Slashdot Mirror


Robotic Legs Instead of Wheelchairs

smooth wombat writes "Atsuo Takanishi, an engineering professor at Tokyo's Waseda University, has demonstrated a pair of robotic legs that may one day eliminate the need for wheelchairs. At the demonstration in Tokyo, one of Takanishi's students rode the robot -- which bears some resemblance to the mechanical "Wrong Trousers" of Wallace and Gromit fame -- up and down a staircase and along a pebbly path outdoors. A picture of the demonstration may be found here " Still waiting for my Gundam but that's a good start.

149 comments

  1. It's the Wrong Trousers, Gromit... by yroJJory · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...and they've gone wrong!

    --
    Jory
    1. Re:It's the Wrong Trousers, Gromit... by cheese-cube · · Score: 1

      I own "The Wrong Trousers", "A Grand Day Out" and "A Close Shave" on VHS. Nostalgia LOL.

    2. Re:It's the Wrong Trousers, Gromit... by Salsaman · · Score: 1

      Someone set up us the legs !

  2. somehow... by minus_273 · · Score: 0

    somehow i get the impression this is not intended for the gian robot fanatic demographic..

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
    1. Re:somehow... by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 0

      somehow i get the impression this is not intended for the gian robot fanatic demographic..

      Looking at the photo, it seems to be mostly intended for dwarves or outdoor steps. on it, my head would be about 2m50 above the ground...

    2. Re:somehow... by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      I think it might be aimed at the "crippled" Vista firewall... :p

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
  3. Interesting by Ironsides · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Only two legs? I'm surprised they didn't go with four. Sure, it's a little bit harder to work with. However, it would seem to be quite a bit more stable as well, especially when the power fails.

    --
    Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    1. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was wondering what it'd be like to sneak up behind elderly people using robotic legs to pull the batteries out of the legs, and watch them collapse to the floor...

    2. Re:Interesting by Cornflake917 · · Score: 1

      Only two legs?

      I don't think the number of legs is much of the issue as the size of the robot. Unless the dude on the chair is alot smaller than he seems, this machine seems to be quite large. No one will want to use this if it is pain in the ass to transport, or if they can't maneuver into small spaces.

    3. Re:Interesting by Mattsson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One would guess, though, that an eventual commercial mass-market version version would be a bit more slim and have over-all a more polished design than a university research-prototype. ^_^

      --
      /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
    4. Re:Interesting by FirienFirien · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The major advantage of this over a wheelchair is conformity to the normal human shape. A wheelchair already has far more motive efficiency - and there's designs with wheel pairs that allow newer-fangled wheelchairs to climb chairs, raise the user, etc. Two legs give a disabled person a more normal appearance; four legs do not.

      Wheelchairs aren't even limited with normal pebble surfaces - and if a surface is unstable enough to cause a wheel problems, then it'll cause a robotic leg-replacement problems too.

      --
      Browsing with +2 to insightful posts and a higher threshold makes the average post seen seem a lot more ingenious
    5. Re:Interesting by Tmack · · Score: 1
      The major advantage of this over a wheelchair is conformity to the normal human shape.

      Me thinks someone did not RTFA or look at the pic... This thing makes the user conform more to a normal human shape than someone in a wheelchair like an aircraft carrier conforms to my rowboat.

      tm

      --
      Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
    6. Re:Interesting by Chr0nik · · Score: 1

      Yeah, wheelchairs aren't a pain in the ass to transport, and they fit in to small spaces soooooo easily.

      Anything that will give a person who is disabled physically more independence, and the ability to go places people with functioning legs go, will sell. Currently, people without the use of their legs, have plan with wheelchair accessibility in mind, they have to drive special cars, live in special houses, and can't even hang out at the beach, unless they can afford uber expensive power assisted all terrain wheelchairs. And unless you live in a big city. Public restrooms would be hell, unfortunately there are far too few wheelchair accessible restrooms. Any legs, robotic or not, will help these people immensely.

      The expensive nature of them will be far more prohibitive to their sales, than the fact that they are bulky. Bulk can be reduced. Hopefully people will be able to get assistance with buying them once they are fully developed. No more wheelchair ramps, no more wheelchair bathroom stalls, no more radically modified construction on their homes, no more radically modified cars. Hell if technology keeps advancing the way it has been, perhaps they'll even be able to dance, or play a sport.

      --


      ... what did you expect, something profound?
    7. Re:Interesting by flogic42 · · Score: 1

      nah, three is the best number of legs. Then you can be a Tripod

      --
      Check out my women's designer clothing store.
    8. Re:Interesting by Chr0nik · · Score: 1

      Perhaps not the ones in the article, but there are many better variations.

      Like these, or these

      --


      ... what did you expect, something profound?
    9. Re:Interesting by Chr0nik · · Score: 1

      Ok, before anyone berates me, I read the article but didn't look at the pic.

      The one in the pic is rediculous in the light of many of the ones already developed that have FAR more potential.

      Like these, or these

      --


      ... what did you expect, something profound?
    10. Re:Interesting by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Note that both of the examples you gave require functioning legs (more correctly, nerves to the legs) to work. Until we can capture nervous signals to the legs accurately and before they get disrupted by whatever is causing the paralysis, these options aren't viable for paraplegics. I'm sure that day will come, but this is only half of the solution.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    11. Re:Interesting by Forge · · Score: 1

      What childhood trauma made you into what you are today?

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    12. Re:Interesting by T-Ranger · · Score: 1

      Well, if we're just throwing around a crap load of numbers, then 6 is the best one. That way, you can always be a tripod, and still move forward. Might be easier mechanically, too: One relativly powerful system to lift/move/drop the sets of legs, with each leg having independe hydraulics controling only length and angle. If the control software is built that one set of legs must be stable for the other to move, then getting off balance would be impossible.

    13. Re:Interesting by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Well these use your existing legs and then enhance them. The robitic legs in the article carry your in a seated position. Completly different idea. And yes I agree that the leg enchacements are much more practicle for most uses, though they may not be usable in the the instance of someone whos legs are cut off at the hip. I do wonder how the robit suit for the quadriplegic http://www.theage.com.au/news/breaking/robot-suit- will-help-quadriplegic-scale-the-heights/2006/04/0 4/1143916503382.html
      maintains balance though, as the quadriplegic won't be able to exert his own muscle movement in order to do so.

