Slashdot Mirror


Is Obtaining a Windows Refund Still Difficult?

Bubblehead asks: "A few years ago, everybody was talking about returning their copy of Windows to receive a refund. I plan on buying a Laptop shortly, and most manufacturers still insist on shipping it with some version of Windows. I was wondering what the state of the affairs is - there isn't that much information on the net. The most prominent piece of information is this 2003 Linux Journal Report outlining how the author had to go to small claims court to receive a refund. Any experiences - especially with vendors that do not offer an alternative?"

548 comments

  1. Your journey starts here by Kimos · · Score: 5, Informative

    Never had the chance to do it myself since I build all my own systems. I've kept this in my Bookmarks for some time though:
    www.windowsrefund.org

    (In the title bar it says windowsrefund.net, but that site times out. Don't know what that's all about...)

    1. Re:Your journey starts here by maxbang · · Score: 2

      You build your own laptops? There are only a few vendors out there that offer lappies w/o the MS tax.

      --
      I also reply below your current threshold.
    2. Re:Your journey starts here by Cylix · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You can order the parts, generic casing and all the fun stuff if you really want too.

      Our local shop used to build them... until they went defunct.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    3. Re:Your journey starts here by Trashman · · Score: 4, Informative

      ...There are only a few vendors out there that offer lappies w/o the MS tax.

      Care to name some? I'll name the ones I know:

      http://discountlaptops.com

      http://www.emperorlinux.com

      Please help expand my list.

      --
      Do not read this .sig
    4. Re:Your journey starts here by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      The best I've seen are pseudo-modular systems where the laptop is shipped without a CPU, memory or hard drive and those components are added in at the shop (or the buyer, I guess).

    5. Re:Your journey starts here by Karzz1 · · Score: 1

      http://www.linuxcertified.com/linux_laptops.html

      Disclamer: I have only had the opurtunity to run linux on 2 laptops, both originally purchased with MS on them. (I purchased both used). The compaq was quirky, but the Dell I have now is great with Linux.

      --
      Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master.
    6. Re:Your journey starts here by alex4u2nv · · Score: 1

      what happens when his journey is slashdotted? hehe

    7. Re:Your journey starts here by rpdillon · · Score: 2, Informative
      I bought mine at:

      Los Alamos Computers

      I'm sure a lot of Slashdotters know the feeling when you get on the tech support line and feel like they treat you like you know nothing, when in fact they're the ones that don't know what they're talking about...

      Well, with LAC, they'll treat you as a peer. First off, they request special instructions when you order, if you'd like a RAID setup, what runlevel you'd like to use, what display manager, what desktop environment, etc. They're also cooperative. For example, if I say something is broken, and tell them how I tested it to determine that, they don't run me through some inane troubleshooting sequence on the phone anyway. They picked up on what I was saying right away and shipped out a new part that day. Their response time to emails is very fast as well, about an hour or so in my experience.

      Anyway, I'm not getting a kickback or anything, but it is the first time I've had a universally good experience with a computer vendor. I found out about them from a pretty good list of pre-installed Linux vendors over at the Debian site.

    8. Re:Your journey starts here by kwpulliam · · Score: 1

      What part of Laptop didn't you understand? or did your local shop build laptops? That would be cool! Link?

    9. Re:Your journey starts here by gxw · · Score: 1

      PC Torque (a Sager notebook reseller) lets you choose to purchase with or without the Microsoft tax.

      http://www.pctorque.com/

      They also run a popular forum site that covers multiple notebook vendors (Sager, Alienware, Dell, etc.), and has an active general area for discussion about running Linux on notebooks:

      http://notebookforums.com/

    10. Re:Your journey starts here by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      The Dell Inspiron 9100 runs Linux as well as it does Windows, given a few things that you'll probably have to compile in yourself.

    11. Re:Your journey starts here by kdriedge · · Score: 1

      It appears that Eurocom still allows configurations without an OS.

    12. Re:Your journey starts here by tomboy17 · · Score: 1

      www.laclinux.org Lately the laptop I've got from them has been out-of-commission, but I'd still recommend them as folks providing linux laptops.

    13. Re:Your journey starts here by jasonditz · · Score: 5, Funny

      You missed the biggest one

      http://www.apple.com

    14. Re:Your journey starts here by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      Generic laptop case?

    15. Re:Your journey starts here by fgl · · Score: 1

      Dont you just wish that there was a way to buy a hardware package without any associated third party software? just a driver CD with what you need. I dont need or want a new OS every time I buy a new system. The EU decision doesnt go far enough, there should be a system that prevents tie ins at all.

      --
      Go Away! Not for Sale
    16. Re:Your journey starts here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate Dell more then I hate a hot poker in the eye but I picked up a 600m a few months back for $400 and it runs Linux better then it runs windows. I had to install almost every driver for windows to work right but with Suse 9.2 it was perfict wirless and everything worked with out even installing one driver.

    17. Re:Your journey starts here by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      The Dell Inspiron 9100 runs Linux as well as it does Windows

      Now, that's a ringing endorsement on slashdot!

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    18. Re:Your journey starts here by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      The part that isn't such a hot endorsement is that it weighs about 20 lbs once you have all of the accessories you need packed.

      It uses a desktop processor (Dell Pentium 4, not the mobile version, the desktop version). Unfortunately, that requires quite a bit of cooling, so it's loaded with heat sinks and has a multitude of fans.

      It also gets about 1 hour of battery life from a battery pack that feels like it weighs about 5 lbs, and the AC adapter is about the size and weight of a brick.

      For all of that, once you're sitting and typing on it, it is a really nice computer to work with.

    19. Re:Your journey starts here by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      That sounds almost like the G5 Powerbook. [Drool!]

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    20. Re:Your journey starts here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yo,

      When Apple publishes a shrink wrapped copy of OS X for all my intel computers, wake me up. ...until then, STFU.

    21. Re:Your journey starts here by mysticwhiskey · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that sitting on a PC and also using it requires some sort of contortionist positions that may well violate any number of occupational health & safety restrictions. Nevertheless, it brings to mind some interesting images. :)

      --

      Stuck down a hole! In the middle of the night! With an owl!

    22. Re:Your journey starts here by PastaLover · · Score: 1

      Okay these come without the "MS Tax", but they replace it with the "Apple Tax". Some people don't wanna run Mac OS X on those things either. And I'm pretty sure you can't buy them laptops without the OS included.

    23. Re:Your journey starts here by jasonditz · · Score: 1

      Since the manufacturer of the hardware and the software in this case is the same company its a somewhat different situation. Kind of like how you can't buy a Sharp Zaurus without their version of a Linux-Qtopia ROM flashed on it... but no one is complaining of it being a "tax".

    24. Re:Your journey starts here by wehe · · Score: 1

      To expand your list you may check the TuxMobil international overview of vendors which sell laptops and notebooks with Linux pre-installed. BTW: the survey also includes vendors which offer PDAs and mobile phones with Linux.

    25. Re:Your journey starts here by Bobnoxus · · Score: 1

      I bought an Enpower laptop from PC Club about a year ago, which is a rebranded Asus M3N. When I ordered it, I asked to not have windows preinstalled, and that saved $100. So, you can order PCs from PC Club and not pay for windows. No rebate required. BTW, I got Mepis linux (Debian derivitive) to run fine on this laptop, with the only issue being the modem, which I haven't spent any time trying to get working.

    26. Re:Your journey starts here by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      All of Slashdot summed up in one post: "I wanna run OS X, but I want it on x86!"

      Thank you.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
  2. How much though? by Greg+Wright · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How much of a refund would you get? I am guessing that you can not get
    the amount MS changes if you buy XP off the shelf. Do they try and
    determine just what that vendor paid for it or would they try and
    determine how much of the cost of the machine is represented by the OS
    installed on it. That is, the difference between a machine sold with
    XP installed and the same machine shipped with linux or no OS at all,
    for example.

    --
    --greg Vulcan quiescent... Q: What machine shutdown with this message?
    1. Re:How much though? by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 1

      I was actually wondering if it would be beneficial to purchase Windows XP Pro if you were getting the refund... Would it more than offset the increased cost? Something tells it it would be unlikely that you would get back extra that way, but I can dream. :)

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    2. Re:How much though? by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The article mentions the manufacturer will avoid giving a price, citing "an agreement with Microsoft." However, it goes on to explain that if the manufacturer cannot specify a price, the Judge will likely use the retail price (i.e. $199 USD).

      Which is good, because if Dell (or whoever) starts losing money by only shipping Windows on their machines, they will want to offer Windows-less notebooks.

    3. Re:How much though? by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1, Informative

      I am guessing that you can not get
      the amount MS changes if you buy XP off the shelf.


      Actually, that's exactly the amount you are entitled to, as you purchased that software for the retail price when you bought your computer.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    4. Re:How much though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhhhhhh, no.

    5. Re:How much though? by spiritraveller · · Score: 4, Interesting
      The article mentions the manufacturer will avoid giving a price, citing "an agreement with Microsoft." However, it goes on to explain that if the manufacturer cannot specify a price, the Judge will likely use the retail price (i.e. $199 USD).

      This is because Microsoft will probably not show up in court to rebut your evidence of value.

      Without any contrary evidence, the judge is going to accept whatever amount you put in your complaint as long as you submit some competent evidence to support the finding.

    6. Re:How much though? by slashrogue · · Score: 1

      No, they'll just jack the price up all together. They make a killing on that crap to begin with.

    7. Re:How much though? by mrsev · · Score: 1

      "Which is good, because if Dell (or whoever) starts losing money by only shipping Windows .."

      I believe that it would be M$ that is liable for the refund not Dell. Could be wrong though!

    8. Re:How much though? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      Dell sells many levels of machines sans Windows.

    9. Re:How much though? by Raelus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Consumer laptops? No. At least to my knowledge, Dell only supports corporate *nix.
      "Dell does not officially support running Linux on Dell laptops."
      Here.

      --
      "It is the stillest words which bring the storm. Thoughts that come with doves' footsteps guide the world."
    10. Re:How much though? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      Laptops? No. But in conjunction with the earlier /. article, they probably have good reason not to.

      And anybody can buy a Dell N-series desktop.

    11. Re:How much though? by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 1

      What? You're high.

      --
      Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    12. Re:How much though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I looked at a Dell today, via a web site ad, and after I added and subtracted some features, it came to $400.00. I kinda doubt that I would get $199.00 back for my trouble. Probably just the cost to Dell, which might be only $40.00, or even less, per copy installed on the assembly line.

      They give no information on their site about whether or not the Sound Card, for instance, is Linux compatable, and generally leave the linux-inclined buyer in the dark.

      If I purchased a Dell, I would want to partition the drive, or just take the drive out and install a new one. That's extra money. Probably better in the long run to just build my own.

    13. Re:How much though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And anybody can buy a Dell N-series desktop.


      and who would want to? n-series are rarely, if ever, cheaper than an equivalent model that includes windows and additional software.

    14. Re:How much though? by Queer+Boy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Which is good, because if Dell (or whoever) starts losing money by only shipping Windows on their machines, they will want to offer Windows-less notebooks.

      Dell is probably the worst example to use, twice companies have tried to get other OSes installed on Dell machines (Apple in the early 90's with Mac OS for x86, Be in the late 90's with BeOS). I am sure going forth since the DOJ trial new Windows licenses are different but Michael Dell has gone on record stating that they have to pay for Windows whether it goes on the machine or not.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    15. Re:How much though? by LPrecure · · Score: 1

      I seem to remember that was one of the things the DoJ convicted MS of: Aparantly, MS gives big OEMs a discount on their software, but the price is that their check to MS is based on the number of systems produced, not on number of systems with Windows installed.

      I think MS says (with a straight face) that this is so Dell can't, say, claim they installed 10K copies, and really install 11K, or some such, and the fact that it means the OEM can't sell Linux systems for less money than Windows is "merely a coincidence".

    16. Re:How much though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think a lot of people are looking at it the wrong way. Instead of trying to get Dell, etc. to offer some Windows-less laptops, the goal should be to return enough laptops, desktops, and anything else that comes bundled with Windows so that Dell offers only Windows-less computers.


      If you can return just the OS and get $199, then Dell will certainly lose money on the deal. Enough lost money and Dell will be forced to change their policy of bundling Windows with just about everything.


      Buy the computer, get the refund, sell the computer on eBay, repeat as necessary. It's like civil disobedience, without even needing to break the law.

    17. Re:How much though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dell is probably the worst example to use, twice companies have tried to get other OSes installed on Dell machines

      Dell will happily sell you a server with no OS or with Linux. Ditto for their Optiplex line of desktops.

    18. Re:How much though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This is because Microsoft will probably not show up in court to rebut your evidence of value.

      I'd gladly pay $100 or so to have MS's OEM contract with Dell appear on the public record.

    19. Re:How much though? by x_terminat_or_3 · · Score: 1

      You don't want to change the drive unless its a Dell issued as well or are prepared to softboot again at each hardboot.

      I installed a Seagate drive and it doesn't start fast enough for the Dell Bios to recognize it. Softboot after Hardboot does the trick.

      This means that the system cannot start on its own though.

      --
      Only those who risk going too far can possibly find out how far they can go. T. S. Eliot
    20. Re:How much though? by class_A · · Score: 2, Informative
      Try turning off AAM (Auto Acoustic Management), it might decrease seek time to an acceptable level. Read http://www.storagereview.com/articles/200110/20011 008WD1000BB-SE_sp.html

      Then download Feature Tool from Hitachi to turn it off http://www.hitachigst.com/hdd/support/download.htm

    21. Re:How much though? by x_terminat_or_3 · · Score: 1

      Cool Thanks

      --
      Only those who risk going too far can possibly find out how far they can go. T. S. Eliot
  3. Recent experience story by Humba · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Go ask David Zamos

    He tried to return a copy of XP that he purchased at his campus bookstore. First the bookstore refused the return. Then Microsoft refused. So he sold it on eBay. eBay took down the auction, but then later allowed it. Microsoft countered by suing him, and trying to take his 2002 Escort as damages. Good story. I won't ruin the ending.

    --H

    1. Re:Recent experience story by DrSkwid · · Score: 2, Informative

      Good story. I won't ruin the ending.

      He countersued & eventually they settled, David signing an NDA so we'll never know the terms.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    2. Re:Recent experience story by quixos · · Score: 0, Troll

      are you as thoughtless, insensitive and attention craving in RL?

    3. Re:Recent experience story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      IIRC, the Escort was one of the only somewhat-good cars Ford ever made, so perhaps Microsoft wanted it to study how people engineer things? Windows is currently at the 1985 Chevy stage of engineering quality, so a 2002 model would be a big help to them.

    4. Re:Recent experience story by ninjagin · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Wow. Substantive proof of the evil predatory Microsoft empire.

      Thanks for posting the link.

      --
      .. pa-ra-bo-la, pa-ra-bo-la, 2 pi R, 2 pi R, where's your latus rectum, where's your latus rectum, 2 pi R
    5. Re:Recent experience story by me+at+werk · · Score: 2, Funny
      I don't feel for the guy, I mean, he's done more than just this:

      This, after all, is the same student who was "arrested after sneaking across a lawn . . . with a can of spray paint, heading toward the notoriously large Bush/Cheney sign in the yard of Summit County Republican Chairman Alex Arshinkoff" and then "convicted of misdemeanor trespassing and criminal mischief," according to a report from the Beacon Journal.


      He seems to have made "stirring up trouble" his goal. I wouldn't be surprised to find out he uses a Mac or something else and couldn't have even used the copy of office anyway.
      --
      For context, click Parent.
    6. Re:Recent experience story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my buddy tried to post that as a story, but slashdot rejected it. Must not be too good...

    7. Re:Recent experience story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you talking about? Anyone who's against republicans, is a hero.. :-)
      He's consistent.. he's against big power hungry monopolists.. that puts M$ and Republicans in the same line. (yeah yeah, flame bait)

    8. Re:Recent experience story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      real life got you down? no need to pick on your friends, here's a hanky, tell big momma all about it, let it all out baby

    9. Re:Recent experience story by argent · · Score: 1

      Yeh, he got caught pulling a sophomoric stunt. Well, you know, there's a reason they call it "sophomoric". I'm one of the most straight-laced people in my circle of friends, when I was at college I was the token "right winger", and I still pulled a couple of pranks when I was that age. I just didn't get caught.

      Plus...

      I wouldn't be surprised to find out he uses a Mac or something else and couldn't have even used the copy of office anyway.

      My copy of Office runs just fine on my Mac.

    10. Re:Recent experience story by argent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's amazing what /. doesn't print.

      It's not what you know, it's who you know.

    11. Re:Recent experience story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I rather appreciate the summary because I don't have to read the entire fucking thing.

    12. Re:Recent experience story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
        1. Good story. I won't ruin the ending.

        He countersued & eventually they settled, David signing an NDA so we'll never know the terms.

      Aarghhh ! You could have warned me about the SPOILER !

      Now, I won't read TFA !
    13. Re:Recent experience story by lewp · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, yeah, the Escort is a great car alright.

      I got pulled over in some rural Georgia county on my way to Florida and the officer tried to say I was doing 98 in a 70. I looked at him and said "98? you do realize this is an Escort, right?" He laughed, started to walk off, and said he'd get his radar gun checked.

      --
      Game... blouses.
    14. Re:Recent experience story by Seumas · · Score: 1

      When you purchase a laptop, the Windows installation media states specifically "not for resale". Period.

    15. Re:Recent experience story by me+at+werk · · Score: 1

      The windows copy of office and the mac copy aren't both in the same box. He sold a copy of Office for Windows.

      --
      For context, click Parent.
    16. Re:Recent experience story by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      Maybe he lied about the ending. You'll have to read TFA to find out.

      By the way, the butler did not do it.

    17. Re:Recent experience story by quixos · · Score: 1

      between you and me... my post was kind of kneejerk reaction. don't you know anyone who takes pleasure in taking all the attention away from others? he read that entire article just to grab attention from the poster. an easy kill. and i'm the troll?

    18. Re:Recent experience story by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      When you purchase a laptop, the Windows installation media states specifically "not for resale" comma, but that is totally unenforceable.

    19. Re:Recent experience story by Mad+Merlin · · Score: 1

      Except he bought the software separately from the campus Bookstore, it didn't come with his laptop.

    20. Re:Recent experience story by argent · · Score: 1

      And so you believe that someone with income of $3550 a year spent $60 on a copy of Office he didn't need and couldn't use just so he could play a prank on Microsoft, and the rest of the story including the attempts to return the software was somehow planned?

      I think you stretch the bounds of belief just a wee bit too far.

    21. Re:Recent experience story by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      no, the story was so lame I didn't want anyone else to waste their precious time having to read it.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    22. Re:Recent experience story by gobbo · · Score: 1
      the Escort was one of the only somewhat-good cars Ford ever made

      That's why I bought my second one. Body designed by Mazda, and I think the engine was euro-Ford designed. Best mileage for station wagons in the mid-90's. Now I can park my 'foreign' car in the parking lot at the autoworker's union and no-one gives me dirty looks!

    23. Re:Recent experience story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because he pulled a juvenile prank during college.

      wow, you never had any fun in those days did you...

      sitting alone at your computer while everyone else is making friends and getting laid.

  4. GET A LIFE! by FreeLinux · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Karma be damned. You are asking Slashdot about getting a refund for OEM pre-installed Windows on a laptop that you haven't even bought yet?

    Get a life!

  5. refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by yagu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    About seven years ago I too was looking for a laptop and I wanted one without Windows on it. I won't divulge the vendor's name. After a frustrating attempt to explain my "customization" with the service rep, i.e., a "nude" laptop, he transferred me to his manager.... He at first declined to agree to sell me one, but after a moment, and a pause he AGREED... another pause, then he said, "But we'll have to charge you an extra $100 for it." (I am NOT making this up!) Kind of gives you a relative feel for what value (or negative value) Windows added to that laptop, n'est-ce pas?

    To the post's question, I am in the similar situation of wanting a new laptop... Have found several that are very close to everything I want and need in a laptop, but ALL come with XP Pro -- which I'm assuming adds $100 to $200 to the cost of the machine and I intend to use the machine for linux ONLY.... and I'm not willing this time to ring one up for MS.

    1. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Kind of gives you a relative feel for what value (or negative value) Windows added to that laptop, n'est-ce pas?

      That's precisely true, in that it gives you a sense of how onerous the "Windows tax" really is, as opposed to your assumption of $100-200.

    2. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by Rob_Bryerton · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'm curious as to why you won't name this vendor. Well?

    3. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by maxbang · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just get one of these if you don't want to pay it. Don't worry, I ain't affiliated. I go to pawn shops and scrounge around for a crappy lappy and throw on whatever flavor I'm interested at the time. Then I wind up giving them away because they're slow and start pissing me off.

      --
      I also reply below your current threshold.
    4. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by yagu · · Score: 1
      I won't name them because they already have a name! :-)

      Actually, I had similar experiences with other vendors in my same trek, and I didn't want to single this one out... they were the only ones I pressed hard enough to bend on giving me a computer without Windows on it.

    5. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by The+Bungi · · Score: 1, Informative
      $200? ROFL. You think Dell would be selling $450 computers if that was the case? Please don't be stupid. A single XP Pro OEM license goes for about $40 or so - a bit less if you are Dell/IBM/Gateway/HP.

      Hope that helps.

    6. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I purchased a dell 300m laptop 18 months back with the intent of running linux on it. I called Dell support, and explained that I wanted a refund on windows. This perplexed the poor lady at the indian call center, and we haggled for better than half an hour. In the end, they declined to refund me the full retail value for XP home, but ended up refunding me $75 and told me to keep the restore CD as they were "worthless". Fair enough I thought.

    7. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by yagu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      $40 -- still more extra than I'm willing to pay for something I won't use... What is your source for knowing this cost? (I assumed manufacturers DID get a volume discount... but didn't know how much.... figured at 50%, PRO would be around $100.... didn't figure more of a discount, but it's really beside the point. I shouldn't have to pay if I'm not going to use it, and I don't want to pay the $100 extra to have it delivered without the OS.... )

      Is this REALLY an unreasonable expectation?

    8. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by pentalive · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I went into one of those Dell Cow stores one day to see if they would sell a laptop without windows, they would not. They also told me that if I re-formated the hard drive and installed Linux that my warrantee would be void, and they would not support the machine - even for hardware problems (like There's a floppy disk *stuck* in the floppy drive)

      I actually do dual boot now on my x86 laptop, since I like to play games that are not available under OS X or Linux.

    9. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by Anamelech · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The reason why they tried to charge extra money was because the major vendors install windows in bulk on the assembly line. The system without the Windows OS on it would have to be made off of the line, and the labour costs would increase. That would bring the price charged up.

    10. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I won't divulge the vendor's name.

      Why not? I demand to know so that I can make sure that I avoid them in the future.

    11. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by aztektum · · Score: 1
      There's also powernotebooks

      You can burn MS *AND* VoodooPC with those guys. They sell the same Sager laptops for a substantially lower price

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    12. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      HP had announced in August 2004 a laptop with a specially tweaked version of SuSE, so it would like, actually sleep, hibernate and wake up properly. The model was nx5000. I'm surprised that model is no longer available, only nine months after the fact. IBM has also sold Linux based laptops. The HP nc6x00 series is supposedly available with FreeDOS instead of Windows XP, but there is a disconnect between the sales pitch page and the store page, like it's hard to figure out how to configure it with an SXGA+ screen, I can't find how to ask for FreeDOS instead.

    13. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by GooberToo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've always wondered what would happen you bought it on credit card and did a charge back on windows for the retail value.

    14. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by The+Bungi · · Score: 5, Interesting
      40 -- still more extra than I'm willing to pay for something I won't use

      I understand that, but computer manufacturers don't cater to you. They cater to people who want their computers to work out of the box.

      What is your source for knowing this cost?

      Fairly common knowledge if you've ever talked to an OEM or Microsoft.

      didn't know how much.... figured at 50%, PRO would be around $100

      This is a *massive* volume discount, not a "buy 9000 get the 10000th free!" deal.

      shouldn't have to pay if I'm not going to use it

      I don't contest that, and unfortunately in the case of laptops you still don't have a choice.

      Is this REALLY an unreasonable expectation?

      My comment was really aimed at your mistaken assumption that because some guy at a retailer wanted (stupidly) to charge you $100 for removing Windows then that must be the cost of the OS. That's not the case.

      Of course people like you conveniently ignore the fact that PC manufacturers operate tight ships with razor-thin margins aimed at the retail consumer market. The "options" that you get when you buy a computer have already been integrated into their assembly/config process and a cost and supply/inventory solution factored for each one.

      Even asking them *not* to do something is disruptive to their business chain. That's why they don't do it. It's not like they don't want the extra business, small as it might be. It would simply cost them more to cater to you.

    15. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by yagu · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, not an easy world for those trying to do linux on laptops, but since you mention HP, I'll relate my happy-ending story...

      I have the HP zx5000... ordered it knowing I could make full use of the Windows side of it (yes, I do DO Windows, .... sigh). And hopeful I might make inroads by creating a successful dual boot with linux and hopefully get the wireless working without having to resort to an external pcmcia card to do so.

      Used Mandrake 10.1, and used the partition re-size out of the box (from Mandrake install), and the entire install went without a hitch! Sweet!

      I DID have to purchase a proprietary driver for the wireless... but I was willing to pay $19 for that (from Linuxant).

      I LOVE this machine!

      And, for the record, out of the box, Mandrake 10.1 recognized and configured and took full advantage of the 1920x1200 resolution screen. It's great!

    16. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah, running fdisk is a really expensive procedure.

    17. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by Xerp · · Score: 1

      Thats right. Its called a "monopoly".

      This is bad for everyone because there is no choice. Unfortunately greed rules this world and it will take enforced legislation to change this shameful, irresponsible abuse.

      "Any colour - so long as it's black."
      Henry Ford

    18. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by karnal · · Score: 1

      Dell Cow?

      Moo.

      Oh, Gateway!

      Geesh....

      --
      Karnal
    19. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by BHearsum · · Score: 1

      See, the problem with that is you don't always get the laptop you want.

      Personally, the only laptop I will buy is a Thinkpad. They are very high quality machines. I don't see any Thinkpads, let alone the specific one I want on that site.

      I really didn't know it was still legal to pull this kind of shit. It makes me espcially sad that IBM refuses to sell me a lappy without Windows. So I'll have to get my refund afterwards.

      YOU AGREE TO BE BOUND BY THE TERMS OF THIS EULA BY INSTALLING, COPYING, OR OTHERWISE USING THE PRODUCT. IF YOU DO NOT AGREE, DO NOT INSTALL OR USE THE PRODUCT; YOU MAY RETURN IT TO YOUR PLACE OF PURCHASE FOR A FULL REFUND.

      So, I simply have to phone them up and quote the EULA, and wait for the cheque. Failing that, I go to small claims court.

