Slashdot Mirror


Columnist Turned Accidental Baseball Blogger

Carl Bialik from the WSJ writes "Wall Street Journal Online tech columnist Jason Fry started playing around with a New York Mets blog almost a year ago. In today's Real Time column, he outs himself as one of the writers behind Faith & Fear in Flushing, and writes about the stress of blogging: "The downside of being a blog writer? Being a blog administrator. I also wasn't prepared for how much work blogging was. Baseball already took up three hours a night; now it took up four -- at least. Blogging about a thrilling extra-inning win was easy; blogging about a dull-as-dishwater loss wasn't. And with more and more people reading us and commenting about our posts, blogging sometimes became a duty; we wrote at least one new entry for 190 straight days, including ones when one or both of us was tired, on vacation or not particularly inspired."" Heh. Boy, does this refrain ever sound familiar.

102 comments

  1. The solution to every IT problem: by Control+Group · · Score: 3, Funny

    Outsource!

    I'm sure there are people in India happy to blog for $1.73/hr.

    --

    Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    1. Re:The solution to every IT problem: by Lev13than · · Score: 4, Funny

      Outsource! I'm sure there are people in India happy to blog for $1.73/hr.

      They tried doing that a few months ago, but readers caught on when the blogs kept referring to "innings" as "overs", "batters" as "batsmen" and "DHs" as "LBWs".

      --
      When you have nothing left to burn you must set yourself on fire
    2. Re:The solution to every IT problem: by th3space · · Score: 2, Funny

      What is that, soccer? Haha! I'm kidding, it's clearly curling.

      --
      "How like you to drag your keyboard to a gun fight." - Aaron Bedard (BANE)
    3. Re:The solution to every IT problem: by AAeyers · · Score: 1

      Hey, I wouldn't mind getting paid just to write a blog about baseball. It would sure beat working at McDonalds.

      --
      "For Great Justice."
  2. Blogging too much work? by plastid · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do what the slashdot editors do -- just use the same posts over and over with slightly different headlines.

    1. Re:Blogging too much work? by Amouth · · Score: 1

      or jsut use the same headline and completely diffrent text and watcht he fake dupe posts come in.. i love it when someone calls dupe on the montly summarys

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  3. The downside of being a blogger by Timesprout · · Score: 0

    The bill for all the laxatives required to spew that amount of verbal diarrhea.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:The downside of being a blogger by MyIS · · Score: 1
      You see, if everyone shared the same hate for blogs as you did, they wouldn't be mentioned as much in the media. It seems that people do read those things after all. But, of course, most successful blogs are actually themed after something, so it's not the inane self-centered ramblings that this is all about.

      Also, writing about your favourite subject happens to be a very therapeutic thing; you should try it sometime, maybe it'll release some of that anger.

      --
      http://zero-to-enterprise.blogspot.com/
  4. Sucks, doesn't it? by garcia · · Score: 4, Informative

    No one realizes just how much work goes into any "hobby project website" until they start doing it themselves. Recently, I was elected into one position in a hobby association, dumped into the "webmaster" position, and also administer the forum software. Man, was it easy to be on the other side of the table when all I had to do was read what others posted. I had no idea how much work content, coding, and administrating is/was.

    Then you have to deal w/the users of your website. Drama, questions, problems, bugs, whatever. Ugh.

    I'm already burned out from that one particular project and I have my own website, other websites, and real life I have to deal with. I have gotten to the point where at least three days a week are "offline time". I sit down with a book and headphones or do something w/the wife or whatever.

    I have talked about making your hobby your job and the problems that causes. Looks like other people are learning about it too.

    1. Re:Sucks, doesn't it? by Psiolent · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No one realizes just how much work goes into any "hobby project website" until they start doing it themselves.

      Actually, I've found just the opposite to be true. I started a "hobby" site about 2 years ago dealing with home remedies (My Home Remedies). There is some initial work coding the site, but after that, assuming there are no huge bugs, it takes maybe 5 minutes a day for me to review submissions. Of course, the key to an easy, successful hobby site, unless you just love the sound of your fingers clicking on the keyboard, is to get the users to write the content for you.

      Further, this hobby site now makes me an extra grand or so a month (and it continues to increase). I've been so impressed with how easy it is once the initial time investment is over that I've taken it up a level and created a new site (Bloomshare) where other people can create their own communities similar to the home remedies site but on any topic they like. They can write content if they want, or they can let their visitors write it for them. Plus they can put ads on their sites and get paid just like me!

      Most serious webmasters know the phrase "Content is King." The real key is to have your visitors create the content for you, which, surprisingly enough, they are more than willing to do.

    2. Re:Sucks, doesn't it? by stevey · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've found that running my site on Debian Administration a fair amount of work.

      Choosing the base software was fairly simple, but since then I find I'm making tweaks to the code on an almost daily basis. Sometimes these are just minor things, othertimes I have to make a lot of changes for different reasons.

