I'm also not sure what locking the car has to do with anything? That'll work just as it did.
I never remove the key from my pocket. It cannot get lost or locked in the car and it leaves my hand free for other things. The moment I have to take it out of my pocket the device is ruined for it's purpose. And if I only need to remove it after I got into the car, that is even worse since pockets are hard to reach into once sitting down. Do you understand now, or did I use too many words again?
This post just means the parent has not tried the new fobs that never have to leave your pocket. Hand full of bags and coffee cups, just walk up and open the door with your pinky finger. The fob in the pocket and touch of the door handle allows the car to unlock. Same with locking, but the back of your hand works well there. And starting means you don't need to try to fish a key out of your pocket while sitting in the seat either.
It really was an invention I didn't think sounded so awesome until a car I got had it. Then after using it i realized how helpful it is and now want it in every car.
That would be called a metal key in the lock then. I never take my fob from my pocket. I unlock the car by touch, start the car by push-button, and lock it again by touching the handle. My hands can be full of coffee and a laptop bag etc, while the back of my hand is all it takes to lock the car. Now you want me to remove the key from my pocket to put it into a holder so the car does not crash while driving down the road. Stupid suggestion and I would rather just go back to a regular key than that. But the key fob is the best invention I didn't know I wanted until I had it. It really is way convenient and it isn't really apparent until you are using it and see how often it keeps your hands free.
What is wrong with parents being able to decide physical attributes of children? If that meant no more people under 6' tall - what is the problem?
Of course it won't be free. So let's change your statement to one like this.
What is wrong with rich people being able to decide the physical attributes of their children? If that meant only poor people will be under 6' tall - what is the problem?
And if hiring looks for over 6' tall people because they can do the job better. Or the more appropriate example where it is brain enhancement. Then poor people can have children that will never get a job. And all the poor people die out then, or do we have wars and famine and all the wonderful things we love about our civilization!
So you deny that Einstein says there is no special frame of reference. How then do you say one clock is moving when the other is standing still. It is just as valid to say the moving one is standing still and the Earth and other clock is moving. So both clocks will be slower than the other one.
The reference frame also shows it's ugly head in a rotating frame. Einstein's theory does not work in rotation while the Lorentzian version does. One direction around the rotating disk would cause the light beam to travel much further than the other direction, but we must assume they meet at the same time? So light travels at two different speeds, or does time change both ways for each beam.
How about the legal notice on US money? "This bill is legal tender for all debts both public and private." It seems like it should be taken if that is what people want to pay with.
But that gold nugget is only worth money if someone will pay him for it. If nobody wanted it, he would be just as poor as he was before he found it. So who's money did he get when he sold his nugget? I don't know, it is your story, you tell me who's money it is.
It isn't only the devices that need to know where they are that can be broken by GPS jamming. I remember an article on here a year or a few ago that showed other problems. Even if you revert back to paper maps for navigation, there were systems that would not boot up because they could not get accurate time from the GPS satellites. So, even if they have nothing to do with navigation or location, they can still be built with a dependency on the GPS satellites for correct and accurate time.
You seem to be unaware that the chip and pin cards can be hacked also. Fraud isn't gone in Europe where they use these things. It was always a story told to us about how we needed this extra security with no facts to back it up.
So then, the accountant for the mob should not be arrested because he doesn't kill anyone! Yeah, that is not how the law works. If you work for a criminal organization, you are determined to be a criminal. If the men I blue burder people, then they are a criminal oroanization, and noone in it get a free pass. Unless they are actually an informant for the real law inforcement that is.
If you do a crime and get caught for it shut the fuck up and do your time don't rat someone else out
In law there is something called the Clean Hands Doctrine that can be fit here. It a nutshell it says that if your hands are dirty, you are not entitled to a fair outcome.
So every police department is not entitled to a fair outcome then. Got it! That is why I cheer inside when someone goes on a killing spree of the asses in blue!
You say 'you're too lazy to find something 'good enough' or to make your own tool to do what you want, I say 'it's more efficient to just use the tool that already works.'
Do you suggest that people who need to nail two pieces of wood together learn blacksmithing so they can forge a hammer and nails?
