And this is just that, the judge/defense busted the prosecution for abusing their privilege to do illegal search and seizure. You missed the part where the defendant is innocent until PROVEN guilty. He was proven guilty on all other counts. With illegal search and seizure they could easily "pick and choose" evidence that will fit the case at whatever time they see fit.
Evidence does not exonerate anyone, it can only be used to prove guilt. If the prosecutor has evidence that is illegally obtained which proves the defendants innocence, the prosecutor would never bring it up (or discontinue prosecution) and if they for some bizarre reason did, the defense would never challenge it.
The only charge the prosecution has is to prove guilt without violating someone's constitutional rights. If they could just illegally search and seize anything anyone speaking up would be in jail and bands of police would simply plunder your goods as they see fit. They already do that to an extent but at least if you can afford a lawyer you can do something about it.
The majority of offenders plead out if they know they have evidence against them so examination of chain of evidence doesn't happen. Police are largely unaware of the law. If all criminals had good lawyers and could afford full trials with defensive investigations we would barely have any behind bars.
It's because he's an idiot like Bush was and he doesn't have the support the approved candidates have. He also has to support the RNC official platform in order to be an RNC candidate and thus a lot of his platform (the Mexican wall stuff and taxes) isn't actually his.
Everything that Clinton says (if she even says it) has gone through a team of lawyers and media personnel. The problem is the media and the powers that be got surprised by Trump. Now they're broadening everything he says and make it sound worse. When he says "We should get observers in certain portions of PA" the narrative becomes "Trump says we should have thugs intimidating voters at all the voting places" and when he says the media is a liar, all they can do is take quotes out of context.
Now I won't vote for either, Trump should've packed his things and gone independent months ago when the RNC was stacking against him, perhaps he would've had a chance to be an honest candidate.
You've been misinformed by the media or are intentionally misstating the candidate. Trump's statement was only about certain areas in Pennsylvania. His call to have neutral observers at poll locations, a thing the DNC and the UN has itself suggested during BOTH of Obama's elections in the same areas, is now being met with threats to arrest those observers.
The US has such large voting problems the UN AND the DNC has called for observers and those observers are now being threatened with arrest.
Asymmetric keys rely on factorization of huge numbers to generate a 'distributable' key. Factorization of a single number is relatively complex, it takes a really, really long time with our current computers to factor any number. If you have to factor numbers quantum computing is promised/theorized to be able to do this instantly or at least very quickly, if you can 'factor' any huge number instantly you can make quick guesses until you have a matching combination.
Symmetric keys rely on secrets. Everyone involved in the message needs the SAME key. It's sort of like a password but the password is insanely long, the problem is you can only distribute the key to whom you are trying to communicate with and everyone needs a different key, that would make maintaining a new key-per-object insanely complex. In quantum computing you still have to 'search' for this password through the entire possible space of passwords (not just numbers but any bit-combination), it can go faster with quantum computing (theorized to be about twice as fast) but it will still take a long time. If it takes you to the heat death of the Universe to guess a key, now it only takes half that long (although known flaws in hardware, software or algorithms can typically reduce the search space substantially).
Either way there are asymmetric algorithms that are quantum resistant but either they are too complex on non-quantum computers or they are patent encumbered. For symmetric keys it is feasible to just use larger keys.
Yeah, but that guy paid the right people and thus will never be charged. Ulbright, Schwartz and Applebaum are just an example for what happens if you want to create a truly anonymous space that can't be controlled or inspected by governments.
Homo Sapiens and it's immediate predecessors have had many extinction events, some apparently very near. Space is a very hostile place, I don't doubt there is lots of life all over space but intelligent life that has the need or capacity for interstellar signaling, let alone communication or travel in our general direction over the last 100 years is very, very slim.
We can't even SEE the stars and planets beyond our own solar system very well, deciphering a foreign signal from any tiny spot on a small planet is quite well out of our capacity. We could potentially see a Kardashev Type 2 or 3 civilization, I don't think we can see Type 1 and we're well below that level ourselves but it's unlikely given our current paths we'd even make it that far.
