Slashdot Mirror


TiVo Plans RFID-Aware PVR

Dotnaught writes "New Scientist has spotted a patent application from TiVo that suggests the company is "working on a PVR that will recognise one of several individual users, and respond to their personal preferences." The patent application describes the invention as "a multimedia mobile personalization system provides a remote control that detects a user's electronic tag, e.g. an RFID tag." It also promises personalized viewing at a variety of locations, detailing how TiVo might forward stored shows from home to a TV in a hotel room, for example. It remains to be seen whether hotels will be eager to help TiVo undermine their pay-per-view video revenue."

114 comments

  1. I want an RFID tag by LilGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Embed me please! I want never again to have to manually pay for anything, prove my identity, or set my TiVo to my preferences. Thanks.

    --

    You're nothing; like me.
    1. Re:I want an RFID tag by kfg · · Score: 1, Funny

      Embed me please!

      I'm flattered, but you're not my type.

      KFG

    2. Re:I want an RFID tag by LilGuy · · Score: 1

      Just because your pins are smaller than my sockets doesn't mean we can't try to make it work...

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
    3. Re:I want an RFID tag by nizo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually a bracelet or necklace with an RFID tag to wear around the house would be nice. Maybe a few for visitors too. Or even better I could embed one in my "lazy pants" (i.e. house-only sweat pants) and one into my SO's engagement ring. Having my machine boot into linux when it detects my lazy pants nearby and start beeping when my SO's engagement ring is approaching would be nice too :-)

    4. Re:I want an RFID tag by LilGuy · · Score: 1

      I imagine our kids will never get caught "looking" at porn like we once did - being walked in on. With these RFID tags, they'll know exactly where we're at in the house at all times with their nifty little RFID tracking devices and buzzers.

      Lucky little stiffs.

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
    5. Re:I want an RFID tag by kfg · · Score: 1

      Right, whatever you say, "LilGuy."

      KFG

    6. Re:I want an RFID tag by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Do you want it implanted at your forehead or at your right hand?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    7. Re:I want an RFID tag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should BE RFID
      You should BE VERY RFID

      You'd think this shameless plugging would pay off, but for some reason it doesn't. :)

    8. Re:I want an RFID tag by m_vand · · Score: 1

      I think that RFID wouldn't have the range you're looking for. Most seem to have a range of less than 30 cm.
      I'd love to see something that was *cheap* and could tell I was within 20 feet.

    9. Re:I want an RFID tag by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually a bracelet or necklace with an RFID tag to wear around the house would be nice.

      It'd be creepy, actually - Bill Gates did something like this with his house, where you get an ID tag that the house can track and customize music and whatnot. What it did was serve to underscore that you were being tracked.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    10. Re:I want an RFID tag by dascandy · · Score: 1

      > Embed me please! I want never again to have to manually pay for anything

      When you do, please get in line at the cash register behind me. Saves me money :-)

    11. Re:I want an RFID tag by JasonBee · · Score: 1

      Just for that we're going to give you the RFID 2000.

      Link here: RFID 2000

    12. Re:I want an RFID tag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I want to read others tags, then have a programmable tag that can broadcast my choice of code.

      Another fun toy would be the a FakeAP type system or a jammer.

    13. Re:I want an RFID tag by Captain_Chaos · · Score: 1

      Embed me please! I want never again to have to manually pay for anything, prove my identity, or set my TiVo to my preferences. Thanks.

      Baja Beach Club Barcelona
    14. Re:I want an RFID tag by Secret+Agent+X23 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well, put a picture of Geena Davis on it and I might buy one.

  2. undermine their pay-per-view video revenue? by Vile+Slime · · Score: 0

    > It remains to be seen whether hotels will be eager to help TiVo undermine their pay-per-view video revenue

    I hardly think it would undermine PPV revenue. It would probably enhance it since those that want to see "Debbie Does Whatever" would probably need to do a lot less searching to get to what they want....

    --
    ---- Go ahead, mod me down, I'll just post it again and you lose your mod points.
    1. Re:undermine their pay-per-view video revenue? by Eccles · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Indeed. The hotels will simply provide a high-speed pipe for $4.95/hour or something like that. Really, though, the TiVo itself is unnecessary. The provider in this case needn't be the user's home machine (or whatever), but instead would be the networks themselves, who would provide the shows for a fee.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    2. Re:undermine their pay-per-view video revenue? by Golias · · Score: 1

      Is hotel PPV really that much of a revenue stream? Most hotels already offer free cable TV, and the ritzier ones sometimes even include the premium channels in that package. The service costs almost as much as going out to the theater to watch a movie, so I can't imagine a high percentage of guests actually use the service.

