While off-topic with regards to WINE, such a post requires a response.
This is akin to the well-known apples and oranges comparison. It is obvious that you are not aware of how strict Microsoft's OEM VAR programs are. In order to qualify for pricing incentives, the likes of Dell and HP are bound to sell Microsoft's latest and greatest OS with new units. As a result of this, the new OS makes it into all major retailers, thus increasing exposure. Due to customer backlash, Dell continued to offer Windows XP, but on a limited set of hardware. Not listening to their customers would have been at their peril (ie. sales).
If GNU/Linux had that kind of leverage, the numbers would have been completely different to say the least. Mac would have much higher numbers if they yanked their heads out of their asses and lowered the prices on their systems; but that's another topic altogether.
I'm confused as well.. by the GP's choice in women.
You should only get close to Denise Richards if you have a good attorney to protect yourself from her after the fact. As for the Olsen twins, a big glass crack pipe and some protein shakes would do just fine to get things going!
Oblig: The following is just my $0.02 from experience with such products, and not meant to troll or start a flame-war. With that being said, any time I find a system running Symantec/McAfee AV of any kind, corporate or otherwise, I have a quick discussion with the user and proceed to uninstall it. Ditto for Microsoft One'could'Care'less'. It's no secret that those products are notorious for siphoning resources and their effectiveness is questionable at best. It's not like there's a silver bullet for anti-malware purposes, but there are much better alternatives out there. Again, just my $0.02.
I've installed AVG, Trend Micro and Bitdefender, among others, in the past several years and must say that the default settings on most anti-virus/anti-spyware apps definitely need some tweaking; IMHO of course. At the very least, a much better explanation for the average end user during the installation process; as in what each module does and if you want to activate it. It would also benefit the end user to have a much easier way to disable problematic features such as Linkscanner in AVG. As for techs and the like, the advanced/custom menus will do just fine.
From my experience, BitDefender could use a rework of the UI. Too much shit to sift through and it would also benefit the users, especially techs, to be able to easily save/restore settings in the event you're setting up several machines at a friend's or family member's house.
Regardless of which product I end up installing, I always choose a custom setup and un-check options such as LinkScanner, or any toolbar-related modules for that matter. During the installation, I explain to the user why it's being installed the way it is. I also disable any scheduled scans as they cause nothing but trouble for the average user; as in full scans scheduled by default to start at 8 or 9am. Most times when I get a call about the machine slowing down to a crawl, I ask if an AV product has been recently installed. Aside from actually being hit by a nasty virus or spyware, it usually ends up being the case. This is from those who try to install the AV app on their own and wonder why the system is running terribly slow. Experiences like that are very common across most anti-malware apps.
Another issue I have with most, if not all 'internet security' apps is their implementation of a firewall. What a monumental piece of complicated horse shit all the way around. Problems ranging from ActiveSync not working anymore because of blocked ports to file-sharing being blocked. And those that claim to be a 'smart' firewall because apps are granted access based on a approval list maintained by the vendor causes it's own set of problems. Needless to say, that I stay away from using such firewall apps from AV vendors. If it's a desktop, the crappy Windows firewall will do. If it's a laptop, I disable file-sharing and explain to the user how to turn it back on if needed, plus I suggest something like Zonealarm if it's a home user or Zonealarm Pro if it's a corporate user.
I completely agree as many drivers are solely relying on the GPS' for getting to their destination, instead using it as an aide.
With regards to that one bridge being hit at an increasing rate by truck drivers; you can attribute that to those who chose to be cheap bastards and use consumer GPS units (ie. TomTom, etc) instead of those specifically designed for big trucks.
Excerpt of features for CoPilot GPS for Trucks can be found here:
"PC*MILER Routing: Practical, Shortest, 53'/102'' Trailer, HazMat, National Network and Toll Avoidance 13' 6" height, 48' length, 80,000 pound weight and 96" width restrictions"
If one wants to try to reduce such accidents, a DOT provision would have to be put in place that specifically states that any driver caught using consumer GPS units for a big truck would be fined (ie. at least several hundred to get their attention). Don't get me wrong, this country will need truck drivers for years to come, but it also needs to do what it can in the interest of public safety.
Oblig. Disclaimer: I'm not affiliated with ALK Technologies or any other GPS-related company for that matter.
While it's about time, I hope something substantial comes out of this hearing, and not some bullshit 'non-binding resolution'; as in suggesting that the Border Patrol honor the oath they took to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States". There has to be valid probable cause before having to be subjected to such search and seizures (ie. 4th Amendment anyone!?!)
