Slashdot Mirror


Impossible Burgers' Key, Bloody Ingredient Wins FDA Approval (cnbc.com)

The FDA has approved the key ingredient used in the vegetarian-friendly Impossible Burger. "The ingredient, soy leghemoglobin, releases a protein called heme that gives the meat substitute its distinctive blood-like color and taste," reports CNBC. The burger comes from a company aptly named Impossible Foods, which started raising millions of dollars in 2015 to pursue a plant-based burger that truly tastes like meat. From the report: In a letter to Impossible Foods released Monday, the FDA deemed soy leghemoglobin GRAS, or generally recognized as safe, in its most recent review. "Getting a no-questions letter goes above and beyond our strict compliance to all federal food-safety regulations," Impossible Foods founder and CEO Patrick O. Brown said in a statement. "We have prioritized safety and transparency from day one, and they will always be core elements of our company culture."

445 comments

  1. As a vegetarian since 15 years... by carlhaagen · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...I can't say that I've ever missed that specific meat-like taste (even less so the color) in any of the many meat facsimiles I've tried. I suppose the reason why one becomes a vegetarian plays a big role in this.

    1. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...I can't say that I've ever missed that specific meat-like taste

      You may not be missing the taste of blood, but many others do !!!

    2. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As someone trying to eat more vegetarian for health and environmental reasons, i'd appreciate it. Personally I eat vegetarian most days of the week, but still love e.g. steaks, burgers, and sushi, and still eat meat on Saturdays as a treat.

    3. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by ET3D · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think that such products are aimed more at meat eaters than long time vegetarians. I'd say that most meat eaters do it because they like the taste rather than because they want animals slaughtered, so offering something which tastes the same (and has similar or better nutritional values and isn't more expensive) would allow them to switch out of eating meat.

    4. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'd say that most meat eaters do it because they like the taste rather than because they want animals slaughtered

      Speak for yourself. I eat meat exclusively so I can contribute to controlling the population of delicious animals.

      If you just leave them be, they'll roam around eating all the plants until there aren't any left. Meanwhile carnivorous animals will have a near-endless food source readily available and undefended by humans, which will cause their population to grow exponentially. Soon we'll have to start hunting these dangerous animals lest they decide beef is too common and would much prefer some long pig for lunch. Then we'll end up with a pile of lion corpses that nobody wants, which will attract a shitload of pesky insects, potentially the sort that carry diseases, which will spread far and wide, spreading the next plague. Humanity will be wiped out in a matter of months, all because some people refused to eat their steaks.

      Vegetarianism is just terrorism playing the long game.

    5. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by mukinrestak · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Unfortunately, all the substitutes that are made to mimic meat well are currently far pricier than actual meat. I tried a sample of a Beyond Burger a while back and it was pretty good, but on the shelf it was like 4 times the price of actual ground beef. That ain't gonna work too well. A plant based burger should cost LESS than the real thing.

    6. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Because right now the Impossible is an early adopter product. As usage spreads, it will get cheaper.

      The market for this is not vegans, because they are religiously opposed to engineered plants. It's for vegetarians and anyone who wants to reduce his part of the "carnal footprint" made by cattle farming. As time goes on, it will become a low-cost substitute for ground beef.

    7. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by magusxxx · · Score: 1

      I have a feeling this is going to be a wanna-be vegetarian's version of a gateway drug. :D

      Oh, and sidenote...I'm tired of vegans who gloat about being able to eat Oreos.

      "Excuse me, how does this help your cause even one bit?"

      --
      Care killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.
    8. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by magusxxx · · Score: 1

      Same here. I'm ever so slowly trying to do the same thing. I make this vegetarian roast that's a great meat substitute. And have continually tried to tweet it so it's more like meat. But nothing matches the sheer audacity of eating fast food every so often.

      --
      Care killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.
    9. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by dcw3 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Do you tweet your meat in public?

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    10. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      As someone trying to eat more vegetarian for health and environmental reasons, i'd appreciate it. Personally I eat vegetarian most days of the week, but still love e.g. steaks, burgers, and sushi, and still eat meat on Saturdays as a treat.

      Only eating meat on Sundays is almost 100% of the reduction that's actually needed in the world.

      In-between? There's so many genuinely tasty vegetable dishes it's untrue. I don't know why people insist on so much meat.

      (Yeah, we know, you can have those as a side-dish to accompany your dead animals - win-win, right? FFS)

      --
      No sig today...
    11. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think that such products are aimed more at meat eaters than long time vegetarians. I'd say that most meat eaters do it because they like the taste rather than because they want animals slaughtered

      No, they do it because that's how they were raised. People's "tastes" form at a young age.

      (not seeing the slaughter also helps, I think if a few more kids saw an animal being killed it would make a big difference)

      --
      No sig today...
    12. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by markdavis · · Score: 1

      I came to post the same thing. I find it fascinating that so many people fail to understand that there are many people who don't like the TASTE or even the SMELL of meat, not just the concept. I won't eat "fake" meat anymore than real meat. I am not trying to "save the earth" or "purify my soul" or such nonsense.

    13. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >"No, they do it because that's how they were raised. People's "tastes" form at a young age."

      Sorry, but your theory is wrong. I was not raised a vegetarian and agree with the OP. Now if you said for SOME people it depends on how they were raised, I would agree with you.

    14. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry to hear about your nutless shitty betamale life.

    15. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only eat meat for most meals. Generally eat about 1 4kg of roast pork per day. I don't really want to eat anything else. The thought of it makes me feel ill.

    16. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      That's just awesome for you. Unfortunately there are people who do like the smell and taste of meat. And their only chance to get this so far was to raise and kill an animal for that meat. Now, unless they really like the idea of killing an animal for meat and that's their reason to eat meat, this is a great alternative for them.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    17. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Salgak1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I grew up on a farm. Doesn't bother me one bit. In fact, I've slaughtered pigs that I later helped eat. And have hunted deer, and ate them as well. You do not want deer eating up your entire truck garden. . .

    18. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I think hunting it yourself must make it taste better otherwise no one would eat venison.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    19. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by jythie · · Score: 1

      *nod* it all comes down to personal taste and a variety of options.

    20. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      No, they do it because that's how they were raised. People's "tastes" form at a young age.

      Tastes change. When I was young I used to love shrimp, can't stand seafood now. Same for things like chocolate milk. When I was in college I started really liking onion.

      Although, my sister-in-law is vegetarian and her 4 year old girls will regularly pass up pizza for salad. I've joked that I've been tempted to Family and Child Services several times.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    21. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by jythie · · Score: 2

      Yeah, it is really difficult to compete with the subsidies and other indirect economic incentives the cattle industry depends on.

    22. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by jythie · · Score: 1

      Very few vegans I have met care about engineers plants one way or the other. They mostly just want to reduce animal suffering. I've even known plenty of vegans that are even in favor of things like the vat-grown meat people have been working on.

    23. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by jythie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think in general, people who grow up with frequent contact with slaughtering do not mind it, but people who only encounter it a few times but it is otherwise not a part of their world have trouble with it.

      It is kinda like, for lack of a better comparison, slavery. People who grow up around slave labor see it as normal, and people who are insulated but benefit from it see it as too abstract but useful to worry, but people who live in countries that do not have it but travel to one that does and witness it tend to come out more strongly against it.

    24. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by dbialac · · Score: 1

      As a non-vegetarian, I don't see the point in eating imitation foods. I can, however, see the need for developing ways to grow real meat without the need to farm animals as we venture out into space, as carrying 10 cows in a rocket isn't exactly practical.

    25. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Everyone has different dietary needs and requirements, as everyone processes nutrients a little differently. I always find it funny with how much passion people put behind other peoples diets.

      Some people are good with processing vegetable protein, and their nutritional needs crave the taste that vegetable provide.
      Other people have a harder time processing vegetable protein, and craves meat to cover the nutritional need.
      That said, we have too much food in general, so for those who crave meat, will actually eat too much of it. And just because something is vegetarian it doesn't make it healthy either.

      Meat isn't a sustainable model for general production, and if vegetarian meals can help cover the meat cravings with a vegetable substitute. Even if our bodies take longer to process the protein normally it will be enough to sustain a person as we are still a creature of excess.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    26. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you promote obesity and diabetes, because that's how you get obesity and diabetes. They kill more people that eating meat ever could. Eating meat and fat is the only sure way to prevent obesity and diabetes and cancer.
      You should work towards reducing the human population if you want to reduce meat consumption

    27. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by HxBro · · Score: 1

      I have a feeling this is going to be a wanna-be vegetarian's version of a gateway drug. :D

      Bacon is the only gateway drug

    28. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Then they have a bad business plan. I've spoken with a lot of other omnivores, usually in the context of mocking vegans behind their backs, and I've not many anyone yet who'd switch to fake meat, no matter how it looks, smells or tastes. Sure, in the company of a vegan, we might say things to be polite, we might even try some of that vegan crap, but it's really just so we don't hurt your feelings.

      Perhaps you can't fathom how someone could just be so uncaring about animals, so you imagine that we're not all evil, that we're just addicted to the taste. Fact is, we don't have any problem with our position within the animal kingdom, with the slaughter of animals, or anything like that. We think it's natural, and we'll continue to enjoy meat long after businesses like this collapse upon the realisation that their target market never existed in the first place.

    29. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's surprising then, that with all the other things I rebelled about, I missed this one completely. It couldn't possibly be that I'm engineered to enjoy meat and that I'm not bothered about the slaughter of animals, it must be how I was raised.

    30. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by atrex · · Score: 1

      Assuming lab burgers don't beat them to it. Technically if all the "vegetarian" is worried about is animal slaughter then a lab burger would be the perfect substitute - assuming the economics of scale can bring the price down from $400 a burger.

      I would which would have less of a carbon footprint, mass market lab burgers or mass market plant burgers?

    31. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're just fine with the raising and killing. It doesn't pose any ethical dilemma for us at all, but thanks for your concern.

    32. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by skam240 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "(not seeing the slaughter also helps, I think if a few more kids saw an animal being killed it would make a big difference)"

      Maybe yes and maybe no. Once upon a time meat didn't come all nicely packaged from the supermarket. You or some one you knew went out and killed an animal and dragged its still bleeding body back home to be skinned and then cooked.

      I also doubt many of the 4-H (and like program) kids that raise animals for slaughter become vegetarians or vegans as these programs wouldn't last very long if that were the case.

      Then again, people are kept so distant from their food production nowadays that all of a sudden seeing an animal slaughtered after a lifetime of getting ones meat wrapped in plastic might shock a lot of people into not eating meat.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    33. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no one cares. This product is clearly designed to lure meat lovers, you aren't a meat lover, so your opinion on something you wont ever use and has no impact on your life is irrelevant.

    34. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      In Japan they eat battered, fried fish with the tail intact. Shrimp as well. It's called tempura.

      I didn't realize how conditioned I was to only eating meat that doesn't look like the thing that it came from. I can now just about manage tempura, but not whole shrimp. Anything with a face... Ugh, no.

      Makes no sense, it's just one of those ingrained norms I can't get past.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    35. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If you just leave them be, they'll roam around eating all the plants until there aren't any left.

      this sounds like a self-correcting problem.

      Besides, if Beyond Meat and Impossible Burger pull off what they are trying to do, then farmers will simply cull their unprofitable livestock and grow more plants.

    36. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then again, people are kept so distant from their food production nowadays that all of a sudden seeing an animal slaughtered after a lifetime of getting ones meat wrapped in plastic might shock a lot of people into not eating meat.

      I'm pretty sure if we genetically engineered plants to bleed red and scream when you cut them, you'd have a lot of people hesitant to eat them as well. I think the overall shock factor would go away after a while, honestly. If there's any good argument for being vegetarian it's the ecological reasons. I'm not sure if things like Impossible Burger--heavily processing--meaningfully helps vs convincing people to use recipes that aren't so reliant upon meat as a base, but then I know ecological minded vegans who still drink almond milk.

      Me? I know personally it'd be off-putting to slaughter an animal, but I also know it's not enough of a reason for me to give up meat (or cheese). One could argue it's all about people's ability to compartmentalize--look at surgeons for a good example. I tend to think of it as temporary amnesia. I don't think we could function if we weren't constantly forgetting things--and I don't mean in the our heads would fill up or anything. Think of the most disgusting circumstance that involves food that you've eaten or possibly eaten? I don't think any level of paranoia will ever guarantee you'll never experience the same or worse again.

    37. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      I don't care about raising and killing, I worry about the cost. Essentially the energy wasted to raise an animal that you then only get to use a fraction of hurts my capitalist heart when you could get the same from some dirt cheap soy with a bit of flavoring.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    38. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My daughter still eats chicken and eggs after seeing chickens slaughtered, still loves the chickens that are alive, still thinks groundhogs are cute, still wants the groundhogs dead.

      You're under-estimating what children will see as normal based on exposure. You can't shock a 4 year old.

      Kids in the 30's weren't sobbing messes who swore off meat and grew to be vegetarians because Pa slaughtered the hogs. We have just entered an era where almost no one is a farmer or knows someone who is, and food is so ridiculously plentiful that it's trivial to become purely carnivorous or purely herbivorous.

    39. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You are what you eat, fat pig.

    40. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by houghi · · Score: 1, Funny

      I do that as well and am discriminated against my way of life if I go to a vegetarian restaurant. I went to a steak house with a vegetarian friend and he was able to get something he liked. I went with him to a vegetarian one and I went out drunk, because I could eat nothing.

      And as an aside, to me meat is basicaly processed vegetables. Some people like their vegetables cooked and then put on a plate. I just add an extra layer of seasoning.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    41. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Iwastheone · · Score: 1

      My earliest memory at 3 years old is of my grandmother chopping the head off a chicken on a tree stump and watching it run around with blood spurting from its neck. I assume we ate chicken that night.

    42. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by arth1 · · Score: 2

      (not seeing the slaughter also helps, I think if a few more kids saw an animal being killed it would make a big difference)

      True. Exposure reduces, while mystery reinforces aversions.
      Growing up next to a farm, I understood the end of life (and helped start of life), and growing up fishing with my father and having to slay my own catch has undoubtedly made it easier for me to eat fish.

      All schools should have farm and abattoir field days, in my opinion. Taking life and eating the bodies is something our species does, and is knowledge passed on since we left the jungle for the steppes.

    43. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by gnick · · Score: 2

      They mostly just want to reduce animal suffering.

      For pretty much all the meat in the supermarket, the alternative to slaughter is never being born. Not many pet cows. Maybe these animal lovers think nonexistence is preferable to the lives these animals are offered, but those are the current alternatives. Bred for food or not bred at all. Trying to improve these animals' conditions is noble.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    44. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. I certainly hope no one eats meat specifically because they want more animals to be slaughtered. We eat meat because we like the taste (and texture and other properties). If that can be replicated in a reasonable way using a vegetarian method instead, I'm 100% for that and certainly wouldn't mind ordering it regularly.

      Minced meat like hamburgers is a good first effort to tackle, because it's much easier than replicating all the features of a steak. Make vegetarian lasagna or bolognese with currently available stuff like quorn or Naturli' or something, and I bet most people wouldn't notice. Burger patties are a bit more complicated, but Impossible Foods seem to have it handled pretty well.

      Replicating roast beef or ribeye or a pork chop is going to be more complicated, but it's an interesting problem to tackle.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    45. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trying to improve these animals' conditions is noble.

      Their fucking animals they don't care if their pen is a pent house or a 1 foot square cage. Their food not people. Animal rights is like tree rights.

    46. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Nobody said "all".

      --
      No sig today...
    47. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just what people like you want to believe.

    48. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, gonna have to stop you there.

      I'm nearly 40 years old and love me a good burger. For the taste. I may have had meat as a staple of my diet while being raised by my mother and father, but right now (and ever since I was living on my own) I could choose to stop eating meat if I so desired.

      But I won't. Because it tastes good.

      So don't think you speak for me at all. Fuck you and your preconceptions.

    49. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by registrations_suck · · Score: 0

      Instead of eating a plant and pretending like its meat, just eat meat and pretend its a plant.

    50. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Joce640k · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It is kinda like, for lack of a better comparison, slavery.

      I think that's quite a good comparison.

      Being accustomed something doesn't make it natural or good.

      --
      No sig today...
    51. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Type44Q · · Score: 0, Troll

      I went to a steak house with a vegetarian friend and he was able to get something he liked. I went with him to a vegetarian one and I went out drunk, because I could eat nothing

      This is entirely the opposite of how that cliche plays out, for the simple reason that while a lot of steakhouses might only have a single fucking item (like a side salad) that isn't either prepared with or alongside their meat dishes, everything on the fucking menu at a vegetarian joint is still an option for the meat eater.

      Yoyr problem isn't the lack of options generally available at vegetarian joints; your problem is simply that you're clearly a fucking moron and likely an unreasonable and abrasive twat.

    52. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by gnick · · Score: 3, Funny

      It is kinda like, for lack of a better comparison, slavery.

      It's like changing your own oil. People who grow up around their parents doing oil changes see them as normal, and people who are insulated but benefit from it see it as too alien. In general, people who grow up with frequent contact with home oil changes do not mind them. For people for who only encounter them a few times, it is otherwise not a part of their world and they have trouble with it.

      I can think of a couple of acceptable car analogies.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    53. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Once upon a time meat didn't come all nicely packaged from the supermarket.

      Once upon a time killing your livestock was only for special occasions or when there was no other food left.

      --
      No sig today...
    54. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Joce640k · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I used to have a shitty "don't care" attitude towards other things, too.