    20. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by blair1q · · Score: 1

      No, it gives you insight into the reality of "value" in a free-market economy. He's legally entitled to negotiate with you, and his opening proposal is to make you pay more for something you consider special. You're free to negotiate with him, but he's free to quit at any time.

      It has nothing to do with the cost. It's just what he thinks you'll pay to get your way.

      Now, as to the cost, it might just cost him more in eventual customer service to have to track your unit differently from every other unit he sells. So if you do negotiate with him, he may have a higher level at which he's forced to walk away from the table. But if you don't negotiate, you'll never draw him down to that point.

    21. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      $200? ROFL. You think Dell would be selling $450 computers if that was the case? Please don't be stupid. A single XP Pro OEM license goes for about $40 or so - a bit less if you are Dell/IBM/Gateway/HP.

      what kind of nuked cd-roms have you been chewing on?

      i do one-off custom builds, five or so a month of desktops with windows on it. this is my current cost for single oem copies (averaged from three vendors):

      Windows 2000 Professional $153
      Windows XP Home $94
      Windows XP Professional $148

      absolutely no price breaks on dsp 3 packs. those are exactly 3x the single price.

      most other small var's are paying about the same, if they're buying their software through "official" channels.

      those kinds of prices are why the little guy has no chance in hell of competing with mass-produced product like hp, dell, gateway, etc.

      btw, the cheapest legitimate, properly packaged and sold copy (of xp pro oem) listed on pricewatch is about $130 plus freight from the cheapest company i'd actually do business with (and have numerous times for other items i cant get from my regular vendors).

      you cannot tell me dell doesn't get a break from microsoft if they (dell) bundles the latest windows with virtually everything they sell.. just like they get insane deals from intel for using intel processors only. anytime dell's "looking" at amd chips is probably the time their contract with intel is up for renewal.

    22. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went into one of those Dell Cow stores one day to see if they would sell a laptop without windows, they would not. They also told me that if I re-formated the hard drive and installed Linux that my warrantee would be void, and they would not support the machine - even for hardware problems

      you either mis-heard, or they mis-spoke. your hardware warranty is not void, your technical support would be kind of hard to recieve, seeing how they only support the original system configuration and what else you may get from dell.

      they may request you restore the original operating system to provide technical assistance for hardware problems. or if you send it in for repairs, what you get back will likely have a factory-fresh load of windows on it.

      (like There's a floppy disk *stuck* in the floppy drive)

      you can still get a 3 spindle dell laptop?

    23. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...my warrantee would be void...

      How do they manage to void a human being?

    24. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by yagu · · Score: 1
      ..., reality of "value" in a free-market economy, ...

      I think this is the underlying strange-attractor in this whole deal. It isn't really a free-market economy because of the Microsoft field-force waves and their effect on the market. Annoying to say the least.

      For the record, the $100 offer (charge to remove windows) was not an opening offer but a capitulation after a lengthy discussion (including the first rep I talked to).... If it had been the opening offer I would have probably been more amenable to a negotiated deal.... but I had to work hard to get just to that point. In a free-market economy (IMO) it shouldn't be that way.

    25. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Discount Laptops (discountlaptops.com) do the same exact thing. Heck, they often have the same laptops and accessories. I wouldn't be suprised to see several others that do the exact same thing. At least with those places when you pay the extra $145 for XP Professional they give you an actual install disk rather than a restore disk.

    26. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by LPrecure · · Score: 1

      Even asking them *not* to do something is disruptive to their business chain. That's why they don't do it. It's not like they don't want the extra business, small as it might be. It would simply cost them more to cater to you. If you want another example, try buying, say, a Dell desktop without a mouse. They don't even have a "no mouse" option, because it's cheaper to throw a mouse into every box than it is to keep track of which ones don't get mice. (Hoping I'm not wrong about this one.)

    27. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by Chmarr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes. It's expensive.

      You need to take the computer out of the line, out of the protective carrier that it's in (either the box, or just some foam protection), plug it in, turn it on, wait for it to boot, then get to a command prompt, then run fdisk, then discover that windows doesn't let you run fdisk on the active partition, and so on. Or... perhaps have that floppy around for the one in 10,000 chance that someone doesnt want windows.

      THEN... add onto that the overhead of having a customisation channel for this kind of thing.

      THEN... add on the additional cost of not being able to simply use the 'number of computers shipped' as the amount of computers installed with windows. You need to either track that number separately, or have two tracking systems. It may well be that MS insists on the payback being the 'number of stickers installed' on the computers... will they accept a used sticket back as a non-install?

      THEN... triple all the costs... generally, a business plays 2.5 to 3 times the employee's salary to actually hire the imployee, due to taxes, liability insurance, accounting procedures, and so on.

      So, yes, an additional $100 for that kind of customisation is NOT unreasonable. Welcome to the world of mass-production. You want a cheap laptop? This is the price you have to pay for that.

    28. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That is so, so stupid. If they have a policy of selling laptops without Windows, then they just order some hd's without windows and do a run every once in a while where they install them. All the manufacturers have lots of variations in what they sell, like you can order with different amounts of ram. The "any variation would cost millions of dollars" argument is just propaganda from oem's that are in bed with Microsoft.

    29. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Yeah, running fdisk is a really expensive procedure."

      Price is determined by value, not the cost of resources. If he was willing to pay for it, then the price was right.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    30. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by maxbang · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dude, I totally hear what you're saying. I know it's futile, but I still believe that if enough people stop putting up with this bullshit, companies will start to pay attention. Start giving people Linux preinstalled on +10% of computers and everything would be fantastically different. If they started doing that, there would be better support for graphics, ACPI, no more stupid winmodems, and so forth. They'd have to try and help better the code and their hardware to meet the plug and play demand that people are used to on Windows. I've found that I've had to wrestle with crap in Windows a lot less than with Linux, especially on laptops (fuck you, Vaio). I've had probably twenty different laptops in the past decade and as they get more complicated, the harder they are to get fully working in either environment. I haven't put Windows on a laptop in ages. The last time I used it on a portable was on my dad's Dell running win2k. Did I have a point here? Oh, yeah. Everyone's always talking about the chicken and the egg critical mass bullshit whenever they bring up adopting open source stuff. It falls on the manufacturers to start offering Linux (or whatever) as a standard reduced price option on all their computers. And fuck all that shit about playing nice with windows. How many regular home users use all that workgroup crap? Unless there's one of us nerds around, there aren't any fileservers, terminals, printservers, subnets, nodes, backups, etc. There are usually a couple of PCs sharing a broadband connection via a simple NAT device. So, everyone wins because my rant declares it so. Now I'm afraid I need to sleep as Ganon's minions have kicked my ass yet again. Fuck you, Ganon.

      --
      I also reply below your current threshold.
    31. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Thats right. Its called a "monopoly".

      This is bad for everyone because there is no choice"

      The mere fact that Linux exists and so many people want laptops without windows proves your statement false. There is a choice. Besides, for the guy who doesn't think he should be charged / inconvienced because he wants a special operating system installed needs to realize that anything custom from a mass production company costs money. You can get some really amazing custom BMW's made....but you normally have to tack on about an extra $50,000 to $100,000 for the custimizations. I'm not the biggest fan of M$, but it pisses me off when people try to say they're a monopoly when Apple is 25 times the monopoly M$ will ever be. Final comment --- why is it so damn hard to just reformat and install Linux yourself?

    32. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      Thats right. Its called a "monopoly".

      A monopoly is when there are no practical alternatives. There are numerous practical alternatives to buying a specific laptop from a specific vendor. Like buying an equivalent laptop from another vendor.

      Unfortunately greed rules this world and it will take enforced legislation to change this shameful, irresponsible abuse.

      No, it will just take an alternative product that enough customers ask for and a competitor prepared to provide it.

      It would take legislation to *force* manufacturers to develop a product the market *isn't demanding*. I'm not sure what world you live in where sellers meeting market demand at the best price is "shameful, irresponsible abuse", but I'm glad I don't live there, comrade.

    33. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by drsmithy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      In a free-market economy (IMO) it shouldn't be that way.

      I'm not sure where the meme that "free market economy == every vendor should be required by law to exactly meet my specific requirements" originated from, but it's not even *remotely* accurate.

      Your experience is a textbook example of how a free market economy *should* work. Vendor A doesn't sell the product you want. You negotiate with Vendor A to provide a product that meets your requirements, a customisation they see the need to charge for. At any time (and this is the important part) you are completely free to seek other vendors who might provide products more aligned to your requirements.

    34. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by yagu · · Score: 1

      ..., I'm not sure where the meme that "free market economy == every vendor should be required by law to exactly meet my specific requirements" originated from, but it's not even *remotely* accurate

      I'm not sure where that meme comes from either... nor do I buy into it (quite frankly, I'm finding the word "meme" a tired saw).

      Maybe if you'd read a few words past what you quoted in my post you'd get to my not-put-in-context-in-your-reply-post thesis. (For the record, THAT post is here.)

      So, putting aside your comment on the meme that doesn't correlate with my original post, my point was that the situation I encountered doesn't represent a free market because it is perturbed by actions (found illegal by the DOJ.... but never effectively remedied) and practices of Microsoft.

      You say, "you [I] are [am] completely free to seek other vendors who might provide products more aligned to your requirements", and normally that's true, but in the distorted OS market, especially then (the time I was describing in my original post), there were no options -- directly attributable to bad behavior by Microsoft.

    35. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pctorque.com great customer service too.

    36. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by yagu · · Score: 1

      from your post:

      ..., I've found that I've had to wrestle with crap in Windows a lot less than with Linux, especially on laptops (fsck you, Vaio).

      You might try installing a linux on a laptop today -- it's much better than it used to be. I currently have linux running on an HP zx5000, wireless and everything working great...(currently typing this up on that HP... btw, 1920x1200 screen, Xorg Xwindows drives it perfectly!). I also have it on my old Dell Inspiron, wireless happens with a pcmcia card, and I have it on a brand new Averitec laptop.... again, everything working perfectly (including the dvd burner -- cool). I gave a Knoppix CD to my friends, and they regularly use that with their old Sony Vaio... boots right up, all devices work, and they access wireless with the pcmcia card.

      For the record, I "proxy" mod you interesting, or insightful -- don't know why you got modded funny.

    37. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by yagu · · Score: 1

      A monopoly is when there are no practical alternatives.

      I guess that's correct! But I'm not claiming "foul" because of a monopoly! I'm crying "foul" because of the illegal tactics of one particular monopoly, Microsoft... (Of course it's not illegal to have a monopoly, it's illegal to USE that monopoly to effect an advantage in the market, something for which Microsoft has been found to be in violation.) And, that abuse of monopolistic power by Microsoft has artificially induced into the market the kind of scenario I described.

      it will just take an alternative product that enough customers ask for and a competitor prepared to provide it

      There is ample evidence enough customers were willing to try other products, but Microsoft negotiated contracts such that vendors could NOT afford to even try to offer these other products.

      It would take legislation to *force* manufacturers to develop a product the market *isn't demanding*.

      Again, ample evidence existed/exists there is demand for products but vendors are still cowed by Microsoft contracts, etc., to the extent the market can't seem to get off the dime. The damage to the OS and computer market is significant, lasting, resonating, and persists today. I don't love the idea of legislation or government involvement but when one company garners so much of the market and controls it with illegal and bullying tactics sometimes action has to be taken by some entity to re-strike a reasonable equilibrium.

    38. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by paulatz · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I'm going to burn my karma, but I'm tired of reading this cost/price bullshit.

      If you don't want to use windows you simply don't have to click "I Agree" the first time you boot you new laptop. Than it will shut down and you can install Linux on it. Windows is not really sold, so if you do not agree you do not have it that's all. No expense and no price, simply you should ask the seller to refund you windows in advance. Of course the seller will deny, this because he is a *&%**#@ù, no cost/price bullshit at all.

      --
      this post contain no useful information, no need to mod it down
    39. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by yagu · · Score: 1
      You can get some really amazing custom BMW's made....but you normally have to tack on about an extra $50,000 to $100,000 for the custimizations (sic)

      Yeah, but I'm guessing for that extra $50,000 to $100,000 you're getting an enhanced BMW... The scenario here is a request to NOT have something as part of the package. In your example, I seriously doubt a BMW dealer would charge anything if a customer were to ask that the floor mats be removed.

      And to the question, "why is it so damn hard to just reformat and install Linux yourself?", obviously whether or not the vendor would sell me a laptop without Windows, I would have to perform the linux install... so implicit in this story is that I am more than happy to accommodate the work necessary to format and install linux.

    40. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by pentalive · · Score: 1

      Actually I asked them twice to clarify that policy and they said twice the warrentee would be void, I would not be able to get *any* techincal support.

      This was some time ago before all the

      ** Gateway **

      Cow stores all closed up.

    41. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see why the manufacturers do this. In the long run it could cost them in support calls if people installed their own os. I re-installed xp home with pro and my retailer HP refuses to provide drivers on their website or through tech support calls. They told me to "use google." wow that off-shoring tech support really did pay off!

      In any case if they don't have 100% control over the computer's configuration then it starts giving them palpatations trying to support it. That's why they love to give the old "insert install cd and reboot." See everything works idiot!

    42. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      Maybe if you'd read a few words past what you quoted in my post you'd get to my not-put-in-context-in-your-reply-post thesis.

      Given it was the last sentence in your post, there wasn't a great deal after it to read.

      Your "thesis" is, essentially, that because $VENDOR doesn't say "how high" when you ask them to jump - and, indeed, won't even jump without a certain amount of negotiation, that they aren't playing by the "rules" of a "free market economy".

      [...] I encountered doesn't represent a free market because it is perturbed by actions (found illegal by the DOJ.... but never effectively remedied) and practices of Microsoft.

      If the "free market" sees no demand for non-Windows OSes, how is not meeting this nonexistant demand mean it is "perturbed" ?

    43. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      I guess that's correct! But I'm not claiming "foul" because of a monopoly! (Of course it's not illegal to have a monopoly, it's illegal to USE that monopoly to effect an advantage in the market, something for which Microsoft has been found to be in violation.)

      This is a meaningless little soundbite lots of people like to throw out. Since a lot of typical business activities suddenly become illegal when a company is ruled a monopoly - and a company doesn't actually *know* it's a monopoly (and thus has to play by the new rules) until _after_ the court finding - how would you propose a "monopoly" *not* act in an illegal way ?

      Of course you are calling "foul" because of a monopoly. Any "monopoly" - illegal or otherwise - would have produced the results you experienced because the market demand for "non-monopoly" products would have been so insignificant.

      There is ample evidence enough customers were willing to try other products, [...]

      Seven years ago ? I'd have to disagree rather strongly with that. It was about the lowest point for alternative OS *demand* - particularly on the desktop - in the last few decades. OS/2 was dead, Linux the sole domain of hardcore geeks (KDE 1.0 having - maybe - only just appeared), Apple's "Next Gen" OS project was floundering (for about the third time, giving us the OS8, 8.5 and 9 stopgaps) and both Windows 9x and NT4 had cemented their place in corporate and home environments with the IE4-updated GUI and a flood of Win32-native software.

      Indeed, if you were going to pick a timeframe for the _least_ interest from the market in non-Windows OSes, ca. 1997 - 2001 would be just about the best you could do. Heck, even in the late 80s/early 90s DOS+Windows 3.x per-processor licensing days there were more viable OS alternatives to pick from that were actually in demand.

      [...] but Microsoft negotiated contracts such that vendors could NOT afford to even try to offer these other products.

      So demand was, apparently, significant for non-Windows machines, but vendors wouldn't have been able to stay in business selling them ?

      Don't you see just a tiny conflict in those two positions ?

    44. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by yagu · · Score: 1
      ..., This is a meaningless little soundbite lots of people like to throw out. Since a lot of typical business activities suddenly become illegal when a company is ruled a monopoly - and a company doesn't actually *know* it's a monopoly (and thus has to play by the new rules) until _after_ the court finding - how would you propose a "monopoly" *not* act in an illegal way ?

      Well, I don't want to continue this discussion forever, but I would at this point throw in my "insider" knowledge about Microsoft. I worked there. I was one of sixteen on the original NT Beta support team, I was hired because of my unix background.... and at the time Microsoft was grandstanding about "POSIX compliant" new OS.... and they now were going to be part of the open standards interoperability "community"... (this I remember -- it was a cornerstone of the persuasion to get me to accept a position there).

      After convincing me they were serious about their posix OS... I found out behind closed doors different... I walked out of one strategy meeting in anger accusing the team that if what they were doing weren't illegal, it was at the very least unethical. Later that week at a posix-subsystem (for NT) technical presentation, the presenter stood up and said (closely paraphrasing here)... "Before we get this presentation started, I want to make it perfectly clear this is a subsystem we don't care about, we don't intend to do anything with -- it's strictly a checkbox to satisfy requirements for getting government contracts."

      All this while nervously re-assuring each other the current investigation into MS was over and settled (not the one later for which they were found in violation...).

      Clearly to me MS was a company knowing fully what they were doing and why and that their actions could be illegal. But also a company fully confident they could get away with it.

      So demand was, apparently, significant for non-Windows machines, but vendors wouldn't have been able to stay in business selling them ?

      Never said it was significant... said there was ample evidence there was demand... certainly enough to foster and create a viable market. But the market was so distorted and skewed by Microsoft's actions the market was suffocated.... (exact words used by Microsoft in another scenario I believe, no wait, I guess it was "cut off their air supply"....)

      I've read many of your posts -- you're quite versed in technology, seem to have a bit of a bent for Windows... You can read mine, you'll see I have a bent for linux, and unix... I think we can mostly agree to disagree on many of these issues... (you can even jump back in with the last word if you wish...). Enjoyed the chat.

    45. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by The+Bungi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      do one-off custom builds, five or so a month of desktops with windows on it. this is my current cost for single oem copies

      You're absolutely right! I cannot fathom why you're not getting the same prices as Michael Dell. It's just not fair!

      Ridiculous punk.

    46. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by TheSunborn · · Score: 1

      To use google is better then it used to be. If you ever need new drivers for their hp 3100 driver, you have to call them, and pay them to send a cd to you. Now THAT is stupid.

      (It happend more then a year ago, so they may have changed since)

    47. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

      No. You just need to tell them to order the computer without a Hard Drive and then seperately get a hard drive. If you want a Nude computer you should be competent enough to install a hard drive.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    48. Re:refund?!? they tried to CHARGE me! by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      After convincing me they were serious about their posix OS... I found out behind closed doors different... I walked out of one strategy meeting in anger accusing the team that if what they were doing weren't illegal, it was at the very least unethical.

      That's a pretty generic statement - you don't actually give me any idea *what* it is you found so outrageous.

      Later that week at a posix-subsystem (for NT) technical presentation, the presenter stood up and said (closely paraphrasing here)... "Before we get this presentation started, I want to make it perfectly clear this is a subsystem we don't care about, we don't intend to do anything with -- it's strictly a checkbox to satisfy requirements for getting government contracts."

      I don't think I've ever heard anyone refer to the POSIX subsystem in NT as anything else other than a tickbox requirements. Indeed, I'm not aware of anyone who thought NT would be primarily a POSIX-ish OS. The primary/preferred API was supposed to be the OS/2 subsystem, but after Windows 3.0's unexpected success, win32 was hacked on top of win16 and used instead.

      At least, that's always been my understanding based on publicly available information.

      Clearly to me MS was a company knowing fully what they were doing and why and that their actions could be illegal. But also a company fully confident they could get away with it.

      I'm not really understanding how anything you've described thus far could be considered illegal. Unethical, maybe - if you believe corporations to be capable of ethical behaviour in the first place (personally, I don't) - but no more so than your typical advertising campaign.

      Never said it was significant... said there was ample evidence there was demand... certainly enough to foster and create a viable market.

      But you also say (or at least imply)that the market wouldn't be profitable enough to sustain itself. So, which is it ?

      Remember, Microsoft can't make it more expensive to get a non-Windows machine, they can just make it cheaper to get a Windows machine. The only ways a non-Windows machine can be more expensive than a Windows machine is if the alternative OS itself costs more, or the market for such machines is too small to cover the additional development and support costs.

      Also, as I said, you're trying to talk up the demand in one of the lowest points for alternative OSes in probably the last twenty years. If you'd been talking about the last few years or the early-mid 90s, it would be a different story, but ca. 1997 - 2001 there was just _nothing_ else out there that was a viable competitor except MacOS - which had a significantly higher cost.

      But the market was so distorted and skewed by Microsoft's actions the market was suffocated.... (exact words used by Microsoft in another scenario I believe, no wait, I guess it was "cut off their air supply"....)

      Another phrase that gets bandied about but wouldn't be unusual in just about any big-business meeting. Heck, you hear worse than that in open-house political debates.

      I've read many of your posts -- you're quite versed in technology, seem to have a bit of a bent for Windows... You can read mine, you'll see I have a bent for linux, and unix...

      I am - or at least try my best to be - platform agnostic. Certainly in my job (Sys Admin) I'm quite happy to use and recommend different platforms (Unix, Linux, FreeBSD, Windows, OS X) for different purposes - and regularly have. Please don't mistake "not anti-Windows" with " strongly pro-Windows", as many people seem to do.

  6. No windows by October_30th · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Heh. The last time I asked whether it was possible to buy a laptop without a pre-installed operating system, I was told that selling one could expose the company to litigation. The reason: knowingly selling a non-functional product.

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
    1. Re:No windows by cowscows · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is functional though. As long as all the parts they sold you work. I can go to CompUSA and buy an optical mouse. It's pretty much worthless without a computer to go with it, but that doesn't mean that it's nonfunctional. My computer came with a CD burner, but no blank cd's. So I couldn't burn a CD without making another purchase, but that doesn't mean my computer was broken.

      That's not a compelling reason at all.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    2. Re:No windows by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      The reason: knowingly selling a non-functional product.

      well, you could turn it right around. buy a windows box, connect to the net (default config), wait 1 week. voila - non-functioning product!

      its better being non-functional at delivery. at least then, it won't ever become a spam relay zombie (like most home windows installs do)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    3. Re:No windows by SunFan · · Score: 1


      But if the customer agrees to the terms of the sale, there is no problem!

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    4. Re:No windows by Intron · · Score: 1

      The grain of truth there is that the industry has no way to test the laptop except by loading and running an OS. The only test of a bare laptop would be if the BIOS self-test comes up and gets to a message like "hard disk fail - no boot partition found" or some such.

      Selling it without an OS would require someone to write a standalone diagnostic. Knoppix might do the trick.

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    5. Re:No windows by October_30th · · Score: 1

      IIRC, our consumer protection laws define computer as a bundle of hardware and a pre-installed operating system (so that the bundle works out of box). Hence, selling a computer without an operating system is illegal. I can't say I am sure about it, though.

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    6. Re:No windows by jb.hl.com · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Does that mean you can't buy a console without games?

      Cos I'd swear you needed games to use a console.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    7. Re:No windows by da_foz · · Score: 1

      You can go to Dell.com (or Dell.ca in my case) and get some of the systems without an OS. Mainly servers. What's the difference?

    8. Re:No windows by rev_sanchez · · Score: 1

      So tape a Knoppix CD to the outside with the boot instructions.

      --
      If you didn't come to party don't bother knocking on my door. Prince '1999'
    9. Re:No windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unfortunately that wouldn't work these days with SP2.... but cute post.

    10. Re:No windows by Surt · · Score: 1

      Surely that's exactly why they're all packaged with one or two free lame games.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    11. Re:No windows by schon · · Score: 1

      the industry has no way to test the laptop except by loading and running an OS

      Bullshit. There are burn-in diagnostic programs, and pretty much every shop I've ever seen uses them.

      Selling it without an OS would require someone to write a standalone diagnostic.

      Gee, you mean like this one? Or this one? Or perhaps this one?

    12. Re:No windows by EvilSporkMan · · Score: 3, Informative

      They aren't - the Nintendo 64 shipped with no games AND no menu system - you HAD to have a cartridge to do anything with it.

      --
      -insert a witty something-
    13. Re:No windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My daughters old computer died so I bought a computer from F.S. that normally came with an OEM Windows distribution on the hard drive. I said I didn't want the hard drive, as I had just bought a new one. They removed the hard drive and sold the computer to me, minus the cost of the hard drive and the OEM OS. I was happy. Computer was a 2.2 GHz with 512MB for CAN $399. Replaced OEM bios with the actual bios for that motherboard and then her existing copy of XP Home. Vendors forgot to remove the OEM recovery CD and install key, so basically had the OEM OS anyway.

    14. Re:No windows by tepples · · Score: 1

      our consumer protection laws define computer as a bundle of hardware and a pre-installed operating system (so that the bundle works out of box).

      How specifically does the Ubuntu Live CD not count?

    15. Re:No windows by NetNifty · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Does the screen of the laptop come with a EULA saying if you don't agree with the terms, return it for a refund? Does your SATA connectors come with a EULA saying if you don't agree with the terms, return it for a refund?

    16. Re:No windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not when I got my desktop system. They have a hard drive with a burn in system and all the drivers on it. All they have to do is slap in the diagnostic hard drive (or the diagnostic CD/DVD with WinPE/BartPE on it) and let it run for 24 hours. When they are done they put the hard drive you ordered in it and ship it. The best thing is that for desktops you only pay a $25-50 assembly fee above the cost of parts and pay for whatever shipping you want.

    17. Re:No windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and what about companies that sell printers without a needed cartridge?

    18. Re:No windows by Herr_Nightingale · · Score: 1

      If it did, would it matter? No. EULAs haven't been proven in court, and I suspect that the first good challenge will wash 'em all down the same sewer.
      Licensing agreements only apply to people who agree to their terms.

  7. Buy a Linux Laptop... by sammykrupa · · Score: 3, Informative

    ....here.

    1. Re:Buy a Linux Laptop... by jnd3 · · Score: 1

      Is it possible to buy a modern PC/laptop with Linux preinstalled? I followed some of the links from Linspire ... Via C3 processors? Gimme a break!

    2. Re:Buy a Linux Laptop... by a+whoabot · · Score: 2, Informative

      The link I followed from there did bring me to this:

      http://linuxcertified.com/linux_laptops.html

      Says on the pages "No windows tax"; and, I'm not the hippest when it comes to the newest specs, but they seem to have the latest and greatest.

    3. Re:Buy a Linux Laptop... by DA-MAN · · Score: 2, Informative

      Is it possible to buy a modern PC/laptop with Linux preinstalled? I followed some of the links from Linspire ... Via C3 processors? Gimme a break!

      http://www.linare.com/linare-linux-notebook.php

      Not the latest and greatest, but at comes with an Athlon XP-M 1800+ CPU. I have one of these and must say it is pretty zippy. Not bad for the price.

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
    4. Re:Buy a Linux Laptop... by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      Nothing wrong with the C3 for day to day operations - Office,Email,Web, etc.

      Linspire isn't exactly in the same leage as Gentoo IMO...

