to the Chinese Government. The government of China will ACTUALLY own Microsoft. You say governments do not own companies and profit from them? George Bush will change that. Long live Plutocracy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutocracy)
How about using a software interface to hook into the kernel, but allows a propriatary driver to be used? It wouldn't be included with the kernel, but the socket would be available and ready to accept the driver. This would be similar in principle to the Evolution connector, an interface that connects Open Source software to propriatary solutions.
Yes, I think Linux should be allowed to use proprietary drivers. We are seeing such in WiFi now such as ndiswrapper.
the governments of the U.S., India, and China, and the wealthy.
The people that will die first will be poor or the least resourceful. And that means less people everyone else to take care of.
Do you think Bill Gates is going to die because of this? I think he would be the last man on earth to die because of how rich he is.
If the poor and 3rd world die first, then the world wouldn't need $100 laptops from MIT and Bill Gates would be happy about the lack of need of $100 laptops. Then an avenue for world-wide usage of Linux would go away and he would certainly be happy about that.
The oil companies can continue to charge outrageous prices for oil because consumption is not reduced. The U.S. would still occupy Iraq.
So who benefits if we do not address this polution situation?
How funny. This is one product, when resold, you would think Microsoft would benefit from it. They would if they could get people to upgrade soon after they purchase these licenses from the reseller. However, there is one feature about old Microsoft software that would be a hinderance to Microsoft. And that would be updates, especially security updates. And the fact that Microsoft EXPECTS a certain cycle of upgrade revenue, which negated the need for this older software in the first place. Another thing that comes to mind is support of these legacy programs. I think Microsoft is trying to get out of that business, no? Should be interesting to see how this pans out.
Then maybe China is also headed that way. Maybe that is the way we have always been headed, just that no one wants to follow a Plutocracy. I guess anything will work, even Communism (as in the former U.S.S.R.) as long as the leadership has control over the people.
Thank you. You know, in my entire academic career, from Kindergarten to college, and even now, I have NEVER heard that word to describe the governemnt of the U.S. I think we ought to start using this word and teach it to our kids. I will talk to the local principle of the elemetary school about this. And I am almost 40.
China is Communist. United States is "supposed to be" Democratic, but I would say in action it is more what I understand to be Capitalistic.
With George Bush and the republicans in power, what is there difference between them now? Sounds like what Microsoft does in the U.S. (bullying OEMs) is perfectly fine with the Chinese government and cohesive with their philosophy, is it not?
So is the U.S. Democratic, or are is it Communist where it decides it will be? I guess the U.S. is free to choose to be Communist, eh? So much for Reaganomics and the Cold War. The U.S. is losing it's Freedom it so valiently faught for over the past 200+ years with blood of our ancetsors and today's family.
Unix has the tools, the technology, and the ability to repel, withstand, and almost eliminate the threats that Virus, Spyware, and Malware pose to MS-Windows based machines
That is why we do not need a Microsoft monopoly, because then you have a monopoly sized problem with these threats.
If the 7.1 Billion dollar R&D company can't stop it, but Freeware Linux can, what is stopping you from migrating to a better Operating System? Get over it already! Just do it!
Need Linux for Dummies?, try Linspire.com or mandriva.com or suse.com
Need absolutely free of cost? - try ubuntu.com or slackware.com
It is your perspective that is wrong. Microsoft did a bad thing, they got caught (by the DOJ.) After that was over with, they were still up to no good.
Jackson: Nothing has changed.
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/229468_msft jackson22.html
And that is why they are in front of the EU. Except, they are 19 now, and Jr got caught with his pants down! So he hits up Dad to bail him out.
Why don't you grow up and open your eyes to reality. Microsoft hasn't changed. They don't just need a swat on the rear. They need to be jailed, because the teen is still acting like a five year old. And as comparing to family, I have a 19 year-old step son that acts just like Microsoft. Getting into trouble, asking his parents to bail him out. What an idiot.
They are both out to defeat Democracy and establish dictatorships. Remove them both, now!
It is obvious from the U.S. invasion of Iraq, and Microsoft's misdeeds with the U.S. market since the 80's and the Department of Justice. Even former Honorable Jackson said "Nothing has changed." Microsoft should have been dismantled a long time ago.