    14. Re:Interesting by DeepStream · · Score: 1

      The title of that article it very misleading -- the robot suit they describe is just like the exoskeleton in the other article. It is not designed for a para- or quadriplegic, but rather to help someone else carry a person for a long time/distance.

    15. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus wheelchairs generally aren't too good with stairs, and this seems to be designed for them.

    16. Re:Interesting by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Oh the lady is the quad. Sorry didn't read.

    17. Re:Interesting by moro_666 · · Score: 1

      i don't think that the design it has will make it fall apart without electricity. however losing balance is most likely to happen :)

      however this is no way going to end the need for wheelchairs, there are far too many people out there who have more serious problems than missing or unfunctional real legs. quite many children with th rh+/- syndrom have serious stability issues so they'd fail to keep balance unless they are in the wheelchair.

      people will always need wheelchairs.

      and when i'm in a private hospital, i want a sexy nurse to drive me around with the wheelchair not some kind of robotic bumps under me

      ps. is it just me or is it a bit interesting that this story came out right after the crippled firewall on windows ? will the robolegs be able to compensate that ?

      --

      I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
    18. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I appreciate you're observations!

      I, myself, am a disabled college student, and living on my own can really be a terribly difficult task at time. I have a powered wheelchair, which may I add is immense and very heavy. I can't just take this thing anywhere, if you know what I mean.

      Until about 5 years ago, my batteries that power my chair, were unable to clear luggage. They were old styled water cell batteries, that if brought up to that altitude, would rupture and leak in the luggage section of the plane, causing some serious problems. Gladly, they fixed that problem at last, so I wouldn't require very expensive gel cell batteries.

      Also, there's just some places you can't go with a wheelchair. No matter what. It requires people like myself to just be content with saying "Well, lets go elsewhere then," or "Maybe it will be accessible some day." I, personally, don't enjoy thinking like that.

      Regardless, the robotic legs at the moment seem like an impractical idea and a possible hazzard. But look at it in a broader aspect, if we make a technology as such currently, we've got something to start with to make this possible.

      I couldn't imagine what I'd do first if they gave me the chance to walk, even if it was robotic, artificial, hazzardous, and strange looking. I would not care, after all this time never taking a step on my own, no person can justify to me that it's a useless project.

      --- Chi

    19. Re:Interesting by flogic42 · · Score: 1

      the problem with programming three or fewer legs is the unstable equilibrium during each step. 4 or more legs is trivial.

      --
      Check out my women's designer clothing store.
  4. ease of use by Digitus1337 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It takes two joysticks to control... how much of an improvement is this over wheelcheers? What of those with limited or no use of their hands. While the legs seem cool, are they really practical?

    1. Re:ease of use by rayde · · Score: 1

      i think this could offer a lot of improvement over a wheelchair. think of the ability to interact at eye-level with a standing person. or mobility up and down stairs and other places that would typically require special equipment to be in place. wheelchairs would restrict mobility more than a functional set of robotic legs.

    2. Re:ease of use by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      The advantage is that our infrastructure is more geared towards humans on legs than on wheels (e.g. stairs).

    3. Re:ease of use by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It takes two joysticks to control... how much of an improvement is this over wheelcheers?

      Why don't you try going up a flight of stairs in a wheelchair and get back to us with your results?
      You'll want to count the number of hands you're using to turn the wheels too...

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    4. Re:ease of use by Noodles · · Score: 1

      He's right though, giving up your hands just so you can go up/down stairs is not a reasonable trade-off. You might be able to navigate stairs, but you couldn't hold anything. You can't always sit stuff in your lap due to wind and the object (e.g. glass of beer). Also, devices like this are not practical to put in your car.

    5. Re:ease of use by SnotBob · · Score: 2, Funny

      If they make it so it can ride a Segway it will be able to go faster.

    6. Re:ease of use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>Why don't you try going up a flight of stairs in a wheelchair and get back to us with your results?

      No problem :)

    7. Re:ease of use by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      Why don't you try going up a flight of stairs in a wheelchair and get back to us with your results?
      You'll want to count the number of hands you're using to turn the wheels too...


      This thread will be archived by the time the OP gets out of the hospital.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    8. Re:ease of use by krakelohm · · Score: 1

      You'll want to count the number of hands you're using to turn the wheels too...

      Obviously we are discussing electric wheelechairs here so your answer is one.

      --
      You are all a bunch of idots.
    9. Re:ease of use by Chr0nik · · Score: 1

      Because, normal people are constantly doing complex tasks with their hands when climbing stairs?

      --


      ... what did you expect, something profound?
    10. Re:ease of use by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. Electric chairs are generally reserved for
      quadraplegics, not people who have full use of their upper
      torso. They get the manual chairs, and those require 2 hands.

    11. Re:ease of use by Digitus1337 · · Score: 1

      Are there not wheelchairs with treads that are capable of climing stairs? As I understand it, they are usable by those with neck/head injuries, and that lack most motor functions.

    12. Re:ease of use by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      If they make it so it can ride a Segway it will be able to go faster.

      Hehe, but seriously, you know that the Segway was made as a consummer product for the technology in Kamen's earlier invention: An electric wheenchair that can stand up and climb stairs.

      His goal was to make the wheelchair more affordable by lowering production cost through commercial distribution of the segway... didn't pan out, but the goal was commendable. That fancy wheelchair of his is a marvel of engineering.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    13. Re:ease of use by Original+Replica · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure robotic legs are going to fit through doorways any better than most wheelchairs do. But with the variety of designs that have been pointed out in other posts we can't be too far from fully robotic legs that are on a human scale.

      --
      We are all just people.
    14. Re:ease of use by audacity242 · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that manual wheelchairs already require two hands, so that's not an issue for many wheelchair users.