As a refresher, additional information can be found here.
4th Amendment:
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
Fortunately, I haven't been subjected to such seizures, but I've read enough horror stories from frequent travelers to warrant such a response.
While insightful (not trolling here), one should consider the arming of the average vessel from a law enforcement, or rather maritime enforcement point of view. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for this; but it would have to be with the implementation of proper communication channels, among other things.
In order to protect Maritime Enforcement crews, Rules of Engagement would have to be revisited so they would be able to defend themselves if they come across a 'pirate' vessel. In addition, a 'crime watch' system should be put in place where vessels report suspicious actions, by way of identifiable transmitter. As a disincentive to filing fraudulent reports (ie. against a competing vessel), a checks and balances system of sorts would be enacted so that such vessels would be fined.
While pure conjecture at this point, it would be a good place to start; IMHO of course.
This kind of article is one that usually gets people to choose sides almost immediately. The truth of the matter is that students like Kahn should have the benefit of being recognized for their talents early on and foster them so they don't go on to commit crimes such as this; possibly going on to work in consulting firms or for the military if they so choose.
With identity thefts on the rise in the past several years due to massive data breaches at credit card companies, banks, etc., in addition to breaches at government agencies, it is not difficult to ascertain that the state of information security in this country is in dire straits. Discussions can be had with regard to where the break-down in security occurred, but that's besides the point.
With many other nations focusing on building their cyber-warfare capabilities, as is the U.S. of course, Kahn will more than likely be scooped up by any number of government agencies or end up working for a military contractor as a 'plea deal'. Since this in *no way* rises to the level of what Kevin Mitnick did, odds are that Kahn will have things work out in his favor at some point down the line. With the laws in this post-911 world being much stricter, I guess we'll just have to wait and see.
I agree that his actions more than likely caused some innocent kids to get looked over for scholarships and the like, but I seriously doubt he'll be tossed aside. Then again, if he's an arrogant little prick, they'll drop the hammer on him so fast, he won't know what hit him.
Given the average/. reader, I beg to differ on that point.
If you're referring to the average user, then perhaps it would be a valid point that MS was out to screw you for the availability of that one feature (pun intended).
However, if you're even remotely adept at dealing with network apps, then you would be actually screwing yourself by forking over "$200+" for a feature you could actually install for free by using OpenVPN or OpenSSH running on Cygwin.
There is a ring of truth to this. Whenever there is a movie like this comes out, it's bound to stir up controversy as to its authenticity.
What I haven't seen posted is a discussion concerning the possibility of "teams" that were never caught, but can't claim credit as it would bring unwanted attention to themselves.
This reminds me of a quote from the movie "The Recruit":
The bottom line is that the tables have turned for a change (or will be turning if Wal-mart keeps up the pressure).
Wal-mart telling the recording industry that they could do without their business is the same as your local bank or cell carrier telling you to fuck off when you try to get your monthly costs down or else.
[sarcasm] Checks and balances in business? What a concept!! [/sarcasm]
Given your list of programs, it is obvious that your experience is that of the average home user; regardless of the fact that you use a VPN client to connect to your office.
In terms of OS security, poorly coded applications such as Quickbooks Manufacturing & Wholesale cause nothing but security policy issues for admins because they require that the user have Local Admin privileges. This obviously causes issues as the user, without additional registry hacks/group policy tweaks, can install programs at will and have access to parts of the system that they would not otherwise have. Not to mention that they also have issues with roaming profiles, which is another issue altogether.
While you mentioned the use of the "Run as administrator" option, it's a moot point in the corporate world as it defeats the purpose of implementing securing policies to protect the workstation installation and restrict what the user can and cannot do.
Just my 2 cents... from a different vantage point than that of an end user.
While waiting for a connecting flight several months ago, I heard about a guy getting delayed for about 15 minutes at an airport security checkpoint because of his laptop's "suspicious look" on the x-ray machine. It turned to be a Sony X505 laptop. For those not familiar with the X505, this review by Digital Trends mentioned in this/. article back in 2004 details the specs.
What was so suspicious about it? I was told that someone overheard a TSA agent mention that it looked transparent on the x-ray machine. It seems that this was the case with the AirBook.
Perhaps companies like Sony and Apple that develop such advanced portables should notify TSA officials so they could, inturn, teach the line agents to not become alarmed when encountering such a device passing through the x-ray machine? Since that would make too much sense, it probably won't happen. Go figure.
If you happen to own an AirBook or other sub-notebook, good luck!!