      So a C3 is really all a Linspire user would need IMO...

      JMO though - you can run whatever you please, just gotta give them credit for knowing their target market at least.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    5. Re:Buy a Linux Laptop... by eurleif · · Score: 1

      I've been thinking of buying one of those for a while, so I'm hoping you can answer a few questions I've been wanting to ask a user. Have you tried installing a different distro on yours? Is the keyboard unusually hard to type on for a laptop? What kind of battery life do you get? Thanks a whole lot.

  8. Got my refund by murderlegendre · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just got my Windows XP Pro refund from MS last week. Package contained several foreign coins, a coupon booklet, and one human soul.

    --
    There's a Starman, waiting in the sky / He'd like to come and meet us, but he hasn't got the time.
    1. Re:Got my refund by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Just got my Windows XP Pro refund from MS last week. Package contained several foreign coins, a coupon booklet, and one human soul.

      You're probably also on a watch-list now.

    2. Re:Got my refund by Kippesoep · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you got a great deal.

    3. Re:Got my refund by jazzman75 · · Score: 1

      That human soul you received has to be worth something. I bet you could resell it in eBay's "Everything Else > Weird Stuff > Totally Bizarre > Human Souls" category. You can probably get several hundred thousand dollars for it you agree to tattoo the winning bidder's corporate logo on the soul's forehead for a year. For added value, try toasting the soul to see if any images of the Holy Mother appear. Just a thought.

    4. Re:Got my refund by Larry+Lightbulb · · Score: 1

      With the fall in the dollar the foreign coins are probably a good investment.

    5. Re:Got my refund by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spend the coins/coupons and put the soul on eBay.

    6. Re:Got my refund by unitron · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "...refund from MS...contained...one human soul."

      Well, of course. MS has a bunch of them they obtained dirt cheap.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    7. Re:Got my refund by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think if you heat it images of bread appear.

  9. here is what i'm wondering by Coneasfast · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the type of people who would want a refund for their copy of windows is the same type of people who not buy a computer from a manufacturer.

    having said that, why should one have to go through all this trouble just to get a refund, i've seen an article explaining the very same procedure before, will this go on forever?

    as long as the manufacturers can avoid it whenever possible, they will continue to splurt out BS over the phone as long as it's legal and gives them a slight chance that they can avoid the refund.

    --
    Marge, get me your address book, 4 beers, and my conversation hat.
    1. Re:here is what i'm wondering by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 1

      Laptops are not so easy to build-your-own, so you really don't have much choice but to order one from a manufacturer.

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

    2. Re:here is what i'm wondering by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      the type of people who would want a refund for their copy of windows is the same type of people who not buy a computer from a manufacturer.

      This is true in most cases, and I won't argue. However, what happens when we want to get our hands on the latest AMD64 laptop? Our choices are limited. Generally, I just stick with buying XP home, but there has to be a better way, like opting not to buy it at all or selling it on ebay.

    3. Re:here is what i'm wondering by Otter · · Score: 1
      as long as the manufacturers can avoid it whenever possible, they will continue to splurt out BS over the phone as long as it's legal and gives them a slight chance that they can avoid the refund.

      A round or two of squabbling with a customer probably costs more than an OEM Windows license does. I think the answer is simply that there is insufficient demand to make the manufacturers bother to have a policy. As the submitter said, this was an issue a few years ago and since then has almost entirely dropped out of sight.

    4. Re:here is what i'm wondering by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      There are many laptop manufacturers that will sell you a laptop without Windows on it. But they are NOT well known manufacturers like Dell, IBM or Compaq. Instead you need to seek out manufacturers with "penguin" or "daemon" in their name...

      I think the general point stands. The type of people who demand Windows refunds aren't the type of people who buy Dell Latitudes.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    5. Re:here is what i'm wondering by Tlosk · · Score: 1

      not many people have the capability of building a laptop

  10. Previous Slashdot discussion by waynegoode · · Score: 1

    This was previoulsy discussed on Slashdot here a few years ago.

    1. Re:Previous Slashdot discussion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and he SPECIFICALLY asks if all of that is still applicable NOW. The funny thing about the world is that as time moves forward, it changes.

    2. Re:Previous Slashdot discussion by waynegoode · · Score: 1

      Yes. That's right. I was just posting the URL of the previous discussion for those who wanted to read it since the URL wasn't listed in the article.

    3. Re:Previous Slashdot discussion by Soruk · · Score: 1

      That's beside the point. The OP was asking what the current situation is.

      --
      -- Soruk
  11. Shouldn't the question be: by winkydink · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do you value your time so little that it's worth going through the hassle?

    I guess if you're extremely principled, I can see doing it.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Shouldn't the question be: by gphinch · · Score: 1

      i'm guessing thats the point of his question...if it's truely a hassle, then it's not worth the time, but if its a matter of filling out a form, mailing back the cd with said form, and have a check in your hands 6-8 weeks later then go for it. i can't imagine it is tho.

      --
      in bed.
    2. Re:Shouldn't the question be: by TeknoHog · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I'm somewhat principled. In this case, the principle is called market economy.

      In market economy, you don't just buy things to get them for yourself. When you buy a product, you are giving a message to the manufacturer that there is demand, and that you like their products better than their competitors'. Your actions are shaping the industry.

      If I'm forced to buy a copy of Windows I don't want, I'm giving the wrong message to the industry. For example, Linux drivers are not being developed well enough, because everyone thinks everyone uses Windows. It's not quite true, but the industry is getting the message that everyone wants Windows, because of this imbecile policy of OEM Windows copies.

      In the end, I'm doing this because I'm greedy: I want good Linux drivers. It probably helps if I give everyone the message that I prefer to use Linux rather than Windows on my machines.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    3. Re:Shouldn't the question be: by wed128 · · Score: 0

      --> Boycott Dilbert


      Dilbert is right, and you're a dick. It was worth the karma, trust me.
    4. Re:Shouldn't the question be: by Sloppy · · Score: 1
      Do you value your time so little that it's worth going through the hassle?
      Well, maybe his question is: how big is the hassle? If the hassle is small, then it could still be worth it, even if your time is worth a lot.

      From this, we can infer an optimum strategy for MS: make it be a hassle.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    5. Re:Shouldn't the question be: by winkydink · · Score: 1

      Kind of like mail-in rebates. It's that way for a reason. I suspect MS has a similar strategy.

      I agree though that if it's easy, then it would be worth the time. However, if it was easy, I'd suspect that I'd find a few easy howto's on the first page of returns from a Google query.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    6. Re:Shouldn't the question be: by bit01 · · Score: 1

      Do you value your time so little that it's worth going through the hassle?

      As a single purchase it is not worth it but if a few thousand people do this it could trigger a reform of the whole industry. That allows millions of people using linux (out of the hundreds of millions of people using windows) to avoid the M$ tax and also encourages openness and competition. For the industry as a whole it is worth it in the extreme. On a personal note I just want to be able to walk into a retail computer shop in a year or two and be given the option.

      I guess if you're extremely principled, I can see doing it.

      Just volunteering to help the community. No extreme principles required.

      ---

      DRM - destroying free markets one step at a time.

    7. Re:Shouldn't the question be: by JediJorgie · · Score: 1

      The part I don't get is why this is such a big deal?

      There are plenty of examples of the same *deals* in every other market..

      Some simple examples:

      1. fast food places often have specials that are cheaper if you get the *package*. Our local McDonalds has buy-one-get-one free pies... Guess what, if you only want one you pay the same price.

      2. Coke/Pepsi distributors give big discounts to folks that that sell fountain drinks if they only sell *their* brand. (The folks I have talked to have said that they save up to 40% by only offering one or the other depending on the contract that year.)

      3. Site licensed software is often sold based on the number of computers in a company, even if they will never all have the software installed. This is NORMAL business, and for large system counts, it usually works out to be MUCH cheaper then if you actually spent the time and money to track how many licenses you have. (I am sure this is how Dell/GW get Windows. They is why they put Windows with every box, they have already paid for it.)

      4. When you buy a car, and you want AC, you can get a package that has the 1 thing that you really want (AIR) and you get 5 or more things you couldn't care less about, and it is the same price or cheaper then if you add AC on it's own.

      5. I can buy a Direct TV sytem with receiever and dish for $69. Guess how much it is for just the receiver? Yep $69.

      6. Everyone in the local schools district pays property taxes that are partially used to fund the schools. If you don't have any kids in school, you don't get a discount.

      7. Go to taco bell, order a taco salad, no meat. Yep, same price even though you are buying it with out the most costly part. (Yes, I know, most of the cost of fast food is for the labor to serve it. That is the whole point.)

      8. And my favorite example... Every telephone/modem I have ever purchased has come with a phone cord. Well guess what, I have a drawer full of phone cords. I don't need another one, yet I don't try and get for the phone cheaper without the cord.

      It is normal economics, you buy the *package deal* and they get to save money by selling a bunch of similar packages. You want something different then most folks, you pay extra for the time it takes them to deal with exceptions.

      If the linux crowd gets big enough that it is worth them offering a standard *linux package*, they will. (Dell servers are a perfect example.)

      Until then, quit calling it the *Microsoft Tax* unless you are also going to refer to the *phone cord tax* when you buy a telepohone and it comes with a cord you don't need. Unless you just enjoy being overly dramatic.

      Jorgie

    8. Re:Shouldn't the question be: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dilbert is right

      Would that be the part where:
      (1) He implies there's something wrong with P2P software?

      (2) Where he cites utterly meaningless and nonsensical polling statistics on "unlicensed commercial software is used in their profession"? (Umm yeah... I guess maybe there's at least one unknown person somewhere on earth using some "unlicensed" software.)

      or (3) the repeated comments that software needs to be "licensed"? When you buy a book you do not receive or need any license to read it. When you buy a CD you do not receive or need any license to read it. When you buy software the law says it is not copyright infringement to install and run that software without any license at all. They may ship it with a contract offer and plaster the the letters "EULA" at the top of that contract offer, but you do not NEED any license at all and you can decline that contract offer. Note the letter A for agreement, without which it does not exist.

      An artist is perfectly free to be a pathetic sellout for a pretty wretched propaganda peice, but if he does I hope he gets a very satisfying wad of cash out of it. He's certianly going to lose my respect, and if some guy wants to call for a boycott then I wish him luck.

    9. Re:Shouldn't the question be: by wed128 · · Score: 1

      I agree that the current software licensing/EULA scheme is broken. I myself use almost all free software for that reason. However, what little commercial software i do own (games) are fully legal/licensed copies. If headway on this problem is to be made, piracy is not the answer. If everyone played by the rules, american consumer wouldn't be treated so much like a criminal.

  12. What?? by surefooted1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why would you buy a prefab machine with windows knowing that you didn't want it in the first place? If I buy a car and don't like the rims, I don't ask the manufacturer or dealer for a refund. Don't buy from that vendor. No one put a gun to your head. This is stupid.

    Any experiences - especially with vendors that do not offer an alternative?"

    The wording of that would lead me to belive that there are vendors that do offer an alternative. So once again...this is stupid.

    1. Re:What?? by mrsev · · Score: 1

      This is not stupid. If you dont like the question dont post. The question is that many vendors do not sell machines without Win preinstalled. This is a genuine question and deserves a genuine answer. I dont have this answer but some people probably do. I for one and interested in the answer.

      I remember something in the EU regarding product bundling. I am not sure exactly so someone can probably explain but I was under the impression that there are rules regarding bundling of products. I mean I am not sure if it is legal to insist that before you sell someone a product you can demand that they buy another and refuse the sale if they dont.

      As regards refund value I would imagine that if they have to refund they have to refund retail value. A judge would certainly insist that retail value be refunded.

    2. Re:What?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you buy a prefab machine with windows knowing that you didn't want it in the first place? If I buy a car and don't like the rims, I don't ask the manufacturer or dealer for a refund. Don't buy from that vendor. No one put a gun to your head. This is stupid.

      Flawed analogy, skippy. Car manufacturers give you options. You can choose what you do[n't] want. If you want a stripped down car with no A/C, CD player, power whatever, you can do that.

      The wording of that would lead me to belive that there are vendors that do offer an alternative. So once again...this is stupid.

      There are companies that sell bare laptops. That would be an alternative.

    3. Re:What?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The big deal with returning your copy of windows is because M$ wants you to agree to a shrinked wrapped license. If you do not agree (since you allready paid money to buy it) the agreement says to return WINDOWS for a refund.

      I am not sure if the agreement still says this or not. But at least in the past the main point is since MS says you are not buying it, but leasing it, and you don't know the terms until AFTER you paid for the product, you should be able to back out of the "License." and get your money back. ie. YOu cannot agree to a license that you have not seen.

    4. Re:What?? by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why would you buy a prefab machine with windows knowing that you didn't want it in the first place? If I buy a car and don't like the rims, I don't ask the manufacturer or dealer for a refund. Don't buy from that vendor. No one put a gun to your head. This is stupid.

      As the article mentions, Windows' licensing agreement explicitly entitles you to a refund from the manufacturer.

    5. Re:What?? by murderlegendre · · Score: 1

      If I buy a car and don't like the rims, I don't ask the manufacturer or dealer for a refund. Don't buy from that vendor. No one put a gun to your head. This is stupid.

      This is a really weak analogy.. despite the fact that you don't like those rims, they are still certified by a non-corporate entity (the DOT in the USA) to not fail under normal use and render your ass to grass. In addition, if the car manufacturer were to ship a model with rims/tires that were not roadworthy, they would be in quite a fix. Contrast this with the "safety" of the popular OS - your physical life my not be on the line in this instance - but in our modern technocracy, your personal information, credit, banking data etc, are pretty much "your life".

      Anyway, I see you've become quite accustomed to corporate bullying strategies.

      --
      There's a Starman, waiting in the sky / He'd like to come and meet us, but he hasn't got the time.
    6. Re:What?? by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      After you bought your car and took it home, there wasn't a shrink-wrapped contract on your rims requiring you to agree to a bunch of terms in order to use them. You also didn't have a contract that stated you could return the rims to the manufacturer if you didn't agree to their terms.

    7. Re:What?? by RealAlaskan · · Score: 5, Insightful
      If I buy a car and don't like the rims ...

      When this was on slashdot almost two years back, I seem to recall that there were too many dozens of posts making bad analogies to cars and car dealers.

      Folks, computers are fundamentally different from cars, and most other goods[1]. Argument by analogy is a bad plan in general, but argument by bad analogy is a sure-fire disaster. Let's try arguing by logic, or inspecting the entrails of goats, instead.

      I suppose that I've just unleashed a thousand bad analogies which will prove my point while trying to disprove it. Sigh.

      [1]So, why are they fundamentally different? Microsoft's monopoly, the unique dependence on software to make them useful, (and the unique characteristics of that software, relative to any physical good, including computers), the fact that they are general purpose machines to an extent that nothing else is, and on and on. You might find one of these exceptional circumstances in any field, but you're unlikely to find all of them anywhere else. Unless your analogy accounts for all of these and more, it's probably wrong.

    8. Re:What?? by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Well no, but on the other hand if I put my own rims on the car (perhaps something I make in my own machine shop out back), nobody will send lawyers after me when I try to sell the original rims on eBay. Try to sell that copy of Windows on eBay and Microsoft will send their lawyers after you.

      There is a EULA (which you never have to agree to since you will install Linux on the first boot) that says you can return it for a refund. There are "first sale" laws in most states which may protect your rights to sell this software on eBay. However it is still a hassle. If I can just get a refund for Windows I will do that rather than deal with eBay.

    9. Re:What?? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      That is _the_ dumbest analogy I have ever read on /.

      When I buy a car, I do not have to agree to some encrusted EULA about my usage of that car. If I don't like the rims I can take them off and I can buys rims from some company I like. When I buy a car, I don't have to agree to some encrusted EULA that states that I am not allowed to resell that car. I can take parts out of that car and sell them or put other parts in. MS doesn't let you replace all the software that comes with the OS, not even most of it. To agree to the MS EULA, you give MS permission to control certain parts/aspects of your OS. Nissan doesn't have any control over my car after I made the purchase. I can go on and on here.

      The point is, is that the MS EULA says you are entitled to a refund if you do not agree to the EULA. So it is OK for MS to not live up to their end of the EULA why end-users are supposed to uphold their end of the EULA?

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    10. Re:What?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course there are vendors that offer an alternative: Wal-Mart and Linspire, to name only two. There are many others that sell notebooks with Linux/naked. Granted, this was a problem some years ago, but not anymore. You can even buy PCs without Windows from Dell!

    11. Re:What?? by whoever57 · · Score: 1
      If I buy a car and don't like the rims, I don't ask the manufacturer or dealer for a refund.

      Yes, but the car dealer or manufacturer did not try to change the terms of the deal after you got your car home.

      That's why you are entitled to a refund: because in order to use the Windows s/w, you are required to agree to extra restrictions on your purchase.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    12. Re:What?? by delphi329 · · Score: 1

      Good point. Car analogies are too vague. Can one buy a car without breaks? is different Can one buy a car without buying a specific set of tires.

    13. Re:What?? by violent.ed · · Score: 1

      ... you obviously havent heard of the chewbaca defence.

      --
      - You're not paranoid, they really are after you.
    14. Re:What?? by taboo959 · · Score: 1
      Woohoo! I opt for the goats. :P

      It's probably a LOT more precise than what often passes for "logic" here and......gives a whole new meaning to "slashdot" too.

    15. Re:What?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet, they still need to be manufactured and supported like any other product. They aren't put together on the fly. Changing the way the process works costs money.

    16. Re:What?? by nels_tomlinson · · Score: 1
      And yet, they [computers, that is] still need to be manufactured and supported like any other product. They aren't put together on the fly. Changing the way the process works costs money.

      True. How about MS getting that silly refund clause out of the EULA? Until that clause is gone, I'd say that anyone who wants a refund for Windows has it coming, regardless of what's convenient for the bundler. Maybe the bundlers should have a talk with MS about it. Since that clause is probably there because the EULA would be invalid without it, I don't think the situation will change soon.

  13. Not as difficult... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...as getting a refund on an AOL cd.

  14. The way you get a refund by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is to just download a copy of XP corporate.

    You get support for 2 cpu's, you don't have to deal with activation and can slipstream your drivers and service packs. You can install whenever you want, and even setup an unattended install to make it easier when the son of a bitch crashes on you.

    Kind of like the barter system, where you get a voucher for your next purchase from MSFT. Lowe's and Home Depot do the same thing if you don't have the receipt, and it's not any more hassle than if you did and had to have your credit card so they could reimburse you.

  15. My short, negative answer by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
    I got a new FS Amilo Pro a few weeks ago (in Finland), and contacted the importer on my willingness to return the Windows license that I didn't need or want. I rambled a little on the principles of market economy, how I don't want to give MS the message that I like Windows.

    The explanation why they declined was that the OS was a part of the package, just like a hard drive, and people are not expected to be able to return a HDD they don't like. They also mentioned that it's impossible for them to have OS-free laptops available because of so little demand.

    So, in the end, it's my bad that I chose to buy a laptop that came with Windows. But what choice did I really have, especially when I wanted a budget-ish machine?

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    1. Re:My short, negative answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you check the EULA? I'm curious since I was contemplating buying a laptop in Finland (but then went for another desktop) myself as well and took a look at what the consumer rights authority (kuluttajansuoja-asiamies) has to say and the situation is interesting: EULA:s are invalid and actually illegal but nobody takes action against that since the only affect they have on consumers is that people have to click "Yes" whenever they install something (but that, obviously, doesn't bind them to anything). This made me consider buying one and then returning to the store with it and saying that I don't agree with the EULA because it would've put them in an interesting situation - either to give me the refund or to state that I'm not entitled to one since the EULA is invalid anyway. The first case would be the desirable outcome but in the latter case it would've been interesting since then it would be reasonable to demand that the store states in writing that the EULA is invalid and I really wonder whether any store would be brave enough to do so - since then I'd have a copy that I can reverse-engineer as much as I like or sell to somebody else since only normal copyright restrictions apply.

    2. Re:My short, negative answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Maybe you should have asked them if it's OK for you to sell your unused Microsoft OS, just like it's OK for you to sell your unused HDD? If they said "yes", then I think it's fine for them to bundle it -- you can sell whatever you don't want. If they say "no", then it's not like the HDD at all, is it?

      Oh well. Next time.

    3. Re:My short, negative answer by plj · · Score: 1

      It's different here in Finland than in the States -- if stuff is bundled (like Windows is), it is bundled, and nothing will change that: You can freely refuse to accept the bundled stuff, but that does not make you eligible to any kind of refund. Shrink-wrapped licenses that are not really signed won't apply anyway (which also means that you're free to resell OEM stuff etc.).

      And for sure there is demand for laptops sans Windows; perhaps you can't get a Fujitsu laptop or other branded laptop, but just go to verkkokauppa.com, for example, choose to customise your own laptop, and you'll save 133.90 € when you choose a "without OS" option instead of XP Pro. That option is, in fact, the default one.

      --
      “Wait for Hurd if you want something real” –Linus
    4. Re:My short, negative answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a right to resell purchased software in Europe, demand a full installation CD so that you may do so as per the 1991 software directive.

    5. Re:My short, negative answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sounds interesting. I don't suppose anyone here could provide some background?

  16. Make sure by elid · · Score: 1

    that you're getting an actual Windows cd, and not a manufacturer recovery cd.

    1. Re:Make sure by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      Or even worse, you have a hidden partition that holds your restore. My sister's HP had that, meanign if your disk goes totally to shit, you're up a creek. Me wonders if the hidden partition is quoted in the disk in the sales brochure, making it sound like you have more space available then you have to work with

    2. Re:Make sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They include the hidden partition in the size of the hard drive. You just don't have access to it.

  17. entitlement? by wankledot · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Maybe I'll get flamed for this but...

    Are you really entitled to a refund? Can you take apart any product and return the parts that you don't want? There are plenty of hardware devices (computer and otherwise) that would retain some functionality if you removed part of the system, but do you have the right to pick and choose what you feel you need, and return those that you don't, do you?

    To use the (slightly flawed) car analogy, can I return the spare tire because I don't feel I need it and ask for $50 back? The car works just fine without it, just like a PC works just fine without windows. To use a hardware/software analogy, can I buy a Cisco product that uses some IOS features I don't need, then tell Cisco I will simply remove the features and expect them to write me a check for "returning" them?

    --
    My sig is blank, I typed this by hand.
    1. Re:entitlement? by rjw57 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Are you really entitled to a refund?

      Certainly in EULAs up to and including Windows 2000 there was a clause saying that, if you didn't agree with the EULA for Windows, one could take the shrink-wrapped box back to the vendor for a refund. I don't know if the WinXP EULA has such a clause however.

      --
      Rich
    2. Re:entitlement? by Drachemorder · · Score: 1

      The reason in this case is that the Microsoft EULA specifically says that you can return the product if you don't want to accept the license. It's just a case of using their own stupid restrictions against them.

    3. Re:entitlement? by wankledot · · Score: 1

      Well there you go, thanks, I wasn't aware of that.

      --
      My sig is blank, I typed this by hand.
    4. Re:entitlement? by calyptos · · Score: 1

      According to the EULA of the software, I am entitled to a refund if I do not agree with the EULA, which I am unable to read before the purchase.

      --
      http://illhostit.com/ - Webhosting
    5. Re:entitlement? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are you really entitled to a refund? Can you take apart any product and return the parts that you don't want?

      the diff, of course, is that with computers that include windows, you have to agree to their license OR DEINSTALL IT. if you deinstall it, you should not have to pay for stuff you reject based on license terms.

      there is no such agreement on, say, cd players in cars. if I buy a new car and don't want the cd player, rarely do I get 'credit' for removing it. that was an old old car dealer's trick that is not used much anymore. "delete the radio for credit". sorry sir, can't do that anymore.

      but with windows, you DO have the option to return for a refund. it says so. they just don't honor it. false advertising, if you ask me.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    6. Re:entitlement? by rjw57 · · Score: 1

      And the clause is no longer present in the XP EULA (just read it). Guess you would have to be careful not to buy a machine with XP installed.

      --
      Rich
    7. Re:entitlement? by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Are you really entitled to a refund? Can you take apart any product and return the parts that you don't want?

      If that part says you can return it if you don't agree with it's EULA, then the answer is yes.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    8. Re:entitlement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it says you can in the windows license agreement if you don't click 'yes'.

    9. Re:entitlement? by dynamo · · Score: 1

      not false advertising. breach of contract.

    10. Re:entitlement? by Software · · Score: 1
      Sorry, that's just wrong. The EULA says (emphasis added, CAPS removed):
      You agree to be bound by the terms of this eula by installing, copying, or otherwise using the product. If you do not agree, do not install or use the product; you may return it to your place of purchase for a full refund.
    11. Re:entitlement? by jmv · · Score: 1

      The answer is that there would be no way to get a refund if it weren't for the EULA. When you buy a car, does your spare tire tell you "If you want to use me, you have to agree on this and that. Do you accept?". That's what Windows does, it lets you accept or refuse. If you chose to refuse (they can't force you to accept), then the product is completely useless, so you should be given a refund. Originally, I think the EULA even said something like "If you refuse, bring this back to your vendor" or something like that, but they removed it.

    12. Re:entitlement? by linuxtelephony · · Score: 1

      Using the car analogy, MS Windows are like power windows. You can buy the car with or without power windows. The car works just fine either way. With manual windows, you are going to do the work yourself. If you don't want power windows, you don't buy a car with power windows, and you don't pay for power windows. He is unable to buy the laptop he wants without windows, thus he is seeking to return (for refund) the unused windows.

      --
      . 62,400 repetitions make one truth -- Brave New World, Aldous Huxley
    13. Re:entitlement? by TheKubrix · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      ugggggggggggghhhh

      Maybe I'll get flamed for this but...

      I fucking HATE it when people start out like with that phrase. Just fucking say what you want and be done with it, you're not going to really going to be burned from these supposed "flames".....

    14. Re:entitlement? by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      "Are you really entitled to a refund?" Is MS "entitled" to my money?

      --
      C|N>K
    15. Re:entitlement? by Software · · Score: 1

      Note that the XP Home EULA http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/home/eula.mspx adds "if applicable" after "for a full refund".

    16. Re:entitlement? by dirtmerchant · · Score: 1
      To use the (slightly flawed) car analogy, can I return the spare tire because I don't feel I need it and ask for $50 back? The car works just fine without it, just like a PC works just fine without windows. To use a hardware/software analogy, can I buy a Cisco product that uses some IOS features I don't need, then tell Cisco I will simply remove the features and expect them to write me a check for "returning" them?


      How about this then. I buy a car, I decide that I want to put a different stereo in it. I wouldn't presume to return it to the dealer after purchasing the car and ask for a refund. I am, however, within my rights to sell the factory installed stereo on eBay. Why can't I do the same with the copy of Windows that came with my laptop?
    17. Re:entitlement? by wankledot · · Score: 1

      I understand that the EULA lets you return it now, but you can't take a car back to a dealer after you buy it and return the power windows and ask for manual ones, plus a refund. If you've already bought it, you don't have that right.