"This new TRS-80 Computer is another "first" from the company which brought you the best-selling, world renowned TRS-80. A truly pocket-sized Computer (not a programmable calculator). Of course it is an ultra-powerful calculator too... And it "speaks" BASIC - - the most common computer language, and the easiest to learn. You'll soon be impressed by the phenomenal computing power of this hand-held TRS-80 - - ideal for mathematics, engineering and business application."
What did you expect in this monopoly-controlled market? What does Microsoft have to do for you? Surely, you MUST be doing something wrong if the Bush Administration agrees that Microsoft should remain a monopolist. (Retired Honourable Thomas Penfield Jackson:
'Nothing changed') What did you expect
partnering with a Monopolist? How about developing your own standard or adopt Sun Microsystems
Open DRM
standard if you need to co-exist with the RIAA and the government? Don't give Microsoft what it wants. Give it what it deserves. You do have options. Go ahead and complain to the EU, but don't think for a moment someone else will save you out of this. These are your choices available. Die, Live in Freedom, or Live under absolute rule of the dictatorship of Microsoft, your choice. It is a choice WE ALL have to make. I choose freedom. And sometimes, that means taking a risk in spite of opposition to that objective. Are you going to take a stand, or are you going to be a disgrace and just stand there and take it. Show me what you've got inside your heart... Gold or Jello?
k12ltsp.org: Linux is free in terms of cost and in terms of development because it's based on Open Source software. We are free to adapt the work of others for use in our schools. This kind of freedom produces better software and makes Linux the right choice for schools and agencies concerned with the ethical use of public funds.
Most people who use Windows don't see past their nose when it comes to their computing needs. Look at the long term and where do you want your school in 5 years. Linux and Open Source IS keeping up and the software is readily available and with a little digging, your systems can be VERY compatible in a Microsoft world.
Me: When I am forced to use MS-Windows, I run it in VMplayer
http://www.vmware.com/vmplayer. It is free. It is the best at running Microsoft software, especially ActiveX and DirectSound and a number of other gotches that cause other emulators to hiccup. You can even run it full screen and think you are on a Windows box. But having Linux run on your hardware will make it easier for anyone to manage. Go buy a copy of Mandriva 2006 at
http://www.linuxcentral.com.
Also, I am running virus free with Linux for the past 8 years without the use of anti-virus software. To me, Linux IS the anti-virus software. But if you really think you need it, Linux has an external package available to do that for you. And if you get a virus on Windows running in VMplayer, simply reload the virtual drive image. No hassle!
Too bad the DOJ didn't see deals like Microsoft made with OEM PC suppliers to only preload PC systems with Windows and not competitors (like Linux) or face steep financial/licensing torture. And don't tell me Linux isn't preinstalled because nobody wants it. The licensing structure is based on the old setup of excluding other OSes back in early 90's (like Novell DOS 7, OS/2 Warp, or IBM DOS) and is carried into the present (can't preload Linux or Microsoft will revoke your OEM license discount and send your business into the craphole.)
OEM: "Oh, Oh Mr. Gates, please spare us, we wouldn't think of pre-installing Linux on common-market PCs. Please don't beat us. We will comply. We will even post a 'OEM recommends Microshifty Winders Pro' message just to show you we are submissive to you, Almighty Holy One Gates"
41: Jesus sat down opposite the place where the offerings were put and watched the crowd putting their money into the temple treasury. Many rich people threw in large amounts.
42: But a poor widow came and put in two very small copper coins, worth only a fraction of a penny. 43: Calling his disciples to him, Jesus said, "I tell you the truth, this poor widow has put more into the treasury than all the others.
Yes, I agree. It is because of the legacy of Microsoft and what they have done is why most people hate Microsoft, it's copy-cat product, it's sudo R&D practices, and how they have smited compnaies and denounced innovation from competitors. There are a Monopoly. Total destruction of Microsoft wouldn't hurt.
Whatever Microsoft has now, the Amiga pretty much had it, fifteen years ago. Nothing is new except the marketting, which is Microsoft's only strength. They know how to sell snake oil, and keep people buying into it. Fear. Uncertainty. Doubt.
Slashdot Mirror
to the Chinese Government. The government of China will ACTUALLY own Microsoft. You say governments do not own companies and profit from them? George Bush will change that. Long live Plutocracy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutocracy)
How about using a software interface to hook into the kernel, but allows a propriatary driver to be used? It wouldn't be included with the kernel, but the socket would be available and ready to accept the driver. This would be similar in principle to the Evolution connector, an interface that connects Open Source software to propriatary solutions.