While there may be others out there,/. is a good place to start for recruiting the talent sought after by such an agency. It also serves as a way of obtaining direct input from such talent by agreeing to respond to their questions and possibly tailoring their entry requirements to attract said talent.
IMHO, if they open it up to private contractors (GSA-style terms and pay), that would be your best bet. If enlistment is required, caveat emptor.
With an increase in data theft at all levels in the US, it is obvious that the country is in dire need of talent to secure the various infrastructures critical to the economy. Unfortunately, all the talent in the world is not going to guarantee that you'll end up with a supervisor or upper management structure that knows their ass from a hole in the ground. At that level, it's all about politics; which is why those that have many years of experience and tenure in any agency tend to quietly exit stage left into the private sector and become consultants or open up their own security firm.
Best of luck to us all!
---
Always keep in mind:
"All warfare is based on deception." ~Art of War (Ch. 1, paragraph 18)
I installed it a couple years back at a local retail store (single PC), and it's been working just fine. From the times I sent in support questions, the maintainer was good about addressing issues in short order.
While the program has some caveats, it seems to be well suited for most small businesses.
At the very least, it's another option to consider.
I completely agree with regards to not feeding into Microsoft's stronghold. I'm constantly sitting down with friends/family/customers and booting up different Live CDs (ie. Fedora 8, U/Kubuntu, Freespire, etc.) to show them how much Linux has progressed in recent years and invite them to use it in their spare time to see for themselves how functional it is.
There is validity to my explanation in so far as the "average office worker" is concerned; which is the group I was referring to. Unfortunately, reality dictates that if the average office worker applying for a job doesn't have "Windows/MS Office" skills, they don't stand a chance in hell of getting hired. So to pay the bills, one MUST learn the software most businesses run to be a viable candidate. Short of opening your own company, that's just the way it's going to be for some time to come.
I don't like it anymore than you do, but we're in the middle of a transition period with regards to Linux and its stride into the business desktop arena. European countries and some states in the U.S. are making strides to introduce OSS solutions, so it's definitely heading in the right direction. Changing business infrastructures is not going to happen overnight; it's just not a reasonable expectation. And given that the U.S. economy is not doing too well, regardless of what's said on the major news channels, many companies are holding on to capital as much as possible.
Not ours! At least not in the corporate desktop arena.
The reasons:
* As some have mentioned, most of us are set in our ways; including some fellow/.'ers. There are some of us that will test and spend countless hours; months and years in some cases, to expand our knowledge of an unfamiliar OS. But people like that are part of that "1%" group of users, and not your average one.
* As you get older and your priorities change (ie. family, greater demand of your time from work, etc.), there's simply no spare time to learn anything new. Even if you manage to get some free time in, it would be to do something else other than learning a new OS.
* Marketability of your skills as an average office worker - Will your time spent honing your skills on GIMP, OpenOffice, Evolution, etc. improve your odds in being picked for the job over someone with skills in Windows apps? Quite the opposite! Why? A majority of corporations use Windows as their desktop OS of choice
* While Ubuntu and it's various flavors have garnered quite a bit of attention, there is still a great deal of work to be done in terns of getting to the point of saying "It Just Works!(tm)". Apple's advantage is that OS X is designed to work on core hardware manufactured by them, which makes it that much easier. Third party manufacturers are given access to APIs so they could develop apps/drivers to access their devices.
Side note: Why doesn't Canonical or some other major Linux backer venture into the hardware business, instead of getting into half-assed deals with the company's like Dell whose strings are pulled by the likes of Microsoft?
I could go on, but you get the point.
If Linux intends to make its way onto corporate desktops, it should start by establishing itself as the desktop of choice in elementary schools and later work its way up as those kids get older. That's how you build product loyalty and wider acceptance. Some of those kids will eventually be the IT managers and CEOs of major corporations.
As an example, take Apple's strategy over the past decade. Build your customer base from the ground up. They started with the iPod, built product loyalty and worked their way up the product line with sleek computers.
The result: An increasing number of college/university bound students are choosing Apple for their laptops. Check out this article for more details.
While that may be the case, the same can be said for so-called "green" cars. This can be found in the following article: The History of Electric Vehicles
The difference between what Shell tried in the past and this time around is something called INNOVATION; which is something that has been severely hindered by ass-backwards patent system in the US. Not to mention the litigation-happy society some of us live in.
From TFA:
"It works for any car whose tank can be opened without a key, and whose contours and dimensions have been recorded to avoid scratching."