I thought that was an urban legend. How stupid do you have to be to run into a river because a piece of first gen tech tells you so. Next you'll be telling me people will vote for someone like Donald Trump or another Clinton.
Looking over their site, it doesn't look all that interesting. It's just a standard reference Intel configuration. I can get the same from SuperMicro and a host of other sites probably for a lot cheaper.
The brand got bought, "SGI" is now selling basic, standard SuperMicro servers and putting the logo on it. They also apparently support your average Hadoop, SAP etc. implementation.
Pretty much in that order: - You cancel whatever service you have with them so they get no further money if you can legally do so. - You threaten them with cancellation, non-renewal or no further sales - most smaller companies will bend over backwards to maintain clients - You threaten with social pressure (trade groups, other departments or companies you have ties with, social media) - You go for legal action. In European countries this is a heck of a lot easier as consumer protections are baked into the law even if you have contracts saying otherwise. In the US you have fewer protections but small claims is often viable for small companies even if you can't recover the whole sum. If you have a legal team staffed, talk to them about your options but unless you do jury trials are usually too expensive unless you get a class action going.
Don't EVER use social media or other publishing options to outline issues you have with a company. It's too easy for a big company to bully you with lawsuits and you may say something that's not strictly true or legal or even shows you violated a clause or your contract. All communications from your company should go through a lawyer.
I never heard about people being that stupid when cruise control was introduced into the mainstream. Autopilot, as it stands, is a smarter form of cruise control (it basically helps you maintain the speed without your foot on the pedal but it's a bit fancier than a fixed speed)
Stagnated? 10TB drives are available for purchase. It's easier to scale SSD up, you can simply put more chips in. But the cost is still prohibitive and it will stay that way until you get the price down from $1 to 3 cents/GB.
IO is still the major bottleneck at this point for most workloads. Your SSD's will only go 'so fast' and your interconnects (Gigabit? 10GbE if you're lucky?) are usually what you'll end up filling. SSD's aren't going much faster than they did a few years ago, they sure have a bag of tricks to make it seem that way (computers capable of running BusyBox with 512MB-2GB of DRAM on their SSD chips). They have made some improvements (with huge drawbacks) in the latency of the fabric (NVMe) but it mainly improves reads.
Enterprise SSD currently peak out at about 50k write IOPS under 'real' workloads (fsync writes with a realistic read/write ratio when the SSD is 'dirty', not a synthetic benchmark on a fresh SSD), cheap SSDs (Samsung V-NAND tech) will peak out at about 10k write IOPS. We haven't really made much progress on the matter of IOPS but we have made a huge dent in the cost. I paid a lot for a set of 32GB X-25E but they still have fairly similar write IOPS characteristics.
The cheapest SSDs these days are ~$0.30/GB. This is an enterprise SSD though so we're usually looking at ~$1-2/GB or $4-10/GB, I'm not sure what their statement implied as far as which 'price class' it belongs to. Either way we're looking at ~$15-30k for a drive if not more if they're matching current market prices. It's "reasonably" priced but you'd need at least two of these and even then the rebuild times on these puppies will be murder.
Secure Boot is not a security feature, it is simply intended to make sure you don't install an "unapproved" OS on things like their Surface Pro. Any vendor can thus lock any otherwise relatively open hardware into "their" software under whatever guise (security, export restrictions, terrorism).
Completely impossible for these thermostats or hell, even newish furnaces to have a freeze sensor that mechanically triggers the heat regardless of it's internal setting?
Or you could place your old thermostat at a low temperature in parallel and hang it in your basement.
Never seen one like that and I own and have researched many 'smart' thermostats. Mine and most IoT devices also doesn't just sit exposed to the Internet, not sure why anyone would spend a public IP (because those things sure as hell don't do IPv6) on a thermostat.
They probably did but then tried to shave the costs down again when a new generation of managers came along 2 years later "why do we have a datacenter doing nothing most of the time, let's go to the SAAS/MAAS/PAAS model (which I think was the buzz word for shared hosting 10 years ago)"
Slashdot Mirror
And this is just that, the judge/defense busted the prosecution for abusing their privilege to do illegal search and seizure. You missed the part where the defendant is innocent until PROVEN guilty. He was proven guilty on all other counts. With illegal search and seizure they could easily "pick and choose" evidence that will fit the case at whatever time they see fit.
