Slashdot Mirror


The World of Competitive Gaming

cphilo wrote to mention an article in the AP about the world of competitive gaming. From the article: "Welcome to the basement lair of the 24-year-old Wendel, the man known and feared by aficionados of multiplayer games across the globe as 'Fatal1ty.' If you deign to think of video games as simply a childish pastime, consider this professional game player. He collects a six-figure salary, has his own brand of gaming merchandise and travels the world to compete - regarded by those in the know as one of the most gifted players of his kind."

318 comments

  1. Baseball anyone? by saskboy · · Score: 0, Troll

    "If you deign to think of video games as simply a childish pastime, consider this professional game player."

    At least the Baseball players who learn to cash in on a child's game aren't Coke-swilling computer nerds. There are all sorts of professions that are traditionally for kids who don't grow up, and it doesn't mean we have to respect them for doing nothing productive for society other than to provide the workers with something to gossip about.

    -/trolling done.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    1. Re:Baseball anyone? by rewinn · · Score: 3, Funny

      >At least the Baseball players who learn to cash in on a child's game aren't Coke-swilling computer nerds

      Insert Daryl Strawberry joke here

    2. Re:Baseball anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what, exactly, have you done to help anyone? Once you find something that you're good at, you find a way to make a living on it. Who are you to judge these people so harshly?

    3. Re:Baseball anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Who are you to judge these people so harshly?"

      Someone who doesn't play games to bilk people of harder earned money. It just isn't ethical to make all that money from something so pointless to human survival/betterment.

    4. Re:Baseball anyone? by servognome · · Score: 1

      Someone who doesn't play games to bilk people of harder earned money. It just isn't ethical to make all that money from something so pointless to human survival/betterment.

      Beyond the entertainment value (we aren't robots), games provide a platform for learning.
      Necessity is the mother of invention. Games, of any kind, provide challenges to solve. Significant advances in medicine and physiology have come from athletics and mechanics and materials from autoracing.
      I'm sure as computer games become a bigger business, people will study and learn things about visual processing in the brain and human-computer interaction. For example, the preference for the mouse-keyboard control scheme gives us insight how people want to interact with virtual environments. Studying RTS players gives us an idea of how well the brain can track, control, and make decisions with multiple objects in a quick changing environment.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  2. He's not pro! by toupsie · · Score: 5, Funny

    He is a freaking CAMPER!!!

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    1. Re:He's not pro! by Linux-Fiend · · Score: 1

      Ture or Not,
      I knew someone would say it!
      LMAO!~

      --
      -Fiend-
  3. I bet... by bashbrotha · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...he still lives in his *mom's* basement

    1. Re:I bet... by ettlz · · Score: 1

      At a shade under $500 a month?

      Just what kind of mom has he got?!

    2. Re:I bet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In what way is $500 a month a six figure salary

    3. Re:I bet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of the oh so awesome mygot flash: http://pwned.nl/ [pwned.nl]

    4. Re:I bet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...he still lives in his *mom's* basement

      Well I heard he works in *your mom's* basement.... ;-) !!!

    5. Re:I bet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when you write it like $500.000

    6. Re:I bet... by ettlz · · Score: 1

      From TFA:

      [Wendel] lives a bare-bones life, investing all his earnings into his business endeavors and paying himself around $15,000 each year to cover expenses, including a monthly rent bill that's less than $500.

      But $500 just so happens to be a six-figure salary if you live in the Czech Republic, for example.

    7. Re:I bet... by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      At six figures a year, his mom probably lives in *his* house. Upper floor(s), of course.

    8. Re:I bet... by Scarletdown · · Score: 1
      At six figures a year, his mom probably lives in *his* house.
      That all depends on whether or not two of those six figures are on the other side of the decimal point. :D
      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
  4. The Girls... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    And the girls... you can't imagine the girls these professional game players get in addition to that six figure salary.

    1. Re:The Girls... by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 0

      There are some girls, albeit rare in US, that think pro gamers are hot. In South Korea, its more common and pop star singers to be hanging out with progamers. Theres no reason I should be hanging out in the states when I should be progaming Starcraft in Korea... I rocked that game far harder than I rocked Warcraft3, and I held #1 1v1,2v2,3v3 ladder all at the same time in Warcraft3.

    2. Re:The Girls... by keyrat+rafa · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you've seen him on MTV (True Life: I'm a gamer), you see that he does actually manage to pull girls doing this, or they make it seem that way. On the other hand, they also show a guy who is the world's best Golden Tee player, and he looks like he totally lost the game of life.

      Also, comptetitive game playing can be extremely interesting to watch. Just take a look at this SF2 tourney highlight:

      Ken vs Chun-Li EVO 2004

    3. Re:The Girls... by Rabid_Llama · · Score: 0

      "OMG ur liek so teh 1337zor i liek want to go down on you liek right now mk?" --- Pro gamer groupy Maybe in korea where they also eat dogs but not here...

    4. Re:The Girls... by Durzel · · Score: 1

      Probably a bit of a cynical attitude, but in respect to attracting women - does it really matter what job you're doing if you're pulling down a 6 figure salary? I mean, money talks after all.

      Another point to note is that this Fatality (I cant be bothered to l33t-ise his name) character is an exception to the norm. There are a finite number of people who are qualified enough to make a living out of it, and not unlike soccer players (or other sporting athletes) it's not like your average person can "just pick up the sport and become a pro".

      This sort of story is about as valid as an exposé on some random professional sportsman.

    5. Re:The Girls... by badmammajamma · · Score: 1

      Clearly you know nothing of women. Money = women. Rich, ugly men have no problems getting women way above their level. Are you really that ignorant?

      --
      Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
    6. Re:The Girls... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's Street Fighter 3, not 2.

    7. Re:The Girls... by MBraynard · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well why don't you just friggin go there.

    8. Re:The Girls... by typical · · Score: 1

      Probably a bit of a cynical attitude, but in respect to attracting women - does it really matter what job you're doing if you're pulling down a 6 figure salary?

      You know...pretend, just for a moment, that *you* have a pair of breasts on your front. Now, who do *you* want to live with for the rest of your life? Yeah, your thought process probably works pretty much the same way it does now. Sure, you might like to go out with a supermodel, all else being equal, but honestly, knowing someone that's nice and that you want to spend your life with is a lot more tied into personality than whether the person is a mortician or a pop singer at the moment, you know?

      Saying "doesn't have a girlfriend" is a ridiculous, long-standing criticism of geeks. There's probably some correlation, sure -- if you spend a lot of time on computers, you probably spend less time with people, and maybe as a result you don't know how to get along with people as well. But that's hardly a hard-and-fast rule. And, quite frankly, of the people that are hardest to get along with in my life, I don't believe any of them are techies.

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    9. Re:The Girls... by masklinn · · Score: 1
      You know...pretend, just for a moment, that *you* have a pair of breasts on your front. Now, who do *you* want to live with for the rest of your life? Yeah, your thought process probably works pretty much the same way it does now. Sure, you might like to go out with a supermodel, all else being equal, but honestly, knowing someone that's nice and that you want to spend your life with is a lot more tied into personality than whether the person is a mortician or a pop singer at the moment, you know?

      Banging girls (or guys) usually doesn't involve living with them _for the rest of your life_, merely for a few weeks top until one is bored of the other.

      Ah, and I fear that for most people, knowing that someone's nice isn't that much of a turn-on. 6 figures, on the other hand, may be

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    10. Re:The Girls... by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Well, then, come here and make the big bucks and get the ladies... The progamers here, though, are excellent and well versed in strategy, so Starcraft may be more difficult than a few years ago.

    11. Re:The Girls... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He still hasn't moved out of his parents basement.

    12. Re:The Girls... by aleatory_story · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I can see it now: "omg CrazyJim1 u r so elite @ starcraft can u autograph my sc cd case with ur battlenet username like omg!!!!!!11111!!!!!!!111"

      --
      Whatever you may be sure of, be sure of this: that you are dreadfully like other people. - James Russell Lowell
    13. Re:The Girls... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      The girls are a bit shallow, a little two dimensional.

    14. Re:The Girls... by Ragein · · Score: 0

      LOL.
      My Gf plays WOW harder, faster & longer than i do.
      Obviously 1 more person who cant understand GIRLS PLAY GAMES and while not a selling point on a man questing with ur gf can b an incredably good way to spend time when distance is a problem.
      Back in your box.

      --
      They fitted George Orwell's coffin with rollers so he could turn over more easily years ago.
    15. Re:The Girls... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Banging girls (or guys) usually doesn't involve living with them _for the rest of your life_, merely for a few weeks top until one is bored of the other.

      Ah, and I fear that for most people, knowing that someone's nice isn't that much of a turn-on. 6 figures, on the other hand, may be


      Well, being interested in someone's earning potential does tend to indicate the hope for some length in the relationship (maybe not for life, but probably months or years). For one-night stands and flings it would be less of an factor. Unless the hypothetical person in question though that he/she was attractive enough to consistently get a "Suger Daddy/Mommy of the month".

    16. Re:The Girls... by pnice · · Score: 1

      I saw that on TV Saturday night. He lives in his parents basement. I thought that was kind of stereotypical of what everyone would think of a professional gamer. I saw the house and was praying in my mind that he purchased it with his winnings...but no, MTV said he rents the basement out from his parents. I guess there is nothing wrong with that but seriously, couldn't it have been a room? Why the basement? That's what every anti-nerd wants it to be.

    17. Re:The Girls... by Shakesphere · · Score: 1

      CrazyJim1 is crazy. One time I was at the CMU A.I. lab, trying to have my A.I. imprint on me like a duck, and CrazyJim walks in and steals my ideas for a really successful MMORPG called Roaming Dragon. He's been my enemy ever since. I used to be top-rated in Warcraft, but then CrazyJim used those devilis "Korean net-cafe strategies" against me. I'm not the street on net-cafe strategies, so he beat me. Oh well, I'm now inventing sterling electric motors. It'll probably make me billions of dollars and then I can steal all of CrazyJim's awesome ideas. If properly marketed I could make millions.

      --
      "I'm not the street on operas" - CrazyJim1
  5. And... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ... western society takes one more step toward the grave.

    1. Re:And... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From TFA:

      "Tens of thousands turn out each year at tournaments around the world (South Korea is a particular mecca with its own stable of pros) as both serious gamers and doting fans."

      And why should baseball be acceptable but not this?

    2. Re:And... by blues_shuffle · · Score: 1

      Baseball doesn't occur in a fictional world. It is bound by the laws of our universe and the best players are those who can best take advantage of their abilities within these limitations (steroids aside).
      Gaming occurs in a world made by the programmer. It's more akin to a puzzle tournament; where there are limits, but they're not universal.

      The important part is that if a gamer knows an error within the system that he can take advantage of, it's possible for him to win based solely off that. You can't cheat gravity and friction.

    3. Re:And... by masklinn · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Baseball doesn't occur in a fictional world.

      Which doesn't matter at all to anyone

      It is bound by the laws of our universe

      And gaming is bound by the very dynamics of the game.

      and the best players are those who can best take advantage of their abilities within these limitations (steroids aside).

      And the best gamers are those who can best take advantage of their abilities and knowledge withing the boundaries and limitations of the game (cheats aside).

      The important part is that if a gamer knows an error within the system that he can take advantage of, it's possible for him to win based solely off that. You can't cheat gravity and friction.

      But you can use steroids or other body-enhancing drugs. Your point?

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
  6. Re:Yesterday's News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You do know that this site is a news aggregator , don't you? News are not governed by the laws of quantum dynamics, they do not collapse when first observed. No one's forcing you to read it again. Lastly; if you do not like slashdot; don't let the door hit you on your way out.

    Sincerely
    Anti Troll

  7. Out of Touch with an Old Reality by Quirk · · Score: 4, Interesting
    ... travels the world to compete

    Not to take away from the guys accomplishments but will a time come when we all but do away with the need to press the flesh?

    Why do we need to gather and mingle in the face of the web, the very essence of which is near instantaneous communication at a distance. This reminds me of those who need to print out hard copies of material in order to study it properly.

    Do we gain or lose signal to noise when we gather to celebrate our heroes?

    I keep a few fundamental books at hand's reach but other than those and the turn over of new material taken out from a library, I'm much more comfortable and able to take from an e format than from dead tree material, and, I can learn more from another at a distance than when merged in a touchy feely mind meld.

    --
    "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
    Cohen
    1. Re:Out of Touch with an Old Reality by PDXNerd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Humans are physical creatures. We touch, smell, feel, and love. I participate in teleconferences all the time, even some with video. Something is lost when you can't reach over and whisper a snide remark in someone's ear.

      I am a book collector, and have many old books. Something about the fact that many people have touched them and loved them makes them all the more special. I have about 10 copies of the Rubiyat of Omar Kayyan - none any less than 80 years old. Something about the different artwork, leather covers, hand-written notes that conveys a continuity, a chain of humanity to them.

      Shaking the hand of the world's best gamer is really no less.

      Is this gamer real? Is he a person or a bot that a marketing exec thought up to encourage the Future Gamers of the World to play more games in the hope that they too can make money by sitting on their arse? Never underestimate the phyiscal world and our need to *physically understand* something.

    2. Re:Out of Touch with an Old Reality by Bishop · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Humans are social creatures and the need to "press the flesh" will exist long past our lifetimes.

      In this case Fatal1ty is a legend, a sort of real myth. He doesn't get paid to play well, he gets paid to make public apperances. Fans want to see him. They want to hear him talk. The want to watch him play, not his avatar.

    3. Re:Out of Touch with an Old Reality by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I question the need to remove physical interaction. Big example: given the choice, would anyone here really chose cybersex over sex in person?

      Or brought down several notches, I suspect that most people would prefer to be in person for basic conversations whenever reasonably possible. Telephones, VoIP, video conferencing are all simply second-rate substitutes that come on for convenience's sake when the expense of being in person isn't possible or justiable.

      Conferences and trade shows are great if you can go, they are great ways to build a social network, great ways to actually try things out in person rather than trusting text descriptions and photos on the web.

    4. Re:Out of Touch with an Old Reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two words: Network Latency.

    5. Re:Out of Touch with an Old Reality by bgog · · Score: 1

      Because it's fun to go to an event and compete and see people and have fun.

    6. Re:Out of Touch with an Old Reality by ToxicBanjo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ...will a time come when we all but do away with the need to press the flesh?

      Likely not until fibre is everywhere.

      Travel for professional gamers is a requirement. The internet has this nasty thing that ALL gamers hate called "lag" (varied and fluctuating ping that causes noticable hiccups in the game). The problem for the pro is that lag can be the difference between 1st place and last place. When money is on the line it's LAN play all the way for any serious gamer.

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in the world. Those that understand binary and those that don't.
    7. Re:Out of Touch with an Old Reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you must get a lot of dates with your "human contact is so pointless and archaic" attitude. Well, a lot of virtual dates, at least.

    8. Re:Out of Touch with an Old Reality by misterbozo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's online competitions, but cheating and latency are big issues. A LAN setting is required when money is at stake.

    9. Re:Out of Touch with an Old Reality by seagis · · Score: 5, Funny

      Big example: given the choice, would anyone here really chose cybersex over sex in person?

      You realize, don't you, that it's a bit of a stretch to think that most of the people here will have the opportunity to make such a choice?

      ;-)

    10. Re:Out of Touch with an Old Reality by HaggiZ · · Score: 1

      There is a very good reason why people print out hard copies "in order to study it properly". The eye is able to perceive, and thus it is easier for the brain to understand, reflected light as opposed to transmitted light. CRTs and LCDs emit light into your eye, paper will reflect it. That's why people print out hard copies, because it is actually easier to study it properly.

      Likewise, there is much more to be learnt about and observed by someone in the flesh as opposed to via a webcast. So I'd say no, there won't come a time in our lives at least.

    11. Re:Out of Touch with an Old Reality by Not_Wiggins · · Score: 1

      Not to take away from the guys accomplishments but will a time come when we all but do away with the need to press the flesh?

      No. And that's mostly because it proves he's a real person. How would one tell a very skilled player from a corporate-sponsored bot? Think along the lines of the movie S1m0ne.
      I suppose that'll be the next big thing... don't beat Deep Blue at chess, frag it at Quake4! ;)

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying, "Nice doggie!" until you can find a rock.
    12. Re:Out of Touch with an Old Reality by JonathanBoyd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There''s no physical difference between reflected and transmitted light. They're both just photons and not perceived by the idea any differently, if they're the same wavelength and intensity. The crucial difference is that the light you use to read a book is usually a lot brighter than the light your monitor emits and the image has more detail.