      And there are already devices out there that allow wheelchair users with limited/no hand control to still use their wheelchair. A mouth-controlled joystick is one method of allowing a quadriplegic to remain fairly independent. While these robotic legs currently require two joysticks, it wouldn't surprise me if they were able to get it down to one, meaning that any person who can use a wheelchair (manual or electric) would be able to use those legs.

    15. Re:ease of use by darrylo · · Score: 1

      Funny, the iBot wheelchair can climb (some) stairs, but it only needs one (1) controller.

    16. Re:ease of use by Noodles · · Score: 1

      Why is it so hard to believe that someone might carry an object up or down a flight of stairs? That's complex when you don't have hands available to do the carrying.

  5. This is dynamic standing, not walking. Still great by chriss · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think this is great, but it will still take some time to be used in daily life. This looks like one of the biped robots we have seen in the last years who has the possibility to carry a person. These bots can balance each step, but they are always in balance. A person which is walking or running is not in a permanent state of standing, but falling. To move forward at a reasonable pace you have to abandon stability and use gravity to draw you forward and reestablishing balance once you set down your foot.

    This is difficult enough on a fixed floor (watch babies learn to walk), but much harder on something like grass or inside a moving train. Considering how long it took to get robots to even stand it will still take some time to walk. So if you depend on a wheelchair today and would like to actually move at decent speeds, you may be out of luck for some time.

  6. Dare i ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mention Stephen Hawking got there first!

  7. Next step in evolution by techpawn · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now if this eliminates old guys on those damn Rascals, I'm all for the metal pants even if they are up to their armpits

    --
    Ask not what you can do for your country. Ask what your country did to you
    1. Re:Next step in evolution by Kaptain+Kruton · · Score: 1

      But eliminating the Rascals gets rid of the old guy's best pickup line.... "Hey baby, wanna ride my rascal?"

  8. I can just picture it now... by TWX · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...So, these things come out, and someone programs a macro that gets them out of bed, into the trousers, walks to the bureau and stands for fifteen minutes, then walks out of the house, down the stairs, and to work. Unfortunately, the owner has recently become deceased, and the trousers, not programmed to account for little things like that still executes its normal routine...

    I don't know which would be creepier, it doing that with the corpse, or it leaving the house empty...

    And with that I'm reminded of a short story about an automated house...

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:I can just picture it now... by Jamil+Karim · · Score: 1

      For those trying to rack their brains... the short story is called "There will come soft rains"

    2. Re:I can just picture it now... by TWX · · Score: 1

      For those trying to rack their brains... the short story is called "There will come soft rains"

      For some reason that doesn't sound right, but I admit that I could be incorrect. The gist of the story is that the house has been going in perpetuity for an indeterminate time with no people, preparing breakfast, turning on lights, and something short-circuits and it burns down. Almost kubla-khan-esque...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    3. Re:I can just picture it now... by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      The gist of the story is that the house has been going in perpetuity for an indeterminate time with no people, preparing breakfast, turning on lights, and something short-circuits and it burns down.

      That's the one. 'There Will Come Soft Rains' is right. It's from The Martian Chronicles, and was indeed very good. It was from after all the colonists had abandoned Mars and gone back to Earth for the war.

      I never quite got why they did that, mind. If it had been me, it would have been 'oh, they're blowing each other up back home? Wow. Glad we're well out of that, eh?'

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    4. Re:I can just picture it now... by melandy · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the owner has recently become deceased, and the trousers, not programmed to account for little things like that still executes its normal routine...

      Maybe they should borrow some ideas from RFC 2795 (Infinite Monkey Protocol Suite). The KEEPER Message Response Codes would be invaluable here.

      http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2795.txt

  9. What about failure by holdenholden · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When this contraption fails (because it will, inevitably), I don't want to be the one caught under it. A wheelchair may be inconvenient, but at least will not break your neck in case of a mechanical failure. And if the battery goes dead, a wheelchair can be moved using hands or somebody can push it. If this thing looses power, you are pretty much stuck.

    1. Re:What about failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A wheelchair may be inconvenient, but at least will not break your neck in case of a mechanical failure

      Imagine heading down a ramp. You started with two wheels but all of a sudden one of them has decided to go on ahead without you. Now you flip over on your head and since you are paralyzed you cannot bring up your arms to catch yourself....it could happen. Wheelchairs, believe it or not, can and do mechanically fail. Maybe you meant something more along the lines of a software glitch?

    2. Re:What about failure by chris_eineke · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because people never stumble without wearing those techno trousers. Or collapse because of alcohol intoxication.

      --
      "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
    3. Re:What about failure by hevenor · · Score: 1

      "The Excalator is the greatest invention of all time because it they can never break. Excalators can only become stairs."

      -Mitch Hedberg

    4. Re:What about failure by audacity242 · · Score: 1

      Wheelchairs can cause fairly serious injuries when they have mechanical failures. Ever seen an electric wheelchair stuck in forward run into a wall? Not pretty. And I've seen wheels fall off of manual wheelchairs (fortunately, not when a person was in it).

      Also, have you ever tried to push an electric wheelchair? They can be incredibly heavy, and sometimes it's difficult (ie, near impossible) to get the things in neutral. If the batteries die on one of these robotic legs, it won't be the end of the world, virtually every public place you can think of has a spare wheelchair lying around for injured customers/clients.

      Yeah, it's going to suck if there's a power failure or mechanical failure with these robot legs. But it's not going to be much different than the failures that occur with manual or electric chairs.

    5. Re:What about failure by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      they do but the human body is quite capable of dealing with falling over or having another person fall on it with no damage in the majority of cases.

      the person on that walker is quite high up and there is the weight of the walker itself to deal with too. Falling while on that or having it fall on you would be a LOT nastier than falling while walking/running or having a person fall on you.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    6. Re:What about failure by Dean+Hougen · · Score: 1

      When this "airplane" contraption fails (because it will, inevitably), I don't want to be the one caught under it or in it. A car may be slow and restricted to relatively smooth, level, and solid terrain, but at least will not drop from the sky in case of a mechanical failure. And if you run out of fuel, a car can be moved by towing or somebody can push it. If this "airplane" thing looses power, you'll need to land pretty fast. I don't see any future for this whacky "airplane" idea, you crazy technophiles.

