Slashdot Mirror


EU Plastic Bag Debate Highlights a Wider Global Problem

jones_supa writes "An EU citizen uses around 200 plastic bags per year. That's too much, says the EU. But wasting plastic bags is not just a European problem. Countries around the world are struggling with the issue, and it especially affects growing economies such as Asia. Some Southeast Asian countries don't even have the proper infrastructure in place to dispose of the bags properly. The problems for the environment are many. Plastic bags usually take several hundred years until they decay, thereby filling landfills, while animals often mistake the plastic for food and choke to death. Additionally they are a major cause of seaborne pollution, which is a serious hazard for marine life. This autumn, EU started ambitious plans which aim to reduce usage 80% by 2017. Some countries have already applied measures to slow plastic bag use: England has added a 5p charge to previously free bags, and in Ireland the government has already imposed a tax of 22 euro cents ($0.29) per plastic bag. The EU Environment Commissioner, Janez Potonik, said, 'We're taking action to solve a very serious and highly visible environmental problem.'"

470 comments

  1. England by biodata · · Score: 5, Informative

    In England the government has said that a 5p charge will come in 2015 AFTER THE NEXT ELECTION. Too early to count chickens.

    --
    Korma: Good
    1. Re:England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Supermarkets already charge for plastic bags in England.

    2. Re:England by Chrisq · · Score: 3, Informative

      Supermarkets already charge for plastic bags in England.

      Some do, mostly "low cost" stores - not Tesco, Asda, Sainsbury's or any of the major supermarkets I know of

    3. Re:England by somersault · · Score: 0

      Marks and Spencers do.

      It is a bit weird if you think about it, to just keep using plastic bags when you could take your own. I wonder who started the whole deal.

      I have 2 reusable bags, but I almost always forget to take them with me anywhere. I used one last week, but that was the first time in months. Keeping one in the car would probably be a good start.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    4. Re:England by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Informative

      In Wales, the charge has been in place for over a year.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure it would help most if they found a way to encourage shopping by bike. You don't generally take plastic bags when biking because they rip. You use a backpack.

    6. Re:England by Vanderhoth · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They tried that here in Nova Scotia, at one point. Home Depot, Superstore and Walmart were charging 5 cents for each plastic bag. Sobey's, a competing grocery store with Superstore, opted not to charge for bags. Superstore lost BIG because people saw charging for bags as a cash grab, passing the buck, and making a profit, for something that's been free for a long time off to the consumer. People started going to Sobey's in droves, I remember not even being able to get in a store at one point. It wasn't long before Superstore stopped charging for bags. Not long after that so did Home Depot. I speculate because Kent, Home Depot's competition, didn't charge. Warlmart gave up shortly there after when Costco moved into town.

      What Sobey's did do right was start selling cheap reusable nylon and canvas bags, which they would replace if ever the bag was damaged. I paid around $12 for six bags and some how ended up with ten somewhere along the way. I've had three replaced over the last four years with no issues. People still use plastic bags, I get them every now and then to clean the cat box and for kitchen catchers, but I see a lot more people using the reusable bags instead.

    7. Re:England by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Funny

      I have 2 reusable bags, but I almost always forget to take them with me anywhere. I used one last week, but that was the first time in months.

      Its not just me then. The thing is I have about 20 reusable bags - I keep buying one to keep in the car .... take it into the house full of groceries and there it stays.

    8. Re:England by somersault · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Someone posted Tim Minchin's Canvas Bags song below. I've added it into my current work music playlist - hopefully its catchy message will become etched into my brain, and somehow force me to change my habits :p

      --
      which is totally what she said
    9. Re:England by Saethan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Only problem with keeping them in a car is they tend to be alive. If you're going to use reusable bags, please wash them. BTW, what the heck happened to paper bags? Those decompose pretty quick.

    10. Re:England by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      Seems to low a charge to make a major difference in England but the levy is pretty effective here in Ireland. Reusable bags are widely available from around a euro upwards. There are paper bags available too in many shops. I generally use a rucksack. The plastic carriers supplied by tesco's are not very strong anyway with a high chance of breakage just going from the checkout to the Car Park.

      Irelands pretty good at recycling, you basically pay to get your rubbish collected so it pays to be more environmentally conscious. Tins and bottles are generally recyclable for free at can banks as are clothes and shoes. It's not uncommon for supermarkets to host recycling banks on site although they tend not to be emptied often enough. If you rinse a tin after opening it and not leave it sitting around then you do not leave rotting crud on them to attract insects and moulds and disgusting smells.

      you can even sell clothes by the kilo and even if there is no recycling bank available for steel cans, scrapyards will take them even thou the price is too low for them to be worth selling.

      I grow a lot of my own herbs and vegetables but even while that isn't an option for everybody. You can always prep the vegetables you buy and freeze the excess. Actual cooking isn't that hard and has very little difference in buying ready meals and saves cash too. if you make too much well freeze the excess. Pretty simple isn't it.

      I'm pretty sure i'm eating healthier by making my own food from ingredients rather than factory processed foods which have to be able to be stored on a shelf for weeks or months. I do buy good quality food too. I don't mind paying for coffee beans and actual butter, rather than instant coffee and emulsified dyed oils.

      It is a better way of doing things both for you and the environment.

    11. Re:England by slim · · Score: 2

      Yes, and everybody got used to it really quickly.

      Even though it's a negligible charge, people tend to react by carrying a couple of spare carrier bags with them in case they go to a shop.

    12. Re:England by lxs · · Score: 2

      You hang your backpack off your handlebars?

    13. Re:England by somersault · · Score: 1

      The only place that I can think that we have paper bags here in the UK is when buying small baked items. Fish and chip shops also used to wrap stuff in paper, though I think they might use boxes more often now (not been to one for many years). Both will then put things in plastic bags if there is a lot to carry though.

      The article you linked mentioned one place selling anti-bacterial bags. I can't find any on Amazon right now.. wonder if there's anywhere else I could get one. Everything I buy is already in some kind of container when I put it in my bag though, so I shouldn't have too much of a problem with bacteria..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    14. Re:England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, Italy has recently passed a law banning non-biodegradable plastic bags, causing complaints by the UK, which blocked a EU-wide ban.

    15. Re:England by __aarzwb9394 · · Score: 1

      ALDI (a German super discount, no-frills at all supermarket & newcomer to Britain) charges for plastic bags. They don't do it because "hey man we gotta save the whales", but because bags are not free to manufacture. ALDI does very well.

    16. Re:England by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Errr, why don't you keep the rest in the boot (or trunk or regionally-named-subvehicular-enclosed-storage-area)? What value are they serving in your house?

      Bring one in, still have 19 left in the boot. When the pile inside gets noticeable, take them back out to the car. (This is what I do. Although more like 6 than 20.)

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    17. Re:England by camperdave · · Score: 5, Funny

      Only problem with keeping them in a car is they tend to be alive.

      Actually, that is not a problem. Not only does it affect only the weak and sickly (the ones who aren't going to make it anyway), but it only threatens the tiny percentage of the population who remember to reuse their reusable bags in the first place.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    18. Re:England by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      ALDI also charges a refundable fee for grocery cart use. It's a quarter to get a cart, and if you return the cart (don't leave it in the parking lot) you get your quarter back. Pretty smart move.

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    19. Re:England by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Informative

      You hang your backpack off your handlebars?

      A colleague who cycles everywhere (even in the snow - he's insane) says "Never use a backpack for something heavy. If the weight shifts it will pull you off track. Use panniers instead and you can carry loads of heavy stuff without problems"

    20. Re:England by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      What value are they serving in your house

      They were pretty useful when my daughter moved flats!

    21. Re:England by gutnor · · Score: 3, Informative

      It is not only the price but also the fact that there is no longer a pile of bag available. You need to ask for the right amount of bags, and it gets recorded on your receipt. Cashier will also very often forget to even ask you the question so you end up with your stuff pilling and no bag to pack them until you get the attention of the cashier.

      It is all the little annoyance combined that make it work. It seems to work much less in Marc and Spenser Food Only where somebody is packing your stuff for you.

    22. Re:England by bmo · · Score: 0

      In the anaerobic environment of a landfill?

      That's a big fat NOPE.

      We are preserving our trash for future archaeologists by putting it in huge landfills. Archaeologists and anthropologists just love landfills.

      Here's a well-written webpage about the pros-and-cons of each. https://www.ncga.coop/newsroom/paper-or-plastic

      The answer to "paper or plastic" is BYOB and recycling.

      --
      BMO

    23. Re:England by __aarzwb9394 · · Score: 1


      Almost all supermarkets do that in many countries. And that is a different problem - failure to return a piece of company property.
      Presumably not as much of a problem in North America since no-one walks anywhere.

    24. Re:England by Wootery · · Score: 0

      Not only does it affect only the weak and sickly (the ones who aren't going to make it anyway)

      Err, what?

    25. Re:England by __aarzwb9394 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That anecdote shows why the market is not the infallible benificence that libertard fundies claim.
      It is obvious to anyone with an education that hundreds of millions of plastic bags that will never rot is a bad thing.
      You cannot wait for companies who are interested only in their own profits. They will not change.

    26. Re:England by ifiwereasculptor · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well, I tend to choose plastic bags at the supermarket because later I use them for garbage disposal. AFAIK, that's the norm (and very harmful to the environment, but garbage bags are plastic everywhere, aren't they?).

    27. Re:England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back many years ago, the old Fine Fare used to use big heavy paper bags. They ended up getting bought out by Safeways (IIRC) though, which put paid to that.

    28. Re:England by Reapy · · Score: 1

      Worked at a grocery store when younger, I recall sticking my hand into a reusable bag to open it up and finding what would have basically been a smashed egg in there from a week ago. It smelled rotten and was goopy disgusting. The customer still told me to go ahead and put her food in there.

      The best is that before I worked there I had no knowledge of reusable bags, so the first time I saw them as a bagger, I thought they had been purchased from the store and put them in a plastic bag, then started putting their other groceries in plastic bags. Whoops.

    29. Re: England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do the same.

    30. Re:England by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      What value are they serving in your house?

      For use when shopping at the small superette within walking distance, that's open on Sunday mornings?

    31. Re:England by Bert64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Having to carry around bags just incase you might want to use them is a fairly significant inconvenience. Also while the thin free ones are easier to carry, they are also more easily damaged.

      Plastic bags also have other uses, for instance i use them as rubbish bags and when they're full tie them up and put them into a larger bin outside. Compared to full size garbage bags, smaller bags occupy less space in the house, and fill up quicker so they have less time to start to smell.

      On the other hand, packaging in stores is getting far more annoying than it was years ago...
      If i go shopping in the car i would prefer to use boxes than plastic bags. Supermarkets used to have a pile of empty boxes near the tills that you could put your shopping in, and boxes slide into the back of a car much more easily and don't tip over spilling their contents. Stores get their stock delivered in boxes, and any given supermarket will be discarding hundreds of empty boxes every day.

      And then the actual packaging on goods is often excessive, which then means it needs more bags/boxes to put it in... And don't even get me started on blister packaging, that should be banned.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    32. Re:England by laie_techie · · Score: 1

      It is a bit weird if you think about it, to just keep using plastic bags when you could take your own. I wonder who started the whole deal.

      I have 2 reusable bags, but I almost always forget to take them with me anywhere. I used one last week, but that was the first time in months. Keeping one in the car would probably be a good start.

      I seem to remember a report from a few months back how people forget to wash these reusable bags, so they would inadvertently contaminate their purchases. If this wasn't ./ I would do an actual Google for the citation.

    33. Re:England by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      and we've already got perfectly bio-degradable carrier bags in use. Tesco ones turn into small fragments after a few months, even with no exposure to light...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    34. Re:England by advocate_one · · Score: 2

      I have a trailer that couples to my bike for when I do my shopping (and also when I go cycle camping/touring). What does annoy me though are the stupid barriers in some cycle paths that block my trailer...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    35. Re:England by somersault · · Score: 1

      You can get some reusable bags that compact nicely when not in use. I had one that folded and fastened with a button somewhere, though I'm not quite sure where it is since I last moved :p

      It's not really an inconvenience to carry one of those around if you're already taking a backpack with you everywhere (camelbacks are awesome). I was in the habit of carrying a backpack everywhere when I got rid of my car, but then I had to ruin it by getting a car again..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    36. Re:England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What Sobey's did do right was start selling cheap reusable nylon and canvas bags, which they would replace if ever the bag was damaged. I paid around $12 for six bags and some how ended up with ten somewhere along the way.

      You complain about lagers stores charging for plastic bags and paid 12 bux to a small store for "reusable bags". Now I have bought reusable bags but there built very poorly and cheap, forcing you to either watch how much weight you put into the bags, or buy new ones because there going to wear out fairly quickly anyway, depending on how often you use them. If they made them out of hemp fiber there's no doubt they would last probably for the rest of your life (the others maybe as well if they're put together the right way). I have clothing made from hemp that has yet to even wear out, 20 years later.

      What should be passed in this country is allowing reusable bags in superstores or any store (I'm living in the US), I not sure which "commercial" stores will and will not allow you to use them but I have heard of some refusing to allow you to use them, and I do know some stores have a policy that charge you for using plastic bags. ALDI's I think has such a policy here in Pennsylvania, but they also sell reusable bags, or will allow you to use any bags you bring into the store.

    37. Re:England by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      A lot of people do, and that's part of the problem. They're made from a kind of plastic that is designed to break down in exposure to ultraviolet. Store one in direct sunlight and it will turn to dust in a few months. Unfortunately, when they're stuck in the ground, they stay there for ages. The real solution would be developing a kind of plastic that doesn't break down in ultraviolet, but does in the presence of something in landfill. Presumably bin bags are made of something intended to be like that?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    38. Re:England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use them too. I fail to see how this helps the environment. Fortunately where I live, such measures failed to pass.

      Let me see if I get this straight. Plastic bags get taxed, resulting in me not using them at the checkout line. However, my need for plastic bags remains unaffected. So I have to buy plastic bags and the SAME EXACT AMOUNT of plastic bags end up in the landfill.

    39. Re:England by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      [Recognizing that you weren't the original poster, but replying as if...]

      So you keep 20 reusable bags in a cupboard in your home so one is available when you go out of your home and walk past your car on the way to buy your Sunday cheese and baguette? While keeping none in the car that you use every week to buy your bulk household food and groceries?

      How does that possibly make more sense than doing the opposite?

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    40. Re:England by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      No, I attempt to keep half of them in the house and half of them in the car. Obviously.

      But forgetful how I am, it doesn't always work out like that. Especially since I've got an odd number (3) of bags. So there!

      O, and the car is in an underground garage.

    41. Re:England by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      All the ones I've used supply the chips in paper.

      The old newspaper wrapping is long gone, though - now they use properly-made and -approved food-grade chip-wrapping paper.

    42. Re:England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Archaeologists and anthropologists would call them 'middens' though, not landfills.

    43. Re:England by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      If you're just going from checkout to car park then bags are ridiculous anyway... Bags are designed to be carried by the handles, once you put them down (ie in your car) the contents often spill out, and if not when you put them down then by the time you've driven round a few corners or through some potholes then the contents of those bags will be scattered around your car.
      What we need are BOXES... Supermarkets used to keep piles of empty boxes near the checkouts, and we could put or goods in those... They fit into the car better, they don't spill their contents so easily etc.
      Bags are only useful when you're travelling on foot., i will always use boxes if possible when i visit the supermarket by car.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    44. Re:England by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      O, and the car is in an underground garage.

      I concede the point, m'lord, though I confess the tune escapes me.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    45. Re:England by BradMajors · · Score: 1

      Instead of a tax, my supermarket gives a discount for not using plastic bags. Providing discounts have not seem to have encouraged using recyclable bags.

    46. Re:England by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Geez, what's next to complain about.

      First they make McDonalds quit serving the sandwiches like the Quarter Pounder in styrofoam packages (and they've never quite been the same since)...now they're bitching about plastic grocery bags?!!??

      :)

      But on a serious note, I tend to keep them to use to bring my lunch to work, and I use them to line my juicer to catch the pulp, and make the cleanup easier.

      The only store I know of around here that even has the option for paper bags anymore, is Whole Foods. I get them, but generally end up throwing them away when I get home, and that they're bulky and take up my already limited room in the kitchen, whereas the plastic bags can easily be wadded up on a drawer.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    47. Re:England by ifiwereasculptor · · Score: 1

      The landfill itself seems to be the bigger problem. Everything takes ages to decompose, not only plastic:

      http://environment.about.com/od/recycling/a/biodegradable.htm

      Maybe we'll eventually have sewer-like vacuum tubes for solid trash, but until then I don't see plastic bags disappearing. They're needed for storage and transportation.

    48. Re:England by mlts · · Score: 1

      So far, the best cycling setup I've encountered was a tandem bike, front/back panniers, backpacks, and a trailer. Then, at the grocery store, one person stood guard [1] while the other went in with the cart.

      [1]: I live in Austin which is a pretty legendary hotspot for bike theft. If one secures their frame and wheels, they will come back to a bike sans fork, pedals, and seat. I've even seen bottom backets gone (and that takes some dedication on a thief's part.) So, one either uses Pinhead or Pitlocks, or takes other means to keep components on their steed.

    49. Re:England by mlts · · Score: 1

      I actually have a better use for the plastic bags:

      When dry camping miles away from a paved road with my RV in below-freezing temperatures, where I have to blow out the water lines [1], I use the plastic bags to line the toilet. When done, I zip-tie it, put it inside another plastic bag, zip-tie that, and toss it in the garbage. With some alcohol wipes for the hands afterwards nearby, there is still an "ecch" factor, but it isn't bad.

      [1]: I use compressed air to blow the water out, pour in cheap vodka, blow the lines out again. this way, any water in low spots that didn't get blown out is diluted enough by the ethanol so its freezing temperature is below what happens here in Texas.

    50. Re:England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Panniers are a completely different story to handlebars. A backpack will swing around on the handlebars and throw your steering out of whack. At least with a backpack its reasonably stable and not directly attached to your ability to steer.

    51. Re:England by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      We need some sort of plastic-eating bacteria that we can infect the landfills with.

      --
      No sig today...
    52. Re:England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In England the government has said that a 5p charge will come in 2015 AFTER THE NEXT ELECTION. Too early to count chickens.

      Translation: This will never fucking happen if the election caveat is used at any time.

      No point in counting chickens. They've already been bought off too.

    53. Re:England by Vanderhoth · · Score: 1

      You complain about lagers stores charging for plastic bags and paid 12 bux to a small store for "reusable bags"

      I wasn't complaining, just stating when given the option people willingly paid for reusable bags, rather than being suckered into paying $0.05 for a throw away bag and no other option. That basically works out to be between $0.25 to $0.50 rough estimate $0.375 a week or $19.50 a year for my house hold, just for groceries. I bought six reusable bags for $2 a piece and have had them for at least four years. So I would have spent around $78.00 over the last four years on plastic bags instead I can average the cost of the reusables over four years ($3/year for 12 bags). Total savings so far $75 over four years.

      Also FYI, Sobey's isn't a small store, it's as large a chain in Canada as Superstore and their stores are of comparably equal size, which is why it was shocking to not be able to get into the store after Superstore started charging for their bags.

      Now I have bought reusable bags but there built very poorly and cheap, forcing you to either watch how much weight you put into the bags, or buy new ones because there going to wear out fairly quickly anyway, depending on how often you use them

      No, the bags are very well constructed and significantly more durable than cheap plastic bags. I've only had to have three replaced over the last four years because my cat ate a hole in two of them and I accidentally banged one into into a draw handle while carrying two 4L (~1 gallon) jugs of milk, also punching a hole through a jug of milk. Definitely not a defect in the bag.

      If they made them out of hemp fiber there's no doubt they would last probably for the rest of your life (the others maybe as well if they're put together the right way). I have clothing made from hemp that has yet to even wear out, 20 years later.

      I fully support, and agree, that hemp would be a superior material.

      What should be passed in this country is allowing reusable bags in superstores or any store (I'm living in the US), I not sure which "commercial" stores will and will not allow you to use them but I have heard of some refusing to allow you to use them, and I do know some stores have a policy that charge you for using plastic bags. ALDI's I think has such a policy here in Pennsylvania, but they also sell reusable bags, or will allow you to use any bags you bring into the store.

      I honestly can't wrap my mind around why a store wouldn't want you to bring your own reusable bags. Their options are to offer plastics at the stores expense, charge a consumer for the plastics, which doesn't normally go over well when customers are use to free bags, or allow reusable bags. If I walked into a store with my own bag, backpack or otherwise, and was told upon checking out I couldn't put the products I purchased into my personally supplied bags I'd demand a refund, if I'd already paid, or just walk out and leave the products on there for someone else to put away.

    54. Re:England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like something I've said. Maybe we work together. Sometimes panniers are not enough. For major grocery runs, I use the kid-trailer (Burley). I agree, backpacks are for hiking, not biking.

    55. Re:England by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      The problem with paper bags is that they have a higher environmental cost in manufacturing than plastic bags (surprising, i know, but they do), and that they are almost never reused.

      That, and they're shit – they will split if you put anything remotely heavy in them.

    56. Re:England by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      What Sobey's did do right was start selling cheap reusable nylon and canvas bags, which they would replace if ever the bag was damaged. I paid around $12 for six bags and some how ended up with ten somewhere along the way.

      Whoever came up with this one was a genius. Charge people for the reusable bags, and then save money at the same time by not having the store have to cover the cost of plastic bags.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    57. Re:England by scamper_22 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I don't see how a 5c fee or tax is going to affect plastic bag use.

      I'm in Toronto, and we also had the 5c bad thing. I think it was repealed, but our grocery store still has charges it (loblaws).

      Here's the thing.

      1. The fee on the bags has basically no impact on our use of them. I'm spending $100 on groceries... you think I'm going to care about 20 cents worth of bags?

      2. What has had an impact is simply having the reusable bags. Loblaws has this amazing one with a sturdy flap that goes on the bottom for extra support. We use these most of the time.

      3. We still need plastic bags for garbage / recycling, so once in a while, we leave/forget our reusable bags and just pay the fee to get proper bags and use them for recycling and garbage.

      Better still if they could develop plastic bag alternatives that degrade. That would be very useful.

    58. Re:England by morgauxo · · Score: 2

      Sure, it wouldn't ever leave the landfil, it wouldn't ever start eating our non-trash items... right?

    59. Re:England by Vanderhoth · · Score: 1

      It goes even beyond that. As I pointed out in another post I may have paid $12 for the original 6 bags, but the longer I have the bags the more spread out the cost is. Sobey's still offers free plastic bags, it's a customers choice to buy reusable ones. But it works out well for the eco-conscious that realize five to ten plastic bags a week are being tossed out. Opposed to the strategy of the other store, which was to charge you $0.05 per plastic bag and not offer a chose for reusable bags. So as I pointed out, I've actually saved around $75 over the last four years by buying the reusable, which are durable and useful for all kinds of other things, and not having to pay for plastic bags.

    60. Re:England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Used to be you used paper sacks for garbage - they got all nasty and soggy. Plastic is an improvement.

      In my area, trash and garbage collection goes to an incineration facility. The heat is used to generate steam, which is used to generate electricity.

