Slashdot Mirror


Magnetic Processors - Computing's New Future?

metalcoat writes "For the first time researchers have created a working prototype of a radical new chip design based on magnetism instead of electrical transistors. As transistor-based microchips hit the limits of Moore's Law, a group of electrical engineers at the University of Notre Dame has fabricated a chip that uses nanoscale magnetic "islands" to juggle the ones and zeroes of binary code. Wolfgang Perod and his colleagues turned to the process of magnetic patterning (.pdf) to produce a new chip that uses arrays of separate magnetic domains. Each island maintains its own magnetic field. Because the chip has no wires, its device density and processing power may eventually be much higher than transistor-based devices. And it won't be nearly as power-hungry, which will translate to less heat emission and a cooler future for portable hardware like laptops."

206 comments

  1. Crinkled by HaydnH · · Score: 5, Funny

    "For the first time researchers have created a working prototype of a radical new chip design..."

    I thought this had already happened when they moved from straight cut to crinkle cut??

    --
    Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. - Douglas Adams
    1. Re:Crinkled by robertjw · · Score: 1

      Thought it was from potato to corn.

    2. Re:Crinkled by Haydn+Fenton · · Score: 1

      Completely OT, but w00t! Looks like we share the same (uncommon) name.

    3. Re:Crinkled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know about 5 guys called Haydn, and I'm a /. geek. I barely know my OWN name.

  2. Does it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...run GNU/Linux?

  3. Flipping magnets... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Will these new processors work when the Earth's magnetic field eventually flip over?

    1. Re:Flipping magnets... by mwilli · · Score: 1

      Who knows, but it would be fun to see the mass panic not seen since the terror of Y2K!!

      --
      My sig beat up your sig.
    2. Re:Flipping magnets... by kaiser423 · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      Who modded this insightful? People say there are no stupid questions, but this one is scraping the bottom of the barrel.

    3. Re:Flipping magnets... by funpet · · Score: 0

      The pole reversal is a slow process, and probably won't happen soon enough to cause problems for this generation of technology, even if these magnets do depend on fixed poles.

    4. Re:Flipping magnets... by jcgf · · Score: 3, Funny

      They already thought of that. When the flip happens, they'll simply tell the processor (through firmware) to simply act as it normally would except now invert all results.

    5. Re:Flipping magnets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes, but the results will be in 2's complement.

    6. Re:Flipping magnets... by kryzx · · Score: 1
      Hey, I watched that NOVA too, and it's the first thing I thought of when I saw this.

      I suppose that, just like all toilets swirl the other direction down under, when the poles swap these computers will run backwards... (hmmm, what would all that pr0n look like in reverse?)
      ;-)

      --
      "I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
    7. Re:Flipping magnets... by pclminion · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Have you considered that maybe he was going for Funny, not Insightful? Don't blame him for the moderators' stupidity.

    8. Re:Flipping magnets... by plover · · Score: 2, Funny
      Only if you take them to Australia. I believe their magnetic spin will then change from counterclockwise to clockwise.

      On an unrelated note, imagine a beowulf cluster of these things -- all stuck together and you can't pry them apart!

      --
      John
    9. Re:Flipping magnets... by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1

      They say the "islands" are nonvolatile, but if you get data based on a magnetic field, wouldn't EMI be a big concern or can that be easily controlled? Just to pick a rather shallow example, it wouldn't be cool if you opened up calc and typed in 2+1 and got 3 (10 + 01 = 11), but then your hard drive spins up or somebody sits down next to you in the coffee shop wearing therapeutic magnets that cause a bit to be read wrong by your processor so you get 5 (10 + 11 = 101).

    10. Re:Flipping magnets... by OglinTatas · · Score: 1

      If that happens, rotate your computer 180 degrees. It will never know the difference. :-D

    11. Re:Flipping magnets... by Ruvim · · Score: 1

      Then you just turn the PC case 180 degrees.

    12. Re:Flipping magnets... by wanerious · · Score: 2, Funny
      I suppose that, just like all toilets swirl the other direction down under, when the poles swap these computers will run backwards... (hmmm, what would all that pr0n look like in reverse?)

      Russian

    13. Re:Flipping magnets... by iamlucky13 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Coriolis effect is basically negligible across the 12 inches or whatever the major diameter a toilet bowl is. The shape of the bowl and the angle water flows into and out of it at are going to have a greater effect on the direction of flow than Coriolis effect. I wouldn't be surprised if mythbusters has tried this one.

      When I first heard this claim, I watched the water drain out of the sink that night when washing dishes. I was a little disturbed when it swirled down the drain clockwise.

    14. Re:Flipping magnets... by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 2, Funny

      what would all that pr0n look like in reverse?

      Everybody goes to church and votes Republican?

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
    15. Re:Flipping magnets... by Surt · · Score: 1

      They'd better. Otherwise you'd be wise to keep them away from your refrigerator.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    16. Re:Flipping magnets... by KyleJacobson · · Score: 1

      All I know is I hope they are BIG magnets... I cant wait to have a magnet next to my hard drive, might just have to lay it on top of the processor... The extra magnetism should help speed up my hard drive beyond any speeds known to man...

      --
      I have worse karma than M$.
    17. Re:Flipping magnets... by orion41us · · Score: 1

      The Industry would issue a alert something to the tune of: "We are please to notify consumers of BCPU's that a Firmware patch is currently being tested in our labs and we expect to have the fix out no later then 2019. This fix will be avaible only to customeres running Microsoft Pannorama 2018 OS or later with TrueMS (tm) Subscriptions, unfortunaly customeres without TrueMS (tm) will have to purchase a valid license for this upgrade."

    18. Re:Flipping magnets... by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Um that already is a concern. With electrical systems just "accidently" put 36 volts to the motherboard and see what happens.

      This is like a side step more than an upgrade. Though it might handle cosmic radiation better leading to the space shuttle's having something more powerful than 486.(Note they have of upgraded to something a bit faster by now, my data is old).

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    19. Re:Flipping magnets... by lubricated · · Score: 1

      They will work, but only in the Southern Hemisphere.

      --
      It has been statistically shown that helmets increase the risk of head injury.
    20. Re:Flipping magnets... by rts008 · · Score: 1

      "(hmmm, what would all that pr0n look like in reverse?) "

      Like an aardvark snorting milk. ;)

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    21. Re:Flipping magnets... by Grab · · Score: 2, Funny

      And you get spam saying "See really grim pictures of ugly, frigid, unfriendly women"...

    22. Re:Flipping magnets... by GreekPimpSlap · · Score: 0

      that would suck if the happy ending came first

    23. Re:Flipping magnets... by onwardknave · · Score: 1

      Who thought finding the square root of negative one would be this easy?

    24. Re:Flipping magnets... by pclminion · · Score: 1

      Funny, but... Russian really only has two letters that are drawn "backwards," R and N. Neither letter sounds anything like the English counterpart. The backward R sounds like "ya" and the backward N sounds like "ee."

    25. Re:Flipping magnets... by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure my question was understood. I don't really see how running 36 volts through a motherboard is particularly relevant to the question of whether having varying strengths of magnetic fields around this sort of processor could affect its operation. As I understand, strong EMI can cause a traditional transistor to flip. Could not a similar thing happen to this magnetic processor, and if so would it be more or less sensitive? Consider a bit being held in the processor as a 0, that is, no magnetic field (or perpendicular field, whatever). The state is being read based on its magnetic field. If there was another source of a magnetic field, wouldn't it be theoretically possible (by superposition) for the state to be incorrectly read as a 1? Furthermore, if a magnetic processor turns out to be more sensitive to interference than current processors, how do you protect against that.

      On the shuttle tangent, I think they had an electronics upgrade a couple years ago, but astronauts still carry laptops (EMI rated) to do most of their computer-related tasks.