Evidence does not exonerate anyone, it can only be used to prove guilt. If the prosecutor has evidence that is illegally obtained which proves the defendants innocence, the prosecutor would never bring it up (or discontinue prosecution) and if they for some bizarre reason did, the defense would never challenge it.
The only charge the prosecution has is to prove guilt without violating someone's constitutional rights. If they could just illegally search and seize anything anyone speaking up would be in jail and bands of police would simply plunder your goods as they see fit. They already do that to an extent but at least if you can afford a lawyer you can do something about it.
The majority of offenders plead out if they know they have evidence against them so examination of chain of evidence doesn't happen. Police are largely unaware of the law. If all criminals had good lawyers and could afford full trials with defensive investigations we would barely have any behind bars.
There is a reason warrants and the like are necessary. This was the right procedure in a court of law, illegal search and seizure is illegal.
It's because he's an idiot like Bush was and he doesn't have the support the approved candidates have. He also has to support the RNC official platform in order to be an RNC candidate and thus a lot of his platform (the Mexican wall stuff and taxes) isn't actually his.
Everything that Clinton says (if she even says it) has gone through a team of lawyers and media personnel. The problem is the media and the powers that be got surprised by Trump. Now they're broadening everything he says and make it sound worse. When he says "We should get observers in certain portions of PA" the narrative becomes "Trump says we should have thugs intimidating voters at all the voting places" and when he says the media is a liar, all they can do is take quotes out of context.
Now I won't vote for either, Trump should've packed his things and gone independent months ago when the RNC was stacking against him, perhaps he would've had a chance to be an honest candidate.
Please correctly attribute your quotes (of Mark Twain)
And who would buy them? There is a reason the politicians have gone with Diebold so far even though they KNOW about the issues.
You've been misinformed by the media or are intentionally misstating the candidate. Trump's statement was only about certain areas in Pennsylvania. His call to have neutral observers at poll locations, a thing the DNC and the UN has itself suggested during BOTH of Obama's elections in the same areas, is now being met with threats to arrest those observers.
The US has such large voting problems the UN AND the DNC has called for observers and those observers are now being threatened with arrest.
Asymmetric keys rely on factorization of huge numbers to generate a 'distributable' key. Factorization of a single number is relatively complex, it takes a really, really long time with our current computers to factor any number. If you have to factor numbers quantum computing is promised/theorized to be able to do this instantly or at least very quickly, if you can 'factor' any huge number instantly you can make quick guesses until you have a matching combination.
Symmetric keys rely on secrets. Everyone involved in the message needs the SAME key. It's sort of like a password but the password is insanely long, the problem is you can only distribute the key to whom you are trying to communicate with and everyone needs a different key, that would make maintaining a new key-per-object insanely complex. In quantum computing you still have to 'search' for this password through the entire possible space of passwords (not just numbers but any bit-combination), it can go faster with quantum computing (theorized to be about twice as fast) but it will still take a long time. If it takes you to the heat death of the Universe to guess a key, now it only takes half that long (although known flaws in hardware, software or algorithms can typically reduce the search space substantially).
Either way there are asymmetric algorithms that are quantum resistant but either they are too complex on non-quantum computers or they are patent encumbered. For symmetric keys it is feasible to just use larger keys.
Yeah, but that guy paid the right people and thus will never be charged. Ulbright, Schwartz and Applebaum are just an example for what happens if you want to create a truly anonymous space that can't be controlled or inspected by governments.
Homo Sapiens and it's immediate predecessors have had many extinction events, some apparently very near. Space is a very hostile place, I don't doubt there is lots of life all over space but intelligent life that has the need or capacity for interstellar signaling, let alone communication or travel in our general direction over the last 100 years is very, very slim.
We can't even SEE the stars and planets beyond our own solar system very well, deciphering a foreign signal from any tiny spot on a small planet is quite well out of our capacity. We could potentially see a Kardashev Type 2 or 3 civilization, I don't think we can see Type 1 and we're well below that level ourselves but it's unlikely given our current paths we'd even make it that far.
