I am amazed by the responses that say in essence: Communism / Socialism sucks. How dare a communist sci fi writer write a sci fi story that involves communism?!
Relax and take a deep breath. It is only science fiction.
There have been many Sci Fi stories about how a group of capitalists got together and created a moon landing / interplanetary travel / interstellar travel / colonization. Shall we decry them for the capitalist propaganda?
In reality the moon landing was created by the government taxing the citizens and using some of that money to create a government program to send men to the moon.
Science fiction has always had a lot to say about technology, economic systems, governments and societies. I am concerned about the problem of a world where fewer workers (this includes computer nerds) are needed to produce the things society wants because of advances in technology. What happens to this large mass of unemployable workers under unregulated capitalism? This is a perfect theme for a science fiction story. I look forward to reading The wages of humanity.
I'm guessing the lawsuit with the best chance of success will be and end user who incurs a huge expense due to his inability to use the bricked device. Or the manufacturer who ordered FTDI parts but received fake ones.
A job should be a learning experience just as much as college. By frequent switching you learn a variety of skills and ways of doing things. During your first few months on a new job, you have to absorb a lot of information in a short time. This is a plus if you value learning.
I have always got far bigger "raises" by switching jobs than I got for working for a company for a long time. Admittedly, I haven't worked for many companies for more than a year. A couple of times, I switched because of the amount of my raise and got a much better salary at the new employer.
Job shopping teaches you the art or resume writing and interview techniques.
That said, if you are truly happy with your work I wouldn't jump for a small increase.
There are a lot of benefits to job shopping to offset some employers seeing a job shopper as a liability.
The one improvement Microsoft could have made in windows 8.1 is to have an option to have a more windows 7 like interface. I accomplished with a lot of work and by adding classic shell. The old windows is still there, but Microsoft hides it because they want us to start using the metro apps.
The trouble is that a lot of us don't want to move to the metro apps. My computer has a keyboard and mouse and my old programs work just fine that way.
"Real journalists" have a conflict of interest. They want to keep their jobs and their access to government sorces. As a result, they become stenographers for government PR people.
The media owners also have a conflict of interest. They are intimidated by the government and demand that the journalists do what it takes to keep the midia owners business safe. They are also intimidated by the threat of lawsuits.
As a result the media has become garbage. I am sad to say that there is no high quality media in the United States today. Better coverage can be had from foreign sources and bloggers.
All of these programs ran in MS DOS, itself on of the great programs. Sorry, Microsoft haters, but at that point in my life, DOS was they only operating system I knew.
Q&A was a word processor and database (sort of). It had the totally cool feature of being able to add a list of figures in a document! It did macros.
Borland C After giving up on Microsoft C, someone gave me a copy of Borland C which had the advantage that it actually worked.
Telix was a full featured shareware comm program that was written by 17 year old! It was the best one out there at the time.
Norton Disk Doctor and Spinrite to keep the hard drive going.
Dirmagic was a program that handled files and directories instead of using the clunk dos commands.
Lemmings - Just plain fun.
Star Control 2 Great space game that told a story
DesqView and QEMM Allowed you to multitask in DOS.
The ick of making friends with someone who's visibly old. ???? Most of us old farts don't wear adult diapers, don't have old man smell, and if you actually talked to us, you might just find out that we have insights and ideas worth hearing.
Think about this. Someday you will be old. When that day comes, do you want people to think of you as "Icky"??
Neither of the candidates represent me. I am a liberal who wants maximum freedom. While I will vote peace and freedom, I have much more in common with both the peace and freedom part and the libertarian party than either the democrats or the republicans.
Both the democrats and the republicans are owned by special interests (read people richer that 99% of the people). It's not even a secret. the solicit campaign contributions (bribes) openly.
I recently worked at a company that had 286 computers running on the production line. They have plenty of smart people working there. We ended up buying one on Ebay (a great source for obsolete hardware).
I have no doubt that hardware and software that works with XP will be available for a very long time.
