Slashdot Mirror


Court Shuts Down Alleged $120M Tech Support Scam

wiredmikey writes A federal court has temporarily shut down and frozen the assets of two telemarketing operations accused by the FTC of scamming customers out of more than $120 million by deceptively marketing computer software and tech support services. According to complaints filed by the FTC, since at least 2012, the defendants used software designed to trick consumers into believing there were problems with their computers and then hit them with sales pitches for tech support products and services to fix their machines.

According to the FTC, the scams began with computer software that claimed to improve the security or performance of the customer's computer. Typically, consumers downloaded a free, trial version of the software that would run a computer system scan. The scan always identified numerous errors, whether they existed or not. Consumers were then told that in order to fix the problems they had to purchase the paid version of the software for between $29 and $49. In order to activate the software after the purchase, consumers were then directed to call a toll-free number and connected to telemarketers who tried to sell them unneeded computer repair services and software, according to the FTC complaint. The services could cost as much as $500, the FTC stated.

129 comments

  1. Why... by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 4, Informative

    did this take so long to occur. It amazes me both that people fall for this, and that the credit card companies allow these services to operate under merchant accounts.

    1. Re:Why... by TigerPlish · · Score: 2

      did this take so long to occur.

      Big ship turns slow -- the inertia of government / judiciary is fearsome.

      Maybe they spent the time gathering intel and evidence, dotting Is and crossing Ts. Building a case. Due process and all that.

      Either way.. win!

      --
      The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    2. Re:Why... by khasim · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My guess is that someone important was scammed OR the money got to the level of "important" for the banks. This has got to be one of the easiest things that the FBI could track and bust.

      A related question, though. As anyone who's ever done support knows, the average computer is awash with problems. How different would the situation have been if the scan had been real instead of a scam?

    3. Re:Why... by Pablew+Nopl · · Score: 5, Funny

      Man, these people are idiots. Why didn't they just use MyCleanPC?

    4. Re:Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did this take so long to occur. It amazes me both that people fall for this, and that the credit card companies allow these services to operate under merchant accounts.

      The wheels of government turn slowly, but they produce a very fine result..

    5. Re:Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they were too busy trying to interpret APK's host file instructions to have gotten around to that part yet

    6. Re:Why... by arth1 · · Score: 1

      It amazes me both that people fall for this, and that the credit card companies allow these services to operate under merchant accounts.

      The latter shouldn't amaze you. The credit card companies get a cut, I mean transaction fee.

    7. Re:Why... by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Why would the credit card companies allow this?

      1) It brings in money to the credit card companies. They have no incentive to stop a money flow from coming in.
      2) If the scam gets too much negative PR, the credit card company can "discover" the scammer, cut off their accounts, and publicly declare how shocked (SHOCKED!) they are that this scam was taking place.

      In other words, scams like this are free money to the credit card companies with no downside.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    8. Re: Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please don't speak his name. It will conjur the beast.

    9. Re:Why... by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 2

      Legitimate AV software that will scan for free will also fix for free. You never see it scan but refuse to fix until you pay up unless it is a scam, AFAIK.

    10. Re: Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beast? APK is a clueless little bitch.

    11. Re:Why... by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Man, these people are idiots. Why didn't they just use MyCleanPC?

      I'm surprised it is not posted here many many times as, for once, it may be on topic.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    12. Re:Why... by knightghost · · Score: 1

      If something takes forever then it's not a win. Maybe the FCC needs an app like Mr. Number.

    13. Re:Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These scammers had to be free long enough to be able to accumulate the scammed funds for which to pay the fines in said lawsuit which will give them time to change names and locations to accumulate more illgotten booty so this can happen all over again. Don't you just love the free enterprise system when it really works correctly?

    14. Re:Why... by smallfries · · Score: 1

      And yet this has reached a conclusion, so it did not take forever. Sounds like a win?

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    15. Re:Why... by quantaman · · Score: 1

      did this take so long to occur. It amazes me both that people fall for this, and that the credit card companies allow these services to operate under merchant accounts.

      More than that. Why isn't this criminal?

      I understand why you may not want to criminalize every dubious business practise, but these folks were literally telling straightforward lies to consumers to make the sale. Why isn't that fraud?

      --
      I stole this Sig
    16. Re:Why... by smallfries · · Score: 1

      Yeah the telephone support is amazing.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    17. Re:Why... by Zibodiz · · Score: 1

      Kaspersky and McAfee both publish scan-but-don't-fix AV software. I'm sure others do as well.

    18. Re:Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Legitimate AV software ...

    19. Re: Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say that the difference is that the software in the article install without consent of the user but it would seem the large companies do the same thing.

    20. Re:Why... by Wootery · · Score: 1

      But the whole story is that the court shut them down. Surely it is considered fraud (or something similar), no?

    21. Re:Why... by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      Where does Bennett stand on the MyCleanPC vs telemarketer controversy...?

    22. Re:Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      did this take so long to occur. It amazes me both that people fall for this, and that the credit card companies allow these services to operate under merchant accounts.

      They weren't infringing on Disney copyright.

    23. Re:Why... by qbast · · Score: 1

      And how many chargebacks?

    24. Re:Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is it a scam to ask people to pay for a service??

    25. Re:Why... by kmoser · · Score: 1

      Legitimate AV software that will scan for free will also fix for free. You never see it scan but refuse to fix until you pay up unless it is a scam, AFAIK.

      My Windows XP has known bugs which Microsoft refuses to fix. Instead, they are asking me to upgrade to Windows 8. Scam!

    26. Re:Why... by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      did this take so long to occur. It amazes me both that people fall for this, and that the credit card companies allow these services to operate under merchant accounts.

      The credit card companies like these guys. After all, they did not steal the card numbers, payments were made and there are no losses, as would happen if the card/card number was stolen.

      As the card companies would say

      "There is a sucker born every second".

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  2. Let's just execute the principles live on TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If we consider the aggregate harm of these scams, they're on the order of mass murder, possibly up there with actual war. Thus the punishment should fit the crime. It's not even like these people have the Moist von Lipwig excuse of scamming the scammers.