      (Of course switching to a CSS layout to be all cool like /. doesn't help that ;)

      Even if you allow users to submit content, as I do, there's still a lot of writing I've had to do. With a couple of thousand registered users and a lot more anonymous repeat visitors I still find that only around 1% of users will ever contribute anything.

      Most people seem more interested in reading than supplying content - and I find it unlikely this will ever change significantly.

      In terms of income I get virtually nothing, personally, the Google Adsense subsidises the site's hosting costs - but doesn't cover it 100%. Still it is a hobby, and it is a useful site for a particular audience so I'll keep it going as long as I can..

    3. Re:Sucks, doesn't it? by Psiolent · · Score: 1

      I couldn't find your AdSense ads. Are they still on the site or have you taken them down since they were not producing much? Anyways, after reading your comment I think maybe the subject matter has to do with how willing people will be to contribute content. On the home remedies site, for example, everyone has their own theories about how to cure the common cold or get rid of hiccups, and they're happy to get online and share that with everyone. Perhaps there aren't enough people knowledgeable enough (or who think they're knowledgeable enough) to post an article on Debian administration. Truth be told, I don't know exactly what the difference is, but you make some interesting points worth consideration.

    4. Re:Sucks, doesn't it? by stevey · · Score: 1

      There is one block of adverts on each "article" - on the front page, and the other pages there are none.

      (Actually that is not the whole story, there is a 75% chance of viewing an adsense advert upon each article, and a 25% chance of seeing a "paypal donate" button).

      I agree that your site is much more open-ended than mine, and has a much wider potential contributor/audience pool.

      I'm not unhappy that I'm not raking in $$, just figured that it was worth suggesting that either you got lucky, or are doing more than you suggest, or I'm unlucky.

      I've seen other sites where readers contribute most of the content and there is a wide range in the quality of content posted. I guess on /. a good comparision is the number of people who post news links (which are practically no effort) vs the number of people who write soley new content (e.g. book reviews).

      I guess that's the situation I'm in, many visitors, many members, few original new pieces of writing. Maybe I just need to reach a critical mass? (And that is certainly not to suggest that I don't value suggestions, or the submissions I've had so far - because I certainly do :)

    5. Re:Sucks, doesn't it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you're just bad at what you do?

  5. Why the responsibility? by Pedrito · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And with more and more people reading us and commenting about our posts, blogging sometimes became a duty;

    Only in your own friggin' heads.

    I have a blog that's fairly popular (not the link here and I'm not posting it). Sometimes, if I go a while without posting, I get comments, some quite nasty, asking why (or just complaining that) I haven't posted recently.

    My thought is, "Pay my rent and then we can talk about my responsibility to write this damn thing." I write when I'm in the mood and I don't write when I'm not in the mood. If people can't deal with that for free, then they can go find another blog.

    Any responsibility these guys feel to doing this daily is of their own making. If they're not getting paid for doing it when they don't want to do it, then they're morons. If they ARE getting paid, then they need to stop whining.

    1. Re:Why the responsibility? by Kelson · · Score: 1

      Agreed. If you're not getting anything out of it, stop or take a break. If it's your hobby, let it stay your hobby. Once it becomes an obligation, it becomes a chore, and once it becomes a chore... why are you doing it in the first place?

      I've got a blog which is basically a place for me to post interesting stuff or sound off. I like getting readers and comments, but that's not the purpose. I post what I want, when I want, and I haven't lost interest.

      I've also got a long-running (i.e. 9.5 years now) comic book fan site. I've found that the more people ask me to add things, the less interested I am in working on it. It's a strange, somewhat perverse reaction, but I think it comes down to hobby vs. work. When I'm just doing it for myself, it's fun and I put a lot more into the site, but when it's an obligation, it's work, and I dig in my heels and spend my time doing something else. I've already got a job, why should I do more work at home?

    2. Re:Why the responsibility? by fistfullast33l · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I totally agree with you, but for some reason I always get twangs of guilt for committing to do something and not being able to do it. I also think that most people get to the point where they don't want to blog anymore and the blog dies out. My brother's and girlfriend's blogs both suffered from this. I think that it doesn't even matter who reads it, nine times out of ten it's more of how much effort you want to put into it. Most blogs are created out of the user's ideas of, hey, that might be nice to do. Once you get into it, however, you can see how much effort it takes to maintain these things and that usually kills the "nice idea" thoughts in your head. Of course, the Slashdot editors are excellent examples of how to keep a blog going by getting paid for your efforts. I think the dedication level only comes from monetary rewards or something like PJ's from Groklaw where you're carrying a cause on your shoulders. The blogs where people just comment on daily life are a dime a dozen and tend to disappear very freqently.

    3. Re:Why the responsibility? by Pope · · Score: 1

      So disable the comments. Do you really value the feedback that much?

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    4. Re:Why the responsibility? by ErikZ · · Score: 2, Interesting


      Yeah, but my hobby site was more relaxing/fun when it *didn't* pay the rent.

      Now it's bringing in enough money to do that, and I feel obligated to clean up the bugs, be vigilant about spam, redesign the site to something modern, getting upset when artists don't deliver...