As to whether it is better to upgrade the XP applications, or replace them is a decision that needs to be made. In some cases it makes sense to upgrade.
In the example I gave, we bought several spares on ebay. that cost around $300 that should keep the machine running for the forseeable future. Replacement of the machine would have cost upward of $100,000.
I remember star trek on the atari 800. It took over 20 minutes to load from the cassette drive. You got to shoot at Klingons. It seemed so cool back then.
A salesman needs two skills. One is the ability to sell, the people skills. In addition he needs deep product knowledge. If you are selling development tools, you need to understand development and exactly how these tools will make the programmers more productive.
It is not unusual to require multiple skills for a job. How is this any different?
I have often been approached by salespeople with little product knowledge. They never succeed in selling me stuff.
When I am interested in a technical product, I call the engineer. Usually they can quickly get me the information I need to make a purchasing decision.
What is the point of cracking open a science textbook when you are going to be competing with people in Asia who can produce the same level of genius for pennies on the dollar?
I don't care what you can learn here in America, someone in China can learn the same thing and apply that knowledge for far lower wages than you.
The point is that if you have knowledge you will be way ahead of those that do not! Not all engineering jobs can or will be sent overseas. There is plenty of opportunity for intelligent engineers and techs here in the U.S.
This situation occurs from time to time. A person starts a new job. He is paid a low wage because of his lack of experience. But he is ambitious. He spends time improving his programming skills. He notices a persistent problem and writes a program in his spare time to solve it. He offers it to his boss and the program is implemented. There are the usual hiccups that go along with implementing a new program but after a few months, the program is running smoothly. Efficiency increases, man hours are reduced and most people are happy with the changes.
His manager gives raises of 1 to 3 % with 5 % for exceptional performance. To give a larger raise, the manager has to fill out a lot of paperwork, making the case why the employee deserves more. Even then the raise may not be approved. After all money is tight and 5% is considered an excellent raise.
When the employees review comes due, he is called to the manager’s office and is offered the 5% raise. He will go from 24000 to 25,200 per year. The manager explains that 5% is the largest raise he can give.
The employee is disappointed. He protests. “Programmers make 60 – 70 k. I have proven my abilities. I expected a larger raise.” The manager says “I don’t have a slot for a programmer in this department. My manager won’t authorize me to pay you even $30,000 much less 60 or 70.
What happens next? Sometimes the employee keeps up the good work, with various results. Often he concludes that working hard is a waste of effort. Why work so hard when to company will basically steal his work? He becomes one of the drones, doing the minimum amount of work he can get away with.
If he is smart he looks elsewhere. In the company’s mind, he is a 25,000 a year guy. No matter how many new skills he develops, the company is unlikely to give him a substantial raise.
Occupy has brought attention to the problem of income inequality, Money created through work is taxed more than money created by investment.
I work in industrial automation and I have seen the gains in productivity and efficiency that have taken place since I began working in the 70’s. When I was young it was common for the man to be the wage earner while the woman raised the children. It was possible in this situation for them to live the “American Dream”. Today with both parents working families are struggling. Why, with all these improvements in technology, are people worse off than we were 40 years ago?
Most people know that they are being screwed but don’t agree on how it is being done. I agree with some of the tea party ideals but my gripe is not that we pay too much in taxes but that we get far too little in exchange for the taxes we pay. For example, the other industrialized countries have very inexpensive medical care 5 weeks of vacation per year etc. We get lots of government control of our lives but very little that benefits us. And where government control is needed in regulating corporations we get far too little of it.
The problem as I see it is that politicians are owned by corporate interests. What else can you call it when a corporation donates to both the democratic and the republican candidate for the same office? The politicians in turn make laws that benefit corporations over individuals.
The goal of corporations is to pay employees as little as possible for as much work as possible. They want to sell their products for as much as possible. The goal of workers is to maximize compensation. The goal of consumers is to get the most for their money. I realize there are other issues involved but these are basic. There must be a compromise. But because of the corporations influence over politicians that balance has shifted way too far toward the corporations.