      --
      No sig today...
    55. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by gnick · · Score: 3, Funny

      I didn't realize how conditioned I was to only eating meat that doesn't look like the thing that it came from.

      Speak for yourself. When I go out for a steak I demand that they bring me the head of the cow it came from so that I can stare into its cold, dead eyes and remind it who runs this planet.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    56. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by jockeys · · Score: 1

      (not seeing the slaughter also helps, I think if a few more kids saw an animal being killed it would make a big difference)

      Maybe, maybe not. I didn't start hunting until I was an adult; pursuing, killing, dressing, and cooking the animals I harvested made me appreciate them MORE, not LESS.

      I've also grown my own vegetables, and a similar thing applied. Maybe simply working for it makes it taste better.

      --

      In Soviet Russia jokes are formulaic and decidedly non-humorous.
    57. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Worse, when you read the fucking ingredients, they're full of inflammatory grains and legumes containing toxic anti-nutrients (phytins and lectins: plants' biodefenses). I relied on the delicious, metabolism-destroying "Standard Vegetarian Diet" for over twenty years before I learned that I needed to give up the grains, beans, eggs and dairy... and the improvements to my health have been truly profound (although the choices available to me as a 'carb-based paleo vegan' are usually limited to "fruit, fruit, kale or kimchee," the cravings for unhealthy shit are through the roof, my carcass clearly benefits so I try to stick to it).

    58. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Stonent1 · · Score: 2

      "Oh George, not the livestock...."

    59. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that humans have been omnivores for a very long time and have been slaughtering their own beef/pigs/lambs/... up until very recently, I am not sure I'd agree that seeing slaughtering is the reason. The only reason we are being pushed into not eating meat is there are too many of us. We could just as easily mandate 2 kids, and then snip. It would solve our increasing population in 9 months.

    60. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 3, Informative

      Once upon a time killing your livestock was only for special occasions or when there was no other food left.

      Umm, no.

      As an example, cows and bulls are born in about equal numbers. But you only need one bull for all your cows. So the extra bulls get slaughtered every year.

      Hell, the "one bull" gets slaughtered every few years since inbreeding is a bad thing. Once all the cows are his daughters, he's history.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    61. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      They do it depending upon why they became a vegetarian: if you quit eating meat because you were grossed out by it, you hardly want to be reminded of it let alone eat an actual deliberate imitation. However, if you still love or crave meat yet wish to avoid it for some other reason, these products have more appeal.

    62. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've actually helped slaughter animals. (thanks grandma!)

      Still taste great.

    63. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Right back at ya, string bean.

    64. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Resulting in massive increases to the rates of pesticide use and fertilizer runoff that is killing waterways and oceans.

      As it turns out, trying to support billions of humans where 90% of them "hunt" their food in a supermarket or restaurant without having effects on the environment is hard.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    65. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      All schools should have farm and abattoir field days, in my opinion. Taking life and eating the bodies is something our species does, and is knowledge passed on since we left the jungle for the steppes.

      I don't know if it would be fair or anything, but I'd love to see people have to get a meat license before they were allowed to eat any. Under some age you get a free pass, but after some reasonable age where the lesson can possibly sink in, kids and adults alike would have to either kill something, prepare it, and eat it, or tour a slaughterhouse. I've killed a couple of things and eaten 'em, and could have recorded evidence and used it on my meat license application :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    66. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The other thought is that according to the "Least Harm Principle" a massive switch to vegan diet for society would result in far more deaths of small furry animals being run through harvester machinery than current deaths of large herbivores in slaughterhouses: https://www.morehouse.edu/facs...

      Why is a cow's life worth more than a cute bunny's? Clearly we should be going for the least amount of deaths per human, which would mean finding a balanced omnivorous diet.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    67. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He disagrees, therefore he has a "shitty don't care attitude" eh? You must be a joy to live and work with.

      Don't be a dipshit.

    68. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Essentially the energy wasted to raise an animal that you then only get to use a fraction of

      People like to make a big deal about how ancient, "primitive" cultures used every part of an animal, but the fact is that we do the same. We don't landfill anything. The bones are ground up for bone meal, or burned to make pigment. The fats are used in other food products, or in cosmetics, or even converted into biodiesel. (Better to make green diesel, though, since it has a much lower gel point.) Even the hide and hair are rendered. Your imaginary food animals where only a small part of the animal is used do not exist.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    69. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      your problem is simply that you're clearly a fucking moron and likely an unreasonable and abrasive twat.

      Judging from your post, you'd certainly have expertise on that from personal experience.

    70. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by gnick · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why is a cow's life worth more than a cute bunny's?

      Souls are distributed using a complicated algorithm that considers size, cuteness, flavor, and ability to act human. Humans get 1 full soul. Crickets get only a small fraction of a soul, making them fine to smash. Cows are much larger and cuter than crickets, but they're strongly penalized for being delicious and forfeit almost their entire soul. A bunny's life is actually worth MORE than a cow's based on cuteness and relative flavor. Dogs are a curious case in that American dogs have a larger portion of a soul than Korean dogs based on environment. It's not an entirely fair system, but it's what we've got.

      Clearly we should be going for the least amount of deaths per human...

      Start whaling?

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    71. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's not an option if you're a strict carnivore. Where are the SJW friends now to defend our carnivorous minority???

    72. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      No, they do it because that's how they were raised. People's "tastes" form at a young age.

      I can see you've never had kids. Adult's tastes are incredibly different to children's. I was a super fussy eater, hated spinach, and couldn't stomach anything that came from the sea, not to mention the usual didn't eat my fruit and veg. Now ... well my weekend breakfast usually includes smoked salmon stacked on wilted fried spinach because it's frigging delicious.

      My young self wouldn't have ever considered it. Neither would my teenage self, or my university self for that matter.

    73. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      No, they do it because that's how they were raised. People's "tastes" form at a young age.

      (not seeing the slaughter also helps, I think if a few more kids saw an animal being killed it would make a big difference)

      I was wondering why vegetarianism was rampant when we all lived on farms, and so rare now.

    74. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a self-proclaimed anti-vegetarian.. I'm in agreement with you. When I eat a burger, there should be no pink, no taste of blood. In a steak sure, but I just never understood the appeal of a burger that was less than well done.

    75. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


        I'd say that most meat eaters do it because they like the taste rather than because they want animals slaughtered

      You vegetarians or wannabees have a very, very weird perspective on life. You're starting to remind me of fundamentalist Christians. "Nobody WANTS to have sex before marriage, they just want the orgasms. This new jerk-off device gives you the orgasms without all that nasty out of wedlock sex stuff".

      Listen buddy, us "meat eaters" (itself a colored term, we're all omnivores buddy) don't sit around and worry about slaughtering animals. We're OK with slaughtering animals. That's what animals do! If you're so against slaughtering animals, go bother the wolves, or the frogs, or the bacteria. They all "take lives" too. Leave us humans alone until you can end all the other slaughter that goes on in the world, and then you can create your vision of Disney nature where everything frolics in peace an harmony!

    76. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've participated in the killing of cattle to go to the butcher back on the farm. Cattle I've bottle fed as calves and had as pets. Participated to the point I've raised the gun myself. I refuse to be a hypocrite about my meat eating ways.

    77. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, holier than thou huh. you should know those healthy vegetarian dish, in order to make it tastier, usually ends up oilier and have ingredients that includes msg "upstream" so you don't see msg listed in the dish per se.

    78. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is entirely the opposite of how that cliche plays out

      From dictionary.com:
      Irony - an outcome of events contrary to what was, or might have been, expected.

      your problem is simply that you're clearly a fucking moron and likely an unreasonable and abrasive twat.

      Projecting much?

    79. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they are promoting obesity and diabetes as you claim, and if such diseases kill more people than eating meat, then it sounds to me like they are working towards reducing the human population. :P

    80. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by skam240 · · Score: 1

      In my head I was more referring to hunter / gatherers, some of which ate quite a lot of meat. I wasn't very clear in my post though.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    81. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the animal rights people are hypocrites, if they are seriously into animal rights, they should commit suicide right now so the bacteria and germs
      living in their bodies can live.

    82. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      I would mod you... A lot of veggies are not eating meat for ethical reasons, not taste reasons. So for a lot of them this is a win. Personally I would eat a human without batting an eyelid, protein is fucking protein, I promise that you won't suffer for long before you become a substitute pork chop. Unless you resist, in which case some tenderising may be required.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    83. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      everything on the fucking menu at a vegetarian joint is still an option for the meat eater.

      Did you miss the part where the meat eater in question does not eat non-meats? Oh but that's a choice? Well so is being a vegetarian.

      The same logic you are using to justify your claim, can also be used to justify the claim that "everything on the fucking menu at a meat joint is still an option for vegetarians." And the same logic you would use to dismiss my claim, can also be used to dismiss yours.

    84. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      There, their, they're.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    85. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by hamburger+lady · · Score: 4, Funny

      i hope so. otherwise he canâ(TM)t have any pudding. how can you have any pudding if you donâ(TM)t tweet your meat?!

      --

      ---
      Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
    86. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can think animals have no thoughts, and that they're just food, that is probably more a reflection on your own emotional intelligence and empathy or you're such an urban dwellers you've never really encountered an animal.

      I've watched a chicken on the day it has begun laying its first egg, come inside a house, locate a photo of a rooster that was sent away and start pecking at the photo as if saying "give me some cock." The damn things can be fairly affectionate too if you look after them right.

    87. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly, a strictly meat based diet should hardly make you fat. The problem is people stuffing their face with french fries, doritos, snickers, and and other number of things that would be considered vegetarian, as if those labels mattered.

      Now, eat enough meat and you may drop dead from a heart attack, sure, but fat accumulation isnt an issue from primarily eating proteins.

    88. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ironically, you same people who are against meat are also against GMOs and this product relies HEAVLY on GMOs.

    89. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Killing food isn't natural? Seriously? Nothing in nature kills to eat?

      GTFO with that bullshit. I swear, some people have their head so far up in the clouds they can't even see reality anymore.

    90. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      I grew up in the countryside, I saw plenty of animals being put down and slaughtered. Heck, I even poked at pig carcasses with a stick, for fun. I still eat meat, but I'm not a fanatic about it or anything.

      I think more people should learn and observe where their food comes from. Not just meat, I mean everything. Especially processed food. If they're OK with something, they can eat it. If they freak out, they're free to avoid that food in the future. But at least they've been informed.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    91. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >People's "tastes" form at a young age.

      I'm not buying that.

      When I was a kid, I couldn't stop eating brussels sprouts. Fuckin' loved the little things. And they come close to inducing vomiting in me now.

      Likewise, you think I would've ever eaten raw fish as a kid? Fuck, my parents couldn't get me to eat cooked fish. (Which I will happily murder an ocean to get.)

      Tastes are anything but immutable.

    92. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Bravo "hamburger lady" for your comment, and article appropriate handle!

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    93. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by datavirtue · · Score: 2

      Seeing people trolled never gets old.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    94. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like all the subsidies the grain and other farmers also rely on?

    95. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I learned that I needed to give up the grains, beans, eggs and dairy... and the improvements to my health have been truly profound

      I'm no expert on nutrition, but a priori this looks like terrible advice. How do you get the 8 essential amino acids (i.e. those that the body needs but cannot produce itself) with a vegetarian diet without grains, beans and eggs? Those are precisely the things that you need to eat if you cut out animal flesh from your diet. I'm aware that some can come from nuts and seeds, but as you completely avoided mentioning them in favor of fruit and kale, it seems to me that you're full of it.

    96. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a hunter, I found myself unable to slaughter a hog.

      In hunting the prey has a sporting chance. Capping a pig in the back of the head, just didn't seem very sportsmanlike.

    97. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I think you are missing the point. You can go to a steak house and they will cater (somewhat) for veggies, with at least a menu item or two. Not a lot, but then why the fuck are you trying to be a vegetarian in a steak house? But they DO cater for you veggie mother fuckers. But if a non veggie goes to a vegetarian restaurant there are NO options for meat eaters.
      "But you went to a vegetarian place and asked for meat!"
      Well you went to a steak house and asked for a veggie dish, who is bending over backwards and who is being a self centered opinionated dick?

      Fuxor, I used bending over and dick in the same sentence, /. is going to have a field day, but I am tired and can't be bothered to reword it.
      Go nuts.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    98. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably lab burgers, vegetarian options are not particularly energy efficient on a per calorie basis. The most efficient diet for humans is roughly 90% plant matter and 10% meats.

      Plus, with lab burgers you're not having to support as much of the organism that you're not interested in eating.

    99. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Soy and shitty grains are prime actors in the monumental health crisis inflicting humanity right now. Unfortunately we are not set up to feed people on a mass scale food that would prevent them from spending their entire retirement savings on health care.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    100. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (not seeing the slaughter also helps, I think if a few more kids saw an animal being killed it would make a big difference)

      Only if you teach them that harvesting meat for food is "bad". Otherwise it's "business as usual" like it always has been for all omnivorous/carnivorous creatures.

    101. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's practically none though. Sure there are some variations, but people respond to fats, sugars, salts and the like no matter where they are in the world. The variation in tastes that people acquire is usually more a matter of how they're seasoned and "comfort" foods that are more about reliving a better time of life.

      The tendency to want certain nutrients is hardwired into the nervous system because it's what your body needs to be healthy. The main issue we have today is that in some places the access to food is so easy that what was functional behavior for the best possible health is no longer viable without some sort of restraint.

    102. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by bestweasel · · Score: 1

      Except as everyone here should know by now, producing food plants uses far fewer resources than producing food animals.

      "Pork, chicken, dairy and eggs are equivalent within a factor of two when it came to their environmental burdens, the authors determined. But beef requires far, far more resources than any of those other protein categories. The team calculated that beef requires 28 times more land, six times more fertilizer and 11 times more water compared to those other food sources. That adds up to about five times more greenhouse gas emissions.

      To further put these findings into perspective, the authors also ran the same calculations for several staple crops. All told, on a calorie-to-calorie basis, potatoes, wheat and rice require two to six time less resources to produce than pork, chicken, eggs or dairy."

    103. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      Clearly we should be going for the least amount of deaths per human

      Well we could start with forcing America to stop fighting wars against everything, I reckon that would be a good place to start. A couple of Americans killed in 9/11 and when everyone wiped the shit out of their eyes America had illegally invaded three countries and killed MILLIONS of people. I know that in the USA "black lives matter" but seriously, how many black people were in the two towers?

      Why is a cow's life worth more than a cute bunny's?

      It's not, I would eat the bunny too. I have been involved in raising bunnies for eating, they are vicious horrible fucking creatures, they are fucking cannibals as well. Eat them all!

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    104. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      LMFAO

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    105. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Venison is much healthier than beef is and it does taste good, but you have to actually take care of it properly from the point of killing the deer to serving it up.

      I've never personally killed any deer, but my dad has and the meat is good. It's both free range and organic.

    106. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly we should be going for the least amount of deaths per human

      Ban sardines?

    107. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Once, when I was visiting my GF's farm-bred family, they were talking about beheading chickens, and I informed them that my chickens came from the grocery store.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    108. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      some of which ate quite a lot of meat

      Not true for most
      When they killed something it had to either be preserved (usually with smoking or salting) or eaten, so there would be periods where there was a LOT of meat eaten during migrations etc. and long periods where mostly veggies were eaten. A lot would depend on tribe and location.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    109. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I've gone the other way. As a kid/teen, I'd eat anything that didn't move, and a few things that did. I'm a lot more picky now.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    110. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by MaryannG · · Score: 1

      Pretty much my take as well. If the product tasted like meat, looked like meat but perhaps lacked the cholesterol and fat that can accompany meat products but still deliver protein, taste and texture...and do it for a similar price point...I can see how people might be enticed to go with this.

      But that's a lot of "ifs" to cover.

      --
      Social Media Handywoman at Texas Boys Balloo
    111. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by vlad30 · · Score: 1
      Read trough the comments and only thing missing is this lamb ad 2016 - warning vegans complained some say they were traumatised yes it was real ad and aired. for those not in Australia https://youtu.be/7i15OPuFvmA

      actually always look forward to the Meat and Livestock ads for Australia Day good chuckle material

      --
      Your'e all thinking it, I just said it for you
    112. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by bestweasel · · Score: 1

      Once upon a time, farm animals wandered about the yards and fields and weren't bred entirely for yield or kept their entire lives in sheds in cages too small to turn around in, fed with hormones to make them grow faster and pumped with antibiotics to stop them getting sick in the cramped conditions.

      The treatment of animals as industrial commodities is offensive to many people.

    113. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by laie_techie · · Score: 1

      I grew up on a farm. Doesn't bother me one bit. In fact, I've slaughtered pigs that I later helped eat. And have hunted deer, and ate them as well. You do not want deer eating up your entire truck garden. . .

      Both my parents grew up on farms in a small country town. I helped hold sheep while my dad slit their throats. I remember harvesting a pig on the farm once, too. My family raised dozens of rabbits. They were mostly pets, but we harvested a few. My dad taught us boys how to humanely kill the rabbits and how to prepare them. It feels weird knowing you are eating Snowball. My dad used to hunt.

    114. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by skam240 · · Score: 1

      "Not true for most
      When they killed something it had to either be preserved (usually with smoking or salting) or eaten, so there would be periods where there was a LOT of meat eaten during migrations etc. and long periods where mostly veggies were eaten. A lot would depend on tribe and location."

      So when I said "some of which ate quite a lot of meat." I was 100% correct then?