    26. Re:Flipping magnets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the words of Mr Garrison from South Park: "There are no stupid questions, only stupid people."

    27. Re:Flipping magnets... by MrKibkibs · · Score: 1

      Well, someone didn't get the joke.

    28. Re:Flipping magnets... by pclminion · · Score: 1

      Maybe I got a joke other than the one he intended. Was he going for some kind of "In Soviet Russia pr0n watches you" or somesuch?

    29. Re:Flipping magnets... by RWerp · · Score: 2, Informative

      just like all toilets swirl the other direction down under
      They don't. It's a myth. The Coriolis force is too weak to enforce the direction of swirl. It depends on the toilet.

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    30. Re:Flipping magnets... by lumbercartel.ca · · Score: 1

      I assume Intel knows enough about Faraday Cages (and similar solutions) to have this potential nightmare of a problem nipped in the bud. Perhaps one possible solution might also be to build this entire farm if miniature magnets on one giant high-powered magnet to prevent lesser magnetic fields from causing problems?

      Using magnetism is a fantastic alternative that will certainly give IBM a run for their money with their recent research on copper-based processors.

    31. Re:Flipping magnets... by Sarisar · · Score: 1

      When I first heard about this as a kid, the next time I had a bath I spun the water the other way just to see if it would stop and redo itself the 'right' way. Rather upsettingly to me (at the time) it didn't.

      Yeah I was a sad kid :P

    32. Re:Flipping magnets... by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1

      According to my understanding of superposition, all that having a really strong field super-imposed would accomplish is raise the noise floor...same for electronics. You can increase the voltage above your ground, but it still only takes a certain amount of voltage drop across an element to cause an effect. In the same way, they could look for a field of 1 gauss among a 0 gauss background or a field of 101 gauss against a 100 gauss background.

      My thought was perhaps this is no problem at all, or perhaps the strength of magnetic field they're working with is currently great enough that they don't run into this problem

  4. pretty cool--I hope they've patented it! by gevmage · · Score: 1
    This will be really interesting when it's mature. I don't know that the results will be quite the snake-oil-will-solve-all-your-problems that the article claims, but this could well be a huge deal in five years.

    I hope they've patented it!

    --
    Craig Steffen
    http://www.craigsteffen.net
    1. Re:pretty cool--I hope they've patented it! by Dunbal · · Score: 1, Funny

      pretty cool--I hope they've patented it!

            I bet _somebody_ has...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:pretty cool--I hope they've patented it! by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      but this could well be a huge deal in five years.

            Especially if it turns out these "magnetic" chips have a limited life of 5 years or so, forcing you to keep shelling out money to the chipmakers...then they don't even need to be innovative to continue to receive the periodic upgrade money they have become so used to.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:pretty cool--I hope they've patented it! by HerrGoober · · Score: 1

      "I hope they've patented it!"


      I don't. Selfishly, I hope they didn't; improves the odds of it coming to market as a decent product soober rather than later.

    4. Re:pretty cool--I hope they've patented it! by Dashing+Leech · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "I bet _somebody_ has..."

      I bet one of two things happens. Either someone tries to patent it 5 years after being on the market, and perhaps succeeds since by then patent agents will only have 8 seconds to decide if an idea is patentable, or somebody currently has an obscure patent of a vague rough idea that they never produced that sounds slightly similar to this, which doesn't show up on searches, and they'll keep quiet about it until this thing makes billions and then say "Hey, you owe me money!".

    5. Re:pretty cool--I hope they've patented it! by Voltageaav · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      If not, I will. Step 1: Surf /. for cool sounding ideas that aren't patented and patent them. Step 2: Wait for the cool sounding ideas to become all the rage. Step 3: Turn to the darkside. Step 4: Profit!

      --
      Someone save me from this sanity.
    6. Re:pretty cool--I hope they've patented it! by Giometrix · · Score: 1

      How is this offtopic, its a joke based on a comment that has been modded insightful....

      --
      Download free e-books, lectures, and tutorials at bookgoldmine.com
    7. Re:pretty cool--I hope they've patented it! by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

      I hope they've patented it!

      Unfortunately, that isn't possible. The patent office can grant a temporary monopoly on the production of a given good, but they can't create magnetic monopolies.

      <rimshot>

      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
    8. Re:pretty cool--I hope they've patented it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the article: "Computers using the magnetic chips would boot up almost instantly." Just like an Apple II. w00t!

      Seriously, I hate bullshit claims like this. Despite having processor speed increasing by 2-3 orders of magnitude over the past 20 years, bootup time is actually slower than ever. No matter what the hardware guys can come up with, the software guys will find a way to abuse it to cripple the speed. BeOS is the only example I can think of of a modern OS that had reasonable bootup speed, unless by "bootup" they meant "starting to execute BIOS code."

  5. The down side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The processor erases your HDD as it processes.

    1. Re:the down side by demonbug · · Score: 1

      It isn't that difficult to put some magnetic shielding around the processor. MuMetal, for example, could work pretty well.

  6. Obligatory Futurama Quote by nmccart · · Score: 0

    Bender: "Last time that magnetic psycho nearly cut my head off."
    Fry: "Oh right, plus the magnet screws up you inhibition unit and makes you sing folk songs."'
    Bender: "What! Who said anything about me secretly wanting to be a folk singer? How ridiculous!"

    --
    Funny sigs make your Karma go down.
  7. Magnetic monopoles by goombah99 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Since magnetic monopoles dont exist, you have to use magnetic dipoles or higher order moments. this translates in to macoscopic structures. It's hard to see how this could beat monopole electrons in size or group velocity. As for power consumption, it's true that magnetism can have low queiscent power consumption because of it's hysterises making it non-volatile. But you pay aprice for this when you have to switch it's state. on the other hand the ideal transistor consumes no power when it is not switching states. If you got rid of the hysteresis in magnetism to make it faster and lower power then it too will become volatile like electronics.

    I can see how this could create dense active bulk storage, such as was done long ago with magnetic bubble memory. But I'm skeptical about a pure magnetic logic system beating electronics.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Magnetic monopoles by shaka999 · · Score: 1

      Today's small transistors are far from ideal. Leakage currents are a huge concern for portable devices.

      --
      One should not theorize before one has data. -Sherlock Holmes-
    2. Re:Magnetic monopoles by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      And how does it switch? The time for a magnetic field to collapse is much slower than a transistor.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    3. Re:Magnetic monopoles by syle · · Score: 0

      Yeah. What he said.

      --

      /syle

    4. Re:Magnetic monopoles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the poster says:
      ...magnetic dipoles or higher order moments..translates in to macoscopic structures...monopole electrons in size or group velocity...low queiscent power consumption...hysterises making it non-volatile...

      What the poster means:
      ...first post...first post...first post...first post...first post...

    5. Re:Magnetic monopoles by birge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Magnetic dipoles have to be macroscopic? Doesn't an electron have an intrinsic magnetic moment? Certainly an electron in an atomic orbital creates one. I don't think size is the problem here, at least not in theory.

    6. Re:Magnetic monopoles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My cat's breath smells like cat food.

  8. Radical new chip design? by mc6809e · · Score: 3, Informative

    "For the first time researchers have created a working prototype of a radical new chip design.."

    Hmm. Maybe.

    But this seems a lot like bubble memory to me.

    And while the wiki entry doesn't mention using this for direct computation, it is indeed possible.

    1. Re:Radical new chip design? by quanticle · · Score: 1

      /*But this seems a lot like bubble memory to me.

      And while the wiki entry doesn't mention using this for direct computation, it is indeed possible.*/

      Its true that others speculated that bubble memory could be used for computations, but this experiment has produced working gates from this technology.  Also, these gates seem to be much smaller (hence faster) than bubble memory structures.