      So, for me, no problem with plastic bags being used for garbage. Surplus bags get taken to a collection point for recycling.

    61. Re: England by divec · · Score: 1

      It was equally ineffective in Wales until they (a) required all shops to charge, and (b) required them to donate the proceeds to charity. Now it's normal to carry reusable bags and few people seem to object.

      --

      perl -e 'fork||print for split//,"hahahaha"'

    62. Re:England by Vanderhoth · · Score: 1

      Better still if they could develop plastic bag alternatives that degrade. That would be very useful.

      Paper bags, and they suck. I go to the liquor store and buy a couple bottles of wine and they put them in the paper bags, I can't count the number of times the bottoms ripped out just from picking the bag up off the counter.

      I'm in Toronto, and we also had the 5c bad thing. I think it was repealed, but our grocery store still has charges it (loblaws).

      Odd, isn't Sobey's owned by Loblaws? or is superstore owned by them? I/my wife spend about $100 a week on groceries, for us that's between five to ten bags so $0.25 to $0.50 a week on bags. As I pointed out in another post that's about $19.50 a year, or $78 for four years. Since I've had my reusable bags (one time $12 fee) for four years I've saved about $75. It's not a lot when you think about it as $0.20 a week, but that adds up. five weeks is a dollar, a year (52 weeks) is $10.40. Maybe some people don't care about that, but if I was earning $10.40 a year in interest on a bank account I'd be ecstatic.

    63. Re:England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People started going to Sobey's in droves, I remember not even being able to get in a store at one point. It wasn't long before Superstore stopped charging for bags. Not long after that so did Home Depot. I speculate because Kent, Home Depot's competition, didn't charge. Warlmart gave up shortly there after when Costco moved into town.

      In Toronto, Canada, it was actually mandated by the city to charge five cents per bag, so every store had to do it. And then Rob "Smokin' Crack" Ford got elected and was against it, and so the folks who leaned Right on city council got the charge rescinded.

      It should be noted that the City didn't 'profit' from the charge. The store collecting it was free to do with the nickel whatever it wanted. Some kept it, some made a show of donating it to some eco-charity.

      A lot of places started selling (or even giving away for a little while) re-usabl bags. Even though the mandatory charge is gone, some places still have it, and the "experiment" probably changed a lot of people's habits.

    64. Re: England by Vanderhoth · · Score: 1

      I would have liked to see the proceeds from plastic bags go to charity rather than the store making profit off them. They buy those cheap plastic bags by the tens of thousands you can't tell me they're paying even one cent a bag let alone the five cents they were charging for them. I'm sure it's part of the reason people around here had such a hate on for Superstore. They didn't offer an alternative and practically sawed off a leg for something that's been free for as long as I can remember. Then Sobey's started selling reusables and *still* didn't charge for plastic.

      It's pretty well the same here now, most people use the reusable bags even though no one's charging for plastic anymore. As I said, I also pick up some cheapy plastic ones every now and then to use for garbage and recycling.

    65. Re:England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Compared to the price of food inflation (£50/person per week, £200 for a family of four), 5p is nothing. Simple thing would be to promote reusable cloth bags

    66. Re:England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never really understood how this works - are people putting unwrapped (unbottled or untinned) food directly into the bag?

    67. Re:England by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

      I got in the habit of moving the bags to the trunk of my car. I usually have at least 4 of them in there at any one time. I prefer the reusable bags to plastic or paper ones when I shop. Having a real handle is a big bonus.

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    68. Re:England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yaaaawn. Booring. Sure it wouldn't evolve into a 100-foot high creature that burst forth from the landfill in a mighty explosion then tramps towards town? The army would be assembled to fight it, but their weapons would be useless. Helpless citizens would run and strangely shout stilted expressions out of sync with the movement of their mouths. For some reason, everybody would be Japanese too. Then, just as all hope seemed lost a lizard-like creature would emerge from the ocean and fight garbage-monster. The battle would be epic. Significant portions of the city would simply be trampled during the melee. Finally garbage monster is dragged into the ocean and drowned... or is he? Roll credits.

    69. Re:England by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      So as I pointed out, I've actually saved around $75 over the last four years by buying the reusable, which are durable and useful for all kinds of other things, and not having to pay for plastic bags.

      If this store is eating the $0.05 cost of the plastic bags anyway, then isn't it the store that saved $75, not you? Most grocery stores around where I live do the same sort of thing too, largely to try to reduce the amount they spend on plastic bags. I know some stores have even started giving away rather than selling reusable bags in hopes of getting more people to use them.

      I really wasn't being snarky in my post; the whole thing is a good idea. The stores save money, and we reduce the amount of waste.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    70. Re:England by Quila · · Score: 1

      What Sobey's did do right was start selling cheap reusable nylon and canvas bags, which they would replace if ever the bag was damaged.

      Your solution to help the environment does not involve a new tax or added government regulation on the activities of the people; therefore, it is rejected.

    71. Re:England by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      supermarket I shop at has CCTV cameras covering the parking lot and the cycle racks.

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    72. Re:England by Vanderhoth · · Score: 1

      I really wasn't being snarky in my post

      I didn't think you were, in case that's what my response seemed to imply I thought.

      I seriously doubt they're paying $0.05 per bag. They order them by the tens of thousands I doubt they even pay a full $0.01 per bag. Sure they're saving money if I'm using a reusable bag, but like I said when the option is I pay $2 for a reusable or $0.05 for a disposable I'm saving money too.

      Like Toronto there was a municipal law here in Halifax at one point that stores had to charge for bags, which is how the whole reusable bag thing got started here. That lasted all of a couple weeks, but some retailers used "ecofriendly" as an excuse to continue charging after the law was repealed, but offered no alternative to plastic bags. Had they really been concerned about being "ecofriendly" they would have offered an alternative. If Sobey's had gone along with Superstore and charged for bags we wouldn't have a choice except to pay for them.

    73. Re:England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He needs to get a backpack with load compression straps...and possibly chest and hip belts. They were designed to be the right tool for the job.

    74. Re:England by Vanderhoth · · Score: 1

      Actually there was a municipal regulation to charge for bags, but it was dropped pretty quickly. Just like it was in Toronto apparently. Some stores just decided to be "ecofriendly" and continue to charge for the bags even though they didn't have to. Sobey's opted to sell reusable bags and *not* charge for plastic so they ended up pulling in a ton of Superstore customers for awhile.

    75. Re:England by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      That problem was solved in parts of Silicon Valley by the government forcing all stores to not provide any plastic bags, and charge $.05 per paper bag.

      So now you can't even get a plastic grocery bag, and a lot of people get the reusable bags.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    76. Re:England by MemoryAid · · Score: 1

      I've bought bags before--not necessarily the reusable grocery type--only to be asked at checkout "would you like that in a bag?" To which I replied, "it is a bag." It might just take a little nudge to break out of the 'put everything in a bag' habit.

      --
      Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
    77. Re:England by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I've always hated plastic bags, without worrying about environmental concerns. First, they're too damned small. With paper bags, a full grocery cart took four bags. Now it's fifteen or twenty little bags. Paper bags would stand up by themselves, plastic won't.

      Bigger plastic bags, if you can actually get them, are good for lining the bathroom trash can but nothing else.

      Bring back paper! It biodegrades quickly, suffres none of the disadvantages of plastic, doesn't harm wildlife... there is just too much plastic these days. How about we go back to cardboard boxes instead of the damned plastic packaging they have that you need a chainsaw and a jaws of life to get open, that won't biodegrade and takes up a lot more room in your trash can?

      Honestly, is plastic that much cheaper than paper? I can see no other advantage to plastic.

    78. Re:England by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well, that's only if you have no use for the plastic bags, like, for trash, taking your towel to the gym or whatever..

      (cost is not relevant to this waste discussion)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    79. Re:England by MemoryAid · · Score: 2
      There's a lot of talk about 'the environment' when plastic bags are discussed. Where is that, exactly? Seagulls choking on plastic bags is a pretty clear example of 'bad for the environment,' I'll admit, but 'plastic bags buried in a landfill' doesn't sound so bad to me. The landfill has bigger problems, environmentally speaking. That's why we have landfills--to confine the problem.

      Plastic bags that degrade in UV light would seem to mitigate the danger to wildlife (for surface-dwelling animals), which is where they cause the most damage. If it ends up being buried and lasting for 1000 years, so what? Archaeologists will be thrilled.

      --
      Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
    80. Re:England by mlts · · Score: 1

      Very true. Most places have CCTV cameras... but that may not mean the store's LP will bother sending someone to stop someone who moves up with a pickup, snips a lock off with bolt cutters, tosses it in the bed, and drives off.

    81. Re:England by gagol · · Score: 1

      Yay! 10000% margins! Blame pollution and make customers feel bad.

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    82. Re:England by gagol · · Score: 1

      In the meantime, let's all buy plastic bags for our little trash cans instead of giving a second life to grocery shopping bags. And let's forget the fact we can make 100% organic plastic bags from cellulose that decompose nicely in natrure.

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    83. Re:England by haruchai · · Score: 1

      "What we need are BOXES... Supermarkets used to keep piles of empty boxes near the checkouts, and we could put or goods in those"

      Used to?? All the chain supermarkets in the major cities where I've lived have been doing this for 20 years.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    84. Re:England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's England, so the Doctor would fix it.

    85. Re:England by praxis · · Score: 1

      Presumably not as much of a problem in North America since no-one walks anywhere.

      I walk to the greengrocer's and I do not use a cart. I find a hand basket to serve as a good measure of how heavy my groceries will be to carry home. I do seem to be in the minority though.

    86. Re:England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I moved out, it took me less than a week to resort to always taking a shopping cart, so I don't have to hurry putting everything in my back pack.
      And I bought one textile bag to carry the 9 liter pack of water.
      It has been working nicely like this for five years.

    87. Re:England by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      Plastic has one advantage over paper: it's easier to make airtight.

      For my own use, when making deserts, I bought a large box of disposable clamshell bowls. They close airtight and keep things like chocolate mousse fresh for several days. And the kicker? They're made from PLA, so they biodegrade.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    88. Re:England by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

      Bigger plastic bags, if you can actually get them, are good for lining the bathroom trash can but nothing else.

      I live in a city that has decided to micromanage the local shops by outlawing "single use" plastic bags and forcing a charge for the paper bags that used to be free. You can plan ahead and go into a store to buy a few things carrying a bag of your own, and then find they've got a special on something you want to buy a lot of. But you can't carry it all home without paying for what you would get for free in the next town over.

      I've found that those "single use" plastic bags that you can't find any use for other than lining a trash can make great bags to carry groceries home in. That's what they were designed for, and that's what I'm using them for now. They're light, small, and three or four fit in a pocket without any trouble at all. But if you have three and need four ...

      Honestly, is plastic that much cheaper than paper? I can see no other advantage to plastic.

      You don't have to cut down trees to make plastic bags. My fair town is also in a place where logging is an issue. On one side the logging brings in money and jobs that the counties are dying for lack of. On the other logging cuts down happy smiling trees and kills baby seals. And makes owls move.

    89. Re:England by gagol · · Score: 1

      Over packaging is the real problem, not the customer bags to carry them. This whole thing is engineered to make profit whjile making us feel guilty about our habits.

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    90. Re:England by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      It is obvious to anyone with an education that hundreds of millions of plastic bags that will never rot is a bad thing.

      That's why they were putting recycling containers at the stores.

      You cannot wait for companies who are interested only in their own profits. They will not change.

      Of course they will -- if the customers want them to. If the customers will pay extra for a pretense of ecological concern, then a store that refuses to provide plastic bags and uses only paper would do so. They'd get the customers who won't go to a store with free plastic bags.

      We have a co-op* in our town. Two stores, actually. They carry all the free-range this and organic that and compassionate coffee and all the right warm-fuzzy earth-friendly stuff. They're doing quite well despite the arrival of a Walmart* and the previous existence of several Safeways and an Albertsons. Their prices are much higher compared to every place else, but they have the customers because the customers exist and want what they sell.

      The Albertsons folded.

      The fact that the stores aren't doing what you think is the ecologically-friendly thing on their own is proof that the customers don't want it. It is much easier for the eco-active to coerce the governments to do what they want than to educate all the people to why it is better to do things their way, so that's what they do. If you can convince 7 people with a lefty bent to start with that they should tell everyone else how to live, that's much easier than actually getting everyone else to think you're right.

      * -- the Co-op. Ecologically/earth friendly. They built one of their stores around a tree. A small tree at the time. A very large tree until a year ago. Instead of thinking ahead ("this tree will grow and we'll have to do something, so let's not build around it") or caring for the earth ("let's move the store so the tree can be free...") they cut it down. Chainsaws.

      * -- Walmart. Scum. They handed out free reusable semi-cloth bags on their grand opening day. Free! I got two. A smart move by a store to build brand loyalty. None of the other stores gave them out for free. Then the third time I went back the cashier made a point of charging me for the free reusable bag. They got to put all the stuff I had just tried to buy back on the shelves. Now I carry the free Walmart bags to the other stores to tweak their noses for not providing the bags themselves. That is when I don't do my shopping in the next town over to avoid the city-imposed eco-nuttiness.

    91. Re:England by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      Like Toronto there was a municipal law here in Halifax at one point that stores had to charge for bags, which is how the whole reusable bag thing got started here. That lasted all of a couple weeks, but some retailers used "ecofriendly" as an excuse to continue charging after the law was repealed, but offered no alternative to plastic bags.

      All right; I didn't know that part. I was assuming that the store was simply covering the cost of the tax itself.

      A little searching says that average costs for grocery bags (for the stores) run from about 2 to 5 cents per bag, depending on the quality of bag. Maybe Wal-mart manages to get lower rates for their patented fall-apart-if-you-look-at-them-too-hard bags, but the cost to the supermarket of using plastic bags might be higher than you think.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    92. Re:England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in HRM, Superstore on Quinpool still does, and the no frills off the macdonald does too.

      Used to live in Antigonish, walked out of superstore when they told me I'd have to pay for bags. Fuck that. It is a cash grab.

    93. Re:England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ex- Source (Bell, post circuit city) manager. We paid $50 for 1000 reg bags, and $20 for 400 big ones. The $0.05 cent charge is basically exactly what the store pays.

      Granted, bigger stores like Sobeys / Superstore can probably get better deals.

    94. Re:England by Algae_94 · · Score: 0

      Seagulls choking on plastic bags is a pretty clear example of 'bad for the environment,' I'll admit

      I really don't see the problem with this. Seagulls are trash birds that do nothing but annoy people. If they are really stupid enough to choke to death on plastic bags they try to eat, screw them. It's not like it matters anyway, I haven't heard anything about seagulls being endangered. They're plentiful anywhere there's trash near a coast.

    95. Re:England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The charge in Ireland has been in place for over 6-7 years now and it really makes the difference,
      You no longer see plastic bags litering the streets and people use reasonable bags in a big way,

      Its almost alien anytime I've seen shoppers in England supermarkets and they'd have 10-20 bags in a trolley after doing a weekly shop, such a waste.

      I'd be amazed if the plastic bag charge in England ever comes into force,

      I've watched English news channels which have claimed that black plastic bin liner bags purchased have massively increased since Ireland introduced the tax and that people use these bin liner bags when doing their weekly shop, i've never ever ever seen anyone use such a bag for a shop and neither has anyone I know. Its complete and utter scaremongering in England against the tax.,

    96. Re:England by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      You already have to pay for bags if you care about quality. Tescos "free" bags are shit. Just pay for the decent ones and they'll replace them when they go bad. So 10p will last you ages so long as you don't throw them away.

    97. Re:England by CrustaceanSoup · · Score: 1

      Superstore/Loblaws is still charging for plastic bags in other provinces, even where it's not required. They're doing it in BC and Ontario at least.

    98. Re:England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Czech Republic plastic bags have cost a few koruna for many years. Many people bring their own cloth bags or reuse plastic bags. I think every place should charge for bags.

    99. Re:England by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      I prefer the paper bags as I use them for the recycling can. They stand on their own so there is no can that the bag is in, the bag is the can. As for the plastic, I will say I like the fact that I can carry 8 - 12 of them in from the car in one go. You can loop plenty of the handles over you hands at once. So even though they might hold less stuff in each bag I can bring in more stuff in each trip from the car. Still, they are less useful later as a reuse item for me, they just pile up in a bag in the kitchen and get used less often than the paper ones. So overall I would be fine getting rid of the plastic ones and only using paper.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    100. Re:England by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      Trader Joe's does it the other way. If you bring your own paper bag back with you, you get a 10 cent discount for each bag reused. It may apply if you use the nylon or canvas ones also, I'm not sure. But it doesn't look like a cash grab because you don't pay to get a paper bag, you get money for reusing your bags.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    101. Re:England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can plant new baby trees. The seals will just grow up to be sea kitten killers, so fuck them.

    102. Re:England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've bought an umbrella during a rainstorm and the cashier asked if I'd like it in a bag.

      At least they didn't assume.

    103. Re:England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very much in the minority. The local grocery store is about 7 miles from my home, and i have two of my own kids, plus two foster kids, so that is six people in the home. No way i can carry the amount of groceries i need from the market on foot.

    104. Re:England by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      I tell you what, those of us that work in a grocery store absolutely loathe those 'bring your own bags" people. they break down into 5 categories:

      1. The spatially inept.
      These idiots are not smart enough to put the round block through the round hole. They bring one reusable bag and an entire shopping cart full of items to the register, and say "oh, just cram it all in there!" Sure lady, I'll just put your 80 lbs of groceries in one bag, and then listen to you bitch about how its to heavy.

      2. The artsy-crafty.
      These mouth breathing yarn fanatics bring their own bags, but they are not the good square bags with the little loop that lets us open and stand it on our bagging station, they are these 'artistic' units made out of god knows what. Probably organic yarn they made from their cats hair. The point is, you spend half your time fighting with the bag, trying to get it to stay open and upright as you try and cram their organic lemon scented toilet paper into the damn thing.

      3. The forgetful bastard.
      These intrepid users of lead lined drinking mugs always bring a couple bags to the store. They put them in their shopping cart, and then load all their groceries in on top of them. They come to the register, load their chocolate frosted sugar bombs and frozen pizza pucks on the belt, as slowly as possible. Then, they wait until you have bagged everything they planed on purchasing to notice that they brought their own bags, and shout OH GOD! YOUR DESTROYING THE ENVIRONMENT! HERE! PUT MY STUFF IN THESE BAGS! We then sullenly un-bag all their crap, put it in their special organic bags, and throw the now wrinkled and used plastic bags in the trash, instead of the recycle bin, because we hate the universe at this point.

      4. The just plain rude.
      These people suck. These people bring plenty of decent quality reusable bags. Then, when they get to the register, they bodily hurl the bags into the face of the cashier, and growl "Use these bags". You fight back the instinct to throttle them with a snack stick.

      5. A good responsible customer.
      I saw one of these once. This customer came to the register with an entire cart full of items. They then kindly handed me a stack of nearly twenty reusable bags, (the good ones, that unfold right, and have the little hoop to hang on our station and keep them open). and then proceeded to help bag their stuff in the usable bags. (which, i'm being honest here, always takes longer than bagging into the plastic bags, simply because the plastic ones auto-index to the next bag because thats how their made). This customer then took their bags of stuff home, and didn't complain about anything. It was weird.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    105. Re:England by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Bring back paper! It biodegrades quickly, suffres none of the disadvantages of plastic, doesn't harm wildlife... there is just too much plastic these days.

      Good idea, too bad it was the environuts who pushed hard and fast for plastic. I remember the big snit in California during the late 80's over it, pretty sure I've still got some of the stickers, and brochures that they were handing out back at my place in Ontario. Yeah it was never about cheapness, it was "environmental concern" over the trees. You know, especially those forests we grow just to use in pulp making.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    106. Re:England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what's the cost of the (presumably) heated water to rinse the can? Does it have a lower environmental impact?

      I'm all about recycling, but metals especially are melted down and organics would burn off long before the metal is molten so I see no value in rinsing them.

      Plastics are generally better rinsed, but once the plastic is shredded at the recyclers, it's washed anyway so why waste the water twice?

      Unless you're required to by your recycler, it makes a lot more sense to *not* rinse empty containers.

      This same argument goes for pre-washing prior to putting items in a dishwasher.

    107. Re:England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a similar problem since the shortcut to my apartment takes me through a park with narrowly spaced bollards at the entrances. My solution turned out to be the hand truck I use for moving. I built a trailer hitch for my bike using angle iron from an old bed frame someone in the building was throwing away. There's two long pieces that attach to the horizontal bars of the rear wheel support of the frame and a cross piece that connects them behind the rear tire. I drilled a hole in the handle of the hand truck and bolted in a heim joint with a large washer for support. To connect the trailer, just put the heim joint onto the cross piece and drop in the quick release pin. My hand truck is long enough that I can fit two blue recycling boxes on it turned lengthwise and the holes in the bottoms allow me to secure them to the frame.

      Total cost of this setup was practically nothing and I built it in less than an hour using a hacksaw and a drill. The trailer hitch attaches to the bike frame with existing holes and "U" bolts so no damage done there. I'm not sure how much weight it can take but I've had a 213 lb friend riding on the trailer without issue.

    108. Re:England by drsquare · · Score: 1

      A quarter? It's a pound in the UK, that's like six quarters.

    109. Re:England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck your goddamed owls. One swooped down and snatched my ferret right out of my kid's lap while we were chilling out on the patio. It then proceeded to carry Lazlo into a tree and torture eat it alive for the next 30 minutes. Fuck your owls. Fuck them in thier dirty asses.

    110. Re:England by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Supermarkets already charge for plastic bags in England.

      Some do, mostly "low cost" stores - not Tesco, Asda, Sainsbury's or any of the major supermarkets I know of

      Erm, they all charge.

      Some charge directly, others build the cost into the price of the items you are buying.

      It's like credit card surchages, credit addled morons complain bitterly about them but fail to realise that banks charge all businesses for accepting cards (Merchant Service Fees), the ones that dont pass the fees on as surcharges just build cost of the fees into the cost into the price of the crap you buy.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    111. Re:England by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      What I wish I could find is semi-cheap reusable bags that are both tough* and NOT emblazoned with a message about how 'green' I'm being. I like reusables due to toughness, but as somebody mentioned earlier - I go for the plastic bags every so often just to get them to use for bin liners and such.

      The mechanics of resource usage for both disposable and reusable bags can be curious. It can literally take hundreds of disposables to make up for the materials for one reusable(to be fair, the reusable would at that point be both larger and stronger). If you're a clean-freak and want to wash your bags every use(yes, I've seen this mentioned on forums), the energy used to wash, provide the detergent, and sometimes even dry the bags can easily end up using more 'resources' than using and disposing of plastic bags. It's the old milk bottle dilema - more energy is used to wash and sterilize reusable milk bottles than is present in and used to manufacture disposable ones.

      *As in I can wash them.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    112. Re:England by advocate_one · · Score: 1
      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    113. Re:England by somersault · · Score: 1

      Well, it worked last night. I remembered my bag! But I managed to forget my wallet

      --
      which is totally what she said
    114. Re:England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paper bags are expensive. I asked the manager of a grocery. Plastic bags (bought by the pound) cost less than 2 cents while paper bags cost 13.