      Now it's work.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    5. Re:Why the responsibility? by YouHaveSnail · · Score: 1

      I totally agree with you, but for some reason I always get twangs of guilt for committing to do something and not being able to do it.

      To whom did you make this commitment to blog every n hours? If only to yourself, then you simply need to decide to write only when you actually have something to say. So many blogs are awful exactly because the authors think quantity is more important than quality. The blogs that are worth reading are generally written by those authors who know that it's always best to leave 'em wanting more. If you find that you have so few thoughts that are worth sharing that you can't get your blog off the ground then you should consider putting the blog on hold and reading a few books instead.

    6. Re:Why the responsibility? by fistfullast33l · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'd say I definitely made this commitment to myself. It's something I wanted to do to get readership up. But in the end, I guess it doesn't really matter. Maybe I'm getting the guilt more because I wanted to do this and failed miserably?

  6. These are the days of "proffesional blogging" by TimeSpeak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    wrote at least one new entry for 190 straight days, including ones when one or both of us was tired, on vacation or not particularly inspired.

    *whiners*
    I guess this goes to show people will read anything reguardless of the quality of content. Hell, your reading this.....

    --
    Am no fek Buddhist, but this is enlightenment.
    1. Re:These are the days of "proffesional blogging" by Markbest · · Score: 1

      That I am, with grammatical errors and all.

  7. Blog stress? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop blogging then, wouldn't that be the best solution? No one will care if another blog disappears and even if they do, who cares?

  8. Put it in perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Blogging is hard? Compared to what? Watching TV? Digging ditches, cleaning septic tanks, plumbing, and about a million other jobs are much harder than merely posting trivial and useless opinions on fluff topics.

    Get real.

    1. Re:Put it in perspective by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      "Blogging is hard? Compared to what? Watching TV? Digging ditches, cleaning septic tanks, plumbing, and about a million other jobs are much harder than merely posting trivial and useless opinions on fluff topics."

      RTFA, please.

      See, blogging in the author's case is a hobby. Not a job, not a necessity. And his point is that it was more involved, and took more time, than he expected. It wasn't just a matter of posting some commentary every day -- he had to administrate the blog, deal with the comments, etc.

      Plenty of /.ers have useless hobbies that they sink tons of hours into (WoW comes to mind :). And plenty of blogs have information that is neither trivial nor useless, and is not about a fluff topic.

      Baseball might be a fluff topic... but then again, so are many of the topics that get discussed on /. You think that the latest Mars Rover news is anything but fluff to the majority of /. readers?

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:Put it in perspective by SamSim · · Score: 1

      But if you're a ditch-digger, the only way you can reach a point where you literally cannot do your job anymore is if you get injured, get old, or forget how to dig a ditch. It's different with blogging, or any creative job: the ability to write is not a resource you can just renew by eating food and getting a good night's sleep. It is difficult to write on demand.

  9. That was fast by Kelson · · Score: 1

    I was wondering how fast someone would post a "blogging=crap" comment.

    Third post -- not bad! And you even managed to use a metaphor that fit in with the pejorative!

    1. Re:That was fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was wondering how fast someone would post a "blogging=crap" comment.

      Third post -- not bad! And you even managed to use a metaphor that fit in with the pejorative!

      hey hey!
      Do you expect anything better from a throng of insular nerds who consider themselves
      worldly,
      enlightened,
      experienced,
      and better informed than most.

      And yet, in all actuality, are the complete opposite, but are too arrogant and slow to realise this?

      I monitored several of my employees web habits (o noes, call the EFF, call RMS!!!) and they posted in this place.

      Fired them on the spot. No one who posts here is worth my money.

    2. Re:That was fast by Kelson · · Score: 1

      Fired them on the spot. No one who posts here is worth my money.

      Good thing you posted anonymously. Otherwise you'd have to take yourself off the payroll.

    3. Re:That was fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fired them on the spot. No one who posts here is worth my money.

      Err, I hate to point this out, but if you're going to be consistent here, we'll have to expect a change of leadership in the Anonymous Coward Corporation soon.
  10. You don't HAVE to constantly update... by mozumder · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just write when you feel like you should. Write only when it means something to you. Don't try to write for the sake of an audience. If you get bored with it, do something else. Or write about different things. Baseball audience doesn't want to hear about your views on music or politics or curling? Well too bad for them!

    1. Re:You don't HAVE to constantly update... by MattGWU · · Score: 1

      Guess it depends on why you are writing. If you're writing for the sake of journaling it doesn't matter if people read your blog or not. A 'hobby' blog like this sounds like the author decided he had something to share with the world, in which case the audience, and maintaining the attention of the audience is more important on some level. How many times can they check back with no update, before they simply stop checking back? Out of sight, out of mind.

      --
      "These people look deep within my soul and assign me a number based on the order in which I joined" --Homer re:
  11. Umm...ok... by pyro+jackelope · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I write in my own personal blog every day of the year. I hate it when people whine about this. And stress? I shudder to think what would happen if these people ever got real jobs.