  3. GOOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The FTC is at least good for something

  4. To be honest... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This sounds a lot like getting medical treatment in America.

    1. Re:To be honest... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up!

  5. Small fish by lucm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just change a few words and multiply the numbers:

    Typically, consumers downloaded a free, trial version of the software. The business analysts always identified numerous suboptimal business processes, whether they existed or not. Consumers were then told that in order to fix the problems they had to purchase the paid version of the software for between $290,000 and $490,000. In order to customize the software after the purchase, consumers were then directed to call a certified partners network and connected to consultants who tried to sell them unneeded upgrades and tools. The services could cost as much as $500 per hour.

    ...and you get a typical SAP implementation scenario.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
    1. Re:Small fish by RandomAdam · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wanted to mod this "funny" but it is too close to the truth....where is the "sad but true" mod!

      --
      @Random_Adam

      Sometimes a sig doesn't have to be funny!!
    2. Re:Small fish by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      so what you're saying is, the real value of SAP is $29 per site license?

      (next dumb question: does SAP actually do what it says on the tin?)

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    3. Re:Small fish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who admins a SAP deployment..... .....this is so sadly true.

    4. Re:Small fish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My experience with JDEdwards is similar, except you can get consultants for $100/hr. Sort of. They don't know anything, but hey, if you get enough of them, they're bound to know something, right? Shakespeare, million monkeys, etc... That's what we thought that what management was thinking. Three whole teams like this were purged before finally settling on one guy for $250/hr - but he really, really knew how the system worked, and accomplished more in two weeks than the three teams in six months.

      Anecdotal evidence suggests that the same can be said for PeopleSoft and its support vendors. It is interesting to me that they both have Oracle in common.

  6. PC Cleaner by budgenator · · Score: 1

    I kind of figure something was up when PC Cleaner said my linux machine had currupt entries in the registry; but al you can say is P.T. Barnum was right, there is a sucker born every minute.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    1. Re:PC Cleaner by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 5, Funny

      I kind of figure something was up when PC Cleaner said my linux machine had currupt entries in the registry;

      Wait a year or two. They're just getting ready for systemd.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  7. "This is windows support calling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    your windows computer has a virus" But I don't run windows, I have Linux.

    1. Re: "This is windows support calling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not funny until you spend an hour on the phone with them, having them patiently walk you through all these steps, and then you reveal your trump card. Lol.

    2. Re:"This is windows support calling... by RandomAdam · · Score: 1

      I have had this exact thing happen; "press F8 when booting to get into safe mode"...."but I just said I'm not running windows, there is no 'safe mode'....what should I do?"...usually results in a confused silence.... :)

      --
      @Random_Adam

      Sometimes a sig doesn't have to be funny!!
    3. Re:"This is windows support calling... by rjstegbauer · · Score: 1

      I've gotten two of these phone calls in the past few months. The first time I followed their instructions up until the point that they wanted to take over my computer. They pointed me to a legitimate screen sharing application. I gave them the wrong access code. Once the caller realized I wasn't going to fall for the scam, he got ANGRY and told me that *tomorrow* he was going to destroy my computer. I challenged him to do it now. :-) I should have told him my IP address was 127.0.0.1.

      I still wonder *what* he was going to do once he took control. Setup a remote control SPAM bot? Encrypt everything? Or simply ask for $500.00 to "fix" all the problems?

      If I had an old throwaway system, I would have pointed him to that...but then I would be worried that he would have been able to infect my other computers on my network...maybe.

      Randy -- regardlessitwasfun

    4. Re: "This is windows support calling... by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      so many times I've had this happen... you're a milk bone to the telemarketing dogs if you run a small business.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    5. Re:"This is windows support calling... by spiritplumber · · Score: 1

      I used to do this on IRC with scriptkiddies... I told them that I was behind a proxy (usually true) but my "real" IP address was 127.(somenumber).(somenumber).(somenumber) and then watch them ping-o-death themselves. The nineties were fun.

      --
      Liberty - Security - Laziness - Pick any two.
    6. Re:"This is windows support calling... by NotSanguine · · Score: 1

      I've gotten two of these phone calls in the past few months. The first time I followed their instructions up until the point that they wanted to take over my computer. They pointed me to a legitimate screen sharing application. I gave them the wrong access code. Once the caller realized I wasn't going to fall for the scam, he got ANGRY and told me that *tomorrow* he was going to destroy my computer. I challenged him to do it now. :-) I should have told him my IP address was 127.0.0.1.

      I still wonder *what* he was going to do once he took control. Setup a remote control SPAM bot? Encrypt everything? Or simply ask for $500.00 to "fix" all the problems?

      If I had an old throwaway system, I would have pointed him to that...but then I would be worried that he would have been able to infect my other computers on my network...maybe.

      Randy -- regardlessitwasfun

      Hey! don't give that out, that's my IP address!

      I've gotten a few of those calls too and played the same game. But before he could (in his thick Hindi accent) express his outrage, I verbally abused him until he hung up.

      I do have a spare Windows VM for the next time, assuming I have time to block all network access except the screen sharing app. That could be fun. A waste of time, but possibly amusing.

      --
      No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
    7. Re:"This is windows support calling... by BVis · · Score: 1

      You ever want to really confuse them? Tell them your keyboard doesn't have a Windows key, like my old IBM model M. They'll spend all kinds of time walking you through trying to find it..

      "Please to be looking at the left side of your keyboard, do you see the button C T R L?"
      "Yes, I see it."
      "The Windows key is being right next to that one"
      "No, there's no key right next to it, there is one that says A L T a little further over"
      "No, there has to be a key between that has the Windows logo"
      "I'm telling you, there isn't. Why don't you tell me what you're trying to do and I'll find a different way"
      "You are lying! You have a Windows key there, you have to"
      "Nope, old keyboard. What are you trying to do?"
      Then you listen to them flip through the script and again insist you must have a Windows key if it's a Windows computer.

      It's great fun. I've wasted 90 minutes of their time this way. Another thing I like to do is, when they say there's a problem with my Windows computer, I ask them "Which one? I have several", which is true. I ask them for the machine name, the IP, everything they should know if they're getting a trouble report, right?