Yes, I think Linux should be allowed to use proprietary drivers. We are seeing such in WiFi now such as ndiswrapper.
the governments of the U.S., India, and China, and the wealthy.
The people that will die first will be poor or the least resourceful. And that means less people everyone else to take care of.
Do you think Bill Gates is going to die because of this? I think he would be the last man on earth to die because of how rich he is.
If the poor and 3rd world die first, then the world wouldn't need $100 laptops from MIT and Bill Gates would be happy about the lack of need of $100 laptops. Then an avenue for world-wide usage of Linux would go away and he would certainly be happy about that.
The oil companies can continue to charge outrageous prices for oil because consumption is not reduced. The U.S. would still occupy Iraq.
So who benefits if we do not address this polution situation?
How funny. This is one product, when resold, you would think Microsoft would benefit from it. They would if they could get people to upgrade soon after they purchase these licenses from the reseller. However, there is one feature about old Microsoft software that would be a hinderance to Microsoft. And that would be updates, especially security updates. And the fact that Microsoft EXPECTS a certain cycle of upgrade revenue, which negated the need for this older software in the first place. Another thing that comes to mind is support of these legacy programs. I think Microsoft is trying to get out of that business, no? Should be interesting to see how this pans out.
Then maybe China is also headed that way. Maybe that is the way we have always been headed, just that no one wants to follow a Plutocracy. I guess anything will work, even Communism (as in the former U.S.S.R.) as long as the leadership has control over the people.
Thank you. You know, in my entire academic career, from Kindergarten to college, and even now, I have NEVER heard that word to describe the governemnt of the U.S. I think we ought to start using this word and teach it to our kids. I will talk to the local principle of the elemetary school about this. And I am almost 40.
China is Communist. United States is "supposed to be" Democratic, but I would say in action it is more what I understand to be Capitalistic.
With George Bush and the republicans in power, what is there difference between them now? Sounds like what Microsoft does in the U.S. (bullying OEMs) is perfectly fine with the Chinese government and cohesive with their philosophy, is it not?
So is the U.S. Democratic, or are is it Communist where it decides it will be? I guess the U.S. is free to choose to be Communist, eh? So much for Reaganomics and the Cold War. The U.S. is losing it's Freedom it so valiently faught for over the past 200+ years with blood of our ancetsors and today's family.
Unix has the tools, the technology, and the ability to repel, withstand, and almost eliminate the threats that Virus, Spyware, and Malware pose to MS-Windows based machines
a spx/precn_n?c=us&cs=04&l=en&s=bsd
That is why we do not need a Microsoft monopoly, because then you have a monopoly sized problem with these threats.
If the 7.1 Billion dollar R&D company can't stop it, but Freeware Linux can, what is stopping you from migrating to a better Operating System? Get over it already! Just do it!
Need Linux for Dummies?, try Linspire.com or mandriva.com or suse.com
Need absolutely free of cost? - try ubuntu.com or slackware.com
Need a whole new consumer package?
low cost Mac Mini from Apple - http://www.apple.com/macmini/
Dell with Linux preloaded - http://www1.us.dell.com/content/products/compare.
It is your perspective that is wrong. Microsoft did a bad thing, they got caught (by the DOJ.) After that was over with, they were still up to no good. Jackson: Nothing has changed. http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/229468_msft jackson22.html
And that is why they are in front of the EU. Except, they are 19 now, and Jr got caught with his pants down! So he hits up Dad to bail him out.
Why don't you grow up and open your eyes to reality. Microsoft hasn't changed. They don't just need a swat on the rear. They need to be jailed, because the teen is still acting like a five year old. And as comparing to family, I have a 19 year-old step son that acts just like Microsoft. Getting into trouble, asking his parents to bail him out. What an idiot.
They are both out to defeat Democracy and establish dictatorships. Remove them both, now!
i ves/005083.html
It is obvious from the U.S. invasion of Iraq, and Microsoft's misdeeds with the U.S. market since the 80's and the Department of Justice. Even former Honorable Jackson said "Nothing has changed." Microsoft should have been dismantled a long time ago.