    115. Re:England by fgouget · · Score: 1

      I keep buying one to keep in the car .... take it into the house full of groceries and there it stays.

      Instead of adding the latest bag to the pile tucked away out of mind, put the pile right against the front door. So the next time you go out and pass by the car you'll be forced to remember that you intended to put the bags in the car and since you're going out anyway you might as well do it then. Note that this assumes you live in an appartment and your car is "far away" in the parking lot. If the car is just in your house's garage then you have no excuse.

    116. Re:England by fgouget · · Score: 1

      Well, I tend to choose plastic bags at the supermarket because later I use them for garbage disposal.

      The bags you buy your fresh vegetables / fruits in are good enough for that. It does work better if they have handles though and that's store-dependent.

    117. Re: England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with reusable bags from UK supermarkets is that they are... Plastic. I use cotton cloth bags, much more durable but easy to pack in pockets or bags. Ihave a drawer full of them. And always carry some four or five for casual shopping.

    118. Re:England by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Dunno what bags you're getting, but I see two kinds:

      Walmart's -- these go to hell in a matter of weeks in sunlight or a few months in a damp environment. Pull up a buried one and all you get is shreds.

      50 pound feed bags -- these are thick heavy woven plastic, double-coated. Initially they're waterproof and really tough. About a year after being emptied they start getting friable and shortly afterward kinda turn to powder. Sun accelerates the process but any exposure to an oxidizer (eg. damp soil) does it. I was annoyed because I use about 350 bags a year, and I'd envisioned repurposing 'em as tarps. :(

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    119. Re:England by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I'm thinkin' the issue probably comes not from canned and packaged goods, but from unwrapped vegetables and leaky meat. So separate 'em or plastic-bag the culprits... ooops, now we're using more bags than we were before!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    120. Re:England by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      Sobey's is the big competitor to Loblaws. Loblaws owns Superstore.

    121. Re:England by andymadigan · · Score: 1

      Actually Aldi does that in the U.S., but I've seen other supermarkets implementing anti-theft devices on carts. You'll see signs warning that the cart won't work off the property (I believe they have brakes that 'lock' if you try to roll them away). Homeless people will steal them otherwise. There's no Aldi's where I live, good thing too, I never carry change.

      --
      The right to protest the State is more sacred than the State.
    122. Re:England by Optali · · Score: 1

      In Germany this was introduced in 1973 as a result of the Oil Crisis. I recall from my childhood that during a period plastic bags were completely unavailable and supermarkets started to place the cardboard boxes for the customers to use. This is now common at least in Germany and Holland (for what I know).

      In Germany I don't know about any supermarket that does not charge for bags and here in Holland all the mayor ones do, but not so the non-food stores.

      I don't see it as a bad move from any perspective: For the supermarkets themselves a governmental mandate would mean that they would have a legitimate reason and this would mean a cost reduction for them, which is always welcome.

      --
      -- 29A the number of the Beast
    123. Re:England by Vanderhoth · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I knew Loblaws owned one of them.

    124. Re:England by volmtech · · Score: 1

      Looking out my back door I can see about 100 ft then its all forest with 80 ft high pine trees. 40 years ago the whole property was clear cut. The damn things grew back.

    125. Re:England by volmtech · · Score: 1

      For some reason the packages you take out of a plastic shopping bag wont fit back in after you open them and they are not liquid tight. I buy 13 gal drawstring bags for my kitchen trash can. Every day I take the full one out and put it into one of my 33 gal garbage cans. This is for five adults. Trying to stuff garbage back into those little bags is a messy nightmare.

    126. Re:England by nobodie · · Score: 1

      What pisses me off is the number of bags used. Locally the baggers just grab a new bag when they have two or three things in a bag. And double bagging-- get outta here.

      --
      Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
    127. Re:England by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      you know when you wash the dishes and the waters not so great after doing the washing up, ideal for cans. But anyway if you rinse a can with cold water right after opening it, generally it will just rinse clean. Not every can but mostly.

    128. Re:England by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      You miss the point rotting food stinks and attracts insects.
      I don't use a dishwasher and in summer i tend to use solar for heating water anyway. It doesn't do any harm to feel a little smug in the summer when you get your hot water for free.

      In the winter hot water is pretty much a side effect of having to keep warm in winter.

    129. Re:England by mpeskett · · Score: 1

      How about we go back to cardboard boxes instead of the damned plastic packaging

      Probably heavier and bulkier for the same amount of contents, so the trucks transporting goods to the store will carry less stuff (so there will be more trucks) and burn more fuel. Same with using glass bottles instead of plastic. With food, you also run the risk of increasing damage done to anything fragile, like fruit, if they're not fairly snug in their package - so bundling them loose into bigger boxes means more waste from the squashed/bruised ones.

      There may well be better options for packaging; the way the world works now is set up to incentivise minimising cost rather than environmental impact, but some costs also have environmental impacts attached or correlated (fuel especially). It's not as simple as just "get rid of plastic".

    130. Re:England by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      "Never use a backpack for something heavy. If the weight shifts it will pull you off track. Use panniers instead and you can carry loads of heavy stuff without problems"

      The positive advice towards panniers is certainly true, but the negative advice about backpacks is ... in need of qualification.

      Personal preferences differ, but I don't really have any concern about carrying 20 or even 25kilos in a back pack while cycling. Much more and it gets annoying, but the weight is not really a problem AS LONG AS you have a rucksack that fits well. That's more than enough for a normal week's shopping for one.

      Sometimes I carry my tool kit (tyre-levers, spare tube, adjustable spanner ; pump ; allen keys ; dual-head screwdriver ; lock ; brake blocks) in my pannier and tote the pannier over my shoulder on the pump ; sometimes I put it in the rucksack. But I always have my tools. And lock.

      A colleague who cycles everywhere (even in the snow - he's insane)

      What's insane about that? The cagers are a little more dangerous than normal, but that's just because they STILL don't know how to behave on the road. As my Norwegian colleague was saying in the bar last night "There is no such thing as bad weather ; only bad clothing."

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. Taxing is not going to fix the problem by schwit1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This gets fixed by developing a better bag. Better means comparable cost and strength, with handles and environmentally safe.

    Jumping straight away to a tax makes it look like nothing more than a money grab.

    1. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Informative

      There already are better bags, they're offered for sale alongside the cheap nasty ones. Either more durable plastic, or foil-lined bags for freezer items, or a range of light-to-heavy-duty fabric bags.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by EasyTarget · · Score: 1

      .. makes it look like nothing more than a money grab.

      No; it's a rent.
      So long as you do not charge for bags that are strong when sold but soon decay once exposed to free air and UV then this is not a land grab, since the market (which only cares about polluting when it is expensive) will rapidly move to the least damaging option and your 'grab' will shrink to nothing.

      Of course. This is actually a land grab, since the market will maximize profit anyway and once we are all used to paying for bags the charge will remain, The only way to prevent this would be legislation, which is commie and apparently evil.

      --
      "Oops, I always forget the purpose of competition is to divide people into winners and losers." - Hobbes
    3. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by TWiTfan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, except I'm not going to use a bunch of fabric bags that have to buy myself, remember to bring to the store, and that have to be washed after every visit to the store. A much better and more practical idea would be a modest surcharge (5 cents/bag or whatever) which you then get back when you turn them in for recycling (which would be required in every store, not just at recycling centers). We already do this with plastic bottles in several states in the U.S. and, the way I see it, everybody wins.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    4. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by stranger_to_himself · · Score: 1

      This gets fixed by developing a better bag. Better means comparable cost and strength, with handles and environmentally safe.

      Jumping straight away to a tax makes it look like nothing more than a money grab.

      Maybe - but it works in the short term. I lived in Ireland for a few years, the 22c was enough to make me (and most people) take my own bags shopping so far fewer bags were used. Now I'm back in free bag country and it feels weird and unnecessary to be given a load of new bags every time I go shopping.

      I agree though that even an 80% reduction doesn't solve the problem, an environmentally safe bag would be the best solution.

    5. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by TWX · · Score: 1

      Well, in my experience, owning a few of those heavy duty canvas bags, they're not particularly straightforward to sanitize. We washed and dried one and it shrunk drastically. I don't know about you, but given the vectors for disease that uncooked foodstuffs provide, I don't want to have un-launderable bags that I have to pay any significant money for.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    6. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      remember to bring to the store

      This is the big one. It's quite common to pop into a shop on the way home, and unless you're driving you won't have a bag with you. I'd love it if shops would give you a bag for a deposit and return the deposit when you returned the bag.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by Sockatume · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1) You don't have to wash them after ever visit, unless you're buying, like, unwrapped raw chicken in which case you've got bigger problems
      2) You don't have to remember to bring them to the store so long as you have the presence of mind to know that you're going to the store, or to keep one in a handy place for unexpected runs.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    8. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Mine's some sort of synthetic, I just machine wash it. I don't know why you would use canvas because like you say it's almost unwashable.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    9. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by durrr · · Score: 0

      It's also a drop in the ocean when you consider the amount of other plastic item packagings and liters of fuel the average consumer uses per year. It's an imaginary problem.

    10. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      That would be a good one, and would work well in parallel with a switch to reusable bags.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    11. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by TWiTfan · · Score: 1, Insightful

      1) You don't have to wash them after ever visit, unless you're buying, like, unwrapped raw chicken in which case you've got bigger problems

      If you want to take your chances with bacteria, salmonella, etc.--go for it.

      2) You don't have to remember to bring them to the store so long as you have the presence of mind to know that you're going to the store, or to keep one in a handy place for unexpected runs.

      In other words, you don't have to remember to bring them to the store, just as long as you remember to bring them to the store.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    12. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by Taibhsear · · Score: 2

      1) You don't have to wash them after ever visit, unless you're buying, like, unwrapped raw chicken in which case you've got bigger problems

      You might want to rethink that statement.
      http://www.chicagotribune.com/health/sns-green-bacteria-in-shopping-bags,0,4837500.story

    13. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because, clearly it's more effective to curse the darkness than lighting a candle.

      Captcha: "Mental". Indeed.

    14. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This gets fixed by developing a better bag. Better means comparable cost and strength, with handles and environmentally safe.

      Jumping straight away to a tax makes it look like nothing more than a money grab.

      This also gets fixed by not using any plastic bags, ever, or even phasing out plastic packaging and outlawing excessive packaging in the retail market. The problem isn't just plastic, it's wasted energy recycling instead of making every temporary packaging biodegradable. Shopping - bring your hessian bags Household trash - metal or durable plastic bins Various products in shops - cardboard containers, etc. It's achievable. We managed to phase out paper bags and bring in plastic, without taxes but with legislation.

    15. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by jbssm · · Score: 0

      See, that's why we need a fee. Because ignorante uninformed and lazy people like you don't understand those exact same bags you talk about already exist for years and are for sale for a: "1 time fee, exchange for a new one as many times as you want", in many supermarkets.

      So yeah, it's no wonder the government has to charge money form ignorants like you, since otherwise they will never learn.

    16. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by Sockatume · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm familiar with the ACC's study. It's bacteriophobic bunk, to be frank, from a campaign group that's opposed to any reduction in plastic bag use. The main issue is that it conflates the presence of scary bacteria with the presence of even-potentially-harmful levels of those pathogens. It belongs in the same trashcan as those chemophobic studies that find trace amounts of scary chemicals in factory-farmed potatoes or whateverthefuck.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    17. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words "I'm lazy and don't want to put any effort towards fixing the problem, and I also don't want to pay for it".

      In Canada many stores sell durable cloth bags as well as durable plastic bins. My family uses both. I leave them in the trunk, so they are always there when I pop in to the grocery store. The bins never need to be cleaned, the bags we clean maybe once per year (honestly what are you putting in these bags?). Occasionally we will ask to have saran-wrapped meat containers put into their own plastic bag, but not usually. When we started doing this, it took us 2 months to start remembering to bring the bins/bags. It is NOT a hassle anymore, it is just part of the routine.

      Giving away more durable bags (or a 5 cent surcharge) will just lead to a new type of bag in the landfills. People who are lazy will throw away 25 cents worth of bags for the convenience of not having to care, regardless of their quality.

      A partial solution exists now - use it and work on implementing a better one. Doing neither and whining about how the solution isn't perfect just keeps the status quo.

    18. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Funnily enough the bacteria, salmonella etc. have a hard time getting through the plastic that my meat comes wrapped in, and my fruits and vegetables get washed to remove "store germs" from everyone who's been handling them anyway. It's amazing how people can make the most trivial change to their habits sound like an invitation for catastrophe.

      You don't have to remember to take the bags if you have them with you; and it's no additional effort to remember to take the bags if you are of sufficient mental competence that you know you are leaving the house to go to the store, and not just wander about in a daze.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    19. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't the food you buy packed (so it never touches the bag directly)?
      Anyway, in 10+ years I've never washed my bags and I've never had any problem. They don't even look dirty or smell...

    20. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      given the vectors for disease that uncooked foodstuffs provide

      Isn't almost everything you buy already wrapped?

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    21. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      The trouble with recycling, to get to your main idea, is that it's never a 100% efficient process. There's a reason why the adage goes "reduce, reuse, recycle":

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    22. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      In South Australia, you can't get a thin plastic bag at the checkout at all. But you can buy a much tougher plastic bag for 20c or a canvas(-ish) bag for $1.00.

      It took a while to remember to take our reusable bags with us when we go shopping, but we've got so many of them now it just seems normal. Every time I travel interstate, I'm surprised by the stores handing out those nasty thin fragile bags.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    23. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by sarysa · · Score: 1

      1) You don't have to wash them after ever visit, unless you're buying, like, unwrapped raw chicken in which case you've got bigger problems

      If you want to take your chances with bacteria, salmonella, etc.--go for it.

      This actually made headlines some time ago as an unintended, but very real consequence of San Francisco's bag tax...

      --
      Charisma is the measure of someone's ability to lie with a straight face.
    24. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by complete+loony · · Score: 2
      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    25. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by devent · · Score: 2

      In Germany we have no free bags for at least 5 or 10 years (feels like forever) and there is no difficulties in bringing your own bags. Mostly it's a concious decision to go and buy groceries. Then you can just bring 2 bags from your home. And since when you have to wash every time a fabric bag? Everything you buy is packaged. If you not put like raw fruits in your bag the bag will not get dirty.

      --
      http://www.mueller-public.de - My site http://www.anr-institute.com/ - Advanced Natural Research Institute
    26. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      right.. just remember to wash hands with hot water three times with a new bar of soap each time, of course after opening the door and flipping the light switch. If you forgot to open the door first, or opened the door before flipping the switch, repeat.

    27. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by thrich81 · · Score: 1

      In Austin, the city council just banned plastic bags last year. It would have been more elegant to tax them instead -- thus the demand is suppressed but if someone really wants a bag they can still get it, and the tax offsets the cost of the city dealing with them in the trash and picking them up off the roads and parks. After a lot of public crying by people who said they wouldn't be able to get their groceries home, everyone seems to have adapted OK.

    28. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by Jahta · · Score: 1

      It's also a drop in the ocean when you consider the amount of other plastic item packagings and liters of fuel the average consumer uses per year. It's an imaginary problem.

      Actually it's not an imaginary problem. Like an earlier poster, I currently live in Ireland. Before the levy, for most people, every trip to the shops meant more disposable plastic bags; just to carry your shopping home. Since the levy was introduced almost nobody uses the old-style disposable plastic bags; indeed many shops don't even offer them anymore. The massive drop in consumption of plastic bags, means a corresponding massive drop in manufacture of plastic bags; i.e. significantly less plastic entering the system in the first place.

    29. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      1) You don't have to wash them after ever visit, unless you're buying, like, unwrapped raw chicken in which case you've got bigger problems

      If you want to take your chances with bacteria, salmonella, etc.--go for it.

      What kind of stuff are you buying that you worry about salmonella? Rotten chicken? Week-old fish? In my country when you buy meat/fish in the grocery store, they come in leak proof containers. They don't get the bags dirty. I know... I've been putting my food in the backpack for years and then biking home.

      2) You don't have to remember to bring them to the store so long as you have the presence of mind to know that you're going to the store, or to keep one in a handy place for unexpected runs.

      In other words, you don't have to remember to bring them to the store, just as long as you remember to bring them to the store.

      Man is a creature of habit. You do have to shop frequently, don't you? How about having some bags in the car anyway?

      But this is not even the only solution. Where I live we have sturdy paper bags. They cost 20 cents (of the local currency, doesn't matter which) and they resist way more than one trip from the grocery store. And once you dispose of them, whether for recycling or to throw in a landfill, it disappears a lot faster than a plastic bag.

    30. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by MouseAT · · Score: 1

      Yet others of us don't go shopping all that often, don't drive and have our big orders delivered to us. So now, I'm suddenly expected to constantly carry around bag(s) in my pocket on the off chance that I might need to pop into the shops to re-stock on perishable goods on my way home?

      I'm all for trying to reduce the number of bags in circulation, and tend to re-use the few that I do get when shopping as bin bags, so no real loss there. I'm just annoyed at the general attitude of just expecting everyone to always have a bag handy, as if that's practical for everyone.

      Maybe a better solution would be for people to be able to get one disposable bag free when shopping, and be charged for additional ones. Maybe they could even reduce the size of the bag if it's that big a deal. That way, people would still be rewarded for taking dedicated bags with them when they do a big weekly shop, whilst not impacting on those of us who just need to pop into Tesco to get a pint of milk before getting the bus home.

    31. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by jbssm · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you work, perhaps you have one of those very few and very specific jobs where you don't have to show up with anything but the clothes on your body for work. Well, most of us don't, I have to carry a messenger bag, most people at least carry a briefcase, so yes, I do expect people to put a grocery bag in there since it's basically weightless.

      If you don't want to carry it around... well it's your choice, but pay for it like the law implies.

    32. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by Schmorgluck · · Score: 1

      A much better and more practical idea would be a modest surcharge (5 cents/bag or whatever) which you then get back when you turn them in for recycling (which would be required in every store, not just at recycling centers).

      Leclerc stores, in France, have been doing exactly that for nearly 20 years now. 0.07€ for a small bag and 0.15€ for a large. They are not super-sturdy but not bad. They also have more expensive ones, including thermal bags, also refundable.

      --
      There's nothing like $HOME
    33. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) You don't have to wash them after ever visit, unless you're buying, like, unwrapped raw chicken in which case you've got bigger problems

      If you want to take your chances with bacteria, salmonella, etc.--go for it.

      Wash the food, not the bag. If you assume food is clean at time of purchase, you're woefully ignorant.

    34. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      In other words "I'm lazy and don't want to put any effort towards fixing the problem, and I also don't want to pay for it".

      No, I'm just practical and have some understanding of basic human behavior. People will only go so far out of their way before they say "Fuck this." Give them a practical option and make it easier on them to do they right thing, and they'll do the right thing. Then we all win. Make doing the right thing a huge pain in the ass, and they'll just say "fuck this." Then none of us win.

      Giving away more durable bags (or a 5 cent surcharge) will just lead to a new type of bag in the landfills.

      That's why you make recycling EASY. Drop your plastic bags off at ANY store, get your 5 cents a bag. Even if you're too lazy and just throw them away, you can bet some homeless person or trash hauling company is going to pull it out before it goes to the landfill and collect the money.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    35. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      is that it's never a 100% efficient process

      NOTHING ever ever a 100% efficient process. I'm proposing a major improvement, not perfection.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    36. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) You don't have to wash them after ever visit, unless you're buying, like, unwrapped raw chicken in which case you've got bigger problems
      2) You don't have to remember to bring them to the store so long as you have the presence of mind to know that you're going to the store, or to keep one in a handy place for unexpected runs.

      1) Plus if people are really so paranoid they ought to be just washing their food before they prepare/eat it anyway.

      2) I just put them back in the trunk of my car after putting the groceries away so that I always have them when I stop at the store, is that really so hard? *cue the anti-car whiners*

    37. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by jandersen · · Score: 1

      Recycling is only a poor excuse for not addressing the problem, which is that we produce things that are meant to be thrown out immediately, such as plastic bags. It isn't impossible to live without those things - there are in fact shops around, where you can buy at least some things unwrapped. It is only a matter of making the effort and being a tiny bit creative.

    38. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would work...

      I have a *stack* of the things I use for different stuff. However eventually the plastic bags are more than the size of my bin. So I grab half shove them all together in another bag, toss them in the back of the car. Then toss them in the recycle bin at the store. I am going *back* to the store anyway. Most stores have them. They are usually overflowing. My city also recently let you take the same stack and toss them into the recycle bin that is at the curb.

      There usually is no reason to throw these things away other than you are being extremely lazy.

      I have been using them as free cat poop bags. Instead of buying the more durable (and longer lasting) trash liners. Oh side note do not get a cat or dog if you care about the environment in any way. They are major resource hogs.

    39. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by camperdave · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've found a solution to having to wash the reusable bags. I just line them with some of the convenient plastic bags from the grocery store.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    40. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by camperdave · · Score: 1

      It's also a drop in the ocean when you consider the amount of other plastic item packagings and liters of fuel the average consumer uses per year. It's an imaginary problem.

      How many litres of extra fuel is it going to cost to cart around those empty bags all over the place on the off chance that one of your trips might be to a grocery store?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    41. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jumping straight away to a tax makes it look like nothing more than a money grab.

      That's because most people are not aware of the high costs associated with dealing with those "disposable" plastic bags, but assume that it's somebody else's problem.

      See, here's the thing, I'm already being taxed to deal with that waste, even if I don't contribute to it at all, but am responsible with my baggage needs by having reusable bags of my own. Why? Because somebody has to pay for the trash pickup along the roads as people throw out their waste, and because my local sanitation department doesn't charge people specific fees based on their actual waste.

    42. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      Real "consequences" like more people getting sick after banning or taxing disposable bags, or like researchers finding certain bacteria in reusable bags (which doesn't necessarily mean anyone actually getting sick from them), or simply newspapers seizing an opportunity to print fat, scary headlines?

      The biggest risk is in raw vegetables; they do not come wrapped in plastic, and besides your nasty gunky reusable bag they will come in contact with all manner of dirtiness: packing crates, sweaty shoppers' hands, your grimy kitchen counter, etc. Regardless of what bag you transport them in, you'll want to wash and clean them thoroughly if you're going to eat them raw.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    43. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      You're arguing that there are more hassles with reusable bags than with... renting people plastic bags? That's nonsense. THe problems you mention for reusable bags would be true with your idea: you'd have to remember to return them, and you'd have to essentially buy them. Washing, unless you're constantly breaking eggs or using the bags for things other than the grocery store, you don't have to wash them. For years, let alone every trip. I say this from personal experience. If you ARE using them for other things than the grocery store, you're getting more value out of them. They are useful.

      Moreover, most of the plastic bags won't be returned, they'll just be thrown away.

    44. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I'm just practical and have some understanding of basic human behavior.