      The goal is to get them to hang up on YOU.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    8. Re:"This is windows support calling... by rjune · · Score: 1

      I talked with one of them on Saturday. After spending about 25 minutes acting like a total doofus - I asked him if it made any difference which enter key I used because they are shaped differently. It was really fun thinking up stupid things to ask him. After about 25 minutes, we were at the point where he wanted to open an internet connection, I called him out and hung up. (I had also drank a lot of coffee and really needed use the bathroom) He called back 5 times to cuss me out. Name an insult and he used it (I have one, but I'm not one!) After the third call, my wife wanted to talk to them and he asked her for oral sex, she accused him of stalking and said she would notify law enforcement. Perhaps we could start a contest to see how badly the scammers have been annoyed.

    9. Re:"This is windows support calling... by azadrozny · · Score: 1

      My personal best is about 50 minutes, before I got bored with them. I told them I only had flaky dial-up service. I kept playing the modem connection sound, then tell them that their software was downloading. After waiting for 5 minutes, asking them rude personal questions in the interim, I tell them that I am at 90%, then shout a lot of expletives, saying that the connection went down, and need to reconnect. Once they passed me off to their tech support people because I told them the issue was on their end of the dial up connection.

    10. Re:"This is windows support calling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh you're that guy. Well, I got you no>PF%$ [NO CARRIER]

  8. You know what's really sad? by sribe · · Score: 2

    Given that: 1) people were actually spending money with strangers who called them on the phone, and 2) how many home Windows machines are infested with malware, this shows that you could make a hell of a lot of money by modifying the operation just slightly--have people download legitimate scanning software which would only report real problems. You trade away some of your profit margin in exchange for not going to jail. (Granted, you might still run afoul of telemarketing regulations, but that's a whole lot less serious than fraud, civil vs criminal.)

    1. Re:You know what's really sad? by youngatheart · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Greed.

      There is/was a popular scam that involved getting people to look at their Windows error log in order to convince them that they needed "help." It was quite effective because the average user easily accepts that errors are the same as problems.

      My mom and a co-worker were both targets of this particular scam. The target would receive an unsolicited phone call from someone who made the target think the caller was associated with Microsoft who would show them the errors on their computer. The caller would then try to convince the target to let the caller have access to their computer. Neither of the targets had a clue that the errors they were seeing were normal and it could have gone quite badly for them. Both my mom and co-worker declined to let the caller do anything on their computer saying that they had someone who handled this kind of stuff for them (me.) Naturally I received a not quite panicked call shortly after and was able to reassure them it was only a scam and their computer was fine, but I think either could have been victimized if they hadn't had someone they know and absolutely trust to handle serious computer issues for them.

      My company gives me a phone and it's an iPhone so I can give good tech support to the boss who "needs" an iPhone. Because it is a company phone, I can't jailbreak it or hack around on it in good conscience, but it chafes. I can't put whatever software I want on it or make it work the way I would prefer because Apple makes their customers a deal: trust us completely and we'll make your device work the way it should.

      As much as it chafes me to deal with such a walled garden, I can't help but think it's the way consumer products need to be designed. The harder it is for my mom and co-worker to mess up their device, the less time I have to spend fixing it.

      With that background in mind, I can't help but hope MS goes more and more down the road toward building in their own computer security because it removes the incentive to get an anti-virus package which has to "solve" issues that aren't really problems in order to appear useful.

      If the scammers were just a little less greedy, they could have used the same approach to sell actual anti-virus packages. I think most anti-virus companies are just slightly less greedy or they'd be running the same scams.

      Greed is the thin greasy line that separates "legitimate" anti-virus vendors from criminals. For decades I've told people they needed antivirus and security software despite knowing the big vendors introduce a new set of problems, because it was necessary. Now MS is building it in and I can tell them to just use the free MS software that's built in and I get less support headaches. I'm sure it's hurting the AV vendors, but I've had to fix too many problems they caused to feel much sympathy.

    2. Re:You know what's really sad? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      to bad apples walled garden was to much censorship

    3. Re:You know what's really sad? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      My father and my wife's grandmother were both hit by this scam. My dad almost ran their software until the guy mentioned how it would let him remote in. This worried him enough for him to call me. (Though he still tried arguing with me for a bit that "it might be real" when I told him it was a scam.)

      My wife's grandmother only escaped from being victimized due to extreme technological non-savvy. Yes, talking her through downloading and running a file was *SO* horrible that the scammer gave up! (They called back another day to try again but by that time, we warned my wife's grandmother and she was prepared.)

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    4. Re:You know what's really sad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "temporarily shut down" != "going to jail"

    5. Re:You know what's really sad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lady at my work got scammed three times.

      Each time we told her it was a scam.

      Upside is she hasn't been scammed since. (for what it's worth).

      Sigh.

    6. Re:You know what's really sad? by gstoddart · · Score: 0

      to bad apples walled garden was to much censorship

      Too bad nobody has ever taught you the difference between "to" and "too".

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    7. Re:You know what's really sad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      to bad apples walled garden was to much censorship

      Too bad nobody has ever taught you the difference between "to" and "too".

      Or to use apostrophes.

    8. Re:You know what's really sad? by matria · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the time my Cuban refugee ex-husband wanted me to help him work with the widow of a deceased Spanish ambassador to Nigeria, who needed to move several million dollars out of a Nigerian bank account before the Nigerian government seized the money. It took a while to convince him that it was a scam.

    9. Re:You know what's really sad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... MS goes more and more down the road toward building in their own computer security ...

      Really! You were an Apple fanboi until you said this. When has Microsoft ever increased security in a application release? There's Vista, where the security was so anal, everyone turned it off. Just about everything else was worse, usually because the microsoft 'extensions' were designed to break the previous version.

      ... it's the way consumer products need to be designed.

      We would still be limited to Genie/CompuServe/AOL, if that model was really followed.

      ... I can't put whatever software I want on it or make it work the way I would prefer ...

      You say how great training wheels are and then whinge you don't want them. Yes, you have the technical know-how to avoid PC problems and your parents don't.