    13. Re:Out of Touch with an Old Reality by rewinn · · Score: 2, Informative

      Precisely! Technology extends the range of options, but does not have to do away with the old options. Most of my gaming is via computer, but that doesn't make card night with old friends any less valuable.

      >I have about 10 copies of the Rubiyat of Omar Kayyan - none any less than 80 years old. Something about the different artwork, leather covers, hand-written notes that conveys a continuity, a chain of humanity to them.

      I share the feeling (... and covet your collection, twice the size of mine.)

      The Rubiyat is an especially suitable example of the enduring value of physical books, for its poetry is far more than the bare text freely available on the web. Its commentary on the human condition is all the more poignant and effective when spoken in a variety of books of varying conditions, each of whose original owner "... indeed is gone with all his Rose" (V). The various book designs and scars of time make each volume like one of the Pots (verses LXXXII+) that comment on the Maker: "They sneer at me for leaning all awry; Why? did the Hand of the Great Maker Err?" Web-pages can be made perfect and enduring; physical books can only decay.

      The physical experience of leafing through the poetry, on the gress, with a loaf of bread, a jug of wine, and a "Thou" beside you in the wilderness ... that's what Omar is talkin' about!

    14. Re:Out of Touch with an Old Reality by Quirk · · Score: 2, Funny
      would anyone here really chose cybersex over sex in person?

      For fun I would..., with a twist. Consider the possibility of all the male geeks who masturbate having a method for home storage of their sperm, (they might want to store some off site for redundancy). Maybe at the time they're alone in their mom's basement jerking off to porn their chances of finding a mate are slim, but who's to say in time they might become highly sought after and their late adolescent and early adult sperm might be preferable to that culled late in life.

      From a woman's point of view it might be preferable to be able to surf the net looking for a sperm donor more suited to her needs than might be available in her immediate vacinity.

      An artifical womb might be far off but surrogate mothers are a reality today and thus women could (and do) sell their eggs to males wanting to procreate from a selection of women far greater than available to them in their various nearby meat circles.

      Perhaps sooner than the development of an artificial womb we might manage having our young carried to term in other mammals. I wouldn't mind one of my offspring being carried to term by a Cetacean. The intrauterine experience of an ocean voyaging surrogate mother might make for some positive attributes.

      --
      "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
      Cohen
    15. Re:Out of Touch with an Old Reality by Quirk · · Score: 1
      Why should I care what some shut-in, diabetic piggy thinks?

      As your question is self referential and you've posted it, I'm going to assume you're unable to come up with an answer.

      Given the prejudiced nature in which you've framed the question, I'm inclined to suggest ignorance on your part as the most immediate and telling answer.

      Hope this helps you out.

      cheers

      --
      "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
      Cohen
    16. Re:Out of Touch with an Old Reality by Swordsmanus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just FYI, according to the findings of I/O psychologists, online business meetings are better at facilitating creative discussion and are more productive than in-person meetings. Also according to the findings of social pyschologists, when people gather in-person, their opinions become more polarized than if they were alone or in smaller groups. Despite the findings, business execs still prefer in-person meetings, even for brainstorming new ideas, and even for important decisions that should be carefully and precisely made. I agree that we humans are physical creatures, but not always is something lost in online discussions; gains can be had in certain situations.

    17. Re:Out of Touch with an Old Reality by xouumalperxe · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, that's all very pretty.

      But his ping would suck

    18. Re:Out of Touch with an Old Reality by Bad+D.N.A. · · Score: 1

      "This reminds me of those who need to print out hard copies of material in order to study it properly."

      Add me to that list. I peer review all of the time and when I want to study an article "properly" I always print a copy of it. I highlight, make notes, spew comments, criticize the author, etc.... It's essential that in my first pass of an article I have a hard copy of the paper, a pencil with plenty of lead, a spell checker, and an internet connection.

      --
      "Truth is much too complicated to allow anything but approximations"
    19. Re:Out of Touch with an Old Reality by chemisus · · Score: 1

      another example: concerts vs recorded music. though at the rate that the RIAA is going, im sure eventually the tickets will just mean you get to sit out in the parking lot and listen.

    20. Re:Out of Touch with an Old Reality by Mathinker · · Score: 1

      "Web-pages can be made perfect and enduring"

      That's just an illusion, also, if the page isn't "wikified" and actively maintained by others after you're gone. In another 2000 years, even if it is still hosted somewhere like www.archive.org, your "perfect and enduring" web page will be about as intelligible as Beowolf is today (and I'm not talking about clusters). If not less so, given the accelerated pace of change.

    21. Re:Out of Touch with an Old Reality by thexgodfather · · Score: 0

      I for one would like to see some evidance for this claim maybe back it up with a study by these psychologist, a link would be nice. Also clairifying what you mean by "online meeting" If you are video conferencing with the latest technology its similar to having them in the room with you but 2 dimensions limits the view to one or two at at time. If you have to explain something to a group of people or demonstrate how something works there is no wany an online meeting could compare to a "real meeting" but then I don't have 2.5 kids and my name is not Norm... If an "online meeting" is strictly text based the main thing lacking would be tone. The whole tone of a sentence can change the meaning from sarcastic to serious...

    22. Re:Out of Touch with an Old Reality by -kertrats- · · Score: 1

      Asimov already came up with this idea in the book "The Naked Sun". Pretty good, but it's a sequel to "The Caves of Steel", so you'll probably want to read that one first.

      --
      The Braying and Neighing of Barnyard Animals Follows.
    23. Re:Out of Touch with an Old Reality by Jackmn · · Score: 2, Informative

      At LANs it is far easier to ensure all players are using the same setup with no third party programs or illegal cvars giving them an advantage.

      There is also almost no latency on a LAN.

    24. Re:Out of Touch with an Old Reality by thesandtiger · · Score: 1


      Not to take away from the guys accomplishments but will a time come when we all but do away with the need to press the flesh?


      Why would we want to? People gather in person because they enjoy the proximity of other people. Some people like that a lot, some people don't like it at all. What possible reason could there be for suggesting that everyone give up actual physical proximity, if that's their thing?


      Why do we need to gather and mingle in the face of the web, the very essence of which is near instantaneous communication at a distance.


      Because we're humans? Because meeting people face to face is, generally, for humans who don't have some sort of social anxiety disorder, a pleasant thing? Because instantaneous communications is a nice trick, but ultimately is just another tool in the box, not a replacement for every other kind of human-human interface?


        This reminds me of those who need to print out hard copies of material in order to study it properly.


      I'm one of those people, and until someone comes up with a way for me to have a digital copy that I can comfortably read while in a comfy chair, while on the bus, or standing in line, have an interface as easy to mark up and annotate with as a pen to paper is, and can be folded up and stuffed in a purse or pocket, I'll continue printing things out. Oh, and, let us not forget that it'd have to have the same optical qualities as paper - easy on the eyes, dontcha know.

      You seem to be an advocate of using tech for tech's sake, rather than using the right tool for the job, whatever that tool is, whatever that job is.

      Do we gain or lose signal to noise when we gather to celebrate our heroes?

      What if the noise is part of the signal? Some people - this may shock you - *enjoy* the "grit" of a crowd. Some people like the smell, the feel, the sound, the whole experience of being near thousands of other people who are all sharing an event, a purpose.


      I keep a few fundamental books at hand's reach but other than those and the turn over of new material taken out from a library, I'm much more comfortable and able to take from an e format than from dead tree material, and, I can learn more from another at a distance than when merged in a touchy feely mind meld.


      How's life in the Collective?

      Here's how I roll (can ya believe I said that?)

      Entertainment:
      Dead tree books I can snuggle up with, movies in the theatre, plays every couple of months, music preferably live, comedy in clubs while drinking beer, the way nature intended, friends face to face and even *gasp* touching every once in awhile.

      Work:
      Digital books - easily searchable. Communications - instant but not intrusive (IM/email, no phone if I can manage it). Meetings - first meeting in meatspace, but after that it should be a mailing list/im kinda thing.

      So, for me, work = digital, life = analogue, and I'm rather happy that way. Note that I said *I* am happy that way. Maybe other people want other things, and that's great - they can have them.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    25. Re:Out of Touch with an Old Reality by rewinn · · Score: 1

      >In another 2000 years...

      Hmmmm, perhaps I should have said "relatively" perfect & enduring. If the half-life of an AOL disk is 20 years, there will still be several thousand of those buggers functional in 4006, bearing a usuable but embarassing browser.

      There is a fundamental difference between physical books and electronic media. In 2000 years, nearly all paper books will have cycled through the biosphere a dozen times, which destroys the information on them. In contrast archived web pages will very likely still exist as information. Perhaps they will be readable only via old browsers but those browsers themselves are only information, similarly archived and available to researchers who care to figure them out.

      There is no need to wikify or continually update works such as the Rubiyat, which have reached their final form long ago. Translations of course require continual update as language changes over the centuries, but the original text of Beowulf is the same today as it was 200 years ago (...plus or minus findings of new texts.)

    26. Re:Out of Touch with an Old Reality by Trizor · · Score: 1

      That is true Bishop, but apperances and tournament winnings alone don't make a 6 figure income. Right from the article it sayes he invests most of it, and he's making his real money from returns on good investments, and also more recently name liscencing. He markedted himself with the skill of an adept businessman. His skill isn't in gaming but in business. True he may have the reaction time and time to practice gaming, but that is not his strongest point. I'm surprized that the business world hasn't taken notice.

      His biggest win when he decided to go pro was $4000. If he didn't know to invest it wisely and use his tournament winnings as entry capital he'd be just another nerd living in his parents basement, burnt out after a few years of tournament play and a way to extravagant lifestyle.

    27. Re:Out of Touch with an Old Reality by Elad+Alon · · Score: 1

      Why are you modded "funny"? You should be modded "insightful".

      --
      News for merdes. Shit that matters.
      Ask me about my sig.
    28. Re:Out of Touch with an Old Reality by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      Not to take away from the guys accomplishments but will a time come when we all but do away with the need to press the flesh

      Well, seeing as these are gaming competitions, I imagine that silly little speed-of-light limitation thing might cause him some issues with lag if he's playing in a competition half a world away...

      So, to answer your question, as soon as we get the FTL data transfer thing solved, people won't need to fly to LAN gaming competitions.

    29. Re:Out of Touch with an Old Reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One word: ping.

    30. Re:Out of Touch with an Old Reality by Mathinker · · Score: 1

      Hm, everything you say is correct, but it's obvious to me that you missed my point, since you more or less corroborate it in your post.

      It hinges on two fairly different ideas of what "perfect & enduring" is.

      You focused on the information itself contained in the page being perfect and enduring. I have to admit that I hadn't really thought that hard about that. I guess a web page with a valid proof of some hard mathematical problem will still be perfect and enduring information in the future. I admit I was thinking of a lot of other stuff for which perfection is a much more subjective judgement.

      I was more focussed on perfection including accessibility of the information, and as you yourself state:

            "available to researchers who care to figure them out"
            "translations of course require continual update as language changes"

      and here again you are ignoring what I thought was the major thrust of my post which was "interpretation, explanation, and rehashing will be required as culture changes". I probably just read too much science fiction, but I have no problem imagining someone in the far future reading the Rubiyat needing to search crossreferences for more or less every concept, including lots of stuff you probably accept as unchangeable, like "eating", "sleep", yes, even "death", and just not being able to get to the "perfect" information you claim is in them.

  8. OSTG Content NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does this further the OSTG agenda? Let's get some more anti-MS and pro-Google going. Oh wait, you already did post about Google today. Ok, move along.

  9. But still.. by slashmojo · · Score: 5, Funny
    regarded by those in the know as one of the most gifted players of his kind.

    But still a nerd with no sex life. (presumably)

    "Gaming is so much fun and so relaxing," he said. "I don't see why anyone would want to stop playing."

    Yep, no sex life is confirmed..

    Yes I am still very jealous ;)

    1. Re:But still.. by deathy_epl+ccs · · Score: 1

      heh. Didn't read the article, did you? To add insult to injury, the son of a bitch was a jock in high school... so I suspect you are incorrect about his sex life.

    2. Re:But still.. by Zakabog · · Score: 2, Informative

      That says up through high school. I mean technically I was also a jock up through high school. Do I look like a jock? No. Do I have the sex life of a jock? Well... yeah, but not while I was a "jock" because while I was a jock, I didn't focus on JUST physical sports I focused on video games and sports were just some other thing I did to see how I liked it. A real jock is dedicated to sports like football and basketball and all that. He's dedicated to video games and just so happened to play those sports. And did you read this?

      "I don't really have time to indulge in anything," said Wendel. "I'm so dedicated and so determined to be the best I don't have time to indulge in other stuff." To most people that says "24 year old virgin living in mother's basement." I used to be as dedicated to gaming as he was and I was very good at it, but then I started going out and just hanging out with people. I started to enjoy that more and more, and now video games are just something I might play 2 hours a week at most. If I could wake up tomorrow with his skill, but I had to be as dedicated as he was I'd turn down the offer, it's all about what you enjoy most in life. He enjoys being the best at everything and he seems to be the best at video games so he's going to continue that.

  10. sure "the best" by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I very much doubt he's the best gamer ever as they try to make out. "Pro gaming" is based on abusing bugs, short cuts and general lamer tactics. The type of people who bunny hop around maps using the rocket launcher to frag you as you spawn, collecting all the weapons before anyone else can get to them.

    I don't care how much people get paid, I refuse to play with people who abuse these bugs (and trust me, they all do. It's become socially acceptable) and I outright refuse to call any of these people "pro".

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:sure "the best" by briancarnell · · Score: 2, Informative

      Understanding and exploiting the game to its limits is not "abusing" bugs.

      Learn To Play.

    2. Re:sure "the best" by tomstdenis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The point to video games is to have fun, not win.

      When you sacrifice any sense of competition [e.g. spawn camping, unbalacing teams, tk'ing] you just make the game a waste of time. This is largely why I don't MP [well that and the lag].

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    3. Re:sure "the best" by PDXNerd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I agree. Knowing and using the limitations of a system is the mark of someone who wants to win, not necessarily an abuser.

      Hiding in a wall hack is cheating. Bouncing around a map using rockets on rocket arena requires talent.

      Each game has it's own limitations, and each fight has it's own strategy. Many British generals decried the foul tactics of the American Revolutionary army as they used guerilla tactics. Come out and fight us face to face! Line up in bright colors! Don't attack during tea time!

      Do you want to win or have a long set of rules? If it's the rules, go play D&D, not FPS. You (and the rest of us who won't have to listen to Yet Another Whiner) will be happier.

    4. Re:sure "the best" by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      "exploiting the game"

      Says it all.

      --
      I like muppets.
    5. Re:sure "the best" by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

      "exploiting the game"

      Says it all.


      Sounds like life to me.

    6. Re:sure "the best" by Tlosk · · Score: 1

      It's the same kind of lame thinking that leads to crap in more traditional sports as well, from squeezing another guy's testicles in a football pile so he lets go of the ball to milkshaking in horseracing and everything in between.

      Good sportmanship will always be an ideal to uphold and strive toward.

    7. Re:sure "the best" by kaiser423 · · Score: 1

      Most leagues have rules or modes that severely curtail lamer tactics. Also, if it's a team-based game, then usually they're already nerfed.

      Any competitive conoutner-strike or team-based league I was in was devoid of any lamer tactics when you got into a high enough level. Those tactics might work great on big public servers, but they need to change when playing someone good.

      As far as spawn killing goes, some people consider it a very large part of the game -- playing cat and mouse, and trying to outsmart the stronger opponent to get the upper hand and then become the predator instead of the prey. Not thatI ever thought that, but it's all in how you look at it.

    8. Re:sure "the best" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good sportmanship will always be an ideal to uphold and strive toward.
      Tell that to the Southern Hemisphere rugby union teams. And anyone who believes that style of play is good for the game.

    9. Re:sure "the best" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      From someone who takes part in competitive gaming and is very knowledged on the subject, it is very hard to deny him of being the best gamer (in terms of FPSs). He has an unparalleled track record in past competitions, and has continued to prove his place at the top. The only rival that Fatal1ty currently has is "Vo0", a Norwegian player that has traded many matches with him. Fatal1ty is definately is above the rest.

      "The type of people who bunny hop around maps using the rocket launcher to frag you as you spawn, collecting all the weapons before anyone else can get to them."

      I'm failing to see how this is considered an "exploit" or "lamer tactic". It is a very viable strategy that, when attempted versus other players of high calibre, CAN be countered.

      Keep in mind that the higher level players do not fall into the holes that average players would. Actual strategy is employed to avoid being spawn fragged, locked out of weapons, etc, whereas the average player would throw up his hands in frustration.