      Basic human behavior is that we are willing to go through some trouble to pay less. A tax on new plastic bags would - when it's high enough - make people use durable bags more despite the "horrible" need to have some forethought and take a bag with you in the morning if you intend to shop on your way home. Oh, and WTF do you buy if you fear germs like that? Every shopping basket is much dirtier than any bag I use over and over again.

      People will only go so far out of their way before they say "Fuck this."

      If the tax is high enough, people will avoid buying new plastic bags unless it's absolutely necessary.

      Give them a practical option and make it easier on them to do they right thing, and they'll do the right thing. Then we all win. Make doing the right thing a huge pain in the ass, and they'll just say "fuck this." Then none of us win.

      I'm sure many people would also use a perpetual motion unlimited energy generator if they had the option. Arguably, what you're asking for isn't impossible but sometimes it's better to change behavior than develop a technological solution. Hardly any such changes in society have been made without stubborn, old people opposing them so you're not alone.

      That's why you make recycling EASY. Drop your plastic bags off at ANY store, get your 5 cents a bag. Even if you're too lazy and just throw them away, you can bet some homeless person or trash hauling company is going to pull it out before it goes to the landfill and collect the money.

      Recycling bottles works because identifying a recyclable bottle is a relatively simple task to create a machine for. The shape of the bottle, the weight any bar code on it etc. can be used. But how would you identify wrinkled plastic bags with possibly something left inside (maybe a bottle was leaking, maybe some grains of rice fell out, whatever) so that people can return bags quickly and conveniently whilst you must still ensure that people cannot trivially game the machine to count more bags than were actually returned? Such as by just cutting a bag in two...

      Saying that something must be EASY is a tall order. In an ideal world plastic bags would have special homing beacon bar codes, an aerodynamic shape and a helium compartment so that you can throw them out the window where they fly away with the wind until recycling drones catch them and then you get the refund into your bank account. Or bitcoin, if you prefer anonymity when you throw out the bag from the sex shop.

    45. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      So now, I'm suddenly expected to constantly carry around bag(s) in my pocket

      Yes, and as the experience of countries that have gone hard-core with charging for bags shows (Finland sells a bag for 0.20 euro, for example), this is not an unreasonable request. Many people are already carrying a briefcase, message bag or backpack. Others fold up a high-quality plastic bag previously bought from the supermarket and tuck it deep in their pockets. You can even get a highly durable fabric bag that folds up so small, you can carry it on your keychain.

    46. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      By this logic, we should just throw up our hands because the biggest polluters are factories in China.

      Have a nice Earth. However long that lasts.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    47. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by laie_techie · · Score: 1

      Wash the food, not the bag. If you assume food is clean at time of purchase, you're woefully ignorant.

      So, does your local grocer provide a sink for you to wash the produce before bagging it?

      We obviously wash produce before eating it, but if the bag doesn't get washed it serves as a potential vector for cross-contamination. Many chefs even have separate cutting boards for meat, poultry, and vegetables.

    48. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Most of it. Fruits and vegetables aren't.

      Some commenters above criticised the study for a biased source (An anti-environmentalism political pressure group was involved) and lack of quantitative evaluation. I don't know if these criticisms are valid, I've not the time to research the issue in depth.

    49. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      And herein lies the problem... It used to be common to return empty bottles etc, but at least in the UK that's never done anymore.
      You *can* turn in your bottles for recycling, but you have to make an extra stop to do so and there is no incentive offered.
      If they offered a rebate for returned bottles and accepted them in store like they do in other countries, a lot more people would do that.

      Also on the point of recycling bottles, they should clean and refill the bottles rather than melting them down... It is a colossal waste of energy to melt a glass/plastic bottle only to them make another identical bottle.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    50. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      I once built a machine that increases local entropy. It was 100% efficient.

      =Smidge=

    51. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by sarysa · · Score: 1

      heh, I'm not going to defend the intentions of general media sources, but I believe the concerns were that the bottom of peoples' bags were essentially petri dishes, and over time the infestation got to the point where all but the most thorough of washing of potentially contaminated food items (and even then...) would be ineffective.Of course one's own negligence is to blame in this case but what people forget about social engineering is engineering works with what you have, not some ideal.

      --
      Charisma is the measure of someone's ability to lie with a straight face.
    52. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many adapted by shifting their purchasing to Cedar Park, Kyle/Buda, or Round Rock so Austin is losing some sales tax revenue. Myself and others will occasionally collect plastic bags from friends buying outside the city limits and use them to line trash bins or collect pet waste. I don't see the point in spending more money to buy a trash bag when the store bags are sufficient. A box of Hefty type bags will last me about 10 years. Occasionally, I will have someone make a remark about how obviously I don't have a family to get by using a store bag. My response, is obviously they have no experience with a house based daycare where margins are slim and you save where you can. Five toddlers in diapers produce a lot of waste you don't want hanging around.

    53. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      Well sure, in *this* universe.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    54. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, except I'm not going to use a bunch of fabric bags that have to buy myself, remember to bring to the store, and that have to be washed after every visit to the store. A much better and more practical idea would be a modest surcharge (5 cents/bag or whatever) which you then get back when you turn them in for recycling (which would be required in every store, not just at recycling centers). We already do this with plastic bottles in several states in the U.S. and, the way I see it, everybody wins.

      "Everybody" is a bunch of lazy fucks who would gladly rather pay more money than waste precious time recycling plastic bags. It's too much effort to walk 10 feet to the recycling bin when the garbage can is right there.

      Go ahead. I dare you to prove me wrong. Laziness built this problem. Humans know how to recycle, and it's pretty damn obvious that plastic isn't going to break down, so they even know they should. Lazy fuck syndrome kicked in, and here we are.

    55. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you wash the food before eating, what does anything else matter? You're a stupid crybaby. Everything is already cross-contaminated.

    56. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jumping straight away to a tax makes it look like nothing more than a money grab.

      You're assuming it's a tax that is collected by the government. (I haven't RTFA, so don't know the details.)

      In Toronto, Canada, it was mandated by City Council that stores had to charge five cents (nickel) per bag, but the City didn't collect the money. The store was free to do with it whatever it wanted. Some kept it (extra revenue), some donated it eco-charities (with a corresponding PR statement).

      City Council simply wanted to push behaviour in a certain direction and minimize unnecessary "stress" on landfills. (Rob "Smokin' Crack" Ford and those who leaned Right then had the mandatory fee rescinded shortly after being elected, but some stores still charge the fee.)

    57. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by eth1 · · Score: 1

      This gets fixed by developing a better bag. Better means comparable cost and strength, with handles and environmentally safe.

      Jumping straight away to a tax makes it look like nothing more than a money grab.

      Or change the way you check out. Put RFID tags on stuff so I can just bag stuff as I shop, then pop the bags on a reader and swipe my card on the way out. That would actually get me using my own bags.

    58. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      Yes, except I'm not going to use a bunch of fabric bags that have to buy myself, remember to bring to the store, and that have to be washed after every visit to the store.

      I could easily flame you on this but I will remain civil in tone...
      I have been using "paid for" / "permanent" grocery bags, both cloth and plastic for the last 6 years or so. Sure, every once in a while I don't take them, but I've made a habit of keeping them on my fridge, so when I leave to go shopping I just grab them and all is good, no worries.

      Wash them...? Right. I've used the same bags for years and never washed them. I'm weird, I wash my food before I cook or eat it...

      This ain't rocket science.

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    59. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by Endlisnis · · Score: 1

      Except, who gets the $0.05 when you fail to recycle the bag? Atlantic Canada did something similar with aluminum pop cans, but allowed the bottling company to keep half of the deposit for cans that were never returned. Almost overnight, they stopped producing the more environmentally sensible, refillable glass bottles because they simply made more money off of lazy people who couldn't be bothered to recover the $0.05 by recycling their cans.

    60. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by durrr · · Score: 1

      And by your logic we should keep chasing those feel-good zero-impact idiot ideas that makes things slightly inconventient for us so that we feel we're doing something, while totally ignoring the big issues.

      "It's okay that there's polluting factories in china because plastic bags and incandescent lights are banned in Europe!"

    61. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Not at all, but if we don't choose to start somewhere, no progress will ever be made.

      It's a lot easier for me to control what I produce than to regulate China.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    62. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No free bags in Germany? Of course we have free bags. It's just the supermarkets that make you pay for plastic bags. And to be exact, they don't want to have money for the bags found in the produce section.

    63. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your meat wrappings leak blood. Put some kitchen roll paper under each and then look at what leaked out under a microscope. Liquids will always find a way through the cheap crap store use as temporary covers for meat produce

    64. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      Trader Joe's does something close. It's not a deposit return, but they give you 10 cents off your bill for each bag you bring with you to be reused. There is a big 10c mark printed right on the bag to remind you to bring them back. They use the paper kind with good strong handles, so I use them for keeping recycled stuff in until I take it out to the recycling can outside which also works good as they are being reused. And if you don't have enough with you when you are shopping you don't pay for the extra, it's money back for reusing, but not an extra cost to get new ones.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    65. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, it may sound scary, but you have to remember that most food comes from a pretty dirty environment in the first place. I'm using the same plastic bags for a looooong time before they wear out and have not had any stomach issues.

      Keyboards and similar are reportedly pretty nasty too in terms of what grows on them. Do people really get sick from eating next to their keyboard? No.

    66. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by sarysa · · Score: 1

      This isn't really something that one can gauge properly with their own anecdotes. In my case I practically never buy anything but well-packaged slow perishables so I have nothing to worry about. A small quantity of meat juices leaking into the bottom of someone's bag (rare enough that it doesn't ever happen to most people, but it is a concern on a broader scale) will feed a significant quantity of bacteria for a long time and create a real problem, versus the tiny bits that get onto your keyboard and create an infestation that only a germophobe can appreciate...

      Again, personal responsibility, wash your damn bags, yadda yadda...as someone who'll eat fallen food while on a hiking trip and follow it up with a "meh", even I can admit that the concern here is reasonable.

      --
      Charisma is the measure of someone's ability to lie with a straight face.
    67. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by mjwx · · Score: 1

      In Germany we have no free bags for at least 5 or 10 years (feels like forever) and there is no difficulties in bringing your own bags. Mostly it's a concious decision to go and buy groceries. Then you can just bring 2 bags from your home. And since when you have to wash every time a fabric bag? Everything you buy is packaged. If you not put like raw fruits in your bag the bag will not get dirty.

      Yes, but that's in Germany where people are German, therefore organised and have given a little thought to what they will be doing for the day (OK, Germans often give it a lot of thought).

      Most poster's here are Americans and Americans have terrible organisational skills, dont give any thought about what they are doing and complain bitterly that everything wasn't automagically provided afterwards.

      BTW, we've had the canvas (fabric) bags along side plastic bags in Australia for years now. Plastic is still free in most stores (only a matter of time though) and the canvas bags are A$1. I prefer the canvas bags is that they are stronger (no more double and triple bagging crap), hold more (fewer bags needed) and dont shred your hands when carrying them. Above this they are reusable, I keep a few in my car just in case I go to the shop on the way home (or if I'm only getting 1 thing, I'll forgo the bag completely).

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    68. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      If you want to take your chances with bacteria, salmonella, etc.--go for it.

      Keep a distinctive bag for your meat products then. I still think the hazard from 'bacteria everywhere!!!!' is overstated.

      In other words, you don't have to remember to bring them to the store, just as long as you remember to bring them to the store.

      I'd simply say to remember to toss them back in your vehicle when you're done unloading.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    69. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is nothing wrong with cars, but seriously, who does their shopping by car?

    70. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Or, we could be sane:

      It's not great that Chinese factories are polluting, just as it's not great that we are wasting tonnes of plastic a year for no reason. Let's try to solve both - the first with diplomacy, aid, education, and trade instruments, and the second with logic and common sense.

    71. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by gjscott33 · · Score: 1

      >Jumping straight away to a tax makes it look like nothing more than a money grab. In Wales, where we've had a plastic bag charge for some time (see comments above about England's charge being proposed) this problem is dealt with very easily - it's not a tax it's a mandatory donation to charity. This may be because the welsh government is not allowed to introduce such a tax (i'm not sure to be honest) but it certainly deals with the money grab issue - the organization that mandates the charge fundamentally does not get the cash.

    72. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by fgouget · · Score: 1

      The biggest risk is in raw vegetables; they do not come wrapped in plastic

      The bags you buy your vegetables in are not part of the ban. Or at least they are not in sane countries like France.

      they will come in contact with all manner of dirtiness: packing crates, sweaty shoppers' hands, your grimy kitchen counter, etc. Regardless of what bag you transport them in, you'll want to wash and clean them thoroughly if you're going to eat them raw.

      Precisely. So the case of vegetables is quite irrelevant to the current discussion. Your point is moot.

    73. Re:Taxing is not going to fix the problem by syngeek · · Score: 1

      Where I live in California, stores are required to charge you 10c per disposable bag you use. This even goes for non-grocery stores. This sounds nuts, but it's an example of taxes being used to encourage people to alter their behavior. That and many local people actually voted for this tax because they were horrified by images of trees covered in plastic bags, animals choking on bags, and bags floating around along the sides of roads. Really, when you think about it, the use of thin plastic bags just to bring home a few items (more stuff/bag and they break) is kind of a gratuitous use of plastic and the petroleum required to make it, recycling or not. Anyways, yeah, I thought the ban would be completely obnoxious, but I ended up collecting a set of large cloth bags and bought a couple of the thick plastic ones the stores sell for 99c. I have 3 large bags that were free conference schwag bags and 3 that I bought for 99c each. I've used them for three years now and they're all going strong. I might have never done this had it not been for the convenient bags going away and I have to say... THEY ARE AWESOME. Don't knock it until you try it, I swear. It sounds like it will be so annoying, but they're so so nice once you get used to them. I can actually fit HUGE amounts of groceries in these bags and they never tear on me. With the long, strong, handles, I can sling several bags of groceries over my shoulders and make fewer trips to unload the car. Keep in mind, nearly all of our food in the US is pretty much laminated too. Seriously, the FUD about people getting salmonella from grocery bags is just that: FUD. If you put a tray of meat in your bag and it leaks, yeah, you ought to wash it. You might even designate a "meat bag" if you're paranoid (I don't and have never had a problem). It's not the case that you have to wash them after every use. I don't wash mine after every use and we've never had any issues. I'm more likely to get salmonella from produce or eating out. I do still use plastic produce bags for veggies. Most people in the US do that anyways, plastic shopping bags or not. Actually, I ended up liking my non-disposable bags so much, I just bought some reusable produce bags to try out too. They claim to make produce last longer... we shall see about that... After every shopping run, I typically hang the bags on the door so I remember to put them back in the car on my way out. It almost always works. If not, I have to pay the 10c and deal with annoying little bags that tear easily. I think the annoyance of the easily tearing bags that I used to treat like just part of getting groceries is more effective at changing my behavior than the tax at this point.

  3. Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Paper bags.

    1. Re:Solution by rvw · · Score: 1

      Paper bags.

      Paper is bad for the environment as well. We should invent e-bags!

    2. Re:Solution by Chrisq · · Score: 2

      Paper bags.

      For most Americans this is hard to visualise but many Europeans walk to the supermarket. The bag has to be carry-able with handles, survive getting wet, and support a reasonable amount of weight.

    3. Re:Solution by TWX · · Score: 1

      For most Americans this is hard to visualise but many Europeans walk to the supermarket. The bag has to be carry-able with handles, survive getting wet, and support a reasonable amount of weight.

      And handle all of this without any underwear-loss incidents...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    4. Re:Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They cannot much weight. Additionaly, the people who are too lazy to recycle PE bags are likely also too lazy to recycle paper bags.

    5. Re:Solution by Kurast · · Score: 1

      I live in Brazil and sometimes I walk to the market.
      Some upper end markets here give you a paper bag with handles, like this one:
      http://blogs.estadao.com.br/curiocidade/files/2012/03/sacola_papel_SantaLuzia-682x1024.jpg
      I prefer those to plastic ones. They easily handle 10kg(about 25 lbs, for americans), where the plastic ones barely get 2kg(5 lbs) without punctures. Also they are very sturdy, and survive minor rain.
      With two of those paper bags I can take the equivalent of ten or more plastic bags, and they don't hurt my fingers like the plastic ones do.

    6. Re:Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't need to worry as much about recycling, paper takes a lot less than hundreds of years to decompose... more like a couple of months.

    7. Re:Solution by SScorpio · · Score: 1

      I've had them overflowing with 12oz glass bottles I'm taking back to the store and the bags have survived multiple trips. I've had more issues with the handles on plastic bags ripping apart.

      Recycling is a non-issue. And get this, it promotes the growth of more trees which will be used for paper.

    8. Re:Solution by Megane · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Most Americans can't visualize it because of a 20th century invention called the "subdivision". That's where a property developer takes a large tract of land, builds a couple of hundred houses on it, with twisty streets so you can't see more than a couple of blocks away, and limits access to the main roads in one or two places (a specific variant called a pod subdivision), thus meaning most people have to go a mile or two through the maze just to get out of the subdivision.

      All business development is along the main road. If you are lucky, a supermarket will build at that intersection. If you aren't lucky, the supermarket is a few miles down the main road, and you get a "convenience store", which is small and has a limited inventory for twice the price. If you are driving, it isn't too far, but you can't just cut across other people's yards when walking, because all the houses get a fenced-in back yard when they are built. In any case, the businesses get a fence between them and the houses to prevent, um, "unsavory persons" from having an easy way in and out, usually mandated by zoning laws*. The walk thus becomes far enough that it's not worth the bother, and you just get in the car to go those three to five miles. And your place of employment is going to be nowhere nearby, so it's not like it's along your way when you were already walking.

      Europe, like older US cities, usually in the northeast, was built up long enough ago before this became common.

      tl;dr: Most modern American neighborhoods are designed to be actively hostile to pedestrians trying to get anywhere.

      *actually zoning is probably the real cause of why subdivisions exist

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    9. Re:Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paper bags.

      For most Americans this is hard to visualise but many Europeans walk to the supermarket. The bag has to be carry-able with handles, survive getting wet, and support a reasonable amount of weight.

      The benefit of living in a nation that exports a lot of wood. Even paper bags made from recycled paper here have high quality and can support a far greater weight than the plastic ones. They are also more resistant to piercing from sharp box corners or pointy fruit.
      The only downside is the getting wet part. A few raindrops is no problem but a soaked paper bag isn't good for anything.
      The solution is to have both alternatives and only use the lame plastic bags when it is raining.

    10. Re:Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is still wasteful not to recycle them.

    11. Re:Solution by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Zoning, like many things in law, is a fundamentally sound idea but also one that can be easily exploited and abused by the politically well-connected.

    12. Re:Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like it will promote the cutting down of more trees. Yes, ideally it would all come from tree farms, but be realistic.

    13. Re:Solution by weilawei · · Score: 1

      As a child, my parents and I always walked to the store. We bought a little wire-mesh cart with wheels. Problem solved. These days, the grocery store with the least packaging is far enough to make walking infeasible, so the SO and I drive, but we still re-use the same bags (they are not free at our grocery store, but they are cloth and quite durable).

    14. Re:Solution by weilawei · · Score: 1

      Replying to myself to clarify something I realized in retrospect. We don't go further to simply avoid packaging--this store sells only generic items with minimal packaging, at a fraction of the retail cost of brand names. It means that our grocery bill, even after gas, is approximately 1/3 of what it would be otherwise.

  4. The cost and use of plastic bags by Apotekaren · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ok, so plastic bags in the grocery stores here in Finland have cost somewhere between 15-30 Euro cents for, well forever. I could get a proper cloth grocery bag to reuse, or buy paper bags instead, but I choose not to. Why? I use those plastic bags for my trash!

    So if I did go cloth or, heaven forbid, paper, I'd still have to buy plastic bags to put in my trash cans. It doesn't matter if I buy them separately or on a roll, I'm going to keep buying those plastic bags until I come up with a better way to get rid of my trash.

    --
    She: Hey, are you a traitor? Me: No, I'm atheist.
    1. Re:The cost and use of plastic bags by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A roll of specially-designed bin-liners costs the equivalent of about five Euro cents per bag here, and you can get them in biodegradable varieties. You're wasting your money by using shopping bags.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:The cost and use of plastic bags by berashith · · Score: 1

      so why isnt someone attaching handles to these bin liners? Cheaper, same size...

      I use my grocery bags for trash also, as I dont like having large trash cans holding large amounts of trash. The bags are free in the states, and I buy a box of large trash bags about once every 5-7 years i think. The cloth bags seem like a good idea, but it is just more stuff to keep track of, especially when you have to leave the bags at the front desk then ask for them back when you are ready to leave. Then they are a potential disease spread if not cleaned and maintained.

      I have family in Austria, and shopping there involves using the stores discarded cardboard boxes to bring things home. That makes a ton of sense.

    3. Re:The cost and use of plastic bags by Apotekaren · · Score: 1

      But saving time and bother. Some plastic bags here are some kind of biodegradable plastic(or they offer them), and when I throw them they'll end up in the municipal incinerator anyway. Doesn't matter.

      --
      She: Hey, are you a traitor? Me: No, I'm atheist.
    4. Re:The cost and use of plastic bags by thatkid_2002 · · Score: 1

      In Australia plastic bags are generally gratis. The cost of them is just factored into prices whether you use them or not... So, rather than buying bin liners I use the bags from my shopping. I wish more stores would use the biodegradable variety - then I'd have the best of both worlds!

    5. Re:The cost and use of plastic bags by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      1) My bin liners do come with handles. Really convenient for tying them off. If I was stuck and for some reason I needed a plastic bag for groceries I would certainly take one. (I use them for carrying the occasional inconveniently-shaped object anyway.)

      2) You don't have to use "large trash cans holding large amounts of trash", I have bins of sizes from about 1 metre tall (kitchen nonrecyclables) to about 30cm (bathroom trash) and I can buy bin liners that neatly fit all of them.

      3) Why on Earth do you have to leave your cloth bags at the front desk? We're just allowed to carry us around with us as we shop.

      4) If you're coating your bags with things that cause disease you are doing something horribly wrong with your shopping. I have to machine wash a bag now and then if an item breaks but that's a quarterly chore at most, and just involves throwing it in when I wash my kitchen towels and cloths.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    6. Re:The cost and use of plastic bags by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      I don't see how it saves time and bother. You go to the store once, and you have a roll of bags for about 3 months. Versus having to go shopping to be able to throw out your garbage.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    7. Re:The cost and use of plastic bags by Apotekaren · · Score: 1

      It's rare that the trash I produce takes up more space than the groceries I've carried home. Right now I have 4 or 5 plastic bags from previous trips waiting neatly rolled up under my sink. For when I take out the next filled bag. I've never run out of trash bags, and never bought a roll specifically for that use.

      My recommendation; ban flimsy bags, and make only the big (40L is almost standard here) strong ones out of biodegradable materials.

      --
      She: Hey, are you a traitor? Me: No, I'm atheist.
    8. Re:The cost and use of plastic bags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translation "I want to keep throwing away things, so technology: make this possible".

      Look: even supposing there was a biodegradable alternative with a carbon-neutral source (say PLA from corn): the bag itself may be biodegradable, but what about the manufacturing & transport? The thing might be CO_2 neutral on paper, but what about the fertilizers and pesticides needed in support of such a corn monoculture we'd need to keep up our "throw-away" way of life?