      I see it as kind of like the hotel laundry pick-up service. People like to know it's there if they really want it, but generally don't want to pay for it if they don't need to.

      Then again, maybe hotel pr0n is way better than the stuff out on the Internets, and I'm missing out on something really spectacular by not buying it when I travel. Somehow I doubt it.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    3. Re:undermine their pay-per-view video revenue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Actually, they will probably count the number of RFID chips (viewers) in the room and charge you $4.95 a head. Happy viewing.

    4. Re:undermine their pay-per-view video revenue? by Fx.Dr · · Score: 1

      You see, this is just a big lead-up to the long awaited RFID-aware vibrating beds.

    5. Re:undermine their pay-per-view video revenue? by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1
      Then again, maybe hotel pr0n is way better than the stuff out on the Internets, and I'm missing out on something really spectacular by not buying it when I travel. Somehow I doubt it.

      It's not better quality, but it's certainly a big revenue stream. I can tell you for sure that at most hotels during the evening there are always a handful of guests who are paying for adult movies. (I have several friends who work at hotels and I know a little way to easily hack hotel entertainment systems to see what other people are buying).

    6. Re:undermine their pay-per-view video revenue? by sterno · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Besides if they can charge you that same $10 to play what's on your Tivo at home, I rather doubt they'd complain.

      --
      This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    7. Re:undermine their pay-per-view video revenue? by smoker2 · · Score: 1
      if they can charge you that same $10 to play what's on your Tivo at home
      And that's where the Orwellian nightmare continues.

      What's stopping them from preventing the media being played when the rfid tag doesn't match. Does the whole family need to subscribe in order to watch a movie at home ?

      I really can't see me handing control over what I watch to a glorified vcr. I mean, think of the children, really.

    8. Re:undermine their pay-per-view video revenue? by sterno · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that their primary interest is in making it as convenient as possible for you to watch what you want. This likely means:

      1) They will not prevent you from watching something if there's an RFID mismatch unless you specifically configure it that way (i.e. blocking your child from watching some blood bath of a movie)

      2) They will not make you purchase multiple seats to watch a video because it'd raise the price and annoy you. Better to just charge an average cost based on how many people are likely to watch it at any given time. Then if one person watches it or 6 people watch it, it's irrelevant to them.

      The other thing to keep in mind from the orwellian aspect is that it doesn't behoove them to give out any information about your specific viewing habits to somebody else. Their is value in your information and if they sold it, you'd get cranky, and they'd lose control of it. It's better for them to provide aggregate data or anonymous personal information.

      --
      This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    9. Re:undermine their pay-per-view video revenue? by dosquatch · · Score: 1

      Isn't this called "on demand", and doesn't it already exist?

      --
      "Hey, the third matrix movie would have been good except for the plot,story, and acting." --AC
    10. Re:undermine their pay-per-view video revenue? by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Hotel on-demand, from my limited experience, has been a smallish selection of on-demand movies, presumably streamed off some in-house server. This new model makes the hotel just a provider of a broadband pipe, with outside companies providing the actual video.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    11. Re:undermine their pay-per-view video revenue? by Golias · · Score: 1

      A handful? So, in a small-ish hotel with 50 rooms, let's say 10 are watching PPV movies.

      At $4.99* that works out to fifty bucks. The company providing the service probably takes most of that, let's say 80%.

      [sarcasm] Wow, ten extra dollars a night. I can see how they would fight tooth an nail, blatantly and openly screwing over their own customers if need be, in order to protect that precious revenue stream! [/sarcasm]

      *Disclaimer: I have no idea if PPV shows are $4.99. I travel with an iBook, and usually hack it in to the hotel TV to watch my own movies. If they cost more or less, adjust the math accordingly, but it still doesn't change my point much. I simply find it hard to believe that the hotel PPV industry makes enough for the individual hotels for them to actually give a shit about it at all, beyond the fact that some of their guests want to have access to it.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    12. Re:undermine their pay-per-view video revenue? by bit01 · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that their primary interest is in making it as convenient as possible for you to watch what you want.

      No, their primary interest is in maximizing their revenue stream.

      To that end they will make the licensing as complicated and as confusing as possible so that people will make errors and pay extra to keep things simple. Exactly as happens with mobile phones now.

      It's all about market manipulation; when you've got the technical means to manipulate your customer, i.e. to manipulate the free market, and the law can't keep up, unethical businesses go for it. Just look at pretty much any intellectual property based business today.

      ---

      DRM - Democracy Restriction & Manipulation

  3. Business case by gingerTabs · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Surely this will be an additional revenue stream for hotels as they can charge the same as existing PPV to allow hotel TiVO access to external content which is more appealing to the hotel guest?