      --
      My sig is blank, I typed this by hand.
    18. Re:entitlement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The car parts analogy is more than slightly flawed. What you're paying MS for (or attempting to get a refund for) is a license to use the software, not the software itself.

    19. Re:entitlement? by IWannaBeAnAC · · Score: 1
      When I called IBM to get a refund for the un-used Windows XP on my Thinkpad, they told me that it referred to the product as a whole - ie you could return the laptop for a full refund, but you can't get a refund on just the OS.

      Stinks.

    20. Re:entitlement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are missing the point.

      When you buy windows you are buying a "license". If you bought an electronic device you could remove parts and sell them; you own them. With software, what do you remove? The cd from the tray? The cd from the box? How do you sell what you own without breaking copyright law. You return the license.

    21. Re:entitlement? by v1 · · Score: 1

      The difference here is he bought it at a campus store, where he was given an educational discount. He then sold it on ebay to people that would not normally receive the discount. Because of this, he proffited from the ebay sale in the amount that microsoft discounted it when they sold it to him.

      Whether or not this was legal I don't know, but I can see where a company would get irritated if someone came in and bought say, several cases of product using their discount, then turned around and sold them at retail to the general public. That would at least be considered abusing one's discount privledge. MS may have just been trying to be consistent, going after anyone that does this, no matter how limited in scope.

      Imagine a Best Buy employee buying racks of CDs using his employee discount, and taking them home and selling them out of his car for a little mark-up. That'd get you fired or your discount privledge suspended right quick. In the case of MS and software though, no agreement existed between him and MS, and they had no leverage over him as your employer would, so they lashed out legally to try to coerce him.

      I believe this was just ms's knee-jerk reaction to someone reselling their product for proffit. Strictly speaking, this guy may have not been legally entitled to sell the license, (though I suspect he was - the license is non-transferrable, but he never accepted the license) but ms refusing him the refund was definitely illegal. The usual caution has to follow "Two wrongs don't make a right." He was harmed by MS's practice, but he may have reacted the wrong way. Though sometimes there's a lot more resistance taking the high road.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    22. Re:entitlement? by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 1

      That's bogus, the EULA is not for the whole thinkpad, it is just for windows. I'm sure that if you were to take the rest of the terms in the EULA and apply them equally thinkpad itself, they would be ridiculous.

    23. Re:entitlement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wrote "To use the (slightly flawed) car analogy, can I return the spare tire because I don't feel I need it and ask for $50 back?"

      To fix your analogy, the agreement to buy the car would have to specifically state that if you don't want the spare tire, you can return it for a full refund. Given that in the purchase agreement, it seems pretty unreasonable if the dealer would not accept the return.

    24. Re:entitlement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Listen, it's still NOT LIKE A CAR IN ANY WAY. You can take those power window motors out of your door, sell them on eBay. You can take the glass and sell it on eBay. You can take the control panel and sell it on eBay. It's YOURS to DO WITH AS YOU WISH. If you try to sell the unused pieces of Windows XP on eBay, you WILL GET SUED. I can not tell you in any more clear language that this analogy is flawed. Will you admit that these are not the same at all?

    25. Re:entitlement? by dark_requiem · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more. In a market economy (which we don't have, but they like to tell us we do), all valid exchanges must be mutually voluntary. That means both the seller and buyer must agree to the terms of sale. In this situation, that translates to mean that the seller is perfectly within their rights to refuse to offer laptops with no OS or Linux installed. If you agree to buy the laptop, knowing it has Windows installed, then that is a valid exchange. If, however, you then decide you don't want Windows, but you have no prior agreement with the merchant that they will give you a refund for that component of your system alone, then you have no legitimate claim to a refund. Do you go to a restaurant, order veggie soup, pick out all the peas, and then insist that you shouldn't have to pay for the peas? Of course not.

      The only issue here, as another poster pointed out, is the EULA, which advises you to return the product to the vendor for a refund if you don't agree to the terms. Are you then entitled to a refund for your copy of Windows? Absolutely not. In this instance, Windows was bundled, i.e. it is a part of another product. If you want a return and refund, you have to return the entire product, not just a portion of it (unless the vendor has provisions for this in their return policy, but I can't imagine you'll find a company that does).

      I'm as upset as anyone about the lack of availability of non-Windows laptops, but that doesn't give me the right to dictate the terms of sale to an unwilling third party.

    26. Re:entitlement? by IWannaBeAnAC · · Score: 1
      Of course its bogus, its just one more level in the bureocracy set in place to stop people from getting refunds. They also said that they buy the laptops from their (Tiawanese?) manufacturer with Windows already installed and they have no mechanism for getting a laptop without a windows license.

      You could take them to the small claims tribunal and probably win, but unless a HUGE number of people did that, I doubt IBM would respond in any way - I would not be the least surprised if someone (probably the original manufacturer) had an agreement with microsoft that they must supply windows with every laptop they produce.

    27. Re:entitlement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't a better analogy be something similar to a dealership forcing you to buy the extended warranty. Or best buy automagically forcing you to pay for their service plan, without any option to do so sans.

    28. Re:entitlement? by Software · · Score: 1

      You should get that statement in writing - that you can only return the product as a whole, for a full refund. Then return it - when you're done using it, in 4 or 5 years.

    29. Re:entitlement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft is a corporation and therefore entitled to any an all money it lays claim to.

      You are a worthless freeloader with no rights. Don't like it, don't buy it.

      Oh wait... you were trying to NOT buy it.

    30. Re:entitlement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      It's too bad people don't do this more often. Here's what you do (IANAL, YMMV, etc.). Let's say the small claims court limit is $1000 in your jurisdiction. The estimated retail price of Windows is $199. $1000 / $199 is about 5.

      1. Buy 5 of the cheapest brand-name computers you can find with Windows preinstalled. Buy from a local retailer so there's no jurisdictional questions. Make sure the retailer sells retail (or at least upgrade) copies of XP.
      2. Demand a refund of 5 x $199 = $995 from the retailer.
      3. Sue in small claims court when your refund is denied.
      4. Win in small claims court (do not omit this step!).
      5. Collect $995 (plus court costs, I hope).
      6. Sell the computers on eBay. You'll probably get close to what you paid for them, maybe $50 or $100 less. But if you get within $199 of what you paid for them, you've reached "Profit!!!".
      7. Go to step 1.

      It's almost arbitrage. There is a risk that you won't win in small claims court, so the profit is not quite riskless.


      I suppose there's another risk that the retailer will declare you PNG (persona non grata), which means that you won't be able to enter the store any more. So you might want to pick someplace where you won't go back anyway, or keep moving from store to store.

    31. Re:entitlement? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1
      Yeah -- and have you tried buying a car with manual windows lately?


      Either way, you're screwed when it comes to "windows."

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    32. Re:entitlement? by buss_error · · Score: 1
      Are you really entitled to a refund?

      Yes.

      First, because the EULA says you are. Second, because it's in the 98 consent decree that you are entitled to a refund if you remove the software and do not agree to the license.

      --
      Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
    33. Re:entitlement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For reference, the small claims limit in some states is much higher. In Connecticut, for example, it's $3500.

    34. Re:entitlement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That argument isn't going to get you anywhere. The EULA includes a "do not use" clause for the refund, so if the EULA applies to the whole package, you can only return it if you haven't used the laptop.

    35. Re:entitlement? by violent.ed · · Score: 1

      > if you didn't agree with the EULA for Windows, one could take the shrink-wrapped box back to the vendor for a refund.

      but to read the EULA for Windows you have to remove the shrink-wrap. but thats an entirely different flame-wa.... thread

      --
      - You're not paranoid, they really are after you.
    36. Re:entitlement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What a lot of folks fail to realize is that this student almost single handedly un-did ~20 years of case law establishing the legitimacy of shrink wrap licenses (which eventually lead to the modern incarnation... the "click-wrap" agreement).

      > [...]
      > But Zamos made one mistake. He wasn't, in fact, a
      > licensed "qualified end user," because he'd never
      > signed the agreement that would allow him to resell
      > his software. And he couldn't sign the agreement
      > until he loaded the software.
      >
      > He turned his mistake back on Microsoft, however,
      > accusing it of deceptive sales practices, since the
      > agreement had essentially been hidden from him.
      > "How could I sign the agreement if I'd never opened
      > the software? It didn't make any sense," he says.
      > [...]

      The shrink wrap license is one of the key foundations of the modern software industry. I bet this guy could have asked for the sky and I bet Microsoft would have settled with him gladly.

    37. Re:entitlement? by Software · · Score: 1
      You've got a point there; I guess my idea won't work. I guess I'll go back to the point that the EULA mentions only software:

      IMPORTANT--READ CAREFULLY: This End-User License Agreement ("EULA") is a legal agreement between you (either an individual or a single entity) and Microsoft Corporation for the Microsoft software product identified above, which includes computer software and may include associated media, printed materials, "online" or electronic documentation, and Internet-based services ("Product"). An amendment or addendum to this EULA may accompany the Product.

      Nothing about hardware in there. Nothing about the manufacturer. OK, maybe in the addendum. It's a little hard to say what's in an addendum.

      Licensing is basically a contract. Contracts generally have to have benefits for both parties, or they will be ruled void by the court. Contracts also have to be freely entered into. "In exchange for X, you get Y. ``I agree.''"; that's a contract. "You give us Y, you get nothing"; that's not a contract and would generally be unenforceable. In the XP case, you get the benefit of using the software, and you give up the rights to reverse-engineering, the right to rent it out, and (this is the important part), the right to return it for a refund. You indicate your acceptance of this by clicking the "I agree" button. This is an exchange that reasonable people might find useful, so it's a valid contract. But it's a contract between you and Microsoft, not you and the manufacturer.

      In EULAs like this, the manufacturer is trying to trying to impose conditions on the use of a product AFTER it has been purchased without any benefit to you. There's no exchange of benefits, because you already have the right to use the hardware - you paid for it. You have the right to use the software if you agree to the license. If you decline the right to use the software, you have the right to a refund. The "IF YOU DO NOT AGREE, DO NOT INSTALL OR USE THE PRODUCT; YOU MAY RETURN IT TO YOUR PLACE OF PURCHASE FOR A FULL REFUND" part of the EULA did not just slip in there by accident. It's essential to make it a valid contract. The manufacturer may not make it easy for you to exercise your right to a refund, but that's why we have courts (and state attorneys general - or is it attorney generals?).

      If the manufacturer wants to limit your use of the product, it must be done BEFORE the sale. Before you buy the product, the manufacturer needs to get your agreement to the license. Only then could the manufacturer claim that the EULA is binding on you.

      IANAL, this isn't legal advice, etc.

    38. Re:entitlement? by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      Imagine a Best Buy employee buying racks of CDs using his employee discount, and taking them home and selling them out of his car for a little mark-up. That'd get you fired or your discount privledge suspended right quick.

      I imagine. My boss telling the employees he's sorry but they are short on cash and the salary will be delayed, but whoever wants, they can get some of the product they make (for production price) and go, sell it on their own if they can't wait 2 days more.

      If they offer a discount program that allows for 3rd party profit that causes loss to the company, that means the program is flawed and they should change it. A reasonable program would still bring them profit, lower than normal sales but definitely on the "plus side". Sell stuff in the shop, while paying normal salaries to the employees and having cost of these salaries added to the price of the wares, simultaneously let your employees sell the same stuff in their spare time on any conditions they desire, letting them buy it for its shelf price minus their salary cost and some (cost of maintenance of the shop, shelf space etc). The profit is the same, no matter if you sell it for full price and then return a part of the price to the buyer in form of salary, or if you just cut on the price right then.

      Of course if your "discount programme" causes loss, but you intend i.e. to take customers away from the competition, it's called dumping and it's forbidden by law. A common method of fighting with the dumpers is to come and call their bluff, buy all the products at the price they offer and then sell it yourself for a right price. Of course they won't be happy about that, but serves them right!

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
  18. Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Can't get Coral Cache or Mirrodot. Google cache turned up this result:

    http://216.239.59.104/search?hl=en&q=cache%3Ahtt p% 3A%2F%2Fwww.linuxjournal.com%2Farticle%2F7040

    --------------

    Getting a Windows Refund in California Small Claims Court
    By Steve Oualline on Tue, 2003-07-29 23:00.
    Thanks to good records and a Small Claims judge, Steve Oualline got a $199 refund for his unused copy of Microsoft Windows XP. One Linux user's story shows how to establish a good refund case.

    Getting a Microsoft Windows refund from a manufacturer is seldom easy to do. In this article, I describe some techniques you can use to get your refund, including how to deal with the manufacturers (and all their excuses) and going to small claims court.

    The first step to getting a refund is to ask for one. In most every case, you immediately hit a wall of stupidity and evasion when you do this. Dealing with this part properly is important, though, because you are building a record for the court case that may follow. Your job is to be as reasonable as possible and to make them look as dumb, inflexible and unreasonable as possible.

    It's important to know what excuses the manufactures will come up with and how to counter them.

    Excuse: You aren't entitled to a refund.

    Answer: Then why did the software come with a license that said I was. Isn't the license a binding contract?

    Excuse: Contact Microsoft about the refund.

    Answer: The license said contact the manufacturer. That's you. Why should I contact Microsoft when they said to contact you?

    Excuse: The software comes bundled with the hardware and can't be separated.

    Answer: Then why did you give me a license that said they could?

    Excuse: We'll give you a refund, but not for the retail price.

    Answer: I paid retail for the computer and the software.

    Excuse: The software is only worth $10.

    Answer: Okay. Send me the check.

    Although this doesn't look like it, you've won a major victory with these words--that check is written evidence of the fact that the manufacturer owes you a refund. If you go to court, you don't have to establish that the company owes you something. All you have to do is establish the amount.

    But before you do that, you should follow up with the company. There are several ways of doing this.

    Follow up #1: I got your check for $10. You say Windows XP costs only $10, so I'd like to buy 100 copies please. To whom do I make out the check for $1000?

    You won't sell me Windows XP for $10? I'll have to pay $199 for it? Then that means the check you sent me is too low. Please send me a check for the full amount.

    Follow up #2: I got your check for $10. But your $10 price is far lower that the retail price of Windows XP ($199). Because of the vast difference in the amounts, I'm going to have to ask you for a copy of your purchase contract with Microsoft so I can verify the price.

    You can't verify the price. Well, I can only find one documented price and that's $199. You'll have to pay that amount or document your price.

    One company tried this excuse with me. When I asked for documentation, the customer service representative said, "I don't have access to price information".

    "Then how did you come up with the $10 price figure?"

    "I just know it's the right amount."

    "So what you are really doing is guessing. Well, my guess is the software is worth $1,000,000. Tell you what, let's split the difference. Send me a check for $500,005."

    Excuse: We'll give you a refund but that applies to only Microsoft Windows, not the other bundled software.

    Answer: No problem. Please provide me with a copy of all the other software on another disk so I can install it under Linux using the Wine program.

    In all of these cases, follow up the phone conversation with a writ

    1. Re:Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just goes to show you that the person who puts the most effort into manufacturing an appearence wins in court. Not so suprising. Basically, the platiff just manufactured a better argument, that while is was flawed, the defendant declined to point it out. That said, all the effort? How much was that worse. I can see how homeless people would find this an effective use of their time, but other than that....

    2. Re:Article Text by Xtifr · · Score: 3, Funny

      > I can see how homeless people would find this an effective use of their time, but other than that....

      I dunno, sounds like a better/more entertaining use of my time than, say, watching the latest incarnation of Survivor. Or standing in line to see Star Wars episode 3. Or filling in little boxes in my web browser with text in order to debate the effective uses of my time with anonymous cowards on slashdot. :)

    3. Re:Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Honestly, until it can beat masturbating and napping it's not getting on to the to do list.

      I can multitask so the text boxing is essentially free....

    4. Re:Article Text by ErikZ · · Score: 1


      Did you just get the 10$ plus court costs, or the 199$ plus court costs?

      Great post BTW.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    5. Re:Article Text by spectre_240sx · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not to mention, I was certainly entertained by the story and the information given was interesting. I think that's worth something right there.

    6. Re:Article Text by Caseyscrib · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah but it feels good to tell a major corporation to go fuck themselves after screwing you over. Especially when a judge sends the letter on your behalf. For some people (myself included), thats far more important than money.

    7. Re:Article Text by csteinle · · Score: 2, Funny

      Man, I so hope you are typing in your sleep.

    8. Re:Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It happened to be work. This time.

  19. If the giant pain in the ass this will always be.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is worth the $15 bucks. I'd recommend getting all your ducks in a row, understand the court case, and precisely what it says about your rights. Feel free to call up and buy a laptop off the 1-800-NUMBER and ask to talk to the supervisor. They do use a SKU for whatever software they're putting on it. But the drives might just be pre-imaged en mass, so they'd have to be willing to have a person go and nuke the partition, or pursue something even more labor intensive.

    It's a matter of what they're willing to do, how far they'll lay out for you. If you're ordering something off a business line, and you have it shipped to your "Company" (whatever form that takes) they'll probably be more likely to go that extra step.

    That said. There are businesses that specialize in selling linux gear including laptops, and supporting that. Their prices aren't bad, and occasionally they're quite good. Not to mention, when you support many of them, you're supporting companies in your community, which *does* imporve it. Moreover, they're likely to be more focused on the experience of their individual customers, if you put in the effort to avoid the scammers.

    Ultimately, any business has the right to say they just don't want to do what you want to pay them to do.

  20. Why is everyone going nuts over this? by Transcendent · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's like a car... Say you get a nice audio setup but you were going to put in your own speakers afterward, you don't go back to the dealership and demand a refund.

    Just because you don't want an item that comes with a package deal, the seller has no obligation to refund you the money for what you didn't want.

    It's in the package price. Packaging items together reduces cost. That's how business works.

    1. Re:Why is everyone going nuts over this? by argent · · Score: 1

      Say you get a nice audio setup but you were going to put in your own speakers afterward, you don't go back to the dealership and demand a refund.

      If the dealer includes speakers that cause you pain and lists them at 1/10th the cost of the car, you damn well do demand a refund.

    2. Re:Why is everyone going nuts over this? by Tsiangkun · · Score: 1

      But in this case, the "audio setup" part of your analogy is a software package that contains a phrasing very similar to "return for refund if you don't agree with the licensing agreement".

    3. Re:Why is everyone going nuts over this? by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

      Just because you don't want an item that comes with a package deal, the seller has no obligation to refund you the money for what you didn't want.

      Sorry, but the Windows license agreement obligates anyone who sells Windows to do eactly that. Read the first paragraph of your Windows XP EULA sometime.

      "YOU AGREE TO BE BOUND BY THE TERMS OF THIS EULA BY INSTALLING, COPYING, OR OTHERWISE USING THE PRODUCT. IF YOU DO NOT AGREE, DO NOT INSTALL OR USE THE PRODUCT; YOU MAY RETURN IT TO YOUR PLACE OF PURCHASE FOR A FULL REFUND."

      (caps are Microsoft's, bold is mine)

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
    4. Re:Why is everyone going nuts over this? by Cylix · · Score: 1

      Bad analogy...

      That's one bad ass speaker system.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    5. Re:Why is everyone going nuts over this? by ShadowFlyP · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There reason everyone is "going nuts over this" is because the windows install that ships on these laptops has a license agreement that says something to the effect of: If you do not agree with this license you can return this software for a full refund. When you buy an "audio setup" or a car (an analogy in other posts) you aren't licensing the speakers or the tires; you know what you are buying. When you buy a computer, you are buying the hardware AND licensing the software. But, a clause (self imposed by Microsoft) gives you the privilage of returning the software. I'm not an expert in contract law, but there may be legal reasons that Microsoft is forced to add this clause.

    6. Re:Why is everyone going nuts over this? by argent · · Score: 1

      That's one bad ass speaker system.

      Well, it's pretty bad, and it sounds like ass... but if you're going to use the "speaker system" analogy, let's look at it:

      Windows XP (the speakers): $199
      Laptop (the car): $1000-$3000, typically under $2000.

      Yeh, the "speaker system" costs 1/10th the cost of the car. And it makes my head hurt. I want it out of there AND I sure as hell don't want to pay for it.

    7. Re:Why is everyone going nuts over this? by nsayer · · Score: 1
      Say you get a nice audio setup but you were going to put in your own speakers afterward, you don't go back to the dealership and demand a refund.

      Your analogy-fu is weak.

      If part of the purchase contract for the car includes a clause that says that you may not play operas in pig-latin over the speakers (the precise restriction makes no difference, it merely has to be something to which you do not agree), and if you don't agree to that restriction you can return the speakers for a full refund, then yes, you are entitled to such a refund.

    8. Re:Why is everyone going nuts over this? by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      Not when the speakers come with a hidden license you don't discover until you fire them up for the first time that says you can't play any creative commons music on the speakers, and you have the option to return the speakers for a full refund.

      In that case, the seller has an obligation to refund the money. And that's the case with Windows.

      Still think it's like a car?

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    9. Re:Why is everyone going nuts over this? by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      Poor metaphor.
      *) The EULA specifically allows for this refund. If the above happened AND part of the contract allowed you to get a refund on those speakers, and you chose to get your refund, then you should get it.
      *) Microsoft was found to be illegally tied to hardware. This bundling was found to be illegal, you must at least allow the option of unbundling, as seen above.

      Microsoft has some big ones. One lawyer says to DoJ "No we're not a monopoly, look, people can install Linux" while another lawyer argues "you can't buy a bare system, that would just be encouraging piracy, because we all know windows is the only OS people will install". Reminds me of the "Windows is a strong trademark, not generic at all, and Lindows is too close to the name" while they argued before "Internet Explorer is a generic term, not trademarkable at all" when the guy who trademarked "Internet Explorer" sued.

    10. Re:Why is everyone going nuts over this? by v1 · · Score: 1

      That's true of physical goods, where you are buying the item and are then the owner of the item. This is software licensing. You are not purchasing the software, you are licensing it. Software companies license you the software instead of selling it to you so that they can impose restrictions on your use of the software.

      The license is a contract, and it usually can be summed up by saying you have to legally agree to abide by the terms of the contract to use their software, usually in exchange for payment for the privledge of using their software. As a consequence of it being a contract, both parties must agree to the terms. Having accepted your money, they have received their benefit from the agreement, and having accepted your money means they have accepted their terms of the agreement. If you choose NOT to agree to your terms, they are not entitled to their half of the agreement (the money) and are legally required to refund you. They are also required to tell you that you are entitled to this refund.

      Software companies empower their software vendors to handle this agreement for them, and as such they almost always specify in the license that the refund must be sought from the vendor rather than the software company. (since you're buying from the vendor not the software co) This makes it clear who you are to seek your refund to, and prevents the vendor and the software company from both pointing you toward the other one for your refund.

      Getting a refund for software is a bit like turning in a rebait or getting a free ipod mini... it's possible, but they make it as difficult as they can in the hopes that you dont try, or give up. And they're not above lying to discourage you.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    11. Re:Why is everyone going nuts over this? by tokabola · · Score: 1

      In the US at least, the dealer is required by law to remove options you don't want, such as stereos. You will get a lower price, it varies by how much. Less than $70 for a normal stereo, but Ford has been known to knock off a couple hundred for the bose systems. Of course, you are required to do this at the time of purchase, not after, so it's a discount, not a refund.

      A note to all you youngsters on /. Learn the laws before you blow all your money on stuff you don't have to buy (because the salesman sure isn't going to tell you that).

      Tommy

      --
      Open Source for Open Minds
    12. Re:Why is everyone going nuts over this? by Sloppy · · Score: 1
      It's like a car... Say you get a nice audio setup but you were going to put in your own speakers afterward, you don't go back to the dealership and demand a refund.

      Just because you don't want an item that comes with a package deal, the seller has no obligation to refund you the money for what you didn't want.

      I agree. But your analogy has a problem.

      Microsoft's products are very different from car speakers in one fundamental way. *AFTER* your purchase Microsoft's product, they then try to railroad you into a new contract. The terms of the contract take all sorts of rights away from you, and offer no consideration to balance this.

      But, just to be nice, I guess, Microsoft then makes you an additional offer, as an alternative to the ridiculous terms of the EULA: if the user is not interested in agreeing to the contract, they are willing to let you return the product.

      Now, I don't know why they make that offer, but they do. (Actually, I do know why. They don't want the customer to think about the possibility that they are also allowed to reject the offer and use the software under the terms of copyright law.)

      Imagine if you bought a car with preloaded speakers, and the speakers came with a piece of paper that said the company agrees to buy back the speakers. That would be weird, since they're normally under no obligation to buy them back. But there's the matter of the piece of paper that they elected to include with the speakers, where they agree to buy them back. Under such circumstances, where they include a promise to take the speakers back, would you agree that they have some sort of obligation?

      And what if it were common knowledge that the speakers come with this promise to take them back? Might that not create a minor market force in favor of people buying the speakers? (Surely this isn't the first time you've heard the sales pitch, "Full refund if you're not satisfied.") If someone bought the speakers on the understanding that they include a refund offer, and in fact the speakers really do include that offer, then wouldn't the manufacturer be especially obligated?

      There's a really easy way for MS to get out of this: don't falsely promise refunds to their customers. Just take that clause out of the EULA. And then just hope that this doesn't result in customers thinking about what all their options are, should they choose to reject the EULA.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    13. Re:Why is everyone going nuts over this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Replace speakers with an engine in the analogy, and it holds up against your ratio rebuttle.

  21. PowerNotebooks.com by Jason_D_Berg · · Score: 1

    http://www.powernotebooks.com/ ships computers without an operating system installed. Check em out.

    1. Re:PowerNotebooks.com by MSTCrow5429 · · Score: 1

      Hey, how come they have a line with a one-year no defective pixel guarantee, but my IBM Thinkpad has at least 4 of them? This was after the screen was replaced because it had about 16.

      --
      Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
  22. Lists by mcelrath · · Score: 4, Informative
    Tuxmobil has a list of resellers that will preinstall linux. However be careful, several of those vendors sell linux laptops by buying OEM ones with windows on it, and then removing windows. (e.g. you're still paying M$ for the privelage of having a linux laptop)

    I also have a page of linux-preinstalled and no-OS laptop vendors. By my count there are at least 20 vendors that sell linux and no-os laptops, so nobody should have an excuse anymore for whining about not being able to find linux laptops.

    P.S. All you currently looking for a laptop...please email me if anything on my list needs to be updated.

    --
    1^2=1; (-1)^2=1; 1^2=(-1)^2; 1=-1; 1=0.
  23. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First time a non-article link gets slashdotted! We're getting heavy, guys (YEAHHHH)

    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you must be new here

  24. Hardly .... by El+Cubano · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is Obtaining a Windows Refund Still Difficult?