Given your comment, you obviously didn't read the entire statement:
"One of the few things that could've happened the day of the 'event' was to arrest the 'actors' for trespassing. Unless mistaken, that can only be done lawfully if the manager asks them to leave AND THEY REFUSE, which is where local law enforcement comes in."
Next time, try to quell your excitement for clicking the "reply" button and take a moment to read a comment in its entirety before firing back.
In other words, think before you speak (or write a comment in this case)...
IANAL either, but keep in mind that while Best Buy is open to the public, it's still private property. One of the few things that could've happened the day of the "event" was to arrest the "actors" for trespassing. Unless mistaken, that can only be done lawfully if the manager asks them to leave and they refuse, which is where local law enforcement comes in.
Given the times we live in, I'm sure they'll try to nail them with disturbing (or breaching) the peace, or some other bullshit charge(s). The caveat is that they'll have to file charges against each of the "actors" and try to lump them into one big court case.
It's a crying shame that this country has lost its sense of humor!! Bravo to those trying their best to keep it alive.
IDKFA - Full iPhone capabilities as God (ie. Steve Jobs) intended...
* Making use of your MP3 ringtones as rumored about during the iTunes 7.3 beta stages before the evil AT&T overlords castrated the idea just prior to launch
* EDGE actually works as it should (ie. high-speed vs. the utter shit it is today)
* Activation Just Works(tm) - Hold times were ridiculous!
* Better choice of carrier (Unfortunately, the only other major GSM player in the U.S., AFAIK, is T-Mobile. so Apple was pretty much screwed!)
Best of luck to the v1.0 iPhone crowd!
That can be EASILY remedied by turning on the "Isolated AP" feature (or equivalent) on most modern wireless routers.
That would prevent clients on the AP from seeing each other and make the concern a moot point...
On a related point, the FCC should move their ass and open up another small segment of spectrum for wireless systems, which doesn't share it's existence with cordless phones, EMI emissions from Microwave Ovens and other 2.4GHz devices. Of course there's 802.11a, but that's a little expensive and has a shorter range in comparison to 802.11b/g. Too bad 802.11n didn't call for a new segment of the frequency spectrum.
[club type bouncer pushing people aside]Move out of the way you measly citizen!!
[Queue music...]
[AT&T overlord steps to the podium]We will usher in a new era of telecommunications (ie. actually meaning 1984 style controls) for the citizens of these great United States! Blah Blah Blah Blah...
[Lone guy in the back yells 'YOU SUCK!!!' and is promptly escorted to the airport and flown to Gitmo as an enemy combatant]
While I said that in a humorous/satirical way, I seriously hope that the people of this country will rise up and not allow such controls to be put in place permanently. Apparently, the British "privacy" model is making its way over to The States.
Those unfamiliar with the Sherman Act can take a look at this Wiki entry.
The fact of the matter is that there are people out there that SHOULDN'T BE DRIVING! Period, end of story... This is true whether they're old people or compulsive law breakers. Somehow, it doesn't seem to register with many that having a DL is a PRIVILEGE, *NOT* a right!
Mass transit sucks in your city? Tough shit! Lobby your local government for better transit options. When you've proven that you can't drive safely, you're endangering the safety of the public and don't deserve to have a license.
To not stray off-topic, there are people out there that CAN drive and talk on the phone without causing an accident. Granted, it may hinder your reaction time somewhat, but you can drive safely nonetheless.
The issue shouldn't only apply to cell phones, as there are devices that people use while driving that can cause them to become distracted (ie. CB's, pagers, etc.) Is Big Brother going to create detection devices for them too?? Give me a freakin' break!
In the end, it's about generating additional revenue through such legislation. Contrary to news reports, the economy is NOT doing all that well. Many cities and municipalities are starving for funding! That's why property taxes have shot through the roof in many areas.
Bottom line... If you do cause an accident due to the use of a cell-phone or any electronic device, you'll get the usual penalties the first time around. The second time, 60 to 90 day suspension of your license. Keep doin' it and kiss it goodbye for a year (and so on and so forth.) Get caught driving with a suspended license, you're carted off to jail.
Slashdot Mirror
While off-topic with regards to WINE, such a post requires a response.
This is akin to the well-known apples and oranges comparison. It is obvious that you are not aware of how strict Microsoft's OEM VAR programs are. In order to qualify for pricing incentives, the likes of Dell and HP are bound to sell Microsoft's latest and greatest OS with new units. As a result of this, the new OS makes it into all major retailers, thus increasing exposure. Due to customer backlash, Dell continued to offer Windows XP, but on a limited set of hardware. Not listening to their customers would have been at their peril (ie. sales).