      Your claim that pro-gaming is based on abusing bugs and shortcuts is ridiculously unqualified and shortsighted.

    10. Re:sure "the best" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but abusing bugs is still abusing bugs, troll.

      Learn To Think Logically.

      (By the way, I have shown considerable restraint in this post. Your abuse of logic made me physically angry, together with your obvious ignorance of the sort of outrageous bugs being abused)

    11. Re:sure "the best" by ToxicBanjo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Seeing how abusing bugs, short cuts and general lamer tactics will get you booted and/or banned from most organized gaming I can't agree with your statement.

      There is a HUGE difference between knowing and using a map to it's full potential and exploiting bugs.

      Bunny hopping is something I personally don't like but I don't see anything "cheat" worthy about it. Neither is spawn camping with a rocket launcher. It's just part of the game.

      I'm sorry but when I read your collecting all the weapons before anyone else can get to them I actually laughed out load... quite hard too. The whole point of the game where there are many weapons is to limit the amount your opponent can get thus maximizing you potential to frag the hell out of 'em.

      I think you're confusing PRO with NOOB. I've been in many MP servers in all kinds of games and it's the same crap all the time. Get pro's playing against each other and you'll see some of the best game play you could imagine.

      (and trust me, they all do. It's become socially acceptable)

      I don't and no it has not. Exploits get you banned, simple.

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in the world. Those that understand binary and those that don't.
    12. Re:sure "the best" by Bootvis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe you should watch the pro's play. Which you obviously didn't because pro's don't play the game like you described

      You getting owned != opponent abusing the game

      --
      Read, refresh, repeat.
    13. Re:sure "the best" by Verloc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I refute that. I agree that it's a different game than a casual player would play, but to watch a duel between two of the best players out there (q3 is what I know) is an exercise of instinct and grace. I've seen 1v1 games between players like ZeRo4 and Cooller and been marvelled at the kind of shots, jumps and movement they can pull. It is a skill and it can be stunning. If one person is using the rocket launcher to spawn kill, the other ususally made a mistake to get into that position. There are 4v4 team games/ctf that are amazing examples of co-ordinated teamwork. Pro gaming is playing a game to win and if everybody's playing the same way (which is usually the case in the upper echelon) the playing field is quite level. To call it 'lamer' just shows you don't understand it. You don't have to play them if you don't want to.

    14. Re:sure "the best" by friedmud · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You have obviously not seen him play then...

      I have, _several_ times at Quakecon and let me tell you it is unbelievable. He will play just hard enough to screw with his opponent... only whipping out the "tricks" when he needs them.

      For Quakecon 2004 he was setup in the Abit booth and was playing people for spectacle... if you could even kill him _once_ you got a prize. If you could beat him then you got a whole new computer.... only a few people got a prize at all.

      One of the memerable moments from watching him play was when he was taking on a beginner in Doom3... Fatal1ty ran into a room and knew the guy was coming behind him... he shot out all of the lights and crouched in a corner... while his opponent ran _right_ past him... the crowd HOWLED with laughter and his opponent swung around dumbfounded until he got a shotgun in the face.

      Fatal1ty plays _so_ often that he is basically one with the game... he knows every nook and cranny of every map and knows exactly which weapon to use in every situtation... he also has an uncanny ability to predict the behaviour of his foe.

      Go see him play sometime... then tell me he is some kind of "lamer".... I think you will be surprised.

      Friedmud

    15. Re:sure "the best" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL.

      Who is the troll here now? You're spouting shit, not backing up a single thing you're saying. Pro gaming is different to the public server wastelands you've ended up getting owned on, noob.

      (by the way, I'm not the other poster. lol)

    16. Re:sure "the best" by RelaxedTension · · Score: 1

      Not to be a troll, but you sound just like the whiners that show up in my Counter-Strike servers and call someone a hacker every 30 seconds. You just can't believe that players can be that good. Well, some of them are. I've run CS and Quake servers for 5+ years now, and seen players that are simply a cut above the rest. I've also seen/banned thousands of cheaters too, but thats another story. Pro gaming is based for the most part on lan tournnaments, where your machine is verified cheat free, and your matches are recorded and monitored on top of that. The exploits and bugs in games and their maps are well identified by the people running the tournaments, and explicitly forbidden where necessary. You should watch video of Fatal1ty play sometime, he really is good. That's what talent and 12 hours a day of playing, every day, will get you.

    17. Re:sure "the best" by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a better test of his skill would be having him play on never-before-seem maps.

    18. Re:sure "the best" by bfields · · Score: 1

      "Each game has it's own limitations, and each fight has it's own strategy. Many British generals decried the foul tactics of the American Revolutionary army as they used guerilla tactics. Come out and fight us face to face! Line up in bright colors! Don't attack during tea time!" Fortunately, we're playing a game, not shooting at each other on actual battlefields. So fun counts, and players have some responsibility to make sure other players are having fun. Most games are meant to be fun if everyone just forgets all that and plays to win. But they don't always work that way all the time.

    19. Re:sure "the best" by Z-Knight · · Score: 1
      I think I mostly agree with you...and I'd also like to add an observation of how these "pros" play and why is it they win a lot.
      I've watched the FatalityDumbass play and it is quite simple...he starts against an opponent obviously even. He runs around collecting weapons and power-ups, as does his opponent. He then gets the first kill and he is set for the rest of the match because all he has to do is keep collecting weapons, health, armor, etc while the opponent must start from scratch and hence is already at a huge disadvantage. Easy win for FatalNumbNuts. Yes, he had to get the first kill to take advantage but that's typically luck because he knows the maps better. At QuakeCon, he played the game for days while it was the first time for his opponents to even start the game up.
      In order to make any of these matches fair, you should force a restart after every single kill or give everyone all of the weapons at the start..and NOT INCLUDE SINGLE power-ups...I mean things like double/quad damage because only one person can have that at a time...totally unfair. Play even and then see who is the best.

      I'd like to add another point. I guarantee you there are players better than FatalAWipe out there...I've played with many and in some games I am considered a wicked-shot and rank very highly...but we choose not to waste our time playing with ourselves constantly so as to make our gaming skills better...we choose other life pursuits and hence are not part of the "pro-gaming" scene...especially if you live in a small town or outside of where competitions occur or can't afford to travel...hard to prove yourself if you don't have the opportunity and so I challege that FatalNoob is not the best, he's a pretender....yes, I'm just bitter. :)

    20. Re:sure "the best" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Actual strategy is employed to avoid being spawn fragged"

      LIKE WHAT!? -- you die the second you spawn, what could you possibly do??

    21. Re:sure "the best" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      like ... hmmm ... not dying ? .. Well, yes, like not dying. Sure, not dying is the way !

    22. Re:sure "the best" by Hackeron · · Score: 1

      I dont think you know what you're talking about. There are plenty of ways to get frags by exploiting game bugs instead of being skillful. -- I can get man of the match in many games by just being lame, but thats boring.

      * lining the exits of the spawn with mines in enemy territory - no way around that but wait for a team player to step on them and get killed.

      * Hiding in places where the player has to walk past but turn around to see you with a rocket launcher

      * Being shot with the missile launcher as you spawn in doom3 (no delay before you can be damaged)

      * Camping in a single convenient location to frag

      * Throwing non stop granades while re-supplying yourself with more (being a field ops)

      * Using anti tank weapons while hiding in a different place each time to blow up an enemy engineer from the back

      Also read this: http://dansdata.com/t2bastard.htm

      Bottomline is there are thousands of ways you can get a shitload of frags by just being lame, not skillful.

    23. Re:sure "the best" by masklinn · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The point to video games is to have fun, not win.

      The point of sports, likewise, is to have fun, not win...

      Do pro-sports seem any less acceptable to you?

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    24. Re:sure "the best" by masklinn · · Score: 1
      So fun counts, and players have some responsibility to make sure other players are having fun.

      Fun counts as long as people want it to count.

      This guy is a pro-gamer, he takes part in pro-gaming tournaments, and he has fun doing it.

      Noone involved in pro-gaming tournament is *forced* to do it, they do it because they want to, and for some because they have fun in doing so.

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    25. Re:sure "the best" by friedmud · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess that depends on the "skill" you are trying to test... it takes a _lot_ of skill to analyze a map... and be able to effectively utilize your knowledge of the map. I've played most of the maps used in Quake3 competition a _lot_ (as in, at my peak I was playing 4 to 5 hours a day), but I still get completely owned by the pro's because their ability to use the maps to their advantage is superior to mine.

      That said, I do agree that it would be interesting to plop down a bunch of the pro's in never before seen maps and see what happens. In this case we would be testing their aiming skills and their adaptivity skills... it would be fun to watch!

      To my knowledge no professional competitions do this, and probably won't ever do this. You don't make pro football players play on completely different fields (as in not rectangular or not standard length)... instead they always play on the same size field, and team's ability to create a good game plan utilizing that field and properly execute it has a lot to do with their success...

      Friedmud

    26. Re:sure "the best" by masklinn · · Score: 1

      My be, even though actually knowing the maps is part of gaming (even at non-pro level).

      That's pretty equivalent to satellite image and "real world" intelligence: you know how the field is, you can devise which tactics your opponent is likely to use, and you can try to counter or outsmart is.

      At pro-level, everyone knows the maps, in fact most tournaments run on very specific (and quite small amounts of) maps, chosen for various factors (fun, balance, tricks, points of interrests, ...) and knowing them by heart is not even required, it's logical.

      Playing on new, unplayed-before maps may lead to having to use unbalanced/unplayable/uninterresting maps.

      Maybe that'll be done, when mapmaking will actually be a well-payed profession and some people can take the time to actually design good maps in all kinds of games (FPS, but also RTS and such)

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    27. Re:sure "the best" by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      Would you like to provide a list of those lame ways now that you gave us a rundown of the skillful ones?

      Possibly number three is bad, but all the rest can be countered by a skilled opponent.

    28. Re:sure "the best" by 615 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Fatal1ty plays _so_ often that he is basically one with the game... he knows every nook and cranny of every map and knows exactly which weapon to use in every situtation... he also has an uncanny ability to predict the behaviour of his foe.

      I haven't been phenominally good at a video game since Descent. I'll never understand why 2D FPSes (where you're chained to the ground by gravity) surpassed in popularity the 360 degree, 3-dimensional freedom of the Descent series. Anyhoo, if you ever got your ass handed to you by a guy named "Nexus" ... well, that was me. ;-)

    29. Re:sure "the best" by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      To be honest I find the whole sports and entertainment genre overvalued.

      Why does my doctor make 100K/yr while some-two bit hack like Clooney make millions?

      I'd say the guy who makes me feel better, or builds the house I live in or delivers my toys I order off the net is far more important.

      So yes, they are not acceptable.

      I'm all for professional sports but the salaries have to be kept in check.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    30. Re:sure "the best" by Hackeron · · Score: 1

      haha, and lets not forget superweapons and suicides.

    31. Re:sure "the best" by Hackeron · · Score: 1

      oh and during temporary invincibility and super damage like the berserk mode, etc.. There are so many!

    32. Re:sure "the best" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd love to! -- Where can I get some? - I only found a few at events with a shaky camera that doesnt really show whats going on.

    33. Re:sure "the best" by BlueCollarCamel · · Score: 0

      You mean he shot out his flashlight, right? Lights in Doom3... har har har!

      --
      1&1 - Cheap domain and web hosting.
    34. Re:sure "the best" by Locke03 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Dunno, but from my observations of people playing, lots of person handles 3D movement very poorly. My brothers and most of my game playing friends are able to fairly consistently beat me (by a small margin) in games like GT2 or anything where you're mostly concerned with front-back, left-right movement. Switch to a flying game (especially if the ground is there) and I can usually take on several of them at once. Oh yeah, and Descent 2 kicks major ass, almost as much as Freespace.....I miss Volition....

      --
      I don't care what youre doing so much as the idiotic way you're doing it.
    35. Re:sure "the best" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spawn faster than your opponent can keep picking up ammunition. By the time it's 20 - 0 to the other guy you'll have him right where you want him.

    36. Re:sure "the best" by Horizon_99 · · Score: 1

      I disagree. How many sports do you know of where the competitor knows nothing about the playing field?

    37. Re:sure "the best" by briancarnell · · Score: 1

      No, it's not at all. You'll note the original troll posting included bunny hopping in FPS. That is not exploiting a bug in any way. Yes, it is annoying if you can't do it very well, and yes some online leagues do ban it, but there is nothing cheating or hacking about it. It is simply a method of exploiting the constraints of the game itself.

      It is kind of like the first time a team in the NFL decided to fake a spiked pass. The NFL changed the rules after that season to make a fake spiked pass an illegal play, but it was completely legal for that season and it was an excellent example of someone exploiting a ruleset for an unintended outcome.

      Or just like the first people who discovered rocket jumping in Quake, which had never been intended but as a consequence of the ruleset of that game.

    38. Re:sure "the best" by saskboy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It's too bad he can't use his uncanny ability to do something that helps humanity. I guess we can't punish him for not helping out, but it's not like we have to worship him.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    39. Re:sure "the best" by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      Probably sour grapes to the guy. There are those that are lamers that think they are good. I once got banned from a CS:source server because I was crouched down, and sawed another guy off at the ankles. He swore I was hacking because he was shooting where my torso should have been, but wasn't due to the crouch. Lamers abound.

    40. Re:sure "the best" by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm well the Guerrilla tactics eventually did bring us something excellent.

      Now we carpet bomb cities, kill women and children and destroy the landscape instead of simply changing the government.

      The American's ignorance of the consequences may have won them the war but they cost society.

      Computer Games are an interesting conundrum, there is a set way they are meant to be played and people who try to exploit will never be successful in real competition...
      Ah if only life had rules as simple as if(wallhack)kickplayer();

    41. Re:sure "the best" by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      "2D" is probably more popular because by the time you are old enough to use a keyboard and mouse, you already know how to walk and run, and just have to learn how to aim. With flying games, you have to learn how to fly & shoot at the same time. And some people, like me, simply suck at it. :)

    42. Re:sure "the best" by Scudsucker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Those are all great ways to get cheap frags in a public server with a bunch of n00bs. Try that against a good team or a pro player one on one and you'll get ground into hamburger.

    43. Re:sure "the best" by Scudsucker · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Many British generals decried the foul tactics of the American Revolutionary army as they used guerilla tactics. Come out and fight us face to face! Line up in bright colors! Don't attack during tea time!

      I find it funny that we Americans fall all over ourselves in History class, congradulating ourselves for using guerilla tactics against the Regulars (the colonists were British at the time) and yet call Iraqis terrorists when they do the same thing to our troops. And before some neocon gets his panties in a bunch, I'm specifially talking about the Iraqis that attack our troops, not the ones that bomb civilians in hotels, as that really is terrorism.

    44. Re:sure "the best" by Bad+D.N.A. · · Score: 1

      Well, Supply and demand.

      While your doctor might be able to diagnose a problem would you pay him $60 to try to intercept a pass? (well OK, I just might) but seriously. There are very few people with the physical skills to intercept a pass and there are far more people with the skills to diagnose a problem with your prostate.

      Once life gets tough enough that people wont shell out the cash for professional sports then the salary for these players will go down fast.. Supply and demand, just the way it should be.

      --
      "Truth is much too complicated to allow anything but approximations"
    45. Re:sure "the best" by friedmud · · Score: 2, Funny

      You have to be kidding me...

      What the hell is wrong with all you fucking bleeding heart liberal bastard slashdot high and mighty fuckers that let's you think you get to judge everyone else? (yes there should have been commas in there... but if anyone even thinks of telling me that, then they can take their post and shove it up their ass)

      What did _you_ do to "help humanity" today? In the 30 seconds it took you to create this reply you could have saved a baby seal... get off your ass and do something!

      God damn...

      Friedmud

      (PS: I am normally a very level headed contributor, but this post just struck a nerve...)

    46. Re:sure "the best" by saskboy · · Score: 1

      Well if you want me to make a list:
      I made some funny pictures which caused a few people to laugh [entertainment, which is what this gamer is good for].
      Plus I recycled a few pounds of cardboard that wasn't mine, plus my own.
      I pointed out that playing games for money doesn't really contribute to the economy [other than encouraging more kids to buy games I suppose because they think they can make a living at playing them].
      And I gave you a civil response, which is more than your flamebait deserved, in an attempt to contribute to world peace.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    47. Re:sure "the best" by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Yeah but they're only good at what they do because they spend a lot of time at it... [well that and the drugs...]

      Almost like doctors..