Neither the Democratic nor the Republican parties are working for the benefit of the citizens. Both have sold out to the corporations.
Occupy represents me too. I am a self employed computer programmer who has plenty of work.
Is someone gets caught stealing a carton of cigarettes from a store he will likely spend a few days in jail. If someone illegally downloads a few songs he can be fined thousands of dollars.
But when criminals on Wall Street screw up peoples pensions and trash the economy with their get rich quick schemes, they get huge bonuses. The companies that perpetrated these frauds got bailed out. No one was held accountable. No major player in the scandal was held accountable.
The government takes a large chunk of my pay as taxes. Corporations make billions and often pay no taxes.
I am not saying Assange in particular, but Wikileaks as an organization. Did they disclose the people that are leaking the information to them, such as Manning? How is that any different than a government refusing to release the sources of their information? a lie by omission is still a lie.
You are missing the whole point. Wikileaks has to keep the leaker's identity secret so that they will be free to reveal what they know. This used to be the job of the press in this country but unfortunately they are in bed with the government and the corporations.
The purpose of all this is so that we, the voters, can know what is going on. How can we vote intelligently when all we are fed is propaganda?
Slashdot Mirror
I am amazed by the responses that say in essence: Communism / Socialism sucks. How dare a communist sci fi writer write a sci fi story that involves communism?!
Relax and take a deep breath. It is only science fiction.
There have been many Sci Fi stories about how a group of capitalists got together and created a moon landing / interplanetary travel / interstellar travel / colonization. Shall we decry them for the capitalist propaganda?
In reality the moon landing was created by the government taxing the citizens and using some of that money to create a government program to send men to the moon.
Science fiction has always had a lot to say about technology, economic systems, governments and societies. I am concerned about the problem of a world where fewer workers (this includes computer nerds) are needed to produce the things society wants because of advances in technology. What happens to this large mass of unemployable workers under unregulated capitalism? This is a perfect theme for a science fiction story. I look forward to reading The wages of humanity.
I agree completely. We need a law that says simply: It shall be illegal to do any misleading advertising.
Financial penalties would rapidly escalate and repeated offences would subject company owners to jail time.
The offender would be required to publish in a similar venue a statement admitting to, and apologizing for, the misleading advertising.
The test of misleading would be if average people would believe something untrue after viewing the ad.
I'm guessing the lawsuit with the best chance of success will be and end user who incurs a huge expense due to his inability to use the bricked device. Or the manufacturer who ordered FTDI parts but received fake ones.
Personally I hope they sue FTDI into bankruptcy.
I telneted in to your bbs. Wow that brings back memories! The all text interface. How amazing BBSes were in their day!
A job should be a learning experience just as much as college. By frequent switching you learn a variety of skills and ways of doing things.
During your first few months on a new job, you have to absorb a lot of information in a short time. This is a plus if you value learning.
I have always got far bigger "raises" by switching jobs than I got for working for a company for a long time. Admittedly, I haven't worked for many
companies for more than a year. A couple of times, I switched because of the amount of my raise and got a much better salary at the new employer.
Job shopping teaches you the art or resume writing and interview techniques.
That said, if you are truly happy with your work I wouldn't jump for a small increase.
There are a lot of benefits to job shopping to offset some employers seeing a job shopper as a liability.
The one improvement Microsoft could have made in windows 8.1 is to have an option to have a more windows 7 like interface. I accomplished with a lot of work and by adding classic shell. The old windows is still there, but Microsoft hides it because they want us to start using the metro apps.
The trouble is that a lot of us don't want to move to the metro apps. My computer has a keyboard and mouse and my old programs work just fine that way.
"Real journalists" have a conflict of interest. They want to keep their jobs and their access to government sorces. As a result, they become stenographers for government PR people.