      Making the end user feel the value of something (perhaps through a few cents) is IMO the best option.

      Heck -- when I go to the store these days and bring along the plasic bag where yesterday's bread was in (and which is still in an excellent shape may be for ten uses more, at least) they stare at me as if I was something strange, and I've to make clear that yes, I want my loaf into that.

      But nooo -- every little change is met with fears of "going back to stone age". Sheesh.

    9. Re:The cost and use of plastic bags by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      So, it's exactly as convenient as actually owning a roll of bags. What would the problem be if you suddenly had to switch over to ready-made bags? Do you actually use up all the bags you bring in?

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    10. Re:The cost and use of plastic bags by Freultwah · · Score: 1

      That pretty much depends on the size of your trash can, ha. Yours seems minuscule. And how large a percentage of said trash is packaging? You know, other plastic bags, plastic boxes, the plastic that they use to laminate the supermarket presliced ham etc? I began sorting it some years ago and I realised that about nine tenths of my trash was plastic packaging. Bags made of cloth for me from that point on.

    11. Re:The cost and use of plastic bags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      price about the same here, and all trash gets burned and used for central heating so when the plastic bags are used for trash they work just as well as the oil they are made from

    12. Re:The cost and use of plastic bags by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      So if I did go cloth or, heaven forbid, paper, I'd still have to buy plastic bags to put in my trash cans.

      You use less trashbags than you get grocery bags (think about it... empty packaging takes less space then full. And stuff that goes into the glass or cardboard container doesn't take any space at all in your normal trash).

      So, you can still use recycled bags. Just don't use them every time, but only, say, 3 times out of 4. And if you're of the forgetful kind, the ratio works itself out all by itself :-)

    13. Re:The cost and use of plastic bags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny story, don't know if it's true:

      There was a place in Ireland that banned film grocery bags. The local supplier of polyethylene resin saw the demand for product go up. People had been re-using the grocery bags for trash, dog shit and so-on. Instead of the exquisitely thin grocery bags, they were now using more robust purpose-made bags for waste.

    14. Re:The cost and use of plastic bags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finnish grocery plastic bags are really hard-core compared to American grocery plastic bags.

      Finnish plastic bags are sturdy enough for carrying heavy loads (~ 10 kg, easily) and are relatively to comfortable to carry. They can be, and are regularly, reused for numerous purposes including recurring visits to the grocery store.

      In contrast, the American bags are film-thin; you need two plastic bags to carry a single gallon of milk. The handles drill into your finger joints with considerable pain. When you get home, you don't think twice before chucking the plastic bags in a trash bin.

    15. Re:The cost and use of plastic bags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't use less bags when you're dealing with disposable diapers or pet waste.

    16. Re:The cost and use of plastic bags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so why isnt someone attaching handles to these bin liners? Cheaper, same size...

      I use my grocery bags for trash also, as I dont like having large trash cans holding large amounts of trash.

      The rest of the world uses special receptacles that have specially designed bags (with handles and everything!) that are used to hold trash. We call them "trash cans".

      You're the stubborn shit who refuses to own one, and now have the gall to question why we haven't designed something around your problem?

      And we wonder why we have a narcissism epidemic.

      Tell you what, let me reach out to Apple. I'm certain that if they make you a special little iBag, you'll buy it. At four times the cost.

    17. Re:The cost and use of plastic bags by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 1

      I try to minimize the number of bags I get from the stores, even though they are still free here. But I too still need some of them for trash, otherwise I would also have to buy them.

      I would probably be fine with that if the bags I bought for that purpose were specially designed to break down quickly. When we have spring flooding here we use sandbags that break down in a year or two. They can hold a lot of weight, but build a dike with them and after a few years it's mostly only sand left.

      I recycle what I can, and use a garburetor for food scraps (my yard is small so I have no use for composting), but there is still some trash that needs to go in the kitchen trash can, and that needs some sort of bag that is durable for the short term, and disposable.

    18. Re:The cost and use of plastic bags by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      My parents have dogs; dad uses old plastic bags for pick-up duty. It's rare that they can't use more plastic bags...

      I'd also like to see the smallest bags go away, especially when I'm buying only 1 thing. They can't hold more than I can stick in my pockets anyways, and I'd rather have one big one than 3 small ones. At least I can use the big one in my bathroom trash can.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    19. Re:The cost and use of plastic bags by fgouget · · Score: 1

      I could get a proper cloth grocery bag to reuse, or buy paper bags instead, but I choose not to. Why? I use those plastic bags for my trash!

      [...] I'm going to keep buying those plastic bags until I come up with a better way to get rid of my trash.

      Use the plastic bags you buy your fresh vegetables / fruits in instead. They work just fine if you're set up right.

  5. Good riddance by Sockatume · · Score: 1

    I started using re-usable bags and a backpack when I started having to hike to the nearest supermarket. You can fit more in them, you don't even notice the backpack, and the handles don't turn into cheese wire after thirty seconds with a moderate load. Mine even have a folding fibreboard base so you can fill them more easily. Once you get past the initial investment - and small policy nudges should take care of that - the convenience makes the switch worthwhile all on its own.

    Car owners: do you use plastic crates? Safeway here used to offer them when it had a scan-as-you-go self-service system and I'm surprised they didn't take off more generally.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    1. Re:Good riddance by thatkid_2002 · · Score: 1

      I'd like a crate system! You could probably even return them at the door as you walk in. The problem with re-usable cloth bags is that you have the carry the bastards around while you shop, and I find that annoying.

    2. Re:Good riddance by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      If I'm remembering rightly, they even had special trolleys that the crates fitted right into. Everything went straight into the crate as you shopped-and-scanned. You bought the crate outright, so it was yours, you just took it out to the car with the shopping in there and walked it right into the house. I still see them now and then when someone on my street is moving.

      Of course the self-scanning thing is kind of the trick here.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    3. Re:Good riddance by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      No you don't have to hold them. I use bike bags to do my shopping and I can simply throw them in my shopping cart. About once a year I get asked if they can look into the bags because of anti-shoplifting measures but for the rest they are just conveniently out of the way during shopping and at the right height to pack my shopping in after paying.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    4. Re:Good riddance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The main thing I know about the Safeway Green Boxes is that they break easily. I've still got a couple around with random junk in them, but you can't lift them any more. They were also too big to fit more than one into a typical hatchback boot easily (which might explain how they kept getting broken).

      Reusable bags are easier to carry, more versatile, and don't take up as much space when they're empty.

    5. Re:Good riddance by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      The problem with re-usable cloth bags is that you have the carry the bastards around while you shop, and I find that annoying.

      Folded up at the bottom of your cart? Hardly noticable...

    6. Re:Good riddance by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      If I'm remembering rightly, they even had special trolleys that the crates fitted right into. Everything went straight into the crate as you shopped-and-scanned. You bought the crate outright, so it was yours, you just took it out to the car with the shopping in there and walked it right into the house. I still see them now and then when someone on my street is moving.

      Of course the self-scanning thing is kind of the trick here.

      Ok, that is downright brilliant. The big box megastores in the US give the discarded packaging boxes, but you invariably need to repack your groceries after you buy them into your car. This would make the entire checkout experience more efficient if they combined it with hand-held scanners instead of conveyor belts.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  6. Easy to ACTUALLY solve by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Waste is a massive problem. And it has a trivial solution. Mandate that all packaging be recyclable, and marked for recycling. If it's not marked for recycling, prohibit sale and require the packages to be destroyed or returned to the country of origin. Anything not recyclable must be compostable and clearly marked as such. Finally, all plastic bags must be rapidly UV-degrading and compostable, full stop. That outright solves the problem of plastic bag forests. You don't need to charge a premium, which does absolutely nothing to mitigate the problem of the bags which ARE thrown away, and only an idiot would believe that the majority of the population will take good care of plastic sacks because they cost them 5p a piece. Requiring a more expensive bag will have the effect of making the bags more expensive anyway; some retailers will roll the cost into the cost of their products, and some of them will charge the customer. Either way, the free market is completely capable of solving this problem with the proper guidance, which is NOT a fee.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Easy to ACTUALLY solve by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't the greater cost of the biodegradable bags also be passed onto the consumers in the form of higher prices? Anyway, the idea isn't that people would "take good care" of sacks they would otherwise throw out; the idea is that people would stop taking them in the first place.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:Easy to ACTUALLY solve by Jamlad · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You don't need to charge a premium, which does absolutely nothing to mitigate the problem of the bags which ARE thrown away, and only an idiot would believe that the majority of the population will take good care of plastic sacks because they cost them 5p a piece.

      That's just it. It does work, and it did work, in Ireland. I remember when the fee came into place and the number of plastic bag littler noticeably dropped, because it wasn't the big supermarkets that was causing all the waste. It was the local corner shop, where people would go to pickup a pint of milk, or the paper and some smokes and forget to bring a bag with them. All of sudden having to pay 15%-25% extra on top of your pint of milk (I forget how much it was relatively) and most people just carried it home in their hand.

    3. Re:Easy to ACTUALLY solve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Siad the man who has never visited another country. There is no "recycling" program in many of the other countries becuase there is no trash collection program in some of these same countries. Yet they face the same issue with plastic bag pollution that other developed countries have.

    4. Re:Easy to ACTUALLY solve by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      In industries with low competition yes. That hardly describes supermarkets.

    5. Re:Easy to ACTUALLY solve by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      My point is that whatever passing-on-the-cost objection applies (or does not apply) to a bag surcharge also applies (or not) to his solution.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    6. Re:Easy to ACTUALLY solve by comrade+smith · · Score: 2

      Having biodegradable plastic bags is a great option. I believe there are corn based materials that fit this requirement. Making more packaging biodegradable (particularly for non-food stuffs, like toys or tools) is also a good idea. But simply reducing packaging and plastic bag use is an even better option. Charging an amount per bag encourages people to reuse stronger bags. And they will if they are hit with a surcharge every time they shop. Some jurisdictions have even banned the distribution (by shops) of thin plastic bags altogether. You have to either carry your stuff by hand, or bring (or buy) a reusable bag.

    7. Re:Easy to ACTUALLY solve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The plastic bags are already marked for recycling, and already compulsorily UV-degradable in several EU countries. That's not solving anything. However paying does solve the problem. At my place some supermarket started selling bags for 2p and even though the price is negligible, it's enough to significantly lower the number of bags actually used. If I could choose, I'd prefer pay the 2p as a tax instead of them going to the pocket of some millionaire owning the supermarket.

    8. Re:Easy to ACTUALLY solve by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      I don't have mod points, but I found this interesting. Here in Spain they charge for bags in the chain supermarkets, but in the "Chinese shops" (budget independent supermarkets mainly run by Chinese immigrants) and take-away shops they give you bags for free. A cheap bag in the chain supermarkets is only 2c, and the impression I get is that most people just pay it, although they do also sell reusable bags for 1€.

    9. Re:Easy to ACTUALLY solve by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't the greater cost of the biodegradable bags also be passed onto the consumers in the form of higher prices?

      As I stated, some retailers would charge for the bags, and some would roll the costs into their prices. Who cares? Either way, you solve the bag problem.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Easy to ACTUALLY solve by aBaldrich · · Score: 1

      In my country bio-degradable bags are mandatory. We have to pay an insignificant amount of money for each bag (equivalent to 0.025 USD - yes: two and a half cents) and it solves the problem completely because we still use them to carry goods from the supermarket and to dispose the trash, but after a year or two the bags degrade and are gone forever.

      --
      In soviet russia the government regulates the companies.
    11. Re:Easy to ACTUALLY solve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why focus only on plastic bags? They are only a small part of the packaging waste problem. Not only the plastic bags should be regulated but also the trays, blisters, flow packs, tetra bricks, plastic boxes,...

    12. Re:Easy to ACTUALLY solve by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Siad the man who has never visited another country.

      I admit that so far I have only visited Mexico, Panama, and Costa Rica, but that is hardly never visiting another country.

      There is no "recycling" program in many of the other countries becuase there is no trash collection program in some of these same countries.

      Any recyclables with actual value are recycled avidly even in places without garbage collection. Corrugated recycles worldwide! Forcing all the materials to be stamped with their number gives them value in nations which only recycle stamped materials. Further, you simply ignored the significant portion of my comment in which I discuss the need for compostable plastic bags. I can see why you're too scared to log in, someone might know who the idiot is.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:Easy to ACTUALLY solve by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      most people just carried it home in their hand.

      Probably resulting in millions of items being dropped and having to be bought twice.

    14. Re:Easy to ACTUALLY solve by StripedCow · · Score: 1

      The REAL challenge is not to come up with a practical solution. That part is easy.

      The difficulty starts when communicating it to a parliament that lacks common sense, is steered by lobbying groups, and is subject to dynamics of political self-interest and plain stupidity.

      Solve THAT, and I'm all ears.

      --
      If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
    15. Re:Easy to ACTUALLY solve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My point is that whatever passing-on-the-cost objection applies (or does not apply) to a bag surcharge also applies (or not) to his solution.

      People prefer solutions which declare a list of requirements that make things more expensive versus a flat tax.

      The flat tax has a more predictable cost, but gubbermint is bad m'kay; they're taking your money m'kay.

    16. Re:Easy to ACTUALLY solve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The actual cost isn't even that important. It just has to be more than nothing, and it has to be specifically for the bags, not rolled into the cost of groceries. If you don't specifically charge for the bags, then people who do reuse their bags end up subsidising those who don't.

    17. Re:Easy to ACTUALLY solve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in Europe, I can't remember the last time I have seen such a plastic bag being not recyclable. More and more of them are also becoming biodegradable.

      The problem is, the bags float around with the wind and in effect travel anywhere. IMHO, there should be large prints on them "reuse as a trash bag", so that the bags are balasted with the trash and thus will properly degrade in a dump.

    18. Re:Easy to ACTUALLY solve by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      I live in Montgomery County, Maryland. We now have a 5 cent tax on bags. I had been a critic of this law... Until I saw it put into effect.

      Very simply: Since the bags are taxed, the tax (like sales tax) must be paid by the customer. It cannot be absorbed by the retailer. While I agree about rapidly degrading bags, compostable bags, etc, the problem arises when not everybody plays by the rules.

      Since the law was put into effect, the amount of waste bags has dropped dramatically. I work in another county, and the difference is significant. For example, if I stop by a 7-11 in Howard county to buy a Coke Zero, they immediately put it in a bag, whether I want one or not. In MoCo, I have to get like 5 things before I even think of a bag... And then the 5 cent tax really doesn't bother me. Milk, which already has a handle, is unbagged in MoCo, and DOUBLE bagged in HoCo.

      The number of random bags sitting by the side of the road, or floating in the breeze, is visibly different between these counties. Even if we do go to bio-friendly everything, I'd still be OK with the tiny tax that helps reduce this waste.

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    19. Re:Easy to ACTUALLY solve by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Plastic bags ARE recycleable.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    20. Re:Easy to ACTUALLY solve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mandate that all packaging be recyclable, and marked for recycling.

      That's great. Except where I live, there's nowhere to take recyclable materials. There's exactly one recycling center, and I can't use it because it's run by a local municipality and I'm not a resident. Nobody else wants to recycle stuff because it costs too much. It's far cheaper to just dump it into a landfill and make new disposable crap.

      The only exception is metal recycling. Scrapyards are more than happy to give you $3 for a trash bag full of crushed aluminum cans. That's a gallon of gas, right there. Of course, nobody wants a scrapyard in their neighborhood, so you have to burn that gallon of gas to drive to a scrapyard.

      Stupid. Just wasteful and stupid. I hate greedy, wasteful people. I want them to die in a fire. Possibly a trash fire.

    21. Re:Easy to ACTUALLY solve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although you may be surprised, in Europe most of the people learns to hold items without dropping them at strikingly young ages. I've seen even three year olds carrying things in their tiny hands without much problems. True story.

    22. Re:Easy to ACTUALLY solve by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I kind of don't see that the average consumer is going to get cheesed off about 5 cents a bag unless they're using 50+ bags a month (maybe people do, but I don't). Now, if each bag was a dollar...

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    23. Re:Easy to ACTUALLY solve by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      Or better yet, just put it in landfills! That would be easier!

    24. Re:Easy to ACTUALLY solve by Endlisnis · · Score: 1

      There is no such thing as a compostable plastic bag. There are bags which are LABELLED as compostable. My city (Ottawa, Canada), has a curbside city compost pickup program, but they do not allow any plastic bags (even ones marked as compostable) into that program. The bags gum up their grinders.

    25. Re:Easy to ACTUALLY solve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah, nonsense. Waste is a tiny problem (we have plenty of space for landfills) and it has a trivial solution (molten salt oxidation). Putting adjectives like "massive" in front of perceived problems instead of numbers is really not helpful. Also not helpful are political pseudo-solutions as opposed to technical fixes.

      If I shop for groceries, everything is wrapped in plastic... let me see: loaf of bread in plastic bag, check. Slices of cheese in plastic, check. Same for sausages, check. Cornflakes come in plastic bag, check. Yoghurt is in a plastic cup. Vegetables come in a plastic bag, etc. You really think regulations for the additional bag I put this stuff in are going to make a difference?

      If this tiny problem needs a solution at all, it's going to be a technical solution. But we can't have that in the EU, because a technical solution makes the problem go away and thereby removes the need for unelected officials whose job it is to regulate the problem and whose joy it is to impose their worldview on others.

    26. Re:Easy to ACTUALLY solve by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Since the bags are taxed, the tax (like sales tax) must be paid by the customer. It cannot be absorbed by the retailer.

      Nah. They could put cups of nickels at the register... They have the option, if the customers feel strongly about it.

      For example, if I stop by a 7-11 in Howard county to buy a Coke Zero, they immediately put it in a bag, whether I want one or not. In MoCo, I have to get like 5 things before I even think of a bag...

      Yeah, but that will happen no matter who pays for the bag.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    27. Re:Easy to ACTUALLY solve by Incadenza · · Score: 1

      And it even has been solved already, in Rwanda.

    28. Re:Easy to ACTUALLY solve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're probably thinking of PLA. That fits the bill perfectly. Compostable, strong, flexible.

  7. Relevant text by Sockatume · · Score: 1

    The first half of the following seems to be the important part:

    First, Member States are required to adopt measures to reduce the consumption of plastic carrier bags with a thickness below 50 microns, as these are less frequently reused than thicker ones, and often end up as litter. Second, these measures may include the use of economic instruments, such as charges, national reduction targets, and marketing restrictions (subject to the internal market rules of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU).

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  8. solution not taxation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it just me that's struggling to see how a 'solution' is to charge people more for something they already use? Surely we aren't going to stop using them because we get a charge added on, more likely we'll get more frustrated at the cost of the groceries bought since our total bill is higher because of the bag-tax.

    Isn't there a better solution, different chemicals used in the bag 'technology', alternatives (The USA used paper bags for many years, why is that such a bad solution?)

    1. Re:solution not taxation by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Alternatives are already widely deployed in Europe. By shifting the price of the dominant option, you change people's buying patterns towards those alternatives. Simples economics.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:solution not taxation by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Is it just me that's struggling to see how a 'solution' is to charge people more for something they already use? Surely we aren't going to stop using them because we get a charge added on, more likely we'll get more frustrated at the cost of the groceries bought since our total bill is higher because of the bag-tax.

      The idea is that people will switch to reusable bags and bring them to the supermarket.

      Isn't there a better solution, different chemicals used in the bag 'technology', alternatives (The USA used paper bags for many years, why is that such a bad solution?)

      Paper bags are hard to hold from the top and can't stand getting wet. Try carrying half-a dozen paper bags to the bust stop in the rain and you will see why they don't work so well in Europe.

    3. Re:solution not taxation by TWX · · Score: 1

      By shifting the price of the dominant option, you change people's buying patterns towards those alternatives. Simples[sic] economics.

      Not always. The price of fuel has skyrocketed in recent years, and most people do not commute on a daily basis further than the range of an electric car, but even households with more than one car (where the other can remain petroleum-powered) have not switched over to electric cars for at least one vehicle. Demand remains low enough that most automakers have only begrudgingly developed electric cars as governments have required them, and even then, only distribute them in limited numbers and only to the absolute minimum requirements.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    4. Re:solution not taxation by penix1 · · Score: 1

      That's if they know the higher cost is because of the bag. If the cost is hidden in the total grocery bill, then the blame for that cost will be shifted to the store.

      Look, most people use these bags because they are there, usually free and they are in a hurry. Until the reusable bags are given away as freely you will continue to see plastic bag usage no matter the cost.

      --
      This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
    5. Re:solution not taxation by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      The cost is always attached to the bag, in my experience. Unless there are some nations taxing supermarkets per bag used or something I don't know about.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    6. Re:solution not taxation by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Paper bags are hard to hold from the top and can't stand getting wet. Try carrying half-a dozen paper bags to the bust stop in the rain and you will see why they don't work so well in Europe.

      Paper suffers from that same problem in a lot of places.

      But grocery stores, at least where I'm at, have been selling re-usable bags with handles for years. We've got a bunch of them we've been using for at least 3-4 years. They also charge 5 cents/plastic bag to make people less interested in using them, and I think even offer a small discount per re-usable bag.

      We still occasionally end up with plastic for one reason or another, but we find out re-usable bags hold a LOT more than the store plastic bags, and are far more durable (and machine washable despite being made out of recycled plastic bottles).

      As much as I can, I don't want to get too many plastic bags. They do come in handy for small garbage bags and the like, but on balance, you'll accumulate a lifetime supply in a relatively short period.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    7. Re:solution not taxation by Xiaran · · Score: 1

      What if the shift was on the car itself not the fuel(people can be funny about thinking things through). What if there was a 20% increase applied to traditional cars that was not applied to alternative cars.

    8. Re:solution not taxation by Sockatume · · Score: 2

      That's because electric cars inherently cost a small fortune. (And will do until technology improves.) The barrier to entry is large enough that you'd need a much larger economic incentive before people were willing to switch.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    9. Re:solution not taxation by itsdapead · · Score: 1

      Not always. The price of fuel has skyrocketed in recent years, and most people do not commute on a daily basis further than the range of an electric car, but even households with more than one car (where the other can remain petroleum-powered) have not switched over to electric cars for at least one vehicle

      Well, there are also a few other issues like (a) the problem of how to re-charge overnight if you don't have a garage/driveway (or if the garage/driveway is occupied by your second car) or (b) the sky-high price of EVs that makes it touch-and-go whether you'll ever save any money c.f. a modern, economical gasoline car - especially if you need a loan to raise the purchase price and/or pay a lease for the batteries. Plus, you can always walk, cycle or take the bus (maybe not so much in the US).

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    10. Re:solution not taxation by itsdapead · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Is it just me that's struggling to see how a 'solution' is to charge people more for something they already use?

      At least in the UK, the big supermarkets are already making quite a bit of progress*: they have racks of cheap re-usable bags prominently displayed by the till, sometimes with 'bag for life' free replacement deals, and give extra loyalty card points for customers who bring their own bags.