      Eskimos and the Souix are two groups who lived primarily off of meat just off the top of my head and that's all it takes for my statement to be correct.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    115. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > For pretty much all the meat in the supermarket, the alternative to slaughter is never being born. Not many pet cows.

      Oh, how very kind of you to give these poor creatures a twisted life just so that you can enjoy eating them.

      Fuck your condescension, and superciliousness

    116. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, old bean, most vegetarians eat a lot of nuts.

    117. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe these animal lovers think nonexistence is preferable to the lives these animals are offered, but those are the current alternatives.

    118. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by skam240 · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, the magical golden age of animal rearing.

      "...weren't bred entirely for yield"

      Domesticated animals have been selectively bred since they were domesticated animals as that's how we got domesticated animals. These animals don't live in the wild naturally.

      "...kept their entire lives in sheds in cages too small to turn around in, fed with hormones to make them grow faster and pumped with antibiotics to stop them getting sick in the cramped conditions."

      Which is why it's great we have options in our grocery stores for animals that have not been raised as such.

      "The treatment of animals as industrial commodities is offensive to many people."

      Sadly the adoption rate for the above referenced ethically raised animal products isnt very high as indicated by what most grocery stores carry which means your "many" isn't very many.

      And that's not even getting into how animals used to be butchered. Nowadays it's typically a quick bolt to the head but if you look at traditional practices for killing animals, some of them are downright gruesome. Halal is the first example that comes to mind with animals being intentionally bled out by slitting their throats to kill them.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    119. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Strider- · · Score: 1

      Well, no... those harvesters are already being run through the fields to produce feed for the animals that we eat. Cutting out those animals would reduce the quantity of plant matter that needs to be harvested, as we're cutting out the (inefficient) step of converting it to meat.

      That said, I'm still going to enjoy my 6oz steak along with all the other bits that go with it.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    120. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Strider- · · Score: 1

      Eh, I grew up around doing oil changes... but the only time I do it myself is changing the oil on the little diesel on my boat. For my car? I'd rather just pay someone to do it, plus they can get the supplies cheaper than I can.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    121. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Venture out into space? Seriously? We are not going to do any significant space travel unless our conciousness is uploaded into a robot you dumb fuck.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    122. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Your post caused me to remember hipsters lapping up ground raw meat. Heard of a story where someone ate sushi and had octopus eggs sprout in their gums.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    123. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Strider- · · Score: 1

      Halal is the first example that comes to mind with animals being intentionally bled out by slitting their throats to kill them.

      It might be gruesome, but done properly it's not especially inhumane. Slitting the throat cuts off the blood flow to the brain, rendering the animal unconscious in very short order.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    124. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In China they cook fishes with their heads above the frying oil so that the lips still move when it's at the table but the rest of the body is cooked flaky tender. Really fresh fish.

    125. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Strider- · · Score: 1

      This year, during the local prawn season, I remarked that it's interesting that in western culture, pretty much the only food that most people handle live any more is seafood. (for reference, we killed our prawns by bathing them in a bottle of Chardonnay, before grilling them).

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    126. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by skam240 · · Score: 1

      You know what does that much faster and with less suffering?

      A bolt to the head.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    127. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes the world revolves around you.

      Fuck off

    128. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah and you have a shitty don't care attitude about the suffering of plants.

      You are the one creating deforestation for agriculture.

      You ignore the suffering of plants ...just because they can't scream they don't have the right to life?

      Don't be a fucking asswipe you fuck stain.

    129. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better nutritional values?
      Are we talking about calories? Only then we can make a comparison.
      But no need to wait for an impossible burger. Already a piece of bread has similar caloric content as piece of meat the same weight.
      So try eating bread only versus meat only and see how that works out....
      They missed it in the movie but in the book the Martian it is well explained why only potatoes won't work....
      Nothing replaces meat effectively and likely never will.
      It is also hilarious how often meat eaters are called pigs considering that the revolting state of humanity's waistline is a direct effect of substituting fat and protein with carbs....
      Btw, you turn vegetarian your balls shrink 50%. Turn vegan and they disappear altogether...the effect on the methaphorical balls is even worst.

    130. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 from me.

      Grew up seeing the pops doing oil changes (and general car maintenance), and now I do it.

      I now hate cars that I cannot work on (so basically all modern cars). Stop buying 80s German cars people - the prices are getting too high.

    131. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We est meat because it is healthy and good fir you. And that is WHY we like the taste...

    132. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because westerners are idiots when it cones to eating animals. You eat the whole damn thing! Organ meat is sooooooo healthy and good for you....of wait the greedy capitalist are feeding toxins and drugs to the animals so their liver is toxic....do you know how incredibly good for anyone's health is bone broth?

      Thus, eating animals is the best, but not when you do it as a westerner...

    133. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Solandri · · Score: 1

      (not seeing the slaughter also helps, I think if a few more kids saw an animal being killed it would make a big difference)

      Actually in my experience it's the other way around. People who grow up insulated from the real world and get all their food in the supermarket develop a fantasy version of reality where all animals live in peace and harmony, until a big bad human comes and starts killing them.

      The reality is quite different. The vast majority of animals are fated to be killed and eaten, usually while still alive. Outside of humans and the domesticated animals we protect, dying peacefully in your sleep of old age is extremely rare. People who hunt, fish, or grow up on a farm have had this shoved in their faces most of their lives. They know how the real world works, and have less qualms about killing animals for food. While non-religious vegetarians usually chose that lifestyle because they've been disconnected all their lives with how nature really works, and it comes as such a shock to them when they first find out that they can't bear the thought of participating in it.

      If I were a wild animal, I would much rather be killed by a human than by other wild animals. People at least have enough empathy to try to make the kill as swiftly and painlessly as possible.

    134. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by jythie · · Score: 1

      That does not make a whole lot of sense. Large herbivores and pretty inefficient, they take far more pounds of feed to produce than the equivalent calories that they eventually become. A vegan or vegetarian diet requires less farming than meat production. The linked piece is based off the increasingly rare practice of just letting animals out to forage, which makes for a nice nostalgic image but is not how modern ranching is done.

    135. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      I'm fucking brilliant and an abrasive asshole; not trying to toot my own horn (I'm just as flawed and miserable as the next fuck, I suspect) but you may as well get it right if you're going to bother at all. ;)

    136. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by bestweasel · · Score: 1

      Mmmm, bolt to the head, throat slit with a sharp knife, bolt to the head, throat slit with a sharp knife?

      Do you know, I don't think I'd have a preference.

      I believe the bolt to the head is in any case followed by throat slit with a sharp knife

    137. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Start whaling?

      Hunting Fat americans it is !

    138. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      car analogies ??

      Clearly you were talking about sex, more specifically incest.

    139. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clever troll post... I actually use this argument, to justify eating hunted venison, despite being otherwise vegetarian.

    140. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that when most people are exposed to changing their own oil they form one of two opinions. That was easy but now what do I do with all this oil that I took out of the car? Some will either take it to autozone or otherwise dispose of it (Hopefully properly) or other people will see it as a waste of time and just pay someone the $30 to avoid the hassle of getting dirty and dealing with the byproduct.

      Growing up in a rural area hunting was definitely not a foreign concept to me. I don't enjoy seeing animals die by I accept that it happens and choose to appreciate what I eat. When I was young and a family caught a deer it was always appreciated and no part was wasted. That is why I don't believe in hunting for sport/trophies.

      I welcome the chance to eat a steak or burger that didn't have to be raised in captivity at great expense both economically and environmentally but hope that it doesn't have the same issues that Soy has been known to cause. Soy when it is digested metabolizes into estrogen which causes issues for men who eat it as well as women.

    141. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, but I actually had a different context in mind when I answered the question, I apologize for my misunderstanding.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    142. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct, animal lovers do not want to see animals born into tragic and torturous circumstances. Imagine we bred humans for food, and raised then in cages, in an an environment so deplorable antibiotics needed to be put in the water just to keep all the children alive. When they turned 8 or so, we would line them up into trucks (save a few breeders) and force then on a conveyor belt where a sadist, would kill them one at a time by driving a bolt the childrens skulls.... But at least the children got to live eight years in a cage, before being shipped of to slaughter, right?

    143. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that such products are aimed more at meat eaters than long time vegetarians. I'd say that most meat eaters do it because they like the taste rather than because they want animals slaughtered

      No, they do it because that's how they were raised. People's "tastes" form at a young age.

      (not seeing the slaughter also helps, I think if a few more kids saw an animal being killed it would make a big difference)

      Maybe kids in cities, but most kids in the rural areas are well aware of "where" their food comes from. Go to any county 4-h fair and watch the kids show their animals before they are auctioned to the slaughterhouse.

      A very common conversation in the country:

              KID: "Mommy, where did miss piggy in the backyard go?"
              MOM: "We had her for breakfast dear, don't you remember?"

    144. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This product is not for people who happily prefer to eat plants only. This is for people who want to eat meat, but can't, for various health reasons.

      THAT audience will pay up for a good substitute.

    145. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried a sample of a Beyond Burger a while back and it was pretty good, but on the shelf it was like 4 times the price of actual ground beef.

      And, if you look really closely at the packaging, you'll find most of the meat analogs are so full of sodium and other crap that it isn't funny. Like, 2x the RDA per serving or so.

      After > 17 years as a vegetarian, I've gone back to eating meat, in part because the meat substitutes were full of garbage. Some of the shit vegans eat appals me .. I looked at vegan egg replacers once, and essentially they were just starches and other crud I wouldn't eat. You certainly wouldn't use that shit if you were a diabetic.

      The other thing you have to remember is demand ... if a smaller number of people want the plant-based version, the economics says you have to charge more to be viable. Even some of the bigger brands like Tofurkey are going to cost significantly more than their counterparts for the same amount of stuff.

      I eventually concluded that you have two options to remain a vegetarian ... cook it all yourself and give up on the idea of good meat analogs which weren't full of crap ... or eat the analogs with all of the crap. I chose "none of the above", and have gone back to meat.

      At the end of the day, I'm pretty sure what I'm eating is overall better than trying to use any of the commercial meat substitutes. It's also significantly reduced my grocery bills, because family-sized cuts of meat can be had for reasonable prices most of the time.

      Nobody is going to do tofu in the slow cooker ... but I can have a pulled pork prepped in about 15 minutes, and then I put it into the machine and flick the switch before I leave for work.

    146. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Years ago when I was in high school, I opted for a cooking class over gym class (was called a fag by all the guys for ages, but who was the real fag - the guys getting sweaty with each other or the sole guy in a class of girls?) and we had a field trip to a butchers store.

      We were shown out the back of the store and the butcher went over how a carcass is broken down and where the cuts come from. He showed us the cold room full of carcasses and his smokehouse, operating the bandsaw, making sausages (using intestines for casing) etc.

      The best part was when he told us about eyeball races. Him and his apprentices would pick the eyes out of pigs, flick them against the wall and bet on which one would roll to the floor first.

      Some of the girls couldn't take it and had to step outside. Most said at the end that they weren't going to eat meat anymore. I think I was the only one who was hungry and wanting to tuck into a big juicy steak, lamb roast or some blood pudding and was disappointed that we didn't get any freebies.

    147. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you think that things like leather, gelatine and felt come from? Bloodmeal, feathermeal, bonemeal, tallow, lard, etc. (Your organic soy was probably fertilised partly with ground up animal parts)

      Every cent of value is squeezed out of livestock on an industrial scale. Nothing goes to waste, because waste costs money to deal with.

    148. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Joke's on you, Death rules and runs this planet. You just try and escape it. There is no point, you can't run fast enough, you can't run far enough. Death will always rule you.

    149. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by MattskEE · · Score: 1

      I agree with this. I went primarily vegetarian for a few years, mainly for environmental reasons. I ended up going back to meat when I was working a job where the cafeteria on some days had no good vegetarian options. Now I still eat a lot of vegetarian meals and less meat than I used to. Mostly that ends up being dishes that don't imitate meat at all since fake meats usually fall very short of the mark. But I'm very open to fake meats that are tasty and meat free.

    150. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not blood though. It's a protein solution with preservatives. Packed meat contains no blood.

      I guess if you kill it & you grill it you can get a taste of blood but not from a grocery store.

    151. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      I don't care about raising and killing, I worry about the cost. Essentially the energy wasted to raise an animal that you then only get to use a fraction of hurts my capitalist heart when you could get the same from some dirt cheap soy with a bit of flavoring.

      Energy really isn't the issue. Most livestock lives off of stuff that humans can't eat and is easy to harvest. Ox and cow eat grass. Chickens eat seed and insects. Pigs eat trash. (Horses eat grain, but they are usually too important as work animals so we don't eat them.) We only feed them things like corn because there is a filthy amount of cheap corn. Even cheaper and less energy intensive than non-food stock options with modern production methods. (We'll leave out subsidies.) In the past and still in many places in the world, raising animals for eating and milking is the least amount of energy required, otherwise, they'd do otherwise and choose not to starve. Indeed, the common theme these days is that the modern vegan diet is pretty much only possible in areas like Europe with a particular climate and serves only to promote colonialism and dominance of the West.

    152. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meat doesn't cause cardiovascular disease

    153. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by skam240 · · Score: 1

      That's fine.

      Personally I'd choose the one that killed me instantly over the one that wouldn't.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    154. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by gnick · · Score: 1

      You must be a blast at parties.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    155. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by OutOnARock · · Score: 1

      amnesia

      what allows a woman to enjoy sex after childbirth

      Lighten Up Francine

    156. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Vegan zombies looking for soy based braaains!

    157. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by pots · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that paper's a joke. The author is basing his conclusion on the idea that cows foraging in a pasture will produce the same volume of food per unit of land as intensive crop production does. This is, of course, absurd. It's like that "animals have evolved to be tasty so that we will preserve their species" notion - it's just some silly nonsense.

      Maybe you meant it as a joke too, but you were modded "insightful" for some reason.

    158. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Clearly we should be going for the least amount of deaths per human

      Celery and all other plants are living things too. So are krill and protozoa. Eating celery kills it, and it takes a lot more celery lives than cow lives to keep a person running.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    159. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone use to have to slaughter their own I still have no problems with that or what you do, each his own.

      And to Reply Being accustomed something doesn't make it natural or good. No being natural does.

      How many animals does taking all those vegetables to the store for you kill not to mention people.

      But then god knows we could use a few more animals and a lot less people.

    160. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by pots · · Score: 1

      If you had that many cows and bulls then you were rich and every day was a special occasion. A typical family might have a single cow, and they only killed that cow for meat when it was too old to produce milk for cheese making.

    161. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hitler was a vegetarian and pretty much did all of the things you said...go figure.

    162. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      It's not the taste of blood that makes steaks and burgers delicious. Seriously, get some cow blood and taste it. It doesn't taste the way you think it does.

      You need lean muscle meat combined with fat in the right proportion to have that great flavor.

    163. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by MoaDweeb · · Score: 1

      NZ has an economy built on the processing of grass into animal protein and thereby predicated on the suffering of animals. In my view being a vegetarian is unpatriotic :-) .

      --
      New Zealanders are well balanced with a chip on each shoulder. One represents Australia, the other the rest of the world
    164. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by MoaDweeb · · Score: 1

      I hope it was shitty Australian or Californian Chardonnay and not the classy Kiwi tipple.

      --
      New Zealanders are well balanced with a chip on each shoulder. One represents Australia, the other the rest of the world
    165. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all meats are created equal. There are many fat-soluble toxins that concentrate as you go up the food chain. Generally speaking, you should only eat herbivores. The average human would be just about inedible given the crap we feed ourselves as a species.

    166. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      If I were a wild animal, I would much rather be killed by a human than by other wild animals. People at least have enough empathy to try to make the kill as swiftly and painlessly as possible.

      Killed? Sure. But I would choose any wild animal over an animal in an industrial facility. Cramped conditions, sometimes with no sunlight or even room to turn around and killed before even an adult. That's no enjoyable life at all. Now where I live we still have a lot of beef cattle that spend a year or two at pasture before being killed. Their life is still short but relatively pleasant. The pigs and chickens aren't as fortunate.

    167. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by skapunker21 · · Score: 1

      we should hold animal auditions - https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    168. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Peter+P+Peters · · Score: 2

      A bunny's life is actually worth MORE than a cow's based on cuteness and relative flavor.

      I can only assume you are a city dweller? In a lot of rural areas, rabbits are a plague and it's open season to kill as many of them as you can. The phrase 'breed like a rabbit' actually comes from the fact rabbits (strange huh?). I would put them on the bottom of the list right near mosquitoes and flies.

    169. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by baker_tony · · Score: 1

      It's not blood, it's myoglobin.
      Your hate stems from a misunderstanding!

    170. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Europa uber alles!

    171. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We need "+1 Trolled" mod option so hard...

    172. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love a good ribeye for that reason, pretty much my default cut when I want a steak.

      One thing a don't like is heavily salted food; it horridly drowns out the flavor. But that's pretty much the point, it's heavily salted to hide the fact that it has no flavor.

      Probably why both vegan restaurants I've been to only serve salty food. I had imitation chicken (in a salad) at one of them, and while the "chicken" had the texture and fats consistent with the dark meat, it didn't taste like chicken at all. Its flavor was more like halite drenched in a moderately sugary glaze. But that's not as bad as veggie burgers, those are more like somebody cut up a corrugated box, soaked two slices in cooking oil, and put it in your burger.

    173. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because "food" was the only subject mentioned above.

      I guess some people only read what they want to read.

      --
      No sig today...
    174. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Huh? He's the one saying "I'm not bothered about the slaughter of animals" and giving no justification.

      --
      No sig today...
    175. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Hylandr · · Score: 1

      No, you so incorrect on so many levels.