      The problem is a bit like sex education; you have to teach yourself the practicals and can learn the wrong moves. Now imagine your sex-life occurred only in a walled garden. The result: You can have sex only in the (woman on top) reverse cowgirl position every Thursday plus the 3rd Tuesday of the month. Would you accept that? Strangely, many people want to use a different sexual position; or different software in the case of their computer.

      That Windows is a less stable and less secure system is a different issue. Yet many people like you, demand that everyone else be shoved into the walled garden as a solution. It might be a good solution, but just like their sex-life, most people don't want their computers in a walled garden. It's also like you and your computer.

      ... trust us completely and we'll make your device work the way it should.

      And they make a lot of money ensuring that you install only devices they approve via their obsolete-in-18-months hardware interface. Plus ensuring that you only install applications they allow and don't want to make themselves.

      ... but I've had to fix too many problems they caused ...

      I've seen at least 3 Microsoft OS updates scramble the computer boot sequence over the years. It's a lot easier to uninstall a faulty 3rd-party application than a faulty hidden MS service. Plus it's easier to detect that a 3rd-party application is faulty.

      ... just slightly less greedy or they'd be running the same scams.

      This is outright defamation. A real AV has to use algorithms and databases to check the user is doing the right thing. A fake AV has to open a telnet channel to a data-scraping server. When both are sold at the same price, I have a different conclusion on who is running a scam. And that's avoiding the fact that many real AVs provide virus removal for free.

    10. Re: You know what's really sad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I stopped reading after Windows was less stable. Blah blah blah. In case you haven't noticed Windows 7 is a excellent OS. I'm sure that whatever top 100 Linux distro that you use will always be best. Go back downstairs and ask mom to make you a hot pocket and bring a 2 liter of diet whatever.

    11. Re:You know what's really sad? by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Greed.

      There is/was a popular scam that involved getting people to look at their Windows error log in order to convince them that they needed "help." It was quite effective because the average user easily accepts that errors are the same as problems.

      Fortunately, many of the scammers aren't to bright either and are easily played if they think you're a mark. I get those calls every now and then and drew with them until they are clearly really pissed. Then I tell them I'm bored and thank them for the free entertainment. That causes them to blow a gasket and I start laughing and hang up. You can go many ways with the game and if you slowly and progressively win their trust ask all kinds of strange questions.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    12. Re:You know what's really sad? by youngatheart · · Score: 1

      Really! You were an Apple fanboi until you said this.

      I'm an admin, so that probably accounts for a lot of my perspective. I judge a system by more than how convenient it is for me. Most systems have good and bad parts and I've rarely used something I couldn't find both the good and the flaws in. It's not totally unfair to call me a Unix geek, Linux zealot, Apple fanboi and MS shill if you must, they've all helped me earn a paycheck. Even Xenix and SCO had good points. About the only OS I didn't care for at all was an NCR ATM system but even that probably had something good about it if I'd looked harder.

      When has Microsoft ever increased security in a application release? There's Vista, where the security was so anal, everyone turned it off. Just about everything else was worse, usually because the microsoft 'extensions' were designed to break the previous version.

      I didn't turn off the UAC in Vista for myself or our company; I learned how to work with it. When we moved to Win7, we already had the skills and experience to use it, but I was really speaking of Security Essentials and Windows 8 and 10 building in anti-virus and malware protection. MS had done plenty that they deserve to be faulted for but UAC and integrated AV and Malware protection are things that I think have been good for the industry. It's no SELinux (love it) but it is a step in the right direction.

      We would still be limited to Genie/CompuServe/AOL, if that model was really followed.

      The open internet seems obviously the way things should have gone now, but back in the days of running a bulletin board system, it wasn't so obvious. Genie/CompuServe/AOL provided a necessary stepping stone. If you think the internet would have developed as quickly as it did without AOLs send everyone a disk approach, you're overestimating the average consumer.

      You say how great training wheels are and then whinge you don't want them.

      If everyone was like me, there wouldn't be a need for anti-virus and malware protection and UAC. There wouldn't be a need or market for Microsoft for that matter. I can accept that most people need protection from their own bad decisions because not everybody has the aptitude or interest or even energy to learn the things they need to in order to work with computers safely. I'm a long, long way from being an average computer user. It is a hobby, a career and a friggin' paycheck for me. Of course I don't want to follow the normal computer user recommendations, I'm not the normal computer user.

      That Windows is a less stable and less secure system is a different issue. Yet many people like you, demand that everyone else be shoved into the walled garden as a solution.

      Windows is a quite stable and secure system handled correctly. Microsoft has made the decision to offer backwards compatibility over and over again and there is no doubt that has hurt their ability to make Windows as stable and secure as I wish it were, but Win 7,8,10 have made significant and important strides. Vista had some serious growing pains, but if you move someone from Win7 to Vista now, it is nearly painless, proving the industry was more of the problem than Vista was. When you consider how many programs used to be designed to have free reign without ACL controls, it is clearly Vista that was on the right track. Look what disdain it got them. (Metro was a terrible decision, but it wasn't about security or stability.) The average consumer will make bad decisions even if you try to protect them from it, but making it take more thought is not a bad thing.

      Walled gardens have yet to be designed so that people like me can't get around them. (Can I get a woot woot from the Cyanogen crowd?!) If every system was a walled garden, then I might be on the other side of the debate, but the way things are now, people using aptitude, yum, ports and

  9. Good! I hope they burn. by Chas · · Score: 2

    BOTH of this shit companies have damaged clients of mine and cost them insane amounts of money to repair the crap they broke.
    Luckily they never got far enough in with my customers that they could damage their backups. So actual business data loss was minimal...

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  10. These scumbags ought to be in jail next to Madoff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fraud and a ponzi scheme are no different. Maybe Charlie Manson wants to consummate his marriage second hand since he's not allowed conjugal visits.

  11. Free speach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    The consequences of free speech is the prevalence lies, sigh...

