It's worth noting that other browsers' "private browsing" modes only hide the details of the session from the local machine. Using "incognito mode" in Google Chrome is not encryption and does not shield your privacy in any way from others on your network, your ISP, the NSA or Google themselves.
Check out a documentary called "The Lightbulb Conspiracy" on planned obsolescence. They find a Canon or Epson printer with a chip inside that counts the number of prints made, and after some arbitrary number will throw an unrecoverable error essentially telling you it's time to buy a new printer. By the end of the movie, they've reset the chip without any hardware modifications and the printer continues printing just fine.
Check out FLIF which beats almost any other format in quality per byte regardless of whether you're at the low end (JPG) or the high end (PNG) of the quality scale
Incognito mode is not encryption and cannot prevent people on your network, your ISP, the NSA or Google themselves from keeping an eye on your data. The effects of incognito mode are specific to the Chrome browser on that machine (and the cloud backup you may allow Google to keep of this data, such as if you log into Chrome).
Don't just ignore your privacy rights in one area because there is a greater threat in another. If you want these organizations to respect your privacy, you have to start by respecting it yourself.
It's not so much that Groupon isn't useful, what they've always failed to do is convert the coupon users into repeat customers which frequently causes their clients to operate at a loss (making only the heavily-discounted deal and never cashing in on full-price sales).
Also, for anyone curious, polygraph reading involves reviewing physiological responses from control questions like "what is your name?" against the readings after questions like "did you kill your wife?" and the most widely accepted means of "beating" these tests is to fake the physiological response during control questions by clenching the anus, driving the blood pressure up and skewing the readings when compared against the actual questions. Now you know!
You probably already know this, but for those who may not, the polygraph is mostly an interrogative tool used in eliciting confessions or telltale behavior regardless of its real ability to gauge honesty. As for "beating" a polygraph, the charge is as spurious as the basic claim that it can gauge honesty. If it can't, and it's largely been demonstrated that it can't, there's no reason to hold anyone to the results it presents regardless of what the operator may believe they indicate.
Right, that's the exact story the officer, Darren Wilson gave. And indeed, it was corroborated, by his girlfriend who wasn't even there. That's about all we know, because the case was not even allowed to go to trial. These are the kind of fundamental injustices people are upset about.
Are you kidding? Popcorn Time has been well known for a while, though its heyday was last year before the original version came down under MPAA pressure.
Microtransaction based games have a fundamental problem and that is that rather than being primarily designed to be fun, they are instead primarily designed to be addictive and to drive the user toward making microtransactions in order to maintain the play that they've become addicted to. However, games that offer mostly cosmetic microtransactions that don't offer a substantial in-game advantage usually manage to avoid this problem.
The DMCAs are directed at Vimeo, and it's Vimeo's responsibility to stand up for non-infringing content, or it's their right to remove the content from their site for no good reason. I doubt they'd comply with an individual's request to have all of a major producer's works removed in the same way they'd comply with a major producer's request to have various individuals' works removed.
To be fair, some large-scale exploits do not require the installation of non-store apps or ignoring any warnings, in the case of Stagefright I believe all you needed was to have SMS messages routed through Hangouts. Obviously this kind of exploit is patched ASAP on newer devices, but pre-4.4 you're pretty much on your own.
It's unlikely you can keep anything running a version of Android 4.4 truly secure, and even that won't be secure for much longer. The best idea if you're worried these still have some sensitive personal information on them would be a factory wipe (from the phone's recovery mode, not within the OS as this will leave internal storage in-tact). This should protect you from what most malicious parties are looking for, though if the phone is on your local network there's always the opportunity for them to use the compromised phone as a pivot point to compromise other machines on your network, but you'd probably need to be in someone's crosshairs for them to be doing this.
There's no government agency involved. A team of lawyers sent an overly-broad takedown notice to Vimeo and Vimeo complied. The lawyers are just doing their job (poorly). It's Vimeo's responsibility to stand up for the authenticity of user-posted content that is clearly not infringing (or their prerogative to remove it for no good reason).
I went from Voice to Fi and I can use multiple devices with my number, send texts or check voicemail from any internet-connected device, (not sure about contact management as I don't use this personally), I can have all my smart devices ring when I get a call and forward calls to non-smart devices, the only difference is you now have to use the hangouts/fi interface instead of the google voice interface for these things. The Google Voice interface is disabled after the number is ported over to Fi, so I don't know why the author of this article refers to having to dig it up to use his services, he should be using hangouts for things like texting from PC. Oh, and did I mention my bill for last month was $25 without having to give up any of the services I'm used to? Mind I only use about 500mb mobile data max per month, but with Fi automatically connecting me to reliable open networks (with automatic VPN) all over the place it's usually pretty easy to get on some wifi to keep my bill low.
Slashdot Mirror
It's worth noting that other browsers' "private browsing" modes only hide the details of the session from the local machine. Using "incognito mode" in Google Chrome is not encryption and does not shield your privacy in any way from others on your network, your ISP, the NSA or Google themselves.