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
  9. More uses? by Plocmstart · · Score: 1

    What happens to my data when my microwave turns on? Can you "erase" my CPU when the feds show up at the door? Yes there are lots of good uses for this new technology.

    1. Re:More uses? by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1

      What good is erasing your CPU going to do? Or even erasing it's cache? The stuff the feds want is on your hard drive.

      Techie cop: "I scanned his CPU."
      Detective: "Any evidence?"
      Techie cop: "Well, his last operation was 00110001010001101100100110011001 masked through 11001110101110010011011001100110."
      Detective: "And what's that mean?"
      Techie cop: "The answer is 00000000000000000000000000000000."
      Detective: "Aha! Book him."

    2. Re:More uses? by mikael · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That wouldn't be any different from an ordinary CPU. You can erase your CPU simply by turning off the power. An EMP only needs to make one transistor change state in order for the CPU to go wonky. Although you may want to worry more about stray cosmic rays.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    3. Re:More uses? by pclminion · · Score: 1
      Although you may want to worry more about stray cosmic rays.

      My boss used to design software and hardware for NASA spacecraft, including the shuttle. Apparently, cosmic rays (as well as other forms of radiation) are such a problem for onboard computers that the early systems were designed to reboot themselves every 10 milliseconds. That guarantees that, if the processor gets stuck in a bogus state, it won't stay that way for more than 10 milliseconds before recovery kicks in.

      Imagine writing software with the requirement that all data must be loaded, processed, and stored back in protected memory within 10 milliseconds. Complex tasks are performed piece by piece as the system continually reboots itself.

      I have no idea if current spacecraft computer systems have the same kind of limitations. ECC memory combined with better shielding probably eliminates most of the problems.

    4. Re:More uses? by mikael · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia has a good article on radiation hardening, along with mention of a watchdog timer - a timer set up to perform a hard reset unless the software program writes out some useful data.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  10. Faster than transistors? by michaelmichael · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I didn't see anything in the article about the magnets being faster than transistors. Yes, being able to cram more onto a chip will make a faster processor but are the magnetic "islands" faster in and of themselves?

    1. Re:Faster than transistors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go read what Moore's Law is. In a nutshell it says nothing about speed.

      Some days I can't believe what's modded insightful.

    2. Re:Faster than transistors? by michaelmichael · · Score: 1

      I wasn't really referring to Moore's Law with that comment. I was simply wondering if these tiny magnets flitting back and forth are as fast as a transistor switching back and forth. Now, since the properties of these magnets allow them to be packed much tighter than a transistors, you can fit more on today's processors, resulting in speedier processors. But if one were to take one magnet island and one transistor and place them side by side, which would spit out the 1's and 0's faster?

  11. magnetic links? by midol · · Score: 1

    "the process of magnetic patterning (.pdf) " - isn't that supposed to be a link?

    1. Re:magnetic links? by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1
      "the process of magnetic patterning (.pdf) " - isn't that supposed to be a link?

      RTFA -- the submitter just copied and pasted the first four paragraphs of the article in his submission.

  12. Magnetic Sensitivity? by Odin_Tiger · · Score: 1

    How sensitive will these be to magnetism, static, etc., compared to a normal transistor-based chip? Will exposure to an EMP or other magnetic disturbance (say, my subwoofer) destroy them, or simply cause a crash? I would think it would be difficult to provide sufficient shielding within a reasonably small package.

    --
    Unpleasantries.
    1. Re:Magnetic Sensitivity? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      If you're worried about that, then you should be frightened that the contents of your bank account is currently represented by the quantum spin states of a tiny handful of electrons on some magnetic disk. The tiniest jolt of energy could nudge those electrons and wipe you out financially!

  13. Moore's "law" by Dan+East · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As transistor-based microchips hit the limits of Moore's Law

    The submitter speaks of Moore's law as if it were some actual law governing the physics of silicon based integrated circuits. His "law" was nothing more than an observation regarding the time it took the industry to pack more transistors into a given space. It makes no assertions regarding maximum transistor density, heat dissipation, or any of the other physical limitations chip manufacturers keep overcoming.

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Moore's "law" by MaceyHW · · Score: 1

      the submitter is just parroting the article. The use stems from the fact that while Moore's Law has been surprisingly accurate in predicting the miniaturization of silicon-based circuits, certain inescapable physical limits for the miniaturization of this technology are now on the horizon, and threaten to "break" Moore's law.

    2. Re:Moore's "law" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The submitter speaks of Moore's law as if it were some actual law governing the physics of silicon based integrated circuits

      In general, it's worthwhile to correct people who think that Moore's Law (or Brooks' Law or...) is a law of physics.

      In this case, though, your pedanticism seems misplaced. Moore's Law is a generalization that holds true under certain circumstances; the boundaries of those circumstances are now being approached.

    3. Re:Moore's "law" by grungebox · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes and no. Yes, it's true that Moore's Law is not a "law" as such, but when people speak of "hitting the limit of Moore's Law" or "the end of Moore's Law" they are almost always referring to a physical limitatation to the trend of increasing transistor density and switching speeds. It's easier to say "the limit of Moore's Law" than "the regime where transistor density cannot be increased appreciably without a radical change in current semiconductor processing technology."

    4. Re:Moore's "law" by grungebox · · Score: 1

      The use stems from the fact that while Moore's Law has been surprisingly accurate in predicting the miniaturization of silicon-based circuits.

      That's also somewhat inaccurate. Since around the mid 80's, the international semiconductor consortium (I don't remember the exact name) set their technology targets to fall on the Moore's Law line. It was sort of their goal from that point on. So, it's really only "surprisingly accurate" up until the 80's; from that point on it's really just "expected."

    5. Re:Moore's "law" by MaceyHW · · Score: 1

      It may be true that Moore's law became the industry expectation, but given the winner-take-all nature of semiconductor manufacturing I have a hard time believing that IBM/AMD/Intel etc are simplying "developing to the timeline".

    6. Re:Moore's "law" by williamhb · · Score: 4, Informative
      It may be true that Moore's law became the industry expectation, but given the winner-take-all nature of semiconductor manufacturing I have a hard time believing that IBM/AMD/Intel etc are simplying "developing to the timeline".


      Specifically they are developing to the International Technological Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS), which is produced by the Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA), of which Intel, AMD, IBM, etc are members. This is the little-known [by the public] pre-competitive stage of the semi-conductor industry in which they all get together and collaborate on developing a "best available industrial consensus" on the way that the industry should move forward (choice of semiconductor technologies, etc).

      This lecture by Sir Maurice Wilkes http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mvw1/Progress_in_Computer s_IEE_Cambridge_2004_web.pdf contains details.
    7. Re:Moore's "law" by MaceyHW · · Score: 1

      wow, I stand corrected. Thanks for the link!

    8. Re:Moore's "law" by dosquatch · · Score: 1
      when people speak of "hitting the limit of Moore's Law" or "the end of Moore's Law" they are almost always referring to a physical limitatation to the trend of increasing transistor density and switching speeds

      True, but these same people keep underestimating this limitation. In particular, I still have the PopSci article stating that there is simply no way to push clock speeds any faster without melting the substrate. The article is talking about the '486DX2/66MHz.

      To borrow a phrase, "You keep saying 'limit of Moore's Law'. I do not think it means what you think it means."

      --
      "Hey, the third matrix movie would have been good except for the plot,story, and acting." --AC
    9. Re:Moore's "law" by wiml · · Score: 1
      His "law" was nothing more than an observation
      That's what any scientific "law" is, from Ohm's Law, to Kepler's Law of Equal Areas in Equal Times, to the Law of Gravitation, etc.: an observation that this quantity appears to always match that quantity. They're laws in the sense of rules, in the sense of "rule of thumb" (though typically much more accurate than a rule of thumb). They're not laws in the legal sense of something that's imposed from outside. This is another place where English confusingly uses the same words for two different concepts, much like the "free as in beer vs. free as in speech" distinction that is already familiar to any slashdot reader.