If GNU/Linux had that kind of leverage, the numbers would have been completely different to say the least. Mac would have much higher numbers if they yanked their heads out of their asses and lowered the prices on their systems; but that's another topic altogether.
Just my $0.02...
I'm confused as well.. by the GP's choice in women.
You should only get close to Denise Richards if you have a good attorney to protect yourself from her after the fact. As for the Olsen twins, a big glass crack pipe and some protein shakes would do just fine to get things going!
Oblig: The following is just my $0.02 from experience with such products, and not meant to troll or start a flame-war. With that being said, any time I find a system running Symantec/McAfee AV of any kind, corporate or otherwise, I have a quick discussion with the user and proceed to uninstall it. Ditto for Microsoft One'could'Care'less'. It's no secret that those products are notorious for siphoning resources and their effectiveness is questionable at best. It's not like there's a silver bullet for anti-malware purposes, but there are much better alternatives out there. Again, just my $0.02.
I've installed AVG, Trend Micro and Bitdefender, among others, in the past several years and must say that the default settings on most anti-virus/anti-spyware apps definitely need some tweaking; IMHO of course. At the very least, a much better explanation for the average end user during the installation process; as in what each module does and if you want to activate it. It would also benefit the end user to have a much easier way to disable problematic features such as Linkscanner in AVG. As for techs and the like, the advanced/custom menus will do just fine.
From my experience, BitDefender could use a rework of the UI. Too much shit to sift through and it would also benefit the users, especially techs, to be able to easily save/restore settings in the event you're setting up several machines at a friend's or family member's house.
Regardless of which product I end up installing, I always choose a custom setup and un-check options such as LinkScanner, or any toolbar-related modules for that matter. During the installation, I explain to the user why it's being installed the way it is. I also disable any scheduled scans as they cause nothing but trouble for the average user; as in full scans scheduled by default to start at 8 or 9am. Most times when I get a call about the machine slowing down to a crawl, I ask if an AV product has been recently installed. Aside from actually being hit by a nasty virus or spyware, it usually ends up being the case. This is from those who try to install the AV app on their own and wonder why the system is running terribly slow. Experiences like that are very common across most anti-malware apps.
Another issue I have with most, if not all 'internet security' apps is their implementation of a firewall. What a monumental piece of complicated horse shit all the way around. Problems ranging from ActiveSync not working anymore because of blocked ports to file-sharing being blocked. And those that claim to be a 'smart' firewall because apps are granted access based on a approval list maintained by the vendor causes it's own set of problems. Needless to say, that I stay away from using such firewall apps from AV vendors. If it's a desktop, the crappy Windows firewall will do. If it's a laptop, I disable file-sharing and explain to the user how to turn it back on if needed, plus I suggest something like Zonealarm if it's a home user or Zonealarm Pro if it's a corporate user.
Comments and rants are more than welcome. LOL!
I completely agree as many drivers are solely relying on the GPS' for getting to their destination, instead using it as an aide.
With regards to that one bridge being hit at an increasing rate by truck drivers; you can attribute that to those who chose to be cheap bastards and use consumer GPS units (ie. TomTom, etc) instead of those specifically designed for big trucks.
Excerpt of features for CoPilot GPS for Trucks can be found here:
"PC*MILER Routing: Practical, Shortest, 53'/102'' Trailer, HazMat, National Network and Toll Avoidance
13' 6" height, 48' length, 80,000 pound weight and 96" width restrictions"
If one wants to try to reduce such accidents, a DOT provision would have to be put in place that specifically states that any driver caught using consumer GPS units for a big truck would be fined (ie. at least several hundred to get their attention). Don't get me wrong, this country will need truck drivers for years to come, but it also needs to do what it can in the interest of public safety.
Oblig. Disclaimer: I'm not affiliated with ALK Technologies or any other GPS-related company for that matter.
While it's about time, I hope something substantial comes out of this hearing, and not some bullshit ' non-binding resolution '; as in suggesting that the Border Patrol honor the oath they took to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States". There has to be valid probable cause before having to be subjected to such search and seizures (ie. 4th Amendment anyone!?!)
As a refresher, additional information can be found here.
4th Amendment: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
Fortunately, I haven't been subjected to such seizures, but I've read enough horror stories from frequent travelers to warrant such a response.
Good luck to us all...
While insightful (not trolling here), one should consider the arming of the average vessel from a law enforcement, or rather maritime enforcement point of view. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for this; but it would have to be with the implementation of proper communication channels, among other things.