      Packaged meat does indeed contain blood. It's what will ooze into your refrigerator if you leave it too long.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    176. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Yeah, like the world needs more soyboys.

      And I expect this process improves the bioavailability of phytoestrogens, which directly impact testosterone levels (and inhibit thyroid function, leading to a wide array of long-term medical problems).

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    177. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by torkus · · Score: 1

      Well that's where speaking in absolutes gets people in trouble. Packaged meat does contain blood, however it contains far less blood than the meat originally did when it was part of an animal.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    178. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fried salmon head(n neck), its crazy good.
      Also curry fish head (google it).

      Expand ur comfort zone!!!

    179. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Hylandr · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. :)

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    180. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by gnick · · Score: 1

      I said the system wasn't fair. You're acting like I just made it up.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  2. Eww? by Rei · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's weird... after having been vegetarian for 17 years, the concept of making a vegetarian burger taste more like meat only strikes feelings of "eww, gross" in me. And I imagine that's a pretty common reaction.

    But I guess it's good for non-vegetarians and maybe people who are newly vegetarian.

    On the upside, I imagine this product is a good source of iron, since heme iron is well absorbed.

    --
    "Lock and load, Brides of Christ!"
    1. Re:Eww? by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      Well I for one welcome our new vegan overlords, and I will entreat them to dismiss your "eww, gross" reaction as mere girlish whimsy.

    2. Re: Eww? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess having any diet for 15 years changes your tastes. Personally, I eat vegetarian 6 days per week, and my love for that meaty taste is honestly what's keeping me from going full vegetarian. (But I'm mostly doing it for health and environmental reasons, so eating meat once a week is not a big deal philosophically for me).

    3. Re:Eww? by CambodiaSam · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm not a vegetarian but have greatly reduced my meat intake over the years. I had the opportunity to try an Impossible Burger recently and I can confirm that it's freakishly like animal meat. Not 100% indistinguishable but so damn close that I was amazed. The guy at the restaurant warned me that many vegetarians don't like it because it's so close. He wasn't lying. If there is a safe option to help people eat less meat, that's probably good for health, the environment, and a number of other factors right? It's like a gateway veg. Just like bacon is the gateway meat.

    4. Re:Eww? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I’m an omnivore. I was grossed out the first time I tried to eat one of theses burgers

    5. Re:Eww? by magusxxx · · Score: 0

      Someone I knew had the same reaction to SweetN' Low and Splenda.

      "But it's not natural. It's artificially whatevered. It's not pure and white."

      I replied, "Oh, so you like your drinks like you like your neighborhood."

      (Yeah, I went there.)

      --
      Care killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.
    6. Re:Eww? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I'm not a vegetarian.

      But I like eating good vegetarian dishes. I'm basically the salad king ... not sure if cheese already is forbidden for vegetarians, the line between vegan and vegetarian is not clear for me.

      But I loath vegetarian food, that tries to mimic meat. Tofu is tofu, and good tofu is like a good cheese. Bastarding it into meet is a crime in my opinion. Same with that new attempt.

      Can't be so hard to eat a real Falafel instead of having a pseudo meat burger.

      But alas ... americans ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    7. Re:Eww? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This someone you know sounds pretty intelligent and may be a statistician. Not drinking very unhealthy artificial sweeteners that are scientifically proven to cause weight gain (compared to sugar) if consumed regularly.

      Added bonus. This person also must know crime statistics. White people commit the fewest violent and non-violent crimes of any race on a per capita basis. This even hold when adjusting for economic status. Who wouldn't want to live next to the statistically least violent group people on the planet.

      So you think you are such an edgy SJW but in reality this person you know is being smart and logical and you are antagonizing this person for it.

      Next I will be called a racist just for outlining facts and then suggesting that people using those facts as a basis for life decisions are immoral or worse.

      Go live in the projects for a few years just to prove you don't make life choices based on stats and logic. Thanks.

    8. Re:Eww? by radja · · Score: 1

      most cheeses are not vegetarian, because the rennet used comes from one of the stomachs of calves.

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
    9. Re:Eww? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I kinda doubt the food is aimed at hard-core vegans.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    10. Re:Eww? by denzacar · · Score: 1

      That's like saying tomatoes driven in a car with leather seats are not vegetarian.

      The amount of enzymes from rennet in actual cheese is measured in micrograms per kilogram.
      I.e. Unless one is eating kilograms of one particular cheese per meal, we're talking about parts per billion of "animal matter" per portion of cheese.
      At that range, eating any food prepared or handled by humans makes one a cannibal.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    11. Re:Eww? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Next I will be called a racist just for outlining facts

      You haven't outlined a single fact. You have made a bunch of uncorroborated statements but you haven't laid out any conclusive facts.

    12. Re:Eww? by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 2

      The biggest thing about the Impossible Burger is that it shows you can make a burger that tastes like a burger, without using beef. The target market is not vegetarians/vegans, as I presume they're already well-satisfied with portobello mushrooms and chickpea patties, or similar alternatives. They have plenty of veg* choices that play on their ingredients' own strengths, instead of trying to imitate meat.

      For the people who like the taste of burgers, but would prefer not to contribute to factory farming practices or have other ethical reasons, this is a good alternative. Personally, I don't care if my burger has beef or not, or whether it has real bacon or not. If it tastes like it has beef or bacon (or sufficiently similar), bring it on. I love the taste of a burger, but it is absolutely not a requirement for me that it actually contains beef. If they can give me the same taste without using beef, bring it on!

      --
      Eat the rich.
    13. Re:Eww? by vossman77 · · Score: 1

      That was my first thought, I thought vegetarians would avoid it. But I run a science club at a university, and my Indian and Pakistani students who were raised vegetarian cannot get enough of the new meat. WE have a club outing every semester and I have to limit the number of spots. Maybe it is because they are more into the ecology and biotechnology aspects of it.

    14. Re:Eww? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why was that modded to -1?

    15. Re:Eww? by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      most cheeses are not vegetarian, because the rennet used comes from one of the stomachs of calves.

      It's not too difficult to find cheeses that use vegetable rennet. Any kosher cheese doesn't use animal rennet. You don't have quite the same variety available, but you can get the basics like cheddar and mozzarella.

    16. Re:Eww? by apoc.famine · · Score: 2

      Likewise I had one recently, and I have to say, it wasn't the best burger I've ever had. It was far from the worst, however. And that's saying something.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    17. Re:Eww? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      the concept of making a vegetarian burger taste more like meat only strikes feelings of "eww, gross" in me.

      Why? Do you hate meat because of the taste or because you associate it with meat? Meat has an incredibly diverse and wonderful mix of flavours across many animals, so really to lump them together under "tastes like meat" sounds like the latter to me.

      It's sad denying such a diverse palate of flavours because of some percieved association.

    18. Re:Eww? by butzwonker · · Score: 1

      But I guess it's good for non-vegetarians and maybe people who are newly vegetarian.

      Maybe for some, but I for one prefer expensive ecologically farmed meat to industrialized fake-meat production. The same for lab-grown meat, it's seems to be primarily intended to replace highly dubious meat of unknown origin in processed fast food. For all I know, "Impossible Burgers" is just another wannabe future mass food corporation like Nestle. Nobody should eat this crap anyway.

      Due to intensive livestock farming and insanely long transport ways meat is way too cheap nowadays. If proper animal protection laws and ecological standards were in place, it would be a luxury good as it should be and that would also alleviate ethical concerns for people like me who think there is nothing wrong with slaughtering animals per se.

    19. Re:Eww? by b0bby · · Score: 1

      I have been (mostly) vegetarian for 30 years, and I've never had this problem. I could absolutely eat a burger or pulled pork right now, and I'm confident it wouldn't make me feel queasy. I know a lot of people feel that way, but it's certainly not universal.

    20. Re:Eww? by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Different levels of poverty yield different results. Not sure how someone adjusted for this non-tangible, at best elusive, factor. Also, cultural differences may not be attributable to race. No way to isolate that either.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    21. Re:Eww? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I never met a vegetarian who made that distinction.
      Either they eat cheese and are "vegetarians" or they don't and are "vegan".

      Natural cheese is not made with rennet anyway ... it ferments naturally.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  3. GRAS, We Pinky Swear by mentil · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Reading TFA (I know), it turns out that new food ingredients don't actually require FDA approval, since food companies can simply state that their novel ingredient is safe, and then the FDA probably won't challenge that. ~10% of all food ingredients haven't been FDA tested/assessed, due to this self-approval loophole, and a concerned party is suing the FDA to close it.

    Reading elsewhere on the net, the Impossible Burger tastes/looks/smells remarkably like a real hamburger. The Beyond Burger smells closer to real beef, but doesn't taste/feel as similar. If vegetable-based burgers can get this close, it makes me wonder if there'd be any market for lab-grown meat, which would presumably cost more to produce. Both veggie burgers seem to have the same amount of protein as beef burgers. One hitch: the impossible burger's heme is from GMO yeast, so the anti-GMO people will have a problem with that (probably a significant fraction of vegetarians).

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    1. Re: GRAS, We Pinky Swear by johnstrass1 · · Score: 1

      The FDA regulates prescription drugs. Everything else ( especially in this corrupt administration) gets OKd with little analysis. Thatâ(TM)s why people are taking âoe fish oilâ supplements which have no health benefit and likely will kill a subset of people, like vitamin E was doing a few years ago.

    2. Re:GRAS, We Pinky Swear by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Reading TFA (I know), it turns out that new food ingredients don't actually require FDA approval, since food companies can simply state that their novel ingredient is safe, and then the FDA probably won't challenge that. ~10% of all food ingredients haven't been FDA tested/assessed, due to this self-approval loophole, and a concerned party is suing the FDA to close it.

      Seems to me if that were the case it would be the other way around. As in, if it doesn't legally require testing and you can self declare something as safe then only about 10% of it would be properly tested/approved.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    3. Re:GRAS, We Pinky Swear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citation? I didn't see any mention of yeast or GMO in the article or brief search. Genuinely would like to know if your claim is true.

    4. Re:GRAS, We Pinky Swear by Only+Time+Will+Tell · · Score: 1

      My girlfriend gets violently sick when she has an Impossible burger. She's tried them at different locations to the same result. I'm curious if there is an allergy or some other sensitivity that causes it. I'd be curious how extensive testing was, and if others have this reaction.

    5. Re:GRAS, We Pinky Swear by edi_guy · · Score: 1

      I've had the Impossible Burger and it's pretty decent. It's not the best burger I've had, but good. I wouldn't get one regularly at the current pricepoint, but my hope/wish is that they will get the price down and move this tech down to McDonalds, Wendy's, BK, etc (but leave In N Out alone!). If we as a society could greatly reduce the amount of beef consumed it would be beneficial to all in both health, and environment.

    6. Re:GRAS, We Pinky Swear by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Slow learner? If something makes me puke, I never eat it again anywhere, nor buy from the same organization again.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    7. Re:GRAS, We Pinky Swear by mentil · · Score: 1
      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    8. Re:GRAS, We Pinky Swear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congrats? Would you like a parade for your idiot comment? The OP was just sharing a story, not asking for your insults.

  4. Sodium by Daralantan · · Score: 1

    I wonder what the sodium content of this is though? I've tried a few vegan fake meats before out of curiosity, and lot of them seem to be 30%+ of the daily value per serving.

    I'd rather just eat natural stuff like nuts, avocado, mushrooms, beans, etc for protein and not bother with imitating meat (I'm not even a vegetarian, just try their stuff sometimes).

  5. Still waiting.... by Tokolosh · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why do we never see reports that steak is being processed to taste like tofu?

    --
    Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
    1. Re:Still waiting.... by Mr0bvious · · Score: 1

      That's no challenge, just come and try the steak at my local.

      --
      Never happened. True story.
    2. Re:Still waiting.... by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Cook it for more than 2 minutes on each side and it starts resembling the taste of tofu.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    3. Re:Still waiting.... by magusxxx · · Score: 1

      Isn't that called lard?

      --
      Care killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.
    4. Re:Still waiting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do we never see reports that steak is being processed to taste like tofu?

      Happens in my guts all the time ;-)

    5. Re:Still waiting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a recipe for that: grind the steak to a minced meat. Cook it in too small frying pan at a medium at most. Add some gelatin to firm up the result and remember to not to add salt or pepper at any point.

    6. Re:Still waiting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do we never see reports that steak is being processed to taste like tofu?

      I plan to release it under the name "Faux-Fu". Faux-Fu, the meat based tofu alternative!

    7. Re:Still waiting.... by jythie · · Score: 1

      I've seen some recipes from the early 1900s that come pretty close. 'boil everything till it has the constancy of mush and the taste of cardboard so that older more distinguished guests do not have to worry about dentures!'.

    8. Re:Still waiting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be the equivalent of Tesla announcing the Model H - a horse drawn carriage.

    9. Re:Still waiting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      You're modded funny but it's just true. No human being naturally wants to live a vegetarian/vegan lifestyle. It's just sad fucks with mental issues who want to self-flaggelate over some perceived wrongdoing they see in everyone else, so they can feel better about themselves. It's utterly pathetic.

  6. This could help the environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    people consuming less meat means less rain forest cleared for cattle farms in the Amazon. That's worth giving Impossible Burger a try and you may even like it.

    1. Re:This could help the environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You can acheive the same by disallowing import from the Amazon region - and anywhere else that don't live up to your environmental standards. Many countries make their own meat, in ways acceptable to the local population.

    2. Re:This could help the environment by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      Yes, instead we can clear rainforest to grow plants for ethanol! Because biofuels are so good for the environment!

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    3. Re:This could help the environment by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yes, instead we can clear rainforest to grow plants for ethanol!

      Is anyone actually doing that? AFAICT most of the plants grown for ethanol are grown right here in the USA. The corn grown for ethanol is however almost universally grown continuously, meaning without even letting fields lie fallow, let alone use of crop rotation. That's how we got the dust bowl the first time... BOHICA!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:This could help the environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Were you born an asshole, or did you have to work at it?

      Go away now while the adults talk: your momma is calling you for dinner.

    5. Re:This could help the environment by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      Most plants for ethanol use in the USA are grown locally. Except in markets where it has to be imported like Florida. But the reason cattle farms are in the Amazon is because they got displaced from other regions by biofuel production for the Brazilian market... https://globalforestatlas.yale...

      At least they are using sugar cane which is more efficient than corn.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
  7. Yes ewwwwww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I've been a vegetarian since birth, and come from a family of vegetarians (since grandparents on both sides "converted"). I've started to eat some red meat when I was 40, for health reasons.

    I these days steer away from foodstuffs that are heavily processed (vegetable and animal sourced). My diet consists of mostly vegetable matter as it comes off the plant and animal protein as it came off or out of the animal/bird - preferably pasture fed.

    As a male, I also avoid soy.

    I'm not convinced that one can make something with a concoction of chemicals that is even closely as healthy to put inside your body than it is to just get it how nature has made it for millennia and our bodies are finely tuned to utilize through generations of selection?

    I actually agree with other vegetarian posters: the likeness to meat of fake meat is actually a detractor, not a good selling point. If you make a choice to eat vegetables, you want your food to taste like that.

    1. Re: Yes ewwwwww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a male whose wife left me a couple of years ago, I've taken to eating lots of soy and I have to say my tits are coming along very nicely and provide me with much-needed company during the long lonely nights.

    2. Re:Yes ewwwwww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > I'm not convinced that one can make something with a concoction of chemicals that is even closely as healthy to put inside your body than it is to just get it how nature has made it for millennia and our bodies are finely tuned to utilize through generations of selection?

      ???

      Everything you eat is are just concoctions of chemicals. Your body is merely just a large chemical processing plant. Your body is not aware somehow of where the chemicals it is processing came from. Your opinion really makes no sense.

      > If you make a choice to eat vegetables, you want your food to taste like that.

      Projecting is an undesirable trait in a human being, I would stop doing it if you hope to have any kind of social or romantic life.

    3. Re:Yes ewwwwww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not convinced that one can make something with a concoction of chemicals that is even closely as healthy to put inside your body than it is to just get it how nature has made it for millennia and our bodies are finely tuned to utilize through generations of selection?

      Everything you eat is a concoction of chemicals! Yes, even the stuff created by nature. It's chemicals all the way down!

    4. Re:Yes ewwwwww by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      We use our minds to determine what food substances are healthy, and choose accordingly (or not). Nature, on the other hand, frequently tries to poison us. Have some digitalis, sumac, raw cassava root, etc..

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    5. Re:Yes ewwwwww by codeButcher · · Score: 1

      > I'm not convinced that one can make something with a concoction of chemicals that is even closely as healthy to put inside your body than it is to just get it how nature has made it for millennia and our bodies are finely tuned to utilize through generations of selection?

      ???

      Everything you eat is are just concoctions of chemicals. Your body is merely just a large chemical processing plant. Your body is not aware somehow of where the chemicals it is processing came from. Your opinion really makes no sense.

      There are many "co-factors" in naturally grown foods that are just too expensive to manufacture, occur in minute quantities, possibly are unknown and are thus not replicated, etc. Some enzymes in vegetables and fruit, for example, are pretty important to a healthy digestion, but having them in food makes the shelf life much shorter. Luckily for food processors, heat above about 65 deg C destroys these, so after cooking and canning, or pasteurization, putting a "best before" date on it becomes a more predictable process. Another example is the naturally occurring bacteria of various Lactobacillus species in vegetables. These are also important to proper digestion and gut health.