      Of course, the submitter (and original article) are still saying something other than what they think they are saying. It's not Moore's Law that has a limit; it's physics that has a limit. We don't know what that limit is yet, but it seems pretty likely that we won't be able to keep up with the Moore's Law trend indefinitely. So far so good, but someday...

    10. Re:Moore's "law" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your philosophy of science is broken.

    11. Re:Moore's "law" by Splab · · Score: 1

      Moores law died september 2004 when talking about CPU's - the intel 4Ghz should have been out then - and keeping on, that would be 8Ghz now - 2007 10Ghz and core temp of about 6000 celcius.

    12. Re:Moore's "law" by LionKimbro · · Score: 1

      That's a powerful link; Plain spoken, though technical, and it explains the ITRS well.

    13. Re:Moore's "law" by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Moores law will end, even if transisters are the size of a single photon.
      I would also like to point out that the fabs are running into many issue in trying to keep up with moores law, so the smalles gate size probably won't be smaller the about 8 electrons. your loss do to tunneling starts to get unresonable, and gates that can use fewer elsetrons have a tendency to flip unpredictably.

      Don't get me wrong, I would lover to see 1000 trillion transister on a cpu, but I ahve my doubts. I also suspect this is why the manufactures are moving away from the MHz push, and into the 'more CPUs on a die' push. They could have gone to more CPUs instead of a faster CPU many years ago.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    14. Re:Moore's "law" by dosquatch · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong. I'm not denying that there is a limit, I'm simply proclaiming a healthy skepticism about our ability to predict it. I believe there's life yet to be wrung out of the current manufacturing process.

      --
      "Hey, the third matrix movie would have been good except for the plot,story, and acting." --AC
  14. Sounds good by Peregr1n · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    This sounds like it has possibilities, especially as it'll have very low heat emissions. Plus, presumably, some of the speed limitations will be removed as (in a very basic sense) a magnetic signal travels so much faster than an electical signal. And I especially like the idea from the article that it retains data when the power switches off - true instant on computers at last.

    My only reservation is that magnetic memory doesn't seem that reliable in the long term - I've had to throw out a lot of flash based memory after a few years, whereas I've never had a processor fail spontaneously (discounting heat transfer problems, naturally - I can't deny I've had many go up in smoke).

    1. Re:Sounds good by skoaldipper · · Score: 1
      > And I especially like the idea from the article that it retains data when the power switches off - true instant on computers at last.

      Among other things, the optical (laser) crystal lattice CPU being researched by an AT&T engineer some twenty years ago would have this property as well. Obviously, nothing materialized from it. Let's wish this magnetic venture more success.

      --
      I hope, when they die, cartoon characters have to answer for their sins.
  15. I have heard this before by Psionicist · · Score: 3, Funny

    Electicity... magnetism... Bah. Show me a processor working entirely by gravity!

    1. Re:I have heard this before by wiggles · · Score: 3, Funny

      No problem. I have an old Pentium Pro chip and heat sink I use as a paperweight!

    2. Re:I have heard this before by Bob+Cat+-+NYMPHS · · Score: 2, Interesting
    3. Re:I have heard this before by plover · · Score: 1
      --
      John
    4. Re:I have heard this before by asadodetira · · Score: 1

      Since classical conduction equations are the same for electrical and thermal phenomena. I've wondered if it could be possible to create thermal-logic gates, and then purely thermal microprocessors.

    5. Re:I have heard this before by infinityxi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Here you go. Runs Linux a little slow but with a cluster of these....

      --
      Turn based strategy game that runs over XMPP. Phalanx
    6. Re:I have heard this before by Voltageaav · · Score: 1

      That's ok, I have a NEW P4 3.4 chip & heatsink I use as a paperweight. Crappy Intel.

      --
      Someone save me from this sanity.
    7. Re:I have heard this before by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1

      Haha! Wow, my thought was an abbacus, but your's is definitely more on the mark. That's similar to a game called avalanche I used to play.

      Forget gravity though. I want a computer based on the strong nuclear force.

    8. Re:I have heard this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, for the cluster, just hire some Chinese for 7 cents a day - that should do the trick. Probably cheaper too.

    9. Re:I have heard this before by plover · · Score: 1

      I had one of these when I was a little kid. I don't remember much about it now (that was a very long time ago), but I remember playing with it for hours on end. Definitely counts as my first computer!

      --
      John
    10. Re:I have heard this before by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      That's insanely cool. It's rather unfortunate he doesn't have any photos of the device. A nice black walnut model would look awesome, albeit expensive.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    11. Re:I have heard this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how about.... the earth!

    12. Re:I have heard this before by whit3 · · Score: 1

      Yes, it should be possible. There are positive-temperature-coefficient
      resistors that 'switch' current off when heated. You could make a crude
      relay with heater resistors as the input and a PTC resistor as the
      output conduction channel. Negative-temperature-coefficient
      resistors are also available, you could do something like CMOS using both.

      I've seen some thermal effect in silicon chips, related to heat changing
      the input current of (for instance) op amps. It makes a big effect, but
      only at low speeds (two cycles per second, in the case that bit me).
      Silicon is a very good heat conductor, if you were to make thermal
      gates on such a substrate it'd be one per chip OR you'd have to
      get such high switch rates that the heat 'leakage' current was negligible.

      But crude logic IS still useful; there are intrinsically-safe electric heaters
      using a ceramic that stops heating when it is just under the ignition temperature
      of common home furnishings (using a positive-temperature-coefficient
      heating element to lower the power consumption when the target temperature
      is achieved).

  16. Wow, by 9secondadidas · · Score: 1

    I wonder if fabs are cheaper for magnetic chips?

  17. oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok now let my just slide in my new magnetic processor past my hard drives and... D`OH!

  18. Oops! by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 4, Funny

    I degaussed the monitor on the cart in the computer room and reset every processor in the compute farm!

  19. Why I'm skeptical in the short-term by G4from128k · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The chip industry spends billions in R&D to extend the performance growth of silicon chips. A very large number of engineers know how to design efficient fabs for silicon. Until this technology also attracts a sufficient following of $ and manufacturing experience, I won't count silicon out.

    Also, it's not clear that this technology isn't subject to same "limits of Moore's law" (if there is such a thing) as silicon chips. The use of electron-beam lithography would seem to mean that this technology is subject to the some of the same feature-size and practicality limits suffered by silicon chips.

    Perhaps this technology will find a place somewhere, it just faces a major uphill battle if it is to supplant silicon.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Why I'm skeptical in the short-term by RosenSama · · Score: 1

      An academic research lab just said they've created the first working prototype. I agree it's a safe bet to say that this has a long way to go to be practical and we won't see this in the wild in the "short-term"

  20. Yeah Right... by eno2001 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...and next you'll be telling me that tabletop fusion has been discovered, there are parasitic viruses that alter the host's behavior, and that someone invented the plasma drive at NASA. You're ready to swallow all that pseudoscience and yet you all deny me when I try to inform you about the return of the Niburu and Planet X by the great Zecharia Sitchin!!! It's unbelievable just how gullible the Slashdot crowd is and how blind they are to honest truth.

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    1. Re:Yeah Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tabletop fusion occurs when you explode a fusion bomb above the building. There are lots of drugs that alter peoples behavior, modify a virus to replicate one of those drugs and inject somebody with them. Plasma is just high energy matter, shouldn't be too hard to get it to drive something. These are all science, not pseudoscience. Practicality on the other hand is the problem. Oh, n/m, didn't notice the sarcasm....