    No. It is practically impossible. Next question, please.

  25. maybe ebay? by univacmac · · Score: 1

    sell the damn thing.

  26. One question by nizo · · Score: 1

    To get my refund, do I have to send back the nifty silver-colored drink coaster that came with my laptop?

  27. Re:Keep Windows by koreaman · · Score: 2

    If you're going to use /. to advertise your blog, at least conceal it better...

  28. Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The server is already slow, so here it is:

    Getting a Windows Refund in California Small Claims Court
    By Steve Oualline on Tue, 2003-07-29 23:00.
    Thanks to good records and a Small Claims judge, Steve Oualline got a $199 refund for his unused copy of Microsoft Windows XP. One Linux user's story shows how to establish a good refund case.

    Getting a Microsoft Windows refund from a manufacturer is seldom easy to do. In this article, I describe some techniques you can use to get your refund, including how to deal with the manufacturers (and all their excuses) and going to small claims court.

    The first step to getting a refund is to ask for one. In most every case, you immediately hit a wall of stupidity and evasion when you do this. Dealing with this part properly is important, though, because you are building a record for the court case that may follow. Your job is to be as reasonable as possible and to make them look as dumb, inflexible and unreasonable as possible.

    It's important to know what excuses the manufactures will come up with and how to counter them.

    Excuse: You aren't entitled to a refund.

    Answer: Then why did the software come with a license that said I was. Isn't the license a binding contract?

    Excuse: Contact Microsoft about the refund.

    Answer: The license said contact the manufacturer. That's you. Why should I contact Microsoft when they said to contact you?

    Excuse: The software comes bundled with the hardware and can't be separated.

    Answer: Then why did you give me a license that said they could?

    Excuse: We'll give you a refund, but not for the retail price.

    Answer: I paid retail for the computer and the software.

    Excuse: The software is only worth $10.

    Answer: Okay. Send me the check.

    Although this doesn't look like it, you've won a major victory with these words--that check is written evidence of the fact that the manufacturer owes you a refund. If you go to court, you don't have to establish that the company owes you something. All you have to do is establish the amount.

    But before you do that, you should follow up with the company. There are several ways of doing this.

    Follow up #1: I got your check for $10. You say Windows XP costs only $10, so I'd like to buy 100 copies please. To whom do I make out the check for $1000?

    You won't sell me Windows XP for $10? I'll have to pay $199 for it? Then that means the check you sent me is too low. Please send me a check for the full amount.

    Follow up #2: I got your check for $10. But your $10 price is far lower that the retail price of Windows XP ($199). Because of the vast difference in the amounts, I'm going to have to ask you for a copy of your purchase contract with Microsoft so I can verify the price.

    You can't verify the price. Well, I can only find one documented price and that's $199. You'll have to pay that amount or document your price.

    One company tried this excuse with me. When I asked for documentation, the customer service representative said, "I don't have access to price information".

    "Then how did you come up with the $10 price figure?"

    "I just know it's the right amount."

    "So what you are really doing is guessing. Well, my guess is the software is worth $1,000,000. Tell you what, let's split the difference. Send me a check for $500,005."

    Excuse: We'll give you a refund but that applies to only Microsoft Windows, not the other bundled software.

    Answer: No problem. Please provide me with a copy of all the other software on another disk so I can install it under Linux using the Wine program.

    In all of these cases, follow up the phone conversation with a written letter describing what was said and why you're unhappy with it. Remember you are creating a record for the judge.

    At some point in this process you'll either get your r

  29. Why shouldn't he charge you extra? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you're asking for extra labor, you should pay extra money.

    If all their drives are pre-imaged with whatever selection OSs their inventory system can tolerate, that's good for 99.9995% of all their customers, why shouldn't the guy who wants to be different and have the work done for him pay for it?

    1. Re:Why shouldn't he charge you extra? by yagu · · Score: 4, Insightful
      so, just how do they get pre-imaged? They're certainly not being shipped from the manufacturer (hard drive) that way! They've got staff doing the imaging... highly automated to be sure, but what is it going to take to "not" pre-image one? "Hey, Joe!, don't pre-image that one!" is my guess. And, am I a guy (you're assuming, btw) who wants to be different?, or one who has a specific requirement in a field that should but doesn't have options because of the illegal practices of one monopolistic giant?

      Using a car as an example (I hate doing this) it might be like one tire manufacturer insisting through bullying and manipulating that ALL cars are delivered with their specific brand of tires, even though they are very specific and non-general tires, and there is ample evidence of a market for other types of tires (non-studded, low temp, etc)... It would be an unfair market place if consumers had to pay that "tax" (even if labor were involved to remove and replace said tires with other type) to get a product more suitable to their needs.

      This isn't an issue of people being pissy and making snippy demands, it's an issue of a marketplace gone awry and still not corrected by the tactics still in practice by one giant firm, albeit practiced in a more nuanced and subtle way.

    2. Re:Why shouldn't he charge you extra? by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 1

      Because they are selling you the OS as well and that has value. Should you pay for something extra that you don't want that if you didn't get you would have to pay several extra hundred dollars more for.

      If you went to a car dealer and said I want that car but not the CD changer. They would pull the cd changer and put in the standard radio and sell it to you because they can do that and that part is a small part of the sale.

    3. Re:Why shouldn't he charge you extra? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think that assumes there was a choice. The dealer doesn't necessarily handle that, that is often done at the manufacturer level. I don't know if the computer industry has an assembly and inventory method that allows for truly custom choices like this, where they know the unit with serial number ending in 13242 won't have an OS in it. It's not like the auto industry where you can request a build with certain packages, certain paint and so on, from the factory.

    4. Re:Why shouldn't he charge you extra? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, I believe they are shipped from the manufacturer that way, in many cases. At least it's my understanding that my late-nineties dell was pre-imaged at the hard drive manufacturer's place.

    5. Re:Why shouldn't he charge you extra? by yagu · · Score: 1

      You're probably right... they don't or won't know which one.... but, not because this isn't a possible scenario but more because of the penalties incurred for even thinking about it.... Remember, they have a relationship with Microsoft, and Microsoft still pretty much calls the shots about how they do business, like it or not... It COULD be more like the auto industry -- that's the point. It's NOT.... that's also the point.

      Hopefully pressure brought to bear eventually un-jams this juggernaut, but I fear it's a long time (way too long) time in the making and fear (even worse) it may never happen at all.

    6. Re:Why shouldn't he charge you extra? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. If they take the SKU for the OS off, and add in the labor there you go. Which by all accounts is 10 to 15 bucks.

      Guess what, if you by a system that costs as much as a car, they'll toss in a fair amount of free labor. Hell buy something that costs as much as a house, they'll sometimes practically be panting to give you a blowjob. Money is funny that way.

    7. Re:Why shouldn't he charge you extra? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are.... You can even get a place like Dell, Hp to move mountains for you if you're good enough with people. They can occasionally be moved to special requests. They don't do it for cheapskates, and they don't do it for assholes, but talented humanists can get it done. And it depends on how reasonable what you want is. But what it amounts to is you're asking a chain of people to find extra time in their day that won't be accounted for, that they might not get credit for, and which might be looked down on. Extra time is hard to find.

    8. Re:Why shouldn't he charge you extra? by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 1

      The vendor mass images hard drives and keeps them in stock. They don't image the drive at the time the computer is built. Even if they did, they'd still have to image the drive to burn-in test it, then have to wipe it afterwards.

    9. Re:Why shouldn't he charge you extra? by weorthe · · Score: 1

      Should you pay for something extra that you don't want that if you didn't get you would have to pay several extra hundred dollars more for.

      Cost has nothing to do with sale price in a market economy. Well, maybe it defines minimum price. But other than that, price is set according to supply and demand. You have no natural "right" to pay less for something that costs less.

      In the case of the MS-less consumer laptop, demand is effectively zero (on Dell's scale), so the item is unavailable at any price. To buy this item, you need to go to a niche marketer, and then you'll pay a higher price anyway because of the lack of economies of scale.

      --
      cat * >> sig
    10. Re:Why shouldn't he charge you extra? by MntlChaos · · Score: 1

      This is the origin of the "Microsoft Tax": Since there is (practically) no market for computers without Windows, you need to pay MS it's fee to buy a computer (from a major manufacturer)

    11. Re:Why shouldn't he charge you extra? by wazerface · · Score: 1

      How can the hard-drive manufacturers preimage the drives if the install is device-dependant? In other words, the drivers would not be correct in this 'generic' image.

    12. Re:Why shouldn't he charge you extra? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      This is a moot point, the guy could have just bought the laptop without the hard drive then.


      In that case, the company would have had no excuse to charge him extra for not installing Windows (or de-installing it, whatever). Unless of course all the laptops already have hard drives in them, pre-installed in China or wherever they're being assembled. In which case I would say that a company that's not even assembling the computers on-site isn't one that I'd really want to buy a 'custom' system from, and is a bit hypocritical to be doing so.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    13. Re:Why shouldn't he charge you extra? by St.+Arbirix · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Using a car as an example (I hate doing this)

      Oh, please keep those jokes and metaphors going so that maybe people will begin to legitimately care rather than just laugh it off.
      "If Windows were a car..." jokes should be on billboards.

      Oblig.

      --
      Direct away from face when opening.
    14. Re:Why shouldn't he charge you extra? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can make a windows image that contains all the device data you want, and installs the devices as it detects them. This is useful, for among other things enterprise deployment. It's actually pretty decent the way Microsoft did that with 2000 and beyond.

    15. Re:Why shouldn't he charge you extra? by flawedgeek · · Score: 0

      Perhaps because they don't officially support other OSes, they don't want to send them out without an OS, for fear that the end user would be thrifty and use a, for lack of a better word, pirated copy?

      --
      My other Sig is .40 caliber.
    16. Re:Why shouldn't he charge you extra? by jbolden · · Score: 1

      And if you tried to buy a box of FruitLoops with no cardboard they might refuse entirely. Some business offer custom products others don't. The x86 systems vendors are essentially outsourcers to assemble the hardware for Microsoft/Intel systems.

    17. Re:Why shouldn't he charge you extra? by rew · · Score: 1

      You're assuming the licence costs say $100.

      The thing is, microsoft offers the vendor $99 (i.e. a lower price) per laptop in licencing fees, provided that the vendor ships ALL laptops with the Microsoft OS. In any case, they don't pay per laptop shipped with the Microsoft OS, they pay per laptop shipped. Even yours after you refuse to pay for the OS you won't use.

      So they could just refund you your $99, and leave it at that. Just tell you: Please don't use it.

      However that story would quickly get out, and be misused.

      The thing is, if they sell 1000 laptops with the Microsoft OS, microsoft will emphasize that they are offering the licence at say $99 per copy. The company should realize that they are getting a reasonable deal at $100 per copy for the 990 users that DO want Windows installed.

    18. Re:Why shouldn't he charge you extra? by yagu · · Score: 1

      The thing is, microsoft offers the vendor $99 (i.e. a lower price) per laptop in licencing fees, provided that the vendor ships ALL laptops with the Microsoft OS. In any case, they don't pay per laptop shipped with the Microsoft OS, they pay per laptop shipped. Even yours after you refuse to pay for the OS you won't use.

      It's interesting you think that, because if what you describe were true then Microsoft would be continuing a licensing practice in violation of anti-trust laws for which they were found "guilty".

    19. Re:Why shouldn't he charge you extra? by rew · · Score: 1

      It's interesting you think that, because if what you describe were true then Microsoft would be continuing a licensing practice in violation of anti-trust laws for which they were found "guilty".

      Not being a vendor myself, I can't be sure. Sorry.

      However, even in the face of lost anti-trust-suits MicroSoft would like to continue this practise, so if they are no longer allowed to put the "all PCs" clause in the contract, they will try something like: We'll give you 30% extra discount if you allow us to charge you for "PCs sold" instead of "PCs sold with Windows".

      They can always argue that this is because the accounting is easier and more reliable, so that they are doing this to improve direct income.

    20. Re:Why shouldn't he charge you extra? by yagu · · Score: 1
      Yeah, don't they just annoy the heck out of you? :-)

      sigh

    21. Re:Why shouldn't he charge you extra? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then it is extra labor. That one laptop needs to be handled differently. And it needs to be supported differently. This of course a moot point because he's buying a complete laptop, not the pieces. This isn't expected anywhere else. I can't go into a car lot and ask to get one without doors without any extra cost. I can't buy a towel hanger and ask them not to charge me for the included screws because I already have my own.

    22. Re:Why shouldn't he charge you extra? by angle_slam · · Score: 1
      Using a car as an example (I hate doing this) it might be like one tire manufacturer insisting through bullying and manipulating that ALL cars are delivered with their specific brand of tires, even though they are very specific and non-general tires, and there is ample evidence of a market for other types of tires (non-studded, low temp, etc)... It would be an unfair market place if consumers had to pay that "tax" (even if labor were involved to remove and replace said tires with other type) to get a product more suitable to their needs.

      That's a terrible analogy. Let's say that Ford always puts Michelins on their cars. That means they stock only Michelins. To put a Firestone on the car means a lot of extra work because they have to procure different tires. What parent is asking is merely to not install anything at all, which is literally no additional work.

      Here's a different, car related analogy:if you take your car into Midas to get your brakes inspected, you can ask them to rotate your tires for you. They charge you $10 to $20 for it. But look at what they actually do: they remove all the tires from the car to inspect the brakes. They are going to have to put them back on the car. But if they put them back on in a different order, it costs you $10-20, even though the additional work (rolling a tire from the front to the back) is negligible).

    23. Re:Why shouldn't he charge you extra? by dublin · · Score: 1

      so, just how do they get pre-imaged? They're certainly not being shipped from the manufacturer (hard drive) that way!

      Actually, in the case of vendors that use a standard image, they are. Sun used to buy disks from Seagate that were pre-imaged with SPARC Solaris - It was way easier for Seagate to do this than Sun, and it saved a *bunch* or production time. I know for sure this was done by many PC manufacturers in the Win 9x days. I suspect the unique SIDs in NT/2K/XP make this harder, but my guess is that the disk-makers are happy to jump through those hoops to ring up a sale for a few hundred thousand drives...

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
  30. Avoid the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy a Mac

    1. Re:Avoid the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like my refund for OSX please.

      Mostly because I think Steve Jobs is a whining pussy, and all ethics ran out of Apple when Woz left.

  31. Re:Keep Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey if roland can do it why not him. (sarcasm)

  32. pick the right vendor by tverbeek · · Score: 4, Funny
    I believe Apple has fairly liberal policies for buying a latop without Windows.

    I hear they're more difficult about OS X refunds, though.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    1. Re:pick the right vendor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll happily tell you that the cost of Mac OS X (preinstalled) for an Apple Portable/Desktop is $0.

    2. Re:pick the right vendor by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 1

      I believe Apple has fairly liberal policies for buying a latop without Windows. I hear they're more difficult about OS X refunds, though.

      Terrasoft offers Apple hardware with Linux pre-installed. (It still has OS X on it, though.)

    3. Re:pick the right vendor by blackmonday · · Score: 1

      I know this is a joke, but the same question can be asked of Apple (don't flame em I'm a mac user). Would Apple sell you a system with a bare hard drive at a $129 discount? Remember the recent article where Linus revealed his new machine is a G5 Powermac running Linux only.

      Neither Apple or Dell will give you a discount. There isn't enough demand for a program like this to suceed. Linspire will see you a laptop, check out their offerings.

    4. Re:pick the right vendor by daeley · · Score: 3, Informative

      the same question can be asked of Apple

      When Apple has ~95% of the personal computer market, then it will be the same question. As it is, it isn't. :)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    5. Re:pick the right vendor by killtherat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is just a thought (and I could be wrong here), but I think the apple situation is a bit different. Because the OS is by the same company that made the machine, they can simply claim that when you bought the machine, the OS was just an added bonus they threw in for free. You could try to get the machine without the OS, but you'd only be removing the free bonus.
      This is supported by the fact that frequently, it you buy a machine within a month of an OS update, Apple will sometimes let you send in a voucher for the new OS for free (happened with my G5)

    6. Re:pick the right vendor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, though, all Apples come with Linux pre-installed.

      Well, OK, it isn't really Linux and doesn't make a lot of difference if you have a distro you really want to use, but it does come with the Unix terminal and runs many X apps.

      Actually, I think there was a /. article on how a lot of Linux people are getting Apples. No need to fight with Linux on whatever hardware your box or book happens to have.

      --At a Call Center wil no calls (acutally e-mails)

    7. Re:pick the right vendor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So it's ok for them to be assholes because they only have 3.5% of the market?

      Bullshit.

      1%, 99%, you are either right or you are wrong. Apple is a lot more morally challenged that MS is in many ways. Just because they are an underdog does not give them the right to be the assholes that they frequently are.

    8. Re:pick the right vendor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You can look at it this way:
      1) You buy a Mac, get the OS with it.
      2) You like the OS and like to upgrade. Well, the $129 is really just the upgrade price to the OS you already got with the Mac.

      Think about it. There is no other computer you can install the Mac OS on anymore (I don't mean emulators) and every Mac comes with Mac OS. What is a $129 box for the next Mac OS other then an upgrade?

    9. Re:pick the right vendor by Thu25245 · · Score: 1

      For that matter, would Apple sell me a Mac mini ($499) with a bare hard drive and a refund for...

      - the OS ($129 retail)
      - AppleWorks ($79 retail)
      - iLife '05 ($79 retail)
      - Quicken 2005 ($69 retail)
      (all included with a Mac mini) ...For a $143-after-rebate Mac?

      Something tells me that there's no corresponding clause in the Apple licensing agreements for an unused-software refund.

    10. Re:pick the right vendor by jasonditz · · Score: 1

      It definately wouldn't be worth $129... the OSX that Apple ships with a system generally only works on that specific type of system, its resale value is much lower.

    11. Re:pick the right vendor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope:

      OSX actually ADDS value to a computer.

    12. Re:pick the right vendor by ravee · · Score: 1

      But when you buy an apple computer, you get the OSX free right?

      --
      http://linuxhelp.blogspot.com
      http://though ts2005.blogspot.com

      --
      Linux Help
      for all things on Linux
    13. Re:pick the right vendor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't an antitrust issue, but about MS honouring their contract terms, as stated in the EULA.

  33. Input by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 0

    It doesn't take a computer genius to want something that works just as well for free. My girlfriend, who wants Linux, knows almost NOTHING about computers except what I've taught her. Linux may not be for the lazy person who just wants their stuff to run, but it's definitely for the person who wants to save 100-200 dollars and is willing to settle with slight performance and software issues.

  34. I wonder, do you really need the money... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

    ...or you just trying to score points among your friends by bragging about how cool you are for not having paid for a Microsoft product? And is that second of coolness really worth the hassle?

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:I wonder, do you really need the money... by quixos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      was your comment really worth sharing? is mine? people do THINGS. perhaps he should just quit acting up and watch more t.v.?

  35. Tshiba won't let you. by harl · · Score: 1

    Picked up a Toshiba laptop at CompUSA last week. Inside the box is a note stateing that the package must be installed as a whole and no parts may be returned.

    They saw you coming.

    --
    I find being offended by me offensive.
    1. Re:Tshiba won't let you. by harl · · Score: 1

      Too tired.

      That should be returned not installed.

      --
      I find being offended by me offensive.
  36. Simple answer to that... by gosand · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Heh. The last time I asked whether it was possible to buy a laptop without a pre-installed operating system, I was told that selling one could expose the company to litigation. The reason: knowingly selling a non-functional product.


    Simple Solution: Include a bootable Linux distro with the laptop. It proves it is working, but doesn't alter it in any way. It is about as close to free as you can get (cost of a blank cd). I would, in fact, recommend trying out the laptop with your bootable distro of choice before buying it. (if you can find the model you want in a brick-n-mortar store)

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:Simple answer to that... by October_30th · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You'd still end up paying for Windows - even if you weren't using it.

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    2. Re:Simple answer to that... by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

      It costs a lot more than that. It is not just some friendly workman burning you a CD. They are legally responsible for distributing a linux distrobution with their product. This might violate an agreement with Microsoft, and would probably violate something with the Linux distro about non-commercial free use. They don't want to get sued. Also, the people who run the phones are not usually very computer literate, and are under tremendous pressure to get you off the phone within 2 minutes without costing the company money. If you want a laptop with no OS, try one of the smaller companies, like ABS, that will custom build you computers, and OSes are usually extra anyway.

    3. Re:Simple answer to that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This might violate an agreement with Microsoft

      A contract that prohibited vendors from Supplying Linux or any other operating system would be illegal. Not only would it be a violation of anti-trust law, but it would explicitly violate the terms of Microsoft's settlement agreement with the US Department of Justice for their prior use of such illegal terms.

      would probably violate something with the Linux distro about non-commercial free use.

      The GPL does not prohibit commercial use. It is 100% legal to sell copies of Linux (or to sell machines with Linux) so long as you either include the source code or include a valid offer to supply the source code.

  37. Re:I'VE GOT MORE KARMA THAN YOU HAVE MOD POINTS!!! by tverbeek · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    GET A LIFE!

    pot. kettle. black.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  38. Find a nice refurb......... by big-giant-head · · Score: 1

    Most of the time have no OS.

    --

    So Long and Thanks for all the Fish.
  39. WTF? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I had no problem getting a laptop without Windows.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    1. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no.. you got a portable

    2. Re:WTF? by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      I think you were still forced to buy an OS with the laptop, even though it's perfectly possible to install and use a Free OS instead.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  40. You'll Get More Enjoyment If You..... by geo_10 · · Score: 0

    Take the Windows CD apply scotch tape to it in a fashion that allows you to tape it across the toilet seat (The part that my wife always tells me to put down). After that wait until the next morning, drink a big cup of coffee, and wait until that special moment arrives. You feel much better after shitting all over Windoze... just like they have done to so many people of the years... I'm not bitter... :)

  41. lawsuit? by gosand · · Score: 4, Insightful
    To use the (slightly flawed) car analogy, can I return the spare tire because I don't feel I need it and ask for $50 back?

    No, but you could sell that spare tire without the automobile manufacturer suing you.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  42. Re:Keep Windows by Pollardito · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i question the objectivity of any review of an OS that minimizes the fact that the reviewer's keyboard doesn't work

  43. I bought a laptap w/o WinBloze with no problem! by rwyoder · · Score: 1

    ...and they even included Mac OS X with it!

  44. Re:Keep Windows by Ithika · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, cos naming a Linux distro after a penguin was just an absurd and outlandish suggestion, wasn't it?

  45. Car analogy is flawed by wowbagger · · Score: 1
    The car analogy is flawed, because you can order your car with quite a bit of customization.

    For example, when I had to buy a new car (damn soccer moms in minivans not paying attention to where they are going!) I was very clear to the dealer: "No leather seats. Cloth Seats."

    The dealer's response was "But leather seats are on sale right now - no added cost! A $900 value!"

    "No. I do not want leather seats. They take more care than cloth. They are too hot in the summer and too cold in the winter unless they are cooled and heated - and then that is just one more thing to go wrong. Cloth seats."

    I got my cloth seats.

    This bunk that they cannot sell a laptop without an OS because:
    1. "We need to be able to test the machine." (then test it and scrub the disk when you are done.)
    2. "We cannot ship without an operating system." (fine - install FreeDOS on it.)
    3. "We cannot refund your money - we have an agreement with Microsoft." (The court says differently.)


    Is just that - bunk.
  46. Never received my money from the antitrust suit. by wtoconnor · · Score: 1

    I've never received my money from the anti-trust suit. Has anybody else?

  47. Buy a laptop with linux on it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh wait you can't. The super operating system Linux is still not main stream enough to put on laptops. Use windows and let your mind be at ease knowing that you have the OS that is on 90% or more of personal computers. Linux on it's best day is maybe close to 4-5%. Come on go with the flow.

  48. Refund for XP by eggman9713 · · Score: 1

    I once wanted to upgrade my old computer from windows ME (which I have had no problems with, I am one of the lucky ones) to Windows XP Professional. I decided to install it on a separate partition first to check compatibility since this was only a few months after it was even released. I installed it and found that, after installing all the latest drivers, my sound card, printer, scanner, modem, ethernet card, and firewire card were all dead, with no updated drivers to be found anywhere. I took the software back to the retailer and said that it wasn't compatible with my hardware and they said they don't take opened software (typical). I asked for a written copy of their return policy, they said they couldn't give it out. I asked how I could get a refund. They said to contact Microsoft. I called microsoft and told them what happened and they said to just send them the box and a copy of my receipt. I did and sure enough, a week later, I got a check for the full purchase amount, including sales tax and shipping! This is far from what MS is like now. Just for kicks, I called the national chain's regional office and asked how I could get a written copy of their return policy and they said "The store wouldn't give it to you?"

  49. Not the point - think licenses by Lifewish · · Score: 5, Informative

    So the guy buys this laptop. However, at this point in time he hasn't accepted the Microsoft EULA for the operating system. This EULA specifically states: "YOU AGREE TO BE BOUND BY THE TERMS OF THIS EULA BY INSTALLING, COPYING, OR OTHERWISE USING THE PRODUCT. IF YOU DO NOT AGREE, DO NOT INSTALL OR USE THE PRODUCT; YOU MAY RETURN IT TO YOUR PLACE OF PURCHASE FOR A FULL REFUND."

    If he hasn't agreed, he can return it for a full refund. If no-one is willing to give him a refund then Microsoft is in breach of its own license.

    OT: if MS has breached its requirements to a person, is that person then justified in breaching his/her requirements? For example, the one about not decompiling. Just a thought.

    --
    For the love of God, please learn to spell "ridiculous"!!!
    1. Re:Not the point - think licenses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...this whole conversation is confusing to me. Are people trying to say the EULA allows returning Windows?

    2. Re:Not the point - think licenses by mystik · · Score: 1

      No, through the same mechanism the GPL works:

      5. You are not required to accept this License, since you have not signed it. However, nothing else grants you permission to modify or distribute the Program or its derivative works. [ ... ]
      --
      Why aren't you encrypting your e-mail?
    3. Re:Not the point - think licenses by miyako · · Score: 3, Informative

      OT: if MS has breached its requirements to a person, is that person then justified in breaching his/her requirements? For example, the one about not decompiling. Just a thought.
      No, just as with the GPL, under copyright law, Microsoft's license is the only thing that allows you to use their software at all, so technically if they breach their license, then you no longer are able to use that license to use the software, and are therefore in violation of copyright.
      Hmmm, maybe this could be a new business plan for microsoft. Breach the license for Windows, thereby invalidating everyone's licenses, then sue the people still using windows over copyright infringement if they refuse to buy another license. (My gods, I should be sure to put this post on my resume for SCO and the RI/MPAA)

      --
      Famous Last Words: "hmm...wikipedia says it's edible"
    4. Re:Not the point - think licenses by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Yes, exactly.