    1. Re:Free speach by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

      This isn't free speech. Freedom of speech means that you can stand on a street corner, speak your mind, and the government can't say "We don't like your opinion so we're sending you to jail." Freedom of speech doesn't mean that you can lie to people to get money from them. This is called fraud and is illegal. Try claiming "free speech" if you are on trial for fraud and you'll see how quickly the judge brings the hammer down on you.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    2. Re:Free speach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Try claiming "free speech" if you are on trial for fraud and you'll see how quickly the judge brings the hammer down on you.

      Then you just call it "religioun". This is what the Scientologists pulled when they got caught by the FDA making fraudulent medical claims.

    3. Re:Free speach by ihtoit · · Score: 2

      freedom of speech does not extend to the right to commit fraud.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    4. Re:Free speach by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      There are always issues. If that's how you define free speech, it's interesting to see how broadly fraud can be defined.

  12. About time! by roc97007 · · Score: 2

    "Hello I am being Jim and I am with the Microsoft. I am calling you to tell you that your computer is infested with the viruses."

    Alternately it's "The Internet" rather than "The Microsoft". (For some reason, you have to include the "The" both for Microsoft and viruses.)

    Man, they're annoying. I'm not sure why I find them more unbearable than the usual offshore telemarketer. Perhaps because the lies are so brazen. The last time, I asked him if his mother knows he cheats people out of money for a living? He insisted no, he's trying to help me! He got really excited about it. Probably because he desperately needed this call's rupee for food that night.

    Surveying friends and family (including a couple hundred facebook friends), calls at first seemed random, but in more recent months, appear to specifically be targeting people over 50. The most recent calls have asked for me by name. This leads me to believe that they're using someone's pilfered (or purchased?) address list. Has AARP had any breaches lately?

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:About time! by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Alternately it's "The Internet" rather than "The Microsoft".

      It might be worth getting that scam call if only to reply: "The Elders of the Internet know who I am?!!!"

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    2. Re:About time! by ShaunC · · Score: 1

      Surveying friends and family (including a couple hundred facebook friends), calls at first seemed random, but in more recent months, appear to specifically be targeting people over 50. The most recent calls have asked for me by name. This leads me to believe that they're using someone's pilfered (or purchased?) address list. Has AARP had any breaches lately?

      Curious, what type of lines are the calls coming in on? There's a huge list of folks, mostly over 50, listed by name, freely available to scammers... The White Pages. Many of them are online and easy to spider. Most telcos still print the physical books, too, although you have to request one now instead of having them dropped off by default. Since these directories are comprised primarily of landlines, it's a safe bet that whoever answers most of the calls will be a baby boomer.

      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
    3. Re:About time! by smallfries · · Score: 1

      If they claim that they are from The Microsoft you could say that you are "Bob from the Internet" or vica versa. Spend some time finding out if you have friends in common, maybe from back when you worked at the Facebook. Did they know June from the New York office? Really? Because June died five years ago!! etc etc...

      They can be a lot of fun. When you get bored with them just ask how they *feel* about scamming people for money. Good times.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    4. Re:About time! by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Landlines, exclusively.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    5. Re:About time! by Theaetetus · · Score: 1

      Surveying friends and family (including a couple hundred facebook friends), calls at first seemed random, but in more recent months, appear to specifically be targeting people over 50. The most recent calls have asked for me by name. This leads me to believe that they're using someone's pilfered (or purchased?) address list. Has AARP had any breaches lately?

      You're right regarding age - they've hung up on me in the past if I've sounded too youthful, so when I'm trying to get a scammer to stay on the line, I make my voice all quavery like an old man.
      I have a friend who signed me up for a free trial of adult diapers as an April Fool's joke... my guess is that's how they got my number.

      Incidentally, the Fake name generator is great for keeping them on the line for a long time, giving fake credit card numbers and addresses until they catch on.

    6. Re:About time! by Control-Z · · Score: 1

      The calls I've received say something like (in an Indian accent) "This is Robert from Windows, we are calling because it has been reported your computer has errors and is sending them over the Internet."

      I've also given them the "Does your mother know what you do for a living?" line. They try to justify what they're doing and I cut them off and say "You're a scammer and you're stealing people's money and you should be ashamed." That's when they hang up.

      Anyway TFA doesn't specifically say this operation is the one with the Indian accent callers, but I sure hope so. Although the "cardholder services" robo-calls got shut down a few years ago only to re-emerge strong as ever in the last year or so. I even resorted to pressing 5 to opt out, which actually seemed to work for while, but now I'm back to 1 or 2 calls a day from them. :(

  13. But Geek Squad is still safe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    right?

    1. Re:But Geek Squad is still safe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as you buy the Monster cables, and ONLY the Monster cables.

    2. Re:But Geek Squad is still safe? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      at least they are doing it your face and selling real software but Norton is a bloated POS and there real name is the UPSELL squad

    3. Re:But Geek Squad is still safe? by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      yep, and keep the bend radius over five inches.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  14. now.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    about those ehow, fixya, and driverguide sites appearing as priority matches.

  15. Re:Good! I hope they burn. by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Agreed. They desperately need to burn in hell.

    I've been blessed by customers who contact me when they get suspicious calls or emails, and can be trained to not click on scareware popups. When a computer is infected, it's almost always because someone's kid got access to it. But I still deeply resent these scam calls. They're directly interfering with *my* livelihood!

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  16. just kill them by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    SERIOUSLY, just kill them. Just rip their intestines out and hang them by them. I am so fucking sick of people walking into my repair shop and telling me I'm wrong, they're not scammers, they didn't fall for anything, and they don't want to lose their alleged lifetime membership to unlimited support. In fact, everyone stupid enough to fall for this bullshit should be thrown into a volcano with the people who originally did it.

    1. Re:just kill them by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > I am so fucking sick of people walking into my repair shop and telling me I'm wrong, they're not scammers, they didn't fall for anything, and they don't want to lose their alleged lifetime membership to unlimited support.

      At that point I say "I can't do anything for you. Thanks for dropping by."

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    2. Re:just kill them by ihtoit · · Score: 3, Informative

      been here too. Someone walks in with a computer and a subscription to some nanny software (big name, can't remember it. Net Nanny? No, one of the other ones). Says it's riddled with pop ups. Five minutes in and I've isolated the problem to a redirect to a proxy (clearly in an attempt to get around the softwall), I tell her, "This should have been blocked by the software you've got installed." Asked ME for her money back, I'm like, "You didn't buy it off me, I'm not a software vendor for a start and for two, I don't have a support contract with these guys."

