Isn't it a form of rape- forcing your operating system ideology on others? Why can't you just enjoy your niche OS without worrying about "blah blah viable desktop alternative blah blah" or "blah blah i got my grandparents to play lunix lol" or whatever it is you disgusting faggots occupy yourselves with?
What's it like- to always be as unpopular as you were in high school?
Digg is a technology news website that employs
non-hierarchical editorial control. With digg, users submit stories for
review, but rather than allowing an editor to decide which stories go on the
homepage, the users do.
Digg is actually better. Slashdot is old and ugly. Its content is decided
by editors, the layout looks like it was made in windows95's heyday and its
a dinosaur. Digg on the other hand is new and "growing", they use a
flashier, better looking layout, yet the site is still simpler then
Slashdot. The content is decided by the submitters and you can get that
content via audio and video podcasts.
I never could stand slashdot.
The layout and just overall feel of that site was/is bad.
I don't like slashdot's layout. It's ugly and cluttered. The colors make
me wanna
puke.
Slashdot users agree that Digg.com's entries are a lot more current that
the ones posted at Slashdot.
99% of slashdot users have self-diagnosed themselves as suffering from
Asperger's Syndrome. Most slashdot users consider themselves "smart" when in
fact they are simply of average intelligence, but have more free time and a
higher sense of ego. This can be seen in the forums where spelling and usage
errors are prevalent in condescending, arrogant rants, identified by
containing the phrase "people are stupid" at some point in the
post.
I prefer Digg for my tech news and I've found some really
nice sites that way.
I prefer Digg. I used to check/. but I didn't
like it as much
I like Digg better anyway, much more and more
interesting news.
What I can't stand, even less that the site and
the proseltyzing editors, are Slashdot's users- overweight, effeminate
cubicle shit. At least I don't have to wear a goatee and suck linux dick to participate on
DiggI cant stand Slashdot, I will only Read it when its linked from
somewhere else
Digg is a technology news website that employs non-hierarchical editorial
control. With digg, users submit stories for review, but rather than
allowing an editor to decide which stories go on the homepage, the users
do.
Digg is actually better. Slashdot is old and ugly. Its content is decided
by editors, the layout looks like it was made in windows95's heyday and its
a dinosaur. Digg on the other hand is new and "growing", they use a
flashier, better looking layout, yet the site is still simpler then
Slashdot. The content is decided by the submitters and you can get that
content via audio and video podcasts.
I never could stand slashdot.
The layout and just overall feel of that site was/is bad.
I don't like slashdot's layout. It's ugly and cluttered. The colors make
me wanna
puke.
Slashdot users agree that Digg.com's entries are a lot more current that
the ones posted at Slashdot.
99% of slashdot users have self-diagnosed themselves as suffering from
Asperger's Syndrome. Most slashdot users consider themselves "smart" when in
fact they are simply of average intelligence, but have more free time and a
higher sense of ego. This can be seen in the forums where spelling and usage
errors are prevalent in condescending, arrogant rants, identified by
containing the phrase "people are stupid" at some point in the
post.
I prefer Digg for my tech news and I've found some really
nice sites that way.
I prefer Digg. I used to check/. but I didn't
like it as much
I like Digg better anyway, much more and more
interesting news.
I cant stand Slashdot, I will only Read it when
its linked from somewhere else
Wrong. You'd "move to Alabama rather than Canada" because you don't have any marketable skills and you'll never have enough money to not have to live around a bunch of red-state morons.
In case anyone's wondering, I live on the coast, and fuck you.
Digg is a technology news website that employs non-hierarchical editorial control. With digg, users submit stories for review, but rather than allowing an editor to decide which stories go on the homepage, the users do.
Digg is a technology news website that employs non-hierarchical editorial control. With digg, users submit stories for review, but rather than allowing an editor to decide which stories go on the homepage, the users do.
It amuses the hell out of me to watch a bunch of loser techies gleefully anticipate this kid's downfall.
"blah blah when his skills decline he'll be working at taco bell." Every post in this thread reeks of jealousy. I guess when you're slogging through some dismal vocational-track curriculum at ITT Tech with nothing to look forward to except a call center job one year down the road, you need to see someone else fail, just to keep your sanity. Oh well, not all of us get to be rockstars.
Seriously, what a bunch mexicans. all mexicans do is take take take. take take take take take. take take take. A bunch of immagrantos undocumentos. take take take take take. All they do is take take take.
Not everyone who believes global warming is caused by man is a crazy hippy and not everyone who believes it isn't caused by man is some money-grubbing republican.
indeed, there's also the crucifix junkie republican, the fatass soccer mom republican, the cousin molesting republican, the white pride republican, the dickless gung ho gun fag republican...