    --
    28:06:42:12 - That is when the world will end...
  12. Yep, it's hard. by frostman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Keeping that stream of blog posts coming is a lot harder than most people think before they actually try it.

    In that, blogging is no different than any other kind of content creation. Especially non-profit content creation.

    What makes the difficulty surprising, I think, is how many people don't seem to have it. You look around in blogville and see all these people posting at least once a day, and a lot of them have large readerships. But if you look closely you find that a lot of these folks are doing one or more of:

    1. Obsessively blogging about the (boring) details of their lives.
    2. Compensating for a lack of other other social or creative outlets.
    3. Expressing a natural graphomania (lawyer blogs anyone?).
    4. Actually making money (or even a living) with their blogs.

    If none of those apply to you, that leaves the not-so-simple task of regularly trying to write something interesting and suitable for at least amateur publication. Anyone who ever made a zine or a comic will tell you it's a very hard habit to get into. But with blogging, you have the hyper-productive blogs in front of you, and the blog companies telling you how easy it is, and you dive in expecting it to be cake.

    And then there's the whole templates-and-hacking issue, at least if you don't want the blog to be ugly. Yep, lotsa work.

    --

    This Like That - fun with words!

    1. Re:Yep, it's hard. by lamp540 · · Score: 1

      Yes but 'blog means "web log" which refers to logging things that happen. If things happen then they would be easy to write about. This guy was abusing the concept of a blog in that he was trying to write when there was nothing to write about.

  13. Prepare some ahead of time by G4from128k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Professional columnists and cartoonists sometimes prepare a few submissions ahead of time. Thought-pieces, retrospectives, discussion of long-term trends, etc. don't depend as much on timely, up-to-the-minute news. If nothing timely inspires an entry or exhaustion strikes, then post one from inventory.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Prepare some ahead of time by damsa · · Score: 1

      You can't really do that with baseball, as there are 162 games played in a year. Football you can do that, because they only play 16 games a year. Really no need to blog everyday for football.

      Since baseball is like the stock market, even on off days a team can go up and down in the standings, it is more difficult to ignore the day and post purely on trends. It would be like the WSJ declining to discuss the 5 point loss in the Dow and running a piece on how stocks are on a upward trend.

    2. Re:Prepare some ahead of time by hal9000(jr) · · Score: 1

      Thought-pieces, retrospectives, discussion of long-term trends, etc. don't depend as much on timely, up-to-the-minute news.

      Yeah, the problem is with something like baseball, something is always going on during the season, so these evergreen blogs won't really work>

      What I don't get from some of the responses on /. is the vitrolic response to someone explaing that creatig quality content is hard. Come on, when you put up a blog, you want people to read it, to come back and keep reading it. You want the blog to be popular. If readers stop reading, there is no reason to keep writing. (no, writing for writings sake is not all that satisfying). Here is one guys account of what happened. They obviously built an audience and felt an obligation to turn out the best content they could.

      Instead of busting thier chops and calling they whiners (which he wasn't doing anyway) just take note that there are PEOPLE behind those pixels.

  14. If it becomes work by duncan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Then get paid for it.

    If you want to blog for the fun of it, don't take it so seriously. If you miss a day that's just too bad. If you regret missing a day, that's fine.

    If I'm on vacation and miss blogging for a few days to a week or two, too bad. And if people complain, let them pay me to do it daily.

  15. Advise and Consent by aredubya74 · · Score: 1

    Boy, does this refrain ever sound familiar.

    Well duh, Hemos. Advise the man on the way to deal with "new article" monotony: repost previous game recaps. Dupes 4tw.

    --

    RW

  16. Brasky's Foreskin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They use Brasky's foreskin as a tarp when it rains at Yankee stadium. Stick that in your blog, Mr. Fry.

    -BB

  17. Re:I'm not quite dead yet. by Kelson · · Score: 3, Funny

    About the same time they recognize the death of Apple -- uh, I mean BSD -- wait, the web -- OK, how about e-mail -- oh, nevermind.

  18. Too broad of a definition by British · · Score: 1

    Yes, anything you write about more than once on the internet, and OMG suddenly it's a Blog!

    blog this! blog that! blogs about blogs! It's not a webcam, it's a still image blog! Hey look, it's not a directory, it's a file blog! Apache logs, nope, they are web blogs!(get it?).

    Yes, 2005's the year where suddenly EVERYTHING is redefined as a freakin' blog. Maybe 2006 is the year we go outside.

    1. Re:Too broad of a definition by damsa · · Score: 1

      Blog is so 2004, the new blog is now for 2005, moblog. Blogging while moving. Blog for 2006 is Slogging, blogging while sleeping. And for 2007, it will be dogging, blogging while dead.

    2. Re:Too broad of a definition by Kelson · · Score: 1

      Don't forget blogging while flying (flogging), which will continue until people's morale improves.

      Although this could all just be blogging a dead horse.