    2. Re:Yeah Right... by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Deep Space 1's "ion drive" is a plasma drive. Perhaps what you're thinking of would be more like Hall thrusters, MHD thrusters, Pulsed Plasma Thusters, or VASIMR. All of which exist and have been tested to some degree in vacuum chambers and some of which have actually flown. They were not necessarily invented by NASA, but then neither was velcro, Tang, or kevlar, but those things are all still useful.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  21. Don't get ahead of yourself- Re:Magnetic monopoles by MooseTick · · Score: 1

    "Since magnetic monopoles dont exist"

    That hasn't been proven and actually most GUT theories predict that they do exist.

  22. HDD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, does it make my harddrive now a microprocessor as well? and does it mean I have to purchase a multi-processor Windows license now?

  23. How fast? by boy_afraid · · Score: 0

    I didn't read anything on how fast the "switching" will be compared to today's silicon.

  24. Cool, but... by youknowmewell · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    When do we get to see diamond cpus?

  25. Scenario by Grendel_Prime · · Score: 0

    My child walks by the computer with a magnetically mounted family photo frame, sticks it on the side of my computer. CPU ERASED! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!

    1. Re:Scenario by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

      My child walks by the computer with a magnetically mounted family photo frame, sticks it on the side of my computer. CPU ERASED! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!

      Is your child named Luke, by any chance?

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
  26. limitations? anyone? by mayhemt · · Score: 1

    doesnt this pose these limitations?
    1. no magnetic devices around... eg: speakers
    2. Disturbance to/from other devices?
    3. One uber-geek would come up with a nice magnetic reader which when placed on ur CPU, would detect the magetic fields & can actually read the data lines...privacy issues? ( i know this is very hollywood-ish)...

  27. Wait! Stop! by nysus · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't put that subwoofer next to my computer!

    --

    ---Technology will liberate us if it doesn't enslave us first.

  28. We're coming back to this now? by pclminion · · Score: 3, Insightful
    My boss tells a story about one of his supervisors back in the 1960's who was terribly excited about the new emerging field of magnetic computation. It promised to be faster and more reliable than the current systems based on relays. There were solid-state systems available but they were prohibitively expensive.

    This supervisor poured much time and effort into his team, investigating various concepts of magnetic computation. Then the integrated circuit came along and turned him into a ruined man.

    So have we finally come full-circle now, back to magnetic computation? Call me conservative but I don't think it will fare any better this time around.

  29. What about electronic surveillance? by PFI_Optix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wasn't it just a couple of years ago that they were reading keystrokes through walls by way of magnetic induction?

    I know "reading" a CPU is a bit more complex (understatement), but given enough time and resources someone will figure it out. We're already broadcasting our keystrokes and network communications, how easy do we need to make it?

    --
    120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
  30. magnetic amps? What's old is new again.... by Cryofan · · Score: 1

    ....hmm. They have had magnetic amplifiers in navy nuclear power plants (for purposes of controlling the core rods) for upwards of 40 years.

    Nothing new under the sun?

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
  31. Re:So whyd my submission of it get rejected? by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If "metalcoat", "The Winner", submitted the article ONE MINUTE before you did, then, they would have been placed it in the queue and rejeced ALL similar subsequent submissions. In other words, we shall refer to you as "The Loser". Get used to it. Roland P. submits about 400 articles a day. You are lucky if you beat him to the punch one time in six months.

  32. the down side by revery · · Score: 1

    On the down side, the new processor has been known to erase credit cards upon power up and tear zippers from pant fronts. It is surly towards and dismissive of all non-ferrous metals. It is demanding. In early testing, it refused to work for three days until its creators rented the movie Toys and watched the "deviled-egg" scene 111 times (while still cruel, this is not as excessive as it first seems).

    Lastly, any user of the processor in an area frequented by Boy Scouts, may find that their home being referred to as "the North Pole", "Santa's Workshop", or something similar.

  33. "ideal" transistor by vlad_petric · · Score: 5, Informative

    True, an ideal CMOS doesn't have any leakage; these days, however, the very small feature sizes translate into more and more leakage, mainly because of the tunneling effect. It's not uncommon for the leakage power to be one fifth of the entire power consumption; unfortunately, with future generations, this will only get worse.

    --

    The Raven

    1. Re:"ideal" transistor by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My point was that while we associate magnetism with low power persistent memory and electronics with fast, high power memory, you are going to have to shed the desirable properties of magnetism to achieve speed. At that point you may find it as leaky and power hungry as electronics. Conversely, if you are willing to make electronics slower you can make more ideal, less leaky transistors. I was not saying that transistors in use have ideal properties, but that extrapolating current magnetic goodness to it's future applications may make it less ideal too.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  34. Wolfgang Period? by autopr0n · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Now that is a cool name.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  35. I just want to know... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    if these things are susceptible to external magnetic fields, and why. I know, there are about 20 jokes about it, but no clear answers :(

    1. Re:I just want to know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      if these things are susceptible to external magnetic fields, and why.

      You hard drive works on similar technology (well, magentic fields, etc), yet is only minimally affected by external sourced, and then only if extreme (holding a speaker magnet next to it, etc). The size and power of the fields in use would keep any fields it produces itself internal to the CPU, and Im sure a simple faraday cage would keep the unwanted fields out, just as the metal case of your drive shields it. Also note that the drive itself even has some extremely powerfull magnets inside it, right next to the platters, to drive the heads. They dont alter data because they are shielded from the platters by the case..

      tm

  36. How about my chip? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think I have a fairly sophisticated chip in my head, but I have not completely figured out yet how it works.
    Any takers?

  37. I believe magnetic processars are our future. by RonaldReagan · · Score: 0

    Magnetic processors were a hot-button issue with Stanley "Tookie" Williams. Before he was executed, he spent many sleepless nights in his makeshift jail cell clean room, fruitlessly trying to develop his own magnetic processor.

    He was quoted as saying:

    "In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but magnetic processors developed by TookieCo."

    On a non related note, he also screamed out "I DIDN'T KILL THAT WHITE BITCH!" right before he was executed.

  38. Each island maintains its own magnetic field by davez0r · · Score: 0

    are there polar bears?

    and a nigerian guy named eko who's completely awesome?

  39. In Related News... by CinciTech · · Score: 1

    In somewhat related news, global terrorists are researching large scale EMP devices. Evil hackers, on the other hand, are studying Windows source to find an exploit to cause new magnetic hard drives to generate their own EMP.

  40. Blast from the past. by goombah99 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wikipedia entry for Magnetic Bubble memory. I worked on Magnetic Bubble memory at IBM san jose, and the wired article sounds like this is the nano-scale version of this with some big improvements in how they are manipualted. Back then the "bubbles" were a few microns in size. You patterns permaloy onto the surface of a magnetic material. Usually this was a long loop of almost touching chevrons or T-shaped permaloy elements. the bulk materila was polarized one direction (normal to the chip) and inversions in this formed round "bubbles" for reasons simmilar to surface tension these bubbles were stable in one size and liked to stick to the chevron. Under a polarized light microscope you could see the "bubbles" in contrast sticking to the chevrons, giving them their name due to their appearance. one bubble stuck to one chevron. and the presence or absense of a bubble on a chevron was a 1 or 0. in some fancy schema the bubbles could hold internal higher order domain structures to encode more than one bit per bubble but these were never made practical.

    A rotating magnetic field transverse to the chip would cause the chevrons to act like little iron bar bagnets pulling the bubble from one side to the other. because the chevron shape is asymetric it acted like a rachet and would only move the bubble unidirectionally. If the field was strong enough the bubble would then "leap" to the next chevron. Under the microscope you saw marching "bits" moving along. so you could move all the bit patterns like a train along the tracks in a bulk matterial with one layer of passive patterning. at one point in the loop track you placed a reader and a writer. this way you had sequential access to any bit and could inject or delete bits in the train.