Win or Lose, Kerry Voters Are Smarter Than Bush Voters
NEW YORK--Democratic hand wringing is surrealy out of hand. No one is criticizing the morally incongruous Kerry for running against a war he voted for while insisting that he would have voted for it again. Party leaders have yet to consider that NAFTA, signed into law under Clinton, may have cost them high-unemployment Ohio. No, Indiana Senator Evan Bayh, darling of the "centrist" Democratic Leadership Council, blames something else: the perception "in the heartland" that Democrats are a "bicoastal cultural elite that is condescending at best and contemptuous at worst to the values that Americans hold in their daily lives."
Firstly, living in the sticks doesn't make you more American. Rural, urban or suburban--they're irrelevant. San Francisco's predominantly gay Castro district is every bit as red, white and blue as the Texas panhandle. But if militant Christianist Republicans from inland backwaters believe that secular liberal Democrats from the big coastal cities look upon them with disdain, there's a reason. We do, and all the more so after this election.
I spent my childhood in fly-over country, in a decidedly Republican town in southwest Ohio. It was a decent place to grow up, with well-funded public schools and only the occasional marauding serial killer to worry about. The only ethnic restaurant sold something called "Mandarin Chinese," Midwestese for cold noodles slathered with sugary sauce. The county had three major employers: the Air Force, Mead Paper, and National Cash Register--and NCR was constantly laying people off. Folks were nice, but depressingly closed-minded. "Well," they'd grimace when confronted with a new musical genre or fashion trend, "that's different." My suburb was racially insular, culturally bland and intellectually unstimulating. Its people were knee-jerk conformists. Faced with the prospect of spending my life underemployed, bored and soused, I did what anyone with a bit of ambition would do. I went to college in a big city and stayed there.
Mine is a common story. Every day in America, hundreds of our most talented young men and women flee the suburbs and rural communities for big cities, especially those on the West and East Coasts. Their youthful vigor fuels these metropolises--the cultural capitals of the blue states. These oases of liberal thinking--New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, Portland, Boston--are homes to our best-educated people, most vibrant popular culture and most innovative and productive businesses. There are exceptions--some smart people move from cities to the countryside--but the best and brightest gravitate to places where liberalism rules.
Maps showing Kerry's blue states appended to the "United States of Canada" separated from Bush's red "Jesusland" are circulating by email. Though there is a religious component to the election results, the biggest red-blue divide is intellectual. "How can 59,054,087 people be so DUMB?" asked the headline of the Daily Mirror in Great Britain, and the underlying assumption is undeniable. By any objective standard, you had to be spectacularly stupid to support Bush.
72 percent who cast votes for George W. Bush, according to a University of Maryland's Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA) and Knowledge Networks poll, believe that Iraq (news - web sites) had weapons of mass destruction or active WMD programs. 75 percent think that a Saddam-Al Qaeda link has been proven, and 20 percent say Saddam ordered 9/11. Of course, none of this was true.
Kerry voters were less than half as idiotic: 26 percent of Democrats bought into Bush-Cheney's WMD lies, and 30 percent into Saddam-Al Qaeda.
Would Bush's supporters have voted for him even if they had known he was a serial liar? Perhaps their hatred of homosexuals and slutty abortion vixens would have prompted them to make the same choice--an idiotic perversion of priorities. As things stand, they cast their ballots relying on assumptions that were demonstra
Your post made me chuckle. I can guarantee that the WSJ "baseball blogger" makes more money than you, for doing much less work(christ, he was complaining about 'working' for four hours at a time). Do you think he would suddenly feel ashamed if he were to read your post about him not having a 'real job?'
Real work is for suckers. Real work is for whatever's left behind when the "cream rises to the top."(an obnoxious phrase, I know, but it still describes the situation). Of course, society still needs people like you; the stables need to be cleaned; best buy needs to sell graphics cards; and who could forget about the ubiquitous middle managers, middle-managing for the rest of their productive lives. We wouldn't enjoy the standard of living that we do if it weren't for hordes of worker bees, toiling at the expense of professional baseball bloggers. We definitely need people like you, the proud "real worker":)
Google has TAKEN from the OSS community but not GIVEN BACK.
When I make a copy of your code, you still have your copy, so I haven't really 'taken' anything, right?:D
But seriously, good for google. They don't owe you, me, or anyone in the "OSS community" anything. All this "blah blah TAKEN blah blah community blah blah not GIVEN BACK blah blah" comes from an erroneous sense of entitlement and self-importance.
If the OSS community gives its code away without compensation, and someone "takes" this code without "giving back," and the OSS community doesn't like it, well, the OSS community can go fuck itself. suckas.
Oh and fuck YOU, "slashdot loving, MS hating, geekboy CS student."