  19. When fun becomes work by saskboy · · Score: 1

    A couple years ago I was asked by some pet supply business in California if I wanted them to market my Pet Foil Hat Technology in their magazine, and I'd mass produce them. Since that certainly takes a lot of the fun out of it, I declined, even though I stood to make a little money out of it, and maybe gain some more fame. But it just isn't worth it if fun becomes work, just for the sake of money.

    I feel the same about my blog. I have [probably] enough writing talent to be a somewhat popular blogger, but I'm just not going to get that deep into it unless I'm willing to take on the pressure of performing nightly. Writing. Performing at writing funny, or entertaining stuff, I mean.

    If I had some of my more web-savvy friends help out, I could probably whip up a random-blog-post generator, that would automatically update my blog with random crap if I didn't meet a posting deadline. The public might catch on though if I was writing about the need to conserve energy, and the news just announced cold fusion was made possible.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  20. Re:#1 USA! For Great Baseball! by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Where else holds a World Series for a game only played in one country?

    --
    How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
  21. Re:#1 USA! For Great Baseball! by EmperorKagato · · Score: 4, Informative

    "why do you call it football when there is no goddamn kicking in the game?"

    You kick the ball when making a punt , attempting a field goal, starting the game or half by kicking off to the receiving team and after a touch down you kick the ball to score an extra point.

    For more information about the game please visit http://www.wikipedia.org/ or visit this link.

    --
    ----- You know you have ego issues when you register a domain in your name.
  22. Re:#1 USA! For Great Baseball! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two, you dumb shit, unless you think Toronto is in the US.
    ASSHOLE!!!

  23. Insightful? by Kelson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    posting trivial and useless opinions on fluff topics

    Like dismissing an entire medium* on Slashdot? That takes a lot of work, doesn't it?

    Sure, those jobs are a lot more physically difficult (with the exception of watching TV). But anyone who spends time programming, writing websites -- heck, just writing -- should recognize that mental work takes effort too. And yes, there are a lot of "fluff" blogs -- probably the majority, though that just reflects Sturgeon's Law.

    Posting fluff is easy. Keeping a schedule, or trying to write something more than "OMG my team won/lost/tied!" takes time and effort, no matter what the topic.

    *IMO, "blogs" are simply a subset of the web, and the label has more to do with the structure and management tools than the actual content. So I don't consider blogs to be any more or less important than the rest of the web.

  24. Re:#1 USA! For Great Baseball! by mph · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Where else holds a World Series for a game only played in one country?
    I'll have to double check my map, but I'm pretty sure that Canada isn't yet a part of the United States.

    (And, of course, baseball is played in many other countries, even if the MLB doesn't have teams in them.)

  25. Face it, most ain't got that much to say by Morris+Thorpe · · Score: 1

    From my experience, the length of most blog's entries are inversely proportional to the number of entries.

    * First post: On and on about the blog
    * Second: On and on about response
    * Eighth: Voicing opinion on some overplayed incident
    * Twelveth: Searching for new topics
    * Twentieth: "Anyone reading this?"
    * Twenty-fifth: "Sorry all but I'm going to have to stop the blog. Work's really busy now. Look for me to come back soon!"

  26. Guilt is an internal thing. by AugstWest · · Score: 1

    I've been running a blog for over 4 years now (it may be in my .sig, I forget now), and sometimes I post every day, sometimes I've even gone 6 or 7 days without posting, but it's still there, and people read it, and sometimes they complain, but really, what does it matter?

    I've got the content there, I do it for myself, and if people read it, they read it. It's not like it's paying my mortgage, or even for my bandwidth.

  27. Re:#1 USA! For Great Baseball! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trolling: For those days when blogging is just too hard.

  28. My Lord, but I hope he never flags in his efforts! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1
    God knows we could not all live without another yammering commentary on something as mind bogglingly boring as baseball.

    More power to you Philip J.- er, Jason Fry! God speed and God bless and stuff.

    Flamebait? Yeah, sure, why not?

  29. Familiar? Apples, meet Oranges by dmccarty · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Hemos wrote:
    "we wrote at least one new entry for 190 straight days, including ones when one or both of us was tired, on vacation or not particularly inspired."
    Heh. Boy, does this refrain ever sound familiar.

    Oh yeah, sure. With the exception of Taco's diatribe against Blizzard last week, how much content do Slashdot editors* write in a week? Maybe 50 words?

    * for all values of editors = submission moderators

    --
    Have fun: Join D.N.A. (National Dyslexics Association)
  30. a blog for blogging by se7en11 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Wow! I'm starting a blog tonight about how I hate to read blogs about blogging.

    You saw it here first. ©

  31. Re:#1 USA! For Great Baseball! by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2

    "Where else holds a World Series for a game only played in one country?"

    Your point is valid (I think it's your point)... don't call it a World Series if only American and Canadian teams get to compete.

    But, then again, don't call it a World's Fair if it's only held in one city/country.

    And, of course, baseball isn't played in Japan, in Korea, in the Dominican Republic, in Venezuela, in Cuba, etc.