      Charging for bags isn't going to make any significant financial impact on anybody, but the mere existence of a charge for something that was once free might be just enough to nudge people into changing their habits (remember to stuff the bags back into the car when you've finished unpacking - it's not a big deal). Having the charge mandated by government as a 'tax on bags' helps prevent any one company trying to get an advantage by offering free bags.

      Maybe it will work better in UK/Europe, where displayed prices for consumer goods are always inclusive of tax and 'what you see is what you pay' compared with the US where consumers are used to sales tax and other random 'state surcharge evaluation fee assessment contribution' surcharges materialising at the checkout.

      (* apart from the local Spar which was fairly recently re-fitted with a brilliant checkout design dependent on the plastic bag dispenser that completely fails if the shopper brings their own bag - it does mean they fit 6 checkouts in the space previously occupied by 3, which would be fine and dandy if they ever had more than 3 employees in the shop).

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    11. Re:solution not taxation by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Maybe the reason some of us haven't gotten an electric is because we currently have working vehicles that are owned outright and cost very little to keep going. When my wife's car starts having issues it will get replaced by an electric but that is going to be a while since she puts about 6,000 miles on it a year. She is the perfect case for an electric car like a Leaf since a lot of driving for her in a day is 40 miles and she typically drive about 6. But The money save by giving up a perfectly good vehicle that is basically fully depreciated to get an electric at this point doesn't make sense but in 5 or so year it probably will if her car starts having problems.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    12. Re:solution not taxation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or if the garage/driveway is occupied by your second car

      I think we have a winner for todays first world problem.

    13. Re:solution not taxation by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Initial cost is a large part of the problem. Electric cars are still a lot more expensive than IC cars.

      Also, even people who mostly commute do like the option of occasional longer trips. Especially in the US, where the car is as much a symbol of personal freedom and independence as it is a practical means of transportation.

    14. Re:solution not taxation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paper bags are hard to hold from the top and can't stand getting wet. Try carrying half-a dozen paper bags to the bust stop in the rain and you will see why they don't work so well in Europe.

      Paper bags where you live appear to be different from paper bags where I live.
      Where I live paper bags have handles and are pretty sturdy, they can carry much heavier loads than the plastic bags. A little water on them doesn't matter much as long as they don't get soaked. Unless you intend to walk 5km through rain a paper bag works just fine.
      I wouldn't try to carry half-a dozen fully loaded paper bags. I can lift at most four. If they contain drinkable things like beer I'd rather not carry more than two.

    15. Re:solution not taxation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as the price of the electric cars is as high as it now, I do not see the switch. It is still cheaper to buy a small car and pay for gasoline if your daily commute is short.

    16. Re:solution not taxation by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Electric cars cost considerably more than traditional vehicles, such that the extra cost of the vehicle outweighs the savings made from running it. Electric cars would be good for people who do high mileage, only they don't have sufficient range for that.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    17. Re:solution not taxation by itsdapead · · Score: 1

      I think we have a winner for todays first world problem.

      A first-world solution like an electric car needs a first-world problem.

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  9. The Graduate is the reason by middlemen · · Score: 1

    Mr. McGuire: I just want to say one word to you. Just one word.

    Benjamin: Yes, sir.

    Mr. McGuire: Are you listening?

    Benjamin: Yes, I am.

    Mr. McGuire: Plastics.

    Benjamin: Exactly how do you mean?

  10. petrolium products obsoletely fatal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    packaging more expensive than contents sucks us dry?

    hang on to our hemispheres as the genuine native spirit of momkind rekindles our ability to think about each other as part of the same deal

  11. Obligatory music track by Inf0phreak · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This discussion needs a soundtrack and we're so lucky that the perfect one already exists. I'm of course talking about one of the most "what do you mean it's not awesome?" pieces of music ever made, Canvas Bags by Tim Minchin.

    --
    ________
    Entranced by anime since late summer 2001 and loving it ^_^
    1. Re:Obligatory music track by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An I thought you were going to suggest Ökotut by Benny & The Bugs.

  12. Taking exception to a statement in the summary by TWX · · Score: 2

    From the summary, "Plastic bags usually take several hundred years until they decay..."

    This is technically incorrect. Plastic bags have not existed for even fifty years, let alone a hundred or several hundred. Based on the best research and scientific modeling, materials scientists expect that plastic bags will remain for hundreds of years before they degrade, but that is an educated conjecture, not an observed fact.

    Even tests done in ways to simulate time are by definition, simulations. They may well be accurate, but there have been times where scientific conjectures were later discovered to be either incorrect or else in need of modification to correct inaccuracies. This isn't to downplay the problems with the bags, but excessive assumptions only lead to someone else being able to counter one's arguments.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:Taking exception to a statement in the summary by Sockatume · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The decay rate of polyethylene is on sturdier ground than the decay rate of modern concretes and steels, so I don't think there's much cause for pathological scepticism. Unless you're unduly concerned that your roof is about to fall in on your head.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:Taking exception to a statement in the summary by TWX · · Score: 1

      Given where my career and interests have taken me, I'm regularly in engineering spaces in buildings to see and interact with the concrete and steel and wood of buildings. I have a good feel for how building materials up to a hundred years old behaves.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    3. Re:Taking exception to a statement in the summary by Sockatume · · Score: 2

      If we're going to play that game, I'm a materials chemist. Trust me, you can expect more surprises from concretes and steels - amazingly clever mixtures - over fifty years than you can from a simple polyethylene film over a hundred.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    4. Re:Taking exception to a statement in the summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My wife is a research scientist specializing in additive packages for polyethylene. Raw polyethylene, particularly as film, degrades at a startling rate. Anti-oxidants and UV protectors are required to give the stuff a useful lifetime. When the additive package "runs out", the film disintegrates. "Remain for hundreds of years" is the purest of bullshit. The only place where that might be true is in a landfill, where that is *a desired property*. A landfill is *not* a compost heap, and the people who design them don't *want* the contents to degrade. Studies of landfill stability date the strata from newspaper headlines - paper from 50 years ago is expected to be easily readable.

      Don't get me started on what's greenest - polyethylene, cloth or paper. People get their hate on because poly is a petrochemical, but they never bother to look at the big picture.

    5. Re:Taking exception to a statement in the summary by c0lo · · Score: 1

      From the summary, "Plastic bags usually take several hundred years until they decay..." This is technically incorrect.

      Let me try:
      Tellurium-128 has a half life of 2.2(3)e+24 years.
      Tellurium 128 has not existed for 2e+10 years, let alone 1e+24 or a couple of 1e+24 years. Based on the best research and scientific modeling, nuclear scientists expect that any certain amount of Tellurium-128 will be halved after 2.2(3)e+24 years, but that is an educated conjecture, not an observed fact. etc

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    6. Re:Taking exception to a statement in the summary by Sockatume · · Score: 2

      The only place where that might be true is in a landfill, where that is *a desired property*. A landfill is *not* a compost heap, and the people who design them don't *want* the contents to degrade.

      Stability is desirable, but the addition of waste is not, especially for whoever is paying for the landfill. Anything that reduces waste volume is a plus, and enhanced biodegradability in non-landfill polyethylene is a definite perk.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    7. Re:Taking exception to a statement in the summary by c0lo · · Score: 1

      ...Studies of landfill stability date the strata from newspaper headlines - paper from 50 years ago is expected to be easily readable.

      Don't get me started on what's greenest - polyethylene, cloth or paper. People get their hate on because poly is a petrochemical, but they never bother to look at the big picture.

      Big picture? Like what? A page 3 from a 1973 issue of the Sun that stayed since then in a landfill?
      Thanks, but no thanks: I can't be bothered indeed.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    8. Re:Taking exception to a statement in the summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was selling my car recently I found an almost fully decayed plastic bag in the glove compartment. I couldn't even identify which supermarket it had come from as it had turned into a white powder. The car was old, but it wasn't several hundred years old. (I'm glad I was never stopped by the police and asked to explain what the white powder in my glove compartment was.)

      My wife has recently discovered how to crochet old plastic bags into baskets. However, I wouldn't recommend doing it with those biodegradable supermarket carrier bags as the basket wouldn't even outlive a car.

    9. Re:Taking exception to a statement in the summary by simplypeachy · · Score: 1

      IIRC, the research which found plastic bags will last for "hundreds of years" was in fact looking at plastic bottles. A completely different kettle/plastic container of fish. The times I've gone into a shed, picked up a plastic bag with things in it, and had it disintegrate in my hand tells me that "hundreds of years" is a massive overstatement.

      Despite this: death to such disposable bags!

    10. Re:Taking exception to a statement in the summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, but each plastic bag is only a few mL in volume. If you want to attack the addition of waste, then there are a hundred things you should mandate first, like durable shoes, non-breakable plates, recyclable packaging...

    11. Re:Taking exception to a statement in the summary by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      When exposed to sunlight, plastics deteriorate rapidly. Look at how plastic parts on cars hold up even after only 20 or 30 years. And those are designed to last, unlike bags, which are designed to get our groceries about halfway to your car. I think they should do some testing in a controlled environment. I would bet that left in the sun, a plastic bag would completely decompose within about two years.
      Of course, in order to perform this experiment properly, they first need to subject the bag to touching groceries. Touching groceries nearly instantly causes a bag to lose all cohesion and begin the process of decomposition.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    12. Re:Taking exception to a statement in the summary by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      Ok, so we can't really know how long they'll actually last.

      But that doesn't mean that they'll decay faster than the current estimates.

      They could just as well last much, much longer. Such as a thousand years...

    13. Re:Taking exception to a statement in the summary by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      and the people who design them don't *want* the contents to degrade.

      Why? Wouldn't that cause the landfill to uuhh... fill up, and become unusable? (and unusable for everything else too, because who wants to build on top of trash?)

    14. Re:Taking exception to a statement in the summary by BradMajors · · Score: 1

      * plastic bags are recyclable
      * paper bags are not recyclable
      * a paper bag at the bottom of a garbage pile will not biodegrade.

    15. Re:Taking exception to a statement in the summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Addition of waste to the landfill: Like many people, you have no idea of how parsimonious film is. It adds no measurable volume to the landfill.

      As for making polyethylene rapidly biodegradable, you thereby change a recyclable waste stream into a non-recyclable waste stream.That's not a perk, that's waste.

    16. Re:Taking exception to a statement in the summary by Curmudgeonlyoldbloke · · Score: 1

      IIRC, the research which found plastic bags will last for "hundreds of years" was in fact looking at plastic bottles.

      That's my recollection too, in my case gained from here (about 10 minutes in):

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b03b2zbk

      (That plays in the UK, but I've no idea if it'll work in whatever corner of the planet you're in)

      Specifically it's referring to Polyethylene Terepthalate (are you old enough to remember Terylene? If so, that's the stuff. If not, good for you).

    17. Re:Taking exception to a statement in the summary by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      When I was in university there was a mysterious forest of iron taking up part of the site. A field of concrete blocks, with rebar poking out the top. A strange sculpture perhaps, or the remnants of some abandoned construction left to rust.

      Towards the end of my time there I did learn the purpose: It was part of a study on concrete aging. Every couple of months someone would visit to forklift a few blocks off for testing to destruction.

    18. Re:Taking exception to a statement in the summary by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Building on top of landfills isn't uncommon, really. They don't provide a stable enough foundation for high-rise buildings, but are often covered over and converted to parkland.

    19. Re:Taking exception to a statement in the summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the summary, "Plastic bags usually take several hundred years until they decay..."

      This is technically incorrect. Plastic bags have not existed for even fifty years, let alone a hundred or several hundred. Based on the best research and scientific modeling, materials scientists expect that plastic bags will remain for hundreds of years before they degrade, but that is an educated conjecture, not an observed fact.

      I suppose Carbon-14 dating and general laws of physics should flow through your bible first to be vetted? Just curious where this pointless stance comes from as you attempt to discredit every scientist who has ever studied plastic who has not personally observed a chemical breakdown over several centuries.

    20. Re:Taking exception to a statement in the summary by simplypeachy · · Score: 1

      Bingo! I do enjoy More Or Less. I just wish there was More of it.

  13. Signal purpose by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

    In some countries, vendors "mark" clients with the bags. If you are a tough negotiator for the lowest price, you get a different colour plastic bag than if you are a western tourist who pays the first sum asked.

    --
    Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    1. Re:Signal purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And are any of those countries in the EU?

    2. Re:Signal purpose by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

      Not that I am aware of. A friend of mine experienced it in an Asian country, but I forgot which one.

      --
      Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
  14. Biodegradable is not enough by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 5, Informative

    You are right to say compostable. Merely biodegradable usually means that there are a lot of harmful chemicals after the degrading process.

    --
    Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    1. Re:Biodegradable is not enough by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You are right to say compostable. Merely biodegradable usually means that there are a lot of harmful chemicals after the degrading process.

      I'm totally hip to this. You can even get packaging like this that will protect the contents from UV. Dunno the name but it's a compostable plastic bag that has an Aluminum layer a single angstrom thick... I hate to throw available Al around, but it's not much

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Biodegradable is not enough by fatphil · · Score: 1

      The problem with the compostable ones is that they aren't so good if you try to use them as a kitchen bin liner. I produce so little waste that once or twice the under-sink bin liner has started to decompose before I realise it's filling up.

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    3. Re:Biodegradable is not enough by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      The problem with the compostable ones is that they aren't so good if you try to use them as a kitchen bin liner. I produce so little waste that once or twice the under-sink bin liner has started to decompose before I realise it's filling up.

      And this is the grocery stores' problem how?

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    4. Re:Biodegradable is not enough by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Aluminum is the 3rd most abundant element on the planet, and they probably make those bags out of recycled Al anyhow. At that thickness, a single soda can could probably make thousands of bags. I wouldn't worry much about tossing them in the trash.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    5. Re:Biodegradable is not enough by fatphil · · Score: 1

      And this being the grocery stores' problem is an even vaguely accurate representation of what I wrote how?

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    6. Re:Biodegradable is not enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Al is also eminently recyclable and whenever we get around to mining our landfills, should be fairly easy to pull out.

  15. 3D Printers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting... what about the bigger picture and the revolution which is about to take place with plastic 3d printers?!

    Plastic bag use will be neglible compared to the use of 3d printers, especially if they gain traction and become part of every home, like paper printers.

    One of the worst problems of plastic isn't that animals choke, rather, it changes their sexual nature and in marine life, turns them into hermaphrodites... perhaps that's why there's an explosion in the homosexual disease in humans (i.e. since plastic leach hormone-like chemicals)?

  16. There goes my citizenship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always take my own bag (canvas-and-plastic, designed for carrying vinyl discs) and keep the giveaways I end up with anyway for re-use. Even if just as a garbage bag. The collection doesn't even change much in size. What do I get? A cookie? No. More rules. Why, thank you EU.

  17. But what about my trash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use these bags for my trash. I never hear what they say about trash bags. Am I to buy plastic bags to use for my trash? Not only does that seems silly to me, but it's not going to be any better for the environment.

    1. Re:But what about my trash by hierofalcon · · Score: 1

      Its all a conspiracy / major government lobbying effort by the plastic garbage trash can liner people and the cloth bag manufacturers to increase their sales.

      I personally hate most of the plastic liner bags my wife buys. They tend to rip much more easily than the plastic shopping bags and they frequently don't have the handy handles to tie them up with. I try to reuse the plastic bags from grocery shopping whenever I can. Anytime you can do double duty with one product its a win in my book.

    2. Re:But what about my trash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're talking about the EU here. Only our Glorious Leaders should have the privilege of sanitation and proper light bulbs. Get back in line, slave.

    3. Re:But what about my trash by slim · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't know about you, but I hardly need bags for general waste any more.

      All food waste either goes into my own compost, or into the green wheelie bin for composting by the council -- my council now accepts meat and cooked leftovers.

      Paper, cardboard, metal, glass and plastic packaging goes in a recycling box for kerbside collection.

      That leaves a very small amount of other waste, to go in the grey wheelie bin. It's seldom a quarter-full when the fortnightly collection day comes. There's just no need for bags, because it's all dry.

      If you feel you need trash bags, you should pay for them. You can either pay for carrier bags, which you then re-use as trash bags, or (cheaper) buy a roll of actual trash bags.

    4. Re:But what about my trash by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      The number of shopping bags used as bin liners is vastly smaller than the shopping bags that end up as rubbish. Hence the additional number of bin liners purchased is a small fraction of the reduction in shopping bags when bans/taxes/fees are brought in. (At least according to people who track such things, when such a ban was introduced here in my part of Australia.)

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    5. Re:But what about my trash by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      I personally hate most of the plastic liner bags my wife buys.

      Make it your responsibility to buy the bin liners. Typical rolls last a long time, so buying three/four at a time should be only an occasional chore. This replaces a daily or twice daily eye-rolling annoyance with a once-per-quarter-year 5 minute chore one day on your way to/from work.

      [Your wife must be buying shit brands if they rip more easily than typical thin shopping-bags. Ditto if they don't have handles. Hell, I have to go out of my way to avoid the brands with handles and ties and a stupid draw-string.]

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  18. my cat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    uses these plastic bags twice a day

  19. Australia - IGA Bio Degradable Bags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Australia's IGA supermarkets have free bio degradable bags given at each store. After 3 months they practically turn to dust when exposed to sunlight.

    Charge that little bit extra for bio degradable bags and the problem is solved?

  20. plastic bags in our seas? by amn108 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Five years ago I was on a beach outside Malaga, Spain, about to take a swim in the sea. Diving under water I suddenly saw hundreds of more or less colored plastic bags floating around at different depths, like jellyfish. The sea was apparently full with those, at least along the coastline, to a degree. Some sort of tide bringing these I guess. Needless to say, the swimming experience was not particularly appealing suddenly and was cut short. It was disgusting. I am not really sure how to fix this problem today, but a price tag on each bag and a penalty for disposing of trash in inappropriate locations in general seem like a start to me.

    1. Re:plastic bags in our seas? by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      The government should obviously mandate that all plastic bags have a lead weight glued on so that they'll sink with the rest the junk dumped in the ocean.

    2. Re:plastic bags in our seas? by amn108 · · Score: 1

      Well, wouldn't it be cheaper if they instead had an air pocket inside, so they'd flow up to the surface for "factory recall"? :-) Better for the sea as well, isn't it?

    3. Re:plastic bags in our seas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In Spain there has been a massive reduction in plastic bag usage since all supermarket chains started charging a small amount for plastic bags. I haven't seen official statistics, but from what I see practically everybody uses reusable bags now, wheras a few years ago nobody did.

  21. Customer Service by ledow · · Score: 1

    It's a question of customer service. If you make me pay for a bag, by removing the free alternatives and selling your own, then I'll avoid your store if I can. You know why? Any large supermarket recycles or throws about tons of empty cardboard boxes every month. You could stack them by the door, let me take them conveniently from where I have to pack my purchase into a trolley / basket, and they'd get re-used (much better than recycling). There are some shops that do this (shout-out to Trago Mills). They don't charge for boxes, they do for bags. They have lots of boxes just sitting there. And they have done for years. When I was a kid, supermarkets all did this. Now they don't. The ones that do are the rare exceptions. Probably some crappy health-and-safety or even recycling-backhander in play. Fact is that I'd rather take a used, strong, perfectly-sized cardboard box from a pile than do anything with bags at all. If I go into your shop and buy things, I need to take them out of your shop. If you're going to make me pay to take them out, I'll buy less. Just "to make a statement", nothing to do with the money. And if you're really insistent, I have a very bad memory so never remember to bring my "own" bags (which you expect me to have paid for at some point), so what I'll do is roll the trolley out into the car park, empty it into the car, and take it out at home. No bag for you, more hassle for me. I could buy my own "trolley", like some old British women do, but why would I? I don't want to spend money to help me spend money. All of which means I won't come to your shop for small purchases and other times. Shopping trolleys were invented in order to make sure people could carry enough goods home that they didn't have to worry about what they bought and hence they would buy more. If I have to think about how many bags I have and where they are and whether I have to grab them in the morning to do a shop after work, etc. then I'm not going to go elsewhere. I've done this recently after the last supermarket in the area moved to a "coin deposit" trolley system. I rarely carry cash, and when I have it I won't remember to bring change on my shopping trip. And I probably don't have a pound coin even when I do have a pound in change. So it's just an inconvenience. As far as I'm concerned it's like DRM. You're getting in my way as an honest customer in order to fight against some mythical trolley thieves that you'd be better off just putting a security guard on the exit from the car park to stop. I've been back to that shop once since. I took a basket because I didn't have a pound coin on me and had forgotten about the new system. I bought a handful of things, then my arms got tired, so I paid and put it straight back into the car and drove off. Haven't been back. It has nothing to do with money, ecology or the environment. If you're going to inconvenience me, you're not providing proper customer service. There are ways out that are really simple and tie in very nicely with the way you run your business and dispose of packaging yourself. But you choose to inconvenience me, and force me to pre-plan all shopping trips (which works against you, I spend more when I have no idea what I have in my fridge, have lots of strong bags, etc.). I've got the message. I'll shop elsewhere. Get this: I'd rather go elsewhere if you charge me for bags and provide no alternatives. Even with a car. Even with 100GBP weekly shopping trips. Even with strong arms and no disabilities. Is that worth the pence you save by charging me for bags, recycling your boxes, or not having a trolley wander off? P.S. After a month of the new system, your trolleys now allow you to remove the pound coin without needing to replace it in the lines of trolleys because the internal mechanisms are so weakened (presumably through sheer wear or forcible removal)... lots of money well spent there on pissing me off.

    1. Re:Customer Service by ledow · · Score: 1

      Damn lameness filter decided there was something it didn't like. Edited ten times to get rid of symbols and abbreviations, still flipped out.

      So I changed it from Plain Old Text to HTML and that's the result up there, stripped of all my nice line returns...

      Again, good customer service... the lameness filter is easily bypassed and in doing so makes my post look like shit.

    2. Re:Customer Service by slim · · Score: 1

      It's a question of customer service. If you make me pay for a bag, by removing the free alternatives and selling your own, then I'll avoid your store if I can.

      Not if it's a legal mandate, so every other shop is charging the same for bags.

      Take a bag with you to the shop. It's not difficult.

    3. Re:Customer Service by damnbunni · · Score: 1

      The point of coin-lock cart systems isn't to stop thieves. If someone's going to steal them, the carts are worth far more than the coin used.

      The point of that system is to get people to BRING THE DAMNED CARTS BACK.

      Instead of leaving them all over the parking lot so you have to pay someone to go out there several times a day and round them up and bring them back for others to use.

      This is exactly why ALDI does it. It's also part of why ALDI's prices are so much lower than other grocery stores in my area. They're ruthless about cutting costs.

      It's also why ALDI charges for bags: They're not free to the store. If you don't want to bring your own, or take some empty boxes they have lying around, then buy some.

      Their stores are also set up so that the shelves can be stocked with a minimum of labor, with product generally sitting in its shipping carton with a side removed. When the carton is empty, generally a customer takes it to put their shopping in, which both uncovers the next box of product and removes a box from the store, saving the company money on labor to clean it up and also saving on disposal.

      I really wish more stores did things this way. It's not as pretty as Food City or Kroger, but I don't really give a damn about how pretty the shelves look.