    1. Re:Business case by mandreko · · Score: 2, Funny

      but will this work if i go to the hotel with my rfid card wrapped in foil, and handing foil to everyone else?

    2. Re:Business case by sdhankin · · Score: 1

      Richard? Is that you?

    3. Re:Business case by kawika · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's not about hotels, it's about houses. (Geez, sounds like Monopoly here.)

      TiVo has access to a lot of user preferences information. Companies like Nielsen and Arbitron have made large businesses out of tracking consumer behavior, but TiVo's use of technology would make it much more accurate.

      The problem is, the content providers only want accuracy if it benefits them. The old "journal" system for radio and TV habits reflected what the user liked but not what they necessarily watched. There was quite an uproar when Nielsen switched to an electronic system, precisely because it indicated a drop in viewership.

  4. Oh noes, teh RFID!11!!one by MaestroSartori · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can't wait to hear someone rant about how this use of RFID tags will destroy my privacy, and somehow overnight change the world into some Orwellian police state where we're all branded with the RFID tag of the beast on our foreheads...

    Anyone? :)

    1. Re:Oh noes, teh RFID!11!!one by Entropy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You, sir (or ma'am), will be the first against the wall when the revolution comes..

      --
      The sea changes color, but the sea does not change.
    2. Re:Oh noes, teh RFID!11!!one by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Every member of a family could have a personal radio frequency tag - embedded in clothing or a piece of jewellery, for example

      Or sub-dermal and required by law.
      What? They assure us that the laws requiring sub-dermal RFID for animals won't be extended to humans? Just like they assured us that income tax would only be a short term deal to pay for the war effort? Why shouldn't we believe them this time?

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    3. Re:Oh noes, teh RFID!11!!one by pilgrim23 · · Score: 2, Funny

      The previous poster (FF123-AA-000000-1412.3) has been removed to a secure location for his own well being. There is absolutley no problem with RFID and no danger at all of this technology being used in a manner harmful or dangerous to your freedoms..

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    4. Re:Oh noes, teh RFID!11!!one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have so many paranoid Christians in this country that think that RFID is the mark of the beast. You would have a easier time making Islam the state religion than having people submitting to implanted tags.

    5. Re:Oh noes, teh RFID!11!!one by Anonymous+Monkey · · Score: 1

      They work for the Marketing Division of the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation?

      --
      We are the Borg...
    6. Re:Oh noes, teh RFID!11!!one by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1

      And for that, I'm thankful for those paranoid Christians. Better than the rest of the sheep in this damn place.

      --
      I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
    7. Re:Oh noes, teh RFID!11!!one by DrSkwid · · Score: 1
      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    8. Re:Oh noes, teh RFID!11!!one by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1
      And for that, I'm thankful for those paranoid Christians.

      Yeah, right up to the point where some demagogue convinces them to give up their rights "for Christ". Sheep are sheep, no matter what their color.

    9. Re:Oh noes, teh RFID!11!!one by Golias · · Score: 1

      Yeah, right up to the point where some demagogue convinces them to give up their rights "for Christ". Sheep are sheep, no matter what their color.

      I know enough Fundamentalists to know that this is not true. Fundamentalist Christianity is far more robust against that sort of thing that you would think.

      Fundamentalist Christians have the Bible, and a very strong oral tradition of how it is to be interpreted. Any preacher who strays from that rather narrow interpretation in order to attempt to provoke some alternative way of thinking is quickly defined by such people as outside the fold. Changing the viewpoint of Fundamentalists something that takes not years, but generations.

      For example, many fundamentalists leaders are currently trying to push this "Intelligent Design" concept as a way to make creationism more palatable in academic circles. The think about "ID" that you don't often hear is that the actual creationists out there are having none of it. As far as they are concerned, this "middle ground" notion that God set events in motion which looked a bit like evolution is pure heresy. God made man of clay, and woman of man, and it only took him six days to make light, darkness, the world, and everything on it. Billions of years? Humbug!

      The reason it takes a long time to shift fundamentalist views is because the current generation is simply not going to change their minds, and the following generation is probably only prepared to deviate slightly from the previous.

      And much this current crop is convinced that any "mutilation" of your body (short of maybe women, and only women, who choose to pierce their ears) is an ungodly thing to do. Getting a tattoo is a small step from outright devil-worship in their view.

      Furthermore, decades of end-times dogma preachers have been telling them that anything they put on their bodies which even remotely resembles a numeric concept is likely to be The Mark of the Beast, which will keep them out of Heaven, there is pretty much zero chance these folks will ever even favor allowing people to voluntarily use such a technology, let alone accept the mandatory marking of people.