Slashdot Mirror
What's it like- to always be as unpopular as you were in high school?
Digg The Slashdot Killer
Digg Might Just Bury Slashdot
Slashdot, Digg.com, and the True Meaning of Design
My Slashdot Replacement
Goodbye, Slashdot, Hello Digg
http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_detail s?&range=1y&size=
large&compare_sites=slashdot.org&y=t&url=digg.com
How Digg Uncovers The News
Why Slashdot Will Die
See what others are saying...
Digg is actually better. Slashdot is old and ugly. Its content is decided by editors, the layout looks like it was made in windows95's heyday and its a dinosaur. Digg on the other hand is new and "growing", they use a flashier, better looking layout, yet the site is still simpler then Slashdot. The content is decided by the submitters and you can get that content via audio and video podcasts.
I never could stand slashdot. The layout and just overall feel of that site was/is bad.
I don't like slashdot's layout. It's ugly and cluttered. The colors make me wanna puke.
Slashdot users agree that Digg.com's entries are a lot more current that the ones posted at Slashdot.
99% of slashdot users have self-diagnosed themselves as suffering from Asperger's Syndrome. Most slashdot users consider themselves "smart" when in fact they are simply of average intelligence, but have more free time and a higher sense of ego. This can be seen in the forums where spelling and usage errors are prevalent in condescending, arrogant rants, identified by containing the phrase "people are stupid" at some point in the post.
I prefer Digg for my tech news and I've found some really nice sites that way.
I prefer Digg. I used to check /. but I didn't
like it as much
I like Digg better anyway, much more and more interesting news.
What I can't stand, even less that the site and the proseltyzing editors, are Slashdot's users- overweight, effeminate cubicle shit. At least I don't have to wear a goatee and suck linux dick to participate on Digg I cant stand Slashdot, I will only Read it when its linked from somewhere else
Learn More
Digg The Slashdot Killer
Digg Might Just Bury Slashdot
Slashdot, Digg.com, and the True Meaning of Design
My Slashdot Replacement
Goodbye, Slashdot, Hello Digg
http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_detail s?&range=1y&size=
large&compare_sites=slashdot.org&y=t&url=digg.com
How Digg Uncovers The News
Why Slashdot Will Die
See what others are saying...
Digg is actually better. Slashdot is old and ugly. Its content is decided by editors, the layout looks like it was made in windows95's heyday and its a dinosaur. Digg on the other hand is new and "growing", they use a flashier, better looking layout, yet the site is still simpler then Slashdot. The content is decided by the submitters and you can get that content via audio and video podcasts.
I never could stand slashdot. The layout and just overall feel of that site was/is bad.
I don't like slashdot's layout. It's ugly and cluttered. The colors make me wanna puke.
Slashdot users agree that Digg.com's entries are a lot more current that the ones posted at Slashdot.
99% of slashdot users have self-diagnosed themselves as suffering from Asperger's Syndrome. Most slashdot users consider themselves "smart" when in fact they are simply of average intelligence, but have more free time and a higher sense of ego. This can be seen in the forums where spelling and usage errors are prevalent in condescending, arrogant rants, identified by containing the phrase "people are stupid" at some point in the post.
I prefer Digg for my tech news and I've found some really nice sites that way.
I prefer Digg. I used to check /. but I didn't
like it as much
I like Digg better anyway, much more and more interesting news.
I cant stand Slashdot, I will only Read it when its linked from somewhere else
Learn More
so... you guys like to talk about your computers? you guys like lunix?
so i guess you really like computers, huh? do you talk about lunix a lot? i can play lunix on my computer.
i guess you really like to talk about computers? do you play lunix?
Just so you know- you only make money if you're smart.
In case anyone's wondering, I live on the coast, and fuck you.
Digg the Slashdot Killer
Digg Might Just Bury Slashdot
Learn more
Digg the Slashdot Killer
Digg Might Just Bury Slashdot
Dig g is (Almost) as Big as Slashdot
Learn More
"blah blah when his skills decline he'll be working at taco bell." Every post in this thread reeks of jealousy. I guess when you're slogging through some dismal vocational-track curriculum at ITT Tech with nothing to look forward to except a call center job one year down the road, you need to see someone else fail, just to keep your sanity. Oh well, not all of us get to be rockstars.
Why should I care what some shut-in, diabetic piggy thinks?
Seriously, what a bunch mexicans. all mexicans do is take take take. take take take take take. take take take. A bunch of immagrantos undocumentos. take take take take take. All they do is take take take.
indeed, there's also the crucifix junkie republican, the fatass soccer mom republican, the cousin molesting republican, the white pride republican, the dickless gung ho gun fag republican...