      My body is certainly not only a "basically large chemical processing plant" (but for the chemical processes that DO occur, having all the necessary reagents on hand is important - e.g. enzymes - else the process is stopped or the rate of reaction is much too slow). There are some "mechanics" involved (e.g. fiber's effect on blood sugar uptake amongst others), there's some microbial symbiosis involved (it's better to take good care of those populations in one's gut), etc.

      Why not eat some nice green potatoes and potato shoots tonight? They're just chemicals after all and one's body (including liver) can handle chemicals that occur in them just fine? (It's even from a source that I would find acceptable...) One does do so not because "chemicals" is a very wide term and both the type of chemicals as well as their quantity make a difference to one's body.

      > If you make a choice to eat vegetables, you want your food to taste like that.

      Projecting is an undesirable trait in a human being, I would stop doing it if you hope to have any kind of social or romantic life.

      I certainly do not want to have a social or romantic life with you, but mine is otherwise quite OK, thank you for your concern.

      --
      Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
    6. Re:Yes ewwwwww by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      Except the copycat version does not have every little thing that the real one has. No matter how much you try, you are never going to get it perfect.
      Just look at all the vegetarians in India. The only way they aren't dying by the millions, is because they accidentally eat insects that get into all their grain.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
  8. nutrition value and environmental impact? by sad_ · · Score: 0

    Does anybody have any figures for the nutritional value of this burger? Is it healthier then a real-meat-burger? It's not because it contains no meat that it is always healthier.

    And then we ofcourse of the environmental impact, meat has a very high impact on the environment - cows just demans a lot and turning those cows into burgers as well, how does the production process of this burger compare?

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
    1. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 0

      The only natural way to get vitamin b in sufficient quantities is by eating meat. Non animal sources require vitamin supplements. https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/n...

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    2. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2, Informative

      Strange that no one of the die hard vegetarians knows that ...

      No idea why you americans keep spreading that myth. First of all the vitamin in question is not "B" but "B12".

      Then: there are plenty of vegan foods that have plenty of B vitamins of any type, like 11 or 12. E.g. mushrooms, Sauerkraut, fermented Soy, like Tofu, Algae, even black tea comes to mind, everything containing yeast, e.g. beer! Who had guessed that, beer contains vitamin B! Carrots and other "root vegetables".

      Sorry, that you only can get vitamin B* from meat is the biggest lie in the internet.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    3. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Yeast does not produce B12. Fermenting also does not produce B12. B12 is produced by a specific bacteria.

    4. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      A shame Harvard is such a shitty institute they got this all wrong.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    5. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by Vegan+Cyclist · · Score: 1

      Yes and no - 'reliable' is the key word. Other foods may or may not have B12, and in varying amounts, so the safest choice is to take a B12 supplement. Health organizations like the USADA also say that everyone over 50yrs of age should also be taking a B12 supplement, and I bet that age will only continue to go down. B12 deficiency generally has more to do with one's ability to absorb it than amount consumed, so best just make sure you get much more than actually 'required' to maximize absorption.

    6. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might like to tell that to half a billion vegetarian Indians.

    7. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by robkeeney · · Score: 1

      Nope, I always specify B12. All of the other B vitamins are available from plant sources, but B12 is not and the other B vitamins are not a substitute for B12. B12 is only reasonably available to humans by eating animals, unless you like eating poop like rabbits, gorillas, and pigs do.

    8. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Sorry, that is wrong.
      I mentioned plenty of B12 sources in my post.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    9. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Which institude of Havyed do you mean? Perhaps you should direct your frustation more specifically?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    10. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      The more you take, the more the body 'forgets' how to absorb it.
      Vitamin supplements are a double edged sword. As soon as you are not on them, e.g. while traveling, your body needs weeks to adapt to get them again out of fruits or other food.
      I can understand that people in a cold climate take them in winter, but during normal weather periods no one should take vitamin supplememts. They are unnecesary and counterproductive.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    11. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      No, they don't.
      And vegan != vegetarian anyway.
      E.G. 'vegetarians' might still eat cheese, eggs or drink milk.

      Anyway, as I pointed out, there are plenty of plants that support the body with B12.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    12. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Yes, e.g. the yeast bacteria, depending if you want to call it a bacteria or a 'mushroom' ;D

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    13. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by robkeeney · · Score: 1

      Veganism has rotted your brain and destroyed your reading comprehension*. You did not mention a single source of vitamin B12 in your post. None of those things are natural sources of B12. Not a single one of them.

      Let's hear it from the US National Institutes of Health, Office of Dietary Supplements: "Vitamin B12 is naturally found in animal products, including fish, meat, poultry, eggs, milk, and milk products. Vitamin B12 is generally not present in plant foods" (https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/VitaminB12-HealthProfessional/#h3).

      *Not surprising considering a vegan diet is so low in readily bio-available nutrients necessary for good brain function including vitamin B12 (cf. https://www.psychologytoday.co...)

    14. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by Vegan+Cyclist · · Score: 2

      Sorry, terrible advice. And you seem to be conflating B12 and D (which is from sunshine). I don't understand why you'd avoid B12 in the summer. One thing in veganism is certain: those who make the bold step of skipping B12 supplements become ill, and change their tone a few years later and are fine once taking a regular supplement.

    15. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Yeast is single celled, but it's not a bacterium, and while yeast makes B-vitamins, none of the yeast strains make any B12.

      You can buy yeast in the store with B12, but that's because it's been added by the manufacturer.

    16. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Anyway, as I pointed out, there are plenty of plants that support the body with B12.

      Name one plant that makes B12, and provide a link to nutrition data please.

    17. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I already did name 20, 5 posts back.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    18. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      700 million people in the world live vegetarian, and most of them have no problem with B12 or lack there off. You just fell into the american lie about B12 is only in meat.

      Why don't you make up your mind, if the topic interests you, and read a book about it.

      Facepalm ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    19. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I gave about 10 - 20 sources of B12 in my previous post.

      "Vitamin B12 is generally not present in plant foods"
      Does not mean: not at all

      I gave several plants that contain B12 ... now step off my lawn.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    20. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by robkeeney · · Score: 1

      You listed a bunch of plants that produce others of the B vitamins but not B12. You gave no plants that contain B12, not a single one, because there are none. The only way plant foods have B12 is if it is added by a manufacturer or if the manure used for fertilizer isn't washed off (and then the B12 is in the manure on the vegetable, not in the vegetable). This is not controversial science. Plants do not produce B12. Harvard's nutrition scientists say it too: "B12 is only found naturally in animal products" ( https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/n... ).

      Your confusion on this probably arises from the mentally debilitating malnutrition inherent in a vegan diet.

    21. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      They get accidental insects in their grains. So even small amounts of meat are enough to keep you from dying. If you eat strictly vegetables you end up getting sick and dying.
      Of course thinking may be difficult for modern humans also, since the brain is made from cholesterol and that is now something that people have stopped eating and giving to their growing offspring.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    22. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      If you eat strictly vegetables you end up getting sick and dying
      False.
      Beer contains B12, Sauerkraut does, Carrots do - at least organic grown ones - and I bet most roots like radish and potatoes do as well (organic grown food grows on different soil bacteria, they produce B12 [amoung other things] and the roots of the plants absorb it). Kelp does, asian people like kelp, fermented Soy does, actually it is believed that nearly all fermented "dishes" contain noticeable amounts of B12 (because yeast produces B12, so that would include wine and sake, and traditional made bread, that is bread made from sourdough see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... ).

      And most importantly: mushrooms contain more B12 than meat, except for liver.

      Plenty of nuts, especially almonds and peanuts contain B12.

      And bottom line: the amount of B12 the body needs is so absurdly low and the storage capacity of your liver so absurdly high: you easy last 2 or 3 years before you would notice anything if you actually would not take in any B12 during those 2 - 3 years.

      In other words: go to the cinema and eat a pack of peanuts and you are set for month. Or eat an asian vegetarian dish with peanuts :D

      Anyway, I'm not a vegetarian or vegan. I'm just pissed about the wrong information in america where web sites claim only meat contains B12. What about fish?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    23. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      âpâYou should try to not mislead the poor idiots who might stumble across your shitpost.â/pââbrâ âquoteâAlthough mushrooms are not high in B12, they are still the only non-animal fresh food source of B12. â/quoteâ âpâFrom a quick seach, https://www.australianmushroom...â/pâ âpâThe rest of your âoeinfo" sounds just as solid, so I won't bother wasting my time.â/pâ

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    24. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Everybody has to make up his own mind about nutrition.
      The claim that B12 is only in meat is wrong.
      Period. (A no brainer: how would it end up in meat if there was no source from which it is accumulated from? Humans consist of meat, too. BTW.)

      And that is my only point.

      If you are not interested in the topic, then leave us alone, but stop insulting others.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    25. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I only listed B12 plants.

      Why would I list others?

      Plants do not produce B12.
      So mushrooms, nuts and kelp are not plants?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    26. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by robkeeney · · Score: 1

      Your brain must be really addled from B12 deficiency if you believe that.

    27. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by Vegan+Cyclist · · Score: 1

      You might want to save that facepalm for yourself: there's a difference between vegetarian and vegan. Vegan's don't consume any animal products, where eggs and dairy are consumed by vegetarians and contain B12 (and some even consider sea life 'vegetarian'.) There is zero 'controversy' on the recommendations for vegans to supplement B12. There's a handful of individuals who dispute it, and zero have a degree in nutrition, where 100% of vegan dieticians (people who went to school and studied nutrition) agree on supplementation. You might be interested in sites like https://veganhealth.org/vitamin-b12/.

      I've only been vegan for 28yrs, and I've only read half a dozen or so books on the subject, so I know there's still a lot I can learn about vegan nutrition, especially from non-vegans like yourself, so thanks for the tip!

    28. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      The point of argument was never suplements.
      The point of argument is: only animal sources provide B12 is plain wrong.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    29. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by Vegan+Cyclist · · Score: 1

      Where did I say animal sources are the only source of B12? The problem is the plantbased items you listed aren't *reliable* sources, so if you're actually eating those for the B12, and not supplementing, then there's a very high chance you'll end up with a B12 deficiency. You're spreading just as harmful a myth. Please refer to the link I posted, it should clear up any of your confusion. It's years of data-collecting from a vegan dietician.

      And back to your original post, tofu isn't a fermented soy, and doesn't contain B12. Again, you're confused, and probably thinking of tempeh, which also isn't a reliable source of B12. You list mostly 'fake' or at best unconfirmed sources of B12. Sorry, but anyone relying on that list would get sick.

    30. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Kelp, algae, nuts etc. *are* reliable sources.
      Again: I dont't care about vegans, if they are so braindead not to eat cheese, they have to look for themselves where to get B12 from.
      I simply loath the american way of lying about simple nutrition facts and the wide spread aceptance and repeating of thise lies on the internet.
      Meat is the only source of B12! Wrong!

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    31. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      As I'm a meat eater and beer drinker: my B12 level is just fine.
      Idiot ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    32. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by Vegan+Cyclist · · Score: 1

      haha - you're hilarious. Thanks for the laugh.

  9. Approval? by raburton · · Score: 2

    From the letter it actually looks like the FDA said that they see no reason not to take the manufacturers word for it that it's safe, not that they have actually concluded for themselves that it is safe. I don't know if that counts as "approval", but I think the distinction is important.

    Based on the information that Impossible Foods provided, as well as other information available to FDA, we have no questions at this time regarding Impossible Foods’ conclusion that soy leghemoglobin preparation is GRAS under its intended conditions of use to optimize flavor in ground beef analogue products intended to be cooked. This letter is not an affirmation that soy leghemoglobin preparation is GRAS under 21 CFR 170.35.

  10. We need more of this ... by Qbertino · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... to get the meat junkies off their fix. The eco-balance of meat is truely abysmal. Like just a few notches short of plutonium or something. If we could switch to a substitute without anybody noticing, that would be awesome and also finally get anti-biotics out of meat production and back into healthcare, where they belong. That would also get agriculture back into sane waters.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:We need more of this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea but we'd get even more of those insufferable soy boys. Not worth it.

    2. Re:We need more of this ... by guruevi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Humans are omnivores, we evolved bigger brains because we learned to process meat and eventually started cooking it. Farming eventually allowed us to turn small plots of fast-growing but ultimately inedible crops into high protein/carb meat instead of working large swathes of land for little food value in plant material.

      Some farming practices are indeed abysmal and we eat way too much meat right now, but totally removing it is impossible, unhealthy and would upset nature's balance more. Totally removing meat would require much more farm land to be devoted to edible crops to the point it may actually be impossible.

      Being a vegetarian, in the end, is a luxury, not a necessity and only rich people can truly afford it.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    3. Re:We need more of this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TRIGGERED

    4. Re:We need more of this ... by chill · · Score: 1

      No. Not even close, no. In fact, 100% opposite wrong.

      Totally removing meat would require much more farm land to be devoted to edible crops to the point it may actually be impossible.

      It takes more farmland to raise cattle for consumption than it would plants. That is, the cows eat more plants than we do -- acting as middlemen in the food production process. The actual land use for farming, if animals as food were eliminated, would go DOWN.

      Plant foods such as rice, beans, potatoes, leafy greens, grains, and cruciferous vegetables are significantly cheaper than meat products. The only expensive part is trying to create something that so simulates meat that it is difficult to tell the difference.

      Being primarily a meat eater, in the end, is a luxury, not a necessity and only rich people can truly afford it.

      https://www.onegreenplanet.org/animalsandnature/facts-on-animal-farming-and-the-environment/

      Don't like that one? There are many, many other links. Feel free to go back to original sources, such as government statistics on land use, water use, fertilizer use and cost, etc. Meat is damned expensive compared to plants.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    5. Re:We need more of this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      god, slashdot is such a cesspool

    6. Re:We need more of this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We need more meat ... to get the vegan junkies off their fix. No-one cares (apart from vegans, but you lot are just special) about the 'eco-balance' and other such wacky concepts. We're not bothered by the 'murder' of animals, we think they're tasty. I bet you drive a shitty little jelly-bean car, if you drive at all. Most people don't think like you do, and we're better for it.

    7. Re:We need more of this ... by skam240 · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Totally removing meat would require much more farm land to be devoted to edible crops to the point it may actually be impossible."

      That statement couldn't be more wrong. All the food those animals eat has to be grown somewhere and much of the food they eat does not become the muscle fiber we eat, it either serves other purposes for the animal or gets expelled in their poop. On top of that, there's the space the animals need to live in and this space goes up the more ethically you want your meat raised.

      This makes meat production an incredibly inefficient means of general food production. If we didn't eat meat we would use significantly less farm land in total.

      From/; http://www.bbc.com/future/stor...

      "Food, especially livestock, also takes up a lot of room – a source of both greenhouse gas emissions due to land conversion and of biodiversity loss. Of the world’s approximately five billion hectares (12 billion acres) of agricultural land, 68% is used for livestock."

      Don't get me wrong in any of this, I eat meat. I just couldn't let something some obviously wrong go by without saying something.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    8. Re:We need more of this ... by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      I object to the term "meat junkies", as I don't think anyone is actually addicted to meat.

      For me, I like the taste of a burger. If I can get the same taste without meat, that's great! That's what the impossible burger promises, and I would love to give it a go.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    9. Re:We need more of this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We would need about 10X less land for crops if everyone were vegetarian. It is a fact that at each step in the food chain you lose ~90% of the calories going into the process. Plant to human is the most energy efficient means of absorbing calories. Feed plants to animals then humans eat animals, you're harvesting only about 10% of the energy that went into the process. Where does the rest go? Warm body of the animal, exhaled as CO2, and the pile of shit you almost stepped in with making such a claim.

      To that point, the absolute worst thing you can eat ecologically speaking is an apex predator. Among the worst are extremely large fish such as swordfish. This 90% loss is repeated through 8 or 9 stages before terminating at the swordfish. Big fish also concentrate toxic mercury because it accumulates in their tissue without much impact to the fish.

      That's not to say meat has no function. We can't grow food crops everywhere. Converting inedible plant matter into edible meat is useful. But we eat way more than we need to.

    10. Re:We need more of this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You people are fucking hilarious. Hey, I've got some crystals and natural oils to sell you if you're interested!

    11. Re:We need more of this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being a vegetarian, in the end, is a luxury, not a necessity and only rich people can truly afford it.

      Because the 400 million vegetarians in India are the elite right?

    12. Re:We need more of this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The PP is right. All of you replying to his post claiming he is 100% wrong, farm animals consume 10x more plant material than humans, etc, etc, have just been drinking the vegetarian/vegan cool-aid too long.

      The fact is, farm animals can graze on land that is presently unsuitable for growing edible plants for humans. You can have cattle grazing on semi-desert and prairie land that doesn't need to be altered or managed in any way. Take away the cattle, and most of this land will have to be reclaimed to grow human-edible crops that they presently cannot, and naturally will never, support. So you'll need, fertilizing, massive irrigation, etc, thing that are all incredibly more damaging to the environement than simple cattle grazing.

    13. Re:We need more of this ... by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      There's a reason you're arguing for cows and not chickens.

    14. Re:We need more of this ... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It takes more farmland to raise cattle for consumption than it would plants.

      Grazing land can be on a slope. Using mechanical farming methods, food agricultural land has to be flat. The two don't have to compete.

      With that said, most of the world eats mostly goats and chickens, and then cows. As much as I like eating beef, cows may have to go. They are delicate and fiddly compared to goats, which can turn kudzu or poison oak into meat.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:We need more of this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like how you have to call people "meat junkies" because that's the only way you can make your own twisted logic about the natural human diet make sense.

