Slashdot Mirror


User: DogDaySunrise

DogDaySunrise's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
43
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 43

  1. Re:Probably not on Analyst Says Blu-ray DRM Safe For 10 Years · · Score: 1

    So DRM is... a Disc-Retardant Monkey?


    (I know, I should know better hehe... ;o) )

  2. Re:In other news... on Jack Thompson Sues Microsoft · · Score: 1

    Yes, but can you imagine a Beowulf cluster of those...? /runs

  3. Re:Sad or Telling? on Linus Responds To Microsoft Patent Claims · · Score: 1

    Wait... are you telling me that Steve Jobs is dead, because he got Linux one day?

  4. Re:Disorientate on DARPA Developing Defensive Plasma Shield · · Score: 1

    I found this entry from the Concise Oxford English Dictionary helpful in addressing that particular question...

  5. Re:Upgrade from 6.10 on Ubuntu Feisty Fawn Released · · Score: 1

    > As always, back up your computer fist.

    I only do that when I'm about to punch my XP box.

  6. Re:Who was stupid enough to fund this nonsense? on Spam Haters Given Right of Reply · · Score: 1

    I meant 'redirect' in the sense of 'subvert', rather than the literal meaning... which does kinda beg the question, why didn't I just put 'subvert' lol

  7. Re:Who was stupid enough to fund this nonsense? on Spam Haters Given Right of Reply · · Score: 1

    This isn't about spamming the spammers - it's an attempt to grind the websites spammers get paid through to a halt.

    If nobody can buy their product, they can't make any money, right? The motivation for spamming in the first place becomes redundant.

    Since we can't find the bastards to collect even after a successful suit, this may be the only way to hit back where it hurts...

    However... I completely disagree with the methodology. It's far too easy for the spammers operating the sites to redirect this attack to legitimate websites, where it'll fall foul of the law in a way that it'll be accountable.

  8. Re:and what if it says on Spam Haters Given Right of Reply · · Score: 2, Insightful

    FTA: The plan is to fill order forms on spam websites...

    No 'From' header required...!

  9. Re:Allow me to be the first on U.S. House Votes to Extend Patriot Act · · Score: 1

    For those who believe that 'if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear', I have four words...

    Full Body Cavity Search.

    Scares me, anyways...

  10. Re:Wow! What a question to ask on Slashdot... on Hackers, Spelling, and Grammar? · · Score: 1

    Oh cool, I've been looking for a sig - thanks!

  11. Re:Contract? on Is Obtaining a Windows Refund Still Difficult? · · Score: 1
    If a Windows EULA is viewed as a contract, and you don't agree with the license and do not use/install/whatever the product...

    ...Can Microsoft be considered bound by a contract that you've deliberately refused to enter into with them?

  12. What I resent... on Microsoft to Offer Patches to U.S. Govt. First · · Score: 1

    ...is that I've paid more for my OEM copy of XP (as forcibly bundled with my machine despite my wishes) than any government has paid for any one copy of their OS, and yet I'm the poor beggar boy in the story.

    Since Microsoft gives massive discounts to governmental and other institutions and gains more income from the poor saps who buy a prefab pc just because they lack the knowledge to assemble their own from components, surely this is another kick in the teeth from MS to MS?

    Look after the pennies, and the pounds can f**k off...?

  13. Safety First on Microsoft to Offer Patches to U.S. Govt. First · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sounds a lot more like "Microsoft will delay patches for a month after availability, except to the US Govt". Surely it'd be a lot safer for the US Govt Ltd. for M$ to supply patches to *everyone*, governments included, instead of allowing vulnerabilities to lie unpatched for a few weeks...?!?

  14. Re:QUIT LYING! on LokiTorrent Shut Down · · Score: 1
    Sometimes I make coffee during adverts on TV.

    My god, the number of opportunities I've cost companies must be emormous...

  15. Re:WtF? on TV Piracy is Next · · Score: 1
    It's a little different in the UK, as we have the BBC - which is paid for with public money via a licence fee (about £9 a month, although it's compulsory if you own a TV & it's able to receive a signal).

    The upshot is, the UK *public* owns the shows, as they've paid for it from start to finish - I'm sure you've all read that the BBC is still considering opening it's archives over the net, which is only as it should be :-)

    I've been downloading a lot of stuff lately, people have been posting great shows I remember watching around 1990 lol...!

  16. Re:Uh... this is news? on Former AOLers Bet on Private P2P App · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, I was misled by the site slogan at the top left-hand side of the page. Cheerfully withdrawn :o)

  17. Uh... this is news? on Former AOLers Bet on Private P2P App · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    Sorry bud, yer a bit late - The Register had a story on this over two months ago http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/09/13/grouper_p2 p_launc/.

    Hell, I was seeding a torrent for it on the release date, 23rd September - still running now lol...

  18. Re:Nice... on MPAA Sues Movie-Swappers · · Score: 1

    Could be used by the BPI etc in the UK - where we have no legal right to make backups of any kind... (even taping a vinyl LP to listen to in your car was illegal - ever tried playing a 45 at 70mph?)