Depends on what type of porn, and what community you live in.
PS: Thanks for volunteering yourself as the spokesperson for the entire population. I'm sure your particular beliefs apply to everybody in the country.
THIS much difference from ONE field trip to a museum? Why, by all that is correlated, we MUST start opening up museums like 7-11s! There should be one on every streetcorner!
If you take a kid from the hood who's only ever seen turf wars, people fighting and other gang 'bidness' and show him something past the end of his street then it probably has an effect, yes.
Why would you be typing on a little virtual keyboard and looking at a screen when driving? That just seems stupid. What is the downside to waiting five minutes .
The one I picked out, ie. " Republican strategist Frank Luntz advised members of the Republican Party, with regard to climate change, that "you need to continue to make the lack of scientific certainty a primary issue" and "challenge the science" by "recruiting experts who are sympathetic to your view".
That quote has a little number [10] next to it. If you hover the mouse over that you get a citation and source for that quote. You're free to check it out. You can also see the entire history of page edits and see if anybody has been "vandalizing" a page.
(I hate to have to explain how Wikipedia works, but apparently there's people who don't know).
What about the other claim I made about typing "democrat climate change denial" into google and it coming up with articles about Republicans? Is that just something google does to make the Republican party look bad?
You can type stuff like "climate denial republicans vs democrats" into google, and guess what? Same thing.
If you want to trash Wikipedia, do it by providing facts. Show us where the Wikipedia page is wrong. Waving hands, not providing any evidence, dismissing something because of something you once read on the Internet? That just makes you look foolish.
1) It's a law the same way Newton's Laws are laws.
Newtons laws are based on real physical "laws". Not the same thing at all and definitely not "nitpicking".
There's a well know observation that's known as "Moore's Law", yes, but calling it a "law" doesn't make it one. There's a parable about grains of wheat on a chessboard which explains why. Anybody with a working brain can see that it can't hold for much longer. The laws of physics and mathematics will come into play soon (and they're real laws, not data trends).
Newton's laws? I expect them to hold until the end of time.
Yep. $8,000 a month to watch somebody die slowly, painfully and inevitably. When the person being kept alive doesn't want it.
After a year of watching this person's misery, they die and you're left with a bill you might never be able to pay off.
They dies. Your life is in ruins. The mental scars of watching it for a year are far worse than if you just said goodbye and did it. Does that make sense to anybody at all?
Slashdot Mirror
The only Memory stick I ever bought that was bad right out of the box was OCZ.
YMMV.
Note to self: Don't buy any new Toshiba-manufactured SSDs...
Depends on what type of porn, and what community you live in.
PS: Thanks for volunteering yourself as the spokesperson for the entire population. I'm sure your particular beliefs apply to everybody in the country.
In the entire history of investing, there has never been anything like bitcoin before.
That's *exactly* what they said about the tech bubble. Down to the very word. It was a "whole new economy"...and guess what?
The entire history of investing.
Who knows their motives?
They call it "pump and dump" when they do that to the fools.
We need some sort of plastic-eating bacteria that we can infect the landfills with.
They *THINK* they can get someone younger for much less pay.
And they *THINK* they will get all the experience from that younger person too.
That *IS* the problem, yes.
They're quantitatively extremely good
And will still be extremely good a million years from now.
Or a billion...
So...still no actual counter argument then? Just hand waving, name calling and ignoring the parts of posts that contain pesky facts.
Yawn.
It feels like I'm back in Usenet in the 1990s. All we need is a sock puppet to make it complete.
So, uh... WHY are there rules on fonts?
...says somebody who doesn't spend all his days reading paper documents.
Arial on paper is about as inappropriate as Times Roman on screen.
THIS much difference from ONE field trip to a museum? Why, by all that is correlated, we MUST start opening up museums like 7-11s! There should be one on every streetcorner!
If you take a kid from the hood who's only ever seen turf wars, people fighting and other gang 'bidness' and show him something past the end of his street then it probably has an effect, yes.
Sure. We can teach them to drive drunk as well....
I think people texting is an actual unsafe traffic violation.
Are you happy to think there's people out there driving around while constantly looking down at little screens and typing "OMG! Faggot. LOL!"?
Why would you be typing on a little virtual keyboard and looking at a screen when driving? That just seems stupid. What is the downside to waiting five minutes .
When the next generation starts driving there'll be no shortage of people to fine for social-networking while driving.
Feel free to show us where the Wikipedia page is wrong.
(sound of crickets chirping)
That wikipedia page has 77 citations.
The one I picked out, ie. " Republican strategist Frank Luntz advised members of the Republican Party, with regard to climate change, that "you need to continue to make the lack of scientific certainty a primary issue" and "challenge the science" by "recruiting experts who are sympathetic to your view".
That quote has a little number [10] next to it. If you hover the mouse over that you get a citation and source for that quote. You're free to check it out. You can also see the entire history of page edits and see if anybody has been "vandalizing" a page.
(I hate to have to explain how Wikipedia works, but apparently there's people who don't know).
What about the other claim I made about typing "democrat climate change denial" into google and it coming up with articles about Republicans? Is that just something google does to make the Republican party look bad?
You can type stuff like "climate denial republicans vs democrats" into google, and guess what? Same thing.
If you want to trash Wikipedia, do it by providing facts. Show us where the Wikipedia page is wrong. Waving hands, not providing any evidence, dismissing something because of something you once read on the Internet? That just makes you look foolish.
What are you on about? Are you conflating right wing politics and the christian right?
No. I'm conflating the US Democratic party with the Christian Religion. You're the one extrapolating the data.
1) It's a law the same way Newton's Laws are laws.
Newtons laws are based on real physical "laws". Not the same thing at all and definitely not "nitpicking".
There's a well know observation that's known as "Moore's Law", yes, but calling it a "law" doesn't make it one. There's a parable about grains of wheat on a chessboard which explains why. Anybody with a working brain can see that it can't hold for much longer. The laws of physics and mathematics will come into play soon (and they're real laws, not data trends).
Newton's laws? I expect them to hold until the end of time.
how about a right to decide to cease keeping person in hospital + cease paying?
What if it's incredibly painful and will take six months to kill you?
Yep. $8,000 a month to watch somebody die slowly, painfully and inevitably. When the person being kept alive doesn't want it.
After a year of watching this person's misery, they die and you're left with a bill you might never be able to pay off.
They dies. Your life is in ruins. The mental scars of watching it for a year are far worse than if you just said goodbye and did it. Does that make sense to anybody at all?
Admiral Ackbar gives his opinion on the matter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4F4qzPbcFiA
a) It's not a "law"
b) It doesn't say that transistor counts will double every 18 months.
I don't think "more religion" is an answer to any of society's problems.
(Take a glance at Conservapedia before replying).