    16. Re:We need more of this ... by chill · · Score: 1

      Keeping in mind I was responding to grossly inaccurate specific claims in the parent post. Yes, beef is the most impactful and hugely symbolic. Yes, moving to chickens instead of beef would be a wonderful move when measured in impact to resource consumption and impact on the environment. And moving to plants would be even better. Either is a major win.

      Pork, chicken, dairy and eggs are equivalent within a factor of two when it came to their environmental burdens, the authors determined. But beef requires far, far more resources than any of those other protein categories. The team calculated that beef requires 28 times more land, six times more fertilizer and 11 times more water compared to those other food sources. That adds up to about five times more greenhouse gas emissions.

      To further put these findings into perspective, the authors also ran the same calculations for several staple crops. All told, on a calorie-to-calorie basis, potatoes, wheat and rice require two to six time less resources to produce than pork, chicken, eggs or dairy.

      https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/beef-uses-ten-times-more-resources-poultry-dairy-eggs-pork-180952103/

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    17. Re:We need more of this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Not even close, no. In fact, 100% opposite wrong.

      Totally removing meat would require much more farm land to be devoted to edible crops to the point it may actually be impossible.

      It takes more farmland to raise cattle for consumption than it would plants. That is, the cows eat more plants than we do -- acting as middlemen in the food production process. The actual land use for farming, if animals as food were eliminated, would go DOWN.

      Posting as AC because I'm mod'ing. That's very likely to be true but still have all the very bad consequences as if you are 100% wrong. Animals and plants are grown on different types of land and those types of land are not substitutes for each other. The meat eaten by humans wouldn't be replaced by the alfalfa and hay that animals usually eat. It would be replaced by soy, and a much more diverse set of vegetables and fruits. Now many of those plants don't grow in the same places that alfalfa and hay do (but many do). So its likely that some of the land we currently use would be made fallow (that's where you are correct), but we would also have to start cultivating a lot more different types of land in regions in which some of these other crops grow. So its less about total amount of land but about how much land of each type do we have and what types of crops grow in which type of land. Cattle generally use poor land that can't really be used for other types of food production as even the food animals eat often grows in more marginal land. That's why it looks so bad in the numbers. But its not like we can turn around and use that land for the types of crops you often find in a salad. The substitution of fruits and vegetables for hay and alfalfa would reduce use of that type of (marginal) land on which we grow food for livestock. But richer and more tropical types of land would have to be used more heavily to produce the extra crops eaten directly by humans. The overly simplistic substitution analysis used by vegetarian groups often is tragically flawed in ways that even children who live on farms can see. But if you know nothing of agriculture then its probably easy to be fooled.

    18. Re:We need more of this ... by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      As I noted above, I got to try one recently, and it wasn't the best burger I've ever had. However, if it was half the price, I'd probably order it somewhat often. I think with better (real) cheese on it, if it was cooked properly (it was medium well), and seasoned better, it would have been fine.

      And that's coming from someone who is a bit of a burger snob.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    19. Re:We need more of this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being a vegetarian, in the end, is a luxury, not a necessity and only rich people can truly afford it.

      Ummm ... really? And you're saying this based on your extensive experience with vegetarian food, or something you believe?

      A lot of vegetarian food is essentially poor people's food ... vegetables, grains, pulses and is dirt cheap ... rice and lentils is a complete protein, and it's cheap as hell (in fact, a lot of places feed cows lentils).

      A lot of Indian or Middle Eastern vegetarian food is the food of the poor. They eat it not because they're rich and have the luxury of being vegetarians, they eat it because it's what they can afford.

      There certainly are spendy vegetarian options, but from-scratch cooking of most vegetarian food is actually fairly cheap.

      LOL .. captcha ... bloody

    20. Re:We need more of this ... by skam240 · · Score: 1

      "Being a vegetarian, in the end, is a luxury, not a necessity and only rich people can truly afford it."

      Shit, I didn't read your whole post before posting. This also couldnt be more wrong. Poor people in third world country's are vegetarians or mostly vegetarians because they simply can't afford to eat meat like we do in the US. Only when you get into first world meat substitutes does vegetarianism get more expensive than meat.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    21. Re:We need more of this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree entirely. The less people eating meat, the better.

      (Because reduced demand leads to reduced prices. Aww, yiss.)

    22. Re:We need more of this ... by PPH · · Score: 1

      Meat production might be inefficient on a per acre basis. But animals can be grazed on unimproved grasslands. And with global warming, we are going to be seeing a lot more of these in the northern latitudes. On the other hand, growing plants for human consumption generally requires plowing under the native plant species and using the land to support monocultures. And using a lot of water, fertilizer and pesticides to do so.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    23. Re:We need more of this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Riddle me this: If humans are omnivores then why do we get atherosclerosis?
      You can feed bricks of cholesterol to an omnivore(bear, dog, raccoon) and they don't get heart disease.
      The current science suggests that our brains got larger because we could cook starches and thus has a steady supply of glucose for our brains....
      Being a vegetarian and especially a vegan is actually cheaper and healthier.
      Don't believe me and want science backed facts? Youtube: nutritionfacts.org

    24. Re:We need more of this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just couldn't let something some obviously wrong go by without saying something.

      Please don't be that guy.

    25. Re:We need more of this ... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      ... to get the meat junkies off their fix. The eco-balance of meat is truely abysmal. Like just a few notches short of plutonium or something. If we could switch to a substitute without anybody noticing, that would be awesome and also finally get anti-biotics out of meat production and back into healthcare, where they belong. That would also get agriculture back into sane waters.

      I'd be very happy to eat a meat substitute that fulfilled all the functions of meat (including tasting good) and didn't require animals to be killed.

      If this turns out to be it, great, if not, I hope they keep working on it.

    26. Re:We need more of this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is you who are (some what) obviously wrong.

      Food animals are raised on farm land that can not be devoted to edible crops. A cow can grow on wild prairie grass, which can grow in environments where a food crop simply can not be maintained due to water requirements. If the land wasn't used to raise animals, it would simply be lost as a food production resource, not turned into edible crops. For this reason meat production, despite being incredibly inefficient, is a food resource we otherwise wouldn't have. We can never give up meat production entirely because of this. It's simply another food resource that we need. Totally removing it WOULD require more (plant-able) farm land than we have to devote to edible crops.

      The problem is the cattle industry doesn't just stop at using un-usable crop land. They glut the market with meat grown on any land they can get their hands on, even if that means slashing and burning the rain forests. It's a free market cycle we can't break free of because the demand for meat is huge. If we reduce meat production the price shoots up and suddenly there's even MORE incentive for produces to stop planting crops and start raising more cattle.

      We don't need a steak on every plate at every meal. But we do need meat production to balance our farming resources.

    27. Re:We need more of this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... to get the meat junkies off their fix. The eco-balance of meat is truely abysmal. Like just a few notches short of plutonium or something. If we could switch to a substitute without anybody noticing, that would be awesome and also finally get anti-biotics out of meat production and back into healthcare, where they belong. That would also get agriculture back into sane waters.

      We're evolved to eat meat - cooked meat in particular. There may be good reasons to shift away from consuming it as much, but stop suggesting that it's some sort of artificial addiction.

    28. Re:We need more of this ... by bingoUV · · Score: 0

      That is, the cows eat more plants than we do -- acting as middlemen in the food production process. ....
      Plant foods such as rice, beans, potatoes, leafy greens, grains, and cruciferous vegetables are significantly cheaper than meat products

      Cows eat more plants than we do - but different parts of the plants. Most humans eat a very small part of the plants grown for rice, beans, potatoes, leafy greens, grains, and cruciferous vegetables. The cows can eat the rest of it. Cows can eat much rougher plants that humans can't eat any part of. Those rough plants can be grown on much more rough land where none of your rice, beans, potatoes, leafy greens, grains, and cruciferous vegetables grow well.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    29. Re: We need more of this ... by bestweasel · · Score: 1

      I quoted those same words above. It seems we just repeat old arguments whenever vegetarianism is the topic here.

      It's not natural.
      It's not healthy.
      It's bad for animals/the environment.
      I like meat.
      I hate vegetarians.
      I really hate vegans.

    30. Re:We need more of this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grazing land is many times in areas that aren't suitable for other crops. So, you're correct that (for example) much of the "field corn" in the midwest could be changed to some other type of crop, however, that doesn't offset the millions of acres of ground only suitable for grazing in the US, Canada and Mexico that can't really grow other types of plants for human consumption.

    31. Re:We need more of this ... by robkeeney · · Score: 1

      This is the sort of ignorant drivel spouted by cloistered city types who wouldn't know how to grow a tomato. There are billions of acres of land perfectly suited for grazing cattle and sheep that are totally unsuitable for any sort of crop production. Drive around Colorado or Wyoming sometime.

    32. Re:We need more of this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Humans are omnivores, we evolved bigger brains because we learned to process meat and eventually started cooking it.

      [citation needed]

    33. Re:We need more of this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what are we doing with all the livestock once we go meatless? Does the livestock just cease to exist and then we have all that agricultural land to ourselves?

    34. Re:We need more of this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "On top of that, there's the space the animals need to live in and this space goes up the more ethically you want your meat raised.

      This makes meat production an incredibly inefficient means of general food production. If we didn't eat meat we would use significantly less farm land in total.

      I thought that most of the land that animals graze on isn't suitable for mass crop production. So in effect it is easier to raise animals there than it is to use it for crops. Is this no longer the case?

    35. Re: We need more of this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends on how the cattle are raised. If they are allowed to roam around and eat the native flora, then they require precisely 0 "farmland" in the sense of plant agriculture which truly "uses" the land. Of course, at least in murica, we are way beyond the point where meat consumption could be sustained free range style.

    36. Re:We need more of this ... by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Which is what I said in the first place although vegetarians lack the energy to properly read.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    37. Re:We need more of this ... by guruevi · · Score: 1

      If you have to raise your own crops and animals, then to a point you have to be mostly vegetarian, raising beef isn't done when you're poor, but keeping poultry and pigs is a good source of protein.

      I'm not saying what we are consuming in the US is healthy, but religious practices across time and lands have established many rituals surrounding both eating, raising and subsequent sharing meat with the rest of the tribe as a valued commodity. If meat wasn't easy to do and more beneficial for us than eating plants, we would've never evolved to do that.

      Meat protein, especially cooked, takes much less energy to produce and consume compared to plant meat.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    38. Re:We need more of this ... by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Because we consume way too much meat, I didn't say we are carnivores. Dogs are carnivores, bears have evolved to allow for the potential to be exclusively carnivores and will prefer meat over berries. Many animals (including dogs, but also many raccoons and even squirrels) have been found to get diabetes and heart disease if their diets are based on first world human food waste.

      Current science also suggests that meat took less energy to produce and takes less energy to process in your body than plants, hence why we and many other animals prefer to eat meat if it's available.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    39. Re:We need more of this ... by guruevi · · Score: 1

      "Mostly vegetarian" is not vegetarian. Being vegetarian/vegan takes a lot of energy to produce and consume your food. Even though I'm not recommending to eat 10kg of meat per day, humans have evolved to consume some meat/fish and evolved to eat it because it has a much higher energy density than plants so you can eat less of it and require less energy to consume it.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    40. Re:We need more of this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just the farmland devoted to corn for ethanol would feed a huge swath of people.

      We have plenty of land, and even plenty of non-meat food. It all is logistics getting it to where it needs to be.

    41. Re:We need more of this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm addicted to meat. I've tried numerous times to go vegetarian for a week or two, but after a few days I become incredibly hungry no matter how much I eat.

      Nothing gets rid of that hungry feeling other than a serve of meat. It's the fat and proteins that does it.

      I've also had an "impossible burger" and found it to have a taste, smell and texture that was close to, but obviously not meat. It had a slight metallic tang. My stomach also felt not-quite-right for the rest of the day and I developed that "vegetarian hunger" that I get when I don't have meat.

    42. Re:We need more of this ... by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Open your mouth. Unless you're a crackhead, you most likely have sharp front teeth and molars.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    43. Re: We need more of this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Totally removing meat would require much more farm land to be devoted to edible crops to the point it may actually be impossible."

      Takes far, FAR more land to Raise livestock AND the food they need to survive, than just feed humans veggies, legumes, fruit, etc.

    44. Re:We need more of this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And most of that land is unsuited for human edible crops or converting it to grow crops for humans would have incredibly horrific effects for the environment.
      Such as all wetlands you'd need to drain.

      Additionally they can eat substances that are completely unsuitable for human consumption.

    45. Re:We need more of this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We evolved large brains because we became bipedal, freeing up the hands for mqnuql tool use, which uses the same parts of the brain responsible for complex lip, tongue, and airway articulation. As a result, language and tool use drove each other, and by extension, intelligence.

      Decades of archaeological studies have shown that the vast majority of calories consumed throughout most of proto-human and human history has been in the form of vegetable matter.

      By the time we started eating loads of meat, we were essentially modern in form and genetics. The importance of meat to the agricultural revolution lies in it's being a stable store of calories to tide populations over between harvests, thus allowing a more sedentary lifestyle, more complex social organization, etc. The primary source of nutrition from the Neolithic on (and as new evidence suggests, well before) has always been cereal grains or other starches.

      Of course, I actually have some expertise on the subject, with I know what I am talking about. You (high carb meat?) apparently do not.

    46. Re:We need more of this ... by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      Saying chicken and pigs are "within a factor of two" is bullshit. Humans need protein, particularly developing humans, and getting it from plants is borderline impossible. Chickens are used to turn bugs and seeds into usable protein, and their food supply is minimal. Think about it - you can buy a chicken at the store in the US for $7 or so. That means that a lifetime supply of food for the chicken cost maybe $.50. See what that'll buy you in the produce section.

      Pigs are used by humans to turn garbage into usable protein and fat. They eat anything. People feed them crap like corn stalks. This doesn't even effect the human food supply since they're eating byproducts of our plant production. There's no "2-1" ratio here - they eat crap that would be thrown away otherwise. They're literally free.

      Beef is a luxury. Pigs and chickens aren't. If you visit the developing world, you'll find those two animals are well-represented in the farming industry because they're so efficient at feeding people.

    47. Re:We need more of this ... by skam240 · · Score: 1

      Have you seen pricing on grass fed beef? Most of our live stock is not grazed because that's too expensive in terms of land use. It's much cheaper to feed them corn and soy (people food) which is why we do exactly that.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    48. Re:We need more of this ... by skam240 · · Score: 1

      ""Mostly vegetarian" is not vegetarian."

      Thanks for that genius. The point is that meat is not commonly eaten by third world poor because it's expensive so they are either vegetarians or mostly so because of cost. In other words, it is not a philosophical preference that drives many people to not eat meat, it's that meat is expensive and therefor being a vegetarian is not a "luxury" as you stated above.

      This really should be common sense for anyone who buys their own groceries and cooks. For any given meal the most expensive thing on a meat eaters plate is usually the meat.

      " Even though I'm not recommending to eat 10kg of meat per day, humans have evolved to consume some meat/fish and evolved to eat it because it has a much higher energy density than plants so you can eat less of it and require less energy to consume it."

      This all has nothing to do with whether being a vegetarian is a luxury or not.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  11. Texture by JBMcB · · Score: 1

    It took companies a couple of decades to perfect the texture of ground beef which, all things considered, isn't too far off from ground up beans or mushrooms in emulsified plant-based fat, probably oil. The secret of the impossible burger is getting the emulsifier right.

    Getting the texture of unprocessed meat, which is closely packed muscle fiber interspersed with fat, is probably impossible using plant-based structures.

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    1. Re:Texture by MattskEE · · Score: 1

      Never say never, people are clever and dedicated. The best current technique is a variation on current extruders used for veggie burgers. It utilizes shear force to cause muscle-like fibers to form:

      https://spectrum.ieee.org/gree...

  12. Soylent Red by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This had better be called Soylent Red or I'm not eating it.

  13. Eat meat ffs by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 2, Informative

    Avoiding animal products. People who do not eat any meat, fish, poultry, or dairy products are at risk of becoming deficient in vitamin B12, since B12 is only found naturally in animal products. Thatâ(TM)s why vegans should make sure to include B12-fortified foods or a B12 supplement in their diets. https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/n...

    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    1. Re:Eat meat ffs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being poor will do it too. I can't really afford meat. I ended up B12 deficient. My doctor prescribed 1000g daily B12 supplement. It made a huge difference in my energy levels.

    2. Re:Eat meat ffs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * that's micrograms. slashdot, in its "wisdom" stripped my ALT-0181.

    3. Re:Eat meat ffs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong, B12 comes from bacteria in the soil. Animals and early humans got it from dirt on plants and from water.
      Given the extensive use of antibiotics, which kill the bacteria, farmers now supplement B12 for the animals, so you are taking a supplement once removed.

    4. Re: Eat meat ffs by bestweasel · · Score: 1

      That only applies to strict vegans though. Vegetarians can eat dairy foods and many people don't fit in neat categories: they mght be mostly vegan or vegetarians who eat fish etc. The half billion Indian vegetarians seem to be coping OK without vitamin supplements.

    5. Re:Eat meat ffs by joshuaf · · Score: 1

      It's easily available from bacterial cultures and that's where b12 supplements have been coming from since I think at least the 70s.

  14. Great. Call me in 30 years by nagora · · Score: 1

    If this stuff is still believed to be safe in 3 decades of actual use, then I'll give it a go or at least evaluate the dangers.