      You think your fav pro athlete just got up one day and said "being an engineer sucks, I'll go play football". No. He's probably been playing it since he was 5.

      Same with doctors [or other REAL jobs]. They go through years of school and practice to get where they are.

      And the problem is demand isn't always realistic. I mean on the TV there is friends, friends or friends on, oh no wrong, ER and Raymond!!! Half the shows I watch [or allow to be on in the background as I work] are there just because their production quality is better than the b-rated bullshit on the other channels. Is the demand really there for it? No. It's just less irritating than other stuff.

      Bah, maybe I just don't get "pro sports" ...

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    48. Re:sure "the best" by ed1park · · Score: 1

      How would you compare Fatility to Thresh? Would you consider Thresh to a Paul Morhpy and Fatality to Kasparov? :)

    49. Re:sure "the best" by Gumpmaster · · Score: 1
      I would tend to agree (even though I'm a neocon). There's a good saying that every terrorist is another person's freedom fighter (A line straight from anti-terrorism training manuals). The hard part is that freedom fighting appears to be in shades of grey. It's hard to condemn a person for something they truly believe in. Where should we draw the line though. It's easy to say that Iraqis that attack hotels are bad, but surely all of the ones that attack US troops don't have pure intentions, and thus we can't make a blanket statement absolving them of their actions. It should be clear then, that it is not easy to pass judgement on either the Iraqis, or our own (American) government. Surely history will pass judgement. I think that most people, including the Brittish, will agree that the revolutionary war turned out OK in the long run (the very long run). Will we be able to say the same thing if the Iraqi insurgency is successful? Please reference the insurgency in Afghanistan in the 1980's and the result of its success, the Taliban. And yes, I know, we funded the insurgency, history bites you on the ass sometimes.

      OK, my ranting is over.

      --
      Pod Six was jerks- Capt. Murphy
    50. Re:sure "the best" by general_re · · Score: 1
      In order to make any of these matches fair, you should force a restart after every single kill or give everyone all of the weapons at the start..and NOT INCLUDE SINGLE power-ups...I mean things like double/quad damage because only one person can have that at a time...totally unfair. Play even and then see who is the best.

      Adrenaline Gamer (HLDM mod - HL2DM is supposedly in development) in Arena mode does exactly that. I'm not a huge AG player, but some of the folks on there are terrifyingly good.

      --
      ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
    51. Re:sure "the best" by friedmud · · Score: 1

      Personally, I thought your comment might have been flamebait ;-) In fact after I made my response I thought "Oh god did I just feed a troll?"... but then I went and looked up your post history and was relieved to see that you probably weren't trolling.

      I do appreciate the civil response, and because it was more than I deserved I will apologize for my off-handed comment... sorry about that.

      The thing is I keep seeing this trend on slashdot where people indict other people's actions because they don't "do something constructive for the world" (or something along those lines). For instance, I see comments to case-mod stories like: "What a waste of time, he should do something more constructive with his time." And all I can think is that no one has the right to tell anyone else on the planet how they should spend their time while they are here.

      We all have different pursuits in life, and improving the world around is a great long-term goal (and something I recommend to everyone, I don't think there is anything more satisfiying than knowing you've had a lasting positive impact on the world), but not every action needs to have some "higher purpose"... having _fun_ is just a much a worthy goal (and as you pointed out, entertaining others is definitely a way to make a positive impact... even if it is fairly indirect at times).

      At any rate I have rambled on too long now... so sorry again for the knee-jerk response... I'm not quite sure why your post pushed my buttons but it plainly did.

      Friedmud

    52. Re:sure "the best" by Z-Knight · · Score: 1

      UnrealTournament 2004 (Original UnrealTournamet was the best), has a similar mod...it is called TAM (Team Arena Master) ... I believe you can still play it 1v1.

    53. Re:sure "the best" by n_are_q · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've been playing the games fatality has been playing for a long time. I've seen those who came before him, i saw him come up, and i generally know what i'm talking about when it comes to "eSports" and "pro gaming". Fatality was very dominant for a while, especially in quake 3 when it first came out. But honestly, he is being touted as this super gamer because he's just the most serious and dedicated player. He made it his mission to become THE "pro gamer" and dedicated himself entirely to this goal. He has been near the top in q3, unreal tournament, and now painkiller, but he's not the most dominant as far as actual skill and winning goes. Because he is so dedicated, PR is on his side, companies are promoting him because he is the self proclaimed poster boy for fps pro gaming. But there are people better than him in every game he plays. Voo has been convincingly better than him in the CPL World Tour (painkiller), there are people better than him in unreal tournament, and the competition level in q3 in the last couple years has been, i dare say, over his head. What he deserves a lot of recognition for, is being that good in so many different games.

      I'm not hating on the guy, i just hate this PR bullshit that's crammed down people's throats on a regular basis without them even knowing it.

      He of course still has to be commended for being able to perform at the top level in so many different games and for what he is doing to promote the idea of "pro gaming". And in case you are wondering, there is definitely something to promote. Gaming is truly a skill as long as you are looking at the right games. Being the best in q3, ut, or painkiller, takes intelligence, excellent hand eye coordination and years of dedication. It doesn't take the top players years to learn new games because 90% of their skills carry over, but trust me it took them many years of work (fun work :) to get to their level. And this has nothing with exploiting bugs because these games don't have any to exploit. Counter Strike does, but CS is a lame game, which is probably why it's more popular. There is zero exploitation of some technical glitches or bugs in comptitive play, take my word for it.

      On a final note, fatality and this entire discussion is about first person shooters. True pro gaming lives in the world of real time strategy, in Korea. But that's a whole different topic.

    54. Re:sure "the best" by n_are_q · · Score: 1

      LOL. I'm only replying because this subject is "close to home" and what you said just literally made me laugh out loud. No offense, but you must be like 90 years old if you actually played these games and know fatality's name and yet are so completely clueless about what's going on. OMG HE TOOK ALL THE WEAPONS! Yes, of course he did, that's called map control. That IS the competition. That's what gives the game depth, it's not just who can flick their mouse faster (though there's that too of course). You have to know the map and your opponent, know where to be and when, where to go and when, etc. Anyways, it's past my bed time.

    55. Re:sure "the best" by digismack · · Score: 1

      He actually pulled the "shoot the lights out and hide" tactic in the finals match vs Daler. Daler is hardly what I would consider a "beginner".

      --
      http://www.hollowdepth.com
    56. Re:sure "the best" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sander "Vo0" Kaasjager is Dutch, not Norwegian.

    57. Re:sure "the best" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ed2k://|file|Q3%20-%20Quake%20Con%202002%20-%20Fat al1Ty%20Vs%20Aim.avi|50557586|19341266FE0432E658A7 7DD1B3DFBB43|/

    58. Re:sure "the best" by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      I'll be the one here to agree with you.

      I play a fair amount of Counter Strick Source multiplayer, and there's a big difference between good players.

      One type of good player plays the game. He will will awesome aim, fast reflexes, and know the maps very well. He'll know all the little spots to be careful of, and he will try to reach the objectives of the game (instead of the secondary objective of just killing everyone on the other team.) He'll work with the team to get the mission won. This type of player often does well on the kill board, but often not at the top.

      The other type is the player that attempts to use every cheezy, "not in the spirit of the game or map" tactic to gain an advantage over the other players. He will primarily use a sniper rifle because he can find little spots that only a handful of people can get to (some special jump or something gets him up to a spot the map developer never intended) and kill half the opposing team from a distance. He will then proceed to clean up the rest of the players because most of them will be half dead already. This type of player will almost always be #1 on the kill board by a fair margin.

      I realize that these are commonly found on public internet servers, and an actual clan war would make things different. But in a lot of "real" LAN games I've seen replays of, it's not that far off from what you find in many of those games either. With Quake 3, I believe the problem became epidemic. All the "good" players would do things like set video quality to 0, and put on skins that make other players glow. For some reason, these things became acceptable for official matches. When you watch these players play, it's almost as if a computer player is playing. They run the same circle areas, they have timers that tell them when to get a power up, and they use ever unintended function of the game they can. To me, this just isn't much fun. Quake tournaments are a gathering of who has mastered all the cheezy exploits while still walking the line of cheating.

      That's not to say every player is like that, nor that I would have any hope of defeating any of them. But, I'm not impressed at all. I'm a lot more impressed with team wars in a game like CS because it's a lot more about working together and strategy, and less about finding that new loophole.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    59. Re:sure "the best" by BalloonMan · · Score: 1

      Go see him play sometime... then tell me he is some kind of "lamer"

      I watched him "play" against noobs at CES in Las Vegas last January. It was like watching a fully-loaded freight train play with a cardboard box. Although grimly amusing, I was less than impressed. The challengers were uniformly clueless about the map and their keyboard configuration, and they got about 30 seconds of "warm-up" time. Meanwhile, Fatal1ty is fully wired into the game. Fatal1ty would just zoom around the little 1v1 map, snarf up all the weapons and armor in a semi-repetitive cycle and occasionally unload a barrage on the helpless victim. I didn't get any sense of style or grace from this particular demonstration. It was a classic carnival game, but at least they weren't charging for the privilege of being fragged.

      In the future, they should pair up two competent players, or give the pro some sort of handicap, e.g. set his initial health to 5. Otherwise, it's about as interesting as watching an exterminator kill bugs with a hammer.

    60. Re:sure "the best" by friedmud · · Score: 1

      Now that you mention it I do remember him pulling this stunt against Daler... but I did see it at the Abit booth as well...

      If I remember correctly he was almost dead when he did this to Daler... and he didn't give him the shotgun to the face afterwards... instead he ran off to get health... (is that right?)

      I wish I could watch that video of the match vs Daler... anyone have a better link?

      Friedmud

    61. Re:sure "the best" by PhraudulentOne · · Score: 1

      He should play some objective-based games like True Combat, or maybe CS. I'd like to try and play him in one of those. Im not a huge fan of fragfest games like QuakeIII, or UT. I like slower, more strategic games where you have to wait several minutes when you die. Eliminates spawn camping.

      --
      You create your own reality - Leave mine to me.
    62. Re:sure "the best" by Z-Knight · · Score: 1
      That's not what I meant at all...

      What I meant by my rant about FatalNuts, more accurately about the game itself, is that it is NOT fair and does not really demonstrate that you are better than the other guy if you get all of the weapons and then just hunt someone down over and over and over because they can't pick up a single weapon. That takes no skill. I can camp you all day as you spawn and have to go looking for anything bigger than an anal probe just so you can try to kill me. As you run I keep taking your health down so just as you get to the weapon and you have that little bit of hope, I finally finish you off. ZERO SKILL involved.

      And of course that is the point of the games as is...that's is my problem with them. That is my problem with the competitions. As they are now is NOT FAIR. If you really want to know who is best one-on-one, then you should force a restart every time a kill occurs. Then you will see who can move the best and who can shoot the best...instead of who can spawn-camp-kill the best as currently happens.

    63. Re:sure "the best" by Norfair · · Score: 1

      *applauds*

    64. Re:sure "the best" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you get wtfbbqpwnd recently?

    65. Re:sure "the best" by Reapy · · Score: 1

      Depends on your game.

      In the games they talk about in this article like quake and painkiller, there are multipl spawn points. If there are like 5 spawn points on a whole level, I fail to see how the person can instantly kill you ever spawn. Sure, you may get a bad spawn through dumb luck and have the get you right away, but it won't happen twice in a row. Then it comes down to your ability to regain control of the map and hopefully do the same to the other person.

      In a game like battlefield 2, you can prevent spawn campping by not being a retard and spawning into the same base that has 5000 red dots behind cover with their fingers on the trigger waiting for you to spawn in. Spawn in behind them.

      If that is your last base you have already failed as a team to control the map and chances are you are going to lose anyways.

      I am assuming the spawn campping cry I hear so often is for games like battlefield. Often times it is because people aren't paying attention. They spawn in and let the sniper on the airfield run out of ammo, or even more fun they get sniped, then instead of finding and killing the sniper, they go stand over by the runway and wait for a plane again.

      I started playing fps's online since doom 2 and I've yet to have a problem being spawn campped in any of them.

      Just think a little bit before you spawn in, be aware of where you are spawning, and where hte other team is, and it is no big deal. Sure, you may spawn in through dumb luck on an artillery strike, or right when a tank rolled up on your spawn. Even then, lots of times you have a chance to go run and hide, then come back for it later.

      And if it is really bad, your team cant get out of the start spawn cause your whole team is doing poorly, just go find another server.

    66. Re:sure "the best" by digismack · · Score: 1

      Well, John already had the lead and didn't want to give Daler the opportunity to come back on him so close to the end of the game. He shot out the light on his first pass around and came back to hide in the dark. When John did this the entire room booed and yelled "camper". He did win quite a bit of cash though. :)

      (btw, I was the Doom3 tournament admin at QuakeCon in 2004)

      --
      http://www.hollowdepth.com
  11. If you can smoke and drink while doing it.... by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...its not a sport, and you're not an athelete.

    Just saying.

    1. Re:If you can smoke and drink while doing it.... by brxndxn · · Score: 1

      You can smoke and drink doing almost anything.. It's just not always a good idea..

      I tend to play better golf when I'm not smoking or drinking.. Also, my tennis game really suffers when I decide to quench my thirst with a shot of whisky and a smoke.

      The same probby goes for gamers..

      --
      --- We need more Ron Paul!
    2. Re:If you can smoke and drink while doing it.... by Raul654 · · Score: 1

      Yes! Excellent! I was sitting here, pondering a definition of sport that would exclude things like Nascar and bowling (and video gaming), and you've just answered my question for me.

      --


      To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
      --E.C. Stanton
    3. Re:If you can smoke and drink while doing it.... by Xarius · · Score: 1

      What's your take on golf then? Or bowling? Or darts? Or snooker?

      Sure, you may not be an athlete, but I'm pretty sure they count as sports.

      --
      C17H21NO4
    4. Re:If you can smoke and drink while doing it.... by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      In that case, even running wouldn't be a sport. Granted, most runners don't smoke while they run, but they could, and drinking something is not uncommon if you run over longer distances, either.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    5. Re:If you can smoke and drink while doing it.... by Zakabog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      An athlete is someone who participates in sports. Sports are activities that require you to do something, have some skill, and there must be a defined ruleset. Usually they're competetive. Since playing computer games fit into the deffinition of a sport, Fatal1ty is an athlete and gaming is a sport. Just because it doesn't fit into your idea of sport, doesn't mean it's not a sport.

    6. Re:If you can smoke and drink while doing it.... by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1, Interesting

      By that deinition competative crap-taking is a sport.

      I would still say the participants aren't atheletes.

    7. Re:If you can smoke and drink while doing it.... by sparkhead · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My work requires me to do something, have some skill, and there is a defined ruleset. We are competitive with other companies. Per your definition, my job is a sport. Add in that a sport requires physical exertion and you might have an acceptable working definition.

    8. Re:If you can smoke and drink while doing it.... by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 3, Funny

      Golf is a game.
      Bowling is a game.
      Darts is combat training/a great way to lose money.
      Snooker is an art form.

    9. Re:If you can smoke and drink while doing it.... by daigu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Last I checked, athlete was defined as: a person who is trained or skilled in exercises, sports, or games requiring physical strength, agility, or stamina. While you can make arguments that there is a physical component to gaming, it isn't their central feature. I'd be included to agree with the parent on this one.

    10. Re:If you can smoke and drink while doing it.... by badmammajamma · · Score: 0, Troll

      You're an idiot. There is no such thing as "competative crap-taking". There is no skill in taking a shit. I can assure you that if you played against Fatil1ty in a FPS, that you would soon realise that what he does requires just as much skill as playing quarterback in football. The main difference is he doesn't have to worry about his head getting ripped off by a defender. However, he still has to have extremely fast reaaction times and dexterity. You don't think it's a sport simply because you don't respect it as a skill. Personally, I think golf is fucking gay but it doesn't keep it from being a sport.

      --
      Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
    11. Re:If you can smoke and drink while doing it.... by patternjuggler · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was sitting here, pondering a definition of sport that would exclude things like Nascar

      You can drink and drive in Nascar?!

    12. Re:If you can smoke and drink while doing it.... by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

      How about fishing then? Competative eating? That a sport? Notice I was replying to the assertion that anything is a sport simply because it has rules and metrics.

      I've probably been gaming longer than you've been out of school.

      I was turning over arcade machines before there was "competative gaming".

      Fatal1ty is one of many, let me assure you. He's at the top of his game and good for him. I still don't think he's an athelete, neither am I. Even if I am probably faster than you.

    13. Re:If you can smoke and drink while doing it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There is no skill in taking a shit."