      Nothing anybody says is likely to change their minds on the subject. Anybody who tries will simply be rejected as a false teacher, and therefore Part Of The Problem.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    10. Re:Oh noes, teh RFID!11!!one by Belgand · · Score: 1

      Though I'm far from a fundamentalist (i.e. a politically active atheist) I view piercings and tatoos as a form of bodily mutilation... even including women with a single ear piercing. It's not quite as disgusting as that might seem, but it's still a huge turn-off (non-sexually as well) to me. Doesn't mean people shouldn't be allowed to get as many piercings and tattoos as they want, but I'll never be a fan of them.

      In fact, that's part of the difference. Most fundamentalists would simply be written off as crazy nut-jobs if they were willing to just keep their opinions personal and not interfere with others, but they feel the intense need to make everyone live the way they want them to... to the detriment of us all.

  5. Who Cares by abricko · · Score: 2, Informative

    Who cares about that technology... They can't even get a HD DVR out!

    1. Re:Who Cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The high definition DirecTiVo has been out for at least a year.

    2. Re:Who Cares by marksven · · Score: 1

      It looks like Tivo will finally offer a dual-tuner HD box next year.

      http://www.tivoblog.com/archives/2005/11/21/tivo-r econfirms-plans-for-an-hdtv-tivo/

    3. Re:Who Cares by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      They're waiting until CableCard 2.0 is finalized.

    4. Re:Who Cares by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "They're waiting until CableCard 2.0 is finalized."

      That's the official excuse. However, I don't think CableCard 2.0 will change its physical size any (or card slot reader either) so I don't see what the true holdup is. Plenty of LCD and plasma screens are shipping with DCR support this entire year and thus only supports CableCard 1.0 currently. We don't see any of those manufacturers holding out until 2.0 hits, if ever.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  6. RFID + DRM by lenhap · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Anyone else think of what would happen if this became a standard feature. Sure it may be nice to not have to touch a single button, but as soon as Hollywood can have a show DRM'd to a specific person rather than a specific machine, don't you think they would.

    Tinfoil hats aside, Hollywood dictating per-person DRM doesn't seem to be too big of a jump for me. I certainly can't wait for the day that I can't watch a recorded show just because I wasn't the one to record it. Go tivo!

    1. Re:RFID + DRM by RalphSleigh · · Score: 1

      Go one better, you cnat watch it unless you are the only RFID in the room 8-p

      --
      Come as you are, do what you must, be who you will.
    2. Re:RFID + DRM by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 1

      And it's not even per person; it is per per person per machine. So you can only watch it on the machine you recorded it on if you're the only one in the room.

      --
      Stop Global Warming!
      Just say no to irreversible processes!
    3. Re:RFID + DRM by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      So you can only watch it on the machine you recorded it on if you're the only one in the room.

      I was thinking along the same lines when I realized this was a PVR and not a DVR.

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

  7. this will not work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I highly doubt that this will really come around. Hotels would have to buy a new box to deliver the Tivo shows, and then in turn they would charge you to watch your own content. Would you really pay to watch the shows on your ouwn Tivo? Its easier to bring your tivo on vacation. Or better yet, build a BTV machine and off-load your shows to a laptop or burn it to DVD.

  8. This is terrible!! by dschuetz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This use of RFID tags will destroy my privacy! You just watch...overnight, we'll have a terrible Orwellian police state where we're all branded with the RFID tag of the beast on our foreheads!

    1. Re:This is terrible!! by MaestroSartori · · Score: 1

      Thanks, having a bad day at work - that's just made it a little better :D

    2. Re:This is terrible!! by rcpitt · · Score: 1
      Nah... they'll just put them into passports and then make you carry yours everywhere

      oh... wait... hmmm...

      too late

      --
      Been there, done that, paid for the T-shirt
      and didn't get it
    3. Re:This is terrible!! by BiloxiGeek · · Score: 1

      In the Orwellian future your passport hacks your forehead!

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, For you are crunchy and go well with ketchup.
  9. Phillips Media Lab by sulimma · · Score: 1

    has presented this exact application years ago.

  10. "Unique", eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And when 3 or 4 folks are all in the same area with their tags...which one will TiVo choose? "Gee, Mom...I thought it would pull up Home and Garden as well, which of you kids programmed the TiVo to record Playboy all night?"

    *sigh*

  11. This is a step in the right direction... by Alphi1 · · Score: 2, Informative
    I am very glad to hear of this. I've said for a long while, that while I absolutely love my Tivo, it has a few drawbacks (that can be remedied):

    1) Lack of dual (or more) tuners on standalone models
    2) Lack of support for digital channels (a la CableCard)
    3) Personalizing "suggestions" on a person basis, instead of a Tivo box basis.