    When the power went off the bubbles stayed put.

    It never made it to market (fuji made some) because it's niche was too small. it was slower than ram but faster than a hard drive. it was cheaper than ram but more expensive than a hard drive. At the time it was denser than ram but less dense than a harddrive. Thus it's only use was as a cache between ram and harddrives and in applications where robustness and non-voltility would be valuable like high-radiation sattelites and point of sale terminals. The latter market was eaten by EAROM and then flash memory.

    this new material sounds like it uses simmilar concepts but is much smaller and actually performs bubble logic. Not sure about where the clock comes from: perhaps it's still a rotatin mag fiield?

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Blast from the past. by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Hey I remember that from college!

      It was one of the completely irrelevant things I had to learn to get a degree. Along with how punched cards and paper tapes worked. And databases that wrote directly to sectors on the hard disk.

    2. Re:Blast from the past. by WalksOnDirt · · Score: 1

      The main bubble memory device I remember was a 92k bit device from Texas Instruments. I think I recall AT&T using them to store canned phone messages.

      --
      a,e,i,o,u and sometimes w and y (at be if of up cwm by)
    3. Re:Blast from the past. by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1
      It never made it to market (fuji made some) because it's niche was too small.
      I assume you mean the mass consumer market? I worked as a phone tech at my university. A couple years ago we replaced our finicky NEC phone switch (1980's vintage) with newer system. I'm pretty sure the processor had several cards of bubble memory rather than RAM, I think so calls didn't get dropped if the power blinked. The memory rack probably took up around a cubic foot of space. The new switch uses a pair of redundant compact flash cards. Those are a bit smaller.
    4. Re:Blast from the past. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It did make it to market in CNC (computer numerical control) manufacturing equipment.
      GE used bubble memory in their "cassette" system for the Fanuc series of CNC controls. Essentially, early controls had a tape reader/punch connected to them by serial port to load in/ write out programs. The GE Fanuc cassette reader replaced the tape punch, allowing programs to be stored on interchangeable bubble memory cassettes. Bubble memory's sequential access characteristics suited this application well, since the control was expecting a sequential read from paper tape, and stored the data in RAM for actual execution.
      Later versions of this used ordinary floppy disks as "cassettes". (Yes, they still called them cassettes in the documentation, don't ask me why.)

  41. Hold up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm still waiting on AtomChip to release my 6.8 Ghz quantum computer, never mind the fact it is made on technology using "optoelectronics".

  42. Added bonus by RyoShin · · Score: 1

    For the conspiracy theorists among us, this chip can be turned on to a "high-power" mode with the press of a button, which will also eject the hard drive into its direct vacinity, erasing any and all data on it.

    Let's see the RIAA sue me when I have a useless hard drive, haha!

    (Yes, I know that the magnets wouldn't be powerful enough to do anything to the hard drive.)

  43. New scientist article by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 3, Interesting
    http://www.newscientist.com.nyud.net:8090/channel/ mech-tech/nanotechnology/dn8575

    They say that a magnetic insulator would have to be used to shield the chip from external interference.


    Cowburn, who is working with MRAM makers on developing the technology, suggests a common magnetic shielding material may have to be built into such chips. Called mu-metal, it is an alloy of nickel, iron, copper and molybdenum. "It's effectively a Faraday Cage for magnetic devices," he explains.

  44. Re:Pretty gay idea by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I for one welcome our magnetic field juggling overlords.

    --
    Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

    http://financialpetition.org/
  45. Magnetic processor + EMP = Happy salesman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds weird to me, but what do i know?!

    Little kid goes by the computer holding an etch-a-sketch with about 50"... Puts it against the computers side panel and woops...

    The processor is now acting up strangelly. A few misshaps later and it's a new processor for you.

    Maybe they'll start to put armoured processor with magnetic protective armours to make that etch-a-sketch not be so damaging.

    That would be imensly cool! No more talk about heatsinks and fans for modders, just armours for their processors.

    Of course by the time this is done computers will run on bullshit...

  46. Re:So whyd my submission of it get rejected? by michaelmichael · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I submitted it too but I'm not bitter.
    ...
    Well, not that bitter. But there's no real reason to get upset about it. Unless you've got a job that pays bonuses based on Slashdot story submissions.

  47. Oh no... by Doomedsnowball · · Score: 1

    Is this going to be the Windows ME between silicon and quantum computing? I hope not. I write ECAD software that will produce around 160 million a year in the current market. Designing chips is still a matter of heat and timing control, and until I get a new model to work with, I can't even say whether this will kill a HUGE market. Goodbye Magma, Synopsys, etc.

    --
    7h3$3 4r3n'7 7h3 Ðr01Ð$ ¥0 4r3 £00|{1n9 f0r. M0v3 4£0n9. --OB1
  48. What the article didnt mention by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Did the article say anything about Speed?

    Magnetic circuits have been studied for at least 80 years. The basic problem is one of size and speed. A dipole magnet (onr with N and S poles) has a certain minimum size, otherwise it depolarizes itself. That sets a minimum size for any magnetic device. Also it's hard to make magnetic amplifiers with more than a small fan-out. It's also really hard to distribute a clock signal-- magnetic pulses fall off at a 1/r^3 rate, and generating a fast magnetic pulse gets blocked by the inductance of the coil.

    Now there *are* cigarette-pack to Taj Mahal sized magnetic voltage regulators in use. Your PC power supply may be using one to regulate the 3.3 volt output. But getting them down to IC-size is going to be really hard to impossible.

    1. Re:What the article didnt mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      It seems as though you are picturing actual magnets and wires in this processor. With QCA you are working down to the level of single electrons. The natural force between electrons that pushes them apart is the magnetic force that QCA uses: essentially each little bit could be though of as a square of 2x2, with 2 electrons in opposite corners, say top-right and bottom-left. If you force an electron next to the top-right of the square, the two electrons IN the square will shift around to be in the top-left and bottom-right corners. In this way you can transmit a signal of a 0 or 1. This can be done in a VERY small space, obviously, compared to today's fabrication processes.

    2. Re:What the article didnt mention by macaddictg4 · · Score: 1

      I posted that comment, wasn't able to login before.

    3. Re:What the article didnt mention by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1

      Very nice. Now please explain how to make a: R-S flip flop AND gate OR gate ... all with a fanout of 4 or more. ... and how you connect these devices. ... and how you interface them to the real world. ... and get them to work with the required 99.9999999999% reliability ... and do it quicker or cheaper than using silicon. ----- Once upon a time there was talk of superconducting twistors, and 400,000 MHz tunnel-diode computers, and a dozen other wizz-bang technologies. Most of them were pure rubbish-- for example, most of the devices had no clearly differentiated inputs and outputs, no fan-out or amplification ability, little or no noise margin, impossible clocking schemes, low reliability, poor or expensive or slow interfaces between stages or to the real world, and more foibles beyond recalling.

  49. No, the cat does not "got my tongue." by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2, Funny

    Politician: What good are magnetic devices?

    Pithy Scientist: Sir, in 20 years, you'll be taxing them.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  50. Oblig. Q by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 1

    Let me be the first to say that I welcome our new magnetic overlords.

    --
    disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
    1. Re:Oblig. Q by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one, tire of our catchphrase overlords.

  51. What about Electro Magnetic Pulses? by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

    I was wondering about Electro Magnetic Pulses. Can something like this be hardened for military use? If the military can't use it, I wonder how much money the government would throw into this. I know they aren't the only drivers of technology, but you have to recognize that the military has historically been pretty much one of the largest (if not the largets outright).