      Au contraire... the objective of competitive crap-taking is to hit a small target, represented by a picture of David Duchovny. I challenge you to accomplish such a feat from a height of four feet!

    14. Re:If you can smoke and drink while doing it.... by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      Never played Darts , Pool or Snooker have you . I think Smoking and Drinking are prerequisites for those sports.

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    15. Re:If you can smoke and drink while doing it.... by archgoon · · Score: 1

      >>Just because it doesn't fit into your idea of sport, doesn't mean it's not a sport.

      Just because it agrees with your idea of a sport, doesn't make it a sport.

    16. Re:If you can smoke and drink while doing it.... by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 1

      I was running a cross-country race in the sticks when this good 'ol boy in overalls holds a half-full pint of Jack out at me when I ran by like the water boys hold out cups of waters for runners. I almost took it just to see what that fat guy would do if I did.

      --
      Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
    17. Re:If you can smoke and drink while doing it.... by thermal_7 · · Score: 1

      And do you think a player playing an intense duel is going to drink or eat?

    18. Re:If you can smoke and drink while doing it.... by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

      Played pool for almost 30 years now, and yes drinking and smoking is nearly a prereq, but its not a sport (more an art) and I'm not an athlete.

    19. Re:If you can smoke and drink while doing it.... by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      I would disagree partially there , It is defiantly an art ,but if you have ever been in a drawn out game you require a hell of a lot of Stamina .
      I have had games stretch out for 5 cigars and the better part of a bottle of Whisky , a lot more gruelling than one of my work outs .

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    20. Re:If you can smoke and drink while doing it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you mean by "most runners don't smoke while they run"? I never saw a runner smoking while running and, as someone who runs 60km a week, I can tell you that is simply not possible. Hell, simply changing the settings of my watch cause some balancing problems and it makes me slow down.

      As for drinking, well of course it's possible, it's even necessary, but here again it makes me slow down a lot so I drink only one or two gulps at a time (and anyway drinking more than that would cause bladder and cramping problems).

      Running is a sport, videogames are games.

    21. Re:If you can smoke and drink while doing it.... by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

      Ah, but see there you are playing pool while engaged in competative drinking!

    22. Re:If you can smoke and drink while doing it.... by Rib+Feast · · Score: 1

      If you read a definition for sport it draws upon physical recreation and competition.

      I'd call computer gaming a skill based competition not a sport, just as something like throwing cards into a hat is a skill based activity and not a sport.

    23. Re:If you can smoke and drink while doing it.... by Maian · · Score: 1

      Eh well, it's a good time to redefine the word then. Popular usage is far more important than a dictionary when defining a word. In fact I find this situation really analogous to that of the word manga.

    24. Re:If you can smoke and drink while doing it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, someone who sits all day in front of a computer and plays games while coping with carpal tunnel syndrome is now an "athlete."

      I can't understand why playing an FPS game is now something that you can make a living with. It's inane.

    25. Re:If you can smoke and drink while doing it.... by G-funk · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ

      We salute you Warney you grouse aussie icon!

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    26. Re:If you can smoke and drink while doing it.... by simong_oz · · Score: 1

      "There are but three true sports - bullfighting, mountain climbing, and motor-racing. The rest are merely games." -- Ernest Hemingway

      --
      "Because it's there." - George Mallory, when asked why he wanted to climb Mt Everest, March 18, 1923 (New York Times)
    27. Re:If you can smoke and drink while doing it.... by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

      "Dick Pound, head of the World Anti-Doping Agency"?????

  12. A Child Prodigy by nmb3000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Another professional gamer, this one only 7 years old, is LiL Poison.

    Now this is a child prodigy. Pbbbt...that other kid only got to college by 8.

    --
    "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
    /)
  13. Iain M Banks strikes! by Space+cowboy · · Score: 1

    A real-life Player of games (no, it's not an affiliate link...). Of course we're missing some of the Culture yet...

    I recommend the book, btw, but then most of the 'M' banks (the sci-fi stuff) is pretty damn good...

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
  14. Not another eSports-article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Not another "pro gaming is on the rise"-article. Just because a handful of people can live of pro gaming doesn't mean this is something that is even close to big yet. More money is being diverted into pro dart an pro bowling than pro "eSport". "eSport" suffer from the great disadvantage of not having a set of fixed rules (what game is popular this week?), not having any real arenas to fill to have "real social mass appeal" (you can't cram a few thousand nerds into an arena and actually watch a real game). Sitting in your bedroom watching a replay of a game on your monitor does not cut the cake.

    "eSports" today is just marketing from game companies and CPU/GPU-manufacturers. Keeping the dream of teenagers around the world alive that "one day they can make cash from what they like to do best".

    You want to make money? Computer gaming is probably the single most stupid thing you could waste your time on! /lars

    1. Re:Not another eSports-article... by Durzel · · Score: 1

      eSports also suffers from the stigma of being crushingly boring for any non-gamer to watch for the most part.

      It's not really like a regular sport where any regular person can appreciate the athletic ability and skill of those playing it. Regular sports are more accessible too - by playing it yourself (and discovering how amateur you are by comparison to the pros) you gain a newfound appreciation of the achievements of those who can actually do it for a living. Contrast that with eSports - the barrier to entry is too high. You have to be computer literate for a start, something which is beyond the majority of people. It doesn't take much innate ability or pre-disposed knowledge to kick a football, hit a tennis ball, hit a baseball or dunk a basketball.

      For the most part to any non-geek watching it eSports must just seem like "a load of flashing lights". No non-gamer would appreciate the significance in FPS of map dominance, using the right weapon at the right time, etc. It's "just flashing lights".

      eSports will continue to be a niche sport that very few people care about not because it doesn't command the same level of intelligence or physical exertion as other sports, but simply because in pure marketing and entertainment terms it is stone dead.

    2. Re:Not another eSports-article... by MayorDefacto · · Score: 1
      It doesn't take much innate ability or pre-disposed knowledge to kick a football, hit a tennis ball, hit a baseball or dunk a basketball.

      I wouldn't be so sure about that! this is /. after all...

    3. Re:Not another eSports-article... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Another problem is there's no history. I mean football is based on over a century of traditions and legends. Who are the Peles or Maradonas or Cruyffs of computer gaming? What are the old famous prestigious competitions, the classic games?

      What is the gaming equivalent of the Brazil 1970 team, the 53 cup final, or Hurst's hat-trick in 1966? I don't think that reminiscing about a world championship Pong game in the 70s would be much fun.

      You can watch an old football match from 50 years ago and it's practically the same as today. Computer games are obsolete within a few years. Who'll even know what Quake is in twenty years, let alone a hundred?

      There are no teams either. You can't go and watch your local town's team or your country play in a computer game competition, because there are no such teams. It's just players with funny names with numbers instead of letters, people you've never seen or heard.

  15. Frausters by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ok, theres a user here on slashdot called Fatal1ty

    What are the chances now that this guy is the real one, or its just a troll using his name?

    How much respect does a name get you, and how would an online site decide who was the real Fatal1ty?
    (I only ask this after taco's recent ponderment about WoW banning his account)

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:Frausters by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      "fatal1ty" is not a terribly original name, though. It *may* be that someone registered this account after reading about this guy, but it's just as possible that it's coincidence. leetspeak-ifying a common word, especially one that's both fashionable (as far as nicknames are concerned) and gaming-related, like "fatality", is not the pinnacle of creativity.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    2. Re:Frausters by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      On a gaming site you get more respect for being proven, your complaints are taken as valid rather than just whining. On any other site, nobody really cares. Ingame, a lot of the 'famous' people fakenick just to avoid harassment. Unless you're actually competing, you're better off not letting others even know who you are. People either give you shit for it or start cheating or whatever. Much more fun to ace them as ":)" and let them look up your id later.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    3. Re:Frausters by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wendel apparently has other sites fatal1ty100.com fatal1tyshootout.com fatal1tyshootouts.com that have recently had content added in the last week or two. The curious thing is that they're parked in a 209.164.40.0-31 IP range that's full to the brim with 90+ Cthurch of Scientology web sites.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:Frausters by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Sorry, 65.59.27.0-31 range. (The other one was a IP that a site shifted from.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    5. Re:Frausters by buraianto · · Score: 1

      What's a Frauster? Someone who goes for older German women?

  16. Attacks by tomstdenis · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Everyone is going to attack him so I'll add some perspective

    1. How many people on earth can do this successfully? [hint: think of a dream career in the NBA]

    2. Think about WHY they are paying him?

    3. If gaming is so successful why does he have a clothing line?

    4. What does he produce that we need in say a recession?

    My point is careers like this are not sustainable. While the getting is good it's probably a dream. But once people stop buying the games in droves or someone 1% better shows up he's done for.

    So hey congrats, if you can sucker people into paying you for playing video games, then all the power to ya. But I wouldn't say it's a good career choice if you don't want to worry about what you'll be doing in 10 years [hint: 43 yr old gamer == teh lame]

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    1. Re:Attacks by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is nothing more than an electronic version of any extreme sports or x-games type of star, no big deal, nothing really unique.

      Everything you touch on can be answered by looking at people like Tony Hawk.

    2. Re:Attacks by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Even if he the best player, it won't last more then another 10 years at best. As your get older, you're mind becomes smarter but also slower. In most FPS games, it's the reflexes that earn you points. I'm sorry, but his biology clock is running out of time. Soon, he will have to take all his earnings and invest it.

      Basically, "Pro" gamers are like a white hot flame. They burn the brightest, but also the fastest.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:Attacks by tomstdenis · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      At least what he does is physical. Button mashing can be done by any obsessive no-talent hack sitting in their parents basement.

      At least Tony had to get hurt to perfect his um "craft". Granted, I don't look at skateboarding as a career either. Sports, surprisingly, are not supposed to be careers. They're supposed to be events where people compete for the simple quest of competition.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    4. Re:Attacks by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree that sports are not meant to be careers but thats humanity for you.

      And having played all manner of video games since the beginning of them all, I can assure you there's more to button mashing to beating a skilled opponent. Many tradition sports have great mental aspects to them. Baseball pitchers and batters are a good example. There's more there than thowing and hitting.

    5. Re:Attacks by Dirtside · · Score: 1
      hint: 43 yr old gamer == teh lame
      Why? Are only young people allowed to play games? If a 43-year-old can make a living playing computer games, who are you to judge that?
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    6. Re:Attacks by xouumalperxe · · Score: 1

      Well, not to say I think this is all that great, but how many of those points would have the exact same response relative to him or a "regular" sports star?
      1? 2? all? I mean, tony hawk is definitely one of the all time best skaters in the world, yet he has all the hawk gear. Matt Hoffman has his own brand of bikes (Hoffman Bikes) because no bike on the market suited his needs (granted, I doubt this applies to clothing). Tennis players are given big sponsorships just on the hope that some sad bastard will think that he's Agassi just because his racket is just like the pro's. Ditto for whatever other sport you name; sponsors aren't on it for the goodness of their corporate hearts!

      So, will all olympic medalists please start producing something palpable, in the case we have a recession?

      Oh, and a 43 old gamer, if sad, is probably a lot more feasible than a 43 year old . Except, eventually, that I doubt anyone would sponsor one...

    7. Re:Attacks by apflwr · · Score: 1

      I'll just zero in on this one...

      4. What does he produce that we need in say a recession?

      The answer, of course, is nothing. But then, how many of us have jobs that are mission critical to our society? Do we mock the thousands and thousands of game designers and developers who are creating the fluff that made this guy a star? (I mean fluff in an endearing way, of course.) If the whole gaming industry shut down, a lot of people would take a hit but society wouldn't crumble.

      So hey congrats, if you can sucker people into paying you for playing video games, then all the power to ya. But I wouldn't say it's a good career choice if you don't want to worry about what you'll be doing in 10 years [hint: 43 yr old gamer == teh lame]

      If he has brains and makes wise investments, a few six figure salary years could take care of him for life. Or he could parlay this into a consulting job for the next few rounds of FPS's. I'm not too worried about him.

  17. How does he get his money? by Darkn3ss · · Score: 1

    I mean, come on! Who else doesn't want a 6 figure salary playing games? I'm shoot for a 5 figure salary playing games is possible. :D

    1. Re:How does he get his money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the prize money that is responsible for an event is generated by sponsors. Companies such as Intel, AMD, nVidia, ATI, front the cash because these events drive publicity and advertising.

      "Oh you're the best obsessive little punk to play a FPS. Congrats. Now differentiate this equation or play this sonata or lathe this piece of wood or write a short story or develop some software or perform any number of other "talent-requiring actions"."

      I see no difference if, in your statement, "FPS" was replaced by Football, Baseball, etc. Competitive gaming is probably one of the most thinking/strategy orientated forms of sports.

      You are trying to imply that all gamers are dumb, yet there are some clean examples that refute this. Paul "czm" Nelson, a top-3 Quake III player, is a math major at Princeton with a 4.0 GPA. Fatal1ty runs a successful business and displays excellent self promotion.

      "When you get "winners" who will do anything to kill ya and not actually show skill you can give them the boot."

      Because, as we all know, winning requires no skill.

    2. Re:How does he get his money? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      is a math major at Princeton with a 4.0 GPA.

      I'm not disagreeing for the sake of disagreeing but that doesn't say much. Show me what he has DONE with his knowledge. Then I'll be impressed. I'm not saying he's incapable but just listing his GPA isn't that impressive.

      As for the other dude, it's cool that he runs a WEB business. At least that's productive. But really running a web-based t-shirt shop doesn't really require a significant product of value. Your costs are low and the margins are high. A $29.95 t-shirt may cost him all of a few bucks to produce. etc.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  18. Jealousy by char1iecha1k · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Ok I admit it is a bit sad making a living from playing games, but if you could do it im sure you would, i know i would! it must beat working in IT support...

    1. Re:Jealousy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only bad thing for him will be once his skills decline(or others start beating him on a daily basis)...and he has to go out in the real world for work. If you're 26+ years old, no college and no work history...I smell a Taco Bell career. While it's great for now, his skill is hardly a desirable one for any kind of work. Would game companies even be interested?...maybe as a tester. To Fatal1ty: "I want to say one word to you. Just one word. Are you listening? ...Plastics!"

  19. Face Off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want to see a face-off between him and fps_doug and teh_ownerer from http://www.purepwnage.com/.

  20. Big $$$ talk generally misleading. by external400kdiskette · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Remember the vast majority of people will do nothing but ruin there lives trying to make a professional career out of playing video games at this stage in time. Only a handful of reflex freaks are going to be living it up and there livelihood will depend on maintaining those skills. The vast vast vast majority of computer geeks are better off getting a programming job or something. You have more chance of making a career in the NBA, at least then a few thousand people make huge money as opposed to a handful making good money as is the case with this "career option".

    1. Re:Big $$$ talk generally misleading. by ediron2 · · Score: 1

      Heck, you can miss the NBA cut and still do well.

      James Potter (from Idaho State University of all places) makes good money and gets star treatment in his adopted Belgium, thanks to his Euro-League career.

    2. Re:Big $$$ talk generally misleading. by syousef · · Score: 1

      Only a handful of atheletes will make it as pros either. They should also find something else to do. The whole idea of paying people large amounts of money for being number one at a sport, at acting etc. means that you attract the best talent. Most of them end up with their lives ruined but since they're all chasing that huge payoff, you get cut throat competition amongst the cream of the crop needed to push the boundaries on these endevours.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  21. I do not fear him by jurt1235 · · Score: 1

    To him I am like an unimportant background character. The one which looks impressive, but actually never manages to hit anything with the level 1 weapon he managed to gather.

    --

    My wife's sketchblog Blob[p]: Gastrono-me
    1. Re:I do not fear him by Carlos+Laviola · · Score: 1

      Level 1 weapon? Maybe you're confusing things. As far as I know, Fatal1ty deals in first person shooters, not MMORPGs.

    2. Re:I do not fear him by jurt1235 · · Score: 1

      I meant weapons which are easy to find like in Doom your fists or the simple handgun. Never able to find the rocket launcher to do some real damage, because people like Fatal1ty will already have that weapon before I am ever able to get near to it.
      Anyway: I just get dizzy from the way he plays that kind of game. Never standing still. I think the game makers should make it impossible to keep jumping and bouncing around all the time. Make it a bit more realistic. Maybe than I will stand a small chance again (small I said, not real chance, small chance).

      --

      My wife's sketchblog Blob[p]: Gastrono-me
  22. Just what the world needs... by SStrungis · · Score: 2, Insightful
    **Sigh** Just what my middle schoolers need to hear about. Some lucky rogue that makes a living at FPS games.