You are pretending that the tool works. It is more like trying to hammer in those nails using a screwdriver instead of a hammer. And everyone tells you there is a better way, but you must use the MS screwer because you liked getting screwed.
Glyphosphate also does not stay on the surface; it's highly soluble and washes into the soil, where it binds tightly with soil particles.
If it was used properly. Don't forget that Roundup is used after wheat is harvested to help dry it out. So it is sprayed onto the grain after harvesting and left on there with no rain or washing, as that would be the exact opposite of drying.
Also, look to countries in Europe where Roundup is not allowed and you see plenty of people who are gluten intolerant being able to eat bread again.
Also, don't forget that we have more bacteria in our bodies than we do human cells. So eating a bunch of stuff that kills off our bacteria does not sound like a good idea to me.
The definition I use is one I made up based on the people I see in that role. They are never doing it for the right reasons. The Redskins name change was a paid for group to show up and protest for social justice. That when the name redskin came from native americans to start with and is not offensive to people. But because a group of white SJW's decide that should be offensive, they will take care of it for the poor stupid indian who can't fix their own problems.
To me it seems as if the SJW movement is actualy racist in it's motivations. The poor sub-humans and women need our help. Anyway, I find it false. And the people I see promoting that view turn out to be hipocrites or lyers who seemed to be plotting things all along.
And how many bullshit ideas were accepted because criticizing == triggering
False dichotomy. Not being an asshole when someone tries to participate doesn't mean you have to accept everything they submit. So, the answer to your question would be ZERO "bullshit ideas" were accepted. They just aren't thrown back into the face of someone, with a dose of profanity added, who is honestly trying to help but didn't do everything exactly the right way.
If you are a project manager and accept bullshit code into your project for any reason then you are a bad project manager. If you cannot find some way to help your subordinates grow and become better then you are a bad leader. No, yelling at them and telling them to "shut the fuck up" is not how you lead them.
The mere fact of not accepting their code submission is evidence of the lack of respect. Obviously the code must be excellent, because they are awesome. The only reason it would be rejected is because of racist or sexist reasons. Any and all rejection of code is only for evil intention-ed reasons.
SJWs are the ones who feel you should judge a patch by the quality and not by genitals.
I would disagree with that. I see SJW's as primarily getting offended at things that have bother nobody, but they need to show that it could be offensive to someone so they become offended at it in principle just for "reasons".
So it is less about quality, and more about finding any reason at all to get offended at other people.
Don't forget, you must pay the leach-children of that man who said those words because they are now owned by his descendants. Rather than pay leaches, or get taken to court for piracy, I will just forget he exists. I guess my children will not get to learn about this part of history because it is owned by greedy bastards. Oh well.
Two people are running a 100m race. One notices that there are hurdles in their lane. They suggest that to make it a fair competition the hurdle be removed, and you tell them that they need to prove themselves the "equal" of someone running down a clear lane. Furthermore, the mere suggestion of levelling the playing field should offend them.
Try again? It is more like one lane is only 10 yards long while the other lanes are 100 yards long and see who wins the race then. And they claim that making their lane only 10 yards long makes it even because they imagined it would have invisible hurdles in it if it was 100 yards long that only they could see.
âpâYou should try to not mislead the poor idiots who might stumble across your shitpost.â/pââbrâ
âquoteâAlthough mushrooms are not high in B12, they are still the only non-animal fresh food source of B12. â/quoteâ
âpâFrom a quick seach, https://www.australianmushroom...â/pâ
âpâThe rest of your âoeinfo" sounds just as solid, so I won't bother wasting my time.â/pâ
They get accidental insects in their grains. So even small amounts of meat are enough to keep you from dying. If you eat strictly vegetables you end up getting sick and dying.
Of course thinking may be difficult for modern humans also, since the brain is made from cholesterol and that is now something that people have stopped eating and giving to their growing offspring.
Except the copycat version does not have every little thing that the real one has. No matter how much you try, you are never going to get it perfect.
Just look at all the vegetarians in India. The only way they aren't dying by the millions, is because they accidentally eat insects that get into all their grain.
Slashdot Mirror
I'm also not sure what locking the car has to do with anything? That'll work just as it did.