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    1. Re:Great. Call me in 30 years by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Paranoid much? It's a soy protein. Soy proteins are used in fucking everything and have been for decades now. That's why the GRAS request was pretty much a non-issue.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    2. Re:Great. Call me in 30 years by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      By that logic, a soy genetically modified to express cyanide would be no problem.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  15. Protein called heme by vossman77 · · Score: 4, Informative

    soy leghemoglobin, releases a protein called heme that gives the meat substitute its distinctive blood-like color and taste

    Oh my god, so much wrong with this sentence:

    • leghemoglobin is the protein
    • heme is an organic molecule
    • leghemoglobin does not RELEASE heme, it holds the molecule inside
    • when the heme molecule in the protein binds oxygen it provides the red color.

    source: I am a biochemistry lecturer and wikipedia

    1. Re:Protein called heme by vossman77 · · Score: 1

      I should also say that while leghemoglobin, is different from human hemoglobin or myoglobin, all have heme that binds oxygen and turns red.

    2. Re:Protein called heme by hey! · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think when they say leghemoglobin "releases" heme, they aren't referring to its physiological function, but the result of denaturing during cooking, which is an unnatural process.

      As you cook muscle, the myoglobin denatures exposing the iron in heme to oxidation, which turns the meat from red to brown. This oxidized heme plays a role in the development of other complex flavor molecules in coordination with other classes of compounds like lipids. For example the higher myoglobin content in wild duck breast meat gives it a liver-like flavor.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:Protein called heme by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      source: I am a biochemistry lecturer and wikipedia

      You are a wikipedia? That's impressive!

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    4. Re:Protein called heme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or slightly unripe jackfruit.- pulled pork, or even beef.

      Jackfruit grows on trees and is oval shaped. The jackfruit is native to Thailand, India, Bangladesh, Nepal and Sri Lanka. They have a thick and prickly green skin. When the jackfruit is opened, you will find the round fruit contained in ‘pockets’ in a fibrous interior. The flesh is pale yellow and tastes sweet and has a sweet odor.

  16. Name Change? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    What?...they didn't want to call it Soylent Red, or Frankenburger?

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
    1. Re:Name Change? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Well,
      frankenburger is not taken yet, but "frankfurter wuerstchen" is!

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re:Name Change? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Frankenburger wouldn't be too much off, considering that we already have the Hamburger.

      Fun fact while we're at edible towns. The town of Vienna is called in German "Wien". Which, yes, makes the people living there "Wiener".

      Trying to scare us with Soylent Green? Please, we've been eating each other around here for millennia!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Name Change? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      I think you're actually looking for Frankenburg.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:Name Change? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Having spent six years in Deutschland, I've been to all of those cities...don't forget about the Weiner Schnitzel!

      I had not intention of putting a scare into anyone, only an weak attempt at a wisecrack. Note that eating our young doesn't count.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    5. Re:Name Change? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      "Frankenburger" makes me think of Al Franken - a truly toxic idea.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  17. 30 Years...and counting by buravirgil · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Meat's not Murder, as much as I enjoy Morrisey; It's slaughter. And I admire meat-eaters who address sustainable farms to address factory farming and respect any perspective to appeal to HOW animals are raised and rendered after I had read Diet for a Small Planet (https://www.smallplanet.org/diet-for-a-small-planet) and Robbins' book (the Baskin/Robbins heir who was conned by Madoff) in 1990. I went lacto-ovo vegan and made soy "milk", and my own gluten (ashamed I couldn't master tempeh cultures) and supplemented my diet with nutritional yeast for B complex vitamins and explored every meat substitute available and can claim I was spared seasonal flus for years. Fifteen years later, friends half a generation younger, mocked my preferences to seek out substitutes with the same texture and "mouth feel" as akin to wearing a fake fur. It was my first experience with shifts in generational perspective, I think. (The second is a pervasive belief microwave appliances are dangerous.) Anyway, Morning Star brand was some of the best commercially available (and affordable) product (but used egg whites for texture) and leveraged by the growing market of baby-boomers reduction of cholesterol consumption: Tinfoil Advisory-- Morning Star's "Prime" product was the best I had ever experienced and disappeared from the market for over two decades because (I believe) it was TOO Good. At about this time, Oprah took on the Beef trade associations and was summarily silenced on the subject, the only topic from which I believe she has EVER backed away. Supply/Demand arguments have been the reason given for the 3-4X cost of livestock for three decades. Qorn was prevented from North American shelves for over a decade for reasons ignored when it came to Frito-Lay's potato chip products...end of Advisory...

    In 2010, I returned to being an omnivore, but I miss the days of chasing down "mouth feel" substitutes because the science is interesting, and the business angles are very intriguing. Textured vegetable protein (a fantastic substitute in Chile adopted by Hormel a loooong time ago) is the best example of an affordable substitute and industrially compressed gluten that simulated a roast beef that I experienced in Oakland and LA's Whole foods deli sections is the most expensive (5X that of steak), but truly a delicacy.

    In 1990, Robbins' claimed that, without government subsidized water rights, a dollar hamburger in the US would cost $6. I don't know if that's factual because there aren't many sources or studies to cross reference, but such an estimate goes a long way in explaining why the market is, in my humble opinion, so controlled.

    --
    Would were! Should is! Could be! And live a hundred times three.
    1. Re:30 Years...and counting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So much text.
      Can you summarize your point in one sentence?
      TL;DR, really...

    2. Re: 30 Years...and counting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone else give up on this rambling word salad halfway through?

    3. Re:30 Years...and counting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      friends half a generation younger, mocked my preferences to seek out substitutes with the same texture and "mouth feel" as akin to wearing a fake fur.

      Wait, if I can infer a little here, your friends not only would have shamed you for wearing fur, which has a logical argument behind it that can be richly debated, but also for wearing FAKE fur?

      I get that some people think it's not OK to wear animal products like fur (I don't take a stand on the subject), but you're saying they think it's not OK to wear things that resemble animal products even though they are made from non-animal sources?

      WTF? That would be a level of crazy beyond what I've experienced thus far.

    4. Re: 30 Years...and counting by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Anyone else give up on this rambling word salad halfway through?

      I managed to read and understand it in the time it took you to post bitching about it. Maybe you need to do some work on your parser. For the textually challenged:

      * Meat isn't murder
      * Author demonstrates post-vegetarian qualifications
      * Meat substitutes are interesting
      * Meat has powerful lobbies
      * Meat is government-subsidized

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:30 Years...and counting by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I think the concept of a paragraph has just been murdered.

    6. Re:30 Years...and counting by Solandri · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In 1990, Robbins' claimed that, without government subsidized water rights, a dollar hamburger in the US would cost $6. I don't know if that's factual because there aren't many sources or studies to cross reference, but such an estimate goes a long way in explaining why the market is, in my humble opinion, so controlled.

      The market is controlled because of the foot shortages we experienced after the Dust Bowl which exacerbated the Great Depression. That's when the government realized, holy crap it's really possible for a modern developed country to not produce enough food to feed itself. Consequently, we enacted all sorts of subsidies to insure there's always an oversupply of food. It's why we pay farmers not to plant anything - so if another dust bowl should wipe out a large chunk of the country's farmland, we have plenty of reserve farmland ready and available to immediately go back into production.

      The consequence of all these subsidies is overproduction. That leads to the market price dropping to unsustainable levels (farmers cannot sell their crops for enough to cover their expenses). That's where the other government subsidies come in. The government buys all these crops at a fixed price, thus allowing the farmers to stay in business. The government then acts as a monopoly source and resells the food at a higher price to distributors like supermarkets. That lets them recoup most of the subsidy (but not all - the discrepancy is minimized when the crops are bought at market price; and since the crops are not bought at market price the subsidy always ends up being greater than zero).

      But the supply of food exceeds the demand. So the government is still left with more food than it can hope to sell. Rather than let the excess rot in grain silos, it has to come up with other ways to use it. Some of it becomes foreign aid sent to other countries. High fructose corn syrup is another byproduct of this food oversupply. As is ethanol to mix with gasoline. But a large portion of it becomes cheap grain to feed to cattle, since Americans love beef. This is food that was going to rot in grain silos if not used, so the money spent growing it and subsidizing it is a sunk cost and unrecoverable, and thus shouldn't be a factor in how you decide to use it. Any money you can recoup from selling it is a positive.

      In other words, if the subsidies really did raise the price of a dollar hamburger to $6, ending subsidized meat production wouldn't mean we're saving $5. Since meat production is actually a money source to offset a sunk cost (selling grain that was going to otherwise rot), ending it would actually increase the cost of these food programs to the government. If the cattle industry wasn't buying all that excess grain, the government would have to pay the entire cost of subsidizing that overproduction. So the extra $5 in cost per hamburger would get distributed over all the grain and corn that's sold to supermarkets. And you'd see the price of grains and vegetables increase to pay for the subsidy that the meat industry is no longer paying to help offset.

    7. Re:30 Years...and counting by buravirgil · · Score: 1

      The market is controlled because of the foot shortages we experienced after the Dust Bowl which exacerbated the Great Depression.

      You explanation goes a long way in allowing me to put away several rolls of foil-- sincerely-- Thank you.

      --
      Would were! Should is! Could be! And live a hundred times three.
    8. Re:30 Years...and counting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have more than enough space on Earth and agricultural capacity to feed every meat eater in the 1.3 billion population of the developed world.

      The problem is the developing world and their sky-high birthrates.

      One child policies for every developing country, and we can eat our meat. Let's do that instead and save all this moral tripe.

    9. Re:30 Years...and counting by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      There's something awfully screwy about your logic. Ending all government expenditures that meddle in the food market cannot increase the governmental cost of all expenditures that meddle in the food market.

      There are other problems in your post. For instance, government policy was a major contributing factor in the food shortages during the Great Depression.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  18. GMO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a GMO product, in case everyone is wondering.

  19. Why am I an omnivore ? by Salgak1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Take a look in the mirror, and smile. The Incisors and Canines in your mouth evolved primarily for eating meat, and the premolars and molars evolved for grinding vegetable matter. I go with what my biology is optimized for.

    I will add that almost every animal source is edible, and the vast majority of plant life is either inedible or actually toxic in some way. I stick with what works. . .

    1. Re: Why am I an omnivore ? by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I thought that too, but the other day I say a Neanderthal skull in a museum. The teeth look like a mouth full of molars, ready to eat plants, and yet further analysis shows they also ate meat. We've evolved as omnivores, capable of thriving with a wide variety of different diets.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:Why am I an omnivore ? by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Informative

      Take a look in the mirror, and smile. The Incisors and Canines in your mouth evolved primarily for eating meat,

      Nope. Gorillas have massive canines but they never eat meat.

      Incisors? They work for plants, too. Biting apples is much easier with incisors than molars.

      The puny little canines that humans still have? Throwbacks to when we used to fight like gorillas. No use at all for hunting/killing.

      --
      No sig today...
    3. Re:Why am I an omnivore ? by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

      We have a mouth full of small and wimpy teeth, optimized for eating cooked food and hunting with tools. I do agree that we are omnivores, but comparing our teeth to other animals isn't very useful to prove that.

    4. Re:Why am I an omnivore ? by aevan · · Score: 3, Insightful
    5. Re:Why am I an omnivore ? by arth1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nope. Gorillas have massive canines but they never eat meat.

      They also don't have apolipoprotein E2-E4, which developed after our common ancestors split, and is a big factor in how much meat we can eat.

    6. Re:Why am I an omnivore ? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      "There's plenty of opportunities" for adding mammal DNA to gorilla scat after the fact, Schubert said. "I don't really think they're eating meat."

      --
      No sig today...
    7. Re:Why am I an omnivore ? by aevan · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I looked at it more like: 'if Gorillas are 'close to people'... then young gorillas eating things they shouldn't, and desperate/bored gorillas eating things they normally wouldn't... is to be expected."

    8. Re: Why am I an omnivore ? by houghi · · Score: 0

      We evolved this way, just as God intended 6000 years ago.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    9. Re:Why am I an omnivore ? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      I think we should wait until they actually film a gorilla hunting other monkeys before deciding.

      Either way, it's obvious that gorillas don't have their canines for the same reason lions do.

      --
      No sig today...
    10. Re: Why am I an omnivore ? by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      The Incisors and Canines in your mouth evolved primarily for eating meat,

      The thing is, though, that if you were quoting from the last hundred plus years of anthropological observation and concensus, you'd be repeating that stuff and not just some gibberish that laypeople repeat to one another in the echo chamber because it sounds right.

      Hint: that stuff you said? It wasn't that other stuff. ;)

    11. Re:Why am I an omnivore ? by registrations_suck · · Score: 1

      Nope. Gorillas have massive canines but they never eat meat.

      Probably why humans endanger gorilla habitat, rather than gorillas endangering human habitat.

    12. Re:Why am I an omnivore ? by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      What? We've hunted most predators that could harm us to extinction or near extinction. As soon as we discovered fire and tools, gorillas were food or an inconvenience that needed to be dealt with. What they eat has no bearing on whether or not humans can and will kill them at will.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    13. Re:Why am I an omnivore ? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Nope. Gorillas have massive canines but they never eat meat.

      Evoltuion takes a similar solution to multiple problems. Eating meat is one thing, to do that you gotta kill it first. A gorilla on the other hand uses their canines to grab and snap branches.

      That doesn't change the fact that 99% of animals out there use them for holding onto that juicy animal they just bit.

    14. Re: Why am I an omnivore ? by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      I was going to say: "Creimer, is that you?"

      Low and behold....he outed himself.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    15. Re:Why am I an omnivore ? by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      The mildly toxic constituents of edible plant life provide some amazing cellular-level benefits which trickle up to the health of the whole organism.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    16. Re: Why am I an omnivore ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stfu chris.

    17. Re: Why am I an omnivore ? by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      Could it be considered the height of irony to jest at people so stupid they can't understand their own source material while appealing to an intensely academic idea like evolution?

      These people can't even read their Bible right.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    18. Re: Why am I an omnivore ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weed and shrooms?

    19. Re:Why am I an omnivore ? by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      We have thumbs, brains, and can run for freakin ever. We don't need to get close enough to bite something to kill it. Doing so is counterproductive most of the time, at least with animals of significant fractions of our body mass or larger.

      "Biting apples is much easier with..." has so many faulty assumptions loaded into it, it isn't even wrong. Apples have not always been the same size as they are now. Apples aren't a staple food that people subsisted on and induced genetic changes. Sigh, there's so many layers of WTF in your statement I can't even.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    20. Re:Why am I an omnivore ? by robkeeney · · Score: 1

      Aside from our teeth, the rest of our digestive tract is far closer to that of a wolf than that of a gorilla or chimpanzee. There are no nutrients required for human health that are not available on a purely carnivorous diet. Any nutrients needed that are available from plant sources are far more bio-available to humans from animal sources. Much of the nutrition in plants is bound up with anti-nutrients like phytates and oxylates so that very little of them are used.

    21. Re:Why am I an omnivore ? by Air-conditioned+cowh · · Score: 1

      Have a nice long look at a bear's teeth. That's what an omnivore's teeth are supposed to look like. Also try killing any of the animals you eat with your bear hands and then trying to eat them with no tools.

    22. Re: Why am I an omnivore ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am vegetatarian and still find eating very useful... I know that's only anecdotal evidence.

    23. Re:Why am I an omnivore ? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Take a look in the mirror, and smile. The Incisors and Canines in your mouth evolved primarily for eating meat,

      Nope. Gorillas have massive canines but they never eat meat.

      And that's why they're stuck where they are. If you eat meat you have a much better and more efficient source of protein, and your brain develops much better.

    24. Re: Why am I an omnivore ? by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      Those aren't toxic. Try again.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    25. Re: Why am I an omnivore ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bear hands are the only tools I will ever need!

    26. Re:Why am I an omnivore ? by Peter+P+Peters · · Score: 1

      Take a look in the mirror, and smile. The Incisors and Canines in your mouth evolved primarily for eating meat, and the premolars and molars evolved for grinding vegetable matter. I go with what my biology is optimized for.

      Your body is optimised to adapt to its environment. The teeth you currently have are a result of previous experiences of your ancestors, but you are by no means a finished product. So if optimisation is your thing, then adapting to new things should be your primary goal.

    27. Re: Why am I an omnivore ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We didn't evolve from neanderthal, we evolved in parallel. The pre human ancestors we look to have evolved from not only had canines, but they were much more pronounced than ours. On the other hand, chimps have quite sizeable canines and are omnivores but also mostly eat fruit.

    28. Re: Why am I an omnivore ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh come on - evolution is a matter of faith. There's about as much real science behind most "evolutionary" claims as there is in the book of Genesis.

    29. Re:Why am I an omnivore ? by piers_downunder · · Score: 1

      Exactly, and that's why animals like horses, which have been strict herbivores for tens of millions of years, never grow canine teeth. Oh, except male horses often do, because canine teeth are useful in fighting other males. And they also often grow "wolf teeth", which are only useful for tearing meat, because millions of years ago their evolutionary ancestor was an omnivore. Perhaps it's better not to look at teeth in order to decide what your diet should be.

    30. Re: Why am I an omnivore ? by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      At no point in my post did I either endorse or condemn the veracity of evolution or the Genesis account.

      You're an excellent example of what I was referring to. You can't read two sentences in plain English without fucking it up completely. How could you be expected to understand something as academically dense as the evidence and conjecture surrounding the fossil record?

      Without the ability to read, understand, and form a relevant and cogent reply, you're a terrible endorsement for anything you say you stand for.