    7. Re:What about failure by holdenholden · · Score: 1
      Hmm, you have a good point. We don't know about the safety record of the contraption. I am sure somewhere there is a statistic about how many people are injured as a direct result of using a wheel chair. It may turn out that the new thingy is safer, like the airplane is safer than a car, on the average.

      I don't know...if a plane crashes, there is high probability that everybody will die. If a car crashes, chances are everybody will survive. Each one has its uses. Nevertheless, I see your point and I agree that we need more info before we can pass a judgement.

  10. Cue Dalek joke in 3... 2.... 1.... ACTION by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Nice idea, wheelchairs are idiotic devices. Forget chairs, they can't even deal with a bit of loose sand. Broken up pavement? Going for a ride/walk in nature? Forget it.

    If the device is going to be like the one in the picture I see another advantage. Raise the wheelchair user to eyelevel with standing people.

    Of course this wouldn't be slashdot if someone didn't come up with a lame weak point. This thing can't be pushed if the battery runs out. Granted, electric wheel chairs especially the models used by the elderly can't be pushed without being handicapped yourselve but still.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Cue Dalek joke in 3... 2.... 1.... ACTION by Cornflake917 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      vi VS emacs arguments are pointless and a waste of time.

      vi is the best.

      I agree vi vs. emacs arguements are pointless, but emacs is better.

    2. Re:Cue Dalek joke in 3... 2.... 1.... ACTION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      joke, right? emacs doesn't have a poop on vi

    3. Re:Cue Dalek joke in 3... 2.... 1.... ACTION by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Cue Dalek joke in 3... 2.... 1.... ACTION

      Well, the Davros-brand original Kaled travel machines were a bit iffy. The whole stairs thing. There've been a few design iterations since then.

      If I were to be crippled by some accident, I'd take a modern travel machine over a regular ol' wheelchair any day. The manipulator arm still looks suspiciously like a sink plunger, granted, but I'm betting there've got to be some seriously fine-grained fingers / tentacles / levers / probes / whatever underneath - look how it hacked that combination lock. The death ray - well, 'nuff said. Dalekanium armour is legendary, and these days there's also a force field that disintegrates incoming bullets. Disintegrates them! Add independently rotating sensor stalk and weapons turrets, and all that's left is the killer app: hover!

      The all-new Imperial brand Dalek Travel Machine Plus. Came through everything the Time War could throw at it and bounced right back. Reviewers have never seen anything like it, far surpassing anything from Davrosworks of Skaro. Only CR4,999,999.99 from our official business partners, the Holy Hadrojassic Maxarodenfor! Just call 223-9653, and quote 'EXTERMINATE' for a special discount!

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    4. Re:Cue Dalek joke in 3... 2.... 1.... ACTION by Espinas217 · · Score: 1

      When you depend on something so much what you really need is reliability and the best way to get that is by going the simple way. Would you trust that complex equiment to depend on for almost every moment on your life? What would it cost to make maintainance? How much down time would you have if it's broken? Would you have to have two just in case? What if you are in the middle of the streen and have some problem, how can somebody help you? As an advancement in robotics/enginering it's really impresive but I don't think anyone would use it on a daily basis, it's just too risky. Wheelchairs may seem idiotic to you but are the best solution in a lot of cases, the only problem being stairs and even to moderately strong man can overcome that.

      --
      La vida no es una pastafrola. :wq
    5. Re:Cue Dalek joke in 3... 2.... 1.... ACTION by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      If you're a quadraplegic in an electric wheelchair and it
      breaks down you're not going to be able to do much about
      that either. So whats the difference?

    6. Re:Cue Dalek joke in 3... 2.... 1.... ACTION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah it was a joke...I've never even used emacs before.

    7. Re:Cue Dalek joke in 3... 2.... 1.... ACTION by audacity242 · · Score: 1

      You obviously haven't even attempted to look into what adaptive equipment is available.

      There are wheelchair accessories and specialty wheelchairs that allow people to traverse virtually every surface, including, yes, sand. Think of a dune-buggy crossed with a wheelchair. There are all-terrain wheelchairs. There are even floating wheelchairs meant to allow the non-ambulatory that creature comfort of being in a pool.

    8. Re:Cue Dalek joke in 3... 2.... 1.... ACTION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you automatically qualify as an emacs expert!

    9. Re:Cue Dalek joke in 3... 2.... 1.... ACTION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some diferences:
      it's easier to repair an electric wheelchair and it's easier to find someone who can do it

      an electric wheelchair is a lot more tested and simpler than a robotic that makes it a lot more reliable, with less downtime

      although heavy, an electric wheelchair can be pushed

      if the wheelchair brokes is a lot less likely you fall to the ground

      I think it's great some people make this advances in robotics but sometimes the simple solutions are the best ones. In this case there aren't any real advantages to use that device.

  11. Astounding! by mcai8rw2 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This development is simply brilliant. It shows continued progress in the development of disability products.

    I would have thought the main problem with such a device is balance. Bi pedal movements main hang up is balance, and as such, having such a top heavy unit must be a fairly difficlut task to combat.

    Imagine it! the worlds buildings are just getting started in providing adequate service levels for wheelchair users, and the japanese bring out a unit that need no ramps!

    D'Oh!

    --
    >>>Scanning for I.D.I.O.T.S. >>>
    >>>I.D.I.O.T.S. FOUND! >>>
  12. Stop them, Gromit! Stop them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    /Feathers McGraw rubs his flippers together evilly

  13. strong label warning for the product! by kencurry · · Score: 2, Funny

    do not take on a lodger, especially one that looks like a penguin in chicken costume!

    --
    sigs are for losers (except to point out that sigs are for losers)
  14. Being one who spent time in a chair by techpawn · · Score: 0

    Here's your off road wheelchair answer

    --
    Ask not what you can do for your country. Ask what your country did to you
  15. What happens when we use up all of the electrons? by JohnnyDoesLinux · · Score: 1

    Wheelchairs at least have WHEELS that ROLL and can have motorized assist. So if you have Doc Oct legs, next you need to haul a backup generator, or a strong guy to carry you when out of power...