      At which point, she takes her computer and leaves, comes back three hours later with a trading standards officer in tow. I tell him what I told her. Not my problem, she's trying to get her computer fixed for free after the software she paid for elsewhere failed to do what she expected.

      TSO leaves.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    3. Re:just kill them by TheGoodNamesWereGone · · Score: 1

      About a year ago I went on a service call to a customer's house. The wife had gotten one of those calls and wisely called her husband to the phone; he talked to them and downloaded the malware they were offering but did not install it. They called us to 'fix' it. When I got there there was a mild, unrelated adware infection that I cleaned. I explained to the husband that everything was okay now, but I couldn't convince the wife that there wasn't anything wrong; she was absolutely convinced that what the scammers had told her was true & that their machine was just riddled & infested. She got angry to the point of tears with me AND her husband, for believing me, and ran to the bedroom and slammed the door loudly behind her. I hope they're still married...

    4. Re:just kill them by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      It's hard enough fixing people's computers. You can't be expected to fix their marriage as well.

  17. Re:These scumbags ought to be in jail next to Mado by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

    Maybe Charlie Manson wants to consummate his marriage second hand since he's not allowed conjugal visits.,/i>

    Go ahead. You stick your wang in that bit o crazy. I'll pass.

  18. I See This Every Week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work in tech support for a very large computer company known for it's expensive but easy to use machines ("Have you tried turning it off and on?"). I speak to maybe a hundred and fifty people a week - at least I think they're people. Some days I'm not sure. Every month I talk to between 2 to 4 people who granted some unknown person with a foreign accent full administrative remote access into their machine. When I try to explain to them what they've done and how the person conceivably could have had access to and downloaded all their stored information including passwords , etc I am always - yes always - met with the telephonic equivalent of a blank stare. The people who fall for this scan are inevitably, invariably, unremittingly - stupid.

    Just this very week I talked to someone who fell for the remote access scam and asked me, "What should I do now?" I am not allowed to give specific guidance (I know) but I do tell them what I mentioned above and let them know that spyware could conceivably have been left to transmit back things like their bank passwords when they log on. I told the person that if it were me I would disconnect from the internet until I had completely erased my machine and reinstalled the operating system. The response - "Oh I don't know if I can go without the internet for that long". I have long ago exhausted any remaining sympathy for people who fall for this. One day I shall leave technical support and once again regain my soul.

  19. Re:You know what's "really" really sad? by s.petry · · Score: 2

    That we don't prosecute enough false advertising and deception with intent to defraud claims!

    It's hard to blame the root cause of the problem on anything but the current levels of corruption infesting our Government. Instead of agencies built to enforce regulations doing what they are intended, they are investigating bullshit to make corporations more and more money and keep the cronies in office so that their circle continues to have revenue while the "common" people suffer.

    Yup, stories like yours are a shame. These scams have been known about for at least 4-5 years (if you don't remember the my clean PC bullshit.. well, you could be a n00b), but instead of putting these shitbags out of business we have agencies focusing on Youtube videos that have background audio of a song, or grandma downloading a free MP3 file, or heaven forbid a goddamn whistle blower that must be lambasted and castrated.

    Don't get me wrong, "Greed" is a problem but it's a problem we have known about for at least as long as we have been able to write and read. The whole point of Government is to enforce regulation and prosecute snake oil salesmen to protect the populace from greedy fucks that gain power (in some/any form). The fact that this shit has gone on for this long demonstrates that our Government is a failure. Massive bureaucracies are a failure! (The problems with journalism today, or more properly the lack thereof, fall into these categories so I can't blame them separately).

    I'll get off my soap box now.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  20. Expect the next tier of fraudsters to fill the gap by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 2

    This kind of fraud is much like multi-level marketers and other spammers.I'm afraid that those fradulent companies which are even less traceable, and have overseas offices to avoid US prosecution, will fill the ecological niche very quickly.

  21. Which is why PDFCreator is now on the shit list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PDFCreator used to be bloatware burdened, then cleaned up their act for a few years. They're now back to including at least *six* different "optimizer" tools, all of which pollute your web traffic with ads, many of which are pulling exactly this sort of "oh no, you're infested!!! send us a check quick to save your PC!!!" when the only infestation is, in fact, their software.

    Sadly, the top Google hits for how to get rid of this cruft are now sites that, themselves, are installing and charging for just this sort of fraudulent scanner and optimizer.

    1. Re:Which is why PDFCreator is now on the shit list by Khyber · · Score: 1

      I hope you're not that blind to miss the obvious answer, here.

      Make shitty scareware to get you to download the REAL spyware.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  22. Never give a sucker an even break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The point of this story is NOT that scamming companies sold suckers fake anti-virus programs. The REAL point is that after the sheeple purchased the software, the companies then went after the mark with every means available, targeting HUNDREDS of more dollars from the suckers bank account.

    This is a LESSON every one of you here needs to learn. You cannot walk backwards a little in order to appease a monster, and by 'monster' we mean ANYONE who has sought a position of power- church, business, government, military- the pattern of sociopathy in active power seekers is identical.

    When you 'vote', no matter who you vote for, you 'vote' for the system- you APPROVE of the system, and in the USA that 'system' means the largest (and growing) war machine the Human Race has ever witnessed. Voting, or giving these Microsoft enabled scammers your time and/or money- its the same mistake. It's beta and lower sheeple putting their 'faith' in the system- and that simply empowers the system.

    Expect a new law FORBIDDING Microsoft from placing remote access software as default in Windows installations? Hahahahahahahahahahaha! You think these things happen by accident. Every person you vote for who has ANY chance of actually gaining power LOVES the NSA, and all the abuses NSA friendly entities like Microsoft and Google enable.

    The criminals, like these scammers, simply exploit the cracks that your masters DEMAND run throughout every aspect of your life. What you can 'see' (as in is made aware to you by reports like this one) are bad enough. Won't you remain (mostly) unaware of is far worse.