    The fact of the matter is that "World Series" is a legacy name, that was created when baseball was really only played in North America... as such, it really was a world series. I think they should open it up to other leagues now, or stop calling it the WS.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  32. They do have real jobs. by CyricZ · · Score: 1

    They do have real jobs. As is made quite clear, this is something they do as a hobby. You know, something they do outside of their normal work.

    Let me guess, you were just too fucking busy at your "real" job to actually read the summary and the articles before posting, right?

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:They do have real jobs. by pyro+jackelope · · Score: 1

      I read it, and people that have enough time to whine and complain about a hobby like this have no real life. Thanks for the flame though...real classy.

      --
      28:06:42:12 - That is when the world will end...
  33. Sounds familiar? by Pomme+de+Terre! · · Score: 1

    Heh. Boy, does this refrain ever sound familiar.

    That's probably because it's a dupe.

  34. Typo by ifwm · · Score: 1

    "he CHOSE to administrate the blog, deal with the comments, etc."

    There, I fixed it for you.

    PS, you don't get to whine about something you choose to do. That makes you a crybaby (and deservedly so).

    1. Re:Typo by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      What is wrong with discussing misperceptions about something? What is wrong with bring up a potentially interesting topic?

      "PS, you don't get to whine about something you choose to do. That makes you a crybaby (and deservedly so)."

      Then stop complaining about TFA and the GP to this post. And stop complaining about any single thing that happens, since you CHOOSE to not commit suicide.

      If you'd read TFA, you'd see that he wasn't complaining. He was making a point or two.

      What's the point of a blog, typically? To have other people read what you have to say.

      In that case, wouldn't it be ideal to maximize the amount of people reading what you have to say?

      And, in that case, wouldn't it be necessary to take actions that help? Such as responding to comments, blog administration, etc?

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:Typo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And stop complaining about any single thing that happens, since you CHOOSE to not commit suicide.
      Call me crazy, but I'm thinking you didn't finish first in your Logic class (and I'm not talking computer logic either).
    3. Re:Typo by Kelson · · Score: 1

      What is wrong with bring up a potentially interesting topic?

      My God, man! You do realize you're talking about Slashdot, don't you?

    4. Re:Typo by ifwm · · Score: 1

      You know, I had a well thought out, logical response to your post.

      Then I realized you don't have the slightest idea how to use reason or logic, so I'll go with this.

      "Then stop complaining about TFA and the GP to this post. And stop complaining about any single thing that happens, since you CHOOSE to not commit suicide."

      And that makes sense to you? Um, well... BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. THAT MAKES SENSE TO YOU!!!!! BWAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAA.

      Thanks for the laugh.

      Share some more wisdom genius. I'm going to show this to my friends. I have to, because they'll think I'm lying when I tell them that line of reasoning makes sense to ANYONE.

      BWAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA.

    5. Re:Typo by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Well, yes. You CHOSE to read the post. You CHOSE to read the article (maybe).

      The fact of the matter is that raising issues (complaining, if you will) is a great way of fostering debate about topics.

      There's a literary device called sarcasm that apparently you have no grasp of. Maybe you should go back and learn to read critically. You think my point is ridiculous? Good, so do I -- just like your point was ridiculous. Maybe you missed the obvious step of wondering why I had written that -- to point out the inanity of your little PS.

      Or do you take the Onion literally? Or Swift's "A Modest Proposal?"

      On of your points originally (which was OT, btw) was that if you CHOOSE to do something, you're a crybaby if you complain about it. My point was that (1) his experience differed from his expectations (thus his commentary about having to do more work than anticipated) and (2) that bringing up negative aspects to an expereince is valuable discourse.

      You seem to feel that since the author of the blog chose to do more than a half-ass job of writing and administering the blog, he shouldn't be allowed to point out that it was more work than he thought it would be. Note that the tone of TFA is a positive one, and that he plans on continuing...

      Critical reasoning skills. Learn them. Use them. Learn what sarcasm is used for (sorry I didn't enclose it in sarcasm tags so your little mind could understand it). Learn about other literary devices, and how they are used... and then maybe you won't come across as an utter moron.

      PS. I notice a ton of flamebaits and trolls in your profile... maybe you should go back to fark.com where that kind of BS is appreciated.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    6. Re:Typo by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Sure, but my point is that if you want to discuss the topic, go ahead. If you don't think it's worth discussing, simply don't bother.

      No one is forced to participate in any thread.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    7. Re:Typo by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      It seemed logical enough to me.

      "You don't get to whine about things you choose to do."

      "But that's absurd. Ultimately, everything is optional. Even life itself is optional, you can just kill yourself. Thus, your argument implies that you can't whine about anything."

      The argument isn't neccesarily airtight, (ifwm was talking about actively choosing to do things, whereas the suicide argument refers to are "passive" actions, which philosophically might be considered distinct) but it seems like at least a "reasonable" argument.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
  35. Re:#1 USA! For Great Baseball! by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

    The fact is, it's the World Series, and the World Championship of Baseball because the finest baseball players are competing. Not because we're arbitrarily excluding other countries. The best players from other countries come here to compete-making it truly a World Series.