    I mean, if he stepped into a pot of gold...Hey great for him. I've been playing videogames since my folks brought home an Atari 2600 back in the day. (Yow....That's like 20 years ago) Now, I'm more ancient than this fellow and I certainly can't make a living at gaming even with 20 years under me.

    I can see it now...Sitting in the Guidance Office, looking the counselors in the eye, and stating that college is not need because I am leet at CounterStrike.

    Thank God the kid's investing instead of Viper-crashing.

    Scott

    1. Re:Just what the world needs... by typical · · Score: 1

      Good point; but I wouldn't say that this is any more useless than sports and the number of people that try to get into pro sports.

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
  23. There are worse and better jobs... by suitepotato · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Sewer maintenance versus nude centerfold makeup artist for instance. This still doesn't beat the latter and given my lack of interest in playing games anymore doesn't even beat my day job of doing telecom support. Your milage may of course vary. It's just sad that there's going to be ten thousand boobs out there who point at this and say, "see? I'm not wasting my time!" Yes, you and that kid who couldn't sink a shot if he were dunked holding the ball are both wasting your time. Banking on the longshot and oddball is not where success is at. Nevertheless, I have no ill will towards this oddball so I hope for his sake and happiness that his success continues.

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
  24. Envy. by Xarius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am extremely envious that this person is capable of doing this for a living, and making a good amount of money for it also. I am aware that professional gaming is no walk in the virtual park, but still it's something that I would absolutely love to do.

    And for all the people who complain about it not being a sport, or it not being fair, you're all just as jealous as myself that you can't play computer games for a living...

    I'm just saying.

    --
    C17H21NO4
    1. Re:Envy. by rolfwind · · Score: 1
      And for all the people who complain about it not being a sport, or it not being fair, you're all just as jealous as myself that you can't play computer games for a living...


      I won't complain about him having his job....

      But I couldn't envision myself having it. Actually went to a video game college (to make them!) and after the 3rd semester, all I could think about was that I was going waste my life making products that would be enjoyed for maybe a year before it became hopelessly obsolete. Actually that would be optimistic, as most games are bound for the trash heap of history w/o being so much as a footnote. That's probably why I switched to something I assigned more meaning to.

      I imagine that the same feeling of non-accomplishment might be attached to this job somehow, in the end. Not sure how I could look back after 20 years of doing something like that. There doesn't seem to be any ever lasting quality to the output of it.

      However, since most jobs are like that and this one pays at least 10x better, I'm sure most people could live with it:)
    2. Re:Envy. by shish · · Score: 1
      And for all the people who complain about it not being a sport, or it not being fair, you're all just as jealous as myself that you can't play computer games for a living...

      Go jump off a cliff... don't want to? You're just jealous of my cock :/

      For a less retarded introduction into logical fallacies, see wikipedia.

      --
      I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
  25. This is riduculous by AutopsyReport · · Score: 3, Interesting
    "I'm doing something no one else has ever done before. I'm kind of a pioneer."

    Yeah, okay. Whatever happened to Thresh, who preceeded this kid by years? Pioneer? Please.

    This fellow is far too full of himself, in part because there's so many fanboys lurking in the online community that just envy everything about him. But realistically, anyone could win these tournaments. He is nothing special -- he just happened to dedicate more time than most to become exceptionally good. So what does it require to win? An insane amount of time spent in front of the computer, and a little bit of insanity for good measure.

    --

    For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother.

    1. Re:This is riduculous by Durzel · · Score: 1

      Good point.

      You have to wonder as well how much of this fanboyism and fame in the pro-gaming circle would have an effect on those who face him? I mean, in real sports it is intimidating for teams to face famous opposition. If anything given that those at the very bleeding adge of pro-gaming seem to be either a) young, b) lacking in social skills and/or c) l33t - I'm sure intimidation, fear of failure and other pressures that these sort of competitions instil must be a bigger factor than in regular sports.

      Would other players perform better against him if they didn't know who they were facing?

    2. Re:This is riduculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd bet my PC that you could practice your whole life and never be at his standard. It's not just practice, you need fantastic reflexes and very precise and steady hands, neither of which you can learn.
      Plus, of course, most of us lack the willpower and focus to spend 14 hours a day playing.

    3. Re:This is riduculous by AutopsyReport · · Score: 1

      Except that I was previously sponsored by Diamond Multimedia way back in the days of Quake. We are talking almost 7-8 years ago when the concept of 'pro gaming' was in its infancy. I didn't spend 14 hours a day playing, but I played a considerable amount. I am not suggesting this guy is a bad player, but I am suggesting that almost anyone that already plays competitively can reach that level with enough patience and dedication.

      --

      For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother.

    4. Re:This is riduculous by Comatose51 · · Score: 1
      An insane amount of time spent in front of the computer, and a little bit of insanity for good measure.

      I'm not disagreeing with you but that can be said of any champion in any field. I know a lot of us come from a background where natural talent has given us an advantage that we never really had to put any real effort into doing something, mainly in school. When you are near the top of your game though, it's usually passion and obsessive dedication that makes the difference and to me that makes the victory even more deserving than just natural talent. When asked what's the best strategy for winning a race, Eddie, "the Beast" Merckxx, a former cycling champion, answered, "Ride... lots" (probably a bad paraphrase on my part).

      --
      EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    5. Re:This is riduculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, OK, clarification accepted. This statement seems a lot more reasonable. In fact I think it's the same in any sport.

    6. Re:This is riduculous by geraud · · Score: 1

      I disagree. This reaction was very common also in the high level maths courses I took. Many people thought that they could beat the best if they spent as much time on the subject, but the truth is they are just unable to do it, unable to focus enough on the subject and make the necessary sacrifices. Being able to spend (I would say to dedicate) a huge amount of time to training a subjet is an ability as good if not better as being naturally gifted in it.

  26. I can see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    why he chose Fatal1ty over W3ndell.

  27. Fatal1ty & MTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    For those interested, the CPL World Tour Finals are currently taking place in New York City at the Web2Zone Cyber Center. $500,000 is being handed out, $150,000 going to first place.

    MTV is following the event and you can watch the matches take place over the Internet live via MTV Overdrive.

    MTV will be showing a segment featuring Fatal1ty on Wednesday (11/16) entitled "15 Minutes With... Fatal1ty" @ noon. Then on Saturday (11/26) at 8PM (EST?), the CPL World Tour Finals' match will be rebroadcasted on MTV in which he is expected to be a part of.

    To anyone curious as to what professional gaming is about, I highly recommend watching a match or two.

  28. Re:He's not pro! - Mod Parent Funny by Cochonou · · Score: 1, Informative

    I found this very funny.

  29. Odd... by DarkIye · · Score: 0

    I remember reading about this in a magazine with a bunch of other computer-y type articles on an airplane about 6 months ago. I think it was in Time. I also distinctly remember the magazine saying "The '1' in his name gives him extra 'street cred' in cyber space". Yes, they said that.

  30. Passion for winning by polv0 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was a competitive quake3 player, in the clan stickmen, and used to play with fatal1ty before he won his first major tournament. I would travel to Kansas City and LAN with him for a few days, and what most people don't realize is that he is truly obsessive about playing. He would put in 15 hour days 7 days a week, exericise to keep in good physical shape, and study the game, and more importantly, it's players, incessantly. Any time I had an advantage over him in a 1v1 map, we would play it over and over and over again untill he had learned all of my patterns.

    Few people appreciate how much passion he has for winning.

    1. Re:Passion for winning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Passion? Wouldn't that actually be referred to as Obsessive Compulsive disorder? I'm not sure I can "appreciate" that...

    2. Re:Passion for winning by thelost · · Score: 1

      whats the difference? If he was that compelled to explore particle physics or write renowned literature would you be such a harsh critic. I certainly don't think that looking back on my life, I could be proud of having spent that amount of time gaming, but on the other hand I wouldn't judge someone else who did.

      --
      Promote Charity on Myspace, Show Your Colours!
    3. Re:Passion for winning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Potahto Potato.

    4. Re:Passion for winning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Appreciate, not respect. Appreciate just means you fuly comprehend the extent of his obsession.

    5. Re:Passion for winning by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      More so since he 1) enjoys doing it and 2) has made a buttload of money doing so.

    6. Re:Passion for winning by joelpt · · Score: 1

      That's really not different than working as particle physicist or renowned literature writing, per se.

  31. Re:pro gamers.. Duh by Cochonou · · Score: 1

    Maybe that someday, you will fall in love with someone.

  32. Notice the type of monitor he uses.... by gm0e · · Score: 1

    From one of those pictures it certainly looks like a CRT. Is it still accepted that for the absolute best gaming display you still need a CRT?

    1. Re:Notice the type of monitor he uses.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yes, very much so.

      CRTs are much smoother and cleaner in display when at 120hz than almost any given LCD. Ghosting, slower response time, etc, makes the LCD less favorable than CRTs for fast paced games (which Fatal1ty plays). There are LCDs that are bridging the gap, but when you look at cost and availability, CRTs win out.

    2. Re:Notice the type of monitor he uses.... by StillAnonymous · · Score: 1

      Only by the same type of people that believe you MUST use a tube amp and vinyl to actually appreciate music.

      Older LCDs had problems with refresh rates and movement, but anything made in the last 2 years or so is just fine. Most displays have 8 or 12ms "refresh" rates. That translates to 125 and 83 FPS maximum display rate.

  33. Re:pro gamers.. Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    subscribe

  34. Competitive gamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For every guy like him that makes tons of money as a gamer there are plenty that waste their entire lives on games. I think Slashdot tends to have rather one sided articles that glorify gaming. I mean, I play games for fun, and I'm certainly no Jack Thompson, but gamers tend to just shrug off problems with gaming, mainly addiction as stupid crap and glorify the uses of gaming beyond proportion so in comparison their arguments sound just as stupid as Jack's.

  35. How to tell a hack from a good player? by EMIce · · Score: 1

    Is there a FPS game out there that has done a good job of keeping hacks out? I play Return to Castle Wolfenstein, based on the Quake 3 engine, and there are plenty of players who can see through walls, and others that seem to have a supernatural sense of aim. I hear even the punkbuster enabled retail version has been hacked.

    It seems trusted computing may help this some in the long term, but I find it hard to trust that I'm not wasting my time fighting an impossible opponent at times.

    1. Re:How to tell a hack from a good player? by evilneko · · Score: 1

      No Brainer Question: which would you rather have--Trusted Computing or cheaters in games? Yeah, thought so.

      --
      Slashdot - where to disagree, is to be a troll
  36. So Bike Racing isn't a sport? by woodsrunner · · Score: 1

    If you've ever seen the movie about the Tour de France, Stars and Water Carriers, you'd know they drink alot during the Tour. In fact, Tommy Simpson had a water bottle full of gin and tonic when he keeled over during the tour.

    Merckx, the greatest racer ever, smoked supposedly to get his lungs ready for the indoor track season.

    the term athlete, quite literally, is from the greek meaning "one who competes". I suppose you could go with the most narrow of definitions, and say that athletics is only track and field events... but really, anything can be a competition, and sport is supposedly a noble form of competition -- it is organized and to be played fairly. So really, you could have organized staple competitions where atheletes come together to enjoy the sport of competitively assembling documents... which would be about as exciting as watching some guy play with his joystick.

    If I want to watch a sport where the athletes can smoke and drink while participating, I'll stick to curling. Now that's a sport! There's nothing like listening to Women's Curling on tv... just a bunch of girls moaning and yelling "harder! harder!".

    Wierdly, that Johnathan Wendel looks alot like the American showboat in that Curling movie, Men with Brooms... and somehow, that sort of seems like the kind of sport competitive gaming would be like -- guys in flashy outfits, stobelights, smoke machines, loud disco and a lot of atitude duking it out at a big event in a mall. Yeah, I'll stick to watching other sports.

    1. Re:So Bike Racing isn't a sport? by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

      Having many cyclist and bike messenger friends I've heard far more than I ever wanted to about the Tour.

      There were seasonal races around here by the messengers that were ridden while they drank. Athletes no, silly drunken free entertainent yes.

  37. Re:He's not pro! - Mod Parent Funny by Supurcell · · Score: 1
    I found this very funny.
    How informative.
  38. Pure pwnage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.purepwnage.com/ I don't know if other people know about it, but this is pretty good stuff, and fairly relavent to the topic. It's a web distributed show (but they only put a new one out about once every 3 months) that follows the misadventures of "The Ownerer", a l33t gamer who pwns n00bs. It's worth a look, if nothing else for a good laugh.

    1. Re:Pure pwnage by TomHandy · · Score: 1

      I hate to comment on something without even having watched it, but this sounds like the gaming equivalent of a professional baseball player going around beating little leaguers. I'm sure it's funny, but how "l33t" can someone be if all they do is pwn n00bs?

    2. Re:Pure pwnage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In later episodes he takes on more experienced gamers, but yea.. you're pretty much right on the nose. But it's meant to make fun of ppl like that, so it's all good. :)

    3. Re:Pure pwnage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Difference being, if there's noone else at his level, his only choices are to compete against lesser gamers or not compete at all.

    4. Re:Pure pwnage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Teaches me for not reading. Ignore that :P

  39. I know a "pro-gamer" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I grew up best friends with a guy who is now a 'pro gamer.' He was always a very social and quite popular guy (moreso than I ever was). He was also a computer geek, and he would join us at LAN parties for many years. At one point, he simply decided he wanted to get better at gaming (after losing constantly to other friends of mine who would compete at the national level on occasion). And that's it. It isn't some inherent ability he had; he just practiced every night for hours and hours. After graduating from high school, he moved in with another friend and played games like Quake 3, UT, and so on, drinking 6-12 cans of his favorite soft drink every day. Oh, and he also dropped out of college after two weeks so he could focus on gaming.

    Now, more than five years after graduating from high school, he's becoming a Microsoft certified something-or-other and is having a tough time getting a job, but he's still hanging onto the dream.

  40. eSports might work, but change is needed first by typical · · Score: 4, Insightful

    eSports also suffers from the stigma of being crushingly boring for any non-gamer to watch for the most part.

    I agree that this is currently the case; however, I also think that much of that can be remedied.

    For example, take football. I don't play football. Unlike a lot of people, I don't follow football. This makes a typical football game on TV completely boring to me. To help deal with this, the sport's presentation has been highly tuned. There are rapid transitions, never focussing on one thing for too long. There are sportscasters that act excited, to help get you in the mood. There is a running stream of patter and anecdotes going on, interesting factoids, and an explanation of what's going on. I have no idea what, beyond the basic rules of football, someone should do. The sportscasters explain this.

    As a result, while watching football may not be my favorite thing in the world to do, it's certainly a viable form of entertainment if there's nothing else on.

    Another problem is that it takes people a while to appreciate the higher levels of play. You can't do this with the current video-gaming world, because each new game that comes out changes the rules. You have to have a basic game created, one that keeps being playable for many, many, many years. Sure, you can change the graphics and whatnot, but the rules cannot change aside from minor tweaks (such as those that are occasionally made to football). I don't see any reason that someone couldn't create such a game.

    Next, the rules have to be fairly simple. Football is already, IMHO, too complicated for someone to just drop into, and it is still much more straightforward than most of the video games out there. Chess is an immortal game because it's easy to learn. Age of Empires is just not going to work for televised viewing. Also, simple rules make it easier to ensure that your game has no "easy" loopholes or ways to win. Complex rules, sets of fixes upon fixes for loopholes in a game, mean that "cheap" ways to win probably exist.

    Next, the game has to be visually pretty (and probably improve each year). Note that visually pretty does not mean technically impressive. It just has to be attractive to watch. Perhaps really good art and design work is important. You have a large number of people watching who have to be entertained not by *playing* the game, but by merely watching it and appreciating the strategy -- they aren't experiencing the actual gameplay component.

    Next, I think that team-based play is probably important. In the world of lucrative professional sports, everything is team-based. Football, basketball, soccer, hockey, baseball...fans like being able to speak with knowledge about how well a team is doing, what the trades of various players mean, and so forth. Watching one random guy play doesn't provide that. Also, people can empathize with a team ("I live in New York, and so I want the New York Mets to win!"), but if there's only a single player, the side becomes a hard-to-empathize-with-player. If my *town* had a clan, I might be able to get interested in what they're doing.