    And from what I hear, #1 and #2 are in the works (rumored to come out mid-2006). And this (it sounds like) could be the third.

    I've known for awhile that my Tivo will (if "suggestions" are turned on) record shows it thinks I will like. The problem, is if I record my shows, and my wife records her shows, the machine doesn't differentiate between the two, and tries to find "suggestions" that match both hers and my preferences.

    And it rarely turns up anything useful.

    1. Re:This is a step in the right direction... by spejsklark · · Score: 1

      This might be a step in the right direction if they just implemented it. Not go filing a patent on obvious functionality.

    2. Re:This is a step in the right direction... by Octorian · · Score: 0

      Two more things...
      4) Sluggish user interface
      5) Lack of an on-board 100Mbit ethernet jack

      The USB ethernet dongle approach works fine when you're using it as an alternative to a phone line. However, as they add more network and home media type features, you really feel the slowness of it.

      If they came out with a new TiVo that fixed these two issues, and had a second tuner, I'd probably buy one tomorrow.

    3. Re:This is a step in the right direction... by CharlieHedlin · · Score: 1

      4) I haven't used the 7.2 standalones, but I know that 6.2 made the DirecTivos much faster.
      5) If you are up for it, upgrade the software to USB 2.0 and this isn't much of a problem. Better yet, TiVo needs to upgrade to USB 2.0, if they haven't done so already. I have the HMO/MRV stuff enabled on my DirecTivo with USB 2.0 and it transfers a 1 hour show in about 7 minutes.

  12. Do we really need this? by Chubby_C · · Score: 1

    Really? or it just one of those things that someone in marketting came up with after hearing RFID and found it to be the new tech buzzword?

    --
    - My question is: Can Slashdot be Slashdotted? -
  13. TiVo for compatibility by honeypotslash · · Score: 0, Troll

    TiVo is trying to make themselves the standard so they can have no competition in the future and own the market.
    --
    Get your Free MacMini's here

    1. Re:TiVo for compatibility by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "TiVo is trying to make themselves the standard so they can have no competition in the future and own the market."

      But....TiVo uses Linux as its OS. Does that not give it good kharma? :)

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  14. Quick by flipper65 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Someone send one of these to Stallman

  15. Ordering food by nizo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Actually if they can have one that broadcasts food preferences (I hate onions and pickles) we might be on to something here. I wonder if it is worth some of my privacy to not have to pick off the onions and pickles because I always forget to ask the Wendy's cashier not to put them on? Pretty much applies to all my other food too; just forget adding onions or pickles please.

    1. Re:Ordering food by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 1

      Stick a postit to your phone with the sentence : "I want it without onions and pickles". And put one in your shirt in case you go yourself to the store...

      --
      Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
    2. Re:Ordering food by carlos_benj · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wonder if it is worth some of my privacy to not have to pick off the onions and pickles because I always forget to ask the Wendy's cashier not to put them on? Pretty much applies to all my other food too; just forget adding onions or pickles please.

      Have some T-shirts printed up. Vary the colors so you'll have a well-rounded wardrobe - or just keep eating at fast food joints and let them round naturally......

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    3. Re:Ordering food by symbolic · · Score: 1

      At some point in the not-to-distant future, who's to say that people won't start finding tidbits like this in their mailbox:

      Dear valued fast food customer:

      We understand that you have recently requested the removal of onions and pickles from your meal at our fast food establishment. As you know, this establishment is a fine American company that has provided affordable cuisine to many Americans for years. Because pickles and onions are fundamental ingredients of the meals that we serve, we have deemed their removal an unpatriotic gesture, and strongly believe that this could lead to other behavior that is even more troublesome. We regret to inform you that your name has been forwarded to the proper government authorities.

      Have a nice day.

      Best regards,

      The management team at Fine American Food Company

      PS: Don't forget our 2-for-1 Thanksgiving day special, pickles and onions included!

    4. Re:Ordering food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Forget about putting allergy information on the product: we'll just tag the people.

      (Great for insurance companies too!)

    5. Re:Ordering food by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? They'd never TELL you about forwarding your name to the government!

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  16. RFID underwear or Universal RFID? by bobcat7677 · · Score: 1

    With everyone falling all over themselves to make everything we interact with use RFIDs somehow I begin to wonder... If I need one to start my car, one to pay for gas, one to identify me to the door of my house, one for security at work, one for security on the computer at work, one to "authenticate" me to my entertainment devices (how soon do you suppose the *IAA will be trying to use this for some sort of DRM???). How soon will it be before I need some sort of RFID management system built into my clothing to hold all the RFIDs??? They are small, so it doesn't have to be a large piece of clothing. Just something with lots of little pockets or something to hold all the RFIDs. Since you have to have them with you always and don't want them stolen or your life would be ruined, I suggest RFID management underwear.