In order to protect Maritime Enforcement crews, Rules of Engagement would have to be revisited so they would be able to defend themselves if they come across a 'pirate' vessel. In addition, a 'crime watch' system should be put in place where vessels report suspicious actions, by way of identifiable transmitter. As a disincentive to filing fraudulent reports (ie. against a competing vessel), a checks and balances system of sorts would be enacted so that such vessels would be fined.
While pure conjecture at this point, it would be a good place to start; IMHO of course.
May be slightly off-topic, but then again...
This kind of article is one that usually gets people to choose sides almost immediately. The truth of the matter is that students like Kahn should have the benefit of being recognized for their talents early on and foster them so they don't go on to commit crimes such as this; possibly going on to work in consulting firms or for the military if they so choose.
With identity thefts on the rise in the past several years due to massive data breaches at credit card companies, banks, etc., in addition to breaches at government agencies, it is not difficult to ascertain that the state of information security in this country is in dire straits. Discussions can be had with regard to where the break-down in security occurred, but that's besides the point.
With many other nations focusing on building their cyber-warfare capabilities, as is the U.S. of course, Kahn will more than likely be scooped up by any number of government agencies or end up working for a military contractor as a 'plea deal'. Since this in *no way* rises to the level of what Kevin Mitnick did, odds are that Kahn will have things work out in his favor at some point down the line. With the laws in this post-911 world being much stricter, I guess we'll just have to wait and see.
I agree that his actions more than likely caused some innocent kids to get looked over for scholarships and the like, but I seriously doubt he'll be tossed aside. Then again, if he's an arrogant little prick, they'll drop the hammer on him so fast, he won't know what hit him.
Aside from being unimpressed and trying to spear the helicopter, they were pissed off!
"You contacted us for this shit?!?!!? I knew that damn messenger pigeon worked for the overlords at OSTG!"
Ozbon:
Give the chap a break! Can't you tell he's British!?! (Hint: spelling of 'tonne')
'Ferris Bueller's Day Off' was misspelled on purpose to show disdain for the american slacker culture.
Bhuler it is my good man. Carry on!
Cheerio!
Given the average /. reader, I beg to differ on that point.
If you're referring to the average user, then perhaps it would be a valid point that MS was out to screw you for the availability of that one feature (pun intended).
However, if you're even remotely adept at dealing with network apps, then you would be actually screwing yourself by forking over "$200+" for a feature you could actually install for free by using OpenVPN or OpenSSH running on Cygwin.
Just my 2 cents...
There is a ring of truth to this. Whenever there is a movie like this comes out, it's bound to stir up controversy as to its authenticity.
What I haven't seen posted is a discussion concerning the possibility of "teams" that were never caught, but can't claim credit as it would bring unwanted attention to themselves.
This reminds me of a quote from the movie "The Recruit":
"Our failures are known. Our successes...are not."
~Walter Burke (Al Pacino's character)
The bottom line is that the tables have turned for a change (or will be turning if Wal-mart keeps up the pressure).
Wal-mart telling the recording industry that they could do without their business is the same as your local bank or cell carrier telling you to fuck off when you try to get your monthly costs down or else.
[sarcasm] Checks and balances in business? What a concept!! [/sarcasm]
Given your list of programs, it is obvious that your experience is that of the average home user; regardless of the fact that you use a VPN client to connect to your office.
In terms of OS security, poorly coded applications such as Quickbooks Manufacturing & Wholesale cause nothing but security policy issues for admins because they require that the user have Local Admin privileges. This obviously causes issues as the user, without additional registry hacks/group policy tweaks, can install programs at will and have access to parts of the system that they would not otherwise have. Not to mention that they also have issues with roaming profiles, which is another issue altogether.
While you mentioned the use of the "Run as administrator" option, it's a moot point in the corporate world as it defeats the purpose of implementing securing policies to protect the workstation installation and restrict what the user can and cannot do.
Just my 2 cents... from a different vantage point than that of an end user.
While waiting for a connecting flight several months ago, I heard about a guy getting delayed for about 15 minutes at an airport security checkpoint because of his laptop's "suspicious look" on the x-ray machine. It turned to be a Sony X505 laptop. For those not familiar with the X505, this review by Digital Trends mentioned in this /. article back in 2004 details the specs.
What was so suspicious about it? I was told that someone overheard a TSA agent mention that it looked transparent on the x-ray machine. It seems that this was the case with the AirBook.
Perhaps companies like Sony and Apple that develop such advanced portables should notify TSA officials so they could, inturn, teach the line agents to not become alarmed when encountering such a device passing through the x-ray machine? Since that would make too much sense, it probably won't happen. Go figure.