    Next is the biggest one. Almost all games these days have a twitch component. In FPSes, reaction time is crucial. My first reaction was that this wouldn't work. I've changed my mind. You can have twitch games, but there has to be more-slowly-changing state (other than the score, which changes too slowly). That state has to favor one side or the other, and should be able to completely change within a minute, and at least sometimes stay in one position for several minutes. In most sports, this is handled by the field position of the ball or puck. Why is this important? It's too hard to watch a really good FPS player unless you're equally good and can anticipate to some degree what they're doing. There's too much rapid movement. A kill is in the blink of an eye -- that doesn't build tension. Capture the flag might be more reasonable -- I could see watching a capture the flag game bec

    --
    Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    1. Re:eSports might work, but change is needed first by LincolnQ · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ooh, ooh. You made me think of something.

      Mostly when you watch an FPS tournament, you are watching the same screen as one player or another (usually they mirror the monitors on a projector or something). I think this isn't really beneficial from the viewer's point of view -- most people don't know the map, so even if you look back and forth between the two screens, you're not going to get any sense of anticipation.

      However, maybe what the game needs is an overhead or strategic view. That way the viewers can see things that the players don't -- if someone is hiding behind a corner, we would be able to see that and build the anticipation. Then the scene can cut to a player in order to show the fight better.

      This would be even cooler for CTF -- if we can see both flags from above, and the locations of the players, that would be really cool.

      The problem, of course, is that games don't generally have an overhead observer mode built in. But maybe that would be worth adding -- it is probably not really very difficult to implement. Then you could have several people manning machines as "cameramen" and then the director can cut between views similar to a real sports game in order to give the best experience. (Maybe have cameras on the players' faces as well. That would be sweet.)

    2. Re:eSports might work, but change is needed first by Dirtside · · Score: 1
      I don't see any reason that someone couldn't create such a game.
      Well, the main reason is that FPS-type games usually cost a few million dollars to develop, and they're done so in the business model of selling copies for profit. Inventing a "standard" game that could be used for professional play would mean spending a few million dollars to develop the game, and then hoping you can set up some kind of professional league that actually ends up using that game and blah blah blah...

      There's not that much demand to watch electronic sports in the same way we watch meatspace sports. If there was, then we might have seen such a game arise by now.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    3. Re:eSports might work, but change is needed first by SpeckledJim · · Score: 1

      Both Wolfenstein and Enemy Territory have a spectator mode, where you can either follow the first person view of players on either team, or simply fly around the map to get whatever view from above you want.

    4. Re:eSports might work, but change is needed first by Joel+from+Sydney · · Score: 1

      Counter-Strike implemented this about four years ago. It's called spectator mode, and you have the option of taking the first person view from any particular player, a free-moving camera, or a top down "god's eye" view showing the map and relative position of each player. There was also stuff like picture-in-picture if you wanted to mix and match. This mode was activated every time you got killed.

      There was also the option of connecting to a server purely as a spectator, and then being able to re-broadcast the stream. This was only ever used in high-profile clan matches and tournaments. I haven't played CS in years so I don't know how it's developed since then, but it wasn't all that great. Sure it was OK while you were dead and waiting for the next round, but to actually connect to a server and watch a tournament final? No thanks, I'd rather be playing.

    5. Re:eSports might work, but change is needed first by PimpWilly · · Score: 1

      Check out Super Battle Opera, it's a Japanese Fighting game tournament run annually. They have about 28 team tournaments all around Japan, finding the best players in the country. Then they send out 4 international invitiations to Korea, USA, etc to find the best players they can from there. Then they all compete against eachother. It gets very, very cut throat. They sell a DVD of it every year, and it really does have top notch presentation. Its very exciting, the editing is done very nice, and the commentary (while in Japanese) really helps set the mood. And they do fill a stadium full of people to watch. Website to the event: http://www.tougeki.com/ There are some vids floating the net from old competitions, DVD rips from DVDs no longer in production, that should give you an idea of the market that is waiting to explode in America.

    6. Re:eSports might work, but change is needed first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Team Fortress and its deriviatives would be excellent for television. They have near-constant flag movement, usually set to timed return rather than touch return; they have identifiable positions, like a televised sport; they offer some spectacular and obvious skill-shots, like rampsliding in TFC, a soldier airshotting with the rocket launcher, and so on; and it's very heavily team-based. Announcers could provide strategic analysis just as they do in any sport.

      An example lineup from a 9v9 match:

      Team 1 Team 2
        Defense Defense
            Spiral Soldier Ramp HWGuy
            Ramp Soldier Top Spiral Soldier
            Basement Soldier Bottom Spiral Soldier
            Basement Engineer Elevator Soldier
            Flag Demoman Basement Engineer
        Offense Offense
            Destroyer (Medic) Destroyer (Medic)
            Destroyer (Demoman) Destroyer (Medic)
            Carrier (Medic) Carrier (Scout)
            Carrier (Scout) Sentry Killer (Spy)

    7. Re:eSports might work, but change is needed first by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Or maybe FPS's just don't make very good viewing? The arena is far too big, you can't see everything at once and you can't see what's going on.

      Every successful spectator sport allows you to see the whole pitch and all the players at once, there's no hiding or running round corridors.

      If there's going to be televised Quake, there may as well be televised laser-quest. I don't think that would be successful so why would the computer equivalent be?

      Most other games, like sports and racing games, have real life alternatives that people will watch instead.

  41. Advertising makes you money. by Mutiny32 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've played against him before, he co-founded a LAN party I helped organize in my city (Lee's Summit, MO). It's amazing how good he is at the games he plays. About the income, think about it. The first year he won the CPL, he won 50,000 dollars, a contract with the original Razor mouse company, and then went on to make money in other various tournaments around the world. Hell, he drives a Ford Focus around town that he won by being the best. Now he's got the (arguably) most gamer-oriented hardware company in the world (Abit) with his name on their premier line of products. It's not any wonder.

  42. What makes you think he can drink? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Have you ever seen serious deathmatch players? There is definatley no time for drinking, and while possibly you could smoke I'm pretty sure it would be a detriment from the smoke blurring your vision even slightly.

    You really do not understand how serious players are. It is definatley a sport.

    Personally, my own defintiion of sport is "someone is willing to pay to watch you play". Professional gaming fits that quite well.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:What makes you think he can drink? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever seen a serious chess player? They certainly don't drink nor smoke.

      If videogames are a sport, so is chess.

  43. lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coming from the guy who fake'nicks as 'irc.goatse.cx troll' on slashdot.

    Doesn't matter what your nick is, if inside, you're still a dirty little kid who likes to look at pr0n and play with goats. ;) Fakenick THAT beotch!

    -E

    1. Re:lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey, I resemble that remark. /me closes \EMP_Erotica.XXX.9.XXX.DVDRiP.XviD-DivXfacTory
      -OP

  44. Re:This is ridiculous by kms1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think by saying he is a pioneer he's referring to the fact that he's the first to make a steady living off of competitive gaming. Thresh was probably equally dominant, but there just wasn't the corporate interest in gaming that there is now.

    Also, there are plenty of people who dedicate huge amounts of time to these games, and very few are anywhere near his league. You can't discount his talent by writing it off as just time spent playing. That would be like claiming that Tiger Woods is just good at golf because he practices more than anyone. There is definitely an element of talent involved in playing these games.

  45. Cheating versus strategies by typical · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All the things you talk about (spawn camping, etc) are things that can be frusterating. Nobody wants to have frusterating things done to them.

    There are two classes of these kinds of things:

    1) Unfixed problems in the game. If there *really is* a single, simple strategy, using knowledge of the game's rules that lets you easily beat anyone using any other strategy, then the game is simply broken. On the other hand, very, very few people play games like this.

    2) Strategies that you are not willing to counter. Most people don't mind rocket-jumping in Quake -- it's part of the *game*, a strategy (and one that allows interesting tradeoffs made in real-time -- do I trade some health for an item or a potentially less-guarded route?) On the other hand, I never learned to rocket-jump -- as a result, games where one had to rocket-jump to counter rocket-jumping were frusterating to me. However, most players didn't mind learning to rocket jump. I just wasn't willing to learn how to counter in. I think that what you're thinking of are simple strategies that a newbie may not know how to counter -- and this lack of knowledge means that he will always lose to them. Nobody wants to *lose* all the time, so they call the game stupid and stop playing. People that really immerse themselves in heavy playing often *like* multiple layers of strategy.

    I do think that there are some games that do a better job of dealing with this than others. One of my favorite games from this standpoint is Soul Calibur II. A first-time player can sit down, whack buttons rapidly, and probably beat some not-first-time-but-still-newbie players some decent percentage of the time. Plus, their character will do neat things on the screen. Each time someone learns a new feat, the new feat doesn't make them unbeatable -- it just improves their play by some percent. Say you learn your character's throws really well, and can hurl people out of the ring based on where each throw sends them -- that may be a disadvantage to another player, but it isn't going to result in you winning every match. All game designers should keep this sort of thing in mind -- have a learning curve that stretches off into infinity (or something like it) so that the players are always learning something new to get better. On the other hand, make each degree of improvement only help the character sometimes -- it can work splendidly sometimes, but that new strategy can't be simply applied over and over.

    --
    Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
  46. Idol culture by typical · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've always wondered why the US, which has got to be king when it comes to successful ways of marketing personalities and products (Elvis, pop music groups, etc), doesn't have the degree of idol culture that Japan does, where being a celebrity is a *really* big deal.

    --
    Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    1. Re:Idol culture by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      That is very true. When I traveled to Japan once, the superstar idols have a status that is almost presidential. Here our superstars just collapse financially or physically after a few years. Very few actually last longer than a decade.

    2. Re:Idol culture by Trizor · · Score: 1

      But then again, there are some more off the beaten path Icons that stay there for years. They Might be Giants is a great example. The Johns are my Heros.

  47. The Last Starfighter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe he could get his story into a bood and movie deal too!
    The last starfighter is a fun movie too. :)

  48. Vs. conventional popular sports by patternjuggler · · Score: 1

    The key to making this a successful sport that supports lots of professionals is viewers- if you can't fill a stadium or arena or have millions watching on tv then there isn't going to be a lot of money in it. Watching someone sitting in front of a computer doesn't make for a good viewing experience (millions of shitty webcam photos to prove that, even when there is cleavage involved), and the games themselves aren't yet so visually stimulating that watching but not playing is all that worthwhile for extended periods of time.

    It will be sort of interesting to watch where this goes, but it's hard to imagine the benefit to the casual gamers from having more professional players out there. At best there will just be a pro-gaming world perhaps living in a separate bubble adjacent to the normal gaming market- there will be mods and maps made specifically for tournament play, or even entire games, where single player and internet play would be afterthoughts or not included at all. At worst the pro gaming would distort or damage the normal games market and the types of games that are released because everything would be oriented to making the big money off of pro gaming.

  49. Re:He's not pro! - Mod Parent Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is funny and informative. FPS style games have two types of players: noobie campers and uber-skilled, run and gun, hyper fraggers. A true FPS master knows how to move and aim (with a very high hit accuracy) at the same time. Campers hide in a corner and only aim (probably even with the keyboard) which is even funnier.

    Having never seen fatality play, nor even heard of him, we (the 3r33t) assume he sux h4rdc0r3.

  50. In todays news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In todays news, One of the worlds best gamers goes out and kills 40 people in a strip mall. He said he 'Thought he was in a game'. Naturally this outraged idiotic parents all over the world, And Jack Thompson has been assigned to lead up the investigation.

    Coming up next: Diane's Weight.

  51. Fatal1ty? More like pipe-tality! by illumina+us · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Some pro-gamer fat' is. During the Pain Killer world tour he hid in the rafters of a map for the remainder of a match because he was afraid of losing. Competitive gamer my ass.

    --
    -illumina+us "I put on my robe and wizard hat..."
    1. Re:Fatal1ty? More like pipe-tality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That IS competitive, I've seen that tactic tons of times in q3 1v1 tournaments.
      Say you have two players facing eachother in the finals, both have equal skill.
      If one of the players gets the upper hand initially, that player will often use that tactic to ensure that he stays in the lead, including hiding and running away from the player until the clock stops.
      The opponent might gain control of the map and it's resources (weapons, armor etc), but the other player will run away to avoid getting fragged.

  52. Remember Killcreek? by Winlin · · Score: 1

    At least this time the famous gamer won't be getting implants and posing for Playboy...or so I very very very sincerely hope.

  53. Videos anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please post some videos of him playing, I couldnt find anything in game, just some shaky camera pictures where you cant really appreciate any skill.

  54. Get over your envy some were just born with skills by TheNarrator · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I went to high school with some very talented professional atheletes. One guy was a pro-snowboarder and skater. The guy was good at every single sport he tried. At the local cafe/video game parlor he got the highest score anyone had ever seen on 720 and he didn't even play that often. I spent a lot of time at this particular cafe and had never seen anyone even get close to matching his performance.

    Another example, the wife of a friend of mine who's a native born Czech went target shooting and on her first try she had almost perfect aim.

    So the moral of the story is, stop being envious, look for your natural talents, and develop them.

  55. Interesting to note... by apederso · · Score: 3, Informative

    That if you go to this guys site http://www.fatal1ty.com/players/?players=f and click on his picture, and click on his record this is what you see for 2005:

    --------2005-------
    (1v1)
    2nd - CPL Turkey Qualifier for Spain (PainkilleR) - Instanbul, Turkey
    4th - CPL Turkey World Tour Stop (PainkilleR) - Instanbul, Turkey
    6th - CPL Spain World Tour Stop (PainkilleR) - Barcelona, Spain
    2nd - CPL Brazil World Tour Stop (PainkilleR) - Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    2nd - CPL Sweden World Tour Stop (PainkilleR) - Jonkoping, Sweden

    Certainly better than I would do, but he is losing to people. Good, but I don't know how much of the talk about 'the best in the world' isn't just marketing and PR. Most stories like this that you see on AP newswire and the like are there because of PR firms. My bet is that we are seeing him now becuase Abit wants to make sure they are getting thier moneys worth from their deals with him.

    1. Re:Interesting to note... by catch23 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't you say Andre Agassi of tennis to be one of the top players as well? Although he hasn't won a grand slam title in 2yrs, he has been in 2nd/3rd/4th etc place in many matches. The tennis world still agrees that he's one of the top players yet he isn't always in first place. Another good example would be Nicky Hayden of the MotoGP world. He's been in Valentino Rossi's shadow forever and thus he's only been able to reach 2nd place at most races, and yet the motorcycle racing community still agrees that he is one of the top in his class. I think if you're maintaining top positions during any match, that you should be considered one of the top players regardless if you've ever actually won a match before.

  56. teh_pwnerer wil 0wn u! by SpamSlapper · · Score: 1

    But he's nothing compared to teh_pwnerer ;-)

    Kind of reminds me of this guy. If you are into gaming, those videos are classic!

    1. Re:teh_pwnerer wil 0wn u! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I posted about this an hour and a half before this guy about purepwnage.com and he gets on the front page, while my post dies in "X replies beneath your current threshold" hell? It's anonymous coward discrimination! *pickets*

  57. Re:He's not pro! - Mod Parent Funny by Daath · · Score: 2, Informative

    You obviously aren't that into gaming then ;P Fatal1ty is a genuinely scary opponent, on his tours, you can usually challenge him to a 1-on-1 in some fast FPS, such as UT, Q3, Painkiller or the like. Lots of people do challenge him. I haven't heard of someone winning over him yet. A few ones actually frag (kill) him, but they're few ;)

    He's been to Denmark, and played at the Boomtown cafe, where you could also challenge him, and win some stuff (his Abit motherboard etc).

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic, is insufficiently advanced.
  58. Daryl Musashi by neuro.slug · · Score: 1

    Daryl Musashi could kick his ass! Man, did you see him r0x0r in that X-Files episode? His strategies:

    • He stares straight forward and tries not to blink.
    • He shoots straight forward and attempts to hold back any facial expressions.
    • He doesn't aim, just holds his guns in a "really cool" way and holds the triggers down.
  59. Body Parts Utilized by a Professional Gamer... by PixelScuba · · Score: 1
  60. Videos? by antdude · · Score: 1

    Are there video clips of this? I am sure they exist.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  61. For RTS, try looking up the 4K or SK players by LtDrebin · · Score: 1

    I'm a big FPS fan, at one time I was extremely good at a little gem called Team Fortress Classic. I have played games such as Quake and Unreal Tournament, and so I can respect players who are skilled in those games. I have been a HUGE fan of Warcraft III. Mr. Wendel isn't the only prodigy in gaming. There are a number of players in Warcraft who are exceptionally good and are very well-off. Most of them are either Asian or European, where progaming is much much bigger than it is here. As much as I love playing games, I can only play for about 1 hour at a time before my eyes get kind off weird... It's very difficult to remain focused on a game, whatever type it is, for hours on end EVERY single day.