    Bill Gates is Common Core. Bill Gates is inBloom (now a key part of NSA total surveillance). Bill Gates is EUGENICS- you know, that wonderful pseudo science that the American elite proudly gave to the Nazis and Japanese during the 1920s and 30s, leading to some of the worst atrocities in Human History. Gates' family has a LONG history in Eugenics.

    Gates built the disgusting system that allows your grandparents to be robbed blind when Microsoft trained and approved scammers, using Microsoft provided info about personal Windows installations, make their criminal phone calls.

    There are two kinds of Humans. Those that see the vulnerable as people in need of protecting- and those that see the vulnerable in need of FLEECING.

    Bill Gates partnered with Rupert 'Fox News' Murdoch to create the obscene inBloom system. Each Xmas, Murdoch sends his friends an Xmas card that depicts the various mainstream news outlets as 'FOXES', and depicts YOU the morons that watch/read such services as 'SHEEP'. Too stupid to believe this? Go spend 30 seconds Googling and confirm it for yourself.

    Now perhaps you'll get WHY it is so important to Gates that Windows is the cause of so many vulnerable people being FLEECED by criminal scumbag partners of MS. Never give a sucker an even break.

    1. Re:Never give a sucker an even break by Lord+Maud'Dib · · Score: 1

      You mad bro?

    2. Re:Never give a sucker an even break by BVis · · Score: 1

      /thread

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
  23. haven't read the fuckin' article by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    ...but is that one of the scammers that was shut down?

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    1. Re:haven't read the fuckin' article by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      ...but is that one of the scammers that was shut down?

      We can only hope...

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  24. More importantly.... by sasquatch989 · · Score: 1

    Have I answered your questions satisfactorily and offered good customer service?!

    http://cart.mn/CstmrServc

  25. Government jackboots by paiute · · Score: 1

    I cannot wait until the Republican Congress gets the government out of the way and lets small businesses get on with their work.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:Government jackboots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cannot wait until the Republican Congress gets the government out of the way and lets small businesses get on with their work.

      I know. Everything has gone to hell since the Democrats have been in charge. The Republicans are going to clean things up for sure. No more big corporations having undue influence on government policy. No more fraud and waste in the government either. And definitely no more handouts and tax breaks to big corporations or unwed mothers!

      They'll get rid of the money sucking EPA and the corrupt FDA too! Because they have no business regulating me! If I want to throw battery acid in the river that gives my town drinking water, that's my business. If I want to mix in toxic fillers into my brownies to stretch them, no one should be able to tell me otherwise. If I want to sell cyanide as a weight loss pill (you'd be surprised how thin you get after six or seven months in the ground!), the market should decide whether or not I stay in business. Fucking parasites!

      What is more, we'll finally get some honesty in government, not like those lies Clinton's cabinet told us about WMD and mushroom clouds before he invaded Iraq. No more lies and distortion like when Obama invented the PATRIOT act and set up secret prisons to torture people. No more big bailouts like that huge one by Obama in 2008. Those Democrats screw everything up! And the best part is that they'll make sure that all those filthy illegals get thrown out on their asses. We don't need any damn immigrants here. Jesus gave us America and we intend to keep it. Damn straight!

    2. Re:Government jackboots by operagost · · Score: 1

      Please go back to the basement with the other kids, Captain Straw man. The grownups are typing to have a discussion

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  26. Only had one call and laughed... by EzInKy · · Score: 2

    ...in his ear. He said a problem was detected on my Window's computer. Being every box in my house is running one Linux distro or another I had a problem picking myself up off the floor. Just think of how many people would fall for these scams if everyone really had Window's on some device in their house.

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    1. Re:Only had one call and laughed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The response i received, when calmly explaining that someone from Microsoft calling me up because they detected an error on my computer was more than a little odd, as I run Linux, was a very straightforward "Then fuck you", "Did I hear you correctly, fuck me?" "Yes, fuck you", which did leave me wondering if they might have been a genuine MS employee after all...

  27. OT: Summoning APK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, throw a little gasoline on the fire. Fantastic.

    Please return to the underside of your bridge so that we don't have to hear about this brand-spanking new hosts file that APK has discovered. Pretty soon, he'll tell us how to put our Shields Up on the internet, how to Spin our disks Rite, how to disable (Shoot) The Messenger, and wax longingly about Win32 ASM and wave his small binaries in our faces. I bet APK uses WinASM also. Yup, APK will turn into a one man hype machine, just like that other guy... I wonder if they are related?

  28. But when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... purchase the paid version of the software for between $29 and $49 ...

    Then they have to hire a real support tech to fix their computer. But they don't demand a refund on the faulty software.

  29. Re:You know what's "really" really sad? by FrankHS · · Score: 1

    I agree completely. We need a law that says simply: It shall be illegal to do any misleading advertising.

    Financial penalties would rapidly escalate and repeated offences would subject company owners to jail time.

    The offender would be required to publish in a similar venue a statement admitting to, and apologizing for, the misleading advertising.

    The test of misleading would be if average people would believe something untrue after viewing the ad.

  30. About damn time! by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 2

    As recently as this week I've still been getting one of those goddamn calls every couple days. I just hang up on them, usually after saying something along the lines of "Do me a favor and kindly jump up your own ass."

    My father gets them too... He likes to string the bastards along for a while though. Constantly asking them stuff like where they're calling from and why, requesting specifics until he catches them contradicting themselves and then tells them off and hangs up. (Personally, it drives me nuts listening to him do that, I'm just like "Oh my god hang up on those assholes already!") He does the same thing to the medicaid scam phonecalls but those are far less frequent.

    --

    Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
  31. degrade the enemy's infrastructure ? redundant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this was those idiots "calling from Microsoft" with the unintelligible Indian accents, stupid scripts and potatoe-grade VOIP connection, drone strikes are too good for the lot of them.

  32. Who else does this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's see...

    Bank Of America sells mortgages to people, then uses a sudden burst of fees the home owner cant afford to pay, and as a result BOA re-possesses the home.

    Mainstream media like to sell you the idea that they are reporting news, but in fact it's really propaganda. Courts have rulled on this "entertainment".

    Federal Reserve would have you believe the money is real, but it's not.

    I could go on like this all day long.

  33. Stop government oppression! by plopez · · Score: 1

    This is just another example of government interference in the market place and driving free enterprise out of business! Let the industry regulate its self!

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  34. Apk simply uses facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Making ac trolls like you look stupid since you can't prove them wrong such as http://news.slashdot.org/comme... where you and yours, ac trolls, are helpless against apk (hence your gossiping old lady tactics here)

    1. Re:Apk simply uses facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truer words were never spoken.

  35. "1st they ignore you. Then they laugh @ you" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "... Then they fight you and apk wins" since trolls can't prove apk wrong http://news.slashdot.org/comme...

  36. Too bad you only shot yourself down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In flames (see subject): This always does the job nicely for apk on that account http://yro.slashdot.org/commen... and you weak useless "ne'er-do-well" effete trolls can't do a damn thing against it... hahaha.

  37. How to hurt them? by TheGreatMcCluck · · Score: 1

    I wonder if everyone who knows these calls are a scam were to do the following, if it would kill their throughput enough to stop them: "Hold on a minute... my computer is off. It's a little slow to boot. I'm going to put you down for a minute, just hold on, I'll be right back." Then just put the phone down on a table and walk away.

    Of course, once enough people were using this exact scam on the scammers, they'd know that anyone giving them this routine was to be hung up on. I'm certainly not willing to invest any time stringing them along to keep them busy.

    It's a shame. I'd love to get one over on these jack asses. I get two or three calls "from Microsoft" a year now. I did get a chuckle out of the last one, where the guy told my wife he was calling from Microsoft, she replied only, "No you're not", and they hung up without evening anything else.

    1. Re:How to hurt them? by coniferous · · Score: 1

      I wonder how to get on one of these lists. I love wasting their time. I need to install a XP virtual machine with a snapshot of a perfectly working system. As soon as they connect, restore the snapshot. See how many times I can get them to connect to me before they hang up.

    2. Re:How to hurt them? by vandamme · · Score: 1

      "Hold on, I'll get my credit card". Go to bathroom with telephone, hold it so the scammer gets an earful. Extra points for a #2. "Sorry, I had to go potty. Oh, I just remembered, my PC runs openSUSE and that's not a real Windows, is it?"

  38. Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I helped an old lady who got scammed. The credit card companies told us that we had to contact the scammers and ask them not to charge us. (What a joke) Then they told her, they needed the IT guy to send them a letter confirming she was actaully scammed, because apparently her word isn't good enough. The credit card companies don't give a damn, and don't take fraud seriously at all.

  39. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't believe you.

  40. Whois can be so interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I read the article. Then did a whois on 2 of the domains. This can be interesting at times, because some people don't register their domain anonymously. Seems to me if you are scamming people you should.

    All it take is a little work with whois and google maps. Wow, Nice house or gas station..

  41. Just wait for tech support to call you by Puppet+Master · · Score: 1

    They call me regularly to tell me there's a problem with my Windows computer and they wish to help me. I really like stringing them along.. Sorry, but my Linux desktop doesn't have a Windows key.

    --
    The day Microsoft creates a product that doesn't suck, it will be known as the Microsoft Vaccuum Cleaner!
  42. Common Denominator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ESET is the Common Denominator with many India based Telemarketing Scams.

  43. Common Denominator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think most anti-virus companies are just slightly less greedy or they'd be running the same scams.

    ESET is the Common Denominator with many India based Telemarketing Scams.

  44. Re:You know what's "really" really sad? by sribe · · Score: 1

    ...but instead of putting these shitbags out of business...

    You seem to be assuming that they're operating from countries with competent law enforcement available to cooperate with ours, and that they stay in one place long enough to find them. Both assumptions are incorrect.

  45. Re:You know what's "really" really sad? by s.petry · · Score: 1

    Your straw man is not a very good one. If you read TFA you would have seen that _all_ of the companies in the decisions are US companies.

    As part of the legal maneuver, the state of Florida joined the FTC in filing two separate cases against companies who allegedly sold the bogus software and the telemarketers who sold the unnecessary tech support services. In the first case, the defendants selling software include PC Cleaner Inc.; Netcom3 Global Inc.; Netcom3 Inc., also doing business as Netcom3 Software Inc.; and Cashier Myricks, Jr. The telemarketing defendants include Inbound Call Experts LLC; Advanced Tech Supportco. LLC; PC Vitalware LLC; Super PC Support LLC; Robert D. Deignan; Paul M. Herdsman; and Justin M. Wright.
    In the second case, the defendants selling software include Boost Software Inc. and Amit Mehta, and the telemarketing defendants include Vast Tech Support LLC, also doing business as OMG Tech Help, OMG Total Protection, OMG Back Up, downloadsoftware.com, and softwaresupport.com; OMG Tech Help LLC; Success Capital LLC; Jon Paul Holdings LLC; Elliot Loewenstern; Jon-Paul Vasta; and Mark Donahue.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  46. Re:You know what's "really" really sad? by sribe · · Score: 1

    Your straw man is not a very good one. If you read TFA you would have seen that _all_ of the companies in the decisions are US companies.

    Yes, but... Those are the companies which our government DID shutdown. Your post that I responded to was complaining about the government not shutting down such scams. So if you really want to get picky like this, your argument itself was a misdirection. So, show me the scammers that are operating out of the USA, and which the FTC is not taking action against.

    What? Not got any examples? Because the ones still being run are in India? Yep, thought so.

  47. Re:You know what's "really" really sad? by s.petry · · Score: 1

    What? Not got any examples? Because the ones still being run are in India? Yep, thought so.

    The examples are in the complaints that took YEARS to receive any action on. There is no reasonable or efficient mechanism for dealing with these companies in the US. How long were each of those companies listed in the order operating in the US? Some were operating for as long as a decade, so perhaps you should validate facts before attempting to claim that everything scam related is from overseas.

    Researching a few facts is all that is required to demonstrate that your arguments are invalid.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.