    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  52. Re:Don't get ahead of yourself- Re:Magnetic monopo by Grab · · Score: 1

    However, no-one's yet seen one, so I wouldn't get too worried. Maybe one positive effect of this would be distributing a zillion monopole detectors across the world...

  53. We have this already, sort of by serutan · · Score: 1

    Our netadmin radiates his own individual magnetic field. Sort of.

  54. more like Programmable Logic Arrays? by peter303 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Magnetic bubbles move. Its principle resembles that of delay line memory used in computers before the invention of core and disk memory: You have huge circulating loops one can access at choosen spots to read a record. (People are working on optical delay line memory to store petabytes and picosecond speeds.)

    I interpret this new magnetic technology to be a more compact implementation of programmable logic arrays . PLAs are standard tool in digital circuit design and can theoretically emulate any other digital state machine such as a CPU. Engineers like them because they are like blank circuits you can quickly burn a pattern in them. New high-density PLA chips in the 1980s lead to the rise of the mini-supercomputer industry, with companies like Convex using them. However, general purpose CPUs from Intel and Sun eventually exceeded 1990s PLA speeds and circuit capacities.

  55. An abacus? by PetriBORG · · Score: 1

    How about an abacus... It sort of works on gravity to hold its 'bits' in place. :-)

    --
    Pete/Petri "damn, my chainsaw is clogged with 1's and 0's again." --clyde
  56. Magnetic amplifiers work fine. They're just big. by Animats · · Score: 1
    The UNIVAC Solid-State 80 used magnetic amplifiers for computation. 3000 of them.

    Magnetic amplifiers have a long and honorable history. They're basically transformers with at least three windings, designed so that the control winding can saturate the magnetic core. This yields gain. Magnetic amplifiers were big and slow, but solidly reliable. Absent major physical damage, they don't fail.

    Magnetic amplifiers were used widely in the telephone system for decades. In Western Electric gear, anything with a vacuum tube had to have monitoring and alarm circuitry, but a magnetic amplifier didn't. Millions of little grey boxes with mag amps inside populated the phone system.

    Magnetic amplifiers can be built to handle considerable power, so they were used in motor controls. They're still used in welders.

  57. Woo Hoo!!! by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    Does this mean we can re-introduce iron-core memory to go with our new magentic-core CPUs???

    I've always wanted to find out if 1GB of iron-core memory would completely throw the Earth's magentic field out of whack. And even if it didn't, you'd have that really cool clicking sound on a huge scale as the bits were all flipped.

    Ahh, to hear 1GB of little metal rings being flipped over in a large sequential write. That would be awesome.

    =)

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Woo Hoo!!! by wiml · · Score: 1
      Core memory doesn't rely on any physical movement of the rings. It remagnetizes them in one direction or the other.

      For modern, commercially available magnetic memory, you could use FRAM (ferroelectric RAM).

  58. Misspelling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wolfgang Perod should be Porod.. and /. isnt letting me login

  59. Moore's Law is still working by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As transistor-based microchips hit the limits of Moore's Law...
    I don't think so.
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/02/06021 3091816.htm

  60. Not the only magnetic chip by quoll · · Score: 1

    The other technology that comes to mind while reading this is the Rapid Single Flux Quantum device (RSFQ). While not as fast as RSFQs, these new circuits are much more practical since they can run at room temperature.

    I find it interesting that these new technologies for high speed replacements of transistors are both based on magnetic fields.

  61. learn from galactica by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now i understand why the cylons can switch off all computers by just looking at them.

  62. Bonus points by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

    Ok, for 10 points, can you tell me what famous tv show revolving around a black car featured magnetic memory as a plot point in its first episode?

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    1. Re:Bonus points by mikefe · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen the first episode, but I can guess.

      Knight Rider!

      --
      There: Something at a specific location.
      Their: Owned by someone.
      Please make sure your english compiles.
    2. Re:Bonus points by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      Correct! I was rather impressed at the time they we talking about cutting edge technology. It sort of offset the fact that Michael Knight got his new face because he has a metal plate in his forhead.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  63. Explanation of core memory by lhaeh · · Score: 3, Informative
    For all you youngins out there magnetic core memory is an old kind of memory that used a tiny circular magnet with wires running through it to hold each bit. It was a one or zero based on which direction the magnetic energy flowed through it.

    I have about 128 bits of it sitting in my closet somewhere. It is not based on a power of two like ram is now, but the length X width of the number of magnets on each side.

    A close-up picture of it

  64. Limits by cluening · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As transistor-based microchips hit the limits of Moore's Law

    Actually, I don't think "Moore's Law" has a limit. An off-the-cuff comment that the number of transistors in a processor will double every 18 months doesn't have a limit. It just keeps getting higher and higher.

    --
    Posted from the wireless couch.
    1. Re:Limits by adrianmonk · · Score: 1
      Actually, I don't think "Moore's Law" has a limit. An off-the-cuff comment that the number of transistors in a processor will double every 18 months doesn't have a limit. It just keeps getting higher and higher.

      The value of the number of transistors as a function of time doesn't have a limit. However, the accuracy with which Moore's Law continues to correlate with reality does (or may) have a limit.

  65. Spelling by macaddictg4 · · Score: 1

    Perod is spelled Porod. The article has already corrected this misspelling.

  66. I think I'll wait for biological computers by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Nerve impulses travel pretty fast, and reaction time can potentially be near-instant. After all, our brain does a pretty good job. It helped us make silicon computer chips.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:I think I'll wait for biological computers by wiml · · Score: 1

      Nerve impulses are incredibly slow: they max out at 120 m/s, and are often much slower (10 m/s) depending on the nerve. Contrast with electrical connections, where even with transmission-line effects, the signal goes at a good fraction of the speed of light (let's say 300000 m/s).

      Our brain's power comes from the complexity and subtlety of the interconnect, not from the raw speed of processing.

  67. Technical crap by rbarreira · · Score: 1
    From the article:

    A NAND logic gate, for example, accepts two inputs to arrive at one output. If both inputs are one, the NAND gate spits out a zero. If one or the other or both inputs are a zero, the NAND gate provides a one as an output.

    Porod and his colleagues equipped their new chip with a universal logic gate -- a combination of the NAND and NOR gates. Together, these two logic gates can perform any of the basic arithmetic functions intrinsic to all computer processing.

    Either NAND or NOR gates are enough to perform any logical operation, one doesn't need a combination of both to make an "universal logic gate". If this misleading sentence was on CNN I'd accept it, but Wired should know better...
    --

    The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    1. Re:Technical crap by whit3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's actually beneficial that a single 'gate' element can perform AND, OR, and INVERT
      functions all in one stage. The early TTL won over other logic designs in part because
      the basic gate used multiple emitters on the input transistor to get an AND function,
      and multiple input transistors to get the OR function. That meant that the delay
      and complexity character of AND and OR were the same, and that the complex function
      of AND/OR/INVERT was available as a fast multiplexer, with the same characteristics
      as a simple NAND. There was a brief attempt to use expandable gates (making
      the connection point after the input transistor available on an external pin,
      which was NOT TTL-logic-level compatible), but it didn't catch on.

      CMOS, on the other hand, had input impedance and delay differences in the AND and
      OR and other gates, so the whole 4000 series CMOS logic family only became
      trouble-free to use AFTER THEY BUFFERED THE WHOLE FAMILY with an extra inverter
      (and consequently extra time delay). Buffered (4000B series) is the common small
      scale CMOS you see today, the unbuffered (4000A series) has been sidelined.

      From a circuit-design viewpoint, the AND/OR/INVERT is a very good starting element,
      for a lot of reasons that only show up when some poor engineer is perspiring over his
      timing budget...

  68. Hmmm, Now where did I put that .... by 3seas · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...demagnitizer....

    Oh my, I'm seeing spots, sun spots...