    Alternatively, maybe the answer is a standardized RFID tag for each individual that all the respective devices are taught to recognize when you purchase them? It could be the same tag that is issued to you in your passport. (I know some people would argue that that would open up a huge security hole to your identity, but since when have the RFID sploogers had any reguard for security issues in the technology???)

    With all that said, I for one do NOT welcome our new RFID overlords. I prefer to remain interactive with my environment on a physical level thank you very much. I'll leave my geek card at the door...

    1. Re:RFID underwear or Universal RFID? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sort of like a RFID keychain?

      You could either have one key that opens all doors, or a big keychain.

      I'd prefer the keychain, with a switch that is marked public/private/off

      That way I can only transmit public keys when I'm in public, private keys when I'm at home, and turn it off for when I don't want to transmit at all.

      or maybe a push button, so it isn't accidentalyl switched to the private setting.

  17. How about a Mac-aware PVR? by wardk · · Score: 0

    Gee, all this money for new technology and they can't even get off their weak asses and support macintosh.

  18. Does this mean that pr0n will just start popping by digitaldc · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...up in all different locations at the most inappropriate times?

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  19. Drill a little hole into your RFID tags by Shivetya · · Score: 1, Redundant

    and put them on your keyring.

    Essentially they can perform the same function as a key so why not treat them as such.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:Drill a little hole into your RFID tags by mpeg4codec · · Score: 1

      How about using RFID to FIND the damn keyring. I know it won't allow you to pinpoint exact location, but narrowing down the location of my keys or anything else small, portable, and easily lost to a single room would be immensely helpful. A certain amount of radio direction finding could possibly be used to help even further.

      Yeah, I know there exists technology to make a little siren go off on the key ring or whatever, but let's stay on topic here.

    2. Re:Drill a little hole into your RFID tags by afidel · · Score: 1

      RFID also has the advantage of being passive, it requires no batteries on the device to be found, becuase even if you have one of those little noise makers they have to have working batteries to be of any use =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  20. How many of these things are we going to have? by Phoenix · · Score: 1

    Ok, while the RFID system is a good idea and the technology has proven it's worth in many applications, is it a good idea to have RFID chips for everything we use in real life?

    If we used RFID like this one could forsee:

    The toaster that adjusts to your desired level of toast
    The fridge that remembers that you like crushed ice instead of cubed
    The Tivo that remembers your choices (I know...mentioned in the article)
    The Car that remembers your seating positions
    The stereo that remembers your station and desired volume
    The computer that logs you on as soon as you sit down

    The list could go on and on and with each device you need yet another RFID tag. How many of the damn things will we need in the future to go about our daily lives?

    I mean it's a good idea and all, but how much will be too much, and how can we rework it so the technology DOESN'T require you to find your RFID tag holder before you go to the can in the morning?

    Phoenix

    --
    -- Wiccan Army, 13th Airborne Division "We will not fly silently into the night"
    1. Re:How many of these things are we going to have? by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, you won't be able to lose it once it's embedded in your forehead and on your arm.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    2. Re:How many of these things are we going to have? by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      But if everyone has them you'll have to hold the toaster so that you don't get someone else's dark toast when you specifically RFID'd light. And who get's logged onto the computer? What if person X is having trouble with their PC or a program and you say, "let me drive", does the computer log them off and log you on?

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    3. Re:How many of these things are we going to have? by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 2, Funny
      The toaster that adjusts to your desired level of toast,
      The fridge that remembers that you like crushed ice instead of cubed
      The Tivo that remembers your choices (I know...mentioned in the article)
      The Car that remembers your seating positions
      The stereo that remembers your station and desired volume
      The computer that logs you on as soon as you sit down

      I was thinking . . . I don't need any of these things. My stereo is always set to my station, my ice is the way I like it, the car seat is adjusted for me, because I live alone! you RFID-enabled insensitive clod. It seriously took me a moment to realize why anyone would need this sort of functionality. Sigh.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    4. Re:How many of these things are we going to have? by MCraigW · · Score: 1
      The list could go on and on and with each device you need yet another RFID tag. How many of the damn things will we need in the future to go about our daily lives?

      You will only need one RFID tag that identifies you, and is used for all devices and uses. It would really be quite convenient. You just hang it on a lanyard around your neck.

    5. Re:How many of these things are we going to have? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The Car that remembers your seating positions

      VW and Audi have had this since 1998. Some new models are sensitive enough to read your tag and unlock the door before you even reach the car.