If you happen to own an AirBook or other sub-notebook, good luck!!
While there may be others out there, /. is a good place to start for recruiting the talent sought after by such an agency. It also serves as a way of obtaining direct input from such talent by agreeing to respond to their questions and possibly tailoring their entry requirements to attract said talent.
IMHO, if they open it up to private contractors (GSA-style terms and pay), that would be your best bet. If enlistment is required, caveat emptor.
With an increase in data theft at all levels in the US, it is obvious that the country is in dire need of talent to secure the various infrastructures critical to the economy. Unfortunately, all the talent in the world is not going to guarantee that you'll end up with a supervisor or upper management structure that knows their ass from a hole in the ground. At that level, it's all about politics; which is why those that have many years of experience and tenure in any agency tend to quietly exit stage left into the private sector and become consultants or open up their own security firm.
Best of luck to us all!
---
Always keep in mind:
"All warfare is based on deception."
~Art of War (Ch. 1, paragraph 18)
While it may not be a FOSS project, check out this freeware app:
DHPOS
I installed it a couple years back at a local retail store (single PC), and it's been working just fine. From the times I sent in support questions, the maintainer was good about addressing issues in short order.
While the program has some caveats, it seems to be well suited for most small businesses.
At the very least, it's another option to consider.
I completely agree with regards to not feeding into Microsoft's stronghold. I'm constantly sitting down with friends/family/customers and booting up different Live CDs (ie. Fedora 8, U/Kubuntu, Freespire, etc.) to show them how much Linux has progressed in recent years and invite them to use it in their spare time to see for themselves how functional it is.
There is validity to my explanation in so far as the "average office worker" is concerned; which is the group I was referring to. Unfortunately, reality dictates that if the average office worker applying for a job doesn't have "Windows/MS Office" skills, they don't stand a chance in hell of getting hired. So to pay the bills, one MUST learn the software most businesses run to be a viable candidate. Short of opening your own company, that's just the way it's going to be for some time to come.
I don't like it anymore than you do, but we're in the middle of a transition period with regards to Linux and its stride into the business desktop arena. European countries and some states in the U.S. are making strides to introduce OSS solutions, so it's definitely heading in the right direction. Changing business infrastructures is not going to happen overnight; it's just not a reasonable expectation. And given that the U.S. economy is not doing too well, regardless of what's said on the major news channels, many companies are holding on to capital as much as possible.
Perhaps that clarified things a bit?
Not ours! At least not in the corporate desktop arena.
/.'ers. There are some of us that will test and spend countless hours; months and years in some cases, to expand our knowledge of an unfamiliar OS. But people like that are part of that "1%" group of users, and not your average one.
The reasons:
* As some have mentioned, most of us are set in our ways; including some fellow
* As you get older and your priorities change (ie. family, greater demand of your time from work, etc.), there's simply no spare time to learn anything new. Even if you manage to get some free time in, it would be to do something else other than learning a new OS.
* Marketability of your skills as an average office worker - Will your time spent honing your skills on GIMP, OpenOffice, Evolution, etc. improve your odds in being picked for the job over someone with skills in Windows apps? Quite the opposite! Why? A majority of corporations use Windows as their desktop OS of choice
* While Ubuntu and it's various flavors have garnered quite a bit of attention, there is still a great deal of work to be done in terns of getting to the point of saying "It Just Works!(tm)". Apple's advantage is that OS X is designed to work on core hardware manufactured by them, which makes it that much easier. Third party manufacturers are given access to APIs so they could develop apps/drivers to access their devices.
Side note : Why doesn't Canonical or some other major Linux backer venture into the hardware business, instead of getting into half-assed deals with the company's like Dell whose strings are pulled by the likes of Microsoft?
I could go on, but you get the point.
If Linux intends to make its way onto corporate desktops, it should start by establishing itself as the desktop of choice in elementary schools and later work its way up as those kids get older. That's how you build product loyalty and wider acceptance. Some of those kids will eventually be the IT managers and CEOs of major corporations.
As an example, take Apple's strategy over the past decade. Build your customer base from the ground up. They started with the iPod, built product loyalty and worked their way up the product line with sleek computers.
The result: An increasing number of college/university bound students are choosing Apple for their laptops. Check out this article for more details.
In the end, only time will tell...
