users, IMO.

  66. We're upgrading accounts. by trollable · · Score: 1

    I got the Site under Maintenance for two hours. I could finaly subscribe. Now I got this message:

    We're upgrading accounts. Please come back later.
    Thanks for stopping by. We are currently migrating existing customers to the newly improved Google Analytics service. This process will be completed later this afternoon. Please come back then to sign up for Google Analytics.


    To every slashdoter, please be nice, wait for your turn ;)

  67. Re:warning to Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    5. Profit!

  68. Re:What about google-behaviourpersonality analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, you really sound nutty. Here's a summary of what you just said:

    1) Bill gates wrote something a long time ago, that means now hes a bad man.

    2) I have no life outide my job, and I hate people that do, because they aren't as professional as me. However, I'm unprofessional enough to use dog-poop in a sentence.

    3) I like MS research, and also like to be condescending. I think MS would be better with IT guys as managers. (nevermind Bill Gates himself is/was an IT guy)

    4) I think Bill Gates has a bad attitude, nevermind that hes donating millions to stop aids in africa. I think i am better than he is, and yet I still use the word "fart" and the L33+ spelling of Windows, as if I was in third grade, or really wished I was back there.

    So, how does it feel to be chided by an anonymous coward?

  69. Google confirms it ... by ToasterofDOOM · · Score: 1

    ... Netcraft is dying!

    --
    I am Spartacus
  70. Tin-foil-hat-esque (again) by wilburpb · · Score: 1

    No Sane webmaster? If you'd ever used any enterprise level analytics before other than the hit counter .gif on your geocites page you'd know that this is how most of the best web-site analytics engines work (Hitbox/HBX Analytics for one). Google isn't breaking new ground here. Yes, you need to be able to trust companies that you partner with. Shocker, I know.

  71. Re:But only... by symbolic · · Score: 1


    Google has a lot to lose only if a sufficient number of people react negatively. Many people are so complacent, they let companies/politicians get away with anything short of murder. They might pay lip service, but when it comes down to money, sacrificing convenience, or having to change one's m.o. a little, all bets are off. It's the American way.

  72. We're upgrading accounts. Please come back later. by Kaetemi · · Score: 0

    "Thanks for stopping by. We are currently migrating existing customers to the newly improved Google Analytics service. This process will be completed later this afternoon. Please come back then to sign up for Google Analytics."

    --
    Kaetemi
  73. Re:warning to Slashdot by marktwen0 · · Score: 1

    I HEART HUCKABEES'S!

  74. Overlay feature is interesting by toolbar · · Score: 1

    I have build something similar one or two years ago.

    It's quite easy to do: Use Javascript to install an onclick handler that sets a cookie with the click-coordinates. On the server-side you need to check the cookie and the referrer and store url and coordinates in a database. It's best to limit this to just one browser, ie. the much hated internet explorer 6 (because of slight differences in positioning algorithms). Also, if you have a high traffic site, you might only want to store a small percentage of these tuples.

    To diplay the click-information for a web page simply cumulate all click in a square of a certain size (ie. 20) and draw a small rectangle filled with a colour corresponding to the number of clicks.

    It really helped us to identify some unused/crappy navigation on our website.

  75. Another Language Mandatory Nowadays? by ghotiman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Many people get along just fine knowing only English, or only their own language for that matter. What other language do you think is mandatory nowadays? It depends where you live, and in many places there is no need to know another language. Why should someone living in Kansas bother to learn a language they will never use?

    1. Re:Another Language Mandatory Nowadays? by kers · · Score: 2, Funny
      What other language do you think is mandatory nowadays?
      Doublespeak.
  76. great... by torrents · · Score: 1

    now you don't even have to interpret (or keep) your own apache logs... google makes life easier once again!!!

    --
    Get your torrents...
  77. the future of other online website log analyzers? by fordracerguy · · Score: 1

    I came up with the great idea - or that is taking an existing idea and making it better, and now I guess it's pretty much dead. There are about 15 online web traffic analyzers (the ones that work in your header tags, not the actual log file analysis) ranging from free cheapies all the way up to urchin (as we used to know it) I spent the last two months writing an indepth analyzer of my own and was just about to release it. I wasn't planning on making a living off of it, just a few bucks here or there. But now, I guess I can kiss my idea goodbye. Has anyone thought of the affect this is going to have? I'm sure a lot of people are going to lose their jobs/incomes and more. I know there has already been mention of the power google is going to have over individual websites via the javascript include not to mention the powerful data they are going to be collecting. I guess what my question is, can you guys thnk of a market that my software, or that is all of the lower end/partially free log analyzers can still tap into? Or is it a lost cause? Do you think google will always keep the Urchin code free?