    6. Re:How many of these things are we going to have? by dosquatch · · Score: 1

      I hereby predict the meta-RFID. A single, programmable, multi-personality RFID tag into which you can dump all of the data from all of the seperate tags that will be issued to you. C'mon, it'll be great! Your TiVo will remember your seating position, your car will make your toast at just the volume you like, your crushed ice will automatically $sys$rootkit your network logon... I love this plan!

      --
      "Hey, the third matrix movie would have been good except for the plot,story, and acting." --AC
    7. Re:How many of these things are we going to have? by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      Jaguar (and presumably other high-end) cars remember the driver's seating position, and have done so for quite some time. They don't use RFID, though, they just use the computer chip in your key to remember you.

      Just remember, if you're really tall and your wife is really short, don't go grabbing her keys on the way out of the house, or you may become permanently trapped in your vehicle.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  21. Great marketing opportunity by Colbalt+Blue · · Score: 1

    I would think that advertizers would love to have this in everyone's living room. Then, for example, the tivo could scan the rfid tags in the kitchen and serve an ad for Hunts ketchup to every pvr that detects Heinz 57 in the fridge.

    1. Re:Great marketing opportunity by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      Then, for example, the tivo could scan the rfid tags in the kitchen and serve an ad for Hunts ketchup to every pvr that detects Heinz 57 in the fridge.

      Ummmm. I hope you don't work for Hunts' marketing department...... Although I do know a guy who puts ketchup on his steaks (and even prime rib), most of us don't see the two as interchangeable.....

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    2. Re:Great marketing opportunity by bcattwoo · · Score: 1
      I would think that advertizers would love to have this in everyone's living room. Then, for example, the tivo could scan the rfid tags in the kitchen and serve an ad for Hunts ketchup to every pvr that detects Heinz 57 in the fridge.

      ... and a kernel panic if it detected a roll of tin foil in the pantry.

    3. Re:Great marketing opportunity by Colbalt+Blue · · Score: 1

      That's what quitting watching TV will get you. I couldn't even come up with 2 brands of ketchup.

  22. ob. Revelation 13:16-18 by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1

    And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand or in their foreheads; "And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name

    --
    I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
    1. Re:ob. Revelation 13:16-18 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems all of the blind geeks without ears to hear think RFID (and chips) are just great. I hope they enjoy their slavery. Heck, they will think slavery is freedom come to think of it.

  23. How does it know me? by zztong · · Score: 1

    How does it know it's me? Sure, via RFID, but where is this RFID kept? Do I need to carry around an ID card for my PVR? If so, I'll probably just tape it to the side of the PVR.

  24. Almost there already. by RoverDaddy · · Score: 1

    My key ring has at least 5 'loyalty' program cards attached already, except they have bar codes instead of RFID. At least with bar codes I can choose to not show them to the cashier when I don't feel like it. I'd have to be a bit more careful with RFID.

    --
    RETURN without GOSUB in line 1050
  25. Re:Does this mean that pr0n will just start poppin by Divide+By+Zero · · Score: 1

    Only if we're very, very lucky.

    What a wonderful world this would be...

    --
    Dare to Hope. Prepare to be Disappointed.
  26. Feature versus implementation by sunderland56 · · Score: 1
    Feature: one Tivo can remember several different user's preferences. Good feature, one that people want and would pay for.

    Implementation: instead of a simple menu choice, or a remote control button, implement this via a RFID tag. OK, so how stupid can Tivo get?
    • What if the family is watching TV together? Which tag gets chosen?
    • Most people lose the remote on a regular basis. How many will lose their RFID tags?
    • When you visit your Mother in law, you may not want the Tivo to suggest "Hot Babes IV"


    Dear Tivo: Give us preferences. Keep the RFID tags.
    1. Re:Feature versus implementation by MCraigW · · Score: 1
      What if the family is watching TV together? Which tag gets chosen?

      How about the intersection of the shows that everyone likes? TiVo could be smart about these kind of things.

      Most people lose the remote on a regular basis. How many will lose their RFID tags?

      Since your personal RFID tag will be used to determine what time the alarm clock goes off, how done your toast is cooked, and whether you can unlock and drive a specific car, I would guess that it would be more comparable to losing your drivers license or passport. How many people lose those?

      When you visit your Mother in law, you may not want the TiVo to suggest "Hot Babes IV"

      Why not?

  27. Hotels will love it... by greg_barton · · Score: 1

    It remains to be seen whether hotels will be eager to help TiVo undermine their pay-per-view video revenue.

    Hotels will love it, as long as they get a cut, and as long as it requires no effort on the staff to implement.