  62. Video Link by zhenga · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think this is the link to the video:

    http://files.cyberfight.ru/21219/FINAL_fatal1ty_vs _daler_map1-2.zip

    But the video is a .nsv (VP6), my PowerBook with mplayer and VLC can't play this.. :(

    1. Re:Video Link by camg188 · · Score: 1

      .nsv is a Winamp3 video format.

  63. Let me counter those "arguments" by ickeicke · · Score: 1

    "lining the exits of the spawn with mines in enemy territory - no way around that but wait for a team player to step on them and get killed."
    Engineers can defuse mines.

    "Hiding in places where the player has to walk past but turn around to see you with a rocket launcher"
    Either turn around quickly and frag him first or shoot at the ground near the enemy with a splash-damage weapon.

    "Being shot with the missile launcher as you spawn in doom3 (no delay before you can be damaged)"
    Being spawnkilled is not a skill, but spawnkilling can be, in 1on1 games in Quake or Unreal Tournament. It requires knowledge of spawn areas and fast movement and reflexes to cover as many possible spawnplaces as possible.

    "Camping in a single convenient location to frag"
    If you are being fragged from the same location over and over again, you are doing something really wrong. Just try to approach the enemy form another angle.

    "Throwing non stop granades while re-supplying yourself with more (being a field ops)"
    You cannot do both at the same time. You have to stop at a certain point, skilled players will wait for that and frag you. That, or the attackee will just take another route.

    "Using anti tank weapons while hiding in a different place each time to blow up an enemy engineer from the back"
    What is wrong with that?

    "haha, and lets not forget superweapons and suicides."
    Superweapons are often disabled, and in good maps (maps suitable for competitive play), are situated in risky locations. That way, people have fair chances against superweapons.
    And suicides are (almost?) always punished in game scoring systems.

    "oh and during temporary invincibility and super damage like the berserk mode, etc.. There are so many!"
    Same as "superweapons": often disabled, and in good maps (maps suitable for competitive play), are situated in risky locations.
    Further more; good players will run around maps picking up these special items as soon as they spawn, which requires timing and great skill, especially when your opponent tries to do the same.
    And of course one can defend himself from players with invincibility by running away.

    Further more, you seem only to have based your opinions around Tribes and Enemy Territory, games which are played as mayor competitive games for a reason. Take a look at some skilled 1on1 matches of Painkiller, Quake 3 or Unreal Tournament 2004, and you will come to different conclusions.

    P.S. Vo0 is DUTCH (Sander Kaasjager), his last name translated to english means Cheese Hunter for crying out loud.

    --
    Firehed - Unfortunately, thanks to medical breakthroughs, common sense is not as common as it once was.
    1. Re:Let me counter those "arguments" by Hackeron · · Score: 1

      "Engineers can defuse mines."
      You camp on the bridge above naturally and kill the engineers while they are defusing.

      "Either turn around quickly and frag him first or shoot at the ground near the enemy with a splash-damage weapon."
      There are plenty of places where you can be quite far away from being damageable until being seen.

      "Being spawnkilled is not a skill, but spawnkilling can be, in 1on1 games in Quake or Unreal Tournament. It requires knowledge of spawn areas and fast movement and reflexes to cover as many possible spawnplaces as possible."
      Any noob knows where the spawn is after 5 minutes of playing - just crouch and hold the fire on the spawn -- all you need is to remember enemy spawns at 10 and 30 seconds past each minute, no biggie.

      "If you are being fragged from the same location over and over again, you are doing something really wrong. Just try to approach the enemy form another angle."
      There are always convenient locations that give you a major advantage - and you can always hear if person tries to approach from a different angle, and move accordingly.

      "You cannot do both at the same time. You have to stop at a certain point, skilled players will wait for that and frag you. That, or the attackee will just take another route."
      Actually, its not so hard, you can get a granade to explode every second or so, maybe its not fatal for a skillful player but very damaging, then you just need a couple of non accurate shots to kill - you can also get a buddy to resupply you and there is no other angle when done on both spawn locations which is common.

      "What is wrong with that?"
      Nothing, but it requires 0 skill, just alternate between several crates and blow up the engineer the second he pops into view. I shown players you never played 3d shooters in their life how to get most kills in the game this way.

      "Superweapons are often disabled, and in good maps (maps suitable for competitive play), are situated in risky locations. That way, people have fair chances against superweapons.
      And suicides are (almost?) always punished in game scoring systems."
      Almost never actually. If you blow yourself up, sure, if you shoot the ground right next to you and run /kill as a binded key, you dont lose a point - risky location or not :)

      "Same as "superweapons": often disabled, and in good maps (maps suitable for competitive play), are situated in risky locations.
      Further more; good players will run around maps picking up these special items as soon as they spawn, which requires timing and great skill, especially when your opponent tries to do the same.
      And of course one can defend himself from players with invincibility by running away."
      As long as you get the first kill, which is in many cases luck, you're set with a major disadvantage for the rest of the match.

      "Further more, you seem only to have based your opinions around Tribes and Enemy Territory, games which are played as mayor competitive games for a reason. Take a look at some skilled 1on1 matches of Painkiller, Quake 3 or Unreal Tournament 2004, and you will come to different conclusions."
      I like Tribes and Enemy Territory because they require some skill and tactic and there are many servers that have really skillful players that arent lame with panzers disables and lives limited. Then say you have 5 lives for 30 minutes of gameplay - try getting 120 frags then! :) - With 5 lives no one runs out and expects to win skillfuly as you'll be met by fire from 4 directions of frightened people advancing slowly together to increase their chances - no way in hell are you going to win.

      I found unreal and quake3 just non stop jumping sounds (god how annoying) and very fast paced, non stop action where even the greatest players get killed often, just not as often as other players. In enemy territory I can play a 30 minute game and have a 20 kill spree without getting killed a single time - All I'm saying is there are always various unavoidable tricks how you can get a high frag rate without any skill.

    2. Re:Let me counter those "arguments" by ickeicke · · Score: 1

      "All I'm saying is there are always various unavoidable tricks how you can get a high frag rate without any skill."

      If it is so easy, why don't you compete in a pro tournament and win loads of cash :) ?

      --
      Firehed - Unfortunately, thanks to medical breakthroughs, common sense is not as common as it once was.
    3. Re:Let me counter those "arguments" by Hackeron · · Score: 1

      Its easy to win, not easy to "make it" so to speak. Its like singing - Britney Spears can sing... bearly - I heard people singing on the bus better than her, just like I've seen really good players out there.

      All I can say is great on him and congrats for living the dream, but thats beside the point. Why I dont persue the "dream" is mostly because I dont want the popularity, I'm a bit anti social, but you can tell ;)

  64. It's easy! by ickeicke · · Score: 1

    It's easy; All you have to do is try to die and fail.

    --
    Firehed - Unfortunately, thanks to medical breakthroughs, common sense is not as common as it once was.
  65. Pulmonary Embolism... by kahula · · Score: 1

    I'm sure that the world of professional gaming has its perks, but is DVT one of them? I give him three years.

  66. From his web page: by deadlocked · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Johnathan "Fatal1ty" Wendel started professional gaming in 1999 by entering the CPL (Cyberathlete Professional League) tournament in Dallas and won $4,000 for placing third. Emerging as one of the top players in the United States, he then flew to Sweden where he competed in a tournament against the top 12 players in the world. By winning 18 straight games and losing none he took first place, becoming the number one ranked Quake III player in the world. Two months later he followed that success in Dallas by successfully defending his title as the world's best Quake III player and winning the $40,000 grand prize.

    Since then Fatal1ty has traveled the globe to compete against the best in the world, winning prizes and acclaim, including the first DOOM 3 Inaugural Deathmatch Championship at QuakeCon 2004 for a $25,000 grand prize. He presently reigns as the only 3 time CPL Champion of the Year, winning each, annual title in a different game, a feat never before accomplished.

    Now, products of the highest quality are being introduced under the Fatal1ty brand. The same dedication that drives Fatal1ty to be the world's best gamer is being translated to offer innovative products intended to enhance the gaming lifestyle and experience. At the same time, Fatal1ty is dedicated to expanding the popularity and opportunities for cyber athletes.
    -------------

    It is possible to view recordings of matches in most FPS games today. Websites like cyberfight.org and esreality.com has quite an archive.
    However, most of these replays requires the respective game and any additional mods and maps installed in order to view the replay, in order to save size. I would recommend watching a video compilation. own-age.com is a site with many videos in the most popular games, and this is the link to the top downloaded video. it features mostly highlights in Quake 3. http://own-age.com/vids/video.aspx?id=660

    If you arent familiar with Quake3, it will be very hard to spot anything but fancy moves and aim when you're spectating "pro" players, but keep in mind that there is a high level of tactics involved. Pay attention to item timing.
    I would recommend watching this video as a starter. It requires Quake3 with newest pointrelease and the mod "OSP". It is played on the custom map ztn3tourney1, so you will have to get that too. It features two swedish top players at ESWC2005.
    It is recommended to use "DemoShowCreator" (DSC) or similar to view the replay as it may be tricky doing it manually if you havent done it before. Here are some step by step instructions http://esreality.com/?a=longpost&id=35018&page=3

  67. same thing might be said about golf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or football or baseball. I mean, who would have thought anybody would even care about that jock shit. Like I really want to watch a hardees add circle a track for hours or watch several hours of chevy commercials punctuated by some retarded announcer that gets excited over anything.
    Face it, regular sports are stupid too - they don't dominate the TV because of demand the demand comes from having it stuffed down our throats by the networks. Ppl need to be told what they want to see. Put quake tournaments on TV everyday and everyone will rationalize buying quake shirts, goinf to quake bars, picking up quake bitches, etc.
    Oh, and p.s - you can break a fucking 2x4 over my my torso (is that what 'abs' are, well whatever), and with a bit of practice I can kick all kinds of ass at whatever anybody wants to compete at. Traditional sports fans are mostly pussies.

  68. wrong context by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

    He's not speaking about being a dominant player. Thresh, as you said, preceeded him by several years. This kid realizes he can't be on top forever, just as Thresh isn't the dominant force anymore. So he's trying to establish himself as a brand while he's at the top of his game, and that's how he's a pioneer. He's got a mouse and mousepads named after him, and is trying to branch out from there.

  69. The true question... by ZMorek · · Score: 1

    ...is whether or not he leads a fulfilling life. I guess for him it works, and for a lot of /.ers it would be a wetdream come true. But something about that just doesn't appeal to me. Just my $0.02

    --
    -ZMorek
  70. gaming for money by breadboy21 · · Score: 1

    There are better games around. http://tinyurl.com/7hfl9

  71. Yes but... by ConceptDog · · Score: 1

    ...is he happy?

    He is? Awww F**K!

  72. Re:He's not pro! - Mod Parent Funny by Agrippa · · Score: 1

    I saw him playing people at this year's E3. He was ok, but I was bored watching him. It was clear some of the people he was playing had no talent with the games and he'd just annhilate them like 31-0 in a 2 minutes match. It would of been more fun if he was handicapped in some way, like 50% health or only a few weapons. Blowing the bejesus out of n00bs playing on unfamiliar hardware was hardly awe-inspiring.

    Of course maybe that's fun for some people to watch. I never got into 1v1 very much, I always thought teamwork execution was so much more exciting and took much more skill than running around a small map killing someone repeatedly before they could grab a weapon.

    .agrippa.

  73. Another Professional gamer: Grrrr (StarCraft) by securitas · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Guillaume Patry is another professional gamer who was a StarCraft champ in South Korea. We did an interview with him last year and his view was particularly interesting as someone who was nearing the end of his gaming career.

    The thing that I find interesting is that like Wendel/Fatal1ty, Patry/Grrrr was also an athlete before he got into gaming. In Patry's case, he was a competitive skiier.

  74. no sex life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "fatal1ty (914374) is all alone in the world." http://slashdot.org/~fatal1ty/friends LOL yep he's got no sex life.

  75. Re:He's not pro! - Mod Parent Funny by Cochonou · · Score: 1

    never got into 1v1 very much, I always thought teamwork execution was so much more exciting and took much more skill than running around a small map killing someone repeatedly before they could grab a weapon.

    As far as I know, the whole point of Team Deathmatch is weapon and spawn point control. Deny the other team the access to key weapons, to the quad damage (in Quake-based games), etc...
    So actually, Team Deathmatch is very much like Team Camping. But it does require a lot of skill and a great amount of team coordination.

  76. Re:He's not pro! - Mod Parent Funny by Cochonou · · Score: 1

    The reply might not had been very informative, but it had the effect intended : Parent went from 0 (Troll) to (+5 Funny).

  77. Childish Pastime? by Riktov · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but I do think of videogames as a childish pastime. Along with football, baseball, basketball, auto racing, ice hockey, poker, billiards...

  78. One of the hottest multi-player video game players by Sylven_1969 · · Score: 1

    Asia Carrera http://www.asiacarrera.com/ is easily one of the hottest, if not one of the best Unreal Players around :) *howls* *pants* *drools* The Hoosierbilly!

    --
    Jay Dale "If you're not living on the edge then you're taking up too much space!"
  79. Re:One of the hottest multi-player video game play by Sylven_1969 · · Score: 1

    Here is a link directly to an interview with Asia about Unreal Tournament and online playing. http://www.asiacarrera.com/me2/xsreality/

    --
    Jay Dale "If you're not living on the edge then you're taking up too much space!"
  80. Childish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you deign to think of video games as simply a childish pastime, consider this professional game player.

    He calls himself 'Fatal1ty'? Yup, gamers are childish.

  81. Info on Thresh by Astfgl · · Score: 1

    Here's some more info on Thresh (Dennis Fong):
    http://www.links.net/vita/gx/dennis/

    I watched his Q2 demos back in the day, and they were friggin' unbelievable.

    --
    "I love deadlines - I love the whooshing noise they make as they go by..." -Douglas Adams
  82. On ten years? Easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He'll be a Tech support specialist with the obligatory phone-headset by day.

    By night, a stone-cold highly sk1ll3d crack space commando who rules the deathmatch wastelands...

  83. entertainment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i read thru most of the comments left about gaming not being a sport... i dont think it was ever meant to be a sport in the original terms.. sports to me include football, soccer, etc.. where you get up and move around... baseball as more of a past-time and finally, gaming...

    well gaming is something that people do in their spare time... pro gaming is what someone does when they have good skills, but cant get laid and dont have a wife around...

    now im not going to bash fatal1ty here.. im a 21 year old gamer who loves FPS games... unreal, painkiller, CoD, etc... but you have to give this guy SOME credit, if only for the sake of the FACT that he can frag the hell outta ya before you even get out of your spawn point...

    gaming is for everyone, pro-gaming is for a select few and for the rest of us to watch in awe and hope we can do that someday!!!

  84. Babe Magnet by RebrandSoftware · · Score: 1

    The show "Real Life: I'm a gamer" featured the player mentioned in the article.

    The last scene was him surrounded by swooning women.

    I think you're all just jealous because he's been chatting online with babes all day. Sweet.

  85. humm by Venim · · Score: 1

    its ironic that about 20 days ago i told a person who was a staff member on a irc network i've since left that there are people playing games competitively that make six figure salaries. he kicked me from #staff, this guy was suppost to be mature... seemed more fundamentalist than anything

  86. Re:He's not pro! - Mod Parent Funny by Prophet+of+Nixon · · Score: 1

    That's why I only like playing Deathmatch on Soldier of Fortune 2. There are health and ammo drops that jerks could camp, but I don't care since I spawn with my weapons of choice and can destroy the jerks with ease. Since I usually carry an M60, I don't even care about the ammo drops too much. Once you take away the 'skill' of ensuring lack of weapon balance, things change quite a bit.

    Granted SoF2 can also be played in a 'pick up' mode, but the handguns are quite lethal anyway, so its a bit more fair than the usual Quake 3, etc.

    In any case, the point of team deathmatch is not weapon and spawn point control, its coordination as a group, flushing out and killing targets without risking your team, and skill. Only a poorly designed game lets you play by camping control points (unless you're purposefully playing a domination style game, as in UT, but in those cases the control points are not the points the enemy needs just to fight fairly). This applies to games like Quake 3 as well (I played tons of Quake 3 before I got into SoF2), you can kill a surprising number of otherwise decent players with the gauntlet if you have good team members distracting and wounding them with fire from another direction.

    One of my favorite non-team multiplayer games was in SoF1, a game mode where everyone spawned with the same random gun, and as soon as someone got a kill, everyone's gun would change to something else. It was hectic, and interesting since you could have an advantage with your current gun, but then the weapons would change and the tables would turn. Can't remember what that was called though.