    5. Re:Not the point - think licenses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If no-one is willing to give him a refund then Microsoft is in breach of its own license.

      I'm not sure how Microsoft could breach its own license. Microsoft hasn't agreed to anything, except to let you use the license. They offered you a license, you either accept it and use it. Or you don't. It is not a contract. It's a license, since it grants you certain rights under certain restrictions and that's it. When someone uses my GPL software, I do not have a contract with them.

      The issue here, as I see it, is that you paid to buy something and after buying it they want to limit how you can use it by forcing to you agree to a license before you can use it. That's wrong, but not for the reasons you say.

      --
      Sorry, it's Friday night and I wasted too much time last weekend explaining the difference between a license and a contract. I'M NOT DOING IT AGAIN!

    6. Re:Not the point - think licenses by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problem is that you didn't purchase the software. Dell (or whatever OEM) did and included it in THEIR product to sell to you. The software has no line item value on your invoice.

      If you want to return the software, you have to return the item you bought, ie the computer.

      Suppose you bought a digital camera, and it came with a memory card. You go to return the memory card to best buy (where you bought the camera), but they won't accept it because they didn't sell you a memory card. They sold you a camera.

    7. Re:Not the point - think licenses by ediron2 · · Score: 1
      OT: if MS has breached its requirements to a person, is that person then justified in breaching his/her requirements? For example, the one about not decompiling. Just a thought.


      No, just as with the GPL, under copyright law, Microsoft's license is the only thing that allows you to use their software at all, so technically if they breach their license, then you no longer are able to use that license to use the software, and are therefore in violation of copyright.



      The law's only as good as 12 angry jurors...


      Might be fun to send a 30-day-refund request with the remark that "I bought this to decompile it for educational purposes. Please refund my purchase. Since there is a chance I am misinterpreting the legal jargon, if it is ok for me to decompile this for educational purposes, no response is needed."

    8. Re:Not the point - think licenses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Microsoft's license is the only thing that allows you to use their software at all

      You know, I don't believe that's true. I believe many people accept it as truth, but I'm not sure why.

      What allows you to use the software is the fact that you paid money for a product. Copyright exists to protect the artist's (or in this case, developer's) work. My using their software doesn't damage that at all. I am not violating the spirit of copyright by using it (the claim that you are making a copy because the bytes end up on your HD and RAM is deceptive and shows a lack of integrity rarely found outside of the legal profession).

      The idea that someone can force you to agree to terms after they have taken your money is ludicrous.

    9. Re:Not the point - think licenses by Lifewish · · Score: 1

      ...this whole conversation is confusing to me. Are people trying to say the EULA allows returning Windows?

      Yes - see this comparison for more details (relatively small pdf).

      --
      For the love of God, please learn to spell "ridiculous"!!!
    10. Re:Not the point - think licenses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The software has no line item value on your invoice.

      That is a problem. In Canada, I can depreciate software in one year, but hardware depreciates over many years.

    11. Re:Not the point - think licenses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, just as with the GPL, under copyright law, Microsoft's license is the only thing that allows you to use their software at all, so technically if they breach their license, then you no longer are able to use that license to use the software, and are therefore in violation of copyright.

      Ummm, no. MS may licence their software, but I definitely bought a copy of the software. I own the shiny CD. Copyright law prevents me from copying the CD and selling the copies.

      By purchasing software (or something else protected by copyright), there is an implied right to use the software. No licence needed.

      MS uses licencing to try to restrict my rights to use the copy I own as I see fit.

    12. Re:Not the point - think licenses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, just as with the GPL, under copyright law, Microsoft's license is the only thing that allows you to use their software at all,

      No. If I buy windowsXP, I pay money, and I own a copy of the software. I can give or sell the copy I own to anyone else. MS tries to restrict what I can do with the software with a licence. Copyright only prevents me from making copies of winXP and giving/selling them to other people, unless MS gives me permission to do so, and they won't.

      The GPL also uses copyright. If you want to copy GPL software and give/sell it to others, you can only do so if the copyright owner gives permission.

      The GPL does not restrict how you USE the software. The GPL gives you permission to make copies under certain conditions and give/sell those copies to others.

      If you don't like the GPL conditions, then copyright prevents you from making copies and giving/selling the copies to others.

    13. Re:Not the point - think licenses by Ibn+al-Hazardous · · Score: 1

      This is not like the GPL. If you get something for free under the GPL, the GPL is the only thing that certifies that you have a legal right to have that software. If you buy software in a shop (even if it is only bundled with some hardware), you have a nice little receipt that says the software is yours.

      Old Borland software used to have a not that said you should treat the software like a book. Use it, and resell it if you like, but don't sell, give away, or keep a copy. Seems reasonable to me.

      --
      Yes, I am a biological organism. All rumors to the contrary are just that, rumors.
    14. Re:Not the point - think licenses by schon · · Score: 1
      under copyright law, Microsoft's license is the only thing that allows you to use their software at all

      Bullshit.

      Under (US) copyright law, the thing that allows me to use their software is US Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 117, Paragraph a(1).
      it is not an infringement for the owner of a copy of a computer program to make or authorize the making of another copy or adaptation of that computer program provided:
      (1) that such a new copy or adaptation is created as an essential step in the utilization of the computer program in conjunction with a machine and that it is used in no other manner


      I do not need a license to use any piece of software.
    15. Re:Not the point - think licenses by Alsee · · Score: 1

      By law you do not need a license to install and run software. You are always free to decline any contract or license offer.

      It would be copyright infringment for anyone to start distributing new copies of GPL software without a license, just as it would be infringment for anyone to start distributing new copies of Microsoft software without a license.

      If whatever you are doing would not be infringment, for example if you just want to install and running software you bought, then you do not need a license. You can decline any contract offer or license offer and by law you are not commiting copyright infringment.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  50. How about ones that don't suck? by Some+Random+Username · · Score: 1

    I'm sure someone can find some use for those things, but lots of people need a desktop replacement machine.

  51. Windows refund? When so few claim rebates?? by DarkHelmet433 · · Score: 1

    I couldn't help but chuckle.. the likely amount anybody would actually get in return for what would likely be quite a lot of effort would pale in comparison to the reward/effort ratio from simply sending in rebate forms. And we all know how well those are acted apon.

    I'm sure a few dedicated people would probably have the time/energy/persistence to see it through to the bitter end, but I suspect that actually sending in rebate forms would have a much greater payoff.

  52. Great laptops without Windows by CurbyKirby · · Score: 2, Informative

    here

    Seriously, you get your Unix kernel, CLI shell, X server, terrific hardware-software integration (check out the sleep feature), etc.

    Admittedly, Apple needs to bundle more popular productivity applications.

    --

    --
    "Extra Anus Kills Four-Legged Chick" -- Headline
  53. Goog god by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
    Heh. The last time I asked whether it was possible to buy a laptop without a pre-installed operating system, I was told that selling one could expose the company to litigation. The reason: knowingly selling a non-functional product.

    I'm suing RCA - that piece of shit DVD player they sold me didn't play any movies when I pulled it out of the box, plugged it in, and pressed play.

  54. So dont... by azmeith · · Score: 1

    Go and get one here:
    http://www.pricewatch.com/h/mn.aspx?i=336&f =1

    However I have always wondered as to how joe system builder down the street handles the whole non-oem windows thing?

    Does he/she buy a separate copy and pass the cost to the buyer or get into one of those blood sucking never dying vampiry volume licensing agreements with M$?

  55. What about the anti-trust settlement?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And whatever happened to the refunds everyone was supposed to get as part of their anti-trust settlement? I sent my paperwork and never saw a thing.

  56. Maybe if his math was correct... by Lightborn · · Score: 2, Funny

    From the link:

    "Then how did you come up with the $10 price figure?"

    "I just know it's the right amount."

    "So what you are really doing is guessing. Well, my guess is the software is worth $1,000,000. Tell you what, let's split the difference. Send me a check for $500,005."

    I think by his reasoning he was owed $499,985.00.

    --
    My .sigs are not what they used to be.
    1. Re:Maybe if his math was correct... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I think it's $499,995. If the total they owe him is (10 + 1,000,000)/2 = 500,005, and they already sent him 10, then they still owe him 499,995.

  57. One lesson to be learned: by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    NEVER, EVER buy retail PC's!

    It's much cheaper to buy them in parts - there are specialized stores that assemble them for you. Here, in Mexico, you buy your custom-made PC (with crappy hardware unfortunately, unless you know where to look), and they give you free, a "non-activated" version of Windows. You can uninstall it, or buy a copy with the activation key.

    1. Re:One lesson to be learned: by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      So, where do you get the parts to build a sleek laptop?

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:One lesson to be learned: by kidgenius · · Score: 1

      Asus & Newegg. They sell barebones laptops.

    3. Re:One lesson to be learned: by Trelane · · Score: 1

      Where? Newegg lists your choice of OSes as "Any," "Windows XP Media Center" "Windows XP Home" "Windows XP Pro" or "Windows XP Tablet". Asus apparently only sells to resellers.

      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
    4. Re:One lesson to be learned: by bw5353 · · Score: 1
      NEVER, EVER buy retail PC's!

      It's much cheaper to buy them in parts

      Never ever buy PCs in parts. It is much quicker to buy retail. Time is worth much more than money.

    5. Re:One lesson to be learned: by tehcrazybob · · Score: 1

      Asus only sells to resellers, this is true. I recommend www.leadcomp.com

      I got a nice Asus laptop from them, with no OS installed, and my total came to $400 less than a similarly equipped model from Dell.

      Unfortunately, mine came with a Toshiba hard drive which failed spectacularly when it was about 8 months old. However, it appears that leadcomp has switched to Hitachi drives since my purchase. So long as they aren't DeathStars.

      --
      Computers need to explode more often.
    6. Re:One lesson to be learned: by kidgenius · · Score: 1

      Yes, you have to buy an ASUS laptop from a reseller. But, they sell complete laptops, as well as laptops that are just barebones (keyboard, screen, shell, mobo) and you have to add RAM, hard drive, etc. Goto www.asus.com and look through their resellers until you find one that will sell you the shell, or configured however you want.

  58. How about this? by inode_buddha · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Go ahead. Buy whatever you want, pre-installed. Then, wipe the drive, return the CD's, and take a tax write-off on the software expense. Surely MS wouldn't want to obstruct justice by refusing to deal with your CPA/Accountant, nor would they want to reveal the true cost of the software?

    --
    C|N>K
    1. Re:How about this? by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      Sounds cool, but for most brackets this works out to be about a third of what you're entitled to.

    2. Re:How about this? by b100dian · · Score: 1

      mmm.. this is interesting. Can you go into details please?:)

      --
      gtkaml.org
    3. Re:How about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Damn, that's pretty clever.

      But instead of writing it off as software expense, make a token effort to collect the money from MS, and then if it fails, write it off as fraud loss.

      Then, just to be a pain in the ass, ask the IRS if MS reported their fraud income.

    4. Re:How about this? by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      "Sounds cool, but for most brackets this works out to be about a third of what you're entitled to."

      I love the way people represent tax deductions as a one-to-one relation, or even as a net gain, or even as being worth the extra paperwork.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  59. PowerBook by ewg · · Score: 1

    I got a laptop with Unix instead of Windows without the need to seek a refund from Microsoft:

    I got an Apple PowerBook.

    --
    org.slashdot.post.SignatureNotFoundException: ewg
  60. Talk to IBM by hbarrett · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I purchased an IBM R50 back in April of 2004, IBM was willing to reduce the cost of the notebook by $100.00, but they did leave Windows XP home edition installed. Once I obtained the notebook, I removed Windows.

    Anyone want to buy my un-used Windows XP License and key? Oh wait! That's not legal! Monopoly anyone!

    Harry

  61. Hard to say. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    If I was a HD manufacture, I'd considering implementing an imaging service on a massive scale. They provide me with an image which I neither know/care about and I protect like the proprietary information it is. I ship them the correct hard drives, all preimaged, almost completely automated, if not completely. Maybe I even provide them an interface which they can connect to remotely control which images are used and submit orders. I bill their accounts automatically. Sure I charge a modest premium but their labor savings are tremendous. Of course it's at the cost of a literal handful of customers. If that.

    And dumbass. All cars come with factory stereo equipment. They don't swap it for cost.

    All it is about is sophist arguments, and some people wanting their individual snowflake existance to be subsidised by people who don't share their particular proclivities. One-of's just cost more. Blame Ford.

  62. Microsoft started it by Ricardo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    OK ok. I haven't read the EULA, but I am sure at the end of the three thousand words (or whatever), It says [paraphrasing] that if you don't agree, send it back for a refund.
    If you think about it, how else could it be a binding contract?
    I'm not a lawyer though, and anything is possible.

    --
    Move along... there is no sig here.
    1. Re:Microsoft started it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Don't you think you should at least read the EULA before paraphrasing it?

      Must be a high school drop out.

  63. Give them away by JLavezzo · · Score: 2, Funny

    > Then I wind up giving them away

    Yeah, I'll take one.

  64. Refund Day by Jaeger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Last summer my wife bought a Toshiba notebook. It came with Windows XP Home and the manufacturer refused to send a real install cd. (Even with a new copy of Windows, though, the system was still cheaper than the other notebooks she looked at with comparable specs; this one cost US$1k, at which point IBM notebooks are barely getting started.) When she opened the bok, a sticker on the shrinkwrap said:

    " . . . Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in any third party License Agreement or product documentation supplied with your PC, TAIS does not accept the return of component parts, or bundled software, that have been removed from the PC system. Pro-rata refunds on individual PC components or bundled software, including the operating system, will not be granted. If you wish to return a complete PC system, contact the TAIS dealer where you purchased the product, and comply with the dealer's standard return policies and procedures."

    So, yeah, Toshiba won't let you return the operating system by itself.

  65. "Barebone" laptop by altalt · · Score: 1


    You can also get a custom built "barebone" laptop from many resellers that won't bundle Windows with your purchase if you don't want it.

    Compal notebooks are nice (many barebone laptops are based on them, the CL56 model kicks 4$$), Voodoopc uses them as their base then mod them, they're worth it.

    For Canada:
    http://www.shoprbc.com/ (System Quote section)
    http://www.ttx.ca/ (Notebook configurator) ... and many other places, in the US too.

    1. Re:"Barebone" laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that reminds me of americomp

      http://www.acompinc.com

      anyone buy from them?

  66. He's posting on slashdot by unicorn · · Score: 1

    You really have to ask if he values his time?

    --
    "Politicians are interested in people. Not that this is always a virtue. Fleas are interested in dogs." P.J. O'Rourke
  67. That makes no sense at all. by Some+Random+Username · · Score: 1

    Linspire is not in the same "leage" as gentoo how? Because linspire users realize they are linux newbs? Running something like OpenOffice or Mozilla on a C3 is incredibly painful, which linux distro you're using doesn't change that.

    1. Re:That makes no sense at all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IMO you forgot JMO to add a few IMOs, IMHO

    2. Re:That makes no sense at all. by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      C'mon man, so I made a typo... I know how to spell league...

      Not that I follow here, but I'd be willing to wager that Mozilla and OOo run just fine on a C3 running Xfce4...

      I've never tried to run KDE3 on a C3 like those Linspire laptops... Perhaps you were using Gnome?

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  68. I know how get a refund on Windows by Toby_Tyke · · Score: 1

    Not strictly relevent, but I thought I'd share anyway.

    Many, many years ago (well, about 7) I put together a PC for my dad. It was bleeding edge stuff, PII, 4 speed CD Writer, 56 k modem. Oh happy days.

    Anyway, came time to install the OS. Now I had travelled home for the weekend form university to build this PC, and guess what I had forgotten to bring? Bingo, my Win 98 disc.

    Incidently, yes I am owning up to committing copyright infringement. I fully accept that I this is wrong. I just don't care. At least I'm not hiding behind AC to do it.

    So anyway, I had to go buy a copy of Win 98 from the local branch of PC World. I think it cost around £80. I took it home, installed it, burned a copy, then peeled the serial number sticker off the back of the CD case (or it might have been on the manual). Then I went back into PC world, and set about claiming a refund.

    The first lackey I spoke to tried to tell me I was only entitled to a replacement. I persisted. This software, I told him, is not fit for purpose. Sale of goods act and all that. He eventually had to go get the manager, who stood arguing with me for what must have been a good twenty minutes. Eventually, I was refunded.

    I knew what I'd done, so did the manager, but there was sweet Football Association he could do about it. So, if you ever want a refund on a copy of windows, you know how to get it, at least if you live in the UK.

    --
    "I realise this is not a very popular opinion but it's the truth, and there for needs to be said" -Bill Hicks
  69. Arrr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    Interesting story. It doesn't change my thinking about Microsoft much, but for myself (and whoever I have influence with in regards to computer purchases, which is a fair number of people) I/we will never give Microsoft a single penny ever again. Bunch of fucking bastards.

    Pirate away, mateys.

  70. just by a mac by b17bmbr · · Score: 1

    for all the fuss of the ms tax, hardwre compatiblity, etc., just by an ibook or PB. unless you do kernel development on x86, or linux specific development, there's nothing that runs on linux that can't be run under fink or open darwin. not to mention all the commercial apps that run without wine, crossover, et al. i know i'll get flamed, but i have been winfree since '98. really. i've run linux on my desktops since then. but it's more than software. the hardware itself is better. the battery life, keyboard, screen, etc. plus, wireless works flawlessly under os x. if you need a pc to dual boot, buy a thinkpad, they have i think the best comaptibility, and ibm has been fairly good about that. dell sucks. their laptops are throwaways given to road warriors because they come with warranties and it's easier to just send them back.

    now, if you want a pure kde or gnome desktop, you can still do it, but there is little advantage versus running X under os x. everything open source app is there, just a compile away. if you want to spend sub $500, buy a refurbed thinkpad on ebay froma reputable source. otherwise, save yourself the trouble and by a mac.

    --
    My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
    1. Re:just by a mac by RealAlaskan · · Score: 1
      unless you do kernel development on x86, or linux specific development, there's nothing that runs on linux that can't be run under fink or open darwin. not to mention all the commercial apps that run without wine, crossover, et al. i know i'll get flamed, but i have been ...

      It looks as if in addition to that silly one-button mouse, Apples now come without a shift key (Note to the humor-impaired: that's a joke!).

      Seriously, do Apples take USB mice, and PS2 keyboards? When it's time for a new computer, I'll be thinking _very_ seriously about one of those new, no-monitor-included macs, especially if I can still use my old IBM Model M keyboard.

    2. Re:just by a mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mini mac has no PS2 port but takes USB mouse. Can get a PS2 to USB adapter though.

    3. Re:just by a mac by b17bmbr · · Score: 1

      everything usb. in fact, i scrounged up an older wireless usb trackball from my school that was donated from a busniess, plugged it in, works. usb keyboards are not too expensive if you need one. the mac minis are really nice. i tried talking the old man into one, but went with an emac instead, which is cool because i gave my kids his old imac, which runs panther great. seriously, try running a XP on a 5-6 year old PC, it's a disaster, even if you have a gig of ram. as for *nix, i've been working on some web tutorials using all free software, inkscape, gimp, php, etc., and it runs great.

      --
      My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
    4. Re:just by a mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      try running a XP on a 5-6 year old PC, it's a disaster, even if you have a gig of ram.

      No, it's not. I'm running XP Pro on a circa 1998 PII with 256M, and it runs just fine.

    5. Re:just by a mac by b17bmbr · · Score: 1

      i tried installing it on my wife's P3 700 256MB system, and it really ran poorly, and all she wanted to do was use photoshop CS for her business. i had to buy her a new P4 workstation. maybe there were hardware issues, maybe it was a fresh install, not an oem one, maybe whatever. but then again, i'm not a windows guru. i haven't run windows, even a dual boot box, since like '98. i ran linux (rh 6.0 -> 6.2 -> mandrake 7.0+ ) until i bought an ibook in '02.

      --
      My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
    6. Re:just by a mac by MykeBNY · · Score: 1

      They won't do PS/2 natively, but you can get converters that will make a PS/2 keyboard and mouse look like their USB counterparts.

      I love my buckling spring Model M too, that things lasted me through seven computers so far, no signs of wearing.

    7. Re:just by a mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently not all USB-PS2 converters will do the trick though. I found a great page describing the problem, but unfortunately the google search terms to find it is too large to fit in this post...

      (Seriously, I tried not very hard and didn't find it. If you're buying one, it might make sense to look things up.)

  71. BUY a windoze-less laptop ! by Pantheus · · Score: 1

    http://www.linuxcertified.com/linux_laptops.html

  72. DELL offering windows refund by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've bought a Dell Inspiron without any OS and received a $100 windows refund. I spoke to several different sales representatives who were trained to say that there was not enough interest so I demanded to speak to the supervisor. He knew exactly what I was talking about and offered me the choice between a merchandise credit or a windows refund which I chose. The secret to get a windows refund, at least with Dell, seems to be persistence.

  73. Difficult to get a refund? Is the pope... by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1
    Guess we'll find out eventually.

    I rather expect so, in both cases.

    --

    -WolfWithoutAClause

    "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
  74. Windows XP EULA by hakr89 · · Score: 1

    Microsoft Windows XP Professional

    END-USER LICENSE AGREEMENT

    IMPORTANT-READ CAREFULLY: This End-User
    License Agreement ("EULA") is a legal agreement between you
    (either an individual or a single entity) and Microsoft
    Corporation for the Microsoft software product identified above,
    which includes computer software and may include associated
    media, printed materials, "online" or electronic documentation,
    and Internet-based services ("Product"). An amendment or
    addendum to this EULA may accompany the Product. YOU AGREE TO BE
    BOUND BY THE TERMS OF THIS EULA BY
    INSTALLING, COPYING, OR OTHERWISE USING THE
    PRODUCT. IF YOU DO NOT AGREE, DO NOT INSTALL
    OR USE THE PRODUCT; YOU MAY RETURN IT TO YOUR
    PLACE OF PURCHASE FOR A FULL REFUND.

    1. GRANT OF LICENSE. Microsoft grants you the following rights
    provided that you comply with all terms and conditions of
    this EULA:

    * Installation and use. You may install, use, access,
    display and run one copy of the Product on a single
    computer, such as a workstation, terminal or other device
    ("Workstation Computer"). The Product may not be used
    by more than two (2) processors at any one time on any
    single Workstation Computer. You may permit a maximum
    of ten (10) computers or other electronic devices (each
    a "Device") to connect to the Workstation Computer to
    utilize the services of the Product solely for File and
    Print services, Internet Information Services, and remote
    access (including connection sharing and telephony
    services). The ten connection maximum includes any
    indirect connections made through "multiplexing" or other
    software or hardware which pools or aggregates
    connections. Except as otherwise permitted by the
    NetMeeting, Remote Assistance, and Remote Desktop
    features described below, you may not use the Product
    to permit any Device to use, access, display or run other
    executable software residing on the Workstation Computer,
    nor may you permit any Device to use, access, display,
    or run the Product or Product's user interface, unless
    the Device has a separate license for the Product.

    * Mandatory Activation. The license rights granted under this
    EULA are limited to the first thirty (30) days after
    you first install the Product unless you supply
    information required to activate your licensed copy in
    the manner described during the setup sequence of the
    Product. You can activate the Product through the use
    of the Internet or telephone; toll charges may apply.
    You may also need to reactivate the Product if you modify
    your computer hardware or alter the Product. There are
    technological measures in this Product that are designed
    to prevent unlicensed or illegal use of the Product.
    You agree that we may use those measures.

    * Storage/Network Use. You may also store or install a copy
    of the Product on a storage device, such as a network
    server, used only to install or run the Product on your
    other Workstation Computers over an internal network;
    however, you must acquire and dedicate an additional
    license for each separate Workstation Computer on or
    from which the Product is installed, used, accessed,
    displayed or run. A license for the Product may not be
    shared or used concurrently on different Workstation
    Computers.

    * Reservation of Rights. Microsoft reserves all rights not
    expressly granted to you in this EULA.

    2. UPGRADES. To use a Product identified as an upgrade, you must
    first be licensed for the product identified by Microsoft
    as eligible for the upgrade. After upgrading, you may no
    longer use the prod

  75. Hypersonic PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hypersonic pc: http://www.hypersonic-pc.com/

    offers laptops gives you to option of no OS for 100 $ cheaper. They have quality machines also.

  76. Want a Windows refund? Two words... by IdJit · · Score: 1

    E BAY!!

  77. get a life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm all about linux. I love it. I even use as my main desktop. I also own a computer consulting / I.T. business, in which I sell systems. As an O.E.M. it is MY CHOICE to sell a system with WHATEVER software MY BUSINES DECIDES to offer. I have NO OBLIGATION to sell systems without Windows. If no one buys my systems.. then that's my problem. If you are really that hard up just build your own... and one more thing... quit polluting up slashdot with stupid queer ass articles like this.

  78. So, you want your $6 back? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because that's what Windows costs for Dell.

    1. Re:So, you want your $6 back? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since I have no use for windows, yes I do. If you think I shouldn't care about $6 because it's to small, well, fork over the $6 yourself buddy.

  79. Google is your friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    http://www.linux-laptop.net

    There is no shortage of laptops with Linux pre-installed or OS free for self install. If you can't find them, then you haven't looked at all.

    You can also get them from Wal-Mart and Linspire.

  80. For those looking for a windows-less laptop by SlyJoker · · Score: 1

    I bought my laptop of Powernotebooks.com, when you customize, and can remove windows xp to reduce the price by about 60 or 70 dollars.

  81. Take the easy way out... by pla · · Score: 1

    ...Lie.

    The problem here centers around you wanting to buy a laptop on which you plan to put Linux. While I agree you absolutely, unquestioningly should have that option, and the law even somewhat agrees with our opinion on the matter, Dell can laugh off a lawsuit that would cost you 3x the price of the laptop, just to get a $199 refund.


    So the secret here, to get your way - Shop as a "large business" customer. When you call, you want to buy 20 units, with a single unit initially to evaluate for suitability for your particular needs, the nature of which you of course can't disclose due to an NDA.

    Naturally, your department already has a 500-license VLK version of XP Pro, and anyway, you need to throw Datacenter Server 2003 on it (for which you already have 37 licenses with three spares) so don't need XP in the first place, so would the kindly send it to you unimaged.


    At this point some companies will flat out refuse, but most will put greed ahead of common sense and play along.


    It will help to make up a PO number (that just appears on your invoice, it doesn't actually "mean" anything if you pay by credit card) and some bogus company name at your address (again, doesn't mean anything, you'll still get it as long as you have your name on the shipping address).

    1. Re:Take the easy way out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you actually successfully done this?

    2. Re:Take the easy way out... by pla · · Score: 2, Funny

      Have you actually successfully done this?

      Well, as a scam, no. Legitimately buying a single unit to evaluate, yes.

      Of course, they actually did image the drive (I suspect it would cost take most major OEMs more than the price of a single copy of XP to change their standard McDonald's-like assembly line of PC creation for one machine), but waved a whopping $100 off the $3500 price tag.