    The same could be said for American football, except that there is much less international interest. Which makes it the world championship of American football basically by default, because no one cares.

    --
    (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
  36. It's a Work of Passion by ausoleil · · Score: 1
    I run a fairly busy blog for a college sports team Red and White From State and it has been up for a year. I've written most of the entries, in fact 380 of them in the 366 days that we've been up. We average over 1,000 unique hits a day, with no advertising, no search engine placement, in fact, it's just there and has gotten around by word of mouth.


    My wife asks me why I do it. I tell her that it's therapeutic, that it's interesting to me, and that I enjoy it -- most of the time. She thinks I am crazy. Maybe so. But at least I am having a good time doing it.

  37. Tough crowd here by Da3vid · · Score: 1

    I think everyone is being awfully hard on these guys. Trying to come up with something interesting and worthwhile to say on a repeated basis is a hard thing to do. Sure, there are no major repurcussions if they slacked off and didn't update as often, but they made a personal commitment. They decided to do it, and they did it. I think that is pretty impressive when compared to the majority of projects that I see. I think that calling them whiners is a bit harsh, definitely derogatory, and by saying that you don't have to post, you're just pushing them to give up on their commitment. Instead, it appears that they put in some work and thought, and they pulled it through, without giving up. Unfortunately, for their work, they've become whiners.

    In my opinion, the whiners did a fine job.

    -Da3vid-

  38. Re:#1 USA! For Great Baseball! by SunPin · · Score: 1
    I'll have to double check my map, but I'm pretty sure that Canada isn't yet a part of the United States.

    Not yet. Wait until we find your weapons of mass destruction.

    --
    Laws are for people with no friends.
  39. Heh. Boy, does this refrain ever sound familiar. by fuck_this_shit · · Score: 1

    Why, these guys double post all their stuff as well?

  40. Re:#1 USA! For Great Baseball! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read on /. (so it must be true) that the World Series is named that way because it was originally sponsored by the World News paper.

    But, according this it wasn't:
    http://roadsidephotos.com/baseball/name.htm

    I don't know what to believe, but please, just continue beating up on Americans. We like it.

  41. Yes and No by Jeff+Molby · · Score: 1

    It's not a "World Series" in the sense that teams from around the world compete for it, but it is a competition between the world's best players. There are very few teams in the world that could beat any major league team in a best of 7 series, let alone the World Series champion.

    1. Re:Yes and No by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      You're right... but limiting the WS to MLB teams serves to perpetuate this model. I compare it to football (soccer) in that regard.

      The US national team can compete respectably on the wordwide level because a lot of the players get experience playing in Serie A, or the Premiership, or the Bundeslige, or other major league.

      MLS teams will not be able to compete against teams from these same leagues until MLS teams play against teams of that caliber... which happens as friendlies.

      In baseball, I'd like to see MLB teams play against teams from the DR, or Japan, or Korea. As friendly matches, and maybe minus a few starters who wouldn't want to risk injury (like when Man U comes to the US to play against MLS teams).

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:Yes and No by Jeff+Molby · · Score: 1

      As an American, I have no problem with the current model. I get to see the best players in the world on a regular basis.

      As a side note, they are attempting to implement something analogous to the World Cup. http://mlb.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/mlb/wbc/index.jsp. I'm not sure how successful it will be though.

  42. Re:#1 USA! For Great Baseball! by legirons · · Score: 1

    "You kick the ball when making a punt"

    So why not call it Punting?

  43. Sounds like a subtle way to reference: by ScrapsNY · · Score: 0

    No one realizes just how much work goes into any "hobby project website" until they start doing it themselves. Recently, I was elected into one position in a hobby association, dumped into the "webmaster" position, and also administer the forum software.

    Translation: I became an officer in my WoW guild, and volunteered to run the guild forums!

    =P

  44. I totally agree. by nathan+s · · Score: 1

    I think since I started "blogging," I might have posted 80 articles, and that has been more than a year ago. So out of 365+ days, I post maybe once or twice a week on average.

    I could have written more often, but then my blog would quickly degenerate being from a semi-serious source of information on various topics (ranging from book reviews to rants about spam blacklisting services, probably my most popular post ever by number of comments and search engine hits) to being your classic LiveJournal angst-and-drama-fest.

    You won't find a post about what I had for breakfast on my blog. I think if I forced myself to post every single day, the quality would go way, way down. So, I completely agree. It's best in the long run to post when you have something useful to say, otherwise hold off. Incidentally, it's also the reason I don't post comments on /. more often. If I don't have something I feel is worth saying, I don't say anything.

  45. Re:#1 USA! For Great Baseball! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So why not call it Punting?

    In casual, face-to-face converstations amongst football enthusists it is. However, in the media or on the web it is not as often refered to as such, probably so misunderstandings don't occur.

  46. Blogging for the Mets... by Shant3030 · · Score: 1

    Is better than blogging for a team like the Royals or Pirates. Their season is over around June. At least the Mets were in contention until August, have exciting players and play in NY.