    4. Re:Customer Service by Megane · · Score: 1

      1: preview button
      2: it's called HTML mode for a reason, use tags for your paragraphs: <p>

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    5. Re:Customer Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try paragraphs next time? Plus, I'm sure this money was not spent with the intent of 'pissing you off'. That's just you thinking that you are the center of the universe.

    6. Re:Customer Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you please resubmit your message with paragraphs as a reply to your original message? I'm afraid that your possibly insightful message is now going to get ignored as it's simply too painful to read.

    7. Re:Customer Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People drive from Canberra to Qeanbeayan just to avoid paying 15c for the thick plastic bags.

      The law in Canberra, thank you Greens party!, states that all plastic bags be purchased. Lots of places charge 10c for a tiny plastic bag or 15c for a large thick plastic bag.

      The local tip is covered with the thick plastic bags.

      The thick plastic bags generally get overloaded at the checkout, the handles are destroyed on first use, they break easily and are not much better than the thin free plastic bags they replaced.

      All in all it sucks.

      I agree with you, but no longer for the reasons you state. I don't think about plastic bags when I go shopping. I just buy one, maybe two.
      Yes. That's right. The guy who used to need five to 8 plastic bags and could pick up 10 and haul them through the shopping center now buys one or two thick plastic bags.

      I have looked through my credit card history to see how this change has affected my shopping habits. From the looks of receipts over the last seven years and taking into account cpi increase I am spending roughly 1/2 to 3/4 of what I used to. Bearing in mind that my shopping habits have not changed that much in the last 10 years this is quite significant.

      When I think about it I realise now that when I shop these days I automatically avoid heavy items, bulky items unless I really need them like cereal, always carry a basket where I used to always get a trolley, and never buy anything that wouldn't fit into a small space. All of this happens without me knowing.

      It looks like you are correct, to a degree. Perhaps if this happens in your area you will find that you will go back to the local places and pay for the bags, get over it and stop being angry, accept it, and in time realise that they are helping you by curbing your shopping bill.

  22. Stop Right There by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plastic bags usually take several hundred years until they decay

    Stop right there! My experience with thin plastic grocery bags has shown that within 3 to 5 years they are falling apart. Even in relatively good conditions they start degrading quite quickly and become useless. Outside, in the sunshine, I very much doubt that they last more than 10 years.

    If they must regulate, perhaps their rules should not limit use, but rather insist that manufacturers only produce photodegradable bags, which seems to already be the case.

    1. Re:Stop Right There by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      I came in here and searched for "photo" and found your post, because this was my first thought.

      Photodegradable bags are the answer, easy. They're already the norm in many places.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  23. This issue isn't so black and white by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Some do, mostly "low cost" stores

    And if you look at the places that have introduced the charge, such as M&S, many have adopted a "small bag is free, full size bags are charged" policy as well, presumably in response to negative feedback from customers.

    Some other curious data points on this issue, which isn't nearly as black-and-white as it might seem:

    For one thing, it turns out that lots of people do "recycle" those "disposable" plastic bags. When Ireland introduced a tax on plastic bags, bin liner purchases increased by 400%.

    For another thing, while plastic bags are more environmentally unfriendly than paper bags when discarded, they are more efficient to transport in large numbers, and in practice that inefficiency translates rather directly into increased pollution, greater consumption of non-renewable fuel types for vehicles, and so on. The facts about resources used and pollution generated in manufacture aren't entirely one-sided either.

    If the government really wanted to help the environment, they could politely encourage supermarkets to start selling the actually good reusable plastic bags that at least Sainsbury's and Tesco had a few years ago, which were much larger and tougher than the jokes they sell as reusable today (OK, you can reuse them, maybe two or three times before they fall apart). These actually seemed to be quite popular at the time, and we still use some of ours many years later, but the supermarkets that had them all switched to a different and much inferior type after a relatively short time; I don't know why.

    In addition, far more environmental good would be done if the government slapped a significant tax on all packaging materials at the source, so that using excessive or unnecessary packaging carried a direct financial penalty. This step alone would almost certainly cut the volume of environmentally unfriendly waste -- meaning waste that can't be recycled or otherwise dealt with other than sending it to landfill -- more than even making all single-use bags of any type completely illegal.

    So whenever you see a government official of whatever political affiliation making some claim about helping the environmental by taxing the supply of plastic bags, you should immediately ask what their real agenda is. If they're not also advocating more general restrictions on packaging, and they're not also advocating restricting other environmentally unfriendly practices such as supplying one-time paper bags when reusable bags could be used, then they're probably hiding some ulterior motive and/or capitalizing on some political talking point of the day.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    1. Re:This issue isn't so black and white by TheCarp · · Score: 5, Interesting

      > For one thing, it turns out that lots of people do "recycle" those "disposable" plastic bags. When
      > Ireland introduced a tax on plastic bags, bin liner purchases increased by 400%.

      Bingo! I mean I will admit, i throw away the occasional perfectly good bag but, we use them for all sorts of thing. we even have had a bin just for putting plastic bags in so they could be reused later. Who doesn't reuse them?

      Need to carry something that has to be protected from rain? Plastic bag. Need a small trash bag to carry with you while cleaning up? Need a quick "glove" to pick up something nasty? Plastic bags. plastic bag. Or a trash bag...for the car.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    2. Re:This issue isn't so black and white by Calinous · · Score: 1

      I have a promotional plastic bag that's used only for milk products (about once a week). It held very well for the last 6 or 7 years, carrying up to 5 liters of milk and some more assorted things (butter, yoghourt, ...)

    3. Re:This issue isn't so black and white by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Going to be working on something in the yard when it is muddy and wet? A couple of plastic bags and a rubberband or two protects your shoes so that going back into the house becomes a simple 'remove the rubber band and bags and walk right in'.

    4. Re:This issue isn't so black and white by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It had a great affect in Ireland, was brought in 5 or 6 years ago.

      These days when people do their grocery shopping they bring large reusable bags with them. When you pop in for a couple things you just buy a regular plastic bag, so you still tend to have a few at home when you need one.

      It's no big deal but definately means less plastic bags are being used, far less.

    5. Re:This issue isn't so black and white by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We use a bag a week to stuff other [plastic] bags into. Newspaper bag, plastic wrappers, etc,. they all go in and we tie a knot in it night before trash pickup and add it to the recycling bin. Here in DC it's disgusting how many bags litter the forest and along with plastic water and drink bottles wind up floating in the river and then heading straight down to Chesapeake Bay and points east. I mean right across the Potomac River from the stately US Capitol, the waterfront in Alexandria is a floating mess of crap awaiting the next departure tide to the open seas.

    6. Re:This issue isn't so black and white by Optali · · Score: 1

      We have all these things here:

      reusable bags and supermarkets charging for them.

      And all bags are reusable, mind you. Nobody tells you that you have to toss them away when you arrive home. Here we just keep the good ones and when they break we recycle them.

      To transport large amounts of stuff in a car (or bike) nothing beats a cardboard box.

      And as most of us use bikes we can just put our groceries into our big bags, crates and baskets. I can transport a week worth of groceries in my normal city bike... and we have heavy transport bikes here that are used even for pro-transport (heck people carry a few children and a large dog on their bikes, even grannies can).

      I actually agree on your view, I was only pointing at some practical alternatives, but your last paragraph resumes the situation quite nicely. As an proof of that, with all the nice stuff we do here in Flatland we are one of the most highly polluted countries in the world, air quality sucks massive balls and people toss packages of junk food or whatever everywhere, stuff still comes in layers and layers of useless bags, plastic covers and such stuff and our government has repeatedly disregarded policies to force producers to reduce at origin.

      --
      -- 29A the number of the Beast
    7. Re:This issue isn't so black and white by Optali · · Score: 1

      ...we use them for all sorts of thing.

      You aren't going to believe it, but I have seen them used to mix liters of drinks:

      Get a bag, pour the content of a bottle of gin or vodka in it, take a half-emtpy 2L bottle of lemonade or orange soda, pour the soda in the bag, mix, hold it like a pastry bag above the bottle's opening, cut off the corner, wait... ready to rumble!!!!!

      --
      -- 29A the number of the Beast
    8. Re:This issue isn't so black and white by Optali · · Score: 1

      "Affect"?
      Is that Irish slang for "penis" ?

      --
      -- 29A the number of the Beast
  24. Plastic bag weight by abigsmurf · · Score: 2

    200 plastic bags is under a kilo of plastic, compared to the food packaging (especially for micromeals) it's negligable. In terms of carbon footprint, it's impact is tiny and barely any better than re-usable bags.
    Rather than using it to raise funds, how about mandating supermarkets to use biodegradable/compostable materials instead? Better yet, make supermarkets do "litter patrol" like they do in England with McDonalds.

    1. Re:Plastic bag weight by __aarzwb9394 · · Score: 1

      "litter patrol" like they do in England with McDonalds.

      The problem is not that the streets near supermarkets have plastic bags on them.
      The problem is that the millions of plactic bags do not rot when end users throw them away at their home address.

    2. Re:Plastic bag weight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Plastics that are intended to be thrown out should be mandated to be biodegradable. even if they're currently recyclable, we understand that people are too lazy, too stupid, too everything. thats kind of the point of fixing the supply side. leaded toothpaste might be cheap, and some idiots would buy it (plus there would be some lobbying groups claiming that lead in toothpaste is not agreed on as poison by all scientists) and we use a legal framework to stop the sale of things like that. but thats what educated policy is for. provided its based on sound science, policy can be useful.

    3. Re:Plastic bag weight by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      The problem with shopping bags isn't the mass-equivalence, it's the form. Apparently shopping bags are close to the perfect design for killing the maximum numbers of wildlife and for spreading great distances on wind and water. It's why that specific form is fixated on by researchers.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    4. Re:Plastic bag weight by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

      The problem with shopping bags isn't the mass-equivalence, it's the form. Apparently shopping bags are close to the perfect design for killing the maximum numbers of wildlife and for spreading great distances on wind and water. It's why that specific form is fixated on by researchers.

      If that's the real issue, then the problem isn't the bags, the problem is people littering. Though, good luck on preventing that.

    5. Re:Plastic bag weight by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      The bags are light enough to blow out of bins and away from landfill. They are also a form of litter that tends not to stay where it was littered. Again, it's the nature of the material, not just the tonnage.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  25. Recycling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem is not that plastic bags are used, but that (apparently), part of the bags are not recycled properly

    Plastic bags usually take several hundred years until they decay, thereby filling landfills, while animals often mistake the plastic for food and choke to death

    Plastic bags should not end up in a landfill or anywhere where animals could have access to them in the first place. They can and should be recylced. Additionally, landfills are meant for what is left after proper incineration, not for untreated waste.

    These problems will not be solved by taxing consumers.

  26. Didn't some Canadian kid develop bugs for this? by sandytaru · · Score: 1

    I clearly remember a science project where some teenager bred bacteria that could break down plastic bags in about three weeks. It won somebody's science fair project and everything.

    --
    Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    1. Re:Didn't some Canadian kid develop bugs for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I clearly remember a science project where some teenager bred bacteria that could break down plastic bags in about three weeks. It won somebody's science fair project and everything.

      That would have been this guy. Other people have made similar claims, such as here and here. I've no idea why they haven't made it to mainstream processing yet, but it wouldn't be the first time there was a problem scaling something up from a small lab-batch process to an industrial sized continuous one, or a problem finding a way to make it commercially viable either.

    2. Re:Didn't some Canadian kid develop bugs for this? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      >or a problem finding a way to make it commercially viable either.

      That is just it isn't it? Sure we know how to degrade them. Thing is, what do you get from degrading them? Bacterial cells that can degrade more? At what point is that a usable product? It may be safe to dump, but that implies somebody is paying for disposal, it implies they are being collected and separated from other trash so somebody can pay to have it disposed of.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  27. Depends on the tax by sunking2 · · Score: 1

    I'm actually OK with being charged for the bags if the money collected is allocated to a system that actually addresses a direct bag created issue such as upgrading recycling facilities to better handle them so they don't just go into landfills. What I am against in a general sin tax on bags that goes and funds whatever it is the government wants to fund with the money collected.

    1. Re:Depends on the tax by Megane · · Score: 1

      The problem with recycling is that you need a product coming out of the recycling center that someone wants to buy. Metals are no problem, especially aluminum, which requires a lot more energy to get it out of ore. Soda can aluminum is a finely-tuned alloy, making it even better to be recycled into more soda cans. Paper can be shredded and have the color bleached out of it to make more paper. Glass needs to be sorted by color, and you normally can recycle only bottles and jars, not Pyrex or sheet glass. But paper and glass are still barely worth the cost of recycling (due to there being too much of them sent in for recycling) unless you subsidize it.

      Most types of plastics just get shredded and compressed, or even burned. Because you can't just melt off the coloring as slag like you can with metal, you generally can't re-use them for what they were before. Some can get pressed with sawdust to make really nice deck planking, some can be made into that crappy polyester fabric that they make the most common "reusable" shopping bags out of these days, but without the plastic first being sorted by type, you just have a bunch of crap that's easier to burn than to do much of anything useful with it.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plastic_recycling The very fact that there are six general categories, plus a seventh "aww, fuck it" category, is a good hint that it's not trivial.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    2. Re:Depends on the tax by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      How about making the tax a deposit-refund scheme? Return a bunch of qualifying/specially marketed bags to a recycling centre, get money. Every bin-scab and hobo in the region will be scouring land-fills, parks and storm-drains looking for bags. Worked brilliantly for drink containers in my state.

      [Although the same state banned the thin-type shopping bags, rather than piss around with fees.]

      Aside:

      I'm actually OK with being charged for the bags if the money collected is allocated to a system that actually addresses a direct bag created issue such as upgrading recycling facilities

      No. Any additional funding that comes from a specific levy always results in a reduction in funding from general taxation. In effect it's as if the levy just went into general revenue anyway. Single purpose levies rarely result in an actual increase in funding for the target item. (And given the administration cost of the levy is taken from the levy, you sometimes end up with a net reduction in funding.) Either you accept the levy in its own right, or you don't. Never be tricked into accepting a levy your don't agree with to fund something you do. It's a classic politicians' con.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  28. Why bags at all? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

    We should invent e-bags!

    You joke, but we get a weekly delivery of fresh fruit and vegetables from a service that sources most of the produce locally. It all comes in a wooden or plastic crate, and when they deliver each week they take away the now-empty crate from the previous time. Total waste, washing, or other hassle involved on our side: 0.

    Obviously this doesn't work for all produce you buy at the store, but part of the problem in this debate is the assumption that any kind of bag is a good starting point. Bags basically suck as a way of carrying your shopping home. We just haven't figured out how to shift to a better plan quick enough yet, so it can become established before consumers who hate change kill it by taking their business to stores that didn't make the jump and thus penalise those that did.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    1. Re:Why bags at all? by Endlisnis · · Score: 1

      And how much do you pay for this service? I find that most of these types of services are much more expensive than just doing the shopping yourself.

    2. Re:Why bags at all? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      It's local organic produce and home-delivered, so it's not straightforward to do a fair like-for-like comparison with large supermarket prices.

      I don't think that really affects my point, though. There is no reason those supermarkets, with their vast economies of scale and negotiating power, couldn't introduce a scheme where you could "rent a crate" or something. At least one (Sainsbury's) did experiment with a similar idea a few years ago, but again despite apparently being quite popular at our local store, they discontinued it after a fairly short time.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  29. Simple: Just ban them outright. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Austin, TX did it a year ago. Life has gone on; reusable substitutes work fine. You just don't see them littering the ground or lake at all now. I'm traveling now and it is strange to see them in the stores and on the ground again.

  30. huge strides in biodegradables have been made. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mandate the use of short term biodegradable plastics for anything packaging related including shopping bags, bubble wrap, those fucking clamshell things that you need a razor blade to get into. anyone is any decision making position that skirts the law gets cunt punted by 100 random people in public. problem solved. costs may go up, but so will entertainment until people get the picture.

  31. Biodegradeable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ???? WTF ???? The bags here in the UK have been biodegradeable for YEARS. Try it, spray a bag with a little oil and leave it in the sun, give it a month and it will disintegrate. So I say again WTF ???

    1. Re:Biodegradeable by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      Tesco bags don't even need to be left in the sun. Use one to hold a few things together, put it in your loft for storage, and when you try to take it down it will have broken down into 5 to 8 millimetre fragments which seem to carry an electric charge, judging by the way they stick to things.

  32. 40 p, not 5 ! by spectrokid · · Score: 1

    Here in Denmark bags cost 40 p (3.5 DKK, 0.5 €). I can assure you you start thinking twice before throwing 3 on the belt!

    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

  33. Properly or improperly? by sensei+moreh · · Score: 1

    Some Southeast Asian countries don't even have the proper infrastructure in place to dispose of the bags properly.

    Do they have the proper infrastructure in place to dispose of the bags improperly?

    --
    Geology - it's not rocket science; it's rock science
    1. Re:Properly or improperly? by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Do they have the proper infrastructure in place to dispose of the bags improperly?

      Yes, I believe they have matches in Southeast Asian countries.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    2. Re:Properly or improperly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do they have the proper infrastructure in place to dispose of the bags improperly?

      If you throw it on the street, you have disposed it, but improperly.

  34. Myth....busted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Plastic bags usually take several hundred years until they decay"

    Hmmm really? http://mybiotechblog.wordpress.com/2008/06/27/bacteria-that-breaks-down-plastic-bags/

    Rather uninterestingly normal bacteria seem to degrade them in favorable conditions. They may last hundreds of years on your counter top, but I doubt they last so long in a landfill with a little moisture and modest temperature.

    1. Re:Myth....busted by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      From the link: But the degrading microbes are difficult to isolate because they do not exist in high numbers in nature.

      Like you said, "favorable conditions". Not guaranteed in a landfill, where the specific bacteria that degrade plastic bags still have to compete with all the other bacteria.

    2. Re:Myth....busted by PPH · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it would be possible to grow a brew of landfill-friendly bacteria and spray it on the pile once in a while.

      Oh yeah. That would cause problems for the people who make a living digging through landfills for a living.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  35. It's been law in South Africa for years by burisch_research · · Score: 1

    The plastic bag used to be known as South Africa's 'National Flower'. Since the law was passed, circa 2008 IIRC, the level of plastic litter has plummeted. This works.

    Oh yeah the law is that stores are obliged to charge for plastic bags. The price is something like R0.20 -- ~2 cents US / ~1.5 pence

    --
    char*f="char*f=%c%s%c;main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}";main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}
    1. Re:It's been law in South Africa for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering the difference in income level? How many plastic bags can the average South African buy on his/her monthly salary?

      Not to mention that my perception is that people in poorer countries are already out of necessity doing what this is supposed to encourage us to do - i.e. use the same object more than once, if it isn't broken...

  36. United States by jellomizer · · Score: 2

    We have about 5 reusable bags.
    We usually remember them when we go shopping, and I actually do prefer them over plastic, because they can carry more, have a more comfortable handle,

    However what I can see as a way to get better use is doing the following.

    1. Modify the shopping carts to have a good place to store them while shopping. I tend to stuff it on the bottom, however if I have a big item (aka Cat litter) I have to do a lot of shifting around. Having the spot available is also a note that the store actually encourages reusable bags.

    2. Reusable bag, returns, You return your bags to the store, where they can be properly cleaned/replaced if damaged. Then when you go to the checkout you get some clean bags.

    3. Generic bags. Lets not use them as as an advertising platform. you want bags that you can use tastefully at any store.

     

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:United States by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      3. Generic bags. Lets not use them as as an advertising platform. you want bags that you can use tastefully at any store.

      I never had any problem pulling out a bag of a competing supermarket out of my pocket at checkout. Or a bag with father Christmas on it in the middle of the summer. Who the hell cares? Grow a skin!

    2. Re:United States by slew · · Score: 1

      Your #2 and #3 conflict.

      I can possibly see a large chain store interested in recycling your reusable bag if they got some money from you on the initial purchase and they get some free advertising in return. Expecting a store to give you a generic bag and for them to clean and replace the bags for you seems to be put your suggestions in the realm of fantasy world thinking.

      On the other hand, large department stores used to freely give out fairly large reusable bags for merchandise but these bags of course had their corporate logos splashed all over. Unfortunately in most jurisdictions that eliminated plastic bags, local ordinances require them to charge customers for any paper bags even if the store offers to replace the user supplied bag with a similar bag albeit with the stores logo (I was dubious, but I actually researched this after someone in a department store told me she technically** was supposed to charge me to replace a torn bag that I brought in). Given this reality, I'm guessing cleaning and replacing (for free) any bags would be a non-starter in most places where a bag charge requirement exists even if the companies were generous enough to forgo the advertising possibilities that might finance it.

      **apparently, her manager told her some localities send in people to see if stores are in compliance with bags charge ordinances and actually issue warnings and/or citations. She compared this to how the police send in underage people into bars to look for liquor license violations. Although she said she had to charge me, in this situation, she did end up giving me a free bag, though...

    3. Re:United States by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      I have always thought that carrying a competitor's bag is actually a good thing: it tells the store that the customers are aware of competitors, which pushes to make this store better too.

    4. Re:United States by JMJimmy · · Score: 1

      There's a much simpler way: For general shopping keep 1 easily folded bag available for use. For shopping cart level shopping, keep everything in the cart as is. Take it out to your car and bag stuff there instead of in the store.

      It doesn't fit every situation (those without cars, -30C weather, etc) but for most of the time it works great. We keep about 20 reusable bags in the trunk at one time.

      The thing with plastic bags not degrading for 100s of years though - that seems highly suspect to me. I've had some disintegrate in a matter of 3-4 years

    5. Re:United States by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I give friends in England bags with American supermarket logos on them, just so they can cause confusion.

    6. Re:United States by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get "generic" bags online. Here in the US, my wife picked up a HUGE grocery bag with strong, comfortable handles. Yeah, the pattern is most definitely marketed to women, but I really don't care what it looks like. It's foil-lined, and zips shut on top. Perfect for frozen/cold groceries. Then, the bag has a zippered pouch in the front with about a half-dozen smaller vinyl bags stuffed inside. We take this and 1-2 other reusable bags we picked up from multiple grocery stores (we don't care whose logo is on it), and only on days when we pick up an unusual amount of groceries do we end up carrying a plastic bag home. Usually, we have more than enough room in the reusable bags.

      For non-grocery shopping, we have about a half-dozen other reusable bags made out of everything from vinyl to canvas. Some of them we got at my wife's favorite stores. I travel to trade shows a lot for work, and many of our shopping bags are those little tote bags you get at the show with materials in them. No, they don't carry much, but neither do the plastic bags that we'd just throw away when we got home anyway, so...

      About bags in shopping carts, Home Depot in the US has a really cool orange canvas bag with an elastic closure and a black, heavy plastic clasp. The cool thing is, when you open the clasp, it separates into two halves that you can hook on opposite sides of the cart, stretching the top open, while the rest of the bag rests inside the cart. Perfect for collecting smaller items (nuts and bolts, packages of batteries, etc.). More stores should have bags like that!

    7. Re:United States by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      I have always thought that carrying a competitor's bag is actually a good thing: it tells the store that the customers are aware of competitors, which pushes to make this store better too.