Jackson: 'Nothing changed'
http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/microsoft/arch
Microsoft employees in Vista revolt
Bring me the head of Monkey Boy
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=30490
and
http://minimsft.blogspot.com/2006/03/vista-2007-f
"This new TRS-80 Computer is another "first" from the company which brought you the best-selling, world renowned TRS-80. A truly pocket-sized Computer (not a programmable calculator). Of course it is an ultra-powerful calculator too... And it "speaks" BASIC - - the most common computer language, and the easiest to learn. You'll soon be impressed by the phenomenal computing power of this hand-held TRS-80 - - ideal for mathematics, engineering and business application."
http://oldcomputers.net/trs80pc1.html
What did you expect in this monopoly-controlled market? What does Microsoft have to do for you? Surely, you MUST be doing something wrong if the Bush Administration agrees that Microsoft should remain a monopolist. (Retired Honourable Thomas Penfield Jackson: 'Nothing changed') What did you expect partnering with a Monopolist? How about developing your own standard or adopt Sun Microsystems Open DRM standard if you need to co-exist with the RIAA and the government? Don't give Microsoft what it wants. Give it what it deserves. You do have options. Go ahead and complain to the EU, but don't think for a moment someone else will save you out of this. These are your choices available. Die, Live in Freedom, or Live under absolute rule of the dictatorship of Microsoft, your choice. It is a choice WE ALL have to make. I choose freedom. And sometimes, that means taking a risk in spite of opposition to that objective. Are you going to take a stand, or are you going to be a disgrace and just stand there and take it. Show me what you've got inside your heart... Gold or Jello?
K-12Linux Project
k12ltsp.org: Linux is free in terms of cost and in terms of development because it's based on Open Source software. We are free to adapt the work of others for use in our schools. This kind of freedom produces better software and makes Linux the right choice for schools and agencies concerned with the ethical use of public funds.
Most people who use Windows don't see past their nose when it comes to their computing needs. Look at the long term and where do you want your school in 5 years. Linux and Open Source IS keeping up and the software is readily available and with a little digging, your systems can be VERY compatible in a Microsoft world.
Me: When I am forced to use MS-Windows, I run it in VMplayer http://www.vmware.com/vmplayer. It is free. It is the best at running Microsoft software, especially ActiveX and DirectSound and a number of other gotches that cause other emulators to hiccup. You can even run it full screen and think you are on a Windows box. But having Linux run on your hardware will make it easier for anyone to manage. Go buy a copy of Mandriva 2006 at http://www.linuxcentral.com.
Also, I am running virus free with Linux for the past 8 years without the use of anti-virus software. To me, Linux IS the anti-virus software. But if you really think you need it, Linux has an external package available to do that for you. And if you get a virus on Windows running in VMplayer, simply reload the virtual drive image. No hassle!
Too bad the DOJ didn't see deals like Microsoft made with OEM PC suppliers to only preload PC systems with Windows and not competitors (like Linux) or face steep financial/licensing torture. And don't tell me Linux isn't preinstalled because nobody wants it. The licensing structure is based on the old setup of excluding other OSes back in early 90's (like Novell DOS 7, OS/2 Warp, or IBM DOS) and is carried into the present (can't preload Linux or Microsoft will revoke your OEM license discount and send your business into the craphole.) OEM: "Oh, Oh Mr. Gates, please spare us, we wouldn't think of pre-installing Linux on common-market PCs. Please don't beat us. We will comply. We will even post a 'OEM recommends Microshifty Winders Pro' message just to show you we are submissive to you, Almighty Holy One Gates"
41: Jesus sat down opposite the place where the offerings were put and watched the crowd putting their money into the temple treasury. Many rich people threw in large amounts. 42: But a poor widow came and put in two very small copper coins, worth only a fraction of a penny. 43: Calling his disciples to him, Jesus said, "I tell you the truth, this poor widow has put more into the treasury than all the others.
New International Version (NIV) - Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984 by International Bible Society
Linux Rocks - I'll cast rocks at Windows!
Not Winders or Mac OS X. Good ole Linux.
Yes, I agree. It is because of the legacy of Microsoft and what they have done is why most people hate Microsoft, it's copy-cat product, it's sudo R&D practices, and how they have smited compnaies and denounced innovation from competitors. There are a Monopoly. Total destruction of Microsoft wouldn't hurt.
Whatever Microsoft has now, the Amiga pretty much had it, fifteen years ago. Nothing is new except the marketting, which is Microsoft's only strength. They know how to sell snake oil, and keep people buying into it. Fear. Uncertainty. Doubt.