    Talk about being truly disabled.

  16. Re:Thank you! by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    I'm really sick of people not noting the distinction. Even the recent Asimo demonstration with "running" was very obviously "playing the 'walk' loop at 2x speed".
    While generally a human can "freeze" at various points in his walking step, he is not able to do so without extra effort. So far, I've not seen a [practical] robot which walks by falling (as you put it).

    Asimo is a good demonstration of unnatural "overly balanced" walking. You can see the way it is sortof "hunched over" as it moves with its knees always bent a little-too-much.

    I always wonder why people waste their time building robots instead of working out a computer simulation of real human walking (not motion capture). It would give so much more information than spending all that time and money on something physical, only to have it run around like it has diarhea.

    p.s.: Robot in article does not look like "the wrong trousers" in the slightest.

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  17. The plan is for people with broken necks to use it by technoextreme · · Score: 4, Funny
    A wheelchair may be inconvenient, but at least will not break your neck in case of a mechanical failure.

    You see the plan is to market it to people who have all ready broken their neck. They really won't care if they break it a second time because well what are they going to complain about. They are all ready a parapalegic.
    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
  18. Why two legs? by thePig · · Score: 1

    I would have guesses the existing technology used for robotic spider could have been re-used.
    Should be cheaper to build - with little or no problem of falling, balancing s/w could be reduced. Also, there is no issue of falling in case of catastrophic failure in anything.
    Maybe it might be unsuitable to bipedal based enviornments, but should be better than wheels.. right ?

    --
    rajmohan_h@yahoo.com
    1. Re:Why two legs? by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 0

      In france, we try hard to make the bipedal environment more weelchair-friendly and it cost a lot. I don't want to imagine how it would be if we had to cope for those artificial legs too.
      Anyway, I still remember how the Segway was supposed to make us entirely redsign cities, so I don't really worry.

      It's still some cool engineering that will probably be partially implemented as part of a better idea (DARPA mule?).

    2. Re:Why two legs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      right... except for the fact of its GIANT FOOTPRINT!! the 2x3' wheel chair footprint compared to the.... 6' circular radius footprint? yeah ok, that would be the size of a hummer (the h2 of course) and move at the speed of a jungle gym. oh and don't forget about the golden rule of engineering: more parts = higher chance of some sort of failure. if even 1 leg breaks down, it would be out of commission.

  19. Wheelchair is better by TrueKonrads · · Score: 1

    I remember a quote for N.T. Stephenson's snowcrash, where Ng, the cyber-genius character, said something along the lines of: "i've tried a lot of prosthetic libs, they were good, I could walk almost like i used to, but wheelchair is still faster and easier to handle." And my two cents are: I welcome the development in this area, but I think that future will be in biomech - artificially grown flesh limbs with some mechanical parts.

    --
    Lone Gunmen crew.
    1. Re:Wheelchair is better by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Yeahbut... Ng's "wheelchair" was a big-ass monster truck full of dog-things and other stuff!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  20. Good for the lazy too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some days I'd rather not get off my fat ass, but robo-legs would get me outdoors to take a walk (fresh air, vit-D, etc). I'd program my walks ahead of time so I could do other things while 'walking'. Hell maybe the legs could walk the dog without me being present. Of course I've always though aural/braille would be cool to give my eyes a break.

    1. Re:Good for the lazy too! by mikael · · Score: 1

      Of course I've always though aural/braille would be cool to give my eyes a break.

      Obviously, you need the Tongue placed Tactile Output Device

      Tactile vision substitution systems (TVSS) deliver visual information to the brain through an array of electrodes in contact with the skin in areas of the body such as the abdomen or fingertip. Points of the visual image are mapped onto individual electrodes within the array as vibration or electrical stimulation. With training, subjects learn to interpret tactile images as visual information, i.e. they experience images in space, rather than on the skin.

      The tongue-placed tactile output device is an improved TVSS that uses the tongue as a stimulation site. Electrotactile stimuli are delivered to the top of the tongue when it contacts a flexible electrode array placed in the mouth. A tongue display unit (TDU), connected to the array by a cable passing out of the mouth, excites individual electrodes on the array according to a spatially-encoded signal from an input source, such as a TV camera. In principle, any input that can be converted into a two-dimensional display by the TDU can reach the brain and become part of a new sensory system.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  21. Re:The plan is for people with broken necks to use by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1

    You see the plan is to market it to people who have all ready broken their neck. They really won't care if they break it a second time because well what are they going to complain about. They are all ready a parapalegic.

    But paraplegics can still use their arms. If they break their neck because of this stupid thing, then they'ld be quadraplegic and need robotic arms as well as legs. Of course, that just means more money for the makers of robotic limbs, so I guess they'ld call it a feature, not a bug.

    --
    "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
  22. What a waste of time... by Red+Samurai · · Score: 0

    It's just too big, cumbersome, and impractical. Not to mention expensive. It'll never go mainstream.

  23. Dean Kamen's wheelchair is way cooler by ameline · · Score: 4, Interesting

    See; http://www.independencenow.com/home.html# It can climb up and down stairs, raise you up to eye level of other standing humans, handle gravel and other rougher terrain. Costs 20k, but If I needed a wheelchair, that's the one I'd get.

    --
    Ian Ameline
  24. I am the pusher robot by Random+Destruction · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Even if the power doesn't fail, what if it trips? Who here has never fallen down the stairs, ever?
    I forsee lawsuits in the future of this technology. "Wheelchair replacement protects grandma at the bottom of the stairs"

    --
    :x
  25. Fearsom Four beware! by kippy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Pfft, Stephen Hawking has had this beat for years.

  26. Re:Thank you! by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

    Because we're to the passive-dynamic-walking-robot-has-been-built stage. It can be done in labratory conditions; search google for "dynamic stability". It's just not as stable as the other kind, so can't do things that are nearly as impressive - like manage stairs - without further development.