      I will give you this accolade. At least you aren't taking your inability to read and turning it into a whole new branch of religion.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
  20. Re:SoyBoys by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    You're just jealous that I get to fondle some nice tits!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  21. soyboy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yey, more soyboys to come.

    let me just preorder no man sky 2

  22. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  23. Why is there so much focus on Soy? by oic0 · · Score: 1

    I may have a bit of a conflict of interest here since I'm allergic to soy, but its one of the most common food allergies. I wish the food industry would stop their obsession with it. They put it in literally everything now days and the FDA says they dont even have to put it on the allergy list if they only use lecithin or the oil which is some BS because it still makes us sick.

    1. Re:Why is there so much focus on Soy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I may have a bit of a conflict of interest here since I'm allergic to soy, but its one of the most common food allergies. I wish the food industry would stop their obsession with it. They put it in literally everything now days and the FDA says they dont even have to put it on the allergy list if they only use lecithin or the oil which is some BS because it still makes us sick.

      It has a lot to do with farming resources. Producing meat takes up significantly more land and resources in terms of feedstock (although generally less water) than growing plants. Meat is also in some cases more pollutant; cattle are a net contributor to global warming for example whereas plant growth is, broadly speaking, a net reducer. In addition, with a growing global population, producing enough protein is a coming issue. Soy is relatively easy to grow and has a high protein content for a plant; like all plants it's not the right kind of protein but it's close.

      The thesis if companies like Impossible Foods is that if you can make a plant-based protein taste and feel exactly like a meat, then you've removed a major hurdle to move much of the world's population from animal based protein to plant-based, which has many more inherent sustainability aspects to it.

      For the record, I do not buy into this thesis, but it's the driving force behind these types of efforts.

    2. Re:Why is there so much focus on Soy? by vossman77 · · Score: 1

      If I were you I would probably still not try it (too risky), but I doubt you would have any allergic reaction. The soy plant is not involved in the process. They took the protein DNA sequence from soy and inserted it into yeast, so really it is a yeast product not soy. Other ingredients include coconut and potato.

      Much like human insulin is produced by yeast, but we do not have to worry about the blood type of the insulin sequence that came from human.

    3. Re:Why is there so much focus on Soy? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It has a lot to do with farming resources. [...] Soy is relatively easy to grow and has a high protein content for a plant; like all plants it's not the right kind of protein but it's close.

      The vast majority of Soy in the USA is GMO, which is only a problem because the most relevant modification is glyphosphate resistance. Glyphosphate doesn't break down in anaerobic conditions, and mechanical food production creates hardpan which causes those conditions. Thus, it enters the water supply. More soy in the ground means more glyphosphate in you. The rest of the world recognizes glyphosphate as a carcinogen.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Why is there so much focus on Soy? by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      There's not a lot of plant-based protein sources that are as easily grown and thus inexpensive.

    5. Re:Why is there so much focus on Soy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm likewise allergic to soy. Allergies are always protein based. So, perhaps they just created a yeast that is poisonous to me rather than making a protein that is not.

  24. Re:SoyBoys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice hairy tits.

  25. Re:SoyBoys by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    The estrogen should take care of that too, your chest will look like it's been waxed 10 minutes ago.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  26. Too bad it tastes terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've tried their product at a few places; some restaurants now serve Impossible Burgers and other Impossible Meat versions of their dishes.

    That's great that the FDA agreed that their data showed it's safe for human consumption. However, based on my personal FDA, my taste buds, I cannot agree with this finding.

    Impossible Meat tastes like the ass of a cardboard cut-out man. As an unashamed meat eater I was open to trying it, and I can conclude that it tastes and feels AWFUL.

  27. Mmm bacon. Bacon isn't meat, I used to say by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Yep, bacon is the gateway drug.

    My first ~ year as a vegetarian, I liked to point out that bacon is crispy. Meat isn't crispy. If you cook some meat and leave it sitting out on the counter all day, it'll spoil in a few hours. You can cook bacon and leave it out for days, weeks even if you cover it to keep the dust and flies off. Therefore bacon must not be meat, I can eat it, I said. :)

    1. Re:Mmm bacon. Bacon isn't meat, I used to say by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Yep, bacon is the gateway drug.

      My first ~ year as a vegetarian, I liked to point out that bacon is crispy. Meat isn't crispy. If you cook some meat and leave it sitting out on the counter all day, it'll spoil in a few hours. You can cook bacon and leave it out for days, weeks even if you cover it to keep the dust and flies off. Therefore bacon must not be meat,

      Crispy bacon is disgusting. Bacon should be soft. The last cruise I went on, they separated their bacon in the buffet between crispy and soft and I thought I was in heaven.

      I do like your way of thinking, though. I make the argument that mac and cheese counts as a vegetable because it can be served with a vegetable plate.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  28. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  29. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  30. Hmmm by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    I enjoy a vegetarian meal but I've never understood the search for a meat substitute. When I want meat I eat it, when I want vegetarian I eat that way. There are plenty of vegetarian dishes that I would choose to eat purely because of the taste. I personally think the idea of a gene moded wholly artificial key ingredient sort of defeats the purpose of a vegetarian, or raw diet I wonder if it would qualify as Halal or Kosher ? I think of Soylent : Green when I consider stuff like this...

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    1. Re:Hmmm by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      Meat production costs a lot, so maybe you could have a burger that is healthier (?) and also much cheaper. Think how cheap beans are vs ground beef. Might be a way to make a dystopian nutrient paste more pleasant to slurp, at least.

    2. Re:Hmmm by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      Think how cheap beans are vs ground beef.

      And then think about how I would rather eat ground beef than cheap beans. Supply and demand, no one wants to eat your cheap ass beans.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    3. Re:Hmmm by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      Exactly! But what if you got the same taste and texture as beef at the price of the lame beans!

  31. Re:Name Change? Try "Freakenburger." by pem · · Score: 1

    After all, look at the target market.

  32. Now they need to shame us into buying it by mi · · Score: 0

    pursue a plant-based burger that truly tastes like meat

    Good for them! Now they just need to shame us into buying that — the way we are shamed for not preferring electric cars, and refusing to date "transsexuals".

    And, of course, getting government's help — such as a subsidy or a mandate for governmental institutions (like schools) to offer this fake "meat" — would go a long way too...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Now they need to shame us into buying it by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      I agree! We as a civilization should be promoting things that improve our society and discourage things that harm it (though dunno your dating problems ...seems like a personal issue).

    2. Re:Now they need to shame us into buying it by mi · · Score: 1

      We as a civilization should be promoting things that improve our society and discourage things that harm it

      This implies, that someone — some governmental body — knows, what is good and what is harmful for the rest of us. Contrary to what you may have been led — and even leading others — to believe, there is no such body.

      For one example, allow me to remind you of the horrendously ill-fated and ill-conceived "War on Fat" — a completely misguided endeavor, likely responsible for millions of obesity cases in the US alone.

      Individuals may make whatever choices they prefer and trust whoever they choose to trust, but the authority of the government must never again be allowed to suggest us, what to eat.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    3. Re:Now they need to shame us into buying it by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      Well we know that global warming has a detrimental effect on the planet.

      We also know that livestock contribute around 14% of emissions that cause global warming
      Reducing live stock consumption would therefore reduce climate change.

      Individuals cannot be trusted to do the right thing for the greater good - we've seen again and again that people will do what they want.

      Additionally, there is a government body that knows what is good and harmful. It's called the FDA. The FDA has been very effective at stopping food borne illnesses and helping people have safe eating habits.

    4. Re:Now they need to shame us into buying it by mi · · Score: 1

      Individuals cannot be trusted to do the right thing for the greater good

      Found an Authoritarian... So I can not be trusted, and therefore it is Ok to compel me. All for the Greater Good[TM] — because common interest before self-interest, correct?

      there is a government body that knows what is good and harmful. It's called the FDA

      Yes, and only a few years ago the FDA were telling us, we should not eat fat and cholesterol. And now the same organizations tell us it was all wrong. "Healthy habits" my tail — Western world is horribly obese because we trusted the government, that "fat is bad".

      helping people have safe eating habits

      That's what parents are for. Parents might know better, than their children. The government does not know better than we do, it does not consist of omniscient selfless and benevolent wizards. Government officials have the same passions, flaws, and vices as the rest of us. Working for NASA does not make anyone more credible than working for Exxon-Mobil.

      You can choose to trust someone else at your own peril, but your Authoritarian insistence, that I trust him (and submit to him!) too makes it my peril as well. No way

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    5. Re:Now they need to shame us into buying it by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      I noticed you ignored the reasoning behind what I said - I assume you're pro-climate change? At the very least you're ignorant of its effects.

      Unless you've been living under a rock, you've probably noticed that parents often don't know well enough to provide their children with a healthy meal. You're seriously trying to say that the average parent know more about nutrition than nutritional experts? The benefit of the government is that it's made up of multiple people, so even if some of them have passions, flaws, and vices, the combination of them can be better than any of them individually. If they're making the wrong decisions, we can push our representatives to get hem to change.

  33. You are not the target audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is for people that want to eat vegetarian for other reasons

  34. The hypocrite truth of Vegetarianism by Eloking · · Score: 1

    I found that funny that vegetarians (and vegans) said that they want to help animal with one hand and found initiative like Impossible Foods with the other.

    "Wait, those two things both help animal" you might say.

    Well, let's take the hypothesis that in 200 years this succeed and eventually all meat are replace with "laboratory" meat. That would be wonderful for the ~ 800 million pigs and the ~ 1000 cattle, right?

    Oh wait, they don't exist anymore, except in zoo. After all, extinction sound a lot better than husbandry don't you think?

    --
    Elok
    1. Re:The hypocrite truth of Vegetarianism by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Oh wait, they don't exist anymore, except in zoo.

      Zoos are exploitation. Those will have to go too.

    2. Re:The hypocrite truth of Vegetarianism by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

      Hypocrites, because noone would ever keep farmyard animals as pets.

      Your definition of "husbandry" was also why "agricultural operation interference" laws were invented, to prevent people from being made aware of inhumane practices in feed lots and factory farms.

      As a proud member of PETA (people eating tasty animals) I find your trolling leaves much to be desired.

  35. It's not for you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's for people who refuse to consider anything that doesn't taste like meat. You may legitimately not be one of them, but they are *extremely* common which is why so much money is being poured into this market now.

    1. Re:It's not for you. by sexconker · · Score: 1

      It's for people who refuse to consider anything that doesn't taste like meat. You may legitimately not be one of them, but they are *extremely* common which is why so much money is being poured into this market now.

      Why not just let them eat meat?

  36. Congrats on never being hungry by huckamania · · Score: 1

    First world problems and attitude all in one post. Very humble brag of you.

  37. Bunny or frier, same thing by drnb · · Score: 1

    Why is a cow's life worth more than a cute bunny's?

    The same cute rabbit is called either a bunny or a frier depending only on the buyer's intent.

  38. So... by DarrellBFI · · Score: 1

    ...not meat that looks and tastes like meat. I guess if the ethical conundrum of meat consumption is what drives you to be a vegetarian, I can see how this would be welcome.

    --
    Social Media Mgr at Bluefield Identity
  39. Learning we eat animals when young ... rationality by drnb · · Score: 1

    I think if a few more kids saw an animal being killed it would make a big difference)

    Yes, there would be fewer vegetarians. It is only the hiding of the natural cycle of predation that causes some adults to be disgusted and turn vegetarian. Learning that we eat animals at a young age leads to more rational adults. Now some of these rational adults may still turn vegetarian but they will more likely be motivated by health aspects than squeamishness. Squeamishness is a result of being sheltered and separated from the realities of nature.

    Think of history for a moment, over the millennia of farming where young children saw fowl and livestock turned into dinner. What effect did that reality have on them? To go vegetarian, no. More likely is to be thinking "this is going to taste good" and they do their chore of plucking the chicken for Mom.

    Hell, vegetarianism due to squeamishness is a very modern phenomena even in towns and cities. We are only a small number of decades removed from taking a whole chicken home for dinner. Plucked and partially processed but it still unmistakably looked like a chicken to any young children seeing it and Mom having to removed the inner organs was a common sight too. I recall seeing this at my Grandmother's. Did I want to stick my hands in there to remove the heart, liver, etc ... no icky ... did I sit down at the table and think yummy. You bet I did.

  40. How incredibly wasteful. by filesiteguy · · Score: 1

    Meat is healthy. Processed vegetables are not only unhealthy but destructive to the environment.

    This is just so sad.

    1. Re:How incredibly wasteful. by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Come on, you make that statement and there's no link? Inquiring minds what to know!

    2. Re:How incredibly wasteful. by filesiteguy · · Score: 1

      Humble apologies.

      1. https://medium.com/@drewfrench/grass-fed-beef-the-most-vegan-item-in-the-supermarket-8c46b45a0d47

      2. https://www.regenerative.com/magazine/six-problems-monoculture-farming

      3. http://www.onegreenplanet.org/animalsandnature/monoculture-crops-environment/

      I could go on.

    3. Re:How incredibly wasteful. by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Sounds like some of the same concerns from the past. The third link, at the bottom they tell us not to eat meat.

      Real bitch around where I live. I work with a local farm in Maryland. Turns out there is no place that we can take cattle around here, we have to drive around 2 hours to a place near Baltimore. Even though there is a local place for deer if I shot it. It's not a commercial place or some FDA garbage regulation.

      Thanks for the links.

  41. You haven't tasted farm raised bacon by drnb · · Score: 1

    Food preparation is not sport, its part of sustenance. Slaughtering livestock is an ordinary part of 10,000 years of farming.

    If you have problems killing the pig it only tells me one thing. You haven't tasted farm raised bacon.

  42. SOY: It's what FOOD eats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually I wouldn't eat meat that was fed soy all it's life, that would taint it.
    You vegecucks are ridiculous; your so-called 'moral choice' can't override millions of years of evolution that has been steadily making us into omnivores, all it'll do is make you health shitty, your brain substandard, and turn you into a gigantic weak-willed ineffectual pussy.
    Eating meat and other animal products is NORMAL and NATURAL and HEALTHY and it makes you STRONG. It's what our entire civilization has been built on, and you'd turn your back on that so some dumb animal gets to live a few more years? LOL amazinging retarded.

  43. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  44. TLDR by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

    But I loved the comment "Maybe you need to do some work on your parser."

    --
    There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
  45. I like meat by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

    I like eating meat, I don't eat a lot of it, but I do like some meat with my meals. My wife is almost a vegan (again) but bacon is her one weakness. I find food without a meat portion to be bland and unfulfilling. That's my choice, just as it's my wife's choice to no longer eat meat. I don't give a fuck if the cow takes up more space, it also produces more poop and contributes to the glue you use to stick your kids poster to something. I can also wear it on my feet (the leather, not the steak, or the whole cow). How about finding a substitute for decent leather, there are NONE that come close.

    --
    There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
  46. About bleeding time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now the bloody ingredient's been approved, when's the fucking product coming out?

  47. How can you have any pudding... by TomGreenhaw · · Score: 1

    ... if you don't eat your meat.

    --
    Greed is the root of all evil.
  48. Re:Trump wins lifetime in Federal Prison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Constantly making accusations without proof is commonly called paranoid schizophrenia

  49. what i want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is high protein, low fat, plant based food that is not soy based, that i can use as a meat substitute occasionally. i dont need it to taste or feel like meat. i just want it to be cheap and edible. i can make it taste good. maybe soylent would be good.

  50. To whomever is in charge of slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enough is enough. I have had it with the first goddamned post in every conversation about every goddamned story that has nothing to fucking do with Donald Fucking Trump being ABOUT Donald Fucking Trump.

    If you do not fix this by setting the lameness filter or some other technology to stop this shit, you are losing another reader.

    Yes, I am well aware I can adjust viewing settings to show only score 1 or 2 or higher messages, but unfortunately, not every message worthy of being read has been moderated up yet, and if you grant me mod points, (as you periodically do,) and expect me to spend them browsing at 0 or -1, so I have to keep reading this bullshit every goddamned time I am simply not going to do it anymore.

    It has nothing to do with how I feel about Little Donny McDipshit, (or how guilty he obviously is, how stupid, etc.,) it is simply the fact that the world does not revolve around his big, fat, stupid, ugly, cavernous, shit-filled HEAD... and I am sick and fucking tired of reading about him. Fix this shit or I am gone.

  51. Pardon the pun by zomberi · · Score: 0

    Gosh! It's a bleeding hamburger!

  52. Re: Trump wins lifetime in Federal Prison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No it isn't. It's called religion.

  53. Not impossible but damn good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I finally got to try an Impossible Burger recently. First, make sure that it's not overcooked. It arrived thoroughly "well done" and one bite was, well as tasteless as well done beef burger. I sent it back and asked for it to be a red and juicy, which was the way it came back. I'd say it has about 70% of the flavor and feel of beef. But comparisons aside, taken on it's own it was very, very good. The problem was the price: $16 (this included fries).

    Bottom line, I'd definitely eat one again, for about $9 max. Would I still miss beef burgers if I only ate the Impossible Burgers? Yeah, but a lot less than I thought I would before I tried it. If for some reason it came down to only being able to east Impossible Burgers instead of beef burger, I'd be OK with it.

  54. The future. Imitation everything. by edris90 · · Score: 1

    Welcome to a future where what looks like a chair is really a garbage disposal, what looks like vitamins is really rat poison, what looks like meat is really reconstituted soy conglomerate. You looking for mouthwash ?grab the bottle with the label that says furniture polish? The one that says mouthwash is toilet cleanser. We won't rest until nothing is what it appears to be.

  55. EWWWW... by iq145 · · Score: 1

    Sounds nasty. But remember: "If slaughterhouses had glass walls, the whole world would be vegetarian." - Linda McCartney