      I had two Walmart bags that I got for free on the Walmart grand opening day in town (now I have one) that I love taking into the competing store I shop at. It tells them 1) Walmart is a viable option for this shopper (but really isn't for the reason I expressed earlier), 2) Walmart did something smart by giving bags away instead of charging 89 cents each.

      It's also personally satisfying because, until recently, that store gave a 6 cent rebate for each bag someone brought in to reuse. That the response was "of course" when I last went there and noticed there was no rebate and asked if they had stopped doing it was irking. Why "of course"? I guess it should have been obvious that they would stop giving out a nickel and a penny for each bag we reuse.

    8. Re:United States by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, it prevents any accusation that you stole the bag.

  37. Follow through by onyxruby · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The problem with well intended programs is that most of them have a lack of follow through in their chain of events.

    I recall when early in my career I worked in a fair size office building that had a cafeteria on the premises. In the cafeteria you were presented with an assortments of recycling options where you could recycle everything from organic waste to making sure that green glass was separated from brown.

    When I worked the first shift I would watch as everyone dutifully separated everything just so to make sure they were being good for the environment. I was then transferred to second shift after a while at which point I noticed that every single evening the janitor took every single bin and dumped them all into the same garbage dolly.

    The same thing happens with many recycling programs where the materials are simply shipped to Africa or China. They are then disassembled by hand as they value the money more than the computer, often by small kids and certainly without any kind of environmental controls. In order to put an end to e-waste you really have to start forcing in country recycling programs where the materials are completely broken down.

    1. Re:Follow through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the UK channels did a documentary on that - they put tracking devices inside old CRT television sets and sold them to recycling companies. Then they tracked the progress of the item from London all the way to somewhere in Africa. Apparently there was a second-hand trade in repairing these items or salvaging the parts. At the location where they were, plastic TV's were literally being melted down for the metals by little kids over open fires - everything from cases to cables was melted in the open air by fire.

  38. unicode? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the name of the guy quoted is not Janez Potonik but since no unicode support...

    1. Re:unicode? by jones_supa · · Score: 2

      Right. I'm the submitter and also later realized that Slashdot had eaten the character. The person's correct name can be read from his EU Commission homepage.

  39. This makes complete sense by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

    The charge is turning the previously externalized cost of disposing of plastic bags into a paid cost. And that will change what market players do in order to reduce the number of bags being disposed. The cost of you using plastic bags doesn't go away just because you don't pay for them.

    And we're talking about the not-giant burden of bringing your own bags when you go shopping. All that takes is a small amount of advanced planning. Oh, and you end up with less trash.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  40. In southern France.... by Vilou · · Score: 1

    In Alpes-Maritimes district actually, it's been kinda solved by forbidding regular super/hypermakets to provide such plastic bags. Only bigger re-usable plastic bags are allowed and they are not free either. It's been that way for almost a decade. Some shops can also sell you some rather-cheap (about 1€) fabric bags.

  41. Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I switched on my own to solid, reusable bags (i think they're still plastic though) when i noticed i was literally drowning in the cheap free plastic bags. That was a few years before the EU began to introduce taxes on the plastic ones.
    Now I just keep 3-4 of the huge bags in the trunk of each car and another pile near the front door. Shuffle as needed. Problem solved.
    The oldest are more than 5 years old and still going strong.

  42. Plastic is only part of the problem. by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

    I usually bring my own bags. Sometimes I forget, or don't bring enough. I have a few collapsible cardboard boxes in my trunk. So, I can just cart the bagless goods to the car in the cart, and load them into the boxes or bags for easier carrying into the house. However, it's not possible to avoid all instances where I may need bags to carry out items. When I do I opt for plastic.

    It's not a big deal for me -- I just collect them and return them. The grocery store in my neighborhood recycles the bags. I don't use paper bags for sanitary reasons: That's where those little cockroaches come from (at least in my neck of the woods). I can stand the big variety that come in from outside, but I'd rather not have to fumigate with harsh chemicals again just because I used paper bags brought insect eggs into my abode. Want to see something interesting? Next time you bring paper bags home, dampen them a bit then put them in clear plastic bags, and watch the infestation emerge. Careful, they can eat through plastic, so use a sturdy bag. As a rational person, I of course needed evidence to back my shopping bag preference. YMMV.

  43. Leatherback Turtles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These bags are a huge problem for these jelly-fish-eating sea turtles. They mistake the bags for jellyfish with dire consequences.

  44. Pastic Bags ARE NOT A PROBLEM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the worst that can be said for them is that they are convenient, everywhere, hard to destroy, and occasionally eaten by or disposed of their own property by the ignorant, no problem exists. It is a legitimate thing to talk about at all only because, for a minority, the appearance (as opposed to the utility) of the common landscape and the wellbeing of wild life are part of the important goods/services for those people. But for those people alone. Let them pay out of their PERSONAL pockets such sums as succeed to their satisfaction in paying for improvements (or in paying bribes to prevent dis-improvements).

    Only affects physical and involuntary or economic and general are proper object of any sort of public action, regardless of whether a Constitution, a Law, a Regulation, or a Custom.

    Ideological BS is excluded from legitimate concern.

  45. Garbage bags by ehud42 · · Score: 2

    In Winnipeg (Canada), charging for bags - or even simply flat out not supplying them (MEC), has resulted in such a drop in small, convenient shopping bags that we (re)used for garbage bags, that we now have to explicitly buy garbage bags (for small waste bins like in the bathrooms).

    Also, yard waste used to be dropped off at certain depots - and large plastic bags were king. Now, it is collected at the curb side - but only if in PAPER yard waste bags. We had stocked up on the large garbage bags for yard waste before the switch, and I fear we now have a lifetime supply of paint smocks, emergency rain coats, vapour barrier material, etc....

    --
    I'm in my right mind and I have the answer to everything!
    1. Re:Garbage bags by PPH · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be surprised if the makers of plastic garbage bags were behind a lot of the bans on plastic grocery bags. When I shop where the plastic bags are still available, I've never had to buy the ones for garbage. I just recycle.

      It would be interesting to calculate the profit margins on grocery vs garbage bags. I'm guessing that the industry makes a lot more money off the garbage variety.

      I fear we now have a lifetime supply of paint smocks, emergency rain coats, vapour barrier material, etc....

      They are still good for burying bodies. Just saying.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Garbage bags by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 1

      Safeway still gives out plastic bags for free.

      Don't know if that will change when their acquisition by Sobeys is complete.

  46. Animals eat plastic by dr_leviathan · · Score: 1

    It isn't just sea turtles and waterfowl. On my way to work yesterday I looked into a field and saw a cow munching on a plastic bag that had blown into its pasture. We should eliminate plastic bags. I've already stopped accepting them at stores -- I always carry a messenger bag with me where I put all of my purchases (think globally, act locally).

    --
    Religion is poison to rationality, and we lose sight of that at our own peril. -- Lurker2288
  47. Undead plastic bags... by mad+flyer · · Score: 1

    Where do you get those braziliun years lasting plastic bags ?

    I tended to store stuff in my workshop in hung plastic bags. They usually fall to dust (because of sun's UV from the window) in less than 6 month dropping all their content to the floor...

  48. if you're gonna charge for the bags... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they better be good enough to make it home without breaking....

    that is all.

  49. for what the tax is running per bag by ToddInSF · · Score: 1

    it makes more sense to simply design the bags to be multipurpose, multi-use.

    Frankly, ALL packaging should be designed this way.

    All the tax does is waste money and put it towards nothing of any significance.

  50. Where's the problem by khallow · · Score: 1, Insightful

    200 plastic bags per year just isn't that many bags. If you can't recycle them for some reason then dump them in a landfill. If your neck of the woods doesn't have a lot of landfill space, then ship that junk to where there is a lot of landfill space (for example, eastern Europe and Africa). The problem has been solved for centuries.

    When I read of European environmental concerns, I'm struck by the immaturity and irrationality of it and proposed solutions. It's a waste of time and effort. How about finding ways to make peoples' lives better instead?

    1. Re:Where's the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not 200 plastic bags per year, it's 140 billion plastic bags per year. It's 200 per EU citizen.

    2. Re:Where's the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So.. You make other lives better by shipping your waste to them?!

    3. Re:Where's the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      200 plastic bags per year PER PERSON is a whole lot of bags. And "if you can't recycle them... dump them in a landfill" is not a solution. In fact, it's one of the problems that we are trying to solve here...

      I don't see how wanting to reduce the amount of non-compostable, non-recyclable material that is used is immature and irrational. Isn't it much more irrational to simply ignore your problem and ship it to, for example eastern Europe or Africa?

      I suspect you forgot to post as AC...

    4. Re:Where's the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Part of the issue is not the plastic bags... That is a miniscule amount of the waste stream it is not even funny.

      A better use would to make the OTHER containers things come in more recyclable. For example here in the states you buy pop it is basically either plastic or metal. Why plastic at all? Why not all metal? You can then do things like square containers and not waste as much space. We could make them interlock with each other to make them easier to carry. It is crazy recyclable... Metal is the shit with containers. Yet we continue to use plastic and paper.

      Ask a recycler what he has trouble keeping in stock? Glass and metal. Paper and plastic he has by the bail for a few bucks a ton.

    5. Re:Where's the problem by khallow · · Score: 1

      At 5 grams per bag and packed to half the density of low density polyethylene (~910 kg/m3), that's a cube 115 meters on a side. Sounds big, but there's plenty of room for it on Earth.

    6. Re:Where's the problem by khallow · · Score: 1

      So.. You make other lives better by shipping your waste to them?!

      It's not happening for free. So yes, you are making other lives better by shipping your waste to them.

    7. Re:Where's the problem by khallow · · Score: 1

      I don't see how wanting to reduce the amount of non-compostable, non-recyclable material that is used is immature and irrational. Isn't it much more irrational to simply ignore your problem and ship it to, for example eastern Europe or Africa?

      Ok, what makes that irrational? Let's look at actual costs and benefits here. Landfill space costs money and has a bit of an environmental problem. The huge advantage is that the people using such a service don't have to put a lot of time into that.

      Recycling has the opposite. It saves a little landfill space at the expense of peoples' time. It also costs money since plastic bags aren't worth recycling (else they would already be doing that without the assistance of the state). I think it's rather obvious that peoples' time and the costs of alternate methods is worth more than slightly higher landfill costs.

      Bottom line is that the point of landfills is to save peoples' time - which is also a non-compostable, non-recyclable resource. It also saves money. I think the driving force here is a combination of municipalities trying to push costs off onto their residents and near religious belief that sacrifice, no matter how stupid or counterproductive, is needed to improve the world's environment.

  51. fuck the nanny state by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    why not actually ENFORCE littering laws

    also

    http://www.amazon.com/T-Shirt-Carryout-Bags--Thank-Gracias/dp/B0025W9ALG/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1385566969&sr=8-1&keywords=carryout+bags

    2.5 cents each

  52. Adam Smith asks... by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    ...why are they so cheap?

    Seriously, if these are petroleum products, and petro products are finite, why are they so cheap? Or are they made of petro-fractions that are otherwise nearly worthless?

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:Adam Smith asks... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Because you'd need a micrometer to try to measure how thick those disposable bags are. The volume of plastic used is tiny.

    2. Re:Adam Smith asks... by brianerst · · Score: 1

      According to this pro-industry site, plastic bags are made from a waste product of refining natural gas. All the plastic bags made in a year take up less than a typical day's worth of petroleum use.

  53. Probably somewhere around 20. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mostly because I forget I already have a bag with some bags at home. OR happen to have too few for the shop I eventually did.

  54. plastic bag error by jerry-VA · · Score: 0

    The original article http://http//www.dw.de/eu-plastic-bag-debate-highlights-a-wider-global-problem/a-17241561 doesn't pass the back-of-the-envelope test. "The German environmental organization, Deutsche Umwelthilfe, estimates that more than a billion bags are used every year globally. Only about 10 percent of those are recycled." (World pop 7B. Sounds plausible.) "Europe is a major offender, producing nearly a million tons of plastic bags each year. " Problem. So, if Europe produces plastic bags for the entire planet, each bag weighs one kilogram. 1 million tons = 1 billion kg. 1 billion bags /1 billion kg = 1 kg per bag. --jerry

    --
    Many are destined 2reason wrongly; others, not 2reason at all; and others, to persecute those who do reason. Voltaire
  55. Janez Potonik by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's Janez Potonik pronounced Yanes Potochneeg [jans pottnk], not Potonik.

  56. Several hundred years? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Plastic bags usually take several hundred years until they decay"
    You're aware that no plastic bag has been around for several hundred years, right?

  57. And people will die of food poisoning as a result. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because they never remember to wash those damn reusable bags, they buy some meat and...

    Timmy is going for a dirt nap.

  58. Re:And people will die of food poisoning as a resu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, unless stores want to foot the bill for cleaning, I will remain forever opposed to getting rid of plastic bags for the sake of public health.

  59. Re:England, post 2015 by ombzhch · · Score: 0

    With Cameron, who is just slightly less unpopular than Obama, there is no after 2015, he will be wiped out. Vote UKIP, the English TEA party, Grüss, omb

  60. Cardboard boxes by CAPSLOCK2000 · · Score: 1

    In The Netherlands supermarkets have been charging for plastic bags for ages.
    However, most also provide cardboard boxes for free. They would have to pay to dispose of them so giving them away to customers is mutually beneficial.

  61. What about CO2 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also human body produces over 300 kg CO2 per year. That is simply ecological scandal ! Bureaucrats in Brussels should do something about it too !!!

  62. Late to the party by c9brown · · Score: 1

    In Canada, if you aren't using a cloth/reusable bag, you're just that fucking dude who didn't bring a bag. Almost everywhere asks and charges before handing you one. The only exception, as others have pointed out, is if you just need garbage bags and want them cheap.

  63. Fewer plastic bags/wrappers/containers by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    equal most instances of food borne illness and more food waste, specifically for wrappers, containers not bags as was mention in TFS.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  64. Gun Law, EU style by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EU 'subjects', especially in England, gravely resent 'Directives' from the authorities we utterly defeated militarily 65+ years ago. The 'bags' thing is the silliest of these. We all own robust shopping bags and boxes, but suppliers are compelled by EU rules to put different categories of product in different plastic bags, and now they will tax us for that. Personally, I will join any midnight vigilante group that opposes such creeping oppression. Where is the secure website to sign up?

  65. FTFTFLA* Re:Where's the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "How about finding ways to make my peoples' lives better instead?"

    FTFTFLA *

    *Fixed That For That Flaming Libertarian Asshole

  66. 200 bags/year? by rnturn · · Score: 1

    Heck... I never actually counted them but I'd bet the grocery stores around here were using 200 bags/month for my groceries before we went to reusable cloth bags. It was nuts the way they used them.

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  67. Plastic bag problem is recycling theatre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Seems to me that the regulation of plastic bags for shopping is recycling theatre. They are visible and so they get press and political traction. In our house we reuse all our plastic bags and don't even have enough to cover all the uses we have for them. Moreover, when we buy stuff, there is generally a lot more plastic in the annoying packaging of the products that we put in the shipping bags than there is in the bag itself. What is the weight in plastic of the bags compared to all the other plastic we use? The plastic bags are so light compared to the heavy packaging, and all the other cheap consumer products for sale that get put the to dump soon enough. Look at vacuum cleaners these days. All plastic. They only last a year or two and then you have to buy another one. All that needs to be done is to make them slightly degradable -- even 10 years life is short enough.

    At work we dump shredded paper or packing chips into plastic bags and the use them like pillows to protect fragile goods we ship. That way, when people get them, the packing stuff doesn't fly all over the floor. We can fill them full, or a bit loose, according to what we need. A quick knot in the handles seals them good enough for the transit.

    It's really annoying to have to spend time in a store figuring out the plastic bag policy. I could better put the time into thinking about how to really deal with plastic pollution.

  68. Quit trying to californicate the world by russotto · · Score: 1

    Try to pick up a few things on the way home from work in bag-free areas. Oops, damn, have the wrong car, the bags are in the other car. Fuck. Or you go into the supermarket and realize halfway through you forgot the bags. Or you get all the way up to the checkout and realize you have no bags (or if you're from out of area, learn about this shit the first time).

    It's just one of the little things that demonstrate how much government is micromanaging people's lives.

  69. 200 ? by Tom · · Score: 1

    Really? How do you use almost one plastic bag per day? My personal use is maybe 2 per month, whenever I'm shopping and it turns out the bag(s) I brought aren't enough.

    And I'm not an eco freak. I don't even seperate my waste. So it really takes very, very little to be considerable under that number, so if that's an average, and I assume most of the eco-minded people are somewhere around my level or even lower, who are the fucking morons who use more than a bag every fucking day ??.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:200 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Serious? It's not quantified as per person, per household, whatever. I have six people in the house (wife, two kids, two foster kids, me), and we probably bring home -- and reuse! -- ten bags a week on average (main grocery plus incidentals). That's 520 per year for the household. But, divide that by the number of people in the home and it is a lot less.

      Yes, we reuse every bag from covering while painting, to packing, to covering the shoes while in the muddy garden, to garbage bags. So every bag gets at least two uses before ending up in the landfill.

  70. 20c charge = overnight change in IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when the 20c charge on plastic bags was introduced in ireland i think there was an 80% drop in usage within a month. i started (and continue to) bring a reuse-able to the shop

  71. Just arrived from India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was amazed about the amount of plastic garbage in the streets by the railroad, on the fields.... cheap to produce, plastic bags and containers are a big issue.

    Maybe the approach at the supermarkets should be the opposite....."if you bring your own bags, you get some discount".

  72. Not just seagulls by justthinkit · · Score: 1

    National Geographic, I believe, had an article/piece where someone took pictures of the contents of bird stomachs. Albatross, you name it, they all like to eat plastic, especially colorful plastic. When they laid out all the pieces found in the stomach of birds, it looked like all the weapons a fighter jet can carry.

    --
    I come here for the love
    1. Re:Not just seagulls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they all like to eat it, why should we deprive them of their joy?

  73. in são paulo, brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    our commerce tried that last year
    the move lasted no more than two months, and the plastic bags were back after that
    during the plastic bag shortage, i and several friends of mine only bought what we actually needed, and often left unnecessary (and often more expensive) items in the cash registrer

  74. Pets by justthinkit · · Score: 1

    Must be few pet owners on this thread...we re-use all of our plastic bags, no problem!

    --
    I come here for the love
    1. Re:Pets by Optali · · Score: 1

      Indeed.

      I used two of them in the litter box of my cats: We put the box into one of them and then used the second one the other way around, then we poured the cat litter into the covered box. When we wanted to clean it we just pulled one of the bags off like a condom and so you could put the used cat litter safely into the bin and the box remained (more or less) clean.

      Our new cat is smarter and prefer the gardens of the neighbours ;)

      --
      -- 29A the number of the Beast
    2. Re:Pets by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      We did something like this until we started buying clumping litter from Costco. Now we hardly go through any kitty litter -- used to go through bags a week of it.

      --
      I come here for the love
  75. wrong on the breakdown comment by jafac · · Score: 1

    Your bog-standard disposable plastic shopping bag, (which DOES get re-used, at least they did in my household, before they were banned in my county), will degrade in about 2-3 years, when exposed to direct sunlight, (UV). When buried, it's a different story.

    One of the really damaging plastics out there is large-scale plastic sheeting used for trapping moisture in farming. It's polyethelene, and it stands up to more UV abuse, and they come in sheets hundreds of yards long. When they get blown away or washed out to sea - they definitely cause harm to wildlife. Several beached whales have been found with this crap bunched up and blocking their digestive tracts. The thing is: for shorelines not managed by humans, that whale carcass will rot away, and that plastic sheeting will wash back out into the ocean, and threaten more marine life.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    1. Re:wrong on the breakdown comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Several beached whales have been found with this crap bunched up and blocking their digestive tracts.

      Citation please.

  76. India by JamieIanMacgregor · · Score: 1

    the rag-pickers recycle them for cash... just ship em all there, recycling and providing some income for the poor.

  77. Biodegradable by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    People call for biodegradable plastic bags. I reuse all the plastic bags I get for garbage, and the city incinerate them. I bet this is quite common in urban areas. In that situation, a bag that burns without releasing toxic compound would just be enough.

  78. Washing bags... by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    Case in point on there being people who insist on washing the bags every time.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  79. Danger from bacteria overstated by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    Not really, I think. Remember that they've done studies on all sorts of stuff and they pretty much ALWAYS find bacteria. Heck, our toilets tend to be less contaminated than things like toothbrushes and doorknobs. You'd think we stored our dish scrubbers in the sewer from what's on them. Yet we hardly ever get sick from those exposures.

    For that matter, e coli? Yes, it has the potential to make us sick, but it's also an essential part of our digestive tract.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
    1. Re: Danger from bacteria overstated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are toilets used for the benchmark for 'clean'? They *should* be one of the cleanest things in the house.. They're cleaned with heavy duty chemicals on a regular basis - not to mention urine is sterile anyway.

      We should be using things like dishcloths and door handles for our 'cleaner than' comparison.

  80. charging defeats purpose. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Seattle we banned plastic bags, but charge extra for a thicker "reusable" plastic bag. The problem is that people still will pay the extra amount and in the end more plastic goes back into the environment. Most people I surveyed only wanted to reuse the plastic bags for their garbage anyways. Do away with the plastic bags entirely and people end up buying plastic bags for their garbage...

  81. Bio-degradable plastic bags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most super markets in the UK for quite some time have supplied bio-degradable plastic bags . Had a few on the loft for about 10 tens years and found them pulverised . So a major improvement would already be that clothing/shoe stores and the like would provide this type of bags , but of course these are not very appealing .
    The supermarket Tesco are selling durable plastic bags which last for years and cost only equiv US$0.14. If these eventually are worn out a free replacement is provided. I have used the same bags for more than 5 years .
    But apart from polluting water ways and sea ,plastic bags are an outdoor eyesore ,hence I approve of the 5 pence cost per bag when the relevant environmental law comes into force.

    Frank in northern Scotland

  82. Austin Outlawed Disposable Plastic Bags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Austin TX, the liberal bastion and the capital of a the overall conservative state of Texas outlawed plastic bags but retailers are allowed to SELL re-usable plastic bags and paper bags.

  83. 100 years? by Bust0ut · · Score: 1

    Fact: It takes a matter of weeks to decompose a grocery bag. Fiction: Drink lots of milk kids. The bovine fatty liquid will make you strong.

    --
    He is crazy if you think about it; I am not.
  84. It's even worse in Asia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have just returned from Laos in Asia. There, they use plastic bags to light fires. Cheap, readily available fire starters, and they work well. Shame they give off toxic gases, and release carbon into the air. It's an education challenge to get the entire population to understand it's a bad thing. And they also just burn thousands of plastic balloons they use for dart games, every day. Aaaaarrrrhhhhhh!!!!

  85. this is a solved problem, it's not rocket science by PJ6 · · Score: 1

    Years ago practically all the grocery stores I went to changed their plastic bags over to a new material which most certainly does not last 100 years - after a year or so they break down so much they turn into confetti. I believe they're awfully cheap to make, too.

    If they can do it, how hard can it be?