    --
    100% Insightful
  47. There are editors? by DeadDecoy · · Score: 1

    I didn't know slashdot had editors.

  48. Obvious troll, but makes a point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Name calling aside, I have to agree. I'm a huge (American) football fan, but I think the name does lead to some confusion especially considering that the rest of the world has an international sport called football (American soccer) which has undoubtedly been around longer than American football. However, the name will never change. Like the Imperial system, we will only give it up when you pry it from our cold dead hands. I also think that calling it the World Series is kind of dumb, but again it is tradition. I also cringe whenever the winner of the Super Bowl, NBA Championship, or World Series is called "the world champion".

    Not to get off topic, but I just don't understand the whole hooligan thing. Here in the U.S., the worst we ever get is tons of students rushing the field after a big win. At worst, one or two die when the goal post is torn down and smacks them in the head, and this happens VERY RARELY. Over in Europe, it is actually dangerous to go to a game. I don't know how frequent this is as I don't live there, but it seems like there's always a huge brawl between fans of opposing teams. It also seems like the fans quite often throw things onto the field (the incident of the guy getting hit on the shoulder with a flare comes to mind). Also, a big match being played in AN EMPTY STADIUM?!?!?! I cannot fathom that ever happening here. Although a few years ago we had that incident in Cleveland where the fans started throwing bottles onto the field, but again that is very rare. It's almost as if being a fan of a team over there is like being a follower of a religion. What the fuck could a guy say to you at a game to get you into a fist fight?! I can understand defending yourself, but the big brawls are inexcusable.

  49. Don't feel committed. by ChaosDiscord · · Score: 1

    His complaint that he feels a duty to post is like the many people who complain that they loathe cell phones because they "have" to answer whenever someone calls. The answer to both is easy: If you don't want to, don't. If you don't want to be interrupted, just ignore your cell phone. Heck, turn if off for a few hours. Sure, some people will complain, "You didn't answer." (If it's your boss and you're being paid to be on call, perhaps he has a point.) Tell them you were otherwise occupied, that this will frequently happen, and they should accept it. If they continue complaining, tell them off; they're the one being rude.

    The same goes for your blog. If you don't have something to say, don't. Many of my favorite blogs post irregularly at best. But when the person writes, they've got something interesting to say. I'll happily take two months between posts if those posts are great. I'd prefer it to something pointless daily. If someone politely requests you post more often, again, just explain that you don't have anything to say. Many complain they hate visiting daily waiting for something new; suggest that they try an RSS reader which will alert them to new content. If they're rude, tell them off; you don't owe them anything. (Again, if blogging is somehow your job, the requirements change. But that's not really the point. Lots of people have to do their job when they don't want to.)

  50. Re:#1 USA! For Great Baseball! by sco08y · · Score: 1

    Oh and why do you call it football when there is no goddamn kicking in the game?

    We asked ourselves, "how about calling it rugby? Nope, sounds like something the British do to sheep."

  51. You have NO idea by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    How hard it is to a) write that witty but nonsensical comment at the end of the submission, 2) press submit.

  52. Might be weird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but "blogging" has a nasty sound to it. Let me demonstrate:

    "Wall Street Journal Online tech columnist Jason Fry started playing around with a New York Mets blog almost a year ago. In today's Real Time column, he outs himself as one of the writers behind Faith & Fear in Flushing, and writes about the stress of blogging: "The downside of being a blog writer? Being a blog administrator. I also wasn't prepared for how much work blogging was. Baseball already took up three hours a night; now it took up four -- at least . Blogging about a thrilling extra-inning win was easy; blogging about a dull-as-dishwater loss wasn't. And with more and more people reading us and commenting about our posts, blogging sometimes became a duty; we wrote at least one new entry for 190 straight days, including ones when one or both of us was tired, on vacation or not particularly inspired."

  53. I was wondering... by kwoff · · Score: 1

    ...where could I go to receive ads from the WSJ about someone posting unedited stuff on a webpage about baseball...? Now I know: Slashdot! By the way, does anybody like know where I could get ads about gossip on Jennifer Lopez? OMG PLEASE POST THEM HERE!!!

  54. fist fight? by DennisInDallas · · Score: 1

    >>WTF could a guy say... Obviously you've never been to a Steelers game.

    But seriously, when the players are professionals the fans are much more detached (well the sober, reasonalbe, USofAlien ones are anyway). When the players are the fans' little darlings fights break out all the time, and have for at least 40 years.

  55. Re:#1 USA! For Great Baseball! by Pneuma+ROCKS · · Score: 1
    You kick the ball when making a punt , attempting a field goal, starting the game or half by kicking off to the receiving team and after a touch down you kick the ball to score an extra point.

    Yes well, they only kick the damn ball a couple of times during the whole game. It's like calling baseball "buntball".

    --
    Favorite quote: "
  56. Re:#1 USA! For Great Baseball! by EmperorKagato · · Score: 1

    You wouldn't call it batball either.

    You're funny! I like this guy.

    --
    ----- You know you have ego issues when you register a domain in your name.