    Wait. The statically stable robots make money to fund the development of workable dynamically stable ones.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  27. Re:FRED DURST POST? by sendtwogrey · · Score: 1

    Given the extra height you maybe when they try to negate a doorway. Perhaps a quick re-brand is needed?

    Extreme robot-soccer boots RoboCup

  28. Steven Hawking ahead of the curve by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    Here is Professor Hawking's early research into the field

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  29. OUCH by Brix+Braxton · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you guys - but given the choice of being "bumped" by a wheelchair or being walked on by one of these - I think I would rather get bumped.

    --
    www.wildpad.com
  30. Daleks! by hoggoth · · Score: 1

    This can navigate stairs?!
    Don't let the Daleks get a hold of this or we don't stand a chance against them!

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  31. Sounds awesome. by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

    All you need is a whole bunch of them and a front-mounted chaingun. Then all your pesky cyberdemon cyberdemon troubles are over!

  32. Designers watch sci-fi! by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1

    I think some designer watched Episode 1 too many times with the walking robotic chair!

  33. Obligatory Wikipedia Link by Ozymand+E.+Us · · Score: 1

    Here's the Prior Art...

    URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anakin_Skywalker

    So...where's my +5 informative?

  34. Well! by Volatile_Memory · · Score: 2, Funny

    And here I am using my legs like a sucker!

    --

    /**
    I have a "Zero Policy" tolerance.
    */

  35. Coincidence? by Siberwulf · · Score: 1

    Anyone think this headline and the previous "Vista Firewall to be Crippled" showed up way too close to each other?

  36. iBOT handles stairs, raises user to eye-level by slashd'oh · · Score: 2, Informative
    Back in 2001, Dean Kamen's company DEKA Research developed a wheelchair (marketed through a Johnson & Johnson company called Independence Technology) called the iBOT that raises the user to eye-level. Here's the writeup from Business Week (2001.04.11) with this nice tidbit:
    "Kamen built the iBOT with gyroscopes that are programmed to create balancing capabilities based on an individual's center of gravity. The gyroscopes, in effect, emulate the principle by which humans are able to stand, balance themselves, and navigate around and through various environments and terrain by always offering a counterbalance."
    (Obl. Simpsons quote: "And here I am using my legs like a sucker!")
  37. Bionic legs are next?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Great. Eventually handicapped people will be able to get bionic legs. They will run faster, never tire out and still qualify for closer parking.

  38. Just put a nuclear weapon on the top, and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  39. Already done. by nathan+s · · Score: 3, Informative

    From the Segway guy, this wheelchair can climb stairs and tackle pebbly paths.:-P

  40. Ohh... by spammeister · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure they got everything under control down there.

    --
    I tried to think of a good sig, and this wasn't it.
  41. not a trade off by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    He's right though, giving up your hands just so you can go up/down stairs is not a reasonable trade-off.

    People in wheelchairs are USING THEIR HANDS TO TURN THE WHEELS.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  42. Legs by certel · · Score: 1

    I want electronic legs just because I'm lazy!

  43. Powered Legs... by LEX+LETHAL · · Score: 1

    I saw an article a while back about a Japanese doctor that developed a set of robotic powered exo-legs that help lift and walk and such. They were going to help a senior citizen climb to the summit of a mountain. I can't remember the specifics but I still like that idea best. If designed correctly and the power fails, the legs could assume a crouching position.

  44. Bang... Bang... My joke is shot. by technoextreme · · Score: 1
    But paraplegics can still use their arms. If they break their neck because of this stupid thing, then they'ld be quadraplegic and need robotic arms as well as legs. Of course, that just means more money for the makers of robotic limbs, so I guess they'ld call it a feature, not a bug.

    Notice how I said people with broken necks and then wrote paraplegic instead of quadraplegic.
    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
  45. Best offroad wheelchair yet by Jtheletter · · Score: 2, Informative
    The TankChair won't necessarily go up and down stairs (though I bet it handles wide outdoor concrete steps just fine) but it is the best offroad wheelchair solution I've ever seen. This guy built it for his wife to be able to go hiking with her family after she was paralyzed in an accident. Kudos to his unwaivering effort and a successful solution!

    FYI: I found this on the web last week and have no affiliation with the site.

    Oh, and while the videos are very cool, let's try not to kill this guy's bandwidth. Perhaps someone with experience setting them up can post a reply with a coral cache or other mirror to prevent any slashdotting. I'd rather his money go to helping other people get these chairs than to a bunch of nerds hogging bandwidth. ;)

    --
    -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
  46. you crippled bastards! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Goddamn cripples get all the breaks!

    Now they're first to get giant mecha robot suits.

  47. For Vista Firewall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  48. Usability and Price Barriers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    think of the ability to interact at eye-level with a standing person
    Think, too, of trying to sit at a dinner table with this contraption. It's great as an early prototype, but there's a lot of usability concerns that need to be addressed before this has any chance of being practical.

    Meanwhile, there's Kamen's US$20,000 iBot that accomplishes many of the same feats, but can't be afforded by most of the people that could use this kind of equipment. Remember that the cost of an electric wheelchair is only part of what's needed for true independence; there's also customization of a vehicle to transport the chair, which is pretty damn expensive. Contrary to popular belief, insurance, Medicare, etc. generally will not cover anything beyond the most basic equipment.
  49. Just add a BFG to this... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    And you won't care if someone parked in the handicapped spot!

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  50. Okay, grandpa . . . by Brietech · · Score: 1

    And the important thing was, I was wearing an onion in my belt, because it was the style at the time. . .

    --
    I'm perfect in every way, except for my humility.
  51. Prior Art by autOmato · · Score: 1

    Watch this: Robota

    An awesome brickfilm about a robot who gets robotic legs instead of a wheel chair.

  52. Social Good Perspective... by WOV · · Score: 1

    From the broad, shallow social perspective, I do think it makes a whole lot more sense to focus a lot of money on increasing the ability of the disabled to participate in the physical world unassisted (as through something like this, R&D $$ intensive or no,) than it does to spend an equivalent amount of resources on the converse - trying to make the phyiscial world more accessible to the disabled (via curb cuts, handicapped spaces, extra-wide bathrooms, etc.) I'm confident that the several billion $US / year focused on the latter could make some huge strides in the former at better cost...