    A new lower power level of EMP weapons has been announced, following the announcement of the first commercial Magnetic computing....

  69. But does it...? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    But does it run Linux?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  70. Maybe I'm missing something by ElboRuum · · Score: 1

    Computers using the magnetic chips would boot up almost instantly. The magnetic chip's memory is nonvolatile, making it impervious to power interruptions, and it retains its data when the device is switched off.

    Why, are they planning on replacing the hard drive and the data bus, the two major bottlenecks in boot speed? Or do they intend a "boot once, suspend thereafter" approach, flashing the computer state to some NVMRAM?

    Of course, the whole article has so many implied exclamation points it reminds me of cold fusion.

  71. Josephson Junctions? by Lazarian · · Score: 1

    I vaguely remember a long time ago that Josephson junctions were considered as a contender for logic gates. If I recall correctly, a conductor that carried a current could control a current in another conductor that was perpendicular to the control element via its magnetic field. It had niche aplications, but for processing elements, it was deemed impractical: the devices had to be cooled to cryogenic temperatures, and shearing forces from contraction tended to destroy them. It would be interesting to see if carbon nanotube technology could somehow be a remedy to the problems with using Josephson junctions, or a variant of them in processor applications.

    Just a thought. I'm no physicist.

  72. desirable by mdm001 · · Score: 1

    Computers using the magnetic chips would boot up almost instantly. The magnetic chip's memory is nonvolatile, making it impervious to power interruptions, and it retains its data when the device is switched off. This is probably not a desirable trait for anything running a microsoft product. How often is a system re-boot required with MS?

  73. Bubble Memory by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 1

    I was an EW technician in the AirForce, we had a processor that used bubble memory. That was about 1981.

  74. Re:So whyd my submission of it get rejected? by yyttrrre · · Score: 1

    That would be crazy if he submits 400 articles a day. Assume it takes him 2 minutes to find and submit each article and that he doesn't submit the same article twice. Thats 400 times 2 minutes = 13.3 hours a day spent on sending articles the /. editors.

  75. Faster than current flow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Transistors (except those based on Jopheson junctions which require superconductor properties) operate as the speed of current flow. Current flow is much slower than the speed of light (transmission time for magnetic field changes). So, theoretically at least, this could be faster.

  76. Magnetic Core Memory by Tandoori+Haggis · · Score: 1

    Amazing what they came up with in the 1940's: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_core_memory

    --
    My hyperlinks aren't worth the paper they're printed on.
  77. Is this 'spintronics' ? by zymano · · Score: 1

    What is the technical name for this ?

  78. Re:So whyd my submission of it get rejected? by MrKibkibs · · Score: 1
  79. Magnetic field shielding Materials by Billygoatz · · Score: 0

    Are there any materials that can shield from magnetic fields,
    and are not affected, or magnet themselves.

    For a school project.

    Any help is appreciated.

    1. Re:Magnetic field shielding Materials by whit3 · · Score: 3, Informative

      To 'shield from magnetic fields' is generally the same thing as 'generate an
      opposing magnetic field'; that means the shield materials ARE affected,
      and are in fact somewhat magnetized, to create the shielding
      effect.

      The best shield materials are superconductors (which only exist at low
      temperatures). The most common magnetic shield materials are soft
      iron alloys (Permalloy and Mu-Metal are brand names). Shielding
      from rapidly-changing magnetism is easier, most electrical conductors
      will do this (but superconductors do it for constant magnetic fields
      as well as changing ones). A weak shielding effect is called diamagnetism,
      and is interesting in its own right. Did you know that water is repelled
      from a magnetic field? Water is diamagnetic (weakly). Brass is more highly
      diamagnetic.

    2. Re:Magnetic field shielding Materials by Billygoatz · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the reply, I guess it won't work back to the drawing board.

  80. Scientific American article on magnetologic gates by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Scientific American had a rather lengthy article on magnetologic devices not long ago. MRAM is a limited version of them that can only change the magnetization of the top magnetic layer - full magnetologic devices can switch both sides.

    Although they're a wonderful technology that in the right hands would permit vast improvements in computation, I'm scared to think what a painful experience it would be to program such a device. We have enough trouble dealing with CPUs that have fixed instruction sets and few enough ASM programmers as it is. Is a person even capable of programming such a device efficiently, or writing software to do the same? I'm pretty sure that just having a 10x10 matrix of them to keep track of would be hard for me - I can't imagine trying to write code to control a whole CPU of them that wouldn't be hopelessly bogged down with getGateStatus()- and setGateStatus()-type functions.

    Or would their role be more limited - switching individual gates to be AND/OR/NOT/NAND in hardware, for instance, so you would do setGateFunction(gate_no, wanted_function); LOGIC_OP rather than having a switch? Or perhaps they would be hard enough to program that you would have to use just a handful of pre-written setups for them, optimizing for games or math performance? loadChipSetup(long_math.mag) or loadChipSetup(fast_string_ops.mag)?

    Now imagine the next generation of viruses rewiring your CPU to do God-knows-what.

  81. Moore's "jurisdiction"? by mevets · · Score: 1

    "As transistor-based microchips leave Moore's jurisdiction... "? The range of interpretation of Moore's Law itself appears to follow Moore's Law; with no disrespect to the parent article intended.

  82. Magnetic bubble memory by serutan · · Score: 1

    Glad to know somebody else remembers magnetic bubble technology. When I first read about it in the 1980s it was supposed to revolutionize storage (like everything else). All the music ever recorded would fit in a unit the size of a cigar box. At least that part has probably been achieved by now, but what happened to the bubbles, and how is this new approach different?

  83. Re:Don't get ahead of yourself- Re:Magnetic monopo by davidl9999 · · Score: 1

    I was gonna say... butcha beat me to it! =D

    --
    (Yes, it's my Yahoo id) :P
  84. Diamond on insulator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Diamond on insulator is what i'm waiting for! I read an article in wired a while back about the guy who sold the whole silicon on insulator process to intel has been working on fabricating diamond wafer to produce chips from.

  85. A cool demonstration by kickedfortrolling · · Score: 1

    In the entrance hall of the rochester physics building, Durham University, there was a cool demo of a magnetic 'not' gate. The model was an electric railway. the train had an arrow on it indicating the direction of the magnetic field. When triggered, the train moved round the track into a v shaped grove, the direction of the train was switched as it backed out of the V, as the direction of the field would be switched.

    as well as showing (conceptually at least) that this worked, it gave rise to the possibility that the 'supercomputer' in the instituate for computational cosmology was just a really REALLY elaborate trainset..(turntables and everything).

    also.. working in the group is a Dr Mike Hunt..

    --
    --AlexC
    Just because I dont agree with climate change doesnt make me a troll
  86. Re:Magnetic amplifiers work fine. They're just big by dragonbutt · · Score: 1

    I have a customer with d.c. power supplys using a saturable core transformer (mag amp) they are rated for 12v, 6,000amp 100% duty cycle. powered with 480v 3 phase, the ripple on the output is lower than the s.c.r. controlled power supplies.

    The regulation is poor, there is no voltage drop in the iron core windings unless there is current flow, they are big, noisy, variac controls dc power into bias winding.

    schematic for the power supply is dated 1960. three units still running strong after 46 years!

    This type of power is used in the plating industry. I have worked on 15v 30,000amp dc power supplies. that's big. 1000amp 480v 3phase powered, water cooled, 360 diodes, each diode rated for 300amp 600volt, e-tech tools include 1-1/4 wrench!

    --
    it was like that when I got here.. I wasen't here when that happened... second shift musta done that....
  87. QUICKLY! by Tzarius · · Score: 1

    REVERSE THE POLARITY!!!

  88. Massive advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the first CPU that can stick to your fridge!