I thought that was an urban legend. How stupid do you have to be to run into a river because a piece of first gen tech tells you so. Next you'll be telling me people will vote for someone like Donald Trump or another Clinton.
Looking over their site, it doesn't look all that interesting. It's just a standard reference Intel configuration. I can get the same from SuperMicro and a host of other sites probably for a lot cheaper.
The brand got bought, "SGI" is now selling basic, standard SuperMicro servers and putting the logo on it. They also apparently support your average Hadoop, SAP etc. implementation.
Pretty much in that order:
- You cancel whatever service you have with them so they get no further money if you can legally do so.
- You threaten them with cancellation, non-renewal or no further sales - most smaller companies will bend over backwards to maintain clients
- You threaten with social pressure (trade groups, other departments or companies you have ties with, social media)
- You go for legal action. In European countries this is a heck of a lot easier as consumer protections are baked into the law even if you have contracts saying otherwise. In the US you have fewer protections but small claims is often viable for small companies even if you can't recover the whole sum. If you have a legal team staffed, talk to them about your options but unless you do jury trials are usually too expensive unless you get a class action going.
Don't EVER use social media or other publishing options to outline issues you have with a company. It's too easy for a big company to bully you with lawsuits and you may say something that's not strictly true or legal or even shows you violated a clause or your contract. All communications from your company should go through a lawyer.
I never heard about people being that stupid when cruise control was introduced into the mainstream. Autopilot, as it stands, is a smarter form of cruise control (it basically helps you maintain the speed without your foot on the pedal but it's a bit fancier than a fixed speed)
Stagnated? 10TB drives are available for purchase. It's easier to scale SSD up, you can simply put more chips in. But the cost is still prohibitive and it will stay that way until you get the price down from $1 to 3 cents/GB.
IO is still the major bottleneck at this point for most workloads. Your SSD's will only go 'so fast' and your interconnects (Gigabit? 10GbE if you're lucky?) are usually what you'll end up filling. SSD's aren't going much faster than they did a few years ago, they sure have a bag of tricks to make it seem that way (computers capable of running BusyBox with 512MB-2GB of DRAM on their SSD chips). They have made some improvements (with huge drawbacks) in the latency of the fabric (NVMe) but it mainly improves reads.
Enterprise SSD currently peak out at about 50k write IOPS under 'real' workloads (fsync writes with a realistic read/write ratio when the SSD is 'dirty', not a synthetic benchmark on a fresh SSD), cheap SSDs (Samsung V-NAND tech) will peak out at about 10k write IOPS. We haven't really made much progress on the matter of IOPS but we have made a huge dent in the cost. I paid a lot for a set of 32GB X-25E but they still have fairly similar write IOPS characteristics.
The cheapest SSDs these days are ~$0.30/GB. This is an enterprise SSD though so we're usually looking at ~$1-2/GB or $4-10/GB, I'm not sure what their statement implied as far as which 'price class' it belongs to. Either way we're looking at ~$15-30k for a drive if not more if they're matching current market prices. It's "reasonably" priced but you'd need at least two of these and even then the rebuild times on these puppies will be murder.
$10B is chump change to our government and the government can't be held liable in these endeavors.
Secure Boot is not a security feature, it is simply intended to make sure you don't install an "unapproved" OS on things like their Surface Pro. Any vendor can thus lock any otherwise relatively open hardware into "their" software under whatever guise (security, export restrictions, terrorism).
Completely impossible for these thermostats or hell, even newish furnaces to have a freeze sensor that mechanically triggers the heat regardless of it's internal setting?
Or you could place your old thermostat at a low temperature in parallel and hang it in your basement.
Never seen one like that and I own and have researched many 'smart' thermostats. Mine and most IoT devices also doesn't just sit exposed to the Internet, not sure why anyone would spend a public IP (because those things sure as hell don't do IPv6) on a thermostat.
They don't destroy it, they use it to bait other people.
They probably did but then tried to shave the costs down again when a new generation of managers came along 2 years later "why do we have a datacenter doing nothing most of the time, let's go to the SAAS/MAAS/PAAS model (which I think was the buzz word for shared hosting 10 years ago)"