  53. Re:What happens when we use up all of the electron by bmalia · · Score: 1

    Wheelchairs at least have WHEELS that ROLL and can have motorized assist. So if you have Doc Oct legs, next you need to haul a backup generator, or a strong guy to carry you when out of power...

    Keep in mind, the picture shows a proof of concept. I would imagine a final version that goes to market would be a hybrid, having both legs and wheels. Where the wheels would be the primary because the legs would walk too slow and use up alot of battery. The legs would only be used for things like stairs and rough terrain.

    And to those who say, "What about the people without use of hands?", RTFA

    --
    There's no place like ~/
  54. Makes sense for Japan. by Scott+Byer · · Score: 1

    If you've ever been to Japan, you'd know why they work so hard to come up with these wheelchair alternates - much of the country is simply not wheelchair friendly. From the wonderful train system with it's stair-ridden stations, to small alleys and smaller shops, Tokyo and Kyoto were not very wheelchair friendly places. It's a cramped (by western standards) and vertical environment. The abscence of wheelchairs was one of the things that struck us on our visit. Even if it's a catch-22 - no wheelchairs out and about because it's so tough, and it's tough because because none are out and about - the only way to break it is with something like this.

    --
    > cat ~/.signature | grep -v bullshit

    >

  55. I'll just write a check by Tee7 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm an amputee. I have health insurance through my employer. It's a mega-company. They will not pay one dime for any prosthetics - new, repairs, modifications - nothing. So this sort of news is fairy dust to us who aren't wealthy.

    1. Re:I'll just write a check by nasch · · Score: 1

      Sorry to hear of your situation, but first this is not a prosthetic device, and second not everyone has your insurance plan. So it isn't necessarily useless for everyone.

    2. Re:I'll just write a check by Builder · · Score: 1

      You're sadly in the same position as my wife. She's a member of one of the largest health insurance companies in the UK, but the arrogant fuckers told her that they don't pay for cosmetic surgery.

      Yeah, because I just want that limb back so that I can LOOK good right? It's not like opposable thumbs were actually useful or anything.

  56. If Only We'd Thought of This Before.. by blacklily8 · · Score: 1

    Just imagine if half the tax dollars spent to equip buildings for wheelchair access had instead been spent on R&D to develop stuff like this! Not only would the rest of us be much less inconvenienced, but people with disabilities would likely get around better than everyone else.

    1. Re:If Only We'd Thought of This Before.. by ostermei · · Score: 1
      Not only would the rest of us be much less inconvenienced
      Just out of curiosity... how in the world are you, as a (presumably) non-handicapped individual inconvenienced by public areas being made wheelchair-accessible? Nobody is forcing you to make your own home and private property wheelchair accessible, so that's not it. Maybe you're referring to handicap parking spaces, because you NEED to get as close a parking space as you possibly can get. That's not really gonna do it, either, as even with the robotic legs in the article, handicap parking would still be there; regardless of their means of locomotion, the handicapped will still be given those parking spots. I'm wracking my brain here to come up with something that makes sense of your comment, but I'm totally drawing a blank. Care to enlighten?
      --
      "Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read." -- Groucho Marx
  57. Now I know why.. by f0rtytw0 · · Score: 1

    I think the reason the Japanese don't like the standard wheel chair and keep coming up with "wheel chairs" that can climb stairs is because all they have there are stairs and no ramps. In my brief visit I saw all of one wheel chair ramp. That ramp was only accessible after going up some stairs first. I would hate to be in a wheel chair in Japan.

    --
    this is the most important sig ever! In your face 446154!
  58. On the design by chroma · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The legs appear to be made with 5 parallel actuators, much like the Stewart-Gough platform used in motion simulators, machine tools, and the like. This is an extremely stable design that is very fault tolerant and able to remain stable, even if any one of the actuators becomes disabled.

    --

    Your design to a real part online: Big Blue Saw
  59. Wheelchairs will never become completely redundant by atomic_toaster · · Score: 1

    Atsuo Takanishi, an engineering professor at Tokyo's Waseda University, has demonstrated a pair of robotic legs that may one day eliminate the need for wheelchairs.

    Unfortunately, no. Even if this product is without flaws, it cannot eliminate the need for wheelchairs -- not everyone is in a wheelchair because only their legs don't work properly. A paraplegic would have a really hard time operating the joysticks -- although, from TFA, there are plans to develop controls that would "model that could function more freely without such input". Even so, some people are in wheelchairs because something wrong with their brains or the way that their brains communicate with the rest of their body. Yet these people still have to get to (or be brought from) point A to point B. Also, as many people have pointed out, wheelchairs will still have to be alternative until robotic legs become both affordable and never run out of power.

    The goal is noble, but these robotic legs could never "eliminate the need for wheelchairs" or "replace wheelchairs" completely. Yes, this is a nitpick. I just hate it when (admittedly interesting) innovations create false hope by being mis-marketed as the be-all and end-all by over-enthusiastic people.

  60. Still an intrusive design. A better form factor: by DarthSensate · · Score: 0


    This approach applied to paraplegia would go along way to re-humanizing people stuck in wheelchairs. Even more so than Dean Kamen's four/two wheel stabilized wheelchair.

    http://sanlab.kz.tsukuba.ac.jp/indexE.html

    http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1 129522-5,00.html

  61. Re:This is dynamic standing, not walking. Still gr by uradu · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure true running will ever be practical for such applications. The constant up-and-down motion of the passenger can be very uncomfortable, especially for someone with limited mobility and and/or potentially overweight from lack of motion. The person would have to either hold on for dear life (in which case two axis joysticks would be all but useless for control), or be strapped in, or most likely both. Besides, a machine doesn't have the same motion limitations as a human: artifical legs can have multiple axes of articulation and can potentially move much faster, removing the need for inverted pendulum motion for high speed. In an ideal case the servos would have so much precision and high resolution feedback that the passenger "compartment" would only experience linear forward motion without any vertical or lateral components.