  78. from the FAQ by nazsco · · Score: 1

    when you click on the question: Who will have access to my Google Analytics data?

    you receive: The requested URL /support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=26786&hl=e n_US was not found on this server.

    Does this means that everyone trying to see your stats will get a fake 404?

  79. Google Regulator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is an interesting point. Getting people where they want to go is important. Many people accepted Google and have stuck to it for several years now. Google has been the public transportation of the internet. Google seems to find that Diversifying and offering great utilities, such as google earth, gmail, etc. is a great benefit to the world and themselves. The innovation has been exciting users and stock holders. Someone mentioned before that $393 is still supposed to be a strong buy? Deeper than a conflict of interest. The idea is genius and obviously it is opt-in. But a monopoly like this can spell disaster for online communities, and reap major benefits for others. But how is this different than any other google ranking tool. Beware of the future of the internet that may be regulated. Both for content and for income. Think the IRS of the internet. Doing Business With Google

  80. Re:the future of other online website log analyzer by trollable · · Score: 1

    There is plenty of ways you can compete. First right now Google Analytics doesn't work :( Second you can provide more features (for example there is no display by city in GA) Third you can do it better (no flash, java, png only, ...) But the main point is you could sell the software and not the service. For a lot of websites, GA is not an option because the javascript is from outside and by so insecure. You can not compete with PageRank and AdWords but IIRC Alexa has an offer for the data they collect. Now, I don't know if this business is viable but there is still some space for a new offer.

  81. Block Google Analytics from tracking your visit. by labnol · · Score: 1

    You can actually block Google Analytics from tracking your visits by adding a line to your Windows Hosts file.
    http://labnol.blogspot.com/2005/11/prevent-google- analytics-from-tracking.html

  82. Nope by freeweed · · Score: 1

    Nope. Not a single other person has thought this before.

    Especially no one on Slashdot. Those thousands of other posts you think you might have perhaps seen actually don't exist.

    We also like Linux, but you wouldn't know it due to the lack of posts on that subject as well.

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  83. It had to happen one day... by FF3451 · · Score: 1

    I'm hearing from a lot of people that this service is going at a snail's pace, a friend is waiting for his data 25 hours after he requested it and the system told him it would be ready in 12.

    Will this go down in history as the day Google got slashdotted? :P

    1. Re:It had to happen one day... by GuruBuckaroo · · Score: 1

      No doubt. I'm over 24 hours now, with no reported data, despite visits from my home & work connections (and yes, I refreshed & checked source to make sure the javascript tag was showing up). Google's own 'is it working' link says it's good, and collecting data - but it shows no hits yet.

      Sigh. It sounded so good, too.

      --
      Poor means hoping the toothache goes away.
  84. Scroogle & Clusty by jahknow · · Score: 1

    Try Scroogle. http://www.scroogle.org/ Why? http://www.scroogle.org/gscrape.html Alternately, use Clusty, a metasearch http://www.clusty.com/ Clusty even has a plugin for your Mozilla/Firefox search box http://clusty.com/toolbar/mozilla

    --
    ^^
  85. Check this out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm trying to gather some quick test data for some Google Analytics reports. It would be appreciated if you could click this link, you don't even have to read it! http://www.sawthetableleg.com/

    Thanks guys

  86. Re:the future of other online website log analyzer by bestwebhostingprovid · · Score: 1

    Hmmm...you could still make a living out of your analyzer. I'd try releasing it under GPL, build a community around it, create modules and charge for them, or simply follow a business model like sugarcrm.com Just my 2 cents... Anyhow, Google is becoming like Walmart...bankrupting small businesses. Yet, somehow the society seems to benefit...

    --
    Best Web Hosting Provider -- web host reviews from a nerd.
  87. GA slows loading? by bestwebhostingprovid · · Score: 1

    Just wondering, if someone has actually measured if the script that's added slows the loading of a page?

    --
    Best Web Hosting Provider -- web host reviews from a nerd.
  88. In Soviet Googalia by jahknow · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Googalia, you get Craigslist laid!

    --
    ^^
  89. Seven days by mikae1 · · Score: 1

    It's now seven (yes 7) days since I added the tracking code and it still isn't presenting any data. Marvellous! I still get "Tracking for your website has not yet been validated".