The media owners also have a conflict of interest. They are intimidated by the government and demand that the journalists do what it takes to keep the midia owners business safe. They are also intimidated by the threat of lawsuits.
As a result the media has become garbage. I am sad to say that there is no high quality media in the United States today. Better coverage can be had from foreign sources and bloggers.
Thanks for the info. I will make it a point to buy / recommend Leveno products. I want to reward this behavior.
The best way to rob a bank is to own one.
Some of us loved that obsolete software.
All of these programs ran in MS DOS, itself on of the great programs. Sorry, Microsoft haters, but at that point in my life, DOS was they only operating system I knew.
Q&A was a word processor and database (sort of). It had the totally cool feature of being able to add a list of figures in a document! It did macros.
Borland C After giving up on Microsoft C, someone gave me a copy of Borland C which had the advantage that it actually worked.
Telix was a full featured shareware comm program that was written by 17 year old! It was the best one out there at the time.
Norton Disk Doctor and Spinrite to keep the hard drive going.
Dirmagic was a program that handled files and directories instead of using the clunk dos commands.
Lemmings - Just plain fun.
Star Control 2 Great space game that told a story
DesqView and QEMM Allowed you to multitask in DOS.
The ick of making friends with someone who's visibly old. ???? Most of us old farts don't wear adult diapers, don't have old man smell, and if you actually talked to us, you might just find out that we have insights and ideas worth hearing.
Think about this. Someday you will be old. When that day comes, do you want people to think of you as "Icky"??
Neither of the candidates represent me. I am a liberal who wants maximum freedom. While I will vote peace and freedom, I have much more in common with both the peace and freedom part and the libertarian party than either the democrats or the republicans.
Both the democrats and the republicans are owned by special interests (read people richer that 99% of the people). It's not even a secret. the solicit campaign contributions (bribes) openly.
So why give either one your vote?
I recently worked at a company that had 286 computers running on the production line. They have plenty of smart people working there. We ended up buying one on Ebay (a great source for obsolete hardware).
I have no doubt that hardware and software that works with XP will be available for a very long time.
As to whether it is better to upgrade the XP applications, or replace them is a decision that needs to be made. In some cases it makes sense to upgrade.
In the example I gave, we bought several spares on ebay. that cost around $300 that should keep the machine running for the forseeable future. Replacement of the machine would have cost upward of $100,000.
Rather than a book or game why not set him up with the developing environment for something that interests him?
I remember star trek on the atari 800. It took over 20 minutes to load from the cassette drive. You got to shoot at Klingons. It seemed so cool back then.
A salesman needs two skills. One is the ability to sell, the people skills. In addition he needs deep product knowledge. If you are selling development tools, you need to understand development and exactly how these tools will make the programmers more productive.
It is not unusual to require multiple skills for a job. How is this any different?
I have often been approached by salespeople with little product knowledge. They never succeed in selling me stuff.
When I am interested in a technical product, I call the engineer. Usually they can quickly get me the information I need to make a purchasing decision.
This is already happening. Eli Pariser did a talk on Ted talks about this very topic.
Google and Facebook tailor results to the person the results are provided for. Here is the link.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szaJsXT6q9Q&feature=g-like&context=G2ed170eALTxxsHgANAA
What is the point of cracking open a science textbook when you are going to be competing with people in Asia who can produce the same level of genius for pennies on the dollar?
I don't care what you can learn here in America, someone in China can learn the same thing and apply that knowledge for far lower wages than you.
These people are willing to live in cages. Literally. Look.
http://www.weirdasianews.com/2009/11/21/hong-kong-citizens-living-cages-literally/
The point is that if you have knowledge you will be way ahead of those that do not! Not all engineering jobs can or will be sent overseas. There is plenty of opportunity for intelligent engineers and techs here in the U.S.
There are fewer good choices for the uneducated.