      And no, I don't refer to Dell specifically... Though from my experience with them, I strongly suspect they'd throw in a free blow-job from Michael Dell's own mother if I made a large enough sale conditional on it.

  82. Toshiba windows refund success by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Toshiba gave me a windows refund for my M200 tablet PC. I insisted in buying one without any software installed and initally was told that this was impossible. I had to redial several times and finally spoke to the head of the sales department who admitted that lately they are getting many requests about windows-free hardware and the windows refund program. He told me there was no warranty on the harddrive because their test software was windows and sold me the machine without windows and issued me the requested refund. He indicated that Toshiba is on the verge of anouncing windows-free machines if demand persists. Good job, Toshiba!

  83. Re: EULA check by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

    Actually, I just checked the EULA. It says if I don't agree with the contract, I'm entitled to return the Windows license and get a refund. So I wrote to the importer once again...

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  84. MOD PARENT UP!!! by RockClimbingFool · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Even asking them *not* to do something is disruptive to their business chain. That's why they don't do it. It's not like they don't want the extra business, small as it might be. It would simply cost them more to cater to you.

    I really wish more people would understand this concept.

  85. Official Gateway line by Belgand · · Score: 4, Informative

    I work in Gateway customer service so here's the official policy on this (and it was hard enough to find when I got hired and was curious so it'll probably be a bitch if you call and get one of the largely incompetent people who work there).

    You cannot buy a computer without Windows on it. We simply will not do it. The way the ordering system is set up we cannot get it to go through no matter how sympathetic we are. Likewise if you purchase the system Gateway has determined that you agreed to the license the moment you power on the system. If you decide not to accept the license they will only accept the return of the software if you return the entire system (this being true of any pre-installed software that you want to return).

    In other words don't buy Gateway. Then again, even if you aren't interested in the refund don't buy Gateway. They sell crap and their customer service (employees, polcies, turn-around times, etc.) are crap. While I wouldn't have bought one before I started working there I sure as hell wouldn't now.

    1. Re:Official Gateway line by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1
      You cannot buy a computer without Windows on it. We simply will not do it. The way the ordering system is set up we cannot get it to go through no matter how sympathetic we are. Likewise if you purchase the system Gateway has determined that you agreed to the license the moment you power on the system. If you decide not to accept the license they will only accept the return of the software if you return the entire system (this being true of any pre-installed software that you want to return).

      In most states it is not legal to hinge the sale of a product upon the sale of another, independent product. Just because companies do it does not make it legal (that's why we have a judicial branch).

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    2. Re:Official Gateway line by Tibe · · Score: 0, Troll

      "I work in Gateway customer service... ""[Gateway] sell crap and their customer service (employees, polcies, turn-around times, etc.) are crap."

      You == Crap ?

    3. Re:Official Gateway line by +InvaderSkoodge · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I used to work at Gateway too. Until eMachines took over and decided that about four fifths of the company was not necessary.

      Here's my understanding of the situation. Before Microsoft's big legal case with half the states in the country, they could make manufacturers sign an agreement that they wouldn't sell systems with any other OS. But that was ruled anticompetitive and is no longer allowed. But that doesn't prevent MS from including a clause in their agreements with manufacturers that says they can't sell a system with no OS, because that isn't preventing the installation of a competitors product.

      At one point there was talk of selling systems with Linux but I think that was shot down because they figured they shouldn't sell systems with an operating system that the tech support people were not able to offer support on.

      Gateway used to make quality products. Now that eMachines has taken them over, you are just getting eMachines systems with Gateway printed on them instead.

      Oh, one more thing. I never got told real numbers, but at one point I was told that a copy of Windows XP Home was the second most expensive component in a Gateway system, second only to the processors. Microsoft gets more for Windows than Intel gets for the motherboard.

    4. Re:Official Gateway line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, noticed the post and thought I'd chime in as well since I work at the same place.

      Based on where I work and the people around me I would say that approximately 10-20% of the people working there are fit to do the job. Not that it's not an especially challenging job. I suspect that the vast majority of them just don't give a shit.

      The supervisors are frequently just as bad (some are good, others are so bad that we don't even like to talk to them). They are, of course, not actual supervisors. They're just people who typically have a bit more authority (e.g. they can offer more credit and authorize a few things that we're not allowed to) and have to deal with angry customers. The real supervisors only deal with personnel issues and such and never talk to the customers.

      For a while I worked roaming around the place helping out people who got stuck on stuff so yes, I've seen the bottom of the barrel.

      Then again our customers are frequently just as rude, demanding, pig-headed, and unreasonable. Sometimes you're caught in a hard spot because you know that the company is wrong or has obvious flaws that prevent the customer from being serviced efficiently and effectively. Other times it's the cust. getting unreasonable about something (e.g. can't get a rebate because they threw away the boxes with the UPC codes).

      Then again the part that Gateway doesn't want to get out is that they outsource all of their customer service. You're not allowed to say so (in fact, on my first day of training we were specifically instructed to, and I quote, "lie" to customers who asked if we worked for a call center) and are told that in any situation outside of work you work for *NAME DELETED*, but that at work you only work directly for Gateway. Gateway allegedly doesn't want the negative press of outsourcing. It's a pretty bad dodge though as one of the tech. support centers is rather obviously in Canada and some of the other centers have people with thick enough accents to notice.

      Yeah, customer service like this is a crap job, but a word of advice. If you really want to get the best possible service don't bother yelling. You get yelled at all day. Well over half of the customers are angry. It's the nice people that you're willing to go the extra mile for. Be polite, be patient, and try to be understanding and provided you happened to get someone who knows how to do the job right they'll probably do as much as they possibly can for you.

    5. Re:Official Gateway line by Belgand · · Score: 1

      It's not technically considered another product, but an essential part of the product you're purchasing. It's a bit circuitious and IANAL, but it would function in the same fashion as stating that we won't sell the computer without a hard drive.

      If it's really a sore issue I suggest asking to speak to the sales department as they might (though I doubt it) have a way to get it to go through.

    6. Re:Official Gateway line by Belgand · · Score: 1

      I feel it necessary to state that while this is more or less the company policy I am stating this in the capacity of a private citizen who is familiar with Gateway policy. Not as a Gateway employee. Thus this should not be interpreted as an official statement from Gateway nor that I represent Gateway in any official capacity in this statement.

      That said this is pretty much how it's likely to go down. Likewise as a private citizen I highly suggest that if you have any concerns about this policy and really want the issue to be adressed by someone who might have the ability to cut through this don't take the issue up with customer service. Write a letter directly to the corporate office. The address is buried on www.gateway.com under "Corporate Information" and then "Fact Sheet". The people who answer these tend to have a bit more freedom in solving problems.

    7. Re:Official Gateway line by Belgand · · Score: 1

      My step-father had a couple of Gateway laptops well before eMachines was part of the deal (i.e. mid to late 90s) and they were pretty crappy back then as well.

      As for tech. support's ability to do Linux I worry pretty strongly about their ability to do Windows. Some people are alright and know their stuff. The rest have the total extent of their computer knowledge limited to the three week traning course (which I, admittedly, did not take). Still, the number of times when people get sent SATA drives for IDE-only motherboards or AGP cards for a PCI-only motherboard is pretty staggering. Sure a few people just slip up, but the rest just know how to read the screen and follow the flow-chart.

      Someone once stated that in general phone tech. support is never going to give you the best solution. Just the one most likely to solve your problem quickly and get you off the phone (e.g. lots of destructive reformats and the like). I suspect that this holds true for pretty much every company.

    8. Re:Official Gateway line by +InvaderSkoodge · · Score: 1

      Ok, my comment that "Gateway used to make quality products" was more directed at the desktop PCs than the laptops.

      My only experience with laptops were the ones I had at work. One was a 200ARC and the hinges got weak so the screen would fall down if it was leaned back too far. Otherwise I liked it.

    9. Re:Official Gateway line by DestroBIG · · Score: 1

      I work at the computer store on campus and we regularly have representatives from a lot of the manufacturers come in and give us demonstrations, tell us why their product is better, etc. The last time our Gateway Rep came in we asked "What makes Gateway's products stand out from the rest?" He fed us donuts instead of answering our question. A good trade, indeed.

  86. Re:Keep Windows by packeteer · · Score: 1

    How is parent a "troll". Sure its criticism but its not a troll as in "trolling for suckers". Hes not trying to trick people into getting pissed off. If anyone is trolling for PR its the grandparent post.

    --
    unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  87. Different kind of property by vrimj · · Score: 1

    There is a key difference. You have a fee type interest in the real property involved in the car and its parts (subject to liens, perhaps, but you own it). Software is sold with a license. This is a very different kind of property right.
    A fee interest gives you the full rights of ownership, including the ability to exclude. To give you a fee interest the previous owner has to give up their fee ownership.
    A license simply give you permission to do something, in this case use the software. The person who sold it to you retains all their rights. All their rights, include the ability to exclude you, because in common law licenses were freely revocable.
    When you sell a neighbor your lawnmower you give them a fee interest, when you let them borrow it, you give them a license.
    In order to SELL a license you have to make it valuable. Something that is freely revocable is not all that valuable. The solution is the license agreement. This is a contract that limits the granter of the license's ability to revoke it.
    When you buy a copy of Windows you buy a license to use it, but you also buy a contract with the company that limits their ability to revoke the license. The problem is that contracts must be made by mutual agreement. If you don't agree to the contract you have "bought" a license that is freely revocable, and thus probably worthless.
    This is why there is a return clause in the license. If all they are selling is a license without an agreement they have a serious issue with a potential fraud claim, they would end up selling something that, at the time of sale might be so uncertain as to be worthess.

  88. Actually, no by iamacat · · Score: 1

    Copyright law only prevents me from making additional copies of Windows, excluding some fair use scenarios. How I use my own authorized copy is none of Microsoft's business.

    1. Re:Actually, no by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Here in the UK at least, the act of installing the software, and of loading the software from disk to RAM has been ruled to involve making a *copy* of teh software. Therefore, a licence is required, as copyright law prevents that.

      Insane, huh?

    2. Re:Actually, no by iamacat · · Score: 1

      What was the court case that prompted such a fabulous ruling? Now I will be scared to go into a UK bookstore. Maybe they have a right to disable my "hardware" if I am making an unauthorized copy of their stuff into my "RAM". Mad cow disease perhaps?

  89. Dell offering notebooks without OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are persistent enough you can get a Dell notebook without windows and a $100 refund. You need to speak to the right sales guy, mention your fear of preinstalled viruses and spyware, the Microsoft anti-trust ruling against bundeling software, etc. and you'll succeed. For some reason I had to waive the warranty on the hard disk and it took them a while to process it but it was the easiest $100 I've ever made.

  90. Where to buy a laptop without Windows. by Yaztromo · · Score: 1

    A good source to get a laptop without Microsoft Windows is . As an added bonus, these systems will run Linux quite readily (although you'll have to install it yourself).

    Yaz.

  91. One more thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dare you to buy a computer from me and ask for a refund. At my company you WILL get your ass kicked for that. How's that for customer service ? You stupid prick ! Just the fact that you are looking for a windows refund tells me that you don't deserve to use linux. What do you think you are going to do ? .. put Microsoft out of business by asking for a winblows refund ? Get a life and move on.... I personally would like to see Toshiba, Dell and the other O.E.M.'s have an ass kicking dept just for stupid fucks like you.... not only do you not get a refund... you get the shit kicked out of you just for asking a stupid fuck ass question. You must be hanging out with that stupid queer who came up with a "commercial" distro based on debian. What was that ... "User Linux" ... yea go hang out with him.

    1. Re:One more thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recommend less coffee in the mornings. You seem a little agitated.

  92. Re: Dell cow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gateway has the cow. Dell has the anoying "dude" guy.

  93. Persistence is key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From my own experience and those of my friends I can only say that persistence is the key to getting a refund. You might want to speak to the supervisor of sales right away. Especially large companies like Gatway, Dell, HP, etc. instruct their sales personel to give "not enough demand" as an excuse. However, if you explain the legality of bundeling software with hardware they suddenly listen and happily sell you a blank system and give you a windows refund.

    1. Re:Persistence is key by LuckyStarr · · Score: 1

      However, if you explain the legality of bundeling software with hardware they suddenly listen and happily sell you a blank system and give you a windows refund.

      Please elaborate. What do you mean by legality.

      --
      Meme of the day: I browse "Disable Sigs: Checked". So should you.
  94. Re:Keep Windows by dilute · · Score: 1

    umount

  95. I just think you're wrong. by thegnu · · Score: 1

    Really, read that whole "split the difference" part.

    (1,000,000 + 10) / 2 = 500,005

    So his math isn't really off at all, considering that he hasn't cashed the check they already sent him.

    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
  96. Damn lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But since that is part of the EULA, if you don't accept the EULA you have no agreement with Microsoft to refund your money.

  97. Where to buy a Windows-free laptop. by Yaztromo · · Score: 1

    (Repost -- fixed my bad HTML. Sorry!).

    A good source to get a laptop without Microsoft Windows is here. As an added bonus, these systems will run Linux quite readily (although you'll have to install it yourself).

    Yaz.

    1. Re:Where to buy a Windows-free laptop. by Quixotic+Raindrop · · Score: 1

      Caveat: I'm a dyed-in-the-wool Mac zealot (ask anyone who knows me)

      Have you tried getting a rebate for OS X? Buying a Mac, to run Linux, in order to avoid buying a Windows-based PC, to run Linux, because you don't want to pay the Microsoft Tax ... that's just trading one tax for another.

      I prefer Mac OS X. Mac OS X is what Linux wants to be when it grows up, IMO. But recommending a Powerbook with an un-refundable OS pre-installed in order to avoid buying a ThinkPad with a pre-installed OS doesn't make any sense.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. (Einstein)
    2. Re:Where to buy a Windows-free laptop. by Yaztromo · · Score: 1
      Have you tried getting a rebate for OS X? Buying a Mac, to run Linux, in order to avoid buying a Windows-based PC, to run Linux, because you don't want to pay the Microsoft Tax ... that's just trading one tax for another.

      Shhh! If you don't tell them it's OS X, maybe they won't know the difference! :).

      I prefer Mac OS X. Mac OS X is what Linux wants to be when it grows up, IMO. But recommending a Powerbook with an un-refundable OS pre-installed in order to avoid buying a ThinkPad with a pre-installed OS doesn't make any sense.

      It was a joke. Laugh :).

      Yaz.

    3. Re:Where to buy a Windows-free laptop. by Quixotic+Raindrop · · Score: 1

      I see ... you forgot the [joke][/joke] tags. I do that all the time :\

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. (Einstein)
  98. Re: EULA check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will you be posting a follow-up somewhere? At some point I'll probably buy a laptop here and it would be good to know how/if others have managed to get refunds. I have seen several "success stories" but they've mostly been from the U.S. or Australia. Maybe yet another Refund-HowTo site should be set up (or one of the existing ones be improved) so that you could contribute and browse success stories or advice according to country.

  99. Oh, please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The guy was making a habit of buying educational software and reselling it on EBay. That's pretty shady anyway.

    Also, I'm curious how someone only making $3,500/year (according to the article), can afford a printer to sell for $1,000 on EBay. Check out his feedback. (Interestingly, the buyer says he never got the printer and our esteemed Windows-refunder made off with the $1,000!) Nice.

    1. Re:Oh, please. by mollymoo · · Score: 1
      The guy was making a habit of buying educational software and reselling it on EBay.

      He didn't "make a habit" of it, he did it once.

      IANAL, but I think you libeled him by making that claim. Not a good idea if he fancies another go with the legal system.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    2. Re:Oh, please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IANAL, but I think you libeled him by making that claim. Not a good idea if he fancies another go with the legal system.

      Good luck finding him! (another A.C.)

    3. Re:Oh, please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot keeps a copy of the IP address for every post, including "Anonymous Cowards". This IP address can be subpoenaed, and the then the ISP can be subpoenaed to obtain a name and address.

  100. I second this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a Dell laptop for ages, but it irked me to no end that they made me pay for a bunch of useless crap. I've had this powernotebooks laptop for a year now; it arrived with a blank HD as I requested, and their Linux support forums are excellent.

  101. Try Eurocom by SpeedyRich · · Score: 1

    I did and bought an D900T Phantom, sans Windoze. Fantastic customer support, highly recommended. Lapdog runs Gentoo by the way.

    --
    ## NB: Comment here
  102. DiscountLaptops.com ships GREAT laptops with no OS by fmerenda · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I bought my laptop (A Sager 5690 - model no longer sold on their site) from http://www.discountlaptops.com/, and I couldn't be happer with it. No operating system, great value, and excellent customer service. I also paid about $1,000 less for my laptop than I would have paid if I bought it from Dell (P4 w/hyperthreading, 2GB ram, 1400x1050 LCD, over a year ago). If you don't believe me read their buyer ratings at the bottom of their web site. I actually had to return my laptop for repairs because of a faulty motherboard, and they paid for all the shipping and had my laptop back to me in a few days. The owner of the company emailed me several times before I bought the laptop and answered questions I had about it (like what ethernet chip it had), and made *objective* suggestions about which laptop I should buy. The owner also contacted me several times during my warranty work episode and I felt extremely comfortable that he was making sure that I was well taken care of by Sager. (Sager and Chembook are two of the main manufacturers that they sell on their site. These are the companies that sell to places like Alienware, Hypersonic PC, Pro-star, Voodoo PC and many others. I'm running Ubuntu Hoary on it now, and have not had any problems at all. Before this I ran Fedora Core 2 and 3 with no problems (save the faulty motherboard).

    I can't recommend discountlaptops.com enough. I don't work for them or anything like that, I am just a happy, happy customer. You can bet my next laptop will be from them as well.

    --
    -- http://www.MindBlowingPhotos.com
    Photography inspired by music, nature and life itself.
  103. The OS on my XP-home PC was a free "no-option". by WiartonWilly · · Score: 1

    What a nightmare. 2000pro, an older OS, works more flawlessly with the native Toshiba hardware.

    XP home was free (as in beer) and worth it.

  104. Buying a hotdog by Leperflesh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hi, I'd like a hotdog. Two bucks? Great! Hey, listen, do you have ketchup and mustard and relish and stuff? Over there? Cool. How much does it cost?

    Oh, it's included in the price? Right on! Thanks!

    Ok, so, but that ketchup and stuff, it must cost you something, right? I buy ketchup at Safeway and the smallest bottle they sell is a buck.

    Right, yeah, cool.

    Ok, so, can I have a plain hotdog, for a dollar? See, I have my own sauce, I brought it from home. It's home-made, see. I downloaded the recipe from the internet. You want some of my sauce? You can have it for free, I bet tons of your customers would love this stuff, it's great.

    No? Ok, well anyway: How about that dollar-off, plain hotdog?

    What? But, see, I'm not gonna use any of your ketchup. I'm leaving it in the bottle. If you give it to me anyway, I'll have to scrape it off, see... you might as well just keep it. And since ketchup costs a buck, I'll have my hotdog for a dollar off.

    No. Seriously man, here's the two bucks for the hotdog. If you won't give me a buck back for not using the ketchup, would you at least figure out how much that ketchup costs per-hotdog, and then take THAT off the price? Even if it's only ten cents per hotdog, I should still get the refund 'cause I'm not using the ketchup.

    Ok, yeah, I could take some ketchup and then re-sell it on ebay, but really, why would someone buy my used ten-cents worth of ketchup... it might be dirty. Plus you can't really sell open ketchup like that. I'm sure there's a regulation. Who knows what I'm selling? It might not be real ketchup. It could be filthy, full of viruses. I'm sure Heinz would not like me representing it as their product.

    So, c'mon, one hotdog for a buck, or, show me your balance sheet and then we'll just take off what the ketchup really costs. At least.

    Huh? OK, fine, screw you! I'm going home and making my own damn hotdog! Dammit!

    --
    I am allowed to criticize you: you are not allowed to criticize me. Sorry, that's just how things are.
  105. Is Obtaining a Windows Refund Still Difficult? by caluml · · Score: 1
    Is Obtaining a Windows Refund Still Difficult?

    Is the Pope Catholic?

    1. Re:Is Obtaining a Windows Refund Still Difficult? by Trebuchet · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is the Pope Catholic?

      No, he's dead.

      (sorry, couldn't resist)

      --

      Malcolm solves his problems with a chainsaw,
      And he never has the same problem twice.
  106. Re:Easy. by tokabola · · Score: 1

    Actually, he would be buying Windows, as it is "bundled" with the hardware and included in the price. Unless the manufacturer can prove he's not adding anything to the cost (and find a judge or jury who will actually believe that B.S.), Windows is being purchased.

    You can demand a dealer remove options from a car, and they have to do it. If you don't want the stereo (because you hate music, or plan to install your own hi end system) you can tell the dealer to remove it and adjust the price and they have to do it (in the US anyway). That is the law, and IIRC it isn't specific to autos - so it should apply to PC's also.

    One of the reasons PC manufactures all include Windows is because Microsoft lobbied congress and had a law passed (or just sued a few makers and established precedent, I don't recall) that states that it's not a computer unless it has an OS. It's only a "kit" or a "barebones" system. Manufacturers have a hard time selling "kits", as it implies that hours of assembly (and skill) are needed, so they include what has been (for quite a few years) the only commercial OS available. After all, they pay very little for their bulk license, and profit by marking it up. Linux, until recently, didn't have a name brand commercial distro they could profit from.

    BTW, IANAL but I did pay attention to the whole OS being required thing, and am quite sure that info is reasonably accurate in the US. In any other country YMMV. Your vendor / hardware maker is legally obligated to give you a refund (and recieve credit from MS) but they will NOT make it easy. I believe MS won't refund unless you have an official Microsoft Windows disc, not just a OEM disc made by the manufacturer.

    All in all, good luck. While you could try finding a laptop without an OS, they are hard to find and may not have the features you're looking for.

    Tommy

    --
    Open Source for Open Minds
  107. Re:Easy. by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 1

    Actually, no. You can't demand anything. A car dealer can simply refuse to sell you the car in the configuration you want.

    Secondly, even if they do sell you the car, they only have to remove "options" that are in the car. You can't, for example, demand to remove the steering wheel and be compensated for the price because it's part of the base package and the steering wheel is not a line item of that.

  108. Reselling can be tricky too by Sloppy · · Score: 1
    About a year ago I bought a Fujitsi notebook that came with Windows. That's the first copy of Windows I ever owned, and the first MS product of any type I've had, since my C64 days when I used their BASIC interpreter.

    I never bothered to try to get a refund, because it looked like it would be a pain in the ass.

    What I would have happily done (and what I had assumed I would do, at the time I bought the computer), is resell that copy of Windows to some other sucker. But even that was denied to me. No, not by a marketplace (e.g. eBay) opting to not work with me, but because my Windows copy only consisted of a couple of hard disk partitions. The laptop had not even come with a Windows CD -- it merely came with Windows preinstalled on one partition, and a backup partition intended for reimaging the first one. (Note that, in hindsight, not coming with a CD isn't as weird as it might sound, since the laptop doesn't have a CD drive. A normal user wouldn't have any way to use a CD, without extra equipment.)

    Thus, to sell my Windows, I would have had to sell the hard disk, and that would have been inconvenient. Furthermore, once you have a new toy, you want to use it right away, so I had already nuked the partitions before I even realized the box hadn't contained a Windows CD. Within 20 minutes of having received the box from UPS, I didn't have anything to resell.

    What I learned from this, is: if you do buy a machine preloaded with Windows, and you're not willing to just eat the extra cost, then make sure it comes with a CD so you'll have something to resell. (Unless you wanna diddle around with selling a hard disk.)

    Very clever of MS. Be aware.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    1. Re:Reselling can be tricky too by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      "Thus, to sell my Windows, I would have had to sell the hard disk, and that would have been inconvenient. "

      If you're talking about Windows XP, it would have been more than just inconvenient; it would not have worked. At best, it would have worked for 60 days and then Activation would fail.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  109. In Canada... by mattis_f · · Score: 1

    you can do this.

    http://www.sub300.com/

    They have a really neat ultra-lite for less than $900. Lindows, sure, but I think you can get without OS as well.

    I've never bought anything from them though, so I have no clue about their business practices or such.

  110. How about a class-action lawsuit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Microsoft, or the retailers of its products, are refusing to grant a refund when the very license they wrote says you MUST return the software and get a refund in order to be released from the license, then aren't they committing a consumer fraud?

    And if so, might there not be enough Linux users who bought laptops with a "Windows tax" to form a large enough class that some law firm could be encouraged to take up the case?

  111. I believe u r in error by cinnamon+colbert · · Score: 1

    Computers and cars R very similar, in that there is a limited number of suppliers, and the cost of the item is , to a very large extent, driven by volume and automated manufacturing.

    If any of the posters in this thread had the slightest idea of how things are actually made, they would know that a non standard item is always more expsenseive.

    There are always a small minority bitching that they cant get their pet item. I don;t know what the analogy in car land is, but I am sure there are a lot of car buffs pissed off because what they want is not sold by std vendors, and is an expspensive aftermarket addon.

    I don't understand your logic as to why software makes a product different. You still buy it at the store, you still look for a cheap item, etc. What does the general purpose thing have to do with how I go to compusa or whatever and look at the 599, the 699, the 799, etc - this is exactly like going to toyota, and looking at the camry ce, the le, the xle, leather....
    I guess the exact analogy would be ethanol fueled cars, or something like that.

    1. Re:I believe u r in error by nels_tomlinson · · Score: 1
      Well, imagine that Ford, Chevy, Toyota, et cetera, were all selling cars, but the only engine they would put in them was an engine from MassiveSucks (the convicted monopolist manufacturer of automotive engines).

      Furthermore, imagine that the mandatory MS engine was high-priced, and unsatisfactory to you, while another engine, available separately, at a lower cost, was better for your purpose. Imagine, too, that the MS engine came with a license which said, in part: ``If you don't agree to use this engine only on MS-approved trips, you MUST return the engine to the dealer who sold you the car, for a refund.''

      That would be a pretty solid analogy to the actual situation. I don't think that the current car industry is quite in that state. Especially, the EULA just doesn't exist on car parts which are sold as part of a new car.

  112. Laptops without proprietary software. by jbn-o · · Score: 1
  113. Re:Keep Windows by aichpvee · · Score: 1

    Ok, why would you drop the horrid ui of windows for gnome? I'd think someone dropping windows would do it to get something better, not worse.

    --
    The Farewell Tour II
  114. Send a message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and buy from a laptop vendor that will sell you a laptop without windows. A good example is powernotebooks.com. It may not have the hardware feature set you were looking for, but you have to decide whether the included hardware or software is more important.

  115. Vendor-specific image by LPrecure · · Score: 1

    I'm curious about this, too. If the HD is pre-imaged at, say, Seagate, then who decides that "It's an HP, so load it up with spyware"?