You know it's spam because it's not complaining about a typo.
Check out a documentary called "The Lightbulb Conspiracy" on planned obsolescence. They find a Canon or Epson printer with a chip inside that counts the number of prints made, and after some arbitrary number will throw an unrecoverable error essentially telling you it's time to buy a new printer. By the end of the movie, they've reset the chip without any hardware modifications and the printer continues printing just fine.
Make a digital copy
Check out FLIF which beats almost any other format in quality per byte regardless of whether you're at the low end (JPG) or the high end (PNG) of the quality scale
Incognito mode is not encryption and cannot prevent people on your network, your ISP, the NSA or Google themselves from keeping an eye on your data. The effects of incognito mode are specific to the Chrome browser on that machine (and the cloud backup you may allow Google to keep of this data, such as if you log into Chrome).
Don't just ignore your privacy rights in one area because there is a greater threat in another. If you want these organizations to respect your privacy, you have to start by respecting it yourself.
It's not so much that Groupon isn't useful, what they've always failed to do is convert the coupon users into repeat customers which frequently causes their clients to operate at a loss (making only the heavily-discounted deal and never cashing in on full-price sales).
Also, for anyone curious, polygraph reading involves reviewing physiological responses from control questions like "what is your name?" against the readings after questions like "did you kill your wife?" and the most widely accepted means of "beating" these tests is to fake the physiological response during control questions by clenching the anus, driving the blood pressure up and skewing the readings when compared against the actual questions. Now you know!
You probably already know this, but for those who may not, the polygraph is mostly an interrogative tool used in eliciting confessions or telltale behavior regardless of its real ability to gauge honesty. As for "beating" a polygraph, the charge is as spurious as the basic claim that it can gauge honesty. If it can't, and it's largely been demonstrated that it can't, there's no reason to hold anyone to the results it presents regardless of what the operator may believe they indicate.
Near miss? They oughtta call it a near hit.
"Sometimes," "commonly" and "accidentally" are not exclusive conditions. They can all be true at once.
Right, that's the exact story the officer, Darren Wilson gave. And indeed, it was corroborated, by his girlfriend who wasn't even there. That's about all we know, because the case was not even allowed to go to trial. These are the kind of fundamental injustices people are upset about.
It's a numbers game.
But he can't be a man 'cause he doesn't use/
the same operating system as me
Are you kidding? Popcorn Time has been well known for a while, though its heyday was last year before the original version came down under MPAA pressure.
In one instance, his xenophobia/racism aligns with a policy that protects our tech workers. I doubt this is truly about tech.
Microtransaction based games have a fundamental problem and that is that rather than being primarily designed to be fun, they are instead primarily designed to be addictive and to drive the user toward making microtransactions in order to maintain the play that they've become addicted to. However, games that offer mostly cosmetic microtransactions that don't offer a substantial in-game advantage usually manage to avoid this problem.
The DMCAs are directed at Vimeo, and it's Vimeo's responsibility to stand up for non-infringing content, or it's their right to remove the content from their site for no good reason. I doubt they'd comply with an individual's request to have all of a major producer's works removed in the same way they'd comply with a major producer's request to have various individuals' works removed.
To be fair, some large-scale exploits do not require the installation of non-store apps or ignoring any warnings, in the case of Stagefright I believe all you needed was to have SMS messages routed through Hangouts. Obviously this kind of exploit is patched ASAP on newer devices, but pre-4.4 you're pretty much on your own.
Prior to 4.4*
It's unlikely you can keep anything running a version of Android 4.4 truly secure, and even that won't be secure for much longer. The best idea if you're worried these still have some sensitive personal information on them would be a factory wipe (from the phone's recovery mode, not within the OS as this will leave internal storage in-tact). This should protect you from what most malicious parties are looking for, though if the phone is on your local network there's always the opportunity for them to use the compromised phone as a pivot point to compromise other machines on your network, but you'd probably need to be in someone's crosshairs for them to be doing this.
There's no government agency involved. A team of lawyers sent an overly-broad takedown notice to Vimeo and Vimeo complied. The lawyers are just doing their job (poorly). It's Vimeo's responsibility to stand up for the authenticity of user-posted content that is clearly not infringing (or their prerogative to remove it for no good reason).
You're not a Google customer. You are a Google user.
I went from Voice to Fi and I can use multiple devices with my number, send texts or check voicemail from any internet-connected device, (not sure about contact management as I don't use this personally), I can have all my smart devices ring when I get a call and forward calls to non-smart devices, the only difference is you now have to use the hangouts/fi interface instead of the google voice interface for these things. The Google Voice interface is disabled after the number is ported over to Fi, so I don't know why the author of this article refers to having to dig it up to use his services, he should be using hangouts for things like texting from PC. Oh, and did I mention my bill for last month was $25 without having to give up any of the services I'm used to? Mind I only use about 500mb mobile data max per month, but with Fi automatically connecting me to reliable open networks (with automatic VPN) all over the place it's usually pretty easy to get on some wifi to keep my bill low.