NEW YORK--Democratic hand wringing is surrealy out of hand. No one is criticizing the morally incongruous Kerry for running against a war he voted for while insisting that he would have voted for it again. Party leaders have yet to consider that NAFTA, signed into law under Clinton, may have cost them high-unemployment Ohio. No, Indiana Senator Evan Bayh, darling of the "centrist" Democratic Leadership Council, blames something else: the perception "in the heartland" that Democrats are a "bicoastal cultural elite that is condescending at best and contemptuous at worst to the values that Americans hold in their daily lives."
Firstly, living in the sticks doesn't make you more American. Rural, urban or suburban--they're irrelevant. San Francisco's predominantly gay Castro district is every bit as red, white and blue as the Texas panhandle. But if militant Christianist Republicans from inland backwaters believe that secular liberal Democrats from the big coastal cities look upon them with disdain, there's a reason. We do, and all the more so after this election.
I spent my childhood in fly-over country, in a decidedly Republican town in southwest Ohio. It was a decent place to grow up, with well-funded public schools and only the occasional marauding serial killer to worry about. The only ethnic restaurant sold something called "Mandarin Chinese," Midwestese for cold noodles slathered with sugary sauce. The county had three major employers: the Air Force, Mead Paper, and National Cash Register--and NCR was constantly laying people off. Folks were nice, but depressingly closed-minded. "Well," they'd grimace when confronted with a new musical genre or fashion trend, "that's different." My suburb was racially insular, culturally bland and intellectually unstimulating. Its people were knee-jerk conformists. Faced with the prospect of spending my life underemployed, bored and soused, I did what anyone with a bit of ambition would do. I went to college in a big city and stayed there.
Mine is a common story. Every day in America, hundreds of our most talented young men and women flee the suburbs and rural communities for big cities, especially those on the West and East Coasts. Their youthful vigor fuels these metropolises--the cultural capitals of the blue states. These oases of liberal thinking--New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, Portland, Boston--are homes to our best-educated people, most vibrant popular culture and most innovative and productive businesses. There are exceptions--some smart people move from cities to the countryside--but the best and brightest gravitate to places where liberalism rules.
Maps showing Kerry's blue states appended to the "United States of Canada" separated from Bush's red "Jesusland" are circulating by email. Though there is a religious component to the election results, the biggest red-blue divide is intellectual. "How can 59,054,087 people be so DUMB?" asked the headline of the Daily Mirror in Great Britain, and the underlying assumption is undeniable. By any objective standard, you had to be spectacularly stupid to support Bush.
72 percent who cast votes for George W. Bush, according to a University of Maryland's Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA) and Knowledge Networks poll, believe that Iraq (news - web sites) had weapons of mass destruction or active WMD programs. 75 percent think that a Saddam-Al Qaeda link has been proven, and 20 percent say Saddam ordered 9/11. Of course, none of this was true.
Kerry voters were less than half as idiotic: 26 percent of Democrats bought into Bush-Cheney's WMD lies, and 30 percent into Saddam-Al Qaeda.
Would Bush's supporters have voted for him even if they had known he was a serial liar? Perhaps their hatred of homosexuals and slutty abortion vixens would have prompted them to make the same choice--an idiotic perversion of priorities. As things stand, they cast their ballots relying on assumptions that were demonstra
R.I.P. Slashdot.org
Agreed. I prefer "theives."
Or, "let's start calling 'thieves' to the P2P pirates," As you would say in your fucked up, itinerant-laborer syntax.
Real work is for suckers. Real work is for whatever's left behind when the "cream rises to the top."(an obnoxious phrase, I know, but it still describes the situation). Of course, society still needs people like you; the stables need to be cleaned; best buy needs to sell graphics cards; and who could forget about the ubiquitous middle managers, middle-managing for the rest of their productive lives. We wouldn't enjoy the standard of living that we do if it weren't for hordes of worker bees, toiling at the expense of professional baseball bloggers. We definitely need people like you, the proud "real worker" :)
When I make a copy of your code, you still have your copy, so I haven't really 'taken' anything, right? :D
But seriously, good for google. They don't owe you, me, or anyone in the "OSS community" anything. All this "blah blah TAKEN blah blah community blah blah not GIVEN BACK blah blah" comes from an erroneous sense of entitlement and self-importance.
If the OSS community gives its code away without compensation, and someone "takes" this code without "giving back," and the OSS community doesn't like it, well, the OSS community can go fuck itself. suckas.
Oh and fuck YOU, "slashdot loving, MS hating, geekboy CS student."
Cheers.
Oh my god... is this your homework for ESL class?
Shut the fuck up.
Welcome to the 1998, fuckface.
ideals and vision.
You're on the wrong side. You can shut the fuck up now.
http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/index.php/Sla shdot#Users_on_Slashdot