    The big flaw in this is distribution of the media. Recently I designed a system to distribute movies to a hotel chain using a bittorrent style p2p system, but it depended that the same file being distributed to the entire chain at the same time. If you're sending "personalized" media out on demand you no longer have that economy of scale. It would require a rather gargantuan streaming media infrastructure, and that ain't cheap. Also, depending on the media being distributed, ludicrous amounts of security are required to distribute over the internet. Movie studios in particular are extremely paranoid about their products being transmitted over the wire. Unless there's been a seachange in attitudes recently I can't see them allowing point to point trasnmission of a high quality movie file to some random location on demand.

  28. This is a GREAT idea by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

    No more suing entire families. Now broadcasters and the MPAA will know EXACTLY who to sue when you're fast forwarding though commercials, copying movies to your portable player, and other egregious acts of copyright infringement.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  29. Seems a little premature to me. by Chr0nik · · Score: 1

    I'm assuming the identifier would be tied to CC information for ordering movies, would remove parental locks automatically, would change your favorites, so on, and so on.

    Too many questions left unanswered about RFI. We don't even know how secure an RFID system would be.

    I don't know of many people that will be all fired up to get RFID tags embedded under their skin. I know I wouldn't. And barring that, physical security would be fairly easy to compromise. And if my kid gets ahold of my tag and orders movies and unlocks the playboy channel, the whole thing is pointless. Not to mention, at some point, even if everyone signed off on getting them implanted, some creative soul will figure out how to duplicate signals. Point is, there are a lot of kinks to work out in the whole RFID stuff before it gets to a point that it makes sense to go to market, or even start designing things like this. Chances are your designs will be out of date by the time they are. Seems to me it would make more sense to embed a biometric(fingerprint) scanner into a remote. I don't know. Perhaps the power consumption would be too much. Maybe someone with a better knowlege of electronics can answer that question.

    --


    ... what did you expect, something profound?
  30. So you walk into Circuit City by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 1

    and all the TVs start playing porn?

  31. Re:ob. Revelation 13: 1-4 by periol · · Score: 1

    "And I saw TIVO coming out of the sea. He had ten horns and seven heads, with ten crowns on his horns, and on each head a blasphemous name. The TIVO I saw resembled a leopard, but had feet like those of a bear and a mouth like that of a lion. The dragon gave TIVO his power and his throne and great authority. One of the heads of TIVO seemed to have had a fatal wound, but the fatal wound had been healed. The whole world was astonished and followed TIVO. Men worshiped the dragon because he had given authority to TIVO, and they also worshiped the beast and asked, "Who is like TIVO? Who can make war against him?"

  32. I had no idea... by rushiku · · Score: 1

    that RFID could improve the transfer speed of my TiVo (currently, it takes over 90 minutes to tx a 30 minute show to my PC) Certainly TiVo and the Hotel chains don't expect I'll want to pay to wait for hours before being able to view my custom content...maybe I'll be able to pre-tx the shows we'll want to watch: "No! we are not watching the latest episode, we have to save it for when we're in the hotel" Stove off? check Iron off? check Doors Locked? check Paperboy notified? check TiVo Transferring? doh!

  33. PVR vs. DVR by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    I was thinking along the same lines when I realized this was a PVR and not a DVR.

    They're the same thing. It's just because PVR was already trademarked within the same field (Digital Processing Systems' Perception Video Recorder) that TiVo changed the term to DVR.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    1. Re:PVR vs. DVR by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      I was thinking along the lines of a Personal Video Recorder like the hand-held media players that are available now. I've seen some of them referred to as PVRs.

      Maybe I was stretching too hard to find a good reason to tie a DVR to RFID. Makes no sense for recording at home since part of the reason for a DVR is recording when you aren't there so that you can watch when you are. I can see transferring your preferences to a set-top box at a hotel (unless your favorite show comes on while you're in transit).

      Ah well.

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

  34. Title is misleading. by MishaGray · · Score: 1

    Don't confuse patent applications with product annoucements. I don't see a product arriving soon that does everything their patent says. Patents are filed to protect intellectual work that may have been performed, but doesn't mean that Tivo will ever ship anything like it is described in the patent. Companies think up great stuff and patent it to protect those intellectual assets - sort of staking a "claim" on the idea. Doesn't mean they plan to develop anything yet.

  35. Ouch by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    That would hurt having the tag implanted in your forhead.

    The back of the neck would be better.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  36. Portable pr0n by RageLink · · Score: 1

    This cannot be good... Imagine getting the "really cool" cable package and setting Tivo to get all the "ins" and "outs" of your fav shows... Then walking alongside a TV display who just happens to replay all your fav sick-o shows on for all to see... Better yet... go Tivo shopping with mom! Shell be proud.... NOT.

    --
    "Will the highways on the Internet become more few?" -George W. Bush
  37. Read the patent application by jbengt · · Score: 1

    How the hell is this patentable?