While that may be the case, the same can be said for so-called "green" cars. This can be found in the following article: The History of Electric Vehicles
The difference between what Shell tried in the past and this time around is something called INNOVATION; which is something that has been severely hindered by ass-backwards patent system in the US. Not to mention the litigation-happy society some of us live in.
From TFA:
"It works for any car whose tank can be opened without a key, and whose contours and dimensions have been recorded to avoid scratching."
Given your comment, you obviously didn't read the entire statement:
"One of the few things that could've happened the day of the 'event' was to arrest the 'actors' for trespassing. Unless mistaken, that can only be done lawfully if the manager asks them to leave AND THEY REFUSE, which is where local law enforcement comes in."
Next time, try to quell your excitement for clicking the "reply" button and take a moment to read a comment in its entirety before firing back.
In other words, think before you speak (or write a comment in this case)...
IANAL either, but keep in mind that while Best Buy is open to the public, it's still private property. One of the few things that could've happened the day of the "event" was to arrest the "actors" for trespassing. Unless mistaken, that can only be done lawfully if the manager asks them to leave and they refuse, which is where local law enforcement comes in.
Given the times we live in, I'm sure they'll try to nail them with disturbing (or breaching) the peace, or some other bullshit charge(s). The caveat is that they'll have to file charges against each of the "actors" and try to lump them into one big court case.
It's a crying shame that this country has lost its sense of humor!! Bravo to those trying their best to keep it alive.
Good luck to us all! We sure as hell need it.
You forgot the Ever Important :
IDKFA - Full iPhone capabilities as God (ie. Steve Jobs) intended...
* Making use of your MP3 ringtones as rumored about during the iTunes 7.3 beta stages before the evil AT&T overlords castrated the idea just prior to launch
* EDGE actually works as it should (ie. high-speed vs. the utter shit it is today)
* Activation Just Works(tm) - Hold times were ridiculous!
* Better choice of carrier (Unfortunately, the only other major GSM player in the U.S., AFAIK, is T-Mobile. so Apple was pretty much screwed!) Best of luck to the v1.0 iPhone crowd!
That can be EASILY remedied by turning on the "Isolated AP" feature (or equivalent) on most modern wireless routers.
That would prevent clients on the AP from seeing each other and make the concern a moot point...
On a related point, the FCC should move their ass and open up another small segment of spectrum for wireless systems, which doesn't share it's existence with cordless phones, EMI emissions from Microwave Ovens and other 2.4GHz devices. Of course there's 802.11a, but that's a little expensive and has a shorter range in comparison to 802.11b/g. Too bad 802.11n didn't call for a new segment of the frequency spectrum.
-My $0.02
[club type bouncer pushing people aside] Move out of the way you measly citizen!!
[Queue music...]
[AT&T overlord steps to the podium] We will usher in a new era of telecommunications (ie. actually meaning 1984 style controls) for the citizens of these great United States! Blah Blah Blah Blah...
[Lone guy in the back yells 'YOU SUCK!!!' and is promptly escorted to the airport and flown to Gitmo as an enemy combatant]
While I said that in a humorous/satirical way, I seriously hope that the people of this country will rise up and not allow such controls to be put in place permanently. Apparently, the British "privacy" model is making its way over to The States.
Those unfamiliar with the Sherman Act can take a look at this Wiki entry.
Good luck to us all!
Fellow /.'ers,
The fact of the matter is that there are people out there that SHOULDN'T BE DRIVING! Period, end of story... This is true whether they're old people or compulsive law breakers. Somehow, it doesn't seem to register with many that having a DL is a PRIVILEGE, *NOT* a right!
Mass transit sucks in your city? Tough shit! Lobby your local government for better transit options. When you've proven that you can't drive safely, you're endangering the safety of the public and don't deserve to have a license.
To not stray off-topic, there are people out there that CAN drive and talk on the phone without causing an accident. Granted, it may hinder your reaction time somewhat, but you can drive safely nonetheless.
The issue shouldn't only apply to cell phones, as there are devices that people use while driving that can cause them to become distracted (ie. CB's, pagers, etc.) Is Big Brother going to create detection devices for them too?? Give me a freakin' break!
In the end, it's about generating additional revenue through such legislation. Contrary to news reports, the economy is NOT doing all that well. Many cities and municipalities are starving for funding! That's why property taxes have shot through the roof in many areas.
Bottom line... If you do cause an accident due to the use of a cell-phone or any electronic device, you'll get the usual penalties the first time around. The second time, 60 to 90 day suspension of your license. Keep doin' it and kiss it goodbye for a year (and so on and so forth.) Get caught driving with a suspended license, you're carted off to jail.
Good luck to us all!