  62. Dual Analog Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm, hello?!

    Dual analog stick control is so last gen. They should just hook a Nintendo Revolution controller interface up to it.

    *Ducks*

  63. Re:Still an intrusive design. A better form factor by DarthSensate · · Score: 0
  64. Re:Fearsome Four beware! by MS-06FZ · · Score: 1

    The article fails to mention that the robotic suit incorporates a beatbox, PA, and turntable synthesizer. Details can be found on http://www.mchawking.com/

    --
    ---GEC
    I'm but the humble pupil, seeking to snatch the scratchbuilt pebble from the master's fully articulated hand
  65. Useless much? by Follier · · Score: 1

    First of all.. If this thing stepped on your foot you'd be in some serious pain.
    Second.. If this thing tipped over it'd not only hurt the rider, but also whomever was unfortunate enough to be under it.

    I'm guessing this will go over like a lead balloon. Of course, that's what I said about the segway. (That website still cracks me up. Our police on campus putt along in these stupid things. It's a fact: The only thing less intimidating than a cop on a bicycle is a cop on a segway.)

  66. Why should I? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    I am not in a chair. I just used to live near a handicapped area in my youth (A small part of Arnhem, Holland that was a project to get a living zone specially adapated for handicapped when the whole idea of special facilities for handicapped people was still new).

    It was no uncommon to have to help some wheelchair user get either unstuck because they misjudged the roadsurface OR help them get around an obstacle. With normal wheel chairs it is already a pain but the electric ones are fucking heavy (or at least were 20 years ago).

    So based on observation I would say an alternative to easily stuck wheels that would allow a handicapped person to use the same terrain a walking person can use would be a benefit.

    Yeah, specially adapated chairs for special terrain would be nice for outings perhaps but they probably ain't suited for daily use. This ads costs and again doesn't help if a person suddenly finds themselves needing an all-terrain chair when they are in their regular chair.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  67. Personal Fitness Advance by severoon · · Score: 1

    Let's not discount the major stride for personal fitness this represents. Think of how many miles I can click off on the treadmill with a pair of these babies! I'll be in the best shape of my life, and I won't even spill my beer while I'm doing it if they make the hydraulics smooth enough...

    --
    but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
  68. fall down, go boom by 602 · · Score: 1

    Does it come with a helmet?

  69. technology saves the day by couch_warrior · · Score: 1

    During the 1980's the US federal government made itself odious to every small business by forcing them to spend thousands of dollars installing wheelchair ramps regardless of whether they had any customers who used wheelchairs or not.
    In a decade or so, when robo-trousers replace wheelchairs, that will at last put an end to all those plywood ramps sticking out to the side of resturaunt and bar entrances. Equality through technology.

    --
    "Sic Semper Path of Least Resistance"
  70. MPEG Video of the walker here... by psyclops · · Score: 2, Informative

    I found video of the V2 walker (today's demo was the V3) here:
    http://www.takanishi.mech.waseda.ac.jp/research/pa rallel/WL-16rr/movie/stair_c.mpg

    Hmmm, the rider looks a little nervous...

    The video is from the university page at:
    http://www.takanishi.mech.waseda.ac.jp/research/pa rallel/WL-16rr/index.htm

    They are also working on a reactive foot for walking on uneven surfaces:
    http://www.takanishi.mech.waseda.ac.jp/research/pa rallel/WS-1&1R/index.html

    Very promising stuff. Hopefully the multiple linear actuators will make it somewhat fault tolerant. Now where's my Gundam?

    --
    Nick Donaldson mailto:psyclops@psyclops.com Bit Wrangler Extraordinaire! http://www.psyclops.com/
  71. At Least It Wasn't a Rat Story by muggz1250 · · Score: 1

    These kinds of stories are pretty much irrelevant to the disabled community. These kinds of breakthroughs are a dime a dozen and are reported on a weekly basis. The actual device, procedure, hypothetical breakthrough, etc., is actually 10 to 20 years out. And don't get me started on the rats. :-) If we all could utilize the constant stream of breakthroughs that rats enjoy everyone would be disease-free. I'm surprised there are any uncured rats left to experiment on. Remember the stair-climbing wheelchair built by the Segway guy? I have never seen one except on television. Have you?

  72. i'm not positive by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    but i belive a dead electric wheelchair would be very difficult to move. Those things contain big heavy battery packs.

    If you are relying on a machanical aid you have to plan for supplying it. This applies whether its a car, a powered wheelchair a ride on walker or a powersuit.

    yeah sometimes progress brings with it worse failure modes. With appropriate diligence though theese should be manageable just as they are manageable for aircraft today.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  73. Eliminate Wheelchairs? by funpet · · Score: 0

    Wheelchairs are also used for cases where someone is temporarily injured, and many other cases where the patient still has legs and would rather not have them cut off in favor of machinery.

  74. Best by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1

    That's the best thing I've ever heard!

  75. Re:This is dynamic standing, not walking. Still gr by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    running on your own legs is very uncomfortable if you are overweight or not used to it. But if you start doing it regularlly you'll get used to it.

    now the fact that the bounce isn't controlled by the body may make it worse but i still think its something people could get used to just as people get used to being on ships and similar.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  76. Re:This is dynamic standing, not walking. Still gr by uradu · · Score: 1

    > i still think its something people could get used to just as people get used to being on ships and similar.

    Yeah, but ships don't experience high frequency oscillations as in running, something like two beats per second. You still have the issue of stabilizing the passenger during such constant motion, and of what type of controls would allow precision steering. Joysticks obviously would not work, since they would instinctively also be used as handholds in this contraption, which removes any capacity for fine control. Ok, I have to admit, as a recreational vehicle such as running machine could certainly be a bucketful of fun, but only for reasonably fit and mobile people.

  77. Re: Nostalgia by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1
    I own "The Wrong Trousers", "A Grand Day Out" and "A Close Shave" on VHS. Nostalgia LOL.
    I know what you mean.
    I own a pair of trousers.
    Ah, good times.
    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana