A worm which would spread fast like slammer and destroy infected machines after a short time is actually benevolent.
It will destroy only machines that would otherwise be used as spam zombies.
The day after the outbreak the internet would be clean again!
Let me remind you, the USA didn't win the war in Iraq yet.
China holds the 1/4 of population of Earth and got some nukes as well.
So, it is slightly tougher to stomp down.
LOL, this is why established physicians and engineers build larger and larger neutrino traps from billions of dollars:)
To catch a non-existant particle?
Well, the US was largely untouched by war, if we don't count Pearl Harbor, which was good to replace the outdated vehicles anyway. It became a power only after Europe weakened. I'm sure they were the only nation to profit from the war.
It is not IE7 which is non-standard. It is those websites which try to exclude other browsers out:)
M$ fears they will be excluded too, while Opera and Mozilla can sneak in by a fake UA string.
It would be delicious!
I hope they got past the boot screen graphics at least:)
Re:the code of conduct for free software distribut
on
Drafting GPL3
·
· Score: 1
>A GNU license creates a situation where developers cannot merge published code with their proprietary code.
This is not true.
You can use the result inhouse without any restriction.
You can do anything with the code if you have the consent of all of the original authors.
>while a BSD license creates a situation where some users might not have access to a particular modified variant of the published code.
By some users you meant also all of the developers who would build on this code, but are stripped by a greedy company who 'forgets' to contribute the sources of their released (sold) binaries back to the community.
Why would anyone want to 'switch' to the Mac now when it is running on intel?
1. people who ran a linux on AMD will not switch
2. people who ran a linux on x86 will not switch
3. people who had a PPC Mac hate this, actually they might switch to a Linux now as their old machine is going to phase out
4. big enterprises won't buy a Mac, it is a desktop machine
The only market Mac can tear into is the Windows desktop.
Compared to Windows it might be more ergonomic and stable. And probably even more user friendly. Their prices are now closer.
So, this move can harm Windows, but not Linux.
The part about/tmp should have 10MB is quite lame.
If your windows has no space on the HD, quake will crash there as well.
Don't forget about DirectX versions either. You might say WinXP has the right DX version, but then, a sufficiently recent Linux distro can run Quake3 just as easily. It is even possible you can find Quake3 on the distro's DVD.
Generally, you are right, however. Windows is generally better for running games. Most likely because gamers are usually not programmers.
Wowie, you saw ENTIRE dosnets on IRIX?
You might come up with a 'proof of concept' thingie which 'might' work on a completely defenseless machine, but i doubt you'll find so many of them on the net to build a net.
How many IRIX is still on the net?
One would believe dosnets are viable only on an OS (aside from OS vulnerabilities) with a large and ignorant user base.
Maybe in the future you'll see linux dosnets but i guess they are only in your fantasy.
Slashdot Mirror
A worm which would spread fast like slammer and destroy infected machines after a short time is actually benevolent. It will destroy only machines that would otherwise be used as spam zombies. The day after the outbreak the internet would be clean again!
Let me remind you, the USA didn't win the war in Iraq yet. China holds the 1/4 of population of Earth and got some nukes as well. So, it is slightly tougher to stomp down.
It is a giant spaceship transferring aliens out of our galaxy before it meets its fate with the Andromeda galaxy. We should follow them soon!
Writing plugins?
You are male, females don't speak 1ee7. You are female, males don't pick a name 'harmony'.
Actually they organize themselves in a logo shape in the vat.
Nice from Bush being the first, damn Lincoln did not allow anything!
LOL, this is why established physicians and engineers build larger and larger neutrino traps from billions of dollars :)
To catch a non-existant particle?
Actually, in Europe too. The ESA has nothing but money, the Russian got some proven technology but no money.
So you applaude Star Trek for the positive message it carries, but you blame them for warning about possible negative effects?
Well, the US was largely untouched by war, if we don't count Pearl Harbor, which was good to replace the outdated vehicles anyway. It became a power only after Europe weakened. I'm sure they were the only nation to profit from the war.
It is not IE7 which is non-standard. It is those websites which try to exclude other browsers out :)
M$ fears they will be excluded too, while Opera and Mozilla can sneak in by a fake UA string.
It would be delicious!
I guess, you meant per hour.
Hopefully the large size vulnerability will be treated in this century too.
You passed, Citizen, NEXT!
Yeah, it would be quite suspicious if they worked :)
I hope they got past the boot screen graphics at least :)
>A GNU license creates a situation where developers cannot merge published code with their proprietary code. This is not true. You can use the result inhouse without any restriction. You can do anything with the code if you have the consent of all of the original authors. >while a BSD license creates a situation where some users might not have access to a particular modified variant of the published code. By some users you meant also all of the developers who would build on this code, but are stripped by a greedy company who 'forgets' to contribute the sources of their released (sold) binaries back to the community.
Reopening a 7 years old bug isn't quite keeping up with them. Unless you meant they provide target for the next generation.
Why would anyone want to 'switch' to the Mac now when it is running on intel? 1. people who ran a linux on AMD will not switch 2. people who ran a linux on x86 will not switch 3. people who had a PPC Mac hate this, actually they might switch to a Linux now as their old machine is going to phase out 4. big enterprises won't buy a Mac, it is a desktop machine The only market Mac can tear into is the Windows desktop. Compared to Windows it might be more ergonomic and stable. And probably even more user friendly. Their prices are now closer. So, this move can harm Windows, but not Linux.
I don't understand why you cry. At last now no one has to bother with those weird endians anymore.
He won't share, maybe he'll license it.
The part about /tmp should have 10MB is quite lame.
If your windows has no space on the HD, quake will crash there as well.
Don't forget about DirectX versions either. You might say WinXP has the right DX version, but then, a sufficiently recent Linux distro can run Quake3 just as easily. It is even possible you can find Quake3 on the distro's DVD.
Generally, you are right, however. Windows is generally better for running games. Most likely because gamers are usually not programmers.
Wowie, you saw ENTIRE dosnets on IRIX? You might come up with a 'proof of concept' thingie which 'might' work on a completely defenseless machine, but i doubt you'll find so many of them on the net to build a net. How many IRIX is still on the net? One would believe dosnets are viable only on an OS (aside from OS vulnerabilities) with a large and ignorant user base. Maybe in the future you'll see linux dosnets but i guess they are only in your fantasy.
American pie?