I never remove the key from my pocket. It cannot get lost or locked in the car and it leaves my hand free for other things. The moment I have to take it out of my pocket the device is ruined for it's purpose. And if I only need to remove it after I got into the car, that is even worse since pockets are hard to reach into once sitting down. Do you understand now, or did I use too many words again?
This post just means the parent has not tried the new fobs that never have to leave your pocket. Hand full of bags and coffee cups, just walk up and open the door with your pinky finger. The fob in the pocket and touch of the door handle allows the car to unlock. Same with locking, but the back of your hand works well there. And starting means you don't need to try to fish a key out of your pocket while sitting in the seat either.
It really was an invention I didn't think sounded so awesome until a car I got had it. Then after using it i realized how helpful it is and now want it in every car.
That would be called a metal key in the lock then. I never take my fob from my pocket. I unlock the car by touch, start the car by push-button, and lock it again by touching the handle. My hands can be full of coffee and a laptop bag etc, while the back of my hand is all it takes to lock the car. Now you want me to remove the key from my pocket to put it into a holder so the car does not crash while driving down the road. Stupid suggestion and I would rather just go back to a regular key than that. But the key fob is the best invention I didn't know I wanted until I had it. It really is way convenient and it isn't really apparent until you are using it and see how often it keeps your hands free.
What is wrong with parents being able to decide physical attributes of children? If that meant no more people under 6' tall - what is the problem?
Of course it won't be free. So let's change your statement to one like this.
What is wrong with rich people being able to decide the physical attributes of their children? If that meant only poor people will be under 6' tall - what is the problem?
And if hiring looks for over 6' tall people because they can do the job better. Or the more appropriate example where it is brain enhancement. Then poor people can have children that will never get a job. And all the poor people die out then, or do we have wars and famine and all the wonderful things we love about our civilization!
So you deny that Einstein says there is no special frame of reference. How then do you say one clock is moving when the other is standing still. It is just as valid to say the moving one is standing still and the Earth and other clock is moving. So both clocks will be slower than the other one.
The reference frame also shows it's ugly head in a rotating frame. Einstein's theory does not work in rotation while the Lorentzian version does. One direction around the rotating disk would cause the light beam to travel much further than the other direction, but we must assume they meet at the same time? So light travels at two different speeds, or does time change both ways for each beam.
How about the legal notice on US money? "This bill is legal tender for all debts both public and private." It seems like it should be taken if that is what people want to pay with.
But that gold nugget is only worth money if someone will pay him for it. If nobody wanted it, he would be just as poor as he was before he found it. So who's money did he get when he sold his nugget? I don't know, it is your story, you tell me who's money it is.
It isn't only the devices that need to know where they are that can be broken by GPS jamming. I remember an article on here a year or a few ago that showed other problems. Even if you revert back to paper maps for navigation, there were systems that would not boot up because they could not get accurate time from the GPS satellites. So, even if they have nothing to do with navigation or location, they can still be built with a dependency on the GPS satellites for correct and accurate time.
Right, because you can't just drop it off at a gas station bathroom or somewhere. Or tie it to a helium balloon and let it fly away.
As does any online purchasing?
You seem to be unaware that the chip and pin cards can be hacked also. Fraud isn't gone in Europe where they use these things. It was always a story told to us about how we needed this extra security with no facts to back it up.
What are you trying to say. You don't seem to be using any words and what you are saying seems to be completely the opposite of how history happened.
So then, the accountant for the mob should not be arrested because he doesn't kill anyone! Yeah, that is not how the law works. If you work for a criminal organization, you are determined to be a criminal. If the men I blue burder people, then they are a criminal oroanization, and noone in it get a free pass. Unless they are actually an informant for the real law inforcement that is.
You apparently don't understand the underworld
You're right, we don't.
If you do a crime and get caught for it shut the fuck up and do your time don't rat someone else out
In law there is something called the Clean Hands Doctrine that can be fit here. It a nutshell it says that if your hands are dirty, you are not entitled to a fair outcome.
So every police department is not entitled to a fair outcome then. Got it! That is why I cheer inside when someone goes on a killing spree of the asses in blue!
You say 'you're too lazy to find something 'good enough' or to make your own tool to do what you want, I say 'it's more efficient to just use the tool that already works.'
Do you suggest that people who need to nail two pieces of wood together learn blacksmithing so they can forge a hammer and nails?
You are pretending that the tool works. It is more like trying to hammer in those nails using a screwdriver instead of a hammer. And everyone tells you there is a better way, but you must use the MS screwer because you liked getting screwed.
Glyphosphate also does not stay on the surface; it's highly soluble and washes into the soil, where it binds tightly with soil particles.
If it was used properly. Don't forget that Roundup is used after wheat is harvested to help dry it out. So it is sprayed onto the grain after harvesting and left on there with no rain or washing, as that would be the exact opposite of drying.
Also, look to countries in Europe where Roundup is not allowed and you see plenty of people who are gluten intolerant being able to eat bread again.
Also, don't forget that we have more bacteria in our bodies than we do human cells. So eating a bunch of stuff that kills off our bacteria does not sound like a good idea to me.
The definition I use is one I made up based on the people I see in that role. They are never doing it for the right reasons. The Redskins name change was a paid for group to show up and protest for social justice. That when the name redskin came from native americans to start with and is not offensive to people. But because a group of white SJW's decide that should be offensive, they will take care of it for the poor stupid indian who can't fix their own problems.
To me it seems as if the SJW movement is actualy racist in it's motivations. The poor sub-humans and women need our help. Anyway, I find it false. And the people I see promoting that view turn out to be hipocrites or lyers who seemed to be plotting things all along.
And how many bullshit ideas were accepted because criticizing == triggering
False dichotomy. Not being an asshole when someone tries to participate doesn't mean you have to accept everything they submit. So, the answer to your question would be ZERO "bullshit ideas" were accepted. They just aren't thrown back into the face of someone, with a dose of profanity added, who is honestly trying to help but didn't do everything exactly the right way.
If you are a project manager and accept bullshit code into your project for any reason then you are a bad project manager. If you cannot find some way to help your subordinates grow and become better then you are a bad leader. No, yelling at them and telling them to "shut the fuck up" is not how you lead them.
The mere fact of not accepting their code submission is evidence of the lack of respect. Obviously the code must be excellent, because they are awesome. The only reason it would be rejected is because of racist or sexist reasons. Any and all rejection of code is only for evil intention-ed reasons.
SJWs are the ones who feel you should judge a patch by the quality and not by genitals.
I would disagree with that. I see SJW's as primarily getting offended at things that have bother nobody, but they need to show that it could be offensive to someone so they become offended at it in principle just for "reasons".
So it is less about quality, and more about finding any reason at all to get offended at other people.
If you assume that nobody can be triggered by ridiculous things, then you really don't understand PTSD, do you?
Don't forget, you must pay the leach-children of that man who said those words because they are now owned by his descendants. Rather than pay leaches, or get taken to court for piracy, I will just forget he exists. I guess my children will not get to learn about this part of history because it is owned by greedy bastards. Oh well.
Bizarre logic.
Two people are running a 100m race. One notices that there are hurdles in their lane. They suggest that to make it a fair competition the hurdle be removed, and you tell them that they need to prove themselves the "equal" of someone running down a clear lane. Furthermore, the mere suggestion of levelling the playing field should offend them.
Try again? It is more like one lane is only 10 yards long while the other lanes are 100 yards long and see who wins the race then. And they claim that making their lane only 10 yards long makes it even because they imagined it would have invisible hurdles in it if it was 100 yards long that only they could see.
âpâYou should try to not mislead the poor idiots who might stumble across your shitpost.â/pââbrâ âquoteâAlthough mushrooms are not high in B12, they are still the only non-animal fresh food source of B12. â/quoteâ âpâFrom a quick seach, https://www.australianmushroom...â/pâ âpâThe rest of your âoeinfo" sounds just as solid, so I won't bother wasting my time.â/pâ
They get accidental insects in their grains. So even small amounts of meat are enough to keep you from dying. If you eat strictly vegetables you end up getting sick and dying.
Of course thinking may be difficult for modern humans also, since the brain is made from cholesterol and that is now something that people have stopped eating and giving to their growing offspring.
Except the copycat version does not have every little thing that the real one has. No matter how much you try, you are never going to get it perfect.
Just look at all the vegetarians in India. The only way they aren't dying by the millions, is because they accidentally eat insects that get into all their grain.