    1. Re:Vendor-specific image by Cuthalion · · Score: 1

      Presumably when HP signs some huge deal with Seagate to supply them with 1235125123 preimaged hard drives they also tell them what image they want. Maybe they give them a CD or DVD, or maybe they give them a big stack of floppy disks. We can only speculate.

      --
      Trees can't go dancing
      So do them a big favor
      Pretend dancing stinks!
    2. Re:Vendor-specific image by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      I'm curious about this, too. If the HD is pre-imaged at, say, Seagate, then who decides that "It's an HP, so load it up with spyware"?

      HP do when they place their order for 25,000 hard disks along with a disk image to put on all of them.

    3. Re:Vendor-specific image by silvwolf · · Score: 1

      We got a bunch (around 80, IIRC) of HP SFF EVO d530's at work a couple months ago. I found one of them with a floppy in the drive still.. I put the floppy aside and did my normal imaging of the machine. When I threw the floppy in my desktop I found that it was some sort of Linux boot disc. So I booted up a machine with that disc in it and it seemed to start up some sort of imaging program. Kinda looked like it was looking for a network server. Didn't look real closely as I was busy with those machines and forgot about the disc. Not sure what happened to the disc any more, kinda wish I had taken a closer look now.

      So, at least HP, on those certain machines, doesn't simply throw a pre-imaged drive in to the box and ship it out.

  116. Contract? by Lifewish · · Score: 1

    As I understand it, EULAs that offer concessions such as "we will refund your cash" fall partially under contract law. As such, once the contract is broken (for example by a refund not being provided) surely all bets are off.

    The GPL is a pure license, so doesn't have this sort of worry.

    --
    For the love of God, please learn to spell "ridiculous"!!!
    1. Re:Contract? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not a lawyer. However, at least in the UK, I believe that if a portion of a contract is unfair or invalid (because national law trumps it, or whatever) the remaining portions of the contract will still stand.

    2. Re:Contract? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      True, but this is not the case of an unfair/invalid portion of a contract. If MS had claimed that they'd own your first-born child in a section of the EULA, that portion'd have been invalid.


      Remember, the portion about a refund is not some burden placed on the consumer, it's an offer from the seller.

    3. Re:Contract? by DogDaySunrise · · Score: 1
      If a Windows EULA is viewed as a contract, and you don't agree with the license and do not use/install/whatever the product...

      ...Can Microsoft be considered bound by a contract that you've deliberately refused to enter into with them?

    4. Re:Contract? by Lifewish · · Score: 1

      The contractual parts are specifically written to describe what should happen if you don't agree to the license parts - it's an exception handler. The contractual agreement states that, if you don't accept the license, you can get a refund. If you can't get a refund then MS has breached that contract.

      I'm not sure what the results would be. However, your side of the contract is to not install the software. MS's failure to refund possibly provides a loophole by which one could install the software without being legally considered to have accepted the license. Then they only have to abide by normal copyright laws.

      I'm sure a lawyer could argue that way, anyway. And, of course, this means you could sue Microsoft if they set an update to automatically install (SP2 anyone?) since, without agreement to their license, they have no right to do this.

      --
      For the love of God, please learn to spell "ridiculous"!!!
    5. Re:Contract? by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      this means you could sue Microsoft if they set an update to automatically install (SP2 anyone?)

      What's that supposed to mean? There's nothing in XP that can automatically install an update (SP2 or not) without my permission. Even the automatic update feature is configured to download and prompt for installation by default (although yes, they recommend that it install by default, but then in the vast majority of cases that's excellent advice that more people should heed...)

      Now, if you configure auto update to auto-install stuff, even if you have somehow managed to not accept the licence, *you* configured it to behave like that. I fail to see how MS could be liable for anything in that case.

    6. Re:Contract? by Lifewish · · Score: 1

      Even the download could possibly be considered to be playing silly buggers with your computer ("I *needed* that disk space, your Honour).

      I fully accept that this is pushing the limits of the plausible, but since when did lawyers not do that at every opportunity :P

      --
      For the love of God, please learn to spell "ridiculous"!!!
  117. Just like those bastards at McDonalds !! by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

    If you want to add cheese to a Big Mac, McDonalds charges and extra 50 cents.

    *BUT*

    If you order a Quarter Pounder w/Cheese WITHOUT the Cheese they won't give you 50 cents off!

    I don't like cheese, I can't eat it but I have to pay for it. It's not like it's some integral part of the sandwich. They take it off at my request, and don't even include it in half of the sandwiches they sell but I'm still left paying for something I never received.

    I've gotten a discount twice, but I always have to talk to the manager. I've never had considered a lawsuit, but now I'm thinking maybe I should.

    1. Re:Just like those bastards at McDonalds !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You can order it with the cheese, scrape the cheese off, and give it to someone else.

      McDonalds' cheese supplier won't try to prevent your cheese transfer, or try to stain your reputation by insinuating that you are contributing to cheese theft.

    2. Re:Just like those bastards at McDonalds !! by JediJorgie · · Score: 1

      LOL, I have a vegetarian friend who buy's big-macs at McDonalds and taco salads at Taco Bell without the meat and they don't give a disount for that either. Jorgie

    3. Re:Just like those bastards at McDonalds !! by Quixotic+Raindrop · · Score: 1

      [sings]Two All-Beef Patties, Special Sauce, Lettuce, Cheese, Pickles, Onions, on a Sesame-Seed Bun[/sings](emphasis added)

      Wait, did I miss something? No ... cheese comes on the BigMac so adding extra cheese to it should cost more. Now, $0.50 seems a bit much, but maybe you live in NYC. Or Montreal, where $0.50 doesn't go as far as it does even in NYC. At any rate, adding 'value' should cost something.

      Additionally, McDonald's does indeed sell the Quarter Pounder, sans cheese (see http://app.mcdonalds.com/bagamcmeal?process=item&i temID=6 for details). Maybe the people working in the McDonald's near you are stupid, but that does occasionally happen; they should charge you the QP price if you ask for a QP w/cheese, no cheese.

      However ...

      None of this is at all relevant. McDonald's doesn't have a monopoly on fast food, and can't require food-sellers to sell only with-cheese sandwiches. In order for your analogy to work, McDonald's would have to control nearly all food-service distribution by supplying, say, all the innards for sandwiches (food service is a bad analogy for this, period, but you brought it up ...). If McDonald's had exclusive sales agreements for all food service establishments, and required that all of their sandwiches be made with McDonald's cheese, and that customers couldn't 1) buy cheeseless sandwiches and 2) could only buy sandwiches ... well, it still doesn't work.

      It used to be that any reputable (well, "major") PC maker was required by Microsoft to sell their hard wares with a pre-installed OS provided by Microsoft. There have been occasional exceptions (Dell was selling PCs with Linux pre-installed a while ago; may still be for all I know ... I don't shop Dell), but most major consumer-level, pre-packaged and pre-installed PC makers sell their computers only with Windows. In theory, you can return the OS un-used, but all PC makers I'm familiar with require you to communicate refund requests to Microsoft, who then "conveniently" return you to the PC maker for help. The PC maker won't (usually) sell you a bare PC, and Windows is the only OS they offer. Since you can't request the PC come without Windows, and you can't get a refund for using it, you're stuck paying $100+ for software you neither want nor use. And that is how American-style Capitalism works ... er, and that is the difference between McDonalds and Microsoft.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. (Einstein)
    4. Re:Just like those bastards at McDonalds !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds like the original poster is lactose intolerant or allergic to cheese. So maybe "scraping off" the cheese isn't the best idea.

  118. If it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck... by Lifewish · · Score: 1

    The Microsoft EULA has certain provisions, such as the refund, that imply a contract between the licensor and licensee. If MS refuses to live up to its requirements under said document, I can't see how the licensee could be expected to live up to theirs. I imagine that the product would default back to canonical copyright rules of "copy this and die".

    If so, that would cut through 95% of the crap in the license.

    --
    For the love of God, please learn to spell "ridiculous"!!!
  119. Goto www.pricewatch.com by GomezAdams · · Score: 3, Informative

    They have a category for vendors that sell laptops (and desktops too) without an OS installed.

    --
    Too lazy to create a sig...
  120. Is Obtaining a Windows Refund Still Difficult? by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

    Is windows still insecure?

    There's your answer.

    wba.

    --
    Huh?
  121. To whoever modded this dude as 'flamebait'... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...thanks for reminding me to metamoderate.

  122. 17 USC 117 by tepples · · Score: 1

    under copyright law, Microsoft's license is the only thing that allows you to use their software at all

    How, given 17 USC 117 and foreign counterparts?

    1. Re:17 USC 117 by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      tepples, that's a backup copy essentially. As I understand it, you're only allowed to use the software if you accept the agreement. I'm not sure what law holds you to this, though. You've clearly paid for it, its in your hands. Perhaps something about copying the software to the CPU and RAM, therefore, you're in violation of their copyright. Maybe we should invent a system that doesn't copy somehow?

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    2. Re:17 USC 117 by tepples · · Score: 1

      Perhaps something about copying the software to the CPU and RAM, therefore, you're in violation of their copyright.

      That's expressly permitted by 17 USC 117, which I linked:

      Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106, it is not an infringement for the owner of a copy of a computer program to make or authorize the making of another copy or adaptation of that computer program provided: (1) that such a new copy or adaptation is created as an essential step in the utilization of the computer program in conjunction with a machine and that it is used in no other manner [my emphasis]

      Obviously, copying a computer program from storage to RAM is "essential step in the utilization of the computer program".

    3. Re:17 USC 117 by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I just assumed that when I saw the "additional copy" that I was looking at the archival backup clause. I do recall that clause now, however you must be a legitamate owner of a copy. Notice that it implies that you own a copy in the law, not liscence. But I still don't know what makes these EULAs valid.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    4. Re:17 USC 117 by Elladan · · Score: 1

      "But I still don't know what makes these EULAs valid."

      This is actually fairly simple to understand... It's an age-old legal principle called "The party with the most money wins."

      Seriously, the EULAs are NOT valid under a legitimate legal theory. What makes them valid is that Microsoft has more money than you. That means, the government will tend to rule in their favor. In addition, having so much money, they can easily purchase laws to make EULAs valid, which is exactly what they've been trying to do the last decade or so.

      When you purchase a piece of software, you own that copy, and can use it as you please except as specified in law. A EULA is an additional restriction on your use of the software - it's an attempt to take away rights you already had when you bought it, after the fact. Of course it's not really legal. Your right to use was defined by the government in copyright law, not by the company.

      But since they've been used for a number of years, people now see them as the normal way of things, and it becomes ever simpler for Microsoft and the rest of the corporate world to purchase laws making them legal. Such is the way of things. The sale price on congressmen is quite cheap, you know.

  123. "Until recently"? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Microsoft lobbied congress and had a law passed (or just sued a few makers and established precedent, I don't recall) that states that it's not a computer unless it has an OS. It's only a "kit" or a "barebones" system

    And a Ubuntu Live CD doesn't qualify how?

    Linux, until recently, didn't have a name brand commercial distro they could profit from.

    "Recently" as in since last century? Red Hat has been on the scene for a long time (for instance, Red Hat Linux 6 was first published in 1999), and now there are SUSE, Linspire, and lots of other commercial distributions. Why haven't the PC vendors caught up?

  124. Antitrust II by tepples · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    1%, 99%, you are either right or you are wrong.

    The difference is that Microsoft is a convicted monopolist. Therefore, it has to play by stricter rules, or the Democrats will press antitrust charges as soon as President Bush leaves office in 2009.

  125. "THE PRODUCT" and "IT" in legalese by tepples · · Score: 1

    DO NOT INSTALL OR USE THE PRODUCT; YOU MAY RETURN IT TO YOUR PLACE OF PURCHASE FOR A FULL REFUND.

    In the case of OEM versions of Windows OS, it could be argued that "THE PRODUCT" and "IT" refer to the whole computer.

  126. For what apps? by tepples · · Score: 1

    True, when you bought your iBook or PowerBook computer, you got a rather nice computer running a usable OS with BSD underpinnings, but how fast does it run software written in x86 assembly language or that otherwise has been made available only for x86 architecture? I can't imagine that your Macintosh computer with a PowerPC CPU could run the Bochs emulator fast enough to make x86 apps under FreeDOS or GNU/Linux or FreeBSD usable. Or has Bochs's execution speed improved by an order of magnitude in the last year?

  127. The IBM Thinkpad dilemma by Harish+Mallipeddi · · Score: 1

    Atleast with other laptops, you get a WinXP Installation CD. With my IBM Thinkpad R40, which came installed with WinXP, does not even have an installation CD. WinXP installation files are in the hidden hard disk partition!! How do I get a refund?

  128. Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would you even consider spending money on a laptop w/ Windows installed when you can buy an Asus whitebook like my Z80K? For $1100, I have a high resolution lcd which is non-existant among any laptops I could find, and has a ATI 9600XT.

  129. Yeah I got my refund... by farzadb82 · · Score: 1

    $129 worth of coupons for MS software!

  130. Mod parent down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'm guessing you're not a lawyer. At least not an IP one.

    Selling of any product carries with it an implied license to use that product for it's designed purpose. This has been settled at court for some time. So, software sold without a EULA can be used for it's intended purpose, no problem.

    Of course, consumers can limit their ability to use a product by agreeing to a license defining the limits of the use. This stems from the right to contract, held very sacred in the US. Provided the EULA is held as binding (people love to argue this hasn't been settled yet despite court cases to the contrary), the fact that the software manufacturer breaches the terms of it does not mean the consumer can no longer use the software. It simply means the consumer has a claim against the manufacturer for breach of contract, as any party does against another party who breaches a contract between them.

    The interesting thing about the MS EULA is that it states that the consumer will get a refund from the POS store. (Point Of Sale, not Piece of Shit) But this won't have any legal bindingness on the POS store unless MS has a contract with the store requiring them to provide a refund. Without such a contract, it would be up to the store's policy, or state or commonwealth laws on sales. I just have not heard anything on this topic.

    For anyone chosing to sue their POS store for the refund, I guess the first interrogatory before trial would be whether they accepted any duty to provide Windows refunds in their agreements with MS or it's distributors.

  131. You are buying a whole product by prostetnic · · Score: 1

    People don't seem to be noticing that the manufacturer is selling an "integrated product." That includes the loaded OS. If the click through is the first thing you see when you boot the computer, and you refuse the license, and the company is willing to refund the price whole purchase fee and take back the laptop, they are fulfulling their obligation. Yay! I want to go to Hawaii! Yay!

  132. Should we do the same with medical services. by infosinger · · Score: 1

    How much are they bundling in that we don't need just because they know they can charge our health insurance?

  133. Re:Keep Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Worst review ever. Are you mentally handicapped or something?

  134. Waiting for my refund... by rfunches · · Score: 1

    ...which I asked for in $2 bills.

  135. get Linux laptops by Robocoastie · · Score: 1

    there's several companies selling Laptop's either w/out an OS or with a version of Linux. Just get one of those, my next laptop will be one like that.

  136. Buy a Linux-only laptop then by mamladm · · Score: 3, Informative

    So, why don't you buy a Linux-only laptop then?

    Terrasoft Solutions sell Linux-only laptops, desktops and servers using Fedora Core 2 based YDL.

    http://www.terrasoftsolutions.com/

    They specialise in PPC only, so if you insist on an x86 powered machine then you'd have to find another such shop. I am confident there must be companies just like Terrasoft who specialise in x86 based Linux pre-installed gear.

    In fact, a quick google search for "linux preinstalled laptops" shows the this very interesting site as first hit ...

    http://mcelrath.org/laptops.html

    according to that site, there are plenty of options for people interested in x86 based Linux-only laptops.

    --
    the macintosh asterisk mailing list http://www.astm
    1. Re:Buy a Linux-only laptop then by yagu · · Score: 1

      I may actually go that route. Thanks for the links, I'll be looking into them. For my original post (here), I didn't have that option... That was about seven years ago.

      Again, thanks for the links.

  137. Problems I thought of by The+OPTiCIAN · · Score: 1

    What happens when the manufacturer offers you a full refund for the whole laptop, but not for sections of bundled components? Is it vaid for them to do this? Is there a valid timeout? What happens if you keep buying laptops and refunding them once a month, backing up your partition and reinstalling it each time you get your new unit?

    What happens when the manufacturer puts a seal on the packaging and says "by opening thism you agree to use the software" or something in more legally respectable language?

    --


    Believe with me, my saplings.
  138. HP had the answer by biophysics · · Score: 1

    For a short time last year one could buy nx5000 HP notebook with SuSE 9.1 pre-installed (only in the US) http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/us/en/sm/WF06a/3219 57-64295-89315-321838-f33-395654.html
    Configure and buy link in the web page does not work now. I remember some press release HP announced that they would prefer to enter this (pre-installed linux) market and were testing the feasibility in the US. I think every other linux journal http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7845 had rave reviews including one at MSNBC http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5831949/ but alas all has failed to deliver.
    HP sponsored even a KDE summit in Germany by supplying Linux laptops. http://dot.kde.org/1094715499/

  139. I did it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    and got an apologetic letter too. They EULA says that if you do not agree to the license, you can return it to the retailer for a refund.

    I had to take watford electronics to court (small claims), though they backed down about a week before they court appearance.

    The interesting thing about their defense was it was "The EULA is not binding on us because we are a third party, the license being between microsoft and yourself".

    My reply was that they purchased the OEM copy with that EULA and that it was I that had no relationship to MS. If they didn't want to be bound by the EULA then they could have put a different version of Windows on there.

    1. Re:I did it by paulatz · · Score: 1

      ``and got an apologetic letter too. They EULA says that if you do not agree to the license, you can return it to the retailer for a refund.''

      Actually the EULA say that if you don't want to use it yu must return it to the retailer and you can ask for a refund.

      --
      this post contain no useful information, no need to mod it down
  140. Riddle me this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why, then, is there a separate EULA for the software that you have to agree to after the purchase? If it is an integrated product, there should be an EULA for that product before sale and agreed to.

  141. Toshiba's way around this problem by joefish_only_1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I bought a laptop late last year. One of the things I was considering was asking for a refund for windows. However, on opening the cardboard box, I found that the laptop was enclosed in shrinkwrap with a bright yellow sticker attached. The sticker said something to the effect of "This product is sold with Windows, if you don't want Windows, then please return the whole thing unopened. Refunds will not be given for just the software, and by opening the packet you agree to this."

  142. If MS and the manufacturers... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... don't like the mess, then they could stop offering the refunds when one does not agree to the EULA.

    But they will not do it because then they would fall foul of legislation in most places that forbids to tie in sales of one product (computer) only if you buy another (Windows).

    The offer of the refund is not from the goodness of their hearts. Making almost imposible for consumers to get something they are entitled to is immoral and your criticism of people trying to get what is rightly theirs is ridiculous and preposterous.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  143. Whose time, whose mney? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Are you Billy Gates? Then yes, by all means pay somebody else to get a computer, your time may be literally valued at millions.

    Are you a regular guy that would be doing something else completely unproductive otherwise? Then your time is not worth as much as you think, saving 100 bucks could be worth the hassle.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Whose time, whose mney? by bw5353 · · Score: 1
      Are you a regular guy that would be doing something else completely unproductive otherwise?

      I actually don't mind if people who like fiddling with things choose to play with computer parts. However, I do mind when people tell everyone to spend time doing something many of us don't like, just to save money, and that's what the grand-parent poster did.

      If you spend time selecting computers parts, not because you like it, but because you can imagine nothing else to do, you have a much more serious problem.

    2. Re:Whose time, whose mney? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's so deliciously ironic to see someone holding the "my time is precious" view ... on Slashdot.

      I bet getting a preassembled system buys you lots of time to spend on "stuff that matters" and "intelligent discussion" instead of spending it with the screwdriver. :-)

    3. Re:Whose time, whose mney? by bw5353 · · Score: 1
      It's so deliciously ironic to see someone holding the "my time is precious" view ... on Slashdot.

      You are right of course. But you do not know why each of us reads and writes on Slashdot. It may be because we are collecting material for our sociology thesis, or because we try to find converts for a shady religious sect. Or just for the fun of it, which is as precious as anything in life.

  144. Are you been... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    ... sarcastic, dislexic or forgetful?

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Are you been... by Yaztromo · · Score: 1
      Are you been (sic)...sarcastic, dislexic or forgetful?

      Yes, no, and I don't remember :).

      The HTML fixed version is here.

      Yaz.

  145. The answer is... by realkiwi · · Score: 1

    YES!

    Next question please.

    --
    realkiwi
  146. We buy Dell kit with FreeDOS Bundled by TAZ6416 · · Score: 1

    Where I work is a 99% Microsoft Site (stop booing, I only work there ;) )and we have a Microsoft Enterprise Agreement and a contract to buy Dell Kit. To avoid paying for Windows twice, our Dell Laptops and PC's come with a blank HD and a copy of FreeDOS on CD.
    Not sure if a retail customer can do this, but it might be worth ringing Dell to ask.

    Jonathan

  147. Enterprise Agreement by ftldelay · · Score: 1

    When we buy new computers at my work, my Dell rep said that they must come with Windows XP Pro. We corporately have an EA agreement, so on top of paying for Windows with the machine, we end up paying close to $700 for each machine's EA license (OS/Office/CALs). Why should we pay twice for Windows?

  148. If it doesn't look like rental, it's not rental by tepples · · Score: 1

    Notice that it implies that you own a copy in the law, not liscence.

    In the phrase "owner of a copy", "a copy" is the disc that the computer program is shipped on. 17 USC 101 explains:

    "Copies" are material objects, other than phonorecords, in which a work is fixed by any method now known or later developed, and from which the work can be perceived, reproduced, or otherwise communicated, either directly or with the aid of a machine or device. The term "copies" includes the material object, other than a phonorecord, in which the work is first fixed.

    Who is the "owner" of the shiny disc is determined by state law, which usually implements the Uniform Commercial Code. Based on my limited understanding of retail law, "licensing a copy" would sound more like renting copies from the publisher, which in fact is the case in some site license agreements.

    But I still don't know what makes these EULAs valid.

    One theory is that it's the anti-circumvention provisions (17 USC 1201) enacted as part of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. When you buy a copy of a computer program, you become the owner of a copy. However, it is encrypted and useless to you without decryption, and the conspicuous statement on the box makes this limitation known to you before the purchase. The installer is an access control mechanism that decrypts the program in exchange for your assent to what amounts to a non-interoperate agreement. Circumventing this installer may break the DMCA.

  149. Just buy from a Linux vendor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe nobody mentioned this. There are tons of Linux computer vendors - Pogo Linux, Penguin, Monarch, Emperor.

    Not everything has to be a frigging Dell.

  150. If you don't know anything, don't say anything. by Some+Random+Username · · Score: 1

    What desktop someone is using has nothing to do with it, unless they don't have enough RAM. Once the desktop environment has started up, it doesn't really use any CPU, just RAM. And I used openbox on both the machines I am basing my comparison on. Mozilla and OO run unacceptably slow on my 2Ghz p4m laptop for crying out loud, on a C3 it took over 15 seconds! for firefox to start up, which is just rediculous.

  151. Really Really Dumb Question (Sorry), But... by Cycloid+Torus · · Score: 0

    what if you took the preloaded drive out and sold that (on eBay if they allow it - which they might - especially since you never powered it on - or maybe you have to power it on once so it is transferrable ...) and put a brand new "nude" drive in? Or have I violated warranties and junk (probably)..

    I guess that is why I've been building my own since '86.

    --
    Lost in space at an early age. Survived the vacuum. Now rebuilding castle in air.
  152. Install packages (like Asus) by Kell_pt · · Score: 1

    I recently Bought an Asus laptop. It came with lots of software pre-installed, and a disk that reinstall everything. Seeing as I don't have to click on anything or accept anything (no eulas are visible), what can I possibly do to get a refund?

    --
    "I don't mind God, it's his fan club I can't stand!" E8
  153. Same with Dell, HP, Sony, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The margins in low-end computers are so low that you will see the same problem with any vendor.

    Shell out enough money for high-end PCs with large margins (probably more expensive than a Mac), then the customer service will not be as bad.

    I would rather buy a Mac with that money though.

  154. Nope - unless included in the refund statement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Note that the refund statement is made unconditionally. There is no mention of extra charges, and making that up on the spot will violate Trade Description rules.

    In the UK this company would have its nuts nailed to the wall by the Trading Standards office if they tried to pull this one.

    Sadly, even Trading Standards doesn't address the root problem called Microsoft. Too politically dangerous.

  155. Return to Wal-Mart by etn991 · · Score: 1

    I sucessfully returned a boxed copy I purchased from my local Wal-Mart.

    I took it home, opened it, then 1 week later took it back to Wally's. They told me they did not accept returns of opened software. I pointed out the location on the back of the box where it said "if you do not agree with the license, please return it to where you bought it". I said I did not agree with the license after I had read it, and would like to return it.

    After a few minutes of reiterating this information, they gave my my money back.

  156. I am going to test this out by ps3udonym · · Score: 1

    This has all come at a rather good time for me. I am in the market to buy a new laptop! I was looking at the Sony Vaio S360 (Small form factor with a ATI 9700!Anyone know of any other 13.3" or smaller laptops with a decent vid card?? Preferably nvidia) and had been having an email correspondence with a Sony Sales rep about this exact same question. I was about to give up after they answered that they didn't think the laptop would work without Windows, but now have new hope. I remebered vaguely something about this, and knew that being forced to buy a product that I don't want, won't use and can't sell wasn't right. I am going to talk to the store where I will purchace the laptop in advance so they can do their research and determine that I am not a crazy person and really am standing on solid ground. If nessisary I will go to court about this, as the money we are talking about here is substancial and well worth the cost of a small claims trial. If anyone is intrested I will post my experiences on this when it happens. I should be getting new lappy in about a month or so if all goes well. Thanx again for the reminder!

  157. how about refund for settlement of lawsuit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever happened to the refund of Windows purchases several years ago? Has anyone received any refund?

    I never received mine, after having sent the refund form related to a settlement of lawsuit in California for Windows that came bundled with a laptop.

  158. Buying Dell laptop without Windows license by mrEriksson · · Score: 1
    I'm just about to buy myself a new laptop, and since I never use Windows, I wasn't all that interested in paying for the license either. So I contacted Dell asking them what could be done, and after some time, I got an offer from them where they reduced the price with $80 since I wasn't interested in the Windows license.

    I have made some notes about this in my blog. (here, and followup here)

    I hope that this might be of use to others as well!

  159. Re:Keep Windows by Zorilla · · Score: 1

    WTF is cosine naming?

    --

    It would be cool if it didn't suck.
  160. Re:Keep Windows by packeteer · · Score: 1

    "unmount" works fine for me... perhaps you are using a different OS are you using linux? Im not talking about Linux but you probably think thats what my sig is about. Also you might want to TRY using "unmount" last time i was on a linux system it worked just fine...

    --
    unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep