When you "securely share" your Wifi on this FON service, you are only sharing it with other FON users. It's the "unlimited txt messaging to everyone on our network" scheme brought to wifi.
if Brazilians could just keep it in their pants, AIDS would disappear in a generation If Brazilians all kept it in their pants, there would be no next generation.
1. A source of information about pop culture that can be fun to read even without being 100% sure that it's accurate (like who R.A.B. is)
3. A source of information on subjects where you need to be close to 100% certain that the information is reliable -- at least as certain, say, as you would be if you read the same fact in several books So readers should feel 100% sure that it is reliable, but not 100% sure that it's accurate.
What does that mean?
How is that possible?
Sure Windows Vista is full of features that mimic Mac OS X (in fact, that's what makes Vista such a worthless OS in my opinion). At the same time, Mac OS constantly implements "new features" that have been in Windows for ages, and they call it "innovation". The truth is, everybody steals from everybody. MS is usually quicker to copy Apple's features than Apple is to copy MS's, but in my experience it takes about 5 years for a "good feature" (at least those which are visible to end-users) to go from being in one OS to all of them.
Wheelchairs are also used for cases where someone is temporarily injured, and many other cases where the patient still has legs and would rather not have them cut off in favor of machinery.
The programmer may not know better than the system about memory management, but the compiler probably does, and it's the compiler that is really doing the bulk of memory management in almost every case nowadays, especially with files.
This is a great method if you're porting between two languages that stress the same paradigm, like an Object Oriented program between two languages that support Object Oriented Programming.
However, try translating a C++ program to Scheme, and you'll be ending up being distracted far more than if you just start a new project in Scheme.
And, unless I'm mistaken, this should be illegal.
Yes, because giving things away is illegal. It's clearly an abuse of monopoly power when companies decide to release free software.
"And the people who scientifically minded already think that this fact is just plain obvious."
On the contrary, science is about questioning everything, including things which may seem obvious.
I can think of multiple ways to explain in a scientific way why prayer might help people survive. For one, if you know people are praying for you, you might have more hope in your mind, and there is plenty of scientific evidence to show that people who really really don't want to die don't die as fast.
They already have the real-world issue of gender present in the game. It would be inconsistent to allow players to discuss their character's gender (and even make gender a required in-game aspect of every character) without allowing players to discuss their character's sexual orientation.
Based on his question, he's not a professional programmer, so keeping all his code would be fine.
OOP is key for code reusability. If you write code with reusability and extensibility in mind, it will take longer to code, but you won't have to do it again.
The pole reversal is a slow process, and probably won't happen soon enough to cause problems for this generation of technology, even if these magnets do depend on fixed poles.
This reminds me of pushdown automata. Funny how everything in brain research seems to correllate to computer science. Could it be that the brain is a computer?
On the contrary, the very basis of science is disbelief. One who believes something without question is "undermining science", be it creationism, evolution, or anything else.
Slashdot Mirror
When you "securely share" your Wifi on this FON service, you are only sharing it with other FON users. It's the "unlimited txt messaging to everyone on our network" scheme brought to wifi.
Because if they use third party software, they can blame the vendor for problems like this.
OpenPrivacy is designed to allow marketers to access information about you, while OpenID is a distributed single sign-in system.
RTF websites.
Because it consumes more power than it produces, I'd say it's a pretty crappy world solution.
Sure Windows Vista is full of features that mimic Mac OS X (in fact, that's what makes Vista such a worthless OS in my opinion). At the same time, Mac OS constantly implements "new features" that have been in Windows for ages, and they call it "innovation". The truth is, everybody steals from everybody. MS is usually quicker to copy Apple's features than Apple is to copy MS's, but in my experience it takes about 5 years for a "good feature" (at least those which are visible to end-users) to go from being in one OS to all of them.
I'm already depressed from looking at the black glossy bars on Slashdot:Apple.
$1000 toilet seats? The white house has had those for years.
Let's just hope that someday slashdot will use proper English grammar.
It's been a while since I saw a good joke on slashdot. It must be controlled by controlled by humorless people.
We should mod you up to 5 for that.
does it run linux? (please don't mod this)
Wheelchairs are also used for cases where someone is temporarily injured, and many other cases where the patient still has legs and would rather not have them cut off in favor of machinery.
The programmer may not know better than the system about memory management, but the compiler probably does, and it's the compiler that is really doing the bulk of memory management in almost every case nowadays, especially with files.
This is a great method if you're porting between two languages that stress the same paradigm, like an Object Oriented program between two languages that support Object Oriented Programming. However, try translating a C++ program to Scheme, and you'll be ending up being distracted far more than if you just start a new project in Scheme.
And, unless I'm mistaken, this should be illegal. Yes, because giving things away is illegal. It's clearly an abuse of monopoly power when companies decide to release free software.
"And the people who scientifically minded already think that this fact is just plain obvious." On the contrary, science is about questioning everything, including things which may seem obvious. I can think of multiple ways to explain in a scientific way why prayer might help people survive. For one, if you know people are praying for you, you might have more hope in your mind, and there is plenty of scientific evidence to show that people who really really don't want to die don't die as fast.
No silly, the creator of the sun is sitting like Humpty Dumpty on an open wall.
Good idea. mod parent up.
They already have the real-world issue of gender present in the game. It would be inconsistent to allow players to discuss their character's gender (and even make gender a required in-game aspect of every character) without allowing players to discuss their character's sexual orientation.
Based on his question, he's not a professional programmer, so keeping all his code would be fine.
OOP is key for code reusability. If you write code with reusability and extensibility in mind, it will take longer to code, but you won't have to do it again.
The pole reversal is a slow process, and probably won't happen soon enough to cause problems for this generation of technology, even if these magnets do depend on fixed poles.
This reminds me of pushdown automata. Funny how everything in brain research seems to correllate to computer science. Could it be that the brain is a computer?
On the contrary, the very basis of science is disbelief. One who believes something without question is "undermining science", be it creationism, evolution, or anything else.