This situation occurs from time to time. A person starts a new job. He is paid a low wage because of his lack of experience. But he is ambitious. He spends time improving his programming skills. He notices a persistent problem and writes a program in his spare time to solve it. He offers it to his boss and the program is implemented. There are the usual hiccups that go along with implementing a new program but after a few months, the program is running smoothly. Efficiency increases, man hours are reduced and most people are happy with the changes.
His manager gives raises of 1 to 3 % with 5 % for exceptional performance. To give a larger raise, the manager has to fill out a lot of paperwork, making the case why the employee deserves more. Even then the raise may not be approved. After all money is tight and 5% is considered an excellent raise.
When the employees review comes due, he is called to the manager’s office and is offered the 5% raise. He will go from 24000 to 25,200 per year. The manager explains that 5% is the largest raise he can give.
The employee is disappointed. He protests. “Programmers make 60 – 70 k. I have proven my abilities. I expected a larger raise.” The manager says “I don’t have a slot for a programmer in this department. My manager won’t authorize me to pay you even $30,000 much less 60 or 70.
What happens next? Sometimes the employee keeps up the good work, with various results. Often he concludes that working hard is a waste of effort. Why work so hard when to company will basically steal his work? He becomes one of the drones, doing the minimum amount of work he can get away with.
If he is smart he looks elsewhere. In the company’s mind, he is a 25,000 a year guy. No matter how many new skills he develops, the company is unlikely to give him a substantial raise.
Occupy has brought attention to the problem of income inequality, Money created through work is taxed more than money created by investment.
I work in industrial automation and I have seen the gains in productivity and efficiency that have taken place since I began working in the 70’s. When I was young it was common for the man to be the wage earner while the woman raised the children. It was possible in this situation for them to live the “American Dream”. Today with both parents working families are struggling. Why, with all these improvements in technology, are people worse off than we were 40 years ago?
Most people know that they are being screwed but don’t agree on how it is being done. I agree with some of the tea party ideals but my gripe is not that we pay too much in taxes but that we get far too little in exchange for the taxes we pay. For example, the other industrialized countries have very inexpensive medical care 5 weeks of vacation per year etc. We get lots of government control of our lives but very little that benefits us. And where government control is needed in regulating corporations we get far too little of it.
The problem as I see it is that politicians are owned by corporate interests. What else can you call it when a corporation donates to both the democratic and the republican candidate for the same office? The politicians in turn make laws that benefit corporations over individuals.
The goal of corporations is to pay employees as little as possible for as much work as possible. They want to sell their products for as much as possible. The goal of workers is to maximize compensation. The goal of consumers is to get the most for their money. I realize there are other issues involved but these are basic. There must be a compromise. But because of the corporations influence over politicians that balance has shifted way too far toward the corporations.
Neither the Democratic nor the Republican parties are working for the benefit of the citizens. Both have sold out to the corporations.
What alternative would you suggest?
Occupy represents me too. I am a self employed computer programmer who has plenty of work.
Is someone gets caught stealing a carton of cigarettes from a store he will likely spend a few days in jail. If someone illegally downloads a few songs he can be fined thousands of dollars.
But when criminals on Wall Street screw up peoples pensions and trash the economy with their get rich quick schemes, they get huge bonuses. The companies that perpetrated these frauds got bailed out. No one was held accountable. No major player in the scandal was held accountable.
The government takes a large chunk of my pay as taxes. Corporations make billions and often pay no taxes.
That is why I support Occupy.
If he is willing to bring the fungus he will be invited to certain types of parties.,
In a related story, researchers find an increase of the average intelligence over the same period.
I am not saying Assange in particular, but Wikileaks as an organization. Did they disclose the people that are leaking the information to them, such as Manning? How is that any different than a government refusing to release the sources of their information? a lie by omission is still a lie.
You are missing the whole point. Wikileaks has to keep the leaker's identity secret so that they will be free to reveal what they know. This used to be the job of the press in this country but unfortunately they are in bed with the government and the corporations.
The purpose of all this is so that we, the voters, can know what is going on. How can we vote intelligently when all we are fed is propaganda?